authorised by the statute whereupon the Commission is founded which I have set down in the beginning of the first chapter For it was ancient jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall which was restored to the Crown in that act and meant to be executed by the Commissioners as Nicholas Fuller avowed in the defence of his Clients But to fine imprison and force any person to accuse themselves upon their own enforced othes their being no accuser known nor accusation libelled he proved was not ancient jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall but brought in in the second yeere of â— Hen. the 4. In the record of the worthy proceedings of the House of the Commons at the Parliam holden 1610 we have this greivance Secondly for that whereas by the intention and words of the sayd statute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction is restored to the Crowne and your highnessly that statute inabled to give onely such power Ecclesiasticall to the sayd Commissioners yet under colour of some words in that statute whereby the Commissioners are authorized to execute their commission according to the tenour and effect of your â—ighnesse letters patents and by letters patents grounded therupon the sayd Commissioners do fine and imprison and exercise other authority not belonging to the Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction restored by that statute which wee conceive to bee a great â—â—rong to the subjects Aud that these Commissioners might as well by colour of these words if they were so authorized by your Highnesse letters patents fine without stint and imprison without limitation of time as also according to will and discretion without any rules of law spirituall or temporall adiudge and impose utter confiscation of goods forfeiture of lands yea the taking away of limme and of life it selfe and this for any matter whatsoever pertaining to spirituall jurisdiction Which never was nor could bee meant by the makers of that law To fine and imprison at pleasure are punishments belonging to the temporall sword which Christ hath forbidden his Apostles and all Pastors their successors to use The weapons of their warfare are not carnall but spirituall Christ committed unto them keyes not swords In very deed there is no crueller beast nor more tyrannous then a degenerate Churchman Hee is more insolent and outragious with the Dative sword then Princes are with the Native Why should they not be like their eldest brother that bloody beast of Rome Degenerate Clergimen will either usurpe the power of the temporall sword or take it when it is offered but â—ver abuse it The three commissioners may inflict spirituall censures and punishments as suspension deprivation deposition excommunication They may call for a Priest comand him to denounce and declare in some Cathedrall Church or other publick place the offender to bee excommunicated but they enquire cognosce decerne and pronouuce the sentence of excommunication in their Court and the excommunicate may be denounced long after and howbeit the Priest should pronounce the sentence in judgement yet he should bee onely like the dempster that pronounceth the doome or like the hangman or poore slave directed by the judge hee neither inquireth cognosceth nor decerneth Yet if ye think the coÌ„missioners may excommunicate because the Archbishop is present ye are deceived for his power in the high commission is not Episcopall nor Archiepiscopall but delegate onely from the Prince which other assessours not Bishops have as well as he and by this delegate power he with his two associates as I have sayd may inflict this censure upon any subject within England or Ireland which hee cannot doe as Bishop or Archbishop for their jurisdiction ordinary is limited within the bounds of their Diocie or Province When Spottiswood pretended Archbishop of Saintandros was but a rurall minister in Calder and Law of Glasgow a rural minister at Kirkliston possessing onely the rents of Bishoprickes not authorized as yet with the office of Bishops for that pretended Assembly of Glasgow was not yet convocated yet were they armed with power to decern excommunication against any subject within our Realm to command the minister of the offender to proceed against him and if he refused to suspend deprive or ward him They were thus armed immediatly before that pretended assembly with power of warding â—ining imprisoning suspending degrading and decerning excommunication without the consent of the Church or approbation of the Estates that they might wring out of the hands of the Kirke at that corrupt and pretended Assembly EpisEpiscopall jurisdiction which many times they protested never to usurp before and without the free consent of the Church obtained thereunto O perfidious violence What we have said of excommunication may be likewise said of suspension deprivation and deposition The Archbishop doth not suspend or deprive as Archbishop but as the Kings Delegate Iudge and Commissioner by which power he may suspend or deprive Ministers out of the bounds of his ordinarie jurisdiction which no Bishops or Archbishops may doe by their ordinarie power We had a late example in our own Archbishops about two yeares since for when Mr. Spotiswood was at Court Mr. Law pretended Archbishop of Glasgow suspended Mr. Blyth and Mr. Forrester from their ministerie which he could not doe as Archbishop for they were neither within his Diocie nor his province He did it then as head of the Commission sitting for the time that is by a delegate power from the King To let passe that at that same vile Assembly no mention was made of Archbishops and paction was onely made with these men who had the benefices for which vulgarly they were called Bishops that excommunication suspension deprivation and deposition should not be coÌ„cluded without theÌ„ not that they might suspend deprive excommunicate by themselves and at their pleasures in the high Commission or any where else but according to the damnable Canons made by that wofull but pretended and null Assembly Farther the Prince may inable one or moâ— lay men with this same commission wihout mixture of Ecclesiasticall persons It is then an extraordinary power wherewith they are inabled by the Prince to suspend depose and excommunicate But the Prince hath not this power himselfe and therfore by no right of Gods law may he communicate this power unto them and it is a proud usurpation over the Church to them to receive it or exercise it In the Parliament holden 1592. some acts which were made in that turbulent time of the 1584 yeare were repealed as followeth Item our Soveraigne Lord and Estates of Parliament foresayd abrogates cassis and annulls the act of the same Parliament holden at Edinburgh the sayd yeare 1584. granting commission to Bishops and other iudges constitute in Ecclesiasticall causes to receive his highnesse presentations to benefices to give collation thereupon and to put order in all causes Ecclesiasticall which his Maiesty and estates foresayd declares to be expired in the selfe and to be null in time comming and of none availe force nor effect Not withstanding of this repealed commission our
of Shires from Synodes to Nationall Assemblies they must step up a Popish ladder by Archdeacons Officials Bishops Deane of Arches Archbishops saving that at the top of the ladder they finde the Prince for the Pope to whom they must not appeale nor yet to any greater Councels of many reformed or unreformed Churches or to an oecumenicall Councell whatsoever they talke of Generall Councels Now the causes convoyed by these subordinate appellations are all Ecclesiasticall causes agitated in the Ecclesiasticall Courts Of which causes wee are to treat in the third chapter These which belong to Canons or Ecclesiasticall lawes concerne either the making of them or the administration and execution of them or the relaxation of them As for the making of them 1. in that the Prince may make new lawes anent ceremonies and rites with advice either of his Commissioners in causes Ecclesiasticall or of the Metropolitan 2 Synod provinciall or nationall may not be convocated without the Princes writ direct to the Metropolitan 3. Nothing may be treated or determined in the Synode till the Prince first be made privie and give assent 4. Nothing shall have the force of a law till the Royal assent of the Prince be given to those things which the Synod shall think good to decree Beza in his 8. Epistle to Grindal Bishop of London confesseth that he trembleth and shaketh at the first of these heads And in very deed it may turne upside down the whole government of the Church and outward forme of Gods worship overthrow the one and deface the other Did not the Bishops affirme at the examination of Barow that the Queen might establish what Church government it pleased her Highnes Because they dare not affirm that Princes may change any thing that is unchangeable by divine law therefore they make many unchangeable things both in government and externall ceremonies in Gods worship to bee changeable that they make a change at their pleasure and may bring in all that ever was hatched by the Antichrist a Popish Church government significant rites and symbolicall toyes and ceremonies For what may a corrupt Prince and a corrupt Metropolitan or some few corrupt commissioners not challenge for changeable Nay even rites of order and comelines and lawes of things indifferent for a religious use should be considered by the lawfull and ordinary assemblies of the Church how they agree with the generall rules prescribed in the word how they will edifie the Church how God shall be glorified Christian charitie entertained order and comelines preserved For we must not consider things indifferent onely in â—heir generall kinde but in their particular and circumstantiall use which if we permit to Princes they may abuse indiffereÌ„t things to the great hurt of the Church Synods ought not to be convocate without the Princes privitie or the warrant of the law in generall but if the Prince be wilful in denying his assent and the Church be in extreame danger ready to be overwhelmed or greatly disturbed with heresies schismes divisions enormities we may use the benefit of the law and if the law of man be wanting yet the Church should not cease from doing her dutie and exercising that power which is granted her by Christ who hath also promised his presence when but two or three are convened in his name Salus Ecclesiae suprema lex esto The power of Christian Princes in the Church is cumulative to aid her to execute her power freely not privative to deprive and spoile her of any power Christ hath granted to her And by the same reason the Church may entreate determine and strengthen her decrees and constitutions with Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments notwithstanding the Prince will not assent approve ratifie the Canons of the Church nor confirme them by his lawes and fortifie them with temporal punishments Prudence I confesse is required in the Church to weigh the case of necessity when to put this â—er power in practise As for the administration and execution of lawes in that the Prince may 1. visit the Ecclesiasticall state and their persons 2. reforme redresse and correct them and whatsoever sort of heresies schismes errours abuses offences contempts and enormities of any whomsoever 3. to assigne nominate and authorize when and as often as it is his pleasure such persons being naturall borne subjects as he shall think meet 1. to exercise and execute all manner of jurisdictions privileges and preeminences in any wise touching or concerning any spirituall or Ecclesiastical jurisdiction 2 to visit 3 to reforme correct and amend all such excesses or defects whatsoever which by any maner of Ecclesiasticall power authority or jurisdiction might been have been reformed ordered corrected amended or restrained The Princes power in visiting reforming and correcting abuses enormities errours heresies c. may be seen as in a liuely picture in the high commission to be not onely a temporall power but also a spirituall to inflict Ecclesiasticall censures punishments For the Prince could not communicate this power to his Delegate Commissioners except he claimed it to himselfe as Principall For none can transferre that to others which he hath not himselfe It must follow therefore that the Princes power is Ecclesiastical not onely in respect of the object and matter whereupon it worketh as heresies errours abuses c. but also formally in respect of the manner to wit by inflicting Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments unlesse we will affiâ—me that suspension deposition excommunication are not Ecclesiastical but civill punishments and censures which were absurd We shall entreat of the power of the high commission in the next chapter severally by it selfe As for the relaxation of the Canons or lawes in that 1. first for ever when as they are altogether abrogated by the Prince 2. for a time onely as when hee granteth remission of any crime or transgression of the Canons for times by gone and to come when both infamie is abolished and the transgressor is restored to his former state 4. When the grace of the Canon is granted for time to come to any certaine person upon speciall occasion the cause being tried which grace they call dispensation which is for the most part done when the faculties of this kinde granted by the Archbishop of Canterbury upon whom this office doth lye by statute are confirmed with the great seale of England or when if he without just cause refuseth the Chancellour of England granteth them primarily according to the statute made thereanent If the Prince may abrogate the canons of the Church without consent of the church in vain were the Canons of the Church made Or that the Church may not abrogate any canon when they finde it proveth inconvenient is as great an inconvenience In vaine likewise are canons strengthened and guarded with censures and punishments and the black markes of infamie set upon heynous crimeswith the legall effects thereof if the Prince may abolish the crime as simoniacall paction or any the like
perfidious Prelats haue resumed the same again without any law reviving it But let us proceed and heare what is recorded in the worthy proceedings of the Parliament above mentioned The Act is found to be inconvenient and of dangerous extent in divers respects 4. for that every pettie offence pertaining to spirituall jurisdiction is by the colour of the said words and letters patents grounded therupon made snbject to excommunications and punishment by that strange and exorhitant power and commission whereby the least offenders not committing any thing of any enormous or high nature may be drawn from the most remote places of the kingdome to London or yorke which is very grievous and inconvenient These three Commissioners being armed with double vengeance and power of both swords temporall and spirituall may strike a man at one strike in one sentence for one and the selfe same fault both with temporall and Ecclesiasticall censures and punishments They may depose and imprison a minister at one time for one offence they may fine and excommunicate at one time c. Againe they may punish the same offence in one person with a fine in another with imprisonment in the third with excommunication in the fourth with deprivation For their owne pleasures and discretions and not the lawes ar the rules of their censures and punishments Let us see what is recorded in the grievances Therein to wit in the Commission grounded upon the statute is grievance apprehended thus First for that therby the same men have both spirituall and temporall iâ—risdiction and may both force the partie by oath to accuse himselfe of an offence and also inquire thereof by a jurie and lâ—stly may inflict for the same offence at the same time and by one and the same sentence both spirituall and temporall punishments 2. wheras upon sentences of deprivation or other spirituall censures given by force of ordinarie jurisdiction any appeale lyeth for the party grieved that is heere excluded by expresse words of the commission Also heere is to be a tryall by Iurie yet no remedie by traverse not attaint Neither can a man have any writ of errour though a judgement or sentence be given against him â—â—â—â—unting to the taking away of all his goods and imprisoning him during life yea to the adjudging him in the case of premumire whereby his lanâ—s are forfeited and he out of the protection of the Law 3. That wheras penall lawes and offences against the same cannot be determined in other Courts or by other persons then by those trusted by Parliament with the execution therof yet the execution of many such Statutes divers whereof were made since 1. Eliz. are commended and committed to these Commissioners Ecclesiasticall who are either to inflict the punishments contained in the Statutes being Premunire and other high nature and so to inforce a man upon his owne oath to accuse and expose himselfe to these punishments or else to inflict other temporall punishment at their pleasure And yet besides and after that done the parties shall bee subiect in Courts mentioned in the acts to punishment by the same acts appointed and inflicted which we thinke were unreasonable The three Commissioners may not onely enquire and try but also judge in all causes Ecclesiasticall in causes of heresie simonie idolatry c. It is I grant provided in the statute 1. Elizabeth that they shall not in any wise have authoritie or power to order determine or adiudge any matter or cause to he heresie but onely such as heretofore have been determined ordered or adiuged to be heresie by the authoritie of the Canonicall Scripture or by the first 4. generall Councels or any of them or by any other generall Councell wherein the same was declared heresie by the expresse and plaine words of the said Canonicall Scriptures or such as heereafter shall be ordered iudged or determined to be heresie by the high Court of Parliament of this Realme with the assent of the Clergie in their Convocation This provision is no limitation unlesse wee will say that without the limits of the Canonicall Scripture there are some heresies determined which are not determined within the bounds of the Canonicall Scripture Seeing then they may determine in all he resies determined in the Scripture they may determine in all herefies whatsoever and may affirme that to bee determined for heresie in the Scripture which is orthodoxall If the commissioners the Princes delegates may be judges in all causes of herefie farre more is the Prince himselfe by their lawes and that without the provision foresayd wherwith the delegate commissioners are circumscribed These three Commissioners have power to receive appellations from other inferiour courts Ecclesiasticall like as the five with us have power by the Kings letters patents to receive and disusse all appellations made to them from any inferiour Ecclesiasticall Judges and to inhibite the said Ecclesiasticall judges to proceed iu any matter which they shall hold to be improper for them wherin they shall perceiue the said Iudges to have behaved themselves partially advocating the said matters is their own judgment See the commission renewed Anno 1618. So they may draw to themselves any cause whatsoever agitated in inferiour courts not onely at the appellation of any notorious villaine pretending grievance but also by advocation when they shall construe the cause to be unproper or the proceedings of the infeâ—iour Court to be partiall In the narrative of the proclamation it was pretended that this high commission is erected to stay advocation of causes granted by the Lords of Councell and Session That forasmuch as it hath bene compleaened by the Archbishops Bishops and other Ministers of that his Maiesties Kingdome that advocations and suspensions are frequently granted by the Lords of Councell and Session unto such as bee in processe before them and their Ecclesiasticall Courts for offences committed whereby offenders are imboldned continuing in their wickednesse and â—ing the said advocations and suspensions or meanes to delay their tryall and punishment Therfore c. Complaint hath been made sometime by ministers and suit to stay advocations that the ordinarie indicatures Ecclesiasticall might proceed to their censures without stop but not to change advocations Are the Archbishops and Bishops with their associates honester and more conscientions men then the Lord of Councel and Session An ambitious and covetous Clergie-man is of all men the most vile and prophane Did the Bishops complaine why do they then advocate causes from inferiour Courts Ecclesiasticall seeing they have usurped the sway of proceedings in Courts Ecclesiasticall to themselves Doe they accuse themselves of partialitiall proceeding in inferiour courts or handling improper causes and will these same men bee lesse partiall and more conscientious in the high Commission If no censure can take effect without their approbation and appellations should ascend from inferiour courts to superiour courts and Synods wherefore will they rather advocate causes to this extraordinary court of high
commission In England if a man stand wilfully fourty daies together excommunicate and be accordingly certified by the Bishop into the Chancerie that then he is to be committed to prison by vertue of a Writ directed to the Shriefe as it is sayd in the Apologie of certaine proceedings in courts Ecclesiasticall And in a wrâ—â— de excommunicato capiendo it is sayd quod potestas regia sacrosanctae Ecclesiae in querelis suis deessâ— non debet The ordinarie lawfull courts Ecclesiasticall farre more then should be aided and assisted by the secular power and not molested or stopped The truth is that this high commission is erected to suppresse the libertie of the Kirk to maintain the usurped power and tyrannous domination of our perfidious Prelates over Synods generall Provinciall Presbyteries sessions to effectuate the intended conformity which they know they will never get done in Synods and Presbyteries unlesse the terrour of this high commission were standing above their heads And therfore when they urge conformity they haue their recourse to this weapon or in Synods and Presbyteries men are terrified with the feare of it This is their strong castell out of which they command and hold in slavery bondage the whole citie Here the Bonifacian Prelats stoutly draw the two swords fine consine suspend deprive imprison c. But the couragious souldier fighting the Lords battell will not bee borne downe with any such outrages and terrours Now as they receive appellations from inferiour courts no appellation can bee made from these three or our five suppose their injustice and tyranny cry never so loud I wonder if the heart of any faithfull Patriot let be conscientious professour can digest this These three Commissioners may appoynt inferiour Commissioners from whom also as subdelegates they may receive appellation I will add out of the record of the grievances of the house of Commons these considerations First out of the statute that the said act is found to be inconvenient and of dangerous extent in divers respects for that it inableth the making of such a commission as well to any one subiect borne as to more Item for that by the sayd Statute the King and his successors may howsoever your Maiestie hath beene pleased out of your gracious disposition otherwise to order make and direct such commission into all the Countries and Diocesses yea into every parish of England and therby all causes may be taken from ordinary jurisdiction of Bishops Chancellers and Arch-deacons and Lay-men solely be inabled to excommunicate and exercise all other spirituall censures For that limit touching causes subiect to this commission being onely with these words viz. such as perteine to spirituall or ecclesiasticall jurisdiction it is very hard to know what matters or offences are included in that number And the rather because it is unknown what ancient Canons or lawes spirituall are in force and what not from whence ariseth great uncertainty and occasion of contention Out of the commission grounded upon the statute That the commisson giveth authoritie to inforce men called into question to enter into recognisance not onely for appearance from time to time but also for performance of whatsoever shall be by the Commissioners ordered And also that it giveth power to enjoyn parties defendant or accused to pay such fees to ministers of the Court as by the Commissioners shall be thought fit As for the execution of the commission it is found grievous these wayes among other 1. For that lay men are by the commissioners punished for speaking otherwise then in iudiciall places and courtes of the simonie and other misdemeanours of spirituall men though the thing spoken be true and the speech tending to the inducing of some condigne punishment 2. In that these commissioners usually appoynt and allot to women discontented at and unwilling to live with their husbands such portions allowances for present maintenance as to them shall seem fit to the great encouragement of wives to be disobedient and contemptuous against their husbands 3 In that their pursevants or other ministers imployed in the apprehension of suspected offenders in any things spirituall and in the searching for any supposed scandalous bookes use to breake open mens houses closets and deskes rifling all corners and secretâ— custodies as in cases of high treason or suspition therof Their commission is grounded upon a statute and act of Parliament howbeit it agreeth not with the statute Wee have not so much as a shew of a statute for commission of jurisdiction in causes Ecclesiasticall and yet our usurping Prelates tyrannize over loyall subjects faithfull Patriots conscientious professours deserted by these who will be counted fathers of the Common wealth left open and naked to their violent rage without any protection of the law as if they were but the vile off scourings of the land Will not the estate in Parliament redresse this proud usurpation Shall the house of Commons in their Parliament bee grieved not onely at the exorbitant power of this high commission but also at the statute it selfe and shall our nobles and inferiour estates not be grieved at our usurped commission Or will they suffer the like statute and make the countrey mourn and groane for it the next day as our neighbours have done Can Princes or estates give power of spirituall censures either to lay or spiritual men Or may they lawfully put the temporall sword in the hand of Pastors Or may spirituall men as they call them accept it If neither can be done how can the estates erect ratifie or suffer such a commission What is this but the Spanish inquisition Set me up this throne Satan shall set up Papistry or any other religion whatsoever in short processe of time For they sit at the rudder and may turn religion as it pleaseth them and when they see fit occasions and themselves to have able power CHAP. 3. Of the dignitie and power of Archbishops in England THis proud name of Archbishop is not to be found in all the Scripture It was not attributed to any common Metropolitans at the first but to the renowâ—ed and mightie Giants the Patriarches of Constantinople Antioch Alexandria and Rome who were mounted farre above Metropolitanes when the time was neere that the Antichrist should be mounted on horsebacke But after that he was mounted then Metropolitanes that they might keepe some proportion with their head were lifted up to a degree of power above other Bishops invested into an office that the book of God the Apostolical Church never knew to consecrate Bishops to convocate Synods to receive appellations froÌ„ the courts of inferior Bishops to visit the Diocies of other Bishops within the Privince A Diocesan Bishop that is a Bishop over many flockes and Pastors of one Diocie was unknown to the Apostles far more a Bishop of Bishops a provincial Bishop an Archbishop having iurisdiction and power over the comprovinciall Bishops The Church being for the most part within
THE Altar of Damascus OR THE PATERN OF THE ENGLISH HIERARCHIE AND CHVRCH-Policie obtruded upon the Church of SCOTLAND 2. KING 16. 10. 11. And King Ahaz went to Damascus to meet Tiglath Pileser King of Assyria and saw an Altar that was at Damascus and King Ahaz sent to Vrijah the Priest the fashion of the altar and the patern of it according to all the workmanship thereof And Vrijah the Priest built an altar according to all that King Ahaz had sent from Damascus so Vrijah the Priest made it against King Ahaz came from Damascus Anno 1621. TO THE READER I Have drawen this paterne of the English Altar obtruded upon us out of their owne Tables of the Hierarchy and Church policie Muckets book their Canons and Constitutions Ecclesiasticall the statutes of the Realme the admonitions petitions assertions treatises answers and replies of those who sue for reformation the confessions of their opposites in their own defences I have followed the order of the Tables translated out of Latine and printed with a letter different from the rest I intended not a full refutation for I thought to discover it onely was to refute it sufficiently to any man of sound judgement saving that sometime there iâ— a light touch or poynting at any corruption where I suspected the simpler sort mighâ— be miscaried CHAP. 1. Of the Kings Supremacie IN the Ecclesiasticall policie of England generally are to be coÌ„sidered 1 Persons 2 possessions 3 constitutions concerning both Persons to bee considered are either such as haue some kinde of administration or such as have none at all The persoÌ„s that have some kind of administratioÌ„ have it either as supreme or not so ample The supreme or more absolute administration which is called the Kings supremacie is to be considered 1 generally 2 particularly Generally by which authority the Prince as supreme governor under God can set down in all Ecclesiasticall causes within his dominions whatsoever is not repugnant to the word of God By causes Ecclesiastical are meant not onely matrimoniall and testamentary causes and others abusively called Ecclesiasticall but also these which are in a proper sence Ecclesiastical subject to Ecclesiastical cognition and jurisdiction By the title of Supreme Governour is understood the same power which before was expressed by the title of Head of tâ—e Church of England in the dayes of K. Henrie the 8. and Edward the 6. For howsoever for removing of offence taken at the metaphorical title of Head it was changed in more proper termes of supreme governour under the reigne of Queene Elizabeth yet the sense remaineth still In the first yeare of her reigne it was enacted and ordained That such jurisdictions privileges superiorities and preeminences spirituall or Ecclesiasticall as by any spirituall or Ecclesiasticall power or authority hath heretofore been or may lawfully be exercised or used for the visitation of the Ecclesiasticall state and persons and for reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner of errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities shall for ever be united and annexed to the Imperiall crowne of this Realme And that the Queens highnes her heirs and successors shall have full power authority by vertue of this act by letters patents under the great seale of England to assigne name and authorize when and as often as her highnes her heirs and successors shall think meet and conveâ—ient and for such and so long time as shall please her highnesse her heirs and successors such persons being naturall born subjects as her Majestie her heirs and successors shall think meet to exercise use occupie and execute under her highnes her heirs and sâ—ccessors all manner of Iurisdictions priviledges and preeminances in any wise touching or concerning any spirituall or Ecclesiacticall iurisdiction within the Reaâ—â—es of England or Ireland or any other her highnes â—â—minions or countries and to visit reforme redresse order correct and amend all such errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities whatsoever which by any manner of spirituall or Ecclesiastical power authority or jurisdiction can or may lawfully be reformed ordered corrected restrained or amended And for the better observation of this act it was further enacted that every Ecclesiasticall person officer and minister all and every temporall judge Iustice Maior and other lay or temporal officer and minister and every other person having her highnes fee or wages within the Realm of England or any of her highnes dominions shall make take receive a corporall oath upon the Evangelist before such person or persons as shall please her highnes her heirs or successors under the great seale of England to assigne and name to accept and take the same according to the renor and effect hereafter following I A. B. doe utterly testifie and declare in my conscience that the Queens highnes is the onely supreme governour of this Realme and of all other her highnes dominions and countries as well in all spirituall or Ecclesiastical things or causes as temporall and that no forreigne Prince person prelate state or Potentate hath or ought to have any iurisdiction power superiority preeminence or authoritie Ecclesiasticall or spirituall within this Realme and therefore I doe utterly renounce forsake all forraigne iurisdictions powers superiorities and authorities and doe promise that from henceforth I shall beare faith and true allegeance to the Queenes highnes her heirs and lawfull successors and to my power shall assist and defend all iurisdictions privileges preeminences and authorities granted or belonging to the Queenes highnes her heirs and successors or united and annexed to the Imperiall crown of the Realme So helpe me God and by the contents of this book The title then of Supreme Governour in the oath is explained by the preceeding words of the statute to which and for observation of the which the oath is subjoyned viz. that the Prince hath all manner of spirituall or Ecclesiastical jurisdiction and all manner of privileges and preeminences any way touching or belonging to the same which was before or may be lawfully exercised for visitation of the Ecclesiasticall state reformation order and correction of the same and of all manner of errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities and that he may commit the exercise of the same to any of his naturall born subjects whom it shall please his highness to constitute commissioners in causes Ecclesiastical to judge discern and correct in matters of Idolatry simonie errour and heresie and all other causes Ecclesiasticall whatsoever This oath of supremacie is different from the oath of fidelity or allegeance devised of late That requireth no further theÌ„ to acknowledge the king to be lawful righteous king and to sweare obedience and fidelitie to him notwithstanding he be excommunicated by the Pope to acknowledge that the Pope notwithstanding of his excommunications cannot depose kings and dispose of kingdomes at his pleasure The Papist is straitned with this oath of
allegeance but not with the oath of supremacie for feare of troubling his tender conscience The statute of the supremacie was explained the same year of Qu. Elizabeths raigne in an admonition added to the injunctions as followeth That her Maiestie neither doth nor ever will challenge any other authority then was challenged and lately vsed by the noble kings of famous memory king Henry the 8. and king Edward the 6. which is and was of ancient time due to the Imperial crown of this Realme that is under God to have the soveraignty and rule over all manner of persons born within these her realmes dominions and countries of what estate soever they be either Ecclesiasticall or temporall so as no other forraigne power shall or ought to have superiority over them In this admonition the subjects are made to understand that her Maiestie did not claime power to minister divine offices in the Church as to preach the word and minister the sacraments They have been too simple who have construed the statute in such a sense For no wise man will thinke that kings and Queens will take upon them either the paines or worldly discredit to preach the word minister the sacraments intimate to the congregation the sentence of excommunication The statute doth make no mention of divine offices in the Church but of jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall which is and was in time of papistrie exercised at visitations and in Ecclesiasticall courts This explanation therefore of the admonition annexed to the Injunctions and ratified by Parliament in the fift yeare of Qu. Elizabeth derogateth nothing from the former statute but onely summeth it in more generall tearmes To challenge no more then was challenged and lately used by the noble kings of famous memory K. Henry 8. and Edward 6. is to challenge to be head of the Church to have all jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall flowing from the possessour of the Crowne as from the head and fountaine Mr. Fox in his Acts Monuments relateth that in the 34. of K. Henry the 8. it was enacted That the king his heirs and successors kings of that Realme shall bee taken accepted and reputed the onely supreme head on earth of the Church of England and shall have and enjoy annexed and united to the Imperiall crowne as well the title and stile thereof as all honours dignities preeminences iurisdictions priviledges authorities immunities profits and commodities to the sayd dignitie of supreme head of the same Church belonging and appertaining and that they shall have full power authority from time to time to visit represse redresse reforme and amend all such errors abuses offences contempts and enormities whatsoever they be which by any manner of spirituall authority or iurisdiction might or may lawfully be reformed repressed ordered redressed corrected or amended In a rescript of Edward the sixth it is thus written to Cranmer Archbishop of Canterburie Seeing all manner of authoritie and iurisdiction as well Ecclesiasticall as secular doth slow from our regall power as from a supreme head c. we give unto you power by these presents which are to endure at our good pleâ—sâ—re to give and promove to the sacred orders even of the Eldership or as they use to speake Priesthood any within your Diocie Anno 1. Edw. 6. cap. 12. an act was made That the Bishop should bee maâ—e by the Kings letters patents and not â—y election of Deane and Chapter and that they should make their proces and writings in the Kings name and not under their own names and that their seales should be the Kings armes This act repealed in the 1. of Queen Mary was revived in the 1. of K. James It was objected to Bishop Farrar in the dayes of the same yong king Edward that hee deserved deprivation because hee constituted his Chancellor by his letters of commission omitting the kings majesties stile and authority and that he had made collations and institutions in his owne name and authority without expressing the kings supremacie His answer was that howbeit there was some default of formalitie in the commission yet his highnes stile and authority was sufficiently expressed in the sayd commission Neither did the sayd Chancellor offer to visit but in the Kings name and authority to the sayd Bishop committed And as to the other poynt that hee made his collations and institutions in his owne name not by his own authority nor by any others save the kings authority expressing in them the kings supremacie with the Bishops own name and seale of office Whitgift sometime Bishop of Canterburie sayth We acknowledge all jurisdiction that any court in England hath or doth exercise be it civill or Ecclesiasticall to be executed in her Majesties name and right and to come from her as supreme Governour And againe in another place The Prince having the supreme government of the Realme in all causes and over all persons as she doth expresse the one by the Lord Chancellor so doth she the other by the Archbishops Dr. Bancroft who was afterward made Bishop of London and at last Bishop of Canterbury in a Sermon made at Pauls Crosse anno 1589. maketh her maiesty a petie Pope and assigneth unto her not some of the Popes power but all honours dignities preeminences iurisdictions privileges authorities profits and commodities which by usurpation did at any time appertaine unto the Pope belike relating the words of the act made in the 34. Henry 8. Our Bancroft Mr. Spottiswood pretended Archbishop of Saintandros at the pretended deposition of N. in the high commission sayd likewise I say unto you N. the king is now Pope and so shall be To be supreme governour in all causes Ecclesiasticall then is not onely to be an avenger with the sword as Bilson would make the Iesuits beleeve in his book of obedience but also to be judge in matters of errour and heresie superstition and idolatry and all other causes Ecclesiasticall and as a supreme governour to communicate this power to auy naturall borne subject In the Parliament holden at Perth anno 1606. where a number of the Nobility consented to the restitution of the Bishops to their 3 estate and old privileges that they might get the other prelacies erected in temporall Lordships it was declared in the second act That the whole estates of their bounden dutie with most hartie and faithfull affection humbly and truely acknowledge his Maiestie to be soveraigne Monarch absolute Prince iudge and governour over all persons estates and causes both spiritnall and temporall within his sayd Realme He is then not onely governour but judge also over all causes But the nature of the supremacie may be yet better conceived when we have taken a view of the particular rights of the supremacie and of the power granted to the high commission The Kings supremacie considered particularly consisteth either of things which are granted onely by statute or restored by statute as due of right to the Royall Crowne Granted first by
fruits and crop of the ground as of corne or fruits of trees Personall are such as are payed by reason of the person himselfe out of the gain that he maketh of this trading handicraft hunting warfaring c. The Mixt is added by sâ—me as a third kinde but others reduce them according to their diversitie to one of the first two and such are the birth of bestiall wooll milke whether they be fed at home or be at pasture in the field Tithes of whatsoever kinde are but temporall goods not spirituall howbeit they be annexed to spirituall things and be appoynâ—ed to uphold and maintaine divine service and spirituall functions Tithes were of old recovered in the Kings Court not in Ecclesiasticall as is averred in a treatise alledged by the author of the Apologie of proceedings in Courts Ecclesiasticall We think that the Kings Courts be put out of iuâ—â—sdiction for tythes by a custome of the Realme and not by the immediat power of the law of God And againe That suits for tithes shall be taken in the spirituall court is onely grounded upon a favour that the Kings of this realme and the whole realme have in times past borne to the Clergie That the kings Courts of his Bench and common pleas and also other inferior courts were put out of jurisdiction for tythes suits for tithes were granted to spirituall Courts was a favour it is true granted to the Clergie inabling them with power within themselves to recover tithes destinate to their maintenance but wee must not look so much to the commoditie wee may reape by the grants of Princes as whether Church consistories should medle with such controversies concerning things temporall This man owe me a cole that man a stiâ—k the third two stone of butter the fourth such a number of Saffron heads the fift so many sallow Trees such and such suits were verie pertinent for a Presbyterie to sit upon for the Presbyterie is the true and right Consistorie Now change this Consistorie as ye please and make the Bishop alone to be the Church consistorie it is all one For the causes themselves being temporall the qualitie of the person doth not alter the nature of the cause In the Assertion for true and Christian policie it is said That by a statute 32. Hen 8. c. 44. it is enacted That the Parsons and Curates of five Parish Chuâ—â—hes whereunto the Town of Royston did extend it selfe and every of them and the successors of every of them shall have their remedie by authoritâ— of that Act to sue demand aske and recover in the Kings Court of Chancerie the tithes of corne hay wooll lambe and Calfe subtracted or devyed to be payed by any person or persons Are the tythes of other Parishes more spirituall then these of Royston But admitting such pleas to be pertinent for a spirituall Court they should not be turned over to a Civilian the Bishops Officiall And what favour is granted to Church men by Princes when a Doctor of the Law shall determine in these pleas 2. Oblations due of custome either every quarter of the yeare or in baptismes or at blessing of mariages or at Churching of women or at burials 3 Mortuaries 4 Indemnities 5 Procuâ—aâ—ions 6 expences laid forth for the repairing of Ecclesiastical buildings decayed by the negligence of the Predecessour 7. Synodalls 8. wages and feel due for causes judiciall as to the Iudge the Advocate the Proctor the Clarke Or for causes out of judgement as to the Curate or Sexten A procuration is the furnishing of necessarie expenses for the Archbishop Bishop Archdeacon or any other having power to visit in respect of their visitations For howbeit the Bishops have great temporalities and possessions Ecclesiasticall that doth not content them but they must be sustained besides in their travelling They say they must have great riches because they have a great burthen and must not discharge their charge still in one place but through the whole Diocie And yet when they have gotten more then may suffice reasonable men they will not travell without a new pension and their expenses borne For no man is bound say they to goe on warfare on his owne cost And so with a new trick they got procurations annexed to their visitations as proper stipends due to visitors At the first the visitor and his retinue had their sustentation in victuals for the day which he visited the particular Church Afterward the procuration was rated to some value of money answerable respectively to the dignity of an Archbishop or Archdeacon for their retinue was prescribed in the Canons and Constitutions The Archdeacon was appointed to have onely to have 4. persons on horsebaâ—ke and one Sumner What think ye then shal be the retinue of the Bishop or Archbishop if this be moderate in the Archdeacon Farther whereas they ought not to have procurations except they visit every particular Church They will visit 30. or 40. churches in one day at one place and yet receive the diet in money of 30. or 40. churches or dayes They make commodity of their visitations otherwise also as ye have heard Synodals are another pension due to the Bishop by every Church in the Diocie for convocating Synods And yet their Synods are not worthy the name of Synods for the Diocesan Bishop is onely Lord and Iudge the rest are to bee judged rather then to partake in common with his power A Mortuarie is the second beast that the deceased person hath within the parish if hee have three or above the best being excepted and reserved to the iust owner If the three be of one kind or of divers the parish Priest must have the second and wherefore I pray you for recompensation of the personall tithes or offerings withholden while he lived yea howbeit ignorantly and unwittingly sayth Lindwood and to what end pro salute animae suae sayth Simon Langham Bishop of Canterburie in his Provinciall constitution For the safetie of the soule consisteth in remission of the sinn sayth Lindwood in his glosse upon that constitution which is not remitted sayth hee unlesse that which is withholden be restored These are the Mortuaries as yee see which are demandable in their spirituall courts Oblations should be free from compulsion and superstition not offered immediatly to God upon the Altar as sometimes they doe nor exacted under the colour of maintenance of the ministerie whereto the tithes are already bestowed to that use The rich parson yea the Bishop himselfe claimeth a right to these oblations as well as the poorest Priest To compell men to offer by the censures of their Courts is against the nature of a free offering The fees demandable in their Courts as due to the Iudge the Register the Advocates the Proctors are unreasonable Large fees are payd for the Iudges sentence for the Register and the proctors pains above the rate set down by their Canons as the defender of the last petition doth affirme