Selected quad for the lemma: power_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
power_n king_n people_n regal_a 3,304 5 11.2674 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A53971 A sermon preacht on January 30th, 1683 in Westminster-Abby before the reverend and honourable, the Kings judges, and printed at their request by Edw. Pelling ... Pelling, Edward, d. 1718. 1684 (1684) Wing P1096; ESTC R23221 19,302 48

There are 6 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

such a superlative piece of Villany stir at least an honest mans Choler and provoke him to spit some of it in the Rebels face I hope things will not come to that pass yet but that we who then had not hands to rescue a good Kings blood may now be allowed the use of our Tongues to Revenge it and I trust in God our honest Posterity will think so too But I will charm my self as much as ' ti● possible and instead of breaking out into such declamatory speeches as this occasion does justly require I shall insist upon the natural Sense and Importance of my Text and with what brevity I can handle such truths as may be easily discover'd by any Eye that is not blood-shot or that doth not look asquint upon our Government In order hereunto we are to note 1. That by resistance here is meant in general all undutiful disobedient and contumacious behaviour and in particular all open forcible and violent Opposition 2. That by the Power in my Text is meant not only the Governours Authority but the Governour himself the Person of the Chief Magistrate who is vested with the Supreme Authority This is well to be observed because the Traytors of the late times proceeded upon a nice distinction between the Kings Natural and Politick capacity cheating the World into a belief that his Power was Lodged not in his Person but in the Two Houses of Parliament and that 't was not the Man in the Throne but the Regal Authority which was virtually in the People that was the thing sacred According to this sophistical pretence the King was against himself and such as stood for him were understood to Resist his Power in defending his Person So that in the upshot 't was his Majesty that was looked upon as the Traytor against the King and they who destroy'd him did not destroy their Soveraign but did only cut off Charles Stuart No the Rebellious Juncto at Westminster were in their own Language the Kings most dutiful and most Loyal Subjects even when they pull'd off his Crown when one damned Faction held him by the Hair and the other Godly Reprobates cut off his Head After this rate was not the Apostle a very Heterodox Malignant an ill Common-wealths-man in not dividing the Kings Authority from his Person but joyning both together For he calls the Person of Nero and other Princes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Supream or Highest Powers v. 1. And by his following discourse 't is plain that by the Power he doth mean the Person of the Magistrate that is in Chief the person that presideth over all the person that is the Head of a Nation For at the 3d. 4th and 6th Verses he calls him expresly the Ruler the Minister of God the man that beareth the Sword the Revenger pointing all along to the person himself that is to receive Tribute to the person that is Gods Substitute and Deputy to the person that is to praise them that do well and Execute wrath upon evil-doers Shall I take leave to give you a paraphrase upon my Text Why you shall have it not out of any single Commentator that may be lookt upon as an Arbitrary or Prerogative man or onePopishly affected but out of an honest Statute of this Realm which makes St. Paul's Divinity to be Law too the Act declares That it is not lawful upon any pretence whatsoever to take Arms against the King and that the Position of taking Arms by the Kings Authority against his Person or against those that are commissionated by him is a Trayterous Position Nay there is another very significant word yet which commands every Subject to be an Abhorrer in this point for faith the Law it is a Traiterous position to be Abhorr'd The Text being thus opened there are three grand Truths which it offers to every mans conscience and which cannot but stare in that Rebels face whose conscience ●s not seared with an hot Iron though I think there are few Rebels in the Land whose consciences are not feared to a very Crust 1. That the Supreme Power or the Authority which is seated in the Kings Person is the Ordinance of God himself 2. That because the King is Gods own Minister ordained Supreme by his Commission no man must dare upon pain of Damnation to use any violence against him 3. That considering what Princes were who were the Supreme Powers in St. Pauls time it is by no means lawful to resist even wicked and Heathen Kings And when these truths are a little laid open Duty and Allegiance will further oblige us all to consider the sin of the Day 1. First That the Supreme Power or the Authority which is seated in the Kings Person is the Ordinance of God himself Whosoever resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God saith the Apostle And so this point passed all along uncontradicted through all Ages till some counted it 〈◊〉 greater virtue to be Politicians then to b● Honest I do not know one Christian Write for 1600 years together who ever denye● that the Power of the Civil Magistrate is of Divine Institution though Jure Divino is now look't upon by some either Fanciful or Ill Men as a betraying of the Peoples Liberties and Rights And yet doth not the Apostle positively tell us that there is no power but of God v. 1. And to prevent a mistake for fear we should interpret this of Gods Permission only he tells us in the next breath that the Powers that be are Ordained of God And that is much more than Permission He hath permitted Oppressors and Usurpers Bradshaws Cromwels and such like Excrements of Nature But he never appointed or Ordained them as he doth every Lawful Prince No the Commission the Authority of a Lawful Prince is from above so that he is Homo à Deo secundus quicquid est à Deo consecutus Solo Deo minor as Tertullian and all Christians then believed a Man next unto God holding all his Regalities of God Inferior to God alone And indeed how could St. Paul call Kings the Ministers of God as he doth Thrice for failing in 2. Verses of this Chapter were not the Authority of Kings by Divine Right or Designation All the Apostles expressions are so clear so significant so full on the Kings behalf that I should be loth to see the Tythe of so much for a Chair-man in a Common-wealth or for a Parish Pope or for a Lay-Elder Nay did the Scriptures speak but the Hundredth part so much on their side what a Noise and Dust should we have about Jus Divinum then Many men do not understand what we mean when we say that this or that thing is de Jure Divino many dangerous and mischievous Errors have been occasioned through mens Ignorance in this particular Therefore for the right understanding of this matter we must know that a thing may be said to be Jure Divino either in a strict or
A SERMON PREACHT On January 30th 1683. IN Westminster-Abby Before the REVEREND and HONOURABLE the KINGS JUDGES and Printed at their Request By Edw. Pelling Praebendary of Westminster and Chaplain to his Grace the Duke of Somerset Omnis quidem sub Rege ipse sub nulló sed tantùm sub Deo non est inferior sibi Subjectis non parem habet in Regno Bracton l 1. c. 8. A Deo Rex à Rege Lex LONDON Printed by H. Hills Jun. for William Abington next Door to the Wonder Tavern in Ludgate-Street 1684. To the Right Honourable Sir George Jefferyes Knt. and Bar. Lord Chief Justice of England and one of His Majesties Most Honourable Privy-Council My Lord I Do heartily wish that your Lordships desires had not been so Earnest and Pressing as they were to have this Discourse made Publick which I assure Your Lordship was not in the least by me designed to be sent abroad into the World Your Lordship knew those Obligations I lye under to Your Lordship as my Kind and Noble Friend and the Principle I go upon of submitting to Authority so that Your Lordship had me under a double tye both of Gratitude and Obedience I expect to bear a great many more hard Censures and Invectives for this though I have done no more then what I think was my bounden Duty to do But those things I have been so accustomed to hear that I am now Clamour-proof I had almost said that mine Ears are somewhat like a Traytors Conscience past all feeling But if I may have leave to express my Real thoughts I cannot but pitty Your Lordship and your Reverend Brethren for Causing this Sermon to be Printed because hereby you have made it your own and are Oblig'd in Honour to undertake for it and to be my Defendants if ever I should be Threatned to be brought upon my Knees or to ho●● up my hand at the Bar for this as I have been threatned formerly for things of the like Nature And this I may think to be Security good enough But the mischief is that if ever tho●● Canicular days should come again Your Lordships will be in greater Jeopardy then my self and then God help my Advocates as well 〈◊〉 Your Client Let times be as it shall please God It is my Lord your Honour that you are true to you● Duty and it is my satisfaction that I can in any thing Obey your Commands And I do it with the more readiness because it is observed how ready your Lordship and the rest of the Judges are to stand by the Interest of the Church and upon all Occasions publickly to Vindicate the Honour and Integrity of the Conformable and Loyal Clergy That the God of peace for whom you Judge will Vouchsafe to preserve you in your Great and Honourable Station and support your Courage and Bless your Labours in the Ministration of Justice and Eternally Reward your Faithfulness to the King to the Church and to the whole Nation is My Lord the hearty Prayer of Your Lordships most Obliged and Obedient Servant Edw. Pelling Rom. 13. 2. Whosoever therefore Resisteth the Power Resisteth the Ordinance of God and they that Resist shall receive to themselves Damnation WHen the Christian Religion began to be planted in the World there were four very Evil Men which in their turns Succeeded Augustus in the Roman Empire Tiberius Caligula Claudius and Nero the latter of whom was the Man that raised the first Persecution against Christians I do not know but the Providence of God might order it thus that all men might have the most early notices of their Duty to Princes and that together with the true Faith they might receive the necessary Doctrines of due Obedience and Subjection to their Lawful Governours whether good or bad It was under Tiberius that Christ the Great Bishop of all our Souls gave that Command of rendering to Caesar the things that were Caesar's Matth. 22. 21. It was under Claudius that St. Peter the Great Apostle of the Jews taught the dispersed Converts to submit themselves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lords sake whether to the King as Supream or unto Governours sent by him c. 1 Pet. 2. And as 't is generally conceived it was under Nero that St. Paul the great Apostle of the Gentiles gave this so strict a charge Let every Soul be subject to the Higher Powers Because there is no Power but of God Had not this thing been a prime part of the Christian Religion we cannot conceive why such great care should have been taken to inform the whole World of it especially in times which afforded not any common encouragements thereunto Were it not a sad Truth that some will believe no more of the Scriptures then what serves their present Turn we might wonder how 't is possible for a Christian to be an Undutiful Subject For as that great Christian and Divine the Learned and Incomparable Dr. Hammond hath Of Resisting the Lawful Magistrate rightly observed In the New Testament especially in the Epistles of the Apostles which were all Written in time of the Reign of Wicked Heathen Bloody Adversaries of Christianity and can refer to none but those there is no one Christian Virtue or Article of Faith more clearly delivered more effectually inforced upon our Understandings and Affections to be acknowledged by the one and submitted to by the other then that of Obedience unto Kings So that it is not either Ignorance that can excuse or any allowable principle of Christianity that can encourage Resistance nor is it Zeal or Conscience that doth it though that has been pretended by some puling and ill natur'd Hypocrites but 't is either an haughty and unmanageable Spirit or an hankering after Spoyl or an Aking Tooth after Government or a Furious Rage for disappointments or Personal Spight or hopes of Revenge or the fear of Justice or a Restless Factious Humour or direct Devillishness and Atheism under the Bonnet of Religion some or all these things have ever been the true causes of those Riots which have been so Vexatious so Fatal to Soveraign Powers It being otherwise impossible that Men whose Consciences are so Enlightned by Gods own Word should be so Blind Wicked and Fool-hardy as to Rise up against their Prince at the manifest hazard of the Greatest and most Intolerable of all Evils For that is the Rebels portion if St. Paul may be credited That they who resist shall receive to themselves Damnation Yet I do not intend to declaim though the World might well bear with me and with all others should our mouths be full of the very Quintessence of bitterness especially when we reflect upon that most Horrid and Execrable Murder which was acted about this time upon the person of that Great Monarch and Martyr of whom the World was not worthy and perhaps will hardly ever see the like of him again It would be a pittiful and woful thing indeed should not
in a larger sense 1. In a strict sense when we find it in the Word of God to be Ordained by such an express Command as that the neglect thereof becometh Sinful Now when we speak of the Divine Right of Monarchy we do not mean that God did institute it so by his Express Command as if all other Forms of Government were absolutely Unlawful or as if it were unlawful for a Monarch to Contract his Power or set Limits to himself in the Use and Exercise of his Power No Princes may tye up their own hands themselves tho it be not Lawful for their Subjects to force Manacles upon them Kings may Abate much of their Greatness if they will 't is lawful for them to do it pro re natâ though it be Impolitick and Unsafe for them and for their Subjects too to do so at every Turn Therefore there is no ground for those Odious and Base Reflections which of late have been made upon the honest Clergy of this See Mr. Hunts Post-script Church as if they were Friends to Arbitrary Power and Tyranny and the like for asserting the Kings Power to be of Divine Original These are Lewd and Unjust censures But so it is that if any dirt can be raked out of the Kennel the Clergy shall be sure to have store of it thrown upon their Faces 2. A thing is said to be Jure divino in a Larger sense 1. When the Scriptures declare it to be Ordained of God though we cannot shew the Original Command or the precise time of its Institution 2. Or Secondly when we have strong and highly Probable Reasons to believe it tho there were no Declarations on that behalf 1. Partly from the great Congruity of the thing by reason whereof it seems to be Morally and Humanely Necessary 2. Partly from several Insinuations in Scripture which render the thing very Credible 3. And partly from the General practice of all Mankind who would not as we can suppose have consented in the Universal Observation of the thing had not God given some Law or other for it in the beginning Now then to apply this matter to our present purpose 1. Those places of Scripture which I have alleadged already do abundantly declare that the King hath his Power and Authority from God And this is enough to satisfie any Sober Man who hath any Reverence for the Scripture that Kingly Government was instituted by God as the best of Governments though we could not Trace the Institution of it clearly to the Fountain Head For in a matter of so Remote Antiquity it is not easie to Salve all doubts or to take away all occasion of Cavil from every Witty and Inquisitive Sophister As long as God hath declared that Kings Reign by Him 't is Reasonable for us to rest in that should we not be able to answer that Impudent Question which hath been ask't us of Late Where is the Charter for Kings 'T is in the Bible we see And that must satisfie me though I could not tell when or where or how it was first Signed 2. But then 2ly It hath been found by the certain Experience of all Ages that Monarchy is so Excellent so Incomparably beyond all other Forms so useful for the Ends of Government and in many Cases so extreamly necessary for the publick Good that 't is reasonable to conclude from the very Congruity of the thing that Kings were Ordained of God because 't is Reasonable to believe that in the Beginning God did Order every thing for the Best did Institute that Government which is most for the good of Prince and People too and made the World for us all not to plague one another but to be Happy in as long as we stay in it 3. Besides this Thirdly the Scripture gives us such plain such pregnant Insinuations touching matter of Fact in this point as do abundantly justifie the Jus Divinum of Regal power to be no Idle no Groundless Notion Go to the Creation and you will find that God Invested Adam with a plenitude of power over all Creatures over his very Wife and by consequence over all her Issue This the Apostle calleth a Law 1. Cor. 14 34. and as the Law which God gave to all his Works was to hold and last to the World's End so this Law touching Superiority and Subjection under one person seems as if it was intended to continue and to descend from Father to Son by Right of Primogeniture And this I take to have been the True Reason of that deadly Quarrel which Cain had against his Righteous Brother When he saw that God had a particular respect to Abel and his Offerings he was afraid lest Abel should go away with the Regal power and so he contrived to be rid of him not so much out of Envy as out of Ambition for fear he should lose his Birth-right To quiet his mind as to that God told him that if he did well he should have the Excellence that his Brothers desire should be subject unto him and that he should Rule over him which was the very Form of words whereby the Protoplast was invested with Authority over his Wife And St. Chrysoston Rightly observes that though God was displeased with Cain yet he did not presently deprive him of his just Authority and power but allowed him still 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Priviledges of Primogeniture Thus it was in the Times before the Primo geniti per Patris aut Mortem aut absentiam paternam quodammòdo auctoritatem in fratres habebant Sed hoc jus Peccato amitti poterat Gr●t Annot. ad Gen. 4. 7. Flood Right of Dominion was ordered by God to Descend by Inheritance and so it did actually descend where God himself did not cut off that Right which he had given for some Important Reasons In the times after the Flood Government went in the same Channel So Reuben was called the Excellency of Dignity and the Excellency of Power because he was the First-Born And Esau should have been a Lord and Prince over Jacob had he not Sold his Birth-right and because he Sold it he is called a Prophane person for Selling that which was not his own it was a Sacred thing a Donative from God therefore he was Cursed for Selling it for a mess of Pottage But here we must note that when Families increased so that they were forced to part into several Colonies for want of Room by the grant and Donation of the Father each Son became a distinct Prince having a distinct Empire over his own Family and by such Divisions and Subdivisions it came to pass that so many Monarchies were set up in the World in a short time Hence it was that Nimrod had a Kingdom of his own And the Scripture calls him a Mighty Hunter not because he was a Monarch but because he was a Violent Encroacher because not content with his own Empire he Invaded the Rights and Royalties
of others who were Soveraigns within their Territories as well as himself Hence it is too that upon that ●ee Mr. Med●s ●iatrib in Gen. 10. Orderly dispersion of the Sons of Noah the whole Earth was by degrees divided into a great many Kingdoms so that of Noah Issue there were I know not how many Kings in a short time They were divided after their Tongues after their Families after their Generations in their several Nations and Countries as the Scripture often tells us Gen. 10. Thus all the Monarchies in the World were Founded not by Peoples chusing their Leaders and Governours but by Princes going out with their Respective Families and using a Soveraign Power over them pursuant to Gods Institution and Ordinance that the Head and Chief of a Family should have Dominion and Authority over the rest Hence also it was that we read of Twelve Princes out of the Loins of Ishmael and of several Dukes which Sprang out of the Loins of Esau For every Head of a Distinct Great Family was by the Divine appointment a King in his Nation and his Kingdom was of greater or less Extent as his Family was more or less Numerous And hence lastly it was that we Read of many Kingdoms in one Country as in Canaan for Instance because their Territories were according to their Numbers So that Antiently Principalities were but small till by the Union of many Great Families either by Conquest and Force or by Voluntary Submission Great Monarchies and Empires came to be Erected 4. And this brings me to the last Observable to prove the Jus Divinum of Kingly Power viz. The Universal practice of all Nations For nothing can be more plain than that Kingly Government was the only Government we know of in the whole World for some Thousand Years together The Greeks were under Monarchs all along till such a Frenzy possest some of them as hath possest some Bedlams among us to change their Old Government for a New nothing But their Madness did cost them very dear in the End they were Undone and Ruin'd by it as we should soon be by our Innovations In the most Antient Times there was no such thing as an Aristocratick or Democratick State And the Reason why the Jews would needs have a King though thy were under a Theocracy was because they would not be Singular therefore they would have a King to Judg them as all the Nations all other Nations had 1 Sam. 8. 5. Now Lex currit cum praxi the Universal Practice of the World is a strong argument to prove that there was some Antecedent Law which as they supposed did lay some Obligation upon them because people are not very forward to fall under Government of themselves supposing them to be in a State of Liberty Nor is it conceivable that all Men in the World should be of one mind or that one Form of Government should please all especially that Government which is in the hands of one Man We may as soon believe that all parts of the World did fall asleep at once and then all on a sudden did awake into so many Formed and Setled Monarchies By this time I hope it doth appear that there are stronger Reasons for the Doctrine of the Jus Divinum of Regal Power then that it should be lookt upon as a State Heresie of a Modern date and of dangerous Consequence The sutableness thereof to Humane necessities the Concurrence of Scripture-history which doth plainly Insinuate the Institution the Original the Usage of Monarchical Dominion together with the Suffrages of all Mankind who for a long Tract of Ages submitted unto it as if it were Entailed upon them from the beginning All this I say doth clearly argue as well the Truth as the Reason of this Proposition that the Kings power is Gods Ordinance Which serves also to baffle those Wild and groundless conceits which our Republican Spirits are so very fond of that there was once a State of Nature wherein all Mankind were Free under their own Power and at their own choice whether they would have Government or no Government and whether they would have this Form or another These and the like are no other then the Lewd and Idle conceits of Factious Brains For there never was such a State of Nature but in the Imagination of such Brainsick Men who have fancied a World in the Moon Whosoever has come out of the Womb hath been Born under Government nay under Kingly Government till Rebellion or Faction or the Love of Novelty altered the Natural and Regular course of affairs I do not blame Aristotle and other Old Infidels for not hitting well upon the True Original of Government considering they were not well acquainted with the Scriptures but spake for the most part by guess But I wonder at the confidence of Hobbs and other such Modern Politicians though in truth even they are for the most part Infidels too for talking so idly and unphilosophically as that Kings have their Authority by Compact and Covenant and the pleasure of the people so that they may Crown them or Un-king them as they think fit Doctrines which cost King Charles the 1st of Blessed Memory no less then his Crown and his Head too Whereas for many Ages after the Creation Regal Authority descended by Inheritance and as Nature gave a Man the Father-hood so the Authority which went along with it was Gods Donative people did no more chuse their Kings then Children do chuse their Fathers As for Common-wealths and Aristocracies and Elective States the World formerly was unacquainted with them nay the very Names of them were unknown No they are only so many Usurpations Degenerate and Bastard sorts of Government The Monarchical Form as it is far the best so 't is incomparably the Oldest and of Gods own Institution The rest are but Upstarts and Mushrooms of yesterday in comparison and I think 't is nothing but the necessities of some few places in the World that makes them either Tolerable or Lawful 2. I have done with the first point That the Kings Power is Gods Ordinance and it brings me to the 2d That because the King is Gods own Minister Ordained Supreme by his Commission no man must dare upon pain of Damnation to use any Violence against him they that Resist shall receive to themselves Damnation For if God will Judg the Open and the Secret Actions of men according to the Gospel and reward every man according to his Works what less can the bold Rebe● expect then the Severities of Judgment that presumes in spight of all the Out-cries of Conscience to act that which is so contrary to the Ends of Government so Reproachful to the Gospel so repugnant to the Spirit of its Author and its Laws Did not Christ suffer for us leaving us an example that we should follow his steps 1 Pet. 2 21. Did not his Peaceable and Submissive deportment all along Teach us that all
Undutifulness and Violence must be utterly forborn Did he not pay Caesar his Tribute with a plain command that every Disciple of his should pay him his due Did he not Rebuke those who would have called for Fire upon the Heads of the Samaritanes Did he not recommend to us the Practice of his Humility Meekness and Patience under the Cross Was he not angry with Peter for drawing his Sword upon the Chief-Priests Servants Did he not own Pilates Power to have been from above Did he not submit to it when he had at his Command 12 Legions of Angels Did not every Instance of his Life shew us that 't is better far to Die then to Resist Why this was Christs Religion and this is Christianity that we should be Conformed to the Image of Christ Rom. 8. 29. That 's the Substance the Power the Life of Christianity That 's the business and Office of every Christian And though Men please themselves with other popular Names and call themselves the only true Catholicks on the one hand and the only true Protestants on the other yet as long as they are Disloyal on either hand as long as they are Gun-powder Catholicks or Cut-throat True Protestants as long as they shoot at Government either with Bulls or with Ordinances as long as Consults or Covenants are in Fashion with them and the King cannot be safe for them neither in the Field nor at Home as long as they Act after this Devilish rate they do but abuse themselves into a State of Damnation for all their fine Names they ought not to be called Christians or if they will wrongfully Usurp that Name too there are as good Christians as they with Korah and Judas and I had rather be a meer Philosopher or an honest Heathen then such a Christian And doth not the Gospel strictly Command us not to Strive not to Resist Evil but to be Charitable Patient and Peaceable to obey Magistrates to Honour the King to Submit to our Rulers to be Quiet to do our own Business and to be subject for Conscience sake many Commands more we meet with up and down which hallow the Authority and immure the Throne of the Chief Magistrate And doth not my Text award Damnation to every Rebel Why one would think that such Men did use some other Gospel since they have no benefit by this nothing but Damnation by the Gospel of Christ Certainly they have a Gospel by themselves Evangelium Armatum a Gospel that is covered in Armour and dipt in Blood For by ours there is no Salvation for them without such a Stinging Repentance as St. Paul describes in 2 Cor. 7. 11. But I shall not need to proceed further upon the proof of this Matter because the clearing of the 3d. Point will serve à Fortiori to confirm this Only give me leave before I come to it to note how the Apostle in my Text doth Limit Non-Resistance He forbids Resistance against the Governour in Chief against him that is the Fountain of all Authority in the Kingdom Let every Soul be Subject but to the Higher that is to the bighest or Supreme Powers And so in my Text he that Resisteth the Power meaning the same Power that is the Power the Authority the Magistrate that is over all Whether it be King as Supreme saith St. Peter 1 Pet. 2. 13. Supremacy was in the Crown in those days there the Highest Power is Lodged and that is the Power we must be subject unto for Conscience sake Other Usurping and pretending Powers Men may be forced sometimes to be subject unto upon pain of Plunder and Sequestration but the Supreme Power the King is he whom we must not Resist upon pain of Damnation There is in every Kingdom the Supreme and a Subordinate Magistracy So St. Peter doth distinguish between the King that is Supreme and Governours that are sent by Him The King is Gods Representative other Subordinate Governours are the King 's And as long as those Governours Act Regularly and according to their Commission they are to be obeyed too But I will speak a blunt Truth whatever be the Issue of it should our Nation be so unhappy again as it was in 42. when Inferior or rather Usurping Powers forsook their Allegiance Levyed a War Raised Arms Issued out Commissions and turned the points of their Swords against the Supreme and only Lawful Power it would be not only allowable and Lawful but 't would be the Peoples Duty and in point of Conscience a necessary Duty to Resist such Power even unto Blood though Ten Thousand Houses of Parliament were there so many should pretend to it Perhaps I might have spared that Hint in this Age when our former sufferings on each side should be enough one would think to make all Men Wise and for their Interest if not for Conscience sake to be Dutiful for the Future But I could not baulk it well without baulking something in my Text which forbiddeth all Resistance against the Supreme or Soveraign Power 3. That Power is priviledg'd from all Resistance though the King should happen to be a Wicked or an Heathen Prince which is the 3d. and last point and it is concluded from the Consideration of what those Princes were when the Apostles were planting Christianity For when St. Peter wrote his First Epistle wherein he Charged Christians to Submit to the King as Supreme and unto Governours his Ministers of State Christians were so hardly dealt with that they were forced to Flee up and down into places where they could best shift into Pontus Galatia and divers Provinces more as we find at the beginning of that Epistle And Claudius himself who probably was Emperour at that Time was a Man of a Cruel disposition Zealous for Heathenish Idolatry Severe to all of a Foreign Religion so that he would not suffer the Jews to meet together saith Dio and at last he Expel'd the whole Body of Jews out of Rome Believers and Unbelievers too and that upon Christs account saith Suetonius such was the Emperour and such were his Ministers that they would not allow Christians neither the exercise of their Religion nor the Liberty of their Native Countries nor the protection of their own Houses and yet both Claudius and his Deputies must be submitted unto After Claudius immediately came Nero to be Emperour A man called a Lyon by St. Paul himself because he was of a Savage and ferine mind especially after he had got a tast of Blood that I may save Seneca's credit in his Book de Clementià A Man that kill'd his Tutor after all his Courtship of him that dispatche his Wife and Ript open the Bowels of his Own Mother A man that had a spight against every thing that was Good saith Tertullian and that some Christians took to have been the Antichrist spoken of For he was the Man that rais'd the first of the Ten Famous and General Persecutions that inflicted punishments upon Christians saith Suetonius put
would have abhorr'd the very thoughts and suspicion of it Many specious and popular pretences ran up and down the Kingdom and those set on foot by the Jesuites themselves that innovations crept into the Church that the Prelates were Popishly-affected that there was great danger of Arbitrary Power and the like All the Histories of those times do bear witness to the truth of this But would to God all Sober and Honest Men would consider whither those things came at last Did they not end in the slaughter of the best of Kings Was not that the Period and sad conclusion of all Did not all the clamours and strivings of the people end in that all actions proceedings however otherwise intended by some all was at last unhappily Sealed up with that blood which ever since has cryed aloud for Vengeance upon this Nation Men ought to be careful and wary for the future and endeavour to choke the beginnings of Mischief For if once the bank be cut who can tell how far the Deluge will run In the late times it was not the First Intentions but the subsequent designs of Men which took place so that after the effusion of so much Heroick Noble and at last Royal Blood too God plagued people strait for their First Resistance he suffered the Basest of Men to ride over our backs he brought us under the very Faeces and Scum of the Nation and permitted such to be our Lords as a Man of Honour would have disdained to have set with the Dogs of his flock as the expression is Job 30. 1. And what was the end of this Why nothing but Tyranny Hypocrisie and Oppression To uphold Religion they introduced Atheism To promote Arbitrary Power they banisht our Laws and to preserve our Liberties they made us Slaves and the very worst of Slaves Slaves to the vilest of our Fellow-subjects In a word it may deserve to be consider'd whether all those grievances which People have complain'd of all along under the Kings of England putting them all together since the Conquest do amount to half the value and number of those Cruelties Miseries and Oppressions which within the compass of a few years were brought upon us by those few Carrion Members of that one Rake-Hell Parliament of cursed Memory Thus it is when Men will be Arbitrary and despise the Laws To affirm saith my Author that the Kings Power is separable from his Person is High Treason by the Law of this Land And he observes out of the case of the two Spencers in the Reign of Edw. 2. that to cover their Treason they went upon three principles 1st That if the King do not demean himself by Reason in the right of his Crown his Subjects are bound by Oath to remove him 2ly That seeing the King could not be reformed by sute at Law that ought to be done by Force 3ly That his Lieges are bound to govern in aid of him and in default of him Jenkins Rediv. Vindic. Pag. 74. These Principles were condemned as Execrable and Detestable by two several Parliaments in those days And yet these were the Fundamental Principles on which that Lewd and Profligate Party did rely in 41. Then what had been adjudged to be Execrable before passed for Law and for Gospel too Then Treason was their Conscience Resistance was their Creed V●●es and Ordinances their Magna Charta the Sword was their Judg and hence it followed that so many of the Representatives of our Nation was our greatest Grievance God would not stay till Dooms-day to reckon with us but his Judgments pursued us close at heels We had Worm-Wood for loathing Manna and a Yoke of Bondage upon us for a Stubborn and Ungovernable humour under a Light hand This was part of our Reward in this World and should God add weight to our Burthen yet Rebellious people must confess if they will ever speak Truth in earnest that they have deserved the most intolerable of all Evils if our Apostle be in the night that They that Resist shall receive to themselves Damnition To prevent the Execution of this sad sentence 〈◊〉 all such as have a Real and True value of their Souls and desire to live so in this world as not to he miserable in another let such account Subjection to the King both an Honourable and a Necessary part o● Religion and not suffer themselves either to b● wheadled out of their Loyalty by Flatteries or to 〈◊〉 husst out of it by Fears Methinks 't is something odd that when we all agree in the Premises we should differ in the Conclusion That Kings ought to be submitted unto is a Truth assented to by all sober Christians in the World This is owned in general The mischief is that when we come to Particulars whether Things or Persons either prejudice or passions or interests of Men start Evasions and Conditions which were never heard of in the World among Christians before Some are for the King as long as he is Rich Powerful and able to maintain their Interest that 's the Loyalty of the Leviathan Others stick to him as long as he sticks to their Religion that is the Loyalty of the Conclave and the Kirk But the Faith of the Church of England is this which I am sure is consonant to the universal sense and practice of the Ancient Apostolick Church that let Princes be as it shall please God either a Blessing or a Rod to a Kingdom in all things Lawful they are to be Obeyed and where we cannot Obey them but by sinning against God there their Authority is to be submitted unto so that whatever their Practices or their Faith be yet their Prerogatives their Persons their Lives must be Sacred though they be Sauls yet 't is a most fearful thing to lift up ones hand to destroy the Lords Anointed I shall conclude all with that of the wisest of Monarchs and Men Prov. 24. 21. My Son fear thou the Lord and the King and meddle not with them that are given to change Amen Soli Deo Gratia FINIS