the people should haue power to depose their king as well as they had to set him vppe Whereunto we answere that although it were at the first free vnto the people whether they would haue permitted themselues wholly to the power of the king or no yet when as they had once refigned vp their liberty and authority it was not in their power to call that their voluntarie graunt backe againe Secondly we answere that the people neuer had this power in their handes to make whome they would king they did indeede voluntarilie choose this kinde of gouernment but God gaue them a king whome they coulde neyther refuse at the first nor afterwardes depose to wit Saule with his posteritie and they being by God reiected Dauid with his seede for God kept in his hand the power of nominating the king as the expresse wordes of the scripture doe witnesse Deutro 17.15 Onely thou shalt make him king ouer them whom the Lord thy God shall giue vnto thee Againe it may be obiected forsomuch as not onely kings but also all other magistrates are set vp for the glorie of God and the good of the people that if they doe not not onely not further but also hinder these respectes they do break the condition of the bargain betwixt them the people and so do forfait their kingdomes into their hands as Saul did forfait his and Salomon by his idolatrie the gouernment of the ten tribes we answer confessing this to be true that the kings of Israel had the kingdome vpon the foresaid condition but yet neyther the kingdome was giuen nor the condition imposed to them by man but by God therefore they could not forfait their kingdom to man but only to God neither coulâ— any man exact this forfaiture at their handes without an extraordinarie and speciall commission from God So that vntil such time as God did either immediatly by his own hand or by the means of some man made the executioner of his will by extraordinarie reuelation depriue them of their kingdome euen the wicked and idolatrous kinges did remaine to the people in the full estate and right of the kingdome So after that both Saule had by his disobedience forfeited his kingdome of God and also Dauid was now both appointed by God and annointed by Samuel king in his steade yet Saul remained to the people the onely lawfull king of Israell yea no lesse lawfull then he was before or any other afterwardes vntill such time as God did take from him both his life and kingdome together This doth Dauid ingenuously confesse 1. Sam. 26.10.11 saying that it was not lawfull for himselfe or any other to touch Saule beeing Gods annointed for that he could be dispossessed by none but by God onely wherein he rested not doubting but that God would take him away eyther by naturall death or by the force of the enemie or immediately by his owne hand 1. Sam. 26.10 Likewise Salomon did forfaite his kingdome to God but yet thâ— ten tribes with al their kings made of themselues did vnlawfully and impiouslie rebell against Rehoboam for so speaketh Abiam 2. Chro. 13·6 7 You ought to haue acknowledged that God gaue the kingdome of Israel to Dauid and his sonnes for euer but Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat rose vp and rebelled against his Lord and naughtie men gathered themselues to him and strengthened themselues against Rehoboam So that although the defection came from the Lord as appeareth 2. Chro. 11.4 and was good in that respect beeing a iust punishment of idolatrie yet the action of the people rebelling against their lawfull and naturall king was altogether vnlawfull If it be obiected that Ieroboam was called to be king of the ten tribes by the word of God sent by the ministery of the prophet Achijah King 11.31 where God saith to Ieroboam by the prophet that he had â—iuen to him ten tribes of Israell to this we make two answeres First that although this defection as it came from God was good yet as it was practised by Ieroboam and the people it was vnlawful rebellion For there is in God a secret wil the which when it is contrarie to his reueâ—led will and worde cannot be executed by man without sinne vnlesse it be by an extraordinarie dispensation and therefore although God did make this his secret will knowen to Ieroboam to make his vnthankfulnesse in erecting idolatrie the more inexcusable yet he did not bid him rebell against Salomon neyther did he annointe him king as he did Iehu 2. King 9.6.7 who had the expresse commaundement of God to roote out kinge Achabs house Thus God foretolde Hazael that hee shoulde be kinge of Syria 2. King 8.13 yet he did not approue his detestable murthering of the kinge his master So did Zimri 1. King 16.12 although he also did execute the sentence which God had pronounced against the house of Bahasa king of the ten tribes yet because he was not appointed by God so to do his action was vnlawfull Secondly we answere that if that foretelling of Ieroboam were an extraordinarie dispensation yet his example doth not iustifie the rebellion of the people or of any other who haue not this warrant for their actions But Dauid did lawfully rebell against the posteritie of Saul and so did Iehu against Ioram 2. King 9. because they had the expresse word of God so to doe But heere this is to be noted that although this kingdome were at the first so instituted that all the kinges should by their disobedience forfait their kingdome to God â—nd so be deposed when he thought good yet Dauid and his posteritie were in a manner freede from this condition and from forfaiting their kingdome to God For Dauid a man according to the heart of God found such fauour in his sight that he made this solemne lawe oath and promise that although his children did forsake him yet he would not take the kingdom from them as he did from Saul but onely chastice them for their sinnes And therefore the seede of Dauid kept the crowne yea tho many of them were open idolatours til the whole nation of the Iewes was destroyed and caried away captiue into Babel for their idolatrie and other sinnes Therefore God is saide 2. Chro. 13.5 to haue giuen this kingdome to Dauid by a couenant of salt that is by a perpetuall and inuiolable couenant for so it was needfull that the promises of the Messias shoulde be annexed to some stocke or linage that out of it hee might cotinually be expected But to returne to the matter in hand if it be heere asked how God did punish the notorius sins misâ—emenors of these kings we answer that he did it either immediatly by his own hand as he did smite Ozias with leprosie for his intollerable presumption 2. Chr. 26 19. or else by some forraine nation or king as by the Philistines Aegyptians Chaldaeaens Assyriaens or some other
many and so to conclude this point and specially the first edict which the first king made and that by the immediate motion of the spirit of God because this is most for the purpose of the matter in hand We read 1. Sam. 11.17 that whenas Saule was to call the people together to battaile he gaue foorth such a peremptorie commaundement as neuer any of the Iudges or Elders did For taking a couple of oxen and deuiding them into peeces he sent them to all partes of the land with this message that whosoeuer did not follow him to battaile so shoulde it be done to his oxen Whereupon the people came roundly as one man for that as the text noteth the feare of the Lord that is of this greate power which the Lord had giuen to the king fell vpon them Saule might haue said with Dauid I am yet a tender and newe king and haue many enemies wherefore it is not meete that I shoulde exasperate the people by threarning them but it was the will of God that the people shoulde see in the beginning to what a kinde of power they had â—â—â—mitted themselues Sect. XII THus much of the power or authority of this kingdome the second part of the doctrine of it is the maiesty of it the fundamental lawes of the kingdom belonging therunto The maiesty of the kingdom is the great glorie and excellency wherein it far passeth other kindes of gouernment and for the which it is much more highly esteemed It was procured by these meanes First by that exceeding great power wherof we haue spoken for whereas the whole administration of all thinges is in the handes of one there the good estate of all men publikely and of euery one particularly doth depend on him whereby it commeth to passe that all mens eyes are set on him yea all men doe honour praise and admire him in whom they see great authoritie and riches and whose wisedome is more conspicuous then any others besides Secondly this kingdome was maiesticall by the first originall of it which it had not from man but from God This law is written Deut. 17.14 When thou hast possessed the land and sayest I will haue a king to raigne ouer me thou shalt make him king whome the Lord thy God shall choose and so the euent proued for the state of this kingdome in generall came from the people to whome also it belonged solemnly to acknowledge him whom God did appoint but the nomination of the particular man on whom this honour should be bestowed came from God who appointed first Saul with his posterity and afterwardes Saul being reiected Dauid and his seed By the which meanes God did choose all the kinges in Israel although he did immediately by his owne voyce onely appoint the first three to wit Saule Dauid and Salomon For euen as the fire wherewith the sacrifices were burnt although it were nourished euerie day by the priest putting fresh wood vnto it and so preserued by the same meanes wherby other fire is kept yet be cause at the first it came downe from heauen miraculously was therfore counted holy and wonderfull euen so was this kingdom because at the first it came from God although afterwardes it were continued by naturall and ordinarie propagation Hence it is that this kingdom is called the kingdome of Iehoua 2. Chro. 13.8 The badge and seale of this diuine originall of this kingdome was that holie vnction whereby these kinges were by the prophets of God solemnly in the name of God inaugurated and therefore the signe being put for the thing signified this annointing betokeneth the holinesse of it insomuch that when the king of Israell is as it were to be painted forth in the natiue colours of his maiestie he is called the annointed of the Lorde Thus 1. Sam. 24.7 God forbid saith Dauid that I should lay my handes on Saule seeing he is the annoynted one of GOD. And 2. Samuell 1.14 hee saith to him who had helpt kinge Saule to kill himselfe Howe was it that thou diddest not feare to put out thy hande to kill the Lordes annoynted The third lawe tending to the maiestie of this kingdome was that it was not any vncertaine and moueable state but constant and fixed in one place it was tyed first to one tribe namely to the tribe of Iuda that by God speaking by the mouth of Iacob the first founder of this nation for in his sonnes it began to be deuided into many tribes and families and so came into the forme of a people the prophesie iâ— written Gen. 49. The rod shall not depart from Iuda nor a law giuer c. Secondly it was tyed to one and the same familie to wit to the house of Dauid for euer and went by hereditarie right and succession in lineall discent so that continually the sonne succeeded the father The which lawe although it was established in the like gouernementes in other places yet it coulde seldome take place for any long time by reason of the want of right successours But it was heere kept in continuall force and that by the marueilous prouidence of God who as he promised did alwaies giue to Dauid his seruaunt a sonne of his owne loynes to sitte vpon his throne The which prouidence of GOD may especially be noted in the straunge preseruation of Ioas from the cruell handes of that monster Athalia 2. King 11.3 By this meanes it came to passe that this kingdom was both naturall and in processe of time ancient yea after a sort immortall For the first we need not doubt but that there was an exceeding great loue and reuerence of this king wrought in the mindes of the people whenas they sawe that he had not obtained that place by ambition faction force of armes or any other sinister or violent meanes but was euen borne vnto them and by nature or rather by God the ruler and desposer of all naturall causes appointed and distinated to that calling Yea also in time by this hereditarie succession the kingdome became of great antiquitie which addeth much to the maiestie of meane thinges much more to those which in many other respectes are excellent Euen as men doe ascribe a kinde noâ— onely of reuerence but euen of religion to okes and other trees which haue a long time kept their standing for so in continuance of time they take so deepe roote and gather such strength as that they cannot be moued whereas at the first they may easely be shaken downe so kingdoms continuing long in the same stocke become firme and maiesticall whereas being often transplanted they are weake and contemptible and doe often fall euen in the beginning Thus fell Abimelech his kingdome and euen this kingdome was sore shaken in the defection of the ten tribes because the memory of Ierobaal grandfather to Abimelech a priuate and base man and of Isai the father of Dauid was not cleane worne away and therefore they said
generall state of religion be permitted vnto him wee cannot exclude him from the making of lawes whereby the lawes of God are to be executed The humane lawes of this Church were very fewe because almost all the circumstances of the seruice of God were prescribed by the ceremoniall lawe yet there was alwaies necessary occasion of making some in the which worke the king had the chiefe stroke Thus did Dauid and Salomon make many ecclesiastical lawes which continued long after in the Church and are mentioned by Iosias saying 2. Chro. 35.4 Prepare your selues ye Leuites by your companies according to the writing of Dauid and the writing of Salomon yet these lawes were made by the aduise of others to wit eyther of the prophets as we may see 2. Chro. 33.15 or of the Church and people Thus did Ezechias hold a councel 2. Chro 30.2 wherin by the aduise of the whole Church the passeouer was held in the second month likewise verse 13 the whole assembly tooke counsell to keepe the feast other seauen daies so that although these ecclesiasticall constitutions were established by the sole authority of the king yet they were aduised by others that nothing should be done in the Church peremptorely by the absolute authority of the king or any other but rather by the counsel of others so with the good liking of al men Yea an errour cōmitted in the ordering of the church is more grieuous dangerous therfore was to be auoyded as by al other meanes so especially by taking the aduise of others in making lawes for this purpose Yet it did not belong to the king to take vppon him the office of the high priest as we may see in the example of Ozias 2. Chro. 26. or to meddle with the proper dueties of any other ecclesiasticall person or yet to change the ceremonial law but onely to order the publike state of religion to make by the aduise of others and to establishe by his own authority those lawes which serued for that purpose Sect. XI THere remaine two other properties of this regall power to wit that it was absolute and peremptorie the which we will propounde verie briefly For the first we doe not meane that this power was so loosed from lawes that the king might doe what him listed for he was tied to some lawes as namely first to the keeping of the morall law yea vpon paine of forfaiting and loosing his kingdome if he did wickedly transgresse the same and if at anie time he did commaund contrarie to this lawe he was not to be obeyed 1. King 18.13 1. Sam. 22.17 and secondly the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome the state whereof it was not in his power to alter Yea also he was tied to the ceremoniall lawe containing the outward manner of the worshippe of God But he was loosed first from the Iudiciall lawe of God and secondly from all possitiue lawes made by men By the Iudiciall lawes are vsually ment all those lawes of Moses which belong vnto the practise of the second table and of such dueties as we owe to our neighbour And it is as it were an addition to the seconde Table as the ceremoniall lawe is to the first But heere wee meane more specially onely so many of them as did belong to the publike administration of the common-wealth which may properly be called politicall iudiciall or forensicall concerning the manner of administring iustice and iudgement as namely in what order iudgement ought to beginne and proceede what punishmente ought to be inflicted for euerie seuerall offence and also howe they shoulde behaue themselues in battaile in all which the Iudges Elders and people had a prescript forme which they did follow and were bound by the commaundement of God so to doe But the kinges were freed from these lawes so that if they did execute iustice and iudgement it was free for them to doe it in what forme manner they thought best as for example the iudiciall lawe required that when any had committed any hainous trespasse there shoulde be two or three witnesses solemnely produced and that they shoulde beginne the execution and first throwe stones at the offendour But the kinges namely Saule Dauid and Salomon did put diuerse to death without obseruation of any of these circumstances Neyther heerein did they sinne against God and his lawe because they were freed from it Yea it belonged to the king to make these positiue lawes of the circumstances of executing iudgement and therefore to be a iudge a lawgiuer a kinge and a defender from forraine enemies are all ioyned together Isa. 23.22 the Lord is our iudge our law-giuer our kinge and he shall saue vs. Yea the power of this kingdome was such in this behalfe that the kinge might of himselfe without calling any to consultation make publishe establishe and execute lawes and edictes whereof there are manie examples yet it was more vsuall yea and conuenient in regard both of king and people that the aduise of the priests prophets rulers and elders of the people shoulde be taken Lastly this power of this kingdome herein differeth from the power of the Iudges Elders and of the people in that it was not so gentle and milde but after a sort a fierce and peremptorie power as may easelie be gathered by that which hath beene spoken of it for where there is a greate generall and absolute power wholly in any one hand it must needs be of this nature Hence it was that the people stood in farre greater awe of this authority then of any other insomuch that the lawes edictes and commaundementes of the kinges were like vnto the roaring of a Lyon whereat all the beastes in the forrest doe tremble and quake for feare Yea their whole behauiour was much more reuerent to the kinges then to their other rulers So we read Iudg. 8.1 and 12. that whenas Gedeon and Iephta had gotten notable victories of the enemie the Ephramites came vpon them very presumptuously to quarrell with them because for sooth they had not taken them with thē to the battaile but they did not vse to aske their kings any such questions or to require any reason of their doings but did readelie come when they called goe when they sent and do whatsoeuer thing was inioined by them Yea we may wel thinke that the cause why Rehoboam gaue the people such a strange answere was not for that he ment to increase their tributes for there was no cause why he shoulde so doe the temple and the kinges pallaces being builte and the king being furnished with all thinges requisite eyther for maiesty at home or strength abroade for the which purpose those gret tributes were imposed but rather because he and his young counsell were highly offended and inflamed with anger against the people for that they did offer to make him a conditionall king who should not raigne but vpon those conditions which they propounded To take one example of
of the one Iudg. 28. Who is Abimelech that we should serue him is not he the sonne of Ierobaal and of the other in like manner what part haue we with Dauid the sonne of Isai 2. Chro. 10.16 2. Sam. 20.1 yea thus the kingdome is made after a sort immortall when as the father doth rise againe in the sonne and so continueth for euer For hence it was that the gouernment of the iudges was so contemned of the people because it was a newe vp-start gouernment the iudge being lately taken from a base estate As Gedeon Saul confesse of themselues that their kinred family and birth was of the meanest of the people and that therefore they were the vnfittest to beare rule Iudg. 6.15 1. Sam. 9.21 The last and the greatest cause of the maiestie of these kings was this that they were the progenitors yea and the predecessors of that great Messias which was to come of the linage of Dauid to gouern not that land onely but the whole world Luke 1.32.33 the very expectation of whom made this kingdome glorious aboue measure for that they according to the ignorance of the times and the infancie of the Church dreaming of a temporal king thought that in him all the power riches renowne and glory of the world should be brought to their kingdome Sect. XIII THus we see the causes of the maiesty of this kingdome now we are to consider the meanes whereby this maiesty did shew foorth it selfe It appeared in the glorious stately pompe and magnificence of the whole life and behauiour yea of all the actions of the king and generally of all things appertaining to the kingdome For the apparrell of the king it was such as might not onely distinguish him from his subiectes but also serue to expresse the maiesty of his state Likewise for his whole house the statelinesse of his palaces the daintinesse of his fare the number of his seruantes and retinue that all were correspondent euen in the time of Dauid we may gather 2. Sam. 19.35 where old Barzelli refuseth the kinges offer who woulde haue kept him in his house because hee coulde not taste the daintie meates nor be delighted with the voyce◠of singing men and women which were vsed in the king◠palace Hitherto also is to be referred the whole storie of Salomon in whose time this glorie of the kingdome was euen in the full the infinite prouision of his house the glorious houses which he built for GOD and for himselfe with incredible magnificence all which it shall not be irkesome to rehearse as they are described in the story for so wee reade 1. King 4. verse 20.22.23.26 and Chapter 10. ver 11.12 c. And Salomons breade for one daie was thirtie quarters of manchette flower and threescore quarters of meale tenne stalled oxen and twentie out of the pastures and a hundred sheepe beside hartes buckes wilde goates and capons and hee had fortie stalles of horses for chariotes and twelue thousande horsemen The waight of golde that came to him in one yeare was sixe hundred threescore and sixe talentes of golde beside that he had of marchantes and of the marchandize of the spices and of all the kinges of Arabia and of the Lordes of the countrie Also he made two hundred targets of beaten goulde sixe hundred sicles of goulde wente to a target And hee made three hundred shieldes of beaten golde the pounde waight of golde went to one shielde and the king put them in the house of the woode of Libanon and the king made a greate seate of Iuory and couered it with the best gold and the seate had six steppes and the top of the seate was round behinde and there were pummels on eyther side of the seate and two Lyons stoode beside the pummels and there stoode twelue Lyons on the steppes six on one side There was no like worke seene in any kingdome and all kinge Salomons drinking vessels were of golde and likewise all the vessels of the house of the woode of Libanon were of pure golde As for siluer it was nothing woorth in the daies of Salomon for the kinges nauy of shippes went on the sea vnto Tharsis with the nauy of Hirams shippes euen once in three yeares went the nauy to Tharsis and brought golde and siluer Elephantes teeth Apes and Peacockes And so king Salomon exceeded all the kinges of the earth both in riches wisedome thus farre the text After the time of Salomō together with the sincerity of religion this maiesty of the kingdome did decrease for in the raigne of Rehoboam both the ten tribes fell away from this kingdome and Ierusalem was spoyled by the king of Aegypt so that the targets of gold were turned into brasse but vnder Iehosophat both religion and the kingdome recouered part of the ancient glorie for it is said 2. Par. 18.1 that Iehophat had great riches and glory And likewise in the raigne of Ezechi◠we reade 2. Chro. 32.27 that he had exceeding much riches and honour and he gat himselfe treasures of siluer and gold precious stones and spices shieldes and all manner of pleasant iewels Likewise this maiesty required that the kinges whole behauiour should haue in it that stately grauity which beseemeth so high a place that he should take no meane or base action in hand but such as the perfourmance whereof might be for his glory and renowne By this argument Dauid disswadeth Saule from persecuting him any further saying 1. Sam. 26.20 To whome is the king of Israel come foorth and what is this that he doth Doth he not behaue himselfe as one who chaseth a Partridge vppe and downe in the mountaines And for the behauiour of the kinges person Michol Saules daughter requiteth Dauid with the like noting in him such lightnesse which was as she thought vnbeseeming the maiesty of the king for when she had seene Dauid daunce for ioy before the Arke she saide O howe glorious was the king of Israel this day whenas he vncouered himselfe before the maydens of his seruantes as foolish or mad men vse to doe 2. Sam. 6.20 An finally this part of the iudgement of the kingdome and of the booke which Samuel wrote of this matter is extant 1. Sam. 8. vers 11. c. where it is said that the king will haue horsemen and chariots yea Eunuches and women bakers and cookes and of his magnificence in giuing vineyardes and landes to his seruantes the which place is not to be vnderstood of a tyrannie but of the naturall state of this kingdome as may appeare 1. Sam. 9.20 where when Saule was carefull for his fathers asses which were lost Samuel telleth him that he neede not minde them seeing whatsoeuer was good pretious and to be desired in all Israell it did belong in some sort to him and to all his fathers house The which wordes are not so to be vnderstood as if the propertie of mens goods did belong to the
euils was in their owne wickednesse and idolatrie in that they did forsake the true worship of God and therefore God did forsake them and tooke from them their iudges in whose daies they liued in religious order and peaceable estate And so the people according to that which is written Iudg. 9.13.14.15 forsooke the vine the figtree and the oliue tree euen God the fountaine of all blessinges and saide to the brier come and raigne ouer vs and we will trust in thy shadowe For to haue a king and to trust in his power doe vsually goe together Rom. 15.12 He shal raigne ouer them and they shall trust in him Thirdly the people in the pride of their heartes did despise the gouernment of the iudges as base and contemptible for that howsoeuer it was mightie in the power of the spiritte of GOD yet it had not that outwarde shew of glorie and maiestie which the stately Monarchies of other nations did carie with them The last sinne which they committed in this action we call by the generall name of disobedience for that contrarie to the expresse commaundement of God they had a crooked and peruerse desire to be transformed into all the fashions of the prophane nations amongest whome they dwelt as in all other respectes so also in their gouernment and therefore they â—id affect a kingdome which was the most vsuall kinde of gouernment Thus we see why God was offended with this alteration of the state as for the gouernment it selfe he did neuer mislike it for although he suffered it to be brought in by this cooked meanes yet he did alwaies purpose that it shoulde be established as may plainlie appeare by these reasons First for that he promised Abraham Gen. 17.6 That of his seede should come kings and nations the which is to be vnderstood chiefly of this faithfull nation of the Iewes although beside them others came of Abraham Secondly Moses did foretell this Deut. 17. That assoone as the people were quietly possessed of the lande of Chanaan they would haue a king to raigne ouer them But this doth most euidently apppeare by the prophesie of Iacob who saith Genesis 49. That the rodde shall not departe from Iuda nor a Lawe-giuer cease to be of his ofspringe till Silo come and vnto him shall be the obedience of the people Nowe this cannot be vnderstoode of the iudges for of them all onely Othoniell was of the tribe of Iuda Yea GOD did alwaies purpose that Christe shoulde succeede the kinges of Israell in the kingdome for the wordes are plaine and the euente hath shewed it to be true that of the tribe of Iuda should come the Lion and the Lions whelpe that is the stately kingdome of Israell and the continual discent thereof yea the great lion the little lion that is the Messias the great eternaâ—l king of glory and the temporall and earthly kings of Israel For this cause the most plaine and euident promises which God made of the messias were deferred vntil the time of the kings were made to Dauid who in this respect is to be counted the first king and therefore is called Math. 16. Dauid the King that is the first king of the forefathers of Christ as hath beene alreadie touched And lastly this gouernment may seeme in some sort to be the more acceptable to God because it doth most liuelely represent the power and maiesty of God for although all magistrates doe beare the image of God yet they chiefely doe it whose authoritie being absolute and their glorie great come nearest to the infinite power and glorie of God As touching the lawfulnes of this kinde of gouernement although it be inferred of the former point for whatsoeuer is acceptable to God ought to be accounted lawful for vs yet it may briefly be considered by these reasons for that this gouernment was set vp by the appointment of God and that by Samuel a faithful prophet and so accounted of al Israel yea for that it was practised by Dauid a man according to Gods owne hearte by Salomon the glorie of the worlde by Asa Iehosophat and other religious kinges by good Ezechias and by zealous Iosias who would neuer haue born this office if the kinde of gouernment had beene in any respect vnlawfull the exception which is vsually taken against this kinde of Monarchie is as touching the greatnesse of the power maiesty of it in this manner that howsoeuer the prophane nations of the world doe suffer tyrantes to spoyle them of their liberty and whatsoeuer they haue yea and doe foolishly in the pride of their heartes desire such a loftie gouernment yet that in the Church of God it is a thing both intollerable altogether vnlawfull that one should so haue all the power in his owne hands that he may at his pleasure ouerthrowe all or that a great part of the substance of the land should be imployed to maintaine him in his iolitie vpon sumptuous buildings costly attyre dainty fare great rewardes and other thinges of the same kinde which would serue for many necessarie vses both of the Church and of the commonwealth For answere heereof we are farre from going about to perswade any people which liue vnder a moderate gouernment by this wicked example of this people to affect or desire this estate yea we leaue it to others to determine whether it be the most conuenient kinde of gouernment in respect of the Church of God and the safe constance and good estate of it yet we doe not doubt to affirme that it was a lawful kinde of gouernment among the Iewes and may lawfully be practised amongest Christians at this day For howsoeuer some kindes of gouernment and magistracy are conuenient or inconuenient safe or dangerous yet this and all other kindes are to be accounted lawfull For there is no power but from God and all the powers which are haue beene instituted by God Rom. 13.2 and especially of this gouernment now in question we may see Daniel 5.18.19 that God doth professe himselfe to be the author and giuer of it for there it is saide O King God gaue Nabuchadnezzer thy father a kingdome then followeth a description of the nature of a kingdom euen maiesty honour and glorie he slewe wâ—ome he woulde and smote whome he would he aduanced and debased whom he pleased Now that we see that this kinde of gouernment was acceptable vnto God we are in the second place to consider how farre it was subiect vnto him For the which point it shal be sufficient that we know that as al other powers authorities principalities and dominions whatsoeuer they be whether in heauen or in earth so also this kingdome was wholy absolutely subiect to God and to his power and bound to obey his will and commaundementes and to set forth his glory in all things as it is written in the 17. of Deutronomie that the king whensoeuer he were made shoulde take an excript of the