particular Church it is no Church at all for the Catholicke Church it is not he replyes that though it be not such a particular Congregation as I intend yet it may be a particular Patriarchall Church but 1 then it seemes it is a particular Church which grants my inference 2. It was a particular Church of Christ's institution that I inquired after doth our Authour think that Christ hath appointed any Patriarchall Church a Patriarchall Church as such is such from it's Relation to a Patriarch and he can scarce be thought to judge Patriarches to be of Divine institution who hath cast off and abjured Episcopacy The Donatists are mentioned againe p. 113. And I am againe Charged with an attempt to vindicate them from schisme my thoughts of them I have before declared to the full have no reason to retract any thing from what was then spoken or to adde any thing thereunto if it may satisfie our Authour I here grant they were Schismatickes with what aggravations he pleaseth wherein their schisme consisted I have also declared but he sayes I undertake to exempt some others from schisme I know whom that suffer with them in former and after ages under the same imputation I doe so indeed and I suppose our Authour may ghesse at whom I intend himselfe amongst others I hope he is not so taken up in his thoughts with charging schisme on others as to forget that many the greatest part and number of the true Churchs of Christ doe condemne him for a Schismatick a Donatisticall Schismatick I suppose he acknowledges the Church of Rome to be a true Church the Lutheran I am perswaded he will not deny nor perhaps the Grecian to be so The Episcopall Church of England he contends for and yet all these with one voice cry out upon him for a Schismaticke and as to the plea of the last how he can satisfie his conscience as to the rejection of his lawfull superiors upon his owne principles without pretending any such crime against them as the Donatists did against Caecilianus I professe I do not understand new mention is made of Episcopall ordination p. 120 And they are said to have had their successive ordination from Rome who ordained therein so indeed some say and some otherwise whether they had or no is nothing to me I lay no weight upon it they held I am sure that place in England that without their approbation no man could publickly preach the Gospell to say they were Presbyters and ordained as Presbyters I know not what satisfaction can arise unto Conscience thereby Party and argument may be countenanced by it they professe they ordained as Bishops that for their lives and soules they durst not ordaine but as such so they told those whom they ordained and affirme they have open injury done them by any ones deniall of it As it was the best is to be made of it this shift is not handsome nor is it ingenious for any one that hath looked into Antiquity to charge me with departing from their sense in the notion of schisme declared about the 3d 4th Ages at the same time to maintaine an equality between Bishops and Presbyters or to say that Bishops ordained as Presbyters not as Bishops nor doe I understand the excellency of that order which we see in some Churches where they have two sorts of Elders the one made so by ordination without Election and the other by Election without ordination those who are ordained casting off all power and Authority of them that ordained them and those who are elected immediately rejecting the greatest part of those that chose them Nor did I as is pretend plead for their Presbyterian way in the yeare 46 all the ministers almost in the county of Essex know the contrary one especially who being a man of great ability and moderation of spirit and for his knowledge in those things not behind any man I know in England of his way with whome in that yeare and the next following I had sundry conferences at publicke meetings of ministers as to the severall wayes of Reformation then under proposall But the frivolousnesse of these imputations hath been spoken of before as also the falsnesse of the Calumny which our Authour is pleased to repeat againe about my turning from wayes in Religion My description of a particular Church he once more blames as applicable to the Catholicke Church invisible and to the visible Catholick Church I suppose he meanes as such when a participation in the same ordinances numerically is assigned as its difference He askes whether it becomes my ingenuity to interpret the capability of a Churches reduction to it's primitive constitution by its owne fitnesse and capacity to be so reduced rather then by its externall hinderances or furtherances But with what ingenuity or modesty that question is asked I professe I understand not and pag. 134 he hath this passage only I take notice of his introduction to his answer with thankes for the civility of the inquiry in the manner of its expresion my words were these whether our Reverend Authour doe not in his conscience thinke there was no true Church in England 'till c which puts me into suspition that the Reverend Doctour was offended that I did not alwaies for oft I doe give him that title of the Reverend Authour or the Doctor which made him cry out he was never so dealt withall by any party as by me though upon review I doe not find that I gave him any uncivill language unbeseeming me to give or him to receive and I heare that somebody hath dealt more uncivilly with him in that respect which he took very ill Let this Reverend Authour make what use of it he please I cannot but againe tell him that these things become neither him nor any man professing the Religion of Jesus Christ or that hath any respect to truth or sobriety can any man thinke that in his conscience he gives any credit to the insinuation which here he makes that I should thanke him for calling me Reverend Authour or Reverend Doctor or be troubled for his not useing those expressions Can the mind of an honest man be thought to be conversant with such meane and low thoughts for the Title of Reverend I doe give him notice that I have very little valued it ever since I have considered the saying of Luther Nunquam periclitatur Religio nisi inter Reverendissimos So that he may as to me forbeare it for the future and call me as the Quakers doe and it shall suffice And for that of Doctor it was conferred on me by the University in my absence and against my consent as they have expressed it under their publicke seale nor doth any thing but gratitude and respect unto them make me once own it and freed from that obligation I should never use it more nor did I use it untill some were offended with me blamed me for my
Pope of Rome in any one particular that constituteth him such an officer was once instituted by Christ I shall farther attend unto his Reason for his Authority from that of the High-Priests among the Jewes which was not lost as to it's continuance in the family of Aaron notwithstanding the miscarriage of some individuall Person vested therewithall In the close of the Chapter he reassumes his charge of my renouncing my owne Ordination which with great confidence and without the least scruple he had asserted in his Answer of that assersion he now pretends to give the Reasons whereof the first is this 1. The world lookes on him as an Independent of the highest note therefore he hath renounced his ordination and therefore I dare to say so So much for that reason I understand neither the Logick nor morality of this first Reason 2. He knowes from good hands that some of the Brethren have renounced their Ordination therefore he durst say positively that I have renounced mine Prov. 12. 18. 3. He hath heard that I disswaded others from their ordination and therefore he durst say I renownced my owne and yet I suppose he may possibly disswade some from Episcopall Ordination but I know it not no more than he knowes what he affirmes of me which is false 4. He concludes from the principles in my book of Schisme because I said that to insist upon a succession of ordination from Anti-Christ and the Beast of Rome would if I mistake not keep up in this particular what God would have pulled down therefore I renounced my ordination when he knowes that I avowed the validity of ordination on another account 5. If all this will not doe he tels me of something that was said at a publique meeting at dinner it seemes with the Canons of Chhist-Church viz that I vallued not my ordination by the Bishop of Oxford any more than a crum upon my trencher which words whether ever they were spoken or no or to what purpose or in reference to what Ordination I meane of the two orders or in what sense or with what limitation or as part of what discourse or in comparison of what else or whither solely in refference to the Roman succession in which sense I will have nothing to doe with it I know not at all nor will concerne my selfe to enquire being greatly ashamed to find men professing the Religion of Jesus Christ so farre forgetfull of all common Rules of civility and principles of humane society as to insist upon such vaine groundlesse reports as the Foundations of accusations against their Brethren nor doe I believe that any one of the Reverend Persons quoted will owne this information although I shall not concerne my selfe to make enquiry into their memories concerning any such passage or discourse Much reliefe for the future against these and the like mistakes may be afforded from an easy observation of the different senses wherein the terme of Ordination is often used it is one thing when it is taken largely for the whole appointment of a man to the ministry in which sense I desire our Authour to consider what is written by Beza among Reformed and Gerhard among the Lutheran Divines to omit innumerable others another thing when taken for the imposition of hand whither by Bishops or Presbyters concerning which single Act both as to its order efficacy I have sufficiently delivered my judgment if he be pleased to take notice of it I feare indeed that when men speak of an ordained ministry which in its true and proper sense I shall with them contend for they often relate only to that solemnity restraining the authoritative making of ministers singly thereunto contrary to the intention and meaning of that expression in Scripture antiquity and the best reformed Divines both Calvinists and Lutherans and yet it is not imaginable how some men prevaile by the noise and sound of that Word upon the prejudiced minds of partiall unstudied men A litle time may farther manifest if it be not sufficiently done already that another account is given of this matter by Clemens Tertullian Cyprian Origen Justin Martyr and generally all the first writers of Christians besides the Counsels of old late with innumerable Protestant Authors of the best note to the same purpose This I say is the ground of this mistake whereas sundry things concurre to the calling of Ministers as it belongs to the Church of God the ground and pillar of truth the spouse of Christ Psal. 45. and mother of the family or she that tarryeth at home Psal. 68. unto whom all ministers are stewards 1 Cor. 4. 1. even in that house of God 1 Tim. 3. 15. and sundry qualifications are indispensably previously required in the persons to be called overlooking the necessity of the qualifications required and omitting the duty and authority of the Church Acts 1. 15. Acts 6. 2. 13. 2. 14. 22. the Act of them who are not the whole Church Ephes. 4. 11 12. but only a part of it 1 Cor. 3. 21. 2 Cor. 1. 24. 1 Pet. 5. 3. as to ministry consisting in the approbation and solemne confirmation of what is supposed to go before hath in some mens language gotten the name of ordination and an interpretation of that name to such an extent as to enwrap in it all that is indispensably necessary to the constitution or making of ministers so that where that is obtained in what order soever or by whom soever administred who have first obtained it themselves there is a lawfull and sufficient calling to the ministry Indeed I know no errour about the institutions of Christ attended with more pernitious consequences to the Church of God then this should it be practised according to the force of the principle its selfe Suppose six eight or ten men who have themselves been formerly ordained but now perhaps not by any ecclesiasticall censure but by an act of the civill magistrate are put out of their places for notorious ignorance and scandall should concurre and ordaine an hundred ignorant and wicked persons like themselves to be ministers must they not on this Principle be all accounted ministers of Christ and to be invested with all ministeriall power and so be enabled to propagate their kind to the end of the world and indeed why should not this be granted seeing the whole bulke of the papall ordination is contended for as valid whereas it is notoriously knowne that sundry Bishops among them who perhaps received their own ordination as the reward of a whore being persons of vitious lives and utterly ignorant of the Gospell did sustaine their pompe and sloth by selling holy orders as they called them to the scum and refuse of men but of these things more in their proper place Take then Reader the substance of this chapter in this briefe recapitulation 1. He denies our Churches to be true Churches and our Ministers true Ministers 2. He hath renounced his owne ordination 3. When some
it be rotten or null in the foundation yet by continuance and time it might obtaine validity and strength When the claime is by succession from such a stock or root if you suppose once a totall intercision in the succession from that stock or root there is an utter end put to that claime let us now consider how the case is with them from whom this claime is derived 1. It is notoriously knowne that amongst them the validity of the sacraments depends upon the intention of the Administrator It is so with them as to every thing they call a sacrament now to take one step backwards that baptisme will by some of ours be scarce accounted valid which is not administred by a lawfull minister suppose now that some Pope ordaining a Bishop in his stable to satisfy a Whore had not an intention to make him a Bishop which is no remote surmise he being no Bishop rightly ordained all the Priests by him afterwards consecrated were indeed no priests and so indeed had no power to administer any Sacraments and so consequently the baptisme that may lye for ought we know at the root of that which some of us pretend unto was originally absolutely null and void and could never by tract of time be made valid or effectuall for like a muddy fountaine the farther it goes the more filthy it is or suppose that any Priest baptizing one who afterwards came to be Pope from whom all Authority in that Church doth flow and is derived had no intention to baptize him what will become of all that ensues thereon It is endlesse to pursue the uncertainties and intanglements that insue on this head of account and sufficiently easy it is to manifest that whosoever resolves his interest in Gospell priviledges into this foundation can have no assurance of faith nay nor tolerably probable conjecture that he is baptized or was ever made partaker of any ordinance of the Gospell Let them that delight in such troubled waters sport themselves in them for my owne part considering the state of that Church for some yeares if not Ages wherein the fountaines of all Authority amongst them were full of filth and blood there Popes upon their owne confession being made set up and pulled downe at the pleasure of vile impudent domineering strumpets and supplying themselves with officers all the world over of the same spirit and stamp with themselves and that for the most part for hire being in the meane time all Idolaters to a man I am not willing to grant that their Good and upright intention is necessary to be supposed as a thing requisite unto my interest in any priviledge of the Gospell of Christ 2. It is an ecclesiasticall determination of irrefragable Authority amongst them that whosoever he be that administers baptisme so he use the matter and forme that baptisme is Good and valid and not to be reiterated yea Pope Nicholas in his Resolutions and determinations upon the enquiry of the Bulgarians whose decrees are authentick and recorded in their Counsells Tom 2. Crabb p. 144. declares the judgment of that Church to the full They tell him that many in their Nation were baptized by an unknowne person a Jew or a Pagan they knew not whether and enquire of him whether they were to be rebaptized or no whereunto he answers si in nomine S. S. Trinitatis vel tantum in Christi nomine sicut in Act is Apostolorum legimus baptizati sunt unum quippe idemque est ut S. Ambrosius expressit constat eos denuo non esse baptizandos if they were baptized in the name of the Trinity or of Christ they are not to be baptized againe Let a blasphemous Jew or Pagan do it so it be done the work is wrought grace conveyed and baptisme valid The constant practise of women baptizing amongst them is of the same import and what doth Mr Cawdry think of this kind of Baptisme Is it not worth the contending about to place it in the derived succession of ours who knowes but that some of these persons baptized by a counterfeit impostor on purpose to abuse and defile the institutions of our blessed Saviour might come to be baptizers themselves yea Bishops or Popes from whom all ecclesiasticall Authority was to be derived and what evidence or certainty can any man have that his baptisme doth not flow from this fountaine 3. Nay upon the Generall account if this be required as necessary to the administration of that ordinance that he that doth baptize be rightly and effectually baptized himselfe who can in faith bring an infant to any to be baptized unlesse he himselfe saw that person rightly baptized As to the matter of Baptisme then we are no more concerned then as to that of Ordination by what waies or meanes soever any man comes to be a minister according to the mind of Jesus Christ by that way and meanes he comes to have power for a due administration of that ordinance concerning which state of things our Author may do well to consult Beza in the place mentioned Many other passages there are in this Chapter that might be remarked and a returne easily made according to their desert of untruth and impertinency but the insisting on such things lookes more like childrens playing at pushpin then the management of a serious disputation Take an instance pag. 23. he seemes to be much offended with my commending him and tells me as Jerome said of Ruffinus I wrong him with prayses when yet the utmost I say of him is that I had received a better character of him then he had given of himselfe in his book pag. 10. and that his proceeding was unbecoming his worth gravity and profession pag. 46. or so Grave and Reverend a person as he is reported to be pag. 121. wherein it seemes I have transgressed the rule {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} The businesse of his second Chapter is to make good his former charge of my inconstancy and inconsistency with my selfe as to my former and present Opinions which he had placed in the Frontispiece of his other Treatise The Impertinency of this Chapter had beene intolerable but that the loose discourses of it are relieved by a scheme of my self-Contradictions in the close His designe he professeth in his former discourse was not to blast my Reputation or to cause my person to suffer but to prevent the prevalency of my way by the Authority of my person That is it was not his intention it was only his intention for such a purpose I blesse my God I have good security through Grace that whether he or others like minded with himselfe intend any such thing or no in those proceedings of his and theirs which seemed to have in their owne nature a tendency thereunto my reputation shall yet be preserved in that state and Condition as is necessary to accompany me in the duties and workes of my Generation that I shall through the hand of
way which I delivered more laxly I expresse more distinctly in the Treatise of the Keyes which followed after and some things more fully and clearely in the way cleared then in either of the former Answer 3. When I say No Act of the Peoples part doeth properly binde unlesse the Authority of the Elder joyne with it Keyes pag. 36. I would be understood to speak it as I meant it of the Elders walking without offence in the Right Administration of their office and Conversation of their lives Answer 4. When Mr Hooker saith Excommunication is not an Act of Office Power nor of Rule but of supreame Judgment seated in the Fraternity I easily grant that the Excommunication dispensed by the Fraternity is not an Act of Office-Power But it may Justly be Inquired whether Excommunication being Dispensed by the Elders with the consent of the Church be not an Act as of the Churches honourable Judiciall Power so of the Elders Office-Power and Rule in the Church For as the Pastorall Preaching of the Elders is Officiall and so Authoritative though the Preaching of other Brethren as of the Sonnes of the Prophets be not so so why may there not be the like Difference observed here To deliver unto Satan seemeth to be an Act of Judiciall Office-Power as when in another case it is said The Judge delivereth a man to the Officer and the officer casteth him into Prison Matth. 5. 25. He that casteth into Prison is an Inferiour officer The Judge must therefore be a Superiour officer that delivereth an offendour to the officer to be cast into Prison In the Excommunication of the Incestuous Corinthian where both the Elders and Brethren concurred the sentence might well be delivered in Termes that expresse an Act of highest Authority To deliver unto Satan But where the Church is called to Act against their Elders who corrupt them with false Doctrine there the Apostle Requireth the Church to mark them and Avoyd them Rom. 16. 17 18. which may expresse an Act of liberty and Judiciall Power but not of Authority CHAP. 4. Touching the seaventh Contradiction and eighth The seaventh Contradiction is thus gathered 7. It was a Sacrilegious Breach of Order That Commissaries and Chancellours wanting the Key of Order no Ministers have been invested with Jurisdiction Yea and more then Ministeriall Authority above those Elders who labour in word and Doctrine The Keyes pag. 16. 7. There is a Key of Power given to the Church with the Elders as to open a doore of entrance to the Ministers calling so to shut the doore of entrance against them in some cases c. The Keyes p. 9. Yea to Censure all their Elders without Elders The Way p. 45. as before Ans. The power given to the Commissaries Chancellors I justly called a Sacrlegious Breach of Order in more Respects than one 1. In that being no Ministers they exercised more than Ministeriall Authority over the Elders For Ministers doe not exercise Authority over Elders no nor over any Brother but with consent of the Church But these doe it without and against the Consent of the Church 2. In that they exercise this Authority even in Churches wherein they have not Received the key of Order and so stand not so much as in the Order of Members amngst them 3. In that they proceed against them not for crimes committed against the word of God but for Neglect of Popish-Canons or Humane Traditions But now no Authority allowed to Brethren either in the Keyes or in the Way cometh neere to this Breach of Order For 1. In Joyning with the Elders to open a doore of entrance to Minister's calling They put forth no Act of Authority properly so called at all but only exercise a liberty and Power orderly which they have Received from the Lord Jesus to elect their own officers As the Peoples election of Deacons Act. 6. 2. to 5th And their lifting up of hands in the choice of Elders Act. 14. 23. doth declare And when they doe shut them forth it is not without their Elders where their Elders are not wanting or not wanting to their Duty And even then they put forth no Act of Office Rule or Authority properly so called as the Commissaries doe but only an Act of Judiciall Power common to the whole Church 1 Cor. 5. 12. 2. The People do exercise this Power only in their own Church where themselves are members and have Received a key of Order 3. They proceed not against any much lesse against their Elders but for notorious offences committed against the word of God in Doctrine or life so that this Contradiction speaketh as little ad idem as any of the former Touching the 8th Contradiction The 8th Contradiction is represented thus 8. We are so farre from Allowing that Sacrilegious usurpation of the Ministers office That private Christians ordinarily take upon them to Preach the Gospell Publickly The Keyes pag 6. 8. This is ordinarily Practised in England and Allowed by the Independant Brethren Yea they being but in the Notion of Gifted Brethren no Ministers to other Congregations doe it ordinarily themselves Ans. 1. This Contradiction is not of me to my selfe but of some others who whether they be Independants truly so called I doe not know sure I am that Presbyterians and Independants are not membra Dividentia though I see that all that are not for Popery or Episcopacy or Presbytery doe commonly lurke under the style of Independancy I hope the Replyer would be loth to Renounce the Protestant Religion because there are found some contradictions and greater than these in one of them to another Ans. 2. When I call it a Sacrilegious usurpation for Private Christians Ordinarily to take upon them to Preach the Gospell Publickly to Administer the Sacraments yet this latter of Administring the Sacraments the Replyer leaveth out and so the Contradictiction is not ad idem which is a Common failing in this and the rest For I would not say that it is a Sacrilegious usurpation for well gifted Brethren where ordained Ministers cannot be had there to Preach ordinarily and Publickly especially if they be Approved by those that have Power and requested thereto by the People wherein I goe further in giving way to the Prophecying of Private Brethren than my Reverend Brethren the Prefacers to the Keyes doe who only Allow them to Preach occasionally and not ordinarily which I speak only to this end That the Replyer and others may know there is more consent and Agreement in our Judgments then they take notice of or sometimes our selves either But if Private Brethren doe Administer the Sacraments at all whether ordinarily or Occasionally It seemeth to me like the Fact of Uzziah in offering Incense CHAP. 5. Touching the 9th Contradiction The 9th Contradiction is layd out thus 9. A Particular Church of Saints Professing the Faith that is members without offices is the first subject of all the Church Offices with all their Spirituall Gifts
p. 45. 14. In Act. 13. 2 3. There is no Ordination to Office at all for the Apostles had their office before Mr. Hooker Surv. Part. 2. p. 83. This was not to put a new office upon them but to confirme their sending to the Gentiles ib. p. 60. 14. This was done in a Particular Church Keyes p. 29. The officers of one Church did what was done in an ordinary Way Surv. Parr 2. p. 83. Then it followeth by Mr. C. his Doctrine that the Apostles who were officers in all Churches were ordained in a Particular Church or that officers of a Church may be ordained in another Church which he said was unwarrantable Ans. 1. When I say in the Way That Paul and Barnabas were ordained to the Apostolick office by Imposition of hands of some officers of the Church at Antioch Act. 13. 1 2 3. It is not Disproved by Mr Hooker saying that they had had their office before For I noe where say That ordination Giveth the office but only Approveth it and Solemnely as it were Installeth the elect officer into it and sendeth him forth with a Blessing into the Administration of it Neither when he saith That there is there no Ordination unto office at all doth he contradict what I affirme For his meaning is to Deny it in Mr Rutherford's sence who speaketh there of Ordination as Giving the calling unto the office which Mr Hooker Disproveth and therein I concurre with him For it puts no New office upon them but Bare witnesse to that calling which the Holy Ghost had given them When Mr Hooker saith The Officers of one Church did what was done in an ordinary way He himselfe inferreth the consequence Therefore it is no Precedent for the Pastors of many Churches what either they may or should doe But the Inferences which Mr Cawdry gathereth as from my Doctrine out of that Text either will not hold or not hurt our cause For this Inference will not hold That then the Officers of one Chuch may be ordained in another For they were as much Officers of the Church of Antioch as of any other Churches It will only inferre That they who are officers in many Churches may be Ordained in any one of them The other inference will in part follow That some of the Apostles who were Officers in all Churches may be Ordained in a Particular Church when the Holy Ghost calleth for it For they Act now not in their own Name or Power but in the great Name and Soveraigne Power of the Lord Jesus who is the Head of all Churches But what Prejudice is that to our cause or wherein doth it contradict any of our Tenents The 15th Contradiction is thus Declared 15. What if the whole Presbytery offend The readiest course is to bring the matter to a Synod the keyes pag. 43. 15. There is a readier and nearer way The Brethren may censure them all Way pag. 45. If the Congregation be found faithfull and willing to Remove an offence by due censure why should the offence be called up to a more publicke Judicature Keyes pag. 42. Ans. This Contradiction is made partly out of the concealment of Part of my words in the first Columne and Partly out of the Addition of some words of his own in the second Columne In the former Columne I say If the whole Presbytery offend or such a Part as will draw a Party and a Faction in the Church with them the readiest course then is to bring the matter to a Synod where those words such a Part as will draw a Party or Faction in the Church with them are given for the just Reason why in such a case the case of the offending Presbytery or other such Leading members in the Church should be brought to a Synod before it be censured in the Church But in the words recited in the latter Columne I speak of the Congregation as Agreeing together and both faithfull and willing to Proceed against Hereticall Doctrine and Scandalous crimes in whomsoever And then they need not Trouble the Synod to cleare the case which is already cleare unto themselves so that this Contradiction speaketh not ad Idem The one Columne speaketh of a Church Divided into parts and Factions and their readiest course is to bring the matter to a Synod The second Columne speaketh of a Church both faithfull and willing to Proceede against offences with one accord And then they have sufficient Power within themselves to judge that which is right and to execute their Judgment That which is Added of the Replyers own words in the latter Columne doth help not a little to make up an Appearance of the Contradiction In the Keyes I had sayd In the case above mentioned It is the readiest course to bring the matter to the Synod In the Way he quoteth my words as if I had said There is a readier and nearer way The Brethren may censure them all If these words had been mine there had been an Appearance of Contradiction To say this is the readyest course and yet to say a Discrepant course is a readier and nearer way is at least verbo tenus an apparent Contradiction But the Truth is Those words are none of mine but the Replyers own And so it will be an easy matter to make up Contradictions tot quot if we may take leave in one sentence to conceale Part of the words necessary to make up the sense and in another sentence to Adde words of our owne The 16th Contradiction is delivered thus 16. It belongeth to the civill Magistrate to establish pure Religion in Doctrine worship and Government partly by civill Punishment upon the wilfull oppressours and Disturbers of the same Keyes p. 50. 16. Yet the Brethren here call for or Tolerate Toleration of all Opinions and Deny the magistrate Power to Punish any Pretending conscience Bartlets Model pag. 128. 16. See Mr. Bartlets Modell p. 25. Contrà Ans. 1. This Contradiction laboureth of the same Disease as the rest generally Doe It speaketh not ad Idem Such as require the Magistrate to establish Pure Religion in Doctrine worship and Government and to Restraine the willfull opposers and Disturbers thereof by civill Punishments They speak of Fundamentals in Religion and such opinions as apparently tend to libertinisme and licentious ungodlynesse as Mr Bartlet expresseth it Modell pag. 126. But the Toleration which they Allow and call for is of such opinions as neither subvert the Foundation of Religion nor Practise of Piety Both these may be maintained without the least shew of the face of Contradiction Further I find this in Mr Bartlet That himselfe and some others are not free That Hereticks should be put to Death in case they keep their errors to themselves and doe not seek to seduce and corrupt others And though I grant that such an Heretick after once or twice Admonition may be Rejected out of the Church according to Titus 3. 10 11. yet I doe not finde that Moses