Deum Qui volebat de publico vel alioqui de gravi negotio percontari veniebat ad sacerdotem Is indutus Ephod stabat coram arca Domini In Ephoa sine in pectorali erant inclusi duo decim lapides pretiosi in quib us nomina duodecim tribuum erant inscripta Interrogantem oportuit faciem ob vertere ad sacerdotem interrogare non quidem tam aperte ut vox audiretur nec ita etiam obscure ut tantum in anima cogitaret quae petebat Deinde sacerdoti hoc pacto reddebatur oraculum Spiritus sanctivi literae quaedam in pectorali eminebant idque vel loco vel fulgore in quibus sacerdos oraculum voluntatem Dei legebat Haec Chimbâ— Cui quantum fidei fit tribuendum nescio Potuit enim fieri ut spiritus Dei absque literis oracula ediderit per vocem summi sacerdotis cujus animum vaticinio afflasseâ— Weems Christian Synagogue Prolegomena cap. 4. The Revelation by Vrim and Thummim is not expressely set down Iosephus thinks when they were to go to battell the Priest putting his Ephod upon him if they were to march then the stones did shine but if the stones did not shine then they were to stay but this seems not to have been a sufficient way to have directed them in other cases Wherefore t is most probable that the Priest having these stones upon his breast that the Lord inspired him by his Spirit what answer to make to every question asked him * Junius in Deut. 17 9 12. Conjunctionem disjuctivam esse apparet ex vers 12. ut reipsa munera esse disparata constat ad quae haec officiorum nomina respiciunt Mr. Gillespies Aarons rod blossoming c. 3. 11. Here are two Judicatories distinguished by the disjunctive Or v. 12. which we have both in the Hebrew Chaldee Greek and in our English translation * Vide Mr. Gil lesp Aaronsrod blossoming Book 3. c. 11 12. showing fully in this Scripture a transmitting difficult cases from inferior courts to those at Ierusalem and to the supreme court there Vid Luther Piscat in locuâ— In judiciis conveniens ordo observandus est ut sc judices inferiores quuÌ„ iis oblata est causa difficilâ—c ex qua expedire se non possunt causam illam deserant ad judices superiorestanquaÌ„ juris peritiores * Nicol. lyra in Deut. 17. 8 9 10. Surge ascende i. e. in his casibus consimilibus recurrendum est ad superiores judices sâ— ad summum sacerdetem Judicem populi * Cas Consc lib. 4. cap. 4. pag. 122. Si igitur haeretici sint maniesti publice noxii debent a Magistrrtu publica potestate coerceri Si vero â—tiam manifestè blasphemi sunt in illis blasphemiis pertinaces praefracti possint etiam affici supplicio capitali * De in obedientia in illis rebus quae ex lege Dei manifesto clare determinantur * Hagiomastix page 130. * Ad hoc tribunal referebantur quaecunque non poterant definiri ab aliis vel ambigua erant varia judicia inferiorum judicum experiebantur ex praescripto legis Deut. 17. 8 9. Ainsworth Annot. on the place Weems Christian Synagogue pag. 171. * Vide Diodate English Diviues Annotations on the place * Junius in locum Et si in omnibus aliis causis ad minimum duo testes ex lege requiruntur tamen in religionis negotio unus testis ad Questionem habendam sufficit adeo vult Deus Magistratibus conservationem doctrinae commendatam esse Est autem appendix legis quae habetur supr 17. * Theodoret Quaest in Levit Quaest 33. Deprthensus est quidam qui Deum omnium blasphemauerat nondum autem Lex erat scripta De Blaspemia propterea legislator hanc legem servari jussit * Vide Nicol. Lyram Babingt in locum Lev. 24. 15 16. * Vid. Lyram in Num. 15. Nesciebant tamen qua morte dehebat mori quoniam modus mortis non fuit determinatus Exod. 13. 14. Ergo recluserunt eum quo usque scirent hoc per revelationem Domini ☜ * Lutherus in Deu. 17. 8 9 10 11. Et hâ—nc locum miro conatu Papistae ad suum IdoluÌ„â—raxerunt ut Papatum statuâ—rent * One of the Members of the Assembly was the sole Author of the Vindication of the printed paper entituled An Ordinance for the preventing of the growth of Heresies and not 3. or 4. which worthy Member could hee get any time from his often preaching and constant attendance on the Assembly wold I doubt not make Hagiomastix not only a stripling but a very child * Bilsons true difference between Christian subjection and unchristian Rebellion part 2. p. 277. ☜ * Master Goodwins Modest humble Queres about the Ordinance Quere 2. ☞ * Anapologesiates Antapologias The Preface to the Reader But for those opinions wherein I dissent from Mr. Edwards and the generality of those whom he calls his godly Orthodox Presbyterian Ministers I have bestowed so much labour and travell of soul severall wayes to satisfie my selfe in the truth of them and withal have received such abundant satisfaction from God for what I hold in them in pregnant strong cleare and rationall demonstrations on the one hand in distinct cleare and home Answer to all objections to the contrary that ever I met withall on the other hand that if light be light reason reason sense sense Scriptures Scriptures I suppose I shall never be unsetled or shaken in them though the whole world should rise up as one man to oppose me And therefore being fully perswaded resolved and possest in my judgement soule and conscience that the way of the Congregation is the Truth A Quere concerning the Church Covenant pag. 1. First confident we are as confidence it selfe an make us that there is no commandement given to the Churches for exactâ—ng any such Covenant to those that are to be admitted into Church Fellowship with them A Letter of Master John Goodwins sent to Master Thomas Goodwin pag. 12 13. Confident I am that there is a light beyond your light in these matters and which you are very capable of if your eyes by your long slumber be not over heavy to open I professe in the sight of God and in as great singlenesse and simplicity of heart as ever nâ— an in this world spake word unto you that I doe as clearly apprehend Error and mistake throughout the greatest part of your way as I doe in this conclusion that twice two makes foure The necessity of your Covenant Prolix confession of faith putting men to deliver their judgements in points of doubtfull disputations upon and before their admission into your Churches the power of the Keyes and of Ordination of Pastors to be the right and inheritance of the whole body of the Congregation and of every member indifferently and promiscuously the divine institution or peremptory necessity
of that knowne axiome A particulari ad universale non valet consequentia and therefore though that particular reason be ceased although I haue fully shown that never was any reason of those Laws under the old Testament for punishing of false Prophets but a meer device and a fancie t is no good consequence all the other reasons yea and the commands themselves should cease also Seventhly to that Hagiomastix saith that the punishments enjoyned by God then under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents were more bodily and afflictive to the outward man then the punishments enjoyned under the Gospel and consequently were not only carnall or bodily but typicall also and prefignificative of those greater and more spirituall under the Gospel cutting off from his people then as of casting out from his people now cutting off under the Gospel being no where found to be used but in a metaphorical and allusive sense also to what Minus Celsus Senensis writes that that corporall punishment in Deut. 13. was a Type of eternall damnation and therefore that Law with all the rest given for the future signification of things by the comming of Christ ceased I answer as followes First I deny the punishments enjoyned by God under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents to be bodily or afflictive at all to the outward man as by donfiscation of goods or by death but they were spirituall and inflicted upon the soules by suspension excommunication and such like spirituall censures as well as now under the Gospel T is true there were bodily outward punishments in the Civill Iudicatories inflicted then on the bodies of false Prophets Idolaters c but by the Magistrates the Civil Governors and not by the Priests the Ecclesiastical Governors in the Church of the Iewes For under the Law the Jewish Church and Common-wealth the Civil Government and Ecclesiastical the censures and punishments of Church and State were formally distinct as Master Gillespie hath fully and excellently proved in his Aarons rod blossoming in many places particularly 1. Book cap. 2. 3 4 5 and the Church of the Iewes proceeded then against false Prophets only with the sword of the Spirit and spirituall weapons and the State with the materiall Sword and bodily punishments Which truth is fully acknowledged also by Master Cotton however differing from Presbyterians about a National Church in his Answer to Master Williams Bloudy Tenet saying I should think mine eye not only obscured but the fight of it utterly put out if I should conceave as he doth that the National Church State of the Jewes did necessarily call for such weapons a speaking of a Sword of Iron or Steel to punish Hereticks more then the Congregetional State of particular Churches doth call for the same now in the dayes of the new Testament For was not the National Church of the Iewes as compleatly furnished with spirituall Armor to defend it selfe and to offend men and Divels as the particular Churches of the new Testament be Had they not power to convince false Prophets as Eliah did the Prophets of Baal Had they not power to seperate all evil doers from the fellowship of the Congregation what power have our particular Churches now which their National Church wanted or what efficacie is there found in the exercise of our power which was wanting to them It is therefore a Sophistical imagination of mans Braine to make a mans selfe or the world believe that the National Church State of the Iewes required a Civil Sword whereas the particular State of the Gospel needs no such helpe And was not the National Church of Israel as powerfully able by the same spirit to doe the same surely it was both spoken and meant of the National Church of the Jewes not by might nor by Power but my Spirit saith the Lord of Hosts Zach. 4. 6. So that by what I have already said Hagiomastix must either I suppose recall what he hath written of carnal bodily punishments enjoyned by God then to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents or else must joyne with the Erastians in holding the Iewish Church and Common-wealth their Governement and Censures all one and the same Secondly The foundation upon which Hagiomastix rears this building of outward punishments under the old Testament being typical of spiritual under the new viz the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and peace there being typical and therefore reasons a comparaâ—is and from the Analogie is sandie and unsound for the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and long life in it whatsoever it was typical of was from what God had put into the Land being a Land healthful pleasant flowing with milke and honey abounding in excellent precious fruits the immediate blessings of God upon it and not from what came to it by the Magistrates Laws and their good Government for further satisfaction of which I wish Master Goodwin to resolve me this question whether the Land of Canaan were not typical as well in times of wars and troubles and under bad Princes as in dayes of peace and under good Princes and so to reason a comparatis to use his owne Phrase and adidem if temporall threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted upon delinquents under the old Testament were typicall and Praesignificative of greater under the Gospel they must be threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted from God upon false Prophets c not thoe executed by the Magistrates on them Thirdly Granting both Hagiomastixs foundation and the building reared upon it to be good yet they no whit prove bodily and outward punishments to be wholly taken away under the new Testament for suppose the temporal happinesse and the temporal punishments had typified more spiritual happinesse and lesse of the earth more spiritual judgements and lesse of outward or bodily sufferings under the Gospel yet it followes not they take away all outward happinesse and blessings and all outward bodily punishments there may be greater or lesser degrees of things under the old and new Testament suitable to some difference in the manner of Administration betweene the old and the new and yet not the substance of the things taken away These are knowne axioms Gradus non tollunt substantiam Magis Minus non variant speciem T is apparent by sense and experience that how much soever spirituall blessings and spiritual judgements in the dayes of the Gospel abound above the times under the Law yet they take not away all temporal outward blessings nor all temporal outward judgements but God for all that gives many outward blessings and sends many temporal judgements on the earth So supposing God should inflict more spiritual judgements on the soules of men under the new Testament and the Church greater spiritual censures then under the old it no way followes the Magistrates may inflict none at all especially when all spiritual judgements on the soule are slited and with a high hand
THE CASTING DOWN of the last and strongest hold of Satan OR A TREATISE Against Toleration And pretended Liberty of Conscience Wherein by Scripture sound Reason Fathers Schoolmen Casuists Protestant Divines of all Nations Confessions of Faith of the Reformed Churches Ecclesiastical Histories and constant practise of the most pious and wisest Emperours Princes States the best Writers of Politicks the experience of all Ages yea by divers Principles Testimonies and Proceedings of Sectaries themselves as Donatists Anabaptists Brownists Independents the unlawfulnesse and mischeif in Christian Common-wealths and Kingdoms both of a Vniversal Toleration of all Religions and Consciences and of a limited and bounded of some Sects only are clearly proved and demonstrated with all the materiall Grounds and Reasons brought for such Tolerations fully answered By THOMAS EDVVARDS Minister of the Gospel The First Part. 2 Chron 34. 32 33. And Josiah took away all the abominations out of all the Con 〈…〉 that pertained to the childreâ— of Israel and made all that were present in Israel to serve even to sâ—ve the Lord their God And caused all that were present in Jerusalem and Beniamin iâ—stand to it London Printed by T. R. and E. M. for George Calvert and are to be sold at the golden Fleece in the Old-Change 1647. To the Christian Reader GOod Reader I fully intended and accordingly had provided that this first Part of Anti-Toleration should have come into thy hands more compleat and perfect then it does for the present I prepared an Epistle Dedicatory to the Honourable Houses of Parliament sutable to the nature of Toleration and the Times as also a Preface and Introduction to that Argument and Subject wherein laying down the Prolegomena Praecognita of this Noble and famous Question of Liberty of Conscience as certain Distinctions about Magistrates and their Power of Errors and Opinions of Persons holding them of Toleration and Liberty as some Concessa some Negata certain mistakes and misrepresentations of the state of the Question with divers other Particulars I drew up the true state of the Question both Theologically and Politically it being a mixt question besides I purposed to have added to this Part further proofs out of the New Testament against Toleration and for the Magistrates power But these Preparatives and Additionals amounting to about some â—en sheets the reviewing perfecting and printing whereof would take up at least twenty dayes and not knowing what a Day might bring forth the Storm comming on so fast I thought it best for fear this Book might be suppressed at the Presse and never see the Sun to send it forth as it was that the Church of God at home and abroad might have the benefit of it and to reserve the rest for a second Part if God spare life and liberty In this present Tractate is handled the Scripturall part of Anti-Toleration the best foundation and only ground-work to build on wherein there are not only the Scriptures produced for proof but made good by severall reasons from the text and context with all the evasions to clude and put them off fully answered The subject matter of this Book is the great Controversie of the times Toleration being that very thing for which God hath a controversie with the Parliament and Land having most justly however t is most unjust on their part raised up that Generation not to suffer them because they have against the councel of God yea against all sense and reason let them alone and suffered them to grow to this Head I remember what God said to his people Israel that if they did not drive out the Canaanites and destroy their pictures c. they should be pricks in their eyes and thorns in their sides and should vex them with their wiles What of the King of Israel because that he let go out of his hand a man appointed to destruction therefore his life should go for his life and his people for that people as also what of the Angel of Thyatira that Christ had a quarrell with him for suffering that woman Jezabel to teach and to seduce his servants And we may see how God hath now fulfilled this upon the Parliament Ministry City Kingdome vexing us and threatning heavy things against us by the Sectaries punishing us wherein we have offended In all ages and histories of the Church we shall find that Hereticks and Sectaries however whilst weak and few have pleaded for Toleration and Liberty yet when they have come to grow strong and to have power in their hands they never would suffer the Orthodox but have been the greatest tyrants and persecutors as the Arrians Donatists Anabaptists Arminians It was the observation of Augustine many hundred yeers ago and his answer to Petilian That the Donatists however they pleaded far be it from them to compell any one to their Tenets where they had power used to force the Orthodox violently and where they did not it was not for want of will but because they could not for fear of the laws or the multitude of refusers yea if any of their own party left them and came to the Orthodox they would fall upon them and beat them yea kill them and that Sect of the Donatists which was strongest would implore the help of the Magistrate against their Schismaticks the Maximinianistae and Rogatistae all which Austin shows But for a conclusion I shall turn my prayers unto God that he would give us to see and know our sin in our punishment and to give him glory in saying Righteous art thou O Lord and just are thy judgements And for the time to come to give Magistrates Ministers and his People more zeal and wisdome then to tolerate and suffer Errors Heresies and Schismes And so commending these labours to the blessing of Christ who yet lives and raigns as Luther speaks and will raign till he hath made all his enemies his footstool I remain Yours in Christ THOMAS EDWARDS The TABLE containing some of the principall Heads of this Book AVniversall Toleration is against the whole current scope and sense of all Scripture and sets up the polluted defiled consciences of men above the Scriptures p. 4 5 What God commands Persons for themselves and their own Practise he commands to them being in Power and Authoritie for all under them p. 6 7 There can be no reason given why all other persons in Authoritie as Fathers Masters c should be bound to have a care in matters of Religion over children Servants and Magistrates should have none p. 7 8 The godly Magistrates spoken of in Scripture did de facto make use of their Power to suppresse false Doctrine Seducers c 8 9 10 11 They did not only doe it de facto but de jure were approved of and rewarded by God for so doing p. 11 12 Those Magistrates who were good that out of any carnall respects forbore to use their power were sharply reproved and punished by
God for it p. 12 13 Magistrates and Judges before Moses time before the Judiciall Lawes or Levitical Priesthood did punish for matters of Religion and command men under their power to worship God p. 13 14 Other Kings besides those of Israel and Iudah used their Power for the worship of God against Idolaters Blasphemers c p. 14 15 16 That objection against the Kings of Israel and Iudahs power in matters of Religion that they were tipes of Christ and that Land typical answered at large in eight distinct Answers where divers things are opened concerning Types and of those Kings being Types and how actions may be Typical and yet morall from p. 16 to 27 Idolatry and Idolaters not the adaequate object of the Magistrates coercive power under the old Testament but the whole worship and truth of God from p. 27 to 34 The 17. of Deut. 18. 19. opened and proved to give Magistrates the care of Religion p. 34 35 36 37 Vnder the Father in the fourth commandement and under sanctifying the Sabbath the Magistrates dutie to see the publick worship of God observed by his subjects proved p. 34 40. 41 The Magistrates dutie qua Magistrate in matters of Religion proved and yet with a difference of the Christian and Heathen Magistrates power in such matters p. 42 43 44 The commands in the Old Testament for Magistrates punishing in matters of the first Table as Exod. 22. 13. Deut. 13. 1 2 5. Deut. 17. 1. 2 3 4 5. Levit. 24. 16. Deut 18 20. 22. with divers others laid down p. 44 45 46 Reasons laid down to prove these commands for punishing Idolaters false Prophets c. Morall of common reason and equity given to all Nations and for all Ages from p. 46. to 53. Of Judiciall lawes under the Old Testament being in force under the New how far and in what respects with the reasons thereof from p. 53. to 58. The Magistrates punishing of sinnes immediately against God as Blasphemy Apostasie c. is of the light of nature p. 58 59 60 61 72 73 The Magistrates coercive power in matters of Religion as necessary under the Gospel for the glory of God salvation of mens soules peace of Church and State as under the Old yea more reasons for it under the Gospel then under the Law p. 62 63 64 The Magistrates punishing false Prophets c. is an act of our love to God and our Brethren p. 66 67 68 69 70 71 The reasons of those commands in 13. and 17. chap. of Deut. concerning putting to death false Prophets Apostates have been were and are stil the same of a like nature and force both before the commands given by Moses in Moses time and now under the Gospel p. 76 77 78 An Answer to that objection that if Moses laws bind now then Moses is alive under the new Testament p. 79 80 A full Answer to that objection If the Law in Deut. 13. be in force now t is in force in all the particulars for the manner of the punishment for a whole City not only al the Inhabitants but the cattell also c. in which answer many things are opened and cleared what 's morall in that Deut. 13. and what ceremoniall and that the law concerning the destroying of a city cattell c. is no part of the command spoken of in the first part of the 13. chap of Deut. p. 81 82 83 84 85 86 87. 173 174 175. 195 196 An answer to that obiection If Moses lawes bind under the New Testament then every person in an idolatrous State is bound to seek the death one of another yea the Magistrate bound to sentence to death all his subiects practising idolatry without exception p. 90 91 92 93 A full answer to that Evasion of Hagiomastix against the Old Testament lawes that the reason why the Magistrates did then punish false Prophets Blasphemers c. was because the Jewes to whom these laws were given in all difficult cases about matters of Religion had the opportunity of immediate consultation with God who did infallibly declare his mind to them in which answer many questions are discussed and cleared severall texts opened as whether God gave answers by Vrim and Thummim in difficulties arising about morall transgressionâ— against the first Table or rather whether those answers were not concerning the events of future things as about the successe of war c. as whether Infallibility or Fallibility be the proper grounds and reasons of punishing or not punishing in matters of faith and morall transgressions as whether there be not and how far and by what means an infallibility and certainty in matters of Religion now as well as under the Law as whether that Deut. 17. 8 9 10 11 12. be any proof for God giving answers by Vrim and Thummim or only a ground in difficult cases to go from lower Courts to higher and the highest of all who by reason of their number and abilities were more able from the law of God to resolve difficult cases then the inferior Courts with divers other particulars usefull to be known in these times from p. 95 to 165 A full answer to that Evasion brought by Hagiomastix and other Patrons of Toleration that the punishments under the Law were more bodily and afflictive to the outward man then under the Gospel and consequently were typicall Cutting off of Casting out now and typicall of eternall damnation and therefore by the comming of Christ ceased p. 165 166 167 168 169 170 A full answer to that objection That supposing all those lawes in Deut. 13. c. were morall and in force yet they could not reach to Hereticks and false Teachers among us as not being those false Prophets Idolaters Blasphemers spoken of in those lawes from p. 171 to 190 An answer to that objection That the Sadduces Herodians Pharises were tolerated by the Jewes and that Christ did never charge that Church and State with sin for not punishing them p. 29 30 compared with 190 191 192 193 194 Severall Reasons laid down to prove that if there were no commands nor examples in the New Testament to prove the Magistrates power of punishing Hereticks false Teachers yet the proofs of the Old Testament were binding p. 199 to 211 Besides all the Old Testament proofs some places of Scripture speaking of the dayes under the New Testament brought for Magistrates power in Religion and punishing false Teachers p. 212 213 214 215 Seven grounds from places of Scripture recorded in the New Testament proving Magistrates coercive power against false Teachers annd Hereticks laid down and cleared p 215 216 217 218. Published by Authority A TREATISE against the Magistrates Toleration And Permission of a Promiscuous use and Profession of all Religions Sects and Heresies and a partiall limited Toleration of some few Sects or of any one Sect way of Worship Church Government different from the true Religion established and setled HAving in my Preface and Prolegomena both
worship and false doctrine that denies God that is above is worthy to be punished by the Judges and this is further proved and illustrated that Idolatry is to be punished by Judges corporally by the 9 10 11. verses of this chapter where he speaks the same of adultery that 't is an iniquity to be punished by the Iudges so that the spirit of God here in Iob makes Adultery and Idolatry of the same cognizance and as Adultery is to be punished by the Civill Magistrate so Idolatry and all false wayes whereby men deny the God that is above are by this Scripture to be punished also And that it may further appear the Kings of Iudah and Israel did not qua Kings of Iudah and qua dwelling in such a Land as Kings over such a typicall people bearing visibly and executing typically the kingly office of Christ in his Church meddle in matters of Religion but as Kings in places of authority and power I shall show that other Kings not of the Tribe of Iudah ruling over other Kingdomes and Countries when by any of the great works of God done before them or upon any instinct of the Spirit of God upon them by any message from God by his Prophets and servants they came to be touched in heart and sensible of themselves they used their power in making Lawes and Edicts for the worship of God against Blasphemy and Idolatry and for punishing of those who were Idolaters and Blasphemers Thus Artaxerxes the King of Persia Ezra 7. makes a Decree that whosoever will not do the Law of God judgement shoule be executed speedily upon him whether it be unto death or unto banishment or to confiscation of goods or to imprisonment and Ezra blesseth God for it which showes it was well done of Artâ—xerxes Now whereas Master Goodwin would evade this by saying Ezra blesses God for Artaxerzes beautifying the house of God only not for the Decree of punishing those that would not do the Law of God I answer that 's a part indeed of that he blesses God for but not all as is evident by the 28. verse his blessing God having relation to that also as may appeare by that copulative and hath extended mercy unto me before the King and I was strengthned as the hand of the Lord my God was upon me and I gathered together out of Israel chief men to go up with me now let the 23. verse that speaks of Artaxerxes Decree to Ezra to set Magistrates and Judges to judge all the people and thereupon who will not do the Law of God to have judgement executed upon them whether it be unto death c. be laid to the 28. verse wherein hee blesses God for his hand upon him to gather chief men out of Israel to goe up with him which was to make Magistrates and Judges and 't is evident the Decree for punishing is included besides if this Decree of Artaxerxâ—s had beene according to Master Goodwine the Bloudy Tenet and other Libertines opinion such a wicked and bloudy doctrine Ezra the Priest the Scribe of the Law of the God of heaâ—en had beene bound to have instructed Artaxerxes better and humbly entreated him to have reversed that part of the Decree in the 26. verse and certainly would never have built up Artaxerxes in such a great sin by blessing God for his Decree and by taking care to set up Magistrates and Iudges to execute it but would have dealt clearly with the King blessing God for the Decree of the building of the Temple and showing him his mistake in the other part about punishing and to put it past question Ezra 10. verse 7 8. relates this Decree of the King was accordingly put in execution by Ezra and the Princes and Elders Proclamations being made throughout Iudah and Ierusalem unto all the Children of the captivity that they should gather themselves together unto Ierusalem And that whosoever would not come within three dayes according to the Councel of the Princes and the Elders all his substance should be forfeited which was one of the penalties of Artaxerxes Decree viz. confiscation of goods Nebuchadnezar Dan. 3. 28 29 30. as soone as he knew God upon that great work of Gods power in delivering the three children out of the fiery furnace made a Decree that whosoever should speak any thing amisse against him should be cut in pieces and their houses made a dunghill Darius Dan. 6. 25 26. upon Gods great work in delivering Daniel out of the Lions den made a Decree that in every Dominion of his Kingdome men tremble and feare before the God of Daniel Lastly the King of Niniveh upon Ienabs preaching yet forty dayes and Niniveh shall be destroyed did not only in his owne person arise from his Throne and cover himselfe with sackcloth and sit in ashes but caused it to be proclaimed and published by his Decree that all his subjects should do the like cry mightily unto God and turne from their evill wayes and this turning of Niniveh upon the command and edict of the King is blessed by Gods repenting of the evill that he said he would do unto them and so Gods owne seale of approbation set to the King of Ninivebs Edict for commanding in matters of Religion Augusâ—ine in his 50. Epistle ad Bonifacium makes use of the examples of the King of Niniveh Darius and Nebuchadonezar to show how a King must serve God as a King by commanding good things and forbidding the contrary as the King of Niniveh served God by compelling the whole City to please God as Nebuchadnezar served him by recalling all in his Kingdome from blaspheming God by a severe Law 13. THESIS As for that which is commonly said by the Patrons of Tolâ—ration that what the Iudges Magistrates Kings of Israel and Iudah did in a coerâ—ive way in matters of Religion in Israel and Iudah they did it not by vertue of their office as ordinary Kings and Magistrates towards their subjects but as Kings in a peculiar and extraordinary notion as typicall Kings types of Christ the King of the Church executing typically his kingly office the people also and the very Land over which they ruled being typicall which no Kings not people under heaven at this day are and that therefore their practises cannot be drawn into example by any Christian Magistrates now I desire the Reader well to observe these following answers and the rather because the maine strength of the Sectaries discourse upon this subject hangs by this string and this thred runs all along throughout their works M. S. the Bloudy Tenet The Antient bounds or Liberty of Conscience stated The Storming of Antichrist with many others place all their confidence here and this is their Sheild and buckler making much use of this typicalnesse under the Old Testament to evade all the instances of Kings and Magistrates brought from thence First to make this good there are some things supposed or asserted for proof
very uncertain doubtfull other things absurd and untrue As first that to be a Type of Christ is a sufficient ground of a Politicall Civill power over the Church and that typicalnesse qua typicalnesse gives those persoâ—s a power who otherwise have none the contrary unto which is in severall Reasons proved by Doctor Stewart in the second part of his Duply to M. S. page 22. and never yet answered by M. S. or any other though M. S. and many of his Brethren have written upon that argument since Secondly that he who was Head of the State was Head also of the Church in a typicall way whereas many great Divines are of another judgement and show that the Kings of Judah and the civill judicatures were formally distinct from the Ecclesiasticall and that he who was cheif in the State over civill matters was not cheif Iudge and Officer in the Church in an Ecclesiasticall and Spirituall notion of which point Master Râ—â—herford and Master Gilâ—espie having written so fully lately I shall spare to speak any thing and referre the Reader to their learned Books entiâ—uled The Divine Right of Church Government Aarons Rod Blossoming Thirdly that the people of the Iewes were interchangably a Church and a Nation so that whoever was a member of the Church was a member of the Common-wealth and vice versa of which see the Book entituled The Antient Bounds or Liberty of Conscience seated page 60. Now Master Gillespie in his Aarons Rod blossoming Book 1. chap. 2. proves strongly that the Iewish Church was formally distinct from the Iewish State and that in seven particulars as in respect of distinct Lawes distinct Acts distinct Officers so in respect of distinct Members there being Members of the Church among them who had the name of Proselyti Iustitiae and were initiated into the Iewish Religion by Circumcision Sacrifice c. that neverthelesse were restrained and secluded from Dignities Government and Preferment in the Iewish Common-wealth and from divers matriages which were free to the Israelites Master SELDEN also in that learned Book of his De Jure Natur. Gentium lib. 2. cap. 4. lib. 5. cap. 20. speaks as much of those Proselytes Proselytus justitiae utcunque novato patriae nomine Iudaeuâ— diceretur non tam quidem ciâ— is Iudaicus simpliciter censendus esset quam peregrinus sempeâ— cui jura quamplurima inter cives Secondly how do they prove that Iehu Ioash Manasseh Asa Hezekiah Iebosophat Iosiah were Types of Christ and did execuâ—e typically the kingly office of Christ in his Church were Kings in an Ecclesiasticall notion an extraordinary way not ruling only for the Church but in the Church and over it as they say Moses Ioshua David Solomon were in their persons places and actions expresse types of Iesus Christ as 't is evident in the New Testament Pen-men also of Scripture besides Prophets as well as Magistrates and so were extraordinary men that every thing they did in Religion is not a binding example to Magistrates now as many Reformed Divines have showen against the Arminians and Erastians but that Asa Iosiah Hezekiah Iehosaphat were is gratis dictum not yet proved neither were these Pen-men of holy Scripture or Prophets extraordinarily inspired but these foure great Reformers as Kings were stirred up enquiring after and directed by Prophets as the Reader may finde clearly in the stories of them in the Chronicles and Kings Besides I finde not among Divines who have written of the Types of Christ or who grant Moses David Solomon to be expresse Types that they make Asa Iosiah c. to be Types Again of Types of Christ as Divines distinguish there are particular persons types of him as Adam Noah Isaac Joseph Moses Joshua Samson David Solomon Jonah and there are such rancks and orders of men as the First-born Kings Prophets c. Now though all of the first sort are speciall particular Types of him so that the speciall things done by them do typifie and set forth Christ in many particulars of his person actions and sufferings yet the rancks and orders of men as the First-born Kings Prophets may not be typicall in all the particular persons of those ranks and orders at least to the particular acts they do in those ranks and orders but 't is enough for many in those orders to agree in common as in being Kings and Prophets as Christ was there being some in all those orders and ranks appointed of God especially and peculiarly to be the Types which others are not and for whose sakes in those orders and ranks such orders of men were instituted by God to be Types of which many instances might be given with the Reasons thereof in some of the First-born Kings c. but I shall reserve the further handling of that to a second part upon this Subject Lastly supposing Asa Josiah and those godly Kings to be Types of Christ may it not be doubted whether Jehu Ieboash Ammon Ieroboam c. were Types of Christ and did execute his kingly office who yet were commended viz. the two firâ—t for destroying false worship and reproved for not doing it constantly besides could those Kings of Israel and Iudah who yet were lawfull Kings that apostatised from all the whole worship of God the Ceremoniall Law that ordained the Types that destroyed Gods service and the Priesthood made Priests of the lowest of the people be Types of Christ and I desire to be resolved or M. S. the Author of the Antient bounds of Liberty of Conscience stated whether any wicked men were speciall Types of Christ and whether all persons who were Types of Christ were not saved Thirdly suppose these Kings of Iudah were Types of Christ in setting on the Thron of David and ruling over Iudah in Christ the King of his Church coming out of their loines yet they were temporall Kings had Civill authority Now how does it appear that what they did in punishing idolatrous Priests commâ—nding their subjects to the true worship of God they did only as Types by vertue of that Notion and not as they were temporall Kings which must be proved before their examples can be made null and I am sure the Scripture no where faith that the Kings of Iudah and Israel in what they commanded in matters of Religion they did as Types of Christ and not as Civill Magistrates 'T is one thing to be a Type and another thing to doe such things meerly qua Types and what if Christian Magistrates leaning upon this broken staffe suffering all Herefies Blasphemies and Idolatries in their Kingdomes Christ at the last day when they stand before the judgement feat they objecting for themselves the Kings of Israel and Iudah were Types of Christ and all they did was by vertue of their typicall notion shal tell them no but as Magistrates entrusted by God with a power and authority how will they be then confounded will this distinction and notion
men that were put to the sword the Seducers and the Ringleaders he burned the Calfe ground it to pouder strowed it upon the water and made the children of Israel drink of it causing the Idol to passe from them among their excrements So 2 Chron. 15. 13. They that would not seek the Lord God of Israel whether small or great the little ones who could not be inâ—iâ—ers of Idolatry were to be punished Deut. 13. When one of the Cities of Israel was withdrawn to serve other gods then the inhabitants of the City the children as well as the grown men who could not withdraw from God were to be smitten And we shall finde it all along in the Book of the Kings and Chronicles among the Idolaters and false worshippers that there 's no such distinction made but some of whom no such thing expressed are removed and punished as those who may be supposed were inticers to Idolatry Fourthly As for that the Kings of Judah Asa Iosia c. never punished Pharisees Herodians or any other Sect in the profession of the Jewish Religion the reason is manifest because there was none such till many hundred of yeeres after these Kings for these Sects of Pharisees c. began very late not long before the coming of Christ and as for Herodianâ— they sprung up after Herod was King which showes the great ignorance of M. S. speaking as if there had beene Herodians in the dayes of Asa Hâ—zâ—kiah c. but by the way if M. S. â—lias Cretinsis can prove there were such in the dayes of those good Kings I will undertake to prove that they used their coâ—rcive power towards them as well as towards Idolaâ—ers and â—ndeed 't is evident by many passages that all kind of corruption and declination from the way of God was the object of Josiahâ— and other Magistrates Reformation and had there beene Sadduces Herodians c. viz. men that had held those Errors and wayes in those Kings times they could not have escaped their hands and this is thus proved because the high places not of Idolatry but of will-worship where they sacrificed to the Lord only as t is 2 Chron 33. 17. were put down and the worshippers and Priests suppressed and those good Kings who did not are upon record blamed which kind of worshipping was not so bad as the Herodians and Sadduces who held Herod for the Messias and denied Angels and Spirits and that I may come up yet more close to M. S. objection who saith nothing was done against Sectaries or Scismaticks I conceive they were to the Church of the Jewes as Sectaries and Scismaticks are now and their worship a Scisme worshipping the true God in a separated way apart from the publike place and Assemblies of Gods people as our Sectaries do now Fifthly the true reasons why when the Herodians Sadduces c. sprung up among the Jewes they were not suppressed not punished First in regard Religion was then mightily corrupted all things were out of order the Church of the Jewes did then hasten to their destruction and so no wonder if Heresies and false Doctrines were suffered in such a State as well as other things Secondly the Jewes were not then a free people neither had they the Civill power absolutely in their hands they had no truly Iewish King who cared for those things but Herod the Idumean and the High Priest then could do nothing Thirdly God permitted Iury to abound with diversity of Sects in the dayes of Herod as the Sadduces Essenes the Pharisees the Herodians because he had a purpose to destroy the Iewish Common-wealth and to bring all into subjection to Christ and the Toleration of divers Religions among them was the forerunner and preparer of the way for the ruine of the Iewish State as it hath beene of many States 6ly supposing the Kings of Iudaâ— and Israel de facto had never exercised any coercive power on any other objects but Idolaters and Idolatry and that all the commands in the Old Testament given to the Iewish Magistrates had beene in the letter of the text onely against Idolaters and Idolatry which is not true yet by vertue of those very commands and examples Magistrates might exercise a coercive power against evills of the like kind though not in the letter specified and the reason is this because the commands of God and the examples of good men accordingly recorded in Scripture might in the letter at least for the generality be expressed only against those evills and that kind and sort of them which were most in use in that age and time when they were given and yet other kinds of those sins or other sinnes as bad or worse which should arise afterwards were by just Analogie common equity by a Synecdoche usuall in such commands forbidden also As for example the second Commandement forbids only in the letter and by name graven Image and the likenesse of any thing and yet in that command all mediums of worships invented by men though not graven Images nor likenesse are forbidden under the title of graven Images and likenesse and that by a Synecdoche common in the Decalogue which because in those times of Moses they were the chiefe inventions of mâ—n corrupting the worship of God they are fitly put in the place of all humane inventions brought into the worship of God of which the Reader may finde more in Doctor Ames Medul Theolog. 2. Booke 13. chap. De Cultu Instituto So because Idolatry and Idolatry with Apostafie to serve strange Gods the Gods of those Nations whom God had cast out of the Land of Canaan there being many Cananites c. among them were the corruptions the Israelites were most in danger of the Idolatries most in use in those times and by the Nations round about them when they should come to Canaan as is evident by many places of Deutr. and the false Prophets and Seducers then went most about to seduce men in that way therefore God in the letter as it was most needfull spoke by name against such Prophets and such Idolatry as were most stirring in those times under which commands are forbidden by a Synecdoche and by Analogie other depravations of Gods worship and name that might arise in after ages for by the rules of Interpretation of Scripture given by Divines where a thing is forbid there all of that nature and sort are forbidden also as for example greater sinnes of that kinde then those expressed in the letter must needs be forbidden and so lesser also Now certainly where God hath given a command to Magistrates in the letter to punish such offences if his subjects commit greater and higher against God and his worship by the equity of this command he is to punish them if none in the letter for those as if there had been no command but against Idolatry of such Nations yet worshipping the Devill offering up children to Moloch blaspheming God and his worship with
committed to private persons equally as to Kings for their particular personall observation and therefore sure in this solemne injunction there 's something new and more required of Kings then was of them before or is of persons meerly private Secondly this was not done till just hee was placed in the throne so saith the text verse 18. The Law was committed to the King as a King at his Coronation which showes it had not reference to the Kings private conversation as a meer man but to his Princely function as a Magistrate which stood in commanding others not in guiding himselfe For no man is a King in respect of himselfe but in ruling his Subjects So Augustin saith of Kings As a man hee serveth God one way as a King another way As a man by faithfull living as a King in setting forth Lawes to command that which is good and remove the contrary So that Kings as Kings serve God in doing that for his service which none but Kings can doe This is also proved from 2 Kings 11. 12. compared with 2 Chron. 23. 11. where to King Jehoash in his solemne inauguration as soon as the Crown is put upon him the Book of the Testimony was given him from the high Priest that hee might know the care and publick custody of the Law was committed to him in his being made a King and in that the command of God with the practise accordingly together with putting the Crown on the head was to give the Law in the Kings hand it showes it was to command it to others and make others keep it And that this was the meaning of it in Jehoash and so in other Princes it may further appeare in that the people at that time being much corrupted in Religion and Jehoaida the high priest desiring much their Reformation and the Restauration of Religion as a meanes to effect it made a covenant between the Lord and the people and as the medium and meanes that that people should bee the Lords people hee brings in the King between them that hee should interpose with his authority to make them the Lords people verse 17. And Iehoiada made a Covenant between the Lord and the King and the people that they should bee the Lords people that hee should set up and maintain the true worship of God and bee for God to bring in the people Thirdly the ends expressed in Deut. 17. Of the Kings prolonging his dayes in his Kingdome hee and his children in the midst of Israel of his not turning aside from the commandement to the right or to the left of his learning to fear the Lord God and keeping all the words of the Law show 't is understood of a publike officiall keeping the Law for the Kings of Israel and Judah could not prolong their dayes in their Kingdomes nor their children enjoy good dayes after them if they suffered Idolatry Apostasie c. in their land though themselves practised it not as may bee seen in Solomon and the stories of the Kings of Israel and Judah neither could they keep all the commands of God there being many commands given to the Iewish Magistrates as is confessed but pleaded to bee Iudiciall and peculiar to them to see their people serve God only and to punish Idolaters and false Prophets Fourthly the practise of the good Kings among the Iewes not only keeping the Law themselves but causing others also as Josiah Hezekiah Asae c. and that from this Text and such like showes it was meant of a publick keeping the Law the diligent execution of their office serves for an evident exposition what God required at their hands And as I have proved that of Deut. 17. speaks of a keeping the Law ex officio as a publick custos so for the taking of another evasion brought by Mr. Goodwin in his Hagiomastix page 132. I desire the Reader to observe that God having given power and authority to the Magistrate to see the first Table kept the duties commanded to bee performed by all under his jurisdiction and to bee guarded against all disobedience and contempt from men it must bee understood in the use of such meanes and wayes God hath allowed the Magistrate as distinct from private persons or ministers viz. such as are proper to him and which God hath given him by virtue of his place to use Now those meanes qua Magistrate are in the exercise of his coercive power by Lawes and Edicts and by the use of the temporall sword given him of God to restrain and hinder such evills and to promote and further such good So Melancton when as the Magistrate is the keeper of the Lawes hee himselfe obeys them and compells others to obey them and defends strongly their authority Therefore he is armed of God with the sword The Minister hee restraines and punishes only with the word of God with preaching and excommunication without bodily force But the Magistrate being armed with the sword punishes those who are conâ—umaicous with punishments of the body Triglandus showes how Ministers Fathers of families Magistrates and all people are commanded to keep the Law and are keepers of the Law and then layes down the difference between all these in keeping the Law The Minister hee teaches whole Assemblies the true rule of holinesse admonishes and exhorts al to subject to the command of Christ and by the power of the keyes casts out from the communion of the faithfull impenitent and refractorie persons The father of a family teaches in his family the exercise of true piety goes before them in example and by his authority restrains his that they shall not turne out of the good way Now he who is Magistrate doth not teach but as a beleever out of the Law of love as other beleevers doe and as a Father of a Family his owne household But as a Magistrate with his coercive power he commands and forces all within his Territories that they shall not outwardly offend against the true Religion and worship of God And so all our Divines who have written of the differences between Civill and Ecclesiasticall power as 〈◊〉 Zâ—â—chiuâ— Amesiâ—â— Apolloâ—â—◠〈◊〉 do show the lawfulnesse of the Magistrates using outward force by pâ—nall Lawes and bodily punishments towards those persons and things whereof God hath given them power I will quote one passage out of Amesiâ—â— Between the Magistrates and the Ministers of the Church there is this difference T is the duty of Magistrates by Civil means and coercive power to procure the common good as well spirituall as bodily of all those committed to their jurisdiction 1. Tim. 2. 2. but of Ministere by Ecclesiasticall means to procure the spirituall good of those committed to them And another out of Bilson Ministers may teach but not command perswasion is their part compulsion is the Princes By all which it appeares the Magistrate having power in matters of Religion as the
found to make for the defence and preservation of the obedience of the Decalogue 3. If appear as usefull and necessary now for the glory of God the salvation of mens soules the peace safety of the Church and State as then Now all these do most clearly appear in punishments of sins immediately against God as Apostasie Idolatry Blasphemy c. For first these commands are of the light of nature thaâ— he who is in place and power should forbid and punish the speaking evill of God This sentence as Melancton writes is preacht to all men yea to all reasonable creatures every one in his place ought to forbid and hinder the manifest reproaches and dishonours of God And therefore Magistrates ought to forbid and punish Epicurean speeches worships of Idols profession of wicked doctrines Many Common-wealths among the Heathens have made Lawes against Epicures and Atheistâ— who have openly held there was no God or that there was no providence of God Peter Martyr in his Common Placeâ— that Heathen Princes used to care for Religion and have punished men even to death for the matters of Religion Thus Socrates was condemned at Athens for no other cause but for teaching of new gods I and for with drawing the youth from their old worship of the gods Zanchius on the fourth Commandement writes that by the Law of nature all Princes among the Heathen judged that the care of Religion belonged to them The Athenians judged so the Romans also and thereupon made Lawes and punished for violation of religion Beza gives three instances of punishments inflicted by heathen Magistrates upon three cheif Philosophers for matters of Religion Socrates Theodorus Protagoras the last of which was by the Athenians banished out of their Territories and his books burnt for writing contemptuously of the gods in these words De diis neque ut sint neque ut non sint habeo dicere Musculus in his Common Places speaking of Magistrates having the care of Religion saith the wise men among the Heathen acknowledged it and that the truth of this opinion was so manifest as that it could not lie hid from the Heathen it was jus gentium dictated by the light of nature and therefore ought to be much more acknowledged and embraced by us who in the knowledge of God go farre beyond not only the Gentiles but the Iewes Master Selden in divers places of that learned Book De Jure Naturali Gentium proves that those commands De Cultu Extraneo and De Maledictione Nominis sanctissimi seu Numinis were Jus Naturalis common to all men were indeed the cheif and first Heads of the Law of Nature and that in those precepts viz. for the negative part all the Gentiles who lived or but passed through the Land of Judea were punished by the Magistrate for Idolatry and blasphemy as well as the Iewes and that from Lawes common to the Iewes with the Gentiles though the kinds of the punishments viz. this or that as whether stoning c. were not of the same nature but more proper to the Iewes yea he showes it was an opinion held by some learned men that it was not lawfull for any Gentile to speak evill of and blaspheme his God which hee worshipped as the God of his Countrey and saith it was founded upon those words Levit. 24. 15. Whosoever curseth his god shall heare his sinne the blaspheming the name of the Lord being spoken of after in the 16. verse as if it were distinct from that in the 15. verse In which forme of speech divers learned men both Rabbins Fathers and others would have forbidden to all the sonnes of men not only speaking evill evill of the most holy and only God but also the speaking of those gods which they had chosen to themselves So as none of the Gentiles might blaspheme their false God which yet they had not renounced without the violation of that Law Whosoever curseth his god shall beare his sinne Master Burroughs in his Irenicum though he be for a Toleration in a great measure as in things controversall and doubtfull amongst godly and peaceable men and that with a liberty of declaration of difference of judgement and some different practise page 55. yea brings such Arguments for that Toleration that if they prove any thing they prove a generall Toleration yet confesses page 23. of that Book T is the dictate of nature that Magistrates should have some power in matters of Religion The generality of all people have ever thought it equall It hath ever been challenged of all Nations and Common-wealths The Heathens would never suffer their gods to be blasphemed but punished such as were guilty thereof by the power of the Magistrate Socrates was put to death for blaspheming their multiplicity of gods And Master Burroughs in page 19. of the same book affirmes that Principle That Magistrates have nothing to doe with matters of Religion is abhorring to nature Is it not an abhorring thing to any mans heart in the world that men suffer that God to be blasphemed whom they honour and that nothing should be done for the restraining any but to aske them why they doe so and perswade them to doe otherwise There hath ever been as great a contestation amongst people about Religion as about any thing Exod. 8. 25 26. Pharaoh hade Moses sacrifice in the Land But Moses said it is not meete so to doe for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians Lo shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes and will they not stone us Though they had leave of the King yet the people would not endure it By which place of Scripture 't is evident that the Egyptians who were heathens by the light of nature would not endure the dishonour of their gods to see those creatures they worshipped for gods to be killed as Oxen and Sheep the principall sacrifices of the Hebrewes but they would kill the Israelites for so doing And lastly Master Prynne in that late Book of his The sword of Christian Magistrates supported doth largely and excellently show that by the light of nature in all ages Heathen Magistrates have made Lawes against and punished such whom they esteemed Atheists Hereticks Blasphemers of their Gods or oppugners of their established Religion and that with no lesse then Capitall punishments unto which Book from page 14. to 19. I referre the Reader where he shall finde many examples of Heathen Kings and Nations recited and shall conclude this with that saying of Seneca De Benefic lib. 3. cap. 6. Violatarum Religionum aliubi atque aliubi diversa pâ—na est Sed vbique Aliqua as well as of homicide paricide poysoning Secondly the Magistrates sword in matters of Religion in punishing Blasphemies Idolatries Heresies hath been found by good experience in all ages to make greatly for the defence and preservation of the first Table to stirre men
up to obedience and deterre them from the contempt and violation thereof whereas on the contrary for the want of this all Blasphemies Heresies and Errors have abounded of which I could give many instances but shall referre them to the more proper place of handling viz. to the Reasons for Magistrates punishing men for Idolatries Blasphemies Heresies Schismes only for the present shall hint that God himselfe saith twice once in Deut. 13. 11. the other Deut. 17. 13. the Magistrates punishing in such a case shall cause all the people to heare feare and to do no more presumptuously the Lord gives this blessing unto the punishment of such offendors that others not only which see but heare of them have the bridle of feare put upon them whereby kept from the like Thirdly and lastly this coercive power of the Magistrate will be found every whit as usefull and necessary now for the glory of God salvation of mens soules peace of Church and State as it was then yea and in some respectâ— more necessary there being in our dayes not only the same reasons and causes for that power of the Magistrate but others also Were there under the Law many incorrigible presumptuous offendors against God and his worship that could not be otherwise reclaimed and are there not such now were there then many grosse ways of false worship and Religion destroying foundations broacht among the people were they then infectious drawing away and seducing many soules were they then provoking the wrath of God causing it to waxe hot against his people Ought the glory and Name of God to bee then dear to Magistrates Why behold under the Gospel there are as incorrigible desperate persons broaching all kind of damnable Heresies making it their work to lay wast all Religion whom no Admonitions Church Censures can do any good upon Heresies and Errors now are as infectious spreading subverting whole houses eating as a Gaâ—grene and so in the rest Master Burroughs in his Irenicum page 23. confesses there is a necessity of the Magistrates power in matters of Religion 〈◊〉 truth now as there was then and showes though we cannot argue the being of spirituall Ordinances from our need of them but from their institution yet in naturall and civill things this way of arguing is strong enough there is need of such a help and therefore we should seeke to have it And the necessity of the Magistrates coercive power under the Gospel he sets down as follows Now sure the need we have of such a power is exceeding great we were in a most miserable condition if we had no externall civill power to restraine from any kind of Blasphemies and Seducements The condition of the Jewes O how happy was it in comparison of ours if this were denied us for if any of theirs did blaspheme God or seeke to seduce any from him they knew what to doe with him besides perswading of him to the contrary but if any should seeke to seduce the wives of our bosomes children of our bodies friends as deare to us as our owne lives into those wayes that wee thinke in our consciences will undâ—e their soules to all eternity yet we must only desire them they would not doe so we must only admonish or seeke to convince them or remove them but restraine them we cannet If the deliverance of us from the Pedagogy of the Law hath brought us into this condition our burden is greater in this thing then any that the Law laid upon our forefathers Hath Christ delivered us from one burden to lay a greater upon us Must we now see those who are dearest to us drawne into the way of eternall destruction and stand and looks on but no way left to help them or our selves unlesse we can perswade to the contrary Surely our condition is very sad Have we not cause to say Lord let any burden of the Ceremoniall Law be laid upon our necks rather then this If there were a company of mad men running up and downe the streets with knives and swords in their hands endeavouring to mischeif and kill all they meet with and we must doe nothing to restraine them if we could perswade them to doe otherwise well and good but that is all we can doe for helpe what a dangerous thing were this The case is the same when those who are mad with damnable Heresies run from place to place seeking to draw all they can from the truth If we have no meanes of helpe but 〈◊〉 it is ill with us Surely God hath not put his people â—â—to such a sad condition or this is be hath provided better for his people then thus And I appeale to the consciences and experience of men whether this power of the Magistrate of punishing Blasphemies and Heresies be not found to be usefull and necessary both for the honour of God the safety of other mens soules the peace of Church and State and whether all other mens without this when this might have beene had have made good these ends or whether this coming upon other means as Admonitions Instructions Synods Church Censures hath not suppressed Heresies Schisms vindicated the honor and truth of God recovered many souls setled the peace of Churches and States as among the Donatists of old and the Arminians in Holland of late Any mans reason yea sense may tell him that in this sinfull corrupted condition of man there is in coercive power a naturalnesse and sutablenesse to work upon the outward man for the furtherance of spirituall good and that when no other means can this power removes outward things that hindered keeps from outward evils applies outward means And yet further besides the same reasons and grounds now of the necessity of the Magistrates coercive power as well as under the Old Testament there seemes to be new reasons under the Gospel over and above that plead for the necessity of this power As that under the Gospel so many outward visible judgementâ— are not inflicted by God upon offenders as were under the Law whereupon Master Cartwright speaks Certainly if ever there had beene any time wherein the Magistrates sword might have rested in the sheath the time of the Law had of all beene fittest when the Lord did so visibly sit in his judgement seat and himselfe in proper person held the Assise and Gaile delivery For as the Lord doth not now by outward blessings give so plentifull testimony to the obedience of the Gospel as the Law so doth he not with so many and so severe punishments revenge the breach of it as in the time of the Law for in these outward punishments the dispensation of God under the Law is divers from that under the Gospel in that be did more terribly revenge disobedience and therefore God not striking now so often immediately Blasphemers Seducers false Prophets Schismaticks as under the Law the Magistrates have the more need not to beare the sword in vaine lest Hereticks and
my pen to writefully against every particular passage in the 39. and 40. Section of Hagiomastix as I have done of some of them I should make his folly and weaknesse manifest to all but having hinted already his mistakes and the utter dissimilitude betweene that command in Deut. 13. and all his instances of an Idolatrous state and a Magistrate bound to make a bloudy desolation throughout al his Dominions c. I say no more but here is a great cry and a little wool and so come to the fixt head to give Answer to something that seems more materiall Sixthly to that Hagiomastix saith page 46. There is this cleer reason why that old Testament law for putting of false Prophets Blasphemers and Seducers to Idolatry to death should not now bee in force upon any such terms as it was when and where it was given because in all difficult cases that happened about maters of Religion the Iewes to whom this Law was given had the opportunity of immediate consultation with the mouth of God himselfe who could and did from time to time infallibly declare what his own mind and pleasure was in them So that except those that were to give sentence in cases of Religion had been desperately wicked and set upon bloud and despised that glorious Ordinance of the Oracle of God amongst them they could not doe injustice God being alwayes at hand to declare unto them what kind of Blasphemer and what kind of Idolater it was that hee by this Law intended should be put to death Whereas now the best Oracles that Magistrates and Iudges have to direct them in doubtfull cases about matters of Religion are men of very fallible judgemeÌ„ts and every way obnoxious to error and mistake Yea confident I am that the wisest most learned of them are not able cleerly or demonstratively to informe the Magistrate what Blasphemie or what Idolatry it was which was by God sentenced to death under the Law Therefore the going about to prove that the Law for putting Blasphemers and Seducers to Idolatry to death is now or amongst us in force because it was once given to the Jewes is as I should prove that a man may safely without danger walk among bogs praecipices ditches at midnight because he may well do it at noon day I answer in the generall this Section is full of many unsound and dangerous passages very prejudicial to the perspicuity perfection and certainty of the Scriptures very derogatorie to the state of the Church under the new Testament preferring the old before it for cleernesse and light as much as noon day before midnight which is contrary to many Prophecies in Scripture of the times under the Gospell and to divers texts in the new Testament 2 Cor. 3. 8 9 10 11 12 18. 2 Cor. 4. 4 6. and tending to bring in with a high hand Scepticisme and Pyrronian uncertainty in all poynts of Religion into the Church of God passages becomming a Iesuite and an Atheist but altogether unbeseeming a Protestant Minister and one who would bee accounted to have laboured more abundantly in vindicating the Authority of the Scriptures and building men on a rock then all other men Whoever does but compare the Iesuits Papists writings Stapleton Bellar. Turnebull Fisher c with learned Whittaker Chamier Rivet Cameron Doctor White Baron Willet and other Protestant Divines who have written of the Authority perspicuity perfection c of the Scriptures against the Papists and then look but upon this Section hee must needs say Higiomastix writes as one brought up in the Schools of the Iesuits and had sucked their breasts as also he that reads but Minus Celsus Senenses and the Socinians with the Netherland Arminians will confesse these lines are the very breathings and actings of that Spirit which dwels in that generation of men I could out of the writings of our Orthodox Divines written against Papists Socinians Arminians upon those heads of the authority perfection perspiculty certainty of the Scriptures and points of Christian faith at large confute him but these belong not properly to this Controversie about Toleration and therefore I shall not insist on them and further I desire the Reader to observe what followes that this cleere reason as Hagâ—omastix termes it may be resolved in that common evasion of Socinians and Armâ—nians and all our Sectaries of Infallibility and Fallibility Whoever well weighâ— that 36. Section of Hagiomastix with that part of the 107. Section page 130. fifth Answer will find the Summe and substance of all that discourse to be nothing else but the usuall Plea of the Patrons of Toleration in their late Libertine Pamphlets as Bloudy Tenet Storming of Antichrist Compassionate Samaritane Justification of Toleration Quaeres upon the Ordinance for preventing of Heresies c. that there is no infallible Iudge now all men are fallible subject to error or mistake and therefore the proper place of speaking to this will be in answering their Grounds for Toleration and pretended liberty of conscience where I hope by the grace of God to speak so fully to that particular of Infallibility and Fallibility that I doubt not to promise the Reader such ample satisfaction to that grand Argument as by the blessing of God all men who have not sold themselves to Libertinisme will never againe after that object it yet however for the present I shall hint these things by way of Reply 1. This very point of Infallibilitie and Fallibilitie was the main rise and cause of setting the Pope in his chair of making one that must be an infallible judge in the Church and so is the ground work of the Popes Authoritie and Tyrannie over the Church which all who understand the Controversies between the Papists and the Reformed Churches De Papa doe well know And on the other hand t is made the foundation of bringing in all Anarchie and Libertinisme into the Church to overthrow all power of Magistrates and of Synods and Councels in matters of Religion so that at on the one hand it hath exalted the Pope and given him an unjust Domination and usurpation so on the other it casts down the use of all civil and Ecclesiasticall power for the good of the Church so that the same thing that set up the Pope and made Antichrist sets up a Toleration and universall libertie of conscience which is a new and worse Popâ— But as the want of infallibility was no good ground for â—etting up the Pope as I suppose Hagiomast and all the Sectaries will grant so will it be found no good argument for a generall Toleration of all Religions a farre greater evill then a Pope Secondly I deny that which Hagiomastix takes for granted the reason it self upon which he founds why the old Testament law for the putting of false Prophets Blasphemers and Seducers to Idolatry to death should not now be in force I desire him to prove the Vrim and Thummim of the
there is a Hell and eternall Death for all wicked impenâ—tent persons and a Heaven and eternall life for the Elect and true beleevers that for a Christian to worship and serve the Sun Moon and starres or foure-footed Beasts and creeping things is Apostasie and Idolatrie that to revile scoffe at and speak reproachfully of God is to blaspheme God that for a man to say God revealed to him the day of judgement should bee on such a day or such and such things should come to passe at such a time when the contrary is manifested to all be not to prophecy falsly and so I might instance in many more Unto which question if Master Goodwin answers affirmatively that Magistrates may in these and some other points of Religion infalliblity and certainly know the truth then the universall Toleration pleaded for by him in M. S. Some modest and humble Quaeries concerning a printed Paper entituled an ordinance for the preventing of the growing and spreading of Heresies c Hagiomastix Appendix 〈◊〉 Hagiomastix and other his Pamphlets falls to the ground and the Ordinance presented to the Honorable House of Commons for preventing Heresies and Blasphemies may take place and the Inflicters of heavy censures upon such who broach Doctrines contrary to these viz. that there is a God that he is perfectly holy â—ternal that hee is one in three persons c may infallibly know such Opinions are not the sacred Truths of God and the câ—eer reason of Hagiomastix in this 36. Section against the old Testament Law for putting false Prophets c to death now is of no force at all for in these Principles of religion named and divers others as the resurrection of the dead that Christ is God that Christ according to his humane nature was borne without sin c Christian Magistrates walke no more at midnight but at noon day then the Iewish Magistrates in cases of Blasphemie Apostasie Idolatrie Prophecying falsly c. are as certaine and sure as they who received Answers under the old Law in matters of Religion of Idolatrie Blasphemie supposing there had been any such from the Priests by the judgement of Vrim But now if Master Goodwin dare answer negatively that there is no infallible certaine knowledge in any point of Religion under the new Testament no man infallibly and certainly knowes that there is a God or that this God is holy perfect eternall that there is a Iesus Christ who died for our sins and rose againe from the dead that there is a resurrection of mens bodies and a day of judgement c t is all opinion and probabilitie the contrary may be the Sacred Truths of God and therefore there may be no punishing by death or other bodily punishment for holding any Doctrines or Opinions in Religion suppose contrary to admonition which for ought the said inflicters know except they make themselves infallible may be the sacred Truths of God I say and am ready to prove it against him that he overthrowes the Scriptures all Christian Religion all Faith yea all the comfort and salvation of Christians hee is a Sceptick an Antiscripturist a Newtrall in Religion and an Atheist Hee justifies the worst of the Papists in all they have written against the Scriptures calling it a nose of wax a dumb judge inkie Divinity c. for to hold nothing can bee known certainly and infallibly by the Scriptures is to make them a nose of wax an imperfect weak rule a doubtfull Oracle like that of Apollo's For if the Trumpet give an uncertaine Sound who shall prepare himselfe to the battell so likewise except the Spirit of God have by the holy pen-men uttered words that may bee understood how shall it be known what is written for this would make the Scriptures be as a speaking into the aire but as concerning that point of the Church under the new Testament knowing infallibly and certainly the Christian Religion and matters necessary to salvation both in faith and worship as the Church under the old by Vrim I shal speak fully to it in the seventh answer to this Reason only for a conclusion of this third Answer I adde I much wonder seeing under the new Testament according to Hagiomastix Doctrine no Magistrates nor Synods can be certaine in doubtfull cases about matters of Religion but the best Oracles Magistrates have to consult with are every way obnoxious unto error and mistake and that the wisest and most learned of them are not able cleerly or demonstratively to informe the Magistrate what blasphemy or what idolatry it was which was by God sentenced to death under the Law though by the way I must check Master Goodwins confidence for I who am the least of all the Ministers of Christ and not to be named with the wisest and most learned of them am able cleerly and demonstratively out of Deut. 17. 2. 3. 4. 5. to informe the Magistrate and Master Goodwin too if he will bee informed what Idolatrie it was which was by God sentenced to death under the Law viz for a Iew to goe serve and worship the Sun or Moon how Master Goodwin and divers Members of his Church come to be in many controverted points doubtfull cases about matters of Religion so confident and certaine as they make themselves certain that Presbyteriall Government is not Jure Divino certaine that Christian Magistrates may not exercise their coercive Power in any matters of Religion no not to the restraining of Blasphemie Idolatrie Heresie Scisme most certaine that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 credere faith in a proper sense is imputed to justification and not Christs Righteousnesse certaine that the way of the Congregation is the truth and so I might instance in divers other points To be confident as confidence it selfe can make a man to bee as sure as twice two makes four to have abundant satisfaction from God for what a man holds in pregnant strong cleer and rational demonstrations on the one hand and distinct clear and home Answers to all objections to the contrarie on the other hand that if light be light reason reason sense sence Scriptures Scriptures then such a Doctrine is truth that though the whole world should rise up as one man to oppose yet that should not shake nor unsettle a man in it is to attaine to a high measure of certaintie and infallibâ—litie Now whoever hath but read with due consideration Mr. Goodwins writings cannot but take notice in them of many high strains and professed solemne Declarations of his absolute certaintie and full demonstrative knowledge of many Points of Religion yea of some more doubtfull controverted as of Church-Governement and the way of the Congregation and yet I suppose hee hath no better Oracles to consult with then Christian Magistrates have There is no Priest with Vrim for him to enquire by unlesse the Sectaries have set him up as their Oracle to consult with in stead of the Scriptures and I think he will not
yet plead Revelations and visions for feare of his fate who said it was revealed to him the day of judgement should be on such a day in Aprill last now long since past Fourthly upon the same cleer reason and ground why the old Testament Law for punishing false Prophets c should not now be in force because the Iewes in all difficult cases about Religion might have immediate and infallible Answers from God it followes necessarily that all Scriptures brought out of the new Testament for Magistrates punishing in cases of Heresie Idolatrie Blasphemie or for Church-Officers censuring by Deposition Excommunication in points of Error should not bind now and so whatever is brought out of the Scriptures for punishing Errors and Heresies whether by Civill Punishments or Eccleâ—iasticall censures shall be all evaded for the same thing may be said and is said against the places of the new Testament that in the time when the Gospels Acts of the Apostles and Epistles were written the Churches had Apostles and Prophets who were immediately inspired and infallible and could in all difficult cases that happened about matters of Religion declare infallibly from God what was Heresie and Scisme and what was not and therefore a Heretick after the first and second admonition might be rejected and Hymeneus and Alexander delivered unto Satan and Iezabel for seducing censured because Christ was alwayes at hand by Apostles or Prophets to declare unto them infallibly who were Hereticks and seducers whereas now since the Apostles and Prophets are ceased and all extraordinary wayes the best Oracles Ministers and People have to direct them in doubtfull cases about matters of Religion are men of very fallible judgements and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake the best Synods and Councels being not infallible And so whatsoever Hagiomastix speakes of the old Law another may say the same of the new as to this effect I am confident that the wisest and most learned of the Ministers are not able cleerly or demonstratively to informe the Magistrate what Heresie or what Scisme it was or what kind of holding the resurrection past already it was for which the Apostles censured Hymeneus and commanded to reject avoid Hereticks and Scismaticks and therefore to goe about to prove those commands in the new Testament against false Prophets Hereticks Scismaticks Troublers of the Church to be in our dayes in force because they were given in the Apostles dayes and practised by them is as if one should prove that a man may safely and without danger walke among bogs Precipices and ditches at midnight because he may well doe it at noon day The Socinians upon this very ground plead against Excommunication and al Church censures in matters of Doctrine now however in use in the Primitive Churches and answer to the commands and examples alledged out of the new Testament after this manner For ther 's much difference between Hereticks now and those Hereticks in the Apostles dayes For grant them who now erre in matters of faith were set before that venerable companie of Apostles and their equals suppose them to be admonished and convinced and yet neverthelesse to persist obstinately though but in a light error who would not detest their malice In this case a light error is turned into the nature of a great wickednesse wherefore you will say because they dare to resist the Spirit speaking by the Apostles and when they have no cause of doubting of the Doctrine and faith of that Councell yet they would not beleeve nor obey But now although wee are veâ—emently perswaded of the certainty of our faith who can in such aname assure us or certifie that wee cannot erre What Councell can wee now perswade our selves so uncorrupt as that of the Apostles or Primitive Church Those who deny Excommunication of Hereticks say bring not arguments and reasons out of the new Testament but that power of the Spirit with which the Apostles being endowed delivered up to Satan and kild Hypocrites with a word If you want this Powerfull efficacie of the Spirit acknowledge your rashnes and iniquitie in condemning those to whom you cannot demonstrate your Interpretation of Scripture Neither is the Spirit now so weak but that bee is able to give Testimonies of the divine Authoritie and his presence in his Ministers now against his enemies It followes not because many things were not tolerated in the infancie of the Church in the Primitive times therefore they ought not to bee tolerated now in the old age of the Church They deceive and are deceived who would bring our times to the example of that flourishing age When the Church was healthfull and strong in that first flower of its age and whilst the company of the Apostles were living the using of violent remedies in respect of the Churches vigor was meet and agreeable Now the Church with diseases and old age being weakned and spent it now almost falls downe under its prevailing sicknesse neither is it any time more in danger then when it fals into the bands of cruell Physitians In time past its first vigor admitted of opening of veines and losse of bloud now if after strength exhausted by so many evils there remaine any vitall Iuyce and moisture it cannot but by letting bloud be poured out with the life and Spirit and therefore this remedie of the punishment of Hereticks for the Preservation of the Church ought to bee omitted now when it will bring more hurt and danger then profit to the Church So some of our Sectaries in a late Pamphlet put forth upon occasion of their Indigâ—ation at the late solemne Fast of the tenth of March against Heresies plead that the Scisme spoken against in the new Testament is only of separating from those Primitive Apostolicall Churches planted immediately by the Apostles and by infallible direction but hath no reference at all to the Churches of these times Nay further upon this cleere reason why that old Testament Law about false Prophets c should not now bind all the Lawes and commands written in the old Testament yea and in the new concerning the whole will of God may bee as well not in force and men may say for any thing pressed upon them out of the Scriptures of the old or new Testament that they concern them not because in all difficult cases that happened about matters of Religion in Doctrine Worship Government c the Iewes to whom those commands were given and the Churches in the Apostles dayes to whom the Epistles were written had the opportunity of immediate and infallible direction from God himselfe by the high Priest Prophets and Apostles who could and did in all doubts from time to time infallibly declare and resolve what was Gods mind and Pleasure what was Scisme what was Heresie what use the Law was of how often Christians should pray heare Gods word c whereas now the best Oracles Christians have to direct them about matters of Religion are
Zerubbabel would not let the Priests that knew not their genealogies eat of the most holy things so that some Priviledges are denied for want of Vrim and Thummim in a case of Geneologie and birth after a confusion and mixture of marriages for the space of about 70. yeares being a matter of fact of what genealogie verse 62. not a matter of Law but no restraints of punishments upon Prophaners of the Sabbath those who married strange wives c for want of Vrim and Thummim And long after the losse of Vrim and Thummim we find Artaxerxes Darius the King of Niniveh and Nebuchadnezzar making Lawes for punishing men in cases of Blasphemie and other matters of the first Table and the places of Scripture relating such Edicts and Lawes speak of them by way of approbation as I have shown before in the 15. and 16. pages of this Treatise whereunto I refer the Reader and shall only adde one passage out of Calvin upon that Edict of Nebuchadnezzar Dan. 3. 29. For this Edict Daniel celebrates and sets forth in which capitall punishment is denounced against any man that shall speake amisse of the God of Israel Truely t is no common honor that is given to a cruell Tyrant when God assignes his Prophet as the Preacher to publish the Lawes he made and puts those Lawes among his acts and numbers them among his holy Oracles What whether is Nebuchadnezzar praised by the Testimoniall of the Holy Spirit and of the Prophet for taking upon him according to his Power and Authoritie the defence of the glory of the true God that holy Magistrates should beare with the wicked prophanation of his glory and does not the Lord rather under the Person of a Prophane King showe what becomes them to doe And certainly what is more preposterous then in the bosome of the Church to foster unpunished wicked contumelies against God which was in Babylon enacted to be punished with capital punishment Fifthly this cleere Reason of Gods immediate and infallible declaring his own mind and pleasure under the old Testament even according to Hagiomastix Principles is so far from being any reason why Magistrates might then punish Blasphemers Idolaters false Prophets c but not now as that the contrary seems more reasonable for in cases of immediate and infallible Answers from Heaven God declaring who was an Idolater and what was Idolatrie c convincing men so powerfully as leaving them without all subterfugies one would think there should need the Magistrates Power a great deale lesse then in a time when there are no such immediate Answers from God nor discoveries of men from heaven For it cannot be thought but that very bad men when they certainly knew that if they prophecied falsly entised persons to Idolatrie c could not upon any Pretences whatsoever escape from being convicted but should by God himself from heaven be judged Idolaters false Prophets and thereupon bee but to death they would either wholly forbeare the outward acts or if committed any such they would confesse them repent and do no more so whereas when men know there is no such way of finding them out of God from heaven naming persons and things this is the man and this is Idolatrie Blasphemie c they would be incouraged both to doe such things and to maintaine them when they have done to bring Scripture against Scripture and Reason against Reason as knowing all immediate Answers and Discoveries to be ceased Unto which if that be added that under the old Testament God himselfe inflicted more outward bodily punishments upon persons for Idolatrie wil-worship Scisme c then hee does now under the new the judgements under the Gospel being more spirituall as many examples in the old Testament show being a more Immediate Iudge and Inflicted of bodily punishments on the Jewes as he was to them a more Immediate Legislator of which I have spoken before in page 64. of this Booke there appears lesse reason for those coercive commands being in force under the old Testament then now there being in both these respects now named without the Magistrates coercive Power greater means for awing and restraining Violators of the first Table viz. Gods immediate discovering and inflicting of punishment then in our times And for illustrating this wee may observe that in the Primitive times when there were extraordinary gifts in the Church of Miracles c and immediate Answers and Revelations by Apostles and Prophets then the Church needed not so much the helpe of the Magistrates and the civill sword God giving no Christian Magistrate all that time but the Magistrates that were in those dayes were Persecutors and enemies of the Christians but after the Planting of the Gospel and watering it and the extraordinary Gifts and Offices in the Church ceasing then God gave Kings and Princes to be nursing Fathers to defend the Church and the truth by their Laws and Power and hath continued such ever since as a great helpe to the Church as a wall to the weak Vine So when under the old Testament there was according to this Reason of Master Goodwin such immediate and infallible Answers from the Mouth of God himselfe in all difficult cases of Religion and such immediate visible judgements by the immediate hand of God upon Idolaters false Prophets especially upon Despisers of the glorious Ordinance of the Oracle of God amongst them except men had been desperately and outragiously wicked and had with a high hand despised God himselfe speaking and presently striking dead in case of disobedience they could not have been obstinate Seducers to Idolatrie false Prophets Blasphemers should neither so much have needed Magistrates armed with commission from God to execute those commands of the 13. and 17. chapters of Deut. c as in these dayes we doe wherein both these are wanting according to Hagiomastixs own confession and so much for the fifth Answer Sixthly If this bee a cleer Reason why that old Testament Law for the putting of false Prophets Blasphemers c to death should not be now in force because in all difficult cases that happened about matters of Religion the Jewes to whom this Law was given had the opportunitie of immediate consultation with the mouth of God himselfe who could and did from time to time infallibly declare what his owne mind and pleasure was in them So that except those that were to give sentence in cases of Religion had been desparately wicked and set upon bloud and had despised that glorious Ordinance of the Oracle of God among them they could not do injustice because God himselfe was alwayes at hand to declare unto them what was meet to be done whereas now the best Oracles that Magistrates and Iudges have to direct them in doubtfull cases about matters of Religion are men of very fallible judgements and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake then t is as cleer a Reason why the old Testament Law for punishing Murtherers and other
that is handled is Politicall or Ecclesiasticall The Politicall is Criminall or Civill but the Ecclesiasticall is Ceremoniall So Lyra understands between blood and blood when one part of the Judges say that this shedding of blood is to be punished with death as being voluntary murder the other part sayes no it is but casuall Master Gillespie in his Aarous rod blossoming Book 1. chapt 3. showes t is agreed upon both by Jewish and Christian Expositors that this place holds forth a supreme Civill Court of Judges and that this text holds forth two sorts of causes some forenâ—icall betweene blood and blood some ceremoniall between stroak and stroake Now this Scripture speaking how that man shall die that will do presumptuously and will not hearken unto the Judge as well as he that will not hearken unto the Priest and speaking of matters of the second Table as well as of the first and the sentence of death here spoken of if immediate and infallible by Vrim extending equally to difficult cases in Civill matters as in matters of Religion or rather more there being divers particular instances in Scripture of Answers in Civill matters as of war and foretelling of some events in Civill affairs but none in matters of Religion if then the Magistrate because of his immediatenesse of consultation with God might punish in matters of Religion but not now that immediatenesse being ceased it will also follow he might then punish for bloud c because by Vrim hee might certainly know whether it was wilfull or voluntary but now he may not because t is possible and probable in doubtfull and difficult cases about mans life meum and tuum he may run into errors and mistake Sixthly this cleer Reason of Hagiomastixs making infallibility the ground of coercive Power and Fallibility a being subject to error and mistake the ground of the deniall of such a power is a fundamentall falsity and a grand mistake overthrowing equally all spirituall censures and punishments in cases of false Doctrines and Hereticks and all bodily outward punishments in Criminall Civill matters and so at once making void all the Civill Power of the Magistrate and all the Ecclesiasticall power of the Church For the Magistrate is not infallible absolutely free from all possibility of error and mistake in his judgement in matters of the second Table many Magistrates in those matters have and doe daily grosly mistake many innocent persons have suffered and doe daily and many guilty persons have and doe escape who does not see in Civill matters what mistakes there are and may bee both in point of law and matter of fact how Lawyers and Iudges are divided in their Opinions what controversies and difficulties arise upon cases what doubts and Scruples grow upon witnesses testifying quite contrary and other circumstances so that what Iudge can say hee is infallible and certaine that hee is not mistaken that hee saw such a fact committed that the accusers and witnesses have deposed nothing but truth I could Instance in a hundred particulars both in regard of the Law-Makers the Lawes the Jewry Witnesses the accused partie the Iudges themselves c wherein Magistrates are as fallible and as obnoxious unto error in matters of the second Table as in the first yea and in divers respects more but I must refer this to the second part of this subject where the Grounds for Toleration particularly that of no man being infallible in our dayes is to be answered Deut. 17. 8 9 10 11 12. showes us there are difficultcases and Controversies in matters of the second Table between blood and blood c and that among the Iudges themselves so that higher Courts are appointed to go unto and the highest of all the Councell of Seventie at Jerusalem Who sees not in Kingdomes about their Lawes and Civill Rights as high and great Controversies and Contestations as in matters of Religion each partie having great Lawyers and able men on their side So the Church with the best Councels and Synods are not infallible but may mistake and erre and in in some things have mistaken as many learned Protestants have shown against the Papists upon that question whether the Church may erre And therefore by this cleer reason of Master Goodwin it should not be only unlawfull for the Magistrates to punish for Idolatrie Blasphemie Heresie Scisme but for Murder Theft Polygamie Adulterie c yea as unlawfull for the Church to admonish and excommunicate for Idolatrie Heresie Blasphemie c as for the Magistrates to punish corporally But now M. S. Hagiomastix Ancient Bounds or Liberty of Conscieuce stated with divers of our Sectaries who write of this question yeeld the Magistrates power in matters of the second Table answering that of Rom. 13. 4. to be understood in things concerning the second Table and the Churches power in censuring for Heresies evading that of Revel 2. 20. to be meant of Ministers not Magistrates and of spirituall censures not Civill who yet are alike fallible and subject to error and mistake the Magistrates in Civill judgements and Ministers in spirituall as they are in punishing corporally in matters of Idolatrie Heresie and indeed considering the state of the question of Magistrates coercive Power in matters of Religion as I have laid it downe in the Prolegomena and so is to be understood viz. that the Magistrate is to doe it upon advice and after advice in all difficult doubtfull cases with the ablest Godliest Ministers in the Church by the advice of Synods with Solemne Prayers after meant of instruction and conviction used to the parties which means and helps being not in Civill causes nor in the censures of particular Churches are more liable to error and mistake then Magistrates So that if Magistrates and Churches may punish the one corporally in matters of the second Table the other spiritually in cases of both as is confessed by our grand Patrons of Toleration notwithstanding their fallibilitie and possibilitie of mistake then in difficult doubtfull cases Magistrates may punish in matters of the first Table notwithstanding they are men of very fallible judgements or in case the want of the Magistrates infallibilitie puts a supersedeas to his coercive Power in matters of Religion the same want deprives him of Power in Civill things and Ministers in Ecclesiastical because of their Possibilitie of erring in both By all which the Reader may see t is a very rotten foundation both to build upon or to take away the Power of censuring evill and erroneous persons upon the infallibilitie or fallibilitie of those who have Authoritie from God no certainly this Power and dutie of those who are in place both in Church and State are founded on the Ordinance and Institution of God in appointing such Offices and in the nature of the Crimes and offences and on the ends of vindicating Gods Glory and Name and preserving others from being ruined c but never on that that the persons who should
exercise it were infallible and not subject to error which that t is so may be demonstrated by these following reasons First In the Churches of the new Testament in the Apostles dayes when they had men amongst them immediately inspired who could dictate the mind of Christ infallibly and tell them the certaine meaning of any Scripture notwithstanding all that Infallibilitie and Immediatenesse of Inspiration such Persons Tenets and Practises though erroneous and mistakes as by the rules of faith and love could and might be tolerated and suffered were tolerated and the Apostles in those things so far from giving any directions to the Churches for withdrawing or excommunicating that they give commands to the contrary namely to receive bear with please such and not our selves follow after the things which make for peace and things wherewith one may edifie another and whereto we have already attained to walk by the same Rule as these Scriptures Rom. 14. 1 2 3 4 13 19. Rom. 15 1 2 3. Phil. 3. 15 16. with divers of the like kind show The holding the day of Christ to be at hand was an error and Paul writes pathetically to disswade the Thessalonians from it 2 Thes 2. 1 2 3. yet for all that hee accounts them brethren and so I might instance in other such particulars whereas on the contrary in damnable Heresies Scismes and such like as denying the resurrection of the dead holding Circumcision necessary to Iustification in denying Jesus Christ to be come in the flesh in teaching the Doctrines of Balaam and of the Nicolaitans in separating themselves and going out from the Church the Apostles are against all suffering bearing with receiving of and for rejecting delivering up to Satan and cutting of all such as these Scriptures testifie 1 Tim. 1. 20. Tit. 3. 10. Gal. 1. 8 9. Gal. 5. 12. the second Epistle of Iohn 7. 9 10. Jude 19 23 v. Revel 2. 14 15 20. with many more Now in the Tenets Opinions and Practises of the first sort the Apostles could have resolved the Romans Philippians as infallibly who held the truth and who in the error in those particulars as in the latter of Heresies This is acknowledged by Master Burroughs himselfe in page 59 60 61. of his Heart divisions even where he pleads for a Toleration in all points doubtfull and controverted among godly men who writes thus all these people spoken of in Rom. 14 were not in the right for a man not to eat flesh out of conscience when the thing was not forbidden certainly was a sin or to make conscience of a Holy Day which God required not was a sin Now the Apostle did not come with his Authoritie and say I will make you leave of keeping such dayes or you shall eate or to abstaine thus as you doe is evill and it must not be suffered in you No the Apostle layes no Apostlicall Authoritie upon them but tels them That every man must bee fulâ—y perswaded in his owne mind in what he doth and who art thou that judgest another mans servant the Lord hath received him And yet the Governours of the Church in the Primitive times might upon much stronger grounds have stood upon such a Principle then any Governours of the Church now can there was lesse Reason why they should suffer any difference in Opinion or Practise amongst them then why wee should suffer differences amongst us for they had men amongst them immediately inspired who could dictate the mind of Christ infallibly they could tell them the certaine meaning of any Scripture And yet we see plainly the Apostle applies himselfe both in the Romans and Philippians rather to presse mutuall forbearance and keeping the Vnitie of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace using all arguments of that kind as God hath received him be that regardeth a day regardeth it to the Lord and hee that regardeth not the day to the Lord he doth not regard it he that cateth eateth to the Lord c. Neverthelesse whereunto wee have attained let us walk by the same Rule and if in any thing you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even this unto you then from God immediately and infallibly to declare who were in the right and truth in those particulars wherein they differed and thereupon to command the others to be of their mind and Practise in all the particulars or else upon such an infallible resolution to declare they ought to be cast out of the Church and no communion hold with them By all which t is evident that Infallibility and opportunitie of immediatenesse of consultation with God is not the formall Ground of censure but the nature of the things themselves being destructive to faith Godlinesse and edifying for if the power of punishing had beene founded on infallibilitie seeing the Apostles were as able and infallible to give certaine resolutions in the matter of dayes meate and drinks and such like as in matters of faith they would have given other manner of Rules then they did in Rom. 14. Phil. 3. And indeed if Hagiomastize infallibilitie were good what reason can be given why the Apostles did not proceed with all errors and all persons as with Hymeneâ—s Alexander and the woman Iesable which cleerly showes the lawfulnesse of censures lay not in the infallible knowledge of the Governours of the Church but the Apostles in persons and things themselves the one sort weak peaceable Christians holding the head and communion with the body the other turbulent wilful holding Doctrins subverting in the foundation the precious soules of men and godlines And certainly if infallibility were not the just ground and formall reason of censuring but some other thing then fallibility a possibility of mistaking in some things cannot be a just cause of taking away all power of punishing from Governors and that in all points though never so destructive to Gods glory and the soules of men Secondly in the new Testament there are many commands given and many â—â—â—les laid down both for those times wherein they were written and for all times till the comming of Christ unto persons who were not infallible nor immediately inspired concerning Heresies and Hereticks Scismes and Scismaticks to beware of folk Prophets and false Teachers to avoid reject and turne away from them not to beleeve every Spirit but to try the Spirits whether they are of God not to receive into house neither to bid God speed those that trasgresse and abide not in the Doctrine of Christ not to suffer those who teach false Doctrine and sedâ—ce the servants to God to countend â—arnestly the faith to hold fast the truth and sound Doctrine show was these Scriptures to whole Churches and particular Persons both private Christians and Pastors and Teachers not Apostles and Prophets the extraordinary Officers Rom. 1. 16 17 18. Phil. 3. 2. 1. Tim. 6. 5. 2 Pet. 3. 17. 1 John 4. 3. 2. Epist John 9. 10. Judâ— 3. Revel 2. 14 20. Revel 3. Now however the
those things by the Law So that by all this and a great deal more that might be spoken to this effect as the Magistrates and Priests combining together c. the Iewes to whom the Law was given for putting false Prophets Blasphemers to death for all the opportunitie of immediate consultation with the mouth of God himselfe by Vrim and by Prophets might in many cases have been deceived mistaken and in as great uncertaintie every way as Hagiomastix supposes the Church to be in under the new Testament Thirdly supposing and granting there had been such a certaintie and infallibilitie in the matters of Religion under the old Law as is contended for by Hagiomastix and that free of all the exceptions now spoken of yet I affirme there is an infallibilitie and certaintie under the new also in the Doctrines of faith and worship and Christian Magistrates may infallibly and certainly know such and such Doctrines to be false and such true such Practises and speeches to be Idolatrous blasphemous as well as the Iewish Magistrates did and supposing that true which Hagiomastix saith that the Iewish Magistrates had a certaintie of knowledge in all difficult cases of Relgion by the judgement of Vrim which Christian Magistrates have not yet in another way and by other means they may have a certaintie and infallibilitie that these and these Doctrines are of God and other Doctrines are not of God when there are three or foure wayes to come to the certaine knowledge of a thing a man may be sure and certaine in one or two though he have not all the wayes A Iudge who hath three or foure honest witnesses and many circumstances with the parties own confession may be certaine though he might not see the fact committed nor have all wayes of knowledge that possible may be and so may Magistrates now in this case of Religion though they should want some one way the Magistrates under the new Testament had And for the certaintie and infallibilitie in matters of Religion under the new Testament it may apeeare thus 1. Hagiomastix must confesse upon his own Principles that during the Apostles times which was under the new Testament in all difficult cases that happened about matters of Religion Christian Magistrates might have had the same opportunities of immediate and infallible Answers as under the old Apostles Prophets then having as infallible immediate Revelations from God as the high Priests and therefore in case there had been Christian Magistrates in the Apostles days they might by this reason have exercised coercive power on Apostates Hereticks and Blasphemers as well as the Iewish Magistrates by which t is apparent those Lawes about false Prophets and Blasphemers were not only old Testament Lawes proper for Moses Paedagogie but new Testament Lawes and that for the prime flourishing state of the new Testament the Apostles times Secondly the Independents and Sectaries in many of their Books Sermonâ— and Discourses tell us of a time at hand wherein there will be a new and marveilous light when wee shall cleerly and certainly know the truth of these things now so much doubted of and controverted of the nature of a visible Church of the Government of the Church and such like Now then upon Master Goodwins cleare reason the old Testament Law for the putting of false Prophets c to death should be in force under the new Testament as well as under the old because then in all difficult cases in worship Doctrine c the Christians that live in those times may infallibly and certainly know the mind and pleasure of God in them Master Goodwin in his Postscript or Appendix to Hâ—giomastix the scope of which Discourse is to make inval'd that Zach. 13. 3. from being any ground for Civill coercive Power against false Prophets among other evasions interprets the place to relate to those times of refreshing to the Iewish Church and Nation the time when God intends to build up the Iewes again into a Church of far more inward grace and holines into a Nation of far more outward beauty strength and glory then ever was their portion since they first became a Church or Nation unto this day either in the one kind or in the other Now of that particular time and day of the new Testament t is especially Prophecied that outward coercive Power shall be exercised upon false Prophets And it shall come to passe that when any shall yet Prophesit then his Father and his Mother that begat him shall say unto him Thou shalt not live for thou speakest lyes in the name of the Lord and his Father and his Mother that begat him shall thrust him through when he Prophecieth As for Hagiomast figurative sense put upon these words against the literall and proper and other his glosses to corrupt the text I shall speak to them in the 19. Thesis where I shall prove that Zach. 13. 3. to be a good proofe of the Magistrates coercive Power under the Gospel Thirdly for that time and those dayes under the new Testament between the Primitive Apostolicall Churches and the calling of the Iewes into which we fall and among which our times are to be numbred there is an infallibilitie and certaintie to be had in Doctrines of faith and Christian Religion and the best Oracles Magistrates have to direct them in matters of Religion now are not fallible and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake The Scriptures are an infallible and certaine rule the voice and word of God himselfe God speaking by them as by Vrim and Thummim Learned Bishop Davenant in his Disputation De judice ac norma fidei Cultus Christiani in answering that objection of the Papists if generall Councels could erre their should be no firme Iudgement in the Church to compose Controversies answers If the Papists speak of a humane judgement we acknowledge nonâ— so firme and infallible to which all men may safely and securely commit their faith without triall But if they speak of a divine judgement we affirme there is a firme and perpetuall judgement in the Church of all the Doctrines of faith namely the judgement of God speaking in the Scriptures for he is not to be confuted with arguments but to be reckoned among Atheists who denies in the Scriptures in the things of faith that there is a sentence pronounced by God himselfe and that intelligible firme and infallible Were those Answers by Divine inspiration and immediate Revelation So are the Scriptures of divine inspiration and immediate revelation also 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God 2 Pet. 1. 20 21. No Prophesie of the Scripture is of any private Interpretation for the Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost were those Answers sure and certaine the Oracles of God among them so are the Scriptures sure and certain Psal 19. 7. The Testimony of the
Oxe or Asse and giving money to the Owner of them did not bind as much if a Horse or a Sheep fell into it and yet the words of the Law are only the Oxe or the Asse and not a Horse or Sheep Whether that command concerning the putting to death those children that did curse or strike their Parents though it expressed not in the letter death for killing of them did not include much more death upon those who killed their Parents and so I might instance in many more particulars But for a conclusion of this fourth Answer I shall end with a passage out of Maccovius in a Disputation of his De Lege judiciali that the perfection of the judicial Laws require that we should hold no case can fal out which cannot from the analogie of the Law for of like there is the same judgement be determined From the analogie and similitude of things t is easie to understand that the same Law and Right is to be observed referring the Reader for more satisfaction to page 31. 32 33. of this present Tractate Fifthly as to that brought by Hagiomastix and the rest that the Law of God made against false Prophets and worshippers of false Gods was not intended against those who otherwise held the Law of God was to be kept but were infected with some error because in former times among the Jewes who were affected with a vebement love and zeale towards their Law Hereticks notwithstanding were tolerated and particularly the Sadduces these were not exempted from being Magistrates The Scribes and Pharisees also that taught many dangerous errors yet were in great honor in this Church and State I answer 1. Hagiomastixs foundation upon which he raises this argument is unfound for the Scribes Pheriâ—ees and others in place in the time of tolerating the Sadduces Herodians and other Hereticks which was in Christs time were not zealous of the Law of God as is evident by many of Christs Sermons reproving them for want of love and zeale to the Law and the true worship of God Matth. 5. from the 19. verse to the end of the chapter Matth. 15. from verse 3. to the 10. Matth. 23. from verse 3. to the 29. verse They were zealous indeed of the traditions of the Elders and of their owne Superstitions and Devices but not of the Law of God they corrupted and transgressed the Lawes of God by their traditions and hypocrisies but had no true love nor zeale to the Law nor the Jewish Religion and therefore no wonder they tolerated Sadduces Herodians c but of this point how religion was then mightily corrupted and all things out of order I have spoken before in p. 30. of this Treatise and so wil not tautologize 2. Can Hagiomastix upon second thoughts think the Practise of the Rulers of the Jewes and the people that followed them in a time so desparately corrupt as that was when Church and State hastened to destruction and all things were amisse a safe Ground for Christian Magistrates to walke by and not rather judge they did amisse in that as well as in other things and that their Practice is not a probable Rule to be followed I shall mind him of one particular instanced in by himselfe viz their not hindring the Sadduces and other Hereticks from coming to the Temple or the Synagogues which if it were well done t is by this argument as unlawful for the Church to censure her members with Ecclesiasticall censures for any Hereticall Tenets as for the Civil Magistrate to punish and so all Church Censures for Heresies and false Doctrines are overthrown as well as civil whereas I took it for granted Church censures in matters of Religion had been Lawfull viz. A spiritual weapon suitable by their owne confession for a spirituall evill Heresie and M. S. a good Friend of Hagiomastixs in answer to that Argument against Toleration Revel 2. 20. yeelds it saying that 's meant of Church censures but not of bodily outward punishment by the Magistrate and therefore I think the practise of the People and their Rulers suffering Sadduces and all other Hereticks to be no better argument for Justification of a Toleration then their practise of crucifying Christ a Justification of that 3. Besides that all may see what you and your party aime at in speaking of the Pharisees and Saduces being in honour in the Jewish State Magistrates and bearing civill offices not a bare Toleration of your consciences but that you may be in places of honour government and profit This gives us a cleare reason of the Toleration of Errors in those times namely that Scribes Pharisees and Saduces were in places of power and government had a great interest in Church and State and therefore no wonder if they would tolerate themselves and their owne Opinions can you think it a good argument that Adulterers and theeves ought to be tolerated because Adulterers and Theeves having power suffer such to goe unpunished Or can you thinke it reason to say many Papists Anabaptists being in places of Government suffered Papists Anabaptints therefore t is the duty of the godly Magistrate to suffer them and all other Hereticks Pray Master Hagiomastix resolve me this question seeing Scribes Pharisees and such like were Magistrates and in places of power and honour who should punish Pharisees and Saduces for their Errors and dangerous Opinions Sixthly as to that last clause that Christ did never charge this Church or State or those that bore office in either with â—in or unfaithfulnesse for not proceeding against the Sadduces Pharisees c. in regard of their Errors either by imprisonment or death and yet Christ did teach and presse upon men all and all manner of duties I answer First how is that proved he never did Can the Patrons of Toleration Minus Celsus Senensis Hagiomastix c make it follow by saying t is no where written in the Gospels and therefore he never reproved them can they reason from the Scriptures negatively in matters of fact such things never were because theâ— are not spoken of what thinkâ— they of that Axiome Anon dicto ad non factâ—â— noâ— valet consequentia were not there many things that Christ did which were not written Iohn 21. the last verse But if they will reply yes in some things but not in matters of judgement righteouâ—nesse such a weighty matter as this is made to be I rejoyne that in many weighty matters of the Law and justice Christ either spoke not particularly of them or if he did they are not written neither can be found in the Gospels more then this of punishing Sadduces and other Hereticks in matter of Religion I might instance in many things unquestionably forbidden or commanded by God in the Morall Law that are not particularly spoken of in the Gospels which yet from hence to reason against them wery vere bad Divinity What instances can be given of Christs giving any commands to those in place
God and Christ his Sonne standeth in as full strength under the Gospel as ever it did under the Law For Princes in the new Testament be Gods Ministers to revenge Malefactors as they were in the old and the greater the wickednesse the rather to be punished ergo the greatest as Heresies Idolatries Blasphemies are soonest of all other vices to be repressed by Christian Magistrates whose zeale for Christs glory must not decrease Christs care for their Scepters being increased and those monuments of former Kings left written for their instruction were not this sufficient as in truth t is to refute your evasion yet King David foreseeing in Spirit that Heathen Kings would â—and themselves and assemble together against the Lord and his Christ extendeth the same charge to the Gentiles which the Kings of Jurie received before and warned them all at once Be wise ye Kings understand yeâ— Judges of the world Serve the Lord. And so in another place of this Book the Jesuits saying these were Kings of the old Testament and they had the Law of God to guide them he answers Then since Christian Princes have the same Scriptures which they had and also the Gospel of Christ and Apostolick writings to guide them which they had not why should they not in their Kingdomes retaine the same power which yee see the Kings of Iudah â—ad and used to their immortall praise and joy Againe Christ came not to abolish or diminish the power of Kings and States but to save their souls they are no way loosers but gainers by Christs comming Christs Kingdome is not of this world it alters not the Power and Preeminence God once gave to them as Kings and Magistrates Lastly If Magistrates under the new Testament should have this power taken from them the Church of God should be in a farre worse condition and more uncomfortable then it was under the old Law the Church should lose a great helpe it sometimes enjoyned neither can that helpe the matter to say that we have now Excommunication and other spirituall weapons to supply that losse For the Church of the Jewes had excommunication and the word of God yea extraordinary Prophets many miracles answers by Vrim and Thummim in all difficult cases about religion as Hagiomastix faith which we have not and yet they had need of Magistrates coercive power in matters of religion for all that To conclude there can be no reason in the world showen or given why Magistrates under the new Testament should not have power to restraine and punish Apostaâ—ies Blasphemies c as well as under the old but many might be given why their power rather should be continued and enlarged under the new and in this wee have Master Burroughs himselfe a witnesse what a sad condition the Church of Christ would be in if we had no externall power to restraine from any kind of Blasphemie and Seducements which passage having quoted before and having spoken something on that occasion page 63. of this Treatise of Toleration I referre the Reader thither and to Master Burroughs Irenicum page 23. 24. Fourthly God is unchangeable the Covenant of life under the old and new Testament is one and the same for the essence and substance as our Divines show against the Socinians Antinomians Anabaptists and the rule of righteousnesse and holinesse is the same under the new that it was under the old and therefore God hating corruptions of Religion so as to command his Vice-gerents to punish them then and to prevent their spreading he being unchangeable and the punishing of violations of Religion and impieties being acts of holinesse and righteousnesse must needs stand firmâ— and bind Magistrates under the new Testament And if the Magistrates restraining and suppressing the dishonors of God ruine of souls by his sword be altered and changed by God in the times of the Gospel then that power of punishment was either truely Ceremonial or else judicial belonging properly to the Poliâ—ie and Paedagogie of the Jewes but it was neither First Not Ceremoniall it was no type of any thing which was to come as I have showen before page 168. 169. of this Treatise Secondly Not properly judiciall in the sense laid downe page 53. 54. of this Treatise but morall of common right used by other Nations and that both before the judicial Law was given and after of which having spoken so much in divers pages and places of this Booke I shall onely adde this viz. that Zeppâ—rus in his fourth Booke de Legibus mosaicis excellently showes these Lawes to be Appendixes of the Decalogue and in stead of a just Commentarie upon them particularly of the first commandement whereupon he handles that question of punishing false Prophets and Hereticks and showes how many Errors and Opinions be Blasphemies as Servetus Opinion against the Holy Trinitie and Opinions against the Attributes of God c which abominations whosoever denies ought to be punished capitally he overthrowes all pietie and showes himselfe to be a stranger to all Religion and faith where among other reasons brought by him why false Teachers and Hereticks should be punished by the Civil Magistrates as the expresse Lawes of God given by Moses and not antiquated he gives this No substantial sufficient reason can be brought why the Majesty of God and the Authoritie of the Church ought to be of lesse moment and waight among Christians then in times past it hath been amongst the Jewes Yea by how much God hath more clearely manifested himselfe by his Sonne then in times past by his Prophets by so much the lesse can that coldnesse and luke-warmenesse be excused if wee be carried with a lesse study of our Religion and do lesse defend it then they Fifthly It cannot upon any reasonable ground be presumed that Idolatries Heresies Blasphemies c commanded by God to be punished by the Civil Magistrate under the old Testament should by Christs comming be set at libertie and absolutely freed from punishment For 1. Besides that the old Testament prophecying of Christs comming speaks of those dayes as times of greater holinesse and strictnesse and that in reference to the commands of the first Table as these Scriptures show Isaiah 35. 8 9. there shall be a way and it shall be called the way of holinesse the uncleane shall not passe over it no Lion shall be there nor any ravenous beast shall go up thereon that is no enemie of God hurtfull to the Church among which false Teachers are chief cald by Christ and Paul ravening Wolves and greivous Wolfes not sparing the flock Matth. 7. 15. Acts 20. 29. Zach. 13. 2 3. prophecies that in the day in which the Messiah shall come into the world he shall overthrow Idolatrie false Doctrine and whatsoever is contrary to the word of God and true Religion The Prophet comprehends all under three Heads 1. I will out off the names of the Idols out of the Land and they shall no more
Gratian Theodosius and others who by publick Edicts did prohibit false Doctrines and did command all throughout the whole Empire to embrace the true Faith t is confessed by Master Burroughs himselfe The protection of their Civil peace is not sufficient to give them such a denomination of nursing Fathers and Mothers Upon which place Bâ—lson writes thus with this endeavour of Christian Princes God comforteth his Church by the mouth of Esay Kings shall be thy nursing Fathers c what Esay saith Princes shal do that I conclude Princes must doe because God would not promise they should usurpe another mans office but discharge their owne If you take the milke of Princes for temporall honours Lands and goods the â—ery Children will laugh you to scorne The Church of Christ is no wanton Church She lusteth for no worldly wealth which is rather harmful poison then wholesome food Gods provision for her is spiritual not carnall her delights are not outward in flesh but inward in grace The Prophet good man had no leasure to thinke on yoâ— farms demeans and Revenues no remedy you must needs yeeld us that Christian Princes in respect of their office not of their riches have received an expresse commandement from God to show themselves Nurses to his Church Now Nurses by nature must provide for their infants and defend them from danger ergo Kings and Queens in the new Testament are bound to tender the Church of Christ and by their princely power and publick Laws to defend the same from infection of Heresies invasions of Scismes and all other apparent corruptions of faith and good manners Zach. 13. 2 3. is a prophecie of the times and dayes of the Gospel as the context is cleare and is confessed by some Patrons of Toleration though put off and evaded that t is allegorical and figurative and meant of some one particular time only under the Gospel with other such like as the Posteript to Hagiomastix writes page 21. 22. all which evasions I had thought at this time to have fully taken of and to have cleared this text by many passages and Phrases in the context besides severall reasons that it must needs be understood literally and of all times under the Gospel but the troubles of the times call me of from my intended thoughts and preparations in this kind and shall reserve them if God will for a second part only I shall adde that divers learned Interpreters ancient and moderne as Theodoret Calvin and others hold the Prophet here alludes to Deut. 13. where God required such strictnesse in maintaining pure Doctrine that the Father should rise up against the Sonne whom he begat God would have all the godly to burne with such a zeal of defending the true worship of God and Pietie that no affinitie nor consanguinitie nor any other carnall respect should prevail to hinder the requiring of punishment upon their neerest friends in cases of violating the worship of God and corrupting sound Doctrine This was the Prescript of the Law But whereas for a time Religion had beene neglected yea troden under foot Zacharie saith that when the faithfull should repent they should bee endowed with such a desire of true Pietie as neither Father nor Mother should suffer wicked errors in their Sons And here t is to be observed that this zeale is approved of under the Kingdome of Christ for Zacharie does not here restraine this Doctrine to the time of the Law but showes what shall be when Christ is come namely that then again that zeale shall burne in the hearts of all the godly which was almost extinct It followes therefore this Law was not given only to the Jewes as many fanatical men imagine who would have a leave of disturbing the world but that this Law extends to us also Musculus speaking of things appertaining to the Classis of morall commands shows that many things in the Prophets writings belong thereunto and he gives this reason That in most things they were Interpreters of the Mosaicall Law And therefore Zacharie does here inter â—â—t that Law in Deut. 13. concerning false Prophets and Seducers to be in force under the Gospel The Prophets in their writings doe interpret and explaine Moses writings as the Books of Moses doe the Decalogue written by God in two Tables of stone and delivered unto Moses Deut. 5. 22. That in Deut. 13. is to be compared with this Zach. 13. 3. where we find the same things almost the same words used in a Prophecie of the times of the Gospel the meaning of which is not that his Father or Mother should presently run a Knife into him but that though they begat him yet they should be the means to bring him unto condigne punishment even the taking away of his life and so Master Cartwright speaking of this prophecie writes thus No power is given to one private man to kill another nor for the Private man to kill his children but this manner of speech is grounded on Deut 17. 7. where t is proved the Witnesse who accused should throw the first stone against the convicted persons ergo they ascribe the killing of the guilty person as belonging to the duty of the Accuser THESIS 20. In the Scriptures of the new Test there are clear grounds full proofes that Hereticks and false Teachers corrupters of Religion deserve to be punished corporally as well as spiritualy by excommunication and that Magistrates ought to punish in cases of Idolatry Heresie and such like as well as for transgressions against the second Table Now among many I shall lay down these following 1. That Christ and his Apostles being accused before Magistrates about matters of Religion as blasphemy being against the Law of Moses and such like they never pleaded for themselves that it was not lawfull to punish any man for matters of Religion but they defended their causes that they had not taught any thing against the word of God and the Law of Moses were not guilty of Blasphemy or Heresie so that they granted the major proposition namely that is was lawful for the Magistrate to punish Hereticks who taught against the Word of God but they denied the minor that they were Hereticks For out of the word of God they showed they were not Hereticks in that they taught nothing against the Word of God yea nothing but what had a proof in the Word of God But of this the Reader may see more in Zanchits Miscellanies De Magistratu page 173. 2. Christ in John 2. 14 15 16. made a scourge and drove out of the Temple those that made his Fathers house a house of merchandise which now false Teachers are said to doe 2 Pet. 2. 3. and t is the more observable that Christ who let the woman taken in adultery go away and did not punish her that would not divide an inheritance because his Kingdome was not of this world yet in the matter of his Fathers house did exercise
coercive power with a high hand scourging and driving out of the Temple those that sold Oxen c. and this he is said to doe out of zeale the zeale of thine House hath eaten me up and though this be not recorded for Ministers to use a materiall whip yet certainly this was an act of righteousnesse that should have been done by the Magistrates of that time it had been a glorious action if they had done it and however there might be something heroical in it yet doubtlesse t is an act of righteousnesse and zeal that ought to be done by some in their ordinary calling viz. by Magistrates 3. Rom. 13. 4. Magistrates beare not the sword in vaiue for them that doe evill and they are revengers to execute wrath upon them that doe evill Now Blasphemers Hereticks false Teachers doe evill and are evill workers Phil. 3. 2. 2 Epistle of John v. 11. Revel 2. 2. and non distinguendum est ubi Scriptura non distinguit upon which place Master Bilson writes thus Princes in the new Testament be Gods Ministers to revenge malefactors as they were in the old and the greater the wickednesse the rather to be punished ergo the greatest as Heresies Idolatries and Blasphemies are soonest of all other vices to be repressed by Christian Magistrates whose zeale for Christs glory must not decrease Christs care for their Scepters being increased 4. 1 Cor. 12. 10. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Apostle showes us that when Christian Magistrates were wanting besides miracles gifts of healing c. Christ gave a speciall gift to the Church of restraining Seducers and obstinate Hereticks by corporall punishment There were some that had a speciall gift of coercing ungodly men this Paul exercised upon Elymâ—n the false Prophet and Seducer Acts 13. 11. upon which place Peter Martyr writes fully The Church then had not the Sword of the Magistrate by which offences might be restrained therefore a power was given of punishing them corporally The best Interpreters Ancient and Modern as Chrysostome Oecumenius Calvin Beza Peter Martyr Pareus and divers others doe understand by Powers those who had such a Gift upon which place I intended to have insisted largely by comparing other Scriptures with it and to have demonstrated from it the necessity and lawfulnesse of a power of punishing corporally obstinate Hereticks and Seducers but I must take off 5. Gal. 5. 12. Paul wishes that false Teachers and troublers of the Church were cut off which place I intended to have enlarged upon to prove it meant of bodily cutting off but cannot now 6. 1 Tim. 2. 2. Paul showes Kings and those that are in Authoritie are to be prayed for that we may lead a quiet and a peaceable life in all godlinesse and honesty in all godlinesse as well as honesty This is the end of prayers to be made for Magistrates Now that which is the end of Prayers poured out for Magistrates ought to be the end propounded by the Magistrate in his duty but the Apostle commands prayers to be made for Magistrates for that end ergo it lyes upon the Magistrate to see to it of which the Reader may see more in Meisner Polit. de Magistratu and t is confessed by Master Thomas Goodwin in his Returne of Prayers this was a command to pray that God would give Christian Magistrates to the Church the Answer of which was in giving Constantine a Christian Emperor who as the Ecclesiastical Histories show did by Lawes and Edicts command the Christian Religion as also establish the â—icenâ— Creed touching the Faith of one Substance banishing by his Edict Arius and his adherentâ— 7. Revel 17 16. John prophecies and speaks of it as an acceptable work to God for Christian Kings and States by their Civil temporal power to destroy the Romish Religion Now if the Romish Seducers and corrupters of Religion upon that ground cald the Whore may be punished by Civil Magistrates and dealt with by other weapons then preaching admonition excommunication then such as are certinly worse then they as Antiâ—rinitariaâ—s Socâ—nians Libertins may be also by Magistrates restrained Master Robinson writing against the Anabaptists one Helwisse who interprets this place of Spirituall weapons answers him this is a prophecie of Kings and Magistrates whose weapons and power are other besides that of prayers which is common to all Christians t is spoken what they shal doe as Kings Besides t is contrary to the cleare meaning of the Holy-Ghost which is that Kings should first use their Civill power for the Beast and Whore and after against them to their destruction they shall give their power to the Lamb as they before gave it against the Lamb Now we know they used their Civil power under Poperie as a means by which to suppresse the true Religion and therefore Princes and States shall establish the true by that means and destroy the false of which I had thought to have enlarged further as also upon the other New Testament quotations to have answered the evasions brought against them especially of Hagiomastix against Rom. 13. 4. and to have proved it cannot be restrained only against evils of the Second Table but is to be understood of evil against the First but I must reserve these things and divers more to another opportunitie and for a Second Part. If God wil. To God only wise be glory through Jesus Christ Amen FINIS GOod Reader among many other Errata of the Presse upon running over the Book in hast since printed not having time to read and weigh every page much lesse sentence or line I finde these following ERRATA PAge 32 line 12 after ought to be r. also punished p. 30. l. 13 for they r. these p. 33 l. 28 r. four and five fold p. 55 l. 4. for latter r. letter The figures of the pages which should be 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64. are misprinted p. 64. l. 6. for mens r. means p. 78. l. 23. for others r. other Divines p. 167. l. 12. after put r. upon and. Margin Notes p. 14. for diga r. digna p. 61. for Egyptis r. Egyptii bones r. boves p. 130. r. c. 9 quae 4. p. 189. for equas r. equus p. 214. r. praceptorum for Prophetam r. Prophetarum for plâ—nisquâ— r. plerisque p. 216. r. after peccata r. coercerentur Numb 33. 52 5. â— King 20. 42. Revel 2. 20. * Aug. contra Petil. l. 2. c. 83. Noli dicere inquit Petiliano Augustinus Absit absit à conscientia nostra ut ad nostram fidem aliquem compellamus facitis enim ubi potestis ubi autem non facitis non potâ—stis sive legum sive invidiae timâ—re sive resistentium multitudine * Luther epist ad Wences Lin cum Christus meus vivit regnat ego vivam regnabo ☞ ☞ * Zanch. in quartum praceptum Chemnitii loci Commun De lege Dei in quartum praecept * Vide Master Cheynels
Gerard. Tom. 1. de Scriptura h Baron Apodix Cathol Tract prim Caput 1 2. Tract 7. cap. 3. i Macc. loc commun de Script Author Perspicuit Interpret k Will. Synops The first generall controv concerning the Scriptures l Spanhem Thes de Script contra Anabaptist m Cloppenburg Disput de can Theolog. Cloppen Gangraen Anabapt de Scriptura sacra Verbo Deo interuo * Whitak Contro prim De Scripturae perspicuit quaest 4. Omniae quae sunt ad salutem necessaria apertis verbis in Scripturis proponi Daven De Judice ac norma pag. 9. In omni controversia de doctrina fidei aut praeceptis morum ad salutis necessariis spiritum sanctum tam perspicue judicasse per scripturas ut omnes intelligant ejus sententiam quibus aures oculi spirituales non desunt Verbi causa de vera Christi incarnatione sententiam de finitivameamque planam evidentem tulit spiritus sanctus verbum caro factum John 1. 14. Willets first generall controversie quaest 5. Whites way to the true Church pag. 31. The Jesuite can name no one necessary Article of our Faith but the Word teacheth it as plaine as himself can as that there is one God three persons a generall refurrection and judgement that Jesus is the Saviour of mankind c. Rivet Cathol Orthod Tract Prim. quaest 6. Cloppenburg Disput de Scriptura Macco Disput 7. de Perspicuitate Scripturae Ames Bellar. Enervat Tom. 1. De verbo Dei cap. 4. de Scripturae perspicuitate omnia illa quae sunt intellectu necessaria ad salutem apertissimè in Scripturis proponi * Spiritus sanctus non est Scepticus nec dubia aut opiniones in cordibus nostris scripsit sed assertiones ipsa vita omni experientia certiores ac firmiores Lutherus * Davenant De Judice ac norma fidei cap. 3. cap. 14. * page 4. 5. * The generall Councell of Nice condemned the Opinion of Arrius the generall Councell of Constantinople condemned the Heresie of Macedonius the generall Councell of Chalcedon the Heresie of Eutyches a Synod at Ancyra and others in Asia condemned the Heretick Montanus * Cap. 18. Aliud est posse errare aliud de facto errare Possunt errare privati quilibet Pastores particularia etiam quaelibet concilia non tamen idcirco intolerabilem errorem admittunt quâ—â—ies populâ— sibi subdito aliquid ex verbâ— divino deductum tanquam articulum fidei credendam proponunt * Qui autem ab infallibili veritate dirigitur in judicando is judicat infallibiliter illi etiam constat illud esse verum quod ex verbâ— did cit utcunque non gaudeat judicio â—â—fallibili * Posse alia legitima Conciâ—â— semiliter asserâ—re decreta sua esse dâ—â—rata Spiritus sancti si huic Concilio similia fuerint si eandem reâ—ulam servaverint quam in hoc Concilio servarunt secuti sunt Apostoli Si enim nihil nisi ex Scriptur is statuerint definierint quod in hoc Concilio factum est si omnes Quaestiones ad Scripturas examinaverint Scripturae vocom la omnibus fuis decretis secuti fuerint tum possunt asserere Spiritum sanctum sit decrevisse Contro 3 Quaest. 6. * Nos vero facile concedimus Concilia legitima quoad id quod requiritur intrinsecus id est concilia vere fine fuco fallacia congregata in nomine Christi non posse errare in iis quae sunt alicujus momenti Nam nos quidem fatemur ultro multa concilia non errasse imo fatemur concilia legitima quomodo illud a nobis supra explicatum est hoc est vere congregata in Deinomine non errareiâ— rebus necessariiâ— Cam Praelect De Eccles p. 289 293 * Baron Apodix Cathol Tractat. 5. De Authoritat Eccles cap. 17. Non 〈◊〉 simpliciter absolute id quod Parisienses de Conciliorum infallibilitate docent Pie enim probabiliter credi potest Concilia vera generalia legitima hoc est legitime convocata procedentia ita gubernari dirigi à Spiritu S. ut non errent in dogmatibus fundamentalibâ—â— Dico hoc credi posse quia certo constat talia concilia nunquam hactenus errasse in dogmatibus fundamentalibus Vide ibi plura * Praelect de Ecclesia pag. 292 293. Deinde in concilio si adsint viri pii docti aperiunt quae fuerunt clausa mutua◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id quod non aeque facile possit prae stari à singulia seorsim Id expectamus ut iâ— Concilo in Conventu doctorum piorum virorum proferantur argumenta veritatis quae antea ignota fuere Praelect de Eccles Tract de Infaâ—â—â—b Eccl. Quoties aliquid decretum est a caetu quodam hominum qui in aliqua authoritateconstituti sunt in Ecclesia facit hoc ut ne temere non adhibita accuratat gravi observatione in rejiciatur * Pius Ecclesiae filius non perperam ei insilit sed ab ea reverentiali quodam pudore percussus abscedit Walensis Tom. 5. lib. 2. cap. 27. * Tene certum relinque incertum * Willets Synops First General Contro of the Script Quest 6. 2. part of the question Rivet Cathol Orthod Tract 1. quaest 8. * Hom. 3. de Laz Maldonate in Mat. 7. 22 23. a August de Vnitat Eccles cap. 16. Tract 3. in John Evang say not these things are so because such a one did such and such miracles but let theÌ„ prove their Church by the Canonicall books of the Scripture and by nothing els these are the demonstration of our cause these are our foundation these are our grounds upon which we build b Whitak Contro 2. quaest 5. c. 12. c Camer praelect de Eccl. p. 255 256. d Rivet Cath. Orthod Tract 2. quaest 7. p. 372 373. e Ames Bellar. enervat De notis Ecclesiae f Willets Synops 2. Gener. Controv. concerning the Church quaest 〈◊〉 Of the power of working miracles g Whites way to the 〈◊〉 Church pag. 62 63. h Gâ—rad de Eccles Sect. 11. from p. 448 to 467. * Maldon comment in luc 16. v. 30. * Paâ—strat Cathel de Canon summa Regul Fid. Neque enim quicquid est infallibile estregula summa fidei quiae Angeli sunt infallibiles Apostoli etiam fuerunt infallibiles ex particulari assistentiae Spiritus tamen neutri sunt aut fuerunt Ecclesiae summa regula Hoc nor Paulus docuit Gal. 1. 8. Aâ— haec indignae sunt quae dicantur de regula fidei praesertim summa regula quae nulli rei itae comparari debet ut indâ— coerceatur alias desinit esse regula Sed potius ut inde sint omniae judicanda Quare praeter infallibilitatem aliud quid dam necessarium est ut fiat regula nimirum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc autem est ut summae sit suaeque authoritatis
of your Ruling Elders the necessity of Widowes as Officers in the Church the absolute necessity of one and the same governmant or Discipline in all particulars whatsoever for all Churchès in all times and places a full and peremptory determination of all things whatsoever appertaining to the worship of God with divers such like positions which are the very life soule and substance of your way I am at perfect peace in my thoughts that you will never be able to demonstrate or prove from the Scriptures to any sober minded or confidering man Master Goodwins Appendix in his Preface to the Reader If the soules and consciences of men have any cause at all to blesse me it is because I have clothed them with strength and confidence of the royall parentage and descent of the Scriptures and subdued their fears and jealousies of any subornation in that kind under their feet Nay did I not verily beleeve the Scriptures to be the word of God I would not for their sakes expose my selfe as now I doe But that beleif I speak of which hath reigned in me and over me hitherto and hath blessed me with such an abundance of peace of comfort in sufferings for it will not c. An Apologeticall Account of some Brethren of the Church whereof Master Goodwin is Pastour pag. 5. 6. The Doctrines of the Father and of the Sonne the involving whereof in the clouds of uncertainty the said Vindication most falsely and malâ—tiously charges upon him hath he brought into so cleare and open view that we have seen the peace and everlasting salvation of our soules in them Every one of those fundan entail Principeâ— of Christian Religion which this gangren'd pen would perswade the world he denies or doubts of hath he not only asserted in our hearing againe and againe but proved them with such evidence and demonstration of the spirit that our consciences were forced to fall flat before them and to confesse that of a truth God was in them * Anonymi Dissertatio De pace Concordia Ecclesiâ—e pag. 91 92. Apologia pro Socinianis Fallunt falluntur qui ad florentis istius aetatis exemplum nostra tempora exiguut Non iisdem remediis nunc afflicta Ecclesiae valetudo restitui potest quibus olim poterâ—â— aegritudo submoveri Cum sanam esset ac robusta Ecclesia in primo illo aetatis store ApostoloruÌ„ choro superstite etiam violentis utiremediis ob vigorem suum par erat Nunc morbis ac senio confecta debilis superanti jam aegritudini pene succumbit â—ec magis unquam periclitatur quam cum in crudeles medicos incidit Vide ibi plura * Gerard. Joh. Vossii Theses Theolog. De necessi Baptismi Thes 4. contra Fâ—ustâ—Ì„ SocinuÌ„ Praeterea etsi concederetur Christum de Baptismo de disse praeceptuÌ„ censet illud tantùm pertinuisse ad initia quibus exrudi populo ceremoniis assueto Ecclesia Christo colligebatur Denique eo etiam concesso ut perpetuo debeat in Ecclesia obtinere negat tamen universale esse nam cum aquae Baptismus nihil aliud sit quam publicaâ— solennis quaedam professio nominis Christi minime hunc iis necessarium esse ait qui ex Christianis id est Christum profitentibus nascuntur aut qui in Christiana fide sunt educati * But some commands that in regard of their manner some degrees and adjuncts may not bind yet in respect of their substance and the things themselves are perpetuall of which I have spoken before p. 81 82 83 84. whoever does but consider the difference between the essence of a thing and the adjunct of a thing how the essence is one thing and the adjunct another and how some change may be in an adjunct when not in the essence at all will be satisfied a Vid. Jun. Annot. in Ezr. 1. 65. and Eng. Annet * Calvin Refut Eâ—â—orum Serveti p. 598. Hujus rei illustre nobis exemplum spiritus Dei proponit in Nebuchad Nam ejus edictum celebrat Daniel quo capitalem paenam denunciat siquis in Deum Israel blasphemus fuerit Honor profecto non vulgaris crudeli tyranno habetur quum Prophetam suum Dominus ad publicandas quaet tulit leges qua si praeconem assignat leges ipsas in acta sua refert sacrisque suis oraculis annumerat Quid an spiritus saâ—cti Prophetae elogio laudatur Nebuchadnezer qui veri Dei gloriam pro imperio tutandam suscepit ut ad impiam ejus prophanationem connivâ—ant sancti Magistratus an non potius his dominus sub profani regis persona quid agere ipsos deceat praescribit Et câ—rte quid magis praeposterum quam in Ecclesiae sinu impune foveri fcelestas in Deum câ—ntâ—elias quae in Babylone paena capitali sanitae fuerunt ☞ * Bulling adversus Anabaptistas l. 4. c. 5. c. 6. Osiandri Enchiridion c. 2. Qust 41. De Magistratu Politico * The Errors and Controversies in matters of the second Table upon the 5 6 7 8 and 9. Commandements are the most exactly summed up by Danaeus in his Book De Haeresibus of any Author in that kind that ever I met with Indexâ— Tertius de Decalog Legis De quinto Praecepto Magistratum damnant tollunt Manichai Anabaptistae Magistratus â—utoritatem in negotiis religionis negant Dâ—nâ—tistae Judicia capitalia à Christianâ— homine exerâ—â—i posse negant Tertullianissâ— De sexto precepto seipsos occiacre putant licere hominibus Patriciani Circumcelliones De septimo Praecepto Vxores communes promiscuas ess debere dâ—cent Simoniani Nicolaitae Carpocratiani Incestus admittunt probant Catapâ—â—yges De octavo praecepto Propria quaedam à Christianis possâ—deri posse negant Apostolici Jesuitae Anabaptistae De nono praecepto mentiri homini Christiano licere putant Messaliani Priscillianistae ☜ * Whites way to the Church pag. 81. 83 84 85. Neither can the Jesuite assigne any Company or State of men whereby the Church may be supposed to manifest her teaching but the same may be subject to error and in experience hath erred as wee see in Councels Doctors and all other meanes which she hath used in teaching us except that of the Scriptures only Willets second Generall Controversie concerning the Church second question whether the Church may erre pag. 69 70 71. Amesii Bellarm. Enervat Tom. secâ—nd cap. 2. De Eccles visibilit quaest 4. An Ecclesiaâ— possit errare Rivet Catholic Orthodox Tractat. 2. Quaest 3. An Ecclesia possit errare Cameron Praelect de Eccles De Eccles Infallibilit 281 282 c. ☞ * Chamier Panstrat Cathol De Canon summa Regula Fidei Apostoli fuerunt infallibiles ex particulari assistentia spiritus habuerunt particularem non habitualem assistentiam spiritus Lutherus spirtus Sanctus non semper tangit corda Prophetaâ—um * Whitak Controv 3. quaest 6 An Assertion of the Government of the Church of