speak not Reason For what Power hath the State to elect while any that is living hath Right to succeed But such a Successor is not the Duke of Lancaster as descended from * So call'd from a Cross he used to wear upon his Back Edmund Crouchback the Elder Son of King Henry the Third tho' put by the Crown for Deformity of his Body For who knows not the Falseness of this Allegation Seeing it is a thing notorious that this Edmund was neither the Elder Brother nor yet Crook-back'd but of a goodly Personage and without any Deformity And your selves cannot forget a thing so lately done who it vvas that in the Fourth year of King Richard vvas declared by Parliament to be Heir to the Crovvn in case King Richard should die without Issue But why then is not that Claim made because Silent Leges inter Arma what disputing of Titles against the stream of Power But however it is extreme injustice that King Richard should be condemned without being heard or once allowed to make his Defence And now my Lords I have spoken thus at this time that you may consider of it before it be too late for as yet it is in your Power to undo that justly which you have unjustly done Thus spoke that Loyal and Good Prelate but to little purpose though there was neither Protestation nor Exception made against this Speech which certainly there would have been had there not been as much Truth as Boldness in vvhat he said And tho' Henry the Fourth did afterwards get the Inheritance of the Crown and Realm of England setled upon himself for Life and the Remainder entailed upon his four Sons by Name and the Issue of their Bodies yet that cannot at all make for my Adversaries purpose since it amounted to no more than a Confirmation of him in the Throne or if it did vve may vvell suppose that a Prince that vvas conscious to himself hovv unjustly he had gain'd his Crown would not be very unwilling to take such a way tho' in derogation to his Prerogative to secure himself if possible tho' not out of an Opinion that they could give him a better Right than they had but because 't is natural to suppose they would upon any occasion be ready to defend what they so solemnly had enacted Come we next to Henry the Fifth who this Gentleman says was Elected But how notoriously false that Assertion of his is will appear from hence that first there was no Parliament called till after his Coronation and in the next place that if the Act of Parliament made in the Seventh Year of Henry the Fourth had so great a Force and Vertue as he says it had it was needless nor can he prove any such thing from that careless and negligent Historian Polydore For Concilium Principum with him does not always signifie a Parliament as any one that has read him which I dare say he never did will perceive nor does his Phrase creare Regem import any more than the King's Coronation besides 't is most untrue which he affirms that Allegiance was never sworn before his Time till after a King was Crowned For the contrary appears from King John and Edward the First Nay 't is undeniably true that the Kings of England have exercised all manner of Royal Jurisdiction precedent to all Ceremony or any Formality whatsoever and that the Death of one King has in that very Moment given Livery and Seisin of the Royalty to the next Heir and by vertue of that Richard the First as a Mark of his Sovereignty immediately on his Father's Death restor'd the Earl of Leicester to his whole Estate Henry the Fifth being dead he was without any Opposition admitted to the Throne although but an Infant but in the Thirty Ninth Year of this King in open Parliament Richard Duke of York the true and rightful Heir to the Crown of England and France made his Challenge and Demand of it as being next Heir to Lionell Duke of Clarence Elder Brother to John of Gaunt from whom descended the House of Lancaster but to this Claim of his it was answered by the King's Friends That the same Crowns were by Act of Parliament Entailed upon Henry the Fourth and the Heirs of his Body from whom King Henry the Sixth did lineally descend * Rot. Parl. 39 H. 6. n. 10. c. The which Act say they as it is in the Record is of Authority to defeat any manner of Title made to any Person To which the Duke of York answerably replies That if King Henry the Fourth might have obtained and enjoyed the said Crowns of England and France by title of Inheritance Descent or Succession he neither needed nor would have desired or made them to be granted to him in such wise as they be by the said Act the which taketh no place nor is of any Force or Effect mind that against him that is Right Inheritor of the said Crowns as it accordeth with God's Laws and all Natural Laws And this Claim and Answer of the Duke of York is expresly acknowledged and recognized by this Parliament to be Good True Just Lawful and Sufficient and 't is agreed that Henry shall hold the Crown during his Life and the Duke of York in the mean time to be reputed and proclaimed Heir Apparent So that we have here as much as can be desired a Parliament not only declaring that a Title to the Crown ought to derive it self only from the Laws of God and Nature and not from any Civil Sanction and acknowledging in at the Bargain that it is beyond the Reach of any Humane Legislative Power to debar and exclude any one that justly claims by such a Right But to â— proceed upon Edward the Fourth's coming to the Crown a Parliament conven'd in the first year of his Reign does acknowledge and recognize his Title in these words as the * Rot. Parl. 1 Ed. 4. n. 8. c. Record has it Knowing also certainly without doubt and ambiguity that by Gods Law and Law of Nature He h. e. Edward the Fourth and none other is and ought to be true right-wise and natural Liege and Sovereign Lord. And that he was in Right from the Death of the said Noble and Famous Prince his Father very just King of the same Realm of England So here again we have another Parliament of the same mind with the last and I doubt not but we shall meet with more of 'em e're we have done When King Edward the Fourth was droven out of his Kingdom by Henry the Sixth 't is true the Crown was again entail'd if it may be properly so call'd upon him and his Heirs c. but still the proceeding was grounded upon the same Bottom with the former Here our Pamphleteer is pleased to make this drowsie Observation that both the Families of York and Lancaster claim'd a Title by Act of Parliament 't is true the latter did because they
had no other that would carry Water but as false that the former ever did for they as you have seen before founded their pretences upon the sound Bottom of Divine and Natural Law Besides Richard Duke of York challenged the Crown as his just Right before any Act pass'd in his favour nor was it the want of a Parliamentary Title which he stood in need of that kept him off but because he had not Power and Interest enough to assert the justness of his Title and therefore 't is no wonder he deferr'd the making of his Claim so long for to have done it sooner would but have riveted the Usurper more firmly in his Throne But Edward having regain'd his Kingdom as quickly as he lost it left it at his death to his unfortunate Son Edward the Fifth who was soon deprived both of that and his Life by his barbarous inhumane and ambitious Uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester who having persuaded some and forced others to believe or at least seem to believe that all his Brother Edwad's Children were Bastards did by a kind of pretended Election and at the instance of all the Great Men take or rather usurp the Crown But that the mystery of that subtle Transaction may be fully discovered I shall transcribe that Petition and Election as they call it out of the Parliament Roll as much as is necessary and opitomize the rest and then I will leave the Reader to judge how dis-ingenuously not to call it worse tho' according to his Custom this Gentleman would insinuate as if in the midst of their highest flatteries and courtship to him they tell him only of this great and sure Title by Act of Parliament An untruth if he had had the least grain of Modesty he could not have had the confidence to assert but by this time I suppose you know what a man I have to deal with But I hope the Roll will convince him and make him asham'd of his dis-ingenuity * Rot. Parl. tent apud Weâ—im die Ven. 23 die Jan. 1 R. 3. In this Petition and Election but that Election imports not what he would have it I hope will evidently appear from the sequel they set forth the many Grievances and Oppressions the Kingdom groan'd under through the dissolute Government of the late King Edward the Fourth they say farther That the King was never married to his pretended and reputed Queen or if he was that upon the account of a Precontract to another Lady that Marriage was unlawful and ipso facto void and so either way all his Children were illegitimate They say farther That George the late Duke of Clarence being attainted of High Treason and his Blood corrupted by reason thereof his issue are debarred or all Right and Claim to the Crown But the reasonableness and lawfulness of this Position I shall take the Liberty to examine hereafter Over this I give you the Words of the Record in English We consider that you be the undoubted Son and Heir of Richard late Duke of York very Inheritor of the said Crown and Dignity Royal and as in Right King of England by way of Inheritance how then can the Parliament challenge a power of Election in the modern sense of the words and that at this time the premises duly considered there is none other person living but You only that by Right may Claim the said Crown and Dignity Royal by way of Inheritance And then they go on in a most abject way of Flattery to recount his excellent Parts and extraordinary Qualifications for the Government Wherefore say they these premises by us diligently considered we desiring effectually the Peace Tranquillity and Weal-publick of this Land and the reduction of the same to the ancient honourable Estate and Presperity and having in your great Prudence Justice Princely Courage and excellent Vertue singular Confidence have chosen in all that in us is and by this our Writing choose you High and Mighty Prince our King and Sovereign Lord to whom we know of certain it appertaineth to be chosen From whence it appears that what they call Election amounts to no more than a Ceremony or formality of acknowledging their Prince Therefore they desire him as his true Inheritance which 't is impossible in an Elective Kingdom the Royalty can be to accept of the said Crown and Dignity according to this Election of the Three Estates Surely then the King vvas none They add soon after Albeit that the Right Title and Estate which our Sovereign Lord the King Richard the Third hath to and in the Crown and Royal Dignity of this Realm of England be just and lawful as grounded upon the Laws of God and of Nature mind that and also upon the ancient Laws and landable Customes and therefore not upon any Statute but Common-Lavv of this said Realm and so taken and reputed by all such persons as be Learned in the abovesaid Laws and Customes yet nevertheless Here once for all take notice of the true Reason of the Parliaments medling vvith the Succession for as much as it is considered that the most part of the people is not sufficiently Learned in the abovesaid Laws and Customes whereby the Truth and Right in this behalf of likelyhood may be hid and not clearly known to all the people and thereupon put in doubt and question And over this how that the Court of Parliament is of such Authority and the people of this Land of such a Nature and Disposition as experience teacheth that Manifestation and Declaration of any Truth or Right made by the Three Estates of this Realm Assembled in Parliament maketh before all other things most Faith and Certainty and quieting of Mens Minds removeth the occasion of all Doubts and Seditious Language And therefore at the Request and by the Assent of the three Estates of this Realm the King cannot be one that is to say the Lords Spiritual 't is they are one of the Estates and Temporal and Commons of this Land Assembled in this present Parliament and by Authority of the same be it pronounced decreed and declared That our said Sovereign Lord the King was and is the very undoubted King of this Realm of England c. as well by right of Consanguinity and Inheritance as by lawful Election Consecration and Coronation And since the two latter as all the World knows do give no new right but are only Ceremonies and bare Formalities of State I can see no reason why what they call Election which certainly must not be strain'd to Propriety should be reputed any other because it not only is joyned with the rest without any Distinction but likewise Election in the usual Sence is incompatible with an Hereditary Monarchy such as this is over and over proved to be To all which the King assented in these words Et idem Dominus Rex de assensis dictorum trium Statuum Regni Authoritate praedicta omnia singula Praemissa in Billa
which his ipse dixi was a Law to cut that Gordian Knot asunder which he was not able to unty But it is time now to examine the palpable contradictions of those several mad and extravagant Acts that he made and first in the * Stat. 25. H. 8. c. 22. 25th year of his Reign after he was Divorced from Queen Katherine and had married Queen Anne The Parliament having in the Preamble to the following Act declared what great miseries and how many troubles had befallen this Realm by reason of the ambiguity of the several Titles to the Crown do think themselves bound in duty by a Declaration of the true Heir to avoid the causes of such Distractions for the future It is therefore Enacted and Ordained That the Kings Marriage with the late Queen Katherine is void as directly contrary to the Laws of God and therefore not dispensable with by the Pope or any Humane Power whatsoever They therefore bastardize Mary and declare the Marriage between his Majesty and Queen Anne to be just and lawful and that the Children of their two Bodies begotten shall be and are legitimate and then in default of Issue Male entail the Crown upon the Lady Elizabeth c. and every one by the Sanctimony of an Oath is bound to the observation and performance of this And the next Parliament does Enact a particular Oath for that purpose whereby every one is bound to bear Faith Truth and Obedience only to the King's Majesty and to his Heirs of his Body of his most Dear and entirely beloved lawful Wife Queen Anne begotten or to be begotten But mark what follows a few years after 't is Enacted St. 28. H. 8. c. 7. That the people shall forswear themselves the late Marriage is declared unlawful null and void the Lady Elizabeth is Bastardized as the Lady Mary was in the former Parliament and the King's Marriage with Queen Jane is acknowledged consonant to the Law of God the Crown entailed upon their Issue and for failure of them the King is impowred to dispose of the Crown to whom he please by his Letters Patents or his last Will and the whole Nation was obliged by the Sanctimony of an Oath to the observation of this Law So that you have at once not only Swearing backward and forward but the Crown made Elective if Act of Parliament can make it so which had always hitherto been Hereditary which so many unbiassed Parliaments had declared was due to the next Heir by Inherent Birth-right and by the Laws of God and Nature a Title sure unimpeachable by any Civil Power and all this in open defiance of all Equity Justice and Common Reason on purpose to dis-inherit the House of Scotland which as much as Humane Power could do it was by this Act done and to advance his Bastard Son Henry Fitz-Roy whom he most entirely loved to the Throne But not yet content to put a period to his extravagancy in the 35th year of his Reign he caus'd it to be Enacted That after his Death and the Death of Prince Edward without Issue the Crown should be to the Lady Mary and the Heirs of her Body but subject to such Conditions as the King should limit by his Letters Patents or by his last Will and if the Lady Mary performed not those Conditions that then the Crown should go to the Lady Elizabeth and if the Lady Elizabeth neglected to perform such Conditions then it should go to such other person as the King should appoint And he was again impowred by his Letters Patents or last Will to grant the Remainder or Reversion of the Crown to what person he should appoint and the whole Nation is again bound to the observation thereof By an Oath But surely no man will argue from these contradictory and wild Acts that the King and Parliament have any power to limit and alter the Succession since if we believe those Parliaments I have before mentioned 39 H. 6. 1 E. 4.1 R. 3. we shall find that to be removed beyond the reach of any mortal Arm and reserved to the only disposal of Him by whom Kings Reign and Princes Decree Justice And certainly we have as much reason to believe them as can be rationally expected since 't is very natural for those that assume so much power to themselves as they did to screw it up when their hands are in to the highest pin for 't is not likely that they if they could have found the least shadow of Evidence to the contrary would out of a Complement to God Almighty have thrown back that Power into his hands which he had once pleased to bestow upon and invest in them Nor need we at all wonder to find a Prince of King Henry's Spirit and Native greatness of mind fall so beneath his usual Majesty in such things since perhaps no Prince can be met withall in whom there concenter'd a greater number of odd and anomalous Circumstances which did incline him to crave in Aid of his Parliament for he being one that would sacrifice every thing to his Humour Lust or Revenge he was forced to take this course to remove all the Letts that stood in his way as far as Humane Power could carry them Therefore I am persuaded these Acts of Parliament ought no more to be urged as Precedents for us to guide our selves by than his Arbitrary and Illegal Methods of bringing those that had the misfortune to fall into his hatred to the Block without being once heard or suffer'd to make their defence And as these are not permitted to be drawn into practice tho' done by the Legislative Power as well as the other because of their manifest injustice and illegality I cannot for my Life see why the other should 't is a Riddle beyond my skill to unfold I shall pass by some of this Gentleman's Paragraphs as not worh insisting upon and come to his Proofs drawn from Queen Elizabeth's Reign and indeed 't is in an Act made the 13th of that Princess that the whole Party place their main strength but I hope I shall be able to make it appear if every Circumstance be duly considered that induced that Glorious Queen to do some things that tended highly to the manifest derogation of her Prerogative which at other times she was so tender of that nothing can be gather'd from thence which will really do any service to my Adversaries Opinion For if as all Casuists hold those Oaths and Promises which are extorted by fear or force are not Obligatory I cannot tell why those things which by meer necessity upon those very accounts she was compell'd to as well for the preservation of her Body Natural as Politick should be denied the priviledge of being dissolved upon that very score that other things of the same Nature are And that they were no other things than what I have before mentioned that caused this Great Queen to fall beneath her self and court her people
for her establishment will clearly appear to any one that considers the state of Affairs and the History of those Times the only true Touchstone to try matters of this Nature by For if we consider how questionable Her Birthright was then generally esteemed we cannot at all admire if for her own Interest and Security she attributed much more to an Act of Parliament than otherwise she would have done For tho' in the Act of Recognition 't is said that her Majesty is and in very deed and of most meer Right ought to be by the Laws of God Queen of this Realm yet the dubiousness of her Legitimacy and her being solemny Bastardiz'd by her own Father by Act of Parliament might very well necessitate her to call in the Aid and Assistance of her people for her defence and establishment since the greatest part of Europe did not only look upon the Title of Mary Queen of Scotland to be much the clearer and juster than Hers and therefore since Queen Elizabeth's Title depended so very much upon Statute Law the most part of the World allowing her no other and a great many too disputing the validity of that she was necessitated to make that as strong as possibly she could and therefore made it Treason for any one during her Life to affirm That Our Sovereign Lady the Queen's Majesty that now is with and by the Authority of the Parliament of England is not able to make Laws and Statutes of sufficient Force and Validity to limit and bind the Crown of this Realm and the Descent Limitation Inheritance and Government thereof which tho' as we shall afterwards endeavour to prove was not in their power to do yet she knew very well that her people would be very apt to defend what they had then so solemnly Enacted and so thereby she should gain her end viz. her Preservation which was the great thing she aimed at as appears by this that the punishment to be inflicted upon them that broke this Law was to abate very much of its rigor after her death for then it was but to be forfeiture of goods a certain Argument that it was only Temporary Enacted pro re nata for if the Reason of it did continue the same so ought surely the Punishment since they should alvvays stand and fall vvith one another tho' no doubt another tho' less considerable reason might be the Malaversions she inherited from her Father to the House of Scotland vvhich thereby she did certainly endeavor for ever to deprive of the Imperial Crown of England As evidently appears from this Clause in it viz. That every person or persons of what Degree and Nation soever they he shall during the Queens Life declare or publish that they have any Right to enjoy the Crown of England during the Queen's Life shall be dis-inabled to enjoy the Crown in Succession Inheritance or otherwise after the Queen's Death For this was most apparently contriv'd against Mary Queen of Scots and her Son K. James For since almost all Europe spoke openly of the greater Right that Mary had to the Crown than Elizabeth it might very probably be expected that not only as she thought so so she might upon an occasion offer'd not only speak but act up to her Persuasion and then by this Statute she was as much disabled as Statute could do it But besides all this I am inclin'd to believe there was something more in the bottom of it than this of the contrivance of that subtle and cunning Statesman the Earl of Leicester which I gather from this Clause That whoever shall affirm during the Queens Life either in Writing or in Print that any one is or ought to be the Queens Heir or Successor besides the NATURAL ISSUE OF HER BODY BEGOTTEN c. SHALL c. For in Law none are call'd the Natural Issue of any one but those that are Illegitimate Vit Eliz. Adeo ut sayes Camden tunc juvenis audiveram dictitantes verbum illud à Leicestrio in Legem ingestum eo consilio ut aliquem ipsius filium spurium pro reginae Sobole naturali Angles tandem aliquando obtruderet Insomuch that when I was a young man sayes he I have often heard it said that Leicester caused that expression to be foisted in that thereby he might have a pretence to impose one time or other upon the English one of his own Bastards for the Queens Natural Issue A Design truly not unlikely for him to have who always measured the Publick by his proper Interest and sacrificed every thing else to his own ends and then certainly it will never be denied but such an Act of Parliament was necessary to give colour of breaking so ancient and fundamental a Law of the Land as the advancing a Bastard must needs be How contrary to all the Obligations of Justice and Humanity the unfortunate Queen of Scots was treated by her Kinswoman Queen Elizabeth upon the pretended breach of a Statute made in the 27th of her Reign I shall not trouble my Reader or my Self with the recital of which rigorous proceeding as it was chiefly grounded upon her violent hatred to the House of Scotland so I could heartily wish for the Honour of that Great and Glorious Queen under whose Reign this Island so long and happily flourished were razed out the Annals of Time so that there might be nothing left to stain the Reputation of that otherwise unblemishable Princess But tho' the Mother had the misfortune to fall so ignominiously yet the Son King James had not the wisdom to strive fruitlesly against the Stream but prudently never gave an opportunity of finding a colour to resist him who never laid Claim to a Crown till Heaven call'd him to the Enjoyment of it But no sooner was he come into England but having call'd a Parliament his Title to the Crown is solemnly acknowledged and recognized in these words 1 Jac. c. 1. We being bound thereunto both by the Laws of God and man do with unspeakable Joy recognize and acknowledge That immediately upon the decease of Elizabeth late Queen of England the Imperial Crown of the Realm of England c. did by inherent Birth-right lawful and undoubted Succession descend and come to your Majesty as being lineally justly and lawfully next and sole Heir of the Blood Royal of this Realm And thereunto we most humbly and faithfully do submit and oblige our selves our Heirs and Posterities for ever And now if King James came to the Crown by inherent Birth-right and undoubted Succession I cannot see any thing that makes more against this Gentleman than this for 't is plain the old Entail made by Henry the Seventh cannot be pretended because that Act was tho' not expresly yet tacitly effectually repeal'd by 28. H. 8. c. 7. 35 H. 8. c. 1. for King Henry could not have a power to appoint who he vvould for his Successor if that Act of Henry the Seventh remain'd in
force For then he could not have disinherited the House of Scotland and prefer'd the Younger House of Suffolk to the Remainder of the Crown which 't is notoriously known if he did not yet he intended and was sufficiently as far as Acts of Parliaments could reach impowered to do it and therefore the other must necessarily have been revoked and repealed A thing so clear that it were needless to spend more time or words to prove it So that King James's Title to the Crown or else he had none must owe its Original to the Laws of God and Nature and the Ancient and Laudable Customes of this Realm * Rot. Parl. 1 R. 3. ut sup as 't is elsewhere worded and then what madness is it to think that any Humane Power upon Earth can change those immutable Laws for such they are and with what color of Justice or good Conscience they can pretend to debar any one of his Right or give a better Title to another than the late Usurper had to the Sovereignty is beyond the Wit of Man to demonstrate unless we impiously deny there is a God in Heaven or any such thing as Right or Wrong upon Earth And thus I have gone through all the Historical part of this Gentleman's Discourse as far as it concerns England and I doubt not but every one must make this Conclusion upon the vvhole Matter that tho' he tells us he hath done it faithfully yet it vvill appear by the foregoing Examination vvherein I have rather endeavored to lay dovvn the Naked Truth vvithout the least Disguise than follovv him through all his impertinent Ramblings that never more unpardonable Mistakes and Falsities never more gross Prevarications and malicious Misrepresentations of the plain sence and Meaning of good Authors vvere amassed together under so solemn and pompous a pretence For my ovvn part I cannot but admire vvith vvhat Confidence any man could offer to obtrude such trash upon the World and vent such notorious Untruths Surely a Man must have bid a final Adieu to all Sincerity and Common Honesty tho' perhaps for I vvill be as charitable as I can his over much Credulity may have been his greatest Misfortune For though he vvould fain insinuate in several places as if every man must needs be a Papist that should go about to unmask him yet good man he has been beholden for the most part of his Discourse to one of the greatest Villains of that Society vvhich by their prodigiously vvicked both Tenets and Practices deserve to be the horror and detestation of all Mankind Nor has he had the Descernment to distinguish betvveen vvhat vvas false and vvhat vvas true but has extracted it at least as to the Substance just as he found it from a Conference concerning the Succession written by Parsons one of the most pernitious Books that perhaps ever savv Light and tho' he be so ungrateful as not to own his great Benefactor yet he blushes not to maintain and publish the same destructive Principles a clear Evidence that so many of those that would have us believe they abhor Popery yet are content not only to entertain but hug and cherish their most destructive Opinions disguised under other Names But you are not to think this Gentleman less acquainted with the History of other Nations than our own and that he is not able to give you many Instances from thence that the next of Blood has been frequently excluded from the Succession But really I cannot but pity his ill Judgment in pitching upon one so little for his purpose when his Author could have furnish'd him with such plenty of better Choice For since no man can deny but that it both is and ever was a Fundamental Law of the French Monarchy to be Hereditary I leave it to any man of Common Sence to judge whether those silly Reasons mention'd in the Letter to Charles of Lorrain were a sufficient ground to debar him of that Right which God and Nature had given him and to whom says De Serres I say the Fundamental Law did adjudge the Crown for want of Heirs Males Lawful Sons of Kings But the French being displeased with Charles upon some frivolous Accounts Hugh Capet embraces so fair an opportunity and foments their Discontents to that Degree and so politickly plays his own Game that having insinuated himself into the Affections of most People without very much difficulty he first screw'd himself into the Throne and then to consolidate and establish himself in his ill-acquired Greatness by a pretty kind of Pageantry he called the Estates to elect him into that Throne he already had the Possession of which being met they did accordingly And having thus forfeited their Allegiance and Duty to Charles 't is no wonder if they squeezed their Brains to find out a plausible though never so shallow a Pretence to avoid the Imputation of Disloyalty Not to take Notice that most Writers stick not to call this Hugh an * Sigeb Gemblac in Chron. ad An. 987. Usurper Besides 't is well known that Lewis the Godly never enjoyed the Crown with a quiet Conscience till it was proved that he was descended from the Right Heirs of Charles of Lorrain So mean an Opinion had that good Prince of the Power of the States in altering the Course of Succession And after all this I think it cannot reasonably be pretended by any one that any thing can be drawn from History which can at all countenance the Proceedings of those men who so industriously endeavor to cry up the Justice and Advantage of the Bill of Exclusion as the only Expedient say they that can secure us from Ruin and prevent our Destruction unless they will say that because such things as fill'd the Age they were done in with Shame and Horror were done that therefore they were justly done and so may as justly be acted over again An Opinion of such dismal Consequence that should it once prevail in the World all Mankind would be presently turned into one great Den of Thieves and Robbers that might plunder spoil murder and ravish with Impunity and without Controul and then we should every day see Hobs's Senceless Notion of a State of War proved to us with a Witness Nay what Wickedness is there not which at this rate we might not justifie from Scripture it self Which gave occasion to Saint Augustine excellently to say Haec quae in Scripturis sanctis legimus non ideo quia facta legimus etiam facienda credamus ne violemus praecepta dum passim sectamur Exempla The true State of the Question either is or at least ought to be not what has been done but what in Justice and Equity ought to be done in the Case of his R. H. which is not to be determined by Examples but Law and Raeason Non Exemplis sed Legibus judicandum is the Golden Rule of the Great †Lib. 13. C. de Sen. Justinian In order therefore to the
Nature and this Realm Cons Rot. Parl. 1. E. 4. Rot. Parl. 1. R. 3. 1 Jac. c. 1. if we may give Credit to the Declarations of so many Parliaments of different Humours and Tempers So that it will prove no very hard Matter to make good what I undertook in the Third place to wit That an Act to Exclude his R.H. would be utterly Unlawful and ipsofacto void because contrary to all Laws Divine Natural and Humane and so it ought to be adjudged when ever it comes to the Question before the Reverend Judges For the Laws of God Nature are the Rays and Emanations of the Divinity they are Undeniable Eternal and Immutable and therefore cannot be Altered or Impeached by any Humane Power or Authority but only by the God of Nature it self who did Originally ordain them and so many and plentiful are the Instances of Statutes expounded void because contrary to the Law of Nature that it would be loss of time to take notice of or enumerate any of them no doubt upon this ground it is that those two great and learned Dectors of the Law Jason and Angelus do positively aver that tho the Eldest Son of a King be either a Fool or a Madman either of which qualifications are as pernicious to the Government every whit as being a Papist yet can he not be excluded from Succession And I doubt not it may be made evidently appear that Succession of the Crown to the next Heir of the Blood Royal is so Fundamental and Primary a Constitution of this Realm so antient and received a Custome that against it There never hath been nor ought to be any dispute as †His Argument of the Case of the Postnati pag. 36. the Lord Chancellor Egerton will inform us and if we look into our Antient Records we shall find more than one Parliament declaring that Jura Sanguinis nullo Jure civili dirimi possunt And it is held by several great Lawyers that a Prerogative in Point of Government cannot be restrained or bound by Act of Parliament And surely then much less can such an Act he of any force in so high a case as this of Succession for certainly if this were once allowed the Government would cease to be Hereditary and degenerate into an Elective One And 't is not to be question'd but such a Power as enables the Parliament to break off one link may give them a sufficient Authority to shatter in pieces the whole sacred Chain and totally exclude the present Line and together with that Monarchy which I pray God may not be the bottom of too many Men's designs let them gild over their proceedings with never so specious and popular Pretences and no doubt out of a provident Foresight of the Calamity and dismal consequence of such designes it was that the Lords and Commons did declare That they could not assent in Parliament to any thing that tended to the Disinherison of the King Rot. Parl. 42. E. 3. Num. 7. and the Crown which this Bill of Exclusion evidently does whereunto they were sworn no tho the King himself should desire it But what comes more home to the point is the answer of Richard Duke of York to the Kings Friends who urged an Act of Parliament against him who told them That such an Act was to take no place Rot. Parl. 39. H. 6. Numb 10 c. nor was of any force or effect against Him the Right Inheritor of the Crown as it accorded with God's Laws and all Natural Laws And this Answer of the Duke's is by express Act of Parliament then assembled recognized and acknowledged to be Good True Just Lawful and Sufficient so that in effect we have an ingenuous and full Declaration as can be that the Right of Succession is absolutely unimpeachable by any Humane Power and that the Kings of England in possession their Heirs and Successors in reversion have an indefeasible right to the Crown which they cannot be deprived of by any Authority less than that which invested them therewith Besides 't is a Maxim of our Law That as the King never Dyes which is meant of that Political Capacity which in that very Moment one King Expires is Superadded to the Body Natural of the Next Heir whereby he immediately becomes King And this Political Capacity being of that Sublimity that it is no wayes subject to any Human Imbecilities of Infamy Crime or the like it draweth all Imperfections and Incapacities whatsoever from that Natural Body where with it is Consolidate as it were Consubstantiate so the Crown once gain'd takes away all Defects removes all manner of Bars and Lets laid in the way to the Succession For 't is impossible to hinder the Descent to the Next Heir because that being removed beyond the Reach of a Mortal Arm must go exactly in that Course prescribed by God and Nature and being joyn'd to and indivisible in one Royal Person thereby this later Capacity being added to the former purgeth eo instante all Obstructions of what Nature soever And tho his Natural Body before this Union was subject to the Lash of the Law yet upon the Conjunction of this Political and Immortal Capacity with it they grow inseparable And consequently by reason of those Divine Perfections inherently and indubitably annexed to that Coalition the Prince what ever Crimes he might have formerly been guilty of is now placed above Humane Justice and answerable solely to God Almighty to whom and none other he owes Subjection And thus it has been expresly resolved by all the Judges of England in the Case of Two Princes who were as much Disabled as an Act of Parliament could â—o it The First was when Henry the Sixth by the Assistance of the Great Earl of Warwick re-assumed the Crown for Edward the Fourth had pass'd an Act to disable him from all Regiment and attaint him of High Treason But notwithstanding all this the Judges were of Opinion That in the same Moment that Henry Re-assumed the Crown the said Parliamentary Incapacities were to all Intents discharged and avoided not because as our Pamphletier pag. 17. would have us believe Edward was not Lawful King For if either Right of Blood or an Act of Parliament could give him a Just Title there 's no doubt to be made but he had One But for this very Reason That the Crown once gain'd taketh away all Defects The next Instance is of Henry the Seventh who being once possessed of the Throne the Reversal of his Parliamentary Attainder was unanimously agreed by the Judges to be unnecessary for That the Crown takes away all Defects in Blood and Incapacities by Parliament And that from the Time the King did assume the Crown 1 H. 7.4 Fitz. Parl. pl. 2. Plowdens Com. 238. Co. 1. In. stit 16. a. the Fountain was cleared and all the said Attainders and Corruptions of Blood and other Impediments absolutely discharged And this being constantly received for
Law ever since I cannot but wonder this Gentleman should go about to call in question the Judgment of so Many and so Great Lawyers by his Impertinent Cavils for 't was upon this Precedent that the Lord Keeper Bacon did advise Q. Elizabeth not to Repeal that Statute wherein she was made Illegitimate Nor was it upon the Account of any Attainder that the House of York forbore so long time to pursue their Claim to the Crown but want of Interest And when he tells us The King of France was the more inclined to send over his Son Lewis because King John was Attainted of Treason and so uncapable of taking the Crown he must certainly have forgot himself or he would not have made use of an Instance granting it to be true so contrary to his Purpose For it seems the English when he came to the Crown had but a very slender Opinion of such a Bar or else they would never have admitted him But the King of France was glad of any Pretence tho never so Ridiculous So that we see the Judges were not without Precedent to direct their Proceedings by and such a one if the Story be true as had the Approbation of the whole or greatest part of the Kingdom But that Objection which has most shew of Force is drawn from the Recognition of Richard the Third's Title which he takes a great deal of Pains to set off to the best Advantage But I think he might have spared his Pains if he had but considered that those Men that to Advance an Usurper to the Throne had contrary to their Knowledge declared all the Late King's Children to be Bastards would scarce stick at Declaring contrary to all Right and Justice which they had already so notoriously violated an Attainder of Treason to be of sufficient Force to debar the Issue of the Duke of Clarence who were not in a Condition to assert their Title for the Crown without considering the Truth of it And it is considerable that all those Acts made in Contradiction of one another were never heeded or esteemed by either Party or ever deter'd either the Heads of 'em from pursuing their Claim or the People from assisting them in it the End of all such Statutes was to vanish into Smoak and come to nothing and for the most part never to have the Honour of a Repeal Besides a Thing done in Tempestuous and Turbulent Times is not to Guide and Direct our Actions now especially since we have the Sense of so many several and different Parliaments and therefore the more Remarkable to the contrary wherein it is declared That the Succession of the Crown of England is inseparably Annexed to Proximity of Blood and That a Title of this Sublimity and Grandeur is not at all Impeachable even by Act of Parliament And besides the Parliament of 39. H. 6. doth make their Declaration to the manifest Prejudice of the King in Possession who was Ordained also by the same Accord then made to Reign over them during his Life and whom for that Reason it must be presum'd they would have favoured if they had found but the least colour so to have done And if the Actual Possession of the Throne as has been so often Recognized by our Antient Parliaments which were neither over-aw'd by a prevailing Faction nor seduced by the plausible Pretences of designing Demagogues be by the Law of God and Nature invested with the Soveraignty it does most evidently follow that the Heir Apparent or Next of Blood is by the same Laws entituled to the Crown and consequently the People have no more Right to Dis-inherit the One than to Depose the Other and doubtless it is the same Sin As to cause the Abortion of an Embryo and to take away the Life of a Child already Born are both alike Murder for both have an equal Right to Life tho they differ in the Time of the Enjoyment of it And so have the Possessor and the Heir to the Throne only One is actually Master of it and the Other in due Time must and ought so to be But to affirm sayes this Gentleman that the King and Parliament have not a Power to Change the Direct Order of Succession is to deny the Government a Power to Defend it self To this I Answer 'T is much more likely that altering the Course of the Legal Descent of the Crown is the more probable way of bringing us into Anarchy and Confusion Besides acording to his Notion of Self-preservation a Prince that Governs not according to the pleasure and good liking of the People may be Deposed or else they would be deprived of a power of preserving themselves A very peaceable Notion I assure you and such as would render every Government where it was admitted most extreamly Happy But it ought to be proved That the admitting of a Popish King would be an Infallible Cause of the Ruin of us all or else I much fear this adored principle of Self-preservation will not Justify the Exclusion of his R.H. For nothing less than absolute Necessity will authorize a Man to kill his Enemy as when he endeavours by violence to Rob him of his Life and 't is then only he can lawfully Kill him se Defendendo But that he should be allow'd to destroy any that out of a Groundless Jealousie he apprehends may do him a Prejudice is the Highest Degree of Madness and Destructive of all Humane Society For if it were allowed for one to Kill all he is afraid of we could expect nothing but Murders and Massacres nothing but unavoydable Confusion and Ruin 'T is convenient I grant to bind such as we have just Ground to be apprehensive of to their good Behaviour and tye up their Hands according to the Laws of the Land And certainly one would think this would be sufficient Security in the Case of his R.H. if too many of those that so zealously stickle for the Bill had not a deeper Design than that they give out even to Lay the Axe to the Root of Monarchy it self 'T is that they aim at and have such a Thirst to destroy under this specious pretence and set up their adored Idol their beloved Common-Wealth And if they had not this colour for their Proceedings I am very much afraid they would be guilty of some what worse Nor am I in this at all Uncharitable since this Gentleman has pag. 19. given a very excellent Hint to Justify such a Design For he tells us That the Crown is not a bare Inheritance but an Inheritance accompanying an Office of Trust that if a Mans Defects render him incapable of the Trust he has also Forfeited the Inheritance Can any thing be more full and plain May not upon this account the King in Possession be Removed as well as an Heir secluded So true is that Observation That all the Pamphlets writ upon this Subject tho they begin with the Duke yet constantly End with the King
but for the most part very shallow pretences Ethelred being dead †Fl. VVgorn f. 616. M. VVestm f 203. Canutus by the terrour of his Arms having the greatest part of the Island at his devotion forced them to acknowledge and receive him for their King which they being under an apparent Force could not choose but do which notwithstanding this Gentleman is pleas'd to call an Election but how ridiculously I leave to every man of sense to judge but however the City of †Soli Cives Londinenses pars Nobilium qui tunc temporis ibidem permanebant Edmundum filium Regis ferreum latus in Regem unanimiter exclamaverunt M. Westm ubi supra London and that part of the Nobility that was there stood firm to Edmond Ironside Eldest Son and Heir to the deceased King and received him for their Sovereign as they were in Duty bound but at length these two Princes being grown weary of the War after a Duel sought between them to avoid the effusion of more Blood they came to this ‖ M. Westm f. 205. Conclusion That the Kingdom should be divided betwixt them each peaceably to enjoy his share But upon the Death of Edmund the * M. VVestm ubi supra Fl. VVigorn f. 618. Verum illi restante Deo falsum perhibuerunt testimonium fraudulentes mentiti sunt existimantes illum sibi mitiorem esse propter mendacium eorum se ab eo praemium sumpturos magnum ex quibus falsis testibus quidam post non longum tempus ab eodem rege sunt interfecti Dane being resolved to admit of no Co-parter in the Government of this Island summons all the Great Men and very cunningly as if he had been ignorant of the matter demands of them whether or no by the Agreement made betwixt him and the late King it was Provided That the Sons or Brethren of Edmond should succeed him during his Canutus's Life but he was answered by 'em That they were ignorant of any Provision made for his Brethren at any time but this they were sure of That Edmund on his Death-Bed had recommended the Care and Protection of his Children to him till they came to Age capable of the Government of his Kingdom but sayes Florence of Worcester God knows they bore false Testimony and ly'd falsely but they thought by this means to intitle themselves to some great reward or at least to a Room in his Favours and Affections but after by this means he had obtained the Crown they found themselves mistaken for he wisely considering that such Time-serving Polititians as had betray'd their true Master's Interest would no longer be true to his than it stood with their convenience therefore he soon found means to cut most of 'em off a true and just reward for their disloyalty Canutus being dead and having appointed his youngest Son Hardicanute for his Successor by his Will it seems Princes in those days took upon them the disposing of their Crowns without asking the consent of the people his Second †M. VVestm f. 209. VV. Malmesb l. 2. c. 12. f. 76. Flor. VVigorn 622. Son Harald as having the advantage by seniority of Birth laid claim to the Crown asserting that he being Elder Brother and Legitimate which by the by was false but however it serv'd his turn for the present it was not in his Fathers power to rob him of his Birth-right to determine therefore the justness of his Title a great Council was assembled where the business viz. who had the greater Right to the Crown was very warmly debated on both sides and was at length decided in favour of Harald he having the greatest part of the Nobility and the City of ‖ Qui jam penè in barbarorum mores propter frequentem convictum transiverant VV. Malmsb ubi supra London which was then by the long continuance of the Danes there degenerated into barbarism and tho' this Gentleman would make us believe this was an Election yet I am persuaded it was nothing less because the point in Controversie was who had the most Right and best Title to the Crown besides if we may give Credit to the ** Brompton f. 932. Historian who sayes Placitum magnum de regni Successione apud Oxonium factum est it was only a bare pleading and arguing the justness of Harald's pretences ††quafi justus haeres sc Haraldus regnare nec tamen ita potenter ut Canu'us quia justior haeres expectabatur Hardicanutus which how it could be and yet the Kingdom be Elective I cannot conceive F. VVigorn ubi supra who by the corruption and partiality of the Judges got the day notwithstanding all the endeavors of Q. Emma and Earl Godwin who objected Harald's illegitimacy and the Will of the deceased King so far were they from endeavouring to make any court to the people for the procuring of theirs that they only desired their assent to the justness of his Title which certainly in an Elective Monarchy no man can pretend to but Harald being sensible how unjustly he had obtained the Crown used a great deal of Address and Cunning to cut off all his Competitors and it was the hard Fortune of poor Alfred to fall into his cruel hands by the treachery of Earl Godwin and was presently after most barbarously murder'd and yet our Pamphleteer has the impudence to tell us That the Nobility after the expulsion of the Danes proceeded to Elect him which is as notoriously false as a great many more of his Forgeries But Harald Harefoot being dead to make some amends for their former undutiful carriage they send to * M. VVestm ' f. 110 Fl. Wigorn. 623. Hardicanute then at Bruges an offer of the Crown which he before had been unjustly deprived of which he accepts and comes immediately into England to be Crowned so that all this while we find not so much as one pretence of believing this Kingdom to be Elective After his death the English grown weary of the Danish slavery at last resolve to return to their Duty and restore the Saxon Line to the Crown it had so long been contrary to all Law and justice kept from the possession of in order to which they enter into a joint * Bromptâ—â— 934 Association and resolve to stand by one another as the modern phrase is with their Lives and Fortunes in depriving for ever the Danes of that Government they had no pretence or right to but what the Sword gave them Nor can this be any Argument for the Power of Parliaments in disposing of the Succession for what was done by the Great Council then was but their Duty since they were bound in Conscience upon the first opportunity to endeavour the ejection of an Usurper and the Restauration of the true Heir to the Throne of his Fathers In pursuance to this Resolution it not being well known what was become of Ironside's Children or if it
were they being at that time in Hungary and having few or no Friends to assert their Right by the Power and Interest of Earl Godwin whose Daughter Edward had married the †F. nigorn f. 624. M. VVestm f. 212. VV. Gemiticens de Ducibus Norman in vit Guliel Conq. c. 9. Confessor as the lawful and next Heir was advanced to the Crown but he good Prince knowing the Right his Nephew had to the Crown sends for him home that after his death he might succeed in that Kingdom which Jure Haereditario ei debebatur sayes one of our most considerable ‖ M. VVestm f. 221. Fl. Wigorn. f. 633. W. Malms c. ult lib. 2. f. 93. ut aut ille aut filii sui succedant regno Haereditario Angliae Historians was due to him by Hereditary Right and if so how could the Government be Elective Nor was there any danger like to accrue to Edward by this since not only the memory of so great an Obligation as this was would keep him from attempting any thing in his Uncles prejudice but if he had any such Design he being so great a Stranger would want a sufficient Interest to bear him out But he dying presently after his Arrival his Eldest Son Edgar was look'd upon by every one to be Heir Apparent to the Crown which all our ** M. VVest f. 221. M. Paris f. 2. c. Historians with open cry tell us was his due by Birth-right nay so commonly was the opinion received that he was vulgarly called Atheling which what it signifies we shall best be informed by an Old English Poet speaking of the endeavours of some Honest and Great Men to have had this Edgar crowned according to Law Justice and Equity in this manner The gode tryewomen of the londe wolde aabbe ymade King Rob of Gloucester The kind cir the young child Edgar Atheling Who so were next King by kinde me cluped him Atheling Therefore me cluped him so vor by kind he was King And since this Edgar had no Title to the Crown upon the Account of any Election but by Right or Blood and Inheritance which are things altogether incompatable with an Elective Government I cannot for my Life understand how any man can find any thing to favour my Adversarie's Opinion And tho' his Party not being strong enough to assert his Right he was put by by ††M. Paris f. 2. Fl. wigorn 633. Harald Earl Godwin's Son yet every Body must acknowledge it was most unjustly done since Harald could neither pretend right of Blood nor Election For it was so far from that that he contrary to the Rights of Holy Church without any Ceremony and without expecting either the Votes of the Nobility or the Assistance of the Prelates he set the Crown upon his own Head nor durst any body gain-say it ‖‖ W. Gemiticens ubi supra For he had a great part of the Land of England in his own Possession but were *** Extortâ fide a majoribus sibi regnum ut iujurias suas acumularet ampliores diadema sine ecclesiasticâ authoritate imponendo asseruit M. P. ubi supra forc'd and compell'd for fear to swear Allegiance to him But at length he met with a just Reward for his Disloyalty losing both his Crown and Life at once to Duke William who had as little Right as he And thus I hope I have made it clearly evident that my Antagonist has been wretchedly mistaken in all his Instances during the Saxons Government and tho' he pretend he pick'd but a few out of the many he could have produced yet without disparagement to his exquisite Discernment I think I may truly say he must have had a great deal better Eyes than my self to have found them and a great deal more Dexterity than I can perceive he is Master of to have by wresting and Wire-drawing the meaning of his Authors made more But tho' he may have had ill luck hitherto in his Undertaking yet perhaps he may succeed better in his Endeavours after the Normans had made themselves Masters of this Island but I am afraid when we come to examine How and in what manner and upon what Grounds the Natural course of the Descent hath been changed We shall find very little reason not still to seem astonished at the boldness of the men who would persuade us that a Link of the sacred Chain of Succession may be broke so often as a Parliament thinks fit For if we look but with an impartial Eye upon the History of those times we shall find that such a course of Succession as I am contending for has been constantly conserved unless diverted out of its duc Channel by some powerful and ambitious Prince who by Cunning Subtilty Artifice and Address and by the Assistance of some Popular Friend has jugled himself into the Throne and tho' we find some of them debasing their Prerogative truckling to and courting the People for their Approbation thereby hoping to strengthen a crack'd Title and make up in Power and their Favour what it wanted as to its Legality I presume no man of even Common Sence can take that for an Election since it ought to be a Solemn Free Sedate and deliberate Act which I am sure none of my Adversaries Instances can pretend to be Besides it seems very strange to me that the Kings of those Times should Intitle themselves to the Crown only from the Consent of the People and that we should no where find mention of * Vicar Generals they are stiled in the Empire Administrators of the Government betwixt the Death of the preceding King and the Election of his Successor since without such a Provision and such a one I am sure there never was the Kingdom must necessarily have run into Anarchy and Confufion especially if the Crown were engaged in a War at the Death of any King which has above once happen'd therefore I think my Lord Coke †In the Preface to his fourth Book of Reports had reason for saying This Kingdom is a Monarchy successive by inherent Birth-right of all others the most absolute and perfect Form of Government excluding Interregnums and with it infinite Inconveniencies But proceed we now to examine his Proofs and first he tells us King William himself being illegitimate yet succeeded his Father in the Dutchy of Normandy and therefore had no great reason to set any great value upon that sort of Title which is derived from Right of Blood But if he had pleas'd to have examin'd the matter a little more narrowly he would have found that ‖ M. Westm f. 208. W. Malmsb lib. 3. f. 95. Arlotte the Conqueror's Mother was afterwards lawful Wife to Duke Robert which subsequent Marriage was according to the then almost univerfally received Canon Law not only sufficient to render him Legitimate quoad Sacerdotium but quoad Successionem too tho' the latter was not allowed of in England