But shall your Church lye fallow till that Infant King or green head of the Church come to years of discretion Do your Bishops your â—ierarchy your succession your Sacraments your being or not being Hereticks for want of Succession depend on this new found Supremacy-doctrine brought in by such a man meerly upon base occasions and for shamefull ends Impugned by Calvin and his followers derided by the Christian world and even by chief Protestants as Doctor Andrews Wâ—tton c not held any necessary point of Faith And from whom I pray you had Bishops their authority when there were no Christian Kings Must the Greek Patriarchs receive spiritual jurisdiction from the Greek Turk Did the Pope by the baptism of Princes lose the spiritual power he formerly had of conferring spiritual jurisdiction upon Bishops Hath the Temporal Magistrate authority to preach to assoil from sins to inflict Excommunications and other censures Why hath he not power to excommunicate as well as to dispense in irregularity as our late Soveraign Lord King James either dispensed with the late Archbishop of Canterbury or else gave Commission to some Bishops to do it And since they were subject to the Primate and not he to them it is cleer that they had no power to dispense with him but that power must proceed from the Prince as superior to them all and Head in the Protestants Church in England If we have no such authority how can he give to others what himself hath not Your Ordination or Conseâ—ration of Bishops and Priests imprinting no character can only consist in giving a power authority jurisdiction or as I said before Episcopal or Priestly functions If then the temporal Magistrate confers this power c. he can nay he cannot chuse but ordain and consecrate Bishops and Priests as often as he confers authority or jurisdiction and your Bishops as soon as they are designed and confirmed by the King must ipso facto be ordained and consecrated by him without intervention of Bishops or matter and form of Ordination Which absurdities you will be more unwilling to grant then well able to avoid if you be true to your own doctrines The Pope from whom originally you must beg your succession of Bishops never received nor will nor can acknowledg to receive any spiritual jurisdiction from any temporal Prince And therefore if jurisdiction must be derived from Princes he hath none at all and yet either you must acknowledg that he hath spiritual jurisdiction or that your selves can receive none from him And afterwards again sect 22. he saith But besides this defect in the personal succession of Protestant Bishops there is another of great moment which is that they want the right form of ordaining Bishops and Priests because the manner which they use is so much different from the Roman Church at least according to the common opinion of Divines that it cannot be sufficient for the essence of Ordination as I could demonstrate if this were the proper place of such a Treatise and will not fail to do if D. Potter give me occasion In the mean time the Reader may be pleased to read the Author cited here in the margent and then compare our form of Ordination with that of Protestants and to remember that if the form which they use either in consecrating Bishops or in ordaining Priests be at least doubtful they can never have undoubted Priests nor Bishops For Priests cannot be ordained but by true Bishops nor can any be true Bishop unless he be at first Priest I say their Ordination is at least doubtful because that sufficeth for my present purpose For Bishops and Priests whose Ordination is notoriously known to be but doubtful are not to be esteemed Bishops or Priests and no man without sacrilege can receive Sacraments from them all which they administer unlawfully And if we except Baptism with manifest danger of invalidity and with obligation to be at least conditionally repeated so Protestants must remain doubtful of Remission of sins of their Ecclesiastical Hierarchy and may not pretend to be a true Church which cannot subsist without undoubted true Bishops and Priests nor without due administration of Sacraments which according to Protestants is an essential note of the true Church And it is a world to observe the proceeding of English Protestants in this point of their Ordination For first An. 3 Ed. 6. cap. 2. when he was a Child about twelve years of age it was enacted That such a form of making and consecrating of Bishops and Priests as by six Prelates and six other to be appointed by the King should be devised Mark well this word devised and set forth under the Great Seal should be used and none other But after this Act was repealed 1 Mar. Sess 2. Insomuch as that when afterwards An. 6 7 Regin Eliz. Bishop Bonner being indicted upon a Certificate made by Doctor Horn a Protestant Bishop of Winchester for his refusal of the Oath of Supremacie and excepting against the Indictment because Dr. Horn was no Bishop they were all at a stand till An. 8 Eliz. cap. 1. the Act of Ed. 6. was renewed and confirmed with a particular Proviso That no man should be impreached or molested by means of any Certificate by any Bishop or Archbishop made before this last Act whereby it is cleer that they made some doubt of their own Ordination and that there is nothing but uncertainty in the whole business of their Ordination which forsooth must depend on six Prelates the Great Seal Acts of Parliament being contrary one to another and the like So that you see all along the authority and interposition of the Magistrate is scoffed at and by them made ineffectual in the ordering of the affairs of the Church nay the Church must be no Church if not wholly and independently governed by the Clergy and a Clergy too that do particularly derive their Ordination and power from a forein Head and according to Rights and Ceremonies then abolished If none but true Priests can administer the Sacraments nor none but true Bishops make true Priests nor none but the Pope make true Bishops but that the authority of the Magistrate doth interpose why then no true Sacraments nor no true Church by their doctrine And to that purpose he doth put a mark upon the word devised as deriding the Civil power therein 38. If we shall add to this what was before him observed by Father Parsons concerning the institution of the Service-book and objected against the validity and use of it as well as the power to abolish their Mass and other Ceremonies it will make us wary in condemning less Alterations now made by a greater Power while yet we shall commend conformity to a less Power in a matter of greater alteration For he alleadgeth in his Book of the Three Conversions of England par 2. chap. 12. sect 25. That the Reformation and Service-book were made by the then Protector to Edward the
and of Soepter in the singular number we may well understand the King before mentioned And however the Pâ—ophetick designation of Monarchical government to succeed as under the notion of Kings as the adopted Father of each Country took not place until Moses but that those that were the natural Fathers of the Tribes and had right of Government by primogeniture continuâ—â— as Princes and Rulers yet their as he was the first that was so stiled being King in Jesâ—uâ—â—â—â— even as the succeeding Judges may be so well called for that in the inter-regnum it is said there was no King in Israâ—l so shall we â—ind Moses again as expresly foretelling that they should have a King as that they should possess the Land For the words to each Promise run absolute Dent. 17. 14. When tâ—â—u art come into the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shâ—lt possess it and shalt dwell therein and shalt say I will set a King over me like all the Nations that are round about me c. It is not said If thou shalt say no such conditional but an express duty or prophecie For the conjunction and here used and shalt possess it and dwell therein and shalt say makes all of them equally certain as certain in the blessing of Kingship as in that of the promised Land it self Of all which I have formerly at large discoursed and have briefly here premised to unprejudice such as are averse to Monarchy or the acknowledgment of the power of Kings in the Church and shall now treat of the Church it self and of its proper cognisance and power in which we shall have farther occasion to assert this Kingly superintendencie CHAP. II. Of the Church Catholick and of the power and jurisdiction of each particular Church and Head thereof THe word Ecclesia or ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we English Church doth originally import a Company called forth or men met together upon some special occasion But the Scripture treating of Religious matters applies that notion to Meetings made to that end And therefore that Assembly which Demetrius and his Craftsmen made is called by that name But then farther because to be called forth must presuppose some person or persons having power so to do and also to propound and regulate what shall be disputed of or determined in these Assemblies in that respect again we after find that those things which in the former unruly meeting could not be composed are by the Town-Clark promised to be determined in a more lawful Church or assembly to be called according to Authority All Religions agreeing in this truth that without observation of Government and Order both Church and State will quickly run into confusion After Christianity had a while been professed this name by way of excellence was appropriate to them and those of their communion Insomuch as in the beginning thereof and while the Land of Jewry did contain the whole number of Believers or that the Christians there or elswhere had not cast themselves into any proper or distinct forms of regiment all such as stood as well separated from the world as associated amongst themselves by their joint profession of the same faith stood only distinct from the rest of the world by the word Church or Church of Christ Catholickly applied without distinction thereof into parts in respect of any local application But when afterwards they came to be dispersed into several Cities so distant from one another in place and so different in jurisdictions as to require some form of Ecclesiastical discipline to be setled amongst themselves for their more orderly service in their Religion it came then to pass that as those that had begotten them in the faith and been their spiritual fathers and instructors had chief authority herein so were those their Churches and followers distinguished by topical additions as the Church or Saints at Rome at Corinth at Ephesus or the like By the use of the word at such a place and not saying the Church of Rome of Corinth of Ephesus or the like as now we do the Church of Rome England Geneva c we are to conceive that as the first Believers were in respect of this separation from the rest of the world in faith and some religious exercises called by the name of a Church so these in those several Cities wherein they lived were called Saints or Church at such a City and not of as betokening that they were aswel but a part of that City as to civil regiment as also a part of the whole Catholick Church now subordinate to some separate Authority in the exercise of their Religion But then we are to conceive that although this separation of theirs from others of the same City both in their meetings and holy exercises were done in order to their Religion yet was it not the quality of any Religion as such a Religion but difference in rites and form of Worship and in meeting thereabouts from that other Religion which was publikely authorised in that place which made it preserve this name of Church as taken in its proper sense And therefore as before said we shall usually find that the Addition of the Church of God or of Christ is put to distinguish as well as to dignifie it above other religious Congregations that were not such And upon this reason it is that we never read in the Scripture that the the word Church is applied to the Jews although they were a Nation separate from all the rest of the world both in their Religion it self and in the Ceremonies thereof even for that it was all one and the same with that which the publick Authority of that place did appoint and allow Whereas when Christianity first began amongst them the first Professors thereof being but subordinately divided were set down as a Church or Congregation of men in that respect separate saying The Church or Church of Christ which is at Jerusalem Which being considered we need not wonder why S. Paul should proceed to no higher punishment then that of Excommunication against a Blasphemer or an incestuous person or the like who by the very heinousness and nature of their sins might be presumed not greatly desirous of their Communion even for that it was at that time all the punishment he or other Heads of Churches could inflict wanting as before noted all coercive jurisdiction Upon which ground again we find not that the Jews did ever exercise this kind of punishment while they continued masters of their own soveraignty but comprising all offences under the same Law they punished transgressions of all sorts as breaches thereof when yet afterward in the time of our Saviour that the supreme power was in the hand of the Romans we find them both threatening and actually thrusting men out of their Synagogues But however such notorious sinners as those might in the infancie of Christianity set lightly of any Church-censure in that kind yet with the
invincible Remonstrance as to cause all mens judgements to give place their opposition is to be suspected as proceeding from affected singularity or worse 23. For if in those things wherein controversie is whether they be warranted by Scripture or by the Catholick Church as Fathers Councels or the like such as live under any Christian authority should take upon them to be judges they should then usurpe that proper cognisance and power which is peculiar to the Church onely and leave her nothing to doe For since in points fundamentall or fully agreed upon her power reacheth not it must follow that to her alone it belongeth out of that variety of interpretation made of the meaning of the Texts themselves and out of that variety and contradiction which is found amongst Councels Fathers and other Writers to make choice of and give determination for what sort of doctrine or regiment she shall finde either to have been most Catholiquely received or to be grounded upon most Orthodox Principles and soundest reason Which done for men to say the Church hath no power to institute or or take away contrary to the Word of God and then produce no other Texts for condemning her in any particular then what are by others interpreted otherwise and also after the same manner she hath done already doth certainly argue great arrogance and stubbornness of mind in them that would thus apply it although the speech in it self be most true 24. And no lesse then so it is when out of the Sentences of some Councels Fathers or other Writers the doctrine and authority of the Catholike Church is alledged to take off our obedience to that Church under which we live It being none other in points of controversie in Religion then if in Civill suits and debates the parties in contention should appeal from the Laws of that Common wealth to the Verdict of the Civil Law and avouch the Testimony of Vlpian Papinian or the like for the meaning thereof Or to the Law of Nations and then prove there is such a Law and to be just so construed because some men whom they esteem well of have so thought If there be no controversie about the truth or equity of what they propound but all men are found to agree why then it is a sign God did make the discovery to them since he hath thus enabled them to prove it If not how can they think but reasonable even for peace and order sake if not for her own sake that that side and determination which in this controversie agrees with the Church should be preferred to that which is chosen by them And therefore if the Church may devise new Rites and must for Peace sake be obeyed then certainly when she doth not devise any thing new by way of addition nor so much as retain what was before taken as scandalous in things that were ancient I do not see any invincible reason no nor reason at all for Schisme or separation 25. And as for that power of mitigation what the general and literal rigour of Ecclesiasticall Laws hath set down as he spake it in justification of what was by the then Civill Magistrate or a power from her dispensed with in the cases of Plurality Non-residence and the like so it may also truly inform us that if for the further enabling men in the study of Divinity and consequently in the gift of preaching nay even for their temporal maintenance sake these general Laws and Rules of the Church were dispensed with while the same was still remaining and in power Much more may men now out of the rule of justice and charity both to themselves and others think themselves dispensed with the omission of some Rites and Ceremonies and of reading the Service Book when as not a dispensation alone but a strict injunction against the use of them is by the like soveraign power apparantly made and that Church also whose Laws they were hath neither force or being Charity I say both publike and private when as both preaching it self and the maintenance to rise thereby have so necessary a dependance on the forbearance of them If Preachers that had other places to live on and preach in might out of particular favour to them or some other person whose Chaplains they were be thus dispensed with as we know they were and that they then readily enough made use of it may we not conclude that both the rule of Charity to ones self and of generall charity to others that may reap good by their Doctrine will excuse them in a time when their own maintenance and the exercise of preaching doth wholly rely upon their obedience in this kinde So that seem the thing never so strange and new either in respect of addition or substraction to what was formerly done and established it is not by those that are Members and do live within the jurisdiction thereof to be disobeyed as out of scandal at alteration the Church having power as well to substract as to institute And therefore he saith lib. 5. fol. 196. All things cannot be of ancient continuance which are expedient and needfull for the ordering of spiritual affairs But the Church being a body which dieth not hath alwayes power as occasion requireth no lesse to ordain that which never was then to ratifie what hath been before To prescribe the order of doing all things is a peculiar prerogative which wisdome hath as Queen or Soveraign Commandress over other vertues This in every several mans actions of common life appertaineth unto Morall in publike and politick secular affairs unto civill Wisedom In like manner to devise any certain form for the outward administration of publique duties in the service of God or things belonging thereunto and to find out the most convenient rule for that use is a point of wisedome Ecclesiasticall It is not for a man which doth know or should know what order is and what peaceable government requireth to ask why we should hang our judgement upon the Churches sleeve and why in matters of Order more then in matters of Doctrine The Church hath Authority to establish that for an Order at one time which at another time it may abolish and in both do well Then which nothing could in my opinion have been spoken more pointing to Peace and silencing of disputes in our present alterations and to the satisfaction of such as think that those forms of Prayer and administration of Sacraments Ordination and other publike Rites and Ceremonies may not by a succeeding Church and Power therein be lawfully taken away like as they were by a former established 26. And that specially if to those that have the oversight of these things there shall seem to be superstition incident to the use of them through some over-value and mistake which through frequent use might be cast towards them as though they were indeed Fundamentals of themselves Superstition saith he lib. 5. fol. 191. such as that of the
Reader forborn quotations of many other famous men in our Church concurring in the same judgement and made most particular choice of Mr. Hooker and Bishop Andrews as men generally held most famous and Orthodox in their generations the one in the time of Queen Elizabeth and the other since even in the time of our late King They were then and are still for ought I know held to be the great Defenders of this Churches authority and that of the â—hief Magistrate therein against the then Recusants and Nonconformists and I hope their credit is not so lost but that their authority and yet arguments will remain of the same force still to keep us from all inclinations either to Schism or Sedition that we do not thereby give the world too just occasion to say we are indeed fallen from our Principles through some sinister prejudice or partial conceit of our own 54 To direct and encourage in this constancy let us revert to thse grounds and reasons before laid down let us consider that since the maintenance of love and charity and the preservation of mankind by peace have so necessary a dependence upon submision to the Authority of that Church where we live and since the Glory Service and Worship of God here on earth hath again so near a relation unto this preservation of mankind by peace that therefore in these and thingâ— of the like nature which are not of such express divine Precept as to be demonstrable out of the Word of God or are not fundamental to our salvation there should no opposition be made to the disturbance of the peace of â—he Church but to that very end all to submit to the determination of those that have chief power therein Let not the crafts or designs of other men lead us to dâ—quiet so as to think that in things of this nature and where controversies and differences do daily arise between Church and Church Christian and Christian our salvation should be endangered while we incline to that side that maintains Charity by submitting our selves to those that have the rule over us To this end I shall here record that remarkable speech of Dr. Vsher late Primate of Armagh That in these Propositions which without all controversie are universally received in the whole Christian World so much truth is contained as being joyned with holy obedience may be sufficient to bring a man to everlasting salvation Neither have we cause to doubt but that as many as walk according to this rule neither overthrowing that which they builded by superinducing any damnable Heresies thereupon nor otherwise violating their holy Faith with a leud and wicked conversation peace shall be upon them and upon the Israel of God This as it was alleadged by Dr. Potter in his Treatise called Charity mistaken for that the Church of Rome did make all things fundamental which she held and thereupon excluded all from salvation that were not of her communion so is it by Mr. Chillingworth in his Reply fol 20. held for as great and good a truth and as necessary for these miserable times as can be uttered For if it should stand with men in the point of salvation according to that censure which each Church or sect therein doth put upon all that differ or descent from them then could no one Christian hope for Heaven insomuch as he must necessarily be a member of some Church or other which in matters of Doctrine or Discipline if not both is by some other Churches held so far Heretical or Schâ—smatical as to exclude all of that communion from hope of salvation which thing the Papists do hold concerning all Protestants in general and many of the Protestants hold of them again and do also pass their sentence as hardly of one another But our comfort is that we shall at the last day be judged by him who knows our hearts and whether we have not sought and followed his Truth according to the uâ—most of the ability he gave us and not left to the sentence of such as out of pride prejudice or other interest are so ready to put an over-value upon their own Tenets and become both Parties and Judges 55. Corcerning those aspersions of Heresie and Schism which are now so frequently thrown by one party upon another I have in the general observed that where the names and notions themselves are ofâ—nest repeated and most stood upon there the Arguments used for confutation are the less or less weighty It faring in some mens discourses and writings about controversies as with women in their scolding where she that can call Whore lowdest and oftenest is coâ—ceived to have got the better of it So usually there is nothing to be perceived but a design cast towards disparagement when the imputation of those Ecclesiastical railing terms are used towards any without any remonsâ—rance or proof wherein their ill consists or how their Opponents are justly to be charged with them 56. As â—or Heresie I do not see why any Christian mans case should be held desperate that in things not fundamental cannot bring his judgement to assent to that of anothers always provided that it proceed not from or be encreased through discontent pride or â—ffected singularity and that he hold it peaceably to himself not seeking to disturbe the peace of the Church by publication thereof to others for then it plainly shews that some of those other coâ—râ—pâ— Principles had a hand in the entertainment as well as in the divulging of iâ— And then iâ— will come to pass â—hat that which would as in it self and aâ—â—onsidered aâ— matter of speculation have been an error in judgement onely being now infused into others so as to induce action and separation will argue pravity in the will and turn into Schism which I do look upon as a sin not to be at any time or in any Persons otherwise excusable then when the foundation of Faith or good manners cannot be otherwise preserved And because in all dissenting parties that live under any Christian Authority the name of Schismatick is by either side cast on the other I do hold it for a maxime â—hat that party iâ— onely free that conforms to the Rule set down by him that iâ— Head of that place and all the rest Schiâ—maticks Even as in State differences all parties that hold not with the Sovereign Power are to be called this or that Faction whâ—n as the other is not to be called a Faction or Party but rather to be looked upon as the whole because united to the Head â—7 And therefore truly if men could be once brought to put a greater rate upon thingâ— fundamental and a less upon superstructures considering that the not holding to â—â—â— one bringâ— on the loss of Heaven and the too strict holding to the other brings on the loss of Charity and thereby shrewdly endanger the other also besides that quiet we should imutually reap in the exercise of Religion we should preserve
the State in quiet also and prevent all those mischiefs we now so much complain of through changes therein The which of latter times have from hence chiefly taken their rise when such as are seeking to make themselves more glorious or powerful do daily make use of mens too great zeal and credulity in this kind as the ordinary Stalking-horse hereunto The instances whereof are plain enough in Christendom especially since it became so divided into Sectâ— for the advance of any of which as Gods Truth we shall ever find the notion of Reformation cried up and alledged but alteration in the State and those that are in rule therein is really brought in If we do but reflect on some more remarkable passages among our selves we may from that smal difference which was in the six Articles themselves from the Roman Doctrine well conclude that the preservation of the Popes power as Head of the Church here was more aimed at then truth of Religion insomuch as a dispensation was ready to be granted for every thing save for taking the Oath of Supremacy When on the other side again both Henry the Eighth and his Successors looked upon this foreign acknowledgement as a sure testimony of ill affection to them and their Government Nay the Law it self came to be resolute in that point â—oo accounting Popery to consist in the alienating and withdrawing of Subjects from their obedience to their Prince to raise sedition and rebellion c. 58. And so now also we find that presumption of malignancy and disaffection to the present Government and Governor is most taken from that great affection which is cast to the use of this book because in so doing they manifestly decline those acts and alterations which are made by him and do submit to what was done by another I have not heard that any man hath been particularly forbidden to read this Book that did in the use of it pray for the present Sovereign power according to the foâ—m therein set down and as always hath been used to be done towards them onely that were in present Authority If that be not done doth it not too plainly argue that some affection and zeal beside that of the Book it self doth guide them in this choyce Doth not the Scripture look to the present when it enjoyn obedience to the Powers that are and commands to pray for Kings and all that are in authority Doth it any where in this case leave us to a choice by distinction saying such as should be in authority or the like And is it not a general rule that where the Scripture makes no distinction neither should we No in this case we may presume that the present higher Power and Kings were meant without such distinction both for that they were aâ— that time such as might that way have been excepted against and also for that the words following that under them we may lead quiet and peaceable lives c. must determine the prayer to be made for that present Auâ—hority which we do live under and are subject unto Nor do I find that ever any Orthodox pen but did confess prayer for that person under whose protection they lived to be a duty incumbent upon all Christians without referment of them to distinctions and qualifications Nay doth not the Book it self in that prayer for the whole state of Christs Church militant here on earth interpret this Doctrine of the holy Apostle to include all and accordingly appointed us to pray for all Christian Kings Princes and Governors and when it comes with an especially for that person who shall be at present our Governour â—â— iâ— said because he is the right Heir or hath best Title or the like no it hath still respect to the divine authority of the Apostles precept and therefore presently gives the same reason that under him we may be godlily and quietly governed In which respect I cannot by the way but highly commend that those frequent and full expressions which were made for those persons that were still in chief power amongst us as proceeding from good principles even the sence of honor and esteem which was owing to that God whose Authority he did represent amongst us when as now we may observe that those that have been possessed of the same party with the Protector do yet either wholly neglect to pray for him at all at least to mention him therein and then do it so coldly and fumblingly that partly by the falling of their voyce partly by the conditional qualifications they mention in their prayer for him they give but too just cause to suspect they are not so rightly principled and perswaded concerning that high duty and respect which is â—â—e to him in this his relation for as it becomes not them in publick especially to censure him so also not to insinuate any thing that might give occasion for others to do â—o for this will be â—o pray rather against then for him But to return to the consideration of the Service Book I say that to prevent those jealousies and dâ—ngers which might happen to some amongst us through too much forwardness to read or abuse and partialy in reading it the said Book I have made all the foregoing Discourse both â—o shew what is truly fundamental and necessary in our Christian Faith and what rule to follow in our Christian Obedience and to give satisfaction in that particular of taking away the Service Book the thing for ought I see now most insisted upon I have to that end striven to evince that continual power which is continually residing in the Head of this and each other Church to abrogate as well as impose in things of that natuâ—e Unto the confirmation whereof I shall now onely by way of conclusion add that Testimony of the Universiâ—y of Oxford printed in the year 164â— who in their reasons against the Discipline and Directory in place of the Service Book fol. 32. say We are not satisfied how we can submit to such Ordinances of the two Houses of Parliament not haveing the Royal assent as are contrary to the established Laws of this Realm contained in such Acts of Parliament as were made by the joynt consent of King Lords and Commons Nor so onely but also pretend by repeal to abrogate such Act or Acts for since ejusdem est potestatis destruere cujus est constituere it will not sink with us that a lessor Power can have a just right to cancel and annul the Act of a greaâ—er Especially the whole power of ordering all matters Ecclesiastical being by the Laws in express words for ever annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm And upon what head that Crown ought to stand none can be ignorant In this we see their plain concurrence in yeelding the power of abrogation of this Book to such as instituted iâ— even to him that should hold the Imperial Crown of this Realm And as for the words following which by
that power whereby themselves had power or that fundamental Rule or Law whereby themselves were made Law makers He that is in possession being the present Monarch by that Law established may by vertue of that Authority he hath over all under him for peace sake determine and enact that the Sovereign Power shall descend to his Heir and no doubt but he is therein to be obeyed by all that are his Subjects â—n case he be either naturally or politickly dead and those that were his Subjects become the Subjects of another then the fundamental Law that aims at continuance of peace by continuance of Monarchy must in like manner be presumed to determine the subjection and obedience to this present possessor and his Family Want of due consideration whereof we shall find one of the chief grounds why some of more consciencious sort as well of those that have as have not been of that party are so hardly drawn to conceive right of things of this nature and also for want of due distinction and differencing of that condition which through alteration of time may come to make the same person to contract a different guilt in the entrance into this place of power over it is in the execution of it How a man may be an unlawful intruder in to an Office whereunto a lawful power doth belong when yet being possessed he is lawfully to be obeyed by all that stand subjected to those that are in this place of power For want of which due consideration and how those exceptions and objections usually made against the lawfulness of Government gotten by Usurpation are to be as before noted differently understood in reference to the commander and obeyer much trouble doth many times arise for he though he may not lawfully hold the place by authority whereof he doth command yet ought he lawfully to be obeyed by the authority of that Office which he doth hold 11. Two great faults and mistakes therefore there may be observed which do daily administer occasion of much trouble in things of this nature by frustrating divine and positive Edicts of their true intent through their making so great a separation between those that are necessarily to this end conjoyned that is the power and person thereby impowered for while some would have obedience to the power onely as Gods Ordinance without due regard to the person they make the power vain by leaving no possibility whereby it should be reduced into act These being affected with so much ambition or impatience against Church or State Rulers are crying out with Core and his company You take too much upon you and power is in the whole Congregation in the whole people by which means they are about to usurp and keep the real execution of power to themselves while they leave to others onely the Titles and formalities thereof And some again having too personal regard herein and striving to make the worth and value of the power depend on their affectionate choyce do thereupon shrewdly hazard if not wholly defect that true esteem and benefit which is to be given unto and expected from this conjunction These may be reckoned of Ephestiâ—ns company that report not Alexander as King but the King as he is Alexander and in justification of this their opinion and the attempts of their Favorites in this kind comes the title of Usurper to be every where so commonly applied by the dispossessed and his Favorers to all persons in possession of power although they might perhaps have the better title of the two even as among our selves in that doubtful claim between the Houses of York and Lancaster each party threw it upon the other on purpose to withdraw the Subjects allegeance from his Adversary all that he could For although each party in presumption of his better title had agreed that obedience to an uâ—uâ—ped power was not lawful especially when known and voluntary given when as yet prejudice would not give them leave to consider that when obedience to this Power commanded by its proper Officer now in actual seisure thereof is always both lawful and necessary that is always lawful for Subjects to obey though not lawful for him it may be to continue in command 12. And if we seriously look into the true ground of these aspersions we shall find both the imputation of Vsurper fastned on him that commands and Flatterer on him that defends to proceed from heat and prejudice alone And therefore they seldom go rationally to work and shew what are those evils and inconveniences as in order to peace and publique good that do attend on subjection or acknowledgment of any that is now peaceably obeyed as in the soveraign power and that this is no way to be avoided but by striving to remove the person possessed Then indeed might they have had some ground for disobeying him themselvs and for calling others Flatterers that wrote or spake in his behalf But else to write or speak in the defence of him who by the Law of God and Reason and present Law of the Nation is to be so acknowledged and in a case too apparently tending to publike peace and good is not flattery but duty whereas he that out of private or personal regard would to the plain disturbance and unsettlement of the State perswade to a present obedience where there is not a present power may be truly called a Flatterer or Selâ—-â—eeker both as making his address and acknowledgment where it is not due and by being therein swayed out of discontent of something past or out of hope of increase of private advantage to come to himself by the change 13. And therefore in such like disputes as these passion or interest will be always subject to biass and mislead us in personal adherence if we do not lay aside our private respects and candidly and conscionably look back into those true grounds and reasons why obedience did originally come to be given to any one man at all being as heretofore we shewed Gods glory by mans peace And this will be found the most warrantable and surest way to discover unto us that person who at any time is to have it And to this end I have judged it a well-grounded Maxim Love the King for Peace sake and Peace for Gods sake For since none but God can be perfectly good so as to be loved for his own sake only so all other things being good but suo modo or according to their relation and that serviceableness and benefit they afford to other things that stand his creatures and witnesses of his goodness and glory amongst us they must still be personally loved and respected according to such their present relations whereas those that want that relation cannot out of any separate respect and value that is in themselves be esteemed right objects of that love and respect which is only due in regard of the relation it self 14. So that the way to cleer our selves of prejudices
and to understand things aright is to consider them in their proper ranks and conditions and to diâ—â—inguish them by their proper names Even to put a difference between such as are justly called Usurpers upon reasons before spoken namely by assumption of that power which by place belongeth not to them as for the Woman to usurâ— authority over the Man or Subjects over their Prince and such as do dispossess any of the place it self the which last are to be esteemed Disseisors or Intrudors For although the wrong done by the Disseisor be greater then that of the Usurper as to the party dispossessed yet in respect of their right to obedience the first hath only right herein of the two the other having none at all And therefore in reference to that necessary conjunction which is to be upheld in the union of the person with the power 't is wel to be observed how God hath joyned these two together to the intent that no man through interest or prejudice should put them asunder For where he enjoins subjection to the Higher Power as his ordinance and sets forth the penalty of doing otherwise he presently denotes it to be personally due by subjecting us to those that are Rulers For Rulers are not a terror to good works but to evil that is they being possessed of this power are to be expected just avengers of Resistance therefore called evil because the cause of so much evil And then when it after follows Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same it is presently appropriate to that person which God in his providence hath set over us For he that is this person is the Minister of God to thee for thy good that is Gods Deacon or Vicegerent in preservation of Peace by means of this submission And so it afterwards followeth He beareth not the sword in vain and He is the Minister of God c. And as we find the power and person thus conjoined so that it might be always effectual to this end it is also enjoined in the present tense without any exception to the lawfulness or validity in the title to enter or rule by when it is said The Powers that are that is the Powers in being are ordained of God He is and He beareth c. And so also when we are elswhere enjoined to make prayers for Kings and all that are in authority that under them we may live quiet and peaceable lives in all godliness and honesty these words that are in authority denoting present authority cannot as heretofore noted warrant any exception to be made by those that are to obey For then it should not be effectual to the leading of a quiet and peaceable liâ—e nor would the duties pertaining to Godliness be so duly and freely exercised And we may consequently conceive that obedience and subjection is not to be given to such as are not in authority nor to Powers that are not in being And that Text especially where we are commanded to fear God and the King and not to meddle with those that are given to change will be expressed in obedience to the King or person in present power and possession For why else should we be forbidden to seek to change him or meddle or joyn with them that would do so in such unlimited words If to seek to change by way of sedition had been thought lawful for Subjects upon any ground by him that said That against the King there is no rising up then surely this precept was very wrong put especially not having any such exception for rather the word not should have been left out and the precept have been Meddle with them that would change or are seditious towards it for sedition must precede change in that kind 15. And if we do not carry an equal and impartial respect to persons dignified by Gods Ordinance we shew plainly we have no respect to his Ordinance at all but would have it an Ordinance of our own When as the power thereby claimed is to be at no time of value without our approbation and by this means fall within the compass of Saint James his reproof To have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect of persons For as in his instance if those that are unequal in worldly honor or title are yet equally to be respected as they stand equally our Christian Brethren so also such as are now in power are for their power sake and for the honor of him that ordained it to be equally respected and obeyed however there might be a greater share of outward worldly title in one man then another So then we may see the way to be a constant Royalist is to be a constant Loyalist not to respect the power or place for the persons sake but the person for the place and power sake And thereby according to our duty having respect to God and his Precept before our own If we do not this he that to day was Loyal may to morrow be brought turn Rebel and Traytor through that change of Families which stories do tell us have in this thrust out one another 17. But some would make Prescription the onely way to lawfulness in possessions of things of this nature as well as it is for silencing of Claims between Subjects in their private possessions but since they have not yet nor cannot upon any true ground agree in limiting of this time it argues the thing it self to be but a fruitless invention For although towards the ending of Suits and Quarrels each State and Kingdom do by Laws of its own prefix a certain time in which possession shall in certain cases be a good plea in it self against all other yet this Law being positive bears always an exception to the Law-maker himself as having continual power to right himself and all others in case of equity according to that maxim Nullum tempus occurrit Regi And therefore although it may be available to silence private titles in regard of a superior power to appoint it and see it executed accordingly yet it will not thereupon follow that Subjects may fancy any such Laws to bind their Prince by And therefore when questions of this kind shall arise for confirmation of Law-makers themselves I know not any Superior under God himself who shall ascertain this prescription and see it executed accordingly And if we but mark the thing it self in its original rise and ground we shall find them gain-saying themselves and laying that very first possession which they disallow for a foundation of that which they would have to be right afterwards For in such variety of times prescribed suppose it should be a Hundred years when and where must we begin to accompt Must it be from the first day of the parties secret plotting or attempt to get into this place of power How shall that be truly known And if you leave that