Selected quad for the lemma: prince_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
prince_n great_a king_n orange_n 3,164 5 10.0228 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A29411 A Brief account of the reasons for which the three estates of Scotland forfaulted the Late King James and setled K. William and Q. Mary upon the throne, anno 1689 and some of the reasons induced them to abolish episcopacy there. 1695 (1695) Wing B4519; ESTC R25945 3,913 9

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE REASONS For which the Three Estates of Scotland Forfaulted the Late KING JAMES AND SETLED K. WILLIAM and Q. MARY Upon the THRONE Anno 1689. And some of the Reasons induced them to Abolish EPISCOPACY there LONDON Printed and are to be Sold by the Booksellers of London and Westminster 1695. A Brief ACCOUNT OF THE REASONS For which the Three Estates of Scotland Forfaulted the Late King James and setled King WILLIAM and Queen MARY upon the Throne Anno 1689. THE Prince of Orange now our Gracious King having called the Three Estates of Scotland together by his circular Letters first of all they chose the Duke of Hamilton who deserved Lawrels for his indefatigable Labour in that great Work their Praeses then declared themselves unanimously a Free Estate and secured their frequent Meetings After adjusting other Matters for the common Safety it was moved by the Earl of Leven and seconded by many That for several Reasons the Throne should be declared Vacant and that the Vacancy should be filled up Some were for Delays but the Duke of Hamilton and many others urged That there was a necessity to settle that matter as soon as was possible And after much reasoning at several Meetings an Act was drawn up concerning the same and Copies given by the Clerks to every Member who desired them Upon the 11th of April the Convention met at Nine a Clock in the Forenoon and the Reasons in the aforesaid Act declaring the Throne Vacant with the Estates Conclusion were all read Paragraph by Paragraph to see if any Member had further to fay against the same There were several Arguments Pro and Con but the most material were these betwixt Paterson the then Archbishop of Glascow and Sir John Dalrymple now Master of Stair and Secretary of State The Bishop said That in relation to the great Business then in Hand there were Three things chiefly to be considered 1. Whether the Ministers of State their Faults or Crimes could be imputed to the King so as he should lose his Right to the Crown which was his Inheritance by a Lineal Succession in this Nation for many Ages And his own Opinion was That the Faults c. of the Ministers of State could not be imputed to the King so as to Dethrone him c. 2. He judged it more proper for Redress of their Grievances to send Commissioners to the King that he might come home to keep a Free Parliament and then not only give security for their Religion but also give the standing Laws their full free and vigorous Execution rather than to defend themselves with Foreign Powers thereby to Dethrone their native King and his Lawful Successors and to advance another to the Throne whilst there were any of them living 3. It was a Question whether this Meeting had an Authoritative and coercive Power to declare the Throne Vacant and to dispose thereof Sir John Dalrymple answered to the first That he wondered how any Member of that House could pretend to be so ignorant of the Reasons mentioned in the Act for declaring the Throne Vacant or so obstinate as to deny the Truth of them And being true Matters of Fact it was visible that it was not for the private Acts of Ministers of State that King James was to be Dethroned but his own Actions done during the whole Course of his Reign by unhinging the Laws by a Despotick Power and Arbitrary Government giving Commissions contrary to Law dispensing with the Law in favour of Papists Erecting Popish Chappels Schools and Colledges contrary to Law And whether these and many other things were done by Insinuations of Evil Ministers which he put in Offices and defended those Ministers so put in Offices against the standing Laws others knew best but being they were his own Acts and Deeds must land at King James's Door As to the second the Remedy proposed by that worthy Prelate in Recalling King James would prove worse than the Disease For besides the Reasons contained in the Act which are sufficient of themselves let us but consider that in the midst of our late Fears and Confusions he Deserted us went to France privately to our Enemy and the Enemy of Mankind where he actually raised Forces procured them Arms and Money to go for Ireland with a Crew of French to assist the wild Irish Papists And as the Protestants there met with hard measure if he and that Party prevailed there what might we expect but Popery and Slavery And is there any true Protestant pretend what he pleases can dream of Security either to our Religion Laws Liberties or Properties if he and his Army of cruel French and wild Irish came hither So that we must secure our selves and all that 's dear to us by keeping him and his Party out and setling on the Throne Persons who with God's Assistance can and will secure all of them to us Nor is it doubted but the Honourable Estates will fill the Vacancy with those of the Royal Line And as to that point the Bishop cries out of against viz. the Estates advancing another to the Throne whilst King James and others whom he called his Lawful Successors were alive answered That there were none here but knew that there have been many Precedents of this nature in Scotland where the Estates thereof have Dethroned their Kings and Queens for Faults and Crimes and advanced others to the Throne whilst they were alive but still of the same Line And it is not doubted but our Kings lawful Successors will succeed in the Throne And as to that point of putting K. James's standing Laws in execution after his Return answered That it was hop'd the Honourable Meeting before they seperated would be so wise as to Repeal several of these which the Bishop called standing Laws which were Acts made against the first Constitution and Fundamental Laws Freedom and Liberty of the Nation and were both intollerable and grievous thereto to the utter Ruin of many Protestant Persons and Families It was answered to the Third That it was out of Season for the Bishop or any other Member of this House now to talk of want of Power after they as well as the Bishop himself had unanimously declared themselves a Free Estate And he hoped the Honourable House would take notice of that Allegation As also That it was very well known that our first Constitution of Monarchy here was Elective by the Peoples Choice but was to continue of Inheritance to the Royal Line from Father to Son c. upon Conditions and therefore a limited Monarchy So that our Kings were to maintain and defend the Subjects by Law for which the Subjects were to pay Homage and Supplies to them to support them in the exercise of the Government and if this did not hold a Government would soon destroy it self Yea the truth of this will clearly appear to any who are in the least versant in our Constitution Rights Laws or