and through Jesus Christ To God onely as the chief best and most perfect good through Christ as our Mediatour in whom we have accesse to the throne of grace Prayer is not a work of nature but of grace The principall authour thereof is the holy Ghost Man indeed doth poure out his soul unto the Lord but he is first taught moved and enabled thereunto by the Spirit of grace so that prayer is Gods gift and mans act The matter of our prayer is diverse according to the sundry occasions which happen in this life but ever it must be agreeable to the word and will of God Understanding faith humilitie reverence fervencie holinesse and love are required to that prayer which is acceptable unto God and doth procure audience In prayer with others especially in publick prayer where the minister is the mouth of the people the use of the voice is necessarie for the edification of the hearers for they cannot joyn in supplication and yield their consent unlesse they heare and understand what is prayed for In solitary prayer the voice and words are very usefull but not necessary usefull to stirre up affection and prevent rovings not necessary because it is the soul only that doth animate prayer A man may pray fervently and speak never a word but words be of no worth if the heart be absent Prayer endited by the Spirit and poured out by a sanctified soul is ever sweet and pleasant melodie in the eares of God though the tongue keep silence and the phrase of speech be rough and unpolished But let the outward frame of words be never so smooth and well set together the prayer is not pleasing unto God if therein we crave things unlawfull and impertinent if it be read or uttered without intention of heart understanding faith c. Neverthelesse in prayer with others specially in the publick assemblie words and decent phrase must not be neglected because all things must be done gravely and to edification To place devotion in words is superstition to hunt after quaint terms is foolish vanity but to neglect a decent and comely manner of speech is barbarousnesse Seeing then the use of the voice is not of the essence of prayer no man of understanding will deny that to be an holy and acceptable prayer which proceedeth from a sincere and upright heart feeling its own or others wants and craving supply thereof according to Gods will whether the petitions be put up in the self-same or in other words And yet because the ordinances of God must be kept from contempt in the publick assembly it is good neither to be over-neat nor over-homely but to use such a mean as doth most tend to the glory of God and good of Gods people Here a question is moved Whether a stinted Liturgie or set form of prayer publick or private be lawfull in the deviser or user A penned or stinted prayer I call Prayer in respect of the matter and externall form because the matter is delivered in form of a prayer or supplication tendred to God though properly it is not a prayer as it is penned or printed but as it is rehearsed as our prayer with understanding feeling of our wants humilitie confidence c. The controversie is not of this or that prescript form in particular much lesse of one faulty or erroneous but of a prescript form in generall Whether it be lawfull especially in the publick assembly to appoint any prescript or set form of prayer though for matter never so sound and allowable For if the exception be against this or that form in respect of the matter or maner of imposing then the question should be Whether this prayer for matter or manner of imposing be erroneous not Whether a stinted form of prayer or Liturgie be lawfull It is not questioned whether a man may ask things unlawfull or impertinent in prayer for the matter of our prayer must be agreeable to the word of God and our present occasions A prayer for matter and externall form holy and fit may by accident be sinfull in the user viz. when it is repeated without understanding or intention of the heart Of this there is no doubt It is granted also that no one prescript and stinted form of prayer or Liturgie is simply necessary either in publick or private for then our Saviour Christ who would not be wanting to his church in things necessarie would by his Apostles expressely have set down one to be an exact and unchangeable rule to all Christians and churches to the worlds end both for matter and form words and method whereunto they should have been tied and that alwayes But seeing our Saviour hath commanded no such unchangeable form it is not the Necessity but the Lawfulnesse of a stinted Liturgie or set form of prayer that is pleaded for and that as a matter of order not of religion or substantiall means of worship For in this sense there is no means of worship expedient which is not necessary by commandment It was never held that a man should so tie himself or be tied alwayes to a set form without variation that he should never offer up any prayer unto God as occasion is offered and necessitie requireth but what he findeth in his book Such use of a set and stinted form of prayer we do not acknowledge nor seek to perswade But to reade prayer as a prayer upon a book or to make known unto God the desires of our heart in a set form of words devised by others or our selves when the things we beg are allowable fit and necessary and when it is done with right affection is contrary to no precept or commandment directly or by lawfull consequence Amongst them that oppose a set form of prayer we may observe differences in opinion The ancient brethren of the Separation as M r Smith calleth them for distinction condemn all stinted forms of prayer to be used as a prayer Thus they dispute against set or stinted forms of prayer that it is a devise of man an idole-Idole-prayer a stinting of the Spirit the substituting of a book in the room and stead of the holy Ghost a drawing nigh to God with the lips when the heart is removed farre from him That if set forms be lawfull then one may make anothers prayer buy his prayers at a book-binders shop carry them about in his pocket with many the like Which arguments whatsoever their weight be strike at all set forms and not at this or that onely prescribed in this or that manner M r Robinson hideth the matter as much as well he may by such like additions as these of matter and manner The thing saith he you should have endeavoured to prove is That your Divine service-book framed by man and by man imposed to be used without addition or alteration as the solemn worship of your church is that true and spirituall manner of
worshipping God which he hath appointed Again That these stinted and devised forms do quench the spirit of prayer which God would have them use stinting the minister yea all the ministers of the kingdome to the same measure of the spirit not onely one with another but all of them with him that is dead and rotten and so stinting the spirit which the Lord giveth to his ministers for his church and that so strictly as till the stint be out it may not suggest one thought or word otherwise or when it is out one more then is prescribed Neverthelesse his drift is plainly to disprove all stinted forms as it is evident by that he writeth in answer to some objections For Grant saith he that these words of Christ PRAY AFTER THIS MANNER AND VVHEN YE PRAY SAY are to be interprâ—ted as these men would have it yet do I except against their service-book in a double respect The first is That the reading of prayers upon a book hath no justification from them If it be said that to commit a certain form of words to memory and from it to utter them and to reade them upon a book be all one I deny the consequence and though I approve not the former yet is the latter farre worse And in another place You speak not properly no nor truly in saying you Pray stinted prayers for you Read them and who will say Reading is Praying or if you so say or do is it agreeable either to his ordinance or common reason And in the page cited last before He that readeth hath another speaking to him as it were even him whose writing he readeth and himself speaketh not to God but to the people Thus also he speaketh concerning the Lords prayer We may use a petition two or more or all in or of it even word for word if so the holy Ghost by whose immediate teachings and suggestions all our requests must be put up do direct us and that we apply the same words to our needs And in the same section So neither is the reading of this prescript or repeating it by memory praying Now let the indifferent consider and give sentence whether this be not to condemn all set forms of prayer to be used as prayer And if more then down-weight be required his fourth reason against the stinted form of service in use in our church will put this beyond all exception For thus he disputeth As it were a ridiculous thing for a child when he would ask of his father bread fish or any other thing he wanted to reade it to him out of a paper so it is for the children of God especially for the ministers of the Gospell in their publick ministrations to reade unto God their requests for their own and the churches wants out of a service-book wherein they are also stinted to words and syllables So that all other respects and considerations laid aside for what advantage soever alleadged the simple use of a stinted Liturgie or form of prayer to be used as a prayer is disallowed of them And if this be once accorded the other respects will easily be wiped away at least in regard of the users and them that joyn in prayer and participation of the sacraments In the copie of a letter lately published against stinted Liturgies the Authour willeth us to consider That the Liturgie he excepteth against was devised by men viz. other men whom God hath not called to such a work as to invent forms of prayers which should be used by all the churches in the land for their prayers and That it is imposed upon the minister and the people of necessity That it is stinted both in matter and words to be used without variation and That the service is read out of a book many wayes faulty and corrupt But look to most of the reasons brought to shew the justnesse of this exception and they make against all sorts of stinted forms used as prayers and not against a form corrupt and faulty imposed in such or such a manner as namely these God did never command to use nor promise to accept such a worship in which respect it is the manifest breach of the second commandment God hath appointed other helps for prayer which are sufficient without this Publick prayers offered up by the minister in church-assemblies must be framed according to the present and severall occasions of the church and people of God as also mens private prayers ought to be ordered which cannot be done when men are stinted to forms If you draw any conclusion from these premises it must be That all stinted forms are unlawfull not That a form corrupt and faulty is to be disallowed But if the foresaid cautions be added by way of distinction or limitation as if all stinted Liturgies were not disliked but such onely as be imposed as necessary to be used without variation and for matter or form corrupt and faulty then the reasons fight directly with the conclusion and hang no otherwise together then if a man should thus dispute All stinted forms of prayer are not to be disliked but corrupt onely imposed as necessary because God did never command nor promise to accept any stinted service or devised worship For what purpose therefore these cautions were added let others judge whether by way of aggravation onely or to set the greater lustre upon the position or for some other advantage Some others professe That they oppose not all nor any set form simply as such but are perswaded in many cases there is a lawfull use to be made of them but such a set form as is prescribed amongst us for matter and manner they affirm to be against the second commandment and a sin in the maker and deviser of it to such an use and a sin in the user of it according to that devise or making But the lawfull use of such forms publick or private they allow onely in some case of necessity which cannot fall out in a minister of the Gospel or any man else who deserveth the name of a strong Christian For they suppose abilities in all ministers and in every man else who hath his wits exercised to discern good and evil and deserveth to be esteemed a strong man in Jesus Christ Their words be these Set forms have their proper place and lawfull use onely where abilities are not as a naturall means and help to further some branch or other of that we call Prayer or conceived prayer as to supply defect of invention memory utterance or the like So the lawfulnesse of it lieth onely in a case of some necessity The difference then betwixt them so farre as I can gather standeth in this one thing That these latter allow some lawfull use of a stinted private form of prayer in some cases of necessity which the others altogether condemned But whether they dissent in any other particulars or no it is needlesse to enquire
further or whether the latter take away again what they seem to grant In these things they consent First that all publick Liturgies and stinted forms of prayer be unlawfull a breach of the second commandment both in the deviser and user Secondly that private forms of prayer if lawfull for weak Christians and babes in Christ are unlawfull for strong men in Christ or Christians that have received some growth in godlinesse Thirdly that a Christian weak or strong may not lawfully be present at the prayers of the congregation read or rehearsed out of a stinted Liturgie nor at the sacraments administred in a stinted form of Liturgie as it is with us The Question then hath three branches First whether a set form of prayer sound and pertinent for substance of matter grave and simple for the order and manner not prejudicing abbridging or hindring by the length thereof the preaching of the word and prayer fitted to the speciall occasions may in any sort be tolerated in the church or read by the minister of the word in the publick assembly and congregation of Saints Secondly whether it be lawfull specially for a strong Christian to use a set form of prayer as prayer or upon any occasion to reade as prayer a prayer upon a book Thirdly in case it should be unlawfull for the minister or master of the family to reade or use a prescript form of prayer whether it should be unlawfull also for the people children or servants to be present at such assemblies where the said prayer is read or used To these a fourth may be added to prevent all exceptions whether it be lawfull for a Christian to be present at that service which is read out of a book in somethings faulty either for matter or form In the affirmative the assertion is That a stinted Liturgie or form of prayer both publick and private is lawfull and in some respects necessary both in the congregation family and closet That a minister godly learned and faithfull may sometimes stand in need of the help of a publick Liturgie or stinted form of prayer in publick and may make use of a stinted form at other times when it is not necessarie in respect of inabilitie or indisposition That though it should be unlawfull for the minister or governour of the family to use such stinted forms yet may the people in the congregation and inferiours in the family be present at such prayers without sinne or scruple of conscience yea though the prayers be read out of a book in somethings questionable for matter or form So that voluntarie and willing Separation from the prayers of the congregation and ordinances of worship for that cause onely is sinfull in many respects Thus I have laboured plainly to state the question that I might neither be misled my self nor lead others into any by-path whiles they take their aim amisse And these particulars I purpose to discusse in the fear of God with the spirit of meeknesse according to the scriptures and trust by plain sincere and upright dealing to make it evident that I seek nothing but the maintenance of the truth the puritie of Gods worship the increase and exercise of all holy gifts and grace in his servants and the peace and comfort of his people CHAP. II. All things essentiall to prayer may be observed in a prescript form THe two former points may be confirmed joyntly and severally by these reasons following 1. That is a lawfull prayer wherein the desires of our hearts are lifted up or poured out unto God for Divine blessing according to his will in the name of Jesus Christ by the help of the Spirit of grace But in a set or stinted form of prayer the desires of the heart may be lifted up or poured out unto God according to his will c. Or That form of prayer is just and lawfull wherein all things essentiall to prayer or necessarily required in the word of God may be observed But all things essentiall to prayer or necessarily required in the word of God may be observed in a prescript form or read prayer What is required in holy prayer more then this That the matter be allowable and fit the manner holy reverent fervent and faithfull our wants laid open and petitions forced with as strong or stronger reasons and arguments then we are able of our selves to presse them with And may not a prayer holy and meet for the matter thereof be read or uttered with humility feeling of our wants earnestnesse of desire holinesse of affection and faith in Gods promises In reading the scripture the eye doth lead the heart and yet it may be read with judgement reverence meeknesse and joy why may not the same affections be moved in a prescript form and read prayer What necessitie is there that the heart and eye should be at variance in this duty when they may be conjoyned in the other Asaph and his brethren could praise God in a form of words set down by the prophet David And if a prescript form of words may be allowed in Thanksgiving which is one part of prayer it cannot be condemned in Petition The matter of our requests must fit the occasion so must the matter of our thanks and praise The Spirit of grace teacheth us to pray and the same Spirit moveth us to return praise for benefits received We must pray with the spirit and we must praise with the heart In the dedication of the temple Solomon used the very words of the psalme which David vowed to use at the bringing in of the Ark into his house Jehoshaphat in that excellent thanksgiving which he made appointed the priests and Levites to use a prescript form of words So did Hezekiah Zerubbabel and Jehushua And if we may sing psalmes with the spirit and with understanding with feeling and joy of heart as it is commanded in a form of words stinted and prescribed it cannot be thought a thing impossible to pray with affection in a stinted and prescribed form The differences which some put between Praysing God with a psalme and Calling upon Gods name are little to the purpose do not at all touch the force of the argument For thus the reason standeth In singing psalmes penned by the prophet David or other holy men of God the eye doth lead the heart no lesse then it doth in a stinted form of prayer and yet they may be sung after an holy manner with grace in the heart therefore a stinted form of prayer may be read or said without book with that affection of heart which God requireth in prayer And let the differences be as broad as they will in other things in this they do agree This reason may be drawn into another form thus Whatsoever hath the true matter and form of prayer that is truly and properly a prayer For where the true matter and form of a
cannot be performed Particular duties affirmative against a generall negative commandment must have expresse warrant by way of prerogative and derogation from the generall commandment wherein we must not go one jot beyond signed commission Thus Abraham was commanded to offer up his son Isaac which otherwise had been against the sixth commandment Thus the sacraments are commanded to the church which for the church to devise of her self is against the second commandment and therefore it is unlawfull to institute other sacraments then God hath appointed or adde sacramentall signes to them which the Lord hath instituted But to affirm the same of devised words in prayer preaching administration of the sacraments and reading of the scriptures sc that they were instituted of God by particular warrant and by speciall prerogative and derogation would be exceeding strange Signes religious then are of two sorts 1. Vocall if they may be called signes metaphysicall under which I comprehend naturall gestures as they are expressions of the inward affection and these are not simply forbidden or commanded in the second commandment nor do simply pertein to the second commandment but to the precept rather which requireth the inward affection it self 2. Reall and such as in common nature use and end be one with the positive ordinances of God and these are the images forbidden in the second precept And seeing for the affirmative part positive worship as it is to be approved mainteined and exercised purely according to the institution is the object of that commandment it seemeth that prayer as it is directed unto God onely in the mediation of Jesus whether inward or outward conceived in heart or declared by word or gesture cannot be referred as a branch of positive worship to the second commandment When men pray to idols or saints departed inwardly or outwardly they sinne against the first commandment If with carnall imaginations before an image they break the second if lightly vainly irreverently with the lips alone they sinne against the third But the method words or phrase of speech as such is neither condemned in the second commandment nor doth belong unto it Mens inventions in Gods worship are forbidden in the second commandment But stinted prayer is the invention of man never instituted nor approved of Christ in his Testament Must this go for currant without limitation proof or explication That all inventions of men in Gods worship are forbidden in the second commandment What then shall we say to all devised words and phrases used in Gods service What to all set forms of catechismes studied sermons interpretations of the scriptures the contents of chapters the titles of sundry books of scripture What to the divisions of thē into sections chapters and verses the interlineary glosses divers readings marginall references the reading of one part this week another the next What of the building and ordering of synagogues for the sanctification of the sabbaths the fashion of gathering for the repair of the temple in Joash his time the swearing to the covenant under Asia the ordination of holy feasts and fasts upon occasion What of the forms and gestures used in oathes of conceived prayer it self of set forms of worship studied before and kept in memory as some distinguish in the same form and with like truth we may argue against them mens inventions in the worship of God are forbidden by the second commandment But set forms of catechismes studied sermons interpretations of the scripture c. are mens inventions The conclusion that followeth from these premisses is evidently false therefore some one of them if not both is false also For of truth nothing but truth can follow And what they can answer to the premisses of this latter argument the same will be sufficient to overthrow the other Catechizing is Gods ordinance but this or that form of catechisme in respect of method and phrase of speech is the collection and composition of man Reading the scripture is allowed of God but the division of the law into fiftie three or fiftie foure greater sections and the subdivision of these into lesser sections the partitions of severall books into chapters and the division of them into verses the appointing of this or that portion of the law the prophets and the evangelists to be read ordinarily upon this or that day is the invention or devise of man Preaching is commanded of God so is the interpretation of the scripture but the phrase and method of sermons is of men The matter of scripture is the immediate truth of God but the words and phrases which are as vessels to convey this truth unto us I speak of translations not of the originall text are humane and not of God by immediate inspiration God commandeth us to call upon his name both in publick and private but the words wherein we expresse our desires are our own both in conceived and stinted prayer These are humane in respect of the word and form Divine in respect of the matter And here it must be observed that positive worship or means for these two in this sense are all one opposed to humane inventions is that which must be warranted by particular institution and not by the light of reason according to the generall rules of scripture As for example the sacraments are positive worship or means of worship and they have particular expresse institution but the form or manner of administration as it respecteth decency order and edification is not positive worship or means thereof in the sense before mentioned and therein it sufficeth if all things be done according to the generall rules of scripture the light of reason directing in particulars what is decent and to edification So then devised worship is unlawfull but it is lawfull to worship God in a form of words devised for the form is not worship but the prayer tendred in that form Mens inventions in Gods worship that be of the same nature and use with true worship or means of worship ordained of God be unlawfull but method order phrase of speech devised by man was never judged an invention unlawfull book-Book-prayer in an image or similitude of spirituall prayer which indeed it is not and the book as idoles supplyeth the place of the world and spirit The accusation is grievous but if we crave a reason thereof we shall find them as farre to seek as forward to accuse Is it onely a similitude of prayer because it hath onely the externall form of prayer but wanteth the soul and life thereof They might easily answer themselves As it is penned or printed it hath onely the externall form and so it is not properly a prayer but as it is rehearsed with understanding affiance of heart and fervency it hath the true and whole nature of prayer And by what reason can a book-prayer be called an image of true prayer which will not agree to prayer first conceived and then uttered For
if it be uttered with the lips without the intention of the heart it is a bare similitude and if the other be read or uttered after an holy manner with that affection which God requireth in prayer it is true and acceptable prayer Words without the heart are but empty sounds whether read or pronounced out of the memory or ex tempore and if the voice be joyned with the heart it is pleasant melody though our petitions be read out of a book But the book then saith he supplieth the room of the word and spirit Nothing lesse For the word of God directeth us what to ask even when we reade our prayers upon a book so long as we crave with understanding things agreeable to the will of God And the spirit doth enable and stirre us up to desire that which is according to Gods will and our necessity We may utter requests with our lips in conceived prayer without the aid and assistance of the holy Ghost and so we may in a penned prayer but offer up the sighs and grones of the heart we cannot without his grace It is no more lawfull to use any strange manner of prayer then it was to use strange fire or strange incense in time of the law Psal 141. 2. Apoc. 8. 3 4. But a stinted form of prayer is a strange manner of prayer The proposition we grant if rightly understood otherwise symbolicall and analogicall arguments if the proposition be not rightly taken are very dangerous But a stinted form of prayer is no strange manner of worship because in it all things required to the nature of true prayer may be observed In the word of God we have direction given to whom for what with what heart and affection to what end a man ought to pray but in what method or frame of speech he is to be a petitioner we find nothing prescribed in particular neither do we judge any thing necessary more then this That order decency and edification be observed That which hath the common nature definition use and end of worship but wanteth Divine authority and institution to make it approved and true worship that is strange in the worship of God But the method and phrase of speech hath not the common nature definition use or end of worship or prayer belonging unto it As conceived prayer so a set form of prayer is for substance and nature agreeable to the rules of direction delivered in the word of truth though for method and words both the humane Let our brethren set down out of the word of God what is necessarily and essentially required to the nature and being of true prayer shew if they be able that some one or other condition or requisite cannot be observed in a prescript or stinted form If this cannot be done as I think it never hath nor can be how dare they esteem or style it a strange worship They tell us God hath not ordained that manner of worship But this phrase the manner of worship is used two wayes first as it noteth the substantiall means of worship ordained of God by speciall institution secondly as it is put for the outward order or form how this worship or means of worship is performed A third signification might be added as when we say the third commandment teacheth in what manner the name and ordinances of God are to be used Now if it be taken in the first or third signification the outward frame of words order and method is neither means nor manner of worship either in preaching prayer or administration of the sacraments If in the second the word of God doth not prescribe any particular form stinted or not stinted as necessary but doth warrant both as allowable For where nothing is in particular commanded touching the externall form of words and order in which our petitions should be presented to the Lord there we are left at liberty And to put religion in reading or uttering words in a stinted or conceived form where God hath laid no bond upon the conscience what is it lesse then superstition If the phrase of speech be modus or medium cultûs as it is referred to the second commandment then it is instituted commanded and determined of God in particular then that and none other is lawfull and necessary for so it is in all parts of his positive worship Those sacramentall signes which God hath designed in the covenant are necessary and those onely lawfull and if method and phrase of speech be medium cultûs in the same sense the like must be said of that also In substance a prayer read and conceived is all one and the one is no more a strange manner of worship then the other And here let it be observed that all these objections are made against all use of stinted or read prayers publick or private voluntary or imposed sound and pertinent as well as corrupt and cannot be restrained to a form imposed upon the minister of the congregation to be used continually and that corrupt and faulty The matter if supposed to be alike from God as being truth and according to sound doctrine the manner in that we call conceived prayer is the same which nature teacheth and scripture approveth and is the onely way in which the prayers of all holy men recorded in scripture since Christ have been carried as the Papists themselves grant But for the manner or way of book-prayer we have not so much as example in scripture for it The strength of this reason let us view in the like M r Smith would prove the originals not to be given as helps before the eye in worship Because upon the day of Pentecost and many yeares after the churches of the new Testament did use no books in time of spirituall worship but prayed prophesied and sung psalmes merely out of their hearts Acts 2. 4 42. 10. 44 48. 19. 6. 1. Cor. 14. 15 17 26 37. Because no example can be shewed of any man ordinary or extraordinary that at or after the day of Pentecost used a book in praying prophesying and singing of Psalmes if yea let it be done and we yield And against the use of translations for the hearers thus he argueth The Prophets and Apostles wrote books but did never divide their books into chapters and verses Seeing therefore that chapters and verses were of mans invention hence it followeth before chapter and verse came in the hearers could not turn to search their books in time of hearing The Apostles in quoting testimonies of the prophets do not quote chapter and verse but onely say It is written The scripture saith The holy Ghost saith thereby teaching us that there is no use of chapter and verse for searching in time of hearing Never was there mention made of any hearer that ever had his book to search in time of hearing The reasons be the same and yet I perswade my self they
and consented unto if it were possible by all the sound true orthodox churches in the world is in many respects expedient such a form as being free from all exception apprved of all might testifie their sweet harmonie and concent And the like may be said of forms of catechismes confessions c. A stinted form then of publick prayer is not one in common nature with images devised for worship nor opposite to the worship which must in speciall be instituted of God it is no vain or superfluous devise much lesse an humane invention condemned in the second commandment It is not strange at all that one and the same thing should be a sin in one and not in another If by the same thing you mean the same materially onely And if that which was lawfull to all people priests and Levites in the old Testament cannot be unlawfull now then neither circumcision nor any other Jewish rite is now unlawfull to us True it is that one and the same thing may be sin in one and not in another when the reasons and considerations be not the same as that which a man is bound to do by speciall calling or office may be sin in another which is not called and appointed pointed to that service And many things were lawfull in the old Testament being according to Gods word that are not so now viz. things that were proper and peculiar to them and those times in respect of the manner of dispensation Divine But things which have grounds and reasons common to those and our times in respect of persons and things and do not in peculiar respects belong unto them onely these if lawfull to them are lawfull to us and if forbidden to us they are forbidden to them And of this sort is a stinted form of prayer or blessing not peculiar to them but common to us with them not a priviledge of the persons but of the cause It is given for a rule concerning examples That a reason drawn from them doth necessarily conclude sc cùm unum particulare ab alio particulari probatur vi similitudinis communis toti generi sub quo ea particularia continentur But the publick use of a stinted free arbitrarie form of prayer praise or blessing is grounded upon reasons and considerations common to the priests or Levites and the ministers of the Gospel the things are like and this likenesse is common to the whole kind not materiall circumstance can be named which should appropriate it unto them onely Therefore if the publick stinted use of prayer or blessing was not a breach of the second commandment in them it is not a sin against that commandment in us It is objected that their forms were not as ours strictly imposed ordinarily to be used without so much as the variation of a word But this unlooseth not the knot but rather tyeth it the faster For if it be a sin against the second commandment to use such a form it must not be done once If it be no sin it is not made sinfull by this that it is used this week or the next as occasion is offered If it be lawfull to use the Lords prayer as a stinted form it is not made unlawfull that I use it in these precise words without addition or alteration And if the priests were not tyed to one precise form of blessing without addition or alteration yet might they lawfully use one form without addition or variation and that which was allowable in them is not unlawfull in us upon the same grounds and considerations So that we may summe up this reason thus If publick stinted forms of blessing prayer or praise might be used ordinarily by the priests Levites and ministers of the Gospel without addition or alteration then all stinted forms to be used ordinarily without addition or alteration be not a breach of the second commandment in common nature one with an image devised for worship But the priests and Levites in the time of the Law and the ministers of the Gospel in the New Testament might ordinarily use a stinted form without addition or alteration Or thus it may be framed If a publick stinted form of prayer be unlawfull then either simply and absolutely all stinted forms to be used in publick or such onely as are to be used ordinarily without alteration or addition or such onely as be corrupt and faulty But a publick stinted form is not simply and absolutely unlawfull for then this exception That it is to be used ordinarily and without alteration is vain and superfluous not onely because it is ordinarily to be used without alteration or addition for then that consideration taken away a stinted form should be just and lawfull as also then it should be lawfull at one time to use this or that phrase of speech unlawfull at another when yet the same occasion requireth it If onely because corrupt and faulty then a stinted form is not an humane invention a breach of the second commandment an idole-idole-prayer a superfluous devise to be condemned then the fault and corruption removed the form it self is lawfull to be used without addition or variation A stinted form of prayer is not unlawfull to him that needeth it as not able largely to expresse his own desires or lay open his wants particularly but to him that is able and needeth it not it is unlawfull because in such case a set form of prayer is an arbitrary help or furtherance forbidden by the second commandment But then a set form of prayer in words devised by others or by a mans self is not unlawfull because stinted or devised not of it self nor to all but by accident onely Then it is not a devised worship strange incense an idole-prayer an image of prayer forbidden in the second commandment for whatsoever is verified of a generall as generall is verified of all underneath it Then they must not say Humane inventions in Gods worship are forbidden but Humane inventions in the worship of God are lawfull to them that need them unlawfull to them that need them not because arbitrarie Then the exception of using a stinted form ordinarily without alteration or addition is altogether fruitlesse for the form is unlawfull because arbitrarie And for the thing it self it is an unwritten tradition because it hath no ground in scripture For it is a received rule That all distinctions in Divinity not grounded upon the word of God are unwritten traditions indeed humane unwarrantable inventions and additions But this distinction That a stinted form of prayer is warrantable to him that needeth it because of his inability unwarrantable to him that needeth it not is grounded upon no text of scripture or solid consequence drawn from thence All arbitrarie helps and furtherances in Gods service are not forbidden in the second commandment nor any help or furtherance because arbitrarie in this sense that is no help or furtherance devised in Gods worship that
is lawfull to one because he needth it is forbidden to another by the second commandment because he needeth it not The method of sermons and prayers set forms of catechismes blessings and baptizing are arbitrarie helps and furtherances as they are called as whether we preach by doctrine reason and use or in another method begin with confession or thanksgiving use this precise form of words I baptize thee c. or Be thou baptized c. but not forbidden in the commandment Helps and furtherances in Gods worship so to speak because I would not contend about words are of two sorts Some necessary and in nature and use the same with the true worship of God instituted by his Highnesse particularly and these are unlawfull if devised by men because devised neither can any necessity be pretended to excuse them For in the point of Gods worship what is of the substance of worship and in conscience necessary that if it be not determined of God and instituted by him is unlawfull Others are mere circumstances concerning the method phrase externall manner of celebration which are not determined by God and therefore no particular is unlawfull which is according to the generall rules in scripture Thus for the place of sacrifice before it was determined it was lawfully in any place because no place was designed but after it was once determined it was lawfull in no place but that alone Voluntary and free-will-offerings might be offered at any time because for them no time was determined but the passeover might be celebrated onely at one time because the precise time of it was determined In all matters of positive worship and determined circumstances by the word of God such onely areâ— lawfull as the word of God hath enjoyned and all things are forbidden which are not commanded But in circumstances and matters of order not determined no particular is necessary and all such are lawfull as be consonant to the generall rules given in scripture and that if agreeable to the generall rules is lawfull which is not forbidden And so in this particular if God had determined any prescript form of prayer either for some time or for ever to all men or some onely that form to such and at such times had been necessary and that alone lawfull because determined If God had tied men to conceived prayer without any set or stinted form devised by themselves or imposed by others that alone had been lawfull because determined But seeing we are enjoyned to pray confesse sinne entreat mercy and no set form determined therefore any fit form is warrantable one as well as another For where the law hath put no difference it is not for us to distinguish Let it be demanded of a man when he prayeth why he useth that form he then useth what answer can he return but this That no form is determined and so any Fitting form is warrantable Or if he answer otherwise in effect he shall answer amisse as not knowing the true ground of the lawfulnesse of that he doth No man hath authoritie to devise any substantiall means of worship which must be referred to the second commandment no more then he may teach new doctrines or institute new sacraments in Gods church upon his own head But the order phrase or method which is devised by man is no worship of God And if we put no difference betwixt the positive worship of God which he hath in particular commanded and must not be devised of men and the order phrase and method in which his worship is performed it is not possible to worship God aright without sinne But if we shall looâ— more narrowly into the former distinction we shall find it flat contradictorie to it self and to the commandment For by arbitrarie furtherances we must understand not devised furtherances which this answer granteth to be lawfull but furtherances which are not necessary to one man though lawfull to another And then whereas the second commandment forbiddeth devised worship which is unlawfull as contrary to the eternall rule of righteousnesse by this answer arbitrarie furtherances not devised furtherances should be condemned which is clean contrary to the scope and end of the commandment For example when the commandment saith Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven image c. If a man shall distinguish thus Devised images are not unlawfull to him that needth but onely arbitrarie images sc to him that needeth them not should he not speak contrary to the commandment The case is the same in this particular For the things forbidden in the second commandment are in generall nature one with an image sc devised worship which carrieth not the stamp or approbation of God And when a stinted or set form of prayer is impleaded as contrary to that royall precept do they not speak contradictories that say A stinted form is lawfull to him that needeth it but an arbitrarie form unlawfull viz. a stinted or devised form to him that needeth it not For this is as much as to say devised worship is lawfull and acceptable in him that needeth that help but arbitrarie worship to wit to him that needeth it not is forbidden Actions lawfull in case or upon condition onely the case being amoved become unlawfull As for David to eat the shew-bread and in case the woman be not able to bring a lambe for her burnt-offering then a young pigeon shall be accepted Now the lawfulnesse of a stinted form of prayer lieth onely in case of some necessitie as a naturall help to supply some defect Many things no question are lawfull in case of necessitie which in a time free are unlawfull But the things unlawfull out of case of necessitie are such as God hath forbidden in his word as the eating of shew-bread c. whereas no reason hath been alledged to prove the use of a stinted form unlawfull more out of then in the case of necessitie Also that necessitie which doth legitimate an action unlawfull out of case of necessity must either free us from the commandment or is in speciall dispensed withall by God himself But necessity of a stinted form to free from the obligation of the second commandment or dispensation by way of prerogative in that case none hath nor can be shewed David did eat the shew-bread and sinned not sc in case of extremitie For ceremoniall precepts must give place to morall duties The priests in the temple profane the sabbath not simply and properly but according to the opinion of the adversaries if every action of the hand do profane the sabbath or they profane the sabbath because they do that by the appointment of God which otherwise would be a profanation both of the temple and the sabbath If the woman be not able then in stead of a lamb a young pigeon shall be accepted because the Law-giver hath so appointed otherwise I should think it
had been sinne for the poor woman to bring a pigeon that was not of ability to bring a lamb For her extreme necessitie had freed her from the law but authoritie she had none to institute one rite in the place of another If we apply these instances to the matter in hand they will not hold For God never forbad a stinted form of prayer never gave commandment that whosoever did offer the sacrifice of prayer should bring a conceived prayer nor by dispensation speciall and peculiar warranted him that wanteth a conceived to bring a book-book-prayer And if the cases be like I should think the Lord would have prescribed a set form for the weak and feeble Christian as he hath appointed the oblation of the poor woman and not left him to seek up and down he knoweth not where and to bring an humane invention in stead of pure and true worship And if the Lord have determined any set form in that caâ—e then the weak Christian must use that alone and none other Let this distinction passe for currant and what commandment is there which may not be deluded For consonant to these positions we may say Images must not be devised for worship but in some case of necessitie for they may be naturall helps to teach or stirre up affection as well as a book may be a naturall help to supply some defect in prayer The minister must not use wine milk or rose-water as the outward signe in baptisme unlesse it be in some case of necessity as a naturall help to supply the defect of water The midwife must not baptize out of the case of necessity when the minister is at hand but in case of necessity she is a naturall help to supply the defect of a minister The pastour must be apt to teach unlesse it be in case of necessity when an ignorant man is chosen to supply his room A man must not defraud or circumvent his neighbour it is true unlesse it be in case of necessity This also seemeth strange that a book should be a naturall help to supply some defect in case of necessitie and cease to be naturall when voluntarily used as an help and furtherance by him that needeth it not The conclusion of all is this That a stinted publick form of prayer is the breach of no commandment no forbidden invention of man either in the deviser or user in the case of necessity or otherwise CHAP. IIII. It is as lawfull to pray unto God in a form of words devised by others as to sing psalmes to the praise of God in a stinted form of words prescribed by others IF it be lawfull to sing psalmes to the prayse of God in a stinted form of words prescribed by others and devised by man then likewise to pray unto God in a stinted form devised by others For as prayer is an ordinance of God and a branch of his worship so is singing of psalmes to the prayse of God As God hath left no stinted form of prayer for his church whereunto he hath tied all men and all churches no more hath he prescribed any stinted form of singing as necessary for all times and churches in the new Testament As the one must be done with the heart and spirit so the other As in the one the words are devised by men and prescribed by others so in singing of psalmes If the one be the invention of man a strange prayer the similitude of a prayer the other is an invention of man a strange psalme the similitude of a psalme And if a man be disposed to reason against singing of psalmes in a form of words devised by others he might more plausibly argue That in the infancy of the church when God saw a set form of psalmes to be necessarie he inspired holy men to pen holy and divine psalmes which might be of use for that time when such worship was required but in the times of the new Testament no set form of singing is prescribed of God no authoritie is given to the church or ordinary officers to prescribe any set form which might be of use to all churches there is neither precept for nor precedent of any prescript form of singing in the scripture since Christs time all essentiall parts of Gods worship may be performed without it as appeareth by the examples of the primitive churches and seeing God never commanded nor promised to accept any such stinted forms it is a manifest breach of the second commandment These and such like arguments do make as strongly in every point against a stinted form of psalmes as against a prescript form of prayer But I have not read that the singing of psalmes in a prescript form devised by others is unlawfull Singing of psalmes and praying differ many wayes as Many psalmes are for instruction onely and those psalmes which contein prayers are written for our instruction In prayer the minister alone uttereth the words the people adding their Amen in the end but in singing every person in the church pronounceth every word and syllable aloud The psalmes are parts of scriptures wherein God speaketh unto us teaching and instructing us and we our selves and one another mutually Prayers are poured forth in prose psalmes in verse In prayer we beg things necessary for our selves and others in psalmes we praise God for mercies received c. It is vain to examine or alledge these or such like differences because they make nothing to weaken the force of the argument For be the differences never so many in these and other particulars in this they agree that they be parts of worship to be performed according to the will and commandment of God and therefore if a stinted form of prayer be unlawfull because not commanded or ordained of God a stinted form of psalmes not bearing the Lords stamp must come under the same censure unlesse they can plead speciall dispensation for it And if a prescript form of psalmes not commanded of God be allowable and may be used in Gods service a stinted form of prayer is unjustly censured for that reason It is a received rule A Quatenus ad Omne valet argumentum If stinted prayer be unwarrantable because it is not appointed of God a stinted form of singing not commanded must not be used If a prescript form of singing not commanded of God be approveable in his sight for that cause a stinted form of prayer must not be disliked One circumstance that putteth a materiall difference in the thing or person from whence the argument or reason of likenesse is drawn is sufficient to weaken its force but twentie particular differences betwixt the branches of worship weaken not an argument drawn from the agreement of the branches in the common nature of worship Of which sort this is The Anabaptists may put many differences betwixt circumcision and baptisme and yet the argument is good against them Infants of Christian parents ought to be baptized
merit of the Creatour much lesse can sinfull man who faileth continually in his best duties and offendeth in many things supererogate by doing some outward act not required or forbearing somewhat in it self allowable when outwardly and inwardly he cometh short in many things commanded But in every externall act which is neither work of piety mercy nor justice but onely an appertenance thereunto or an outward prerogative onely a Christian is not bound by the law of God evermore to do that which is best There is a latitude and extent of the commandments which God gave in bounty wherein he requireth not all that he might but what he pleaseth and if we keep our selves within the bounds prescribed of God we sin not David did well in taking care for and purposing to build the house of the Lord but seeing the Lord never spake word to David saying Build me an house if that resolution had never come into his heart he had not sinned They that sold their possessions and laid the price at the Apostles feet did very well whereas they might still have reteined their possessions without sin He that hath the gift of continency doth best if he marry not saith the Apostle in respect of the present occasion and his own freedome But if he marry he â—inneth not The Law required a sacrifice without blemish but simply the best in the flock it did not require He is accursed that having a male for sacrifice doth offer a corrupt thing but no such heavy doom is denounced against him who doth not offer simply the best male in his flock The churches of God sin not in reteining their ancient confessions of faith and forms of catechismes being sound plain and full in matters fundamentall concerning faith and obedience though some more exact methodicall or perfect might be framed If the excellency of one form exclude all others which have not the same measure or degree of exactnesse it will not be easie for our brethren to resolve how either to preach or pray or perform any other service to God at all How shall a minister resolve himself whether this be simply the best sermon that he can make for matter the fittest the exactest for method most proper for phrase profitable for composure How shall a Christian resolve himself whether it be best for him to pray ever so long as he shall be enabled or to contract himself as occasions shall require If a scrupulous Christian should enquire whether he might use the Lords prayer at all or use it onely and none other he could expect no satisfactory answer from them that oppose a stinted form of prayer by this argument For first they will tell him He may use a petition two or more or all in the Lords prayer even word for word if the holy Ghost directeth him then That the heads themselves in those petitions are so generall as no man can well for himself or others use them aright without some speciall relation or application to his or their particular estate or occasions neither can any mans or churches case or understanding reach unto all things needfull for all occasions times and persons as those heads do comprehend That our Saviour giveth us a rule and direction how to pray but tyeth us not to that form That the prayer cannot be ours properly if rehearsed because we are to say Our father and all things necessary for our selves and others for past and future times and conditions are comprehended in it and That if we ask all things comprehended in those petitions at one and the same time we shall ask things contrary which cannot be done in faith Lastly seeing it is a most perfect prayer wherein is no want or superfluity if it were Christs meaning to enjoyn the saying over of these words for our prayer to God then ought we to use these onely and none other because it should be but babbling presumption to joyn or put other prayers in stead of that which is so absolute and sufficient for the Lord will be worshipped with the best we have c. Lay these things together and what resolution can be gathered to that question but this He may use it He may not use it He may use other prayers with it When he useth it he may use none other because it is most perfect and sufficient For answer it might be added That in publick prayer the capacity and edification of the people is more to be respected of the minister then his own ability of conceit or utterance The phrase and disposition of words used in prayer in the assembly should rather be grave and simple then strained to the highest degree of fervency that the messenger of God is able It is also to be considered that what is simply best is not best in relation to this or that circumstance or end what is best in a time free is not best in a time not free And if a stinted form of Liturgie be not necessary to help the inability of the minister it may be expedient upon other grave and weighty considerations concerning the good of Gods church both ministers and people The imposition of set forms so to be used for matter and manner by our ministers hath a variation from I may say an opposition unto the law of fear and service sc That we should love the Lord with all our souls all our strength c. That which is said of our form to be used for matter and manner is altogether impertinent or turneth the edge of the argument For either all publick forms of prayer wherein a minister maketh not use of his own but other mens gifts be unlawfull and derogatorie to the honour fruit and benefit of Christs ascension and then it is impertinent to urge this of our form for matter and manner Or some forms be lawfull notwithstanding a minister maketh not use of his own but other mens gifts and then this is no just exception against the use of our Liturgie For if any publick stinted form of prayer be lawfull then ours is lawfull so farre and in what it agreeth with that lawfull form for matter and manner And what reason soever disproveth the use of ours for matter manner or what else soever can be objected that disproveth the use of all set forms that be of the same nature and use for matter or manner Thus therefore you may take the Argument If some set or stinted form of prayer be lawfull ordinarily to be used without addition or alteration though therein the minister make use not of his own but others gifts then our stinted form of prayer is not unlawfull because it is to be used ordinarily without addition or alteration though therein the minister make use not of his own but of others gifts For whatsoever maketh our form unlawfull that maketh all forms agreeing with ours in that particular unlawfull But the former hath been
particular sinnes against the law of God the state of man by nature and the condition of the Saints and of the church as also to think upon the works of Gods providence and how he is pleased to deal with his people in all places 2. The better to stirre up confidence and affection and to furnish himself with words and matter it is not unlawfull nor unprofitable to reade the prayers of the godly registred in holy scripture or published in other godly books to observe the matter of their prayer their ferventnesse in praying and the arguments wherewith they pressed their suits and contended for audience 3. After a man hath collected matter for prayer by meditation and reading he may studie to digest it into due order and method and to expresse his requests in fit and decent speech and the same so conceived he may utter as a prayer according as occasion shall offer it self The reason may be thus contracted If the Spirit of God doth work by means and stir up good desires but giveth not abilitie to expresse our desires in fitting significant words 〈◊〉 it is lawfull for us to use all godly means to stirr up the graces of God in us and premediate how we may utter our requests in such form and manner as may best serve for our quickning and the edification of others And if the use of a premeditated form of words in prayer do not stint the Spirit in a sinfull manner a set form of prayer cannot be condemned as injurious to the Spirit The Spirit of God is the onely sufficient help which God giveth us to help our infirmities in the time of prayer Rom. 8. 26. Gal. 4. 6. Zech. 12. 10. We confesse most willingly that prayer is not a work of nature wit or learning but of the Spirit of grace True desire or abilitie to pray is not bred in us by nature nor procured and gotten by our study and industry but proceedeth onely from the holy Ghost as the authour and efficient and this is proved by the places quoted But ability to pray standeth in the lifting up of the soul unto God not in the ample expression of our desires according to the various occasions in fit words and pressing them with forcible arguments Prayer is the immediate work of the Spirit But no text of scripture doth in such sense make the holy Ghost the authour of prayer or helper of our infirmities as that it should be unlawfull to make use of outward means to furnish the soul with matter stirre up the graces of God in the heart and blow the coals of the spirit For then we must not reade the scriptures nor other godly books we may not meditate or conferre the better to fit us for prayer Peradventure it will be said the Spirit of God is our onely helper in the time of prayer so that at other times we may use helps to stirre up the graces of the Spirit but not in the time of prayer And if this distinction be found in scripture or by sound reason may be deduced out of scripture we must hearken unto it but if it be of our selves whiles we pleade against the devises of men we maintein devises The Spirit of grace is at all times the sole mover and enabler of us to pray and the use of lawfull helps and such as suite with the nature of prayer are at no time unlawfull As it is fit to meditate and reade before we pray so in prayer it is lawfull to kneel lift up the eyes and hands use the help of the voyce and the benefit of a Christian friend to stirre up affection Therefore for the lawfulnesse of book-prayer we may dispute thus If it be lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer the better to stirre up affection then book-prayer is not to be condemned for this that the Spirit of God is the onely or sufficient help that God giveth to help our infirmities in the time of prayer But it is lawfull to use externall helps in time of prayer The Spirit alone either immediately or by means sanctified and ordained by himself maketh requests for us yea it is by the immediate teachings and suggestions of the Spirit that all our requests must be put up no other helps are mentioned or can be collected in the present action of prayer I will not stand to enquire how these things can agree together what is meant by the immediate teachings of the Spirit or how the Spirit maketh requests either immediately or by means The Spirit alone and that immediately is the authour of prayer but by means he ministreth varietie of matter order and words But what are we to understand by means sanctified and ordained by himself If means ordained by speciall institution it is too strait and hard to conceive what they be If means allowed by God as those whereby we may furnish our selves with words and matter for prayer as reading godly books conference meditation on the works of God c. a stinted form of prayer is a means sanctified And here I desire it may be noted in what sense a form of prayer is called a means or furtherance not as a means or form of worship properly so called but as in fit words and phrases it presenteth to our minds or memories what we ought to beg agreeable to the word of God as the frame of words and matter kept in memory may be called and is reputed a stinted form A stinted form of prayer quencheth the Spirit It is a quenching of the Spirit to reade another mans prayer upon a book That quencheth the Spirit which is as water to cool or allay or exstinguish the heat of that holy fire which cannot be imputed to a set form of prayer either by authoritie of scripture or sound reason Reading godly books is an exercise profitable to stirre up the graces of Gods Spirit in us were it not a wonder if reading a godly prayer should produce the contrary effect As in the ministery of the word the corruption of mans heart and the hainousnesse of sinne may more lively and fully be discovered for his humiliation then he is able of himself to set it forth so in prayer penned by a goldy andwell experienced Christian the case of a distressed soul may more pithily and amply be deciphred and anatomized then he of himself is able to lay it open And in such case to deny this lawfull help is to take away a crutch from the lame and bread from the hungry In the very act of prayer it is lawfull to use outward helps whereby we may be enabled to pray better and shall it not be lawfull for a burdened soul perplexed with doubtings overwhelmed with bitter anguish to use the help of a book that he might the better unfold and lay open his misery into the bosome of his loving Father The ample and particular laying open of our necessities doth ease the
heart and move affections and when this may be done better by the help of a book in prayer then of our selves how can the use thereof be accused as the quenching of the Spirit It is the Spirit indeed that doth help us in our infirmities but we must use means to stirre up the graces of the Spirit in us He quencheth not the Spirit who laboureth to blow the coals of grace and useth all helps afforded in most ample and particular manner to unburden his heart before the Lord. He doth not substitute his Christian friends in the place of the word and Spirit who not able to lift up his own soul by reason of griâ—vous straitnesse and pressure of heart doth crave his help and assistance in prayer And may not a godly book supply the lack of Christian companion When we are dull and out of order we may joyn with others in prayer for our relief and quickning why then should it be intolerable to make this benefit of a godly book A set form of prayer may be committed to memory and uttered from it doth that also quench the Spirit It is not safe they say for a minister to limit himself alwayes to one form of prayer though devised by himself But if it be a quenching of the Spirit an humane invention forbidden in the second commandment if it cannot be made by the Spirit if it be not that true and spirituall worship which God requireth it is not lawfull ordinarily nor once for minister or private christian in publick or private in case of distresse or otherwise for the objection is generall That all stinted forms of prayer do quench the Spirit and these mitigations of safe alwayes and for a minister are a plain concession there is no force in the reason These stinted forms do quench the Spirit of prayer in that they deprive the church and minister of that libertie of the Spirit of prayer which God would have them use stinting the minister yea all the ministers of the kingdome to the same measure of the Spirit not onely one with another but all of them with him that is dead and rotten Nothing is here objected against our stinted form which may not with like truth be alledged against the reading of a prescribed and set translation the use of the Lords prayer a set form of blessing singing of psalms and baptizing in these precise words I baptize thee c. For in these things it may be said The minister yea all the ministers in the kingdome are stinted to the same measure of the Spirit c. And if in those particulars that form of reasoning be of no weight in this it is but an empty sound A stinted form depriveth not the minister or church of that libertie of the Spirit which God would have them use seeing they may use that notwithstanding as the severall occasions of the church or people shall require If all ministers throughout the Christian world should put up the same holy and just petitions to God in the same phrase of speech as in the words of the Lords prayer they should neither stint the Spirit to one measure nor deprive the church of the liberty of the Spirit seeing the measure of the Spirit standeth not in words and forms but in fervent sighs and groans and they have time and libertie to pray besides as God shall enable them and the present occasions of the assembly require And if it must needs be that in a stinted form the Spirit is stinted to one measure then all stinting of the Spirit is not quenching of the Spirit For the minister doth not quench the Spirit if he stint it in respect of time and occasions Suppose sundry private Christians in the assembly do excell their pastour in the gift of prayer the wife excell the husband the child or servant excell the master or governour is the Spirit quenched in them when it is stinted for the time to their measure in prayer Suppose divers Christians meeting upon occasion the weakest in gifts be put to pray for the rest is the Spirit in them quenched because it is stinted to his measure The question is not of prayer devised by a mans self or of limiting the Spirit in the people but of prayer devised by others and imposed and of limiting the Spirit of the minister the first is lawfull the second sinfull The question is of a publick stinted form of prayer or Liturgie Whether it quench the Spirit in the minister or the people and Whether it quench the Spirit because it stinteth it Whether the form be devised by others or by a mans self imposed or voluntarily taken up that is nothing to the matter in hand but Whether it quench the Spirit because for the time it is limited to that form of words And if we look into the matter it self the Spirit of God may be quenched in a mans self no lesse by the rude customary use of a form devised by a mans self then by a form imposed by others and it may be as prejudiciall to the comfort of Gods people And if we consult the scripture where shall we find this distinction of limiting the Spirit by prayer devised by a mans self or devised of others of stinting the Spirit in respect of time occasion form of prayer uttered out of memory or read upon a book But the distinction it self hath been confuted already together with the assertion That a stinted prayer doth quench the Spirit It cannot properly be said saith one that the Spirit is limited by his own ordinance but when the Spirit of the minister is straitned by forms prescribed to him by men without Gods ordinance and appointment then the Spirit is limited and stinted indeed But this is a bare repetition of what was said before without proof or reason and besides a strange description of limiting the Spirit is nothing but a proof of one thing by the same And here I desire two things may be noted First though many reasons in shew be brought against the use of stinted prayer yet when the matter cometh to the upshot they are barely one and that nakedly affirmed Stinted prayer is unlawfull because in reading book â—prayer he doth not exercise his own but another mans gifts Is this reason good No for in reading scripture out of a translation he exerciseth another mans gifts But stinted prayer is the devise of man A child of twelve or thirteen yeares old may reade a stinted prayer as well as the minister The same may be said of reading the Scriptures But stinted prayer is the devise of man It is unlawfull to stint the Spirit Yet this is done in praying with others But stinted prayer is the devise of man So that all hangeth upon this string for the confirmation whereof nothing is alledged Secondly they take that for granted evermore which should be proved or prove the same by the same as Stinted prayer doth
quench the Spirit Why so Because the Spirit is straitned by forms devised by men which is as much in plain terms as to say It is stinted in our sense because it is stinted And the like might be noted in other arguments Where is the consideration of the people had when the forms now are the same for matter and manner that they were almost an hundred yeares ago and at the first dawning of the Gospel the same for the Court Universities and the meanest congregation in the Countrey Might not the same be objected against the use of a set translation singing of psalmes the use of the Lords prayer for this fifteen hundred yeares without alteration for these are the same now that they were many yeares agone or at least may be the same for Citie Countrey Court Universitie and the meanest villages There are some common blessings which we and others dayly stand in need of and those it is lawfull to ask dayly in a set form of words Thus we may pray euery day for encrease of faith patience love meeknesse the forgivnesse of sinnes the continuance of those outward blessings which we enjoy freedom from or victory over temptations c. Thus there is no petition in the Lords prayer which doth not alwayes in the main concern every Christian mans estate And if the matter of our prayers may be the same daily in the Citie the Countrey Court and Universitie in this and former ages the same phrase of speech method and form externall may be lawfull fit and expedient For it is not the repetition of the same words in prayer every day that displeaseth the Lord but the ignorant rash cold customary superstitious and irreverent pouring out of words before him that is distastfull to his Majesty Variety of phrase doth not delight the Lord neither will he reject the desires of an humble and contrite heart because they are tendred often in one and the same phrase of speech And if the matter of prayer be the same in places of greatest wealth and poorest condition and the same form of blessing baptizing singing of psalms and putting up their petitions to God be fit and decent for them all it can be no prejudice to a stinted Liturgie that it is the same in all places and throughout all ages if the language be the same For this doth argue it to be the more not the lesse fit and that the greater not the lesse regard is had to the people The reason in brief is this It is lawfull to ask the same common blessings of God every day in all assemblies and congregations both of the City Country Court and University met together to call upon God therefore the same stinted form of prayer or Liturgy may be lawfull in the greatest city and meanest village in this and the ages following whether read or uttered out of memory for pronouncing cannot make an evil matter good nor reading simply make prayer good and holy to become sinfull Publick prayers offered up by the minister in the church-assemblies must be framed according to the present and severall occasions of the church and people of God which cannot be done when men are stinted to those forms Occasions are ordinary and common or more speciall In a stinted form prayers may be offered up by the minister according to the common and ordinary occasions of the church and people of God assembled though not according to the speciall occasions which may happen now and then or more particularly concern this or that person For if the same blessings are dayly to be craved he prayeth according to the present occasions that asketh the same blessings of God If it be said There be many occasions of particular use for the congregation and others which are not mentioned expressely that proveth not That a man cānot in a stinted form pray according to the severall occasions but that some stinted forms do not meet with all and every particular occasion which is easily granted But if a stinted form meet not with every mans occasions or not so particularly as it ought doth it hence follow that in a stinted form a man cānot pray according to the present occasions at all If this be the conclusion I fear we shall find few conceived prayers which must not come under the same sentence It may argue the imperfection of a stinted form not the unlawfulnesse it maketh somewhat against the sole use of a set form at all times against the simple use it maketh nothing It is found by lamentable experience that when men began to observe that custome there was great quenching of the Spirit and very few there were who did know and observe the true nature and the manner of prayer How is this confirmed by experience If ever the Christian church had no stinted form of prayer lamentable experience will testifie what great coolings and decayes there was in the church before a stinted form was in use If ever the faithfull did by the Spirit of adoption cry Abba Father they have learned to pray by the Spirit since the use of a stinted form as well as before Whatsoever may be thought of the two first ages for the space of fourteen hundred yeares the churches have had their stinted Liturgies The reformed churches since God was pleased to restore light again to the world have approved a stinted Liturgie Was there none or few in all this tract of time who did know or understand the true nature or manner of prayer none or few that in spirit or truth did call upon the name of the Lord The securitie of all ages hath been lamentable both before and since the use of a stinted form but that a stinted form was the cause of securitie and dulnesse can never be proved CHAP. VI. In scripture there be prescript forms of blessing prayers salutations c. which may lawfully be used IN scripture we find prescript forms of blessing prayers and thanksgiving both ordinary and extraordinary approved of God which might be used by the priests Levites and Saints or faithfull people and that upon deliberation usually constantly as occasion was offered and not by the immediate motion of the Spirit I say not that the preists in blessing or the Saints in prayer were necessarily bound to those very words and syllables But they might lawfully use them and without sinne We find also stinted forms of salutations valedictions and blessing which have been often used and may lawfully be used still without variation though we be not necessarily obliged thereunto Our Saviour also prescribed a set form of baptizing which we observe constantly without addition or variation though we be not tied by absolute necessity to rehearse the same words in the same syllables No substantiall change is to be admitted which may alter the sense but the very form of speech
as whether we say I baptize or as the Greek church Be thou baptized c. is not of like necessitie neverthelesse we may and do constantly use this form I baptize c. without addition or variation at any time Our argument from these places is this If a set form of blessing thanksgiving salutaion and administration of baptisme be lawfull to be used ordinarily without addition or variation then a stinted form of prayer to be used ordinarily without addition or alteration is not unlawfull But a prescript form of blessing thanksgiving salutation and administration of baptisme to be used ordinarily without addition or alteration is not unlawfull There is apparent difference betwixt prayer and blessing For prayer is expressed from men to God but blessing is pronounced from God to men Prayer may be performed by one equall to another by an inferiour to a superiour yea by a man to himself but blessing is alwayes from the greater to the lesse And Solomon used a different gesture in praying and in blessing the people Let prayer and blessing differ in these and other particulars as many as they please in this they agree that they are both parts or branches of worship And if a stinted form be disallowed in the one it is unlawfull in the other if it be a devise of man to be condemned in the one it cannot be approved in the other And therefore seeing a prescript form of blessing is lawfull a stinted form of prayer is not to be condemned Moses did not prescribe unto the priests a form of words whereunto they must be tyed in blessing of the people but onely gave them a rule of direction according to which they should blesse them For otherwise the priests had sinned whensoever pronouncing the blessing they had used other words And the particle Thus So or In this manner denoteth the form or similitude of the things whereof there is mention c. It is a troublesome thing that these ministers thus urge the letter of the scriptures as if the question were not about their sense and interpretation which they should prove to be for their stinted service c. but the question is whether Moses tyed and stinted the priests to that form of words in blessing the people The like they say of the form of baptisme It sufficeth that these forms of blessing prayer and thanksgiving and administration of baptisme might or may be used though in conscience neither the priests then nor we at this day are necessarily tyed unto them in so many precise words For the lawfull not the necessary use of a prescript form of prayer or Liturgie is now in question which is proved by the places above rehearsed and not gainsaid at all by this answer For if the Saints in former times might pray unto or praise the Lord in a stinted form of words invented by themselves or indited by others as we find they might and did if the preiests might use a stinted form of words in blessing the people whereunto they were not tyed if Christians may salute one another in this stinted form of words Peace be unto you The Lord be with you The Lord blesse thee though they be not tyed thereunto nor can reach every particular comprehended in those short sentences recorded in scripture then a stinted form of prayer or blessing in words invented by themselves or indited by others is lawfull to us for in that particular the ground and reason is common to them and us Apply this answer to the reason That the priest might use that form without variation but was not tyed unto it That we may use the Lords prayer without alteration and the form of baptisme without addition and diminution but are not necessarily obliged to use the very words and syllables precisely and I know not how they should tye the knot faster For is not this in plain terms to confesse That an arbitrarie stinted form is lawfull but not necessary If God had commanded a form it onely had been necessary if God had determined one precise form that onely and none other had been lawfull but seeing he hath commanded none determined none precisely but left us free to use those recorded in scripture or some others in the selfsame or other words a stinted form is apparently warranted of God though not commanded It followeth not that a prescript form devised by man is lawfull because a form prescribed of God is good Moses was a prophet and had an immediate commission from God for what he appointed in the house of God which the imposers of the Liturgie cannot plead Christs ordinance can make the writings of the Apostles a rule of faith can men make another scripture c. A form prescribed and determined by God is not onely lawfull and good but necessary and onely lawfull as it is prescribed which prerogative no form devised or prescribed by man can participate But when God is pleased to give a form for direction onely and neither to command it precisely nor to determine it as the onely allowable for words and syllables in that case this reason is good That seeing the forms set down in scripture may lawfully be used though not prescribed therefore a stinted form is not unlawfull And thus we conclude from these passages of holy writ The stinted forms of blessing prayer thanksgiving and baptizing set down in scripture are lawfull to be used though not prescribed of God as necessary therefore a stinted form of prayer is not unlawfull For that form of words which is neither determined nor commanded of God as necessary but left at liberty to be used or not that is not in point of conscience absolutely more lawfull then another sound and grave If no form of words be determined or commanded any form just and good one as well as another is free in conscience Gods commandment maketh a thing necessary his determination maketh it onely and none other lawfull but a form not tying to the words precisely but given for direction onely doth authorize any other for matter the same and different onely in words or phrase of speech Every stinted form of prayer or blessing c. not prescribed of God or ordained of him is an humane devise though the matter be good and the words be gathered out of the scripture because whatsoever is not from heaven is of men what is not of God by his institution prescribed or appointed that our brethren conclude to be humane But no prescript form of blessing prayer or praise c. is appointed of God and commanded as necessary to be used of all or any man at all times as they confesse and labour to convince Therefore it necessarily followeth That if one godly form of prayer or blessing may constantly be used another for matter the same though different in phrase of
speech may be used also as occasion shall require For none is absolutely commanded and all things required by the word of God in prayer may be observed in the one no lesse then in the other In this whole answer therefore which cometh so often in the second branch they strengthen our reason as much as can be desired against themselves In the other they look not to the point in hand nor the force of the reason Those forms mentioned 2. Chron. 29. 30. are in the same place expressely said to be composed by those that were Prophets and Seers as in other places of purpose as it were to prevent imitation an ordinary rise to imagery The forms mentioned were given no question by the inspiration of the Spirit and so is the Lords prayer the form of baptizing and other psalmes registred in holy scripture But the application of those particular forms to this on that purpose was not by an extraordinary motion of the Spirit but upon grounds common to others with them upon like occasion or in cases analogicall And if in that respect it be not lawfull to imitate their practice I would gladly know by what warrant we sing the psalmes of David or other holy prophets inspired of God or use a set translation c. Upon what grounds may they compose a catechisme for the edification of the people of their particular charge or gather together and alledge scriptures in their studied sermons either for instruction exhortation rebuke or comfort If they have not warrant from these and such like practices of the people of God it will prove in their construction but the precept or devise of man The composure of those psalmes was by the immediate inspiration of the holy Ghost wherein no man not immediately inspired may presume to imitate them but forms given by inspiration are thus farre for our imitation that we may use the same words or other words devised of our selves to the same purpose sc to expresse and lay open the conceits and desires of our soul Hezekiah did not compose that form but commanded the Levites to make use of it being already composed But how imitation herein should be a rise to imagery I cannot conceive To adde unto or detract from the word of God or his ordinances is great presumption to imitate the Saints in that particular which they did by immediate inspiration and could not do without such inspiration is intolerable boldnesse But where God hath given a pattern of prayer thanksgiving or administration of the sacraments to imitate our samplar in the selfsame words or other words devised by our selves or others is no rise to imagery If this be a rise to imagery every time a Christian maketh use of the Lords prayer in his prayers or the prayers of holy men recorded in scripture he setteth up an image he that deviseth a set form of prayer for one that needeth and he that in case of necessity useth such a devised prayer setteth up an image and every time they pray preach catechize administer the sacraments or meditate of holy things with reference to the scripture they set up images These consequences I am assured they detest let me entreat them to consider whether they do not follow necessarily upon their premisses Those that mean to defend the imposition of a stinted form of prayer to any purpose do what they can to bear us in hand that these prayers are of like nature with those in scripture and speak of them as if the composition and framing of them were by some propheticall or apostolicall Spirit or at least which will be all one in effect by a Spirit or gift extraordinary What opinion the true church of God hath had of a stinted Liturgie we shall see in the next argument But that she hath ever or at any time born us in hand that those prayers were of like nature with those in the scriptures that is given by immediate inspiration or parts of canonicall scripture is an unjust imputation For they know that all reformed churches since the light of the Gospel began to shine forth unto the world untill this day do allow and maintein the use of stinted prayers catechismes confessions and professions of faith a stinted form of singing psalmes c. did ever any of them bear the world in hand that their prayers or composures are propheticall or from an extraordinary spirit Divers godly and learned ministers have soundly and to purpose mainteined the lawfulnesse of a stinted form against them of the Separation in former times did they ever write or speak that the prayers or Liturgie was framed by an Apostolicall spirit I have not seen all men that have written upon this subject upon any occasion and therefore cannot say that never any man did so speak of them but sure I am if any man have so written he is neither the onely man nor the chief which hath set his hand to maintein the expediency of a stinted Liturgie If any one hath spoken unadvisedly the cause hath no credit by his defense nor can it receive prejudice by his weaknesse It hath been objected against some dislikers of a stinted form that they conceit their extemporany prayers to come from the immediate inspiration of the holy Ghost and if a man should rake into every writing and set every speech upon the tentours he might say as much for it as can be said in this particular But at the best this is but to go about the bush This is that which I hold and plead for That by the word of truth a stinted Liturgie or form of prayer is allowable and in some respects expedient CHAP. VII The churches of God have both used and approved a stinted Liturgie THE Jews before the coming of our Saviour Christ used a prescript form of prayer and praise or thanksgiving in the celebration of the passeover and that which they used was as it is probable approved of our Saviour Christ himself The Christian churches of ancient times for the space of this fourteen hundred yeares at least if not from the apostles times have had their stinted Liturgies and all reformed churches at this day do not onely tolerate but approve as very expedient a set form of prayer or Liturgie There is no mention from Moses to Christ of any Liturgie devised by man Which might not have been concealed if it had been for the edification of the church to set up such means of worship as Liturgie read publickly for the prayers of the church That there was no prescribed Liturgie particularly ordained and determined of God is freely confessed but that there was none in use is not proved by the silence of the scripture For the scripture was given to be the perfect rule of faith and manners but setteth not down particular customes or observations according to the generall rules of religion To let passe many take this one for instance The
the Old Testament from the apostles at their first conversion but suddenly they could not be translated into every language and till they were translated they could not be read in the congregation unto edifying The books of the New Testament could not be delivered untill they were written but they were not written all at once and when they were all written being sent to severall churches it must be some time before they could be gathered together and translated And if nothing be allowable in the church but what was found in the primitive churches planted by the apostles by record of scripture I fear the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue must be cast out of the congregations I go not about to equalize stinted Liturgies with set translations of the holy scriptures but I would intreat such as oppose a stinted Liturgie by these reasons to consider whether they do not put weapons into the adversaries hands to fight against the scriptures Again set forms of catechismes publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others used with liberty to adde or alter as occasion requireth are no more commanded of God then set forms of prayer nor no more in use in the apostolick churches Christ our Saviour the Prophets or Apostles have no more appointed the one then the other if all parts of holy and spirituall worship may be performed without a stinted Liturgie they may be performed also without a stinted or set catechisme and if a set form of prayer must be disallowed a set form of catechisme publick or private composed by the minister or devised by others must be condemned also But the antiquity excellency and necessity of catechizing is known to them who are exercised in the building and governing of the house of God the use and profit of a set form therein is both manifest by reason and confirmed by experience at home and abroad in publick and private to them who have laboured to lay the foundation of Christian religion and train up the people committed to their charge in sound wisdome and understanding And in these things we swerve not from our pattern because we teach and professe the same doctrine and worship God with the same worship and substantiall means of worship that the primitive churches and Christians did There is the same reason of reading the Apocrypha books of Maccabees and those that follow them in the congregation and of reading a stinted form of Liturgie and the same reasons that silence the Apocrypha will silence stinted prayers as well and as much When we prove the lawfulnesse of a stinted form of prayer by the stinted forms of psalmes and blessing mentioned in scripture it is thought answer sufficient to say There is great difference betwixt blessings or psalmes and prayer and yet here it is enough to match things unlike together and to say of them without all proof There is the same reason of both But if it have any sinews it will silence the singing of psalmes sermons professions of faith and conceived prayer no lesse then stinted especially the use of notes to help memory and forms of catechisme by whomsoever and howsoever used For there is the same reason of reading and uttering by heart in the congregation And if nothing but the canonicall scriptures must be read in the congregation nothing must be uttered by heart or strength of memory but the scriptures alone But sermons professions of faith conceived prayer are not canonicall scripture The reason is one and whatsoever can be answered truly in the one will put the other to flight If it be said That it is the prerogative of the scripture to be the rule of faith and manners and therefore nothing is to be read in the congregation as the ground undoubted and immediate of faith and manners but the scripture alone this openeth way for stinted prayer as well as for sermons or conceived prayer The substantiall means of worship both publick and private are determined of God It is unlawfull to set up an image for worship either publick or private The scripture must be acknowledged the sole rule of faith and manners both in publick and private It is unlawfull to devise sacramentall signes in private as well as in the congregation And if it be unlawfull to reade any other book in the congregation because the reading of the scripture is the onely approved medium cultûs by the same reason all forms of catechismes and singing of psalmes and reading or use of stinted praiers in the family are unlawfull And if the one be an image in the congregation the others are so in the family When the Lord had devised and appointed a perfume saith the authour of the Letter all men are forbidden to make a composition like that perfume Exod. 30. 35 37. So if it could be proved that Christ had made a form for the churches and believers alwayes when they pray then the offering up of any other prayers made by others or of our own devising would seem to be as unlawfull as the offering of strange incense Exod. 30. 9. Where it is implyed that seeing God hath determined no certain form therefore forms devised by men are not necessary but lawfull In the same manner they may be answered from their own grounds That seeing God hath sanctified and set apart the canonicall scriptures given by immediate Divine inspiration to be the sole and perfect rule of faith and manners therefore the scripture alone must be read and acknowledged as the sole ground of heavenly instruction But seeing he hath determined no certain form of prayer or sermons professions of faith or thanksgiving therefore either none at all must be made or forms devised by men are lawfull to be heard in the congregation yet not as immediate and undoubted grounds of faith for that is proper to the scripture but as instructions and exhortations builded upon or petitions framed according to the scripture as present occasion doth require In sermons who doth not put a difference betwixt the text whereupon the discourse instructions exhortations rebukes comforts be grounded deduced the exhortations rebukes comforts which are propounded in method phrase of speech devised by men The first is ought to be canonicall scripture the other not so But it would argue great ignorance if not perversenesse if a man should cavill in this manner against the preaching of the word That the scriptures alone are to be read in the congregation therefore the minister of the Gospel must simply reade the scripture but never give the meaning nor make application In the Primitive church sundry councels have forbidden the reading of any books as parts of Divine worship but canonicall scripture onely of the Old and New Testament but no councel ever condemned the use of a stinted Liturgie Those churches which forbad the reading of any books which be without the canon did
thing is found there follow all necessarie requisites to the true and complete being thereof But a prescript from of prayer sound and fit for matter grave for the manner of penning and read or uttered as our prayer with knowledge faith reverence and fervencie of affection hath the true matter and form of prayer For the matter of our prayers are those common blessings and speciall good things which according to the will and pleasure of God we are to beg of him for our selves and others The true form of prayer I speak of prayer uttered with the voice is the outward disposition and frame of words and the inward elevation and lifting up of the heart to God by the holy Ghost Will any man say that all these things cannot be observed in a stinted form of prayer common experience will confute him Who knoweth not the matter of many prescript forms of prayer to be good and necessary for all men All our wants and particular occasions are not mentioned or laid open in the prayers conceived by the minister or governour of the family and yet no man judgeth them for that cause unlawfull though imperfect It is not then prejudiciall to the lawfull use of a prescript form that many particulars which we stand in need of are not therein mentioned Can it not be read or uttered with right disposition of heart how then can we sing with joy or praise God with cheerfulnesse in a stinted or set form of words Is it not easier to cry for what we need with feeling then to return praise with love and joyfulnesse for what we have obteined He that will confesse it possible to give thanks aright in a set form of words devised by others or invented of himself cannot deny the same in prayer with any shew of truth or colour of reason Men may read it viz. the Lords prayer and humane liturgies with understanding and feelling saith M r Ainsworth Again If in the ordinary use of the Lords prayer publick and private without addition or variation all things required in prayer by the word of God may be observed then a stinted form of prayer may have the true matter and form of prayer or all things required in prayer may be observed in a stinted form But in the ordinary use of the Lords prayer publick and private without addition or variation all things required in prayer by the word of God may be observed For the matter there is no word in the Lords prayer which doth not ordinarily in great measure and in the main alwayes concern every Christian mans estate though he cannot reach unto all things comprehended in this prayer And all our wants are conteined within the compasse of the Lords prayer and may be deduced thence though they be not in â—lat terms expressed Infinite things are included in the Lords prayer which the weak and imperfect faith of the godly cannot reach unto but such and so much reach the weak faith hath that the child of God doth and may with comfort and profit use the Lords prayer as a prayer The Lords prayer is both the foundation of our godly prayers and the prayer of prayers Some weights and measures may be as rules to others and used as weights and measures themselves Concupiscence is both sin and the cause of sin Of ancient times the Lords prayer was used in all publick Liturgies and was of frequent use among private Christians Tertullian fitly calleth it The law of prayer and breviary of the Gospel Calvine The rule That it may be used with right disposition and affection of soul is confessed by them that dislike all stinted forms and testified by the experience of all Christians Therefore the Lords prayer may lawfully be used as a prayer both in publick and private by ministers and people weak and strong But first we are willed to note That the forms mentioned in scriptures of the old Testament are but for some speciall occasions and commanded to the church not from every ordinary church-officer priests and Levites but onely from the Prophets who had an extraordinary immediate calling from God who might as well deliver for scripture-oracles the truth of God taught by them as any forms of prayers and praises This we have observed and do acknowledge the forms of psalmes prayers and praises given by the Prophets immediately called and chosen of God to be parts of the sacred Canon to which it is not lawfull for particular churches or the whole church in generall to adde the least jot or tittle But this is not to the point in hand For we do not reason thus That seeing the Prophets by extraodinary and immediate calling gave speciall forms of prayer or praises to the church upon speciall occasion which are parts of the Canon therefore the church may do the like But thus we conclude and that according to the truth That seeing holy men have prescribed and the faithfull have used these forms not by extraordinary inspiration or speciall prerogative but upon grounds common to them and us the like forms may be prescribed and used without speciall commandment And seeing the Prophets and holy men of God by inspiration gave certain psalmes or forms of prayer and praise unto the church to be use upon speciall occasion which have the true matter and form of prayer and praise when they be used as a prayer or thanksgiving in faith reverence humility c. according to the present occasion therefore prayer uttered in a stinted form of words or read upon a book as a prayer may come from the spirit and be tendred to God with right affection A man may reade when he prayeth and the eye may guide the heart when the holy Ghost doth lift up and make it able to poure forth its desires unto the Lord. And if those forms of prayers and praises which are parts of the scripture may have the true nature matter form of prayer c. when they be used in faith and by the power of the holy Ghost enabling us to pray or praise the Lord in that form other forms of prayers or praises fit for matter may have the true matter form of prayer or praise when they be used in faith by the power of the holy Ghost as occasion requireth For the prayers recorded in holy scripture have not the true nature and form of prayer in respect of us because they are recorded in scripture but as they are used by us in holy manner upon fitting occasion and other forms fit for the matter used in such manner as God commandeth in faith humility reverence c. by the quickening power of the Spirit have the true matter and form of prayer as well as they But those forms are not the devise of man as be the other True as they be part of holy scripture they are of God both in respect of matter and form but as
they be applyed without speciall commandment to be the matter of form of a stinted prayer or thanksgiving at this time they are the devise of man that is they are so applyed by man without the extraordinary guidance direction of the holy Ghost Let us suppose a stinted form of Liturgie or prayer to be framed of the very words and sentences of scripture wherein nothing is to be read by way of prayer praise exhortation or declaration of the end and use of the sacraments but the very text of scripture if it be demanded whether this stinted Liturgie be the devise of man or no I conceive our brethren will answer That the matter and form both is of God as they are parcells of holy writ but as they are prescribed and used as a stinted form it is the devise of man This may be concluded from their grounds for all stinted forms of prayer and administration to be used in the publick congregation not commanded of God be the devises of men as they hold But this foresaid stinted form is not commanded of God as they affirm Therefore it is the devise of men There is now no form commanded of God as they professe and therefore to prescribe any text of scripture to be read in the administration of the sacraments or the Lords prayer to be used as a prayer is the devise of man What is more constantly affirmed by them then this That a stinted form of Liturgie is no necessry means of Gods worship because in time of the Law God prescribed none to his people when they were in their minority In times of the Gospel our Saviour Christ who would not be wanting to his church in the necessary means of worship hath given no form to be used of all churches throughout the world nor tyed any one member of the church precisely to this or that form of words in prayer and none others That we are not necessarily bound to the very words of the Lords prayer because the Evangelists do not tie themselves to the same words or number of words in recording that form of prayer the Apostles did not bind themselves to those words but used others according to their severall occasions nor do we reade in scripture that they laid any bond upon the churches to repeat over those very words Though therefore the prayer it self was taught by Christ the matter be of God and the form as it is canonicall scripture and though it be left as a perfect and genuine rule of prayer yet the application and use of it in such and such manner at such or such times in prayer in respect of the words themselves that is of men and not of God by particular institution Thus the reason may be contracted briefly the ordinary use of the Lords prayer without variation or addition is either commanded of God and so necessary or devised by men and so free and arbitrarie either it is a naturall help as some speak to supply some defect or taken up upon free choice But it is not commanded of God it is not necessary necessitate praecepti or medii nor an help naturall to supply some defect Therefore it is free and arbitrarie as that which may be done onely but it is not necessary to be done This being observed it will easily appear how little that distinction of using forms inspired by the holy Ghost but not of forms devised by men will avail because there is no form at all prescribed by God as they maintein Secondly if that distinction be granted it is here impertinently alleadged because it cannot be applyed to any part of the reason For forms of prayer inspired by the holy Ghost and recorded as parts of the sacred Canon be not of necessary use for us because they are recorded have not the true matter and form of prayer as they are there registred but as they are put up in faith to God being suitable to our occasions and a devised form of prayer fit for the matter tendred unto God in holy affiance by the work of the holy Ghost hath the true matter and form of prayer God never gave commandment that all our petitions should be presented unto his Majesty in a form of words inspired by the holy Ghost immediately God never disallowed the prayers of the faithfull because the externall form or phrase of speech was devised by man If the devised form of prayer before and after sermon be worship acceptable to God because it is devised of him who is called of God to devise and endite it then all men living are called and commanded to devise the worship of God and not for themselves alone but others in some cases Then the forms of prayer publick or private morning and evening the forms of thanksgiving before and after meals is devised worship but acceptable for the foresaid reason But that God hath called and authorized every man living or all in the church to devise a worship acceptable to his Majesty is most strange And so this first reason stands firm That all things essentiall to prayer or necessarily required in prayer by the word of God may be observed in a stinted from devised by men CHAP. III. A stinted Liturgie or publick form of prayer is no breach of the second commandment THat which is the breach of no commandment which is no where disallowed in the word of God either in expresse words or by necessary consequence that is no sin For sin is a transgression of the law and where there is no law there can be no sin But a prescript form of prayer of Liturgie is the breach of no commandment is no where disallowed in the word of God The exposition of the commandments is to be found in the Prophets and Apostles but the Lord by his Prophets and Apostles doth in no place restrain us to the use of conceived prayer so to call it Prayer is Gods ordinance but whether our prayers be uttered in our own or others words whether by pronouncing or reading that is not appointed God requireth that we lift up our hearts unto him and ask of him in the name of Christ whatsoever we stand in need of and is agreeable to his will But when spake he one word of praying within book or without in this or that precise form of words More particularly a stinted form of prayer for matter and externall form lawfull and pure fit in respect of our occasions and the necessities of the church read or uttered with knowledge affiance and intention of heart is not a breach of the second commandment either in the deviser or user For if all stinted forms of publick prayer be a transgression of the second commandment then in their common nature such stinted forms agree with images devised for worship But stinted forms or prayer agree not in their common nature with images devised for worship False worship forbidden in the second commandment is
opposite to the true worship which must in speciall be instituted by God But a stinted form of prayer is not opposite to that worshop which must in speciall be instituted by God False worship forbidden in the second commandment is in common nature use and end one with that positive worship which is there commanded But a stinted form of prayer is a matter of order and not for common nature use and end one with the true and pure worship of God there commanded The pure worship of God in spirit and truth is set against the worship of images But the pure worship of God in spirit and truth is not opposite to the worship of God in a stinted form of words Against a generall negative commandment no speciall act affirmative is lawfull unlesse the same be specially warranted by the Law-giver But some stinted forms of prayer are lawfull which are not in speciall warranted by the Law-giver viz. such as we have liberty to use but are not tyed to use by any necessity of precept If a publick stinted form of prayer be a breach of the second commandment then all publick stinted forms whereof there is the same formall reason and consideration both for persons and things are breaches of the second commandment at all times and in all men for it cannot be that a perpetuall commandment should be interpreted to forbid an act to one man when if the formall reason and consideration be the same in all it doth not forbid the same to every man But every publick stinted form of prayer whereof there is the same formall reason and consideration is not a breach of the second commandment in all men and at all times For there is the same formall reason and consideration of a publick stinted form of prayers to Christians now that there was formerly to the Jews The same formall reason and consideration I say not of this or that particular rite or ordinance which did peculiarly agree to them in respect of the speciall manner of dispensation proper to those times but of a stinted form in generall which was proper to them in no consideration but common to us with them As for example If the priests might blesse in a stinted form of words the ministers of the Gospel may do so likewise If the Levites might praise God in a stinted form of thanksgiving the ministers of the Gospel may use the Lords prayer as a prayer without addition or variation But all use of a stinted form of prayer and thanksgiving was not a breach of the second commandment in the priests and Levites If a stinted arbitrary prayer be the breach of the second commandment then is conceived prayer when uttered a sin likewise For they both agree in the matter as of God in externall phrase of speech and words boâ—h are of men in that which maketh stinted prayer a breach of the second commandment if it be a breach there is no difference Therefore we conclude That a stinted form of prayer is not a breach of the second commandment Means of Divine worship not ordained of God be unlawfull But a stinted form of prayer is a means of Divine worship not ordained of God Means of worship not to contend about words are of two sorts Some substantiall which are so means of worship as they be worship it self as the word is used when we speak of worship taught in the 2. commandment So the sacraments are means of worship branches of positive worship taught in that precept And in this sense all means of worship allowable are necessary by Divine precept and we are bound in conscience to apply our selves to them as Gods ordinance and not we onely but all the churches throughout the world For such ordinances of God pertein to the substance of worship whereof nothing can be changed or taken away but the worship is changed and another made Others are mere accidents to the substantiall means and deserve not to be called means of worship and if so called it is very improperly concerning which God hath given no particular commandment in his word whereunto the conscience is not bound either to apply it self unto them or to witnesse against them and of this sort are the circumstances of time place order method phrase and stinted form of words in the administration of the holy things of God which are no parts of the worship but honest circumstances of the celebration consonant to the generall rules given in scripture for the right administration of Divine ordinances but not commanded or disallowed in particular For generall rules are not commandments of this or that in particular but approbations of any particular this or another agreeable to those rules The apostle in commanding that all things be done in order doth not command this or that particular order nor forbid this or that in particular because it is not ordained of God For if all such means or worship shall be properly worship then not onely preaching but the church pulpit bells bell-man the phrase and method of sermons then each particular form of prayer the hower and order shall be worship because they are furtherances thereof If all such means of worship must be ordained of God or they shall be unlawfull God must have no worship at all from us in the means which he himself hath ordained because it is impossible to use the means he hath ordained and not to do many things which he hath not instituted Book-prayer is a manifest breach of the second commandment The reason I conceive is because words are signes of our conceits and notes of the things themselves writing is a signe or picture of the thing signified and so words devised by men and books of stinted prayers are images or pictures of our own devising And in this sense onely can a stinted prayer be called a devised worship For the matter of the prayer is of God it is the frame of words and method onely that can be challenged to be of man and if devised words be not images condemned I cannot comprehend how the externall form should be an apparent breach of the second commandment But if this reason be ought worth it is a manifest breach of the second commandment to preach pray administer the sacraments or reade the scriptures in a prescribed translation nay in a vulgar tongue For in preaching and prayer the matter is of God holy and good but the words and phrases of men In translations the matter is immediately inspired of God but the words are devised of men The sacrameÌ„ts are Gods ordinances by speciall and expresse institution but what shall we say of the outward form of words used in the administration If words devised by men be images condemned by the commandments do we not make one commandment of God crosse to another when we say that God requireth these things at our hands and yet condemneth all devised words without which they
because the children of Jews in covenant were circumcised For let the particular differences be never so many in this they agree That they are both sacraments of initiation and so belong to them that be in covenant sc the faithfull and their seed The Papists put many differences betwixt circumcision and the sacraments of the new Testament and yet this is a good strong argument Circumcision is a seal of the righteousnesse of faith therefore the sacraments are seals of the covenant of grace For however circumcision and baptisme and the Lords supper differ in their particular natures in the common authour nature and end of sacraments they agree This is a sound and good reason that lay-men and midwives ought not to baptize Because God hath coupled together the authoritative preaching of the word and administration of the sacraments and yet it is no hard matter to assigne many particular differences betwixt the word and sacraments A caviller might easily have found out many particular differences betwixt the sin of the angels and the Sodomites and those against whom the Apostle writeth but that had not infringed his argument from those examples It is a superfluous thing to heap up differences which are nothing to the point in hand And if we compare this answer with the reasons marshalled to fight against a stinted form of prayer it doth plainly overthrow and put them to slight For thus they must needs run Means of Divine worship not ordained of God are unlawfull to wit in stinted prayer but not in forms of praising God All strange worship is unlawfull But a stinted form of prayer is strange worship sc when the minister speaketh alone to God but not when the congregation pronounceth every word with the minister for then either a devised form is not strange worship or all strange worship is not unlawfull Mens inventions in Gods worship are unlawfull what all inventions or devised forms No but devised forms in prose not in verse when we pray not when we praise God when we speak to God not when we admonish one another Because this answer cometh often I desire our brethren to consider whether any other construction can possibly be made of it then this and whether ought can be spoken more grosse and contradictory to their positions The discourses that I have seen against stinted forms of prayer in generall need no other confutation but an understanding reader to observe how in this answer they turn the edge of their own weapons against themselves The penmen of the psalmes were prophets extraordinarily assisted and immediately by God designed to that work so are not the authours of the Liturgie This is not to the purpose For the psalmes penned by the prophets are paterns and forms of spirituall songs but not set forms prescribed to us as psalmes to be sung in those very words and forms Though the psalmes be parts of the canonicall scripture our brethren must esteem the use of them as a prescript form to be the devise of man because God hath not given them to that end nor by his commandment tied us and all churches to them and none others in the precise form of words When in the new Testament we are exhorted to sing psalmes they will not say that we are tied to Davids psalmes or other songs given by immediate Divine inspiration If therefore a prescript form of psalmes be lawfull it must be of such as are devised by men and not immediately inspired by the holy Ghost Besides we cannot say that the psalmes as they are sung in metre in our churches or for ought I know in any churches in the Christian world are the immediate and infallible truth of God given by inspiration of God any more then we can say of an holy paraphrase upon the scripture that it is the scripture it self In the new Testament since Christ we have no precedent of any stinted form of singing recorded in scripture and if we look to the practice of the times after the Apostles we shall find the church used other hymnes and not scripture-psalmes onely There is a necessity of having forms of psalmes set down in words not so of prayers In psalmes there is of necessitie required a certain known form of words that two or more may sing together according to the nature of the ordinance wherein many joyning vocally do make concent or harmony By which it appeareth how unadvisedly these ministers and others do thus again and again urge set forms of psalmes to prove set forms of prayers In the new Testament we have no precedent for the manner of singing recorded in scripture and in the primitive churches following the Apostles times it was various according to the custome of severall nations sometimes by one the rest hearing sometimes by course or quire-wise as the women answered the men Exod. 15. See Jun. Exod. 15. and sometimes by the whole multitude and sometimes it was but like fair long reading with modulation of the voyce The primitive Fathers therefore did not judge it necessary that the psalmes should be sung by the whole multitude that were present And if it be necessary yet is not a prescribed form in that respect necessary In preaching and prayer both before that people can joyn with the minister a stinted form of words is necessary and this is all can be said of singing This or that form prescribed is necessarie in neither a stinted form is necessary in both The people cannot sing with the minister unlesse what is to be sung be represented unto them in a set form of words nor can they joyn in prayer or attend to the word preached unlesse the matter of prayer or preaching be conveyed to their understanding in a set form of words Is a minister able to expresse the necessities of the people or the doctrine of salvation in a form of words devised and studied by himself and is he not able by meditation and study to dictate or compose a psalme to be sung by the people as occasion requireth And if he be able to compose a psalme in respect of the form of words and method is not a stinted form of singing a devised help an arbitrary help to him and so forbidden as it was said of prayer Christ hath given gifts unto his ministers for preaching and prayer hath he not for singing of psalmes also And if it be a dishonour to Christ as some affirm that they should use a form of prayer devised by others is it not a dishonour likewise that they should use a form of singing devised by others as not enabled with gifts of themselves to furnish the necessities of the church When prescribed and set forms of psalmes were necessary in the church of the Jews did the Lord commit this office to the priests Levites or ordinary officers of the church or to the prophets extraordinarily inspired and called of God to this purpose To
whom hath the Lord committed that charge and given ordinary authoritie to prescribe forms of singing in the churches in the new Testament If thee be such difference as is pretended betwixt the devised forms of praying and singing it is necessary that he that denieth the one to be lawfull and challengeth liberty in the other should shew his commission Christ fitteth his servants with gifts for the whole work of the ministery to pray as well as to preach by their own gifts for prayer is an ordinance of the new Testament as well as preaching and they are made able thereunto not by shewing the sufficiency of other men whose prayer they reade but their sufficiency is of God enabling them Thus our brethren reason against read or prescribed prayer and doth not the same hold as truly against the use of a prescribed psalme To sing psalmes is an ordinance of the new Testament and the minister of God is enabled to sing as well as to pray by his own gifts otherwise he is not enabled for the whole work of his ministery and if he reade or sing a psalme whose gifts doth he exercise therein This necessitie being presupposed I would know whether that particular form of singing devised by man and prescribed by others be an humane invention or no If it be the devise of man then it is forbidden in the second commandment as they say If it be not of man then it must be of God by speciall institution and immediate inspiration then the self-same form of words issuing from the same cause or authour should be humane if delivered in form of prayer and Divine in form of a psalme Whereas this necessitie is onely an adjunct to the thing and doth not so change the nature of it as to make that which is of man by common gifts to be from God by speciall institution as it must in this case according to their tenent I would know further whether this devised or prescribed form of singing be an acceptable worship and service of God or no If it be then some worship devised by men is acceptable to God in case of necessitie which cannot be admitted If it be not worship then a devised form of prayer cannot be condemned as a devised worship And therefore if there be any such necessity as is pretended it should rather exempt from the practice of singing then give liberty to a devised form which God hath not warranted nor approved For it is a rule in Divinity That against a generall negative precept no particular affirmative can be lawfull unlesse that particular be warranted in scripture For the scripture should not be perfect to furnish the man of God completely to every good work if a particular affirmative not warranted in speciall might be lawfull against a generall negative seeing in that case a man can have no sure ground to rest on But against this supposed generall negative precept forbidding all humane inventions in Gods worship all devised helps and furtherances all strange worship there is no particular warrant allowing it in singing psalmes When all devised worship is condeÌ„ned how shall the conscience be assured that this particular devised worship shall be accepted No necessity excuseth in the doing of a thing otherwise unlawful but that which exempteth from the coÌ„mandment in that case Now whether that pretended necessity of a set form should exempt from the generall negative precept forbidding all devised forms as will-worship as they expound it or froÌ„ the affirmative precept of singing of psalmes let them judge who put the exception Necessitie which hath no law in some particular case presupposeth some free time wherein that pressing necessitie hath no place then what necessity hath found out for remedy that must cease the necessity ceasing But that any necessity which lieth continually upon all churches as doth the singing in a prescript form if they sing at all should warrant them to do that which is coÌ„trary to a general negative precept is a tradition in Divinity never heard of before The reason therefore standeth still in force If it be lawfull to praise God in a form of words devised by man it is lawfull also to pray to God in a stinted form and an arbitrary form is altogether as lawfull as a devised form And if Christians shall not withdraw themselves from the stinted prayers of the congregation before a materiall difference be shewed in these particulars and that destinction of Arbitrary and Necessary devised forms be proved by scripture or solid reason the world shall end I am confident before they separate And thus some other objections made against a stinted Liturgie are answered It is Gods ordinance that the churches should be edified by their gifts who minister unto them and that in prayer as well as in preaching and Christ â—itteth all his servants with gifts for the whole work of the ministery But in reading a stinted Liturgie a minister doth not edifie the church with his own gifts This reason concludeth not against a publick stinted Liturgie as a breach of the second commandment or a devised worship nor as unlawfull in it self but by accident onely as it hindreth the edification of the church by the ministers own gifts But I desire to know whether it be not lawfull for the minister at all in the publick execution of his office or any part thereof to make use of other mens gifts or that he must not make use of other mens onely and not of his own at all If the former it is not proved by any text of scripture If the later it maketh nothing against the use of stinted prayer In every part of his publick function preaching prayer blessing singing administration of the sacraments reading of the scriptures a minister may and ought to make use of the gifts of others In exposition of scripture he may make use of the divers readings marginall notes interlineary glosses marginall references he may make use of the gifts of linguists translatours paraphrasts and commentatours to explain hard phrases find out the coherence and meaning of the text c. In matters of controversie of the labours and gifts of them that have travelled most painfully therein In application of doctrine he may make use of such as have handled that matter more soundly fully pithily then he is able and in the act of preaching of all these joyntly or severally as he doth utter what he hath gathered out of his notes or memory Calvine a man of great learning admirable dexteritie of wit singular skill in the Hebrew tongue was yet pleased in his commentaries upon the psalmes to make great use of Vatablus annotations Mercer in his exquisite Commentary upon Job was not a little holpen by the sermons of Calvine upon the same book Mollerus is pleased for the most part to gather his observations upon the psalmes word for word professedly out of Calvine How many sermons and tractates be extant
ordinary reading of the Law in the assemblies upon the Sabbath is not commanded by Moses either to the priests or Levites no mention is found of any such practice for a long time together We find not for a long time that the Jews had any synagogues for the ordinary assembling of the people and the Law could not be read in their synagogues untill they were built Will our brethren hence conclude either that the scriptures were not read in the assemblies or that it was a devise of man to reade them in their synagogues It is not good to lay grounds for such conclusions If M r Ainsworths testimony be of any value then mark what he testifieth from the famous Jew Maimonie in Misneh treatise of prayer That the church of the Jews had no stinted Liturgie Annot. on Deut. 6. 13. Our wise men have said saith Maim What service is this with the heart It is prayer And there is no number of prayers by the Law neither is there any set form of this by the Law c. If M r Ainsworth be not crosse to himself he cannot deny the use of a stinted form amongst the Jews in the celebration of the passeover of a stinted form free and voluntary not necessary as prescribed of God And that which is here cited out of Maimonie is no way repugnant thereunto For he speaketh not of the passeover or any observations in the celebration thereof but of prayer and that private by one alone and not publick in the assembly or congregation Now the Jews might well use a stinted form in the celebration of the passeover when yet by the law there was no number set nor form prescribed for private prayer These two may well agree After long search no copy can be found of any stinted Liturgie in use among the Jews till they ceased to be the church of God which is a poore and weak proof of the lawfulnesse of a stinted Liturgie amongst Christians It followeth not that they never had or used a set form because it is not to be found at this day For many monuments of antiquity are perished Again though forms which now are extant were not entire as now they be untill they ceased to be a church yet many things conteined in them might be in use before So it is in the counterfeit Liturgies which goe under the name of James Mark Basil and Chrysostom they contein many things which shew the whole composure to be late in comparison whereas divers things in them mentioned were of more ancient use in the church of God And if this do not please though there never was any stinted Liturgie or form of prayer to be used in all their synagogues and assemblies yet that is no reason to question the truth of that which the learned have observed touching the stinted form used in the celebration of the passeover and the probabilities at least they bring to shew that our Saviour Christ approved the same which is all that is affirmed in the argument and maketh more for the lawfulnesse of a stinted form of Liturgie then any thing that hath been objected against it As for the reformed churches we are not to consider what they do but what they ought to do It is most true but we must consider wisely and not censure unadvisedly The churches of God are companies of men called out of this world in part onely inlightned subject to errour they have erred they may erre their sole testimony cannot be the ground of divine faith and assurance Neverthelesse the constant judgement of the churches of God for many ages in a matter of this nature in the times of reformation when clouds and darknesse are expelled when the sunne is risen and great light given to the scriptures by the benefit of languages translations and commentaries I say the judgement of the churches at these times and in a matter of this nature is not lightly to be regarded A man should try and examine his grounds and reasons and mistrust himself rather then so many wise learned and godly sweetly consenting in a matter of this nature unlesse his evidence be very good He had need be well advised before he charge them to maintein a worship not allowed an idole-prayer for the spirituall worship of God a strange form of prayer which was never approved whereat a Christian may not safely be present against which he is bound to witnesse Be it that the churches do erre herein yet I hope they be not obstinate and such as will not give consent to the truth when it is shewed and manifested How cometh it then to passe that none of them hitherto have subscribed to their opinion and practice Either their arguments are not sufficient to convince and then their Separation is unjust or they generally want eyes to see the light for they will not say they want conscience to acknowledge what they cannot but see and then in meeknesse they are to be born withall if upon well tried grounds a man be assured that they all and not he himself is in the errour The testimony of the church then is not infallible because it may erre and hath erred and some members of it at this day do erre in the particular differences that be amongst them but yet the constant testimony of the whole church in the times of light and reformation is of great weight otherwise the Apostles would never alledge the practice and consent of churches to confirm the faithfull and stop the mouthes of the contentious We must look to the primitive churches planted by the apostles who are patterns to them and us But the apostolick churches for many yeares had no such Liturgie devised or imposed And therefore it is no ordinance of Christ because the churches may perfectly and entirely worship God without it with all the parts of holy and spirituall worship We freely confesse it to be no ordinance of Christ by speciall institution nor part of his worship It sufficeth that it is allowable in the worship and consonant to the generall rules given in scripture but not of absolute necessitie Whether any stinted forms of prayer were in use in the apostolick churches is more then can be affirmed certainly or denyed That the apostles prescribed none as necessary that is easily beleeved because no mention of it That none was in use our Divines will neither peremptorily affirm nor deny But if that be granted it is no prejudice to a stinted Liturgy nor to the churches apostolick who are to be our patterns For it is more then probable that many assemblies had not the scriptures read in a known tongue at their first planting it is more then can be shewed by precedent or example that they were read in any Christian congregation Some churches converted by the preaching of the Gospel had neither books nor letters It may be others received the book of
first receive a stinted form of prayer and the councels themselves take order touching the reading of the scripture and the singing of psalmes and other things which pertein to a stinted Liturgie So that those Fathers churches had not learned that the same reasons which silence the Apocrypha in the congregation will silence all stinted forms of Liturgie as well and as much As it were a ridiculous thing for a child when he would ask of his father bread c. to reade it to him out of a paper so it is for the children of God especially for the ministers of the Gospel in their publick ministrations to reade unto God their requests for their own and the churches wants out of a service-book wherein they are stinted to words and syllables It is a common saying Similitudes agree not in all things and a rule as generall That to argue from a bare similitude is the loosest kind of reasoning which may be applyed to cover or countenance any errour or abuse whatsoever Therefore this objection might well have been passed over as it is omitted by the most that have written of this subject that I have seen but that colours and shadows do often take more with some then that which is substantiall If a man would set himself to plead for superstitious abuses and idolatrous practices errours and unwritten traditions is it not an easie matter by some similitude to cast a fair glosse upon them And it is a strange thing that such as with so much earnestnesse set themselves against all humane inventions and devises in Gods worship should by their form of reasoning open the floud-gates wide for all superstitious idolatrous antichristian devises and impieties as this reason doth I need not instance every man that knoweth what is principally alledged in defense of any popish vain unprofitable superstitious or idolatrous practice or custome or will take pains to look must needs see this to be so But to look upon the objection it self If a child being to ask many particulars of his father for himself and others should write them in a paper for the help of memory or some other reason and having committed them to memory as they are registred in his paper should in that form of words digested and written down present his requests before his father without addition or alteration what morall evil or incivility should be committed in this case why should this be esteemed a thing ridiculous And if similitudes do please so well may we not say with more reason and upon better ground That as a learned oratour being to make an oration in an honourable presence about divers matters of weight and importance will not onely study and digest but penne his speech and deliver it word for word as it is contrived and penned so the minister of the Lord of hosts in his publick ministration is not onely to consider what requests he is to make to God in his own and the peoples behalf but to digest them into fit method and to penne or write them down and to utter them in the congregation as he hath contrived them Let the indifferent judge whether of these two be the most reasonable Book-prayer is generally laid aside in the families of best Christians And in all reformed churches generally the use of a book by every able and godly minister is left off and at home it is accounted and complained of as a burden by the better sort of them that use it Many things are disused and that by the best Christians which are not unlawfull Where there be many wayes to the wood ordinarily men may make choice of one or two not disallowing the other It is lawfull for Christians when they pray in their families dayly to reade the ten commandments the profession of faith c. which is generally laid aside without sinne Many things also may be decent in the congregation which are not so expedient and requisite in the family And in one congregation a thing may be lawfull and of use which is disused in another without sin where yet it would not be unprofitable The deacons in Chrysostomes and Basils time used to call upon the people with these words Oremus Attendamus Let us pray Let us give eare The deacon at the holy mysteries stood up and thus spake unto the people Oremus pariter omnes The manner was that before every lesson or chapter the minister should say unto the people Let us attend If this custome be disused either in the congregation or Christian families at this day it doth not argue the thing it self to be indecent or unprofitable And if by Book-prayers all stinted forms whether read or repeated by help of memory be understood they are not so generally rejected in the families of the best Christians nor in the ministery of the most able and godly ministers as the objection importeth Let us heare the testimony of a godly learned and well experienced minister now at rest with the Lord When as saith he the question is made by many of the lawfulnesse or at least of the expediency of praying by the help of a book or of using a prescript and set form of prayer it is to be considered that there be divers degrees and measures of gifts both naturall as wit memory utterance as also of grace as knowledge faith zeal given to divers men besides that some have been more trained and exercised in this holy duty then others Now they that are better gifted either by nature or else by grace and custome may use the more liberty Which difference I have observed not onely in divers private Christians but also in some most reverend faithfull and worthy ministers some using both in their publick ministery and in their private families a stinted prayer and set form of words with little alteration at all except some extraordinary occasion have happend and yet both sorts so furnished with pietie and learning as I could hardly preferre one before the other And a little after For the publick congregation for the most part it is expedient to keep a constant form both of matter and also of words and yet without servile tying of our selves to words and syllables If the judgement of reformed churches abroad or of the godly faithfull learned and reverend at home be of any weight they are so farre from complaining of a stinted form as burdensome that in many cases they judge it expedient A set form of prayer and administration of the sacraments not onely devised by the minister himself but agreed upon by the churches is approved by generall consent Is there any reformed church established which hath not their book of common prayer The ministers at home to whom the use of common prayer hath been thought most burdensome have from time to time professed their liking and approbation of a stinted Liturgy That they like well enough of
that councel that forbad vulgar psalmes in the service of God and those forms of service which are not antea probata in concilio vcl cum prudentioribus collata lest haply some things against faith either through ignorance or want of consideration should be composed That they never sought a razing of the communion-book but a filing of it after the pattern of that care which former examples set them wherein they thought some things reteined which might well have been spared They have evermore condemned voluntary Separation from the congregations and assemblies or negligent frequenting of those publick prayers They have ordinarily and constantly used the communion-book in their publick administrations and still mainteined unitie peace and love with them who in some particulars have been of another judgement All this is so notoriously known that it is wast labour to produce testimonies herein As for the reading of a stinted form it may be it is not constant in all reformed churches exacted of every minister at all times but that it is not used at all is more then I can credit and if they exact not the use of the same form continually the thing it self they greatly approve If any man desire an instance of their doings let him compare the prayer which Beza constantly used before and after sermon with the Geneva-book of common prayer And if they impose not their forms upon all congregations to be used of necessitie but leave it free to use them or some other in substance one and the same yet this is certain they disallow their opinion who condemn all stinted forms and Liturgies as vain superfluous humane inventions a strange worship and breach of the second commandment CHAP. VIII The people may lawfully be present at those prayers which are put up unto God in a stinted form of words and partake in divine ordinances administred in a stinted Liturgie THe authour of the Letter formerly cited telleth us That against our prayer-book divers men have pleaded after a different manner First some arguments saith he are proper to the Separatists quà tales viz. 1. That it is offered up in a false church 2. With a false ministery 3. In the behalf of the subjects of the kingdome of Antichrist These are properly theirs being the grounds whereupon they make a totall Separation from all the churches in this land as no churches of Christ These I approve not yet note them that you may see upon how different grounds the same position is mainteined by severall persons and that you may be delivered from the prejudice which hindreth many from receiving those truthes because they fear the reproch of Brownisme Secondly there are other grounds which are common to all that plead for the puritie of Christs ordinance and which do not necessarily inferre such Separation but onely serve to shew the unlawfulnesse of that practice and of communicating therein Thus farre the Letter Wherein to let passe other things we may take notice of a twofold Separation from the worship of God amongst us acknowledged the one totall as from a false church false ministery and subjects of the kingdome of Antichrist the other partiall from the stinted Liturgie and ordinances of worship dispensed in a stinted form And this latter onely is approved by this authour but not the former of which we make no question But whereas he saith his grounds upon which he buildeth his last Separation are common to all that plead for the puritie of Christs ordinances therein he is much mistaken For his grounds are one and the very same with the Brownists whereby they condemn all stinted Liturgies acknowledged by no reformed church in the world nor by particular pastours in any church but themselves And if they take not themselves to be the onely pleaders for the purity of Christs ordinances they cannot shew that these reasons have been approved or positions allowed by any pleaders for reformation in any time or age of the church The reasons brought to confirm the unlawfulnesse of communicating in the ordinances of worship amongst us administred in a stinted Liturgie are of two sorts Some condemne all stinted forms and Liturgies devised by men others concern our book of common prayer more particularly as it is charged with sundry faults and corruptions The first as they concern the ministers who make use of a stinted Liturgy have been examined already Now I come to examine them both as they concern the people and therefore lay down this proposition That in case it should be unlawfull in some respects for the minister of the Gospel or governour of the family to reade or pronounce without book a prescript form of prayer devised by another yet no reason can be shewed why it should be unwarrantable for the people child servant wife to be present at such prayers in the congregation or family I speak not of prayer for the matter erroneous and naught but stinted and read For if the matter be faultie the prayer is not good because conceived and if good and pure it is not made evil and hurtfull to the hearers because it is read First what letteth why the hearers heart may not follow a prescript form of words holy and good either in confession of sinnes request or thanksgiving What letteth I say that the hearers hearts may not profitably go with the same both to humble quicken and comfort The people child servant are commanded to examine and prepare themselves before they draw nigh into the presence of the Lord But where are they commanded to look whether the minister or governour do pray by the Spirit immediately or out of his memory in a set form of words conceived beforehand or suggested without premeditation in the same form of words ordinarily with little or no variation unlesse it be upon speciall occasion or in different order method and phrase euery day whether he reade his prayer or pronounce it onely And if God have laid no charge upon their conscience to inquire into these and such like particulars before they joyn in prayer voluntarily to withdraw our selves from the ordinances of worship in these respects what is it but to adde unto his word When things agreeable to the will of God are begged of God every day in the same form of words as the things begged are the same it is not either the stinted form of words or the presenting of requests by reading them upon a book that can make the prayer unprofitable much lesse abomination in respect of him that joyneth If the minister in that case pray coldly or without affection his sinne cannot hinder the blessing of God from the people If the governour be weak in naturall gifts as memory or utterance or spirituall as knowledge c the lawfull use of a stinted form in that case is not denyed by some as a needfull help to supply defect And if the governour to help his weaknesse make use of a stinted form whether
may the servant child or wife who conceit they need no such furtherance joyn with him in prayer or no If not I desire to know by what authoritie they may withdraw themselves If they may joyn then the heart prepared may follow a prescript form of words devised by others To reade our prayers out of a book is to draw nigh unto God with the lips when the heart is removed farre from him because it is not to draw and poure forth our prayers out of the heart by the holy Ghost A man may both reade his prayers out of a book and poure them forth out of his heart as hath been formerly proved and is confessed by them that allow a prescript form in case of need For they will not say It is lawfull to draw nigh unto God with the lips when the heart must needs be removed from him But if this be granted for the present which is most false I demand whether it be a drawing nigh with the lips onely in respect of him alone that readeth the stinted form or of all present Not of all present For how can it be said that their hearts are removed from God who in sincerity and truth of heart desire the obteining of what is prayed for agreeable to the will of God Hypocrisie hath lost its ancient nature if it be hypocrisie to draw nigh to the throne of grace in the name of Christ with understanding confidence and uprightnesse If it be a lip-labour in respect of him that readeth it onely it can be no sufficient ground of Separation in others For in conceived prayer the minister or governour may pray with the lips and voice when the heart is absent and they that joyn may pray in truth when the prayer is uttered or pronounced in a prescribed form An hypocrite cannot call upon God in uprightnesse at any time and yet they will not say it is unlawfull to joyn in prayer with such a man Put case a particular man did know his minister to be an hypocrite by more certain evidence then possibly he can know read prayer to be lip-labour yet he is bound in conscience not to separate from the publick prayers or ordinances of grace administred by such a man For Christ hath commanded us to come unto him hath promised to be present with them that assemble together in his name to heare them that in truth call upon his name and though an hypocrite shall not be heard for himself he may be heard for others A minister he is not for his own goods but his administration is effectuall to the heirs of salvation Formally as some speak he hath not pardon of sinne for the comfort of his own soul but ministerially instrumentally he hath it for the benefit of others that is hee possesseth not the promise of pardon for his own comfort but he bringeth it for the good of others A Christian may not absent himself from the publick prayers of the congregation and ordinances of grace unlesse Christ hath given him leave or commandment so to do but when he may call upon God purely and sincerely he hath not given a Christian leave to separate or withdraw himself because he conceiteth the minister to be an hypocrite But of this more hereafter Let us then imagine if fansie can be so strong that the use of a stinted prayer is but lip-labour in the minister or governour what else can follow but that the service is lawfull the lip-labour being corrected which is done not by Separation but by conjoyning the service and affection of the heart and inward man with the exercise of the outward Reading is not prayer For in prayer we poure out desires and supplications from the heart in reading we let into the heart the things that are read A blind man may pray but he cannot reade He that readeth speaketh not to God but to the people To reade is not to pray but in reading a man may pray agreeable to the ordinance with right affection of soul As to pronounce is not to pray because a dumbe man may pray who cannot speak but when a man uttereth his prayer for the edification of others he himself may and doth speak unto God But if this be presupposed that a man cannot both reade a prayer and pray himself what hindreth that others cannot lift up their hearts unto God and joyn in requests according to the prescript form of words Is not the matter fit because it is prescribed cannot the heart desire or lift up it self because the requests are read doth the very act of reading pollute the whole action If all things essentially required in prayer may be observed of them that joyn in prayer with such as reade them then the simple act of reading is not sufficient cause why Christians should withdraw themselves But all things essentiall to prayer may be observed of them that joyn in prayer with such as reade the matter may be fit sound and holy the affections goods and so the work acceptable unto the Lord. The monuments of antiquity shew that the Jews used a stinted form of Liturgie and prayer in their synagogues and at the celebration of the passeover before the dayes of our Saviour Christ But our Saviour Christ never taught the people to absent themselves from the prayers of the synagogues or from the passeover rather he commanded them to frequent the assemblies and observe the passeover wherein he himself did give example ordinarily resorting to the synagogues upon the sabbaths and observing the passeover at the time appointed It is not certain that the Jews had or used a stinted form of Liturgie or prayer in their synagogues or the celebration of the passeover It is not certain by certainty of Divine faith for it is not testified in the holy scripture but by humane testimony it is so probable that even such as deny all lawfull use of a stinted form do give their assent hereunto as hath been shewed before The Jews did not prescribe and set apart their prayers for publick use as our Liturgie is neither were they tied to them as we are but left to use or not use them as they saw most fit for edification Bring this answer to the light and it yieldeth the cause as fully as can be desired For if the Jews had or used a stinted Liturgie in their synagogues and celebration of the passeover devised by others when the faithfull did lawfully resort to the synagogues and observe the passeover administred according to that form then the faithfull may and ought to joyn in prayer or participation of Divine ordinances though administred in a stinted Liturgie devised by others It is to no purpose to alledge that that form was not set apart for publick use nor they necessarily tied unto it when the simple use of such a stinted form devised by others is condemned as unlawfull in respect of minister and
his good pleasure If their ministery was true in some respects and false in others then the ministery is not absolutely false which in some respect is not pure as it ought and is to be desired then also it is no sin to communicate in a false ministery in some respect so farre to wit as it hath truth in it and doth carry the stamp of God The priests scribes and Pharisees were of the tribe of Levi which was set apart for the ministery yet might they be strangers thieves robbers murderers which the sheep of Christ will not heare that is follow or be led by them For the ministers whom our Saviour chargeth as thieves and murderers were of continuall succession of Levi and Aaron especially and it is to be understood of them who teach false doctrine and not of them who enter without a lawfull outward calling And to enter by Christ the doore teaching him alone to be the onely Saviour and Mediatour is the note of a good shepherd To heare them is not simply to communicate with them in the ordinances of God which the godly and faithfull among the Jews might not refuse to do with the Scribes and Pharisees who were thieves and robbers but to receive their doctrine and embrace their errours which was evermore unlawfull The thieves and murderers in the church of the Jews sprung up with them and continued amongst them and neither departed themselves nor were cast out by others that had authority In the Christian church divers false teachers ravening wolves Antichrists rose up not from among the Heathen or Jews but in and from themselves whereof some went out from the church and separated themselves others were cast out by excommunication and delivered up unto Satan that they might learn not to blaspheme others were tolerated in the church either because their heresies were not so pernicious at the first or the better side had not power to cast them out or they preached fundamentall truths but of evil minds These in respect of outward order were lawfully chosen or called and yet false prophets discovered by their doctrine not by their calling and some of them continuing in the church the faithfull are warned to beware of their errours that they be not infected by them but not forbidden to partake at the ordinances of worship because they are present And if we look into the Scriptures of the old and new Testament we shall never find the prophets called true or false in respect of their outward calling but in respect of their doctrine A man may have a lawfull outward calling to the ministery and yet be a false prophet because he preacheth the lying visions of his own heart But we shall never find him called a false prophet who teacheth the truth as he hath received it of God because in some particular his calling might be excepted against And seeing he that speaketh the truth to edification exhortation rebuke and comfort of Gods people according to the command of God is a true prophet he that speaketh the dreams of his own heart is a false prophet It were good if they in whose mouthes the chalenge of false prophets is rifest would better weigh how they themselves expound and apply the scriptures in their writings or prophesyings lest notwithstanding any outward church-state or calling as they pretend they be deeper wounded by the rebound of their accusations this way then their adversaries For whosoever will be pleased to trie and examine the matter unpartially shall find their quotations of scripture to be many impertinent forced wrested miserably abused without all fear or reverence Let no man therefore be dismayed at their great confidence big words multitude of scripture-proofs or pretended grounds from others whose principles they put in practice for if they be particularly examined they will either disclaim the cause or put weapons into thy hands truly to fight against and put them to flight But for the present I forbear to enter into particulars because I desire the satisfaction of the more moderate sort who though they scruple communion in some particulars above handled do yet dislike that totall Separation which others make and that bitternesse of spirit wherewith they prosecute their cause The Lord in tender mercy look down upon his church make up the breaches which sinne hath made remove the stumbling-blocks and occasions of offense recall such as are gone astray cause his truth to shine more and more in our hearts and teach them that fear his name to walk in love and by an holy unblamable conversation in all things to approve the soundnesse of their faith and sincerity of their religion before all men for the comfort of their souls the edification of others and the glory of his great name through Jesus Christ our Lord. FINIS The generall heads conteined in this Book CHAP. I. OF a stinted form of prayer pag. 1. CHAP. II. All things essentiall to prayer may be observed in a prescript form pag. 12. CHAP. III. A stinted Liturgie or publick form of prayer is no breach of the second commandment pag. 23. CHAP. IIII. It is as lawfull to pray unto God in a form of words devised by others as to sing psalmes to the praise of God in a stinted form of words prescribed by others pag. 54. CHAP. V. A stinted form of prayer doth not quench the Spirit pag. 83. CHAP. VI. In scripture there be prescript forms of blessing prayers salutations c. which may lawfully be used pag. 97. CHAP. VII The churches of God have both used and approved a stinted Liturgie pag. 106. CHAP. VIII The people may lawfully be present at those prayers which are put up unto God in a stinted form of words and partake in Divine ordinances administred in a stinted Liturgie pag. 122. CHAP. IX It is lawfull for a Christian to be present at that service which is read out of a book in some things faultie both for form and matter pag. 157. CHAP. X. It is lawfull to communicate in a mixt congregation where ignorant and prophane persons be admitted to the sacrament pag. 187. CHAP. XI Of holding communion with that assembly in the worship of God where we cannot perform all duties mentioned Matth. 18. 15 16 17. pag. 216. CHAP. XII The community of the faithfull much lesse two or three separated from the world and gathered together into the name of Christ by a covenant are not the proper and immediate subject of power ecclesiasticall pag. 231. CHAP. XIII An examination of sundry positions laid down by M r Jacob in his Exposition of the second commandment tending to Separation pag. 282. FINIS Octob. 9. 1639. Imprimatur Cantabrigiae Ra. Brownrigg Procan Psal 50. 15. 1. Tim. 2. 5. John 10. 23. Ephes 2. 18. Rom. 8. 26. 1 Cor. 14. 16 28. Orig. contra Celsum lib. 8. Ambr. in 1 Cor. 14. Hieron ad Heliodor Epitaph Nepotian August De Magist lib. 1 Idem De
A FRIENDLY TRIALL OF THE GROUNDS TENDING TO SEPARATION In a plain and modest Dispute touching the Lawfulnesse of a stinted Liturgie and set form of Prayer Communion in mixed assemblies and the Primitive subject and first receptacle of the power of the Keyes Tending to satisfie the doubtfull recall the wandring and to strengthen the weak By JOHN BALL ISAIAH 8. 20. To the law and to the testimonie if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them PSAL. 119. 105. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path ¶ Printed by Roger Daniel printer to the Universitie of Cambridge For Edward Brewster and are to be sold at his shop at the Bible on Fleet-bridge 1640. To the Christian Reader sound judgement the spirit of wisdome uprightnesse of heart and sweet communion with GOD. Christian READER IT is commonly professed though not so well known and observed as it ought that Satan is alwayes busie to solicite and our own deceitfull hearts ready to turn aside from the wayes of peace and comfort either to the right hand or to the left To say nothing of the lamentable state of heathen Infidels Turks and Jews who know not God nor believe the Gospel of JESUS CHRIST Amongst them that professe Christianity some are so deeply plunged into superstition that the truth of God and the ordinances of grace are not prized in comparison of their own vain and fruitlesse traditions And others on the contrary do so farre distast all inventions whatsoever as they speak in Gods worship as they reject that which beareth the stamp and image of God and might be greatly profitable to their souls Many come profanely to the Lords table and pollute the holy things of God to their own destruction Others through groundlesse fears of defilement do withdraw themselves from ordinances Divine and the society of the godly because some unworthy are not debarred To satisfie this latter sort who offend out of weaknesse misguided judgement not of stubbornesse and contempt and to settle them that are staggering I have penned this poore rude treatise nothing doubting but the truth will be able to maintein it self and that the beauty thereof will procure favour and acceptance though it come arayed in a very homely garment A stinted form of prayer hath been challenged as an image forbidden in the second commandment a forged and devised worship unlawfull both in them that use it and those that joyn therein To remove this scruple I have shewed the use of a stinted Liturgie lawfull and allowable by the word of God of ancient use in the churches of Christ approved by all reformed churches at this day Upon which occasion many things are disputed touching the meaning of the second commandment the nature of true and false worship and what it is to pray by the Spirit Many are the objections which are made against set forms of prayer and particularly against our book of common prayer all which I have endeavoured to answer severally and not because they are of so great weight but because I desired fully to satisfie every doubt and roll away every stone I met withall If one and the same thing be oft repeated I desire it may be considered that one and the same objection for substance is often brought forth though perhaps in new aray and every plain-hearted Reader for whose use I principally intend this labour is not able to apply an answer once given to sundry objections in colour diverse though for substance the same And I suppose the prudent will think it more reasonable that the wise in heart be burdened with over-much then that the weak should remain unsatisfied through some defect Some stagger at this that ignorant profane notorious offenders are admitted to the Lords table and conceive that communicating with such in the ordinances of religion they are partakers of their sinne And sure it is a thing to be lamented with tears of bloud that the body and bloud of our Saviour CHRIST should be profaned the house and church of God defiled the name of the Lord dishonoured religion blasphemed and the blind notorious profane permitted to rush upon their own perdition But it is not for private persons to take that upon them which belongeth not unto their place nor being invited by CHRIST to excommunicate themselves because such as are notoriously wicked be not admonished kept back or censured The main ground of the former doubt and all others tending to Separation seemeth to be this That the power of the keyes is primitively given to the community of the faithfull as the first receptacle For then they conceive that it perteineth to them to censure offenders or else to separate from them Then likewise it will more probably be concluded as they think That that society which hath not the power of CHRISTS keyes is not the true church of CHRIST Therefore to raze the foundation of Separation and at once to overthrow their main objections this question is more largely disputed wherein is shewed by evidence of Scripture That the power of the keyes is given by Jesus Christ the Lord and King of his church and great Shepherd of his sheep to the church-governours whom he hath appointed to rule and feed his flock in his name and to whom they must give account If any man shall think these things are small and not to be insisted upon he may please to consider How small soever the things in themselves seem to be the evil consequences that follow thereupon be both many and great It is no small matter to bury that under the condemnation of false worship which the Lord the authour of all truth the determiner of his true pleasing and acceptable worship doth allow in his service It is no small offense to forsake the prayers of the congregation to depart from the table of the Lord when he calleth to feast with himself and to break off society and communion with the churches of Christ where he doth cause his flock to rest at noon to fill the hearts of weak Christians with doubts and distractions as not knowing what to do or which way to take to spend time in reasonings and disputations of this kind which might much more profitably be employed in the practice of repentance and holy obedience to expose religion to contempt and the truth of God to reproch amongst them that delight to speak evil These are sad effects of this Separation which is here opposed Is it not lamentable to see poore Christians who sincerely thirst after the waters of life and long to meet the Lord in his holy ordinances cast into doubts and fears about the things which so nearly concern their comfortable walking with God and salvation of their souls May not this tend to the discouragement of divers that are coming on and turn them who are halting clean out of the way The rents and divisions which have been in the
church have evermore been one advantage which the enemies of the truth have taken to speak reprochfully And if the credit of religion the glory of God and the souls of our brethren be dear unto us what can we do lesse then by a just and mild defense of the truth seek the reclaiming of such as are gone astray the establishing of them that be weak in judgement but zealously affected to the wayes of God stop the stream of seducing free the godly from unjust imputations and settle peace and unitie in the truth amongst brethren I heartily wish we had not so much experience to lesson us that when men have once begun to neglect the publick exercises of religion and to separate from the churches of Christ they have run from one errour into another after the fond imaginations of their own seduced hearts untill they have dashed themselves upon the rocks They that break off communion in the particulars mentioned have not proceeded to a totall Separation from our congregations and assemblies as no churches of Jesus Christ This rigid Separation they condemn as that which was never approved or blessed of God But they have gone further then the word of truth doth warrant them or they have the Lord Jesus for their guide whereas it is the duty and safety of Christians to follow after but not to go before their Lord and Captain The first entrance into an erroneous way is dangerous for in the track thereof there is no stop unlesse God of his infinite mercy do prevent Errours are lapped up together in a bundle and many times the least onely appear which yet serve to bring on and usher in the greater At once men fall not into strange and monstrous opinions no more then into outragious evils but by degrees they insensibly are drawn from bad to worse untill they come to a great height At the first sight many a mans conscience would have been affrighted with that errour which after some tampering he highly admireth and is bewitched withall How many of great hopes and excellent parts have been overthrown hereby is too evident by lamentable observation in all ages Rents and divisions are the disease Separation the wound of the church unto which of long time she hath been obnoxious but it is the sinne of them who either lay stumbling-blocks of offense before their brethren or separate rashly or unjustly being carried away rather with prejudice then strength of argument and commanded more by the examples of others then by the authority of the rule of righteousnesse There is but one body the Church and but one Lord or head of the body Christ And whosoever separateth from the body the Church separateth from Christ in that respect And if we withdraw our selves from Christ where he graciously inviteth us to feast with him may we not justly fear that he will withdraw himself from us and make us seek when we shall not find him Voluntary Separation from the Lords table and prayers of the congregation what is it but a willing excommunication of our selves from the visible tokens of the Lords presence and love And if it be a grievous sinne in church-governours to deprive any member of the church of all communion with the visible church upon light and unnecessary occasions is it not a greater sinne in the members to deprive themselves of the same communion upon the like or lesse occasions Zeal and tendernesse of conscience must be nourished by all good means but they are not to move alone without their guide that is the word of God Perhaps this kind of writing may occasion more disputes If so it is contrary to my hearts desire who intend onely the satisfaction of them that stagger the reclaiming of them that are gone too farre and the maintenance of peace truth and communion in the worship of God as it furthereth communion with Jesus Christ If I may obtein this end I have that which I beg of the Lord. Willingly I would not offend any that fear God but endeavour onely to remove the blocks at which I see some stumble and to further the more comfortable walking of others who desire to please God in all things but are kept under in the means of comfort with vain scruples And happy were it if doubtfull disputations laid aside we might joyn together with one heart and soul to advance religion worship the Lord purely edifie one another in our most holy faith and walk unblameably in the fear of God and comfort of the holy Ghost I take no pleasure in controversies of this kind and could heartily wish that these matters rightly composed we might give heed to that one thing which is necessary But if it seem good to any man to reply I earnestly beg that he would take the word of God truly understood for his warrant make proof of what he saith keep himself to the points in hand without impertinent digressions and proceed on in love and meeknesse as becometh them that professe the truth and desire to preserve the peace of a good conscience A good cause is no way advantaged by heat and passion We must so write and speak in controversies of religion as that we remember we must give account to God of that which we say And if passionate and distempered speeches in common talk be no light offense in matters of religion which are soberly to be debated as in the presence of God to give way to humane rashnesse and distemper is much more disgracefull God will not hold him guiltlesse that telleth a lie for the glory of his name To bear false witnesse in civill contentions betwixt man and man is odious and abominable Therefore it behooveth us to fear and stand in aw lest being transported with misguided zeal we call evil good and good evil and misapply the scriptures when we speak of our selves Let us weigh all things and hold that which is good The Lord in mercy look down from heaven upon his poore church and people bring his truth to light more and more dispell the mists of ignorance remove all occasions of offense settle peace and truth prosper the means of grace build us forward in faith and holinesse and unite the hearts of his people in love that they may direct their course by one rule if they cannot be all of one mind in every thing and as one man may walk together in heaven-way untill they receive the end of their faith the salvation of their souls CHAP. I. Of a stinted form of Prayer PRayer is the sweet and familiar conference of a faithfull soul with the Lord his mercifull Father Or A calling upon God in the name of Christ with the heart and sometimes with the voice according to his will for our selves and others In it to let passe other matters not pertinent to this purpose foure things come to be considered the Subject recipient Authour Matter and Manner thereof The honour of invocation is due to God onely in
that dislike a stinted form of prayer will not allow of the conclusion which M r Smith would inferre As for the reason it self whatsoever can be truly spoken of the excellency profit and use of conceived prayer we freely and willingly admit but betwixt it and stinted prayer there is no such disagreement that if the one be praised the other must needs be cast out of doores if the one be allowed the other must needs be a breach of the second commandment Nature teacheth that from the abundance of the heart the mouth should speak and in the use of a stinted form repeated by memory or read upon a book the mouth speaketh from the abundance of the heart else in the stinted use of psalms prayers or prayses the saints of God recorded in scripture spake not from the heart If no example of any holy man since Christ be recorded in scripture who hath tendered his prayers to God in a stinted form of words or read them out of a book is this any thing against that practice Is not the approved practice of the church of the Jews grounded upon reasons common to them and us and of perpetuall equity sufficient to justifie an act or order though no example can be brought for it out of the new testament I have not heard nor read of such an exception in a matter of this nature in any writer old or new Popish or Protestant and consider I pray what dangerous consequences would follow thereupon I will not presse them because upon second thoughts I make no question it will appear farre amisse If in that particular of stinted prayer we find not example will it not suffice if from grounds of scripture we can prove it lawfull and that all things required in prayer may be observed in a stinted form If in that particular there be none examples will it not suffice that analogicall examples of things of the same nature and kind may be produced And then it will not be hard to find examples since Christ for the use of stinted prayer as we shall shew hereafter But what if none example could be produced of that or the like practice The scripture doth not descend to give particular commandment or example for every thing perteining to order or manner of administration of Divine things It is sufficient that there be generall rules found for that purpose according to which particulars must be directed Nay which is more sundry things are not onely lawfull but necessary for which you can bring no example out of the word of God neither before nor since Christ I will spare to mention particulars because I would not teach profane men to wrangle God may have as much honour or more in our publick assemblies if a stinted form were not used And this is a certain truth That whatsoever the worship and service of God may spare without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of Saints is superfluous and so but a vain invention If all this be granted it will not follow that a stinted form is against the second commandment of the same common nature with an image For in publick administration of Gods service in the outward order method and phrase many things are laid aside by the most and might be spared by all men which are against no commandment And the like may be said of sundry observations The custome of godfathers and godmothers in baptisme of calling an assembly by the sound of a bell of buriall in church-yards might be spared and yet not against the second commandment When there be many wayes or means whereby a thing may be atteined it is not an idle invention ordinarily to choose the one or other as seemeth expedient M r Robinson disputeth thus against our stinted form of prayer It cannot be an ordinance of Christ because the church may perfectly and entirely worship God without it with all the parts of holy and spirituall worship as did the apostolick churches for many yeares before such Liturgie was devised or imposed I should think both these reasons carry the same sense sc That that may be spared without which the church may perfectly and entirely worship God with all parts of holy and spirituall worship And if that be the meaning then I deny that to be a superfluous or vain invention which might be spared without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of Saints For set forms of blessing catechismes administration of the sacraments be not superfluous and vain inventions and yet all parts of Gods spirituall worship may perfectly and entirely be performed without them The use of a set translation of holy scripture to be read in the congregation by such or such portions or sections is no vain invention the distribution of it into chapters and verses the quotation of chapter and verse the marginall references are no superfluous devises and yet the church may perform all parts of Gods worship entirely and perfectly without these as did the apostolick churches The prescribing of a set form of psalmes to be sung by all the people jointly together is no superfluous devise and yet it may be spared without detriment either to the honour of God or edification of the people as it was in the apostolick churches for many years Of which more in the next chapter Set forms of confessions of churches set forms of professions of faith to be used in the publick worship of God be not vain inventions and yet you may say of them as you do of stinted forms of prayer They may be spared There is no example for them in scripture since Christ The word consubstantiall is not necessary as without which the doctrine of that truth of the Divinity of our Saviour Christ cannot be mainteined for that were to accuse the holy pen-men of scripture yet was it not an idle or superfluous invention In some reformed churches before preaching-time the church assembled hath the scriptures read in such order that the whole canon thereof is oftentimes in one yeare run through In others there is no such order of simple reading but besides their set sermons two chapters are paraphrastically expounded with the principall points thereof taken and applyed unto their auditours Neither of these simply necessary nor yet superfluous inventions To kneel in prayer yea to prescribe that men shall ordinarily kneel in publick prayer if with conveniency they may is not an idle invention and yet men may pray sitting standing falling upon the face Men may meet together to worship God at fit time in convenient place observe due order method moderation in length according to the abilities and necessities of the people without rules and prescriptions for that purpose and yet rules prescriptions and precedents are not idle inventions And though it be possible to worship God aright and further the edification of his Saints as much without as with a set form yet a set form of prayer devised
at this day wherein we may observe those that follow to have done more then track the steps of them that have gone before them and this without rebuke In prayer a minister may use the gifts of others to furnish himself with method words matter and arguments and utter his meditations as upon meditation he hath digested them by such helps yea he may use those very expressions and forms which others have used before him when they be more fit and moving then of himself he could reach unto In singing psalmes though the minister be able to turn them into more grave solid exact metre then usuall and nearer to the originall yet it is not denied but he may make use of other mens gifts inferiour to his own In reading the scripture in a prescribed translation which is a part of Gods publick worship whose gifts doth the minister make use of what ministeriall gift is exercised or manifested therein Every child of twelve or thirteen yeares old in respect of the outward act is as well able to reade a chapter as the stinted Liturgie They answer that Between publick reading of scriptures and publick reading of prayers there be two differences First the publick reading of the scripture is Gods ordinance but stinted prayers have not warrant from the word Secondly reading of the scriptures in the publick assembly simply considered in it self is not the proper work of the minister But this later is not to the purpose For we speak of reading the scriptures as it is done by a minister in the publick assembly and in the solemn worship of God be it when he readeth his text being a shorter or larger portion of holy writ The first is a flat contradiction to the reason it self and a plain confession that it is of no worth For when they say Reading the scripture is Gods ordinance wherein the minister useth anothers gifts and not his own but the introducing of new forms by mens devise and appointment is not warranted do they not confesse that this is no just exception against stinted prayer because it should condemn the ordinance of God no lesse then it and that stinted prayer is not unlawfull because a minister in reading it doth make use of another mans gifts but because it is unwarrantable which is the matter to be proved and importeth a confession that it is not proved by this reason but rather overthrown For if they restrain the proposition thus That stinted form of prayer is unlawfull wherein the minister maketh use of another mans gifts not of his own the reason consisteth all of particulars beggeth onely but concludeth nothing If the proposition be generall That is not an ordinance of God in the use whereof a minister exerciseth other mens gifts and not his own the exception here annexed is directly crosse thereunto for the publick reading of the scriptures is Gods ordinance But seeing this is a matter so much insisted upon That a stinted form of Liturgie is not warranted and so unlawfull let us consider a little how many wayes a thing may be warranted and in what sense the proposition holdeth true What is not warranted that is unlawfull A thing is warranted in the worship of God three wayes First by the light of nature and reason according to the generall rules of scripture and so time place method phrase of speech and such like are warranted though nothing be determined particularly thereof in scripture For the scripture commandeth that all things be done in order but it determineth not this or that to be matter of order Thus a stinted Liturgie is warranted Secondly a thing is warranted by necessary consequence when to some particular dutie required this or that particular is necessary or expedient though it be not named and so the translation of the scripture is warranted because is must be read to edification and edifie it cannot unlesse it be understood Thirdly that is warranted which is by speciall institution commanded as a part or substantiall means of worship which should be unlawfull if it was not particularly instituted as being contrary to the second commandment And seeing the word is thus diversly used in different matters unlesse it be wisely distinguished a man shall build false conclusions upon true principles if truly applied and sooner entangle himself then confute his adversary as it fareth with our brethren in this case For taking the word warranted in the strictest sense when they dispute against a set form or Liturgie as an addition to the word and means of worshipping God by the devises and appointment of men they conclude erroneously For a stinted Liturgie is no substantiall means of worshipping or positive worship for these two are one but onely a matter of order or form of words and method wherein we present our requests to God c. And from the same mistake they ensnare themselves while they teach others to argue upon the same grounds and with like force against singing of psalmes and reading of set translations to wit That they are not warranted of God and that we must be carefull as not to take away from the word any ordinance of God so not to adde to the word as means of worshipping God the devises and appointment of men Out of which snare they can never rid themselves unlesse they take the word warranted in a larger sense and distinguish betwixt the substantiall and necessary means of worship and that which is allowed by consequence onely or doth pertein to the worship of God â—s a matter of order For though singing of psalmes be commanded of God though God allow nay command that the scriptures should be translated as that without which they cannot be read to edification yet the frame of words in singing and the translation it self is the work of men and the words and phrases the devises of men not an ordinance of worship This knot cannot be untyed but it will cut the sinews of the former objection Who seeth not that the imposing of prayers devised by other men upn the churches to be used of all ministers ordinarily for theirs and the churches prayers doth much derogate from the honour fruit and benefit of Christs ascension into heaven and from the love care and bounty that he hath and sheweth continually to his church upon earth giving gifts to men for the work of the ministery and the profit of the churches Eph. 4. 8 13. 1. Cor. 12. 4 5 6. with Matth. 28. 20. Whatsoever derogateth from the honour fruit and benefit of the ascension of Christ that is wicked and unlawfull But to reade prayers out of a book derogateth from the honour fruit and benefit of Christs ascension What is here said of imposing prayers devised by others is alledged against the use of stinted prayers and Liturgie and so must be understood and till the use of a prescript form of prayer or Liturgie be proved unlawfull it will never be found
derogatorie to the honour fruit and benefit of Christs ascension Christ ascending up on high hath given gifts unto men for the work of the ministery as well for prayer as for doctrine and preaching added also for baptizing administration of the Lords supper catechizing blessing confession and profession of faith and singing of psalmes And if a stinted form of prayer be derogatory to the honour of Christs ascension for the same reason a stinted form in all or any of these is derogatory likewise Christ hath given gifts unto men for doctrine or preaching is it therefore unlawfull for the minister of the Gospel to make use of translations commentaries linguists controversie-writers c. to help and furnish him the better in this work is this to derogate from the fruit and benefit of Christs ascension Ability to preach is a gift which Christ bestoweth upon his servants but I hope they will not say he is unmeet to be a minister of Christ that doth penne his sermons and ordinarily deliver them in that method and stinted phrase which he hath premeditated or that his so doing is dishonourable to the fruit and benefit of Christs ascension And it will be a difficult thing to give a substantiall reason why a stinted prayer and not a penned sermon should be so challenged Christ hath given to his ministers ability to pray in their measure but not in such measure as they should need no help nor such abilities of speech or utterance as that every minister should be so enabled to pray in fitting words according to present occasions as not to need some help studie and meditation yea to digest his meditations into a stinted form of words And this stinted form delivered upon premeditation out of memory is a prescript form in the judgement of our brethren But let us grant what can never be proved that every minister hath the gift of speech and utterance that he needeth no help or furtherance upon any suddain occasion what will follow If they be so endued it will be said there is no warrant for others to prescribe nor for themselves to reade over such stinted prayers What not An able minister hath discretion and wisdome to know what portion of scripture is meet to be read and how much hath the church no warrant then to appoint what books chapters or sections shall ordinarily be read nor the minister warrant to observe that appointment A learned Grecian or Hebrician is able to translate a book or chapter in the Old or New Testament as well peradventure better then it is in our ordinary translations may not the church then ordain one translation usually to be read Let me intreat our brethren to view the strength of this reason in another of the same form which I certainly perswade my self they will not allow and it is this Reading of translations in the worship of God is unlawfull because it doth contradict the gifts bestowed by Christ upon the church for the work of the ministery and derogateth from the vertue of Christs ascension and dignity of his kingdome and blemisheth Christs bounty to and care of his church and may be performed by a child perfectly well For it may be said If Christ hath given gifts unto men for the work of the ministery he hath given ability also to translate the scriptures or else translations are not necessary And if Christ hath given gifts to his servants to translate the scriptures or translations be not necessary then they have no warrant to reade nor others authority to prescribe any set translation It may also be added That God will be worshipped with our own not with another mans with that which cost us something not with that which cost us nothing with our own gifts not with other mens But for one ignorant of the originals to reade the translations is to offer unto God that which cost him nothing to serve God with other mens not with his own gifts The conclusion our brethren will not acknowledge but whatsoever they can soundly answer to the premisses will with the same labour untie the knot of their own argument God is to be served with the best But a minister is enabled to pray better according to the occasion then possibly he can be in a stinted form Cursed be the deceiver which hath a male in his flock and voweth and sacrificeth unto the Lord a corrupt thing If these ministers then and others have a better sacrifice of prayer and thanksgiving then their service-book as their own practice both publick and private when they have liberty sheweth they have and that so themselves judge let them learn to fear him that is a great King and whose name is terrible even the Lord of hosts The Lord will be worshipped with the best we have and he is accursed that having a male for sacrifice doth offer a corrupt thing to the Lord Mal. 1 14. If this be granted that every minister is enabled to pray better according to the present occasion then possibly he can be directed in a stinted form which can never be proved by text of scripture or sound reason drawn from thence in like manner a man may and some have argued against the reading of translations God will be served with the best we have but there is no one translation the best we have for a minister may be able to render a chapter sentence or verse more significantly then the translation hath it And yet I suppose no minister will refuse to use a sound and good translation though it be here and there lesse significant nor take liberty in reading to alter it at pleasure lest liberty herein should teach gracelesse and ungodly people to wrangle against the scriptures themselves In preaching and disputing men may and do note the significancy of the phrase which cannot so fully be expressed in a translation and more fully interpret what is not so plain and full as might be desired but in reading the scriptures in the congregation great warinesse is to be used lest boldnesse to correct occasion doubts in the weak and embolden the ungodly to carp against religion And if a minister may be tyed to the use of a sound good translation though not in every jot or tittle the best that may be this reason hath lost its sinews Universall propositions duly limited may be of great use whereas if extended too farre they are dangerous in application It is true if we speak of Gods incomprehensible goodnesse excellency glory and dominion that more love and service is due to God then he requireth in his word or possibly can be given by men or Angels It is true we are bound to whatsoever duty the Lord requireth in his law for matter manner and measure to whatsoever he obligeth us unto upon speciall occasion or inciteth us unto by the heroicall motions of his Spirit which must not be resisted It is also most true that the creature cannot
proved already Why may they not as lawfully command to preach by reading of Homilies as to pray by reading of the Liturgie both which are contrary to the institution of Christ and the holy scriptures The two feet upon which the dumb ministery standeth like Nebuchadnezzars image upon the feet of iron and clay are the book of Common prayer and of Homilies the reading of the former which is the right foot serving them for Prayer and the other for Preaching Which feet if they were smitten as were the other with the stone cut without hands the whole Idole-priesthood would fall and be broken a-pieces as that other image was This objection presupposeth that there is some great affinity betwixt a stinted Liturgie and an idle ministry which is a bare conjecture For in the Primitive church the abettours mainteiners and in part devisers of stinted Liturgies have and for ever shall be renowned in the church of God for their constant continuall and unwearied pains and industry in preaching the Gospel It is a thing notoriously known and confessed that Cyprian Ambrose Chrysostome and Augustine did all of them allow and approve and some of them devise stinted forms of Liturgies and yet who almost for diligence and labour in teaching the people in the wayes of salvation to be compared unto them Of their learning and zeal it is needlesse to say any thing For three of them there is plentifull testimony that they preached every day in the week and yeare at least once or twice without fail Ye heard yesterday Ye shall heare to morrow is common in their tractates and homilies Augustine even to the extremity of his sicknesse preached the word of God in his church cheerfully and boldly with a sound mind and judgement without any intermission at all The like diligence is noted in others who lived before and about those times in all which a stinted Liturgie was in use And generally the Fathers in the primitive church presse the knowledge of the scriptures residence upon his charge diligence in reading meditation prayer and instruction of the people as duties requisite and necessary and by no means to be neglected or omitted of the minister They also exhort the people not onely to heare the word of God but to learn it by heart to instruct and warn one another to sing psalmes conferre religiously begin and end their feasts with solemn prayer reade the scriptures in their houses and discourse thereof one with another for their mutuall profit and edification and to call their families children wives servants friends and neighbours together and to repeat the sermons they heare at church-together after the sermon ended Such exhortations are common and ordinary in them who approved stinted Liturgies Let one of you take in hand the holy book and by the heavenly words having called his neighbours about him let him water and refresh both their minte and his own Being at home we may both before and after meat take the holy books in hand and thereof receive great profit and minister spirituall food unto our souls Gregorie disalloweth that such should attend to singing and modulation of the voice who should apply themselves to the office of preaching Hierome cut short the lessons when whole books were read in order before that so there might he time for preaching Durantus himself misliketh the men that extra modum ordinem orationes multiplicant unde auditores sibi ingratos efficiunt populum Dei potiùs fastidio avertunt quà m alliciunt And Petrus de Aliaco counselleth quòd in Divino officio non tam â—nerosa prolixitas quà m devota integra brevitas servaretur A stinted Liturgie then in it self doth not abbridge nor hinder the liberty of preaching or prayer according to the speciall present occasions nor ought it so to do For when the minister of the Gospel is bound to be instant in season and out of season to teach exhort reprove with all long suffering and patience these necessary and wholesome functions of the holy ministery must not be trust out or hindred And it is not hard to shew the wisedome and moderation of the churches in their prescribed catechismes stinted prayers and exhortations in the administration of the sacraments c. to be such that they have allowed time convenient both for preaching and prayer according as God hath enabled his messengers In these times of this reformation the pains of such whom God stirred up first to preach the Gospel and instruct the people in the wayes of salvation was almost miraculous and yet generally they approved and devised a publick stinted form of Liturgie As for Homilies they were first allowed in the church not to uphold or maintein an ignorant ministery or to supply his defect that should take pains but would not much lesse to shut out preaching but to supply the casuall defect of preaching through the weaknesse and infirmitie of the minister CHAP. V. A stinted form of prayer doth not quench the Spirit THe Spirit of Grace enableth us to pray and maketh requests for us but worketh by means It instructeth us what to ask not in what phrase of speech It stirreth up in us holy desires but giveth not abilitie suddenly and without help to expresse and lay open our hearts in fit method and words significant As the Spirit doth perswade and assure the heart that the scripture is the word of God not witnessing of the letters syllables and words but of the matter and saving truth therein conteined So the Spirit instructeth us to pray by opening our eyes to see our misery and inflaming our hearts with a longing desire of mercy and relief in the mediation of Jesus Christ but it giveth not abilitie evermore to utter and expresse these our desires in fit and decent phrase of speech Abilitie of speech is a common gift of the Spirit which the Lord bestoweth upon good and bad Yea many times gracelesse persons are herein preferred before the most sincere and upright and many an honest heart can cry aloud for mercy who is scarce able to utter one distinct and perfect sentence in fit words and order Let no man except that ministers have better abilities For when the Apostle saith the Spirit is given to help our infirmities who know not how to pray as we ought he speaketh of all beleevers as well others as ministers private prayers as well as publick And whosoever is enabled or provoked to lift up any one sigh or grone unto God or to make apologie for himself in the mediation of Christ in any manner it is by the holy Ghost These things considered I suppose all men will grant 1. That it is lawfull for a man before-hand to meditate on his own particular wants and the necessities of others and that he may more fully understand and more sensibly be affected with them to reade good books which unfold the
people the imposer and user Plain dealing is a jewel Moreover to take away the ambiguitie of the word a stinted form may be set apart for publick use two wayes Either as sanctified to be the immediate and infallible rule of prayer a substantiall or proper means of worship holy by institution and necessary in conscience in respect of Divine commandment and in this no publick Liturgie is or ought to be set apart because none is prescribed of God none such can be devised or appointed of men Or it may be set apart where no one being determined by God one is freely chosen and agreed upon for publick use as consonant to the generall rules of scripture for orders sake to testifie consent in matters of faith and for the help of them that may stand in need not as the immediate and infallible rule of prayer nor as a proper means of worship nor as holy above others nor necessary in point of conscience and in this sense a Liturgy or stinted form may be set apart and it cannot well be conceived how it should generally be used unlesse it be set apart that is unlesse one be chosen amongst many and agreed upon to testifie consent In a stinted form or Liturgie two things are to be considered the matter it self which if holy and good is of God as in conceived prayer and the externall method order and phrase of speech which is not determined by God as whether it shall be in these and these words suddenly conceived or more solemnly composed devised by others or invented by our selves And seeing neither of these is determined it is the devise of man to place opinion of worship holinesse or necessitie in either of them simply considered Our Saviour never joyned with them in their prayers though he came often to their synagogues and meetings but alwayes either to preach unto them or reprove them for their humane inventions taking the opportunitie of their meetings for this very end A stinted Liturgie is challenged to be an humane devise condemned by the second commandment because it is not prescribed in the word The like exception upon just grounds do I make to this answer It is an humane devise a corrupt addition because it hath no warrant from the scripture Why did our Saviour go up to the feast of the passeover according to the custome when he was twelve yeares old onely to preach unto them and reprove their humane inventions and not to keep the passeover Did he ordinarily resort to the synagogues and was he present at the lectures of the law and prophets and did not joyn in prayer He himself telleth us it behooved him to fulfill all righteousnesse and was not this one branch of that righteousnesse he was to fulfill It is true he resorted thither to preach the Gospel and reprove the corrupt glosses of the scribes and Pharisees but to preach the Gospel and joyn in prayer with the people of God in covenant are things that may well stand together Our Saviour reproved the humane inventions of the scribes and Pharisees but did he ever reprove them simply for their stinted Liturgie or teach the faithfull not to joyn with the rest in their synagogues in any part of their stinted Liturgie If he came to the synagogues merely to take the opportunity of their meetings did he celebrate the last passeover with his disciples merely for that end likewise And if any man will be so unadvised and rash to say no more it will not avail For unto their custome of finishing the passeover with certain psalmes there is not any thing more probable then that the holy Evangelist doth evidently allude saying that after the cup delivered by our Saviour to his apostles they sung an hymne and went forth to the mount of Olives And some adde as the nature of some hymnes require it may be there was a common foot of the song wherewith the disciples answered unto our Saviour Christ first singing If they did use such without good warrant it will be no warrant to us and if they had warrant from God for any forms they used about the passeover c. if we have warrant from God we may do the like And we know we must go by rule and not by unwarranted example in all things about Gods worship Warrant is twofold One of precise institution determination and commandment and thus all substantiall parts and proper means of worship must be warranted But this warrant is not necessary to a stinted Liturgie unlesse it be determined of God in speciall And if that be true which some confidently affirm that reading cannot be prayer or that in reading a man cannot speak unto God or that read-prayer is an idole-prayer either it cannot be that by speciall institution a stinted prayer should be prescribed to be read or speciall institution is not sufficient to make it warrantable This I note here once again to perswade men more considerately to view over their positions and shew to how little purpose they ofttimes answer that this or that form is not the invention of man Another warrant there is according to the generall rules of scripture where nothing is particularly determined and thus a stinted Liturgie is warranted both to the Jews and Christians which is sufficient Also the example of our Saviour Christ resorting ordinarily to the synagogues and never speaking one word either to his disciples or other faithfull to beware of joyning with the rest in any part of their stinted Liturgies is to us warrant abundantly sufficient not to withdraw our selves from prayer or other ordinances of God because administred in a stinted Liturgie The spirit of the people should joyn with the ministers spirit in prayer according to the ordinance of Christ who ordereth no more to their parts in that case then to joyn with him and to testifie it by saying Amen And if the prayer be sound fit and holy what hindreth why the people may not testifie their consent by saying Amen If the governours neglect to stirre up the graces and gifts of the Spirit in themselves and so deprive the people of the benefit of their gifts must not the people make use of such gifts as they use if not their own then others The worship it self is vain fruitlesse and unwarrantable No branch of Gods worship consisteth in this That our prayers be presented to God in this or that method order or phrase of speech in a form of speech devised by others or invented by our selves suddenly conceived or premeditated long before varied every time we pray or one and the same often reiterated as occasion requireth And if the worship it self be vain and unwarrantable it must be either because the form of prayer is devised by himself and uttered in a stinted form or devised by others and not by himself If the former then no prayer is Gods ordinance which is
not uttered without premeditation settled and digested or at least which is not immediately suggested by the Spirit in respect of words and phrase of speech If the latter then devised worship is not forbidden in the second commandment but worship devised by another For that prayer which should be pure worship if devised by a mans self is unlawfull worship when devised by another And so devised worship or prayer is not condemned but worship or prayer devised by another man And if this be not the devise of man I know not what is Can this alter the nature of the worship in the hearer or him that joyneth that the words in prayer are invented by another studied by the governour or more suddenly conceived In the judgement of some Divines the three first commandments are thus distinguished each from other That the first commandment conteineth all those our duties towards God which are naturall The second all those duties in Gods speciall worship which are instituted and either of these is both inward and outward The third commandment requireth the well using of both these and of all other things which come of God If this distinction be allowed a stinted form as such doth not at all belong to the second commandment For instituted worship and not the order or manner of performance is the matter of the second commandment Stinted prayer is unlawfull because a man in devising it doth not exercise his own gifts Though he exercise not his gifts in devising it in reading or uttering it as a prayer he may set his understanding judgement faith hope love humility fervency and other graces of Gods Spirit on work And if the minister do not may not the people exercise their gifts in hearing and so though it be unlawfull to him it is not so to them Stinted prayer voluntarily taken up upon a mans self is not so much unlawfull but prayer imposed upon men because in such case they subject themselves to mans ordinance in Gods worship This is a strange description of mans ordinance in the worship of God or of worshipping God after the ordinances of men For thence it will follow that the same devised worship voluntarily taken up hath some allowance as the ordinance of God and ceaseth onely to be of God when it is imposed Whereas the ordinances of men in Gods worship condemned in scripture are not mere matters of order forms of words and phrases circumstances of time and place determined by men according to the generall rules but matters of worship devised besides and against the word of God and are unlawfull whether voluntarily taken up and devised of our selves or imposed by others A prescribed set form is not agreeable to the word of God for circumstance because the prescribing of it is to set apart or sanctifie it for such an use without Gods command and so to idolize it above other prayers In what sense a stinted form of prayer is or may be set apart hath been shewed before But this description of setting apart or prescribing is a mere devise barely affirmed without any shew of reason What is here objected against a prescribed form may be affirmed of a prescribed place time and order for the celebration of Divine ordinances which are of the same nature with it and no more determined by the word of God And suppose the minister or governour maintein some erroneous conceit touching the prescribed form of prayer are the people children or servants hereby authorized to withdraw themselves from such prayers or the prayers themselves made unacceptable to such as know how to use them aright One man is of opinion that a prescribed form is better then another another that a prescribed form is unlawfull one that it is best ordinarily to use a stinted form another that he is to pray alwayes according to the present occasion in a different order and phrase of speech In these cases if the least errour do stain the prayers to others that they may not lawfully joyn together with whom shall the faithfull joyn at all Is not this to fill the conscience with scruples and the church with rents Errours and abuses personall they rest in the persons so erring and stain not others It is harsh to affirm that such hath been the estate of the church ever since the death of the apostles almost if not before that a Christian could not without sinne joyn with any publick assembly in prayer or participation of the sacraments that he must either separate from the prayers of the assembly and depart from the sacraments or derogate from the authoritie of God and worship him after the ordinances of men For if such was the state of the Christian church from that time what is become of those great and pretious promises made to the church in the times of the Messias Did the church begin to draw and give up her breath both in one day Many things were amisse in the church many corruptions did begin to bud in the apostles times and after their departure did put forth with greater vigour and the saints of God I doubt not offended many wayes through ignorance and infirmity which God in mercy was pleased to pardon unto them But that the state and condition of the church was such that a Christian could not hold communion in prayer and the sacraments with the churches of God is contrary to the many promises in scripture made to the churches of the New Testament It is true the scripture doth forewarn us of an apostasie from the faith and the mystery of iniquity began to work in the apostles dayes and after their death things declined more and more But that within an age or two after the apostles departure out of this life things were so corrupted that the godly might not hold communion with the church in prayer and participation of the sacraments is more then an advised Christian will dare to affirm or think But if a stinted form of prayer be unlawfull both to minister and people to him that administers according to it and them that joyn a Christian might not safely joyn in any church-assembly or congregation in prayer or participation of the sacraments within few ages after the death of the apostles if at all Unlawfull commands in matters of religion especially cannot be obeyed without sinne Hos 5. 11. and it is a sinne to walk after them many wayes In matters of religion if the commands of men be contrary to the commands of God for substance or matter of the thing commanded we must obey God rather then men But if the command of man be for substance of matter agreeable to the rules of scripture pressed onely with too great strictnesse or severitie it is not evermore against God nor our superiours nor the present age and posterity nor ourselves to yield obedience If it be an holy form of baptisme voluntarily to baptize into
which assembled every day the word was preached every day And in the congregations which assembled every Lords day after the reading of the lessons psalmes and evangelists the word was preached constantly before they were dismissed The time specially appointed or taken for the sermon was the morning after the reading of the prophets and psalmes and evangelists In the afternoon as assemblies so sermons were frequent and two or more sermons were made in one and the same congregation sometimes by one sometimes by divers ministers After the sermon ended followed the prayers of the congregation as the testimonies before alledged plentifully confirm Clemen Constit lib. 2. cap. 57. After the exhortation of the Presbyter and the Bishop all pray unto God Justin Apol. 2. ad Anton. Then we rise all and pray together sc after the exhortation ended Origen Hom. 3. in Isa Idcirco surgentes oremus Deum Hom. 36. in Luc. Surgamus precemúrque Deum Chrysost Hom. 50. ad cap. 14. Matth. But now it is time to conclude our speech with prayer orate igitur universi nobiscum In all which we see the wisdome of the church so moderated the length of the Liturgie that each ordinance of God had its proper season that reading and prayer did not thrust out preaching nor preaching eat up prayer that the weak were not tired and burdened nor the sluggish fostered in their securitie And if a Liturgie be onely burdensome for length it is not altogether to be cast off For the thing it self is thereby justified as good and allowable that which burdeneth being taken away And it is much better to wrestle against bodily tirednesse with spirituall fervour then deprive themselves of the comfort and profit which is to be had in the ordinances of God The worship of God by that stinted form whereof our question is is the devise of Antichrist it being never prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles and recorded in scripture But as the mystery wrought to a greater height in declining times of the church it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed strictly enjoyned and every where used in the papacy as serving to maintein superstition and a dumbe idole-reading ministery and to nourish people in ignorance of the nature and right use of prayer The Masse-book is in Latine this Liturgie-book is in English the Masse-book hath all the prayers this Liturgie hath and some more other differences I know not between them Therefore king Edward the sixth in his letter to the Devonshire-men to convince them that their Liturgie was our service telleth them that it was no other but the old and the self-same words in English which were in Latine save a few things taken out which were so fond that it was a shame to heare them in English And king James in a speech of his in Scotland said that their English Liturgie was an ill-said Masse Pope Pius the fourth sending Vincentio Parpatia Abbat of S. Saviour to Qu. Elisabeth offered to confirm the English Liturgie by his authoritie if she would yield to him in some other things Indeed this Liturgie pleased them so well that for the first eleven years of Qu. Elizabeth Papists came to the English churches and service as the Lord Cook sheweth And when the Popes intelligencers had seen service solemnly sung and said in Canterbury and London with all their pomp and procession they wondred that their master would be so unadvised as to interdict a Prince or State whose service and ceremonies so symbolized with his own The whole form then of the church-service a few grosse things taken out is borrowed from the Papists culled and picked out of that popish dung-hill the Portuis and vile Masse-book But that form of prayer by which God is worshipped after the manner that idolaters worship their Gods swerveth from a rule of prayer prescribed in scripture Deut. 12. 3 4. 30. 31 32. And this is made the first of the exceptions against the common-prayer-book which were briefly added to in the Abbridgement That it appointed a Liturgie which in the whole matter and form thereof is too like unto the Masse-book The main challenge in this objection which I have set down more at large because it is much insisted upon against our communion-book is That it was taken out of the masse-book But in the manner of propounding there be divers great mistakes to say no more It is a great fault that they put no difference betwixt the substance of worship and the externall form or order of celebration The substance of worship in that stinted form of prayer is That we call upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ according to his will Is this the devise of Antichrist because the form of words was taken out of the masse-book Suppose a minister of the Gospel should borrow some expressions or phrases of speech from heathen authours is his sermon forthwith the invention or devise of an heathen It is as far wide that they say Not onely the form of it taken from the church of Antichrist but surely the matter also For the matter of our Liturgie is the reading of the scriptures in a known tongue the calling upon God in the mediation of Jesus Christ and not upon angels or saints departed for the living and not for the dead the right administration of the sacraments for substance and singing of psalmes are these the devises of Antichrist Is the administration of the Lords supper in both kinds in remembrance of Christs death and passion who by one oblation of himself once offered hath made a full perfect and sufficient oblation and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world is this taken from the church of Antichrist These imputations are not so grosse as their reasons weak upon which they are built If our stinted Liturgy be the devise of Antichrist because it is not prescribed by the apostles or recorded in scripture then every stinted Liturgie must fall under the same censure for none other is prescribed in scripture or recorded by the apostles And so either every stinted Liturgie is part of that mystery of iniquitie which began to work in the apostles dayes or our Liturgy is not Antichristian because it was not prescribed or used in the primitive churches planted by the apostles If it was received by little and little till at last it came to be completely framed then the first beginning of it was no more from Antichrist then was the beginning of other Liturgies Antichrist sitteth in the Temple of God and antichristianisme is a filthy and lothsome leprosie which by degrees did infect the pure worship of God If therefore our Liturgie was sowred in after-times with that old leaven it might be pure and free in its first originall Is it for matter taken from the church of Antichrist
because it was culled and picked out of the popish dunghill the popish and vile masse-book full of all abominations Who knoweth not that many pretious truths may be culled and picked out of the masse-book Good gold may have some drosse and amongst an heap of drosse it is possible to find some good gold A true mans goods may be found in a thieves den or cave and the goods of the church in the possession of Antichrist Antichrist hath either by violence broken in upon or by secret insinuation before his cunning was spied gotten the rich treasures of the church into his hand which the right heirs may lawfully require and take back again not as borrowed from him but as due to them I scarce know how a man should more honour Antichrist or wrong the true church of God then to grant that all the good things that Antichrist doth usurp do of right belong unto him and are borrowed from him For they are the rich legacies which Christ hath bequeathed unto his church to whom properly they pertein The matter then of our stinted form may be from God and proper to the church though picked and culled out of the Masse-book If therefore our stinted Liturgie be Antichristian it is so either in respect of the matter or of the form Not of the matter for that which properly belonged to Antichrist the soul and grosse errours are purged out Not of the form for order and phrase of speech is not properly Antichristian of which more hereafter The Papists cannot sincerely approve our publick service but they must condemn and detest their own their prayers in an unknown tongue their praying to saints departed much more to feigned saints their receiving in one kind their unbloudy sacrifice their reall presence their satisfaction for veniall sinnes and temporall punishment of mortall sinnes their blotting out of the second commandment or at least confounding it with the first with others the like And if for the first eleven yeares of Qu. Elisabeth the Papists came to our churches and service what can we think but that the hand of the Lord was with us at that time for good when without division we sought him and he was pleased so to honour us that our adversaries should at least feignedly submit themselves The Lord grant all estates and conditions wisely to consider the true cause why they are fallen from our assemblies since that time and hardned in their perversenesse every day more and more But to come to the thing it self objected to wit That our book of common prayer is wholly taken out of the Masse-book we are here to note that the Masse in former times did signifie the worship of God which consisted in publick prayers thanksgivings confession of faith singing of psalmes reading and interpretation of the holy scriptures and receiving the sacrament of the Lords supper and so the ancient Masse and Liturgie were the same But now the Romane Masse is put for the unbloudy sacrifice of the body of Christ which the priest doth offer up for the quick and dead And in this sense the word is to be taken when they say our service-book is taken out of the Masse-book But it should rather be said that the Masse was in time added to our communion-book and by the purging out of the Masse it is restored to its former puritie Popery is as a scab or leprosie that cleaveth to the church and the Masse an abomination annexed to the Liturgie Before ever the Masse was heard of in the world or began to be hatched there were stinted Liturgies in the church for substance much-what the same with ours and these at first more pure after stained with more corruption as the times grew worse and worse The Eastern churches as it should seem had their stinted Liturgies first and the Western borrowed many things from them but as the times declined they brought in more and more drosse into the church untill the canon of the Masse was completely framed The ancient Liturgies attributed to James Basil Chrysostom c. are counterfeit as our Divines have largely proved and the Papists cannot deny But divers things conteined in those Liturgies were in use in the primitive church without question In the primitive times they had their appointed lessons out of the Law and the Prophets and the Psalmes and the Evangelists their stinted prayers and forms of celebration with some variety but in substance all one in a manner This is evident if we compare the genuine writings of the Fathers with those counterfeit Liturgies before mentioned whereof some particular instances are given in the chapter following The stinted forms at first were more brief afterwards they were enlarged and as often it falleth out by enlargement corrupted and defiled Corruption by this means as a disease cleaving to the Liturgie it is necessary it should be corrected and thereby recovered to its first integrity or foundnesse Thus Cardinal Quignonius by the commandment of Clement the seventh so changed the Romane Breviarie that for a great part it was more like the English book of prayers than the Romane Breviarie And the English Liturgie gathered according to the module of the Ancients the purest of them is not a collection out of the Masse-book but a refining of that Liturgie which heretofore had been stained with the Masse And if those things were unjustly added to the Liturgie they might be and were justly cast out If it was wholly taken out of the Masse-book I should desire further to know how the Masse-book came to have those things in which are found in the book of Common prayers sound and holy for matter and directly contrary to Antichristianisme If these things were in the book before then all things therein were not of Antichrist but he had usurped them and it is lawfull for the true man to lay claim to his goods whereever he find them If they were not in the Masse-book then all things are not taken out of it but somethings restored out of purer Antiquity which the man of sinne had wickedly expunged The ministers of Lincoln never judged the use of the Book unlawfull never thought it lawfull to separate from the prayers of the congregation never refused to use the book though in some things they desired to be excused The churches of God have been evermore taught to prize and esteem these main and fundamentall truths and ordinances of worship at an higher rate then that some petty dislike of this or that in the externall form when the matter is sound and good should cause Separation The conclusion in brief is That our Service-book is not a translation of the Masse but a restitution of the ancient Liturgie wherein sundry prayers are inserted used by the Fathers agreeable to the scriptures Causelesse separation from the externall communion with any true church of Christ is the sinne of schisme But to separate from the prayers of the
congregation simply because a stinted form is used is causelesse separation from the externall communion of the church Weigh all the reasons brought to prove it lawfull and they will be found too light If we look to our guide and captain Christ doth not goe before us therein Dare any man affirm that they be not met together in the name of Christ or that he is not present in the midst of them that joyn together in a stinted Liturgie Is there any duty publick or private which God requireth of people holding communion together in ordinances of worship which may not be performed of each to other when a stinted form of prayer is used without Separation But by that unwarrantable course of voluntary separation they make an unlawfull rent in the church deprive themselves of the comfort of Gods ordinances weaken the faith of many cause divisions among brethren and advantage the adversaries of true religion CHAP. IX It is lawfull for a Christian to be present at that service which is read out of a book in some things faultie both for form and matter ONe reason alledged to prove the lawfulnesse and necessity of Separation from our publick service in particular is this That the prayer-book in question is corrupt in many things which is thus amplified The matter of some petitions is such as we cannot say Amen to it in faith as in the collect on the XII sunday after Trinitie it is prayed that God would forgive us those things whereof our consciences are afraid and give unto us that our prayers dare not presume to ask c. To omit divers others the very â—itting of Collects to certain dayes for holy fasts and feasts not sanctified by God savour of superstition as speciall prayers for Lent serving to countenance the keeping of it as a religious fast c. the manner of praying vain repetitions as the often repeating of the Lords prayer and GLORY TO THE FATHER and LORD HAVE MERCY UPON US c. disorderly responsories the clerk taking part of the prayer out of the ministers mouth c. Moreover the book perverteth the right use of the scriptures dismembreth and misapplieth them for making of gospels epistles lessons and collects appointed for feasts of mens devising and derived from the Papists and it reteineth a corrupt translation of the psalmes and bringeth into the church Apocrypha writings and the errours conteined in them To them that look at all humane Liturgies as images forbidden by the second commandment this objection is of small force because the thing it self and not the corruption cleaving to the Liturgie is disallowed But lest this accusation should breed scruple in the minds of some not altogether disaffected to stinted forms of prayer or Liturgies I will examine not the qualitie of the exceptions whether justly or unjustly taken but the weight of the reason if the particulars should be granted For this objection it self doth free the Liturgie from grosse errours either fundamentall or such as border thereupon respecting faith or practice in the prayers themselves or that which concerneth the administration of the sacraments For the corruptions objected are Misapplication of some text si of scripture Frequent repetitions of the same things Disordered responsories and Breaking petitions asunder c. and these not dispersed throughout the whole book but in some passages onely which concern not the main grounds and chief heads of Christian religion but are such faults or slips as may peaceably be tolerated amongst brethren Therefore not to insist upon any particulars mentioned I lay down this proposition That a Christian may lawfully and with good conscience be present at such service and prayers which are read out of a book though somethings therein are or may be supposed to be faultie for form or matter in things not fundamentall nor bordering thereupon not pernicious or noxious but such as may be tolerated amongst brethren these not dispersed through the whole body of the book but in some passages onely It is one thing to allow corruption another to be present at the service of God where something is done corruptly For the Lord chargeth us to keep our selves free from all pollution but alloweth not to separate from abuses unlesse he be pleased to go before and as he goeth before us It is one thing to approve of abuses in a Liturgie another to tolerate what we cannot reform For a Liturgie should be framed so not that things may be construed well but that they cannot be construed amisse But many things may be suffered which are not so well ordained when it is not in our power to redresse them The Lord needeth not mans lie neither doth he allow us to do evil that good may come thereof and therefore I must not subscribe to an errour against conscience though never so innocent nor professe approbation of that which in conscience I cannot allow though never so small to the intent I might enjoy externall communion with the church of God in the ordinances of worship But I must tolerate many things for the maintenance of peace and unitie and the preservation of Gods worship For if there be not mutuall toleration and forbearance but each man will rigidly stand upon his own opinion and presse others to be of his mind and follow his practice in all things and every tittle of necessitie all things must fall into confusion and the church be rent almost into as many pieces as there be men The proposition is proved first Because they that alledge the foresaid faults or corruptions against communicating with us in our publick Liturgie or stinted prayers do themselves put small strength or none at all in this reason For suppose a chapter be somewhat unfitly divided and break off in the midst of the matter or now and then separate verses which should go together or a verse be ill distinguished or the preacher misalledge a text of scripture or something be found amisse in his prayer when he exerciseth his own gifts must I of necessitie separate from that ordinance of God or reject the good for that which is amisse Hereunto this answer is returned When the minister exerciseth his own gift Gods ordinance is observed wherewith I may communicate in praying as well as preaching notwithstanding his infirmities in either which are but personall and in such cases the rule warranteth men to trie all things and to hold that which is good 1. Thess 5. 21. But when the Liturgie is read an ordinance which is not of God but of man is introduced into Gods worship contrary to the second commandment and therefore I must reject it and have no communion with it Is not this in plain terms to grant that the corruptions alledged can be no cause of Separation but this onely Because it is the devise of man The corruptions alledged are not the cause because they may be found in translations the distinction of chapters and verses the preaching
of the word and the prayers of the minister when he exerciseth his own gifts from which we must not separate and where presence is not approbation But whatsoever is objected touching abuses the whole building leaneth upon this foundation and this alone That stinted prayer is the devise of man And this objecting of abuses in this question is the devise of man because it is brought in to ensnare the simple-hearted Christian when other grounds will not hold and yet in plain terms it is disclaimed as soon as it is alledged Whatsoever worship is offered up to God by the minister is in their name and so the action of the assembly then present who are to declare their assent by saying Amen if it be lawfull if otherwise to call upon their minister to fulfill the ministery which he hath received of the Lord Col. 4. 17. and as occasion shall require to proceed further to declare their dislike in such a manner as is meet either by absenting themselves from it or otherwayes declaring their dislike so as the whole church may take notice of it Whatsoever worship is offered up to God by the minister whether in prayer conceived by himself or devised by others it is in the name of the congregation but every phrase petition or branch of petition is not approved by their presence silence or saying Amen to the prayers in generall as in the former passage is acknowledged The presence of the people was never deemed interpretatively a consent to every thing that was there done The prayers which for matter God disalloweth we ought to disallow but as God disalloweth them and as he calleth us forth to bear witnesse to his truth But it is one thing to tolerate another to approve one thing to disallow the method or form another the matter one thing privately to dislike another openly to witnesse against a thing as in no wise to be born withall one thing to speak when we are called forth another to thrust our selves forth unadvisedly Some things are to be born with in brethren whereof we are not bound so much as to admonish them unlesse we be intirely familiar and of intimate acquaintance Some things we must bear with though upon admonition they be not amended The people must bear with some infirmities in their minister both in preaching and prayer as he must with some wants in them without so much as taking notice of them to admonish by way of censure And if upon admonition he cannot be of their minds in every thing they must not reject and cast him off no more then he is to cut them off because in every point they conform not to his pleasure If the parties be stubborn and will not heare admonitions but rather grow more perverse and desperate even to rent and tear in pieces such as seek to reclaim them we are not bound to make known our judgement and profession unto them unlesse we be lawfully called of God thereunto And if the greater part be in errour and so stiff that they would sooner persecute the better then reform if it be not in matters fundamentall or bordering thereupon or noxious and pernicious to be concealed I know not that either that innocent is allowed to separate from the exercises of religion for that cause or bound to admonish them of their errour He that taught to suffer the tares rather then to pluck up the wheat with them hath shewed a reason for this judgement This I do infinitely grieve at saith Augustine that many most wholsome precepts of Divine scripture are little regarded and in the mean time all is so full of many presumption that he is more grievously found fault with who during this Octaves toucheth the earth with his naked foot then he that shall bury his soul in drunkennesse And after I cannot approve them and I think they are to be cut off wheresoever we have power Many of these things for fear of scandalizing many holy persons or provoking those that are turbulent I dare not freely disallow That every private Christian should in publick manner question the doctrine of his minister or the prayers of the congregation and declare his dislike in whatsoever is not agreeable to his particular opinion in such manner as is mentioned is neither commanded of God nor consonant to right reason is not agreeable to order peace love or Christian moderation and of necessitie must fill the church with confusion disorder rents and schismes If reading the Liturgie be the praying which Gods word alloweth we are bound in conscience to apply our selves unto it as Gods ordinance and not we onely but also all the churches throughout the world If not we are bound to witnes against it Here the reason taken from the faults of our Liturgie is plainly dismissed out of the field For our Liturgie is to be witnessed against by this objection not because it is erroneous or faulty nor for the matter or manner of imposition but simply because it is not the Liturgie appointed by Christ in the New Testament And many things are here confounded which should have been distinguished Prayer is the ordinance of God and all Christians are bound in conscience to apply themselves unto it But the forms of prayer may be divers all allowed because none is necessary or determined and therefore though allowed no man is bound in conscience precisely to apply himself unto any one and none other much lesse all churches And as they are not bound unto any one so neither to witnesse against it a stinted Liturgie being of the number of things lawfull but not determined by God Though all presence where sinne is acted contracteth not guilt yet the danger is greatest when we are in the use of Gods ordinance It is one thing to be present where that which is sinne in it self absolutely and simply is acted another to be present at the doing of some necessary duty wherein by accident somewhat is amisse Now to joyn in prayer or participation of the sacrament is to communicate in the necessary duties of piety not in sinne and if ought be done amisse it is by accident not by it self And presence there though sinne be committed by one or other is lesse dangerous because it is not free and voluntary but necessary and enjoyned We are not left at liberty to come or not as please our selves but commanded under pain of sinne to be there present and he that calleth will preserve from danger and accept of our service which he commandeth And if presence was dangerous yet it is not unlawfull for by watchfulnesse the danger might be prevented and not by separation or withdrawing our selves from the worship it self If there be danger I must be vigilant and circumspect but I must not shut the doore against Christ when he knocketh nor refuse to come unto Christ when he inviteth to sup with him And if all be
granted nothing is here alledged but what might be said against communicating with ministers who have their weaknesses or use a stinted form of their own devising ordinarily or be of different opinions either in prayer or sacrament and if we must hold communion with none who dissent from us in any jote or tittle we must never joyn or not long continue in any congregation The personall miscarriages of private persons are not so perillous as the evil acts of the minister whom I make my mouth to God in prayer Neither do the errours of individuall men tainted with corruptions voluntarily broched in prayer or sermon cast that defilement upon them who joyn together as do the unwarrantable opinions of the church and the ministration upon such publick commandment It is a good rule in Divinity oft to be thought upon That every distinction in matters of faith or religion not grounded upon or warranted by the scripture is an humane devise For is not this to adde to the word of God to lay down an opinion as from God which is not to be found in his word at all Now to apply this to the present matter in hand I desire to know from what scripture this distinction can be warranted That the personall errours of the minister in his voluntary administration of the sacraments or prayer do not defile though I do not publickly testifie dislike or absent my self but errour committed in the administration by publick commandment do pollute all that be present Reason why presence should pollute in one case more then the other none can be given Calling from God to testifie dislike it may be I have in neither but least in the latter It being more tolerable for private persons to rebuke the slips and errours of their minister in voluntary administration then for a man to controll the order established by publick authority and common consent when he is not in speciall called thereunto If this distinction be of weight it would go best with the church to have no settled order amongst them for so long as the faults and corruptions be onely personall they defile not them that be present at the ordinances but personall they are untill they be established by common consent or publick authority Moreover by this rule one member may sooner cast out the whole church then the whole church can cut off one member For the church must not cut off a member but upon weighty consideration and apparent just cause and that after conviction with much long-suffering and patience but if this objection hold true one member must openly rebuke the church or withdraw from communion with the church for a stinted Liturgie or for some slip or fault there committed perhaps questionable at least tolerable among brethren Is not my joyning with them that sinne to be reputed an appearance thereof when I professe not dislike thereof It is one thing to joyn with men in sin another to joyn with them necessarily in the worship of God though for the manner of administration something be done amisse If I professe not dislike of what I judge amisse having no calling thereunto my joyning in prayer is no appearance of evil to a right-discerning eye because I am necessarily called there to attend upon the Lord in his holy ordinances Necessary attendance upon his master excuseth the servants presence in many companies where he seeth and heareth much evil which he cannot amend nor reprove and shall not necessary attendance upon Jesus Christ justly and truly excuse the faithfull To say nothing that this exception is crosse to the former and if these exceptions be laid together we shall find nothing but going backward and forward one denying what the other affirmeth If the faithfull by the approbation of our Saviour Christ and his Apostles were present at Divine ordinances as much or more corrupted then they can be supposed to be with us then for such corruptions we are not voluntarily to withdraw our selves For defilement is feared without cause by simple presence where Christ requireth and approveth our presence and hath promised to be present with us by his grace But the faithfull by the commandment and approbation of Christ have been present at Divine ordinances as much or more corrupted then they can be supposed to be with us For the scribes and Pharisees sinned grievously in corrupting the law with false glosses in so much that they neither taught nor practiced what was necessary to salvation They taught many things directly contrary to the law as if a child had vowed not to relieve his parents he was bound to keep his vow and neglect them They defiled the worship of God with their vain inventions And it may well be thought their praying was answerable to their preaching cold fruitlesse corrupt and rotten many wayes Neverthelesse the faithfull held communion and fellowship with them in the worship of God not in their corruptions and that by the approbation and commandment of Christ himself Our Saviour doth not tell the faithfull they were to call upon the Pharisees to fulfill their ministery which they had received and as occasion should require proceed further to declare their dislike in such manner as is meet either absenting themselves or other wayes declaring their dislike so as the whole church may take notice of it But his commandment is they should heare them so long as they sit in Moses chair It is true our Saviour doth not approve their corrupt glosses and sinfull inventions but doth sharply reprove them himself and admonish others to let them alone and beware of their leaven but not to forsake the assembly or absent themselves from the ordinances of worship From which it followeth evidently that simple presence at Divine ordinances is not consent or approbation of the corruptions therein practiced and that we must leave and forsake some in respect of familiar conversation with whom we may hold outward communion in the exercises of religion The sinne of Eli's sonnes in prophaning the holy things of God was exceeding great but Elkanah Hannah and Samuel did not partake with the sinnes of the priests in that they did not abstein from the Lords sacrifices The behaviour of the Corinthians in their unreverent scandalous and almost prophane coming to the Lords table was foul and corrupt yet the faithfull did not forbear nor the Apostle charge them to absent themselves from the Lords table The famous church of Rome was so weak and feeble in the duties of government as they did not or could not separate from them such as preached Christ contentiously and with spitefull minds against the Apostle and the greater number of that church did corruptly demean and carry themselves therein and yet the Apostle never taught the rest to separate and have no communion with them in the ordinances of worship Knowledge before-hand that such corrupt administration will be used
use And if the Septuagint was corrupted in many things at that time the translations drawn thence cannot be pure Amongst many and divers Latine translations which Augustine saith cannot be numbred there was one more common then the rest and better esteemed by Hierome called the Vulgar who disliketh it and preferreth the translation of Symmachus and Theodotion above it If we give credit to ancient writers we shall find that there were divers customes in the church and rites in the administration of the sacraments not mentioned in scripture and some of them savouring more of superstition then of devotion which the Papists themselves have not onely laid aside but condemned though of ancient and long continuance The particulars are many and well known so that ancient custome is not plea sufficient to prove a thing good nor some abuse crept into and continued in the church cause sufficient why we should voluntarily absent our selves from the Lords ordinances In the second primitive church as some distinguish if not the first they had a stinted form of Liturgie not onely for lessons psalmes epistles and gospels and professions of faith but in prayers for matter and manner not much unlike to ours To the praise of God be it spoken our Liturgie for purity and soundnesse may compare with any Liturgie used in the third and fourth ages of the church And if in those times the faithfull might lawfully hold communion in the ordinances of worship we cannot at this day lawfully withdraw our selves by reason of such faults as be objected This I mention that we might learn to acknowledge Gods mercy walk worthy of what we have received and strive forward towards perfection by all lawfull means Long before the Lord called his people to come out of Babylon what faults soever can be objected against our Liturgie were found in theirs The faithfull therefore may lawfully be present at our service notwithstanding the faults objected against it For the Lord did not onely wink at his peoples weaknesse and ignorance for the time but approve of their non-separation untill he was pleased to call them forth Neither can it be imagined that they might hold communion in other ordinances but not in their stinted Liturgies for in those times of all other parts the stinted Liturgies were most pure God of his endlesse mercy so providing for his church and the comfort of his people in those hard and evil times when the doctrine was miserably dangerously corrupted in respect of Merit of works and Invocation of Saints c. the Liturgies were long preserved pure and free whereby the faithfull might be present with more comfort and freedome of conscience This one thing duely considered would put an end to many scruples and might serve to stop them who out of over-great heat and forwardnesse are ready to except against the means of their own comfort and to cast off what God offereth because they cannot enjoy what they desire The snares of superstition are warily to be declined because we are apt and prone to take infection thereby it being a work of the flesh and agreeable to our nature All sinne is to be shunned and that at all times but the danger of sinning onely is to be shunned by watchfulnesse and circumspection not by omission or neglect of any duty that God calleth us unto or requireth at our hands In a free state and condition the occasions of sin must be avoided because no man is safe who is next to danger and it is no point of wisdome to fish with a golden hook But when God casteth a man upon the occasions of sin in the duties of religion justice or an honest calling he must not omit the duty because of the occasion but resist the occasion and watch over his heart that he be not hurt thereby If a sowre herb or two grow in a good pasture is it not better to heed the flock there then to suffer them to starve The sheep of Christ are wise to discern betwixt things that differ and know where to feed and what to leave And if superstition be dangerous partiall indiscreet misguided zeal is sinfull turbulent and pernicious Whence have most schismes arisen in the church but even from hence that some in place have been over-eager and peremptory to presse the members of the church to professe their belief or approbation of some errours perhaps in themselves small and to be tolerated which they could not professe with a good conscience and not allow them communion in the church but upon such condition Also the frequent drawing out of the sword of excommunication to cut off well-deserving members from visible society with the churches of God for small and trifling matters is a great occasion and cause of schisme Whatsoever man or church saith one doth for any errour of simple belief deprive any man so qualified as above either of his temporall life or livelyhood or liberty or the churches communion and hope of salvation he is for the first unjust cruel and tyrannous schismaticall presumptuous and uncharitable for the second Wherefore such as have power in their hands they are alwayes to remember that this power is given them not for destruction or to shew their own greatnesse but for the edification of others and therefore never to be used but upon speciall and weighty considerations and occasions He that striketh fiercely with his spirituall sword at feathers doth alwayes either wound himself or wrest his arm And of particular private persons it hath ever been most true that a partiall rigid irregular adhering to some branches of holy doctrine hath been no lesse pernicious to themselves then troublesome to others For the fond admiration of their zeal and forwardnesse in this one particular breedeth neglect of Christian watchfulnesse and constant uniform walking with God disregard of Gods ordinances and of the good which may be gotten thereby disesteem if not contempt of others who will not comply with them in the same way and what can follow hereupon but contentions and jarres surmises censurings and uncharitablenesse rents and divisions in the church This danger is the greater because it stoppeth the eare against advise and counsel For being once perswaded that they and they onely do maintein the truth and rightly affect it no reason will enter no perswasion take place to the contrary be it never so evident and apparent And this is most preposterous when the truths wherewith they are so enamoured and which they zealously affect be matters of small or least importance for then the great and weighty truths concerning the very life and soul of religion and the substantiall means of grace are undervalued in comparison of the other We must therefore labour and watch so to keep our selves from the infection of superstition as not to foster indiscreet and partiall zeal which admiring that which is of lesse importance thrusteth into over-vehement contentions and lesseneth
and not to give that honour unto Jesus Christ or to give it unto any other is a breach of the first commandment It is true that inward and outward worship both when they are both of one nature or kind are required in the first precept as if I must pray unto God in the mediation of Jesus Christ or pray unto Jesus Christ mine onely Saviour I may kneel or prostrate my self or bow my body in the exercise of religion and these actions must be referred to the same commandment It is also true that the second commandment reacheth to the heart and requireth that we rightly conceive of allow approve and affect the ordinances of instituted worship appointed of God as well as exercise and maintein it but seeing the worship it self commanded is instituted it is also outward Besides there be some things of mere nstitution which pertein to the third and fourth commandments as the institution and observation of the seventh day from the creation in time of the Law and of the first day in the week in time of the Gospel M r Jacob himself saith The fourth commandment in the word Sabbath setteth down one particular even the ordinary seventh day of rest but understandeth all holy dayes instituted of God that they are likewise to be sanctified By his own confession then all instituted doctrines and ordinances are not referred to the second commandment The just and true generall matter of the second commandment is a free and voluntary institution or matter instituted onely or specially in the exercise of Gods worship wherein it hath no way any necessary use of it self This is the generall matter or full extent of the second commandment even in the mind and purpose of God himself the authour of it And it is likewise the just and full definition of Gods instituted worship in generall that is whether true or false This is obscure and doubtfull If the meaning be that all instituted or positive worship of God which carrieth the Lords stamp and approbation must be referred to this commandment and that all worship devised by men for nature use and end one with the worship instituted of God is a breach of the second commandment it will be granted freely and might have been delivered plainly But if the meaning be that all free and voluntary institutions whatsoever must be referred to the second commandment if of God as just and allowable if of men as sinfull it hath no ground of truth or probability For many free institutions cannot be referred to the second commandment and concerning the instituted worship of God God hath left many things undetermined wherein the church may take order and give direction without sinne unto what commandment soever in generall the things may be referred The Lord forbidding to bow down unto or serve an image doth therein forbid all approbation liking or reverence though never so small shewed towards any institutions and inventions of men set up in the room of or matched with the Lords own instituted worship But an invention for nature and use one with the true worship of God and an institution in the exercise of religion are not one and the same There ought to be very clear and plain proof in Gods word to warrant every visible church if the members thereof desire to have comfort to their own souls because this is even the first and weightiest matter in religion that can concern us viz. to be assured that we are in a true visible and ministeriall church of Christ For out of a true visible church ordinarily there is no salvation and by a true visible church and not otherwise ordinarily we come to learn the way of life Therefore above all things it is necessary that every Christian do rightly discern of the divers kinds of outward ordinances in this behalf chiefly of visible churches and withall to understand which kind or form thereof is the true visible church of Christ or kingdome of heaven upon earth which is the onely way and in it the onely truth ordinarily leading to eternall life hereafter For the true visible church of Christ is but onely one questionlesse in nature form and constitution There are expresse and pregnant texts of scripture which shew what is the true visible church of God whereunto Christians may and ought to joyn themselves in holy fellowship in the ordinances of worship As where the covenant of God is there is the people of God and the visible church For communication and receiving the tables of the covenant is a certain signe of a people in covenant For what is it to be the flock sheep or people of God but to be in covenant with God to be the church of God The word maketh disciples to Christ and the word given to a people is Gods covenanting with them and the peoples receiving this word and professing their faith unto God is their taking God to be their God Those assemblies which have Christ for their Head and the same also for their foundation are the true visible churches of Christ It is simply necessary that the assemblies be laid upon Christ the foundation by faith which being done the remaining of what is forbidden or the want of what is commanded cannot put the assembly from the title and right of a church For Christ is the foundation and head-corner-stone of the church The form is coming unto Christ and being builded upon him by faith the matter is the people united and knit unto Christ and so one unto another Now where the matter and form of a church is there is a church Every society or assembly professing the intâ—re and true faith of Christ and worshipping God with an holy worship joyning together in prayer and thanksgiving enjoying the right use of the sacraments and keeping the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace is the true church of Christ The Gospel may be preached to Infidels some supernaturall truths may be professed by hereticks the use of the sacraments may be in adulterate churches but the intire profession of all fundamentall articles of faith to be believed and main precepts and morall laws for practice to be acknowledged the dwelling of the truth amongst men and the right use of the sacraments which is ever joyned with true doctrine and to be esteemed by it is proper to them that be in covenant with God The laws and statutes which God gave to Israel was the honour and ornament of that nation a testimony that the Lord had separated them from all other people even the Gentiles themselves being judges This is your wisedome and your understanding in the sight of the people He gave his law unto Jacob his statutes and ordinances unto Israel Thou gavest them right judgements and true laws ordinances and good commandments Who received the lively oracles to give unto us They have Moses and the Prophets Sound doctrine
catechiz rudib cap. 9. Justinian De Ecclesiast divers capitul Constit 123. Concil Lateran sub Innoc. III. c. 9. Innoc III. Extravag de offic Judic ordinar Quoniam in plerisque Decret Gregor l. 1. tit 31. cap. 14. Matth. 26. 44. Greenw Against Giff. pag. 8 9. I onely laboured to shew all men this errour of reading mens writings in stead of praying that they might learn how to converse c. Smith Differences of the Separation Epist Johns Against Carpent They communicate together in a false and idolatrous outward worship of God which is polluted with the writings of men viz stâ—nted prayers homilies catechismes c. Robinson Against Bern. pag. 456. The stinting imposing mens writings upon publick assemblies to have them read over by number and stint or any other way as a worship of God instead of true invocation is a mere device of man and so carnall worship as also all other reading of mens writings publickly or privately in this abuse for praying to God Greenw Answer to Gifford Robinson Justif against Bern. pag 424. Idem pag. 419. Idem pag. 473. Idem pag. 425. Pag. 472. Id. pag. 478. Copie of a letter pag. 5. Pag 5. Pag. 13. Pag. 21. Publick Prayer is not made with understanding and in faith unlesse it be in a known tongue Nor can a man pray in saith and purely lift up his soul to God who prayeth before or unto an Image Psal 25. 1 2. Mark 11. 24 25. Joh. 14. 1â— Jam. 5. 15. Psal 145. 18. 1. Chron. 16. 8. 1 Sam. 2. 1 2. Jon. 2. 1 2. 1. Cor. 14 15. 2. Chron. 6. 41 42. Psal 132. 9. 2. Chron. 7. 6. 2. Chron. 20. 21 22. 2. Chr. 20. 30. Ezra 3. 10 11. 1. Coâ— 14. 15. Ephes 5. 19. Col. 3. 16. If in the administration of Baptisme no errour be committed against the matter or form inward or outward the worship it self or substantiall means of worship is approved of God and acceptable A man that readeth a form of prayer in a book may be so affected with it as in the desires of his heart to go along with it and to usâ— it for his present prayer As it may thus fall out in reading one of Calvines prayers printed after his Lectures or the like Ainsworth touching the use of the Lords prayer See Mr Paget his Arrow against Separ chap. 3. pag. 63. Coronidis vice omnibus orationibus oratio Dominica adâ—cienda quae omnium rerum precandarum Epiâ—ome à Cypriano rectè appellatur Heâ—â—sâ—ach Orandi formula Hierom affirmeth that Christ taught his Apostles to consecrate the sacrament of the Eucharist by the Lords prayer Lib. 3. cont Pelâ—g cap. 5. Greg. l 7. epist 63 B. Rhen. in Tertull. De corona militis Dominica oratio habetur in omnibus Liturgiis Cyprian De orat Dom. August Enchâ—rid cap. 71. call it quotidianam In Constitut Apost lib. 7. cap. 25. Monentur Christiani omnes ter quolibet die orationem â—anc fundere Chemnit Exam. par 2. tit De Can. Miss De Miss Pontif. pag. 273. Object 1. Copy of a letter c. pag. 5. How fond and corrupt is the reasoning of these men from Gods example and authority unto their own practised power c. Why do not these men also plead that God gave a law by Moses therefore there may be a law given likewise by the Bishops Ainsw Against Bern. pag. 237. Answ Object 2. Answ Grâ—enwood Against Gifford pag. 6. 19. Johnson Qu. 〈◊〉 precib lit pag. 24 25. Robins Justis against Bern. pag. 470 471 472. Copy of a Letter pag. 18. Deut. 5. 29 32 33 12. 32. Quod praecipitur imperatur quod imperatur necesse est fieri Tert. ad uxor l 2. Ubi praeceptum necessitas est serviâ—ntis Ibid. Copie of a â—etter pag. 1â— 2. Argument 1. John 3. 4. Gal. 3. 10. All use of images is not condemned in the second commandment for carving and cutting is the gift of God and therefore a lawfull use thereof may be made c. Memorative signes or monuments of Gods mercies are not unlawfull All images simply forbidden must not as I conceive be referred to that coÌ„mandment Deut. 4. 15. but images made to be worshipped or ad cultum And if the speciall and the generall be of the same common nature not all inventions but fained worship or service is forbidden Semper specialia generalibus insunt Pandect lib. 50. tit 17. reg 147. Object 1. See Copy of a Letter pag 5. 32. Answ See Calvin Inst l. 4. c. 10. § 14 30 31. Jun. Animad 〈◊〉 Bellar. contr 3. l. 4. cap. 16. not 86 87. cap. 17. not m 10 11 12. Zinch De Redempt l. 1. De cult 4. propos Carâ—wr Answ to the Rheâ— Matth. 15. § 4. Whittak De Pontif. Rom. Qu. 7. pag. 851. 852 853. Calvin opuse De verâ— reform necessiâ— reformat Calvin Epist 259. Zeppâ—r De sacraments lib. 3. cap 12 13. In times of persecution it is probable that the Deacon gave notice to the faithfull when and where the assembly was to be held Ignat. ad â—â—olycarp ad Hieron or appointed it at the present assembly Walafrid De reb eccles c. 5. Rut in times of peace by the sound of a bell which invention some attribute to Sabinian the Pope anno Dom. 604. Polydor. Virg. de Javent l. 6. cap. 12. Others to Paulinus Bishop of Nola contemporarie to Hierome because Hierome mementioneth this use Hieron De regul monach cap. 33. 39. Object 2. Answ Smith Differ chap. 6. In toto juâ—e generi per speciem derogatur illud potissimum habetur quod ad speciem directum est Pandect lib. 50. tit 17. reg 80. Cypr. lib. 1. epist 8. Adulterum est impium est sacrilegum est quodcunque humano furore instituitur ut dispoâ—â—io divina violetur Ambr. in 1. Cor. 11. Indignus est Domino qui aliter mysterium celebrat quam à Christo traditum est Non enim potest devotus esse qui aliter presumit quà m datum est ab Autore Object 3. Johnson ubi suprà pag. 33. Greenwood Against Gifford pag. 8. 18. Answ Jun. Animad in Bellaâ—m contr 5. l. 2. cap. 16. not 18. Rivet Catholic orth tract 2. qu. 37. Humane inventions forbidden in the second commandment are for common nature and use one with the positive worship of God unlawfull because they be not in particular instituted and commanded of God and in that respect matters of order method and phrase in themselves allowed and warranted if done as parts of positive worship are in that respect unlawfull Act. 15. 21. 13. 27. See Jun. Annot. in Act. 13. 15. Buxtorf Com. Masoret cap. 8. Mercer in Gen. c. 1. v. 6. pag. 16. in Gen. 6. 8. pag. 149. cap. 50. 26. pag. 747. Sixt. Senens Biblioth lib. 3. meth 4. Rainold de Idololatr Admonit ad lectorem Ainsworth on Gen. 6. 8. The Jewes under Antiochus devised to reade