the rules of those Laws so far forth as the same doth concern Merchants Merchandizes as well as by the rules of our Customary or Common Law of England especially be cause the rules of those other Laws are well known to the other Nations with whom we have commerce and to whō and from whom all Merchandizes are transported wheras the rules of our own Municipall Laws are only known within our Islands and if this Question may be decided either by the Laws of Nations or by the Law Merchant which is but a member thereof or by the Roman Civil Law we find this point clearly and absolutely determined and over-ruled by the rules of those Lawes viz. That all absolute Kings and Princes may set Impositions upon Merchandizes by their Prerogatives and thereupon we may conclude that since one Monarch hath as much power as another as Fortescue in his Book de Laudibus legum Angliae affirmeth the K. of England as well as any other King as the Emperour himself cum ipse omnes libertates habet in regno suo quas imperator vindicat in imperio As King William Rufus told the Arch-Bishop Anselm may by vertue of his Royal Prerogative annexed to his Crown and inherent to his Scepter lay Impositions upon Merchandizes exported or imported into any of his Kingdoms or Doninions CHAP. VII Of the Kings Prerogatives in general and that the same do consist in certain speciall points or cases reserved to the absolute power of the Crown when the Positive Law was first established and that the Canon Law of England doth acknowledge and submit it self to these Prerogatives BY the Law of Nature all things were cōmon and all persons equal there was neither Meum nor Tuum there was neither King nor Subject then came in the Law of Nations which did limit the Law of Nature and brought in property which brought in community of things which brought in Kings and Rulers which took away equality of persons for property caused Contracts Trade and Traffique which could not be ministred without a King or Magistrate so as the first and principal cause of making Kings was to maintain property and Contracts and Traffique and Commerce amongst men Hereupon by the same Law of Nations Tributes and Cust̄omes became due to the King or Prince to maintain him in his place of Government quasi Ministerii sui stipendia saith the School-man Deo Minister est tibi in bonum ideo tributa potestas saith Saint Paul and all these things namely Property and Contract and Kings and Customes were before any positive Law was made then came the positive Law and limited the Law of Nations whereas by the Law of Nations the King had an absolute and unlimited power in all matters whatsoever By the positive Law the King himself was pleased to limit and stint his absolute power and to tye himself to the ordinary rules of the Law in common and ordinary cases worthily and princely according to the Roman Emperour Dignissimum Principe Rex se allegatum legibus consiteri retaining and reserving notwithstanding in many points that absolute unlimited power which was given unto him by the Law of Nations and in these cases or points the Kings Prerogatives do consist so as the Kings Prerogatives were not granted unto him by the people but reserved by himself to himself when the positive Law was first established and the King doth exercise a double power viz. an absolute power or Merum Imperium when he doth use Prerogatives onely which is not bound by the positive Law and an ordinary power of Jurisdiction which doth co-operate with the Law whereby he doth minister Justice to the people according to the prescript rule of the positive Law as for example the King doth not condemn all Malefactors but by the rule of the positive Law but when the Malefactor is condemned by the Law he giveth him a pardon by his absolute Prerogative Again the King doth punish the breach of the Peace within the Land by the ordinary course of the Cōmon Law but he doth make War and Peace with Forreign Nations Quod pertinet ad liberum jus gladii as a Doctor speaketh by that absolute and unlimited power which the Law of Nations hath given unto him Again the King doth establish the Standard of Money by vertue of his Prerogative only for the Common Law doth give no rule touching the matter or form or value thereof but when those Monies are dispersed into the hands of the Subjects the same do become subject in respect of the property thereof to the ordinary rules of the Common Law Again the right of Free-hold and all Inheritance and all Contracts reall and personall arising within the Land are left to be decided by the positive Law of the Land but the Government and ordering of Traffique Trade and Commerce both within the Land and without doth rest in the Crown as a principall Prerogative wherein the King is like to Primum mobile which carrieth about all the inferiour Spheres in his superiour Course and yet doth suffer all the Planets underneath him to finish all their divers and particular courses or rather he doth imitate the Divine Majesty which in the Government of the world doth suffer things for the most part to passe according to the order and course of Nature yet many times doth shew his extraordinary power in working of miracles above Nature And truly as the King doth suffer the customary Law of England to have her course on the one side so doth the same Law yeeld submit and give way to the Kings Prerogative over the other and therefore in the 1 Hen. 7. fol. 23. there is a rule That every Custome is void in Law quae exaltat in praerogativum Regis which is an argument that the Kings Prerogative is more ancient than the customary Law of the Realm besides the power of the Kings Prerogative above the Common Law doth appear in this That whereas all privileges do flow and are derived from the Kings Prerogative and every privilege in one point or other privat communem legem yet the Common Law doth admit and allow of privileges granted by vertue of the King Prerogative CHAP. VIII Of the Kings Prerogative in the ordering and governing of all Trade and Traffique in Corporations Markets and Fairs within the Land and the Common Law doth acknowledge this Prerogative and submit it self there unto FIrst it is manifest that all Corporations of Cities and Boroughes within the Land were chiefly instituted for Trade and Commerce and not by the rule of Common Law no such Corporation can be made but by the Kings Charter for though there have been some Corporations which have been time out of mind yet the Law presumes that the same at first had their beginnings by the Grant of the King besides we find in divers ancient Charters made unto those Corporations a power granted unto the King to take de
power to shut and open the fame at his pleasure Again all the Ports of the Kingdome are the Kings not onely the Cinque-Ports which have a special Warden appointed by the King but the rest of the Ports are also his and many of them bear a mark of the Kings Inheritance in their Additions as Linn Regis Waymouth Melcombe Regis Pool Regis for the King is Custos totius Angliae Regni as the four Seas are the Walls of the Kingdom so the Havens and Creeks are the Gates and Posterns of it They are Ostia they are Ianua Regni and we find two Ports in Italy called by those names the one at the mouth of Tiber the other corruptly called Genoa but the true name thereof is Ianua And as the Havens are Ianua Regni the King himself is Ianus and hath power to open and shut them at his pleasure Omnia sunt nostra clausa patentque manu Saith Ianus in the Poet And again Modo namque patulchus idem modo sacrifico Clusius ore vocor The King of England hath ever had this Prerogative incident to his Crown to shut and open the Ports when it pleased him as appeareth by many Records especially by the Parliament Rolls in the time of King Edw. 3. wherein are found many Petitions that the Sea might be open which during that Kings time was often shut by virtue of his Prerogative only and never fully opened again but when the King layd an Imposition upon Merchandizes And this Prerogative of Custody of the Ports and of shutting and opening the same is reserved unto the Crown upon an excellent reason For Trade and Comerce is not fit to be holden with all persons neither are all things fit to be imported or exported For such persons as are enemies to the Crown come to discover Arcana Regni such persons as come to corrupt Religion or the manners of the people such persons as under colour of Merchandizes come to set up Monopolies or a dry Exchange to drain or draw away our commodities or money out of the Kingdom are not fit to enter in at the Gates of the Kingdome And again such commodities as the Kingdom cannot spare as Corn in time of dearth and such as may advantage our Enemies and hurt us in time of Warre as Horses Armor Gunpowder c. are not fit to be exported out of the Realm And Poysons Heretical books and other things which are apparently hurtfull to the people are not to be imported and therefore the Prerogative of opening and shutting the Ports is accompanied with another absolute power of stoping and imbarring of Trade Comerce sometimes generally sometimes between us and particular Nations and sometimes for particular Merchandizes only whereof there are many presidents and examples both in Records and Histories of our Nation 2 Edw. 1. Rot. Parliament m. 18. in Archivis Turris 2 Edw. 3. Rot. fin m. 17 ibid. 10 Edw. 3. Chaunc m. 3. in dorso ibid. 17 Hen. 6. Sccio Angliae Matthew Paris Hist. Magna P. 568. 10 Hen. 7 Stow. And this Prerogative of imbarring Trade doth result out of the undoubted Prerogative which the King hath to make Peace and War with Forein Nations for open War is no sooner denounced but all Trade of Merchandize is stopt and imbarred between the Nations which are ingaged in the Warre durante bello inter Reges Christianos merces quascunque exportare vetamur ne Regni arcana serutentur saith a Doctor of the Imperiall Law whereupon wee make this Argument That since the King hath absolute power of shut the Ports and stop Trade it standeth with as good reason that he shold have the like power to lay reasonable Impositions upon Merchandizes for opening of the Ports and for giving of freedome of Trade again he that may doe the more may doe the lesse Non debet ei cui id quod majus est id quod minus est non licere saith the Rule of the Law hee that may prohibit Merchants not to Trade or passe may dispence with that prohibition and give them leave to go and Traffique sub modo Again the King of England is Dominus Maris which floweth about the Island as divers ancient Books and Records do testifie as Fitz Avowry 192. 6 Rich. 2. protection 46. Rot. Scotiae m. 16. in Arch. Turris And he is Lord of the Sea not only quoad protectionem jurisdictionem sed quoad proprietatem and this is our Neptunes trident for God gave unto man as well the Dominion of the Sea as of the Earth where it is said Gen. 1. replete terram subjicite eam dominamini piscibus maris c. and in Psal. 8. Omnia Subjecit pedibus ejus Pisces maris quicquid perambulat Semitas maris And therefore Baldus affirmeth de jure Gentium distincta esse dominia in mare sicut in terra arida and again mare attribuitur terrae Circunstanti Hence it is though there be but one Ocean in respect wherof the whole Earth is quasi insula saith Strabo yet is there Mare Gallicum Sardicum Creticum AEgypticum oceanus Britanicus Germanicus c. which particular names do note a propriety in the Princes and States who are Lords of the Land adjoyning Hence it is that our Common Law doth give unto ourKing all the land which is gained from the Sea which Stampford in the Book of the Kings Prerogative doth affirm to belong to the King de jure Gentium quia Mare seu particula Maris est de Territorio illius Civitatis vel Regni cui magis appropinquat saith one learned Doctor Mare se extendit cum aquae flnt mensurabiles saith another hence it is that all navigable Rivers as the River of Thames and the River of Lee and divers others are called in our Books the Kings Streams 19. Ass p.6 Dyer 117 a because cause such Rivers are arms of the Sea so far as the Sea doth flow in them 22. Ass. p. 93. and lastly hence it is that by the Common Law the King may prohibit all Subjects whatsoever to passe over the Seas without his licence and to that end in 22 Edw. 4. the King commanded the Warden of the Cinque Ports and the Bailifs of all other Ports of the Kingdom that they should not suffer any Man Ship or Boat to passe beyond the Seas quousque Rex illud mandaverit and the like Commandments were given 4 Edw. 3. 21 Edw. 3. 16 Rich. 2. 17 Hen. 6. If therefore the king hath such an absolute Interest in the Ports and in the Sea and in all Navigable Rivers wherein the Kings Ports are situated for the main part why should he not have the like absolute power to limit and prescribe unto Merchants what duties they shall pay and upon what terms and conditions they shall passe to and fro upon the Seas and
Ius Imponendi Vectigalia OR The Learning touching CUSTOMS Tonnage Poundage And Impositions on MERCHANDIZES ASSERTED As well from the Rules of the Common and Civil Law As of Generall Reason and Policy OF STATE By Sir JOHN DAVIS Knight c. The Second Edition LONDON Printed for Henry Twyford in Vine-Court Middle Temple MDCLIX TO THE KINGS Most Excellent MAJESTIE THis Question SIR Concerning your Majesties Prerogative in laying Impositions upō Merchandizes ought not to have been made or moved at all howbeit it hath been stirred and debated in Parliament it is now become an Argument of such Dignity and Importance as the best-able amongst your Servants learned in the Law may well imploy their best learning in the discussing thereof For my part though I find myself unable to handle this Noble Question as the weight and worthinesse requireth yet have I upon sundry occasions arising from the course of my service collected such notes and drawn together such materials as may be of use in the building of a Fortresse in the defence of this Prerogative and sure I am that if your Majestie will vouchsafe to cast your eye upon these Collections that your Judgment will make a far better use and application thereof than I who have gathered the same can posible do these little sparks of knowledge being taken into your Majesties consideration wil instantly multiply and arise into a flame and so give a great light for clearing of this Question This learning within my hand is but a Spade in your Majesties hand will become a Scepter I have onely like the poor Indian digged up the Oare of Mine which being brought into the Kings Mint and refined there becomes part of the royall Treasure For the Argument it self it will hardly receive any Ornament Ornari res ipsa negat contenta doceri The best light I can give it is Lucidws ordo by breaking it into Capita rerum and casting it into a plain and naturall method it is somewhat long and in Multiloquio non deest peccatum saith Solomon it is also mixt with some reasons of State wherein a common Lawyer may easily make a Solaecism yet such as it is my zeal to advance your Majesties Service hath moved me to present it to your Majesty with all humbleness and with some hope that this dutifull pains shall purchase a pardon for the errours therein committed By your Majesties unprofitable Servant and humble Subject Iohn Davies THE CONTENTS Of this BOOK CHAP. I. THe Exposition and meaning of certain words which do shew the true state of the Question page 1 CHAP. II. Of the general Law of Nations or Jus Gentium and the force thereof in all Kingdoms that traffique and commerce is a principal subject of that Law and that it giveth power unto all Kings to take Customes and Impositions upon Merchandizes and that the Crown of England hath many Prerogatives annexed to it by the Law of Nations of which our Common Law taketh notice and doth admit and approve the same 4 CHAP. III. Of the Law Merchant which is a branch of the Law of Nations and how it differs from our Common Law and how in the judgement of our Law Merchandizes do differ from other Goods Chattels which do not crosse the Seas and how the Common Law and Statute Law of England do admit and allow of the Law Merchant 10 CHAP. IV. Of the Imperial or Civil Law and of the extent of the Iurisdiction thereof of what force it is at this day within the Monarchies of Europe and in what case it is received within the King of Englands Dominions and how it warranteth all Kings and Absolute Princes to lay Impositions upon Merchandizes 20 CHAP. V. Of the Canon or Ecclesiastical Law and how far forth it doth examine and resolve this Question in cases of Conscience only 25 CHAP. VI That this Question of Imposition may be examined and decided as well by the rules of the Laws before mentioned as by the rules of our Municipiall Laws or Common Law of England 27 CHAP. VII Of the Kings Prerogatives in general and that the same do consist in certain speciall points or cases reserved to the absolute power of the Crown when the Positive Law was first established and that the Cōmon Law of England doth acknowledge and submit it self to those Prerogatives 29 CHAP. VIII Of the Kings Prerogative in the ordering and governing of all Trade and Traffique in Corporations Markets and Fairs within the Land and the Common Law doth acknowledge this Prerogative and submit it self there unto 34 CHAP. IX That the King hath another Prerogative in the Government in the Trade of Merchandizes crossing the Seas differing from the Prerogative which he useth and ordereth in Trade and Traffique in Markets an Fairs within the Land and of the difference between Custome and Toll by the rules of the Common Law 38 CHAP. X. Of the ancient duty called Custome payable for our principall Commodities exported and that it was originally an Imposition 41 CHAP. XI Of the ancient duties called Prizes taken out of Forein goods imported except Wines and the petty-Customes of three pence of the pound were accepted by King Edw. 1. in lieu of Prizes 46 CHAP. XII Of the ancient Customes payable for Wines called Prizoge and Butlerage 50 CHAP. XIII Of the ancient Officers which our Kings have created by vertue of their Prerogatives to search and over-see all sorts of Merchandizes and to collect the duties payable for the same 52 CHAP. XIV Of other Impositions besides the ancient Customes before mentioned laid upon Merchandizes by severall Kings and Queens since the Conquest some of which Impositions have been discontinued or remitted and some of them are continued and paid at this day and first of the Imposition set by King Edw. 1. over and besides the Customes spoken of before 53 CHAP. XV Of the Imposition set and taken by King Edward the second 55 CHAP. XVI Of the Impositions laid and levied upon Merchandizes by King Edw. 3 57 CHAP. XVII Of the Profits raised unto the Crown out of Merchandizes during the reigns of several Kings who succeeded K. Edw. 3 untill the reign of Queen Mary 62 CHAP. XVIII That Queen Mary did use her Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes 70 CHAP. XIX That Queen Elizabeth also used her Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes 71 CHAP XX That our Soveraign Lord King James hath by virtue of the same Prerogative without Act of Parliament layd several Impositions upon Merchandizes 73 CHAP. XXI The general reasons whereupon this Prerogative is grounded 76 CHAP. XXII Of the several Objections that are made against the Kings Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes and the soveral Answers thereunto 94 CHAP. XXIII The Answer to the first Objection 96 CHAP. XXIV Of the second Objection touching the uncertainty and unbounded largenesse of this Prerogative 99 CHAP. XXV The Answer to the second Objection 101 CHAP. XXVI The third Objection
invectis are the most ancient duties payable to the King so are the same grounded saith Bodin upon the greatest reason and equity in the world quid est enim rationi aequitati magis consentaneum quà m is qui in nostro territorio ex nostris questum facit principi nostro cujus permissu sub cujus protectione negotiatur aliquod perdat presolvat And this common reason and equity which is the ground of these duties payable for Merchandizes what is it else but the Law of Nations which is nothing else but that which common reason hath establisht amongst all men for the common good of all men and which all Nations have received and imbraced for their mutual benefit and commoditie Neither is this the onely Prerogative which the King of England hath by the Law of Nations habet Rex in regno suo saith Bracton alia privilegia de jure Gentium propria viz. Soreceum maris thesaurum insentum grossos pisces balenas sturgiones Wavias c. huiusmodi de jure Gentiune pertinent ad Coronam saith Stampford Prerogativa Regis fol. 37. 6. Adde hereunto the absolute power of the King to make War and Peace League and Truces to grant safe Conducts to pardon all Offenders to distribute all degrees of Honour and the like wherein the King hath sole and absolute power Merune imperium non mixtum and which Prerogative is as antient as the Crown and incident to the Crown by the Law of Nations Lastly for the proof that our Common Law doth acknowledge and prove the Law of Nations in most of these cases The Book 19 Edw. 4. 6. doth approve the Kings absolute power in making War Peace and Leagues and in 37 Edw. 6. 20. That part of the Law of Nations whereby the High Constable and Marshall of England do proceed in their Courts of War and Chivalrie is called the Law of the Land We finde also the Kings sole power in 11 Hen. 4. Rot. Parliament in Archivis turris London for Coyning of Money we have the case of Mines Com. 316. for safe conduct of Merchants and stop of Trades tempore guerrae and Letters of Reprisall we have 7 Edw. 4.19.2 R. 3.2 Magna Charta cap. 30. and the Register wherein we find Writs of Reprisall CHAP. III. Of the Law Merchant which is a branch of the Law of Nations and how it differs from our Common Law and how in the judgement of our Law Merchandizes do differ from other Goods Chattels which do not crosse the Seas and how the Common Law and Statute Law of England do admit and allow of the Law Merchant MErcaturavel Societas Mercatorum est magna Respublica saith Vlpian and therefore that Common-wealth of Merchants hath alwayes had a peculiar and proper Law to rule and govern it this Law is called the Law Merchant wherof the Laws of all Nations do take speciall knowledge first both the Common Law and Statute Law of England do take notice of the Law Merchant and do leave the causes of Merchants and Merchandizes to be decided by the rules of that Law for what saith the Book of 13 Edw. 4.9 10 A Merchant Stranger made sute before the Kings Privy council for certain Bailes of silk feloniously taken from him and it was moved that this matter might be determined by Common Law unto which motion the Lord Chancellor doth there answer This sute is brought by a Merchant who is not bound to sue according to the Law of the Land nor to tarry the tryal of twelve men nor other solemnity of the Law of the Land albeit the King hath jurisdiction of him within the Realm and may cause him to stand to his Judgement yet this must be according to the Law of Nature which some call the Law Merchant which is a Law universall throughout the word these are the words of that Book it is there resolved by all the Justices That if the Merchandizes of such a Merchant stranger be stollen and waved by the Felon the King himselfe shall not take those Merchandizes as waifes though in that case the goods of another person were lost by the Common Law of England Doth not this case make it manifest that in the judgement of our Common Law Merchandizes that crosse the Seas are goods of another nature quality and consideration than other goods and Chattels which are possessed within the Realm and do not crosse the Seas This learning is not common in our Books and therefore I think it meet to exemplifie this difference with more cases in this point If two Merchants be Joynt-Owners or Partners in Merchandizes which they have acquired by a Joynt-Contract in this case the one shall have an Action of Account against the other die legem mercatoriam saith the Register fol. 135. and F. N. 117. D. and yet by the rule of the Common Law if two men be joyntly possessed of other goods which are not Merchandizes the one shall not call the other to account for the same Again if two Merchants have a joynt Interest in Merchandizes if the own die the Survivor shall not have all but the Executor of the party deceased shall by the Law Merchant call the Survivour to an account for the moytie F.N. 117. D. whereas if there be two Joynts of other goods which are not Merchandizes the Survivor shall have all per jus accrescendi even by rule of the Common Law Again in an Action of Debt upon a simple Contract which is without Deed in writing the Defendant by the Common Law may wage his Law that is he may bar the Plantiff of his Action by taking an Oath that he doth not ow the Debt nor any part thereof and yet in Itin. Derby 2 Edw. 3. Iohn Crompton Merchant upon a Contract without Deed the Defendant would have waged his Law but was not permitted so to do and so Judgement was given against the said Defendant Again the goods of Ecclesiastical persons are discharged of Toll by the Common Law si non exerceat Marchandizas de eisdem saith the Register 259. a. for then their goods are charged being now become goods of another nature when the same are turned into Merchandizes so are the goods of the French Nobility discharged by Gabels and Impositions if they traffique not but if they traffique saith Bodin their goods are charged like other Merchandizes Again for goods wrongfully taken within the Land the Common Law giveth remedy against the Trespasser or the wrongfull Taker onely but if an English Merchant be spoiled of his Merchandizes upon the Sea or beyond the Sea by the Subject of another King the Register doth give him a Writ of Reprisall against all the Subjects of that Nation Regist. 122. 6. and 46 Hen. 3. we find a more brief cause of Justice for there the King in respect of the
it is binding so it is perpetuall and cannot be rejected as the Roman Civil Law is rejected in most of the Kingdoms in Europe in such cases as do arise within the body of every Kingdom In France Philip le Bell saith Bodin de Repub. lib. 2. cap. 8. when he erected the Courts of Parliament at Paris and Mountpelier did expresly declare That they should not be bound in their judgments by the rule of the Roman Civil Law and in erecting of all the Universities of France they are charged in their severall Charters not to revive the profession of the Civil and Common Law as of binding Laws in that Kingdom and therfore Earum non imperio sed ratione utimur saith another learned Doctor of France In Spain saith Bodin in the same place several Kings have made Edicts that no man upon pain of death should allege the Roman Civil Law as a binding Law in their Dominions And that Stephen King of Spain did forbid the publique pleading of the Civill Law As for England to omit what Pope Elutherius wrote in his Epistle to Lucius the first Christian Monarch of the Britains and whereof mention is made in Saint Edwards Laws de protestate Regia Ecclesiastica published in the time of 3 Hen. 8 petiistis saith he leges Romanas Caesaris vobis transmitti quibus in regno Britaniae uti voluistis leges Romanas Caesaris reprobare possumus legem Dei nequaquam c. In a Parliament holden in England 11 R. 2. when a course of proceedings in Criminal causes according to the Civil Law was propounded an answer was made by all the States assembled That the Realm of England neither had been informer times nor hereafter should be ruled and governed by the Civil Law Rot. Parliament 11 R. 2. in Archivis turris London and accordingly Chopinus the French Lawyer in his Book de Domino Franciae tit. 28. speaking of the Civil law hujus Romani juris saith he nullus apud Anglos usus sed ex veteri gentis instituto Britani reguntur legibus municipialibus quas illis majorum mores praescripserunt But this is to be understood of causes arising within the Land onely for all Marine and Sea causes which doe arise for the most part concerning Merch and Merchandizes crossing the seas our Kings have ever used the Roman Civil Law for the deciding determining therof as the Romans did use the Law of the Rhodians in those cases according to the memorable rescript of the Emperour Anthonius terram suis legibus Rhodiis Regi How be it now those Laws of the Rhodians are digested and incorporated into one body of the Civil Law the jurisdiction touching causes arising upon the Sea is committed by the King of England to his Admirall who in his Court of Admiralty doth proceed in those cases according to the rule of the Civil Law Now for the Rules of the Civill Law touching the power of Kings in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes the same are clear without question and observed without contradiction in all the nations of the world Regiitantum juris ac muneris est vectigalia imponere redditus seu vectigalia portus quae perveniant ex his quae in portum vel ex portu vehentur regalia sunt Rex qui non recognoscit superior em potest instituere nova vectigalia c. hoc est jus totius mundi totus mundus hoc jure utitur the D. Doctors who interpret the Imperiall Law have their Books full of these Rules And if it be objected That these rules of the Imperiall Law are onely intended of the Emperour a learned Civilian hath this position plus juris habet Rex in Regno quam Imperator in imperio quia Rex transmittit regnum ad successionem quod non facit imperator quiest tantum electionis c. Lastly when I speak of the rules of the Civil Law and make use thereof I do apply the same onely in cases of Merchandizes crossing the Seas which I do expresse by way of protestation that I may not be mistaken here and in other places where I cite the Text of the Imperiall Law as if I intended that Law to be of force in England generally as in other places CHAP. V. Of the Canon or Ecelesiastical Law and how far forth it doth examine and resolve this Question in cases of Conscience only THe Canon Law is received and admitted in England as a binding-Law in cases Ecclesiasticall which are indeed the proper Subjects of that Law But this question of Imposition is meerly Civil and therefore the Canon Law doth not handle it but in cases of Conscience only so indeed it doth examin and determine in what cases an absolute Prince may with a good conscience lay and demand new Impositions Decret. causae 24. Quaesti 3. Princeps potest indicere nova vectigalia and in Summa Summarum tit. degabellis exactionibus these rules and distinctions are laid down Quilibet Monarcha potest imponere novum vectigal quod tamen boni viri arbitrio moderaudum est potest Princeps imponere vectigal ultra conventiouem in duobus casibus i. quando redditus ejus non sufficiunt ad segimē boni cōmunis decentiam status ejus 2. quando non sufficiunt ex nova emergentia principes enim sunt à Deo instituti ut nō quaerant propria Lucra sed cōmunem utilitatem populorum lilia agri neque arant neque nent which may be applyed saith a French Monk to all Princes but espicially to the Kings of France because they bore the Lilies The Canonists do likewise allege the example of our Saviour who paid an Imposition of Poll-money and wrought a miracle to enable himself to do it that the Tribute-money which Christ commanded to be paid Date Caefari quae sunt Caesaris and the Custome which Saint Paul willeth every Christian to pay willingly reddite omnibus cui tributum cuivectigal were but Impositions raised by the Emperours Edict only without the consent of the people and yet Saint Paul requires obedience to Princes in that case not only for fear of the Princes displeasure but for conscience sake non solum propter iram sed propter conscientiam CHAP. VI That this Question of Imposition may be examined and decided as well by the rules of the Laws before mentioned as by the rules of our Municipiall Laws or Common Law of England FOrasmuch as the general Law of Nations which is and ought to be Law in all King doms and the Law Merchant is also a branch of that Law and likewise the Imperiall or Roman Law have been ever admitted had received by the Kings and people of England in causes concerning Merchants and Merchandizes and so are become the Law of the Land in those cases why should not this Question of Impositions be examined and decided by
lay an Imposition upon Merchandizes without the consent of the Merchants and doth cause the Officers of his Customes to take and levie the same it seems sat they they take away the goods of the Subject without his consent and without cause of forfeiture which is not warranted either by Law of Nations which brought in property nor by the Law of the Land which doth maintain property CHAP. XXIII The Answer to the first Objection TO this Objection we answer That the King doth not take the Land or Goods of any without his consent but here we must distinguish there is a particular and expresse consent and there is an implicit and general consent when a man doth give his Goods or surrender his Lands to the King by deed enrolled or when in Parliament which representeth the body of the whole Realm and wherein everyman doth give his consent either by himself or his Deputy A subsidy is granted to the King there is an expresse consent but when subjects who live under a Royall Monarchy do submit themselves to the obedience of that Law of that Monarchy whatsoever the Law doth give to that Monarch the subjects who take the benefit of the Law in other things and doe live under the protection of the Law doe agree to that which the Law gives by an implicit and general consent and therefore there are many cases where the King doth lawfully take the goods of a Subject without his particular expresse consent though the same be not forfeited for any crime or contempt of the Owner If a Theef do steal my goods and waive them the King may lawfully take those goods without my particular consent and without any fault or forfeiture of mine but in regard I live under the Law which giveth such wayves unto the King he taketh not the same without my implicit consent so if my Horse kill a man the King may lawfully take my Horse a Deodand without my fault or consent in particular but in that I have consented to the obedience of the law which giveth all Deodands to the King he taketh not my Horse without the implicit or generall consent of mine In the time of War the King doth take my House to build a Fort or doth build a Bulwark upon my Land he doth me no wrong though he doth it without my consent for my implicit consent doth concur with it for that I being a member of the Common-weal cannot but consent to all Acts of necessity tending to the preservation of the Common-wealth So if the King doth grant me a Fair or Market with a power to take a reasonable Toll If a man will buy any thing in my Fair or Market I may take Toll of him though I give no particular consent to the grant because the Law whereunto every Subject doth give consent and obedience doth warrant the taking of Toll in every Market and Fair granted by the King So it is in case of Impositions the Law doth warrant the Kings Prerogative to impose upon Merchandizes as is before declared and therefore though the Merchants give not their particular consents to the laying of these Impositions yet in regard they live under the protection and obedience of the Law which submits it self to this Prerogative and allow and approve the same it cannot be said that the King doth take these Impositions of them without their implicit and generall consent CHAP. XXIV Of the second objection touching the uncertainty and unbounded largenesse of this Prerogative THe second Objection is against the uncertainty and unlimited largenesse of this Prerogative for in other cases they say where the King taketh the goods of a Subject by his Prerogative there is a certainty what he may take as in the case of way vs he may take onely the goods wayved and no more In case of Deodand he may take only the thing that causeth the death of a man and no more In case of wreck he may take only the goods that are wreckt and no more In case of Wardship of Land holden in Capite the King may take the profits of the Land till the Heir sues his Livery and no longer In case where the King hath Annum Diem vastum hee may retain of the Lands of the Felon attainted which are holden of other Lords for a year and a day and no longer In all these cases there is a certainty what the King shall have and how long he shall have it but in case of Imposition the quantity or rate thereof high or low is left to the Kings own will or pleasure so as if he should be mis-led as many Princes have been with evill Counsell he might with his Prerogative doe hurt the Cōmon-wealth by laying too heavy burthens upon his Subjects for though hetherto his Majesty hath imposed upon Merchandizes only twelve pence on the pound over and above the ancient Custome and the Subsidies granted by Parliament yet this Prerogative being unlimitted he may hereafter say they set five shillings or ten shillings upon the pound if it please him and so undoe the Merchants or discontinue and overthrow all Trade and Comerce CHAP. XXV The Answer to the second Objection TO this Objection the fittest answer is That it is an undutifull Objection and withall too busie too bold and too presumptuous for it is an Objection against the wisdome of the King in point of Government and against the bounty and goodnesse of the King towards his people the Text of the Civil Law cited before doth call it a kind of Sacrilege to dispute of Princes Judgments or Actions and for the Law of England sure I am that it trusteth the Wisdome and Judgement of the King alone in matter of greater importance than in laying of Impositions or setting of rates upon Merchandizes Is not the Kings wisdome only trusted with the absolute power of making War and Peace with forein Nations whereby hee may when hee pleaseth interrupt all Trade of Merchandizing Is not the King alone trusted with the like power of making and decrying of monies which is the onely Medium of all Traffique and Comerce Is not he solely and without limitation trusted with the nomination and creation of all Judges and Magistrates who are to give Judgement in cases concerning the Liberties Lands and Lives of all his Subjects hath not he a sole and unlimited power to pardon all Malefactors to dispence with all penal Laws to distribute all Honours to grant to whom he pleaseth Protections Denizations Exemptions not only from Juries but from all other Services of the Common-wealth and yet these Prerogatives if the same be not used with judgement and moderation may prove prejudicial to the Common-wealth as well as the laying of Impositions upon Merchandizes Shall therefore any undutifull Subject make these conclusions The King may have a continuall Warre with Forein States and Princes and so continually corrupt all courses of Merchandizes Ergo he shall lose his
Prerogative of making War or Peace when himself in wisdom shall think fit so to do The King may decry all monies of Gold and Silver in Bullion and establish a Standard of Copper or Leather therefore he shall coyn no monies without the consent of the people The King may if he please break up all the Prisons pardon all Offenders and so give impunity to all Offenders Ergo he shall pardon no Malefactors by Act of Parliament These are found absurd or rather wicked conclusions à posse ad esse is an absurd Argument but à posse nolle nobile est The Law presumes the King to be so noble and so wise that all Acts done by him or in his Name during his Infancy are of as good force in Law as if the Law had bin done in his ripest years The Law presumes the King to be most just in all his actions therfore it hath these rules the Prerogative of the King can do no wrong the King can commit no disseisin the King can make no discontinuance and the like Cor Regis in manu Domini saith Solomon and therefore the Law presumeth that God will ever direct him to that which is just is it not then too much curiosity to instruct where the Law trusteth and too much presumption to presume against the presūption of the Law especially in the time of such a King who is the wisest and justest the most religious and most gracious King that ever reigned in Europe Can any man imagine that so great a Master in the Art of Government the most prudent King of great Britain Ireland the two greatest Islands in this Hemisphere and seated most commodiously for Traffique which all the World knowing that the duties paid unto him for Merchandizes are the most certain settled and assured and withall the best and richest part of his Revenues at this day will lay heavier Impositions upon Merchandizes than they are able to bear and so destroy all Trade and Comerce When King Hen. 7. his most prudent Predecessor did lend money to his Merchants to maintain Traffique will he for a little extraordinary profit for the time present pluck up at once the Root and dry up the Fountain of this Revenue for the time to come it is unprobable it is uncredible it is impossible But suppose that this is credible that the King should lay such heavy Impositions upon Merchandizes as all Merchants should refuse to Traffique who should lose most by that the King or his people assuredly hee should suffer an exceeding great losse in his Customes but we that are of the Commons should save by it having all things necessary for the Life of man within the Land which is Terra suis contenta bonis non indiga mercis We should spare these vain expences which we now make upon Forein Commodities namely Cloath of Gold Cloath of Silver Silks Spices Wines and many other superfluous unnecessary things which doe nourish Pride and Luxury Riot and Excesse amongst us which corrupt our manners and in the end will be the ruin of the Common-wealth I may therefore conclude this point That since the King hath power by his Prerogative to lay Impositions upon Merchandizes he hath also a power coincident thereunto to limit and rate the proportion and quantity thereof according to his own wisdom reasons of State from time to time for either the King must set down the rates or the people or the King and people both by Act of Parliament but if the people will not assent or agree to a reasonable limitation thereof in Parliament shall the King lose those Royal Duties which all other Kings do take by vertue of their Prerogative it were most unreasonable absurd and unjust CHAP. XXVI The third objection touching the repeal of Charta Mercatoria by King Edw. 2. and the remitall of divers Impositions by king Edw. 3. upon sundry Petitions of the commons in Parliament and the punishment of divers Persons in Parliament for procurtng Impositions to be set up THirdly it is objected that this Prerogative of laying Impositions upon Merchandizes hath never at any time been set a foot and used by any of His Majesties Progenitors but it hath been contradicted and upon Petitions of the people such Impositions have been suspended remitted and abolished first King Edw. 1. say they in the 31 year of his Reign did by his Charter called Mercatoria spoken of before lay the Imposition of three pence in the pound now called the petty-Custome with an increase of other duties upon Merchandizes imported by Strangers howbeit this Imposition stood not above seven years by vertue of that Charter but it was discontinued and quite taken way for in 3 Edw. 2. the Charter it self was suspended by the Kings Writ 3 Edw. 2. Claus. m. 23. in Arch. Iurris and 5 Edw. 2. it was utterly repealed by a solemn Ordinance of State Rot. Ordina 3 Edw. 2 in Arch. Turris Secondly King Edw. 3. did at sundry times during his Reign lay severall Impositions upon Woolls and other Staple commodities sometimes fourty shillings sometimes fifty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll and other the like rates upon Merchandizes yet could he never fix nor settle the same upon His Subjects for upon sundry Petitions of the Commons in Parliament who found themselves grieved therewith these Impositions were from time to time remitted 13 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament in Arch. Turris 14 Edw. 3. cap. 21. 17 Ed 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 12. 12 Ed. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 11. Again the same King many times did shut up all the Ports and thereby restrained the exportation of Merchandizes then would he take great sums of Money to grant licences to transport which proved as great a charge as Impositions and yet upon sundry complaints of the people in Parliament the Sea was set open and liberty of Trade permitted again Stat. 18 Edw. 3. cap. 3. 22 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 8. in Arch. Turris 13 Edw. 3. in Sccio Angliae Rot. 12. 13 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 5. in Arch. Turris Lastly in the last year of this Kings Reign divers persons were accused and punished in Parliament for procuring new Impositions to bee set upon Merchandizes namely the Lord Latimer who albeit he were a Noble man and a Privy Counsellor to the King yet was he fined committed to the Mafhalsce and put out of the Council 50 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament nu 34 in Arch. Turris Richard Lions likewise a Citizen of London and Farmer of the Customes an Instrument of the L. Latimers in raising the new Impositions was fined ransomed and imprisoned and put from the Franchise of the Citie 50 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 17. in Arch. Turris And one Iohn Peachy who had gotten a Monoply of Sweet Wines by Letters Patents and by colour thereof had extorted three shillings and four pence out of every Pipe
Customes 3 E. 2. Claus. memb. 16. and after that by an Ordinance made 5 Edw. 2. utterly to repeal that Charter and to abloish all other Impositions raised or levied since the coronation of his Father Ed. 1. except the customes of the demi mark not withstanding after that again Anno 11. of his Reign when he wanted Money for his Expedition into Scotland exquirentes vias saith he in his Writ to the collectors of his customes at London Rot. fin memb. 12. in Archivis turris quibus possemus pecuniam habere commodius decentius tandem de consilio advisamento quorundam mercatorum inveniemus subscriptum which was that he should receive by way of loan forsooth which never was repaid a greater increase of custom upon all merchandizes imported and exported for it is expressed in the VVrit that praeter incrementum de lanis coriis pellibus lanutis which was a third part more than the demi mark viz. twenty shillings for every Noble the King was to receive for every coloured cloth worth three pound sterling a Noble for every other cloath worth fourty shillings four shillings for every peece of Scarlet a Mark for every Tun of VVine five shillings for all Forreign commodities called Averdepois two shillings the pound all which sums of Mony he commandeth the Collectors of his customes to collect to his use upon their Merchandizes which levy or collection though it bear the name of a loan being not made by authority of Parliament nor with the consent of the whole cominalty but taken up by the Kings VVrit onely was nothing else but an Imposition laid upon Merchandizes by the Kings Prerogative CHAP. XVI Of the Impositions laid and levied upon Merchandizes by King Edward 3. KIng Edward the third reigned a full Jubilee of years for he dyed in the fiftieth year of his reign and during all this time as there lay upon him a continuall charge for the continuance of his VVars so was he continually supplied with his customs and Impositions which he had laid upon Merchandizes whereof he was so great a husband by reason of his good husbandryspent such huge sums of Money as there went a report in those dayes that Raimundus Lullius the famous Alchimist did make that Elixer for him whereas his improving of those duties which were paid for Merchandizes was the true Philosophers Stone which did enrich him and enable him to spend so many Millions in his VVars in France In the first year of his reign by his wit only without Act of Parliament he gave new life to Charta Mercatoria made by Edw. 1. and repealed by Edw. 2. or rather by unruly Barons for the words of the Writ are That the customes and duties payable by the Charter praetextu ordinationum per quosdam magnates in regno nostro factos ad tempus aliquod cessarunt jam adnullatis diciis ordinationibus colligi debent levari sicut tempore dicti Avi nostri c. 1 Edw. 1. Rot. fin memb. 39. in Archivis turris Afterwards the Records of this Kings time do plentifully declare That he by vertue of his Prerogative without Act of Parliament laid many great Impositions and raised extraordinary profit upon Merchandizes though not alwayes after one manner yet all the means he used may be reduced unto three kinds Sometimes he did impose certain rates or sums of Money upon Merchandizes as fourty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll with a ratable proportion upon other commodities for levying whereof hee only sent out his Writs to the Collectors of his Customes in every Port and this kind of Imposition being of the nature of the Impositions now in question was more usuall and frequent than any other in this Kings reign as appeareth by sundry Records in the Exchequer and in the Tower of London 17 E. 3. Rot. 308. in Sccio Angliae 21 E. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 11 in Arch. turris 24 F. 3. Rot. 12. Sccio Angliae 25 E. 3. Rot. Parliament 11 22. in Arch. turris 27 E. 3. Rot. 7. in Sccio Angliae 30 E. 3. Rot. 10. Sccio Angliae 38 E. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 26. in Arch. turris 40 E. 3. Rot. 7 Sccio Angliae 50 E. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 163 in Arch. turris At other times he sent out Commissions to take up great quantities of Wooll and other commodities at a low price set by himself and transported the same beyond the Seas where he made the best profit thereof for payment of the wages of his Army there as appeareth by a speciall Record in the Tower 12 E. 3. Rot. Almaniae pars 1. numb. 3. in dorso These taking prizes of English Merchandizes are the first I find in any Record for the Kings provision of Houshold is of another nature But the King took these Woolls in point of Prerogative as his Predecessors were wont to take prizes of all Forein commodities untill King E. 1. did remit all prizes to Merchant Strangers by Charta Mercatoria as is before expressed and also such of English Merchants as would pay the customes restrained by that Charter were offered the like immunition from prizes 31 Ed. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 24. But our English Merchants refused the benefit of that Charter and therefore the King it seemeth was at liberty to take prizes of them as well as Strangers The King did many times shut up all the Ports and stop all Trade and then granted licences to all particular persons to transport Wool and other commodities for which licences he took fourty shillings sometimes fifty shillings for a Sack of Wool and the like rate for other Merchandizes and this is manifest by these Records 13 Ed. 3. Rot. 2. in Sccio Angliae 14 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament in Arch. Turris Thus did this warlike and politique Prince King Edw. 3. by his Prerogative without Act of Parliament lay sundry Impositions and charges upon all sorts of Merchandizes and although upon Petition of his Subjects in Parliament when they granted him other Aids and Subsidies of greater value than these his Impositions he did many times remit and release those Impositions yet did he often times renew the same or impose the like again when the Aide or Subsidy granted in recompence was spent as shall be shew'd more particularly when I com to answer the Objections which have been against His Majesties rightfull prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes CHAP. XVII Of the Profits raised unto the Crown out of Merchandizes during the reigns of several Kings who succeeded K. Edw. 3. untill the reign of Queen Mary TRue it is that during the reign of these Princes we finde no Impositions directly set upon Merchandizes by their absolute power or prerogative but they did not forbear to lay Impositions directly for that they wanted right so to doe or because they doubted of their right in that behalf for they well knew
they had the same right the same prerogative and absolute power that their Predecessors had but because they found other means to make other profit upon transporting of Merchandizes and that in another manner and in so high measure as the trade of Merchandizes in those daies could hardly bear any greater charge without danger of overthrowing all Trade and Comerce And therefore those Princes did in their wisdomes forbear to lay any further Impositions by their Prerogatives For these Kings who reigned after King Edw. 3. who conquered Callis in France and before Queen Mary lost Callis had two principal waies and meanes to raise extraordinary profits upon Merchandizes but proceeding from one cause namely from establishing the Staple at Callis for King Edw. 3. some few yeares before his death did by his Prerogative in point of Government without Act of Parliament erect a Staple at his Town of Callis and did ordain and command that all the Merchandizes exported out of England Wales and Ireland by any Merchant Denison or Alien should presently be carried to the Staple at Callis and to no other place beyond the Seas This Staple at Callis was first setled and fixed there by an Ordinance which the King made by virtue of his Prerogative and absolute power in the government of Trade and Comerce without Act of Parliament And if this Ordinance so made had been thought unlawful and against the liberty of the Subject it would never have been approved and confirmed by the Judgements of so many Parliaments in the times of Rich 2. Hen. 4. Hen. 5. and Edw 4. Neither could there have been such heavy penalties layd by those Parliaments upon the transgressors of those Ordinances Insomuch as in the time of King Henry the sixth it was made Felony to Transport any Merchandizes to any part beyond the Seas but to Callis onely Now the Staple of Callis being thus established there did arise a double profit to the Crown for transportieg of Merchandizes over and above the ancient Customes and other Subsidies granted by Parliament First it came to pass that the Customs and Subsidies for Merchandizes transported out of England Wales and Ireland which before was single and payd but once that is upon the outgate after the establishing of the Staple at Callis the duties for the same Merchandizes became double at the least and for the most part treble and were ever payd twice and for the most part thrice namely once upon the outgate in the Ports of England Wales and Ireland secondly upon the ingate at Callis and because all the commodities brought into Callis could not be vented into the main Land there but the greatest part was to be exported again by Sea into higher or lower Germany and other the North East Countries and some into Spain and Italy and the Ilands of the Levant there did arise a third payment of Customes and Subsidies for so much of their commodities as were exported again cut of Callis by meanes whereof the Customes and Subsidies did amount to threescore thousand or threescore and ten thousand pounds sterling per annum in the latter times of King Edw. 3. and during the reign of Rich. 2. Hen. 4. Hen. 5. and the beginning of the reign of Hen. 6. as appears by the Records of the Exchequer of England which according to the valuation of Moneys at this day the ounce of Silver being now raised from two shillings to five shillings do make two hundred thousand pound sterling per annum which doth equal or surmount all the Customes Subsidies and Impositions received at this day though that plenty of money and price of all things and consequently the expences of the Crown be exceedingly increased in these times And albeit the breach of Amity between the Crown of England and the Duke of Burgundy who was the Lord of the Lower Germany in the weak and unfortunate time of King Hen. 6. did cause a stop of Trade between us and that Country into which the greatest part of our Staple wares especially Wooll and Cloth were vented and uttered and was likewise the cause of loss of all our Territories in France except Callis and all the Merchandizes thereof whereby the Customes and other duties payable for Merchandizes were in the time of that unhappy Prince withdrawn and diminished to a low proportion yet afterwards upon the Mariage of Margaret Sister to King E. 4. unto the Lord Duke of Burgundy as that in honour of the English Wooll which brought so much Gold into his Country he instituted the Order of the Golden Fleece and thereupon the Customes Subsidies and Impositions were raised again to so high a Revenue as our Kings could not well in policy strain that strength of profit upon Merchandizes any higher Secondly albeit the Staple established at Callis being first established by an order made by the Kings Prerogative and absolute power was afterwards approved and confirmed by sundry Acts of Parliament yet did the King by another Prerogative retain a power to dispence with that Ordinance and those Acts of Parliament and to give license to such and so many Merchants as himself thought fit to export any Merchandizes out of England Wales and Ireland unto any other parts beyond the Seas besides à non obstante of the first Ordinance and of the Statutes which did establish the Staple at Callis By virtue of this Prerogative and power the several Kings who had Callis in their possessions did grant so many Licences to Merchants as well Aliens as Denizens to transport our Staple commodities immediately into other places without coming to Callis for which Licenses whereof there are an incredible number found in the Records of England the Merchants payd so dear for their commodities especially the Genoeses and the Venetians and other Merchants of the Levant as by the profits made of those Licences did amount to double the value of those Customes and Subsidies payable for exportation thereof and thereof those Princes as they had the less need so had they no reason at all to charge the Trade of Merchandizes with any other or greater Impositions In these two points before expressed doe consist the principal cause why the Princes of England who succeeded King Edw. 3. who won Callis untill the reign of Queen Mary who lost Callis did not directly use their Prerogative in setting any other Impositions upon Merchandizes above the ancient Customes and Subsidies granted by Parliament For it is to be observed that most part of those Princes who reigned after K. Edw. 3. and before Queen Mary had the Subsidy of Tonnage and Poundage granted unto them by Parliament which being added to the gain of the Staple of Callis did augment not a little the profit layd upon Merchandizes And may be a reason likewise why those Kings did forbear to lay any other Impositions by their Prerogative We may adde hereunto other reasons First Rich. 2. was a Minor and over-ruled by the great Princes of the
Blood who would not suffer him to use his Prerogative Secondly that during the Wars of Lancaster and York there was no fit time to make use of that Prerogative while both parties did strive to win the favour of the people Thirdly that King Hen. 7. had much ado to settle himself in the quiet possession of the Kingdome after those troubles Fourthly that King H. 8. had such a mass of Treasure left him by his Father and did so inrich himself by dissolution of Abbyes as he had no need to make use of this Prerogative Fiftly that K. E. 6. was also a Minor and that his chiefest Council did more contend to advance their own houses than the Kings profit CHAP. XVIII That Queen Mary did use her Frerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes QUeen Mary in whose time the Town of Callis was lost and consequently the benefit of the Staple at Callis was lost did by her absolute power as appeareth by the Report of the Lord Dyer 1 Eliz. Dyer 165. raise an Imposition upon Clothes viz. six shillings and eight pence upon every Cloth over and above all Customes and Subsidies True it is that the Merchants petition'd to be disburthened of this Imposition which was referred to the consideration of the Justices and others whereupon they had many assemblies and conference as that Book reporteth And albeit the Resolution of the Judges in that behalf be not found in that book it is to be presumed That they adjudged the Imposition to be just and lawfull because it was continued and answered during all the Reign of Queen Mary This Queen Mary likewise by her Preroonely layd and Imposition of four Marks upon every Tun of French Wines over and above the Prizage and Buttlerage which during her life time was payd without contradiction CHAP. XIX That Queen Elizabeth alsoused her Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes QUeen Elizabeth also by virtue of the same Prerogative did not only continue the Impositions layd by Queen Mary upon Cloths and French Wines but did raise other Impositions of sundry sorts of Merchandizes by the same absolute power namely upon every Tun of sweet Wines upon every Tun of Rhenish Wines upon every Kental of Allom which during the time of the prudent Princess were payd and received without question Besides the same Queen upon complaint made unto her in the twelfth year of her Reign That the State of Venice did impose one Ducket upon every hundred of Currans exported out of their Dominions by the Merchants of England did by her Letters Patents grant unto the English Merchants who traded into the Levant That they only and their Assigns might bring Currans into England The English Merchants having this privilege did take five shillings and six pence upon every hundred waight of Currans brought into England by Strangers which was duly payd although it was taken by the Merchants by virtue of their privilege only of sortiori yet it ought to have been payd if it had been payable to the Queen her self as the Lord Chief Baron Fleming did observe in his Argument of Bates's case of Currans in the Court of Exchequer in England CHAP. XX That our Soveraign Lord King James hath by virtue of the same Prerogative without Act of Parliament layd several Impositions upon Merchandizes HIS Majesty likewise when he came to be King of England finding his Crown to be seized of this Prerogative and finding withall the necessary charge of the Crown exceedingly to increase did for the supportation thereof not onely continue the Impositions layd by Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth but also layd new Impositions upon sundry sorts of Merchandizes over and above all Customes and Subsidies formerly due and payable for the same And these are the Impositions now the principal of these is twelve pence upon the pound or a second poundage set upon Merchandizes as well exported as imported by Letters Patents 28. Iuly in the sixth year of his Majesties Reign but how is it set and imposed surely with such moderation and limitations and such receptations full of grace and favour as no Monarch or State in the world did ever impart to their Subjects the like in the like case for besides other gracious clauses contained in the same Letters Patents All commodities serving either for food or sustenance of the Kings people or seting the poor on work or for munition or defence of the Realm or for maintainance of Navigation or which especially tends to the enriching of a Kingdome are excepted and discharged by this Imposition As for the special Impositions which his Majesty hath set upon certain forrein commodities as Currans Logwood Tobacco c. As touching the first of these the Imposition hath been adjudged lawful in the Court of Exchequer of England And for the other commodities they are of such nature as no man ever made question but that the Impositions set upon them were lawful Besides these Impositions layd in England his Majesty by his Prerogative onely since the beginning of his Reign received the Impost of Wines in Ireland and hath likewise to make equality of Trade in that Realm layd an Imposition of twelve pence on the pound of all other Merchandizes imported and exported out of the Ports of Dublin Waterford Drogheda and Galway the Citizens of which Cities and Townes are exempted and discharged of Poundage granted by Act of Parliament there which Imposition was never impugned in Ireland but hath since the setting thereof been levied and payd without contradiction And that wee see how long the Crown of England hath been seised of this Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes and how the same hath been put in practice by the most prudent Princes since the Conquest CHAP. XXI The general reasons whereupon this Prerogative is grounded ALthough it be a matter of difficulty and doth savour withall of curiosity and presumption to search a reason for every Prerogative that is incident to the Crown for Sacrilegii est disputare de Principis facto saith the Imperial Law and Scrutator Majestal is opprimitur à gloria saith the Wise man Yet the reasons whereupon this Prerogative is grounded are so many and manifest as it were not amiss to collect the principal of them rather for the confirmation than the satisfaction of such as have moved this question touching the lawfulness of Impositions layd by his Majesty upon Merchandizes First the King is the Fountain of all Justice and therefore the first reason drawn from the Kings charge in doing Justice and procuring Justice to be done to Merchants not onely distributive Justice wherein consisteth Praemium and Paena but cōmutative Justice is also derived from the King Now his Majesty doth exercise commutative Justice chiefly in the ordering and government of Trade and Comerce wherein hee is to doe Justice or to procure Justice to be done to his Subjects who do make contracts real and personal within the Land But to his Merchants that
trade and traffique with Forrein Nations and to Strangers that trade traffick with us for the Administration of coÌ„mutative Justice within the Land the King receiveth sundry profits which grew first by way of Imposition A man cannot recover a Debt in the Kings Court but first he payeth the King a Fine for his first Process Land cannot be conveighed by a Common Recovery but a Fine for the Original must be payd to the King Neither can Land be passed from one to another by Fine in the Kings Court but the Kings Silver must be payd pro licentia concordandi Adde hereunto the profit of the Seals in all the Kings Courts for all manner of Writs And yet the King in Charta magna did promise Nulli negabimus nulli vendemus Iustitiam vel rectum but the Kings taking of these and the like Duties is no breach of the great Charter for that the same was imposed by the King long before the Charter was made and taken ut Ministerii sui stipendia as the Schoolman speaketh and withall to recompence the charge of the Crown in maintaining the Court of Justice See Bodin lib. 6. de Repub. cap. 2. where hee speaketh of the like profit made upon the Process in France And shews that the antient Romans did the like And the Emperour Caligula took the fortieth penny of that which was demanded in every several Civil Action If then such profits be taken for the King in his Courts of Justice within the Land towards the charge which he sustaineth in the maintainance of these Courts and the Offices thereof which duties were at first limitted and imposed by the King himself without any Act of Parliament for who ever heard of an Act of Parliament whereby the same were granted Is there not as good reason why the charge of the King in doing Justice and procuring Justice to be done unto Merchants whose residence and comerce is for the most part out of the Land should be recompenced out of Merchandizes imported and exported not according to the will of the Merchant and pleasure of the people out proportionable according to the Kings charge which being best known to himself it is most meet that the recompence should be limitted by himself Touching the charge of the King in doing and appointing Justice to be done to Merchants Are not all Leagues Truces and Treaties of State with Forein Princes wherein the publique Trade and Comerce of Merchants are ever included concluded and made at the Kings charge Did not the Kings Council of State and high Court of Chancery give more speedy hearing to the causes of Merchants than to the causes of other Subjects Doth not the King maintain a Court of Admiralty for deciding of Marine causes which doe for the most part concern Merchants Doth he not bear the charge of several Leâ—ger Ambassadors in Italy in Spain in France in the Low Countries in Turkie whose principal Negotiation doth consist in procuring Justice to be done to our Merchants And if our Merchants doe suffer wrong in any Forein Country by reason of any defective neglect in doing Justice there doth not the King by his Prerogative grant them Letters of Mart or Reprisal that they may right themselves which is a Species justi Belli as the Civilians call it And if the injury done to the Merchants bee multiplyed and continued with a high hand Is it not the Kings Office to denounce and prosecute War against such a people as doth refuse to doe Justice unto his Merchants For this cause the Romans began the first Punick War saith Appian Cicero in his Oration pro Lege Manlia affirmeth Populum Romanum saepe Mercatoribus Injuria suis tractata bella gessisse Briefly the plenty of Money being greater in this Age than ever was there by reason of so many Millions of Gold and Silver brought from the Indies into Europe and the price of all Merchandizes being withall greatly enhanced and the charges and expences of Princes exceedingly encreased is it meet or just that the King at this day should be stinted or bound to that old Demimark onely for Native commodities or the three pence of the pound for the Forein commodities which Edw. 1. was content to accept of four hundred years since or a single poundage onely which in the time of King Edw. 4. was not sufficient to maintain the necessary charges of keeping the Sea as the Acts of Parliament 12 Edw. 4. cap. 5. which granteth that Subsidy to the King reciteth all the Kings charge in supporting the Trade of Merchants being unlimited and infinite And shall the duties payable for Merchandizes be stinted and restrained to such a proportion only as the Subject shall bee pleased to grant unto him Assuredly if the King had not a Prerogative of his own absolute power without Act of Parliament to increase the duties payable for Merchandizes at this day a Merchants Counting-house would be richer than the Kings Exchequer and the Subject who may live privately and moderate his expences and yet raise the Fines of his Coppy-holds and Rents of his Demeans without controlement would be in better case than the King who by reason of the Majesty of his Estate cannot abridge his charges and yet should have no power of himself without leave of his Subjects to increase his Revenue Again the King is not only at charge in doing of Justice to his Merchants at home and in procuring Justice to bee done to them abroad but the doth withall maintain a Royall Navy of Ships the best the fairest the strongest in the world at this day to protect all Merchants from spoyl and Piracy on the sea In the maintainance of this Navy the King doth expend more Treasure than the whole Revenue of some of his Predecessors did amount to And he doth not onely secure Merchants by Sea but he gives them safe conduct by Land also as appeareth by the great Charter So as they may well give our King that title which Virgil gives to the King of Bees Ille operum custos And seeing Merchants are most likely resembled to those Industrious creatures because they bring the hony to the Kings Hives to wit to his Havens and Ports where they and their Merchandizes bee protected and reserved why should they not imitate the Bees in observing their King and in making him partaker of the fruit of their labours Neither is it a new thing or an invention of this Age to lay Impositions upon Merchants for their Wastage and Protection at Sea for Plinius tels us lib. 19 cap 4. Merces praetiosae ut ex India Arabia Ethiopia tuto in Europam à Mercatoribus conveherentur necessariò classem parandam esse adversas Piraticas incursiones inde maritimi exercitus habendi causa vectigal rubri maris institutum A third reason drawn from the Interest the King hath in the parts of the Kingdom and the custody thereof which giveth him
come in and out of his Streams and Ports with their Ships and Merchandizes Podagium in Mari debet solvi sicut in terra si sit impositum per dominum Maris saith Baldus and the rights belonging to the Lord of the Sea saith another Doctor are Ius navigandi jus piscandi jus imponendi vectigalia pro utroque Again the Kings of England have the like Prerogative in the government of Trade and Comerce belonging to this Kingdome as other Princes and States have within their Dominions he must of necessity have the like absolute power as they all have to lay Impositions upon Merchandizes imported and exported otherwise he cannot possible hold the ballance of Trade upright or perserve an equality of Traffique between his own Subjects and the Subjects of Forein Princes and consequently it will lye in the power of our Neighbours to drain and draw away all our wealth in a short time or else to overthrow all Trade and Comerce between us and them at their pleasure and we shall have no means to encounter or avoid the mischief for their Princes having sole power to impose will have the sole making and managing of the Market between their Subjects and us and consequently may set what price they please upon all Merchandizes enforcing us to sell our Commodities cheap and buy their Commodities dear onely by this advantage of laying Impositions And therefore the King of England must of necessity have the same absolute power to lay Impositions upon Merchādizes as other Princes have as well ut evitetur absurdum as to prevent the ruin of the Common-wealth by the equall ballancing of Trade Comerce between his Subjects and the Subjects of Forein Princes Upon this reason when the Duke of Venice in the time of Q. Eliz. as is before expressed had laid an Imposition of one Ducket upon a 100 li. weight of Currans carried out of his Dominions by any English Merchant the Queen by speciall Patent in the twelfth year of the Reign did enable the Merchants which did Trade into the Levant to levie five shillings and six pence upon every 100 livre. weight of Currans brought into England by any Merchant Stranger Upon the like reason when in the time of King Hen. 8. the Emperor and the French King had raised the valuation of their monies both so high as there grew not only an inequality of Trade between their Subjects and the Subjects of England but our monies standing at their former values were carried out of the Realm in great quantities The King in the 24 year of his Reign granted a Commission unto Cadinall Woolsey to enhance the values of English monies likewise by that means to set ballance of trade even again and to keep our monies within the Realm Upon the same reason of State when the King of Spain that now is in the year 1614. had laid an Imposition of thirty upon the hundred on all Merchandizes imported and exported by Strangers the French King Hen. 4. was quickly sensible of it and did forthwith impose the like in his Kingdom then it followed of necessity that other Nations should follow and imitate them whereby it came to passe that Comerce of Merchants generally throughout Christendome began to decay which being perceived by these two great Princes they agreed to take away those excessive Impositions upon severall Treaties between them and the Italians and after between them and the English and the Dutch Briefly we find examples in all ages that whensoever by reason of Warre or for any other cause any Forein Prince gave the least impediment to Merchants in their Trade our Princes gave the like entertainment to their Merchants again This is declared in Magna Charta cap. 30. where it is plainly expressed what entertainment the Merchants of all Nations should expect in England Habeant Salvum securum conductum saith the Charter Praeterquam in tempore guerrae si fuerint de terra contra nos guerrina then as our Merchants are used with them so shall their Merchants be used with us 46 Edw. 3. The Countesse of Flanders having arrested the goods of the English Merchants there the King in recompence of their losses granted unto them all the goods of the Flemings in England whereof there is a notable Record mentioned before 1 Edw. 3. pat m 19. in Arch. Turris There are many other examples of mutuall embarments of Trade between the Flemings us and also between us and the French men during our Wars with France which I omit I will recite onely one president in the 40 year of Queen Elizabeth at which times the Merchants of the Haunce Towns having by sinister information procured the Emperour to banish our English Merchants out of the Empire the Queen by her speciall Commission did authorize the Mayor and Sheriffs of London to repair to the Still-yard being the Hostell of the Haunces to seize that House into her Majesties hands and there to give warning to the Merchants of the Haunce Towns to forbear Traffique with any of her Subjects in England and to depart the Realm upon that very day which was assigned to our Merchants to depart out of the Empire Lastly for the ordering and government of Trade among our own Merchants in Forein Countries and at home our Kings by their Prerogatives have instituted divers Societies and Companies of Merchants as the Company of Merchant Adventures the Muscovia Company the Turkie Company the East India Company c. all which are created upholden and ruled by the Kings Charter only whereupon I may conclude that the Kings of England having the same power in governing and ballancing Trade as other Princes have may justly execute the same power as well by laying Impositions upon Merchandizes as by the other means which are before expressed CHAP. XXII Of the several objections that are made against the Kings Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes and the several Answers thereunto THE first Objection touching the property which all free Subjects have in their goods First it is objected that under a Royal Monarchy where the Prince doth govern by a positive Law the Subjects have a property in their Goods and inheritance in their Lands Ad Reges potestas omnium pertinet ad singulos proprietas So as the King hath no such Prerogative say they whereby he may take away the Lands or Goods of a Subject without his consent unless it be in a case of Forfeiture And therefore though Samuel foretold the people when they desired a King Hoc erit Ius Regis tollere agros vestros vineas oliveta dare servis suis Yet Ahab though he were a wicked King did not claim that Prerogative when he coveted Naboths Vineyard neither did he enter into it untill Naboth by false witnesses was condemned and stoned to death for blasphemy and then he took it for a lawfull Escheat but when the King doth
their answers made by the King thereunto it is evident that neither the Petitions of the people nor the Kings answers thereunto do disprove this right of the Crown to lay Impositions upon Merchandizes for Petitions do not of necessity prove or suppose the Petitioners have received wrong Petitions are of divers kinds 1. There are Petitions of Grace which do not insist upon any right but upon meer Grace and Favour 2. There are Petitions of Right wherein the Petitioner doth set forth a pretended right and yet perhaps upon examination it is found that they have no right at all and commonly they ask more than their right is Iniquum petas ut aequum feras 3. There are Petitions Armatae when a company of Rebels armed against the Crown do yet preferre their Petitions but with an intent to effect their desire whether it be right or wrong if their Petitions be not granted Et stricto supplicat ense petens many of their armed Petitions were exhibited during the Barons Wars during the Wars of Lancaster and York and in sundry popular comotions since the Conquest but these Petitions which we speak of were made by the Commons or by some factious Spirits in the name of the Commons in sundry Parliaments holden during the Reign of King Edw. 3. howbeit if wee look upon the form of these Petitions we shall find there is nothing sought but Grace and Favour and if we consider the Kings answers though many of them be very gracious we shall find him therein much reserved and withall circumspect not to prejudice or conclude his Prerogative in point of right the form of these Petitions was for most part but thus The Commons pray that the Imsitions or Maletolt of fourty shillings upon every Sack of Wooll may cease or be taken away and that the Custome of the demi mark may onely be taken Or thus The Cōmons pray that the passage of the Sea may be open to all manner of Merchants and Merchandizes as it had been in former times herein we find no claim or challenge of right but a modest prayer of Grace and Favour unlesse the word Mayletolt may seem to imply a wrong because some do conceive that the word doth signifie an evil Toll wheras indeed the word doth signifie Toll-money for Mayle in old French is a small peece of money and therefore the rents taken by force in the Borders of Scotland was called Blackmayle and the word Mayletolt in some of our old Statutes is taken in bonam partem which speaks of Droiturell Mayletolts But in what form doth Edw. 3. make his Answers to those Petitions in divers formes according to the diversity of the occasions reasons of State but alwayes in a gentle and gracious manner sometime he granteth the Petition in part onely for a certain time or after a certain time expired that his people may know that as he receiveth part of the Petition so he might have rejected the whole if he might have been so pleased sometimes he granted the whole Petition yet not absolutely but conditionally that hee may receive a greater recompence but wheresoever he doth franckly yeeld to remit any Imposition we find in the same Record a Subsidy granted unto him of far greater value and profit than the Imposition by him remitted wherein we perceive that he followed the wise counsell of Roabohams old Counsellers given in the like case of Impositions 3 Kings cap. 12. Se hodie obedieris populo huic petitioni eorum cesseris locutusque diebus c. Sometimes he gives a generall or doubtfull answer and sometimes hee is silent and gives no answer at all so as he doth never bind nor conclude himself by any of those answers to those Petitions but with such reservation as he might still make use of his Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes to demonstrate this point more plainly it were not amiss out of many Records which I have seen and whereof I have the Copies transcribed out of the Records themselves with mine own hands to select and set down some of those Answers in any of the kinds aforesaid In 14 Edw. 3. cap. 21. the Cōmons pray the King that he would grant an Act of Parliament that no more Custome should bee taken for a Sack of Wool but a demi mark nor for Lead nor Tin nor Leather nor Wooll-fells but the old Customes This Petition is general and extending to all Staple Comodities without exceptions of persons or limitation of times but what is the Kings answer That from the Feast of Pentecost which commeth unto a year neither he nor his Heirs shall take of any Englishman for a Sack of Wooll more Custome than the half Mark upon Wooll-fells and Leather no more than the old Custome Here this Petition is granted but in part First in respect of the persons for Englishmen only are favoured and Strangers are omitted Secondly onely in respect of the Commodities for Wooll-fells and Leather onely are exempted and Tin and Lead remain to be charged as before Thirdly in respect of the time for the King continueth his Impositions formerly laid for a year and more notwithstanding that Petition But let us see withall what the King did gain in Parliament upon yeelding to the peoples Petition but in part in the first Sessions of this Parliament it was granted that every man who should ship Woolls over the Seas should find Sureties to bring in upon his first return for every Sack of Wooll two Marks of Silver Plate or Bullion and to deliver it to the Kings Executors and in the next Sessions there was granted unto him the nineth Fleece the nineth Lamb and the nineth Sheaf of Corn throughout the Realm which the people did often times redeem with a gift of twenty thousand Sacks of Wool Here we see the fruit that the King made by following of Rehoboams old Counsellers yet out of this grant and remission made by the King who can draw an Argument against the Kings right in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes Again 29 Edw. 3. when there lay an Imposition of fourty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll above the old Customes A Conferrence was had between the Lords and Commons in the White Chamber at Westmin where after a short Parliament saith the Record 29 Edw. 3. Rol. Parliament numb. 11. in Arch. Turris It was concluded that the King should have a greater Subsidie out of Wooll Wooll-fells and Leather for six years so as during that time the King did lay no other Impositions or Charge upon the Commons Here is a conditionall agreement between the King and the poople and here the King doth remit his power of Imposition for a recompence of greater value And this is a strong Argument That the King had right to impose otherwise the people would never have bought their freedom from Impositions at so high a rate or price The like conditionall agreement between the King and the
people we find in 6 Edw. 3 Rot. Parliament numb. 4. 13 Ed. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 5. 18 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb.10.26.in Arch. Turris In 28 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 26. The Commons complain of an excessive Imposition upon Wooll-fells and desire that the old Custome might he paid The Kings Answer is the old Custome ought not to be withdrawn In 38 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 26. The Commons desire that an Imposition of three shillings and four pence upon every Sack of Wooll at Callis and all unreasonable Impositions bee repealed The Kings answer unto this is It pleaseth the King that all unreasonable Impositions be repealed like unto this is that answer which is contained in the Parliament Rolls of 6 Edw. 3. numb. 4. in Arch. Turris When Petition was made for remittall of Impositions I shall saith the King assesse no such Tallages in time to come but in manner as it hath been in time of mine Ancestors and ought to be by reason Can any wit of man pick any Arguments out of these Answers against the right of the Crown in setting Impositiout upon Merchandizes Lastly in 13 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 13. the Commons pray that the Maletolts of Wooll may be taken as it was used in former times being then enhaunsed without the Assent of the Commons To this Petition there is no answer found of Record the King is silent and gives no answer at all which doubtless the King had not refused to do if the Petition had been exhibited in point of right and not in point of favour Thirdly touching the punishing of the persons before mentioned for procuring of new Impositions to be set upon Merchandizes we are to consider two circumstances first the time when and next the causes wherefore these persons were called in question The time when these persons were called to account was a Parliament holden in 50 Edw. 3. the last year of that Kings Reign at which time that great and renowned Prince who had been formerly assisted by a most wise and politique Councell was become weak and stupid and almost in despair through sicknesse age melancholy conceipted upon the death of his eldest Son the Black Prince and suffered himself to be â—ll-governed by a Woman called Alice Perrey and her Favourite the Lord Latimer upon which occasion and advantage the Commons grew more bold than they were wont to be in former Parliaments and therefore if ought had been done in that Parliament which might prejudice the Kings Prerogative it is â—ot to be urged as an example or presiâ—ent in these times but in truth the â—auses for which these persons were cenâ—ured do rather approve the right of the Crown in laying Impositions than any way disaffirm the same First Richard â—ions a Farmer of the Customes was accused in this Parliament by the Commons that he had set and procured to be set upon Wooll and other Merchandizes certain new Impositions without assent of Parliament converting the same to his own use without controule the High Treasurer not being acquainted therewith the said Richard assuming to himself in divers things as a King 50 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament numb. 17 18 19 20. This was his Accusation and though his answer were that he set those Impositions by the Kings Commandment yet did he shew no Warrant for it and therefore was justly punished with fine ransome disfranchisment and imprisonment But how may this insolency and misdemeanour of a Subject be an argument against the right or Prerogative of the King Lions a Merchant of his own head cannot set Impositions upon Merchandizes Ergo King Edw. 3. a Monarch of his royall Authority cannot do it what an absurd argument were this as if a man should say it were High Treason in a Subject to Coyn money Ergo the King himself cannot do it or cause it to bee done besides the accusation it self doth imply that the King hath power to impose upon Merchandizes because Lions is charged being a Subject to take upon him as a King in divers things namely in setting of ImpositioÌ„s as if they should have said a King may do it but not a Subject according to the rules of the Imperial Law Solus Princeps instituit vectigalia Regni tantum juris muneris est indicere vectialia imponere vectigalia maximi Imperii est inferior a Principe non potest imponere and the like And the Bill exhibited by the Commons in this Parliament 50 Edw. 3. Rot. Parliament 191. praying that those that should set new Impositions by their own Authority encroaching unto themselves Royal Power might have Judgement of life and member seemeth to be grounded upon good reason and doth prove it is a Mark of Soveraignty and Royall Power to set Impositions and therefore if a Subject of his own head of his own authority wil presume to do it he is worthy to dye for it and yet this Bill did receive but a general answer viz. Let the Common Law run as it hath been used heretofore Touching the Lord Latimers censure he had not only upon his own head and authority set sundry Impositions upon Merchandizes at Callis where the Staple there was much decayed but he was charged with sundry other misdemeanors mentioned in the said Roll namely that he brought in divers Tallies and Tickets whereby the King was indebted unto his Souldiers and Pensioners for which he gave little or nothing to the parties and yet had an entire allowance in the Exchequer to the great damage of the King and scandall of the Court that he had also deceived the King of the pay and wages which he had sent unto his Souldiers in Britain that he had sold a great quantity of the Kings provisions for his Army there and converted the same to his own use and that he had delivered up the Town of Saint Saviours in Normandy and the Town and Fort of Betherell in Britainy not without suspition of Corruption and Treason How can the Lord Latimers censure for these deceits and misdemeanors make an argument against the right of the Crown in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes And the like may be said of the punishment of Iohn Peachy who having got a Patent that none should sell sweet Wines within the City of London but himself his Deputies and Assignes by colour thereof did extort three shillings and four pence out of every Pipe or Vessell of sweet Wine sold by others within the City Shall this extortion committed by a Subject by colour of a Patent where perhaps the Patent doth not warrant it be objected as an argument that the King himself might not lay the like Imsition upon every Pipe or Vessel by vertue of his Prerogative therefore the punishment of these persons was not the cause that for an 150. yeares after that no Impositions were layd upon Merchandizes by Prerogative but the Princes who succeeded Edw. 3. untill Queen Mary did
forbear to use their Prerogative in that kind for those other notable and true causes which are before at large expressed in the seventeenth Chapter Lastly touching the Imposition of six shillings and eight pence upon every Cloth laid by Queen Mary after the losse of Callis she held the same with a new Imposition upon French Wines without any question during her life and albeit complaint were made against the Imposition set upon Cloaths unto Queen Elizabeth upon her first entry as it is usuall for the people to complain of burthens and charges upon every change of Government Yet we find that after the Conference of the Judges spoken of by my Lord Dyer 1 Eliz. f. 165. Dyer though their resolution be not their reported Queen Elizabeth did continue that Imposition and also the Impost upon French Wines as being lawfull set for the space of fourty four years without any further contradiction besides Queen Elizabeth did raise divers other new Impositions as is before declared whereunto there was never made any opposition during her Reign and which His Majesty that now is hath received without any question for the space of fifteen years and thus much may suffice for answer to the several points in the third Objection CHAP. XXVIII The fourth Objection that the Prerogative is bound or taken away by divers Acts of Parliament FOurthly It is objected That though it were granted and admitted that the King de jure communi hath a rightful Prerogative to lay Impositions upon Merchandizes yet that power say they is restrained and taken away by sundry Acts of Parliament First the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 30. doth give safe conduct and free passage to all Merchants to buy and sell absque aliquibus malis tolnetis per antiquas rectas consuctudines Secondly by the Act or Charrer of confirmation in 25 Edw. 3. The King doth release a Mayltolt of fourty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll and doth grant for him and His Heirs unto the Commons that he shall not take such things without the Commons consent or good will and in the same Act or Charter reciting that wheras divers people of the Realm were in fear that the Aids and Taxes which they had given to the King before that time was towards his War and other businesses of their own grant and good will might turn to a bondage of them and their heirs because in time to come they might be found in the Rolls and were likewise grieved for Prizes taken throught the Realm The King doth grant for him and his Heirs That he will not draw such Ayds Taxes or Prizes into a Custome for any thing that had been done before that time be it by Roll or any other president that may bee found Thirdly by the Statute 14 Edw. 3. cap. 12. the King doth grant that all Merchants Denizens and Aliens may freely come into the Realm with their goods and Merchandizes and freely tary there and safely return paying their Customes Subsidies and profits thereof reasonably due Fourthly by the Statute 11 Rich. 2. cap. 9. it is enacted That no Imposition or Charge be put upō Wools Wooll-fells or Leather other than the Custome or Subsidie granted to the King in that Parliament if any be the same to be adnulled and repealed saving to the King his ancient right there are other Acts of Parliament containing the same sence and substance but these principally have been singled out and cited as specially Statutes restraining and taking away the Kings Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes CHAP. XXIX The Answer to the fourth Objection TO this Objection first I answer That this being a Prerogative in point of Government as well as in point of profit it cānot be restrained or bound by Act of Parliament it cannot be limited by any certain or fixt Rule of Law no more than the course of a Pilot upon the Sea who must turn the Helme or bear higher or lower sail according to the wind and weather and therefore it may be properly said That the Kings Prerogative in this point is as strong as Samson it cannot be bound for though an Act of Parliament be made to restrain it and the King doth give his consent unto it as Samson was bound with his own consent yet if the Philistins come that is if any just or important occasion do arise it cannot hold or restrain the Prerogative it will be as thred and broken as easie as the bonds of Samson and again Ius imponendi vectigalia inhaeret sceptro saith the Law Imperiall quod Sceptro inhaeret non potest tolli nisi sublato Sceptro The Kings Prerogatives are the Sun-beams of his Crown and as inseparable from it as the Sun-beams from the Sun The Kings Crown must be taken from his head before his Prerogative can be taken away from him Samsons hair must be cut off before his courage can be any jot abated Hence it is that the Kings Act nor any Act of Parliament can give away his Prerogative for in his own Act the King cannot release a tenure in Capite nor grant it to any Subject Dyer 44. If the King grant Land to I.S. to hold as freely as the King himselfe holds his Crown he shall hold his Land still of the King in Capite and if he Alien it hee shall pay a Fine for the tenure is vested in the King by his Prerogative saith the Book 14 Hen. 6. 12. and therefore when King Edw. 3. did grant unto the Black Prince his eldest Son the Dutchy of Cornwall una cum omnibus wardis maritagiis releviis c. non obstante Prerogativa Regis the Prince could not seize a Ward that held of the Kings Ward who held in Capite of the King because it belonged to the King by his Prerogative 34 Ass. pl. 25. whereby it is manifest that the King by his own Grant cannot sever his Prerogative from the Crown nor communicate any part thereof to any one not to the Prince his eldest Son and in this case of Tenure it was resolved in the last Assembly of Parliament in England That no Act of Parliament could be framed by the wit of man whereby all Tenures of the Crown might be extinguished neither can any Act of Parliament in the flat Negative take away the Kings Prerogative in the affirmative The King hath a Prerogative in the affirmation that he may pardon all Malefactors There is a Statute made at Northampton 2 Edw. 3. That no Charter of pardon for killing a man shold thence forth be granted but in one case where one man killeth another in his own defence by misfortune Hath this Statute so bound the Prerogative as no man ever since hath been pardoned for killing a man but in the cases before mentioned The King hath a Prerogative in point of Government to make choice of the Sheriff in every County there is a Statute made 28 Edw. 3 cap. 7. That
no man shall be Sheriff two years together and that no Commission shall be granted or renew'd for the year following to him that hath been Sheriff the year before Was the Kings Prerogative bound by this Statute when hee granted the Sheriffwick of Northumberland to the Earle of Northumberland during his life with non obstante of that Statute 2 Hen. 7. fol. 6. Again the King hath no ancient and absolute power to grant dispensation for holding Ecclesiastical Benefices in CoÌ„mendum There is a Statute made 7 Edw. 3 in Ireland whereby it is enacted and declared that the Kings dispensation in this case shall be utterly void if it be not by Act of Parliament did this Statute so derogate from the Kings Prerogative and so restrain it that he might not only by his Letters Patents Grant CoÌ„mendamus before the Statute of 28 Hen. 8. in this Realm assuredly the Kings dispensation non obstante the Statute would have taken away the force thereof as if no such Law had ever been made There are manyother cases of like nature which I omit as for the particular Statutes before recited the words thereof are too generall to bind or restrain this Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes First that Statute of Magna Charta doth give safe conduct to all Merchants to come and go and to tarry within the Realm and to buy and sell their Merchandizes sine malis tolneâ—is per antiqnas rectas consuetudines How do these generall words restrain the Kings Prerogative in this Case for the ancient Common Law of the Land which is the Common Custome of the Realm doth warrant and approve the Kings Prerogative in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes as before I have fully and clearly proved then a reasonable Imposition laid by the King is Antiqua rect a consuetudo warranted and approved by the Great Charter Secondly albeit King Edw. 1. by Act or Charter of confirmation of Charta Mercatoria made in Anno 25. of his Reign doth release the Maletolt of fourty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll and doth grant for him and his heirs that he will take no such thing without the assent and good will of the Commons That word such doth not absolutely bind the Kings Prerog. that he shall lay no Imposition at all for it is to be intended such in quantity such in excess for foury shillings at that time was as much as six pound at this day which the scarcity of money in those dayes being considered and compared with the plenty of money at this day might then be said to be a great burthen and yet this strong band doth not bind K. Ed. 3. his Grand-child but that notwithstanding this Charter or Act of Parliament he took these things in greater quantities sometimes fourty shillings sometimes fifty shillings upon a Sack of Wooll when the Philistins came upon him that is when the Wars of France and other urgent occasions did presse him to it as to the other Article contained in the Act or Charter of 25 Edw. 3. where it is said the people did fear left the Aids and Taxes granted of their good will to the King might turn to a bondage to them and their heires when the same in time to come should be found in the Rolls and the King did grant for him and his heirs That he would not draw such Ayds and Taxes into a Custome that Act in this point restraineth not the Kings Prerogative in setting Impositions upon Merchandizes for it speaketh only of Ayds and Taxes willingly granted by the people in Parliament therefore I marvell that this Article was ever objected or used as an argument against Impositions and whereâ—â— the King doth grant that such Ayds shall not be drawn into a Custome such words are usuall in the preambles of Acts of Subsidies where the grant is large and extraordinary viz. That it may not be drawn into an example that it may not be a president in future times and yet succeeding Parliaments have not forborn to grant as large Subsidies as formerly were granted Thirdly the Statute of 14 Edw. 3. cap. 12. doth rather maintain the Kings Prerogative in this case than any way impugne or impeach it for by that Law free passage is granted to all Merchants paying the Customes Subsidies and profits thereof reasonably due Now certain it is that all duties payable to the King for Merchandizes are of three kinds only Customes which are these ancient and certain duties wherein the Crown hath no Inheritance as is before expressed Subsidies which are granted by Act of Parliament and Impositions which are raised from time to time by the Kings Prerogative onely we find not a fourth kind and therefore the word Profits must needs be taken for Impositions Fourthly the Statue of 11 Rich. 2 cap. 9. though it provide in expresse terms that no Imposition or Charge be layd upon Wooll Wooll-fells or Leather other than the Custome or Subsidy granted in that Parliament yet it saveth alwayes to the King his ancient rights this was as turbulent a Parliament as ever was holden in England and yet was the Kings Right acknowledged though the unruly Lords and Commons did in a manner force his Assent to limit his Prerogative at that time Lastly if these Acts had absolutely bound the Kings Prerogative and had been observed literally and punctually untill this time the King should onely have had at this day the Demi mark for our own Staple Wares and perhaps the three pence Custome for Forein Commodities and no more What an inconvenience what an absurdity had this been at this day when all Forein Princes have raised their Customes to an exceeding height when as I have noted before the necessary expences of the Crown are so much encreased when the prizes of all Commodities are so much enhanced when there is so great a plenty of money in this part of the World when the Kings Revenue within the Land is so much improved Is it fit that Duties payable for Merchandizes should stand at a stay and keep the old rates without augmentation CHAP. XXX The fifth Objection that Tonnage and Poundage were never taken but when the same was granted by Parliament FIftly it is objected That the Subsidies of Tonnage and Poundage were never taken by any King of England but when the same were granted by Act of Parliament which is an Argument say they that the King could never take those duties but by his absolute power for if his Prerogative could have imposed those rates of it self what need was there of an Act of Parliament why should the King have expected the consent of the Commons cum Dominus eis opus habet and when the Exchequor were so empty as the Jewells of the Crown were layd to pawn by some of those Kings who were glad to take these Subsidies by Acts of Parliament CHAP. XXXI The Answer to the fifth Objection THe Answer to this Objection is twofold First
it be truly said for the honor of the Crown of England That His Majesty that now is and all his Noble Progenitors have used and put in practice this Prerogative with more moderation and favor toward the people than any Forein State or Prince in the world have besides and that in three respects First the King of England doth make use of this Prerogative only in laying Impositions upon Merchandizes crossing the Seas upon such onely and not upon any other goods which are bought and sold within the Land neither doth he by his absolute power alone impose any Tax upon Lands or Capita hominum or Capita animalium or upon other things innumerable whereof there are strange presidents and examples both Ancient and Modern in other Countries Secondly the King doth not charge all Merchandizes crossing the Seas with this Imposition now in question for in the Letters Patent whereby the Imposition of twelve pence in the pound over and above the Subsidie of Poundage is laid and limited divers kinds of Commodities are excepted especially such as serve for food and subsistance of the Kings people for setting the poor on work for maintainance of Navigation and other things of like nature as before is declared Thirdly the Impositions which are laid by the Kings of England upon Merchandizes are not so high as the Impositions and Exactions set and taken by other Princes and States for the highest Imposition in Ireland is but twelve pence upon the pound or but a single Poundage which is but five in the hundred and is the lowest rate in Christendome at this day and in England there is added but twelve pence in the pound more which is but ten pound upon the hundred pound and yet divers sorts of Merchandizes as I said before are excepted and discharged of that Imposition of the second Imposition of twelve pence But on the other side let us see the practice of other Princes and States in laying Impositions and how far they have extended and strained their Prerogative in that point beyond and above the Impositions in England I will begin with the Romans when they had gained the Monarchy of the World so as all Kingly power did rest in their Emperor First Iulius Caesar laid the first Imposition upon Forein Merchandizes saith Suctonius peregrinarum mercium portaria primus instituit and that Imposition was Octava rerum pars which was more by a fifth part than our highest Imposition in England for it is two shillings and six pence upon the pound Next Augustus Caesar about the time of our Saviours Birth sent out an Edict whereby he did tax all the world and this Tax was Capitatio or an Imposition super capita hominum though the quantity thereof doth not appear but the poll-money which our Saviour did pay and wrought a miracle it seemeth to be an high Imsition for the peeces of money taken out of the Fishes mouth which is called didrachma or stater is said to bee worth two shillings and six pence sterling which being given for himself and Peter da illis pro me et te shews that fifteen pence sterling was given for a Poll which must needs amount to an infinite thing if it were collected over all the World then subject to the Roman Emperor Tiberius the Roman Emperor who succeeded Augustus took the hundred part of all things bought and sold within the Empire which perhaps was an Imposition of greater value and profit than the other Caligula the Emperor layd an Imposition upon all Sutes in Law and took the fourth part of the value of the value of the thing sued for and set a pain upon the Plaintiff if he compounded or were Non-suted without his Licence He likewise imposed a number of Sesterii upon every Marriage contracted or made within the whole Empire Vespasian in meaner and more homelier matters took by way of Imposition a part of every poor Labourers wages and part of every Beggers alms he set likewise an Imposition upon Vrine and pleased himself with this Apothegm Dulcis odor lucri ex re qualibet Severus the Emperor did impose upon the dishonest gains of the Stews and took part of the Prostitutes there as the Bishop of Rome doth at this day all the Emperors before Trajan took the twentieth part of all Legacies and Lands descended as things which came unlooked for and as a cleer gain and therfore the Heirs and Legatories might easily spare a part to the Emperor and Nicephorus one of the Emperors of the East did not onely take sumaria tributa Smoke-money out of every Chimney but he layd an Imposition upon every mans Estate that grew suddenly rich upon a presumption that hee had found a Treasury which did belong to the Emperor by Prerogative With a little more search I might find out other Impositions of severall kinds set by the ancient Emperors upon the heads of Beasts upon the tiles of Houses and the like I might adde hereunto the Impositions set by Lorrain upon every pane of Glasse in Windows but these may suffice how high they strained and how far they extended their Prerogatives in this point of Impositions Secondly the Roman Empire being over-come by the Gothes and Vandalls and other barbarous Nations and thereby broken into Kingdomes and Free States their passed divers ages before these Monarchies could be well setled and before peace bred plenty any plenty bred civility and before Trade Traffique Comerce and Intercourse could be established between these States and Kingdoms and therefore while these States and Kingdoms were yet but poor and while there was a generall scarcity of Gold and Silver in these parts of the World and so for want of money there was but little Trade and Traffique among the people either at home or broad Kings and Princes did not neither could they make that use of their Prerogative in laying Impositions as they had done in those latter times since all Arts and Sciences have been encreased all Commodities improved and the Riches of the East and West Indies have been transported into this Hemisphere But now let us see whether the Kings and Princes of other Countries round about us at this day make not a far more profitable use of their Prerogatives in laying Impositions upon their people than the King of England doth albeit his Kingly power be full as large as any of theirs In France the most richest and ancientest of the Neighbour Kingdoms the Impositions not onely upon Merchandizes crossing the Seas but also upon Lands Goods persons of men within the Realm are so many in number and in name so divers as it is a pain to name and collect them all and therefore it must needs be a more painfull thing for the people of that Kingdom to bear them all La tallie le tallon les aids les aquavalentes les equi pollentes les cruces or augmentations of divers kinds le hop benevolence la Cabelle
upon Salt amounting to an exceeding great Revenue the Impost of Wines upon every Vessell carried into any walled Towns or Suburbs thereof and payable although it be transported thence again before it be sold la hault passage or de maine forrein for Merchandizes exported le traject forrene for Merchandizes imported la solid de Cinquants mil holmes imposed upon Cities walled Towns and the Suburbs onely and after layd upon Town and Country without distinction the common positions for provisions the tenthes paid by all Ecclesiasticall persons These and other Impositions of the like nature are layd and levied upon the Subjects of France by the absolute power and Prerogative of the King and though many of these were imposed at first upon extraordinary occasions and set but for a time yet the succeeding Princes have continued them from time to time and the most part of them made ordinary and perpetuall by King Lewis the 11. who was wont to say France was a Meadow which he could have mowed as often as he pleased In Spain there is an Imposition named Alcavala imposed as well upon the Nobility as the Commons which was first raised by Alphonsus the 12. to expell the Mores and for the expurgation of Algiers but afterwards it was made perpetuall and is now a principall part of the Royall Patrimony Gutturis de Gabellis Quaest. 174 this Imposition was at first but the twentieth part but afterwrds it was raised to the tenth of every mans Estate which doth far surmount the highest Impositions that ever were layd in England by the Kings Prerogative without Act of Parliament This Alcavala is an Imposition within the Land but the Impositions upon Merchandizes exported and imported are far higher especially upon Merchants Strangers for their common Impositions upon Strangers is five parts upon the hundred and in the year 1604 they imposed thirty of the hundred as is before declared and upon the Ingate of Indian Spices into Portugall the King of Spain doth lay the greatest rates that ever were set in Christendome although upon the outgate the rates are more moderate In Italy the Impositions and Gabells set upon every kind of thing by the States and Princes there are intolerable and innumerable Non mihi si Centum Linguae sunt oraque Centum Ferrea vox Italorum omnes numerare gabellas Cunct a gabellarum percurrere nomina possem Especially upon the great Towns and Teritories that are subject to the Great Duke of Tusknie where there is not any roots nor any herb nor the least thing that is necessary for the life of man that is bought and sold or brought into any Town but there is a Gabell or Imposition set upon it where no Inholder Baker Brewer or Artificer can exercise his Trade but the Great Duke will share with him in his gain by laying some Imposition upon him where no man can travell by Land or by Water but at every Bridge at every Ferry at every Wharf or Key at every Gate of a Town the Garbellor arrests him and is ready to strip him naked to search what goods he hath about him for which he ought to pay the Garbell In the Popes Territories the Impositions which His Holinesse doth lay upon his Subjects as a Temporall Prince are as many and as heavy as those that are levied by the Duke of Tuskanie in so much as when Sixtus Quintus had set an Imposition upon every thing that served for the use of mans life Pasquill made hast to dry his Shirt in the Sun fearing the Pope would set some Imposition upon the heat of the Sun miastingo saith he in the 16. sole sevenda I omit to speak of the Exactions of the Court of Rome in another kind which are infinite and which long lay heavie upon the Western Countries of Christendome untill of late years some Nations did free themselves thereof by rejecting the Yoke of the Bishop of Rome In the Seigniory of Venice the Gabells upon the Land were more moderate than in the other parts of Italy But that City being the Lady of the Adriatique Sea doth use by prescription a high Prerogative in laying Impositions upon all Merchandizes arriving within the Gulf Civitas Venetiorum saith Baltholus potest pro maritmeis mercibus Gabellas imponere quia est Civitas in Mari situata Veneti saith Baldus ex consuetudine sunt domini maris Adriatici possunt statuere super Gabellis maris wherein they observe a profitable and politique course for upon the Commodities of other Nations which are of goods in their Common-wealth they lay the easier Impositions sometimes five sometimes seven sometimes ten upon the hundred which doth exceed the highest Imposition in England five in the hundred at the least In the Low Countries the Impositions which they call Excizes paid by the Retaylors of Wines and other CoÌ„modities and not by the Merchant are the highest in Christendome and yet we perceive that people to thrive and grow rich withall for an improved high rent doth so quicken the industrie of the Farmer as he thriveth oftentimes better than his Neighbour who is a Free-holder and payeth no rent at all howbeit to draw Trade and to invite all Nations to Comerce with them so to make their Country a Staple Store house or Magizen of all Europe they do set but easie rates upon Merchandizes imported but when they once have gotten their coÌ„modities in to their hands if any Merchant will export the same again hee shall pay a greater Custome The Grand Seignior of Turkie doth impose sometimes ten in the hundred sometimes twenty in the hundred upon Merchant Strangers who Trade into the Levant and I could speak of his other Exactions and Impositions upon his Vassalls but that I think it not meet to compare that Regions Tyrant to the Princes and States of Christendome I may remember at last the Great Toll which the King of Denmark taketh of every Ship that passeth into the Sound taking advantage of a narrow Straight between Elsmore and Copman Haven whereas the King of England being the undoubted Lord of the Narrow Seas between Dover and Callis might take the like Toll if it pleased him and by the same right might participate of the great gain of Fishing which the Busses of Holland and Zeland do make yearly upon the Coasts of Great Britain Thus we see by this comparison that the King of England doth lay but his little Finger upon his Subjects when other Princes and States do lay theâ—â— heavy loins upon their people whâ—â—â—â—â—the reason of this difference froâ—â—â—hence commeth it assuredly not from a different Power or Prerogative for the King of England is as absolute a Monarch as any Emperor or King in the world and hath as many Prerogatives incident to his Crown whence then proceedeth it to what profitable cause may we ascribe it certainly to divers causes profitable and