Chap. V. Difference III. Of the Extent of a particular Church THE third Point wherein they seem to differ is about the Extent of a particular Political Church viz. Whether it be a single Congregation or divers Congregations Whether the Ecclesia Prima or a particular Church of the first Generation as distinct from a Combination of Churches should be no more than can meet in One place and hold personal Communion in the Worship of God Here is an appearance of some difference but really none that will find a Reconciler work Some Presbyterians distinguish indeed between a Worshipping Church and a Governed Church and they would have a single Congregation to be one Worshipping Church but many conjoyned in their Pastors to be the first or lowest Governing Church But that is but in cases of necessity when there are not Elders enough in the single Worshipping Church So that really both Parties are agreed 1. That a particular Church may consist of One single Congregation if it be but furnished with more than one Elder for the work of Government Though for my own part I am quite out of doubt that where one man only is the Pastor or Governour of a Church that man only may Govern that Church and do the work of a Pastor to that Church 2. And they are agreed that a Church that doth not or cannot ordinarily meet in one place may yet be a true particular Church In times of Persecution when the Church dare not publickly appear or hath no capacious Rooms to meet in but are forced to meet dispersedly in Houses it may not only be lawful but most convenient for some that meet in one House and some in another and some in a third a fourth a fifth to be all united in the same Pastors that shall visit them severally as they see cause and have opportunity and rule them all And in a well ordered Church there is none denyeth but that in less Publick Meetings the Church may be distributed into several Houses and that the Aged Sick or Lame or any that by distance cannot frequently come to the same most Publick Meeting may yet have Chappels of Ease or be allowed to meet in Houses rather than not at all This all agree in And I think few Presbyterians if any will deny that it is most convenient regular and suitable to the Ends of a particular Church which is Personal Communion in Worship and Holy Order that where it can be procured the whole Church except the Sick or Lame or necessarilyhindered may frequently if not most usually meet in one Assembly So that either here is no work for a Reconciler or a very easie work For the Presbyterians say that a particular Church May consist of one Congregation and I believe they will say that ordinarily it is most fit and the Independents say It Must consist but of one Congregation or as many as May meet together for Personal Communion in Worship if they have Liberty but that this is not Essential to the Church Either then here is no Difference or if there be it is thus reconciled in a word The Presbyterians May be shall yield to the Independents Must be The Licet to the Oportet Secure them but of more than one Elder in a Church and I dare warrant you that all the sober Moderate Presbyterians shall readily and heartily yield to this They have no conceit that there Must needs go many Congregations to make a particular Political Church If any Presbyterians refuse to condescend so far for Reconciliation another easie remedy is at hand Let each have Liberty to hold that Church which in the extent is suited to their Judgment Let them that needs must have a Church of many Congregations hold it if the people do consent as few will so they will faithfully do the Pastoral work If they will joyn three or four Parishes together as the lowest Governed Church let them have their Liberty exercising just Discipline in them But let others also have their Liberty that think it meeter if not necessary that the Church be but of one Congregation The distance and quality of people may very much alter the case in this point In places where four Parishes at great distance would afford but enough for one particular Church if any such Parishes be it may be the more tolerable to have ordinary Meetings in the several Parishes for Worship and Discipline administred and sometime the Lord's Supper in a fuller meeting of all the Church But I hope we are in no necessity that this should be an ordinary case But Liberty in these cases may well be granted Chap. VI. Difference IV. THE fourth Point of Difference is Whether a particular Church hath Power in it self to Ordain and Impose hands on their chosen Pastors This Difference is easily Reconciled For 1. The Presbyterians hold that regularly it is fittest that the Pastors of divers Churches conjunct do Ordain because of the Interest and Relation which they suppose each Minister hath to the Church Catholick yet withal they deny not but he hath a true Ordination that is ordained by more than one Pastor of the same Church 2. Though they deny and justly that Imposition of hands in Ordination belongeth to the People yet they judge not an irregularity in that Ceremony of force to nullifie the calling of the Pastor 3. If a man that is duely elected and qualified be in Possession of the Ministry without a Regular just Ordination as if it were but by Ruling Elders or by one such with the people though such an Ordination is not to be it self approved of yet being upon a Doctrinal mistake we may well hold Communion with such Churches leaving the guilt of their Errour on themselves when we cannot remedy it 4. The Congregational Brethren hold that in case they have no Officers in that Church the Counsel and Help of other Pastors may and ordinarily ought to be made use of and that ordinarily they are not to be held true Pastors that be not Ordained by true Pastors and that in a constituted Church the Act of Ordination belongeth to the Presbyters and that the multitude confer not the Power of the Keys but Christ immediately And that the counsel of Neighbour Pastors is requisite not only to a weak Church because of their insufficiency to Judge but also for the safety of a well furnished Church by the Amplitude of Advice and in all Churches for the Communion of Churches And I think they grant it Lawful though not Necessary that these Neighbor Pastors lay on hands as well as counsel This much being Doctrinally agreed on our Practical Agreement is easie thus 1. Let the Doctrinal point of the Necessity of more Pastors to Ordain be let alone and left to each Mans Liberty it being no Article of our Creed nor a Credendum of absolute necessity and seeing the Congregational party hold that more from Neighbour Churches May
of a further Agreement with those that have been their Ejecters They have agreed to take no Members out of any of your true Pastoral consenting Churches without a just hearing and satisfactory Reasons to them But I hope you take not all your Parishioners even Atheists Papists and Infidels for your Church Members Noâ— yet all your Auditors and Catechumens but only your Communicants And is it not better that they be Members of Nonconformists Churches than of none I have elsewhere cited you the Canons of a Council decreeing That if the Bishop of the place convert not any Heathens or Unbelievers and another convert them they shall be his Flock that did convert them in my Hist. of Councils Would they but first admit the Excluded to Publick Lectures where the Incumbent consenteth it would prepare the way for further Concord The Great Reconciler will in due time reconcile and closely Unite his own Amen Apr. 11. 1691. Ri. Baxter To the UNITED Protestant Nonconformists IN LONDON THough I was by the Confinement of decrepit Age and Pain hindred from having any part in the Form or Contract of your Agreement I think it my Duty to signifie my Sence of what you have done and by the Publication of my old Endeavours of that Kind to promote the Execution I greatly rejoyce in your very Attempt That God exciteth you to a practical desire of speedy healing our pernicious shameful Strifes Much more that you have so Skilfully made the present Plaister for the Wound No man doth any thing so well but it might be better done You must look that it should be assaulted by Cavil and Reproach Those that these Thirty Years have denied you Brotherly Communion with them will be loth you should be thought to have any Union among your selves And the Potent Schismaticks that to divert the Infamy from themselves have Stigmatized you with their own Name will be loth that your Concord should confute them while you offer your Reasons to prove that what they make necessary terms of Ministration and Communion would be to you if obeyed not medling with them no less than deliberate Covenanted Perjury or Lying and renunciation of repentance and amendment of Church-Corruptions and of the Law of Nature and Nations and the Kingdoms Self-defence they must stretch their Wits and gift of Tongue to make all this seem but a melancholy or feigned Fear and that it is but things indifferent that you refuse As they call me Antiepiscopal and against the Church because I would have more Bishops over a Thousand or many Hundred Churches than One and would have as many hands to do the work at least as are necessary to the Hundredth part of it and would have more Churches in a Diocess than one and would have Incumbents to be Pastors and Rectors But dreaming Men that build Cities or Travel in their Sleep can build more or go further in an hour specially if they lye soft in a University or a Great man's House than a waking Man can do in a Year or in his Life My own Judgment of Episcopacy and Church Constitution I have oft Published and you may see it in Lascitius and Commenius Books of the Bohemian Waldenses Church-Government Brethren I hope you fix not your Bounds of Pacification in the words or limits of this Form of Concord with a ne plus ultra Either when I am dead the Publick Church Doors will be unlock'd to your lawful Communion or not If yea it will be so great a Mercy that the Prospect of a Possibility of it will justifie my Publishing my old Reasons against unnecessary Antichurches or Militant contentious Gatherings But if God have not so much Mercy for this Land but that the Doors be lock'd up against desired Concord or Venient Romani our Foreign Jurisdiction men will prevail to deliver up the Land to a pretended Universal Foreign Power and make all believe that it is Treason to resist either a French or Irish Army if they be but Commissioned to perform it Then your Concord with such as are not Enemies to Peace will be a comfortable help to your patient Sufferings and may keep up some sparks of the Reformed Religion from being utterly extinguished And while you dwell in the Secret of the most High you may lodge under the shadow of the Almighty And may enter into your Chambers and shut the Doors on you for a little moment till the indignation be over-past and God be known by the Judgments which he executeth when the wicked are insnared in the work of their own hands Thus praying God to save you from violating the Concord you consent to and from being perverted by the ignorant Dividing sort of Teachers or People and that you will study Mr. Meade's Reasons against Division well and seasonably urged I bid you Farewel Your Quondam Fellow-Labourer Ri. Baxter London April 23. 1691. The Contents of the First Part. Chap. I. THe Necessity of Concord and Mischief of unnecessary Separations manifested in Twenty of the ill Effects Pag. 1. Ch. II. What is Incumbent on the Pastors for the Prevention and Cure hereof p. 13. Ch. III. The first Difference with the Independents Reconciled viz. Of the necessary qualification of Church Members p. 15. Ch. IV. The second Difference reconciled Of a Church Covenant p. 19. Ch. V. The third Difference reconciled Of the extent of a particular Church p. 21. Ch. VI. The fourth Difference reconciled whether a particular Church hath Power in it self to Ordain and impose hands on their chosen Pastors p. 23. Ch. VII The fifth Difference reconciled Of the first subject of the Power of the Keys Or of Right to Govern and Censure p. 25. Ch. VIII The sixth Difference reconciled Whether a Pastor of one Church may do the work of a Pastor in other Churches for that time being called to it p. 32. Ch. IX The seventh Difference reconciled Whether each particular Church hath Power to exercise all Government and Church Ordinances within it self without subjection to Synods or any other Clergy Governours as over them p. 33. Ch. X. The eighth Difference reconciled Whether Lay-men may Preach in the Church or as sent to gather Churches p. 38. Ch. XI The ninth Difference reconciled Whether the Parish Churches are true Churches p. 41. Ch. XII The tenth Difference reconciled Of taking Members out of other Churches and of Gathering Churches in other mens Parishes p. 42. Ch. XIII The sum of this Agreement reduced to Practice p. 55. The Contents of the Second Part. Q. 1. VVHat are the necessary terms of Communion of Christians as Members of the Universal Church p 62. Q. 2. What are the necessary terms of the Communion of Christians personally in a particular Church Q. 3. What are the terms on which Neighbour Churches may hold Communion with one another Q. 4. What are the terms of Communion between the Churches of several Kingdoms Foreign Iurisdiction is confuted in another Book Q. 5. What is the Magistrates
but in words or very narrow seem more material wide and dangerous than they are and shall hereupon proclaim their Brethren to be heretical or blasphemous and use to revile them and renounce Communion with them and would silence the Pastors if it were in their Power These under the Name of the Ministers of Christ do powerfully militate for the Devil against the Love and Peace of Christians and are the pernicious Incendiaries in the Churches of Christ. Q. 5. What is the Magistrates Power and Duty about Religion and the Churches and Ministers of Christ Answ. I shall say more as to their Power than as to their Duty because I know not how it will be endured or how that counsel will be taken or followed which is not desired It more concerneth us to consider of our own duty to them 1. All the forcing Power about matters Ecclesiastical whether by corporal Penalties or forced Mulcts belongeth only to the Magistrate Besides what Parents and Masters may do And if any Pastors use it it must be as Magistrates receiving it from the Soveraign And the Sword is so unseemly in a Pastors hand and so ill taken by the people and so adverse to the persuasive Loving Government which he must exercise and hath ever been of such unhappy effects to the World that it were to be wished that Princes would keep their Sword from the Clergy to themselves and commit it to such Officers as have not so much other work to do and are not so likely to abuse it 2. If any Pastors will declare that Princes are bound to punish men meerly as Excommunicated by them without any tryal of the Cause before themselves or Officers and will Excommunicate Magistrates for not Imprisoning Banishing or Burning or otherwise afflicting those whom the Clergy have Excommunicated or judged to be so used Much more if any will teach and declare that Excommunicate Kings are no Kings yea though a Foreigner that hath no Power over them Excommunicate them or that they may be kill'd as Tyrants or that the Pope or any other have Power to depose them and dispose of their Dominions see the Council at Lateran under Innocent 3d. Can. 3. and the Council at Rome under Gregor 7. If such be Subjects they are injurious to the Civil Power If they are Foreigners they are open declared Enemies 3. The Office and Power of Kings and other Magistrates is from God and their lawful Commands are to be obeyed for Conscience sake and not to avoid their Punishments only 4. Their Office is to promote Obedience to God and to his Laws by making Subordinate Laws of their own and to be a terrour to Evil-doers and a Praise and Encouragement to them that do well 5. The Clergy as well as others must be subject to Kings and Magistrates Nor is it tolerable Doctrine which would exempt their Persons or Estates except it be by the King's consent 6. Princes must not only promote natural Obedience to the true God but also the special Faith and Obedience of the Gospel by means which are suitable thereunto 7. Princes may make Laws forbidding the Publication of all pernicious Damning Doctrines and the Practice of Idolatry and of all great and notable Crimes against the Law of God and may Correct the Offenders by convenient Penalties with Prudence and Moderation 8. If heretical covetous or lazy Pastors corrupt God's Word and Worship notoriously or neglect their certain Duty to the betraying or endangering of the Flocks or are persons uncapable of the Office the Magistrate may drive them on to their Duties and moderately and prudently punish them for their negligence and unfaithfulness and may forbid the uncapable to exercise that Office 9. Such Circumstances of Worship and Orders of Assemblies before instanced as are fit for Common Determination and Agreement in all the Churches being such whose Determination is not proper to the Pastors Office may on moderate terms and by religious advice be determined of by Magistrates And all their lawful Determinations must be obeyed 10. There needeth not the device of Popes or Patriarchs to call Councils or to keep Peace among the Pastors of the Church For the Magistrate must do it as a great part of the work of his Office Every Soveraign may call such Pastors unto Councils as are his Subjects And several Princes by agreement may call their respective Subjects together when there is Cause And proper Universal Councils as is shewed are things which never were known nor are not to be expected And it must be a very extraordinary necessity which must warrant the Pastors of several Kingdoms to hold Councils together when they are forbidden by their Kings Princes also may correct Church-Tyrants and Usurpers and Destroyers of Faith or Piety or Peace They ought to restrain such Pastors as would raise Seditions or Rebellions or Persecutions of the Innocent or that pretend Religion for the open and obstinate revilings of their Brethren and are proved to be unquiet Firebrands to kindle Dissentions and destroy Mens Love to one another or arbitrarily to oppress the Flocks 11. When any question Who must be Iudge in cases of Heresie Infidelity or Idolatry as divulged or practised the true answer is obvious and easie 1. In regard of publick Ecclesiastical judgment and the Sentence of Excommunication or Absolution the Pastors of the Church are the proper Judges by virtue of the power of the Keys 2. In regard of publick civil judgment in order to corporal forcible punishment or impunity as there is just cause the Magistrate is the only publick Judge 3. In regard of that private judgment of discerning by which every rational person must know his own Duty both to God and Man and discern when and how far to obey Man without disobeying God every such rational person is a Iudge that is a Discerner of what he ought to do And Christ always the final Judge 12. Yet may not the Magistrate invade the Pastoral Office it self nor Ordain or Dâ—grade Ministerâ— in that Spiritual Sense as it is committed to Church-Guides nor Administer the Sacraments nor exercise the proper power of the Church Keys which Christ committed to Church Officers by such Excommunications or Absolutions as are proper to that power nor may they hinder the â—astors from the due performance of their Office in matter or manner Nor forbid the necessary Preaching of the Gospel or publick worshipping of God by all or any of his Ministers But are bound to promote it with studious diligence as Patrons of the Church 13. But if they should forbid us the necessary Preaching of God's Word or necessary assembling for God's publick Worship as we must not account those seasons and circumstances necessary which are unnecessary so that which is necessary indeed we must not desert till we are disabled to perform it seeing it is greater Sacrilege if we alienate a person consecrated to God in so sacred an Office than if we should alienate conseorated Goods
be cast out Norton Resp. P. 28. â—3 De Veritate talis Ecclesiae to nomine dubitare peccatum ducimus Q. 3. Quale saedus sufficit ad formam Ecclesiae R. Faedus implicitum sufficit ad esse faedus explicitam ad magis ordinatum esse desideratur Rutherford Plea Pag. 85 86. An explicite Vocal Covenant whereby we bind our selves by entring in a new Relation to such a Pastor and to such a Flock we deny not as if the thing were unlawful Nor deny we that at the Election of a Pastor the Pastor and People tye themselves by reciprocation of Oaths to each other the one to fulfil faithfully the Ministry he hath received of the Lord the other to submit to his Ministry in the Lord 5. Any Professor removing from one Congregation to another and so coming under a new Relation to such a Church or such a Ministry is in a tacite and virtual Covenant to discharge himself in all the Duties of a Member of that Congregation Norton Illius Ecclâ—siae constitutio quae uno in loco ordinario ad eultum Dei celebrandum convenire requeat ob suam multitudinem est illegitimâ— â— non tamen quoad â—jus Essentiam sed quoad adjunctum numerositatis Rutherford Due Right Pag. 301 302. 1. The ordinary Power of Jurisdiction because of nearest Vicinity and Contignity of Members is given by Jesus Christ to one Congregation in an Isle 1. Because that Church is a Church properly so called A Congregation is a Church wanting nothing of the Being and Essence of a Church Yet is it in compleat Lond. Minist Ius Div. Minist Part 2. P. 82. These Angels were Congregational not Diocesane Ib The Asian Angels were not Diocesane Bishops but Congregational Presbyters seated each of them iâ— One Church not any of them in more than One. See Mr. Hooker's Concession of many Meetings in one Church in Mr. Cawdrey's Review P. 148. Norton Resp. P. 99. Toti multitudini Ecclesiae competit examen Pastorum per mannuum impositionem eorundem ordinatio in Ecclâ—sia homogenea sed non in officium Ecclesiasticum quia officium Ecclesiasticum recipitur invocatione non ordinatione idque à Christo immediatè non à totâ multitudine Id. p. 100. Vicinis insuper ordinariè consultis in Ecclesia homogenea competit fraternitati auxilio Consilio Presbyterorum viciâ—orum prudentum aliarum Ecclesiarum P. 101. Populus in judicando dirigi potest ac ordinarie debet à judicio aliorum Pastorum Electionem vel praeâ—unte vel concomitante Requiritur Conâ—ilium aliorum Presbyterorum Prudentum propter insufficientiam in Ecclesia infirmiori Propter salatem in amplitudinâ— Consiliarii in Ecclesia instructiori in omnibus propter Communionem Ecclesiarum P. 103. Propositio illa Bâ—llarmini Non sunt veri Pastores qui non sunt à veris Pâ—storibus ordinati vera est ordinariè seâ— extra ordinâ—m minimè necessaria Juâ— Ib. p. 105. Quam vis in Ecclesia bene constituta non debet aliis quà m Presbyteris Ordinandi munus mandari in defectu tâ—â—eâ— idoneorum Presbyterorum potest non-Presbyteris mandari Ames In Ecclesia constituta actum ipsum ordinandi ad Presbyteros pertinere ultro concedimus P. 106. Toti multitudini Ecclesiae 〈◊〉 competit collatio potestatis claviuâ— in Ministrâ—s aut tota illa potestas quâ— Ministriâ— Officium Ecclesiasticum tribuit Against the peoples Power of the Keys Rutherford Peaceable Plea and in his Due Right of Presbyteries and many more have written at large and unanswerably taking the Keys for Government or Pastoral Administrations Rutherford's Plea p. 6. The Power of the Keys is given to the Church of Believers as to the end for the Edifying of the Body of Christ Eph. 4. * * Mr. Norton p. 45. Sin per Ecclesiam Representtaivam intelligitur Ecclesia talis proprie dicta h. e. Ecclesia virtualis vicâ—-Ecclesia Ecclesiam repraesentatam subjectivè repraesentans atque adâ—o vi delegationis habens potestatem â—arum negotia exâ—quendi jure Dâ—i hoc sensu simpliciter negamus Ecclesiam repraesentativam P. 4. Their Power of Chusing is a Power about the Keys but not of the Keys And it is common to all Believers who are not to take Pastors as the Market goeth upon a blind hearsay c. It 's commonly granted them that the people regularly should chuse their Officers where some unfitness of their own doth not forbid it but that necessarily they must consent to his Relation or else he cannot Exercise his Office on them And it is granted them commonly according to Cyprian's words that the people also have a great hand in the Rejection of unworthy Pastors and that in case they prove intolerable and they have no more regular way to depose them after sufficient patience and warning they must forsake them But none of these are Acts of Church Government no more than for a Corporation to chuse the Major or for the Servant while he is Free to chuse his Master or a Scholar his School-master or a Patient his Physicion or for the Soldiers to forsake a Traiterous Commander that would deliver up their lives unto the Enemy It 's one thing to be a Church Governor and another thing to chuse or refuse a Church Governor Dr. Owen was at last against all Governing Power in the people and for the Pastors Government only * * See Dr. Taylor 's 2d Disswasive very well on the Text Dic Ecclesiae Mr. T. Goodwin and Mr. Nye Pref. to Mr. Cotton's Keys p. 5. It 's no contemptible case that Mr. Cawdrey puts Review p. 151. Are not a company of Women with the Pastors a true Church having all things Essential to it And have they the Ordaining Admitting Governing power by Vote or not If not then is it not in a Church of Saints as such but in the true Governours by Office or in none ††Ibid p. 4. I must profess that Scripture and Reason speak so plainly that Pastors are Gods Officers to Rule Rulers must Rule and the Ruled obey that I admire that wise and good Men can find a temptation to err in so plain a case A Church in a Prince's or Noblemans House will consist of perhaps a Lord and Lady and their Children and a hundred or two hundred Servants Now can any Man think it agreeable to Gods Word that the Servants because they are the Major Vote and the Children aâ— Age with them shall question examine and censure by Excommunication their Parents and Rulers It 's a true and weighty Speech of Mr. Cawdrey ib. p. 155. These destructive courses of Levelling Church and State proceed from the placing of all Power Originally in the people It hath been made a Controversie whether Bishops or Pastors may Excommuâ—…te a Prince But if his own Family 〈◊〉 just and meet should be a Church â—…ave him Examined and Excommuâ—…ed by his own Servants out of that family-Family-Church methinks should seem a â—aâ—der case {inverted †} {inverted †} Jid. ibid p. 7. Coâ—ton Keys ' p. 33. The Brethren of the Church are the first Subject of Church Liberty and the Elders thereof of Church Authority And both together of all Church Power needful to be exercised within themselves * * Jid. ib. p. 3. Norton pag. 74 75. * * Iudicium de coercendo poenis corporalibus est Magistratus Iudicium de actionibus Pastoralibus praestandis an non est Pastoâ—um Iudicium de obediendo vel non obediendo est subditorum Dâ— Propriis actionibus unusquisque praejudicat officium discernendo See Mr. Norton at large proving that a Minister of a particular Church may not only by virtue of his Gifts and the common bond of Christian Charity but also by virtue of his Calling exercise in another Church the acts of his Office Charitativè non Authoritativè p. 76. c. 6. Of this see my Disput. of Ordination and 3d of Episcopacy * * Nort. P. 45. Si Ecclesia Representativa sumitur pro mutua consultatione consotiatione confoederatione Ecclesiarum particularium in Synodis per Legatos nova Ecclesiae forma non addita libertate Ecclesiâ— salvâ rem agnoscimus
Church Concord CONTAINING I. A Disswasive from unnecessary Division and Separation and the Real Concord of the Moderate Independents with the Presbyterians instanced in Ten seeming Differences II. The terms Necessary for Concord among all true Churches and Christians The First Part written 1655. The Second Part 1667. And Published this 1691. To second a late Agreement of the London Protestant Nonconformists And a former Treatise called The true and only terms of Church-Concord By RICHARD BAXTER Mat. 5. 9. Blessed are the Peace-makers for they shall be called the Children of God 1 Thess. 5. 12 13. We beseech you Brethren to know them who labour among you and are over you in the Lord and admonish you and esteem them very highly in Love for their Works sake and Be at Peace among your selves Phil. 2. 1 2 3. If there be any Consolation in Christ If any Comfort of Love If any Fellowship of the Spirit If any Bowels and Mercies Fulfil ye my joy that ye be like minded having the same Love being of one accord of one Mind Let nothing be done through strife or vain-glory but in lowliness of Mind let each esteem other better than themselves 1 Cor. 3. 1 2 3. And I Brethren could not speak to you as to spiritual but as to carnal to Babes in Christ For whereas there is among you envying and strife are ye not carnal and walk as men LONDON Printed for Tho. Parkhurst at the Bible and Three Crowns in Cheapside near Mercers Chapel 1691. THE PREFACE § 1. IOwe some satisfactory account to the Reader of the Reasons of my Publishing this Book which I have cast by about Thirty four Years It cannot be well understood without the knowledge of the Case we were then in and the Occasion of my Writing it The Ministers of the Churches were then as is usual of divers Opinions about Church-Government 1. Some men for our Diocesane Episcopacy as stated by the Reformation 2. Some were for a more Reformed Episcopacy described by Bucer in Script Angl. 1. Archbishop Usher c. 3. Some were for Diocesans in a higher strain as subject to a foreign Iurisdiction and as parts of an Universal Church Headed by a humane Head the Pope being Principium Unitatis 4. Some were for National and Classical Government by Presbyters only without Bishops 5. And some were for a parity of Ministers and Churches without any superior Bishops or Synods or Governours but to have every Congregation to have all Governing Power in their proper Pastors 6. And some were for each Congregation to be Governed by the Major Vote of the people the Pastor being but to gather and declare their Votes Among all these the 3d sort the Foreigners were utterly unreconcileable and of the 6th we had no great hopes But with the other four we attempted such a measure of Agreements as might be useful in a loose unsettled time to keep up Christian Love and so much Concord as that our Differences should not so much weaken us as to frustrate all our Ministerial Labours § 2. To this end I attempted a double work of Concord in Worcester-shire 1. For the willing Ministers Episcopal Presbyterian and Independent to Associate in the Practice of so much of the Ministerial Office as they were agreed did belong to Presbyters II. To Catechize or personally by Conference instruct all the Families and capable Persons in our Parishes who would come to us or admit us to come to them in order at due appointed times God gave our People in many Parishes willing Minds and encouraged us by unexpected great success The most laborious Ministers took the hint and seconded us in many Counties First and chiefly in Westmorland and Cumberland and then in Dorsetshire Wilâ—shire Hampshire and Essex and Dr. Winter and others in Ireland The terms of our Association the Reader may see Printed at large 1653. But theirs of Westmorland and Cumberland more large and worthy the Consideration of the present tolerated Churches I pray you read them § 3. But when it came to closest Practice As the Foreigners Prelatists and Popular called Brownists kept off so but few of the rigid Presbyterians or Independents joyned with us And indeed Worcestershire and the adjoyning Counties had but few of either sort But the main Body of our Association were men that thought the Episcopal Presbyterians and Independents had each of them some good in which they excelled the other two Parties and each of them some mistakes And that to select out of all three the best part and leave the worst was the most desireable and ancient Form of Government But that so much as might Unite them in the Comfortable Service of Christ was common to them all The most of our Ministers were Young men bred at the Universities during the Wars and engaged in no Faction nor studied much in such kind of Controversies but of solid Iudgment and zealous Preachers and eminently Prudent Pious and Peaceable And with them there joyned many that had Conformed and thought both the Common-Prayer and the Directory Episcopacy and Presbytery tolerable And these in 1660. did Conform but most of the rest were ejected and silenced Though of near Ten Thousand that the Parliament left in possession there were but Two Thousand cast out by the Prelates we strongly conjectured before hand who those would be Satan desired to have Power to sift us as wheat And the chaff and the bran stayed in and made that which some called the best in the World And indeed much of the bran is honoured by us as very useful But the simila was too fine and precise for the pallates of the Great Churchmen and was cast out in the sifting And the Sifters did but call the Similago Simulatio and such other names and out it went with Scorns and Devestation And the hatred of it is propagated as the natural Progeny of revived true simulation and revenge But though fur-fur be a name of no honourable sound or sence as it looks to Brethren and the Church yet for my part I do with thanks for England and with lamentation for other Lands consent with them that say Few Churches are so well fed God can use this for the cleansing and drying up the Hydropical tympanite of this Land And Christ I hope will Remember the Penitent part of them when he cometh in his Kingdom and they that rob'd others of their Civil and Church Rites may yet be with Christ in Paradise Furfure pinguescunt pulli si lacte madescat Even those that read this Praise with displeasure taking Repentance for a Disgrace and being loth to think they need it may yet by Grace repent and live Through God's great Mercy the excussed simila hath been Childrens food though the Milstones have made it unfit for seed But God will aliunde provide seed Though we cannot but dread the abundance and malignity of the Seminary Tares § 4. But our trouble next to the ignorance and badness
of the lawful Pastors Q. 12. Why would you chuse Pastors that be not wiâ—â—r to govern than your selves Q. 13. Do you not imitate those Diocesanâ— that take on them the sole Government of more Churches than they can govern And do not you also undertake what you cannot do Q. 14. Do you think it is not lawful for a great Lord like Abraham that hath a hundred or many hundred Servants to make a Church of his Family And do you think his Children and Servants should rule it by Vote and try their Lord and Ladies graces Q. 15. Do you not know that Baptism entereth into the Universal Church as such and not into any particular Church without a further contract And who made you Rulers of the Church Universal why you rather than another Church Did the People try and judge by Vote the Baptizing of the three thousand Act. 3. and of Cornelius and the Eâ—much and the Iailor or the Samaritans or any one person Prove it if you can and defie not God's Word Q. 16. What if the Minister that must Baptize and give the Lord's Supper be unsatisfied in your Iudgment Must he go against his Conscience in obedience to you Q. 17. Is one abused Text Tell and hear the Church ignorantly repeated enough to blind you against all this Evidence If the King send to the City of London to cast out an ill Member doth it follow that all the People must do it by equal Power or Vote or some as Rulers and others as obedient Consenters your freedom and your choice of Rulers is not a Power to Rule Papists and all Sects abuse this Text. § 13. Is not your Liberty to be governed only as consenting Volunteers enough for you unless being many Masters you receive the greater condemnation Jam. 3. 1. I would you would read the Third Chapter of James and the Fourth to the Ephesians and the Second to the Philippians on your Knees begging of God to cause the Scales to fall from your Eyes and to give you his Eye salve that you may see that you are poor and miserable and blind and naked When the greatest Millenaries say This is spoken of the new Jerusalem in another World in Paradise do not repine that I apply it to you § 14. And that you may not be proud of your Church Liberty it self not to be forced to Sacraments and Communion Let me tell you what it is It is a Liberty to be sinful disorderly and unhappy resulting from that Necessity which God in Nature and Scripture hath founded in that he will make no one happy without his voluntary consent If you will you may renounce your Baptism and your Childrens Church-Membership and your own you may after a first and second Admonition Excommunicate and condemn your selves and renounce Communion with the Universal Church and with Christ himself you have liberty to forsake the Assemblies and Communion of the Church and the help and conduct of true Pastors you have liberty to forsake God and to be damned O woful liberty God will not pardon or save you against your wills And Kings and Bishops should not force you to take a sealed Pardon or any of the Childrens peculiar part without your voluntary consent As much as you blindly cry down Freewill I think you deny not but men have a will free and able to Sin and to choose Destruction till Grace cure that freedom And verily I think to such ignorant proud Dividers as you it is but such a freedom to choose your own Teachers where Christian Magistrates have more Wisdom to choose for you Not much more than for Boys to choose their own Schoolmasters or Tutors or Servants in a Great mans Family-Church yea or Sons to choose their Pastor Your most desireable Liberty is to have wiser Governours and Choosers and to have Wit Humility and Grace to obey them But yet to be the discerning Iudges of your Duty and to do nothing against God's Law Q. 18. I would know why you do not also your selves Baptize and Administer the Lord's Supper Do you not know that the Ministerial Power of the Keys lyeth more in judging decisively who should receive these Sacraments than in the actual delivering them Do you not as the Lay Chancellours do by the Parish Ministers make them but the Executioners of their Decrees You must Iudge and your Pastors Execute or as Cryers proclaim your Iudgments Q. 19. When all the Church must try the Repentance or Conversion of a Sinner must he open his Sin before you all If not you will take him I doubt for no true Penitent If yea then by what right can you make his secret Sins to be openly known Auricular Confession is better than such And if an aged Person for want of use be uncapable of handsom Expressions about Religion must he be put to shame before you all And as Mr. Noyes saith Shall Lads thus uncover their Father's nakedness Q. 20. Are you sure that upon a wiser Examination than yours most of this masterly Party would not be cast out themselves In many things we offend all And he that sheweth not his religious Wisdom out of a good Conversation by works of Meekness but hath bitter envying and strifes his glorying is a lying against the truth Such Wisdom is not from above but is earthly sensual and devilish For where envying and strife is there is confusion and every evil work I would advise the Pastors of such masterly People to try and examine these Tryers I have given them a Catalogue of Questions for them at the end of my Reformed Pastor Try whether they can tell you whether Christ hath one or two or three Natures Whether he was Man before the World In what Nature he made all things How the Godhead and Manhood are one Person Whether each be a part of Christ's Person What the Soul is How they will prove against an Infidel that Christ is the Son of God and that Scripture is true What the definition of Faith is and of Iustification and of Regeneration And the Covenant of Grace whether it be the substance of the Holy Ghost that is given in to the Faithful or only his Effects An hundred such Questions I doubt you will find them ignorant Answerers of It 's a sad case to have those try mens regeneration that know not what regeneration is If you will abuse the Letter of the Text the Women must Govern Are not they of the Church You 'l say They are forbid to speak Ans. That 's as Teachers but what 's that to Iudging And are not you forbid to Rule when you are commanded to OBEY The Church that must be Heard is it that must be Told and Iudge But it is the Pastors that must be Heard For if all the People be the speaking Reprovers it will be a clamorous Church And how without such clamour can the multitude be heard And must not all Dissenters have leave to enter their Dissent
join in Ordaining and the Presbyterians hold that they Must in point of Duty in all reason the May be should yield to the Must And therefore let the Congregational de facto on their own Principles admit of Neighbour Presbyters herein If they will not yield in a thing by themselves confessed Lawful for the Reconciliation and Communion of the Churches the guilt of unpeaceableness will be theirs Especially while they have the Election of their Offices and no detriment is like to arise by it to their Churches 2. But if any of them have not so much love to Peace and Communion of Churches as to yield to this the Presbyterians can in consistency with their Principles hold Communion with them for all this as Churches though deficient having first disowned their disorder And therefore their Pastors may join with us in our Assemblies and we may as Brethren hold a loving correspondency though we own not their defects Other differences Doctrinally not the least there are among us 1. Whether a Man may not be Ordained a Minister sine titulo without Relation to a particular Church but to the World and the Church Universal And so 2. Whether such may not be Ordained without popular Election And 3. Whether therefore a Man be not sometime in time A Minister of Christ before he be The Pastor of this particular Church 4. And so whether the peoples Election be not only to make him Their Pastor and not A Minister of Christ in general 5. And whether such an Unfixed General Minister may not Preach Baptize and also pro tempore administer the Lords Supper yea and Govern a particular Church that pro tempore calleth him thereto the peoples call or consent being necessary for the Exercise but not alway to the Being of the Office or Intrinsick power As a Physicion licensed to practise in general must have Mens personal consent before he be Their Physicion But 1. These I cannot call properly differences between the parties because I think the Congregational are not themselves agreed about them 2. If they were yet they are such whose practice our Reconciliation is not much concerned in Let every Man in these Opinions be left to his liberty and it need not hinder our Agreement or Communion For my own Opinion about most of them I have expressed it Disput. of Church Government 1. and 2. and about some more of this nature Chap. VII Difference V. THE Fifth point of Difference is about the first subject of the power of the Keys Or more plainly and limitedly of the Right of Church Government and in particular of Censures And here the difference seemeth greater than in any of the rest And with some it is so Some have made the Congregation by a Major Vote the Governours of the Church Against this as intolerable we have much to say 1. There is no power but of God But the power of Church Governing is not given to the people by God therefore it is none The Minor is good till a power be proved and the peoples Commission produced which never yet hath been attempted with any considerable appearance of Truth Obj. The Keys were given to the Church in Peter Mat. 16. Ans. 1. The most learned and moderate of these Brethren say that There is no such thing as a Lawful Representative Church therefore Peter was none 2. It lyeth on them to prove that Peter represented the Major Vote of a Congregation in receiving the Keys Till they have proved it we take them to have said nothing It sufficeth us for a disproof 1. That no such thing is spoken 2. That the Keys of the Kingdom are in Scripture phrase significant of Stewardly Government which is in Scripture assigned to the Pastors over the people 3. That Peter was not a private Member himself much less a Congregation but a Pastor and a single Pastor Bishop or Apostle 4. That the same power is elsewhere given to all the Apostles Iohn 20. 21. but not to private Members or to Congregations of such 5. That Iohn 20 21 22. the power is described to be a power of Remitting and Retaining Sins annext to their Ministerial Mission and therefore such as belongeth not to private Men. Obj. 1. Cor. 5 4 13. The Church is commanded to deliver the Incestuous person to Satan and to put away the wicked person from among them Ans. 1. That was but Executively Paul having himself most solemnly past the Sentence v. 3 4. For I verily as absent in Body but present in Spirit have judged already as though I were present concerning him that hath so done this deed Paul you see doth judge And that in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ when ye are gathered together and my Spirit What then doth he decree to do with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ to deliver such an one to Satan c. which with the Excommunication it is most probable contained a Corporal miraculous penalty as Elimas was struck blind and Ananias and Saphira dead c. so that to deliver is the act that Paul himself resolved to perform at their meeting The Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not I have judged concerning him but I have judged him even 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. to deliver such a one But if any will rather take delivering here to be the Churches act than Pauls yet it is plain that it is after his Judgment or Sentence or Condemnation as the Syriack hath it and therefore that it is but 1. The solemn declaration 2. And Execution of the sentence already past 2. But if Paul had left the Work to them he wrote to there would have been no proof that the Censure had been committed to the people Here are two works to be done The Sentence and the Execution that is avoiding Communion c. and accordingly two parts of the Church to do it the Pastors to Censure and the people to Execute it by actual avoiding or putting away Now if Paul write to an Organized Governed Society to deliver to Satan and put away no Man can hence prove that he committeth the same parts of the work equally to all the parts of the Society No more than he can prove if the Prince write to this Burrough to cast out a turbulent Member that he intendeth to equal the people with the Magistrates in the work or to commit the same part of the work to one as to another But rather it plainly importeth and no more that every Man in his place obey the command Obj. Matth. 18. Tell the Church authorizâ—th the people Ans. 1. It is incumbent on the affirmers to prove that it is the whole Body of the people that is there meant And some think this Argument disproveth it That Church which must be heard must be told If he hear not the Church But the whole Congregation is not the Church that is to be Heard therefore it is not the
Church that is to be told The Major seems plain because else the Equivocation in the word Church would make the matter not intelligible The Minor they prove because the whole Congregation cannot speak and be heard without confusion Nor are the Representers of the people in speaking If they be then here 's a word for a Ministerial Representative Church 2. But yet for my part I shall yield that it is this whole Congregation that is here meant that must be told But my answer then is the same as the last to the last objected Text It is the same Church that hath Officers and People the same Body that hath Eyes and Ears and Hands But it doth not follow that the Ears and Eyes and Hands are the same Members Or if the Man have a command to Hear See and Work that he is therefore commanded to do all these by the same Parts The Church may first Hear by her Officers and lastly Hear by the Congregated people and Execute by them and yet not Censure or Admonish or Absolve by them All the Church must hear at last and each part do its proper work in casting out Arg. 2. If God have made the Pastors the Stewards Overseers and Rulers of the Churches commanding them to Rule well and the people to Obey them as their Rulers then is it not the people that God hath made the Rulers But the Antecedent is express 1 Cor. 4. 12. Heb. 13. 7 17 24. Acts 20. 28. 1 Thes. 5. 12 13. 1 Tim. 5. 17. and 3. 1 5. 1 Pet. 5. 1 2 3 5. It is intolerable abuse of Scripture to suppose that it is so self-contradictory as to make the same persons the Rulers and the Ruled and to command them to obey others as their Rulers whom it would have to Rule them and be obeyed and to command them to Rule well whom it would have to be subject Arg. 3. To be briefer in the rest This Doctrine of popular Rule destroyeth the very Essence of a Political Church For as in a Civil Political Body the Pars Imperans and Pars Subdita are Essential to it so are the Ruling and Ruled part in a Political Church So that the Being is gone and the Body dissolved into a Community or ungoverned Company if the Governing part be taken down As here it is For the people are made Governours whom God never made so and so indeed are none And the Officers being a few to the people are supposed to be subject Arg. 4. And this course introduceth having destroyed that of Gods Institution a New Species of a Church Arg. 5. And it setteth the people on a Work that they are uncapable of Their parts allow them not to judge some cases but secondarily as obedient to their Guides as some Heresies against the Original Text c. Their Callings and Necessities allow them not time for all that work that to a faithful Government is required it being such as taketh up with Ministers a great part of their time Arg. 6. And it setteth up an hundred and one to be Governours of â—nâ—…ty nine without any Scripture command or president if not to the oppresâ—… or dividing of the Church Where did Men go to Voting in Scripture for Acts of Government And where find we that the lesser part are to be Ruled by the greater What if the lesser part be the wiser or in the right and say as God saith in judging of a Heretick or such like and the greater part be more ignorant and partial and contradict God and cast out an Orthodox Man as an Heretick By what Word of God are the smaller number bound to take them for their Rulers that can but get the casting Voice But yet though some do thus differ from us in the Essentials of Church Policy we are here in no danger I think of a continued distance from the Congregational party but may quickly be Reconciled if indeed there be any real difference among us For 1. The Brethren that we have to do with do expresly reject and write against this Doctrine as Brownism it is their own word which say they doth in effect put the chief if not the whole of the Rule and Government into the hands of the people and drowns the Elders Votes which are but few in the Major Vote of theirs And they give unto the Elders or Presbytery a binding power of Rule and Authority proper and peculiar to them 2. It is usually confessed by the most Learned of them that the Elders are the Rulers of the Church for the express Scripture cannot be denied and that say they two or three or more select persons should be put into an Office and be trusted with an intire interest of Power for a multitude to which that multitude ought by a command from Christ to be subject and obedient as â—o an Ordinance to guide them in their consent and in whose sentence the ultimate formal Ministerial Act of binding or loosing should consist This power must needs be esteemed and acknowledged in these few to have the proper Notion and Character of Authority in comparison of that Power which must yet concur with theirs that is in a whole Body or multitude of Men which have a greater and nearer interest in those Affairs over which these few are set as Rulers And as long as they confess that the Pastors are the Rulers and the people must obey I think in sense we are agreed 3. And though many of them say that the Power of the Keys are in the Church or people yet they usually tell us that it is but Priviledge and Liberty which they mean by Power and by Keys and that as distinct from Authority So that it is but a misuse of Terms and a false Exposition of a Text that they are guilty of rather than an Error in the thing it self 4. And they confess also that this power of the Pastors they have immediately from Christ in respect of a mediation of delegation or dependance on each other and are the first Subjects of the power allotted them They say that the Office of Rectors is received immediately from Christ and to be exercised in the Name of Christ and that it is the Designation of the person that is from the Church but the Application of the Office from Christ. Mr. Noxton addeth p. 75. Distinguâ—ndum accurate inter officium ipsum conjunctionem personae cum officio Officium est à Christo conjunctio talis personae cum tali officio est ab Ecclesia Christus confert authoritatem illi personae quam eligit ad hec munus quasi praesentat Christo Ecclesia that this is the very truth supposing Ordination also to have its place I have manifested Disput of Ordinat The truth is the people have not the least degree of Governing Power but each man of Self-government and Parents and Masters of Family-government It is Christ
agreed that the Pastors a the Rulers and the people the Ruled that must obey and that the peop must be governed as rational free Agents and have a Freedom from Arbitraâ—â— Government and from all Commands or Sentences that are contrary to 〈◊〉 Word of God but not a Freedom from Obedience nor from the Blessing of P storal Conduct And we are Agreed that in order to Unity the Major Vo in lawful things must be submitted to and that a Minister having enterâ—… his dissent may forbear such reproofs or censures of a Heretick or Impious ma as would break the Peace of the Church and do more harm than good becau of the peoples sinful adhering to him so be it they own not the sin it seâ—â— nor do thus ordinarily to the excluding of Discipline For then I would leaâ—… that people What farther need then of a Reconciliation in order to our Coâ—…munion If any will not take in or cast out a Member without the peopâ—â— Major Vote let them take their Liberty And if any people had rather trâ—… their Pastors and Delegates with this Care and will more acquiesce in thâ—â— Judgments till they see cause to suspect them let them also have their Libâ—â—ty we can do nothing against the peoples wills but by proposal And if the pastors and people consent in these modal or circumstantial things it little concerneth Associated Churches Let this therefore be unmentioned and we are Agreed Chap. VIII Difference VI. THE sixth Difference is whether a Pastor of one Church may do the work of a Pastor in other Churches when he hath their consent and call Some have made a stir about this and dream'd that a Pastor may Preach out of his own Church but only as a private man and therefore may not Baptize Administer the Lord's Supper or exercise Discipline in any other Church But the Learned and Sober part of the Dissenters are become Consenters in the most of this so that here is little work for a Reconcilement For they confess that Ministers may as Ministers Preach and Administer the Sacraments to other Churches Indeed they say that this is only Charitativè not Authoritativè Herein they mistake For though such have not a stated Authority over another Church yet have they a temporary Authority as they are called For he that hath the Call and Power of Office and a Call pro tempore to exercise that Office hath Authority to exercise it and doth exercise an Authority for the Office essentially is an Authority But every true Minister of Christ that pro tempore is called to the Ministerial work in another Church hath an Office which is Authority and a call to exercise it Therefore But saith Mr. Norton p. 83. Hence it would follow either that there are occasional and partial Ministers pro tempore or that the same man is the fixed Minister of many Churches at once or that he is not the Minister of that Church where yet he hath Ministerial Authority Ans. None of all these will follow But only this that he that is either a stated Minister in the Church Universal or also a fixed Pastor of a particular Church may also be the temporary Pastor of another particular Church As a fixed Physicion of one Hospital or Schoolmaster of one School may upon a Call both Charitativè Authoritativè be for a Day or a Week the Physicion of another Hospital or the Schoolmaster of another School It is a contradiction to say He may exercise his Office and not Authoritatively Obj. But saith Mr. N. the Minister of this Church is not the Minister of another Church by the constitution of the Holy Ghost by whom every Minister is tyed to one certain Flock Ans. 1. A great Errour There should yet be general Ministers in the Church that should be itinerant and no more fixed where the Churches state so requireth it than Paul Barnabas Apollo Titus Timothy and abundance more then were Your own Argument is Pag. 80 81. Ex analogia Potestatis Ministrorum erga alias Ecclesias cum Potestatè Ministeriali erga omnes gentes sive omnem Creaturam Si Ministri Ordinarii virtute instituti habent Potestatem Ministerialem non Ecclesiasticam modo debito erga omnem creaturam habent aliquam Potestatem Ministerialem Ecclesiasticam modo debito erga omnem Ecclesiam At c. What need we more Is not Potestas Ministerialis Authority Then I know not what Authority is Authority is either Rational ex virtute aestimatione donorum or it is Imperial or Official which in all subordinate Officers is Ius agendi actus ejus Officii Ministerial Power is Ius Ministrandi Ministerial Authority is Ius Ministrandi Therefore he that hath Ministerial Power hath Ministerial Authority 2. No Minister is so tyed by the Holy Ghost to one certain Flock any more than one Schoolmaster or Physicion as not to exercise his Office by Authority pro tempore in another Flock when he hath a Call Charity and Authority go together Charity obligeth him to exercise his Office that is his Authority The rest of the Objections there an ordinary Reader may answer without help But yet here is nothing to hinder our Communion For 1. They grant us in Substance what we desire that is the temporary exercise of the Ministerial Office to the World or to other Churches according to their Capacities 2. If yet there be any difference in Principles let them that think Ministers have no Power out of their Congregation practice accordingly and stay at home Let them give us our Liberty in this and take theirs and the matter need not hinder our Communion Chap. IX Difference VII THE seventh Difference is about the Power of a particular Church to exercise all Government and Church Ordinances within it self without Subordination to Synods or any other as extrinsick Ecclesiastical Superiour Governours This is Pleaded for by the Independents in ordinary cases whence Mr. Cotton owns the Name of Independency Keys P. 29. 53. saith he A Church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking in the Truth and Peace of the Gospel as it is the first subject of all Church Power needful to be exercised within it self So it is Independent upon any other Church or Synod for the exercising of the same Some of the Episcopal and Presbyterians deny them this and affirm that Synods are a Superiour Power and that particular Congregations without the lower sort of Synods called Classes may not Excommunicate and that in an ordinary Regimental order Congregations are under the Government of Synods and consequently say the Episcopal of the Heads of those Synods But the more moderate both Episcopal and Presbyterians hold that Synods oblige directly but gratia Unitatis Communionis Ecclesiarum and not directly by a Superiour Governing Power So Bishop Usher profest his Judgment to me and that a particular Bishop or Church was not subject to a Synod as their Superiour Governour
but bound in lawful things to consent for Unity and Communion And Mr. Cotton granteth for ought I see as much if not more than this comes to and Mr. T. Goodwin and Mr. Nye I think as much in their Preface to his Book saith Mr. Cotton p. 53. A fourth Corollary touching the Independency of Churches is That a Church fallen into any offence whether it be the whole Church or a strong Party in it is not Independent in the exercise of Church Power but is subject both to the admonition of any other Church and to the Determination and Iudicial Sentence of a Synod for Direction into a way of Truth and Peace For saith he Ecclesia litigans non ligat that is if Christ hath not given to a particular Church a Promise to bind and loose in Heaven what they bind and loose on Earth unless they agree together and agree in his Name then such a Church is not Independent in their Proceedings as do fail in either For all the Independency that can be claimed is founded upon that Promise What ye bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven c. The fifth Corollary affirmeth that Though the Church of a particular Congregation consisting of Elders and Brethren and walking with a right foot in the Truth and Peace of the Gospel be the first subject of all Church Power needful to be exercised within it self and consequently be Independent from any other Church or Synod in the use of it Yet it is a safe and wholesom and holy Ordinance of Christ for such particular Churches to joyn together in holy Covenant or Communion and Consolation Consociation or Consultation it should be amongst themselves to administer all their Church Affairs which are of weighty and difficult and common concernment not without common Consultation and Consent of other Churches about them Now Church Affairs of weighty and difficult and common concernment we account to be the Election and Ordination of Elders Excommunication of an Elder or any person of Publick Note and Employment the translation of an Elder from one Church to another or the like In which case we conceive it safe and wholesom and an Holy Ordinance to proceed with common consultation and consent And so he proceedeth distinctly to prove this 1. Safe 2. Wholsom 3. An Ordinance adding this Caution which we accept To see that this Consociation of Churches be not perverted either to the oppression or diminution of the just Liberty and Authority of each particular Church within it self who being well supplied with a faithful and expert Presbytery of their own do walk in their integrity according to the Truth and Peace of the Gospel Let Synods have their just Authority in all Churches how pure soever in determining such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as are requisite for the Edification of all Christ's Churches according to God But in the Election and Ordination of Officers and censure of Offenders let it suffice the Churches consociate to assist one another with their counsel and right hanâ—… of fellowship when they see a particular Church to use their Liberty anâ—… Power aright But let them not put forth the Power of their Communityâ—… either to take such Church Acts out of their hands or to hinder them in theâ—… lawful course unless they see them through ignorance or weakness to abuâ—… their Liberty or Authority in the Gospel They may indeed prevent the abuâ—… of their Liberties and direct in the lawful use of them but not take theâ—… away though themselves should be willing So also before Pag. 47. he saiâ—… 4th Propos. In case a particular Church be disturbed with Errour or Scandaâ—… and the same maintained by a Faction amongst them Now a Synod 〈◊〉 Churches or of their Messengers is the first Subject of that Power and Aâ—thority whereby Errour is judicially convinced and condemned the trutâ—… searched out and determined and the way of Truth and Peace declared anâ—… Imposed upon the Churches which he proceeds to prove And Dr. Goodwin and Mr. Nye in their Preface approving of this sayinâ—… that these Synods have a due measure of Power committed to them suite and proportioned to those and are furnished not only with ability to givâ—… counsel and advice but further upon such occasions with a Ministerial Powâ—… and Authority to determine declare and enjoyn such things as may tend to thâ—… reducing such Congregations to right order and peace And whereas they put it in as a caution that yet Synods may not Excoâ—municate I answer that as long as they grant that they may renounce Communion with such a Church and Doctrinally apply to them their Portion anâ—… Doctrinally enjoyn the people to avoid the impenitent Offenders by applyinâ—… the Scriptures to them that enjoyn it we have no mind to disagree witâ—… them about the rest I conclude therefore that we are Dogmatically agreed in this great Poinâ—… as far as is necessary to our Loving Communion Let us in our Consociationâ—… either keep our Principles to our selves of the degree of a Synods Power 〈◊〉 else let all have Liberty to write them down in the Register Book of the Synoâ—… and so to proceed in Concordant Practice Perhaps some may be found thâ—… think Synods are the proper Superiour Governours of the Pastors of particulâ—… Churches yea and their Ordinary Governours Others may think that theâ—… are not necessary nor any Ordinance of God but yet a lawful thing that maâ— for Peace be used And others that I think are in the truth may think thâ—… Synods are not the direct Governours of the particular Pastors but are Godâ—… Ordinance for the Communion of Churches and so indirectly bind in lawfâ—… Agreements both as our own Consents oblige us and as God's general Coâ—mand of doing all things in Unity and Peace and Concord doth animate theâ—… Agreements Let us impose none of our Principles here on others but Agrâ—… to hold Communion in Synods for mutual Edification and Corroboration aâ—… such like ends of Communion as Mr. Cotton mentioneth and to be accouâ—… table to the Brethren in cases of offence so far as to tender them due satisfactioâ— and hear their Brotherly Admonitions In a word let us but maintain thâ— necessary Communion of Churches which the Ends and Nature of the Church require and we shall press no more Obj. But being free why should we desire to be bound in Associations Answ. You are not free from brotherly Charity the Communion of Saints and the Concordant doing the Works of God of common Concernment Nor do we desire you to bind your selves to any thing but what is antecedently your Duty and you 're already bound to by God Object But perhaps if we associate with you you will be rigid for your own ways and be the Major part and then if we displease you our Communion shall be rejected to our disgrace Ans. 1. The Churches can pass as disgraceful a Sentence on you if you come not near them as if you joyned
with them Yea and they will no doubt take it to be their Duty if they have proof of the Heresies or Scandals of any Neighbour Minister aggravated by the shunning of their Brethrens Communion to disown them and warn their people of the danger If you joyn with us you are more like to escape such Censures or injurious Reflections than by keeping from us For familiarity kindleth Love and your presence may awe many and your words satisfie those that could not be so well satisfied if they had not heard you speaking for your selves 2. Moreover you have opportunity to prevent such abuse as you fear in your terms of entring the Association 3. Surely Brethren that so earnestly desire your Communion for the Churches Peace will not be hasty to renounce Communion with you 4. By their Accepting you they are engaged not to Reject you for any Opinion or Practice which they knew you guilty of when they Accepted you For if it were not of weight to hinder your Reception it may not be of weight to cause your Rejection Obj. But under the Name of a Communion of Churches you seem to set up a Provincial Church with a Discipline of taking in and casting out Ans. Is it the Name of a Church that you fear or the Thing Not the Name for we use it not nor do you charge this on us If the Thing tells us what you mean by a Church If such a thing as you use to define it to be we deny that we set up such a Church But if you will call the Officers and Delegates of the Churches met for Communion by the Name of a Church you may use your Liberty we hold this Communion for no higher ends than your own forecited words allow and therefore it is but such an Assembly as you may allow Take Mr. Norton's yet larger Concessions Pag. 110 c. Ecclesiae particulares mutuam Communionem inter se inire possunt in eis causae Communes omnium Ecclesiarum i. e. talis res quae omnibus Ecclesiis particularibus Communes sunt quamvis immediatè unam tantum Ecclesiam tangunt ut sunt Pastorum vocationes Membrorum excommunicationes c. Vel etiam tales res quae immediatè omnes Ecclesias ex aequo tangunt communiter Communi consensu Ecclesiarum dijudicentur discernantur Pag. 111. Solummodò inde Colligimus ei potestatem supremam decidendi quaestiones fidei debitam quod promptè damus Pag. 112. De necessitate Synodorum Tametsi Concilia non sint ita absolutè necessaria ut Ecclesia sine illis nunquam bene esse possit tamen in tantâ hominum malitia temporum perversitate non tantum insigniter sunt utilia sed etiam quodammodo necessaria ita ut Ecclesia salutari hoc remedio non possit carere sine insigni veritatis pietatis Concordiae Christianae detrimento Nemo inquit Parkerus quod sciam Ecclesiae alicujus reformatae alumnus ante Hugonem Grotium negavit Synodos esse necessarias quibus nos 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 libenter profitemur sequentibus freti rationibus 1. A Natura duce Cujus dictamine in Controversiis difficilioribus grandioribus à judicio inferiori ad praecellentius confugimus Hinc jus appellationum in causis gravioribus ab inferiori ad superiorem sententiam Parker Cum in causis Personis Ecclesiasticis multae lites oriantur jus appellationum necessariò concedendum quis neget Appellationes sunt juris Divini naturalis in omni societate admodum necessariae propter multorum judicum iniquitatem ignorantiam 2. A fine Concilii 3. Ab exemplo c. 4. A Praecellentia Concilii c. 5. A 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ecclesiarum quam valde tuetur unio sententiarum in Synodis unde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 suavissima diuturna cum doctrina mores probantur ad invicem sin autem singulis Ecclesiis particularibus juxta sententias proprias incedere licet nulla habita vicinarum ratione quam facilè in partes dissidia abiturae sunt 6. A fructu administrationum quae si caeteris Ecclesiis consentientibus fiant spes est etiam fore efficaces sin dissentientibus timendum ne inefficaces sint E. g. in casu excommunicationis vicinis comprobantibus excommunicatus argutus ab omnibus dijudicatus ab omnibus procidens c. Pag. 118. Quatenus particulares Ecclesiae sâ—se subjicere debent sententiae Synodi R. Legitimis Synodi decretis ab omnibus Ecclesiis h. e. à majori parte Ecclesiarum receptis à Magistratu Christiano approbatis tenentur particulares Ecclesiae acquiescere 1. Sub periculo reatus ordinis publici turbati 2. Sub poena non Communionis cum aliis Ecclesiis 3. Sub poena correctionis per poenas civiles à Magistratu Then he comes to the Q. What if the Synod conclude against the Truth and the Church stand for it And answereth 1. That it 's not easily to be supposed in reformed times And 2. Uti in Civilibus est Veritas absoluta Iudicialis sententia supremi judicis vera est quoad homines licet non sit vera absolutè Ita in Ecclesiasticis Veritas est absoluta Synodalis Synodus autem cum sit supremus judex quaestionis sententiâ— Synodalis licet non sit vera absolutè est tamen vera Ecclesiasticè Si in foro exteriore Pag. 119. Statuendum est ordinem publicum praeâ—erendum esse praesenti obedientiae ergo praeceptum affirmativum non fundamentale Hîc obtinet illud Ames Gravissima in commoda facâ—unt aliquando ut praeceptum affirmativum desinat obligare quod alià s non possit non observari sine peccato Ordini igitur taliâ— Ecclesia in hoc casu sese subjicere potest debet sed tamen sine peccato Is not here enough for our Agreement in this Point I should have feared Censures if I had said as much But I hope you deny not the Power of Christian Kings nor that a Christian Soveraign and Christian Subjects are a Christian Kingdom and de nomine may be called a National Church And Moses David Solomon Iosiah had a Governing Power over the Priests though not to change the species of their Office And if I and others think that Apostles and Evangelists have Successors to the End of the World in the ordinary parts of their Office and in Superiority you may with Peace hold your Opinion and leave us to ours Of which elsewhere Chap. X. Difference VIII THE Eighth supposed Difference is about Private mens Preaching and it hath two Parts 1. Whether Private men may Preach in the Church 2. Whether the Church may send them out as private men unordained to Preach in the Parishes of England or to the Heathens or Unbelievers The Presbyterians deny not but Private men may Preach in some cases None that fear God do desire any to bury their Talent nor would hinder men from doing the
they should return to an Orderly Communion This Controversie is de fine and seeing we grant them much in the rest for this therefore we cannot grant them this If in War we grant all that is desired for Peace it is supposed that we will not grant the continuance of the War nor in reason must that be one of the demands I speak all this but of unjust Separations For there is a Separation which we are all agreed to be lawful as far as I know as 1. We all agree that where Christians live in the midst of Infidels they must come out from among them by Faith and Repentance and be separated by the Baptismal Engagement first and the Communion of Saints after and not touch the unclean thing The Church must be separated from the World or it is no Church 2. We are agreed that when a true Church Visibly ceaseth to be a true Church by loss of its Essentials statedly it is our Duty to judge it to be no true Church that is but to judge it as it is and forsake it accordingly 3. When we cannot hold local Communion with a true Church without committing some sin which they would force upon us and which we may escape by leaving them we ought to withdraw from the local Communion of that Church for we must not wilfully sin nor do evil that good may come by it Yet so as that still we must hold Internal and also External distant Communion by owning them as a true Church and corresponding with them as a Neighbour Church 4. If a true Church in the corruption of the Materials become uncapable of its Ends and we have with sufficient patience tryed the means of its Reformation without success it is ordinarily unless some greater matter hinder accidentally our Duty to forsake it Yea and to esteem it no more a true Church if it be the Principal Ends that it 's become uncapable of As if the Body were fallen into an Opinion against Communion and Publick Worship and yet should think they might hold their Relations This were a contradiction If they would in Publick worship God with a Worship false in the Essentials and which is no Church-worship but Impiety or Deceit And though I will not now determine how far Discipline is necessary to a Church more than to say that the Power is Essential to the Pastors Office yet I may boldly conclude that in point of Duty if a Church be so corrupted by Heresie or Impiety that Discipline cannot be exercised in it because the greater part do own the Heresie or Sin or the Sinners in their Sin and this be not in one or a few Acts but they are against the course of Discipline in the main and Vote for Wickedness or against Piety or the publick Censures of the Church or refuse to execute them and if after sufficient patience I cannot reform them I shall take it to be my Duty to take with me the better part of the Church and forsake the rest as to local Communion and perhaps first to cast them out from us as to their Relation though we are the lesser part Unless in some cases where Publick Good requireth a delay and suspendeth my Duty for the time 5. If a Pastor be despised by the Church and refused or if they desire his stay and yet wilfully disobey him and his Labours are unprofitable among them that are like to be profitable elsewhere we doubt not but he may remove as being rejected and forsaken first by them 6. If a Pastor and some choice Members with him have a Call to a far more Eminent Service of God conducing much more to the publick Good we doubt not but they may remove though the rest dissent God is the Master of his Ministers and people more than Men are 7. If the Necessities of a Mans Family Ministers or people require him to remove his Habitation I doubt not but he may remove though the Church dissent unless in some Cases where by accident his removal may more dishonour God or hinder publick Good than his Estate or the preservation of his Family can countervail The Church hath not power to tye Men to Ruine their Families nor to continue with them during Life nor during their pleasure Nor is it implied in the consent of Membership which is to be no more but that I will hold Communion with this Church as a Member while I here Cohabit or I have no call from God to remove It is so in Civil Corporations Cohabitation is an antecedent part of our Aptitude for Church Communion and many just Causes may deprive us of that Aptitude and make the persons to be materia indisposita incapax and so destroy his Relation of it self 8. If persons that have a weak Pastor or a corrupt Society can to the great advantage of their Souls remove they may do it whether the Church will consent or not in case their removal do not accidentally do more hurt against the honour of God and the publick Good than their profit can countervail And still supposing that the Churches consent be first orderly sought 9. The same I say of them that have Pastors that will not exercise any competent Discipline though with sufficient patience importuned thereunto In one word in no case is a Man bound to stay with any Church to the certain prejudice or danger of his Soul or the Souls of his Family unless in the foresaid case if such a case there be when the publick Good and the Cause of God will receive more detriment by our removal than our benefit will countervail 10. Lastly If we be unjustly cast out of any Church and persecuted by them and have no just redress at home no doubt but we may joyn with another Church As if a Pastor that is for Rebaptizing would take none but who will be Rebaptized or having taken some in will cast them out Or if a Pastor be set over us of an uncharitable Spirit that will take in none for Godly but those of his Opinion or some few of a higher Form and denieth Communion to all the rest in this case it is he that doth the wrong and they are necessitated to join with another Church that will receive them and another Church may justly receive them if first they cannot prevail for their reception at home All this we grant for a removal from a Church without the guilt of Schism or sinful Separation But on the other side we must needs desire 1. That Men will not rashly and self-conceitedly judge any of these Cases to be where they are not And therefore that they will take the advice of the next unanimous peaceable faithful Pastors And for this saith Mr. Norton p. 167. But when this or that Congregation is to be taken for No Church let the judgment be in the hands of a Council or in an Ordinate state of the Churches 2. We desire that whole Churches may not be taken
Young Men exalt themselves over the Faith of their Ancients 9. Some are sent to their Graves frustrate of their hopes we being in a way to admit no more in many years than were admitted by the Apostles in one day 10. To grieve such as ought to be comforted to defame such as deserve honour to judge one another for infirmities is unjust Rom. 14. The Apostle thought it just to think well of all Phil. 1. 17 c. The Apostles were diligent and faithful in directing and exhorting and rebuking And why are they then so silent in point of admission Yea when the Churches were corrupted and pestered with corrupt Members such as made their Bellies their Gods Phil. 3. Jude 4. 1 Cor. 15. and 13. Surely admission hath never been deemed in the Churches so momentous as with us And yet we commit it to the dissident and multiformons fancies of Members without a Rule The Apostles were never acquainted with those Questions How when where and whereby and by whom Conversion was wrought The Church is a tender Mother Cant. 7. and speedily embraceth her Infant by admission into her Arms and layeth it to her Breasts of consolations Experience telleth us that a Man will not easily make Protestations before God and subject himself to Discipline unless it be resolved with him If it be resolved he shall be saved Happy is he that is resolved to slee from the wrath to come to the Ark to Zâ—ar to the Cities of Refuge And open we the Gate readily without many expostulations to rescue him from the avenger of Blood Yea the way is to be made easie to encourage him to come We must not have such a Rule of admission as may in an ordinary way disinherit Saints of their Right and Priviledges in the Kingdom of God So far Mr. Noyes 3. We crave and expect our Brethrens consent that we may not have the Gospel hindered through the Land by unnecessary sinful private Antichurches That every Town or City where are Men professing Godliness may not be as a pitcht Field and holy Exercises turned into Contendings nor Christian Assemblies turned into Schools of War or scolding places Let us not be many Masters lest we receive the greater condemnation The wisdom from above is first pure then peaceable gentle easie to be intreated c. where envying and strife is there is confusion and every evil work This wisdom descendeth not from above but is earthly sensual devilish Iam. 3. Let us agree then to do what lyeth in our power that the Churches may be reduced to the Primitive patterns that met all in One place and there were of one Heart and Soul Where find you in all the Scriptures that there were two distinct Churches especially distinguished or divided by differences in one City and that when for the number they might have joyned in one Where find you that the worst Church had any good men that separated from it into a distinct Church in that place Is Scripture our common Rule I beseech you then be able well to resolve these Questions before you venture in your practice to contradict the word If we drive you from our Churches causelessly the Shame be on us But if you causelessly depart into Antichurches the blame shall lye on you Do not stagger and confound our poor People by shewing them in each Town Minister against Minister and Church against Church and entice not young Novices into an opinionative Religiousness and draw not the Nation from the Power of Godliness and Practice of Charity into doting about Questions 4. For order sake let Parishes be the ordinary bounds of Churches not so as if all in the Parish are therefore of the Church but so as that ordinarily we take none out of others Parishes Let us not do it without just cause nor do it when it will tend more to publick hurt than any persons good can compensate If you could prove Parishes no Churches yet they that Preach to them for their Conversion caeteris paribus are fittest to be their Guides when they are converted Tell us if you can wherever you found one instance in Scripture or the Primitive times of one Soul that forsook the Church that was Congregated in the City of his Habitation and was a Member of any other Church in a place where he dwelt not Except the Hereticks that Iude saith did separate themselves being sensual having not the spirit whose manner it was to forsake the Assemblies Heb. 10. 25. Cohabitation is requisite to the Ends of Churches even the exercise of Communion and the offices of Members one towards another How can we watch over men that live out of our reach How know we what their conversation is But especially when a Parish hath a faithful Minister that undertaketh to prove the Members that you receive to be part of his Pastoral Charge or Church it will no more warrant any man irregularly to receive them because he affirms that it is no Church or they no Members than such an Affirmation concerning your own Churches or Members will warrant others to receive your Members 5. And that justice may be exercised and order observed let no Member remove till he have sought the Consent of the Church where he is or heard them give their Reasons against it And let none be received from another Church or Parish but either upon Communicatory Letters or Certificates or else after a just discussion of the Cause with the Church or Teachers from whom they do withdraw 6. And as it is agreeable to our several Principles and the great thing that is now desired that we may all correspond in Brotherly Associations and have Synods at fit Seasons for the Communion of the Churches that are link'd together let us there be Responsible not as to our Governours but as to Associated Brethren and Churches for our Actions that are of Publick offence or of which we shall be there accused and in particular for this of taking Members out of other Churches that the Cause may have an equal hearing 7. Or if any of you shall refuse to meet in constant Synods yet do this much at least Let your Churches and ours be so far Consociate as to Own each other for true Churches though we take the Liberty to disown any notable Distemper that we may see each other guilty of and let Communicatory Letters be necessary for any that be received from one Church to another unless in special cases And deny not to appear at least on such an extraordinary occasion at a Synod to satisfie the Churches when you are accused 8. And let us agree on such Rules for the peaceable management of our remaining Differences as are necessary to the Security of the common Truths and the common cause of Christianity and Piety which we own that we hinder not God's Work and harden not the Ungodly and weaken not each others hands and prove not at last the unwise Destroyers of the Church
such as expect the very Syllables of the Assertions in the proofs Therefore for brevity I take it to be the better way â—â— this time to offer here a full sufficient proof of any one of these Assertions which shall be questioned to such as shall soberly demand it A Servant of Christ for his Churches Unity and Peace Richard Baxter Acton Nov. 2â— 1688. Q. SEeing you have oft affirmed publickly that the Terms of Concord among Christians are easie to be known if their unwillingness to practise them were not the hinderance you are desired to answer these Questions following 1. What are the necessary Terms of Catholick Communion of Christians as Members of the Church Universal 2. What are the necessary Terms of the Communion of Christians personally in a particular Church 3. What are the Terms on which Neighbour Churches may hold Communion with one another 4. What are the Terms of Communion between the Churches of several Kingdoms 5. What is the Magistrates Power and Duty about Religion and the Churches and Ministers of Christ I. It is to be understood that the Universal Church is considered as Spiritual or as Visible As Spiritual it is the Universality of true Spiritual or Regenerate Believers as Headed by Jesus Christ. As Visible it is the Universality of the Baptized or Professors of true Faith as Headed by Christ the Author and Object of that Faith And accordingly Christians are to be distinguished And that the Question is of the Visible Church and Christians 2. This being supposed I answer that Catholick Visible Communion consisteth 1. Fundamentally in being all Baptized or entered into the same Covenant of Grace with God the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost and so being joyned to the same Head and entered into the same Universal Body and professing the same Faith and Love and Obedience contained in that Covenant and not falling away from that Profession or any Essential part thereof 2. And consequently that we all acknowledge the extraordinary Ministry of the Prophets and Apostles and receive their Testimony and Doctrine recorded in the Sacred Scriptures At least the foresaid Essentials of the Covenant and so much more as we understand and are convinced to be Canonical Scriptures or written by the Inspiration of the Holy Ghost 3. And also that we acknowledge a stated ordinary Ministry in the Church appointed by Christ to Disciple and Baptize the Nations of the World and then to teach them to observe all his Commands And that we profess our willingness to join in Christian Assemblies under the conduct of such Ministers for the worshipping of God and furthering our own and others Salvation if we have opportunity so to do And that we do accordingly II. Q. 1. We speak only of Visible Christians in this second Question also of Church Communion 2. A Particular Church signifieth either 1. A Community of Christians agreed to live under Pastoraâ— Guidance before they have a Pastor or have practised that agreement This is not the Church here meanâ— 2. Or a Political Society of Christian Pastor and People professedly associated for Personal Communion Exercise of these Relations as such in the publick worshipping of God and for the furtherance of Love and Obedience in each other The Ends difference it from all Civil Societies of Christians and from the associations of many Churches for Communion by delegates The necessary Terms of this Church Communion are these 1. The Pastor whether one or more must have all things essential to his Office 1. As to his Qualifications that is 1. That he understand at least the Essential Points of Christianity and Church Communion 2. That he be able to teach them to others in some competent degree 3. That he be willing to do it and this for Gods Honour the Churches Good and Mens Salvation 2. As to his Call that he have a true notification of the will of God that he should undertake this Office which is ordinarily done 1. By the Ordination that is the Approbation and Investiture of Bishops or Pastors 2. And in this case of his relation to a particular Church by the peoples consent All this in truth is needful before God and in Appearance and Profession before the Church 2. The People must be Baptized persons Sacramentally engaged into Covenant with God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and such as have not professedly deserted that Covenant by Apostasie nor are proved before a lawful Judicature to be deserters of any Essential part thereof Whether open professed Covenanting may not serve without Baptism in cases of Necessity where Baptism cannot be had is a case so extraordinary that we need not here meddle with it 3. He that was Baptized in Infancy and yet having opportunity at full age doth make no Profession of Christianity nor own his Baptismal Covenant openly by word or deed is to be numbered with Deserters 4. Though the most plain and open profession is usually best where it may be â—ad yet a profession less explicite may serve to the being of Church-members such as is their actual joyning with those Churches who purposely assemble to make publick profession of the Christian Religion Faith Love and Obedience 5. There must be also a signification of consent to their particular Church-Relation either more express and plain or at least by such actions which may be reasonably presumed to signifie it As ordinary joining in Church-worship with that particular Church and submitting to the necessary guidance of the Pastors 6. He that thus consenteth to his Relation to the Pastor and that Church is a Member though he consent not to the Membership or Presence of many particular Members thereof Because they are but Integral and not Essential parts of the Church 7. But if a usual mixture in the Assemblies of Hereticks or Strangers which are not Members of that Church or any other confounding cause do give the Pastors sufficient reason to call all or part of the people to an express signification of their consent to their Relation to put it out of doubt they that causelesly refuse such signification do seem to deny their consent and allow the Pastor and Church to judge of them accordingly 8. The office of the Bishops or Pastors is subordinate to the Teaching and Interceeding and Ruling office of Christ And their work is to Teach the people the Word of God to be their Mouth and Guide in publick Worship in Prayer and in Thanksgiving and Praise to God and to administer his holy Sacraments and to exercise that Power of the Keys which Christ hath committed to their trust in the Prudent and cautelous use of Church-Discipline And all this according to the Laws of Christ recorded in the holy Scriptures These therefore must be the Works and Ends for which these Churches must professedly assemble Especially on the Lord's Days which are separated to these holy Uses 9. The General Command in Nature and Scripture that all be done to Edification decently and
in order do require the Church with Prudence to determine of such undetermined Circumstances Modes and Orders as fall under those Generals As what Translation of the Scriptures to use what Metre of the Psalms what Tunes whether to divide the Scriptures into Chapters and Verses what Chapters to read what Psalms to Sing and when and how many what particular Method to use in Preaching and what words what helps for Memory whether written Notes in length or briefly At what Hour to begin How long to Preach and Pray In what words to Pray In what decent habit and in what gesture to Preach or Sing God's Praises c. what Utensils to use as Pulpit Font Table Cloth Cups c. In what Place c. In all which the Pastors are the Guides by Office and in many the Agents And it is no sinful Will-worship or adding to the Word of God to determine in such cases And they that will not stand to such Determinations cannot be Members of their Flocks As if any will not meet at that time or place where the Church doth meet or will not use the same Psalms or Translations or hear the Pastor in such a Method or with such Notes c. he thereby refuseth the Communion of that Church which must have some determinate time and place c. But yet the Pastors Power being for Edification and not for Destruction he must take the Peoples consent in all so far as the Churches good requireth it to their Edification and Peace and guide them as a Father by Love and in Humility as the Servant of all and not as Lording it over the Flock And if his Determination should be so perverse as to be destructive of the Church or of the Worship of God the people must seek the due Remedy of which more anon 10. As the Keys of the Church are committed by Christ to the Pastors for intromission Guidance and Sentential Excommunication that is for the Government of the Church so the People must not usurp any part of their office They are not obliged to try the Faith or Holiness of such as are to be Baptized or such as are to be received into their Publick Communion but may rest in the Pastors Judgment whose office it is to try them supposing still that they have their due remedy in case of corrupting or destructive Male administration And that their needful assistance in their Places should be used 11. If any Member of the Church do live in any Heresie or other great Sin contrary to his Covenant with God those who are acquainted with it must admonish him and seek to bring him to Repentance in the order appointed by Christ And if he repent not they must tell the Church And if being duely admonished by the Pastors he yet repent not the Pastors as the Church Guides must pronounce him unfit for the Communion of the Church and require him to forbear it and the people to avoid him which the people must obey Yet so as that if the people have sufficient cause to doubt whether a censure be not contrary to the Word of God they may enquire into the cause And if they find it contrary indeed they must not execute that Sentence by any of those private Acts of alienation which are in their own Power And they may seek due reparation of the publick breach 12. If one Pastor of a Church where there are many do perniciously and notably corrupt the Faith or the Worship or the Discipline of the Church the other Pastors must admonish him and both they and the people disown him if after a first and second Admonition he repent not And the same must the people do by all the Pastors if all be guilty in the same kind and must trust their Souls with more faithful Pastors But this must not be done mistakingly headily or rashly nor as an Act of Government over the Pastors or the Church but as an Act of Obedience to God for the preservation of their Souls and of the interest of Christ Nor must it be done without such consultation with and assistance of the Neighbour Churches or the Magistrates as their case shall make necessary or profitable to their right Ends. Nor by a violation of any lawful Orders of the Magistrates 13. If a Pastor preach some unsound Doctrines or faultily perform the publick Worship or neglect just Discipline and receive the unworthy to the Communion of the Church or reject the worthy the presence of the innocent Members who make not the fault their own by consent or by neglecting their Duties to reform it maketh none of this to be their Sin nor is to be taken for a sign of their consent Nor will the presence of the unworthy deprive the Godly of the Blessing or Comfort of God's Ordinance Nor are they bound to separate from that Church because of these Corruptions unless they are so great as to unchurch that Church or make their Worship and Communion such as God himself rejecteth and will not accept or unless by imposing Sin upon them or some other way the Church expel them or they have accidentally some other reason to remove 14. The Members of the same Church must live so near to one another as that they may be capable of the Communion and Duties of their relation But whether Parish-bounds shall be Church-bounds and whether there shall be one Church only or more in the same Parish is a thing which God hath not directly determined but only by general Rules to direct our Prudence as cases are by Circumstances varied Where the Magistrates Laws thus bound the Churches and the conveniences of Numbers Maintenance Place and common Expectation require it And where it is commonly taken for scandalous Disobedience or Disorder or Schism to do otherwise Prudence forbiddeth us to violate these Bounds and Orders without true necessity Not taking all for Church-Members who are Parishioners but taking none but Parishioners into that Church nor setting up other Churches in that Parish But when there are no such Laws and Reasons for it and where there are plainly greater Reasons or necessity to do otherwise we should not make such a Law to our selves 15. When true sound Churches are first settled all unneoessary and causeless Separation from them or setting up of new Churches in the same Towns or Parishes by way of disclaiming them or in opposition to them should be avoided by all Christians Because 1. We find not in Scripture times that any one City had many such Churches approved of God The numbers of Christians being but enow for one 2. Because it taketh up more Ministers than the interest of the Universal Church can allow to so few 3. Because it proceedeth from a sinful want of Love and Unity and tendeth to the further decrease of both Long and sad Experlence having shewed that each of those Churches think it to be their Duty to stablish their several perswasions and oppose the contrary
under the general Laws of Christ. But the use of Synods is so ordinary and great that in sound and peaceable Countreys where Heresie or Church-Tyranny doth not turn them against their proper ends and where State-Iealousies cause not Rulers to forbid them the statedness and frequency of them will be of very great advantage to the Churches But in the contrary cases it may be quite contrary 7. Though no one of these Bishops or Pastors in Councils nor many conjunct be by Divine Right the proper Governour over the rest and therefore as to one another their Canons are Agreements for Union rather than the Laws of Superior Governours yet do they not by their Assembling lose their Governing Power over their Several Flocks but meet to exercise it with the greater consideration and force And therefore their lawful Determinations and Agreements may be truely obligatory to their several Flocks 8. The largeness of these Councils should be suited to the occasion and necessity As the Scandals Heresies Schisms or Contentions do require But to make proper Universal Councils to be the ordinary Supreme Governing Law-givers to a Body Politick called the Universal Church is a device of those who would do Christs work in their own mistaking way and for the preserving of the Churches Unity will desperately divide corrupt and injure it There is no necessity of it Christs Universal Laws being sufficient with the Civil Government of Princes and the Circumstantial Determinations of the particular Churches And it is pernicious if not impossible The many thousand Miles distance of the Churches the paucity of the Pastors and necessity of their presence in many Churches the many years that must be spent in Travel the opposition of Heathen and Infidel Princes whose Subjects they are or through whose Countreys they must Travel the Wars and Jealousies of Princes the probability of the death of the ablest Pastors in such a Voyage they being usually aged Men and weak their diversity of Tongues and unintelligibleness to one another their long continuance in such Councils their incapacity to meet and hear together in any one Room the probability that the numerousness of the nearest Bishops and paucity of the remote will make a Faction go for the Council the improbability that ever they will return to bring home the Decrees the unsatisfiedness of the Churches in their Decrees when a thousand or an hundred Pastors who chuse one single Delegate know not whether he will speak their sense or not with many such Reasons make it as pernicious as unnecessary Nor have the Christian Churches ever had such Councils the meetings of the Twelve Apostles being nothing to this purpose But as all Men know that the Roman Emperors had no power to Summon the Pastors who were the Subjects of other Princes so the recorded Suffrages of all the Councils certifie us that they were none such but the Subjects only of the Roman Empire or those that had been such with a very inconsiderable number of some adjacent Bishops and that but very seldom So that those Councils were Universal only as to the Empire of Rome and that but very rarely if ever but never as to the Christian World 9. If a plurality of Hereticks Schismaticks or ungodly Bishops or Pastors should by the advantage of their Councils oppress the Churches or the Truth the Sound and Faithful Pastors must hold on in the way of Duty and not forsake the Truth or the Flocks in Obedience to such Councils 10. If any Church or Pastor be accused or defamed to the Neighbour Churches of any Heresie Schism Scandal or Injury either to any Person of that Church or to any Neighbour Church or Person the general Precepts of Christian Charity Concord Humility Submission c. do oblige such accused Persons to tender to their offended Brethren especially if it be many Churches due satisfaction and to hear their Reasons and Admonitions and to acknowledge their own faults and amend if they have erred and in lawful things to yield to others for Peace and Concord and to avoid offence where greater accidents make it not then unlawful so to do 11. If any Pastors or Neighbour Churches remain impenitent under such proved Heresie Impiety or Crimes as are inconsistent with the true profession of Godliness the Synods or Neighbour Churches after due Admonition and Pationce should openly disown their sins and if they be inconsistent with the Essentials of Christian Communion should also disclaim Communion with them and should send to the innocent part to exhort them to save themselves by Separation from the rest or to forsake such Heretical and Impenitent Pastors And should motion them to better Pastors and send some to instruct them in the mean time if they be accepted But none of this must be done in case of tolerable infirmities or failings 12. A truely Ordained Minister of Christ being called or accepted by a Church for the present time to teach them and guide them in publick Worship and Sacramental Communion in the Sickness or Absence of their stated Pastors or in a vacancy ought to assist them and is to be esteemed as a Minister of Christ in those Administrations And when a Church is destitute of Pastors it is ordinarily the peoples Duty to desire the Faithful Neighbour Pastors to assist them for supply especially in the tryal of such parts of Pastoral sufficiency which they are unable to try themselves and to Ordain by Approbation and Solemn Investiture such a Person to the Ministry as they Consent to if he be not before Ordained or if he be yet by Prayer to desire God to Bless him in that special Charge Q. 4. What are the terms of Communion between the Churches of several Kingdoms A. This needs no more addition to the former Answer but this 1. That their Communion in the main must be the same in Faith and Love and Obedience to God as if they were under the same Civil Government 2. But they must not busie themselves needlesly with the distant and unknown cases and business of others Nor 3. Must they violate the lawful restraints of their civil Governours nor disturb the Peace of Kingdoms upon pretences of the Churches Privileges or Interest 4. And if they are offended at the Doctrine Worship or Practice of other Churches they should send to them for satisfaction and those Churches should send them the forementioned Confession of the Christian Religion and either purge themselves from the Crimes of which they are accused or confess them and forsake them But when the Pastors which in several Countries have drunk in differing Opinions shall expect that all others should speak as they do in all controverted Points of tolerable difference and by their odious imagined consequences shall slander other Churches or Pastors as holding that which they disclaim or as denying that which in their publick Confessions they profess as their very Religion and by their passions unskilfulness and uncharitableness shall make all differences though
Power and Duty about Religion and the Churches and Ministers of Christ and the Peoples to Magistrates further opened in a Treatise of NATIONAL CHURCHES Chap. I. The Necessity of Concord THE Judgments of all wise and sober men must needs disallow both the Practice of Division and unwarrantable Separation from the Churches of Christ and the common Liberty for Gathering Churches out of Churches now pleaded for and too much practised by many and also the Occasioning of Divisions and Separations by over rigorous proceedings with tender Consciences and imposition of unnecessary things and too much severity against those that through infirmity are guilty of some culpable Divisions and Uncharitableness For it 's not this Oil that will quench these flames In order to the healing of our dangerous Divisions I think it meet to deliver my thoughts in the ensuing Method 1. To shew the Evil of our Divisions and of the common practice of Private Separated Churches where in Publick there are able godly faithful Ministers and such Publick Churches as may lawfully be owned For I meddle with no other case 2. To shew what the agreeing Publick Ministers should do on their parts for the prevention and cure of these Distractions 3. To give you the true state of the Differences that have occasioned them 4. To propound those Terms by which a safe Reconciliation may be made 5. To which I should add if it were not for being thought too bold or confident the Magistrates Duty both in order to our Agreement and in case we will not be agreed I. Though I take not a Private Meeting or a Tolerated Private Church for so odious a thing in it self considered as some do but confess that such may be Good or Evil as the Cause of the Assemblies the Aspect of the Times and other Circumstances and Accidents shall make them and doubt not but there may be warrantable Separations from one or many particular Churches where the blame may lie upon the Churches and the Private Assemblies sometimes may be more justifiable than the allowed Publick ones yet as unnecessary Separations and Divisions are a great transgression so what the Aggravations of that transgression are and what wrong the Cause of God receives from the Differences among the godly themselves and the Divided and Private Congregations that are gathered by occasion of these differences in many parts of England I shall briefly shew 1. When in one and the same Parishes the boundaries of the ordinary Churches as to habitation there shall be divers Churches one Publick and one Private it will ordinarily cause great Disaffection and Contention among the Christians of that place There will be Pastor against Pastor and People against People and one will be accusing another according to their several apprehensions and making the waies and consequently the persons of each other to he odious or unacceptable to others And hereby Christian Love will be much quenched and Unity and Concord much overthrown and all the Effects of Love abated and the odious remnants of Uncharitableness Malice and Emulations will revive Too common and sad experience puts this out of doubt Alas what Factious Doctrine for Parties and against Parties are usually managed in Publick and Private where these Divisions once appear What unconscionable Censures pass too often on one side or both What bitter unchristian taunts and scorns and reproachful words When publick Writings so abound with these and the Press is become the common scold and the most unchristian Language is spoken so familiarly to all the Land and uncharitableness and fury are afraid of being concealed no wonder if in private among those that are pleased with such discourse the Preacher sit in the Scorners Chair 2. Uncharitableness and Divisions are as plainly urgently and frequently prohibited and condemned in the Word of God as almost any sins that are And Love and Unity Peace and Concord are prest as much as any Duty of Man to Man Certainly these Great Obligations are such as smaller matters cannot dispense with And wonderful it is that so many thousand that abhor the Popes dispensing with Oaths and Promises and Subjects Duties and with some of the positive commands of God can yet without remorâ—e of Conscience so easily so long so confidently dispense with the greatest Duties of Man towards Man even with Charity it self and the effects of Charity He that must owe nothing else must owe Love Rom. 13. 8. Love is the fulfilling of the Law Verse 10. Every Commandment of the Second Table is briefly fulfilled in Loving our Neighbours as our selves Verse 9. Yea he loveth not God that loveth not his Brother 1 Iohn 4 21. Love is of God and every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God He that loveth not knoweth not God For God is Love 1 Iohn 4 7 8. If we love one another God dwelleth in us and his Love is perfected in us Verse 12. God is Love and he that dwelleth in Love dwelleth in God and God in him Verse 16. If any Man say I love God and hateth his Brother he is a Liar For he that Loveth not his Brother whom he hath seen how can he Love God whom he hath not seen And this Commandment have we from him that he that Loveth God Love his Brother also Verse 20 21. Every one that Loveth him that begat Loveth him that is begotten also 1 Iohn 5. 1. We know that we have passed from Death to Life because we Love the Brethren He that Loveth not his Brother abideth in death Whosoever hateth his Brother is a Murderer and you know that no Murderer hath Eternal Life abiding in him 1 Iohn 3. 14 15. Yea we ought to lay down our Lives for the Brethren Verse 16. This is the New and frequently urged Command of Christ that we Love one another Iohn 13. 34. and 15. 12 17. Gal. 5. 14. Iam. 2. 8. This is it that we must provoke each other to Heb. 10. 24. and that must continue Heb. 13. 1. We must Love one another with a pure Heart â—ervently 1 Pet. 1. 2â— Yea by Love we must serve one another Gal. 5. 13. And Paul took this to be so Essential to our Sanctification that he tells the Thessalonians 1 Thes. 4. 9. that as touching Brotherly Love he need not write to them for they were taught of God to love one another And can that be the way of God that dispenseth with so Essential a part of Holiness or that secretly and unobservedly extinguisheth this holy Love Let Experience teach you whether the present way of private separated Churches be not the opening a Shop or Forge for Military Engines against each other And under pretence of defending Truth whether they be not the Nurseries of uncharitable Wars among the Servants of the Lord And then as Love is extinguished so the sinful fruits of the contrary Vice do by such Divisions prosper and abound And what weekly Bills of heinous sins might we see that are