thing to govern absolutely Gentlemen The Imperial Crown is a Word that is significative you shall find in all Statutes primo Eliz. and the first of King James nay even in the Act of Judicial proceedings of this Parliament it is called an Imperial Crown They that take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy they swear that they will to their power assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King His Heirs and Successors or annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm What is an Imperial Crown It is that which as to the Coercive part is subject to no man under God The King of Poland has a Crown But what is it At his Coronation it is conditioned with the people That if he shall not Govern them according to such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But the Crown of England is and always was an Imperial Crown and so sworn Gentlemen As I told you even now the Imperial Crown is a Word significative that Crown which as to the Coercive part is not subject-to any Humane Tribunal or Judicature whatsoever And truly that this is such an Imperial Crown though I have cited Authorities ancient enough you may find them much more ancient I remember in the Story of William Rufus you shall find it in Matthew Paris and Eadmerus some Question was about Investiture of Bishops and the like the King writes His Letter That c. God forbid I should intend any absolute Government by this It is one thing to have an Absolute Monarchy another thing to have that Government Absolutely without Laws as to any coercive power over the Person of the King for as to Things and Actions they will fall under another consideration as I will tell you by and by Gentlemen Since this is so consider the Oath of Supremacy which most men have taken or should take All men that enter into the Parliament-House they are expresly enjoyned by Statute to take the Oath of Supremacy What says that Oath We swear that The King is the only Supreme Governour within this Realm and Dominions He is Supreme and the onely Supreme and truly if he be Supreme there is neither Major nor Superior I urge this the more lest any Person by any Misconstruction or inference which they might make from something that hath been Acted by the Higher Powers they might draw some dangerous Inferences or Consequences to colour or shadow over those Murtherous and Traiterous Acts which afterwards they committed They had no Authority But as I told you though I do set forth this and declare this to you to let you know that the King was immediately subject to God and so was not punishable by any Perfon yet let me tell you there is that excellent Temperament in our Laws that for all this the King cannot rule but by His Laws It preserves the King and his Person and the peoples Rights There are three things touching which the Law is conversant Personae Res Actiones Persons Things and Actions For the Person of the King He is the Supreme Head He is not punishable by any coercive Power the Laws provide for that The King can do no wrong it is a Rule of Law it is in our Law-books very frequent 22d of Edward the Fourth Lord Coke and many others If he can do no Wrong He cannot be punished for any wrong The King He hath the infirmities and weakness of a man but he cannot do any injury at least not considerable in Person He must do it by Ministers Agents Instruments Now the Law though it provide for the King yet if any of his Ministers do wrong though by his command they are punishable The King cannot arrest a man as he cannot be arrested Himself but if He arrest me by another Man I have remedy against this man though not against the King and so He cannot take away my Estate This as to the Person of the King He is not to be touched Touch not mine Anointed I come to Things If the King claim a Right the King must sue according to His Laws the King is subject to the Laws in that case His Possessions shall be tried by Juries If He will try a man for His Fathers Death you see he will try them by the Laws The Law is the Rule and Square of His actions and by which He Himself-is judged Then for Actions that is such Actions whereby Rights and Titles are prosecuted or recovered the King cannot judge in Person betwixt man and man He does it by his Judges and upon Oath and so in all cases whatsoever If the King will have his Right it must be brought before His Judges Though this is an Absolute Monarchy yet this is so far from infringing the Peoples Rights that the People as to their Properties Liberties and Lives have as great a priviledge as the King It is not the sharing of Government that is for the Libertie and Benefit of the People but it is how they may have their Lives and Liberties and Estates safely secured under Government And you know when the Fatness of the Olive was laid aside and we were Governed by Brambles these Brambles they did not only tear the Skin but tore the Flesh to the very Bone Gentlemen I have done in this Particular to let you see that the Supreme Power being in the King the King is immediately under God owing his Power to none but God It is true blessed be God we have as great Liberties as any People have in Christendom in the World but let us own them where they are due We have them by the Concessions of Our Princes Our Princes have granted them and the King now He in them hath granted them likewise Gentlmen I have been a little too long in this and yet I cannot say it is too long because it may clear misunderstanding so many Poisonous Opinions having gone abroad To come a little nearer If we consider suppose there were the Highest Authority but when we shall consider this horrid Murther truly I cannot almost speak of it but Vox faucibus haeret When we shall consider that a few Members of the House of Commons those that had taken the Oath of Supremacy and those that had taken the Oath of Allegiance that was to defend the King and His Heirs against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever against His and their Persons Their Crowns and Dignities not onely against the Pope's Sentence as some would pretend but as otherwise against all Attempts and Conspiracies not onely against His Person Crown and Royal Dignity nor Pope's Sentence nor onely in order to the Profession of Religion but absolutely or otherwise that is whatsoever Attempts by any power Authority or Pretence whatsoever I say when a few Members of the House of Commons not an eighth part of them having taken these Oaths shall assume upon themselves an Authority an Authority what to do shall assume to
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
nothing but indeed to make a new Government which is the highest Treason next to the Murthering of the King in the world To subvert the Laws and to make a few of the Commons nay if they had been the whole to make them to have the Legislative power Mr. Scot if you have any thing in extenuation of the Fact we shall hear you further we cannot L. Finch If you speak to this purpose again for my part I will profess my self I dare not hear further of it It is so poysonous blasphemous a doctrine contrary to the Laws if you go upon this point I shall and I hope my Lords will be of that opinion too desire the Jury may be directed Scot. I thought my Lord you would rather be my Councel it is not my single opinion I am not alone in this Case therefore I think I may justifie my self in it it was the Judgement of many of the Secluded Members to own us to be a Parliament Lord Annesley What you said last doth occasion my rising you seem to deliver my opinion who you know could never agree to what you have alledged truly I have been heartily sorry to hear the defence you have made to day because you know I have had Letters from you of another nature I was very confident to have heard you an humble Penitent this day instead of justifying your self As to that which you say of the Secluded Members owning you to be a Parliament they were so far from it that you know for how many years they lay under sufferings and obscurity because they could not acknowledge that an Authority which was not so You cannot forget the Declaration of both Houses that was published upon a Jealousie that the people had they would change the Government of King Lords and Commons It was far from their thoughts it was called in that Declaration A black scandal cast upon them This Declaration you know was by Order of both Houses affixed in all Churches of England that people might take notice what they held to be the Fundamental Government of this Kingdom King Lords and Commons After this for you to set up another Government and under them to act such things that one would think should hardly enter into the heart of any man You know very well all along they declared themselves faithful Subjects to the King and so would have lived and dyed and you might have had your share of the happiness of that peace if you could have had an Inclination to submit to that which both Houses had resolved when you and others could not bring your hearts to stoop to your Fellow Subjects when you could not submit to that equal rule to take your share with them When Pride carried some so high then was the beginning of your fall and others and none could expect other than what is now come to pass That they should come to that shame and sorrow that this day hath brought upon you I could have wished to have heard nothing but an humble confession of the fault that hath been clearly proved and no Justification of it You have sworn among others to preserve the Laws and People of the Kingdom but you drove away not only the House of Lords but most of the Commons and then to give the name of a Parliament to the Remainder this is a great aggravation of your Treason I think we of the Secluded Members could not have discharged our duty to God and the Kingdom if we had not then appeared in Parliament to have dissolved that Parliament and so by our joynt assent put an end to all your pretences which if we had not done we had not so soon come to our happiness nor you to your miseries Lo. Ch. Bar. The Court hath told you before their opinions in the thing and no further debate is to be allowed in this the Justification of it doth comprehend treason We our selves are not by Law to allow the hearing of it If you have nothing to say for your self I must give direction to the Jury Scot. I humbly crave leave to move the Jury that they bethink themselves and consider of it rather as a special Verdict than of a definitive one I think there is cause of a special Verdict Court If there was need of a special Verdict We are upon our Oaths I should give direction to the Jury What We do We do upon our Oaths and must answer it before God Almighty The Court hath delivered their opinions before that in this Case the Pretended Authority under which you did derive that Power which you did execute that it is no Authority it is void in Law it is a foundation if it were true of subverting all Laws and indeed of all Religion a Power that you assumed to your selves of Judging and Condemning your King that you would countenance such an Authority is a great aggravation of the fault They are Jugdes whether you did Imagine or Compass the Kings Death that is all the Jurors have to do Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I would know what particular Law I have transgressed in this thing Court The Law of God and Man 25 Edw. 3. Scot. I humbly conceive that reaches not to this Case Court To satisfie you in that the very words of the Statute are If any man do Compass or Imagine the Kings Death it is Treason The Indictment is That you did Imagine and Compass the death of the King if the Fact be proved against you you are within the Statute Scot. You will not say the King shall be a Traytor if he shall Compass the death of the Queen Court The Queen is a Subject Scot. I am not yet convinced Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Scot. I do plead and claim that I am within the Compass of several Pardons and desire Councel in that particular I do come within the Compass of his Majesties Pardon Lo. Ch. Bar. If you had not gone on to matter of Justification you might have been more heard to this of Pardon but after a Justification then to come for a Pardon which implies a confession of Guilt they are contradictory I must tell you we are now upon point of Law That Proclamation I doubt not but his Majesty will inviolably make good but we are not to judge of that it is nothing to a legal proceeding You are now in a Court of Law it is not to be pleaded in a Court of Law the Kings Pardon in Law must be under his Broad Seal How far you are under that Proclamation care will be taken and what is fitting to be done will be done but it is nothing in the matter of the Charge to this Jury Scot. I desire Councel touching the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. Court You should have done it before you had confessed the Fact Scot. I may do it in Arrest of Judgement Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot for that of the Kings Proclamation if you be within the benefit and
you only that you would lay it to your hearts that you would consider what it is to Kill a King and to kill such a King If any of you shall say That we had no hand in the actual Murther of the King remember that they that brought him to the Bar were all one as if they had brought him to the Block as St. Paul confessed though he held but the Clothes he killed the Martyr Stephen You are shortly to appear before Gods Tribunal and I beseech God Almighty that he will give you and us all those hearts that we may look into our selves No fig-leaves will serve the turn whatsoever you have said now as Prisoners or allowed to say for your own preservation in point of Fact Notwithstanding it will not serve before God Almighty All things are naked before him Lay it to your hearts God Almighty though you have committed these foul and horrid sins yet he can pardon you as he pardoned that murther of David I speak it to you that you may lay it to your hearts I am heartily sorry in respect you are Persons of great Civility and those that I know of very good parts and this I must say That you will consider with your selves if any of you have been led away though it were with his own conscience if any of you did it as you conceived in conscience remember that our Saviour saith The time shall come when they will persecute you and kill you and think they do God good service I have the Judgment of Charity possibly some of you did it in this kind and this is less than doing it wilfully others might do it by a mis guided Conscience there is a spiritual pride men may over-run themselves by their own holiness and they may go by pretended Revelations Men may say I have prayed about such a thing I do not speak it with reproach to any If a man that should commit a Robbery or Murther meerly because he will and should come and say I have prayed against it and cannot understand it to be a sin as one in Shropshire did and yet notwithstanding killed his own Father and Mother try your own spirits you must not think that every Fancy and Imagaination is conscience Men may have a strange fancy and presumption and that they may call conscience Take heed there is a spiritual pride the Devil doth many times appear like an Angel of light do not rest upon that self-confidence Examine your hearts consider the Fact by the word of God That is the rule the Law is to be applyed to it Eccles 8. Where the word of a King is there is power and who can say unto him What dost thou that is to shew the power of Kings in Scripture Remember withal that of David in Psalm 51. that penitential Psalm when he had committed that horrid sin against Vriah Remember what he said being a K. Tibi soli peccavi Against thee only have I sinned Truly it being in such a Case I speak it as before God almighty according to my duty and conscience I wish most heartily as to your Persons I pray God to give you that grace that you may seriously consider it and lay it to heart and to have mercy upon you and to forgive you And this is all that I have to say and now not I but the Sentence of the Law the Judgment which I have to give against you is this You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgement of the Court is and the Court doth award that you be led back c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Clerk Cryer make Proclamation Cryer O Yes c. All manner of Person c. Jurors and Witnesses to appear to morrow morning at seven of the Clock at this place So God save his Majesty Session-House Old-Bayly Octo. 1â— 1660. The Courts being Assembled Proclamation was made Clerk of the Court. Set Cook Peters Hacker and Axtel to the Bar They being brought the Keeper was afterwards ordered to take back all except M. Cook Cl. John Cook hold up thy hand c. Jury Sir J. Whitchcot James Hawley Jo. Nichol of Henden Tho. Nichol F. Thorn Edw. Wilford Wil. Gumbleton Jo. Shelbury Tho. Jenney Tho. Willet Sir H. Wroth Rich. Cheney of the Jury called and Sworn Mr. Cook May it please your Lordship I do not know any of these Persons I beseech your Lordship that in regard the safety of my life depends upon the indifferency of these Persons that your Lordship may demand of the Sheriff to know whether he hath not heard them say or any of them that they are preingaged I hope they are not and thereupon I have not challenged any Lo. Ch. Bar. Sir the Officer reads their names out of his Papers I suppose he doth not pick and chuse them I would not have him and I am sure he will not do you any wrong in that particular Cook My Lord I am satisfied Cl. If any man can inform c. Cl. J. Cook hold up thy hand Cook My Lords I desire Pen Ink and Paper Lo. Ch. Bar. Give it him Cl. J. C. Hold up thy hand You that are sworn look upon the Prisoner You shall understand c. Here the Indictment was read as before Mr. Soll Gen. May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are sworn of this Jury the Prisoner at the Bar stands Indicted for High Treason for Compassing and Imagining the death of the late K. of Blessed Memory The indictment sets forth That he together with others did assemble at Westminster Hall and sets forth many other particulars of sitting sentencing and of the consequent Death and Murther of the King The matter and charge of the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King the rest of the Circumstances of the Indictment are but alledged as overt acts to prove the Imagination which only is the Treason This Prisoner at the Bar stands here Indicted for this Treason of Compassing and imagining the late Kings Death My Lord his part and portion in this matter will be different from those that have been tryed before you they sat as Judges to sentence the King and he my Lord stood as a wicked Instrument of that matter at the Bar and there he doth with his own hand subscribe and exhibite a charge of High Treason a scandalous Libel against our Soveraign to that pretended Court to be read against him as an accusasion in the name of all the people of England when he had done that he makes large discourses and aggravations to prove if it had been possible innocency it self to be Treason When he had done he would not suffer his Majesty to speak in his defence but still took him up and said that he did spin out delays and desired that the charge might be taken as if he had confessed it He pressed the Court that Judgment might be given against the King he was the man that did
more unless he was present and see it but you owned the Charge and there your name is that besides the two Witnesses there is your own actions to prove it When two Witnesses shall swear it is like your hand and you own that Charge I must leave it to the Jury you say you did this after command the words were dictated to you the words were conceptis verbis appointed and ordered by the Court but the pressing was yours he stands upon delays let it be taken pro confesso demanding Judgement these were your words another man may dictate a thing but you are not forced to speak it you urged it owned it you demanded not in the name of the Court but in the name of all the People of England you say further that your demanding Justice is not within the Statute as I said before what can be the effect of demanding Justice but that the King should die upon those premises you say further that it was in behoof of the King as you would urge it to do the King a Courtesie in asking the King might have Justice but you did not name what Justice it was but you did him a Courtesie truly the King was but a little beholden to you for that request all the world knows what that demanding of Justice was it was to have the Kings head cut off you went as far as you could it ended with you when you demanded Justice that is as far as you could you cut off the head S. Paul when the Witnesses laid down the clothes at his feet he said I killed Stephen the Martyr You say further that in all Tragedies the Accuser or Witness the Jury the Judge and executioner are the only persons and you are none of these you are only of Council if Justice was not done what was it to you you said you did not assume a power there was only Eloquence required in the Councel it hath been truly said that this is a great aggravation to be of Councel against the King you said his Majesty was then a Prisoner and accused Counsel cannot be heard against the King you undertake to be Counsel against the King in his own person and in the highest Crime if the Council at the Barr in behalf of his Client should speak Treason he went beyond his sphere but you did not only speak but acted Treason you said you used not a disrespective word to the King truly for that you hear what the witnesses have said you pressed upon him you called it a delay you termed him not the King but the Prisoner at the Bar at every word you say you did not assume an authority it is an assumption of authority if you countenance and allow of their authority you say you do not remember you demanded Judgement against the King that is fully proved against you you your self asked the question whether you did say against the King he did not remember but others positively that you demanded Judgement against the King and Prisoner at the Bar you said that before Sentence there was not an intention to put the King to death to that Mr. Starkey swears that you expresly said the King must die and Monarchy with him and this before the sentence whereas you say this is but one witness that there is to be in Treason two witnesses but that there should be two witnesses to every particular that is an Evidence of the fact that is not Law if to one particular that is an Evidence there be one witness another to another here are two witnesses within the meaning of the Statute two witnesses to the Indictment compassing and imagining the Death of the King being accompanied with other circumstances this one witness if you believe him is as good as twenty witnesses because other overt acts are expresly proved by several witnesses You say next for the drawing of the Charge in right reason it ought to be counted for the service of the King First you do acknowledge and truly very ingenuously that in the time of peace to bring him to the Bar not being a prisoner is Treason you say it according to the Law and that you delivered the charge for the accelerating of the Charge and that it was not done by you traiterously you say the King was a Prisoner before and you say what hands he was in in the hands of men of power and violence it had been your duty to have delayed it not accelerated it that there might have been some means of prevention of that bloody act that followed if you knew that to be Treason to make him a prisoner Subjects do not use to make Kings Prisoners but Death follows You urge in the next place the Act of Indemnity and that you are not excepted for that you have made as much of it as the matter will bear yet you must consider First as a rule in Law that where they are general words when they come to be explained by the particulars you shall not include them within the general Mark the very words they are these Provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to pardon discharge or give any other benefits whatsoever unto such and such among whom you are named nor any of them nor to those two persons or either of them who being disguised by Frocks and Vizards did appear upon the Scaffold erected before White-Hall upon the thirtieth of January 1648. All which persons these are the words First It shall not extend to you then it comes All which persons for their execrable Treason in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being Instrumental in taking away the Precious Life of our late Soveraign Lord CHARLES the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to His late Majestie according to the Laws of England and are out of this present Act wholly excepted and foreprized First as I told you before and as it was very well said by Master Sollicitor admitting the reason had been mistaken and that you had not been comprehended in the reason you are excepted out of the body provided it shall not extend c. Many times Laws do make recitals which in themselves are sometimes false in point of fact that which is the Law is positive words the other words are for the reason Excepting all which that is Master Cook which persons are excepted not for doing of it but for his execrable crimes in being instrumental It is clear without that if it were not so we say when a Sentence is or such a one or such a one the third Or makes all disjunctive Here are three Or 's first in sentencing to death or signing the Instrument then comes this or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign c. this Or doth clearly exclude the other two or instrumental not only in point of death but further being neither a Sentencer Signer or being
actually guilty of putting the King to death nay admitting in charity you had no intent to go as far as you did you are by the laws of Christ and this Nation guilty of high Treason in that you that are a Lawyer know very well and I speak it that you may lay it to your heart in the convictions of your conscience I must say to you as Joshua said to Achan my son give glory to God and confess and it would become you so to do you know very well it is the law of this Nation that no one house nor both houses of Parliament have any coercive power over the King much less to put him to death you know as you cited very well that the imprisoning of the King is Treason You know both of you this is an undoubted truth the rule of Law is that the King can do no wrong that is the King can do no wrong in the estimation of Law he may do some particular Acts as a private person but he can do little prejudice in his own person if he would hurt any it must be by Ministers in that case the Law provides a remedy if he doth it by Ministers they must answer for it The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown what is that It is not to do what he will no but it is that he shall not be punished in his own person if he doth that which in it self is unlawful Now remember this when you took the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy I presume you both did so what was your oath of Supremacy It was this that the King was the only Supream Governour of these Realms it goes farther as he was Supream Governour so he was the only Supream Governour that excludes Coordination you swear farther that you will to the utmost of your power defend the King against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever truly you that were a Lawyer when you had thus sworn your fee could be no excuse against what you had sworn to We know that the King in his politick or natural capacity is not only salus populi but salus Reipublicae The Law hath taken care that the people shall have justice and right the Kings person ought not to be touched the King himself is pleased to judge by the Law you see he doth by Law question the death of his Father he doth not judge it himself but the Law judges it Mr. Peters knows very well he subscribed the 39. Articles of Religion look upon them that were made in 1552. and upon those Articles that were confirmed in 13. Elizabeth the King is there acknowledged to have the chief power in these Nations the medling with the King was a Jesutical doctrine This I speak not that the King should or ought to govern but by the Fundamental laws of the land they that keep within the bounds of the law are happy you that are a Lawyer know this in point of law and you that are a Divine know this in point of Divinity You both know the truth of it and when you have thought upon it I hope you will reflect upon that horrid crime the shedding of Royal Blood You see he had granted all those grievances of the people taken them away secured them for the future and at this very time when this horrid act was done you see he had granted all at the desire of the people he had made those concessions such as were it not in respect of others more than those that treated themselves they thought was more than could be expected by the Nation You that had a hand in the Kings death it falls upon you the guilt of it because you were some of those instruments that assisted those persons that broke the Treaty prepare your selves for that death which you are to die it is a debt which we all owe to nature if in this case there is something of shame comes to you it is that you must take as part of the reward of your sin The only work I have now to do is to pronouce the Judgment and this is the judgment of the Court and the Court doth award That both of you be led back to the place from whence you came and from thence shall be drawn upon a hurdle c. and the Lord have mercy upon your souls Cl. Cryer make proclamation Cryer O yes c. All manner of persons c. and all Jurors and witnesses are to appear at this place to morrow morning at seven of the Clock in the morning upon pain of 100. l. a piece So God bless King Charles c. 15. Octo. 1660. at the Sessions House in the Old Bailey The Tryal of William Howlet Memorandum that the Bill of Indictment against William Hewlet alias Howlet was found at Hickes-hall 12 Octob. instant Proclamation of the Court being made Clerk of the Crown SET William Hewlet alias Howlet to the Bar which was done accordingly Cl. William Hewlet alias Howlet hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason in the County of Middlesex by the name of William Hewlet alias Howlet for that thou c. How sayest thou art thou guilty of the High Treason whereof thou hast been Indicted and art now arraigned or not guilty Hewlet I am not guilty my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be tryed Hewlet By God and the Country Cl. God send thee a good delivery Set him aside Octob. 15. 1660. Clerk of the Crown Set Axtell to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Daniel Axtell hold up thy Hand Axtell Pray my Lord let me have Pen and Ink. L. Ch. Bar. Give Mr. Axtell Pen and Ink. Cler. Daniel Axtell these men that were last called of the Jury are to pass c. if you will challenge them or any of them you must challenge them when they come to the Book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Do you know how many you have liberty to challenge because I would not have you misinformed 35 you may challenge peremptorily and no more Axtell I thank you Lordship L. Ch. Bar. Unless you have any particular cause if so you may challenge more Axtell I confess I am wholly ignorant of the law John Kirke John Smith Thomas Morris Ralph Halsell John Sherecroft Francis Beale Robert Cromwell John Gallyerd John Shelbury George Rithe were called and by the Prisoner challenged Thomas Bide Charles Pitfield Robert Sheppard William Dod Thomas Vsman William Maynerd George Plucknet Samuel Harris John Nicoll of Hendon Henry Marsh Thomas Bishop Thomas Snow in all 12 were admitted and sworn of the Jury Cler. of the Crown If any man can inform my Lords the Kings Justices c. Cl. Daniel Axtell hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner you that are sworn and harken to your charge you shall understand that the prisoner stands Indicted c. K. Council May it please your Lordships and you Gentlemen that are Sworn of this Jury The High Court
were the subsequent overtacts to prove the same Axtell I hope you will not think it much to give me some more freedom for my own defence for life My Lord I must needs say though there was a force on the Parliament I am not to justifie it I was no Lawyer no Statesman no Councellor but a Souldier and if the General who had a Commission from the Lords and Commons and that some years before and after the King's Death be not guilty of Treason what I did was by command from my General and though I am charged with being in Arms in Westminster-hall and at such and such a place yet it was not a Voluntary Act for I was bound to obey my General I do humbly pray that I may have your Lordships Judgment in this point I must say it was from the sense of their exposition of the Law and of the Statutes and from the Authority that every one took up Arms for and served them and obeyed either the one General or the other I say it was under this very Authority and this must needs acquit me from all the guilt that is laid upon me L. ch Bar. You put your self upon the Judgment of the Court upon this which you call a point in Law First it is manifest that there is no excuse at all for Treason no man by his Commission can warrant the doing of an Act which is Treason you must take notice of the Authority whether it be good or no your Commission was not to put the King to Death but on the contrary to preserve the Kings life The Lords and Commons what they did we do not meddle with the Reason and Ground of what they did was the preservation of the Kings Person as well as the maintenance of the Laws and Liberties of this Nation they made Protestations Declarations and Oaths for the preservation of the King's Person and you could not but take notice of those things Now whereas you go about to shroud your self under the Lord Fairfax he had no such Power and therefore you can challenge no more then he had and to what you say concerning the Judgment of the Parliament there will be a great deal of difference between a particular Case and a Declaration of Lords and Commons there is nothing you have said that hath any thing of Force and God forbid you should make use of it But I must tell you you could not but notoriously know all those Transactions that were in the Army what the Army had done that they came up with Swords in their Hands and turn'd out whom they would you saw what the Lords and Commons had done that the Treaty was ready for his Birth And then you come up with your Mermidons with Force and Arms and Exclude the greatest part of the Members and then the Lords were laid aside it is true the Lords were not wholly dissolved but they would not suffer them to Sit nor Act at all and this was apparent to the Nation If men under colour and pretence of such things Namely that a few persons for so they were but an Eighth part of the House of Commons permitted to remain and of that Eighth part which was but 46 in the whole there were but 26 that Voted that Act which you say you obeyed but you say you obeyed the General you were not to obey the General in this Case for the Facts that you have committed are not charged as Acts of War you are not charged for bringing the Souldiers in but for those Violent Actions that you were guilty of there you made the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice Execution Execution you sent officiously for a Hang-man to come down to you your Commission gave you no power for this the Death of the King you know how it was designed you know the Act for the bringing in of that Commission as they call'd it to sit in justice was after the House of Commons was reduced to a very small Number and some of those dissenting too what you did Act under that Authority if you can justifie it in the Name of God say so but do not Engage the Nation in those things which they abhorred and by the mercy of God are laid asleep Mr. Justice Foster You begin at the wrong End you ought as all men ought to do First to answer the matter of Fact and not to put in these long dilatory Pleas till you have answered the matter of Fact whether those things charged on you be true or not then if you have any thing further to say for your self by way of excuse it will be the time to speak and not before Axt. May it please your Lordships I humbly conceive I am upon that method to the first part of the witness they accuse me for commanding my Souldiers in Westminster-hall then I must prove my Authority which I have been about to do and declared the Judgment of Parliament L. ch B. The Court have heard you with a great deal of patience and that which is not at all to the business Axtell I only refer this as to the Authority I humbly conceive you will give me leave to insist upon this and how far I may improve it for my own defence here is the Commission by which my Lord Fairfax acted and that after the King's Death and I acted by the same Authority he did I had not been at Westminster-hall but on the command of the General Court Doth that Commission Authorize you to cry Justice Justice and to look up and down to get Witnesses against the King is that in your Commission Axt. I am to serve and obey all my Superior Officers that is my Commission if I do not I die by the Law of War Court You are to obey them in their just commands all unjust commands are invalid If our Superiors should command us to undue and irregular things much more if to the committing of Treason we are in each Case to make use of our passive not active Obedience Axt. Under Favour it is not proved that I did either Compass or Imagine the King's Death that is matter of Fact Court Let us try that Axt. My Lord I did nothing but as a meer Souldier I had Authority from the General I would leave this before your Lordships and the Jury that what I have done hath been by Authority of the Genetal L. Hollis Sir a word to you If you could satisfie the Court that you had received a Commission from the General to do those things with which you stand charged it were something then were it proper for you to plead it and the Court to judg Pray take this along with you the General gave you no such command what you are charged with in the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that by such and such overt acts as making your Souldiers cry out Justice and Execution for being active and forward in sending for the
there may be a favourable construction made of it I humbly leave it with you I did my Duty to pray for the King but had no malice to act willingly against him Clerk Henry Marten Counsel He did both sign and seal the Precept for summoning the Court and the Warrant for Execution sat almost every day and particularly the day of Sentence Marten My Lord I do not decline a confession so as to the matter of Fact the malice set aside maliciously murderously and traiterously Counsel If you have any thing to say to that we will prove it L. Ch. Baron That I may inform you in it there is malice implied by Law malice in the Act it self that which you call malice that you had no particular intention or design against the King's Person but in relation to the Government that will not be to this present business if it should extenuate any thing that would be between God and your own Soul but as to that which is alledged in the Indictment Maliciously Murderously and Traiterously they are the consequences of Law If a Man meet another in the Street and run him through in this case the Law implies malice though but to an ordinary Watchman there is malice by the Law in the Fact if there was no such expressed personal malice as you conceive yet the Fact done implies malice in Law Mr. Solicitor General My Lord He does think a Man may sit upon the death of the King sentence him to death sign a Warrant for his Execution meekly innocently charitably and honestly Marten I shall not presume to compare my knowledg in the Law with that of that Learned Gentleman but according to that poor understanding of the Law of England that I was capable of there is no Fact that he can name that is a Crime in it self but as it is circumstantiated Of killing a Watchman as your Lordship instanced a Watchman may be killed in not doing his Office and yet no murder Lord Chief Baron I instanced that of a Watchman to shew there may be a malice by Law though not expressed though a Man kill a Watchman intending to kill another Man in that case it is malice in Law against him so in this case if you went to kill the King when he was not doing his Office because he was in Prison and you hindred him from it the Law implies malice in this It is true all Actions are circumstantiated but the killing of the King is Treason of all Treasons Justice Foster If a Watchman be killed it is murder it is in contempt of Magistracy of the Powers Above the Law says that contempt adds to the malice Counsel We shall prove against the Prisoner at the Bar because he would wipe off malice he did this very merrily and was in great sport at the time of the signing the Warrant for the King's Execution Marten That does not imply malice Ewer sworn Councel Come Sir you are here upon your Oath speak to my Lords and the Jury you know the Prisoner at the Bar very well you have sometimes served him Were you present in the Painted Chamber January 29. 1648. at the signing the Warrant the Parchment against the King Ewer The day I do not remember but I was in that Chamber to attend a Gentleman there I followed that Gentleman looking at Mr. Marten I followed that Gentleman into that Chamber L. C. Baron After what Gentleman Ewer Mr. Marten my Lord I was pressing to come near but I was put off by an Officer or Souldier there who told me I should not be there I told him I was ordered to be by that Gentleman My Lord I did see a Pen in Mr. Cromwel's hand and he marked Mr. Marten in the face with it and Mr. Marten did the like to him but I did not see any one set his Hand though I did see a Parchment there with a great many Seals to it Sir Purback Temple sworn Counsel What do you know of that Gentleman in his carriage of this Business Sir Purback Temple My Lords I being present in Town when that horrid Murder was contrived against the late King there came some Persons of Honour Servants to the late King to my Father's House Sir Edward Partridge to engage me to join with them to attempt the King's escape In order whereunto they told me nothing would tend so much to his Majesty's Service as to endeavour to discover some part of their Counsels for that it was resolved by Cromwel to have the King tried at the High Court of Justice as they called it the next day and desired me if possible to be there to discover their Counsels whereby the King might have notice and those that were to attempt his escape In order whereunto the next day by giving Mony to the Officer of the Painted Chamber I got in by day light in the Lobby to the Lords House I espied a Hole in the Wall under the Hangings where I placed my self till the Council came where they were contriving the manner of trying the King when he should come before them and after the manner of praying and private consults amongst themselves when their Prayer was over there came news that the King was landed at Sir Robert Cotton's Stairs at which Cromwel run to a Window looking on the King as he came up the Garden he returned as white as the Wall returning to the Board he speaks to Bradshaw and Sir Henry Mildmay how they and Sir William Breerton had concluded on such a Business Then turning to the Board said thus My Masters He is come He is come and now we are doing that great Work that the whole Nation will be full of Therefore I desire you to let us resolve here what answer we shall give the King when he comes before us for the first Question that he will ask us will be By what Authority and Commission do we try him To which none answered presently Then after a little space Henry Marten the Prisoner at the Bar rose up and said In the Name of the Commons and Parliament assembled and all the good People of England which none contradicted so all rose up and then I saw every Officer that waited in the Room sent out by Cromwel to call away my Lord such a one whose Name I have forgot who was in the Court of Wards Chamber that he should send away the Instrument which came not and so they adjourned themselves to Westminster-Hall going into the Court of Wards themselves as they went thither When they came to the Court in Westminster-Hall I heard the King ask them the very same Question that Cromwel had said to them Mr. Solicitor Gentlemen the Prisoner at the Bar confesses his Hand to the Warrant for Executing the King you see by his Servant how merry he was at the sport You see by his Witness how serious he was at it and gave the foundation of that Advice upon which they all proceeded and now he
the name of Daniel Axtel of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Gentleman I think none knew me to live there and inhabit there Lord Chief Baron I would not interrupt you this is past you should have made your exception to that as Master Matten did before concerning his name that should have been first done you have appeared and pleaded to that name and it was late of Westminster Axtell My Lord I have this to speak in arrest of Judgment that the Indictment being grounded upon that statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third it is either mistaken or not pursued my Lords I did yesterday give you the Judgment of the Lords and Commons concerning the statute in relation to my case I say the Statute was mistaken or not pursued Lord chief Baron That was offered before Sir as to the matter of it Axtell My Lord I think not I am mistaken if it were Lord Chief Baron Then open it Axtell My Lord I do not find in that statute that words are an overt act words only L. Ch. B. This was over-ruled The things that you objected were these That there is not any overt act that is laid that could be applicable to your case if it were not particularly applicable you are found guilty by the Jury it would be nothing But there is an overt act you were present at the Court beating the Souldiers sending for an Executioner but for words if one man should say here is the King go and kill him this is Treason but you were guilty in all according to Law You being there and doing this you were not guilty onely of the words but of all that was done there is none but Principals in Treason What we say and do to you we well know we must answer before God Almighty for it Axtell I have but one word more truly I do appeal to God before whom I shall have another tryall I do not find my self guilty either of consulting contriving or having a hand in the death of the King I am innocent and I pray God that my innocent blood Lord Chief Baron Pray Sir Axtell May not cry Lord Chief Baron You are now to speak in arrest of Judgment Axtell I have no more I pray your Lordships favour and mercy to me William Hulet alias Howlet hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Hulet Truly my Lord I have little further to say If you had been pleased to give me further time I should have cleared my self I call God above to witness upon this account that I am as clear as any man I submit to the mercy of the Court. L. Ch. B. For that I do but cannot positively say it that at your request notwithstanding the Judgment will pass against you there may be some time till his Majesties pleasure be known before any execution will be upon that Judgment against you in the mean time we must proceed according to Law and Justice Proclamation for silence whilst Judgment is giving The Lord Chief Barons speech before the Sentence pronounced against the aforenamed Prisoners found guilty YOu that are Prisoners at the Bar you stand here in several Capacities yet all of you persons convicted of the detestable and execrable murder of our Soveraign Lord King Charles the first of blessed memory Mistake me not I do not say that you are all of you guilty of executing the fact but in Law and in conscience pro tanto though not pro toto you are guilty of it in that you prepared the way and means to it in that you brought his head to the block though you did not cut it off You are here in three sorts and I must apply my words accordingly and truely I do it with as much sorrow of heart as you have many of you being persons of liberal education great parts I say you are of three sorts There are some of you that though the Judgment of death is to pass against you by his Majesties grace and favour and the mercy under him of the two houses of Parliament Execution is to be suspended untill another Act of Parliament shall pass to that purpose that is all of you but three for those three the one of them that was last called William Heveningham he is in another capacity too for I presume some time will be given to him to consider of something relating to him before any order will be given for his execution there are two others of you and that is Dan. Axtel and Francis Hacker and for you as it yet stands before us there is no mercy there is no room for it but though you be in these several Classes yet what I shall say will concern you all because I do not know how it may fall with you none of us know how soon we may come to our deaths some probably sooner then others all must come to it you are now before the Tribunal of man but that is for Judgment for your offence here but there is another Judgment hereafter and a Tribunal before which both you and we must stand every man here and we must receive according to our work those that have done ignorantly by a serious and unfeigned repentance God Almighty may shew mercy unto them He hath reserved mercy even for the greatest offenders Saint Paul himself when he presecuted Christ ignorantly upon his repentance he found mercy those of you that are not yet convicted in your consciences of the foulness of this horrid fact look into your Consciences a little more and see if it be not a great Judgment for your former offence that you should be given over to a reprobate sense let me tell you a seared Conscience a bold confidence not upon good grounds is so far from securing the Conscience it may stifle perhaps the mouth of Conscience but it will rise up more in Judgment against you Here you have made your defence and I do not blame you for it life is precious but remember the thoughts of your hearts are open whether you did it ignorantly covetously or to get the Government into your own hands that I am not able to search into God and you only know that give me leave to say something perhaps I have repeated it by parts before God is my witness what I speak I speak from mine own Conscience and that is this Gentlemen because I saw it stuck with some of you that is that whatsoever the case was that by the Laws of these Nations the fundamental Laws there could not be any coercive power over your King I speak it again because I would as near as I could speak the whole truth and would not mislead any man in such a case remember that no power no person no Community or body of men not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive power over the person of the King by the fundamental Laws for that
Gentlemen I shall begin to shew you that which all of you might remember that is your oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to add to this that obligation which all this whole Nation did oblige themselves to by the Parliament without question then rightly represented and in being the first of K. James whereby to shew you that not only persons but the Body politick of the Nations not only the single Members but the Members in both houses of Parliament were loyal and obedient subjects to the King their head even to yeeld a natural and humble Obedience and Allegiance I told you the Act of the 1. of K. James when K. James came first into Engl. We the Lords and Com. representing the whole People of the Nation the very words of the Act are so primo Jacobi Chapter the first Representing the whole Body of the Nation do acknowledge an humble natural Leige Obedience to the King as Supreme his Heirs and Successors And in the name of themselves and all the people humbly submit themselves untill the last drop of their bloud be spent in defence of the King and his Royall posterity and therefore they did oblige themselves and all the People of England as far as they could represent them the words are more full then I can express them and indeed it is so dark I cannot read them They did acknowledg to be bound to him and his Imperial Crown Remember these were not words of Complement you shall find that they all of them and so did so many of you as were Members of Parliament yea all of you before you came into the House of Commons did take the Oath of Allegiance which was made after this Recognition the third and fourth of King James or otherwise were not to be Members What was that Oath of Allegiance that you took it was That you should defend the King his Person that is in 3 Jacobi Chapter the fourth his Crown and Dignity What was it Not only against the Pope's Power to depose but the words are or otherwise look into the Act and reflect upon your Conscience and you shall find that all did swear to defend the King his Crown and Dignity and there it is called Imperial Crown I would have you lay this to heart and see how far you have kept this Oath Gentlemen In the Oath of Supremacy which you all took therein you did further acknowledg that the King was the only Supream Governour of this Realm Mark the words I will repeat them that you may lay it to heart you that have more time to apply it to your Fact and you that have less time for ought I know you have reason to consider what I have to say you sware then That the King by the Oath of Supremacy which all of you have taken or ought to have taken if any of you have not taken it yet notwithstanding you are not absolved from the obligation of it but most of you did take it there you sware that the King is the only Supream Governor of this Realm and you sware there that you would defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness His Heirs and Successors or united and annexed unto the Imperial Crown of this Realm For the first If the King be Supream then there is no co-ordination Non habet majorem non habet parem that word Imperial Crown is at least in nine or ten several Statutes it is the very word in this Act that was made lately in pursuance of former Acts concerning Judicial Proceedings And so in the time of King Charles they acknowledged him to be their Leige Sovereign I say that word Supream and so the word Imperial Crown is in the first of Queen Elizabeth the third and the eighth of Elizabeth the twenty fourth of Henry the Eighth Chap. 12. there it is said this Kingdom is an Imperial Crown subject to none but God Almighty Before these times you shall find in the sixteenth of Richard the Second the Statute of Praemunire the Crown of England subject to God alone I will go higher William Rufus some of you are Historians and you shall find the same in Eadmerus and also in Matthew Paris shortly after William Rufus his Time when he wrote to the Pope he challenged and had the same liberty in this Kingdom of England as the Emperor had in his Empire mistake me not I speak only as to the Person of the King I do not meddle of Rights between the King and Subjects or Subject and Subject you see in this Case concerning the Death of his Majesty's dear Father and our Blessed Sovereign of happy memory he doth not judg himself but according to Law that which I assert is as to the Person of the King which was the priviledg of Emperors as to their Personal Priviledges if he had offended and committed an Offence he was only accountable to God himself I will come back to what I have said You swore to be faithful to the King as Supreme The King of Poland hath a Crown but at his Oath of Coronation it is conditioned with the People That if he shall not govern according to such and such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But it differs with our King for he was a King before Oath The King takes his Oath but not upon any condition this I shew you to let you see that we have no coercive Power against the King The King of England was anointed with Oil at his Coronation which was to shew that Absolute Power I do not say of Government but of being accountable to God for what he did The Law saith The King doth no injury to any Man not but that the King may have the imbecilities and infirmities of other Men but the King in his single Person can do no wrong but if the King command a Man to beat me or to disseize me of my Land I have my remedy against the Man though not against the King The Law in all Cases preserves the Person of the King to be untouched but what is done by his Ministers unlawfully there is a remedy against his Ministers for it but in this Case when you come to the Person of the King what do our Law Books say he is they call it Caput Reipublicae salus Populi the Leiutenant of God and let me tell you there was never such a blow given to the Church of England and the Protestant Religion There was a Case and that of the Spencers you shall find in the 7th Report of the Lord Cook in Calvin's Case that Homage is due to the King in his Politick Capacity and then they made this damnable Inference That therefore if the King did not demean himself as he ought that he should be reformed pure aspertee by asperity sharpness or Imprisonment but these were condemned by two Acts of Parliament in Print that they could not do that even
Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
be directed to answer and if he refused That the matter of the Charge be taken pro confesso And the King not owning their Authority was remanded Fol. 58. Westminster-Hall Tuesday the 23d Afternoon The King not owning their Authority was remanded and the Court Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there Resolved They would examine Witnesses Fol. 61. Painted-Chamber Wednesday the 24th was spent in examining their Witnesses Fol. 66. Painted-Chamber Thursday the 25th Afternoon They examined more Witnesses They Resolved to proceed to Sentence of Condemnation against the King And that this Condemnation be for being Tyrant Traytor and Murtherer and Publick Enemy to the Commonwealth And that the Condemnation extend to Death Fol. 68. And Ordered That a Sentence grounded upon these Votes be prepared by Scot Marten Harrison and others Painted-Chamber Friday the 26 th The draught of the Sentence Reported and agreed And Resolved That the King be brought the next day to Westminster-Hall to receive it Fol 96. Painted-Chamber Saturday the 27 th Fore-noon The Sentence being engrossed Resolved The same should be the Sentence which should be read and published in Westminster-Hall the same day That the President should not permit the King to speak after Sentence That after the Sentence read he should declare it to be the Sence and Judgment of the Court. That the Commissioners should thereupon signifie their Consent by standing up And the same day the Commons Ordered the Clerk to bring in the Records of that Judgment to the House Journal of the House Westminster-Hall the same Day After-noon The King being brought in and not owning their Authority the Sentence was read And upon the Declaration of the President That it was the Judgment of the Court they stood up and Owned it and Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there appointed Waller and others to consider of the Time and Place for Execution Painted-Chamber Monday the 29 th Upon the report of the Committee Ordered A Warrant be drawn for executing the King in the open Street before White-Hall the next day directed to Hacker and others which was done accordingly Fol. 116. 31. January 1648. Ordered by the Commons That the Lord Grey out of Haberdashers-Hall to difpose of 100 l. for the Service of the Common-wealth 2. February 1648. They Ordered in the first place to take into Consideration and Debate the House of Lords for settlement of the Government 6. February 1648. The House being seventy three And the Question put Whether that House should take the Advice of the House of Lords in the exercise of the Legislative Power The House was divided and it carried in the Negative by fifteen Voices And then Resolved That the House of Peers was useless and dangerous and ought to be abolished And Ordered an Act to be brought in for that purpose 7. February 1648. The Declared That the Office of a King in this Nation and to have Power thereof in a Single Person was unnecessary burthensom and dangerous to the Liberty Safety and publick interest of the People and therefore ought to be abolished 9. February 1648. They Ordered The Narrative of the Proceeding and Records for Tryal of the King to be forthwith brought into this House 16. February 1648. They Ordered That the Clerk of that High Court of Justice be desired to bring in those Proceedings to their House the next Day March 1648. Sir Arthur Hasilrig Reports from the Committee that Charls and James Stewart Sons of the late King should dye without Mercy wheresoever they should be found 12. December 1650. Mr. Say Reported the Proceedings of their High-Court against the King contained in a Book entituled A Journal c. which was read at large by their Clerk He likewise presented from that Court the Act for Tryal of the King and the Precept for holding the Court. The Charge was exhibited the twentieth And The Sentence Read the twenty seventh of January 1648. And thereupon they Declared That the Persons entrusted in that great Service had discharged their Trust with great Courage and Fidelity That the Parliament was well satisfied in that Accompt of the Particulars and Proceedings And Ordered That the same Records do remain among the Records of Parliament That those Proceedings be Engrossed in a Roll and Recorded among the Parliament-Rolls for transmitting the Memory thereof to Posterity And Resolved That their Commissioners for their Great Seal issue a Certiorari to their Clerk to transmit those Proceedings into the Chancery there to be on Record And that the same be sent by Mittimus from thence to other Courts at Westminster and Custos Rotulorum of the Counties to be Recorded In the County Middlesex The Proceedings at Hicks Hall Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. in order to the Tryal of the pretended Judges of his late Sacred Majesty THe Court being sate the Commission of Oyer and Terminer under the Great Seal of England was first read It was directed to the Lords and others hereafter named viz. Thomas Aleyn Knight and Baronet Lord Mayor of the City of London The Lord Chancellor of England The Earl of South-hampton Lord Treasurer of England The Duke of Somerset The Duke of Albemarle The Marquess of Ormond Steward of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Lindsey Great Chamberlain of England The Earl of Manchester Chamberlain of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Dorset The Earl of Berkshire The Earl of Sandwich Viscount Say and Seal The Lord Roberts The Lord Finch Denzil Hollis Esquire Sir Frederick Cornwallis Knight and Baronet Treasurer of His Majesties Houshold Sir Charles Barkly Knight Comptrouler of His Majesties Houshold Mr. Secretary Nicholas Mr. Secretary Morris Sir Anthony Ashley-Cooper Arthur Annesley Esquire The Lord Chief Baron Mr. Justice Foster Mr. Justice Mallet Mr. Justice Hide Mr. Baron Atkins Mr. Justice Twisden Mr. Justice Tyrrel Mr. Baron Turner Sir Harbottle Grimston Knight and Baronet Sir William Wild Knight and Baronet Recorder of London Mr. Serjeant Brown Mr. Serjeant Hale John Howel Esquire Sir Geoffry Palmer His Majestie 's Attorny General Sir Heneage Finch His Majestie 's Solicitor General Sir Edward Turner Attorney to His Highness the Duke of York Wadham Windham Esquire Edward Shelton Esquire Clerk of the Crown The Grand Jury Sworn were Sir William Darcy Baronet Foreman Sir Robert Bolles Baronet Sir Edward Ford Knight Sir Thomas Prestwick Sir William Coney Knight Sir Charles Sidley Baronet Sir Lewis Kirk Knight Sir Henry Littleton Baronet Sir Ralph Bovey Baronet Edward Chard Esquire Robert Giggon Esquire John Fotherly Esquire Charles Gibbons Esquire Thomas Geree Esquire Richard Cox Esquire Robert Bladwell Esquire Henry Mustian Esquire John Markham Esquire Edward Buckley Gent. Francis Bourchier Gent. Edward Lole Hart Cryer After Proclamation for silence was made it pleased Sir Orlando-Bridgman Lord Chief Baron of His Majestie 's High Court of Exchequer to speak to the Jury as followeth The Lord Chief Baron's Speech Gentlemen YOu are the Grand Inquest for the Body of this County of Middlesex You may
Terrours of that Presence of God that was with his Servants in those days However it seemeth good to him to suffer this Turn to come on us and are Witnesses that the things were not done in a Corner I have desired as in the sight of him that searcheth all hearts whilest this hath been done to wait and receive from him Convictions upon my own Conscience though I have sought it with Tears many a time and Prayers over and over to that God to whom you and all Nations are less than a Drop of water of the Bucket and to this moment I have received rather Assurance of it and that the things that have been done as astonishing on one hand I do believe e're it be long it will be made known from Heaven There was more from God than men are aware of I do profess that I would not offer of my self the least Injury to the poorest Man or Woman that goes upon the Earth That I have humbly to offer is this to your Lordships You know what a Contest hath been in these Nations for many years Divers of those that sit upon the Bench were formerly as Active Court Pray Mr. Harrison do not thus Reflect on the Court This is not to the Business Mr. Harrison I followed not my own Judgment I did what I did as out of Conscience to the Lord. For when I found those that were as the Apple of mine Eye to turn aside I did loath them and suffered Imprisonment many years Rather then to turn as many did that did put their Hands to this Plough I chose rather to be separated from Wife and Family than to have Compliance with them though it was said Sit at my Right Hand and such kind of Expressions Thus I have given a little poor Testimony that I have not been doing things in a Corner or from my self May be I might be a little mistaken but I did it all according to the best of my understanding desiring to make the Revealed Will of God in his Holy Scriptures as a guide to me I humbly conceive That what was done was done in the name of the Parliament of England that what was done was done by their Power and Authority and I do humbly conceive it is my Duty to offer unto you in the beginning that this Court or any Court below the High Court of Parliament hath no Jurisdiction of their Actions Here are many Learned in the Law and to shorten the Work I desire I may have the help of Councel Learned in the Laws that may in this matter give me a little assistance to offer those Grounds that the Law of the Land doth offer I say what was done was done by the Authority of the Parliament which was then the Supreme Authority and that those that have Acted under them are not to be questioned by any Power less than them And for that I conceive there is much out of the Laws to be shewed to you and many Presidents also in the Case Much is to be offered to you in that according to the Laws of the Nations that was a due Parliament Those Commissions were issued forth and what was done was done by their Power And whereas it hath been said we did Assume and Usurp an Authority I say this was done rather in the Fear of the Lord. Court Away with him Know where you are Sir You are in the Assembly of Christians Will you make God the Author of your Treasons and Murthers Take heed where you are Christians must not hear this We will allow you to say for your own Defence what you can And we have with a great deal of Patience suffered you to sally out wherein you have not gone about so much for Extenuation of your Crimes as to Justifie them to fall upon others and to Blaspheme God and commit a new Treason For your having of Councel This is the reason for allowing of Councel when a man would Plead any thing because he would Plead it in Formality Councel is allowed But you must first say in what the Matter shall be and then you shall have the Court's Answer Lord Finch Though my Lords here have been pleased to give you a great Latitude this must not be suffered that you should run into these damnable Excursions to make God the Author of this damnable Treason Committed Mr. Harrison I have two things to offer to you to say for my Defence in Matter of Law One is That this that hath been done was done by a Parliament of England by the Commons of England assembled in Parliament and that being so whatever was done by their Commands or their Authority is not questionable by your Lordships as being as I humbly conceive a Power Inferiour to that of an High Court of Parliament That 's one A second is this That what therefore any did in obedience to that Power and Authority they are not to be questioned for it otherwise we are in a most miserable Condition bound to obey them that are in Authority and yet to be punished if obeyed We are not to Judg what is lawful or what is unlawful My Lords Upon these two Points I do desire that those that are Learned in the Laws may speak too on my behalf It concerns all my Countreymen There are Cases alike to this you know in King Richard the Second's Time wherein some Question had been of what had been done by a Parliament and what followed upon it I need not urge in it I hope it will seem good to you that Councel may be assigned for it concerns all my Countreymen Councel You are mistaken if you appeal to your Countreymen They will cry you Out and shame you Mr. Harrison May be so my Lords some will but I am sure others will not Mr. Sollicitor Gen. These two Points my Lords are but one and they are a new Treason at the Bar for which he deserves to dy if there were no other Indictment It is the Malice of his heart to the Dignity and Crown of England I say this is not matter for which Councel can be assigned Councel cannot put into Form that which is not Matter Pleadable it self It is so far from being true that this was the Act of the Supreme Parliament of the People of England that there was nothing received with more Heart-bleeding than this Bloody Business But that the World may not be abused by the Insinuations of a man who acts as if he had a Spirit and in truth is possessed I will say That the Lords and Commons are not a Parliament That the King and Lords cannot do any thing without the Commons Nor the King and Commons without the Lords Nor the Lords and Commons without the King especially against the King If they do they must answer it with their Head for the King is not accountable to any Coercive Power And for the Prisoner to Justifie his Act as if it were the Act of the Commons of England
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
had not the blood of English-men that had been shed Councel Me thinks he should be sent to Bedlam till he comes to the Gallows to render an Account of this This must not be suffered It is in a manner a new Impeachment of this King to justifie their Treasons against His late Majesty Mr. Solicitour General My Lords I pray that the Jury may go together upon the Evidence Sir Edw. Turner My Lords This man hath the Plague all over him it is Pity any should stand near him for he will infect them Let us say to him as they use to write over an House infected The Lord have Mercy upon him and so let the Officer take him away Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison We are ready to hear you again but to hear such Stuff it cannot be suffered You have spoken that which is as high a Degree of Blasphemy next to that against God as I have heard You have made very ill use of these Favours that have been allowed you to speak your own Conscience cannot but tell you the Contradiction of your Actions against this that you have heard as the Opinion of the Court. To extenuate your Crimes you may go on but you must not go as before Mr. Harrison I must not speak so as to be pleasing to men but if I must not have liberty as an English-man Court Pray do not reflect thus You have had liberty and more then any Prisoner in your Condition can expect and I wish you had made a good use of it Keep to the Business say what you will Mr. Harrison My Lords thus There was a Discourse by one of the Witnesses that I was at the Committee preparing the Charge and that I should say Let us blacken Him The thing is utterly untrue I abhorred the doing of any thing touching the Blackning of the King There was a little Discourse between the King and my self The King had told me that He had heard that I should come privately to the Isle of Wight to offer some injury to Him But I told Him I abhorred the thoughts of it And whereas it is said that my Carriage was hard to Him when I brought Him to London it was not I that brought Him to London I was commanded by the General to fetch Him from Hurst-Castle I do not remember any hard Carriage towards Him Court Mr. Harrison You have said That you deny that of Blackning which the Witness hath sworn and somewhat else touching the King in His Way to London that the Witness hath sworn to also The Jury must consider of it both of their Oaths and your Contradictions If you have nothing more to say which tends to your Justification We must direct the Jury The end of your Speech is nothing but to infect the People Mr. Harrison You are uncharitable in that Justice Foster My Lords This ought not to come from the Bar to the Bench if you sally out thus about your Conscience If your Conscience should be a darkened Conscience that must not be the Rule of other mens Actions What you speak of that Nature is nothing to the Business If you have any thing to say by way of Excuse for your self for matter of Fact you may speak but if you will go on as before it must not be suffered Mr. Harrison The things that have been done have been done upon the Stage in the sight of the Sun Court All this is a Continuance of the Justification and Confession of the Fact We need no other Evidence Councel He hath confessed his Fact my Lords The matter it self is Treason upon Treason Therefore we pray Direction to the Jury Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison I must give Direction to the Jury if you will not go further touching the Fact Mr. Harrison My Lords I say what I did was by the Supreme Authority I have said it before and appeal to your own Consciences that this Court cannot call me to question Lord Chief Baron Mr. Harrison you have appealed to our Consciences We shall do that which by the Blessing of God shall be just for which we shall answer before the Tribunal of God Pray take heed of an Obdurate Hard Heart and a Seared Conscience Mr. Harrison My Lords I have been kept six Moneths a Close Prisoner and could not prepare my self for this Trial by Councel I have got here some Acts of Parliament of that House of Commons which your Lordships will not own and the Proceedings of that House whose Authority I did own Lord Chief Baron This you have said already If you shew never so many of that Nature they will not help you you have heard the Opinion of the Court touching that Authority They all unanimously concur in it Gentlemen of the Jury You see that this Prisoner at the Bar is Indicted for Compassing Imagining and Contriving the Death of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of Blessed Memory In this Indictment there are several things given but as Evidences of it they are but the Overt-Acts of it The one is first that they did meet and consult together about the putting the King to Death and that alone if nothing else had been proved in the Case was enough for you to find the Indictment For the Imagination alone is Treason by the Law But beause the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is secret in the Heart and no man knowes it but God Almighty I say That the Imagination is Treason yet it is not such as the Law can lay hold of unless it appear by some Overt-Act Then the first Overt-Act is their Meeting Consulting and Proposing to put the King to Death The second is more open namely their Sitting together and Assuming an Authority to put the King to Death The third is Sentencing the King And I must tell you that any one of these Acts prove the Indictment If you find him guilty but of any one of them either Consulting Proposing Sitting or Sentencing though there is full Proof for all yet notwithstanding you ought to find the Indictment You have heard what the Witnesses have said and the Prisoner's own Confession Witnesses have sworn their sitting together and that he was one One swears he sate four times another twice some several times There are several Witnesses for this as Mr. Masterson Mr. Clark Mr. Kirk and Mr. Nutley And then you have another thing too which truly the Prisoner did not speak of Witness was given against him That he was the Person that Conducted the King this was before that which he would have to be done by a Legislative Power and that is another Overt-Act If a man will go about to Imprison the King the Law knows what is the sad Effect of such Imprisonment That hath often been adjudged to be an Evidence of Imagining and Compassing the Death of the King That man the Prisoner at the Bar it hath been proved to you did Imprison the King and it appears by his own
have to say my Lords L. C. Bar. You Gentlemen that are sworn of this Jury you see the Prisoner Mr. Scroop hath been indicted for imagining and contriving the death of his late Majesty of blessed memory King Charles the first You see there are several things in this Indictment the charge is the Imagining and compassing the death of the King In the Indictment there are several matters of fact to prove this Imagination The Imagination is the Treason the matters of fact to prove it are but the evidences of that imagination if any one of them be proved to you it is sufficient the one is consulting and meeting together how to put him to death the other Sitting and Assuming Authority to bring him to Tryal Then you have a Sentence by the Court to put the King to Death thereupon Afterwards he was put to Death Any one of these matters are Evidence enough for you to prove the Indictment for though the Indictment concludes that so they did Imagine and Compass the Death of the King and that the King was put to Death in manner and form as aforesaid the manner and form aforesaid goes to this To the imagination of the Heart for the Law did not think any one would put the King to death they thought it so a Crime they thought it not convenient to bring it into the Statute But the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King is made Treason Then to apply it this Fact to the Gentlemen it appears to you here by the proofs against him Here is Mr. Masterson he swears he saw him sit in that pretended Court there was your Evidence of the first the first was their Meeting together and of the second too They did Assume Authority upon them and he swears further to the Sentencing That the Prisoner was there Here were the Three Overt-Acts all proved He confesses he did sign the Warrant for putting the King to Death This without any Witness at all was a sufficient proof a Proof of proofs The other Witnesses you hear what they say you hear Mr. Kirk M. Clark M. Nutley swear all to his Sitting there It is true when this comes to the particulars where he sate you must remember it was Twelve Years ago when a man sees a mixt number of about Eighty Persons it is impossible a man should be able to answer this particular after Twelve years where such a one sate but you may see by his Sentencing what he did They all witness they saw him positively and one tells you He wondered he saw him there and indeed it might be a wonder for Mr. Scroop to give him his right was not a Person as some of the rest but he was unhappily ingaged in that Bloody Business I hope mistakenly but when it comes to so high a Crime as this men must not excuse themselves by ignorance or misguided Conscience As to God for this Horrid Murther of the King somewhat may be but there is no Excuse or Extenuation before Man there may be I say before the Lord. You see the Proof is full against this Gentleman as full as may be Witnesses saw him Sit and he himself confessed he signed the Warrants I have no more to say to you but Gentlemen you see what it is I think for matter of Fact you need not go from the Bar but I leave it to you Scroop My Lord Lord Chief Baron Mr. Scroop If you have any thing to say when the Jury have brought in their Verdict if you will say any thing for matter of Mercy the Court will hear you Scroop I thank your Lordship The Jury went together and presently settled themselves in their places Clerk A. Scr. Hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner How say you Is he guilty of the Treason whereof he stands Indicted and hath been Arraigned or not guilty Jury Guilty Clerk What Goods and Chattels c. Jury None that we know L. Chief Bar. If you will say any thing the Court will hear you Scroop I have no more My Lord but refer my self to this Honourable Court. Clerk Set John Carew Tho. Scot John Jones and Gregory Clement to the Bar who were set accordingly And being Commanded they severally held up their hands Clerk These men that were last called c. Sir Tho. Allen Lay your hand on the Book Look c. Carew I Challenge him L. C. Bar. Are you all agreed as to your Challenges Pris No my Lord. L. C. Bar. Then we must do as before sever you and go to Tryal severally Take the Three away and let Mr. Carew stand at the Bar. Challenged Charles Pitfield Wille Will. Smiths Rich. Rider Edward Rolph James Shercroft Tho. Vffman Francis Beal Will Whitcombe Samuel Harris Jo. Nicol of Finchley George Rigth Tho. Fruen Ab. Newman Tho. Blithe Will. Vincent James Hawley Chr. Abdy Tho. Bide John Smith Abr. Scudamore Ralph Halsel John Galliard In all 23. Jury Sworn Robert Clarke Thomas Grover Rich. Whaley Sam. Greenhil Nicholas Raynton Tho. Winter Rich. Cheney John Kerk Rich. Abel Thomas Morris George Tirrey Thomas Swallow In all 12. If any man can inform my Lords the King's Justices c. Cler. John Carew hold up thy hand You that are sworn look upon the prisoner You shall understand c. Sir Edw. Turner May it please your Lordships our Hue and Cry still proceeds against the Murtherers of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of blessed memory and this Gentleman the prisoner at the Bar is apprehended as one among others for shedding that pretious blood Gentlemen of the Jury he stands indicted before you For that he I cannot express it better not having the fear of God before his eyes but being seduced by the instigation of the Devil he did imagin and compass the death of his said late Majesty In prosecution of this Gentlemen there be several things that are mentioned in the Indictment which are the open acts to discover to you these secret and private imaginations He did meet and consult with divers persons touching the death of the King that did usurp and take upon them to exercise a Power and Jurisdiction to try the King and finally most horribly put him to death The Treason by the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. and which you are to enquire of is the imagination and compassing the death of the King the rest of the Indictment are but particulars to prove that he did so imagine and compass the death of the King If we shall prove these or any of these facts you have then sufficient to convict them There was a thing they called a High Court of Justice that was set up wherein they did intend to try our late Sovereign Lord and a precept made and that under the hand and seal of the prisoner at the Bar amongst others for summoning and convening that bloody Court where among the rest of the Miscreants the prisoner at the Bar did sit and had confidence nay impudence
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
such a Priviledge that no man shall ever be called to account for any thing spoken in Parliament if he be not called to account by the House before any other Member be suffered to speak Lord Ch. Bar. That is the House will not determine but that doth not extend to your Case you are not charged here criminally for speaking those words that have been testified against you but for Compassing and Imagining the Kings death of which there are other Evidences and this but an Evidence to prove that Scot. My Lord I never did say these words with that aggravation which is put upon them I have a great deal of hard measure as to say I hope I shall never repent I take God to witness I have often because it was spoken well of by some and ill by others I have by prayers and tears often sought the Lord that if there were iniquity in it he would shew it me I do affirm I did not say so Mr. Baker My Lord I omitted something which was this I had occasion to speak with Mr. Scot whilest Richard's Parliament was sitting and among other discourse insisting upon some things that Richard had done saith he I have cut off one Tyrants head and I hope to cut off another Scot. My Lord This is but a single witness Mr. Soll. Gen. I suppose he meant Rich. for he was a Tyrant Lord Ch. Bar. Speak on Mr. Scot whatever you have to say Sc. If that he laid aside as an impertinency I have the less to say L. Ch. Bar. The next thing you have to do is to answer to the fact whether you did it or did it not Scot. I say this Whatever I did be it more or less I did it by he Command and Authority of a Parliamentary Power I did sit as one of the Judges of the King and that doth justifie me whatever the nature of the fact was Lo. Ch. Bar. We have had these things alledged before us again and again The Court are clearly satisfied in themselves that this act could not be done by any Parliamentary power whatsoever I must tell you what hath been delivered that there is no power on earth that hath any coercive power over the King neither single Persons nor a Community neither the people Collectively nor Representatively In the next place that which you offer to be done as by Authority of Parliament it was done by a few members of the House of Commons there were but 46 there at that time and of these 46 not above 26 that voted it at that time the House of Lords was sitting who had rejected it and without them there was no Parliament there was a force upon the Parliament there was excluded seven parts of eight Supposing you were a full House of Commons and that without exception there was not Authority enough and it is known to you no man better that there never was a House of Commons before this time that this foul Act was made for erecting that High Court of Justice as you call'd it assumed that Authority of making a Law you cannot pretend to act by Authority of Parliament and because you would excuse it you did it by Authority of Parliament whether it were good or no If a man do that which is unlawful by an unlawful Authority the assuming to do it by that Authority is an Aggravation not an Extenuation of the Fact It was over-ruled I think my Lords will tell you That they do not allow of that Authority at all either to be for Justification or Plea Scot. My Lords I humbly pray leave to say that without offence to the Court every person whereof I honour This Court hath not Cognizance to Declare whether it were a Parliament or no. Lo. Ch. Bar. That was objected too and we must aquaint you That first of all it is no Derogation to Parliaments That what is a Statute or not a Statute should be adjudged by the Common Laws We have often brought it into question whether such and such a thing was an Act of Parliament or not any man may pretend to an Authority of Parliament If forty men should meet at Shooters Hill as the Little Convention did at Westminster and say We do declare our selves a Parliament of England because they do so shall not this be judged what is a Statute and what not It is every days practise we do judge upon it the Fact is so known to every body they did assume to themselves a Royal Authority it hath been over-ruled already it hath been the mistake of many the vulgar acceptation of the word Parliament A Parliament consists of the King Lords and Commons it is not the House of Commons alone and so it is not by Authority of Parliament It is not unless it be by that Authority which makes up the Parliament You cannot give one instance That ever the House of Commons did assume the Kings Authority Scot. I can many where there was nothing but a House of Commons Court When was that Scot. In the Saxons time Court You say it was in the Saxons time you do not come to any time within 600 years you speak of those times wherein things were obscure Scot. I know not but that it might be as lawful for them to make Laws as this late Parliament being called by the Keepers of the Liberties of England My Lords I have no seditious design but to submit to the providence of God Court This is notorious to every man This we have already heard and over-ruled L. Finch That that I hope is this That Mr. Scot will contradict that which he hath said before that is That he hopes he should not repent I hope he doth desire to repent Mr. Scot for this we must over-rule it as we have done before there is nothing at all to be pleaded to the Jurisdiction and this point hath been determined before Scot. The Parliament informer times consisted not so much of King Lords and Commons but King and Parliament In the beginning of the Parliament in 1641. the Bishops were one of the three Estates if it be not properly to be called a Parliament a legislative Power though it be not a Parliament it is binding If two Estates may take away the third if the second do not continue to execuâ—â— their trust he that is in occupancy may have a title to the whole I do affirm I have a Parliamentary Authority a legislative power to justifie me Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot what you speak concerning the Lords Spiritual is nothing to your Case be it either one way of other it was done by an Act of Parliament with consent of the King Lords and Commons though you will bring it down to make these Commons have a legislative Power I told you it was over-ruled before We have suffered you to expatiate into that which was a thing not intended by many of my Lords that you should have any such power to expatiate into that which is
Court being shewed Coun. Is that Mr. Jones's Hand the Prisoner at the Bar set to that Warrant Nut. I have been acquainted with his Hand I do believe it is The Warrant for Execution was also shewed Coun. Is that the same Hand-writing Nut. Yes I believe it is he hath written several Letters to me Mr. Hartlib Sworn Court Mr. Hartlib do you know Mr. Jones's Hand Har. I never did see him write but I have seen several Letters out of Ireland and other Papers which have been supposed to be his Hand-writing This seems to be like that which was reputed to be his Hand Coun. Mr. Clark do you know Mr. Jones's Hand-writing Cl. I have seen several Letters of Col. Jones and these are like his Hand-writing I do believe they are his Hand-writing Mr. Jones looks upon them both and confesses they are like his hand-writing Coun. We have given our Evidence What do you say for your self before Charge be given to the Jury Jones I have little to say your Lordships have already heard what is to be said in this Case I have nothing to say to the point I am not fit to plead any thing especially in matter of Law I must wholly put my self upon the Lord and this Honourable Court and Jury Lo. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury here is this Prisoner John Jones stands Indicted for that he with others did Compass and Imagine the Kings death that is the substance of the Indictment The Indictment sets forth several Acts each proving the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death One of them is that he did consult and meet together and propound how the King should be put to death The second is they did assume a power to Judge the King The third is that they did actually sit upon him And the last of them is that they sentenced the King and afterwards the King was murthered The whole substance is whether he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death If any one of these particulars that are alledged for the overt acts be proved you are to find the Indictment He hath confessed very Ingenuously that he did sit upon the King that he did sit in that Court and so there is an overt act proved if nothing else you ought to find him guilty of this Treason There is further Evidence though not any Evidence of his sitting the last day of the Sentence you have had three comparing similitudes of hands to prove that he did sign that Sentence that horrid Instrument whereby the King was ordered to be put to death one of them having received Letters from Ireland and others acquainted with his hand say that it is like his hand he hath so confessed the likeness of his hand but he saith he doth not remember he signed it As to you of the Jury there is no more to be considered if any one of the acts do appear true to you that is sufficient to find him guilty though he were not guilty of all but that he did Compass and Imagine the Kings death is clear in sitting and signing the Warrant for the other whether you shall find that he did sentence the King that must be left to you Whatsoever it is still it is the same if any one be proved you ought to find him guilty of the Indictment which is the Compassing and Imagining the Kings death I think you need not stir from the Bar for he hath confessed it The Jury went together and after a little Consultation returned to their places Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Cl. Who shall say for you Jury Our Foreman Cl. John Jones hold up thy hand Look upon the Prisoner at the Bar. How say ye is he guilty c. Foreman Guilty Cl. Look to him Keeper Cl. You say the Prisoner at the Bar is guilty c. and so you say all Jury Yes Cl. Set all that have been tryed this day to the Bar. Lord Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot I must speak a word to you you made mention of the Kings Proclamation for pardon and you did desire the benefit of it As I told you before so now again That it was not proper for us upon that Proclamation to give any allowance by way of Plea because the Pardon ought to be under the Broad Seal but God forbid but just and due Consideration should be had of it with honour so far as you are comprehended within it Though Judgment shall pass no Warrant for Execution shall go out against you till consideration be had how far you are within the Compass of that Proclamation and the like to you Mr. Scroop Clerk Adrian Scroop Hold up thy hand Thou hast been Indicted of High Treason and hast thereof been found guilty What canst thou say for thy self why Judgement should not pass for thee to dye according to Law Scroop I do humbly submit to his Majesties mercy Cl. John Carew Hold up thy hand Thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Carew I commit my cause unto the Lord. Cl. Thomas Scot Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what canst thou say c. Scot. I shall only say I do only cast my self upon his Majesty and pray mercy Cl. John Jones Hold up thy hand thou art in the like Condition with the former what hast thou to say c. Jones I pray his Majesties Clemency Cl. Gregory Clement hold up thy hand Thou standest Indicted of High Treason and thereunto hast pleaded guilty What canst thou say c. Clem. I pray mercy from the King Lo. Ch. Bar. You that are Prisoners at the Bar Ye see the Sentence of death is now to pass against you and for ought you know or we know yet may be nearer than you are aware How soon it will be executed we know not when you have reflected upon your own consciences many of you could not chuse but look there and see as in a glass the foulness of this horrid Offence It is the Murther of our most gracious Soveraign King Charles the First of blessed memory a Prince whom we such of us as had the honour personally to attend him knew was of such parts and vertues if he had been a private man more could not have been desired truly what he did as a King his Clemency how it appeared at first in this Princes time If you look what Peace and Prosperity we enjoyned in his days we will not find it in other Kings times You had not a Noble-man put to death save one and that for an Offence which must not be named A Prince that had granted so much You may remember what was granted before the beginning of these Wars Grievances complained of Star-Chamber High Commission Court Ship money The Claim of Stannery c. All these were taken away What Concessions he made after in the Isle of Wight how much he wooed and courted the people for Peace I urge this unto
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
heard the Charge read Hern. I did not hear the Charge read I was not there the first day I heard you confess you had exhibited a Charge of high Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar which was then the King's Majestie Cook Whether I did not in the Charge conclude that all proceedings might be according to Justice Court Read the Title and last Article of that Charge which was accordingly read and follows in haec verba The Title of the Charge The Charge of the Commons of England against Charles Sewart KING of England of High Treason and other Crimes exhibited to the High Court of Justice The last Clause in the Charge And the said Iohn Cook by protestation saving on the behalf of the people of Eng. the liberty of exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Charge against the said Char. Stew. and also of replying to the answers which the said Char. Stew. shall make to the premisses or any of them or any other charge that shall be so exhibited doth for the said Treasons and Crimes on the behalf of the said people of England impeach the said Charles Stewart as a Tyrant Traytor Murderer publick and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth of England and prayeth that the said Charles Stewart King of England may be put to answer all and every the premisses that such proceedings examinations tryals sentences and judgement may be hereupon had as shall be agreeable to Justice Court Mr. Cook will you have any Witnesses examined touching the question you last asked Cook No be pleased to go on Mr. Baker Sworn Mr. Bak. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was at the High Court of Justice as they called it the first second and third daies not to trouble you with the proceedings of of Bradshaw I will tell you what I observed of this Gentleman I have the notes that I took there and pray that I may read them to help my memory which was granted and then proceeded in this manner That day my Lord Mr. Cook told the Court that he charged the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the KING with Treason and high misdemeanors and desired that the Charge might be read the Charge was this That he had upheld a Tyrannical Government c. and for that cause was adjudged to be a Tyrant c. and did then press that the prisoner might give an answer to that and that very earnestly The second day my Lord he told the Court that he did the last day exhibit a Charged High Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the King and that he did desire he might make answer to it and he told them also that instead of making an answer to the Court the King had delayed the Court but desired the K. might make a positive answer or otherwise that it might be taken pro confesso The third day my Lord he came and told the Court as before that the King had delayed then and then he charged him with the Highest Treasons and Crimes that ever were acted upon the Theatre of England and then pressed that Judgement might be given against him and another expression was that it was not so much He but the Innocent and precious bloud that was shed that did crie for Judgment against the Prisoner at the Bar this my Lord in substance there were other passages Cook Whether before this time he had not heard some thing of an Act or Order proclaimed at Westminster whether there was any other word in effect used in that charge more than in the Proclamation Mr. Baker I did hear of the Proclamation and Charge and the substance of it I have given an accompt of it and I did hear you press upon it very much the Proclamation I heard of it that it was made forthe summoning of the Court but I did not hear the Proclamation made Cook That that was called the Act of the Commons for Trying of the King Mr. Baker I did hear of the Act but did not take notice of it Mr. George Masterson Sworn Counc Mr. Masterson pray inform my Lords and the Jury what you know touching the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at the Tryal of his late Majesty Mr. Masterson My Lords and you Gentlemen of the Jury I was present in that they called the High Court of Justice upon the 22 23. and 27. days of January in the year 1648. I shall wave those circumstances which you have heard and many of which I well remember and what I heard likewise between the King who was then a Prisoner and the then President Bradshaw but concerning the Prisoner at the Bar this I very well remember that upon Munday I heard him say he had exhibited a Charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then the King and demanded how that he might plead to his charge I do very well remember that after some passages between the King and the Court the Prisoner at the Bar desired the King might plead to his Charge or else it might be taken pro Confesso I remember upon the last day the day of that fatal Sentence I heard the Prisoner at the Bar demand in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and all the good people of England Judgement upon the Prisoner at the Bar pointing to the King this is all Mr. Burden sworn Councel Do you know who did examine the witnesses against the King and were you examined and by whom Burden By Judge Cook for so he was called in Ireland Councel Did he examine you as a witness against the King did he give you an Oath Burden Yes my Lord and many others Cook This is a new thing I never heard of this before where was it that I examined him I had no power Council No we know that but you were active Court Where was it Cook Whether there were not any others with me in the Room and where it was Burden It was at Westminster-hall within the High Court of Justice Cook Who was there besides me Burden I cannot tell Axtel he was there and I am sure Cook was there Councel Mr. Burden Pray tell my L. the Jury what questions you were examined upon and what they tended to Burden He examined me and gave me my Oath there was eight or nine of us we had been in the Kings Army in former times this Gentleman Col. Axtel brought us in commanded us out of our Company I was in his Company and this Gentleman himself gave us our Oaths he asked us where we saw the King in action I did reply to him and told him I saw him in the Field with his Army he asked me many other questions that I could not tell him he asked me whether I did see the King at Nottingham set up his Standard and I was never at Nottingham in my life these were the questions Mr. Starkey Sworn Court Pray inform my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury what passed between you and the Prisoner at
the Bar concerning the Trial of his late Majesty Mr. Starkey My Lords this Gentleman now Prisoner and my self have been acquainted a great while being of the same Society of Grayes-Inne and truly my Lord I confess I owe all my knowledge in the Laws to that Gentleman when 〈◊〉 came first he was accused for debt and was pleased to do me and several other Gentlemen now and then the favour to reason the Law with us and assist us in the beginning of the long Parliament that is to give you an accompt of his being indebted he did desire I would do my endeavour to get his Protection Near the time of the Kings Trial there was a Gentleman with my self one Samuel Palmer of Grays-Inne which frequented his Company had several nights the opportunity of understanding the affairs at Westmin and truly he himself did seem to us to count that a very ridiculous Council I remember what he said one night I think they are all mad which was within two or three days before the Kings tryal and instanced how a Fellow cryed out to the Lord Fairfax that if he did not consent to the proceedings he would kill Christ and him After that I did not think he did go to this Council for imployment but out of curiosity when the King came to Tryal we heard that Mr. Cook was the person that was Solicitor and Acted that part that you have heard of and that during that Tryal whether the second or third day I cannot say that certainly Mr. Cook came to Grays-Inne that evening about Ten or Eleven of the clock at might only upon some particular occasion as he said I being walking in the Court in the walk before my Chamber with another Gentleman I did see him pass out of a house to go back again I thought it was he called after him Mr. Cook said I upon that he turned back and met me I took him by the hand said I I hear you are up to the ears in this business no saith he I am serving the people truly said I I believe there is a thousand to one will not give you thanks said I I hear you charge the King for the levying war against the Parliament how can you rationally do this when you have pulled out the Parliament to make way to his Trial he answered me you will see strange things and you must wait upon God I did ask him but first he said this of himself said he he was as gracious and wise a Prince as any was in the world which made me reflect upon him again and asked how he could press those things as I have heard what answer he made to that I cannot tell I did by the way inquire what he thought concerning the King whether he must suffer or no he told me he must die and Monarchy must die with him Cook Whether was this after or before the Sentence Mr. Starkey It was before the Sentence for it was either the second or third Trial or rather in some interim of time before the Sentence for there was an adjournment for a day or two but I am sure it was before the Sentence Court Mr. Cook they have concluded their Evidence plead for your self what you think fitting Cook My Lord I have been a Prisoner three months I humbly desire to acknowledge his Majesties and his Councils favour that I was not put into a Jeremy's Prison but in the Tower and not in Irons I give your Lordships humble thanks for that and truly considering the nature of the Charge had it been in some other Kingdom they would have served us as Iohn Baptist in prison I thank you that I have a fair Trial with the Judges of the Law who are upon their Oaths to do equal right and justice between our Soveraign Lord the King and every Prisoner concerning matters of life and death and likewise those Noble Lords that though they are not put upon their Oaths but upon their honour if they know any Law to preserve my life I trust they will rather save than destroy My Lords I do therefore say as Paul said my plea is much of that nature against the Law and against Caesar I hope I have not offended at all and so I have pleaded not guilty The learned Council have examined several witnesses against me and I humbly conceive that the matter will rest in a very narrow compass the substance of the Charge so far as my memory will serve doth rest in these three things the other being but matter of form That I with others should propound consult contrive and imagine the Death of the late King Secondly That to the perfecting and bringing about this wicked and horrid conspiracy that I with others did assume a Power and Authority as I remember power I am sure then to kill and murther the King thirdly That there was a person unknown that did cut off the Kings head and that we were abetting aiding assisting countenancing and procuring the person or words to that effect against the form of the Statutes and so forth I hâ—ve twelve poor words to offer for my self in this business wherein if I do not answer every thing that hath been particularly objected I hope you will give me leave afterwards to offer it First I humbly propound this that if it was not made appear to your Lordships that I did ever propound consult advise contrive attempt or any way plot or counsel the death of His Majestie then I hope I cannot be found guilty within the Statute of 25. Edward the third for the naked truth Mr. Nutly hath in a great part spoke to I was appointed upon the tenth of January 1648. for to give my advice concerning a Charge there having been upon the ninth a Proclamation for the Trial and upon the tenth Mr. Steel Dr. Dorislaus and Mr. Ask and my self were appointed and ordered to be of Council to draw up a Charge Here I have the order attested by Mr. Jessop and pray it may be read Court They do admit the thing that you were so assigned Cook Then I humbly conceive that that cannot be said to be done maliciously or advisedly or with any wicked intention in me which I was required and commanded to do Acting only within my Sphere and Element as a Counsellour no otherwise The next thing is this my L. that by Law words will not amount unto Treason we usually say that words may declare an Heretick but not a Traytor there were some Statutes formerly 1 Ed. 6. were words are made Treason but they are all repealed by 1 Mariae that nothing shall be Treason but what is expressed in 25 Ed. 3. this Objection will seem to lye that these were words put in writing and that I humbly conceive to be the greatest matter objected to which I answer 1. Whether there be any full certain clear proof that that is my hand to the Charge I must leave to you two or three
witnesses say they believe it that it is like my hand that I leave to you if that appear yet My Lord that that is put in writing as done by another that is the Dictator and does dictate unto me I humbly conceive that for any man to write words which in their own nature may be Treasonable if he doth but write them by the command of another by speaking them after another taking them upon rebound that is not Treason because they do not discover a trayterous heart Those words of compassing the death of the King in the 25 Ed. 3. they are secret imaginations in the heart and they must be manifest by some overtact that which was dictated my Lord unto me that I had expresly prescribed me what I should say what words I should say That I did not invent any thing of mine own head of my own conceit and therefore cannot properly be said to be malicious The next thing that I crave leave to offer is this that the pure and plain demanding and praying of Justice though injustice be done upon it cannot possibly be called Treason within the statute then I hope nothing that has been said against me will amount to Treason for the words in the natural grammatical plain genuine and legal sence will bear no other construction as I humbly conceive but that whereas those Gentlemen had his Majestie then in their power a Prisoner that it was prayed by me that they would do him justice I do hope that it will appear that I did give Bonum fidele Consilium It will appear I hope that some would have had a very voluminous and long charge that I was utterly against it as conceiving that it was not fit and requisite that any thing should be put in at least I durst not invent one word my self but what was expressed in the Act for tryal if your Lordships will not admit it an act you will an Order and so it will bear me forth at least to excuse me from Treason because I kept my self to the words whereas in that it was said that they should proceed according to the merits of the cause I was against that that I did not understand that but according to Justice that is but according to Law because the Law is the rule of Justice I do humbly hope my Lord that if by Law when words may be taken in a double sence they shall always have the more favourable interpretation much more when the words in the legal sence will bear it when it is prayed they will proceed according to justice I hope it will not be inferred there was any intention of doing injustice when justice was required And therefore my Lord the next word what I would offer is this if my Lord in all Tragedies which are as we call them judicially or colourably there are but these four Actors Accusers or Witnesses The Jury Judges and Executioner If I be none of these I cannot be Guilty of Treason I hope I may safely say according to Law that I had not a hand at all in his Majesties death My Lord the Court and Councel it is very true they do aim at the same thing the Councel Requireâ—â—â— Justitiam the other Exequendo Justitiam the end being the same to have Justice If when justice be demanded and injustice be done what is that to the Councel we read to of John concerning Pilate Knowest thou not speaking to Christ that I have power to crucifie thee and have power to release thee My Lord I humbly answer this to that which seems to be the most material part in the Indictment that We did assume a Power My Lords I did not assume a power I hope it will not be said that the Councel had any power Eloquentia in the Councel Judicium in the Judges and Veritas in the Witnesses 25. Acts. Tertullus that eloquent Orator accused Paul Paul answered for himself and it is said Festus being willing to do the Jews a courtesie he left Paul bound it was not the Councel that left him bound His Majesty was never a Prisoner to me and I never laid any hands upon him if any witnesses have spoke of any irreverence I must appeal to God in that I did not in the least manner carry my self undutifully to his Majesty though one of the Witnesses was pleased to say that I said these words that there is a Charge against the Prisoner at the Bar It was not said the Prisoner at the Bar there was not one disrespective word from me There is a Case in the third Institutes of the Lord Cook it is to this purpose That one wilfully and knowingly forswore himself the Case was put to inveigle the Court and though the Court does injustice upon a false Oath it is not injustice at all in the Witness it is Perjury in him if there can be no injustice in a Witness much less a Counseller can be said to have his hand in the death of any because he has no power at all this must needs follow that if it shall be conceived to be Treason for a Counseller to plead against his Majesty then it will be Felony to plead against any man that is condemned unjustly for Felony The Counsellour is to make the best of his Clients cause then to leave it to the Court it is said I should demand judgement I do not remember that I leave it to you but still to demand Justice Counsellers they do ingage in business before they do rightly understand the true matter of the fact it is part of a Serjeants Oath that so soon as he does discover the falsity of the Cause he should forsake the Cause My Lord by what Mr. Nutly hath said it appears and I have many Witnesses in the Countrey three or four in Leicestershire would have spoken full to this that my Lord there was not before the Sentence of the King to the best of my knowledge a word spoken by any that they did intend to put him to death I say to my knowledge and my Lord when Judgement is demanded is it not twofold of Acquittal and Condemnation if those that then were entrusted with the power of Judicature if they did not know any Law to proceed by to take away his Majesty then I demanding their Judgement it doth not appear to be my Judgement and I refer it to the learned Councel that Councel many times at the Assises and other Courts have been sorry that the Verdict hath been given for their Clients when they have known the right lay on the other side and so I might in this The next thing I humbly offer is that if in right reason considering the condition his Majesty was then in the advising to draw up the Charge was rather to be looked upon as a matter of service than disservice then it cannot be called Treason it is very true my Lord that a very small little Overt act will amount to a
confesso was afflicted with the delays how angry he was when he was interrupted Is it not proved to you that he was at first against the thing and said it was a base business when he was engaged in it said that he was a Servant of the people of this Kingdome what doth he do at last when the thing had gone far he speaks that which is the only truth which I have yet heard from him He must dye and Monarchy then must perish with him from which Event good Lord deliver us Sir Edward Turner My Lord the substance of the defence that the Prisoner hath made at the Bar with much skill and cunning may be referred to two heads The first to the Statute of the 25 of Edward the 3. The second to the late Act of Oblivion for the first my Lord he saith that his fact is not comprized within that Statute saith he I did never conspire or imagine the death of the King nor did believe that would be a consequent of their actings It was expresly proved that himself did say that the King must die and Monarchy with him but Gentlemen though he had said true that it had not been proved or that he did not believe that would be a consequent yet my Lord I must tell you that every step of this Tragedy was Treason the summoning themselves that was Treason every proceeding upon that was Treason the summoning of their meetings in the Painted Chamber coming into Westminster-Hall every person as instrumental those that came to act the least part in that Tragedy were every one guilty of Treason what saith he I acted as a Councellour for my see It was that see that Judas had the 30. pieces of silver that made him hang himself He goes further and tells you there must be no semblable Treasons this is clear the conspiring and imagining the death of the King that 's the Treason that is mentioned in the Act Treason by the Common Law though this be not named the killing of the King yet all these proceedings are demonstrations to you there was a Secret Imagination to kill him Then to the Act of Oblivion his Argument is That because the Act saith that if they had Sentenced signed or been Instrumental in the death of the King that they should be excepted but it is not said or otherwise Instrumental that therefore this should refer to subsequent not precedent Acts that 's a strange Exposition take it Grammatically it hath the most large construction Instrumental more large than if they had said or otherwise for it doth comprehend every thing There having been so full an answer already I will be short I will not meddle with his civil debts but with his Political If a man kill another though he doth repent the Magistrate must do Justice in terrorem Though he doth repent I hope in God he doth so The Magistrates your Lordships must do Justice in terrorem I desire that Justice may be done upon that man He said it was no Treason to demand Justice against the King because he did but demand it I hope he will think it no unkindness in me to desire judgement against him because it is just Mr. Wadham Windham As I understand the Prisoner at the Bar the chief argument which he shelters himself under was his profession which gives a blast to all of us of the long robe I will not mince his arguments saith he here was a Court I was appointed Sollicitor and saith he for men to practise before those that have not a proper Judicature it is not Felony Murther or Treason I would not willingly mince his Argument and that I was appointed and the words dictated to me and a Councellor carrying himself within the compass of his profession is not answerable but if he will exceed his bounds his profession is so far from sheltring him that as it hath been opened it is very much an aggravation it is the duty of a Councellor to give Counsel if a man shall come to me and ask counsel and I shall counsel him to kill a man am not I accessary to that murder Words by his argument will not amount to Treason if the fact follows I am as guilty as if I did the fact in point of Treason it is all one as if I had done that very act If Mr. Cook did advise that Act or was instrumental he is as much a Traytor as the man in the Frock that did the Execution for his profession truly my Lord I do not think that a Counseller is always bound to know the patent of him that sits as Judge that will not be his Case here was no ordinary Warrant of Law to carry on Justice Grotius saith in case of necessity for carrying on Justice there may be many things allowed I pray where did Mr. Cook read of such a Court as a High Court of Justice there was never such a High Court of Justice read of in the Law then as this was a mock Court so under good favour it was a mock Jurisdiction Was there any Law under Heaven to put the King to death is it not out of the compass of all Courts whatsoever to do it and under good favour my Lord this is but to shelter a mans self under colour of Justice to do the most execrable Treason in the World I have no more to say to you Lo. Ch. Bar. I would repeat the Evidence and your answer to you if you have any thing new speak to it Cook This is new it was said by one that if there had been no charge there had been no sentence given in the Case I say that the Indictment or Charge is no part of the Tryal by the Statute of Magna Charta The Peers of the Land shall be tryed by Peers but are indicted by the Countrey I conceive by what they have said they do make me causal of the Kings death It is said in the Indictment there was a power I say this I did not assume any power it cannot be said if Council be come in to an unlawful power that he takes the power but stands with respect at the Bar. At Assises Judgement passes the Clerk of the Assises he is not instrumental in taking away life for that which Mr. Starkey should say that I should say The King must die and Monarchy with him I humbly beg that the Jury would take notice of what Mr. Nut. said that I told him there was no intention of taking away the Kingslife and besides it is but a single witness I hope there must be two witnesses in point of Law to convict a man of High Treason Lo. Ch. Baron Mr. Cook you said right but even now that if there was any thing in matter of Law which the Court knows of which may be of advantage to you they are of Council to you and so they ought to be Cook I think your Lordships L. Ch. Bar. I shall repeat the whole Evidence and
that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye
says he did it not Traiterously I humbly conceive he means it was Justifiable Sir P. Temple At another time I was in Town on a Friday and wanting Horses I went to Smithfield where I saw the Horses of State of his late Majesty to be sold in the Common Market at which I called to the Rider said I What makes these Horses here says he I am to sell them Why said I there 's the King's Brand upon them C. R. and he shew'd them me said I Will you sell these Horses What price he asked me three or fourscore pound a piece said I Who warrants the sale of these Horses says he Mr. Marten and Sir Wil. Brereton Afterwards I heard the Horses were taken into the Mews by the Prisoner at the Bar and Sir Wil. Brereton Counsel Was this before the Trial Sir P. Temple It was in 1642 or 1643. Counsel That 's nothing to this Business Marten My Lord the Commission went in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the Good People of England and what a matter is it for one of the Commissioners to say Let it be acted by the Good People of England Mr. Sol. Gen. You know all good People did abhor it I am sorry to see so little repentance Marten My Lord I hope that which is urged by the Learned Counsel will not have that impression upon the Court and Jury that it seems to have That I am so obstinate in a thing so apparently ill My Lord if it were possible for that Blood to be in the Body again and every drop that was shed in the late Wars I could wish it with all my heart But my Lord I hope it is lawful to offer in my own defence that which when I did it I thought I might do My Lord there was the House of Commons as I understood it perhaps your Lordships think it was not a House of Commons but then it was the Supream Authority of England it was so reputed both at home and abroad My Lord I suppose he that gives obedience to the Authority in being de facto whether de jure or no I think he is of a peaceable disposition and far from a Traitor My Lord I think there was a Statute made in Henry the Seventh's time whereby it was provided That whosoever was in Arms for the King de facto he should be indempnified though that King de facto was not so de jure And if the Supream Officers de facto can justifie a War the most pernicious Remedy that was ever adjudged by Mankind be the Cause what it will I presume the Supream Authority of England may justifie a Judicature though it be but an Authority de facto My Lord if it be said that it is but a third estate and a small parcel of that my Lord it was all that was extant I have heard Lawyers say That if there be Commons appurtenant to a Tenement and that Tenement be all burnt down except a small Stick the Commons belong to that one small piece as it did to the Tenement when all standing My Lord I shall humbly offer to consideration whether the King were the King indeed such a one whose Peace Crowns and Dignities were concerned in Publick Matters My Lord he was not in execution of his Offices he was a Prisoner My Lord I will not defer you long neither would I be offensive I had then and I have now a peaceable inclination a resolution to submit to the Government that God hath set over me I think his Majesty that now is is King upon the best Title under Heaven for he was called in by the Representative Body of England I shall during my life long or short pay obedience to him Besides my Lord I do owe my life to him if I am acquitted for this I do confess I did adhere to the Parliaments Army heartily my life is at his mercy if his Grace be pleased to grant it I have a double obligation to him Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar hath entred into a Discourse that I am afraid he must have an answer in Parliament for it He hath owned the King but thinks his best title is the acknowledgment of the People and he that hath that let him be who he will hath the best Title we have done with our Evidence Marten I have one word more my Lord I humbly desire that the Jury would take notice That though I am accused in the Name of the King that if I be acquitted the King is not Cast It doth not concern the King that the Prisoner be Condemned it concerns him that the Prisoner be Tried it is as much to his Interest Crown and Dignity that the Innocent be acquitted as that the Nocent be condemned Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord this puts us now upon the reputation of our Evidence and you may see how necessary it is to distinguish between Confidence and Innocence for this very Person that desires you to have a care how you condemn the Innocent he doth seem to intimate to you that he is an innocent Person at the Bar and yet confesses he did sit upon the King did Sentence him to Death that he signed the Warrant for the Execution and yet here stands that Person that desires you to have a care of condemning Innocence What is this at the bottom of it but that my Fact is such as I dare not call it Innocence but would have you to believe it such Gentlemen of the Jury was it your intention the King should be so tried as this Prisoner moved It will concern you to declare That the People of England do abhor his Facts and Principles every Fact the Prisoner hath confessed himself the sitting in that Court which was Treason his Sentencing was Treason signing the Warrant for Execution was the highest of Treasons Gentlemen all that he hath to say for himself is there was an Authority of his own making whereby he becomes innocent But we hope out of his own Mouth you will find him guilty Gilbert Millington I desire you to hear me I come not hither to dispute but to acknowledg I will not trouble you with long Discourses My Lord it is not fit for wise Men to hear them I am not able to express them I will not justifie my self I will acknowledg my self Guilty My Lord The reason why I said the last day Not Guilty was in respect of being upon the Scaffold and murthering the King and those things but I will wave all things if your Lordship will give me leave and will go unto the lowest strain that possible can be I will confess my self Guilty every way I was awed by the present Power then in being This I leave with you and lay my self at your feet and have no more at all to say but a few words in a Petition which I desire you will please to accept and so I conclude Counsel We do accept this
honest and humble Confession and shall give no evidence against him to aggravate the Matter L. Ch. B. Your Petition is accepted and shall be read Robert Titchburne My Lord when I first pleaded to the Indictment it was Not Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted My Lord it was not then in my Heart either to deny or justify any tittle of the matter of Fact My Lord The Matter that I was led into by ignorance my Conscience leads me to acknowledg But my Lord if I should have said Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted I was fearful I should have charged my own Conscience as then knowingly and maliciously to act it My Lord it was my unhappiness to be call'd to so sad a Work when I had so few years over my head A Person neither bred up in the Laws nor in Parliaments where Laws are made I can say with a clear Conscience I had no more enmity in my heart to his Majesty than I had to my Wife that lay in my bosom My Lord I shall deny nothing After I was summoned I think truly I was at most of the Meetings and I do not say this that I did not intend to say it before but preserving that Salvo to my own Conscience That I did not maliciously and knowingly do it I think I am bound in Conscience to own it As I do not deny but I was there so truly I do believe I did sign the Instrument And had I known that then which I do now I do not mean my Lord my Afflictions and Sufferings it is not my Sufferings make me acknowledg I would have chosen a red hot Oven to gone into as soon as that Meeting I bless God I do this neither out of fear nor hopes of favour though the penalty that may attend this acknowledgment may be grievous My Lord I do acknowledg the Matter of Fact and do solemnly profess I was led into it for want of years I do not justify either the Act or the Person I was so unhappy then as to be ignorant and I hope shall not now since I have more light justify that which I was ignorant of I am sure my Heart was without malice if I had been only asked in matter of Fact at first I should have said the same I have seen a little The Great God before whom we all stand hath shewn his tender mercy to Persons upon repentance Paul tells us Though a Blasphemer and a Persecuter of Christ it being done ignorantly upon repentance he found mercy My Lord Mercy I have found and I do not doubt but mercy I shall find My Lord I came in upon the Proclamation and now I am here I have in truth given your Lordship a clear and full account what ever that Law shall pronounce because I was ignorant yet I hope there will be room found for that Mercy and Grace that I think was intended by the Proclamation and I hope by the Parliament of England I shall say no more but in pleading of that humbly beg that your Lordships will be instrumental to the King and Parliament on that behalf Counsel We shall give no evidence against the Prisoner he says he did it ignorantly and I hope and do believe he is penitent and as far as the Parliament thinks fit to shew mercy I shall be very glad Owen Rowe I have not much to say I never had any ability therefore my Lord it was never my intent upon my Plea as was said before to deny any thing I have done for I was clearly convinced that I ought to confess it before and I do confess against my self that I did sit there several times and to the best of my remembrance I did sign and seal the Warrant for his Execution and truly my Lord it was never in my heart to contrive a Plot of this nature How I came there I do not know I was very unfit for such a Business and I confess I did it ignorantly not understanding the Law so was carried away hidden in the Business not understanding what I did therefore my Lord I humbly intreat this honourable Court that you will consider of it and look upon me as one that out of ignorance did it and if I had known of my Act I would rather have been torn in pieces with a thousand Horses When I heard of the Declaration and gracious Pardon of his Majesty I confess I went to my Lord Mayors laid hold of it and I thought my life as secure as it is now in my own hands But I do wholly cast my self upon the King's Mercy and as I have heard he is a gracious King full of lenity and mercy so I hope I shall find it I was never against Government it is a blessed thing that we have it I hope all the Nations will be happy under it I shall submit to his Majesty and Government I can say no more I was not brought up a Scholar but was a Tradesman and was meerly ignorant when I went on in that Business I do humbly intreat your Lordships that you would as tenderly as may be present my case to the King whom I rest upon and leave all to your Lordships wisdom and discretion to do what you will concerning me Counsel We accept his Confession and do hope he is penitent before God as well as before the World Robert Lilburn Be pleased to give me leave to speak a few words I shall be ingenuous before your Lordships I shall not wilfully nor obstinately deny the Matter of Fact But my Lord I must and I can with a very good Conscience say That what I did I did it very innocently without any intention of Murder nor was I ever Plotter or Contriver in that Murder I never read in the Law nor understood the Case throughly What-ever I have done I have done ignorantly L. Ch. B. Because you shall not be mistaken in your words God forbid that we should carp at your words the word Innocent hath a double acceptation Innocent in respect of Malice and Innocent in respect of the Fact Lilburn The truth is my Lord I was for the withdrawing of the Court when the King made the motion to have it withdrawn and upon the day my Lord that the King was put to death I was so sensible of it that I went to my Chamber and mourn'd and would if it had been in my power have preserved his life My Lord I was not at all any disturber of the Government I never interrupted the Parliament at all I had no hand in those things neither in 1648 nor at any other time I shall humbly beg the favour of the King that he would be pleased to grant me his Pardon according to his Declaration which I laid hold on and rendred my self according to the Proclamation Counsel We shall say nothing against him Henry Smith My Lord I shall not desire to spend your Lordships time what I have done
how to reconcile that which hath been said before with this that comes after I leave it to you I am totally at a loss When those times were how impetuous the Soldiers how not a man that durst either disown them or speak against them I was threatned with my very life by the threats of one that hath received his reward I was induced to it Certainly my Lord it doth argue that there was not malice predommant Love and Hatred cannot be at the same time in one person Design my Lord what should be my design a poor ordinary mean man Surely my Lord I could not design any great matters or places I knew my self unfit I humbly beg you would give me leave to tell you a little what I got Mr. Sol. Gen. By your favour my Lord the Prisoners at the Bar may say what they will by way of extenuation but we expect that when they enter upon these Discourses they will save your Lordships time and ours by a publick confession and evidence of sorrow We cannot spend so long time to hear these long Discourses we will rather prove it against every man singly Downes I will trouble you no further I do acknowledge all I humbly submit and beg your favour and leave my self eupon my Countrymen the Jury and beg the King's mercy specially Pray spare me one word that you would hear but a Witness or two unto that business Counsel He doth confess he sate and signed we beleive he is sorrowful and against his Conscience he did sign and that he did it out of a fear and from a threat that he was over-awed so was the Hangman too but after he had apprehended this sorrow and declared his Judgment upon the fact he signed the Warrant Downes My Lord I do humbly beg his Majesties mercy I came in upon the Proclamation Vincent Potter My Lord my condition requires ease for my Body he had a fit of the Stone upon him at that same time I pray that the passing the Sentence for execution may be suspended L. Ch. B. The Execution must be suspended for you are within that Qualification Potter I desire only this I am not in a condition to declare what I know and would speak I am mighty ful of pain if I am under that Qualification let me rest under that Counsel Do you confess the Indictment or will you put us to prove it Potter I am one that came in L. Ch. B. It is thus with you whether or no did you sit sign or act in this High Court of Justice against the King Potter I will deny nothing I confess the fact but did not contrive it I am full of pain Lord Chief Baron According to the demerit of the Case in Law you must receive Judgment here but no execution of that Judgment shall be until the King by advice and consent of Lords and Commons shall order the execution of it you are to be tried now Do you confess you signed the Warrant for execution of the King Potter I do confess it my Lord. Counsel We do accept it Potter I beseech you let me go to ease my self Lord Chief Baron Officer set a Chair for him which was done Mr Potter sit down Aug. Garland May it please your Lordship I came here this day intending to have waved my plea and referred my self to this honourable Court to be recommended to the Kings mercy and the Parliament But hearing of some scandal upâ—â— me more then ever I did hear till within these few dayes I shall desire your favour in hearing of my Trial. Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord he saith well for if he had confessed the Indictment we should not have accepted it Call the Witnesses Garland I do confess this I sate and at the day of Sentence signed the Warrant for Execution Mr. Sol. Gen. And we will prove that he spat in the Kings face Gar. I pray let me hear that Otherwise I would not have put you to any trouble at all Clench sworn Counsel Do you know the prisoner at the Bar Augustine Garland Clench I know him very well Counsel Tell my Lords and the Jury how you saw him behave himself to our Sovereign Lord the King when he was at the Bar. Clench I was that day at Westminstar-hall when the King had sentence they hurried the King down this Mr. Garland came down stairs by them towards the bottome of the stairs he spit in his face at a little distance Couns Do you believe he did it on purpose upon your oath Clench I suppose he did it somewhat suspiciously in that way I did see the King put his hand in his left pocket but I do not know whether the king wiped it off Mr. Sol. Gen. The King wiped it off but he will never wipe it off so long as he lives He hath confessed that he sate that he sentenced and that he signed We say he contrived it at the beginning and at last bid defiance to the King I shall desire he may be remembred in another place Garland I do not know that I was near him at that time I do not remember this passage I am afraid he is an Indigent person If I was guilty of this inhumanity I desire no favour from God Almighty L. Ch. B. I will tell you this doth not at all concern the Jury but this Circumstance possibly may be considered in another place Gar. I refer my self whether you be satisfied that I did such an Inhumane act I submit that to you I dare appeal to all these Gentlemen here looking upon the prisoners or any other whether they ever heard of it nor I was never accused for such a thing till a few dayes since but I wave my plea and refer my self to the Court Now my Lord this is the truth of my Case there is that honorable Gentleman the Speaker of the House of Commons knows I lived in Essex in the beginning of these troubles and I was inforced to forsake my habitation I came from thence to London where I have behaved my self fairly in my way Afterwards in 1648 I was chosen a member into the Parliament in June 1648 I came in a Member of the Parliament My Lord after the division of the House by the insolency of the Soldiery some came to me and desired me that I would go to the House I was then at my Chamber at Lincolns-Inne I forbore a Week and more said I I do not expect to be admitted for they look upon me as another person said they If you will go you shall have no contradiction I went and went in when I was in the first business that came was the business of Tryal of the King and it was put on me to be Chair-man for bringing in this Act for Tryal I did not know how to contradict that power or authority be it what it will but I must obey I fear my ruine will follow it in that respect my Lord when I came there I
in that Case one was called the Banishment of Hugh Spencer and the other is in 1. Edward 3. upon the Roll. My Masters In the first of Henry the Seventh you shall find it in the printed seven Books he saith That as to the Regality of his Crown he is immediately subject unto God Mark the Doctrine of the Church of England Gentlemen I do not know with what Spirit of Equivocation any Man can take that Oath of Supremacy You shall find in the Articles of the Church of England the last but one or two it is that Article which sets forth the Doctrine of the Church of England they say That the Queen and so the King hath the Supreme Power in this Realm and hath the chief Government over all the Estates of the Realm the very words are so this was shortly after making the Act the Articles were in 1552 and she came in 1558 or 1559 it is to shew you the King hath the chief Government over all the Estates within the Nation and if you look upon it you shall find it was not only the Judgment of the Church but of the Parliament at the same time They did confirm this Article so far that they appointed that no Man should take or be capable of a Living but those that had taken that Oath God forgive those Ministers that went against it The Queen and the Church were willing that these should be put into Latin that all the World might see the Confession of the Church of England and of the People of England you may reade it in Cambden I have told you how and wherein the chief Power consisted not in respect the King could do what he would no the Emperors themselves did not challenge that but this they challenge by it That they were not accountable to Man for what they did No Man ought to touch the Person of the King I press it to you in point of Conscience you see in the Scripture in Psalm 51. the Psalm of Mercy whereby we ask pardon of God for our great Offences I think none of you in this condition but will join in this you know the Adultery and Murder that David committed this penitential Psalm was made for that What doth he say Against thee thee only have I sinned c. tibi soli peccavi Domine not because he had not sinned against Man for 't is plain he had sinned both against Bathsheba and Vriah too But because he was not liable to the Tribunal of Man he was not bound nor accountable to any Man upon Earth And now my Masters I beseech you consider that some of you for ought I know suddenly and some of you for ought I know not long after all of us we do not know how soon must come to make a right account to God of what we have done After this Life you enter into an Eternity an Eternity of Happiness or of Woe God Almighty is merciful to those that are truly penitent the Thief upon the Cross and to all that are of a penitent heart You are Persons of education do not you go on in an obstinate perverse course for shame of Men even this shame which you now have and which you may have when you come to die a sanctified use may be made of it you pay to God some part of that punishment which you owe to him for your sins I have no more to say but the next thing I have to do is to give the Sentence the Judgment which truly I do with as unwilling a heart as you do receive it You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Court adjourned till Friday morning seven a Clock Friday Octob. 19. 1660. Set William Heveningham to the Bar. Serjeant Keeling May it please your Lordships the Prisoner at the Bar William Heveningham hath been indicted of High-Treason for compassing and imagining the Death of the late King of blessed memory he has been tried the Jury has found him guilty I do humbly move your Lordships in the behalf of the King that you will proceed to Judgment Clerk William Heveningham hold up thy hand what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Heveningham My Lords I have nothing more to say than I said formerly only I plead the benefit of the Proclamation and cast my self upon the Mercy of our most gracious Sovereign and desire your Lordships to be Mediators on my behalf Lord Ch. Baron By the Act of Indempnity of which you claim the Benefit and we ought to take notice of it we are to proceed to Judgment but no Execution of this Judgment is to be until by another Act of Parliament by consent of the King it shall be ordered And therefore I need not speak any more of that or any Exhortation to prepare your self for Death our work is only to give Judgment The Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that you the Prisoner at the Bar be led back to c. And the Lord have mercy upon your Soul THus having given the Reader a most impartial view of every Passage occurring in this so solemn and legal Indictment Arraignment Trial and Condemnation of these twenty nine black Regicides with their several Pleas and Defences in their own words It may be also some additinal satisfaction to let the Reader know the time and manner of the Death of such of them who were according to the Sentence Executed For their last Discourses and Prayers as they were made in a Croud and therefore not possible to be taken exactly so it was thought fit rather to say nothing than give an untrue account thereof chusing rather to appear lame than to be supported with imperfect assistances ON Saturday the 13th of October 1660 betwixt nine and ten of the clock in the Morning Mr. Tho. Harrison or Major General Harrison according to this Sentence was upon a Hurdle drawn from Newgate to the place called Charing-Cross where within certain Rails lately there made a Gibbet was erected and he hanged with his face looking towards the Banqueting-house at Whitehall the place where our late Sovereign of eternal memory was sacrificed being half dead he was cut down by the common Executioner his Privy Members cut off before his Eyes his Bowels burned his Head severed from his Body and his Body divided into Quarters which were returned back to Newgate upon the same Hurdle that carried it His Head is since set on a Pole on the top of the South-East end of Westminster-Hall looking towards London The Quarters of his Body are in like manner exposed upon some of the City Gates Monday following being the sixteenth of October abouâ— the same hour Mr. John Carew was carried in like manner to the same place of Execution where having suffered like pains his Quarters were also returned to Newgate on the same Hurdle which carried him His Majesty was pleased to give upon intercession made by his Friends his Body to be buried Tuesday following being the sixteenth of October Master John Cook and Mr. Hugh Peters were about the same hour 〈◊〉 on two Hurdles to the same place and executed in the same manner and their Quarters returned in like manner to the place whence they came The Head of John Cook is since set on a Pole on the North-East end of Westminster-Hall on the left of Mr. Harrison's looking towards London and the Head of Mr. Peters on London-Bridg Their Quarters are exposed in like manner upon the tops of some of the City Gates Wednesday October 17 about the hour of nine in the 〈◊〉 Mr. Thomas Scot and Mr. Gregory Clemenâ— were â—ought â—n several Hurdles and about one hour after Master Adriâ—n Scroop and Mr. John Jones together in one Hurdle were carried to the same place and suffered the same death and were returned and disposed of in like manner Mr. Francis Hacker and Mr. Daniel Axtel were on Friday the 19th of October about the same time of the morning drawn on one Hurdle from Newgate to Tiburn and there both Hanged Mr. Axtel was Quartered and returned back and disposed as the former but the Body of Mr. Hacker was by his Majesties great favour given entire to his Friends and buried FINIS 3. Jan. 1647.