to be exercised in Causes and over Persons Ecclesiastical or Spiritual the one placed in the Princes the other in the Churches of Christ 1. The difference betwixt these two Powers 2. The Necessity if the Civil Power in Ecclesiastial Matters notwithstanding Church-Power § 2. What is common to both and wherein each of these Powers differ from the other shall briefly be shewed 1. They are Powers both a Subordination or Policy in the Church as well as in the Common-weal and an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Jurisdiction exercised in each You read of Authority or Jurisdiction not only in Civil Assemblies as Rom. 13. John 19.11 but also in Churches 2 Cor. 10.8 and 13.10 the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places 2. They are both from God and the Ordinance of God and ought to be submitted to for Conscience sake and are for Encouragement to those that are Good and for Wrath upon him that doth Evil and he that resisteth this Power in either resists the Ordinance of God and they that resist receive to themselves Damnation as the Apostle speaks as well in respect to the one as the other And both being from God they are also both Powers under God that is under his Designment and Limits as also his Direction and Guidance for his Glory as the ultimate and the good of Mankind as the penultimate end of both 3. This Power of Princes is termed spiritual Ratione objecti because it hath to do with Spiritual Persons and Causes In such like a sense and manner of Speech if it had the stamp of vulgar Use the church-Church-Power may be termed Civil or Temporal because all sorts of Persons and Causes without Difference are under the Power of it That as the secular Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae matters of Holiness and what 's opposite to it Blasphemy Heresy Perjury c. as well as Righteousness so Church-Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae Righteousness and second-Table-Duties and what is opposite as Rebellion Sedition Lying Stealing if any Man that is called a Brother be a Fornicator or a Drunkard or an Extortioner c. In all these and such Cases the Church-Power is applied in an Ecclesiastical or Spiritual way as in a Civil and Secular way the Magistrate deals with what are Duties of the first Table The Powers do mutually further each other and so ordained by God from whom they are both originally as they sweetly comply and agree being kept in their just Bounds each with other as Moses and Aaron David and Nathan Zerubbabel the Son Shealtiel and Joshua the Son of Josedech Jungamus Gladios said the Emperor to his Bishop let us joyn our Forces and purge the Land of Wickedness And our Senators in Parliament speak thus of these Stat. 20. Hen 8. c. 12. Both Authorities and Jurisdictions joyn together and the one helps the other § 3. Their Differences are in these Particulars 1. Though both have in their respective way to do with both Tables yet the Civil Magistrates Work lyeth most over Persons with respect to the Duties of the second Table as in matters of Justice and Righteousness in the managing whereof the very being of a Common-wealth principally consists its wel-being only as he hath to do in Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes So the Church-Power is chiefly and principally exercised in the ordering of Persons with respect to the first-Table-Duties and which appertains to Piety Wherein is the Being and constant Employment of Churches The other that is matters of Righteousness Justice Sobriety and the like are occasionally only and in ordine ad spiritualia under Church-Power and Censures 2. The Power of Churches is not only spiritual Ratione objecti because it s over spiritual Persons and Causes but ex natura rei a spiritual Power having Spirituality and its Denomination from more intrinsick Considerations as the Matter Form Subject Rule End c. and not from the Object only as that other Power which though it be in spiritual things yet it is not properly spiritual Power the Sword which it bears is not the Sword of the Spirit Rev. 1.16 Ephes 6. which is the Word of God and this Word is eternal not temporal it endureth for ever the Power and Soveraignty of it is from Christ out of his Mouth went a sharp two-edged Sword his Sword and Power being spiritual it pierceth runs deep Heb. 4. even betwixt the Soul and the Spirit there comes no such Sword or Law from Civil Authority that Power in its greatest Efficacy reacheth not the Inner-Man though to be submitted unto for Conscience sake Indeed this Power is over spiritual Persons but not immediately and directly over their spiritual part By these Powers we are given up to a Prison to Banishment to Death but not to Satan It is not for cruciating the Souls and perplexing the Consciences of Men as is Church-Power where there is Cause 3. That of Secular Magistrates even in Spiritual Affairs and having to do primarily with the outward Man is more Authoritative it is Jurisdictio propriè dicta Legislative Coercive and in all respects the same as in Civil Matters what he doth in his own Name And truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Church-Power is not properly Jurisdiction or Authority as in the Church but as in Christ the Head of the Church as seated in the Church or Caetus fidelium it is only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministerium not Deminium and acts all in the Name or Authority of Christ 4. They differ in Extension in respect to both Persons and Causes 1. Church-Power is limited to a particular Congregation as Family-Power to those of our own Houshold But this other Ecclesiastical Power seated in the same Person or Persons extends it self throughout a whole Kingdom yea sometimes to more than one But in some one Province or Kingdom you read in Scripture of many Churches This cometh to pass from another Difference between these Powers The Manage of Ecclesiastical Affairs as in Civil Magistrates may be delegated to other hands by way of Commission or Deputation they may ordain under them subordinate Thrones and inferior Powers acting in their Names which is Lordly and full of Honour and State But Churches may not do so by delegation of Power Representatives or any other Method or Way to stretch forth the Wing of their Authority like that of the Civil over all the Churches of a Nation or over more Congregations than one or a greater than ordinarily partake of all other Ordinances together is not at all suitable to a Church-Condition which is Ministerial not Lordly So Mr. Bradshaw as the Opinion of the Nonconformists We confine and bound all Ecclesiastical Power within the Limits only of one particular Congregation holding that the greatest Ecclesiastical Power ought not to stretch beyond the same And that it is an arrogating of Princely Supremacy for any Ecclesiastical Person or Persons whatsoever to take upon themselves Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction
immediately the Object of this Supreme Power and the Laws made by it upon another Consideration than as Bishops c. namely as being born within these her Majesty's Realms and Dominions and such Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be She hath the Sovereignty and Rule over them Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Things are mentioned in the Oath upon a twofold Account 1. Because the Civil Magistrate's Power and Jurisdiction really extends it self to the Duties of both Tables and hath to do with Matters and Causes as well as Persons that are spiritual as hereafter we shall shew but 2. Principally that a Calling or Employment in Church-Affairs whatsoever hath been formerly judged and practised doth no more exempt a Person and his Actings that is a Subject to the Queen upon any other account from her Secular Power than doth a Temporal Calling or Employment in any worldly Affairs There is something of Explication further in the Articles of Religion concluded in the Year 1562. The 37th Article is this The 37th Article professed in the Church of England The Queen's Majesty hath the chief Power in her Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any Foreign Jurisdiction Where we attribute to the Queen's Majesty the chief Government by which Titles we understand the Minds of some slanderous Folks to be offended we give not to our Prince the ministring either of God's Word or of the Sacraments The which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify But that only Prerogative which we see to have been given always to all Godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself that is that they should rule all Estates and Degrees committed to their Charge by God whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal and restrain with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England It is mentioned in the Admonition that the Queen 's Ecclesiastical Power is the same that was challenged and used by Henry the Eighth c. Which is supposed by some to be the same that was in the Pope the Person only and not the Power changed so that our Princes are but Secular Popes This Objection was strengthned by the Subtilty of Gardiner abroad Whom Calvin terms Impostor ille in Am. 7.13 and at home by a Sermon preached at Paul's-Cross in the Year 1588 by Dr. Bancroft who calls Queen Elizabeth a petty Pope and tells us her Ecclesiastical Authority is the same which the Pope had formerly This 37th Article removes the Scruple sufficiently 1. In asserting the Authority given to her Majesty to be no other but what we see to have been given to all Godly Princes in holy Scriptures c. And for what Power Henry the Eighth challenged it was no new Jurisdiction wrested from the Pope but a Power or Prerogative justly and rightfully belonging to him 26 Henry 8. cap. 1. claimed and exercised by his Predecessors some hundreds of Years before his Time being anciently annexed to the Crown 2. In the latter part of the Article it is also evident For tho a Power in spiritual Causes be given to a Secular Prince yet it is not a spiritual Power and such a Jurisdiction as the Pope claims but such a Power only and in such a way as is put forth and exercised in ordinary Civil Affairs and the same in respect both to Ecclesiastical and Temporal Persons namely a restraining with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers So to restrain or coerce is an Authority or Jurisdiction peculiar to Civil Magistrates and by Christ himself denied to the highest Ecclesiastical Powers Mat. 20 25 26. Ye know saith Christ the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion over them and they that are great exercise Authority upon them but it shall not be so among you you apostles and threatens the Use of the Sword in such Persons Mat. 26.52 King James speaking of the Oath of Supremacy In that Oath saith he is contained only the King 's absolute Power over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions In his Apol. pag. 76. And more fully afterwards pag. 164. It implies saith he a Power to command Obedience to be given to the Word of God by reforming Religion according to his prescribed Will by assisting the spiritual Power by his temporal Sword by Reformation of Corruption by procuring due Obedience to the Church by judging and cutting off all frivolous Questions and Schisms as Constantine did and finally by making a Decorum to be observed in all indifferent Things for that purpose which is the only Intent of our Oath of Supremacy My Lord Coke out of 1º Eliz. and in the Words of the Statute gives this Interpretation There is saith he no Jurisdiction by this Act affixed to the Crown but was of Right or ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of his Jurisdiction and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The End of which Jurisdiction and of all the Proceedings thereupon is that all Things might be in Causes Ecclesiastical to the pleasure of Almighty God Increase of Vertue and the Conservation of the Peace and Unity of the Realm as by divers places of the Act appears And therefore by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being ungodly or repugnant to the ancient Law of the Crown was or could be restored to the Crown according to the ancient Right and Law of the same Coke de Jure Ecclesiastico fol. 8. Bishop Bilson a great Searcher into the Doctrine of the Supremacy of Kings gives this as the Sence of the Oath The Oath saith he expresseth not Kings Duty to God but ours to them As they must be obeyed when they join with Truth so must they be endured when they fall into Error Which Side soever they take either Obedience to their Wills or Submission to their Swords is their due by God's Law and that is all which our Oath exacteth And in a few Lines following he interprets what is meant by Supremacy We do not saith he give Princes Power to do what they list in the Matters appertaining to God and his Service Indeed we say the Pope may not depose them nor pull the Crown off their Heads In this only Sence we defend them to be Supreme that is not at liberty to do what they list without regard of Truth or Right but without Superior on Earth Dr. Morton against the Pope's Supremacy out of an Epistle of Leo to the Emperor speaking thus You must not be ignorant that your Princely Power is given unto you not only in worldly Regiment but also spiritual for the Preservation of
a Church within it self not an Assembly but a Society A Church as we are now to understand it is a Society that is a number of Men belonging to some Christian-Fellowship the Place and Limits whereof are certain having communion in the publick Exercise of such Duties as are mentioned Acts 2.47 As those of the Mystical Church by their inward Graces differ from all others which are not of the Body and those that are of the visible Body of the Church have the Notes of external Profession Even so these several Societies or Churches have Properties belonging to them as they are publick Christian Societies And of such Properties it may not be denied that one of the very chiefest is Ecclesiastical Policy We use the name of Policy rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatsoever besides belongeth to the ordering of the publick Affairs of the Church of God In which words he asserts not each particular Church to have Government in it self but this Government as a Property or Propriety by which it 's distinguished from the Mystical as also the Catholick visible Church So that he doth not as some of late make the Catholick visible Church the first Subject of the Keys but each particular Society or Church supposing that great Body of Christians to be only and immediately under the Spiritual Government of Christ Jesus 2. Compleat and sufficient It is not to be understood of such a perfection as may not with much advantage receive help both from the Power of the Magistrate as I have shewed before as also from the Counsel and Advice of other Churches But I mean an essential Compleatness or Sufficiency not being deficient in any material requisite for Government This that learned Author expresseth in those last Words ' We use the Word Policy saith he rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatever besides belongeth to the ordering of the Affairs of the Church of God Every particular Church Against Whitgist lib 3 pag. 147. saith Mr. Cartwright having an Eldership is a Catholick Church of Christ under whom Pastors Doctors and Elders are the ministerial and immediate Governors In which Words he intimateth a Compleatness in each particular Church for Government and Privileges as much as if the Catholick visible Church were Organical Rutherf Due Right or Presbyt pag. 307. and a governing Church The Power of Jurisdiction saith one is as perfect and compleat in one single Congregation as in a Provincial as in a National yea as in the Catholick visible Body All Things are yours saith Paul to a particular Church 2 Cor. 3. Parker's Polit. lib 3. cap. 13. To this purpose Mr. Parker Sicut non para c. As a particular Church is not a maimed or half but a whole and perfect Body so it is possessed with the whole and entire Church-Government and not with a part only This Oeconomick and Domestick Power is intrinsick and essential to a Family 2d Instance and is a Power derived immediatly from the Lord by the Light of Nature and hath not its original from any Power on Earth Families being much more ancient than Common-Wealths So Government or Discipline is intrinsick and inseparable from the very Essence of a Church received immediately from Christ and not the Grant or Constitution of any Secular Prince or State Jackson of the Church cap. 8. § 5. Churches are endued saith Dr. Jackson with a Judicature immediately derived from Christ and independent upon any Earthly Power or any Power whatsoever on Earth whether Spiritual or Temporal Bilson of Suprem p. 171. Bishop Bilson expresseth it thus The Things comprised in the Church and by God himself commanded to the Church these Things are specified in pag. 227. to be the Word Sacraments and Vse of the Keys or Ecclesiastical Power and Cure of Souls are subject to no mortal Creature Pope nor Prince And those of another Persuasion are to the same purpose The Church saith Mr. Rutherford hath the Keys from Christ Peaceable Plea p. 300. equally independent upon any mortal Man in Discipline as in Doctrine Due Right of Presbyt cap. 9. § 9. A Power and Right to Discipline saith the same Author is a Property essential to a Church and is not removed from it till God remove the Candlestick and the Church cease to be a visible Church Potestas ipsa de jure c. Power saith Dr. Ames is so much the Right of a Church Cas cen lib 4. cap. 24. p. 4. as it cannot be separated because necessary and immediatly floweth even from the Essence of each true Church There are Authorities enow to be produced from the Writings of the Learned for the confirmation of this particular All grant there is a Government jure divino I speak not of this or that Form and by the appointment of Jesus Christ It is denied by none but Erastus and those that follow him who may as well deny Praying Preaching or Sacraments jure divino It is as expresly ordained that Discipline be exercised in the Name of Christ as to preach pray or baptize in his Name There are certainly Things of God that are not the Things of Caesar And if those Things upon which Christ hath put his Name be not peculiarly his I know not where we shall find the Joint As we say there were Families so particular Churches before any Commonwealths were and Christian Churches and Discipline exercised many Years before any Emperors or Kings were Christian And therefore as Families have many Privileges so peculiar and by the Law of Nature so much theirs as are never touched or infringed by the Supreme Power of any Nation So likewise it is with Churches they have very many Privileges so evidently theirs from the Law of Christ and their spiritual Constitution as Christian Magistrates will do their utmost to preserve and cherish and not in the least infringe It is a part of Magna Charta Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta confirmavimus 3 Hen. 3. cap. 1. pro nobis Heredibus nostris in perpetuum quòd Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra Libertates suas illaesas And it is mentioned in the Oath our Kings take at their Coronation that He shall keep and maintain the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Holy Church A third Particular 3d Instance or Instance of what we have supposed in the former Considerations is this The lesser Corporations Cities Families and the like have not Authority or Jurisdiction one over another It is the same with Churches each having the Fountain and Original of their own Power as before is shewed immediatly proceeding from Christ in themselves and not elsewhere or one from another cannot by any Art or Device of Man be made to rise up above it self as it doth if one Church exerciseth a Power or Jurisdiction over another There is
The Oath of Allegiance I A B do truly and sincerely acknowledg profess testify and declare in my Conscience before God and the VVorld that our Sovereign Lord KING CHARLES is Lawful and Rightful KING of this Realm and of all other his Majesty's Dominions and Countries And that the Pope neither of himself nor by any Authority of the Church or See of Rome or by any other means with any other hath any Power or Authority to Depose the KING or to dispose any of his Majesty's Kingdoms or Dominions or to Authorize any Foreign Prince to invade or annoy Him or his Countries or to discharge any of his Subjects of their Allegiance or Obedience to his Majesty or to give License or Leave to any of them to bear Arms to raise Tumults to offer any Violence or Hurt to his Majesty's Royal Person State or Government or to any of his Majesty's Subjects within his Majesty's Dominions Also I do swear from my Heart That notwithstanding any Declaration or Sentence of Excommunication or Deprivation made or granted or to be made and granted by the Pope or his Successors or by any Authority derived or pretended to be derived from him or his See against the said King his Heirs or Successors or any Absolution of the said Subjects from their Obedience I will bear Faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors and him and them will defend to the uttermost of my Power against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever which shall be made against his or their Persons their Crown or Dignity by reason or colour of any such Sentence or Declaration or otherwise and will do my best endeavour to disclose and make known unto his Majesty his Heirs and Successors all Treasons and Traiterous Conspiracies which I shall know or hear of to be against him or any of them And I further swear That I do from my Heart abhor detest and abjure as Impious and Heretical this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes which be Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murthered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever And I do believe and in my Conscience am resolved that neither the Pope nor any other Person whatsoever hath Power to absolve me of this Oath or any part thereof which I acknowledg by good full Authority to be Lawfully ministred unto me and do renounce all Pardons and Dispensations to the contrary And all these Things I do plainly and sincerely acknowledg and swear according to these express VVords by me spoken and according to the Plain and Common Sence and Understanding of the same VVords without any Equivocation or Mental Evasion or secret Reservation whatsoever And I do make this Recognition and Acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon the true Faith of a Christian So help me God The Oath of Supremacy you may see at large in this Book page 2. THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy AND Power of the King IN Ecclesiastical Affairs With Queen Elizabeth's ADMONITION declaring the Sence and Interpretation of it confirmed by an Act of Parliament in the 5th Year of her Reign Together with a Vindication of Dissenters proving That their particular Congregations are not inconsistent with the King's Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Affairs With some Account of the Nature Constitution and Power of the ECCLESIASTICAL COVRTS By P. NYE a Congregational Divine sometime Minister in London In the Epistle to the Reader is inserted King James's Vindication and Explication of the Oath of Allegiance LONDON Printed for Jonathan Robinson in St. Paul's Church-Yard and Samuel Crowch in Cornhill 1683. The Publisher to the Reader THE reprinting of this judicious and learned Treatise of Mr. Nye 's is occasioned by the re-imposing of the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy on the City of London at this Juncture for Election of Common-Councel-Men some supposing that many Dissenters will refuse the said Oaths or at least that of the Supremacy but by what is here said it will appear King James in his Catalogue of Tortus's Lies saith The Puritans do not decline the Oath of Supremacys but do daily take it c. and the same Supremacy is defended by Calvin himself Instit l. 4. c 20. Bp Andrews says the same Tortura Torti p. 110. that the Principles of Dissenters are not inconsistent with the King's Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Affairs and as a further Testimony hereof as they have* formerly so they are again ready to take the said Oaths and professedly assent also to all the Articles of Religion which concern only the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrine of the Sacraments comprised in a Book entituled Articles c. printed 1562 and so do humbly hope living peaceably under his Majesties Government they shall obtain that Indulgence which his Majesty hath often graciously promised and which they formerly enjoyed his Majesty having told us in his Declaration for Indulgence It being evident by the sad Experience of twelve years that there is little fruit of forcible courses And in his gracious Speech Febr. 5. 1672 assured the Parliament that he had hitherto found the good Effect of the said Indulgence The Reverend Author hath said nothing of the Oath of Allegiance supposing no Protestant scruples that unless it be such as scruple all manner of Swearing but that all may understand the nature and design of both I will here insert the Words of King James in his Apologie for the Oath of Allegiance p. 46 c. in his Answer to Card. Bellarmin 's Letters Viz. As the Oath of Supremacy was devised for putting a Difference between Papists and them of our Profession so was this Oath of Allegiance which Bellarmine would seem to impugn ordained for making the Difference between the civily obedent Papists and the perverse Disciples of the Powder-Treason In King Henry Eighth's time was the Oath of Supremacy first made by him were Thomas Moor and Roffensis put to death partly for refusing it From his time till now have all the Princes of this Land professing this Religion successively in effect maintained the same and in that Oath only is contained the King's Absolute Power to be Judge over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions Whereas this last made Oath containeth no such matter only medling with the Civil Obedience of Subjects to their Sovereign in meer Temporal Causes And that the Injustice as well as the Error of Bellarmin's gross mistaking in this Point may yet be more clearly discovered I have also thought good to insert here immediately after the Oath of Supremacy the contrary Conclusions to all the Points and Articles whereof this other late Oath doth consist whereby it may appear what unreasonable and rebellious Points he would drive my Subjects unto by refusing the whole Body or that Oath as it is conceived For he that shall refuse to take this Oath must of necessity hold
the Church As if he had said not only in Cases Temporal but also in Spiritual so far as it belongeth to the outward Preservation not to the personal Administration of them And this is the Substance of our English Oath and further neither do our Kings of England challenge nor Subjects condescend unto pag. 26. Mr. Mason in his Vindiciae Ecclesiae Angliae Lib. 3. c. 5. speaking of Calvin's being offended verum si intellexisset nihil aliud sibi voluisse hunc Titulum c. Calvin would never have disallowed this Oath if he had understood by the Title of supream Governour in Ecclesiastical Things that nothing else had been claimed but an exclusion of Popish Tyranny and a lawful Power in the King over his Subjects which stands not in coyning new Articles of Faith or Forms of Religion such as were Jeroboam's Calves but in defending and propagating that Faith and Religion of which God in the Scripture is the undoubted Author In this sence and no other that ever we have heard of is the Title of Supream Governour given to and accepted by the King § 5. This Oath hath matters contained in it as you may perceive that are not of one nature and kind the Assent and Stipulation required of us in respect to the several parts of it is likewise various and different As our Creed according to the different nature of the Articles is believed by the different Acts of Faith To what is contained in the former part of the Oath in these Words I do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supream Governour of this Realm c. Herein is required a true real and cordial Assent to and Profession of what is mentioned as also to give this Testimony with such Sincerity of Heart as in the Presence of God To swear positively to any dogmatical Assertion is not required it would be taking the Name of God in vain for if it be a certain and undoubted Truth in it self and to others as are Principles in Reason and Articles of Faith an Oath is vain for it ends no Strife 2. If doubtful Heb. 9. and a question whether true or not though such an Oath puts it out of question that I believe so yet not that it is a Truth My Belief though ever so much evidenced and confirmed doth not make a doubtful matter it self more credible nor is one Man's believing an Assertion any just ground for another Man to believe the same such an Oath is therefore in vain it 's not a fit medium to end such a Controversy 2. It is further said I do utterly renounce and forsake all Forreign Iurisdictions c. This requires not only the Sincerity of my Perswasion and Profession against the Title and Claim of all foraign Powers but upon Oath to forsake that is to abjure we abjure when we swear to quit and forsake To forsake a Power or Jurisdiction is to refuse and not to receive submit or yield Obedience to any Commands given by it or make any Appeals or Complaints to it 3. That which followeth and wherein the main of this Engagement lieth is in these Words I do promise that from henceforth I shall hear Faith c. and to my Power shall assist all Iurisdictions c. Herein is required a Promissary Oath swearing Allegiance to the King as a Loyal Subject to submit to his Laws as also if there be occasion to my Power to assist and defend him and all Jurisdictions and Priviledges belonging to him Though my Perswasion be ever so right my Resolution ever so sincere at the taking of this Oath that 's not all is required In an Assertory Oath if there be Truth and a right Frame of Heart in time I swear and give my Testimony it sufficeth But a Promissory Oath is not discharged by this that I sincerely intend what I say and promise for I engage to Action and for the time to come I must not only promise but if it be lawful and possible I must act and do accordingly Numb 30.2 If a Man swear an Oath to bind his Soul with a Bond he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his Mouth CHAP. II. What is meant by Persons and things Spiritual or Ecclesiastical in the proper as also in the vulgar use of these Terms IF this Expression Spiritual be interpreted by the Contradistinct Member Temporal it seems to direct us to understand such matters as concern Eternity for that is the true Opposite to what is temporal 2 Cor. 4.18 The things that are seen are temporal and the things that are not seen are eternal now in strictness of Speech carnal not temporal is the opposite Member to spiritual I could not speak unto you as spiritual Men but as to carnal 1 Cor. 3.1 and 1 Cor. 9. If we have sown unto you spiritual things is it a great matter if we reap your carnal things But this is too narrow and strict a Sense There are matters vulgarly termed Spiritual or Ecclesiastical being such in Name and Title only having nothing of a spiritual Nature in them-Such a Distinction of spiritual things you have in a Letter written by Henry the 8th to his Clergy of the Province of York in the Year 1533 who were offended at his Title of being Supream Head of the Church Men saith he being here themselves earthly and temporal cannot be Head and Governour to things eternal nor yet spiritual taking this word Spiritual not as in the common Speech abused but as it signifies indeed By spiritual things as abused in common Speech he means what is given to all such Persons and Causes as belong to the Spiritual Court and are termed by Civilians causae vel res contentiosae vel judiciales matters of contest inter partes actorem reum and come to be determined by Sentence of the Judg in those Courts By those things that are indeed spiritual is meant res extra judiciales or non contentiosae that is such things as are determined not in a Judicial or Court-way of Tryal by Witnesses Oaths Interpleadings Sentences and the like but in a more deliberate and synodical way having the Word of God for Witness and Judg both in respect of what we do and what we may do in things of this Nature Causes Eazlesiastical saith Dr. Field are of two sorts Field of the Church p. 680. for some are originally and naturally such and some only in that they are referred to the Cognizance of Ecclesiastical Persons as the probat of the Testaments Matrimony c. Those Spiritual Courts being continued and the same Causes tried in them as before when this Jurisdiction was usurped the matters that were then are still vulgarly reputed Spiritual Emperors receiving the Christian Faith honoured the learned and godly Bishops antiently with some Jurisdiction in the cases of Tythes Matrimony Wills and the like which are termed Ecclesiastical or Spiritual not from their own
Church offending there is none if there be not a superior Church or Ecclesiastical Power to appeal unto Leaving wholly what they pretend from Scriptures I shall examine this only their Reasoning from common light it being more suitable to our present subject and in the general say Answ 1 1. In the Mysteries of the Gospel from which by their own concessions Church-communion and Discipline is not to be excluded any more than Preaching or the Sacraments It is very unsafe to make the dim Eye of Reason our Guide Of what advantage such suppositions have been in producing Arminianism Socinianism Platonism c. but especially of the many gross Errors and loathsom Superstitions in Popish Worship we cannot be ignorant Answ 2 2. An Appeal as understood in this dispute and ordinarily by Civilians is a provocation to a superior Tribunal upon the error or wrong done by an Inferior Such an Appeal is not essential to Government unless we can suppose a progressus in infinitum Nor is there a defect in that Government where it cannot be had Some Societies are 1. So low and little in compass as they need not such Appeals A Family is a compleat Society or Corporation though there be not a Superior in the same kind that is an Economical power to appeal unto so may a Church be though not a Superior in a series properly Spiritual or Ecclesiastical 2. Others so High If there be an Error or Wrong done in or by a general Assembly or National Synod supposed in the exercise of power of greatest perfection we have no remedy Argued by the Commissioners of Scotland Anno 41. p. 1 2 9. Also their Declaration against a Cross Petition P. 10. no Superior to appeal unto therefore they term their Church or General Assembly an Independent If it be said as it is by some we may appeal from it to an Oecumenical Councel Answ These great Councels have erred and may and what then is the Remedy or further Provision To what Ecclesiastical Tribunal Superior can we appeal from them Answ 3 To answer more particularly This Reasoning being grounded upon a Similitude betwixt the Ministerial Government of Christ and the Political Government of Kingdoms we say there is not Par ratio and therefore no just consequence The Disparity will appear in divers Particulars Disparity I In their Natures as Civil and Religious Assemblies In this the Difference is so great as Councels Schoolmen and Casuists who all grant Appeals in Civil Affairs yet in Ecclesiastical Matters the ordinary use of them is so constantly and generally denied Videtur axioma communiter acceptum inter probos Religiosos Appellationis vocem audiendam non esse Suar. de virt Tom. 4. pag. 99. as it is an Axiom saith One That in Religious Causes the Voice of Appealing is not to be heard or mentioned And in the same Chapter he gives us the Reasons of it in these words Si in ordinariis correctionibus quae juxta disciplinam religiosam fiunt locum haberet Appellatio à Priore ad Provincialem à Provinciali ad Generalem magna sequeretur perturbatio disciplina religiosa sine dubio corrueret c. In ordinary Censures and such as are according to a Religious Discipline if Appeals should be made from the Prior to the Provincial and from the Provincial to the General it would breed a great Disturbance and be doubtless the Ruine of Religious Discipline For 1. Inferiour Governours would quickly be despised and have little Reverence or Fear 2. By such a dilatory way opportunity will be given by Friends or under-hand working to prevent any Religious Discipline It is therefore expedient for the good of Religion that there be a more simple way of procedure in these spiritual Corrections and that it be without any kind of Appellation Thus far Suarez And others of them also tell us That in a voluntary and brotherly Society Soto de Just lib. 54.6 art it 's more comely and honourable to end Offences and Differences in a private and peaceable way amongst themselves and within the Society than by clamorous Appeals to make Matters more publick It should not be of little weight also with us the Tenderness of Christ if it be confidered and how he would not have Breaches and Offences amongst Brethren to be made more publick or carried further than is necessary And by any thing we find in the Text there is no Necessity we should carry Matters for Censure out of the Church where the Offence is if there were doubtless Christ would have given us direction as well for the managing of Appeals FROM a Church as IN a Church Mat. 18.15 16 17. where each step and circumstance in the progress from a lesser to a greater Authority is described Disparity II From the different condition of Punishments in respect to Relief if unjustly inflicted Church-Censures have little operation on us further than our own Conscience and the Spirit of Christ make them effectual by working them in upon us But if inflicted where no just Cause and Clave errante the Spirit of Christ will not convince us of Sin or let in Satan's Terrors nor any such impressions of Grief or Shame as much to afflict us being innocent How little hath the Pope's Bulls or such Thundrings from Rome been valued or esteemed or Excommunications sent out of our Spiritual Courts when we know it is but for a Four-penny Offence In Civil Affairs it is much otherwise For be the Sentence just or unjust the Execution of it is equally grievous and a punishment be it in respect of Life Liberty or Estate and there is no way either to avoid or mitigate such wrongs but by Appeals The necessity of such Appeals therefore is very great but in respect to Ecclesiastical Censures little or nothing at all Disparity III The ordinary end and use of Appeals is either 1. For Relief of Persons suffering Or 2. That corrupt Judges be censured and unjust Sentences rescinded Persons come to be relieved when by Appeals to Higher Powers there is a better understanding either 1. in the Rule and Law or 2. a more righteous judgment in matters of Fact There are none of these Ends or Uses of an Appeal so accomplishable in an Ecclesiastical Process as in a Civil 1. If the Rule be obscure a right understanding of it may infallibly be had by appealing in Civil Affairs the Supreme Court is here on Earth that made the Rule or Law what 's determined by a Parliament or such Persons as are intrusted by it to this purpose is to us unquestionable But it 's otherwise in Church Affairs our Law-giver is in Heaven and cannot in such a forensical way be appealed unto nor hath he left any Vicar or Visible Judge under him of greater Authority in respect of Infallibility than a particular Church which is the ground and pillar of truth 1 Tim. 3.15 The Papists some of them in great and weighty matters not