that the Children of Israel came up out the Land of Aegypt unto this day consider of it take advise and speake that same may be said of this Oath There was never such a deed done or seen since we came out of spirituall Aegypt Consider of it take advise and speake what shall be done to these Innovators It 's against the King and his Prerogative Royall who by the Statutes and Customes of this Kingdome hath power to appoint any of his naturall Subjects to exercise all manner of Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction under him as appeareth by Stat. 1. Elizab. cap 1. and Stat. 25. Hen. 8 cap. 19. and 37. Hen. 8. cap. 17. but this Oath spoyles his Majesty of all such power investing onely Arch-bishops Bishops Deanes c. with Ecclesiasticall power and so takes from his Majesty what his Predecessor Henry the had who gave a Commission to Lord Croâ—â—â—d to 〈◊〉 cise under him all Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall as you may 〈◊〉 in Mr. Fox his Martyrologie Volume 2. pa. 1000. Printed An. 1597. It 's against the Oath of Supremacy in taking of which we acknowledge the Kings Majesty to be Supreme Governour of the Church in all Causes and over all persons Ecclesiasticall as well as Civil and the King by Law having power to alter Church Government and to delegate whom he pleaseth of his Subjects to exercise Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction as appeares by what is foresaid and still is in practise in the High Comission in which are alwayes the Lords of his Majesties Privy 〈…〉 If the Oath be once lawfully taken what new power can discharge it in such a case they may aswell Unchristian me as unsweare me How can any honest sworne Subject take this New Oath without manifest danger and great suspition of perâ—ary for having sworne before for the King in case he alter the Government by vertue of this Oath I have sworne against the King set up Oath against Oath myselfe against my Soveraigne and that which is yet worse must not repent of it For I am sworne from ever consenting to what his Majesty hath done And is that all No I must dissent and become a Schismatick and Seperatist for ever Neither is that all but I must take up Armes twice a year at least and Preach for the Hierarchie and their present Government against my Soveraigne and that he hath charged This I am bound to by vertue of the 〈◊〉 Canon and if not by the Oath of Canonicall obedience And in case a Minister refuse or neglect this it's Suspension by his 〈◊〉 and if it be done who knows but it may câ—st Hangâ—â— tuum for resisting Supreme Authority Againe this Oath is a plot to sweare in the conceit of Episâ—â—pacie to be jure divino of late they have step'd off from their ancient foundation thinking to weaknesse either to depend vpon humane Laws or Princes favours and have published to the whole world that their standing is by divine right and therfore 〈…〉 Now this Oath will hinder the alteration of the Church Government to a better For being once sworn to Melius non mutabis pejus Christs Kingdome must be kept out Antichristian Offices government rules and wayes of proceeding be established in the Church and that by an Oath If the Book of Common Prayer would better the Discipline and doe much wish therefore to have publique Penance restored this Oath contradicts it and tells us that we have all the Discipline is needfull to Salvation and that the Government by right ought to stand aâ— now it stands But there are great grievances dreadfull disorders and horrible corruptions in the Discipline and Government of the Church as now it stands and men should rather sweare to indeavour their utmost to get them removed in this approaching Parliament then give consent to have them unalterd one day longer as Iesu-worship Altar-worship kneeling at Sacrament promiscuous receivers subscription Oaths ex Officio Canonicall obedience reading of Apocrypha Books abuse of Excommunication the exorbitant power of Bishop interdicting whole Churches perverting equity in all their Courts changing times and seasons for Marriage at their pleasure hindring Preaching and praying where they list imposing new and unlawfull things upon the Ministry illegally outing them from their livings c. The proceeding yet in many things by the Popes Canon Law the taking away the power of the keyes from the Pastors of particular Congregations and setting up Chancellors over them and their flocks putting into Laymens hands for a Chancellor is no other the power of Excommunication Lay-Elders are much cryed out of and condemn'd by us in the Scottish and Forraigne Churches and yet we set and hold them up at home with both hands The Bishop delegates his power to the Chancellour and so the sentence of Excommunication is devolv'd upon a meere Lay-man which dealing with Presbyterians we say is incompatible to a Lay-man and what is this but to destroy with the hand what we bind with the tongue Neither is that shift avayleable to say it 's some grave Minister that must pronounce the sentence because he is but os Canceliarij the mouth of the Chancellour to pronounce what he decrees who can stoppe it if not pronounc'd call it out of the Ministers hand and must give the Aâ—solution if pronounced and so the whole power lyes still in the Chancellors hand If these things therefore and diverse other were altered we should not abjure them but thinke our selves bound by right and Conscience to intertaine them Againe this Oath appeares further to be unlawfull First because it doth insuare our Consciences and takes away the liberty of them binding us not so much as to consent unto any alteration although it should be in the judgement of all farre better then what we have Secondly it doth make us vassals and bondslaves to the Prelary we must be their sworn Subjects and tye our selvs by Oath to uphold their tottering Kingdome And if the Prelacie have its pedegree from Rome as some of themselves 〈◊〉 me what is this Oath but a policie to setch in our shoulders so support Antichrist and his Government what is it but the plain marke of the Beast which some make to be an Oath and others a submitting to his power and acknowledging of him to be Lord Meâ—d in Comment. 〈◊〉 Here is both an Oath and an absolute 〈◊〉 unto the 〈◊〉 and acknowledging of them to be 〈◊〉 By this Oath free 〈◊〉 become 〈◊〉 which 〈◊〉 contrary to the Petitâ—on of Right 30. 〈◊〉 3. It is an 〈◊〉 and perpetuating of humane and 〈…〉 for the whole Hierarchie mention'd in the Oath from Arch-bishops to the end of the c. are sufficiently known to be moore Ecclesiasticall Constitutions and subject to such coruptions from time to time as may necessitate an altertâ—ion Are there not such â—oule corruptions now amongst them as erâ— mightily to the Parliament for alteration and without redresse will sinke the whole Kingdome What safety or 〈◊〉 then
the Doctrines of thy Grace and Gospel with the preaching thereof all preaching on thy Dayes in the afternoons and all true Catechising mainly cryed down and that all thy painfull and godly Ministers are persecuted suspended deprived cast out of all and can have no remedy either by course of Law which is stopped or by the King himselfe to wâ—om they complaine and that the Prelates of late more especially usurped a false Title to their false Government Ecclesiasticall by claiming their Prelaticall Jurisdiction from thine own divine Authority So as we cannot be any longer ignoranâ— except we will be wilfully blind that the Doctrine of the Church of England established in Queene Elizabeths dayes hath now suffered not onely an Innovation but an utter eversion and extirpation of the very foundations thereof And this Innovation this eversion being now finally concluded on in a Synod confirmed by the King and injoyned to be Sworne unto by all those aforesaid and besides all this the King himselfe professing that he hath diligently with great contentment and comfort read and considered of all the said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions of the late Synod aforesaid and that he finds the same such as he is perswaded wil be very profitable to the whole Church and Kingdome And thereupon doth propound publish and straightly injoyne by his Authority and Letters Patents the same to be diligently observed executed and equally kept of all his Subjects within this Realme Now ô Lord all these things weighed and layd together Solemne and Sacred Protestations against Innovations on the one side and a mighty flood of Innovations on the other side which by Royall Authority have made a terrible universall invasion and irruption both into thy Spirituall Kingdome and this Temporal threatning speedily to sweep all away at once what shall we thinke Or what shall we say Wouldst thou have us still to dreame or imagine that here are no Innovations at all brought in either of Doctrine or Ecclesiasticall Government and all because the King hath so frequently so solemnly before Gâ—d and Angels and Men protested to the contrary Or that the Innovations concluded in this Synod are therfore no Innovations because ratified and confirmed by the Kings Letters Patents and by all the strength of Royall Authority and because commended by the King to be such as he is perswaded wil be very profitable to the whole Church and Kingdome Or may we not rather thinke or rather most certainly beleeve that for the iniquities of the Land oppression in the State persecutions of thy Ministers effusion of innocent blood of thy Servants open Profanation of thy Sabbaths and that by publicke dispensation yea in a word a contemptuous trampling of all Laws divine and humane underfeet nay yet moreâ— more especially as the orginall source and cause of all the rest a damnable Apostacie from the Gospel joyned with a desperate League with Rome too palpable to be seen so as Antichrists Religion is imbraced instead of thy True word and Gospell for this for these crying sins is it not lawfull for us to thinke at least yea to beleeve that thou in thy just judgement restrained and withheld from us the benigne influence of the Kings heart and hast so farre for a time at least for our humiliation given him up to be Seduced by the Prelates and their Romish faction and to be guided and led by their Councels as refusing to hearken to any true Information of his most loving and loyall Subjects whereof we have had of late lamentable experience he will rather hazard all his Kingdomes then either displease them or disobey their Councels But yet ô Lord seeing thy judgements are unsearchable and thy wayes past finding out we will not take upon us to judge in so deep a matter onely thou hast sayd you shall know them by their fruits But Lord the King saith He doth these things by his Prerogative Royall and Supreme Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall Holy and Righteous Lord hast thou given to any mortall Creature to any Kings on Earth any such Prerogative Royall any such Supreme Authority over thy Church as to alter Religion at his pleasure or to confirme the alteration of the true Religion for others pleasure to make voyd by Edicts or Declarations the Saving Doctrines of thy word thy holy Commandements thine eternall Law or to sit in thy Throne over the Soules and Consciences of thy People captivating and oppressing them under the burthens of humane inventions and Superstitious Ceremonies Nay hast thou not expresly * forbidden thy People to subject their necks under any such yoake as being a denyall of thee our King and of our Redemption by thy precious blood Such usurpations therfore of man we doe ô onely Soveraigne of our soules even before Angels and men utterly renounce ‡ O Lord our God other Lords besides thee have had dominion over us but by thee onely will we make mention of thy Name And Lord be thou our Judge between us and our oppressors in this thing and give thy People holy courage and zeale to use all lawfull meanes for the upholding of this thy Sole Royall Soveraignty over our poor Soules and Consciences against all Antichristian usurpations to the contrary And last of all whereas our King saith that he hath called and given free leave to this Synod to treat and agree upon certaine other Canons necessary for the advancement of Gods Glory the edifying of his holy Church and the due reverence of his blessed Mysteries and Sacraments which words are taken out of the Act for Conformity in Queen Elizabeths Raigne If it shall clearly appeare by this our Complaint following that the things concluded in the said Synod be neither for the advancement of Gods glory nor the edifying of his Church nor the due reverence of Christs holy Mysteries and Sâ—â—raments but quite contrary then how the Kings Authority extends to the confirmation of those things therein so concluded do thou ô Lord Judge In the next place we present our Complaint before thee ô Lord touching the most materiall Canons concluded by the â—â—id Synod and confirmed by the King The first is Concerning the Regall power 〈…〉 〈…〉 or absolute as all Tyrannicall States as that of the Turke seeing the Kingdome of England is â—empered seasoned and conditioned with good Laws which are the ordinary rules of good and just Government of the Subject the due execution whereof in the administration of the Kingdome is an essentiall part of the Kingly â—ffice which cannot be seperated one from the other To this purpose King Iames in 〈…〉 * Speecâ—es in Parliament expresly distinguisheth between an absolute Monarchie not bounded with Laws but depending onely on the will of the Prince and the King of England who saith he doth by 〈…〉 that by Oath â—nter upon the Kingdome to of their Estates let him but call a Parliament and yeeld to the redressing of their heavy grievances and he shall find us
his People most ready to yeeld him all manner of necessary due Support yea abundant more then necessary Yet Neverthelesse Subjects have not onely possession of c. Againe what assurance of true and just right title and property to and in all their goods and estates can this their Canon as it were by Canon-Law make unto the Subjects of England when all then practises both in the Ecclesiasticall and Civill Government are such such the courses of their Courts whether Ecclesiasticall or mixt as consisting of Ecclesiasticall and Civil Judges together but still where the Ecclesiasticall beare the maine Sway even there where they be fewest in number such their usurped illegall extravagant power such terrible Precedents filed up in their Courts which stand for Laws and ruled Cases for all that come after and the like as no Subject in the Kingdome can secure himselfe that any one thing or all that he possesseth are his owne For the best and surest Tenure by which every free-borne Subject holds the right and propriety of his goods is the Law of the Land But let the Subject be brought into one of their Ecclâ—siasticall Courts as aforesaid whether into their High-Commission or other Courts where the Arch-prelates sit party Iudges and be his cause never so just never so innocent never so cleare as against which no Law of the Land doth lye yet first of all in those Courts he cannot have any benefit of the Law at all and consequently where those Ecclesiasticall Judges set their Fangs they will teare a man out of all his estâ—â—e yea out of his Skin and pull his flesh from his back and breake him and his all in pieces So as at those Boards where these harpies sit against whomsoever complaints are served in being such especially as wheâ— the Ecclâ—siasticall teeth against them how quickly shall they and their whole estates be swallowed up as it were at one morsell And to the end that the Civil State may be subservient to the Ecclesiasticke these Ecclesiasticks have their care in every bâ—â—te and their finger in every pye where any thing may be pluckt from the Subject by hocke or by crooke that so as their Ecclesiastick Government is Tyrannicall so they may advance the Civil to hold correspondence with it So as now the whole Government taken together is reduced to certaine Tallâ—s even as all Religion is served up upon a Court-Cuâ—bord at the end of the Chanâ—cel wherof anone And as is noted before which least it be forgotten we mention againe whatever Conclusions or Orders are made at those Tables or Boards â—e they never so foule and shamefull they are fixed and filed up for perpetuall Laws in all such cases for time to come yea and when they please where they want a Precedent for some extraordinary feat to be done they can with a wet finger make a new Law for it Hereof if we take but a few instances it will easily appeare what truth there is in the words of this Canon which seem to give to the Subject what ever right and title and true property of estate doth or can belong unto them For first we have late Precedents to shew that no Freeman of London after he hath served his yeares and set up his Trade can be sure long to injoy the Liberty of his Trade but either he is forbidden longer to use it or is forced at length with the rest of his trade to purchase it as a Monopolie at a deare rate which they and all the Kingdome pay for Witnesse the Sope-businesse Againe no Doctor and practitioner in Physicke is sure to hold his Profession whereby he and his should live when once he comes into the High Commission Witnesse Dr. Bastwicks case Item no Minister is sure to hold his free-hold his Benefice which is by Law his freehold if once he be quarrelled in the High Commission yea or in other inferiour Ecclesiasticall Courts Witnesse manifold Precedents in the Land Item none can be sure that his goods are his owne when all and more then all are taken from 〈…〉 Witnesse Mr Henry Buâ—ton one of the foresaid three Item none can be sure of his right and title propriety and interest which the Divine Law and Sacred Ordinance of God hath given a man in his own Wife but that one of these Boards shall 〈…〉 him as by vertue thereof being confined to perpetuall 〈◊〉 prison his Wife shal be perpetually seperated from him so as if she shall dare to hazzard her life in a farâ—e â—ourney by Sea which She would doe to have but a sight oâ— her Husbands face she must be sent Prisoner backe againe Witnesse the case both of Dr Bastwâ—cke and Mr Burton aforesaid Many more instances might be brought But these Summed up together let any English Subject now resolve what assurance oâ—true and just â—ight title and property to and in all their goods and estates or in any of the particular instances forespecified this false and wicked Canon can give him Let him be but brought before one of these Boards and he shal be stript of all They will pretend this and that I wot not what heâ—nous crime 〈…〉 as they did against those three aforesaid when they could not prove any such thing And Mr Burtons Case in particular being a Minister was so cleare his defensive Answere being orderly admitted in Court and before the day of 〈◊〉 by the Courts order expanged by two of the Judges oâ— that Court as Impertinent and Scandalous as they could object nothing against him at the Censure but proceed against him Pro Confessâ— all his fault being his refusaâ—l to answere 〈◊〉 Interrogatories which if he had done he had betrayed his Cause and layd both it and himselfe open to the just lash of the Court by assenting to the condemnation of his innocent Cause before it was heard Which one Example well weighed what Cause so innocent so just can look to escape Scot free But thus we see ö Lord and thou better seest what truth these Canonists have in them whose words pretend all right to the Subject and whose deeds doe practise the bringing of all mens soules bodies and estates under the yoake of an universall Tyranny To proceed For the third the setting up of an independent coactive power Papall or popular which undermines they say the Royall Office and cunningly overthrows the sacred ordinance of Godthis being meant of the State of Religion if it be Papall it is altogether unlawfull as being Antichristian but being according to thy word every Christian State is bound to 〈◊〉 it up and maintaine it and no Christian King ought to hinder or oppose it But as for all Pre 〈…〉 it is meerly Papall and Antichristian though not in the first degree the Pope usurping an universall power over all the Churches in the world yet in a second Every Prelate in his Diocese exercising a Papall power and so doth cunningly undermine the Royall Office and overthrew Gods
Sacred Ordinance who hath given a power and charge to Kings to suppresse all such Ecclesiasticall Tyranny over the soules of his people And whereas they say the Royall Office is the Sacred Ordinance of God we all acknowledge it and that this Ordinance of God comprehends in it not onely the institution of the Superiority of Kings over their people but their Speciall office of Government as it is limited and establishâ—d upon those Laws and Covenants and Conditions agreed upon between the Prince and People These are a Speciall part of thy Divine Ordinance that Kings should governe by a Law as Deut 17. 18 19 20. Pro. 31. 5. and that they should inviolably keep those Oathes and Covenants that they have solemnly made with their people And therefore they which perswade Kings that they are no way bounâ— but have liberty to rule as they list by an independent Prerogative these are they that are traytors both to God and to the King and to the Realme and to the peace and prosperity thereof For the Fourth For Subjects not to beare Armes against their King offensive or defensive upon any pretence whatsoever as being a resiâ—â—ing of the Powers Ordained of God First we hold that no private person ought to take up armes against his Prince but Secondly if a King maintaine a Faction about him which goe about to oppresse â—s whole Kingdome and People in their Lawâ— and Libertiâ—s and most of all in the true Religion so as he will not rule them by the good Laws of the Kindome but seeks to make all his Subjects Slavâ—s by bringing their soules Bodies estates 〈◊〉 a miserable bondage is it not now high time for the whole State either to labour to heale the breach or if necessity when there is no other remedy to stand up is one man to defend themselves and their Countrey untill the Faction shal be 〈◊〉 casheâ—ed and so the King reforme himselfe and renew 〈◊〉 Covenant and 〈◊〉 of the Kingdome to the good and just 〈◊〉 of the People And wheras â—i is point trencheth upon the Scots at this time what doe they stand upon but in the first place to free their Religion from Antichristan usurpaâ—on 〈…〉 * 〈…〉 which otherwise by 〈◊〉 and Tyranny would be brought to 〈◊〉 And for the Fâ—st and last that all Ministers doe declare this Consatution of the power of Kings to the people yearely Ought not Ministers to consider that they are also members of the Common-wealth and live under the Law thereof And being Subjects ought they not to teach the people that they love and hâ—nour the King and chearefully pay all such taxes as by Law are due unto him forasmuch as we all live under a Law And 〈◊〉 the other side ought not all Court-preachers to tell the 〈…〉 christian and Lawlesse Government And this ô Lord we conceive of this first Constitution so farre as we are able to apprehend committing the whole judgement thereof to thy unerâ—ing wisdome The Second is For the better keeping holy the day of his Majesties most happy Inauguration Ah Lord can this be to the honour of our King when the annuall memory of his Inauguration is saine to be forced What Canon or Constitution is for the continuation of the joyfull memory of Queen Elizabeth of ever blessed memory which yet to this day ceaseth not But o that our King would consider that word of thine * Those that honour me I will honour and they 〈…〉 and then they might have spared this Canon for the Kingâ—s day No no if these things be not reformed a ‡ blacke day is hastening on a pace as thou ô Lord hast threatned in thy word for such Sinnes And with thee there is no respect of persons ‡ King Iehâ—jachim lived without being desired and had the 〈◊〉 of an Asse and it was written upon him write this man childlesse A man that â—hâ—ll not presper in the Earth nor should be lamented being dead nor should any of iâ— Seed prosper after him O how terrible art thou ô Lord to proud and obstinate Sinners when not Kings Crowns and Scepters can secure of defend them from thy just hand And how fearefull a judgement is that when thou § powrest contempt upon Princes and weakenesâ— the power of the mighty The Third Canon is For suppressing of the growth of Popery O Lord dost thou not see in this whole long Canon the naked hypocrisie of this Synod clothing it selfe with many same figleaves of pious pretences forsooth for the suppressing of Popery Yea Lord their â—ypocrisie is so palpâ—ble herein that all the world sees that this Constitution was purposely made to blind the eyes of the simple in these stirring times wherin they see their Popish practises to grow into such hatred and detestation with all the Kings good Subjects What other but these practises have been the coâ—les that have kindled the fire in our neighbour to make the greater report but without shot in so hotly assaulting the Tower of Babel because in so doing it may make the world beleeve that contrary to the Doctrine of Canterbury there is no Salvâ—tion for Papists out of the Church of England and then let all Court Papists looke to it and withall the President must 〈◊〉 a great part of his Relation which he hath written in favour of Papists especially 〈◊〉 silly and ignorant to whom he grants Salvation in their Râ—â—igion he must also retract his Saying that the Church of England and of Rome are one and the same Church and hold one Faith and Religion undifferent he must also 〈◊〉 that wherein he assemeth with his Iesuite * that none â—â—ght to come to the English Church then and there in that manner to worship God that is resolved of the truth of the Roman Church or to the like effect and the Relator himself holds the truth of the Roman Church for he affirmeth it to be a true Church With many other new leaves which he must turne over upon this suddaine motion of suppressing the growth of Popery which if cordiall they should first have rid all Churches from Images Crucifixes 〈◊〉 Altars and the like least in bringing Papists to Church they should but change their Latine Popery into English Popery And now ô Lord we beseech thee to judge of the hypocrisie of this selfe-styled Sacred Synod which under a pretence of suppressing the growth of Popery doe indeed supplant the true Faith and Religion amongst us that so instead thereof they may at length as fast as they can set Idolatry up in her throne and full 〈◊〉 For besides all this that is said have they not set out many notorious Popish Books as that called the Femall Glory which makes the blessed Virgin to be a Goddesse to be adored and called upon or prayed unto the whole Booke being a very packe of Idolatry throughout and set out in English and allowed by one of the Prime Prelates Chapleins So
hath any man to sweare these Constitutions into an inâ—â—â—rable condition 4. It 's a condemâ—â—â—g of all other Reformed Churches They have not our Discipline and yet we have given them the right hand of fellowship that they want nothing necessary to Salvation And if we sweare this Discipline to be necessary to Salvatâ—â— we must condemne them as wanting somthing necessary thereunte It 's little lesse then to unchurch and to pronounce them to be without that Discipline which is Essentiall to the beeing of a true Church and they may charge us with falsifying the 20th and 〈◊〉 Aâ—â—â—ch which teach that things belonging to Government and Disâ—ipline are alterable and so much is expressed in the Title of Ceremonies before the Book of Common Prayer 5. Because by this Oath the Prelates are invested with a 〈◊〉 which neither God nor the Laws of the Kingdome ever gave them as namely upon refusall of this wretched Oath they will deprive any painfull conscientious and faithfull Minister of all his Ecclesiasâ—â—call promotions whatsoever and of the execution of his Function which is directly against Law for if Pastors be Legally possess'd of their hvings what injustice is it to make after-Canons and Oaths to question and throw them out of their right 6. This Synod had not our consents and suffrages for the Clerks of it Those were legally chosen had voyce no longer in the Convocation house then the Parliament indured There being therfore no new elâ—ction of Clerks nor any new Writ to legitimate those but onely a new Commission to goe on with what was begun in Parliament but nulâ—â—â—â— by breach thereof 〈◊〉 being â—â—â—out that Commission the space of a whole weeke as 〈◊〉 by the date thereof May 12. â— we cannot but jâ—dge both Oath and Canons to be illegall 7. The Oath implyes a plain contradiction and that which is 〈◊〉 It requires me to Sweare sincerely without any secret reservation and 〈◊〉 an c. in it which imports more then is expreâ—â— and necessiâ—â—aces a mentall conception and 〈…〉 8. We are bound to take it heartily and willingly which no man that hath any consideration or conscience can doe For it 's against truth and obligeth to sweare a falsehood viz. that the Government of this Church as now it stands ought by right so to stand which is not true of Chancellours Commissaries Offâ—â—â—alls c. nor of Bishops proceeding in their Courts in their own names and under their own Seales It s against judgement including a contradiction as appeares in the 7th particular It 's against righteousnes because both the Parliament the Prince and Pastors themselves are perjured by it as hath formerly bin shewn and it 's a swearing up a corrupt if not an Antichristian Government over the People Besides this Oath is backed with severe punishment Refusall of it brings Deprivation ab Officio Beneficio Hence many that are poore and weake it 's to be feared will take the Oath reluctante conscientia and to save their Livings forsweare themselves 9. This Oath is full of ambiguities The Doctrine of the Church is not clearely known the Homilies have been disclaim'd The Articles are challenged by the Armiâ—â—ans and others to be for them It 's doubtfull to us whether a great part of Scripture be not excluded as unnecessary because much of the Scripture is neither verbaily expressed nor vertually included in the publique Declaration of the Doctrine and Discipline of the Church of England and that they are said to containe all things necessary to salvation we are doubtfull of the Discipline because much depends upon the interpretation of the Ordinary which is unknown and yearely differing Articles are composed for Visitations And although a generall standing Book of Articles be promised for the whole Kingdome yet three yeares liberty is reserved for alteration and who can say he knoweth what the Discipline is We doubt whether the Oath doth not suppose some Popish Doctrine established We know not in what sense those words by right it ought to stand are to be taken This word jus or right is a word equivocall There is jus Divinum and if we sweare in this sense then we sweare Deanes Archdeacâ—â—s and the c. to stand jure divino There is jus Ecclesiasticum and if we sweare in that sense then the Prelates will not be our Friends because we sweare divine right from them There is jus positum and if we sweare in this sense then the Hierarchie must loose both divine and Ecclesiasticall right It being thus who can sweare without equivocation Lastly no man taking this Oath can well acquit himselfe of perjury for if he take it in the plain common sense and understanding of the words yet there must be some mentall reservation in the words c. and equivocation in the minds of Hyerarchicall men touching those words by right for though they should venture to sweare Prelates into a jus divinum yet they dare not sweare Deanes and Archdeacons into it and so must sweare in a double sense and perjure themselves But all this may be helped by our own interpretations and protestations Ans. We may not take it in our own senses Those authorized to administer the Oath by the Kings Commission are tyed to keep the very words of it if they should leave out the c they have no power to administer it at all And the Oath it selfe binds us to take it in the common sense of the words If we then take the Oath and protest against such and such senses and make a sense of our own this is direct and wilfull perjury said Civilians And the protestation being made before a publique notary this shal be sufficient evidence in any Couâ—t of the Kingdome to convict us of the perjury If then any of the Prelater have taken this Oath in its proper sense or a sense of their own how have they perjur'd themselvs propham'd their hands and put in a barre against their future conferring of holy Orders Quiâ— Synodus nodâ—â—â— patrum Chorus integer aeger Câ—nvenâ—â—◠〈◊〉 Sessâ—â—â—â—ramen Amen FINIS * Ier. 14. 8 9. ‡ ver. 7. ‡ 2 Chron. 19. § Esa. 63. 15 16. †Esa. 26. 1â— * Psal. 66. 11 12. * Hos. 6. 1. ‡ Gen. 18. 25. ‡ Heb. 4. 15 16. * Col. 2. 8. to the end of the Chapter ‡ Esa. 26. 23. * Speach at 〈…〉 ☜ ☞ * Psal. 72. 4. * 1 Sam. 2. 30 ‡ Ieâ—â— 1. 15. 2. 2. ‡ Ier. 22. 18 19. 30. § Iob. 12. 21. * Relat. p. 375. * Râ—lation of a Contâ—â—â—â—nce by Will of Canterburie * Iudâ— 24. * Esa. 26. 3. ‡ Col. 2. 8 c ‡ Article of Consecration of Archbishops c. * 〈…〉 ‡ Ier. 20. 1◠‡ Col. 2. †〈…〉 †〈…〉 28. 3. * Eze. 11. 12 * Peâ—â—â—anagke Eâ—sâ—◠‡ Câ—â— 2. 2. 4. ‡ Pythagaâ—â—â— Eusâ—b Praepâ—â— Euang lib. 5. Cap 8. § 〈…〉 Cap. 〈◊〉 * Ezech. 20. 4. * â—lib 13. 10. * Math. 15. 9. ‡ Math. 15. 5. ‡ Nilutile quod non honestum est Cic. Offic. § 1 Cor. 8. 10. †Râ—â—â— 17 4. * Psal. 104. 22 * Psâ—l 74. 10. 〈◊〉 Lib. 3. disâ—inâ—t 39. Act Perjurisunt quiid quod falsum esse sciunt aut putant juramento confirment Est in sent â— 3. dist. 39