Selected quad for the lemma: power_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
power_n	ceremony_n	church_n	rite_n	2,845	5	10.3412	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34903	An answer to a late book intituled, A discourse concerning the inventions of men in the worship of God, by William, Lord Bishop of Derry wherein the author's arguments against the manner of publick worship performed by Protestant dissenters are examined and by plain Scripture and reason confuted, his mistakes as to matters of fact detected, and some important truths concerning the spirit of prayer and external adoration, &c. vindicated / by Robert Craghead ...	Craghead, Robert.	1694 (1694)	Wing C6793; ESTC R7154	118,658	170

House and this being religious Worship let the Author consider how this practice can be reconciled to the second Command Page 116. Vncovering the Head is a common work of respect and then followeth a digression concerning covering the Head which is not material to the purpose in hand But Page 117. However being an honour payed to men there is no reason why it should not be payed to God Ans Custom having prevailed among us to make uncovering the Head a sign of Deference and conferring honour on others is therefore practiced by us in acts of religious Worship as Prayer Praises and hearing the immediat Words of God read as a part of his Worship but this is no argument to uncover the Head to any Creature when thereby religious reverence and worship is designed but at length other pillars failing as not able to bear up the honour conferred on Churches the Author hath recourse to his rich Magazine where there is no want And it is one of the Articles of our Church that the Church has power to order Rites and Ceremonies that is to determine what particular things comes under the Apostles general word of Decency Ans Here it s to be observed that the Author is defending religious bowing when they enter the Church which is worship and for proof of its lawfulness fairly maketh this his Argument Our Church has power to order Rites and Ceremonies it followeth then that by this power the church may appoint new worship the inference is native seing according to the author it s therfor lawfull to bow the head religiously because the church hath this power I desire he would review his first preliminarie position that it belongs to God only to give rites how he will be worshiped how can these two stand it belongeth to God only and yet the church hath the power to institute new worship If the Church hath such power it were a most necessary service and justice to the World to discover and make once that commission appear whereby the Church is invested with this power and if no man can make it appear why is such a power assumed That the Church hath power to order external circumstances necessarly belonging to the Worship of God and determinable by the prudent use of natures light and the general rules of Scripture is readily yielded but what is this to a power of prescribing worship which God hath not prescribed as to bow the head religiously unto or before any creature as sharer in the worship here the Author overstretcheth the article Page 118. We stand at our praisings thanksgivings c. at our confessions of sin and at our prayers we present our selves before God on our knees Ans That there ought to be signs of religious reverence in all acts of immediat commanded worship we are agreed but there appeareth no reason why the Author should make such a difference between confession of sin and prayers for confession of sin and thanksgivings are performed in prayer and for confessions of Faith I demand by what rule they are made any part of worship except as they may be comprehended under the heads of Prayer or Praises As for kneeling in the time of Prayer which I know is most noticed let the reader understand that we are far from offending at the kneeling of others in publick assemblies but standing is also a warrantable praying posture which is our practice and in numerous Congregations such as by the Lords Mercy we have conveniency for kneeling cannot be had without forcing many of the Congregation to such a distance as they could not hear the Prayers which in their hearts they should offer up to God Ibid The Author asserteth another sort of kneeling than kneeling in prayer viz. a kneeling before the Elements of Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper We celebrat the Holy Sacrament of the Body and Bloud of Christ in a worshiping posture I know that many except against this Ans Many do except against it and of all the Arguments you have mustered not one of them passeth muster and no wonder others make exception seing your self makes the first exception before ever you bring them to the field as by your appended marginal Not appeareth saying the Authors intention is not to assert that the Scriptures require kneeling at the Lords Supper I see a bad cause will sometimes make the courage of a Champion to faint If the Scripture require not kneelling at the Lords Supper with what confidence can any man require it why are we charged as deficient seing the Scripture doth not require To what purpose did the Author write these words in his Preliminaries That the holy Scriptures contain the revelations of Gods will concerning his worship and yet by the Author the Holy Scriptures contain not this kneeling as any Revelation of his will it followeth undenyably therefore kneeling at the Lords Table is no Revelation of Gods will if this conclusion be displeasing blame the Authors two propositions his marginal Note that can admit of no other conclusion and thus he yieldeth the Cause leaving kneeling before the Elements of Bread and Wine deprived of any Revelation of Gods will let him advise us now what name we shall give it the Authors own words constraineth me to place it among the meer unwarrantable Inventions of men But the Author will not yet let it pass therefore addeth in his marginal Note but to shew that it is not contrary to the institution of Christ or practice of the Apostles who compare our receiving it with the Jews partaking of their Altar to which they approached with adoration Ans We shall have the Author answering himself in this also by his first Position Page 3d That it belongeth only to God to give Rules how he will be worshipped For if it belong to God only then there is no place left for mans prescribing of Worship whether the worship prescribed be contrary or not contrary yet it s an encroachment on Gods peculiar Prerogative to prescribe his own worship 2ly We find the Lord charging guilt on this account because he did not command Jer. 7. 31. They have built the high places of Tophet c. which I commanded them not neither came it into my heart Their wicked practices of burning their Sons and their Daughters in the fire was contrary to Gods Law yet the way that God taketh to express their guilt is because God had not commanded it So Jer. 14. 14 and 19. 5. and 23. 32. which the Reader may peruse and shall find in all these places the displeasure of God discovered because they acted without his command so that the Author's endeavours to make it appear that kneeling at the Lords Table is not contrary to the Institution of Christ will not deliver it from the reflection of being a meer invention of man However the Author essayeth what the Scriptures will do for him First The altar was of Old the Lords Table from whence his