altari of the Ministerie of the high Priest upon that Altar which is called most holy And againe if in this respect it was said to be in the most holy place by the same reason the brazen Altar should be said to be there for that is also called most holy chap. 29.37 3. Some thinke that aureum thuribulum the golden censer which the Apostle speaketh of was not the golden Altar but a golden censer which was kept in the most holy place wherein the high Priest offered incense when he went into the holy place once in the yeare Of this opinion is Thomas and Lyranus in 9. Hebr. and before them Hierom. But this cannot be so for these reasons 1. Because in Moses description of the Tabernacle and all things thereto belonging there is no mention made of any such golden censer in the most holy place 2. If the Apostle did not thereby meane the golden Altar then had he omitted one of the principall things in the Sanctuarie which he would not doe 3. Againe the high Priest is first bidden to take a censer full of burning coales of the Altar before the Lord and so bring it within the veile Levit. 16.12 He then had not the censer within the veile but without Tostat. qu. 6. Riber lib. 2. cap. 8. 4. And Iosephus also calleth the Altar of incense without the veile thuribulum the censer and the Syriake Interpreter domum aromatum the house of perfume 4. Ribera thinketh therefore that the most holy place is said to have the golden Altar quia ad ejus ministerium deputatum est not because it was in it but because it belonged to the service thereof for thence the high Priest tooke the burning coales and incense when he went to make reconciliation once in the yeare in the most holy place 5. But I rather take Tostatus solution here because the golden Altar aliquem modum fitus specialeâ— habebat respectu veli had a speciall kinde of situation in respect of the veile which was before the Arke being had before it as it is said to be set lippens before the veile and therefore the holy place behinde the second veile may be said to have it in respect of the neere situation to the veile So 1 King 6.22 it is said asher ladebir the altar which was to the oracle or by the oracle And Levit. 16.18 it is called the Altar which was befoâ—◠〈…〉 was next unto the veile before the Mercie seat where Gods presence was Ribera 〈…〉 QUEST 〈…〉 commanded to be burned morning and evening Vers. 7. ANd Aaron shall 〈…〉 sweet incense c. 1. Thomas thinketh that the 〈…〉 pointed to be 〈◊〉 upon the golden Altar to this end to qualifie the 〈…〉 which did arise from the sacrifices of flesh which were offered 〈…〉 and therefore everie morning and evening the incense was burned about 〈…〉 sacrifice was offered But Tostatus thus confuteth the opinion of Thomâ—◠〈…〉 not burned just at the same time but somewhat before the morning sacrific◠〈…〉 after the evening sacrifice for the incense in the evening was offered when the 〈…〉 it began to be darke but the evening sacrifice was not deferred so long but was prepar◠〈…〉 houre which Act. 3.1 is called the ninth houre of prayer 2. Though it had concurred with the morning and evening sacrifice yet there were other extraordinarie sacrifices which were offered at other times when the incense burned not 3. And though it might serve to mitigate the savour of one lamb offered morning and evening yet it could not helpe this inconvenience when many sacrifices were offered yea thousands as at the dedication of Salomons Temple 4. And if the incense had been to this end it should rather have beene appointed to bee burned in the same place where the smell of the sacrifices was in the outward Court than within in the Tabernacle 5. It is verie like that God so provided as that the smell of the burnt sacrifices was not grievous and irksome or offensive but that rather was by some supernaturall worke than by naturall meanes 2. Therefore this was rather the end why incense was offered ad majorem reverentiam cultus for more reverence of Gods worship As among men it is counted an honour to entertaine great persons with sweet odours and the Gentiles did honour their gods with incense so the Lord would hereby adorne the service of the Tabernacle Tostat. qu. 4. And beside the Lord would hereby have shadowed forth the spirituall incense of his people which are their prayers as the Prophet David faith Let my prayer bee directed in thy sight as incense Psal. 141.2 Borrh. And the golden Altar was a lively type of Christ by whom the spirituall incense of our prayers is acceptable unto God Apoc. 8.3 QUEST IX Whether any of the lamps burned by day Vers. 7. WHen he dresseth the lamps thereof 1. Tostatus following Iosephus thinketh that all the seven lamps of the golden candlesticke burned and gave light in the night but three of them only in the day and that in the morning the Priest did put out foure of them and at night againe hee did set them up So also Lyranus 2. But I rather herein suscribe to the opinion of Vatablus and Oleaster with others that the lamps mane mundabantur vespere accendebantur were cleansed onely in the morning and lighted in the evening c. And so much may be gathered here by the diversitie of the phrase here used in the morning it is said behetibo in making of them good that is cleansing of them in the evening behaghaloth in causing them to ascend that is kindling of them Iun. or setting of them up Vatab. Likewise chap. 27.21 they are said to be dressed from the evening to the morning that is to burne so long See more hereof upon the question upon that place handled before QUEST X. What things were inhibited to be offered upon the golden Altar Vers. 9. YEE shall offer no strange incense 1. Foure things are forbidden to be offered upon this golden Altar strange incense that is made after another composition than the holy perfume afterward in this chapter prescribed to be made burnt sacrifices of beasts oblations which were ex aridiâ— of dry things and drinke offerings of liquid things Lyran. 2. The reasons hereof were these that if any other kinde of incense should be used redundaret in quandam irreverentiam it would tend to a certaine irreverence in Gods service and it was not fit to offer any sacrifices or oblations upon that Altar 1. Because the fire ascending upon the Altar might have put the Tabernacle in danger which was covered with curtaines or with the smoake it would have defaced the beautie and abated the colour of them 2. Beside the sacrifices with bloud would have imbrued the Altar and so annoyed the Sanctuarie 3. The Altar in respect of the smalnesse being but a cubit square was not fit for that service 4. Neither was
it convenient in regard of the forme and fashion it was made plaine above whereas the brazen Altar was made hollow above the grate or hearth being about the middest thereof where the fire was made and the sacrifice burned Tostat. qu. 7 8. 3. Beside two other things concerning this Altar are though not directly yet by necessarie consequence inhibited First that they should make no other Altar of incense in any other place and therefore they sinned which offered incense in the high places Secondly none but Aaron and the Priests were to burne incense therefore Core Dathan and their company displeased God for offering incense being not thereunto called and Vzzia King of Judah was stricken with leprosie for usurping the Priests office in burning of incense 2 Chron. 26. Lippom. QUEST XI Whether the high Priest entred more than once in a yeare upon any occasion into the most holy place Vers. 10. AAron shall make reconciliation upon the hornes of it once a yeare with the bloud c. 1. Augustine whose opinion is briefly touched before quest 6. thinketh Sacerdotem quotidie intrare solere sine sanguine that the Priest used to enter into the most holy place everie day without bloud to lay incense upon the Altar but onely once a yeare with bloud 2. But it shall now bee made manifest that hee entred onely once in the yeare at all 1. None but the high Priest were admitted to enter into the most holy place for none were suffered to be in the Tabernacle when he entred in Levit. 16.17 And so the Apostle saith that the high Priest entred alone into the most holy place Heb. 9.7 but it was lawfull for the inferiour Priests to burne incense as is shewed before in Zacharie Iohn Baptists father who was not the high Priest so it would follow that they also might go into the most holy place to burne incense 2. It was not lawfull for the high Priest to goe at all times into the holy place within the veile Levit. 16.2 but if hee went in everie day twice then there should no time be exempted 3. The high Priest was not to enter into the most holy place without a young bullocke for a sinne offering and a ram for a burnt offering Levit. 16.3 but these were not offered everie day the daily sacrifice morning and evening was only of two lambs therefore everie day the high Priest went not into the most holy place 4. Further when the high Priest went within the veile he put not on his glorious apparell but only the common linnen garments of other Priests Levit. 16.4 but in his daily ministerie and service when hee went into the Tabernacle he put on his priestly robe whereon hung the bels that his sound might be heard going in and out chap. 28.35 5. The Apostle also saith directly that the high Priest went into the second Tabernacle alone once everie yeare Heb. 9.7 Likewise vers 25. he saith he entred everie yeare into the most holy place he saith not everie day or everie moneth and this was upon the tenth day of the seventh moneth Levit. 16.29 And herein consent Beda Lippoman Vatab. Iun. Oleaster Osiander Lyran with many other that the high Priest entred into the most holy place but once everie yeare QUEST XII How Aaron made reconciliation upon the hornes of the altar Vers. 10. ANd Aaron shall make reconciliation c. 1. Hee meaneth not Aaron only in respect of his person but of his place and office Aaron for the time present and his successours afterward Tostat. 2. Whereas the Latine Translator readeth deprecabitur super cornua alteris hee shall pray upon the hornes of the Altar Lyranus thinketh that the Priest did extend and spread himselfe upon the hornes of the altar and so prayed But this had beene an unseemly gesture as Tostatus noteth and it would have shewed presumption rather than humilitie to have come so neere that holy Altar And beside this could not have beene conveniently done the incense burning upon the coales upon the Altar This errour then ariseth upon the false translation of the word vechipher which signifieth expiabit and he shall make reconciliation or expiation upon the hornes of the Altar which was by putting of the bloud of the sinne offering upon the hornes of the Altar as is declared Levit. 16.18 3. And the reason why he made reconciliation upon the hornes of the Altar is there also shewed to hallow it from the uncleannesse of the children of Israel quia ex irreverentia filiorum Israel peccantiam in circuitu Sanctuarii videbatur esse pollutum Sanctuarium because by the irreverent behaviour of the children of Israel sinning round about the Sanctuarie the Sanctuarie it selfe seemed to be defiled Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XIII The spirituall sense of the Altar of incense COncerning the mysticall application of this golden Altar with the rites thereof I will omit the curious observations of Beda who by the Altar of incense understandeth those which are perfit and give themselves unto contemplation in offering continuall prayers unto God by the gold charitie by the squarenesse of it patience and constancie by the foure hornes thereof the foure morall vertues So also Ribera following Beda But it is more fitly applyed thus 1. The Altar of incense signifieth Christ by whom we doe offer up the incense of our prayers Apoc. 8.2 This Altar was within of wood without of gold to signifie both the humanitie and divinitie of Christ. 2. The incense betokeneth the prayers of the Saints Psal. 141.2 Let my prayer c. be as incense 3. The squarenesse of this Altar signifieth the firmnesse of it the crowne the regall dignitie of Christ the hornes his power which sheweth it selfe in all the world 4. As no incense must be offered but upon this Altar so no prayers are accepted which are not offered in Christ proceed of faith and therefore the Prophets reproved the Israelites for offering of their incense without faith in God He which remembred incense after a carnall manner was as if hee blessed an idoll Isai. 66.3 Simler 5. The incense must bee burned when the lamps were lighted so our prayers are then accepted cum fidei lumen pracediâ— when the light of faith goeth before 6. Everie day morning and evening the incense must be offered to shew that we must pray continually Pelarg. 7. No other incense must be offered but the holy perfume appointed by God and our prayers must bee directed according to Gods will as we have a rule prescribed in the Lords prayer 8. The hornes of this Altar must be laid on with bloud so our prayers are availeable against sinne and Satan si Christi sanguine tincta fuerint if they be dipped and died in Christs bloud Marbach Borrh. QUEST XIV How this Altar of incense differed from Salomons BUt before I proceed to the questions remaining to be handled in this Chapter somewhat would be briefly touched concerning the difference betweene
this golden Altar which Moses made and that which Salomon erected 1. Some thinke that Salomon made a new Altar of incense as Comestor Tostat. qu. 16. in cap. 6. 1. Reg. because this was made of Shittim wood but Salomons of Cedar But Ribera answereth that it is not said that Salomon made the golden Altar of Cedar but onely covered it with Cedar 1 King 6.22 that is enlarged it lib. 2. cap. 8. de Templ 2. But Beda and Lyranus are farre wide who thinke that Salomon made the Altar of incense of stone which was covered over with Cedar Osiander The text before alleaged is evident that it was of Cedar there is no mention made of stone 3. Iunius his opinion is that it was the same Altar and readeth thus Obduxit altare Câ—drinum He laid over the Altar of Cedar not with Cedar but gold as it followeth ibid. v. 22. but the Altar which Moses made was of Shittim wood the Cedar is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or enrit seemeth then they were two divers kinds of wood 4. Ribera therefore thinketh that 〈◊〉 first did enlarge the golden Altar with Gods 〈◊〉 and then covered it with gold so that it was the same Altar but enlarged So also Borrhaius For the words of the Text are he covered the golden Altar with Cedar and Iosephus writeth evidently that Salomon did build a new brazen Altar but of making a new golden Altar he maketh no mention Ribera ibid So some things were made new by Salomon as the brazen Altar and the brazen sea or lover ten golden candlesticks ten tables 2 Chron. 4. Some things he only beautified and enlarged as the Arke over the which he made two Cherubims beside those upon the Mercie seat 1 King 6.23 Likewise he enlarged the Altar of incense for one Altar might serve to burne incense upon though for other services the number of vessels and instruments was increased according to the proportion of the Temple which was larger than the Tabernacle QUEST XV. Whether it were lawfull to number the people and wherein David offended Vers. 12. WHen thou takest the summe of the children of Israel c. 1. Simply then it is not unlawfull to number the people which may be done upon two necessarie occasions as when either a publike collection is to be made of tribute or subsidie money unlesse account should be taken the burthen should lye upon a few and others should escape Againe when any great warres are taken in hand it is fit that the people should be mustered that choice may be made of such as are fit for warre Tostat. qu. 9. 2. But then Davids example will be objected with whom God was offended for the numbring of the people To this divers answers are made 1. Augustine thinketh David did evill therein to number the people quia Deus non jusserat because God commanded him not But this is no sufficient reason for then it should be unlawfull for Princes now to number the people they having no speciall warrant from God 2. Simlerus saith that God was angrie with David because non curavit Domino persolvi tributum hee did not cause this tribute here appointed to bee given unto God So also Beda But this was not the cause neither for neither did Moses when he numbred the people which he did thrice Exod. 38. Numb 10. and 26. Neither is it like that David was so ignorant of the Law 3. Oleaster maketh this the reason because the Lord promised to multiply the seed of Abraham as the starres of Heaven and the sand of the sea without number therefore he was angrie whensoever they were numbred But by this reason they should never have beene numbred at all rather this might tend to Gods glorie in seeing by the numbers of the people how the Lord performed his promise 4. This rather was the cause of Gods indignation because David numbred the people for an evill end ad gloriam suam for his owne glorie to rejoyce and as it were to put confidence in their multitude Tostat. qu. 9. Therefore Haec sive superbia sive temeritas sive ingratitudo this either pride or rashnesse or ingratitude was severely punished Calvin QUEST XVI Whether this collection of money were commanded only at this time or were to continue WHen thou takest 1. Some thinke though here be no certaine time expressed when this account of the people should be taken whether everie yeare or everie fifth yeare as the ancient Romans used to doe yet this is certaine that whensoever the people was numbred this summe of halfe a sicle of everie one was collected Simler Lippoman thinketh also that they were often numbred ut gratia Dei agnosceretur c. that the grace and goodnesse of God might bee acknowledged in multiplying his people And it is the received opinion of the Hebrewes that this precept for the collection of this summe was perpetuall and anniversarie toward the charge of repairing the Tabernacle and maintaining of the sacrifices and other services So also Calvin in 17. Matth. vers 24. 2. But Iunius opinion is more probable with whom agreeth Beza annot in Matth. 17.24 that this was a precept only for this time and not to continue afterward which he confirmeth by these reasons 1. From the end and use of this money which was to acknowledge their late redemption and deliverance out of the bondage of Egypt 2. Moses himselfe did not exact this summe when hee numbred the people againe Numb 1. and the third time Numb 26. 3. This money was not to be spent in the sacrifices which were consumed but in the worke of the Tabernacle which was permanent and remained and so it was as a memoriall for them before the Lord vers 16. And of this money now collected which came to 100. talents of silver and 1775. shekels were made the sockets of the Sanctuarie and of the veile the hookes also and the fillets of the pillars Exod. 38.26 27. So that the end of this collection being extraordinarie and for this time only toward the building of the Tabernacle and the instruments thereof it was not to be perpetuall 4. And if this proportion had beene perpetually to be observed for everie one to pay halfe a shekel toward the Tabernacle Nehemiah would not have appointed another rate that everie one should pay the third part of a shekel by the yeare toward the service of Gods house Nehem. 10.32 3. But this further may be added though this manner of collection was not enjoyned as ordinarie and perpetuall yet upon the like occasion as to repaire the ruines of the Temple they might raise Moses tax upon the people as Ioash did 2 Chron. 24.9 which was upon the like extraordinarie occasion which ceasing the collection also was intermitted as Ioash said to the Priests that having received money of the people yet were slacke to repaire the decayed places of the Temple Receive no more money of your acquaintance except yee deliver
of the altars which the Patriarkes had made to aske counsell of God seeing God was every where present to the prayers of the faithfull 7. Neither are we to imagine that she used any such superstitious way as to lay aguâ—â— castus lawrell or any such thing under her head to have a dreame or a vision as she had seene her friends to doe in her owne countrey sic author histor scolastic in Gen. c. 66. for she was farre from such superstitious toies ex Perer. 8. Nor yet did she consult with God by Abraham then living as Aben Ezra Iun. for this oracle was given her by Gods owne mouth rather than mans Calvin 9. But she went to some secret place to pray and received some revelation from God Muscul Calvin Mercer Perer. QUEST XXXII How many waies they used to consult with God in Israel FOure waies they used to aske counsell of God in Israel 1. Beside the casting of lots which was but seldome used as by Iosua in Achans cause Iosua 7. and by Samuel at the election of Saul 1 Sam. 10. and by Saul to finde out the transgression of his vow by Ionathan 1 Sam. 14. there were three waies beside to aske counsell of God which are mentioned together 1. Sam. 28.6 by dreames urim and prophets 2. The second way was by dreames and visions as the Lord spake to the elder Patriarkes but this way God seldome revealed his will by after he sent them prophets and for these visions they used to prepare themselves by fasting and prayer Dan. 10.3 3. They used in hard and difficult matters to seeke unto the prophets as Saul went to Samuel 1. King 9. Ieroboam sent his wife to Ahiah the Prophet 1 King 14. These Prophets had such matters revealed unto them three waies 1. The Lord instructed them aforehand as he did Samuel before Saul came at him 2. Sometime at the same instant when they were consulted with as the Angel of God spake to Eliah 2. King 1.15 3. Sometime the Prophet presently gave no answer but waited upon God by prayer as Dan. 9. or stirred himselfe up extraordinarily that the spirit might come upon them as Elisha did 2. King 3.15 4. They also consulted with God by the priest who asked counsell of God for them by his Vrim as Abiathar applyed the Ephod for David 1. Sam. 23.9 30.7 Now the Priest received answer by the Ephod not as the Hebrewes fable by finding written in the foulds and pleats of the Vrim the sentence or answer of God nor as Iosephus supposeth by the extraordinary shining of the stones in the Vrim which miraculous kind of answering he confesseth to have ceased two hundred yeares before his time 3. antiquit Iudaic. for how could the shining of the stones be a signe in such variety of matters which were demanded of the priests and more than two hundred yeares before Iosephs time who lived vnder Domitian were such gifts of prophecying ceased as under Iudas Maccabeus 1 Maccab. 4.46 yea long before that the Church complained We see not our signes there is not one prophet more Psal. 74.9 And further the Scripture would not have beene silent in setting downe such a miraculous gift Therefore God did otherwise reveale unto the priest and inspire him with the knowledge of his will by the illumination of his minde for so Vrim signifieth illumination Perer. QUEST XXXIII How the elder is said to serve the younger Vers. 23. TWo manner of people shall be divided out of thy bowels c. the greater shall serve the lesse 1. The Hebrewes apply this text against the Empire of the Romans whose Emperors they say came of the Idumeans as Iulius Caesar the rest that succeeded him who though they held the Iewes in subjection in the end should be destroyed sic David Kimhi Rabbi Salomon ex citat Perer. 2. But the right literall meaning is of the Idumeans and Israelites the posterity of Esau and Iacob for so we read that the Idumeans were subdued unto Israel by King David 2. Sam. 8.14 and so continued to the reigne of Iotham Mercer 3. Neither were the Israelites onely superiour in temporall dominion but also in spiritual blessings for they were the visible Church of God Edom was cut off Calvin 4. Spiritually these two people doe signifie the carnall Iewes subdued unto the Christians being yet themselves the elder people August lib. 16. de civitat c. 25. Againe by the striving of Esau and Iacob in their mothers wombe is signified the continuall fight in the wombe of the Church betweene the true and carnall professors which are said to be the greater because they are more in number but as the greater here did serve the lesse so the wicked while they persecute the righteous quibus nocere volunt prâ—sunt plurimum stirâ—â—â—tem ipsi maxime nocent they profit those whom they goe about to hurt hurting themselves most Augustin serm de tempor 78. Beside Origen draweth from hence this mysticall sense understanding these two people to be within vs and this strife and combat to be betweene the flesh and the spirit vertue and vice hom 12. in Genes QUEST XXXIV How Iacob was sanctified in his mothers wombe FUrther whereas Iacob strove with Esau in his mothers wombe which was an extraordinary motion and worke of Gods spirit here ariseth a question whether Iacob were sanctified in his mothers wombe which doubt not resolved but onely expounded by Pererius may thus briefly receive satisfaction 1. that first if santification be taken for an actuall and inherent holinesse so neither Iacob nor any other were sanctified but onely Christ in which sense the Angel saith to Marie That holy thing which shall be borne of thee shall be called the sonne of God Luke 1.35 2. There is also a certaine holinesse ascribed to all the children of the faithfull because they are within the covenant 1. Cor. 7. vers 4. whereby they are distinguishâ—d from the seed of unbeleevers Iacob was sanctified otherwise than thus 3. There is a particular sanctification that is a setting apart or preparing of a thing to some speciall use as Paul was separated from his mothers wombe in the purpose of God to preach the Gospell Galath 1.15 Thus also was Iacob sanctified and separated to be the father of the people of God 4. A thing also is said to be sanctified when any extraordinary worke or motion is wrought upon it by the spirit of God as Iohn Baptist was sanctified in his mothers wombe when as at the voice of Maries Salutation the Babe sprung in his mothers belly Luk. 1.44 and thus Iacob also was sanctified and stirred by the spirit to wrestle with his brother not that he had any sense or understanding in fighting against the carnall generation but he was used as an instrument by the spirit to prefigure that state and condition of the people of God which should be resisted and wrestled against by the world QUEST XXXV Esau why so
Saints departed this life Isay 63.16 Abraham is ignorant of us and Israel knoweth not us and they might as well inferre thus The Saints alive doe one instruct and teach another Ergo much more the Saints departed 2. Their charitie is seene in that they doe in generall long to have us joyned with them in that blessed estate though in particular because they know not our wants they cannot wish our supplie 3. And though it be granted that this communion is in charitie this proveth no particular intercession made by them for us but as we in generall give thanks in earth for their peaceable departure and deliverance from the miseriâ—s of this life So they in generall desire that we may be partakers of the same blessed rest with them 4. Wee request the living to pray for us because they are present with us but the dead are absent and heare us not it may as well be inferred from hence that we may also consult with the dead and aske counsell of them which is directly forbidden Deut. 18.11 4. Argum. Absolom could not bee admitted to his fathers presence till Ioab had mediated for him and Bethshaba Salomons mother entreated for Adoniah So it is necessarie to have mediators to come unto God Answer 1. We have also one sufficient Mediator Christ Jesus who is able sufficiently to reconcile us unto God 2. Though many mediators are used in Princes Courts because either the Prince is ignorant of our affaires or his affection estranged yet it is not so with God who knoweth all things and the love of Christ toward us exceedeth the love of all other inferiour mediators which men can seeke unto 3. The example of Bethshaba is unfitly alleaged for shee obtained not her suite 5. Argum. Invocation of Saints is warranted by the Scripture 1. Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith concerning Iosephs two sonnes Let my name be named upon them 2. Iob 5.1 Eliphaz saith to Iob Call now if any will answer thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne thee 3. Praise the Lord in his Saints Psal. 150.1 4. Ezeâ—h 22.30 I sought for a man among them that should make up the hedge and stand in the gap before 〈◊〉 c. but I found none Answer 1. Iacob meaneth by that phrase that they should be called by his name and counted as his children as the same phrase is used Isai. 4.1 seven women shall take hold of one man and say c. Let thy name be called upon us who will say that they prayed to their husband they desire to be called by his name 2. Though that had beene Eliphaz meaning that Iob should have made some of the Saints departed his patrones yet because Iobs friends maintained an evill cause and afterward are reproved of God for it all that they say is not to be justified but that is not Eliphaz meaning he speaketh of the Saints and righteous living to see if Iob could finde among any of them a patrone to defend his cause 3. The place in the Psalme is to be read Praise God in his Holinesse Iun. Or in his Sanctâ—ariâ— Vatab. Neither doth it follow because God is praised in his Saints therefore wee are to pray to Saints as it followeth in the next words Praise him in the firmament will they have also the firmament prayed unto 4. That place in Ezechiel is understood of men living not of the dead 6. Argum. The honour given unto the Saints redoundeth unto Christ as he saith Matth. 25.45 In as much as yee did it unto one of the least of those ye did it unto me Answ. Our Saviour speaketh of his members living here upon earth to whom we are to extend our charitie not of the dead and of such honour as is due unto the Saints not of that which is due unto God for to give that to any creature were not to honour but dishonour God 7. Argum. Many miracles have beene done at the tombes and sepulchers of the dead where prayers are made therefore God is well pleased that they should be prayed unto Answer 1. The argument followeth not so by the touching of Elishaes bones one that was dead was restored to life this was to confirme their doctrine and propheticall calling 2. Many of those miracles are fained and small credit is to bee given unto them 3. Some of them were wrought by the operation of Satan to deceive as the Lord warneth his people to take heed of such false Prophets which shew signes Deut. 13. And S. Paul saith That Antichrist shall come by the power of Satan c. in lying wonders Among the Gentiles such miracles and wonders also were wrought This may suffice for an answer to their reasons Our arguments follow Reasons out of Scripture disproving the invocation of Saints 1. THere is neither precept nor example extant in Scripture to warrant the invocation of Saints the Scripture sendeth us to God Call upon me in the day of trouble and our Saviour teacheth us to pray to his Father Our Father In matters of doctrine an argument drawne negatively from the Scriptures doth conclude strongly 2. The Saints know not our affaires Abraham is ignorant of us Isai. 63.16 they are not present to heare us they are at peace their soules rest under the Altar Revelat. 6. they doe not know our hearts therefore they are not to be prayed unto all these things are requisite in them to whom we should offer our prayers But they say that the Saints in the divine essence as in a glasse doe behold our affaires Contra Whether doe they behold all or what it pleaseth God to shew them not the first for they know not the time of the comming of Christ to judgement if the second then God must first be prayed unto to reveale our affaires unto them were it not then much better for us to goe the next way unto God 3. S. Iohn saith We have an Advocate with the Father Iesus Christ the righteous 1 Ioh. 2.8 We need then no other Advocates for we have greater cause to doubt of the love and inclination of the Saints toward us than of the love of Christ. 4. Christ biddeth us aske in his name and promiseth we shall receive Ioh. 16.24 Then are prayers made to others superfluous seeing by Christ we are promised to obtaine our requests 5. There is none other name under heaven than Christs whereby wee must be saved If we have salvation in Christ then all other good things It is the Apostles reason If God gave his Sonne for us How shall he not with him give us all things also Rom. 8.32 6. This invocation of the Saints maketh a way for superstition and Idolatrie for so the Heathen did invocate the name of the dead and place them in the number of the gods erect Temples and Altars and consecrate festivall dayes unto them 7. God onely is to be worshipped invocation is a part of the divine worship therefore to bee yeelded unto God They would
some spirituall thing partly they had some other politick end and use which not in respect of the figure and type but in some other regard may upon a new institution be observed under the Gospell as the shew-bread or face-bread as it was a figure of Christ is now no more used but yet bread by Christs institution is still retained in the Eucharist as representative of the body of Christ. So they under the Law used washing with water to signifie the inward cleansing and now also in the new Testament upon a new ordinance it is used as the outward element in Baptisme So the observation of the Sabbath the paying of tithes Churches garments Church-musicke and the like were partly ceremoniall partly morall belonging to the service of God to the maintenance of Ministers to externall decencie and comelinesse in which respect though the ceremoniall use be ceased they may be retained still all things being done without offence and to edification according to the Apostles rule 4. But here I cannot let passe untouched an unsound assertion of Lyranus to whom consenteth Lippoman that thurificatio quae de ceremonialibus erat in nova lege remanet that censing and offering of incense being one of the ceremonials of the old Law yet remaineth in the new because it signified nothing to come but only shewed the devotion of the people in the worship of God which is greater in the new Testament than in the old Contra. 1. The offering of incense was a necessarie appertinance to the externall sacrifices of the Law it did continually wait and attend upon them and as the sacrifices did prefigure the holy sacrifice of attonement and passion of our blessed Saviour upon the crosse so the incense did betoken the sweet savour of that sacrifice and the acceptance thereof with Gold as Saint Paul sheweth that Christ hath given himselfe for us an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5.2 Beside the oblation of incense did shadow forth the mediation of Christ in offering up the prayers of the Saints as Revel 8.3 Much odors were given to the Angel that had the golden censer to offer with the prayers of the Saints and hereunto alludeth the Prophet David when he saith Let my prayer be directed in thy sight as incense Psal. 141.2 It is evident then that the incense of the old Law was figurative and significative of things to come 2. And true it is that the inward and spirituall devotion is more and greater in the new Testament than it was in the old but not the externall for they had more outward ceremonies and rites prescribed as signes of their devotion than are now required under the Gospell for now they that worship God must worship him in spirit and truth Ioh. 4.24 QUEST IV. How farre the Iudicials are now to be retained FUrther concerning the Judicials of Moses 1. They doe much differ in respect of their observation from the Ceremonials for these are so abrogated as that now to observe the figures and types of the old Testament were great impiety for all such things were observed then vel expresè vel tacitè sub protestatione Messiae futuri c. either expresly or closely under protestation of the Messiah to come now therefore to observe them were to protest Christum nondum venisse that Christ were not yet come But it is not so with the Judicials for they being conclusions and rules of justice grounded upon the Law of nature and first given for the conservation of the peace and politike state of that Common-wealth and not prescribed for any signification or prefiguring of things to come they may now be so farre forth observed as they are found fitting and agreeable unto the state and condition of the people Sic fere Tostat. Lippom. 2. Two wayes is a precept said to be figurale figurative◠one way when it is principally instituted to figure somewhat such were the ceremoniall precepts another ex consequenti by a certaine consequent and so are the Judicials after a sort figurative because they belonged unto that people cujus status erat figuralis whose state was figurative Sic Thom. Lippom. To bee figurative in this sense letteth not but that the Judicials may be retained now seeing they were not appointed or ordained to prefigure any thing as the Ceremonials were 3. But here two strange positions come to be examined the one is of Lippoman That to observe the Judicials tanquam ex lege veteri obligatoria esset mortiferum as binding by force of the old Law were a deadly sinne Tostatus also saith We receive the judiciall precepts given of God tanquam dicta sapientis viri c. as the sayings of some wise man not as of a lawgiver binding us to the observation thereof like as the Romans borrowed their Lawes of the wise Grecians Tostat. qu. 1. Contra. 1. The old Law in the constituting of the Judicials was grounded upon the Law of equity which rule of equity it is no sinne to follow now therefore it is no sinne to follow the rules of the old law as they are grounded upon equity and justice nay therein to depart from them were rather transgression 2. S. Iames saith chap. 4.12 There is one Lawgiver which is able to save and destroy therefore to whom doth it rather belong to give direction for what offences mans life is to be saved and other punishment to be afflicted and for what his life is to bee taken away than unto that perfit and soveraigne Lawgiver who is the author and giver of life and at whose will and pleasure only mans life is taken away To say therefore that the Judicials appointed by God are to be observed now only as the sayings of a wise man not as of a Lawgiver is both to derogate from Gods authority who is the only sufficient Lawgiver and from the sufficiencie of his law which is more perfect than any humane constitutions whatsoever in making these Judicials but equall unto the sayings of other wise men But this question hath beene already handled at large before in the generall questions in chap. 1. Exod. QUEST V. Why these Lawes are called judgements THese are the judgements 1. He saith not Dei judicia sed absolut◠judicia the judgements of God but absolutely judgements for he which observed these was not yet just before God though hee were before men Lippoman 2. This word judgement in the singular signifieth not as judgements in the plurall for judgement in the singular for the most part signifieth condemnation but in the plurall it signifieth tam re◠vindictam quà m innocentis defensionem as well the revenge and punishment of the guilty as the defence of the innocent Rupertus 3. This word judgement is taken three wayes first it signifieth the act of the judgement and understanding which determineth what is meet and convenient to be done and so it is as the fountaine and beginning whence