that can save and destroy Iam 4.12 Onely God that gave unto man his life hath power to take it away and therefore otherwise than God hath given direction either by particular precept or generall rule the life of man is not to bee taken away 3. And seeing Magistrates are but Gods Ministers Rom. 13.4 they must execute justice according to his will for it is required of a disposer that he bee found faithfull 1. Cor. 4.2 but Gods will otherwise appeareth not than in his word 4. And seeing whatsoever is not of faith that is firme perswasion is sinne Rom. 14.23 and faith must be grounded upon the word as being wrought by the word Rom 10.17 how can the Magistrate approve his acts of justice as in the sight of God unlesse hee can warrant the same by the word 2. Neither yet can I consent with those which thinke that the punishment inflicted by Moses for the breach of the morall law together with the morall law is imposed upon Christian Magistrates as it is not lawfull to punish adulterie otherwise than by death nor simple theft by death but by restitution Piscator praefation in Exod. for if this were so then the Gospell should overthrow the policie and institution of divers Common-wealths which of a long time have continued but God is the author of peace not of confusion 1. Cor. 14.33 2. Mardoche and Daniel having place of government under the Persian Kings did no doubt minister justice according to the lawes of that countrey 3. Our Saviour Christ commanding to give tribute to Caesar and injoyning obedience to the higher powers which did beare the sword and that for conscience sake Rom. 13. seeme to give approbation to the lawes of nations maintaining right and tending to equity 4. Our Saviour himselfe observed not the judicials belonging to the morall law for whereas he that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath was stoned to death by Moses yet out Saviour excuseth and defendeth his Apostles who did as much as the other in rubbing the eares of corne for their necessity Matth. 12. yea hee giveth a rule that for fornication onely and adulterie it was lawfull for a man to put away his wife Matth. 19. which exception needed not if either in fact then or in right afterward adulterers and adulteresses were to bee punished by death If it be answered that Christ tooke not upon him the office of the Civill Magistrate to impose corporall punishment yet would not our Saviour have defended his Apostles nor yet by silence have left them unreproved for neglect of the law 3. Wherefore the best resolution is that the morall judicials of Moses do partly bind and partly are left free they do not hold affirmatively that we are tied to the same severity of punishment now which was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates ruling now under Christ the Prince of peace Isai. 9. that is of clemencie mercie may abate of the severitie of Moses law mitigate the punishment of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie to shew more rigour than Moses becommeth not the Gospell to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of these two assertions my reasons are as followeth 1. That which Ambrose urgeth out of the mouth of Luke how our Saviour reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire come downe upon the Samaritanes upon the which example hee thus inferreth Ostenditur nobis non semper in eos qui peecaverunt vindicandum quia nonnunquam amplius prodest clementia tibi ad patientiam lapso ad correctionem It is shewed us that alwayes vengeance is not to bee taken of those that offend because oftentimes clemencie is more profitable for patience in thee and amendement in the offender And this collection is ratified by the answer of our Saviour in that place The Sonne of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to sâ—ve them Luk. 9.55 2. Augustine urgeth the example of Christ who suffered the woman taken in adâ—â—tery to escape without punishment of death Ioh. 8. Whereupon hee inferreth that the adulter◠〈◊〉 not now to bee put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her husband or to come 〈…〉 the usuall answer is that our Saviour doth not here abrogate the Law against adultery 〈◊〉 only to meddle with the Magistrates office Piscator Ans. Neither doe wee say that Christ abrogateth that law but leaveth it free and taketh away the necessitie of it And though Christ exercised not the Magistrates office in his owne person yet in this case it had not beene impertinent to have given direction to have her before the Magistrate as in another case he sendeth the leper to the Priest Matth. 8.4 if it had pleased him to impose still the severitie of the law yea our Saviour sheweth by his answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Ioh. 8.7 that hee would not have them such strait executors of the rigour of Moses law upon others but rather to bee severe judges of themselves and with charitable affection to support the frailty of others to the which themselves were subject 3. Further the difference betweene the times of the Law and of the Gospell must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8.15 then they which came neere the mount where the morall Law was given were stone or stricken thorow with darts whether man or beast Heb. 12.20 but it is not so now then the bloud of Abel cryed for vengeance but the bloud of Christ now calleth for mercie and so speaketh better things than that of Abel Heb. 12.24 Therefore to mitigate the severitie of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sinne unpunished nor by connivence cherishing the same it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospell of peace and mercie Wherefore I here say with Chrysostome Vbi paterfamilias largus est dispensator non debet esse tenax Where the master of the house is bountifull the steward must not be sparing Melius est propter misericordiam rationem reddere quà m propter crudelitatem It is better to be called to account for too much pitie than for cruelty 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much that the rigour of Moses judicials is mitigated S. Paul willeth the incestuous man only to be excommunicate 1. Cor. 5. it seemeth then there was no law in force to put such to death nor in Cyprians time who thus writeth Quidam episcopi in nostro provincia c. Some Bishops in our province have altogether shut up penance against adulterie Nor after that in the time of the Eliberin Councell which was held under the reigne of Constantine where it was decreed can 9. Moechatus
which is actâ—â— imperatus the act commanded therefore the externall worke being by this coherence and connexion an act of the internall powers hath some good or evill in it though not so properly as the internall Sic fere Tostat. quast 29. QUEST VI. The law of Moses did not onely restraine the hand but the minde BEside this opinion of the Hebrewes some other doe hold that the law of Moses did onely restraine the hand and not the minde and to this purpose they urge that place Matth. 5.27 where our Saviour saith It was said unto you of old Thou shalt not commit adulterie c. But I say c. So that of old it seemeth the law onely restrained the outward act but Christ doth forbid more even the inward desire c. Contra. 1. Our blessed Saviour secundùm corum opinionem loquebatur speaketh according to their opinion because they thought they were onely obliged and tied to the outward act and therefore he doth deliver the law from their corrupt interpretations he giveth not a new exposition and this appeareth vers 43. Yee have heard that it hath beene said Thou shalt love thy neighbour and hate thine enemie but in all the old Testament there is no such precept given by God or libertie for any to hate their enemie our Saviour then meaneth not such sayings as were found in the law but such expositions as they made among themselves Now that even the law of Moses did binde not onely the hand and externall act but the inward will and desire it thus is proved 1. None are said to repent but of that which is evill but they under the law were to repent and to shew themselves contrite even for the internall acts of their minde as Psal. 4.4 Tremble and sinne not examine your heart upon your bed c. Ergo c. 2. It is directly forbidden Levit. 19.17 Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart which was an internall act and many other such like sinnes of the heart are reproved by the Prophets 3. The law doth not justifie that which is naturally unjust but forbiddeth it now to covet another mans wife is naturally unjust Ergo. For the proposition or first part of the argument if the theft of the Israelites the killing of Isaack intended by Abraham the fornication of Ose chap. 1. be objected these were singulares casus which the the lawgiver commanding thereby declared quod non includerentur sub lege communi that they were not included under the generall law but if this whole law Thou shalt not covet had given a generall libertie for the Jewes to covet anothers wife Non jam declaretur lex sed destrucretur The law should not by this meanes be declared but destroyed For the assumption that it is against the law of nature to covet another mans wife it is evident 1. Because he faileth in the end coveting her onely of lust not for procreation 2. Matrimonie est de jure naturali is grounded even upon the law of nature if then to breake and violate matrimonie bee against the law of nature then to will and purpose so to doe is against nature also yea the will and purpose is rather sinne than the act it selfe for it may fall out that the externall act is sometime without sinne as when a man ignorantly lieth with another woman taking her to bee his wife as Iakob tooke Leah for Rachel but the will and desire is never without sinne Tostat. Burgens addit 7. in cap. 20. would thus excuse this assertion that Moses law prohibebat manum 〈◊〉 anâ—â—â—um did inhibit the hand not the minde not that their meaning is that in no part of Moses law there is any prohibition to be found of the minde for hatred is directly forbidden Levit. 19.17 but that when any externall act is forbidden Non intelligitur ex vi illius praecepti prohiberi actus interior The internall act is not understood to bee forbidden by vertue of that precept as in this precept Thou shalt not kill he is not judged to be guiltie which purposeth to kill and yet killeth not Contra. 1. But our Saviour saith that even this precept is transgressed by the anger and hatred of the heart Matth. 5.22 therefore the law intendeth even by the externall act to forbid the internall also QUEST VII Whether any morall and naturall duties were to be restrained by positive law BUt it will further be objected that the old law was not to give precepts of morall duties 1. The morall precepts are grounded upon the law of nature and such precepts are knowne unto all but the divine law prescribeth such things as otherwise are not neither can bee knowne 2. The keeping of the morall law giveth life Galath 3.12 but the old law was the ministration of death 2 Cor. 3.7 therefore the old law was not to containe morall precepts Contra. 1. The law of God was not onely to give rules of such things as men know by the law of nature but to keepe and preserve them also from errour in those things which they know And therefore because men doe erre and swarve in such things as they know their will and affection not giving way to reason it was fit that a law should be given as well to rectifie their affection as to direct their understanding 2. Beside although these morall duties are grounded upon the law of nature yet seeing the naturall instinct is obscured by mans corruption that dimme light of nature had need of a clearer light by the law to helpe it If man had continued in the perfection of his creation hee should not have needed any other law but seeing mans naturall knowledge is much decaied it was to be revived and renewed by the divine law 3. The rules of direction of mens actions are of foure sorts 1. Some are so well knowne by nature as none can doubt thereof as these that evill is to be shunned and good to be desired that no unjust thing is to bee done of such knowne principles it is not necessarie that any law should bee given 2. Some things may so be searched out by the law of nature as yet that many may erre therein such 〈◊〉 the particular precepts of not committing fornication not coveting anotherâ— wife therefore because many may erre in these duties it was requisite they should bee determined by the law of God 3. Some things are so derived from the law of nature as yet they are onely searched out by those which are wise such are the positive and judiciall lawes of men that wisely can applie the principles of the law of nature to particular circumstances of this kinde are Moses Judicials 4. Some things cannot at all be concluded by naturall reason but altogether depend upon the will of the institutor and law-maker of this kinde were Moses Ceremonials So then for a full answer to the first objection wee say that if morall duties were so generally and perfitly
even in that place in the wildernesse she had seene an Angell Mercer 7. But the right and proper meaning is that she seeth that is liveth after shee had seene God for they thought no man could see God and live and therefore Iacob also said I have seene God face to face and my life is preserved Gen. 32.30 QVEST. XI Who is understood by the living and seeing Vers. 14. THe well of him that loâ—eth and seeth 1. Some referre both unto God 2. some to the Angell who as Gods Minister though not as God liveth and seeth 3. Some living understand of Ismael that lived 4. But Hagar saying the well of the living and seeing by living understandeth her selfe that lived after this glorious sight by seeing God which seeth our afflictions QVEST. XII Of Cades and Sur. BEtweene Cadesh and Bered 1. These were two places in the wildernesse of Sur which extended to the red sea 2. Cadesh is that place where the water gushed out of the Rocke and the people murmured against God Numb 20. 3. It is called a well and before a fountaine because it was a deepe fountaine for as Augustine saith omnis putens fons non omnis fons puteus Every well may be called a fountaine not euery fountaine a well QVEST. XIII Why Abraham not Hagar gave the name to Ismael Vers. 15. ABraham called his name Ismael c. 1. Before it is said thou shalt call and here Abraham giveth the name as he had learned of Hagar and so in effect she gave it Perer. 2. For the Lord would not by his oracle diminish the right of the father to whom it belonged to give the name Muscul. as Eva is said to have given Seth his name Genes 4.25 yet Adam first called him so Gen. 5.3 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Evill must not be done that good may come thereof Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid it may be I shall be builded by her c. Sâ—ra though shee had a good intent that Gods promise concerning Abrahams seed might be accomplished yet shee doth not well to use unlawfull meanes that Abraham may have this seed by a concubine for according to Saint Pauls rule we must not doe evill that good may come thereof Rom. 3.8 And this device of Sara prospered not she being so farre from being builded and increased hereby that the posterity of the seed of Ismael the Ismaelites and Hagarenes became enemies afterward to her owne seed Musculus 2. Doct. They that punish justly are not persecutors Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly with her Augustine from this example collecteth that they alwayes which inflict punishment are not persecutors and that discipline may be administred justly against the obstinate as Sarai dealt with Hagar Hagar passa est persecutionem à Sara hac tamen sancta erat qua faciebat illa iniqua quae patiebatur Hagar suffered persecution of Sara and yet she was holy that did it the other evill that suffered it Epist. 50. 3. Doct. Religion no enemie to politicke order Vers. 9. HVmble thy selfe under her hands Hagar was a bond-servant whose condition then was very hard yet the Lord commandeth her to returne to her mistresse we see then that religion dissolveth not politicke order neither is the doctrine of faith a doctrine of licentious liberty Hagar though now come to herselfe and called of God yet is not to renounce her condition and state of life according to Saint Pauls rule Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he is called c. 1 Cor. 7.10 Luther 4. Doct. The office of Angels THe Angell of the Lord said to her c. This is the first place that maketh mention of the apparition of Angels This Angel is sent to call home againe Hagâ—r to her station and calling so the Angels chiefe office is to protect the servants of God and to bring home againe those that erre so as the Apostle saith They are all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Polygamie of the fathers never lawfull or dispensed with Vers. 3. THen Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Agar 1. Some thinke that Abrahams marriage or copulation rather with Hagar was lawfull and that Sarai was moved of God to perswade this marriage to Abraham Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit But this no where appeareth for though God approved Sarai her advice for the casting out of the bond-woman with her sonne Gen. 21.8 yet it followeth not that God liked of her counsell in Abrahams taking her to be his wife 2. Some thinke that adultery was not yet forbidden by any law Ambrose because Abraham was both before the Law and the Gospell he thinketh him to have beene blamelesse Durandus also and Tostatus are of opinion that polygamie was lawfull before it was forbidden by the positive law of the Gospell But the saying of our Saviour a principio non fuit sic from the beginning it was not so sufficiently confuteth these assertions seeing God in Paradise made unto Adam but one Eva one wife for one husband 3. Some simply allowed not the polygamie of the fathers but hold that it was permitted by some speciall dispensation for those times and so though they will not simply justifie it yet they qualifie and excuse it by these reasons 1. Theodoret saith neque natura neque lex ulla tunc scripta c. Neither nature nor any written law did forbid then the having of many wives Cont. Though no law were yet written that made any such prohibition yet they had the law of the creation they two shall be one flesh Matth. 19.5 which was continued by faithfull tradition and the lively examples of the Patriarks 2. This marriage proceeded not of any intemperate lust but was done studio quarendae posteritatis of a desire to increase posterity Ambr. Cont. The Apostle for this hath given us a rule not to doe evill that good may come thereon Rom. 3.8 Abrahams good intention doth not excuse an unlawfull action 3. Abraham did it not of himselfe Augustine saith Voluntatem illius non voluptatem suam implevisse accepisse non petisse that he fulfilled not his owne lust but his wives desire he asked her not but received her And he to this purpose urgeth the Apostle words that the man hath not power over his owne body but the woman 1 Cor. 7. Contra. If this were a good defence then Adams excuse also might have served because the woman gave him thâ— apple and he did eat The Apostle giveth the woman power over her husbands body and the man likewise over the womans to performe mutually the matrimoniall duties but the woman can no more give liberty to the husband to joyne unto strange flesh than the husband can unto the woman As the Apostle in the same place restraineth that liberty Let every man have his wife let every woman have her husband 1.
sympathies and Antypathies their qualities and operations he can apply and temper the causes together and so is able to worke wonders though not true miracles which are beside the order and course of nature which Satan cannot invert As to put this for an example the small fish which is called Echinus or Remora is able by applying himselfe to the ship to stay it though it bee under saile and have both the sea and winde with it which Plinie sheweth to have beene found by experience how that Antonius his ship at one time and Caius at another were stayed by this fish Now if a Magitian should secretly apply this fish to a ship hee might bee thought to worke a great wonder and yet it should bee naturall The other reason is that beside the knowledge of nature Satan is skilfull of all humane arts and sciences by the benefit whereof even men doe worke wonders as Archimedes was able to stirre a ship with his hand by certaine engines which he had prepared which a great number of men by strength could not doe He also devised such kinde of instruments when Marcellus the Romane Captaine besieged Syracusa whereby they so annoyed their enimies and made such havock and slaughter of the Romanes that Marcellus himselfe said they fought not against men but against the Gods Architas the Pythagorean by Mechanick art made a dove of wood to flie Severinus Boetius made serpentes of brasse to hisse and birdâ— of brasse to sing If men can make such admirable things by art it need not seeme strange if by the power of Satan wonderfull matters are sometime compassed Ex Perer. QUEST XII What things are permitted unto Satan to doe THe next point to be shewed here is what things which seeme to us to be miraculous the Devill may doe by himselfe or his ministers the Magitians First in generall wee are here to consider a twofold action of spirits the one is immediate as they can themselves passe speedily from place to place as Iob. 1. Satan came from compassing the whole earth for if the Sunne being of a bodily substance can compasse the heavens of such a huge circuit many hundred thousand miles about in the space of 24. houres the spirits can doe it with greater agility they have also power to transport bodies from place to place aâ— our Saviour yeelded his body to be transported of Satan to the tempters further confusion The other action is mediate as Satan can transport and bring together the causes of things which being tempered and qualified may bring forth divers naturall effects which are wrought immediatly by those naturall causeâ— yet mediately by Satan which bringeth them together Secondly in particular these things are permitted to Satans power he can transport bodies and carry them from place to place as thâ— Ecclesiasticall stories make mention how Simon Magus was lift up on high in the aire by the 〈◊〉 of Satan but by the prayer of Peter was violently throwne downe so sometime serpents and 〈◊〉 have beene seene flie in the aire Albertus Magnus saith that oxen have rained and fallen out of the aire all which may be wrought by the conveyance of Satan 2. The Devill can suddenly convey things out of ones sight as Apollonius from the presence of Domitian Thus it may be that Gyges if that report be true not by the vertue of a ring but by the power of Satan became invisible 3. They can make images to speake and walke as before wee heard of Apollonius brasen butlers and the image of Memnon so the image of Iuno Moneta being asked if she would remove to Rome answered se velle that she would and the image of fortune being set up said ritè me consecrastis yee have consecrated mee aright Valer. Maxim lib. 1. cap. ultim de simulachris But the Devill cannot give power unto these things being dead to performe any action of life but that hee moveth and speaketh in them as the Angell caused Balaams Asse to speake 4. The Devill can cause divers shapes and formes to appeare as of men Lions and other things in the aire or on the ground as in the life of Antonie the Devill appeared unto him in the shape of terrible beasts 5. And as he can counterfeit the shape of living things so also of other things both naturall as of gold silver meat and artificiall as of pots glasses cuppes for if cunning artificers by their skill can make things so lively as that they can hardly bee discerned from that which they resemble as Plinie writeth of Zeuxis grapes lib. 35. cap. 11. much more can Satan coyne such formes and figures as Philostratus lib. 4. of the life of Appolonius maketh mention how a certaine Lamia pretending marriage to one Menippus a young man shewed him a banquet furnished with all kinde of meat and precious vessels and ornaments which Appolonius discovered to be but imaginarie things and shee confessed her selfe to bee a Lamia 6. The Devill by his subtile nature can so affect the sensitive spirits and imaginary faculty as that they shall represent unto the inward sense the phantasie of some things past or to come and cause them to appeare to the outward sense as wee see that franticke persons imagine many times that they see things which are not and there is no doubt but that the Devill can effect that which a naturall disease worketh 7. Hee can also conforme the fantasies of those that are asleep to represent unto them things which the Devill knoweth shall come to passe and by this meanes to bring credit unto dreames 8. In some things the Devill can interpose himselfe and helpe forward those superstitious meanes which are used to prognosticate as the Augurs by the flying and chirping of birds by looking into the intrals of beasts by casting of lots tooke upon them to divine and the Devill by his mysticall operation concurred with them more strongly to deceive 9. The Devill can stirre up in naturall men the affections of love anger hatred feare and such like as he entred into the heart of Iudas Iohn 13.1 and this he doth two wayes either by propounding such externall objects as helpe to inflame and set on fire such affections and by conforming the inward phantasie to apprehend them Hierome in the life of Hilerius sheweth how a certaine virgin by Magicall enchâ—ntments was so ravished with the love of a young man that shee was mad therewith QUEST XIII How divers wayes Satans power is limited THese things before recited Satan by his spirituall power is able to doe yet with this limitation that his power is restrained of God that he cannot doe what he would but sometime the Lord letteth him loose and permitteth him to worke either for the triall and probation of his faithfull servants as is evident in Iob or for the punishment of the wicked as hee was a lying spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs false Prophets for if Satan had free
libertie to exercise his power like as hee ran upon the heard of swine and cast them all headlong into the sea so hee were able to force men into many dangers both of their bodies and soules Ex Perer. Beside this absolute limitation and restraint of Satan when God doth stay him from working there are two other kindes of inhibiting for neither hath Satan such free scope to exercise his rage upon the faithfull as hee hath power to worke upon the children of disobedience for they are his proper subjects and in them the God of this world blindeth their mindes 1. Cor. 4.4 and they are taken in the snares of Satan at his pleasure 2. Tim. 2.26 But over the faithfull hee hath no command to delude deceive or seduce them neither to invade them at all without speciall liceâ—ce from God as Iobs tentation sheweth And againe though the Lord for some causes best knowne to himselfe doe give him leave to trie his children yet God so qualifieth his assaults and tentations as that they effect not that which Satan intendeth but are disposed of to that end which the Lord propoundeth as Satan desired to winnow Peter as wheate and thorowly to have sifted him but Christ upheld him that his faith failed not Luk. 22.31 32. and that his tentation tended not to his subversion Concerning this threefold limitation of Satan I thinke it not amisse here to adde the sentence of Augustine For the first that Satan cannot doe what he would but his power is restrained he thus writeth Si tantum posset nocere diabolus quantum vult non aliquis justorum remaneret If the Devill might hurt as much as he would not any of the just should remaine For the second that Satans power is more free and absolute over the wicked he thus saith In fili is diffidentiae tanquam in suis mancipus operatur quemadmodum homines in pecoribus In the sonnes of unbeliefs he worketh as in his owne vessels as men upon their cattel Againe Sicut homo de pecore suo facit quod vult de alienâ— pecore ut faciat expectat sibi dari potestatem ab eo cujus est As a man doth what hee will with his owne cattell but with another mans he cannot doe any thing but expecteth first that leave be given him of the owner For the third that when the Lord permitteth Satan to assault his owne servants yet he moderateth the action that Satan worketh not his will upon him but what he intendeth for their destruction the Lord directeth to be onely for their probation Augustine also thus inferreth Vtitur Deus Angelis malis non tantùm ad puniendos malos ut in Achab sed etiam ad probandos manifestandos bonos sicut fecit in Iob God useth evill Angels not only to punish the wicked as in Achab but to prove and make knowne the good as he did in Iob. Thus then is this point determined 1. The Devill hath not now such power as before his fall as Augustine saith Sunt nobis potentiores neque tamen tam firmi nunc sunt ac si in pristino statu permansissent They are mightier than wee are but yet not so strong as if they had remained in their former estate 2. The good Angels have greater power in working upon the creatures than the evill Augustine In haec Angelis longe amplior potestas est bonis malâ— quamvis major bonis The Angels both good and bad have greater power than man over these inferiour creatures and yet the good have greater power than the evill 3. Satans power is limited he doth not what hee will 4. The Devill hath more command over the wicked than power over the righteous 5. When hee practiseth against the righteous yet his malice is restrained God turneth the tentation to that end which shall be to his glory and the good of his children From hence may bee inferred two conclusions first that righteous and faithfull men are not altogether freed from the assaults and invasions of Satan as S. Paul felt in himselfe the pricke of the flesh the messenger of Satan sent to buffet him 2. Cor. 12. And as hee may trie them with spirituall tentations so also he may if God permit torment them with corporall vexations as Iobs example sheweth and to this purpose Augustine concludeth well Contra mulâ—iformes daemonum incursus quis sua innocentia fidit c. Who can trust upon his innocencie to be defended against so many incursions of the Devill seeing that they many times vex infants then whom nothing is more innocent The other conclusion is that although Satan may set upon the members of Christ yet hee cannot hurt them he may enter into the lists with them but not overcome them the Serpent may bite the heele but Christ hath broken his head and as our blessed Saviour saith of himselfe The Prince of this world commeth and hath nought in me Ioh. 14.30 So neither by Gods grace hath he any part in us that are the members of Christ. Augustine doth notably touch this point in this manner Fortior quis est aut corpore c. One may be said to be stronger either in body as an horse is stronger than a man or in minde as the reasonable creatures than the unreasonable and in affection and disposition as the just man more than the unjust or in power and authority as the Captaine stronger than the souldier by the first of these wayes potestas datur deterioribus in meliores the worse may have power given them over the better for the proofe of their patience and so he concludeth Principes illi in re inferiore superant in potentiore superantur fideles enim mente firmiores sunt infirmiores corpore Those principalities he meaneth the spirituall powers are superiours to us in things inferiour but they are in things superiour weaker the faithfull are stronger in minde and more infirme in body QUEST XIV Whether the Devill by his owne power can raise thunder and lightning HItherto it hath beene shewed what Satan is able to doe in that immediate action of moving and transporting himselfe and other creatures from place to place it followeth to shew wâ—at power he hath in the other mediate action which is done by the meanes and instrument of the creâ—â—ures But here ariseth a question fit to bee discussed whether the Devill by his owne power can raise tempests windes thunder lightning as Pererius thinketh he can by warrant of the story of Iob where Satan brought downe lightning upon Iobs sheepe and raised winde whereby the house was overwhelmed upon Iobs children Perer. in 4. disput in cap. 7. Num. 34. But herein I must needs dissent from Pererius though I finde that Augustine inclineth to the same opinion for thus he writeth In libro fidelissimo legimus diabolum potuisse ignem de coelo demittere We reade in a most faithfull booke that the
Devill could bring downe fire from heaven But how is it then called the fire of God if it were of Satans sending therefore the text it selfe is against that opinion some take it to bee called a fire of God that is a great and most vehement lightning as things of excellencie are so called as the wrestlings of God Gen. 30.8 and the mountaines of God Psal 36.7 Iunius But this sense in that place seemeth to be improper for as here the lightning is called the fire of God so Psal. 29. thunder is called the voice of God I thinke that it will not be said that here also it is so called because the thunder giveth a mighty voice for this is there beside expressed The voice of the Lord is mighty but there the reason is shewed why it is called the voice of the Lord because the God of glorie maketh it to thunder vers 3. Againe every where the Scripture maketh God the author of thunder and lightning and windes as Psal. 107.25 Hee commandeth and raiseth the stormie winde and Psal. 147.15 Hee sendeth forth his commandement upon the earth and his word runneth very swiftly he giveth snow like wooll Psal. 148.7 8. Praise the Lord c. fire and haile snow and stormy winde which execute his word they execute Gods word and commandement onely but if they might bee raised by the power of Satan then should they execute his word Further the Lord saith Iob. 38.25 Who hath divided the spoutes for the raine as the way for the lightning of the thunders and vers 28. the Lord is said to bee the father of raine and so consequently of the other meteors If the Devill can cause raine thunder lightning then he might be said to bee the father of it Hence it is that the people of God have used to pray unto him as the only author and giver of raine and weather as Samuel saith Is it not wheate harvest I will call unto the Lord and he shall send thunder and raine 1. Sam. 12.17 So Ambrose saith Cum pluvia expeteretur ab omnibus quidam dixit neomenia dabit eam c. When raine was desired of all one said the new Moone will bring raine although we were very greedy of raine yet I would not such assertions to bee true yea and I was much delighted that no raine was powred donec precibus ecclesiae datus manifestaret non de initiis lunae sperandum esse sed providentia misericordia creatoris untill it being at the prayers of the Church did manifestly shew that raine is not to be hoped for by the renewing of the Moone but by the providence and mercy of the Creator Some thinke that the fire which came upon Iobs flocke did not come downe from heaven but was otherwise kindled by Satan but that the Devill made as though it came from Heaven the more to terrific Iob when hee should see that even the heavens and God himselfe were set against him Of this opinion seemeth to bee the author of the Commentary upon Iob under Origens name Non de coelo cecidit ignis ille sed ita finxit nequissimus c. Non à Deo missus est sed tua iniquita â— miserrime omnium diabole succensus est That fire came not downe from heaven but so the wicked one fained it was not sent of God but kindled by thy wicked meanes O thou Devill of all most miserable And afterward hee sheweth that Satan cannot bring fire from heaven Dic ergo infoelix tunc super oves Iob ignem de coelo potuisti adducere cur non potuisti revocare illum ignem quem advocavit Helias Say then couldest thou O wretched one bring fire upon Iobs sheepe and why couldest thou not then keepe backe the fire which Helias called for upon the fifties for they were thy ministers and servants This authors judgement in this latter point wee willingly imbrace but his first conceit seemeth not to bee agreeable to the text which saith it was the fire of God then not kindled by Satan Neither yet is it to be thought that Satan had no hand in it but that it was wholly Gods worke for so God should be Satans Minister in serving his turne and not Satan his Wherefore my opinion is this that this tempest of fire and winde were in respect of the naturall generation of them of the working and sending of the Creator But Satan was Minister dejecti ignis the minister of the fire cast downe as Osiander saith not the author but the minister yet not Gods minister in the originall worke which proceeded of naturall causes but in the execution God caused the fire but Satan brought it upon Iobs flocke God raised the winde but Satan drave it upon the foure corners of the house for this we doubt not of but that thunder and lightning and winde being once raised that Satan hath power by Gods permission to carry and transport it from place to place if the winde blow one way he can turne it to another but of himselfe by his spirituall power I deny that he can raise windes and tempests where none are upon the reasons before alleaged And therefore we may hold that to bee a fable which Philostratus reporteth how Apollonius saw two tunnes among the Indians which being opened did send out the windes and being shut they were restrained So I conclude this place with that decree of the Councell Bracaâ—ens 1. c. 8. Si quis credit quòd diabolus tonitrua fulgura tempestates siccitates sua authoritate facit sicut Priscillianus docet anathema sit If any man beleeve that the Devill by his owne authority can make thunder lightning tempests drought as Priscillanus holdeth let him be accursed QUEST XV. Of the power of spirits in naturall workes NOw concerning the other actions of spirits which is called mediate they by applying tempering and qualifying naturall causes may bring forth strange effects for the vertues and properties of herbes plants precious stones mettals mâ—nerals are exactly knowne unto them and but in part unto us 1. As we see man by art by composing things together can effect rare and strange workes as is evident in the graffing and incision of trees in distilling of waters compounding of medicines so much more can spirits by aportioning and applying divers naturall causes together produce strange things 2. Againe many times the excellencie of the artificer or workeman addeth to the perfection of the worke beyond the vertue of the instrumenâ—â— as an axe serveth but to cut but the cunning workeman can therewith doe more than cut as frame a bed or table and such like so these spirituall powers by their great skill can by naturall instruments and meanes bring forth more excellent and strange works than their naturall force serveth unto because they are the instruments of Angels and spirits Sic Thom. Aqui. cont Gent. c. 103. 3. Augustine giveth instance of divers strange and admirable workes in
sent before when the other plagues were but the Scripture maketh no mention of it as many matters of fact are omitted beside but Thostatus refuseth this conjecture for why should this bee onely here expressed that Pharaoh sent if he had done it at other times 2. Some thinke that the other plagues all but the first as of the frogges the lice and swarmes were such as Pharaoh could not send and in the plagues following but in the first Pharaoh did not then bethinke himselfe of any such thing Perer. 3. But it is more likely that Pharaoh though now twice he had been told so much by Moses did neglect to trie whether the Israelites were exempted from these plagues or no. Simler QUEST VII Why Pharaoh called not to Moses to pray PHaraoh entreated not Moses at this time to pray to God to remove this plague partly through envie and griefe to see the privilege and freedome of the Israelites which was an occasion of the hardning of his heart partly because the other plagues continued sometime and so might be remooved But this plague of mortalitie and murraine came all at once and suddenly swept the cattell away so that no remedie was left neither was there place for prayer to remoove it after this plague had suddenly smitten their cattell in all their coasts Pererius QUEST VIII Whether this plague were naturall or supernaturall COncerning the kind of this plague 1. It is evident that it was no naturall plague but supernaturall for the text saith the hand of God should be upon their cattell that is should smite them immediately no meanes being used at all not so much as Aarons rod whereby other plagues were called for And beside it was not infectious as other naturall plagues are for the cattell of the Israelites feeding among the Egyptians cattell they dwelling in the middest of them were not smitten at all with this plague Simler 2. Yet there might be some preparation unto this plague by the former as it is mentioned cap. 8.14 that the land stunke of the dead frogges and so both the aire and ground were corrupted apt to breed putrefaction Perer. But this was not the cause of the plague for if the earth and aire generally had been corrupted the men had died as well as the beasts QUEST IX Why Moses is the minister of the sixt plague Vers. 10. ANd Moses sprinkled them toward heaven 1. They both tooke the ashes out of the fornace but Moses sprinkled them toward heaven Philo saith that Aaron was the Minister of those plagues wherewith the earth and water were smitten and Moses of those which came from heaven out of the aire Augustine giveth this reason because Aarons office was to speake to the people he worketh upon the earth and water because Moses was in the things that belonged to God hee is the minister of those plagues which came from above But these are curious observations The reason rather was this they stood both before Pharaoh and therefore Moses as the chiefe whom the Lord had made as Pharaohs God he is the minister of this wonder Ferus 2. As the two first signes were of the water the two next on the earth so this is wrought in the aire Simler rather than the element of fire as Ferus QUEST X. Of the sixt plague of boyles and of the manner thereof Vers. 10. ANd there came boyles breaking out First the handfull of ashes being cast into the aire there was raised as a cloud of white dust like unto the ashes of the fornace over all Egypt which dust could not be engendred of that handfull but upon the sprinkling of the ashes the Lord by his great power caused that cloud of dust in the aire over al Egypt 2. The matter which is here used is somewhat answerable to the effect for as Moses taketh of the white ashes of the fornace so they falling upon man beast caused burning boyles which at the first swelled hoved the flesh then brake forth into sores the word here used for blisters is derived of bagnah which signifieth to boyle up as the water doth at the fire Borrh. Perer. Philo. thinketh that these sores or boiles were over al their bodie grew into one being most grievous to behold 3. This plague is answerable to the Egyptians sinne for as they oppresse the Israelites with fornace work in the burning of brick so they are punished with burning sores which came of the ashes taken out of the fornace Perer. QUEST XI Why the Egyptians are smitten with vlcers Vers. 11. ANd the boyles are upon the enchanters 1. This sheweth that the Magitians though before they had confessed the power of God yet doe persist still in their malice against Moses Simler Hereupon Cajetane thinketh that they did not acknowledge the power of God before but rather some superiour power of the spirits but this followeth not because they resist Moses still that they did not confesse the power of God before for like as the same aire that is illuminate by the sunne is darkened when the sunne is gone away so no marvell if the minds of the wicked after they have received some light be darkned againe Perer. 2. This is the third time that these sorcerers are confounded first when Aarons serpent eat up theirs secondly when their power was restrained in the third plague and now because they will not yet give over they are punished 3. Like unto these sorcerers are all unfaithfull counsellers to Princes whom the Lord in like manner will plague Borrh. And thus the Magitians of that Pharaoh of Rome are smitten with exulcerate consciences which swelling with pride and hypocrisie doe bring forth most vile ulcers of impietie Simlerus QUEST XII Of the hardning of Pharaohs heart Vers. 12. ANd the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart 1. The word signifieth to obfirme or strengthen chazak because it was a signe of strength or rather stubburnenes to stand against God there is another word used to signifie the same thing cabadh to make heavie as cap. 8.15 Pharaoh first by his owne corrupt mind hardning or making his heart heavie the Lord as by casting a heavie weight upō it maketh it heavier Iun. 2. Origen well noteth how sometime Pharaoh is said to harden his owne heart c. 8.15 sometime the Lord as in this place the first kinde of hardning is declared by the Apostle how it commeth when men by their impenitencie abuse the lenitie and longanimitie of God Rom. 2.5 But the same Apostle making mention of the other hardning by the Lord Rom. 9. he passeth it over and it may be thought to bee one of those high matters which Paul heard being taken up into paradise and is not to bee uttered Thus Origen counteth this a great secret how God is said to harden the heart And so it is yet not such a secret but that we find the same opened in scripture how the Lord by giving wicked men over to themselves and withdrawing his
intended no evill or hurt to their father but it so fell out The wicked are said to hate their owne soules and to procure unto themselves eternall death whereas simply they hate not their soules neither would be damned but upon their committing of sinne it so falleth out that their soules perish by their meanes as if they hated them unruly patients that will not obey their Physitians whereupon followeth death are said â—o seeke their owne death and yet they desire to live but upon their unruly and disordered behaviour death followeth So God is said to harden Pharaohs heart by the like figurative speech because the hardning of their heart ensueth upon the abuse of those things which God intendeth not to that end but they pervert them to their owne hurt Ex Perer. All this may safely bee received and acknowledged and yet somewhat more is to be added as shall afterward appeare QUEST XXIII How diversly in Scripture these termes of blinding and hardning are taken BUt by the way this word to blind to harden though it signifie an action proceeding from him that hardneth yet is it not alwayes so taken therefore we shall find that foure wayes in Scripture a thing is said to blinde and consequently to harden 1. Giftes are said to blind the â—â—es Deut. 16. Not that they being a dead thing can corrupt the judgement but mans corrupt heart taketh occasion and is thereby enticed to pervert justice 2. The Devill is said to blinde the mindes of the wicked â— Cor. 4.4 3. The malice of a mans owne heart is said to blinde and harden as Pharaoh hardned his owne heart 4. God is said to blind the eyes Esay 6.10 and to harden Pharaohs heart gifts doe blinde occasionaliter by way of occasion the malice of mans heart blindeth meritâ—â—â—â— by way of desert and meritoriously because it deserveth to be further blinded and hardned the Devill blindeth incitando by inciting and provoking unto sinne And God as is before shewed by withdrawing his grace and inflicting the punishment of induration upon them QUEST XXIV How divers wayes the Lord forsaketh those which are hardned FUrther God is said to harden mans hart in his diverse leaving and forsaking of them 1. Hee suffereth them to follow their owne lusts and desires not giving them power or grace to restraine them as Rom. 1 24. he gave them up to their hearts lusts 2. He giveth them ease abundance prosperity whereby they are intangled therefore the Prophet prayeth Give me not riches lest I be full and forget thee Prov. 3. 3. He denieth them the benefit of wholsome corrections and afflictions whereby they should learne to know themselves as the Apostle saith the Lord receiveth no child whom hee doth not chastise 4 God forbiddeth his servants to pray for such and so they want the benefit of their prayers as Ieremie is forbidden to pray for the people chap. 7.16 5. God in his justice depriveth them of such as should travell for their soules and bring them unto God as the Apostles left the obstinate and wilfull Jewes and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Acts 13. 6. God taketh away from them the preaching and knowledge of his word as the Lord threatneth by his Prophet Amos to send upon them a famine not of bread or water but of hearing his word Amos 8.11 7. God suffereth them to be deceived by flatterers and unfaithfull counsellers as â—eboboâ—â— was by his young men 8. And the more strongly to delude them the Lord permitteth sometimes false Prophets to shew signes and wonders 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith of the false Prophet Antichrist whose comming is by the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders 2. Thes. 2.9 9. The Lord permitteth Satan to invade them and to worke upon them at his pleasure as the evill spirit was sent of the Lord upon Saul and a lying spirit was in the mouth of Baals false Prophets to deceive Achab. 10. God taketh away from them all helpes whereby they should be defended against the assaults of Satan as the Lord threatneth to doe to his unfruitfull vineyard I will take away the hedge thereof and it shall be â—aten up I will breake downe the wall thereof and it shall be troden downe Isai. 5.4 11. But the Lord doth not thus forsake any till they have first forsaken God as Chrysostome saith Quod autem Deus non derelinquat nos nisi fuerit à nobis derelictus apertè ostendit Isaias That God forsaketh not us till wee have forsaken him I say sheweth chap. 59.2 Your iniquities have separated betweene you and your God Ex Perer. QUEST XXV God hardneth otherwise than by foreseeing BEside these divers interpretations of the hardning of Pharaohs heart by the Lord which I have abridged out of Pererius there are three other which I will briefly set downe first some thinke that this in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart is to be understood of Gods prescience that he is said to harden it because he foresaw it should be hardned by their owne malice This seemeth sometime to be the opinion of Augustine in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Non ad operationem Dei sed ad prascientiam pertinere monstratur it is shewed to appertaine not to Gods operation or working but to his prescience But this cannot bâ— the meaning for by this reason whereas God foreseeth all the sinnes of men which are committed in the world God might be said himselfe to kill steale doe wrong because he foreseeth that such things shall be done in the world QUEST XXVI Whether God may be said to doe those things which he disposeth of to a good end SEcondly God may be said to harden Pharaohs heart because he disposeth thereof and directeth it to such an end as he himselfe propounded because thereby the Lord did take occasion to worke his miracles as he saith to Moses I have hardned Pharaohs heart that I might worke these my miracles Exod. 10.1 So as God ordained the end he may be said also in some sort to doe those things which helpe unto that end as Act. 2.23 Christ is said to bee delivered by the determinate councell of God yet was hee betrayed and delivered by Iudas whose act is said in some respect to be the Lords because God disposed of it to effect and accomplish his glorious councell in redeeming the world by the death of his Sonne But neither can this be safely affirmed that the Lord should bee said to doe those things which hee ordereth and disposeth for God so disposed of that spirituall combate which S. Paul found in his flesh that it tended further to Gods glory and the manifestation of his power as the Lord saith My grace is sufficienâ— for thee my power is made perfect through weakenesse yet God was not the worker of that temptation but the Apostle imputeth it to Satan 2. Cor. 12.7 And like as in the creation God made
of God as the Lord by his Prophet saith They worship mee in vaine teaching for doctrines the commandements of men as our Saviour citeth the Prophet Maâ—kâ— 7 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against uncertainty or doubtfulnesse of salvation Vers. 13. THou wilt carry thy people But in the Hebrew it is â—achitha thou hast carried Propter certitudinem fidei sic de futuris loquitur ut de praeteritis For the certainty of faith hee so speaketh of things to come as already past Ferus As S. Paul saith By his mercy he saved us Tit. 3.6 whereas yet we are not saved but are assured of our salvation by faith in Christ This then sheweth the absurdity of popish doctrine that counteth it presumption for any man to be assured of his salvation 2. Confut. Against the Maniches Vers. 25. ANd there he proved him The Maniches upon the like place where the Lord is said to tempt Abraham thus objected Egone Deum colam qui tentat shall I worship a God that tempteth These Maniches rejected the old Testament and the Author thereof they made two beginnings one of evill the other of good two chiefe Princes the one of darknesse to whom they ascribed the old Testament the other the Prince of light whom they held to be the Author of the new Testament Sâ— displiceat tibi Deus tentans displiceat Christus tentans If God displease thee because he tempteth then must Christ also displease thee because he is said also to tempt As he said to Philip Whence shall we buy bread that thâ—se may eat Ioh. 6.5 then it followeth This he said to prove or tempt him for he himselfe knew what he would doe Christ is said to prove him that is to see what he would say so Deo tentante id quod occultum est proditur God tempteth that what is hid may bee bewrayed Deus tentat ut dâ—ceat and God tempteth to teach and instruct August de tempore serm 7â— See before quest 50.51 3. Confut. Against free will Vers. 26. IF thou wilt give eare unto his commandements These and the like places are urged by the Romanists to prove freewill as Esay 1.19 If yee consent and obey yee shall eat the good things of the land upon these and such other places they argue thus If it bee in our power to performe these conditions then have wee free will if not to what end are they propounded Bellarm. lib. 5. de grat cap. 19. Contra. This argument consisteth upon a disjunctive proposition These places either shew free will or else they are propounded in vaine First therefore I answer that according to their collection these places as well shew that a man hath power of himselfe to keepe the Commandements as that hee hath free will But this S. Paul denieth and thereupon hee concludeth that every one that is of the workes of the Law is under the curse because they cannot keepâ— it Secondly these places being urged in their sense doe as well conclude that a man of himselfe without grace may keepe Gods commandements for if a man cannot performe them wholly of himselfe the same question remaineth why they are propounded to him that cannot keepe them Thirdly And yet though it bee not in mans power to keepe these commandements they are not in vaine for they serve as spurs to incite and stirre us up to obedience and to strive unto perfection and to labour to goe forward But S. Paul sheweth the onely sufficient reason why the Lord gave the Law to bee a Schoolemaster to bring us unto Christ Galath 3. And Augustine writeth excellently of this point Non ob aliud superbis data ista praecepta sunt quam ut in suis viribus deficientes in quibus confidebant liberatoreâ— requirerent These precepts were for no other cause given to the proud people than that failing in their owne strength wherein they trusted they should seeke for an helper and deliverer Contra Celestin. de perfectione justitiae 6. Places of Morall Observations 1. Observ. Against vaine confidence in strength or riches Vers. 4. HIs chosen captaines were drowned also in the red sea Notwithstanding their great power nobility favour with the King skill in feats of warre the Lord being mightier than they and a greater man of warre was able to confound and overthrow them this sheweth that no man should put confidence in his nobility power riches Ferus As the Prophet saith Ierem. 4.23 Let not the wiseman glory in his wisdome nor the strong man glory in his strength neither the rich man glory in his riches c. 2. Observ. The enemies of the Church are the enemies of God Vers. 7. THou hast overthrowne them that rise against thee They which are enemies unto the Church the Lord holdeth them to be his enemies they which rise against his people doe set themselves against the Lord as the Lord Jesus said to Saul Why persecutest thou me Simler They then which oppose themselves to the Church and people of God doe bid battell to the Lord himselfe and hee will take their cause in his owne hand and maintaine it 3. Observ. Sinne presseth downe to hell Vers. 10. THey sunke as lead in the mighty waters Sinne is heavy and presseth downe yeâ— it weigheth downe to hell Examinemus ergo nos per poenitentiam ne deprimamur gravitate pecâ—atorum usque in profundum Let us therefore examine our selves by repentance lest wee bee pressed downe with the weight of our sinnes into the deepe Ferus So the Apostle exhorteth That wee should cast away everything that presseth downe and sinne that hangeth on so fast Hebr. 12.1 4. Observ. Not to give over to goe on in our calling notwithstanding the unthankefulnesse of men Vers. 24. THen the people murmured against Moses and he cried unto the Lord. Moses notwithstanding the peoples murmuring goeth on in his calling and leaveth not off to pray for them though they were a very stubborne and ungratefull people this teacheth the servants of God to goe on with courage in their calling notwithstanding the evill acceptance in the world of their labours Ministers must looke for small thanke at the hands of men for their paines nor yet must such as labour either by preaching or writing to propagate the knowledge of the truth looke for their reward among men nay it ought to be a comfort unto them that they find not their reward here for it is a sure signe that a greater reward is laid up for them in heaven As the Lord saith by his Prophet Ieremy Râ—fraine thy voice from weeping and thine eyes from teares for thy worke shall be rewarded Ierem. 31.16 As Moses here prayeth for a murmuring and unthankfull people the like doth Samuel God forbid that I should sinne against the Lord and cease praying for you but I will shew you the good and right way 1. Sam. 1â— 23 5. Observ. Obedience the best remedy against sicknesse Vers. 26. IF thou wilt keepe all his
Qua cum infideli habitat non est immunda c. she which dwelleth with an infidell is not polluted or uncleane For the unbeleeving husband is sanctified by the wife 1 Cor. 7.14 But the fornicator and much more the adulterer maketh the members of Christ the members of an harlot 1 Cor. 6.14 6. In hac vita secum innumera mala trahit This sinne of adultery and fornication bringeth an innumerable company of evils with it in this life beside the punishment of the next Cogitur vitam miseram infoelicem vivere he liveth a miserable and unhappy life Alienam domum trepidus ingreditur omnis timet liberos servos he entreth trembling into anothers house hee is afraid of every thing of the servants and the children c. Sic fere Chrysost. super Ioan. hom 62.7 Thom. Aquin. A woman committeth three great sinnes in the sinne of adultery she is first Sacrilega she committeth sacrilege in going against Gods ordinance in parting that asunder which God hath coupled secondly she is Proditrix she sinneth by betraying her husband under whose government she is and giving her selfe over to another for the woman hath no power over her owne bodie but the man and so likewise of the man 1 Cor. 7.4 Thirdly she is furatrix she committeth theft Ex alieno viro sibi constituit filios she getteth her children by another man Thom. in opuscul 8. This sinne of adulterie is one of those which excludeth out of the Kingdome of heaven 1 Cor. 6.9 and whoremongers among the rest shall have their part in the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone Revel 22.8 And in this world though adulterers and adulteresses should escape the censure of men as often they doe yet God will not suffer such to goe unpunished hee will judge them himselfe Heb. 13.4 Therefore the Wise-man setting forth the adulterous woman saith that shee forsaketh the guide of her youth and forgetteth the covenant of her God Prov. 2.17 God therefore will take revenge of such as transgressors of his covenant This made Ioseph that hee would not consent to the unlawfull desire of his Mistresse saying How can I doe this great wickednesse and so sinne against God Gen. 39.4 QUEST VII Adultery as well forbidden in the husband as in the wife FUrther it will here be enquired whether this precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie doth not indifferently binde both the man and the woman that as well the husband as the wife if hee goe unto any strange flesh committeth adulterie In Augustines time men tooke unto themselves great libertie herein and it was growne to be such a generall custome ut jam mulieribus fere persuasum sit licere hoc viru sed non licere mulieribus That women are almost now perswaded that it is lawfull for men but not for women for it is often heard that the wives have beene brought to the market place to be punished quae facto cum servis invent a sunt which have beene found with their servants but it was never heard of that a man was set in the market place qui inventus est cum ancilla which was found with his maid Augustine by divers reasons overthroweth this wicked custome shewing that it was par peccatum a like sinne both in the husband and wife and in the like sinne that the man seemeth more innocent facit non divina veritas sed humana perversitas not the divine veritie is the cause but humane perversitie Then he useth these perswasions 1. From the faith that is made mutually by both the husband and the wife unto Christ Quod à me exigis redde mihi fidem tibi debeo fidem mihi debes fidem Christo ambo debemus c. That which thou exactest of me render unto me I have plight thee my faith and thou hast plight me thy troth we both have plight our faith unto Christ c. 2. He reasoneth from the like Noliteire vos quò eas sequi non vultis Yee men got not that way wherein you would not have your wives to follow say not I goe not to another mans wife I goe unto my maid Vis ut dicat tibi uxor tua c. Wouldest thou thy wife should say unto thee I goe not to another womans husband I goe unto my man or servant 3. From the preeminence and superiority of man Say not we cannot Quod potest foemina vir non potest Can a woman forbeare and cannot a man For what illa carnem non portat c. is not shee also flesh and bloud was not the woman first beguiled of the Serpent But you will say that the woman may easily avoid adulterie because shee is held in by the watchfulnesse of her husband and by the terror of humane lawes Multa custodia faciunt foeminam castam virum castum faciat ipsa virilitas Many keepers make a woman chaste and let manhood it selfe make the man chaste nam ideo mulieri major custodia quia major infirmitas for therefore a woman had need of more strait keeping because shee is the weaker her husband and the terror of lawes watch over her and God watcheth over thee To this purpose Augustine 4. Further the very letter of the precept which in the Hebrew is put in the Masculine to tineaph Thou that is the man shall not commit adulterie Augustine well inferreth that although it be onely expresly forbidden to the man Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife Ista lex non solum viris sed foeminis data est Yet this law is not onely given unto men but unto women also and so this precept as well bindeth women as men as all the rest of the Commandements doe Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steale c. August qu. 71. in Exod. 5. Lastly the Apostle sheweth that as the woman hath no power of her owne bodie but the husband so neither hath the husband power over his owne bodie but the wife 1 Cor. 7.4 and therefore as well the one as the other are restrained of all carnall libertie to goe unto strange flesh QUEST VIII Whether adulterie be a more grievous sinne in the man or the woman BUt this being agreed upon that adulterie is a sinne as well in the husband as in the wife it will further be demanded in which of them it is a greater sinne or whether it be not equall in both 1. Augustine thinketh as is shewed before that it is par peccatum a like sinne whether in the husband or in the wife And Thomas addeth further that in the time of the law there was not an equalitie for the man among the Jewes might have many wives but not the wife many husbands Ideo matrimonium nunquam statum perfectum habuit nisi in lege Christi Therefore matrimonie had never any perfect state but under the law of Christ. But to this it may be answered that the institution of matrimonie being first made in Paradise
an habitation of sucan to dwell as the Lord himselfe saith chap. 25.8 They shall make me a Sanctuarie to dwell in The boords were not this Tabernacle for it is said vers 15. Thou shalt make boords for the Tabernacle and the curtaines of goates haire was a covering for the Tabernacle vers 17. The curtaines then first described are properly called the Tabernacle miscaâ— the other curtaines were called â—he Iteâ—tâ—rium a Tent Vatablus QUEST II. Why the Lord appointed a Tabernacle to be erected and that in the wildernesse THou shalt make a Tabernacle 1. It was requisite that a speciall place for Gods worship should bee made for more reverence sake as we see that Kings and Princes pulchriores habitationes possident have more costly and beautifull houses that they might be had in greater admiration So that although in respect of God himselfe who filleth heaven and earth there was no necessitie of any place yet in regard of men it was necessarie in those two respects that having a peculiar place ordained for the worship of God Cum majori reverentia accederent They should approach with greater reverence Et per dispositionem talis Tabernaculi significarentur c. And that by the disposing of such a Tabernacle those things might bee signified which belonged unto Christ. Thomas 2. It pleased God that this Tabernacle should be first erected in the wildernesse before they came into Canaan 1. Not so much because Moses that great Prophet who was to end his dayes before they should come into the promised land was the meetest instrument to set forward that worke For God who endued Moses with those gifts could also have raised as great Prophets as Moses 2. But one reason was that his people being to sojourne in the desert 40. yeares might be kept from idlenesse and be exercised in the rites and ceremonies of the worship of God lest if no forme of worship had beene prescribed unto them they might have swarved and declined unto superstitious usages 3. Another reason was that they might be afore instructed in the manner of the true worship lest they should have fallen presently to the Idolatry of the Canaanites after they had obtained their land if they had not beene setled before and well grounded in the right worship Tostatus qu. 2. QUEST III. Why the Lord would not yet have a Temple yet built 3. YEt the Lord would not injoyne his people now to make him a Temple in some certaine place because they were now continually to remove their tents and dwelling all the time of their sojourning in the wildernesse And it was a long time after they had possession of the land before the Lord would have a Temple built because till such time as the people had a King to be able to defend them and they had peace and quietnesse from their enemies a Temple could not conveniently be built therefore neither in the time of the Judges was this worke taken in hand because none of them was of sufficient power and ability to doe it the government still shifting and changing from one to another neither under Saul and David was it a fit time to begin that worke because they had much trouble and businesse with their enemies God therefore reserved that worke for the peaceable reigne of Salomon Tostat. qu. 3. 4. And this further may be alleaged as a reason why first the Lord would have a Tabernacle built and afterward a Temple Quod Tabernaculum prasentis adificiâ—m Ecclesia designat Because the Tabernacle doth designe and shew the state of the Church now present sojourning in this world and continually exercised but Salomons Temple was a figure of the Church of God in heaven where there shall be peace and tranquillitie as in the building of Salomons Temple the noise of a hammer was not heard Beda QUEST IV. Of what stuffe these curtaines were made Vers. 1. TEn curtaines of fine twined linen c. 1. To omit here both Augustines note of some corrupt Interpreters that in stead of the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Latine aâ—laa curtaines did reade 〈◊〉 courts as though there should be ten courts in the Tabernacle and to let passe also Rupertus notation of the word cortina curtaine which hee taketh to be derived of corium leather because at the first curtaines were made of leather 2. These curtaines were not made of divers-peeces of cloth of contrarie colours sewed together but the matter and stuffe was fine twisted silke and linen Simler The word shes silke or linen may bee derived of shasah which signifieth to take the sixth part because it is like it was twined in six threeds together Oleast Like unto a fine cord or line Iun. 3. Osiander thinketh that these colours were so mingled together as yet one among the rest most appeared and therefore some of them are called coverings of blew silke some coverings of skarlet Numb 4.7 8. But those there described were not these great curtaines but other smaller coverings that served to cover the things which were carried It seemeth that these coverings were indifferently tempered of all these colours QUEST V. Of the manner of worke used in these curtaines IN them thou shalt make Cherubims of broidered worke 1. Some thinke that these curtaines were not onely pictured with Cherubims Angels but withall flowers and such like Cajetan Iosephus thinketh that there were no pictures of men or beasts at all but onely of trees or flowers but this is contrarie to the text which maketh speciall mention of Cherubims Calvin Simler 2. Arias Montanus imagineth that they were the full and perfect pictures of Cherubs like unto young men with wings and he also conjectureth with what colours they were set forth their flesh with white and red their wings with blew But it is neither like that they were pictured in their full proportion for then there should have beene a great part of the curtaines left bare and naked without any pictures unlesse we imagine some other filling worke but they were such Cherubs as were described before upon the Mercie seate neither were they pictured naked which was against that law Exod. 20.26 which provideth that the nakednesse of none should be discovered As for the colour of their face and wings it was like to be such as best served to resemble them 3. Concerning the manner of worke it was not painted and so set forth with colours because then they should not have needed to have brought stuffe of divers colours to make the curtaines of Tostat. qu 6. Cajetane thinketh that they were not made suendo sed texendâ— by sowing but weaving So the Septuag Vatab. Some thinke it was altogether needle worke as the Latine Interpreter Tostatus Pagnius But the word signifieth artificiall or curious worke or worke devised Oleaster There was both woven worke in it as may be gathered chap 28.32 and needle worke also because it was like on both sides as appeareth in that the vailes
exceed the vulgar and common sort 4. Thus as God first made the creatures and last of all man whom he created for his glorie So after that God had appointed the Tabernacle to be made and every thing thereto belonging he in the last place setteth downe the office and ministration of the Priests who served to set forth Gods glory in the Tabernacle as man was created to that end in the world Borrh. 5. And to this end God ordained the ministerie of man in his service to succour and releeve the imbecillitie of the people who were not able themselves to endure the Lords voice Simlerus QUEST II. Why Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest Vers. 1. THy brother Aaron 1. The Lord maketh speciall choice of Aaron Moses brother for the Priesthood Propter principatum frequentia cum Deo colloquia Because of his preeminence and for the often conference they had with God and the great works which were done in Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron And therefore because in these respects they were more noble and famous than the rest of the people the Lord doth single out Aaron for this high office Simler 2. And the Tribe of Levi was taken from the rest of the Tribes Ad honorem Mosis Aaron ducum populi c. For the honour of Moses and Aaron the captaines of the people Ferus 3 And Aaron was appointed to be the high and chiefe Priest to be a figure and type of Christ Simlerus The divers glorious vestures made for the Priest doe shadow forth the most heavenly graces of the Spirit wherewith Christ was adorned Ferus And he is therefore called Moses brother Quiâ— enim ampliùs alâ—eri est fraterâ—â— foedere nexus quà m Christuâ— Mosi legi gratia novum Testamentum veteri For who can be neerer allied unto another by a brotherly league than Christ to Moses grace to the law the new Testament to the old Beda QUEST III Wherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree NOw Aaron in some things most fitly resembled Christ and in some things betweene them there is great difference First Aaron herein prefigured Christ both in his peculiar function in entring into the holy place to make attonement for the people So Christ is now entred into the heavens to appeare in the fight of God for us Hebr. 9.23 As also in those functions which were common to Aaron with the rest which were these three dâ—cendo precando offerâ—â—do in teaching praying offering or sacrificing So Christ hath taught and lightned the world with the revelation of his Fathers will and by the preaching of the Gospell Christ also prayeth and maketh intercession for his people Heb. 9.25 And he also offered up himselfe in sacrifice for our redemption Tit. 2.19 Hee gave himselfe for us that hee might redeeme us from all iniquitie But yet there is great difference betweene the Priesthood of Aaron which was the type and figure and the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. In the dignitie of their persons Aaron was a meere man Christ was both God and man 2. In their condition the Priests of the Law were men compassed with many infirmities and subject to sinne but Christ was holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 3. In the excellencie of the sacrifice they offered the sacrifices of beasts but Christ offered up his owne bodie as the Apostle saith Heb. 9.12 Neither by the bloud of goats and calves but by his owne bloud entred he once into the holy place 4. In the effect they differ the Priests of the law did not perfectly reconcile but onely shadowed forth by that typicall reconciliation the true remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ who hath obtained eternall redemption for us and hath redeemed us from the curse of the law Galath 3.13 5. In the continuance the Priesthood of Aaron was not to continue for ever but as the Apostle saith This man because he endureth for ever hath an everlasting Priesthood Heb. 2.24 6. In the manner of confirmation They were made Priests without an oath But this is made with an oath by him that said unto him The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 5.21 Marbach QUEST IV. Why Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron ANd although Aaron were a type and figure of Christ yet he is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not after Aaron not because there was no resemblance betweene Christ and Aaron but for that Melchisedeck and his Priesthood did in three things more lively set forth Christs Priesthood than did Aarons 1. In the eternitie thereof 2. Office and function 3. And name 1. As Melchisedeck is set forth without father and mother without beginning of his dayes or end of his life not that he was so indeed but they are concealed in storie to make him a more lively type and figure of Christ who was in respect of his Divinitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without mother in regard of his humanitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father 2 As Melchisedek was both a King and a Priest so Christ was a Priest in the expiation of our sinnes by the sacrifice of himselfe upon the crosse and a King both in gathering his Church together by the scepter of his word and governing them by his Spirit as also in that all power over all creatures and over the universall world is committed unto him 3. The name of Melchisedek fitly agreeth unto Christ which signifieth the King of righteousnesse and the place whereof he was King which was Salem that betokeneth peace did also set forth the peaceable Kingdome of Christ both making peace betweene God and us and taking away the wall of partition that was betweene the Jewes and Gentiles making of both one as the Apostle sheweth Ephes. 2.13 Now in Christ Iesuâ— yee which were once a farre off are made neere by the bloud of Christ for he is our peace which hath made of both one Marbach QUEST V. Why these Priestly garments are commanded to be made Vers. 2. HOly garments c. glorious and beautifull 1. These garments were called holy in two respects both because in respect of the end they were consecrated and ordained onely to holy uses and therefore the Priests onely were to put them on and none other beside and they were not at all times to use them but onely when they went into the Tabernacle when they went out they put them off as also in respect of the manner of consecration they were anointed with the holy oyle chap. 30. and so set apart for holy uses Tostat. quaest 2. 2. This apparelling of Aaron with such glorious apparell was commanded both in respect of themselves that they by these ceremonies might bee assured that their calling was of God Ferus 3. And in regard of the people hereby the Lord would
then must be of the content of 18. egs Sic. Iun. Lippoman Simler Gallas which is a pint and quarter of ale measure for there goe unto a pint of our English measure as much as fourteene eg-shels doe containe QUEST XLVIII Of the spirituall application of the Altar and daily sacrifice THe spirituall signification of these things is this 1. Christ is our Altar whereby wee are sanctified he is ara victima both our Altar and the sacrifice of this Altar the Apostle speaketh Heb. 13.10 We have an Altar whereof they have no authority which serve in the Tabernacle Gallasius 2. By the daily sacrifice of the lambes Christ also is signified who is the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world Simler 3. By the bread and wine which was offered Lippoman would have represented the Eucharist which is ministred with bread and wine Rather it signifieth Christum pro nobis oblatum cibum esse potum that Christ offered for us is both our meat and drinke to be received by faith Osiander 4. The offering of the one in the morning the other at evening Cyprian thus applieth Vt hora sacrificii ostenderâ—t vespâ—ram oscasum mundi That the houre of the sacrifice should signifie the evening and Sunne set of the world when Christ should be offered Bernard understandeth two oblations of Christ one when he was offered and presented by his parents in the Temple the other when he was offered upon the crosse at the first oblation he was received inter brachia Simeonis between the armes of Simeon in the second inter brachia crucis betweene the armes of the crosse Lippoman thus Agâ—us vesperâ—inus Deminum morieâ—tem praefigurat c. The evening lambe did prefigure Christ dying the morning lambe Christ rising againe from the dead But rather hereby is signified that Christ from the morning to the even from the beginning of the world unto the end is the Saviour of all them that trust in him he is the Lambe which was slaine from the beginning of the world Osiander And by this daily offering and that twice done is shewed that wee have daily need of reconciliation that Christs bloud should continually be applied unto us by faith Simler And by this daily sacrifice twice offered the Israelites were admonished ut à principio ad finem dâ—â—i ad Dei misericordiam confugerent that from the beginning to the end of the day they should flee unto Gods mercie And that this continuall sacrifice was an evident figure of Christ is evident because it is prophesied to cease at the comming of the Messiah Dan. 9.27 for the shadow must give place to the body Calvin QUEST XLIX How the Lord appointed with the children of Israel Vers. 43. THere I will appoint or meet with the children of Israel c. 1. Here the reason is given from the notation of the word why it was called before ohel maghed the Tabernacle of appointment or meeting because the Lord would meet with them there it is derived rather of iâ—ghad which signifieth to meet or appoint a time than of ghadah to testifie Calvine 2. Here the Lord will appoint with Israel not by speaking himselfe unto them for after the Lord had spoken unto them out of mount Sinai when he delivered the Law and the people were afraid of Gods voice and desired that Moses might speake unto them the Lord after that did not speake himselfe but declared his will by Moses Tostat. qu. 21. 3. Where it is said in the former verse where I will make appointment with you to speake unto thee there Caietanes note is somewhat curious that God in respect of the Levites promittit se duntaâ—aâ— paratum promiseth onely to be readie but with Moses hee promiseth to speake for by with you the Lord meaneth the Israelites with whom hee will speake by Moses as it followeth vers 43. QUEST L. What the Lord promiseth to sanctifie Vers. 43. IT shall be sanctified by my glorie 1. Iunius referreth this to the Israelites that everie one of them should be sanctified by the Lord. But that were too generall it is evident by the next verse where the Lord speaketh of sanctifying the Tabernacle the Altar and the Priests that he meaneth a speciall sanctification and consecration to holy uses 2. The most do supplie place and understand it of the Tabernacle but that is expressed afterward I will sanctifie the Tabernacle 3. Therefore the speech is more generall that he will sanctifie by his presence and what things hee will sanctifie is expressed in the next verse in particular the Tabernacle the Altar Aaron and his sonnes QUEST LI. What is meant here by Gods glorie BY my glorie 1. Some interpret it To my glorie because that was the end wherefore the Lord appointed all those things 2. Some doe understand it of Christ who is the glorie of God without whom nothing is sanctified in the Church this glorie Moses desired to see chap. 33. 3. Lyranus and Lippoman refer it to the comming downe of fire upon Aarons sacrifice Levit. 9. 4. Tostatus to that example of Gods power in destroying Nadab and Abihu with fire for offering strange fire and thereupon the Lord saith I will be sanctified in them that come neere me and before all the people will I be glorified But this promise of God is not so to be restrained to one or two of Gods glorious workes 5. Therefore by glorie the Lord understandeth gloriosam praesentiam his glorious presence Vatablus as Exodus 40.34 Then the cloud covered the Tabernacle c. and the glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle Oleaster QUEST LII How the Lord is said here to sanctifie Aaron Vers. 44. I Will sanctifie also Aaron c. 1. Lyranus understandeth this of their consecration which although it were described alreadie non adhuc tamen erat in executione posita yet it was not hitherto put in execution but the Lord speaketh not here of that sanctification which consisted in the outward ceremonies for they were not Gods glorie whereby he saith he will sanctifie them 2. Tostatus referreth it to that miraculous approbation of Aaron and his two sonnes Eleazar and Ithamar by shewing his fierce wrath in the sudden destruction of his other two sonnes Nadab and Abihu But as Aaron and his sonnes are promised to be sanctified so the Altar also shall be sanctified but the Altar was not sanctified by that example of judgement 3. Therefore the meaning is this that as God had prescribed the externall rites of their consecration so he promiseth se in his efficacem fore that he will be effectuall in them Simler Divina actio sanctificans aderit c. The divine sanctifying action shall be present Caietane lest they might thinke that their sanctification depended upon the outward ceremonies of their consecration For those externall things were used only ut verae sanctificationis symbola as signes or symbols of the true