to abate this windy tumour consider with themselves that all their greatnesses piled together in a generall or Nationall Synod though steepled with the Popes owne Chaire and three-forked Miter cannot so much as treat of debate dispute determine any Church-affaires much lesse constitute or promulge any new Ecclesiasticall Lawes Canons Articles Ceremonies Rites c. without the previous licence and permission of those temporall Princes and Powers that summon them nor yet exercise any manner of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction whatsoever more then the poorest Vicar and Curate breathing that is a Minister lawfully ordained without the Kings Letters Patents or Commission authorizing them which erected their Bishopricks Diocesse and Episcopall jurisdiction at the first and must still support them else they will fall to utter ruine and then all their pretended claimes and crackt title of jus divinum with all Independents Anabaptists Brownists Anti-monarchicall Anti-parliamentall fancies concerning the jurisdiction and authority of their Independent Congregations opposite to the premises will vanish into ayre If any deeme the premised power of Christian Princes and Civill Magistrates in limiting Synods and Councels thus to be derogatorie to the lawfull authority of Bishops Ministers Synods or Independent Churches Ianswer that it is not so forthese ensuing reasons First because the chiefe care of preserving the purity of Gods Worship Ordinances Religion the Churches peace prosperity and of suppressing all heresies errours schismes corruptions superstitions contrary thereunto is committed to Christian Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates both by the Lawes of God the constant acknowledgment use practice constitutions lawes canons of all Christian Empires Kingdomes Councels Synods in all ages and the Coronation-Oaths of all Emperours Kings Princes in the Christian World which oblige them to discharge this trust as the subsequent Sections will abundantly manifest Therefore the power of directing Synods Councels in debating matters of controversie making Lawes Canons c. concerning all or any of the premises and the confirming of them ought principally to belong to them Secondly because Christian Emperours Kings Princes are the supreme heads and Governours under Christ in and over all Ecclesiasticall persons Assemblies Synods Councels Churches within their owne Dominions as well as temporall and our Kings of England are declared to be such by severall Acts of Parliament by the Oaths of supremacy and Allegeance which all ought to take within their respective Dominions Therefore they ought of right to direct and order all manner of proceedings in such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies Synods it being the duty and just right of every Naturall and Politicke head to direct the members as of the head of the family to regulate and direct the family wife c. by way of authority or jurisdiction not they the head Thirdly because the Bishops and Clergy of our owne and other Realmes have no Legislative power or other Ecclesiasticall authority vested in them by the Word of God but onely to preach the Word administer the Sacraments and to binde or loose mens sinnes declaratively by preaching or applying the Gospel to them according as they finde them penitent or obstinate in their sinfull courses and no more of other Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction then what is derived to them by our Kings and the Lawes of this our Realme as is resolved in these expresse termes by the Statute of 37. H. 8. c. 17. The Arch-bishops Bishops Arch-deacons and other Ecclesiasticall persons of this Realme have no manner of Iurisdiction Ecclesiasticall but by under and from the Kings royall Majestie the onely and undoubtea supreme head of the Church of England and Ireland to whom by holy Scripture all authority and power is wholly given to heare and determine all manner of causes Ecclesiasticall and to correct all vice and sinne whatsoever and to such persons as his Majestie shall appoint thereunto And by the Statute of 1. Ed. 6. c. 2. in these words That all jurisdiction spirituall is derived and deducted from the Kings Majestie to all Bishops and Ecclesiasticall persons within England and Ireland as supreme head of these Churches and Realmes of England and Ireland and so instly acknowledged by the Clergie of the said Realmes and that all Courts Ecclesiasticall within the said two Realmes be kept by no other power or authority either forraigne or within the Realme but by the authority of his most Excellent Majesty whereupon it enacts That all their Processe shall issue out under the Kings Seale and in his Name and Stile as in Writs originall and judiciall at the common Law with which sundry other Acts of Parliament concurre Now the Kings and Lawes of this our Realme have given the Clergie assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations no other but such a limited power and authority as is expressed in the fore-cited Statutes of 25. H. 3. c. 19. 27. H. 8. c. 15. and mentioned in the premises Therefore they neither can challenge nor pretend to claime any other but such a limited and confined authority the rather because they are assembled to such meetings as our Assembly is now onely as advisers and assistants not as Judges or Law-givers Therefore the keeping of them to the fore-mentioned limits can neither be an infringement or eclipsing of their just priviledges or Christian liberty Fourthly because every particular Christian is to try the spirits doctrines and determinations of Ministers by the Scriptures whether they are of God or not and to beware yea judge of false Teachers doctrines and no wayes to receive them as the Marginall Texts abundantly evidence and all Orthodox Divines assert Much more then are Christian Princes the chief Defenders of the Christian faith to judge and determine of them therefore to give particular directions to and in all Synods Councels how to proceed and what to treat of for suppressing false Teachers Heresies Schisms Errours advancing Religion Truth unity and sincerity of Gods Worship within their territories and Churches Fifthly because every soule as well Bishops Ministers and all other Ecclesiasticall persons as temporall subjects is and ought to be subject to Christian Princes and the highest temporall powers who are to provide for their spirituall as well as their temporall welfare Therefore they ought to be regulated and directed by them when assembled by their Writs in Councels or Synods for their spirituall good SECT 3. Of Confirming Ratifying the Canons Decrees and Resolutions of Councells Synods by Christian Princes Peers Parliaments before they become valid or obligatory Of the Presence and Power of Christian Princes Nobles and other Lay-men in Councells That many or most Councells Synods in ancient and latter times especially in England were in truth meere Parliaments wherein Christian Princes Nobles Senators and Lay-men met and voted as well as Bishops and other Ecclesiasticall persons And that no Canons Lawes Articles concerning Gods Worship Religion Church-Government Ceremonies were ever lawfully prescribed or imposed on any Subjects of our Realme but
Greeks on the left hand the Latine Clergy on the right and himselfe would have sate in the midst but the Emperor withstood it saying Locum ipsum sibi potiùs quà m summo Pontifici convenire That that place did rather belong to him than to the Pope But after many contestations they all accorded at last that the Pope and his Clergy should sit on the right side the Emperor and his Greeks on the left of the Church one right over against the other and neither Pope nor Emperor in the midst In the Councell of Lateran under Leo the tenth there were divers Ambassadors Princes Nobles and Lay-men present in every Session Sigismond King of Poland had his Ambassadors and Orators there chosen by himselfe his Princes Lords Spirituall and Temporall Nobles and Commons in full Parliament who gave them full Power and Commission for them and every of them Pro Nobis ac Regnis Dominiis Principibus Spiritualibus Secularibus Proceribus Populis ditioni Nostrae Subjectis saith their Commission under the Kings Seale 10. Aprilis Anno 1515. to treat of handle conclude agree and determine of all things in their names and steads that should bee propounded or handled in that Councell concerning Religion or the Church Etiamsi talia forent quae mandatum exigerent magis speciale quà m praesentibus est insertum Promising that they would ratifie grant confirme and establish whatever should be there done and acted by their Orators Maximilian Duke of Millain Francis Marquesse of Mantua Stanislaus and John Dukes of Mazovia and Russia sent Orators and Ambassadors to this Councell with like Commissions under their Seales to ratifie all things therin concluded in their steads recorded at large by Surius in the third Session of that Councell And the like Commissions had the Ambassadors of Lewes King of France Joachim Marquesse of Brandenburge William Marquesse of Montferrat Emanuel King of Portugall Charles Duke of Savoy and Maximilian the Emperor the Constitutions of Councells wherein the Pope sate President being not obligaotory unlesse the Emperor with other Christian Kings and Princes ratified them by their Ambassadors Orators and Proctors if absent from or by their Subscriptions and Seals if present in them In the Councell of Lyons Anno 1245. foure Noble-men chosen and sent by the King and Parliament of England were present as Ambassadors And the Bishops sent by the Church of England to the generall Councell of Pisa Anno 1409. were elected and chosen by the whole Clergy of England in their Convocation In the Councell of Basil King Henry the Sixth of England had fourteene Ambassadors Orators Proctors to whom and to the major part of them hee gave as well a generall as speciall power and Mandate in his name and stead to bee present in that Councell and therein to treat conferre and conclude as well of those things which might concerne the Reformation of the Universall Church in the Head and in the Members as of those things which concerned the Supportation of the Orthodox Faith and the Pacification of Kings and Princes as also of and concerning a perpetuall Peace from Warre between him and Charles of France his Adversary and also to treat commune and appoint and moreover to assent and if need were to disassent to those things which should there happen to bee decreed and ordained according to the determination of the said Councell Promising that hee would bona fide ratifie approve and confirme all and every thing that should bee done acted or effected in the premises or any of them by his said Ambassadors Orators and Proctors or the greatest part of them and that when hee should bee certified thereof hee would see them duly executed as farre as belonged to him and to a Christian Prince The Letters Patents themselves dated the tenth of July are recorded verbatim by Master Selden out of the Tables of France 12. H. 6. memb 2. A sufficient Testimony that it belongs to Christian Princes by themselves their Ambassadors Orators or Proctors to ratifie the Decrees of all Councells and Synods and to disapprove and damne them if they see cause Whence King Henry of France and the Parliament and Synod of Paris Anno 1593. damned and disavowed divers of the Canons of the Councell of Trent as prejudiciall to the Crown Royall Justice and liberty of the Church of France as Bochellus relates at full To conclude with Forraigne Presidents The Conclusions Constitutions and Determinations of that late famous Synod of Dort were ratified by the generall approbations and Edict of the Estates of the Low-Countries under their hands and Seale Visis cognitis maturè examinatis atque expensis praedicto judicio sententia Synodi say they in their Charter of Approbation ista plenè in omnibus approbavimus confirmavimus rata habuimus approbamus confirmamus rata habemus per praesentes Volentes statuentes ut nulla alia Doctrina de quinque praedictis Doctrinae capitibus Ecclesiis horum regionum doceatur aut propagetur praeter hanc quae praedicto judicio sit conformis consentanea c. Actum sub nostro Sigillo Signatione Praesidis Subscriptione nostri Graphiarij Hagae Comitis 2. Julij Anno 1619. All these with sundry other Forragine Testimonies abundantly demonstrate That the Constitutions Canons and Decrees of Councells are of no binding force and power at all unlesse confirmed by Emperors Kings Princes Nobles Subscriptions Edicts Patents Proclamations and Acts of Parliament and that most ancient Councells in forraigne parts were in truth but Parliaments To passe from these to our owne domesticke Presidents It is most apparent by numerous punctuall Examples that the Clergy of England alone had never any lawfull Jurisdiction vested in them to make binding Ecclesiasticall Lawes or Canons in our Synods and Convocations in any age without our Kings Nobles and Parliaments assents and approbations That all or most of our ancient Councells Synods Convocations were nought else but Parliaments wherein our Kings Nobles Senators and Commons were personally present as well as Bishops or Clergy-men And that all matters concerning Religion Church-Government Ceremonies with all binding Lawes Canons Articles relating thereunto have since the first planting of Religion in this our Island till this present time beene alwayes setled resolved confirmed in and by Parliaments or such Councells and Synods wherein our Kings Nobles Commons were present and had decisive Votes It is the received opinion of all our Antiquaries and Historians that King Lucius was the first Christian King of this Island and the first Prince in the world that embraced the Christian Faith That about the yeare of our Lord 185. hee writing to Pope Elutherius to send him the Romane and Imperiall Lawes whereby to governe his people then newly converted to Christ the modest Pope returned him this answer You have requested the Romane and Caesarean Lawes to bee transmitted to you from Vs which you would use
Edâ—arus Rex tandem potior emvocate ad Brandenfordiam Regni Concilio Patris Edwini acta decreta rescindit Ablatas Ecclesiis Monasteriis opes restituit c. This no doubt was a Parliament King Eâ—gars Ecclesiasticall Lawes An. 967. have this Prologue which proves them made in full Parliament Leges quas Edgarus Rex FREQVENTI SENATV ad Dei gloriam regiae Majestatis ornamentum ac Reipublicae utilitatem sanciunt Hoc est institutum quod Edgarus Rex Consilio Sapientum suorum instituit c. Anno. 973. I finde a Councell held at London under King Edgar for the regulating of the Abbots and Monkes of Glastonbury and setling of their priviledges wherein King Edgar granted a Charter to this Abbey CONCILIO OMNIVM PRIMATVM MEORVM subscribed by himselfe and Alfgina his Mother Edward Clito his successor Kmedius King of Scotland Mascusus his Admirall Dunstan Archbishop of Canterbury Oswald Archbishop of Yorke caeterisque Episcopis OMNIBVS Regni PRIMATIBVS with others of his officers In the Councell of Winchester An. 975. assembled to determine the great controversie whether married Clerkes ought to bee preferred before monkes King Edgar and his Queen Elferus Prince of Mercians Ethelwin Duke of the East-Angles Elfwold his kinsman Archbishop Dunstan cum cae teris Episcopis Abbatibus c. Brithnotho Comite cum NOBJLITATE TOTIUS REGNS were present to decide this difference In the Councell of Calne Anno 977. called for the same purpose there were present praeter Episcopes caeterum clerum TOTIVS Angliae Majores Natu Omnes aderant Aaglorum Optimates Rege tamen propter teneram aetatem absente There were at it Praesules PROCERES EQVITES NOBILES PARITER IGNOBILES Omnium ordinum conspicui clarique viri write our Historians Anno 1005. King Aethelred granted Lands and priviledges to the Monkes of Christ-Church in Canterbury by his Charter confirmed and subscribed in a Parliamentall Councell as well by his Nobles as Prelates and Abbots as you may read in the subscriptions themselves Anno 1009. There was a generall Councell at Eanham Concilium Aenhamense generale seu Pan-anglieum Optimatibus celebratum In this Councell there were thirty two Canons made which begin thus Haec sunt Constitutiones quaetulerunt Angli eruditi eligerunt etiam edixerunt instanterque docuerunt observandas This writes Spelman was doubtlesse a Parliament Regium fuisse certum est Aenhamense Concilium tum quod edicto Regis cogebatur de rebus statuit ad ecclesiasticos non pertinentibus tum quod in festo habebatur Pentecostes in quibus celebritatibus convocare Reges ex antiqun consuentudine soliti orant Proceres suos utriusque ordinis ad festum Regium adornandum consilia Regni ineunda yet its decrees are stiled SYNODALIA The Ecclesiasticall lawes of king Aethelred Anno 1012. have this Inscription Haec instituerunt Rex Aethelredus SAPIENTES ejus apud Habam They were made in full Parliament not in a Convocation of the Clergy and intermixed with secular Lawes The Councell of Winton under Canutus Anno 1021. begins thus Haec sunt statuta Canuti Regis Anglorum c. Venerando sapientum ejus Concilio ad laudem gloriam Dei sui regalitatem commune commodum Rex Canutus anno regni sui 5. cunctos regni sui Praelatos Proceresque ac Magnas ces ad suum convocans Parliamentum in suo publico Parliamento persistentibitpersonaliter in eodem Wolstano Adelnodo A chiepiscopis Ailwine Episcope Elmhamense alijs Episcopis ipsorum Suff aganeis septem Ducibus cum totidem Comitibus nec non diversorum Monasteriorum nounullis Abbatibus cum quamplurimis gregarijs Militibus ac cum populi multitudine copiosae ac omnibus tunc in eodem Parliamento personaliter existentibus votis Regijs unanimiter consentientibus praeceptum decretum fuit Quod monasterium sancti Edmundi c. sit ab omni jurisdictione Episcoporum Comitatus illius ex tunc in perpetuum funditus liberum exemptum c. This Councell was clearely a PARLIAMENT and so expresly stiled The Ecclesiasticall Laws of K. Knute An. 1032. were made in Parliament not in Convocation as appeares by this proaeme Consultum quod Canutus Aaglorum Dacorum Norvegiensium Rex ex SAPIENTUM CONCILIO ad Dei immortalis Gloriam Regiae Majestatis ornamentum Reip utilitatem Natalatijs Domini Nostri Jesu Christi diebus Vintoniae sancivit the Laws are in number 26. and intermixt with his secular Lawes made at the same time Haec illa humana atque politica sunt Jura quae Sapientum adhibito consilio per omnem Aagliam observari praecipio So as this Councell clearely was a Parliament not a Synod or Convocation Anno 1066. There was a most famous Councell or Assembly held at Westminster under King Edward the Confessor in the last yeare of his Reigne on the Feast of Christs Nativity Praesentibus Rege Confessore Edgitha Regina Stigando Archiepiscopo Cantuariae Eldredo Archiepisc Eboraci caterisque Angliae Episcopis Abbatibus Capellanis Regis COMITIBUS MINISTRIS seu Thanis Regijs MILITIBUS about the endowment priviledges and Sanctuary of Westminster Abby then newly re-edified and consecrated In which Councell the King granted severall Charters of priviledges to this Abbey which were consented unto ratified and subscribed as well by the Dukes Nobles Officers Knights and other Lay-men as by the King Queen Bishops Abbots and Clergy By all these ancient Presidents before the Conquest to which others might be added it is most apparent That all our prisline Synods and Councells were nought else but Parliaments that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voting in them as members and Judges and that all our Ecclesiasticall Laws Canons and Constitutions that were obligatory or binding as well concerning matters of faith Church-Government discipline as manners were ever made enacted ratified in and by our Parliaments only and not by the Bishops or Clergy alone or by the King and Clergy in meere Ecclesiasticall Synods without the Nobles Senators and Commons consents or Votes Neither finde I any example or Author from King Lucius his Reigne to the Conquest that either denyed the legislative or coercive power of such Councells and Parliaments either in matters of doctrine Discipline Church Government or manners but all readily and unanimously subscribed to it enough to silence all novell opposits whatsoever King William the Conqueror as he was resolved in a Full Councell and Parliament to bee Christs Vicar and chiefe Governour of the Church within this Realme in these words Rex quia Vicarius summi regis est ad hoc constituitur ut regnum Populum Domini super omina SANCTAM ECCLESI MREGAT ET DEFENDAT c. taken out of King Edward the Confessors Lawes which he established and ratified so he reformed the Ecclesiasticall Lawes and
HERETIQVES limiting the maner of proceeding against them defining what shal be heresie how it shall be punished and abridging the Authority of the Bishops and Canon Law ch 16. concernes Pluralities ch 19. containes the submission of the Clergy Convocation to the King declares the Kings supremacy in causes Ecclesiasticall the impotency of the Clergy or Convocation to make or promulge any Canons or Ecclesiasticall constitutiâ—ns or to debate any thing in Convocation without his Royall Lycence and approbation The Nullity and invalidity of the Canon Law abolisheth all appeales to Rome and Authorizeth 32. persons whereof halfe to be of the Clergy the other halfe of THE LAITY to survay the Canon Law and to compile a body of the Canon Law to be authorized by the King under his Great Seale by vertue of this Act for to be the only Canon Law to be used within this Realme Chap. 20. takes away the payment of any Annates oâ— first fruits to the Bishop of Rome nullifies his usurped power and Buls settles the forme of electing and consecrating Archbishops and Bishops within this Realme and plentifully manifests the Kings and Parliaments Jurisdictions in Ecclesiasticall affaires chap. 21. doth the like exonerating the Kings Subjects from all exactions and Impositions heretofore payed to the Sea of Rome and enabling the Archbishop of Canterbury and his Officers to grant all Licences and dispensations within the Realme which were formerly granted at Rome only The Statute is worthy perusall consideration fully demonstrating the power of the Parliament in Church affaires 26. H. 8. c. 1. declares the Kings Highnesse to be supreme head of the Church of England under Christ making it a part of his Royall Title and to have Ecclesiasticall authority to redresse and reforme all Errors Heresies and abuses in the Church punishable by any spirituall or ecclesiasticall Law Chap. 3. enacts The payment of the first fruits of all Dignities Benefices promotions spirituall and tenthes to the King and his Heires abolishing the Popes usurpations and authority herein ch 13. abolisheth sanctuarie in cases of High Treason ch 14. Authorizeth the nomination and consecration of suffragan Bishops in sundry places of this Realme and both creates and limits their authority chap. 15. takes away some exactions of spirituall men within the Archdeaconry of Richmond 27. H. 8. c. 8. limits that the Kings spirituall Subjects shall pay no Tithes whiles they are in their first fruits ch 15. authorizeth the King to nominate 32. persons halfe of the Clergy the other of the Laity for the perusall and making of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and manifests the Convocations invalidity to make such lawes or Canons ch 19. Limiteth and abolisheth Sanctuaries and sanctuary persons ch 20. containes an Order touching the paying of Tithes throughout the Realme ch 21. Limits the maner of payment of Tythes within the City of London ch 27. suppresseth divers Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses vesteth their revenues in the King and erects the Court of Augmentations 28. H. 8. ch 10. extinguisheth thes authority of the Bishop of Rome prescribes an Oath of abjuration of it and Popery together with the Popes usurpations and excellently sets forth the Kings supreamacy the Parliaments authority in matters ecclesiasticall as you may read in the Act worthy perusall ch 11. enacts Restitution of the first fruits in time of vacation to the next incumbent ch 13. compells spirituall persons to residence upon their livings ch 16. Releaseth such as have obtained pretended Licences and dispensations from the Sea of Rome 31. H 8. c. 6. enables such as were Religious persons to purchase lands to sue and be sued in al maner of Actions which they were disabled formerly to do by the Common Canon Law ch 9. Enables the King to make Bishops by his Letters Patents only and to erect new Bishopricks which he did ch 13. disolves all Monasteries and religious Houses and vests them in the King wherein you may behold much of the Kings and Parliaments power in Church businesses ch 14. For abolishing of diversity of opinions in matters of Religion most fully and exactly demonstrates the Kings and Parliaments jurisdictions in matters of Religion as the whole Act sufficiently manifests though the Articles therein defined were erronious and the Act too cruell and bloudy 32. H. 8. cap. 8. provides for the true payment of Tythes and offerings chap. 10. containes the punishment of incontinent Priests and of women offending with them ch 12. concernes Sanctuaries and the priviledges of Churches and Church-Yards ch 15. prescribes the manner of proceeding against Heretickes and impugners of the Act for abolishing of enormious opinions in Christian Religion chap. 23 24. concernes Accounts of Bishops and subsidies granted by the Clergie chap. 25. Dispences the Kings marriage with the Lady Iane chap. 24. Dissolves the Hospitalls of Saint Johns of Ierusalem in England and Ireland for supporting and maintaining the supremacy and jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome contrary to their duty and Allegiance chap. 26. Intitled An act concerning true opinions and Declaration of Christs Religion is most pregnant to our present purpose which you may peruse chap. 38. Concerning precontracts of marriages and degrees of consanguinity is likewise a most punctuall Act for the Kings and Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power and chap 44. 45 47. good evidences of it 33. H. 8. chap. 15. 27 28 29 30 31 32. Enabling Religious persons to sue and bee sued severing the Bishopricks of CHESTER and Isle of MAN from the jurisdiction of CANTERBURY to the See of Yorke making the Church of Whitgate a Popish Church by it selfe and severing it from the Parish of Over which I wish our Independents to observe and to learne from this and other Acts that no new Churches or Parishes can be erected legally but by act of Parliament which none of their Churches are 34. and 35. H. 8. c. 1. intituled An act for The advancement of true Religion and For the abolishing of the contrary is most pertinent to our purpose and c. 15. 17 19 35. H. 8. c. 9. for ratification of the Kings stile and Title of Defender of the Faith and supreame head of the Church of England and Ireland ch 6. Concerning the qualification of the Statute of the 6. Articles c. 16. concerning the examination of the Canon Lawes by 32. persons halfe of the Clergie and halfe of the temporalty to be named by the Kings Majesty during his life to compile a body of the Canon Law to bee used in the Realme 37. H. 8. c. 4. 12. but especially ch 17. That Doctors of civill Law may execute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction though Laymen and married a Law worthy reading and chap. 21. For the union of Churches not exceeding the value of 5l which could not be done but by Act of Parliament are all most pregnant evidences of the Kings and Parliaments indubitable Ecclesiasticall jurisdictions in matters of Discipline Religion Church-government and all Church affaires whatsoever The Statutes made in King
the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled That all and every the personâ— hereafter in this present Ordinance named that is to say Algernon Earl of Northumberland William Earle of Bedford Phillip Earle of Pembroke and Montgemery William Earle of Salisbury Henry Earle of Holland Edward Earle of Manchester William Lord Viscount Say and Seale Edward Lord Viscount Conway Phillip Lord Wharton Edward Lord Howard of Estr John Selden Esquite Francis Rows Esquire Edmund Prideaux Esquiâ—e Sir Henry Vane Knight Senior Iohn Glyn Esquire Recorder of London Iohn White Esquire Bouldstrode Whiâ—locke Esquire Humphrey Salloway Esquire Master Serjeant Wilde Oliver Saint Iohn Esquire his Majesties Sollicitor Sir Benjamin Rudyard Knight John Pym Esquier Sir Iohn Clotworthy Knight Iohn Maynard Esquire Sir Henry Vane Knight junior William Pierpoint Esquiet William Wheeler Esquier Sir Thomas Barrington Knight Walter-Young Esquier Sir Iohn Euelin Knight Herbert Palmer of Ashwell Batchellor in Divinity Oliver Boles of Sutton Batchellor in Divinity Henry Wilkinson of Waddesdon Batchellor in Divinity Thomas Valentine of Chalsont Giles Batchellor in Divinity D. William Twisse of Newbury with sundry other Divines mentioned in this Ordinance and such other person and persons as shall be nominated and appointed by both Houses of Parliament or so many of them as shall not be lefted by sicknesse or other necessary impediment shall meet and assemble and are hereby required and enjoyned upon summons signed by the Clerkes of both Houses of Parliament left at their severall respective dwellings to meete and assemble themselves at Westminster in the Chapell called King Henry the sevenths Chappell on the first day of July in the yeare of our Lord one thousand six hundred fortâ—y three and after the first meeting being at least of the number of forty shal from time to time sit be removed from place to place and also that the said Assembly shall be dissolved in such manner as by both Houses of Parliament shall be directed And the said persons or so many of them as shall be so Assembled or sit shall have power and Authority and are hereby likewise enjoyned from time to time during this present Parliament or untill further Order be taken by both the said Houses to conâ—erre and treat amongst themselves of such matters and things touching and concerning the Liturgy discipline and Government of the Church of England or the vindicating and clearing of the doctrine of the same from all false aspertions and misconstructions AS SHALL BE PROPOSED VNTO THEM BY BOTH OR EITHER OF THE SAID HOVSES OF PARLIAMENT AND NO OTHER and to deliver their opinions and advices of or touching the matters aforesaid as shall be most agreeable to the Word of God TO BOTH OR EITHER OF THE SAID HOVSES FROM TIME TO TIME IN SVCH MANNER AND SORT AS BY BOTH OR EITHER OF THE SAID HOVSES OF PARLIAMENT SHALL BE REQVIRED and the same not to divulge by printing writing or otherwise without the consent of both or either House of Parliament And be it further ordained by the authority aforesaid that William Twisse Doctor in Divinity shall sit in the Chaire as Prolocutor of the said Assembly and if he happen to die or be letted by sickenesse or other necessary impediment then such other person to be appointed in his place as shall be agreed on by both the said Houses of Parliament And in case any difference of Opinion shall happen amongst the said persons so assembled touching any the matters that shall be proposed to them as aforesaid that then they shall represent the same together with the reasons thereof to both or either the said Houses respectively to the end such further direction may be given therein as shall be requisite in that behalfe And be it further Ordained by the authority aforesaid That for the Charges and expences of the said Divines and every of them in attending the said service there shall be allowed unto every of them that shall so attend during the time of their said attendance and for ten dayes before and ten dayes after the summe of foure shillings for every day at the charges of the Common-wealth at such time and in such manner as by both Houses of Parliament shall be appointed And be it further Ordained that all and every the sayd Divines so as aforesaid required and enjoyned to meet and assemble shall be freed and acquitted of and from every offence forfeiture penalty losse or damage which shall or may arise or grow by reason of any Non-residence or absence of them or any of them from his or their or any of their Church Churches or Cures for or in respect of their sayd attendance upon the sayd Service any Law or Stature enjoyning their attendance upon their respective Ministeries or Charges to the contrary thereof notwithstanding and if any of the persons before named shall happen to die before the sayd Assembly shall be dissolved by Order of both Houses of Parliament then such other person or persons shall be nominated and placed in the roome and stead of such person and persons so dying as by both the sayd Houses shall be thought fit and agreed upon And every such person or persons so to bee named shall have the like Power and Authority Freedome and acquittall to all intents and purposes and also all such wages and allowances for the said service during the time of his or their attendance as to any other of the sayd persons in this Ordinance is by this Ordinance limited and appointed Provided alwayes that this Ordinance or any thing therein contained shall not give unto the persons aforesaid or any of them nor shall they in this Assembly assume to exercise any Iurisdiction Power or Authority Ecclesiasticall whatsoever or any other Power then is herein particularly expressed Some generall Rules for the Assembly directed by the Lords and Commons in Parliament Assembled 1. THat two Assessors be joyned to the Prolocutor to supply his place in case of absence or infirmity 2. Two Scribes to be appointed to set down all proceedings and these to be Divenes who are not Members of the Assembly viz. Master Henry Rowberry and Master Adoniran Byfeild 3. Every Member at his first entrance into the Assembly shall make a serious and solemne Protestation not to maintain any thing but what he believes to be the truth and to embrace Truth in sincerity when discovered to him 4. No resolution to be given upon any question on the same day wherein it is first pâ—rpounded 5. What any man undertakes to prove as necessary he shall make good out of the Scriptures 6. No man to proceed in any dispute after the Prolocuter hath enjoyned him silence unlesse the Assembly desire he may go on 7. No man to bee denied to enter his dissent from the Assemblâ— and his 〈◊〉 for it in any point after it hath beene first Debated in the Assembly And thence if the dissenting party desire it to be sent to the Houses of Parliament by
the Assembly not by any particular man or men in a private way when either House shall require it All things agreed 〈◊〉 and prepared for the Parliament to be openly read and allowed in the Assembly if the major part assent Provided that the opinion of any persons dissenting and the reasons urged for it be annexed thereunto if the Dissenters require it Together with Solutions if any were given in the Assembly to these Reasons Jo Browne Cler. Parliamentorum Having thus sufficiently evidenced the authority and jurisdiction of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church affaires by these numerous punctuall irrefragable Presidents in all Ages give me leave to add these two considerations to them to demonstrate this their undoubted right and priviledge beyond all contradiction and silence every adverse tongue Pen of all Papists Anabaptists Brownists Separatists or Independents whatsoever First that all our ancient and moderne Writs for summoning a Parliament have ever had this speciall clause in them Pro quibusdam ardnis ungentibus negotiis Nos statum defensionem Regni Angliae ECCLESIAE ANGLICANAE concernentibus quâ—ddam Parliamentum c. teneri ordinavaimus From whence it is most apparent That the state and defence of the Church of England and well ordering of the same is one Principall end of summoning Parliaments and one maine part of the subject matters of our Parliaments as Sir Edward Cooke resolves 2ly That all every of the preâ—ended opposites to Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction hand formely and none especially in the present Parliament addressed severall Petitions to this High and Honorable Court for Reformation of the Church suppression of haeresies Errors Idolatry Popery Superstition Schismes Prelaâ—y and establishing Gods true worship Religion Ordinances Discipline as to the most proper Iudicature Tribunall Lawgiver in our Church which they could resort unto and not to the Convocation or any other Assembly of Clergy-men alone or Independent Congregation To give you some few remarkable instances besides those formerly remembred instead of infinite others which I pretermit for brevity Our famous English Apostle Iohn Wickelesse as he professedly maintained in K. Richard the second his Raigne That any Clergy-man yea the Pope himselfe might lawfully be reprehended accused and corrected by Lay-men That the temporall Lords and Princes might lawfully and meritoriously take the possessions and Revenues from the Church and from Ecclesiasticall persons offending habitually c. to the end they might reforme them And that they were obliged to reforme the Church and Prelates under paine of being traitours to Iesus Christ So likewise in the fifth year of this King he Writ and sent to the Lords and great men assembled at London IN PARLIAMENT seven Propositions tending to the abolishing of the Popes usurped power and exactions to selfe the temporalities of Deliâ—â—â—ent Bishops to remove Bishops and Clergy-men from all secular imployments 〈◊〉 reforme the abuses of Excommunications and imprisonments upon them to 〈◊〉 Transubstantiation and reforme the Churches both to 〈…〉 the particulars whereof you may read at large in 〈◊〉 And 〈◊〉 long after his learned Disciple William 〈◊〉 a Martyâ— being unjustly condemned by the Bishop of Hereford for maintaining Wickliffes opinions appealed to the King and Parliament against it and withall writ a pious Letter to the Parliament recorded by Master Fox which concludes thus Deare worshipfull Sirs in this world Theseech you for Christs love as ye yet 〈◊〉 loven Gods Law and Truth that in these dayes is greatly borne abacke that they wollen vouchsafe these things that I send you written to Gods worship to let them be shewed IN THE PARLIAMENT as your wits can best conceive to most worship to our God and to shewing of the truth AND AMENDING OF HOLY CHVRCH My concâ—usions and mineâ— appeale and other true matters of Gods Law if any can finde in them error falsenesse or default privet by the Law of Christ clearly to christian mens knowledge I shall revoke my wrong conceit by Gods law be amended more ready to hold with Gods law openly and privily with Gods grace and nothing to hold teach or maintain that is contrary to his Law By which he made that very Parliament Iudges of his Doctrine had reformers of the Church though for the most part Papists in those dayes On the contrary side the very Papists Prelates Clergy and Convocation in those times did likewise Petition the King and Parliament for suppression of haereticall opinions Preachers Bookes Schooles Conventiâ—les and the punishment and restraint of hereticks sectaries haereticall preachers and Schoolmasters as they deemed them and upon their prayer and importunity the Statutes of 5. R. 2 〈…〉 5. â—2 H. 4. c. 15. â— H. 5. c. 7. to which the Commons never consented were made and 〈◊〉 to that purpose as is evident by the very words of the Acts themselves Master Fox his Acts and Monuments vol. 1. Edi◠〈◊〉 p. 773. And it is as evident that the Popish Commons Petition was the cause of the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 14. For the punishment of heresie and the Popish Clergyes importunity to King Henry the eight his motion to the Parliament the occasion of the bloudy Statue of 31 H. 8. c. 14. 34. H. c. 8. 1. as the words of the Acts and Master Fox demonstrate both King and Clergy Nobles and Commons even in these times of Popery deeming our parliaments the meetest Iudges and only lawgivers for ordering Church affaires and matters of Religion About the 37. yeare of King Henry the 〈◊〉 Roderick Morse once a Grey 〈◊〉 published a book in print 〈◊〉 A complaint to the Parliament house of England directed to the Parliament wherein he demonstrates many abuses and corruptions of the Church and Clergy of England in those dayes both in matter of Doctrine Worship Discipline manners which he earnestly presseth petitioneth the Parliament effectually to reforme by wholsome Lawes and Edicts as a thing most properly belonging to their place and Iurisdiction as the whole booke manifests which had been very absurd had the Parliament been no meer Iudge of Religion and Church affaires and no 〈◊〉 Reformers of these abuses by Lawes and punishments as some now repute them In King Edward the sixt Queene Maries and Queene Elizabeths severall Raignes the Clergie and 〈◊〉 made their Petitions and addresses to the Parliament for setling reforming establishing all matters of Religion Church-government and discipline as the forementioned Statutes with multitudes of Petitions and bookes printed and dedicated to the Parliaments in their severall Raigns demonstrate especially 1. and 2. Phili. and Mary c. 6. 8. 1 Eliz. c. 1. 2. 4. 8. Eliz. c. 1. Two admonitions to the Parliament Anno. 1572. Iohn Penry his supplication to the Parliament and others The Petitions to all the severall Parliaments in King Iames his Raigne and our present Soveraignes but more especially to this present Parliament from all sorts of people in every County of the Realme
Common State before all controversies of Religion and causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded King Canute in his Parliament holden at Winchester upon Christmas day after sundry Lawes and Orders made touching the faith the keeping of holy Dayes publike prayers learning of the Lords Prayer receiving of the Communion thrice in the yeare the manner and forme of Baptisme fasting and other like matters of Religion in the end thereof saith thus Iam sequitur institutum Legum secularium Now followeth an Order for temporall Lawes Thirdly we see that the Godly Catholique Princes in old times thought is their duty before all other offices of the Common weale first to determine matters of Religion and that even BY THE PARLIAMENTS OF THIS REALME In a Parliament holden by King William the Conquerer it is written thus The King for as much as he is the Vicar of the highest King is therefore appointed for this purpose that he should Rule and defend the Kingdome and People of the Lord and above all things the holy Church c. Hereby it appeareth that Kings and Princes are specially and of purpose appointed by God not only to defend but also to Governe and Rule the holy Churh How be it if any imperfection shall appeare in the former Parliaments we give God thankes for the same that is and trust that for his owne names sake he will confirme what he hath begun The hearts of Princes and determinations of Parliaments are in his hands If any thing want the arme of the Lord is not Shorted he is able to supply the same So our incomperable Iewell enough to satisfie and silence all our Opposites Thomas Bilson Warden and afterwards Bish of Winchester bringing in the Prelates and Iesuiâ—s objecting against our reformed Protestant Religion that it was brought in and ratified not by a Councell and Synod of the Clergy but by the Prince Queene Elizabeth and the Parliament who say they had no power to determine or deliberate of those matters returnes this answer May not the Prince command for truth within hee Realme except your consents be first required and hadâ— May not her Highnes serve Christ in making laws for Christ without your likeing Claime you this interest and prerogative that without you nothing shall be done in matters of Religion by the Laws of God or by the liberties of this Realme By the Lawes of the land you have no such priviledges Parliaments have beene kept by the King and his Barons the. Clergy wholy excluded and their Acts and statutes good And when the Bishops were present their votes from the Conquest to this day were never negative By Gods Law you have nothing to do with making Lawes of Kingdoms or Common wealthes You may teach you may not command persuasion is your part compulsion is the Princes If Princes imbrace the truth you must obey them If they pursue truth you must abide them By what authority then claim you this Dominion over Princes that their laws for Religion shall be voyde unles you consent seeing they are the maintainers establishers and upholders of the faith with publique power and positive Lawes which they and their Parliaments may make without a precedent councel of Clergy men to guid them as he there proves at large by sundry presidents If any Concurre not with me in this undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction of Christian Princes and Parliaments after all these pregnant testimonies I must tell them in plaine english they directly violate their late vow and Covenant and symbolâ—e herein with Jesuites and Popish Prelates whose doctrines they have abjured by their Nationall Covenant and therefore cannot may not ever hereafter embâ—ace without the highest Perjury and plaine Apostacy unto Popery I shall finish this Section of the Authority and power of Parliaments in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline and enacting Lawes in all and every of these particulars with some forraigne presidents in the Parliaments Diers Assemblyes of Estats in other Realme republikes Should I now relate unto you the many ecclesiasticall Laws of all sorts made in them I might swell this Treatise into many folio volumes I shal therefore only give you a brief touch catalogue of some few which the Studious may peruse make use of at their leisure For FRANCE you may survey the Decrees of King Childebert debated and agreed by him and his people in a Parliament de quibuscunque conditionibus una cum Optimatibus nostris c. 2. 4. c. 15. For sanctifying the Lords Day prohibiting the dressing of any but necessary food on it all Bodily labour under pecuniary mulcts The ecclesiasticall laws of Charles the great Ludovicus pius Charles the Bald collected into one volum by Abbot Ansegisus Benedictus Levita Lindebrogus others printed with some pettinent additions Parisijs 1640. stiled Capitula Regum Episcoporum Maximeque OMNIVM NOBILIVM FRANCORVM were made GENERALI CONSENSV PIDPLIVM SKORVM ET GENERALI CONSVLTV ET COMMVNI CONCILIO by generall consent of the King Bishops and especially of the Nobles and states of France in Common Councells Parliaments and Assemblies of the estates Who had so great a power in making rejecting Canons ecclesiasticall Lawes that when in the yeare 846. the Bishops of France and their suffragans had in their Synods compiled certaine Canons by the command of Charles the Bald and tendered them to him as he had commanded in Sparnaâ— a Village of the Church of Rhaemes to peruse and approve the King Dissidentibus regni sui PRIMORIBVS ab eorundem episcoporum admonitionâ— by reason that the Nobles and other men of his Realme differed from the Bishops in opinion in most of those Canons the King and Nobles out of all their Canons or Chapters haec tantum observanda complacenda sibi colligerunt Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes NON AMPLIVS DE FORVM CAPJTVLIS ACCEPTASSE QVAM ISTA ET ISTASE VELLECVM PRINCIPE OBSERVARE which were Stiled Captule Regis CAROLI not the Bishops Canons By which it is evident that no ecclesiasticall lawes or Canons could be made in France to bind either Clergy or Laity but such at the King Nobles Parliament and three estates approved and confirmed I shall add to this that Anno 1307. King Philip the 4. of France assembled a Parliament at Paris wherein the Laity of France exhibited 65. Articles against the Clergy to regulate their jurisdiction and abuses which were there largely handled and debated as you may read at leisure in Masters Fox who records the passages very fully in the French Histories What the Parliament Estates in France have done enacted in matters of Religion Church-Government and discipline of ancient and latter times you may read at large in Liurentius Bochellus his Decreta Ecclesiae Gallicaiae in Carolus Molinaeus Contra parvas Datas c. in William Ranchin his Survay of the Councel of Trent but above all in Antonie Fontanon
confession was againe ratified Anno 1567. in the first Parliament of James the 6. After which there was an Act made against the Masse and the sayers and heares thereof and another Act for the abolishing of the Pope and his usurped Authority in Scotland After this a forme of Church Government and discipline was presented to the Nobility to peruse but not then fully agreed on and setled The like Petitions and proceedings in ecclesiasticall affaires I finde in the yeares 1561. 1562. 1563. to 1580. 1581 1582. and that the Generall Assemblies of Scotland in nature of a Councell or Synod wherein they debated matters of Religion and Church-government consisted not only of Ministers but of Nobles Gentlemen with other Laikes and that their resolutions and Acts were not thought obligatory unlesse ratified by special Acts of Parliament by which they still petitioned they might be confirmed Not to trouble the Reader over long I finde these ensuing ecclesiasticall Acts of Parliament in Scotland against provisions from Rome Iam. 3. parl 6. c. 43. Iam. 4. parl 1. c. 4. parl 5. c. 53. Iam. 5. paul 〈◊〉 c. 119. Against Working Gaming playing haunting of Taverines Aâ—châ—uses and using any sorvile worke on the SABOTH-DAY Iam. 4. parl 6. c. 83. Iam 6. parl 6 c. 70â— parl â—4 c. 148 against Apostacy Idolatry Masse the Pope Semeniary Priests Iesuites uncommunicants Popery as Iam. 8. parl 1. c. â— 3 5. parl 3. c. 1. 45 46. 55. parl 4. c. 7 8. 35 parlâ— 7. c. 106. parl 10. c. 24 27. parl 12. c. 1 20. parl 13. c. 60. parl 14. c. 193. parl 16. c. 17 18. parl 19. c. 1. Against Adultery Mat parl 5 c. 10. parl 9. c. 74. Iam. 6. parl 2. c. 14. parl 7. c. 105 with sundry others which you may finde mentioned and recired in the 5 and 6 Acts of the second Parliament of King Charles at the Sessions holden at Edinburgh the eleventh day of Iune 1640 Regiam Majestatâ—â— to which for brevity 〈◊〉 referre the Reader I shall conclude with the Ecclesiasticall Acts made in the severall Sessions of the second Parliament of King Charles held at Edinburgh in the yeare 1640 and 1642 where in the presens government of the Church of Scotland together with their profession of Faith nationall Covenant and all Ecclesiasticall matters whatsoever were fully settled and ratified In the first Session of this Parliament I finde these ensuing Ecclesiasticall 〈◊〉 enacted Act. 4. 〈◊〉 the Ratification of the ACTS OF THE ASSEMBLY which are recited in and ratified approved perpetually confirmed by this law Act. 5. Anent the Ratification of the Covenant and of the Assemblies Supplication Act of Councels and Act of Assymbly concerning the Covinant and confession of Faith formerly made and subscribed sundry times here in recited and confirmed In which Act sundry lawes formerly made against Popish Idolatry superstitious Doctrine Papists Seminary priests Iesuits Papisticall Ceremonies Masse the Popes iurisdiction the reformation of the Church and maintenace of Gods true religion are recapitulated confirmed Acts 6. Rescissory repealing divers former Acts concerning Archbishops Bishops with other Prelates their unjust jurisdiction and authority Acts 7. For planting of Kirks unprovided with Ministers through the Patrons default Acts 8. Anent admission of Ministers to Kirkes which belong to Bishopricks Acts 9. discharging the going of Salt-pans and Milnes upon the Sabbath day Acts 10. discharging Salmon fishing upon the Sabbath day Acts 11. Against Papists Acts 12. discharging the Zule vacancy or Christmas Act 13. discharging Monday market in Edinburgh and elsewhere as occasioning great prophanation of the Sunday and distracting men from Gods publike worship and Service Acts 14. For taking order with the abuse committed on the Sabbath day c. Acts 15. Directing Letters of horning against excommunicated persons to which I might adde Acts 16. 29 30. 32. 37 38 having relation to the Church and defence of Religion And Session second of this Parliament 1641. Acts 8. 9 10 11 for abolishing the Monuments of Idolatry 12. Anent Non-communicants and excommunicate persons all printed besides sundry other Acts unprinted are an abundant Evidence both of the Scottish English Parliaments undoubted right jurisdiction and authority in all matter of Religion Discipline and Church-government maugre all inconsiderable late privateopinions to the contrary by whomsoever broached Section 4. Containing certain Corollaries from the premised Sections against the Inpugners of Parliaments and Princes Legislative Power and Authority in matters of Church-government Discipline Religion Together with a compleat Answer to Master Iohn Goodwins pretended Authorities my deare Brother Burtons and others Arguments to the contrary in Iustificaetion of their Independent way in some late Publications the substance whereof is here clearely refuted and this point among others cleared That just humane Civill or Ecclesiasticall Lawes binde the conscience in point of obedience And that there is no exact set forme of Church government universally prescribed in Scripture to all Churches IN the precedent Sections I have according to my solemne Covenant and Protestation abundantly cleared the ancient unquestionable Iurisdiction and Legislative Authority of our Kings and Parliaments in all matters of Religion Church-government Discipline by multitudes of expresse Presidents in all Ages and Authorities of all kindes I shall in the next place Dissipate all those empty clouds of objections which endeavour to obscure this clear-shining Verity by deducing some Corollaries from the premises and then refuting the principle late objections against the same The first Corollary is this That Bishop Laudes desperate Positions in his Anti-Parliamentary paper of Hopes and Feares about calling a Parliament An. 1627. That Church-businesse is not fit for Parliaments That the Parliament House one or both can be no competent Iudge in any point of Doctrine That the Papists insult over us by this meanes and call it Parliamentary Religion That the King suffers by this as much or more than the Church For in the Statute of submission of the Clergie the King and the Convocation are Judges of all Ecclesiasticall Causes An. 25 H. 8. c. 19. And why should the Parliament take this from either That he should have little hope of good successe in Parliament till they leave medling with the Church Are all dangerous false Positions exceeding derogatory and destructive to the indubitable ancient Rights priviledges and power of our Parliaments constantly exercised and enjoyed without dispute even in the darkest times of Popery and highest Ruffe of Pope of Prelates and ever since the Reformation admitted without any opposition but by Popish Priests and Iesuits as the forequoted passages of Bishop Jewell and Bishop Bilson withall the premises manifest Secondly That Master John Goodwins late printed passages against the Ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Parliaments seconded in substance by some other Independents viz. That the generality and promiscuous multitude of the world who have a right of nominating persons to Parliamentary trust and power are but a SECVLAR ROOT
civill Magistrates as you have plentifully done even with some colour of reason as well as insanire cum ratione which is all I shall answer to your reasons Fourthly Hee writes Let Master Prynne Or any other evict mee of any wilfull or unwilfull violation of the priviledges of Parliament and I shall bee as willing as willingnesse it selfe can make me to further such a conviction and no man shall be more ready then I to crave their pardon or undergoe their Justice nay I shall repent my selfe and abhor my errour in dust and ashes Certainely this your promised late Repentance which is yet contingent and improbable after so many publike offronts and oppositions against the power and proceedings of Parliament will bee a very poore recompence and satisfaction for all your former misdemeanors and scandalls to the Parliament yet late repentance being better then none at all I shall now challenge you to make good this your promise since your owne Conscience and judgment cannot but informe you I have written enough in the former Sections to evict and convince you and all the world besides that you have not only violated but denyed oppugned those priviledges of Parliament in Ecclesiasticall affaires which our owne Parliaments in all ages and Parliamentary Assemblies in all other Kingdomes have unquestionably exercised enjoyed without any such publique opposition as you have made against them And if you now make not good your promise few or none will ever credit you hereafter 5ly For the Authors you cite to justifie yourselfe they are miserably wrested and mistaken for the most part The first you quote is Master Edwards who maintaines point blancke against you throughout his Treatise a Legislative and coerceive power in Parliaments and civil Majestrates even in Church-affaires and matters of Religion in the very pages you quote and else where Therefore you palpably abuse the Author and Reader in quoting him to the contrary who is so point-blancke against you For the passage you quote out of his Page 256. The Parliament interposeth no Authority to determine what government shall be whence you inferre p. 7. Therefore his opinion appeares to be either that the Parliament hath No authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a government It was written only with reference to that present time the Parliament having at that time when he writ during the Assemblies debate and consultation interposed no Authority to determine what government shall be yet before that it had declared the old prelaticall Lordly government to be abolished and called an Assembly to advise with about a New But to inferre from thence as you doe Therefore his opinion is either that the Parliament hath no Authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a Government Is an inference quite contrary to the next ensuing words and pages to the whole scope of the Authors Booke Humbly submitted to the Honourable houses of Parliament contrary to his expresse words p. 138. 281. to all his reasons against Toleration of your Way and to the Parliaments intent in calling the Assembly to assist them in determining and setling a Church-government agreable to Gods word Be ashamed therefore of this grosse perversion of your first Authors passages diametrally contrary to this meaning Your Passages out of Master Hayward Bishop Iewell Master Fox Mr. Calvin Iacobus Acontius Junius Peter Martyr and Gulielmus Appolonius make nothing at all against the Legislative Authority of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church government and have no aâ—â—inity with your Passages words most of them Bishop Iewel especially as I have already proved vindicating propugning the very ecclesiastical power of Parliaments which you oppugne Indeed some of their words seeme to diminish the Coercive power of Majestratâ—s enforcing of mens consciences in matters of Religion which I shal answer in due place and manifest how you abuse the Authors herein as well as Mr. Edwards not hitherto answered by any of your party but how they militat against the jurisdiction of Parliaments in making Lawes touching Religion discipline and Church-government I am yet to seeke For the Passages he aleageth out of the Divines of Scotland That the Prince or Majestrate may not make or publish any Ecclesiasticall Law without the free assent of the Clergy c. That he may not by HIMSELFE define or direct such matters nor make any Lawes therein That the King hath not a Nomotheticke Legislative Power in matters ecclesiasticall in a constitute Church That the ordinary power of the King is not to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes c. I Answer 1. That their only meaning if I mistake not in these passages is that the Prince or chiefe civill Majestrate of HIMSELFE without a Parliament or without the assistance and consent of his Nobles Commons Clergy cannot legally make any ecclesiasticall Lawes to obliege his people upon which reason our Brethren of Scotl. rejected the late New service booke and Canons and our selves the late Canons c Oath which Canterbury wold have obtruded on us because they were made and prescribed only by the Kings Authority and the Prelates or Convocations not the Parliaments upon which very reason the Parliaments of both Kingdomes have respectively adjudged both one and other illegall But that the King or supreame temporall Majestrates assisted by a Parliament and Orthdox Divines may not make binding ecclesiasticall Lawes or that their or our Parliaments have not a reall Legislative power in any matters ecclesiastike the only point controversed is directly contrary both to the constant Doctrine and Practise of our Brethren and their Church used ever since the Reformation to the proceedings of their last Parliaments and generall Assemblies as I have formerly manifested You may therefore blush at this your perverting of their meaning as if they held that the Parliaments of England or Scotland had no power to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes for Religion or Church gouernment when as their Bookes Actions addresses to our present Parliament their presence assistance in our Assembly proclaimes the contrary And the very publique Confession of faith professed and subscribed in their Church Anno 1560 Chap. 14 since confirmed by severall Acts of Parliament doth the like But admit all those Authors really as not one of them is in verity opposite to the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and Legislative power of Parliaments yet the unanimous practise and resolution of all Christian Realmes Synods Parliaments in all ages contrary to their private novell opinions is sufficient infinitly to overbalance them in the Judgements of all prudent men And thus much for Mr. Goodwins Innocencies tryumph as to the present point I shall next apply my selfe to Answer such Objections as my deare Brother Master Henry Burton hath lately made against the premises in his Vindication to my 12. Queeres touching Church-Government my Independency examined His first and principall Objection is this
ends of the World shall turne unto the Lord and all the kindreds of the Nations shall worship before him for THE KINGDOME is the Lords and he is the Governour among the NATIONS That ALL NATIONS shall serve and worship before him That he shall have DOMINION from sea to sea and from the Rivers to the ends of the earth That all DOMINIONS shall serve and obey him That the KINGDOMES of the earth shall sing unto the Lord c. All pregnant proofs of Nationall Churches which should serve and obey Christ But that Independent particular Congregations of visible Saints and they only should be Christs Kingdom Republick and Governed immediately by him rests yet on my Brothers part to make proofe of when he is able Thirdly I shall request my Brothers to satisfie me others by that Texts he can make good these Paradoxes of his That those who will not submit to his Independent Church-government Covenant become members of such Churches have no interest in the Covenant Sacraments or Seal of the Covenant or right to any Church-Communion That they are not within the Covenant visibly and therefore their Children not visibly to bee baptized That they professe not Christ to be their King and are afraid or ashamed to be in Covenant with Christ as their King c. Do not these uncharitable Paradoxes good Brother un-Church un-Saint all Christians and reformed Churches whatsoever which submit not to your new way excluding both them and their Children from the Covenant and Seales of Grace and all Church-communion at least in and among your Congregations as professed enemies to the Kingdome and Soveraignty of Christ Is not this the very language Doctrine of the Antichristian Church of Rome who vaunts herself the onely true Church of Christ out of which there is no salvation un-Churching all Churches and un-Saincting all Christians but their owne professed members as haeretickes Schismaticks and enemies to Christ yea is it not an higher strain of spirituall pride and uncharitable Behaviour against your brethren then ever the Donatists or Nouatians broached I beseech you deare Brother in the bowels of Christ to consider and recant these harsh passages which you can never justifie before God or men and have given great offence to many who cordially affect you These generall questions being demanded I shall next addresse my selfe to a more particular answer of the premised Objection by reducing it into these Logical arguments which wil best detect the fallacies imbecillities of it The first is this Christ is the only immediate supreame King Head Ruler and Governour of every particular Church Ergo no Kings Parliaments Councels Synode or any human Power can make any Lawes Rules Canons for the setling of Religion or reforming Governing well ordering of any particular Churches of Christ This is the summe of all my Brothers Passages I answer that this is a meere Independent Argument which will introduce a world of absurdities if admitted as I shall cleare by these following Instances 1. The Scripture is expresse That God himselfe is King yea a great King over all the earth That Christ is the ONLY Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords yea a great King over all Gods That all the Kingdomes and Nations of the earth are the Lords and that he giveth them to whomsoever he willâ— That his kingdome ruleth over all That his is the greatnes the Kingdom the power and the glory and the Majesty that all that is in the Heaven and in the Earth are his that he is exalted as head over all and raigneth over all That he is Lord and King of all as well of their bodies estates as soules and consciences Ergo By my Brothers forme of Arguing No Kings Parliaments Potentates Rulers Kingdoms Republikes ought to make any Lawes for the government of their Realmes publikes Nations Corporations or the ordering of mens persons or temporall estates but God and Christ alone and all particular Kingdomes Societies States Corporations Families are and ought to be immediatly subject to no King Majestrat Parliament or human power whatsoever even in temporall things but only to God and Christ 2ly God is more frequently stiled in Scripture The Lord of HOSTS and God of BATTLE then he is called the only King of his Church a Title you can hardly show me in direct termes in sacred writ Yea his power and providence principally appeares in mannnaging and disposing all occurrences and particulars concerning Hosts Armies Battles as your Brother Burroughs in his Glorious name of the Lord of Hosts hath largely manifested Ergo by this Logicke No King Parliament Generall Captaine or Councell of Warre may or ought to make or prescribe any Martiall Lawes for the regulating governing mustering Marshaling or disciplyning of their Hosts but God alone 3ly Christ is our only Soveraigne Lord Master Father Ergo no Landlord Master Father ought to prescribe any Lawes Rules orders for the better Government of their Tenants servants families Children but Christ alone by your argumentation 4ly Christ is the chiefe Shepherd Bishop Prophet Teacher and Instructor of his Church Ergo none ought by your reasoning to seed teach or instruct the Church and people of God but Christ alone We must have no Ministers teaching Elders Pastors Teachers to instruct Vs henceforth who are but men and not Christ himselfe 5ly Christ is the only Mediator Advocate Intercessor for his Church and people Ergo none ought by their Prayers and intercessions to soltcite the throne of Grace for the peace prosperity reformation and deliverance of Christs Churches and people but Christ alone Ministers must not pray for their people nor Saints one for another noreither of them for the whole Church of God if your Argumentation be solid 6ly If this argument stand firme then marke the inevitable consequences of it Independent Subjects will argue with their Princes Majestrates Superiors thus Christ is our only King Head Lord. Therefore we must not be subject to any Lawes and commands what soever but only to the lawes and precepts of Christ Wives Children servants will reason thus Christ is our onely Head Husband King Lord Father Master Therefore we will not we ought not to be subject to any of the Lawes Orders precepts of our Husbands Parents Ministers but only to the immediate Rules Laws edicts of Christ himselfe Mutinous or Independent Souldiers will thus argue with their Generalls and Commanders Christ is our only Captaine Generall and our Lord of Hosts Ergo we will be commanded conducted ordered by none but Christ not by any other Captain or Generall whatsoever Nay people and every member of your Independent Congregations upon any discontent wil thus dispute with their Ministers Ruling Elders Congregations Christ is our only head King lawgiver Judg. Therefore neither Councels Synods nor any Independent Ministers or Congregations may prescribe any Laws covenants Orders or directions to us or exercise any jurisdiction
eclesiasticall over us or passe any censures upon us but only Christ himselfe Brother if such Antimonarchicall Antiparliamentall and Anarchicall Logicke and Divinity be ever taught and beleeved in the world which cutts asunder the nerues and dissolves the very foundation of all Governments and Relations whatsoever whether naturall civill or Ecclesiasticall what an horrible confusion will be immediatly produced to the utter distruction of all Kingdomes Republiques Churches Families Societies Corporations in the World let all prudent men Judge Yet this is the dangerous Logicke this the Foundation stone whereon your whole Independent fabrick is built the absurdities and ill consequences whereof I trust all will now at last discerne Secondly I answer That though Christ be the only King and supream Law-giver of his Church yet it followes not thence that therfore no Parliament or humane power may or can make Lawes to order or governe the Churches and people of God by but onely Christ For Brother your selfe will grant 1. That Parliaments Kings and Synods may and ought to make Lawes to supposse and punish all manner of Idolatry superstition Impietie prophanenesses corruptions Heresies Doctrines Opinions and exorbitances whatsoever in their Churches Ministers people that are contrary to the Word of God the Lawes Doctrine Government of Christ or tending to the depravation disturbance or prejudice of the Church and Gospell Secondly they may publish Lawes and Canons to settle and establish the true Confession of the Christian saith the sincere Ordinances of God and such a true worship Church-Government and Discipline which is most consonant to his Word throughout all Churches in their respective jurisdictions yea compell Ministers to doe their duties and people diligently to repaire to all the Ordinances of God to sanctifie the Lords day and to observe extraordinary dayes of humiliation and thanksgiving upon extraordinary occasions Thirdly They may enact Lawes and Ordinances to settle the places and times of publike Worship and all necessary circumstances w ch concern the same not peremptorily determined in the Scriptures concerning Church assemblies Fourthly They may enact Laws for the maintenance of Ministers of all necessary Church Officers and for prayer preaching reading the Word administring receaving the Lords Supper concerning ordination Mariage siging fasting excommunication agreeable to the Word of God This I presume all will grant and my Brother will not deny which is all I contend for Therfore Christs being the only King Head Ruler and Lawgiver of his Church is no impediment to Kings Parliaments by advise of Synods to enact such Lawes as these and so the Argument a meere Independent Nonsequitur Thirdly Christ is the King Lord Head and Lawgiver of every private Christian or Member of a Congregation as well as of every particular or of the whole Catholik Church and so by your determination he is subject to no other jurisdiction then that of Christ his Spirit and Word Yet I hope you will grant that every Independent Congregation hath a true jurisdiction and power over every particular member of it yea a legislative power to prescribe a speciall covenant and such Ecclesiasticall Rules Orders as the whole Congregation shall thinke meet to which they must submit under paine of excommunication suspension Non-communion and denying baptisme to their Infants as you plainly intimate pag. 44. 45 46 62 63. Therefore these titles and Prerogatives of Christ doe not deprive particular Churches of the power of prescribing covenants Orders Rules and Canons to their Members much lesse then whole Synods Councells Parliaments of farre greater wisdom power Authority then particular Churches And if private Churches may thus oblige their Members then much more may Parliaments Councells all particular Churches within their jurisdictions And so much in answer of this grand argument The second is this Christ is the full and sole King raigning in the heart and conscience of every true Beleever He only is King over every mans Conscience so as no man nor power on earth may sit with him in this his Throne Therefore no Parliament Councell nor human power may prescribe Laws for the Government or ordering of the Church for then of necessity man should be Lord over the Conscience which is the highest presumption against the most high I answer That this argument is grounded upon a very sandy foundation and upon this controversed question both among Divines and Casuists Whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill human Laws made and ratified by the supreame civill Magistrates Parliament bind necessarily oblige us to obedience in point of conscience in case they be not contrary to Gods Word for if they be all grant they do not bind to obedience in point of Conscience My Brother here holds the Negative as an indisputable Maxime That these Laws bind not the conscience in point of Obedience to them A very dangerous false unsound Position tending to meere Anarchy and contempt of all humane Lawes and lawfull Authority in Church or State And for my own part I clearely hold the Affirmative to be an undoubted truth This question is largly debated and held affirmatively by learned Paraeus Explicatio Dubiorum in c. 13. ad Romanos Dubium 7. pag. 1413. to 1446. by Musculus Peter Martyr Marlorat and Doctor Willet in their Commentaries on Rom. 13 with other Protestants on this Text by Ursinus in Exposit secundi Praecepti p. 299. by Theodoret Ambrose Beda Anselme and generally most ancient and modern Commentators on that Text by Alexander Alensis Summa Theologiae Pars. 2. qu 120. Artic 2. 3 4. with whom all other Shoolemen generally concurre Paulus Windek Canonum Legum Consensus Dissensus cap. 4. p. 12. Stapleton in Antid p. 783. Bellarmine l. 3. c. 9. De Laicis Pererius Disp 2. Num. 8. by Saint Augustine in Epist 54. ad Macedonium and in Tit. Psal 70. by Saint Bernard Tract de Praecepto Dispensat With infinite others Indeed Master Calvin Instit lib. 3. c. 9. Sect. 15. 18. and lib. 4. c. 10. Sect. 3. 4 5. Beza in Notis ad Rom. 13. Sibrandus De Pontif Romano l. 8. c. 7. and some others seemingly hold the contrary yet not generally of all but of some particular humane Lawes I shall briefly lay downe the truth of the affirmative part out of Pareus and Doctor Willet in these insuing Propositions and then propound the Affirmative and answer the Negative arguments in their Order to vindicate this truth now most opposed when it is most necessary both to be discovered and obeyed The Propositions are these That all just Civill Ecclesiasticall or Oeconomicall Laws and Ordinances made by the King and Parliament or by lawfull Magistrates Parents Masters Tutors Superiors which concerne the duties of the first or second Table do bind the Conscience of themselves and that simply both in generall and particular That all good Laws made for the determining of any necessary circumstances of Gods Worship or necessary and profitable for
severall Iurisdictions to submission and reall obedience especially when just and agreeable to Gods Word or at least to passive whiles in force where unjust or contrary to the Word Hence the publike Laws Ordinances Edicts of Parliaments and general Assemblies of the Estates have in all Kingdomes Ages without the least dispute oblieged regulated all Corporations Societies Persons within their severall jurisdictions because they are the Representative Body and supreame power of those Realms where all are virtually present and consenting when all or the major part at least assent Hence the whole World have ever held the determioations Creeds Canons Decrees of Oeumenicall Nationall or Provinciall Councels ratified by Emperors Kings and Parliaments obligatory in point of jurisdiction to all Churches persons within their jurisdictions And in truth the chiefe end use of Parliaments Councels Synods approved by God and the higher powers ordained by him is not to advise admonish perswade debate or deliver their opinions of doubts errors mischiefes for this every private man hath power to do and containes no stampe of jurisdistion Power or Authority in it But authoritatively to prescribe Lawes Canons Rules and determinations oblieging otherrs to obedience under paine of exemplary censures and penalties Sixthly It cannot be gainsayd but every man and woman in the world considered meerly as such or as single persons stript of all their naturall civill or Ecclesiasticall relations are of equall Authority and have no jurisdiction power or superiority at all one over another no more than fellow servants fellow Citizens or neighbors out of office have over one another yet look upon the selfe-same persons as they stand cloathed with their severall Relations as members of a family Corporation City Kingdome Church and their very relations make them subordinate and lyable to sundry superiour jurisdictions not only by way of counsell but command Thus children servants wives Pulpits are by a naturall relation established by a Morall Law and sundry divine Precepts subject to all the just Lawes Orders commands of their Parents Masters Husbands not onely by way of Counsell or advise which they may obey or reject at pleasure but of Iurisdiction and Authority so farre as to be enforced to obedience and justly punished for disobedience or neglect according to the quality of the offence and contempt Thus inferiours of all sorts in a politicke relation onely as subjects to their Princes to all subordinate Magistrates Officers in their respective places of power Kingdomes to their Parliaments Cities to their Majors Aldermen and Common-Councell Companies to their Masters Wardens and Assistants Souldiers to their Generals Commanders of all Rankes Schollars to their Tutors Colledges to their Rectors mariners to their Masters both by the Law of God Nature Nations Dictat of common reason are subject to all just orders Mandates of these their superiours to which they must yeeld obedienceâ— under paine of such punishments as are answerable to their contempt and disobedience The same rule and reason holds as firmely in all Ecclesiasticall Relations Take severall private Christians as Christians or severall Parishes or Congregations as they are such and it is certain one of them hath no Iurisdiction nor power at all over another in any Ecclesiasticall matters either to prescribe Lawes to or inflict censures upon one another but only a power to exhort admonish reprove advise or assist one another in a brotherly way But yet looke upon the selfe-same particular persons Churches as Members of a Parochiall or Nationall Church and then in this Relation they are and ought to be subject to the just rules precepts Canons Orders of the Ministers and whole Congregation of which they are Actuall Members even in point of conscience and every particular Church must and ought readily to submit to the just Canons Constitutions Orders determinations Ecclesiasticall Censures of the whole Representative Nationall or Provinciall Church Councell â—ynod ratified by Authority of Parliament in a Regular way under paine of Obâ—inacy Contempt Disobedience and exemplary punishment there being the selfe-same reason and equity for severall combined Churches in a Councel Synod Presbytery to have a coeâ—cive power over every particular Church within their limits as for any particular Congregation to claim or exerise a jurisdiction in point of direction or correction over any or every particular member of it Our Independents no doubt will grant that if two or three severall Congregations unite themselves into one Church they do by vertue of this union become all lyable to the Iurisdiction Canons Orders Determinations Censures of that one Church and those who whiles divided had no authority nor power but onely of their owne members have by this union a Iurisdiction over the Members of all these Churches thus eonjoyned into one As it is with several persons united into one Corporation Society Church or when severall powers Or jurisdictions meet and joyne together in one as the Parliaments Commissioners Armies of two Provinces Kingdome in one Parliament Councel Army the Lords Commons Knights and Burgesses of every County Citty Town and Burrough in both Realmes in one Parliament they have by this their union the whole power and authority of both united Kingdomes Armies Parliaments and a joynt Iurisdiction over both which they had not before whiles seperated even as a Major or King hath when as severall Cities Townes Villages Kingdoms as our ancient Saxon Heptarchy are all conjoyned into one City Realm and therby subordinated to one new Iurisdiction If this then must be yeelded to me it will inevitably follow by the selfe-same reason that severall particular Churches being united together in one Synod Councell Assembly Parliament or Presbytery even for this very end and purpose to prescribe such generall Canons erect such a uniforme Church-government and Discipline for the publicke peace and benefit of the Church as shall equally binde all Churches victually present and combined in it must have a lawfull Iuridicall Legislative power in them to make such Laws Canons as shall binde all particular Congregations not onely as advises or brotherly counsels but as vigorous Lawes which subject the particular persons or Churches who transgresse or contemne them to condigne punishment as the reasons Scriptures formerly alleaged to prove that humane Lawes obliege the conscience in point of obedience abundantly demonstrate These uncontrolable verities never yet so much as doubted in any Age till this clearely discover the falsity and vanity of my Brothers objection to which I will give this further direct answer 1. I deny that every particular Church or Congregation in a Christian State where there are many adjacent Churches under the selfe same Civill Government is an absolute compleat independent Body City or Republike of it selfe as is objected to all intents and purposes without dependency on or relation or subordination to any other True it is that in some respects so far as concerns its own private interest it is a compleate body having a Minister
not onely in their Pulpits but likewise in sundry late Pamphlets wherewith they have filled the World That every particular Congregation of visible Saints and Independent Church is under the Government of Christ alone as the ONELY Head King Governour Law-giver of it and subject TO NO OTHER IVRISDICTION then that of Christ his word and Spirit That NO POWER ON EARTH NOR EARTHLY LAW-GIVERS MAY CAN OR OVGHT TO GIVE LAWES FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THIS REPVBLIKE nor claime nor exercise an Headship or undertake the Government of this Body That neither KINGS NOR PARLIAMENTS NOR SYNODS have any Authority to prescribe Lawes or Rules for the Churches Government to order the affaires of Christs Kingdome or institute the Government of his Churches or to make coactive Lawes in any Ecclesiasticall matters to bind the conscience of any Church or Christian to outward conformity or inflict any mulcts or penalties for contempt or disobedience Christ onely being the Lord of mens consciences which ought to be left at liberty That the Members of the Parliament are chosen but by a secular Root by the Generality and Riffe Raffe of the world Papists Atheists Drunkards Swearers Men voyd of the knowledge feare and grace of Christ And therefore the Independent Brethren conceive as great AN IMPOSSIBILITY that a Legitimate Ecclesiastick Power should according to the mind of Christ bee by them conferred upon any men or that they should have any Power or Authority from Christ to nominate or appoint who shall bee the men by vertue of such nomination or election to enact Lawes and Statutes in matters of Religion and to order under mulcts and penalties how men shall worship and serve God as it is in Jobs expression to bring a cleane thing out of an uncleane That the Parliaments claiming or exercising any such Ecclesiasticall Power or others attributing of it to them is a meanes to awaken the eye of Jealousie upon them and seven times more destructive and under-mining of not onely their Power but Honour Peace nd Safety also than any thing that is found in the Independent Way so ill entreated That it is a claiming of the sacred and incommunicable Royalties of Heaven an accounting it no Robbery to make themselves equall with God and such an high provocation in the eyes of the Most High as IF CONTINVED IN by the Parliament will kindle a fire in the brest of him whose name is Jealous which will consume and devoure Yea one of them puts this Question If the whole Kingdome may deny obedience unto Popish Acts and Canons or upon any other like just occasion and they themselves bee Judges whether the occasion bee just or no Whether MAY NOT INDEPENDENTS a part of the Kingdome onely doe the like in all respects Or Whether ought they because a Lesser part of the Kingdome yeeld obedience to Popish Acts and Canons because a Major part approve of and agree with a Parliament and Synod in approving them What if they should be for Popery again Judaisme or Turcisme t is no offence to make a Quere nor impossible to come to passe the greatest part of those that chose our Parliament men being thought to be Popishly or Malignantly affected c. Putting divers such like Queries destructive to the very fundamentall Power and Being of Parliaments and as bad or worse than the Popish Gun-powder Plot to blow up the Soveraign Ecclesiastick and Civill Authority of this High Court in all succeeding Ages These with infinite other Anti-Parliamentall Anti-Synodicall and Anti-Monarchicall Paradoxes at which I professe I stand amazed have not onely dropped from the Lips but Pens of sundry Independents who have avowed them publikely in Print with their Names affixed to their Bookes even before the face of Your Right Honourable Parliamentary Assembly and Supreme Tribunall in such open affront and high contempt of Your undoubted Rights Power Priviledges which Your Honours and wee all are obliged by Late Solemne Oathes Covenants Protestations to defend maintaine with our very Lives and Estates and to discover oppose all others who shall invade them to our uttermost power as I am confident no Age nor History can ever parallel in the least measure the very Malignant Prelates and Anti-Parliamentary Cavaliers having not proceeded in this kind so farre as they which I speake with deepest griefe of heart and spirit out of Conscience of that common Vow and Covenant which bindes mee to discover oppugne reveale abhorre it and detestation of their most pernicious Assertions not out of the least malice or hatred to any of their Persons What the Independents end of publishing these desperate Anti-Parliamentary Paradoxes should be unlesse to prepare their party and all others as much as in them lies utterly to reject whatever publike forme of Church-Government Discipline Reformation and Directory of Worship Your Honours by the advice of the Reverend Assembly shall establish in our Church for the future after all your serious consultations debates paines Prayers and Fastings about it and to set up their owne Anomolous Platforme which they averre is Christs Kingdome and Government and which may upon probable and higher grounds than of reason bee thought in time to overthrow and put downe all other Governments whatsoever and to stand up alone in their stead since Christs Kingdome shall stand up when all opposite earthly Kingdomes like earthen vessells shall with an Iron Rod bee dashed in peeces Which they close up with a Faxit Deus festinet in despight of Your Authority and all humane Power whatsoever I cannot conjecture And their owne late printed Passages with Mr. Iohn Goodwins Sermon that it would be more easie for him and hee should rather yeeld to bee torne in pieces by wild horses than submit to such a Government which proceeded from a Parliament chosen by the Riffe-raffe of the world c. intimate and expresse as much Which what an high contempt it is against Your undoubted Power and pious Ecclesiasticall proceedings in Reforming setling the Doctrine Discipline and Government of our Church the grand desire and prayer of all wel-affected spirits I most humbly submit to Your saddest thoughts and deepest wisedomes who have both Power and Authority in Your hands to suppresse incomparable Prudence and Providence to prevent these growing dangerous Insolencies before they become Masterlesse or Epidemicall past Your cure Farre be it from my thoughts to exasperate Your Power or Iustice against any Delinquents of this kind some whereof are so neare and deare unto mee that it is my heaviest affliction to mention their extravagancies in this kind of which I trust they and all their followers will be now ashamed and a Brotherly Admonition to their Persons though their Writings undergoe the sharper Censure will I hope induce them upon second thoughts both to discerne lament recant their fore-mentioned Paradoxes and abhorre themselves for them even in dust and ashes as one of them professeth hee will doe in case hee be convinced And
then if they will not bee reclaimed Fiat Iustitia better some should suffer than all perish My onely desire is that Your Honours would have a speciall jealous care of preserving your owne undoubted Parliamentary Rights and Priviledges against these unparalleld publike Violations Impeachments of them and of the tranquility safety of our Church and State endangered by them Toward the just defence whereof I have with as much expedition as my many other distracting publike and private Imployments would permit contributed these my indigested Nocturnall Lucubrations borrowed from the houres allotted to my necessary naturall rest in Vindication of the ancient and undoubted Ecclesiasticall Power and Iurisdiction of Parliaments Christian Princes and Magistrates which I have made good by sundry Divine Historicall Presidents and Authorities in all Ages and answered all the chiefe Pretences Objections of Papists Prelates Independents Anabaptists Separatists and all others who oppugne them in such a manner as I hope will silence them for the present and reforme them for the future It was my primitive intention and desire to have published this Treatise complete at first but it swelling to a greater bulk than I expected and my engagements in other publike services for the Common-weale retarding my speedy progresse herein I have thereupon divided it into two Parts the First whereof I here humbly tender to your Honourable Patronage till God and oportunity enable mee to complete the Second of which there is lesse Necessity since learned Mr. Samuel Rutherford in his Due right of Presbyteries and Mr. Thomas Edwards in his Anti-Apologia neither of them hitherto Answered by the Independents and in truth unanswerable with Gulielmus Apollonius and the Wallacrian Ministers Consideratio Quarundam Controversiarum c. quae in Angliae Regno hodie agitantur newly published will supply the present defect thereof and this First Part supply some particulars concerning the Ecclesiasticall Power of Parliaments Christian Princes Magistrates Councells which are wanting in them and in laborious Sir Edward Cookes Fourth Institutes who hath recorded little or nothing concerning the Jurisdiction or Power of Parliaments in Ecclesiasticall affaires and matters of Religion Thus humbly submitting these my distracted subitane Collections and Lucubrations to Your Honourable favourable Acceptation and imploring the God of Verity of Unity speedily to dissipate all our Errors and comprimise all our unhappy Divisions which threaten ruine to us if continued by Your most Religious Care Wisedome and indefatigable Endeavours that so wee may bee all like minded one towards another and may with ONE MIND and ONE MOVTH in one Way one Congregation glorifie God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ I shall with my ferventest Orisons daily recommend Your Honourable Assembly with all Your pious Endeavours for the Reforming Setling of our Church State to his Divine Benediction and ever rest Your Honours most humble devoted Servant William Prynne To the Reader CHristian Reader I here present thee with Truth Triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty to settle both thy Judgement and Practice in these unsetled times wherein the very Foundations of Parliaments States Churches Government are shaken and subverted by some of our owne dear Friends from whom wee least expected it For my part I take no pleasure in detecting my Brethrens nakednesse Errors Over-sights nor in disparaging their Worth or Writings yet I must needs acquaint thee for thine owne good to preserve thee from seducement with some materiall Observations touching their Independent Treatises for which thou maist chance to give me thanks First That they all generally take that for granted which they should prove and demonstrate to us viz. That there is an exact and most absolute forme of Church-Government prescribed to all Churches in the Scripture from which no man must vary in the least title And that the Independent Way it is and no other But when wee demand of them how they prove it or what that Way Government and Discipline is they contend for or in what plaine Scripture Texts they find it instituted and universally prescribed to all Nations Churches or how they make good all their transcendent Encomiums of their New Way wee find them altogether silent or unsatisfactory telling us onely a large story of the Patterne of the Tabernacle shewed to Moses in the Mount of the exact forme of the Temple shewed to David by the Spirit and of Ezekiels vision and his and the Angels measuring of the Temple Which are nothing to the point and meere impertinencies fit to delude the ignorant injudicious vulgar who take their weake inferences thence for divine Oracles Secondly That they are extraordinary bold confident peremptory copious in their affirmations and positions concerning their Way but very poore lame impotent deficient in their proofes thereof You must take their bare Assertions for undeniable Arguments Proofes Thirdly That their whole Independent Fabricke is built either upon false Principles As that every Church is a complete absolute independent body of it selfe subject onely unto Christ That no humane Power upon earth hath any Right or Authority to prescribe any Rules or Orders to any particular Congregation That just humane Lawes binde not the Conscience in point of obedience and the like Or else upon false or absurd Inferences from true Principles As that Christ is the King Lord Head and Law-giver of his Church Ergo No man or humane Power may make Lawes or Canons to regulate and order it or any thing in it but Christ alone Fourthly That to maintaine their New Way of Government they are enforced to deny the undoubted Power and Jurisdiction of Parliaments Councells Synods Kings and Civill Magistrates in Ecclesiasticall affaires and to maintaine such Paradoxes Passages against their lawfull Authority as if duly pondered may justly induce all Wel-affected persons to mistrust and abhorre their Way as Anarchicall and destructive to all Christian and humane Society Fifthly That they are constrained publikely to deny that there is any Nationall Church under the New Testament though they acknowledge one in the Old Upon which ground they must of necessity likewise deny one Article of the Creed That there is a Catholike Church and themselves members of it or of the Nationall Church of England They pluck up the bounds and orderly distribution of all Parish Churches absolutely necessary to avoyd confusion to provide competent maintenance for Ministers to bring all to frequent the publike Ordinances Warranted by Scripture wherein wee read not onely of distinct Synagogues and Tribes under the Law but Churches under the Gospel Approved by the practice of all Christian Churches ever since there were Christian Emperors Princes and as necessary as distinct Families Villages Cities Societies of men in civill respects yea observed in New-England it selfe though now disliked in Old and thereby bring in meere Ataxy and Confusion among us Sixthly They are constrained to wrest Scriptures against their meaning to invent many strange Apocryphall new shifts Interpretations Distinctions to evade
second at Rheemes the third at Towers the fourth at Cavailon the fift at Arelat The third Councell at Aquesgran was summoned providentissimo et jussu salutifero of King Pipin as were the two former by the wholsom command and most provident direction of his Father Lewis The Councels of Meaux and Medardum by the consent and command of Charles the son of Lewis The Councell of Valentia by the Emperor Lotharius his command ex jussione praefati Principis reverendissimi trium provinciarum Episcopi in unum collecti residissent The Synod of Ticinum and the Councell of Wormes An. 868. were congregated by the Emperor Lewis the second The Synod of Colen Anno 887. by Charles the third his consent The Councell of Ments Anno 888. and of Triburby Arnulphus the Emperor The Councel of Ferrara by John Paleologus The Provinciall Synod of Augusta Anno 1548. by the Emperor Charles the fift Cui hanc Synodorum congregandarum facultatem veluti olim Constantino Imperatori totius â—â—re orbis acceptam ferunt saith Otho the Popes own Legate To these I might accumulate the Synod at Tholetum Anno 525. congregated by the command of Richard King of the Wisi-Gothes The Synod at Rome Anno 773. cited thither by Charles the great to whom Pope Adrian and that whole Synod consisting of 154. religious Bishops and Abbots gave the right of chusing the Pope and ordaining the Apostolicall See with sundry others yea most of the Councels that I have met with in Surius Binius Crab Merlin Photius Carranza Syrmond Bochellus Spelman Cresconius Fulgentius Ferrandus and other collectors of Councels and Synods have bin alwaies usually called by Emperors and Christian Princes That being most true which the Code of the Liberties of the French Church affirmes That most christian Kings in allages have been accustomed according to the state of things hapning in their Realmes to call Synods and provinciall or Nationall Councels for the ordering of Ecclesiasticall affaires as the forecited presidents with infinite other testifie the forequoted Councels Fathers Popes Historians together with St. Hierom and Pope Gregory the great resolve Most false impudently arrogant then are the assertions of Pope Marcellus Iulius Pelagius Gregory and Symmacus if Gratian misreports not their positions as likewise of Gratian the Canonists Iesuits and Popish Parasites who all sticke not to publish without shame or feare That the power of calling generall nationall and provinciall Councels belongs properly to the Apostolicall See of Rome That regularly no Synod ought to be called without the Popes authority That it is no Councell but a Conventicle which is summoned without his authority And that all Councels without his authority presence in person or by his Legates and ratification are meerly voyd and invalid Parodoxes which all the premises and the constant practise of all ages places sufficiently confute yea and some learned Papists to Nicolaus Cufanus determines the quite contrary in these very termes The authority of a Councell doth not so depend of him by whom it was summoned that unles it be summoned by the Pope it can be no Councell for so we should avoyd all the first eight generall Councels For wee read they were summoned by Emperors not by Popes And the Pope of Rome like other Patriarcks received the Emperors Majesties sacred commandements to come or send to Councels If the Pope be negligent or if hee say nay the Emperour may by his own authority summon Councels by way of command to stay the wavering State of the Church Hence we have one conclusion that in generall Councels and making Lawes the Bishop of Rome hath no such power as certain flatterers give him Thus this learned Cardinall Aeneas Sylvius afterwards Pope Pius the second is as point-blanck as he From these authorities writes he they thinke themselves wonderfully armed who deny that Councels can be kept without the Popes consent whose judgement if it should stand as they woul have it would draw the ruine of the Church with it For what remedy shall there be if a criminous Pope should disturbe the Church if he should destroy soules if he should pervert the people with his ill example if finally he should teach things contrary to faith and should fill his subjects with haereticall Doctrines Should we suffer all things to go to ruine with him But I whiles I read over ancient Histories while I consider the Acts of the Apostles do not verily finde this custome that Popes onely should call Councels Neither afterwards in the time of Constantine the great and of other Emperors when Councels should be called there was no great account made of the Popes consent Durandus De Concilio celebrando Parisiis 1545. Tit. 1 2. Franciscus Zabarella Cardinall of Florence de Schismate Concilio p. 542 543 544 Theodoricus a Niem de Schismate c. 3. 5. 7. p. 154. confesse and teach that it belongs to the Emperors to call Councels The Code of the Liberties of the French Church saith directly Although generall Councels ought not to be called or kept without the Pope nor any thing to be decreed and concluded in them but by his authority by the Ecclesiastical rule made by Popes themselves yet notwithstanding in the French Church it hath been ever resolved that the Pope is not thought to bee above a generall Councell but is bound to keep its Decrees Statutes Precepts no lesse than the people of the Church which is the Spouse of our Lord Iesus Christ and which is especially presented by the Councel Yea William Ranchin a famous French Lawyer though a Papist in his Review of the Councell of Trent l. 1. c. 8. l. 3. c. 1. to 14. and l. 4. c. 1 2 c. not only avers but copiously and irrefragably manifests by pregnant evidences that Generall Nationall Provinciall Councels Synods in all Christian Nations Kingdoms Republikes have alwayes been constantly summoned by Emperors Kings and christian Princes and that neither the Pope nor any Prelates or Ecclesiasticall persons whatsoever have any lawfull power or authority to call them unlesse it be by the speciall licence and authority of Kings and Emperours first obtained The like is maintained and proved at large by Marsilius patavinus Defensoris Pacis pars 2. c. 21. to 27. Rabanus Maurus de Universo l 5. c. 7. Ioannis Marius de Schismate et Conciliis pars 2. c. 1. to 19. p. 507 508. by Carolus Molinaeus in his learned praeface to his Commentary on the Edict of King Henry the second of France Contra parvas Datas et Abusus Curiae Romanae p. 14. to 27. by the resolutions of divers French Councels Synods and Edicts of Parliament cited by Laurentius Bochellus Decreta Eccles Gal. l. 5. Tit. 20. cap. 17. 19 20 21. 29. 33 34 35. 38 39. 41. 43 44 45 46. by the Code of the Liberty of the French Church
Controversia 3 de Conciâ—â—s Quaest 2. p. 577. to 585. Doctor Willets Synopsis Papismi Controversi 3. Concerning generall Councels Quaestion 2. Doctor John White his way to the true Church sect 29. n. 28. p. 111. Master Rogers his Analysis on the 21. Article Proposition 1. with sundry others whom I pretermit subscribe and justifie this truth against all Romish opposites And if these be not sufficient all the Reformed Churches in their several confessions registred in the Harmony of confessions cited by Master Rogers in his Analysis of the 21 Article with the whole Classe of their learned Writers unanimously resolve That the power of calling Councels Convocations Synods belongs not to Popes or Prelates but only to Christian Emperors Kings Princes and other chief temporall Magistrates which our late famous King James in the last place in his Letters Patents prefixed before the Canons and Ecclesiasticall Constitutions made in Convocation Anno 1603. ratifies to the full affirming that the Synod and Convocation at that time held was and ought to bee summoned and called only by vertue of his royall Writ The like is affirmed by our present Soveraigne King Charles in his Declaration before the 39. Articles and in his Patents Commissions licenses for making the last new Canons 1640. and resolved in the first Canon thereof From this 1. Proposition thus plentifully ratified by uncontrolable Presidents and publike Authorities of whole Synods Parliaments States in all ages which infinitely over-ballance the inconsiderable rash opinions of any private men I shall deduce these Consectaries 1. That the chiefest care of defending propagating the true Religion suppressing errors haeresies schismes vices and enacting Laws Canons for this end for the Churches peace Government and advancement of Gods true Worship belongs to Christian Princes or supreme temporall Magistrates and is an essentiall part of their duty because the right and trust of calling Synods Councels upon all such occasions is thus originally vested in them 2. That Synods Councels are very useful necessary profitable to the Churches of Christ if rightly ordered else God himself all Christian kingdoms states Churches would not have invested Kings supream civill Magistrates with such a power of convening them nor all Christian Kings Emperors but made so frequent use of this their power not onely without opposition but even with publike approbation yea such hath been the necessity and expediency of Synods and Councels in all Christian Churches in all ages That the generall Councell of Nice An. 363 the Councell of Antioch Can. 20. the first Councell of Constantinople Can. 3. the Councel of Africke Can. 18. the Councell of Chalcedon Can. 19. the third Councell of Toledo under King Reccaredus An. 600. cap. 18. the fourth Councell of Toledo under King Sisenandus An. 6â—1 the Greeke Synods collected by Martin Bishop of Bracara cap. 18. the second Councell of Arelat Can. 2. the third at the same place Can. 1. and the fourth Can. 37. the second Synod of Towers Can. 1. the fifth Councell of Orleans cap. 11. the Councell of Hereford under King Egfred An. 670. the sixth Councell of Constantinople Can. 8. the Councell of Antricum Can. 7. the Councell of Mascon Can. 20. the Synod of Soissons under King Childeric the Councell under King Pepin at the Pallace of Vernis An. 755. cap. 4. the Councell of Paris under Lewis and Lothaire An. 829. the Councell of Meaux An. 845. cap. 32. yea the great Councell of Basill An. 1331. with sundry other Councels Decree that a Synod or Councell shall be kept twice or thrice or at the least once every yeare at a certaine time and place in every Province That all Bishops and others unlesse hindered by sicknesse or other inevitable occasions should be present at it and not depart from it till all businesses were ended and the Councell determined under paine of Excommunication that none should interrupt not keep back any necessary members from them Therefore certainly they are both expedient and necessary for the Church not uselesse antichristian diabolicall and pernicious to the Church as some Papists Arminians Socinians hertofore and Independents now scandalously ignorantly if not maliciously deeme them Sect. 2. THat Bishops and Clergie-men when assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations by Christian Princes and Magistrates have alwayes been limited and directed by them not onely for the time and place of their meeting but likewise for the manner and matter of their debates and proceedings having no power liberty to debate or determine any thing but what was first prescribed them by their summoners or by their speciall Licence first obtained With a touch of Princes and Laymens presiding judging voting in Synods and Councels Secondly As Bishops and Clergy-men cannot summon Councels or Convocations not yet assembled together in them but by the Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates authority who alwayes appointed both the time and place of their meeting continuance and dissolution as all ages Authors attest so when they are lawfully met in Councels they cannot debate determine any points of faith nor yet frame any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Constitutions in them but by the Princes or Magistrates licence direction that summoned them who have always both abroad and at home prescribed them either in generall or speciall termes what things they should debate treat of and conclude in their Synods confining them to such particulars for the determination and ordering whereof they were convened as well as to the time and place of their assembling This is evident by sundry Presidents The first famous generall Councell of Nice and the Bishops therein assembled were thus licensed and limited by Constantine the great who fate President in it as Eusebius with others manifest at large The Bishops assembled by him in the Synod of Tyrus were limited likewise by him how to proceed and what to treat of as appears by his letters to them wherein after he had exhorted them to peace and unity he chargeth them not to delay but to define the present controversies with al earnest endeavour within those fitting bounds he there prescribed telling them That he had sent Dionysius the Consull to admonish them of all things they were to do and who ought to be present at their Synod Maximè vero ut idem animadversor sit custos conservandae aequalitatis ordinis but especially that he should be an observer and keeper of that aequability and order which he had prescribed to be observed in that Synod The Bishops assembled by Constantius his Edict in the Councell of Ariminum most humbly requested his Majesty of his gracious favour and wonted clemency to grant them license and lawfull favour firmely to persevere in those things which their ancestors had decreed and that nothing might be diminished or added unto the old and ancient decrees In the Councell held at Seleucia summoned by Constantius precept it was commanded by this
in this point let him consult William Ranchin his Review of the Councell of Trent who is copious and zealous in this point though a Papist Bishop Jewels Defence of the Apologie part 6. cap. 12. 13 14. 15. and the ensuing Sections But to returne to the point proposed As in the forecited Councels abroad so in our Councels Synods and Convocations at home as our Kings and their Nobles were usually present and president as I shall shew hereafter so the Prelates could debate propound and conclude nothing without their privity and licence Hence Eadmerus records of King William the Conquerour that all divine and humane things did expect his approbation for he would not suffer any man living within any of his Dominions to receive the Bishop of Rome as Apostolicall unlesse he commanded him nor yet to accept his Letters upon any termes if they had not been first shewed to him Yea he did not suffer the Primate of his Kingdome to wit the Arch-bishop of Canterbury or Dover if he sate President in a generall Councell of Bishops gathered together to decree or prohibit any thing but those things which were sutable to his will and had been first ordained by himselfe William Rufus his sonne tooke the same jurisdiction on him and challenged it as part of his Prerogative Royall For when as Anselme Arch-bishop of Canterbury moved him to command if he pleased Councels to be renued according to the ancient use because there had not been a generall Councell of Bishops in England since his comming to the Crowne not in many yeares before he gave him this reply When I shall thinke fit I will do something concerning these things not at thine but my owne pleasure But of this I shall thinke some other time and adds by way of scoffe but thou whence speakest thou in a Councell After this the King demanded of him from what Pope he would receive his Pall he answered from Urbane which the King hearing replyed That he had not yet taken him for Apostolicall neither had it been the Custome in his or his Fathers time that any one should name a Pope in the Kingdome of England without or besides his license or election and whosoever would wrest from him the power of this dignity should do all one as if he had endeavoured to take his Crown from him If therefore thou recivest the same Vrban or aeny other for Pope in my Kingdome or holdest him being received thou doest against the faith and allegiance which thou owest to me neither dost thou offend mee lesse in this than if thou shouldest endeavour to take my Crown from me Wherefore know that thou shalt have no share or portion in my Kingdome if I shall not see thee by open assertions to deny all subjection and obedience to Vrban at my desire Which he refusing to doe the Bishops and Noblemen sent to him from the King told him Thaâ— the whole Kingdome complained against him that he endeavoured to take away from their common Lord the dignity of his Empire and his Crowne For whosoever deprives him of the customes of his Royall dignity takes away his Crown and Kingdome together with it for one cannot be decently enjoyed without the other So little power had the Pope or Prelates here in England in those times Anno 1234. there was a Councell held at Glocester to which the King sent this Mandate Mandatum est omnibus Episcopis qui conventuri sunt apud Gloucestriam die Sabbati in chrastino Sanctae Catharinae firmiter inhibendo quod sicut Baronias sua quas do lege tenent diligunt nullo modo praesumant Concilium tenere de aliquibus quae ad coronam Regis pertinent vel quae personam Regis vel statum suum vel statum Concilii sui contingunt scituri pro certò quod si fecerint Rex inde se capiet ad Baronias suas Teste Rege apud Hereford 23. Novembris c. Anno 1237. in the Councel held at London under Otho the Popes Legate the King sent the Earle of Lincolne with others to the Legate sitting in Councell with an Inhibition in the Kings name to determine of nothing against the Crowne and Dignity Ut dicto Legato writes Matthew Paris ex parte Regis Regni inhiberent ne ibi contra Regiam coronam dignitatem aliquid statuere attemptaret and William de Reel one of the Messengers remained in the Convocation house to see this Inhibition observed clothed in a Canonicall Cap and Surplis the others departing thence So in 26. Hen. 3. rot 21. 9. E. 1. rot 2. 11. E. 2. rot 10 18. E. 3. rot 21. in the Tower and in many other Records I finde a generall Prohibition usually directed to the Convocation the Prelates and Clergie therein such loyall subjects usually were they Ne quid attemptarent contra jus Regium Ne quid statuant contra Regem in Concilio suo Ne aliquid tentetur contra Coronam Regis in congreganâ—ione Cleri c. the King confining them of what to treat and conclude of what not to entermeddle without his speciall license Not to mention That our Kings have frequently prescribed the Convocation what Subsidies they should grant and how they have handled them in case they refused to grant them The Statute of 25. H. 8. c. 19. Records ` That the Clergie of the Realm of England submitting themselves to the Kings Majesty then promised in verbo Sacerdotii that they would never from thenceforth presume to attempt alleadge claime or put in ure or enact promulge or execute any new Canons Constitutions Ordinance provinciall or other by whatsoever other name they shall be called in the Convocation unlesse the Kings most Royall assent and Licence may to them he had to make promulge and execute the same and that His Majesty doe give His most Royall assent and authority in that behalfe And thereupon enacts according to the sayd submission and petition of the Clergie that they assembled together in Convocation ne any of them to wit in their severall Visitations Synods Constitutions Chapters from henceforth Shall presume to alleadge claime or put in ure any Constitutions or Ordinances provinciall or Synodals or any other Canons nor shall Enact Promulge or execute any such Canons Constitutions or Ordinance provinciall by what name or names they may be called in Convocation for time to come unlesse the sayd Clergy may have the Kings most Royall assent and licence to make promulge and execute such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances provinciall or Synodall upon pain of every one of the said Clergy doing the contrary to this being thereof Convict to suffer imprisonment and make fine at the Kings will Hence the whole Clergy of England in their Booke entituled The Institution of a Christian man dedicated to K. Henry the eight Anno 1543. subscribed with all their names in a Convocation Chapter of Orders acknowledge this sovereign jurisdiction of the Prince
of Canterbury in their and every of their distinct Courts and in the order and manner of their and every of their proceedings and by all other persons within this Realme as far as lawfully being members of the Church it may concerne them And further to conferre debate treat consider consult and agree of and upon such other points matters causes and things as we from time to time shall deliver or cause to be delivered unto the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation in writing under Our Signe Manuell or privie Signet to be debated concluded consulted and concluded upon the sayd Statute or any other Statute Act of Parliament Proclamation Provision or restraint heretofore had made provided or set forth or any other cause matter or thing whatsoever to the contrary notwithstanding And we do also by these Presents give and grant unto the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation and to the rest of the Bishops of the said Province of Canterbury and to all Deanes of Cathedrall Churches Archdeacons Chapter and Colledges and the whole Clergy of every severall Diocesse within the said Province full free and lawfull liberty licence power and authority That they the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation and the rest of the sayd Bishops and other the Clergie of the same Province or the greater number of them whereof the sayd President of the sayd Convocation to be one all and every the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters Causes and things so by them from time to time conferred treated debated considered concluded and agreed upon shall and may set down in writing in such forme as heretofore hath been accustomed and the same so set down in writing to exhibite and deliver or cause to be exhibited and delivered unto Us to the end that we upon mature consideration by us to be taken thereupon may allow approve confirme and ratifie or otherwise disallow annihilate and make voyd such and so many of the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters causes and things so to be by force of these Presents considered consulted and agreed upon as wee shall thinke fit requisite and convenient Provided alwayes that the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters and things or any of them so to be considered consulted or agreed upon as aforesaid be not contrary or repugnant to the Liturgy established or the Rubrick in it or the nine and thirty Articles or the Doctrine Orders and Ceremonies of the Church of England already established Provided also and our expresse will and commandement is That the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters and things or any of them so to be by force of these presents considered consulted or agreed upon shall not be of any force effect or validity in the Law but only such and so many of them and after such time as we by our Letters Patents under our great Seale of England shall allow approve and confirme the same any thing before in these presents contained to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding c. In witnesse whereof We have caused these our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse Our selfe at Westminster the twelfth day of May in the sixteenth yeare of our Reigne Per Regem Ipsum Willys To which I shall adde the Kings further Warrant for making a particular Canon and Oath in the late Convocation Charles R. MOst reverend Father in God right trusty and right entirely beloved Councellour Right reverend Fathers in God right trust and well-beloved and trusty and well-beloved We great you well Whereas We out of our meere grace and favour and for the good and peace of the Church have granted to you our Arch-Bishop of Canterbury free leave and licence under our great Seale of England bearing date the twelfth of this instant May to propose treat and conclude upon all such necessary Articles and Canons which you shall finde fit to be ordered for the peace and government of this Church Provided that you shall thereby have no power to meddle with nor alter any thing ratified and confirmed by Act of Parliament And whereas we have further in that Licence which we have granted unto you reserved power to our selfe to command you to propose treat and determine of any such thing or things as we shall recommend unto you under our Signe Manuall or Signet These are therefore to will and require you to propose treat and conclude upon such a Canon as may secure us and all our loving subjects against all growth and encrease of Popery in this our Kingdom as also of any hereticall or schismaticall opinions to the prejudice of the doctrine or discipline of this Church of England established by Law And that in this case you agree upon some Oath to be taken by your selves and all the Clergie respectively and by all which shall hereafter take upon them holy Orders that they shall adhere constantly to the doctrine and discipline here established and never give way for so much as can any way concerne them to any innovation or alteration thereof And when you have made this Canon and inserted this Oath we require you to present it to us that we may advise upon it and if upon mature consultation we approve it we shall confirme it and then give you power under our great Seale both to take the said Oath your selves and to administer it to all such as the Canon appoints Given under our Signet at our Court at White-hall the seventeenth day of May in the sixteenth yeere of our Reigne To the most Reverend Father in God our right trusty and right entirely beloved Councellour the Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitane of all England To the right Reverend Fathers in God our right trusty and well-beloved the Lords Bishops and to our trusty and well-beloved the rest of the Clergie now assembled in Convocation 3 ly by the Kings letters Patents for Confirmation of those Canons after they were made presented to be confirmed by him In the first canon whereof they thus truly resolve That a supream Power is given to this most excellent Order of Kings by God himself in the Scriptures which is That Kings should rule and command in their severall dominions all persons of what rank or estate soever whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill and that they should restrain and punish with the temporall sword all stubborn and wicked doers The care of Gods Church is so committed to Kings in the Scripture that they are commended when the Church keeps the right way and taxed when it runs amisse and therefore her government belongs in chief unto Kings For otherwise one man would be commended for anothers care and taxed but for anothers negligence which is not Gods way The power to call and dissolve Councels both nationall and provincial is the true right of all Christian Kings within their own Realms or Territories
Canons of the Church in and by a Common Councell and Parliament as well of the Nobles and Commons as of the Prelates and Clergy as is evident by this passage in the Manuscript Tables of Robert Winchelsy Arch-Bishop of Canterbury WILLIELMUS Rex Angliae DE COMMUNI CONCILIO Archiepiscoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PROCERUM REGNI SUI Leges Episcopales quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praeceptae fuerunt sicut nec sunt his diebus OBSERV AND AS IN CONCUSSE JUDICAVERIT c. And by this his rescript to Remigius Bishop of Lincolne WILLIELMUS Gratia Dei c. Sciatis vos omnes caeteri mei fideles qui in Angliamanent quod Episcopales leges quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praecepta usque ad mea tempora in regno Anglorum fuerunt COMMUNI CONCILIO et consilio Archiepiscoporum meorum caeterorum Episcoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PRINCIPUM REGNI MEIEMEND AND AS JUDICAVI Proptereamando Regia authoritate praecipio ut nullus Episcopus vel Archidiaconus de legibus Episcopalibus amplius in HUNDRET placita toneant c. In the Councell of Rhoan Anno 1073. William the Conqueror sate chiefe President And decreed many things as well touching Ecclesiasticall Affaires as the benefit of his new Kingdom of England Among other things it was there decreed Judicatum est praesidente Rege Anglorum Gulielmo writes Matthew Westminster the King himselfe being president that Monkes who by force assaulted their Abbotts as the Monkes of Andoem had assaulted and slaine their Abbot at that time whiles hee was saying Masse in any Abbies should there be thrust into prison for it which before it seemes they could not be This Councell was no other then a Parliament diverse temporall Lawes as well as Ecclesiasticall being enacted therein and both ratified approved by this King who as Eadmerus stories of him would not so much as suffer the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primate of all his Realme when hee sate President in a generall Councell of Bishops assembled together to decree or prohibite any thing but such things as were suitable to his will and had first been ordained by himselfe In the Councell of London under Lanfranks An. 1075. Concessum est Regia MUNIFICENTIA Synodali authoritate Episcopis de villis transire ad Civitates By the Kings Royall munificence and the authority of the Synod liberty was granted to Bishops to remove from the Villages wherein they resided unto Cities whereupon Herman Bishop of Schiroburne removed to Salisbury Stigand from Selescia removed to Chichester Peter from Litehfield removed to Chester the King ratifying the constitution of the Synod and ordering this removeall An. 1093. King William Rufus assembled a Councell of his Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome that they might By their common assent determiue and discusse whether Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury could Keepe his faith to the King or not saving that faith reverence and obedience which he owed to the Apostolike See of Rome which he would by no means violate A weighty question surely of a loyall Prelate The Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome almost Ex Regia Sanctione assembled at Rochingham Castle on the fifth day of March at one a Clocke in the afternoone to debate this businesse but the King commanded all things to be adjourned till the morrow Quia Dies Dominica erat because it was the Lords Day an unmeet time to discusse such a businesse as this was On the morrow in medio Procorum conglobatae multitudinis eos assistentem Monachorum Clericorum LAICORUM numerosam multitudinem sic loquitur c. Lo here the Nobles Commons as well as the Bishops Abbots and Clergie assembled in a Councell to wit a Parliament to determine a case of conscience and that at Anselms request This matter being long debated and Anselme continuing refractory the busines was defetâ—ed till after Whitsuntide In the Councell of London under Lanfranke summoned by King William Rufus Anno 1095. Vlstan Bishop of Worcester was deprived of his Bishopricke by the Kings sentence and verdict quasi homo idiota c. Ipso rege consentiente hoc dictante decernitur deponendus saith Matthew Paris the King sitting chiefe president in it In the Councell of London Anno 1102. under Anselme the King and his Nobles were present as well as the Bishops and Ahbots that whatsoever was therein decreed might be approved ratified and observed by the unanimous care and solicitud of both orders For soit was necessary A plain testimony that the Councells of England in antient times were no other but Parliaments and that their Canons ound not any unlesse confirmed by King and Parliament At this Councell write Wil. Malmesbury Eadmerus Anselme the Archbishop requesting it of the King Primates Regni the great men of the Kingdom were present quatenus quicquid ejusdem Concilii authoritate decerneretur VTRJVSQVE ORDINIS CONCORDI CVRA ET SOLJCITVDINE RATVM SERVARETVR SJC ENIM NECSSE ERAT quum multis retre annis Synodali cultura cessante viciorum vepribus succrescentibus Christiana religionis fervor in Anglia nimis reripeat which they thus preface out of Anselmes owne Copy and relation Anno 1102. quarto autem Praesulatus Paschalis Summi Pontificis tertio Regni Henrici gloriosi regis Anglorum ipso annuente celebratum est Concilium in ecclesia beati Petri in â—ccidentali parte juxta Londoniam sita communi consensu Episcoporum et Abbatum et Principum totius regni In this Councell held at Westminster therewere 26. Canons compiled some against Priests mariage and Wives which when Giraldns Archbishop of Yorks enjoyned his Clergie to observe all the Clergie of his Province refused to submit to them being unwilling to part with their Wives or to vow Chastity as some of those Canons enjoyned them to the execution whereof the great discord betweene the King and Anselme concerning the investitures of Bishops being an obstacle produced to this effect Necanones hujus Synodi legum vim ac potestatem sortirentur That those Canons should not obtaine the force and power of Lawes Anno. 1107. another Councell was held under Anselme in King Henry the first his owne Palace in which Councell The King assented and enacted that from thenceforth no man should be invested into any Bishoprick or Abbie of England by the King or any Layman by giving him a pastorall staffe or a Ring Proceres Regni the Peeres of the Realme writes Eadmerus were called to this Councell and the King assented to and ratified this Act Astante multitudine ac per Consilium Anselmi et Procerum Regni the Commons standing by him by the Councell of Aâ—selme and of the great men of the Realme This Councell then was a Parliament and this Canon assented to both by the Commons Peeres and King â—o make it valid Not long after this King
Henry the first summoned another Councell about Easter ad Curiam suam apud Londoniam cunctis Majoribus Regni having assembled to his Court at London not only his Archbishops and Bishops but all the great men of his Kingdome to suppresse the Marriages of Priests contrary to the Canons of the Councell of London Anno 1102. For the extirpation of which evill the King Regali authoritate atque potentia fultos roboravit by his royall Authority and power ratified those Canons and thereupon Anselmo Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas elect Archbishop of Yorke and all the Bishops of England Decreed in the presence of the said Glorious King Henry Assensu omnium Baronum suorum with the assent of all his Barons that Priests and Deacons should live chastly and keepe no Women in their Houses but those who were of their neare kindred as the Councell of Nice had defined this Canon being ratified both by the King and Peeres in Parliament to make it obligatory In these three Councells under Archbishop Anselme a great stickler for the Popes and Clergies Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction we see the King and great men of the Realme were present and ratified the Decrees and Canons therein concluded to make them valid and binding Anno 1114 King Henry the first commanded all the Bishops and Nobles of the Kingdome to meete together at his Court whereupon a rumour was spred over all the Land that the Archbishop of Canterbury was about to celebrate a generall Councell in presence of the Popes Legate and that he would promulge some new things worthy so great a Councell for the reformation of Christian Religion in every order On the sixteenth of October they all met together in the Kings Pallace at Westminster where the multitude which assembled together at last perceived that the tumour of celebrating a Councell and of the reformation of Christianity was nothing so There Anselme in the behalfe of the Pope brought a letter directed from him to the King and Bishops wherein hee taxeth the King for conferring Bishopricks claiming that right as belonging to Peters See for determining Ecclesiasticall matters and the affaires of Bishops without his or his Legats privity which belong only to the Apostolike Sea for stopping appeales to Rome as also for calling and keeping Synodall Councells without his privity when as it was unanimously ratified in the great councell of Nice consisting of 318 Bishops that no Councells ought to be summoned or kept without the privity of the Bishop of Rome and for translating Bishops without his consent Which letters much offending the Kings mind he sent his Nuntioes by common consent to Rome to give the Pope an answer and justifie his proceedings herein as warranted by his Royall Prerogative The same yeare upon the thirteenth of Aprill there was an Assembly held at Salisbury of the Bishops Abbots and great men of all England the Kings Writ compelling them to appeare there where the King appointed William his sonne lawfully begotten to be heire to the Crowne to which all the Nobles condescended and presently tooke an oath of Allegeance to him to be his men But the Bishops and Abbotts swore only and gave their faith that if he survived his Father they would forthwith conferre both the Kingdome and Crowne of the Kingdome on him without any controversie or exception In August following one Anselm the Archbish of Canterburyes kinsman came from Rome to King Henry being then in Normandie bringing the Popes Letters which authorized him to exercise the Office of the Popes Legate here in England which in a short time being knowne in the Kingdome of England the Bishops Abbots and Nobles admiring at it assembled together at London about it and certaine other things the Queen being present to discusse the matter Communi Concilio in a common Councell whereupon they all accorded to send the Archbishop of Canterbury whom it most concerned to the King to acquaint him with the ancient custome of the Kingdome and the liberty thereof and if he thought fit that he should goe likewise to Rome to annihilate This Novelty Who comming accordingly to the King found Anselme there expecting his passage into England to exercise his Legatine office there But King Henry the first not suffering any prejudice to happen to the ancient Customes of England kept him from entring into England that not without presidents For in the first yeare of this Kings Raigne Guido Archbishop of Vienna came into England having as he said the power Legatine of all England by the precept and authoritie of the Apostolicall See which being heard of throughout England was admired by all men all knowing that it was a thing unheard of in Britaine that any man except the Archbishop of Canterbury should take upon him to supply the Popes Apostolicall turnes Wherefore as he came so he returned being received as a Legate by no man nor exercising the Office of a Legate in any thing After this one Peter having obtained from the Pope a power Legatine over England Ireland France and the Iland of the Orcades at the same hereof all England was astonished the King sent the Bishop of Saint Davids and another Clergie man beyond Sea to conduct him to him enjoyning them that after his entrance into England they should not suffer him to enter into any Churches or Monasteries to lodge or eate Being brought to the King and honourably received by him having declared the cause of his comming the King answered him that hee had now no leasure to minde so great a businesse and that his Legatine power could not be established and ratified but by the connivance and assent of the Bishops Abbots Nobles and the Assembly of the whole Kingdome in Parliament moreover hee affirmed that he could not by any meanes willingly loose any of the Customes of his Country granted him by the Apostolicall See so long 〈…〉 lived whereof this was one of the chiefest and greatest that hee made the kingdome of England free from all Legatine power Whereunto Peter affented and promised to doe his endeavour to have this priviledge preserved and augmented And so being gratified with rich presents Ille qui Legati officio fungi in toto Britania venerat nimirum ab omni officio tali cum ingenti Pompa vâ—a qua venerat extra Angliam a Rege missus est writes Eadmerus of him by way of derision So little jurisdiction had the Popes Legates here in England in those dayes who became an intollerable vexation oppression to it in succeeding Ages in the Reignes of King John Henry the third and others In the Councell of Westminster under Iohn de Crema the Popes lecherous Legate Ann. 1125. there were 17. Canons made ab omnibus confirmata and confirmed by all there present to wit by 20. Bishops 40. Abbots Cuminumera Cleri Populi multitudine with an innumerable multitude of the Clergie and people who were present at it as the Continuer
have else-where manifested In King Henry the 3. his Raign I finde these severall printed Acts of Parliament made concerning the Church Bishops Abbots Clergymen and Ecclesiasticall affaires which you may peruse at pleasure 9. H. 3. c. 1. 5. 18. 31. 33. 36 37. The Charter of the Forrest 9. H. 3. c. 4. 11. 16. 20. H. 3. c. 9. 51. H. 3. c. 10. 12. 28. besides those Recorded by Matthew Paris In King Edward the first his Raigne there were these Acts to like purpose 3 E. 1. which begins with this Prologue Because our Soveragine Lord the King had given power to redresse the State of the Realme c. for the common profit of holy Church and of the Realme And because the State of holy Church hath ever been kept c. c. 1 2. 46. 4 E. 1. c. 6. 7 E. 1. the Statute of Morâ—main 13. E. 1. c. 5. 19. 29. 31 32 33. 41 42 43. 48. Circumspecte agatis 13 E. 1. commonly called a Statute though 19 E. 3. Fitz. Iurisdiction 28. it be adjudged none The Statute upon the Writ of Consultation 24 Ed. 1. The confirmation of the Charters of the Liberties of England 25 E. 3. c. 4. 6. The Statute concerning certain Liberties granted to the Commons The Statute of Carlisle 25. E. 1. See Cookes 5. Report of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Law f. 13. 34. E. 1. c. 6. In King Edward the seconds dayes I meet with the Statute of Aâ—ticuli Cleri 19 E. 2. which wholly concernes the Clergy their Courts Tythes Rights The Statute de Prerogativa Regis c. 1. 8. 10. 14 15. and Articles against the Kings Prohibition In King Edward the third his Regency I finde very many Statutes concerning the Clergie and all kinde of Church affaires as namely 1 E. 3. Stat 2. c. 10 11. 4 E. 3. c. 6. 5 E. 3. c. 2. 9 E. 3. Stat. 2. c. 1. 14 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. 17. and stat 3 made for the Clergy the Prologue and c. 1 2 3 4 5. 15 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. 6. Parl. 3. c. 6. 18 E. 3. stat 3. for the Clergie c. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 23 E. 3. c. 8. 25 E. 3. stat 3 for the Clergie c. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 25 E. 3. stat 6. of Provisions 27 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. of Provisions 28 E. 3. c. 14. 31 E. 3. stat 1. c. 4. 11. 13 14. 36 E. 3. c. 8 concerning Priests Salaries c. 38 E. 3. stat 2. against provisors and Appeales to Rome c. 1 2 3 4 5. 45 E. 3. c. 3. 50 E. 3. c. 1. 4 5. To which I shall adde only this observation That the prologues to the statutes of 1 E. 3. stat 2. 2 E. 3 stat 3. 28 E. 3. 38 E. 3. stat 1. and 50 E. 3. with others begin thus To the honour of God and of HOLY CHVRCH and redresse of the oppressions of the people c. these ensuing Acts were made granted to testifie that even in those dayes our Parliaments first began with matters of God and the Church and settled them by Lawes as there was occasion and then proceeded to temporall matters and grievances the very Statute of Magna Charta having the same prologue wherein you may discerne this method pursued and in most subsequent Parliaments I shall adde to these printed Acts 6 E. 3. num 5. prohibiting Bishops to meddle in matters of the peace 45 E. 3. num 15. removing Bishops from all temporall Offices 50 E. 3. num 99. 103. complaining against popish Cardinals 40 E. 3. num 7 8. a notable Record against the Popes claime to the Kingdome of England by vertue of K. Johns grant 17 E. 3. num 59 60. 18 E. 3. num 59 60. 38 E. 3. num 7. 50 E. 3. num 85. 87 88. complaining against yea restraining the Popes exactions and usurpations as the cause of all plagues 50 E. 3. num 46 47. complaining against the Canons of the Clergy and 47 E. 3. num 24. against Ordinaries incroaching upon the civill Iurisdiction To proceed to King Richard the second the Statutes in the first yeare of his Raigne have this Preface Richard by the Grace of God c. Know that to the honour of God and reverence of holy Church for to nourish peace unity and concord in all the parts of the Realme c. We have ordained and established certain Statutes c. First it is agreed and established that holy Church shall haue and enjoy all her rights liberties and franchises wholly and without blemish c. The confirmation of Magna Charta with other temporall Laws next follow then c. 13 14 15. three Lawes for paying of Tythes and freeing Clergymen from arrests during their exercising of divine Service The second Parliament in â— Rich. 2. hath the like prologue To the honour of God and holy Church cap. 1 confirmes the franchises liberties of the Church 3. R. 2. C. 1 doth the like c. 3. is a Statute against Provisions from Rome to avoyd Nonresidency to provide for instruction of the people by preaching and reforme many abuses in the Church occasioned by provisions made at the complaints clamors and divers Petitions of the Kings Leige people delivered in divers Parliaments to reforme these abuses 5. R. 2. cap. 1. hath the like preface c. 1. confirmes the Churches liberties 5. R. 32. Parl. 2. c. 5. Is a Statute made at the Clergies motion to suppresse haresies and Errors contrary to the Christian faith and to imprison haeretickes and erronious Preachers till they justifie themselves according to the Law and reason of holy Church 6 Rich. 2. Stat. 1. hath the like prologue and c. 1. Ordaines and accords that our holy Mother the Church of England have all her Liberties whole and unhurt and the same fully enjoy and use 7 Rich. 2. hath the same prologue c. 8. the like confirmation of the Churches priviledges and c. 12. prohibits Provisions from Rome 8 Rich. 2. hath the like preface and enacts in the first chapter That holy Church have all her liberties 9. R. 2. c 4. 5. concerns Ordinaries Priors dative and perpetuall and Preists 10. R. 2. c. 1. saves pontificall dignity and priviledge of holy Church and cleares all in all things aforesaid 11. R. 2. c. 3. declares that Bishops ought not to be present or voting in Parliament in matters of blood 1. 2. R. 2. c. 1. confirmes the Churches liberties Chap. 7. exempts pilgrimes from the punishments of Vagrants and c. 15. prohibits Provisions from any forraign power 13. R. 2. recites That the acts therein passed were to the honour of God and holy Church c. and c. 13. prohibits hunting on holy-dayes and Priests to keepe Dogs who have not livings to a certaine value c. 18 concernes the Bishop and Deane of Lincolne and c. 29. Pilgrimes 13. R. 2. Parl. 2. c. 23. provides for the election of Bishops and all other ecclesiasticall
dignities elective and prohibits provisions usurpations citations and Bulls of the Pope and Court of Rome under paine of a Praemunire banishment abjuration Imprisonment Fine and ransome 14. R. c. 2. Limits the exchanges of monyes to the Court of Rome 15. R. 2. c. 2. 6. concernes forcible entries into Benefices Offices of holy Church mortuaties to Religious persons Popes Bulls consecrations of Church-yeards and Appropriations of Churches and Almes 16. R. 2. c. 5 provides for presentations to Churches against the Popes usurpations Translations excommunications Bulls and Jurisdiction under paine of a Praemunire 21. R. 2 it prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and c. 1. confirmes the Churches Liberties In King Henry the 4th his Parliaments I finde that the Prologues of the Statutes in 1. â— 4. 7. 9. and 13. H. 4. begin thus To the honour of God and reverence of holy Church c. and the first Chapter in each of them is That holy Church have and enjoy all her rights liberties and Franchises entirely and without imbleamishing Then follow temporall Lawes 2. H. 4. c. 3. 4. prohibits provisions of exemption from regular or ordinary obedience granted to any religious persons from Reme Buls of exemption from payment of Tithes granted to the Religious of the Order of Cysteaux under paine of a Pâ—amunire and Cap. 15. provides for the suppression of Sectaries hereticall Preachers Conventicles heriticall Bookes Schooles and preservation of the Catholique faith enacting that Heritickes shall be imprisoned abjured and in case of relapse or obstinacy burned 4. H. 4. c. 2. 3. confirme all the Statutes formerly made in favour of the Church and Clergy and for preservation of their liberties Cap. 12. concernes appropriations of Churches Vicaridges Ordinaries the Bishop and Archdeacon of Ely and other Religious persons cap. 14. prohibits working or wages on holy-dayes Cap. 17. enacts that none shall enter into Religion unlesse he be foureteene yeares of age without the Parents consent Cap. 22. concernes presentations to Benefices 5. H. 4. c. 11. 12. concerne Tithes Chalices and ornaments of holy Church 6. H. 4. c. 1. prohibits provisions and the payment of first fruits or exacted fees to Rome under forfeiture of all their estates who offend herein 7. H. 4. c. 6. inhibits Religious persons under paine of a Praemunire to procure any exemption from payment of Tithes or any provisions from the Pope 9. H. 4. c. 8. forbids provisions and translations from the Pope under paine of a Praemunire and makes all elections of Archbishops Bishops Abbots Prebends Deans to be free without any interruption from the Pope or King 11. H. 4. c. 4 Prohibits unlawful games on Sundayes and other holy dayes 1. H. 5. c. 7. 8. prohibits the conferring of Ecclesiasticall living upon Aliens and orders their benefices and the lands of Priors aliens to be seised in times of Warre 2. H. 5. c. 1. provides for Ordinaries visitations of Hospitalls and reformation of them after the lawes of the holy Church Cap. 3. grants a prohibition to spirituall Courts where they deny a Copy of the Lible Chap. 7. for the preservation of the Christian faith the Law of God and holy Church with in this Realme and the punishment of Heresies and Hereticks enacts that Hereticks shall be apprehended and imprisoned by Sheriffs and upon conviction of Heresy forseit their Lands and goods and be burned 2. H. 5. Parl. 2. c. 2. limits the wages of Curates and Parish Priests 3. H. 5. c. 1. enacts that holy Church have all her liberties and franchsies C. 3. concerns Abbots and Priors C. 4. inhibits provisions from Rome under a Premiarie C. 8. concernes Probate of Wills and râ—gulates exorbitant fees for procuring them C. 6. forbids the promotions of Irishmen to Beneficies or Ecclesiasticall dignities 9. H. 5. c. 9. limits the manner of collecting Dismes by Archbishops Bishops and their Agents 2. H. 6. c. 1 confirmes the Churches liberties 6. H 6. c. 3. prohibits worke on and wages for holy dayes 8. H. 6. begins thus To the Laud and honor of Almighty God and of the holy Mother the Church Ch. 1. provides for the priviledges of the Convocation 10. H. 6. c. 11. limits how Bastardy shall be tryed between the Common and Canon Law which differ therein 15. H. 6. c. 7. concernes Abbots and Priots 27. H. 6. c. 5. prohibits Faires and Merkets upon Sundayes and principle holy dayes as a great prophanation of them 28. H. 6. begins To the honour of God and of holy Church 33. H. 6. c. 6. concerns the exemption of the Abbot of Founteynes and other Abbots and Priors from Vexations sutes 1. Ed. 4. is prefaced To the honour of God and of holy Church C. 1. containes in it many particulars concerning Bishops Abbots and Clergymen 3. E. 4. hath the same prefaced and 12. E. 4. c. 7 prescribes excommunication 4. times a yeare to be denounced against the infringers of Magna Charta as other Acts formerly did King Richard the 3d. prefaceth the Acts of his first Parliament in his 1. yeare thus To the honour of God and of holy Church c. 14. limits the maner of collecting the Clergies Dismes King Henry the 7th begins his Statutes in the 1. yeare of his Reigne To the honour of God and his holy Church and Cap. 4. enables Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries to imprison Priests Clerkes and Religious persons for incontinency which they could not doe before The Statutes of 2. 4. 11. 12. 17. H. 7. as their Prologues attest were made to the worship of God and holy Church and for the common good of this Realme The Statutes of An. 1. 3. 4. all or most Parliaments in the Regine of King Henry the 8th are prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and for the Common Weale and profit of this Realme In the Parliament of 21. H. 8. C-3 4. 13. there were Statutes made concerning Probat of VViâ—s taking of mortuaries by Priests or others against Pluralities of Benefices and taking of farmes by spirituall men All of Ecclesiasticall Cognisance 22. H. 8. c. 15. containes the Kings generall pardon to his spirituall Subjects who were fallen into a Praemunire by submitting to Cardinall Wolsies power Legatine 23. H. 8. c. 1. abridgeth the power of Ordinaries and takes away the benefit of Clergy in some cases ch 9. enacts That no man shall be cited into any ecclesiasticall Court out of the Diocesse wherein he dwells unlesse in certaine causes ch 10. settles the Law concerning feofements and assurances to the use of any Parish-Church or Chapell 24 H. 8. ch 12. takes away all Appeales to Rome and excellently sets forth the Kings supremacy as well in and over Ecclesiasticall causes and persons as temporall as you may read at large in the Act it selfe denying exploding the authority of the Pope and Sea of Rome 25. H. 8. c. 14. conteines a Law for the punishment of HERESY and
Edward the 6. his Reigne are most punctuall and pegnant evidences hereof as namely 1. Edw. 6. ch 11. For administring the Sacrament in both kindes therein proved necessary by sundry Texts of Scripture and punishing such persons as shall unreverently speake against the Sacrament with Temporall and Ecclesiasticall censures ch 2. concerning the election and creation of Bishops by the Kings Letters Patents and what Processe and Seales they shall use declaring that they have no Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction but meerely from the King ch 9. For uniting certaine Churches within the City of Yorke ch 12. which abolisheth Sanctuaries and Clergy in some cases 2. and 3. E. 6. ch 1. For the Vniformity of service and the administration of the Sacraments throughout the Realme ch 13. For the true payment of Tythes ch 19. For abstinence from flesh ch 20. Concerning Recusants ch 23. For positive Lawes made against the Mariage of Priests ch 23. The repeale of a Statute touching Precontracts of Mariage 3. and 4. E. 6. ch 10. For the abolishing and putting away of diverse superstitious Popish Books and Images chap. 11. That the Kings Majesty may nominate and appoint 32. persons halfe Clergy-men and halfe Laymen to peruse and make Ecclesiasticall Lawes ch 12. For the manner of Ordaining Ecclesiasticall Ministers and Consecrating Bishops ch 15. Against fond and phantasticall Prophecies 5. and 6. E. 6. ch 1. For the uniformity of Common Prayer and administration of the Sacraments ch 3. For the keeping of Holy-dayes and Fasting dayes ch 4. Against fighting and quarelling in Churches and Church-Yards ch 12. For the lawfulnesse of Priests Mariage and legitimation of their children chap. 13. Touching Religious persons and c. 23. Against Vsurie All these are clearely Ecclesiasticall Acts yet made by Parliament The Statutes in Queene Maries Reigne though of a different Religion from her brother and a zealous Pontifician sufficiently evidence the jurisdiction of our Princes and Parliaments in matters of the Church and Religion witnesse 1. Mar. Parl. 1. Ses 2. Chap. 2. Repealing diverse acts-made touching Religion in King Edward the 6. his Raigne and setting up Masse and the old Lyturgies againe chap. 2. Against Offendors of Preachers and other Ministers in the Church or Church-Yard or interrupting them in their Sermons or saying Masse under paine of imprisonment fines and Ecclesiasticall censures chap. 15. For re-edifying the parish Church of Saint Ellins in Stangate 1. Mariae Par. 2. c. 1. Declaring That the Regall power of this Realme is in the Queenes Majesty as fully and absolutely as ever it was in any of her most Noble Progenitors Kings of this Realme chap. 3. Being an Act of Repeale of two severall acts in the 7. yeare of King Edward the 6. touching the dissolution of the Bishoprick of Durham Chap. 9. Touching Ordinances Rules c. in Cathedrall Churches and Schooles c. 10. Repealing a statute for the uniting of the parish Churches of Onger and Greensted in the County of Essex 1. and 2. Phil. and Mary chap. 6. For the reviving of three Statutes made for the punishment Of Heresies and that with forseiture of Lands imprisonment and death in some cases chap. 8. Intituled an Act repealing all Statutes Articles and provisions made against the See Apostolike of Rome since the 20. yeare of King H. 8. and restoring the Bishops with their Courts offices the Pope himselfe to their former usurped jurisdictions in England ratifying this Popes very Bulles and dispensations to make them valid and setling the whole affaires of the Church of England chap. 9. 20. For the punishing of traiterous Sermons and Prayers against the Queene chap. 17. Concerning leases of some spirituall persons and 2. and 3. Phil. and Mary chap. 4. For the extinguishment of first fruits c. All Ecclesiasticall Statutes In Queen Elizabeths happy Raigne there are sundry Statutes abundantly manifesting her own and the Parliaments supreame Iurisdictions and Legislative power in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline c. as namely 1 Eliz. c. 1. An Act restoring to the Crowne the ancient Jurisdiction OVER THE STATE ECCLESIASTICALL SPIRITVALL and abolishing all fortaigne power repugnant to the same which gives the Queen her heires and successors all manner of Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction in and over all Ecclesiasticall persons and causes and power to correct redresse and reform all manner of HERESIE SCHISME ERRORS ABVSES OFFENCES ECCLESIASTICALL prescribes the oath of Supremacy which all are to take and most Independents have formerly taken wherein they do utterly testifie and declare in their consciences that the Queen and her Successours are the onely supreame Governours of this Realme and other their Dommions as well IN ALL SPIRITVALL OR ECCLESIASTICALL THINGS OR CAVSES as temporall c. which jurisdiction of theirs they sweare to their power to assist and defend Which oath if any refuse to take hee shall forseit all his Ecclesiasticall promotions and temporall offices This Act likewise abolisheth the Popes jurisdiction under pain of a praemunire and other mulcts against the maintainers of it It determines what shall be adjudged HERESIE and what not namely Only such matter and cause as heretofore hath been determined ordered and adjudged to be heresie by the authority of the Canonicall Scriptures oâ— by the first foure generall-Councels or any of them or by any other generall Councell wherein the same was declared heresie by the expresse and plain words of the Canonicall Scripture or such as hereafter shall be ordered IVDGED OR DETERMINED TO BE HERESIE BY THE HIGH COVRT OF PARLIAMENT OF THIS REALME with the assent of the Clergy in their Convocation to wit by way of assistance and advice cumulatively not negatively as if their assent were simply necessary So as by this Act the Parliament is made the sole proper Iudge what is or shal be reputed punished as heresie what not how it shal be punished the highest point of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction Ch. 2. For the uniformity of Common prayer and service in the Church and administration of the Sacraments enjoyning conformity under temporall and Ecclesiasticall punishments is an irrefragable proofe of the Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power in all Church matters and 1 Eliz. c. 3. 4. 6. 5 Eliz. c. 1. For the assurance of the Queens royall power over all States and Subjects within her Highnesse Dominions ch 23. For the due executing of Writs de Excommunicato capiendo ch 28. For translating of the Bible and divine Service into the Welch tongue 8 Eliz. c. 1. Declaring the manner of making and Corsecrating the Archbishops Bishops and Ministers of this Realm to be good lawfull and perfect ratifying the Booke of common Prayer and of Ordination together with the Queens Soveraigne Ecclesiasticall Authority 13 Eliz. c. 2. Against the bringing in and putting in execution of Bulls and other instruments of the See of Rome chap. 8. Against Usury ch 19. concerning Dilapidations c. 12. To reforme certain disorders touching Ministers of the Church ratifying the 39.
That every particular Church now consisting of visible Saints is under Christ as the SOLE Head King Governour Law-giver of it and so is subject to no other jurisdiction then that of Christ his Spirit his Word We hold that every particular Church is under Christs Government as the SOLE Head King Lord Governour thereof That it is a spirituall House whose only builder and Governour is Christ and not man A spirituall Kingdome whose only King is Christ and not man A spirituall Republique whose only Law-giver is Christ and not man A spirituall Corporation whose only head is Christ and not man That no man nor power on earth hath a Kingly power over this Kingdome That no earthly Law-givers may give Lawes to this Kingdome or Republique That no man may claime or exercise a head-ship over this body That no man can or ought to take the Government of this Communion of Saints That men may not appoint limit constitute what Congregations of all sorts they please to be Churches of Christ as Nations and Parishes That Christ is King over every mans conscience so that no power on earth may sit with him in this his Thror c. yea so as no human power not Law may intermeddle to prescribe rules for the Government or formes of this Church of Christ That the Children of those Parents who will not thus acknowledge Christ to be their only King and Law-giver and are ashamed or afraid to be thus in Covenant with Christ in the Independents way as their King are not to be baptized such Parents not being within the Covenant A very hard and uncharitable censure of all Churches Persons who are not Independent That Christ is the ONLY Potentate Law-giver Lord King Governour over Churches and not men Not Councells or Senates That this is Christs Royall Prerogative which is incommunicable to ANY or All the powers on earth That Christ hath not delegated his Kingly Office to any Princes Magistrates PARLIAMENTS to set up any forme of Worship of Church-Government who have no authority to make Lawes to rule or binde any particular Churches and if they make any such they shall be apt to transgresse them but yet men must take heed how they punish them for that transgression with any enseresciderdum or Club-law This is the summe and oft repeted Argument of my deare Brothers Booke To give a satisfactory Answer to this Objection I shall first demand of my dear Brother what he meanes by this frequently incultated assertion That every particular Church is under Christ as the only Head King Lawgiver Lord and Governour thereof c. and that none ought to have any power rule or Jurisdiction in the Church but Christ alone If he intends that he is the only immediate HEAD KING Law-giver and Governour as he clearely doth I desire some solid scripture proofes for it since he produceth none to evince it the rather because it is quite contrary to sundry expres Texts which stile Kings Majestrates Ministers Heigher powers Rulers Overseers Fathers Nursing Fathers Pastors of over their Churches people flocks who are ever enjoyned to obey submit unto them yea Rulers of the Templ Congregation Church Rulers Chife Rulers of the Synagogu â—ay sometimes Gods sitting upon Gods throne to whom men must yeeld obedience for the Lords sake as to Gods Christs Vicegerents and Embassadours Yea Brother your selfe informe us out of Scripture pag. 51. That the members of Christs body are Superiour and inferiour as Pastors Teachers Teaching and RVLING Elders Helps GOVERNMENTS Bishops or OVERSEERS c. If Christ then be the onely Head King Ruler Shephard Governour of his Church and none else in that sense you object what will become of these Pastors Ruling-Elders Governours Overseers which you averre Christ hath fixed in his Churches What will become of those Independent Ministers who take upon them like absolute kings Popes Lawgivers to erect gather new Chruches of their own forming and prescribe both Lawes Rules Covenants to them which Christ never made Brother you must expunge the 1 Tim. 5. 17 Let the Elders that RULE well be counted worthy of double honour Rom. 13. 1. Let every soule BEE SVBIECT to the HIGHER POWERS c. even for CONSCIENCE SAKE Tit. 3. 1. Put them in minde to be subject to Principalities and Powers to obey Magistrates c. Heb. 12. 17. Obey them that have THE RULE OVER YOU and SVBMIT your selves for they watch for your soules as they that must give an account c. Remember Salute all them that have the RVLE OVER YOV Acts 20. 28. Take heed to the floke over which the Holy Ghost hath made you OVERSEERS or Bishops to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his bloud Rom. 12. 8. HE that RVLETH let him do it with diligence 2 Chron. 9. 8. Blessed be the Lord thy God who delighted in thee to set thee VPON HIS THRONE to BE KING FOR THE LORD THY GOD c. with infinite other Texts yea the very names of Kings Princes Governours Elders Rulers Magistrates Overseers Bishops Teachers Fathers Pastors Masters c. out of the Bible and all Christian States Churches if you will make Christ alone the only immediate King Ruler Governour Lawgiver of his Church in the sence you here object it and that no person nor humane power whatsoever hath or ought to have any rule power or jurisdiction in or over the Churches people of God But if you meane no more but that Christ is the onely supreame Head King Lord Governour Lawgiver Pastor and Ruler of his Church and that all other Kings Princes Magistrates Rulers Pastors Ministers Governours are subordinate unto him as to the King of Kings Lord of Lords and chiefe Shepheard of his flockâ— your proposition is true but your conclusion miserably false that therfore there are no subordinate Kings Magistrates Rulers Pastors Governours Lawgivers under him to rule governe order instruct direct his Churches and people which the forequoted Texts your owne experience reason and the whole world will contradict Secondly I shall demand of my Brother how he proves all his forementioned Paradoxes concerning Christ and the Church in the sense he propounds them Or that his own or other Independent Churches lately gathered erected by no other but by men and consederated by a new Covenant framed by men not Christ to be built governed ordered onely by Christ and not men to be the spirituall Kingdome of Christ c. whole onely King Governour Head is Christ and not man Or in what Text he can shew me any particular Independent Church stiled Christs spirituall Kingdom and Republike I find it prophesied Revl 11. 15. That when the seventh Angel foundeth The KINGDOMES of this World which must be meant of Nationall Churches which you deny not of Particular Congregations which are no such Kingdoms shall become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ That all the
And when in the first times of Christs Church Prelates used this power 't was therefore onely because in those dayes they had no Christian Kings And it was then so onely used as in times of persecution that is with supposition is case it were required of submitting their very lives unto the very laws and commands even of those pagan Princes that they might not so muchas seem to disturb their civil Government which Christ came to confirm but by no meanes to undermine CHARLES by the Grace of GOD c. Now for asmuch as the said Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury President of the said Convocation for the province of Canterbury and the said Arch-bishop of Yorke President of the said Convocation for the Province of Yorke and others the said Bishops Deans Arch-deacons Chapters and Colleges with the rest of the Clergie having met together respectively at the time and places before mentioned respectively and then and there by vertue of Our said authority granted unto them treated of concluded and agreed upon certaine Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to the end and purpose by Vs limited and prescribed unto them have thereupon offered and presented the same unto Vs most humbly desiring Vs to give our Royall assent unto the same according to form of a certain Statute or Act of Parliament made in that behalfe in the 25th yeer of the Reign of King Henry the eighth and by Our said Prerogative Royall and Supream authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall to ratifie by Our Letters Patents under Our great Seal of England and to confirm the same The Title and Tenour of them being word for word as ensueth Wee of Our Princely inclination and Royall care for the maintenance of the present Estate and government of the Church of England by the Lawes of this Our Realme now setled and established having diligently with great contentment and comfort read and considered of all these their said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions agreed upon as is before expressed And finding the same such as Wee are perswaded will be very profitable not only to Our Clergy but to the whole Church of this Our Kingdome and to all the true Members of it if they be well observed Have therefore for Vs. Our Heires and lawfull Successours of Our especiall grace certaine knowledge and meere motion given and by thâ—se presents doe give Our Royall Assent according to the forme of the said Statute or Act of Parliament aforesaid to all and every of the said Canons Orders Ordinances and constitutions and to all and every thing in them contained as they are before written And furthermore We do not onely by our said Prerogative Royall and supreme Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall ratifie confirme and establish by these Our Letters Patents the said Canons Ordinances and Constitutions and all and every thing in them contained as is aforesaid but do likewise propound publish and straightly injoyne and command by Our said Authority and by these Our Letters Patents the same to be diligently observed executed and equally kept by all Our loving Subjects of this Our Kingdome both within the Provinces of Canterbury and Yorke in all points wherein they do or may concerne every or any of them according to this Our will and pleasure hereby signified and expressed And that likewise for the better observation of them every Minister by what name or title soever he be called shall in the Parish Church or Chappell where he hath charge read all the said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions at all such times and in such manner as is prescribed in the said Canons or any of them The Booke of the said Canons to be provided at the charge of the Parish betwixt this and the Feast of S. Michael the Arch-angell next ensuing straightly charging and commanding all Archbishops Bishops and all other that exercise any Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction within this Realme every man in his place to see and procure so much as in them lyeth all and every of the same Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to be in all points duly observed not sparing to execute the penalties in them severally mentioned upon any that shall wittingly or wilfully break or neglect to observe the same as they tender the honour of God the peace of the Church the tranquillity of the Kingdome and their duties and service to Vs their King and Soveraigne In witnesse whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse Our Selfe at Westminster the thirtieth day of Iune in the sixteenth yeare of Our Reigne By all these Patents with others of like nature directed to all our Convocations by our Kings in former and latter times by Our present Parliaments manner of calling limiting directing our present Assembly of Divines in all particulars of their proceedings and debates appointing some eminent Members of both Houses to sit and consult together with them and to certifie all their results and determinations to them to be considered rectified rejected or approved by both Houses as they in their wisdomes shall see cause and by the fore-cited premises it is most apparent that the Arch-bishops Bishops Clergy and Convocation of England assembled Synodically together much lesse then any particular Independent Minister or Congregation notwithstanding all their late printed vaunts of their Ecclesiasticall soveraigne Iurisdiction by divine right and power to prescribe and enjoyne Visitation-Oaths Articles new Rites and Ceremonies of their owne Inventions both unto Ministers and people which they seconded with their practice to the insufferable grievance and oppression of the people are so farre from having any lawfull right power and authority to make prescribe any Ecclesiasticall Injunctions Canons Lawes Rites Ceremonies or forme of Government to any of his Majesties Subjects that though they be lawfully assembled together in a Provinciall or Nationall Synod by the Kings owne Writ or Parliaments command yet they cannot legally or of right so much as treat debate consult of any Ecclesiasticall affaires without a speciall licence first obtained from the King or Parliament and then only of such generals or particulars as they shall prescribe them much lesse compile enact promulge impose or execute any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Injunctions Ordinances Oaths without their speciall approbation and ratification of them by their speciall Letters Patents under the great Seale and by Act of Parliament too as hath been lately resolved by unanimous consent of both Houses in the case of the condemned new booke of Canons The like I have proved of the Bishops Clergie Councels in other Christian Empires and Kingdomes Where then is that immense Episcopall jurisdiction authority preheminence superiority power in point of dominion over and beyond that of ordinary Ministers which our Lordly Prelats lately so much boasted of and pleaded for as due unto them by no lesse then divine institution if we may beleeve them not by the Grace Patents Grants or connivence of Christian Princes Let these swelling ambitious Grandees