exalted sith for their sakes al Creatures shal be renewed with them as they were cursed for Mans fal and fault Yet shal they not partake the same measure of glory but a better condition after every capacity yet what that shal be in Inanimats Plants and Beasts is curiosity to inquire sith the chief part or pitch of corruption is annillation This implies that they may be freed from bondage of corruption not simply from corruption as Regenerats are released from sins reign by utter abolition which he cals a cheif part or pitch of corruption but renovation is the Acme of perfection Now if the Text be taken literaly how can mute Creatures groan or travel in pain But say 't is meant Metaphoricaly of their Natural appetit to be freed from bondage yet how can they enjoy a like liberty of Gods Sons for whom Christ died Or grant too that no identity is intended but only an analogical proportion by exemplar resemblance yet how can they partake a redemption of the Body which having bin the Souls receptacle here shal be reunited to it for ever 'T is sown a 1 Cor. 15. 23. corruptible Body raised incorruptible sown in dishonor raised in glory sown in weaknes and riseth in power Which is evidence enough for restitution of Human Bodies but al Creatures els being compact of the common Chaos which was made of meer nothing shal probably revert to nothing this seems to sute best with Faiths analogy and Scriptures harmony which tends more to utter abolition then restitution or substitution for al at last day shal be delivered from corruptions bondage when Gods sons shal be and for their sakes tho the maner diametraly differ viz. the one by Redemption of the body the other by deletion of the whol substance So saith Saint Ambros the Creature travelling in pain hath this comfort that it shal rest from labor for ever when al shal beleev whom God knows are to beleev Howbeit if it be granted that al shal be Individualy raised yet it folows not that a finit containing World shal be restored or new created but rather al turned to infinity so wel as time to Eternity for such infinity of Creatures as hath bin since the World began In brief St. Paul intends the time when they shal be delivered not the terminus or thing into like liberty with the Saints This Question is very difficil to decide by Scripture nor is Perclose defined by any Synod nor any Article of salvific Faith Paraeus declines the decision but saith som points are plainly asserted Rom. 8. 20 21. which must be beleeved as that al Creatures are subject to vanity for mans sin that al shal be delivered from bondage 2. Pet. 12. 13. of corruption into the glorious liberty of Gods Sons or rather for and together with it that good Angels shal abide with the Saints that the Elect shal enjoy eternal glory with Christ that the created Heavens Elements and works therin shal be burnt up that a new Heaven and Earth must be expected wherin dwels righteousnes but other clauses how dumb Creatures shal partak the liberty of Gods Children whether by renovation or abolition How many sorts of Creatures shal be released Whether al a few or none How Heaven and Earth shal be dissolved by fire whether as Gold is refined or utterly annilled being of no farther use what manner of fire it shal be material or immaterial what shal be the condition use place quantity quality glory of the new Heaven and Earth if any such shal be Al which with other like Saint Austin saith t is better to leav hid in doubt then litigat about incertanties sith they may be debated with danger but left in suspens sans harm or hazard he holds that al scruples are safest satisfied by annihilation that the fire shal be material as the old world was drowned by ordinary water so saith Aquinas and most School-men but on no good grounds yet al agree it shal not work as a natural Agent but divine Instrument to consume the whol mundan Machin with al things therin as God eternaly decreed therfore it behovs al to decline the fury of it by turning from our sins and returning by repentance to God in Christ Master John Down a pious Pastor of Insto sororal Nephew to Bishop Juel had a smart bout by Pen with Doctor Hakewil his intimat friend for the worlds renovation specialy touching the tru sens of that dark precited Text but in fine approved Annihilation peruse it pondrously but I forbear to abridg it for the prolixity Surely of al three opinions about Restitution Substitution and Annillation the last brings best Cards or fairest Colors both of Scriptures Reasons and Authorities Judicio extremo post ultima secula Mundus Ignibus extinctus materialis erit At the last Judgment when Time is finished This real world with fire shal be extinguished Non renovatus erit praesens nec conditus alter Alitâ—r Cosmos cum veniet sero suprema dies This world shal not renewd be nor new formed When the last day at length shal be performed Mundus hic ut perhibent passim sacra Biblia postquam Alias Vertitur in cineres annâ—hilatus erit This world as Scriptures speak after 't is burned To ashes shal be into Nothing turned Quod fuit ex nihilo factum post secula tandem Secus In Nihilum hoc Mundi grande adigetur Opus This worlds huge work which was of nought compounded Shal into Nought at last day be confounded In cineras Mundi redigetur maxima moles Sive In Nihilum cineres mox adigentur item The worlds huge Mass in t ' ashes shal be brought Thos ashes too shal soon be turnd to Nought Inchoat hicce liber primaeva ab origine Mundi Epiphonema Cum Mundi excidio terminat istud Opus At the Worlds origin that Book inchoats With the Worlds period this work terminats Incipit a Mundo primus liber iste creato Aliud Cum Mundi exitio desinit hicce liber That first Book took rise at the Worlds creation This last takes end with the Worlds annillation Juvenci carmina de mundi conflagratione Immortale nihil mundi compage tenetur Non Orbis non Regna hominium non aurea Roma Non Mare non Tellus non ignea Sydera Coeli Nam statuit Genitor rerum irrevocabile tempus Quo totum torrens rapiet flamma ultima mundum In Mundan machin naught 's immortal found Not golden Rome not realms not the Globe round Not Sea not Earth not Stars within Heavens bound For the Worlds founder fixd time doth propound When the last fire shal the whol World confound FINIS SVPPLEMENTA SVBJVNCTA SUPPLEMENTS SUBIOYNED Supplementum de Festis A Supply about holy Dais Festa Christi sacranda Christian Fests sacred Natalis Christi Festum Christs Birth-days Fest The two debats touching Name and Thing about celebrating Essay
treats only of the Bodies resurrection or immortality of Men who shal liv again He means thos Patriarchs were immortal becaus God in meer grace confers eternal life on the faithful who tho dead liv stil to God being writ in the Book of life with thos that are absolved of their sins to reviv at resurrection but not by any property consequent to Mans essence or Soul For to make it a living entity independent after separation on the Body and in it self immortal or that any Man is immortal except Enoch or Elias hath no cleer warrant Job 14. 10 12. in the word Job complains of Mans mortality by nature Man dies and wasts away yea givs up the Ghost and wher is he Down he lieth and riseth not til the Heavens be no more Which 2 Pet 3 7. 13. St. Peter shews shal be at the universal Resurrection when the Heavens and Earth shal be dissolved by fire but new expected according to promiss wherin dwels righteousnes So wher Job saith Man riseth not til the Heavens be no more 't is as if he said immortal life for Life and Soul in Scripture sens is the same begins not in Man til the Resurrection or day of Judgment and the caus of it is Gods promiss as St. Peter tels not Mans specifical Nature or Essence Now sith Gods Kingdom is a civil Common-wealth wher he-self is Soveraign by virtu first of the old and now since of the new Covenant it evidently appeers that when Christ shal com again in Majesty and Glory to reign existently and eternaly his Kingdom shal be on Earth as God was in Israel So Gods Enimies and their torments after Judgment shal be on Earth for the place wher al remain til the Resurrection is usualy stiled in Scripture under ground in Latin Infernus or Inferi Greecly Hades wher Men cannot see or dy implying the Grav so wel as any other deep place but the damneds place after Resurrection is not designed in al holy writ by any note of situation but only by their company wher such wicked Men were whom God in miraculous maner had cut off Touching Hel 't is no real place in any part of the created Hel what World but a Metaphorical word signified by wicked Men ther being 1. 'T is caled Infernus Tartarus or bottomless Pit from Corah Dathan and Abiram swalowed alife into the Earth 2. 'T is said to be under water becaus the Giants mighty Men in Noahs dais caled Greecly Heroes were drowned in the Deluge 3. Becaus Sodom and Gomorrha consumed by Fire and Brimstone becam a bituminous Lake 't is caled a Lake burning with fire and brimstone which is the secund death So Hel fire is expressed by Sodoms fire indefinitly Rev 21. 8. taken for destruction as 't is said Death and Hel were Rev. 20. 14. cast into the Lake of fire or destroied for after the last day Men shal dy no more nor go into Hades 4. 'T is termed from Egypts triduan deep darknes utter or extern darknes viz. without the habitation of Gods elect which is ful of Light 5. Neer Jerusalem is the Vally of Hinnon in part wherof caled Tophet the Jews most Idolatrously sacrificed their Children to Moloch wher they cast out their Carrion and to clens the Air made continual fires whence Hel is caled Gehenna or Vally of Hinnon and from thos incessant Fires cam the name or notion of everlasting unquenchable Fire Now none is so sensless to expound any of thes literaly as if the damned after rising from death shal be for ever under Earth or Water both which are but one Globe like a Pins point compared to the Heavens in a bottomless Pit or that they shal be eternaly punishd in Gehenna the Vally of Hinnon or shal liv in utter darknes not one to see another or be scorched for ever with Fire and Brimstone Ergo the meaning is Metaphorical and must be disquired by the nature of the Torments and Tormenters The Tormenters are termed Satan or Enimy Diabolus or Tormenters Accuser and Abaddon or Destroier which significant titles set not forth any individual Persons like proper Names but only an office or faculty and are very Appellativs which should not be left untranslated as they are becaus therby they seem to be proper names of Demons and Men sooner seduced to beleev the Doctrin of Devils then Pagan Religion contrary to Christs So becaus the Enimy in Gods Kingdom of the Jews is meant by Enimy Accuser and Destroier if Gods Kingdom after the Resurrection shal be on Earth the Enimy and his Kingdom must be ther also as it was when the Israelits deposed God and chose Saul sith Gods Kingdom was in Palestin and the Nations round about Enimies whence it appeers that Satan signifies any Enimy of the Church Metaphoricaly it may but is not Satan properly or literaly Quaere Rev. 12. 〈◊〉 a foul Fiend Enimy to Mankind as the great red Dragon that old Serpent was who deceived Eve and since the whol World Are al the Dialogs between betwen God and Satan about Job conterfet Chimaeras When the seventy rejoiced that the 〈◊〉 10. 17. 18 20. Devils were subject to them Christ said I saw Satan as lightning fal from Heaven but rejoyce not that the Spirits are Mat 12. 24. 〈◊〉 Cor. 5. 5. subject to you Here Christ cals Devils Spirits and names Satan as one yea Beelzebub is named Prince of Devils Excommunication 1 Tim. 1. 20. is caled a delivery to Satan is this meant only a Jailor or temporal Enimy Hel torments are somtime caled weeping and gnashing Torments of teeth somtime the worm of Conscience of time fire wher Dan. 12. 2. the worm dieth not which is never quenched but by Daniel shame and contempt Al which Metaphoricaly denote great grief or discontent of Mind from sight of others felicity which they lost by their own disobedience and incredulity but becaus others felicity is known only by comparing it with their own misery it results that they shal suffer such bodily pains and calamities as Men that liv under cruel Governors having God the King of Saints their eternal Enimy Yea beside al torments of Body and Mind they shal likwise endure a secund Death For tho the general Resurrection be evident yet it 1 Cor. 15. 42 no eternal life promised to Reprobats St. Paul to the question with what Bodies Men shal rise saith 'T is sown in corruption and raised in incorruption sown in dishonor raised in glory sown in weaknes raised in power but Glory and Power cannot comply to wicked Mens Bodies nor the name of secund Death apply to such as can never dy but once Howbeit tho a calamitous everlasting Life may Metophoricaly be termed eternal Death yet can it in no property of speech be stiled a secund Death Everlasting fire prepared for the Damned is an estate wherin Secund Death none can liv after the Resurrection
Press but with this difference or dissonance Dictio Praeconis tenues cito transit in auras Scriptorum at remanent dogmata saepe diu A Preachers wordst ' empty Air turn again But Writers works oftimes doo long remain Al Men are apt to er but the modest ready to acknowledg and amend it if detected or displaied as I vow in presence of our great God freely to doo if any shal fairly shew it nor ever wil be found a Beast perversly to persevere therin I wil serv no Person Sect or Faction for fear favor or flattery but only deliver my privat personal Judgment how weak or worthless soever sincerely according to verity or verisimility This such as know my constant resolut disposition wil easily beleev but others may take it on trust til they shal hav time to try the contrary Al the Theses are too redious but ther prolixity consists more in multitud of matter then words for I could hav made the Work twise so voluminous with half the toil but doo study brevity to spare the Readers Purs and Pains The Speculations are somwhat sublime but stile facil and familiar fit for vulgar understandings Let every one take or leav and take al in good part Farewel Rustica Ruricolae Fabrique Fabrilia tractent Tangere nec Medicos dogmata sacra decet Let Clowns the Plow and Smiths their Forge attend Nor should Phisitians to things sacred bend Articuli Fidei Anglicae 39 Articles of our Faith THE Articles of Religion concluded in Convocation and confirmed by Act of Parliament under Queen Elizabeth Anno 1562. but ratified or reestablished under King James by the same duple authority Anno 1604. which are here presented to satisfy or gratify al lest men like Lynces should seem sharp sighted to look into the Confessions of other Reformed Churches abroad and Lamiae or blind Beetles at home in being ignorant of our own Principles and Doctrins the general Catalog of which follows in order 1 Of Faith in the holy Trinity 2 Of the Word which was made Man 3 Of Christs descent into Hel. 4 Of his Resurrection 5 Of the holy Ghost 6 Of the Scriptures sufficience to salvation 7 Of the old Testament 8 Of the three Creeds 9 Of original birth-sin 10 Of free wil. 11 Of mans justification 12 Of good works 13 Of works before justification 14 Of super trrogation 15 Of Christ alone without sin 16 Of sin after Baptism 17 Of Predestination and Election 18 Of obtaining salvation only by Christ 19 Of the Church 20 Of the Churches authority 21 Of general Councils 22 Of Purgatory 23 Of ministring in the Congregation 24 Of speaking ther in an unknown toung 25 Of the Sacraments 26 Of the Ministers unworthines which hinders not their effects 27 Of Baptism 28 Of the Lords supper 29 Of the wicked who doo not eat Christs Body and Blood 30 Of both kinds 31 Of Christs Oblation finished on the Cross 32 Of Priests marriage 33 Of Excommunicat Persons how they are to be shunned 34 Of the Churches Traditions 35 Of â—omilies 36 Of Consecrating Bishops c. 37 Of the Civil Magistrat 38 Of Christians goods which are not common 39 Of a Christian mans Oath The Particulars insu Article 1. THere is but one only tru living God everlasting without body parts or passions of infinit power wisdom and goodness maker and preserver of al things both visible and invisible in unity of which Godhead ther be three Persons of one substance power and eternity the Father Son and holy-Ghost Article 2. The Son who is the Word of the Father begot of him from everlasting the very eternal God of one substance with the Father took mans Nature in the womb of the blessed virgin of hir substance so that two whol perfect Natures the Godhead and Manhood were joined in one Person never to be severed wherof one Christ consists perfect God and very Man who suffered was crucified dead and buried to reconcile his Father to us and be a sacrifice not only for Original guilt but also for al actual sins of men Article 3. As Christ died for us and was buried so 't is to be beleeved that he went down into Hel. Article 4. Christ truly rose from death and took again his body with flesh bones and al things pertaining to the perfection of Mans Nature wherwith he ascended into Heaven and ther sits til he shal return to judg al men at last day Article 5. The holy Ghost proceding from the Father and the Son is one substance majesty and glory with the Father and Son very eternal God Article 6. Holy Scripture contains al things necessary for Salvation so that whatever is not read therin nor may be proved therby is not required of any man to be beleeved as an Article of Faith or be thought needful to salvation By the name of holy Scripture we understand thos Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament whos authority the Church never doubted of and the other Books as saint Jerom saith the Church reads for exemple of life and instruction of maners but doth not apply them to stablish any Doctrin All the Books of the new Testament as commonly received we receiv and reput them Canonical See their names and number in the holy Bible Article 7. The old Testament is not contrary to the New for in both everlasting life is offred to mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man Therfore they are not to be heard which fain that the old Fathers looked only for transitory promises though the Law given of God by Moses touching Ceremonies or Rites doo not bind Christians nor the civil precepts of necessity to be received in any Christian Commonwealth yet no Christian man whatever is free from obedience of the Commandements caled moral Article 8. The three Creeds Nicen Athanasius and that commonly caled the Apostles ought throughly to be received and beleeved for thes may be proved by most certain warrants of Scripture Article 9. Original sin stands not in imitating Adam as the Pelagians vainly talk but is the fault and corruption of every mans Nature that is ingendred of Adams ofspring wherby man is far gon from original Righteousnes and inclined to evil so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therfore in every person born into the world it deservs Gods wrath and damnationthis infection of Nature remains yea in the Regenerat wherby the lust of the flesh caled in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which som expound the wisdom som the sensuality som the affection som the desire of the flesh is not subject to the Law of God and though ther is no condemnation to them that beleev and are baptized yet the Apostle confesseth that Concupiscence hath of it self the nature of Sin Article 10. The condition of man after Adam's fal is such as he cannot turn or prepare himself by his natural strength and good works to Faith for
invested or indowed with the faculties forenamed which dy not with the body tho their acts and operations ceas for want of fit organs as the power of seeing remains when the eys ere dimmed or torn out Nor doth diversity of faculties and functions derogat from the Souls unity more then different offices or operations in the Sun to soften harden melt dry up c. els ther must be many Souls in the Microcosm and Suns in the Macrocosm but as the Sun suffers no decay when during an eclips it neither shines nor warms so the Soul dies not nor her faculties though after separation she useth no faculties being destitut of organs Zanohy holds the Souls unity consisting of three essential parts wherof the Vegetal being first infused at coming of the Sentient perisheth others of his opinion say vanisheth or removeth and that upon access of the Rational which is harsh doctrin to digest For hereby a duple death must insu by destruction or departure of those two first Souls Indeed they are distinct essences in Plants Beasts and Men but subordinat subservient faculties to Mans Soul and cannot subsist without it 5. Whence it coms or how it enters this earthy mansion whether by infusion or generation which is the main Sparta scope or subject of this subsequent speculation For as ther be three productions of Man beside the common foretouched First Without natural Father and Mother as Adam created by God The secund From a carnal Father without Mother as Eve out of Adams Rib. The third Of a Mother without human Father as Christ of the Virgin Mary by the Holy Ghost So are said to be three several origins of Mans Soul 1. By infusion as Adams 2. By transfusion as Eves 3. By Traduction or procreation as al their Posterities since which is the debat here to be discussed but hardly decided or defined Divers dissident opinions occur which shal be fully and fairly vented or ventilated specially the two principal of Creation and Traduction They are reduced to three general heads 1. The efficient whence Souls com whether of God Angels or Men 2. The matter whereof whether of somthing or nothing 3. The time when whether from eternity or eviternity The particulars shal be handled promiscuously 1. Pythagoras and Plato thought Mans Soul to proced Opinions from the Worlds Soul of celical immortal substance but created by God in set number not to be augmented or diminished which in du time descend to be united with bodies designed for them Thes being separat pass into other bodies as the Jews deemed or dreamed when som said Christ was John Baptist or Elias or one of the Prophets who were dead 2. Origen the father of fancies or fopperies held That God created al at once keeping them in a Treasury to be sent into bodies prepared for them becaus he rested from al creatific Works the seventh day and doth not stil form new Souls His reason is better then his opinion 3. Philo the Maniches and Priscillianists from the Stoics suppos them al created at once of Gods own substance becaus he breathed into mans face the Spirit of life divina particulam aurae which is not meant his own Spirit but a new created by his word Fiat which Moses expresseth Catanthropopeian by breathing 4. The Massilians from Philaster maintain them to be made by Angels of Fire and Spirit but God is sole Creator 5. The Traductis are of two sorts Som hold the Soul is corporeal and begot carnally as the Body whom saint Austin justly condemns 6. Others that 't is a Spirit spiritualy derived from both Parents Souls with the Seed like light from light 7. So Apollinaris and many Godly Bishops defended with most of the Western Church as S. Jerom testifies whom sundry modernists Hunnius Magirus Goclenius Brightman c. folow 8. The Infusiasts also are bipartit Som imagin them created without as Aristole intimats and after instilled which is generaly exploded 9. Others within the Body That it is created in infusing and infused in creating The two last of each side shal be sifted but al the rest excluded S. Austin and Eucherius hang in bivio between both who neither deny lineal traduction from Parents Souls becaus al are tainted one from another nor jugial creation de novo nihilo becaus universaly received but conceiv it cannot be evidently evinced out of sacred Scripture Many of no mean mark in the Traductists Tenets literary Republic assert That the Soul is produced or procreated from Parents by an Animific virtu conveied with the Seed imparted successively from the first Soul which had a power property or prerogativ given by Gods general blessing be fruitful and multiply to beget a spiritual and immortal substance like it self in a mortal material Body but contamined with the stain of that sin which was contracted by our Protoparents primitiv disobedience in whom al Mankind offended as the Root against the Creators command and commination so Traduction if duly weighed doth no way wound or weaken its immortality For God who inspired an immortal essence into a Casket of Clay gav it a faculty or energy to produce the like indued with the same immortal authoquality no less inseparable though not essential then Rationality or Risibility according to the received Rule Naturae sequitur semina quodque suae This is the ground work or chief Ancher-hold wherto they stick like Limpets to a Rock But on the other part how that primeval pollution of our first Parents prevarication which at once defiles both Body and Soul linealy transcending through the loins of Mankind should infect a spiritual pure-made Soul wherein no corporal thing can impress unless it be derived from Parents polluted Souls is a very hard Theory to conceiv or comprehend Nor doo the many coyned curious distinctions of Schools satisfy the scruple if strictly scanned though Cobweb-Lawns wil suffice to Partialists 'T is a lepry inseparably hereditary which may be sullied or slubbered over with palliativ salvs But al the wiles or wavings of mens wits in the world cannot cleerly cure it if it be created pure which traduction easily skinneth The Souls immortality on one side and original sins traduction on the other are two difficil tasks to reconcile but neither repugning to evident Scripture nor to any Article of Faith which concerns salvation Indeed the first Council of Bracarum in Spain censured Priscillianists for holding with Origen That al Souls were created together and sinned in Heaven but the Apollinarians Tertullianists or mere Traductists never were condemned of error or heresy for asserting the Souls traduction from Parents Souls which ever had pious Patrons in the Church nor doth any absurdity arise therfrom The Infusiastists build on thes foundations 1. That our Infusiasts Grounds Protoparents personal sin becam natural or universal by derivation from the Root 2. That God in his prohibition and commination Of the Tree of knowledg thou shalt not eat for in
then every efflux shift and abortiv is a Man But what maner of Man wil such a shapeless sensless substance be at the general Resurrection when every one shal resum his identic numerical Body Ergo the generation of Souls is subject to sundry absurdities in Nature and common Reason Answ Such as hold Infusion at time of conception as Traductists inferences violently inforce are liable to the same difficulties so are they that set it at quickning for if it miscarries the day after which a few hours distance makes no difference what maner of Man wil that be cannot God perfect the one so wel as the other doo not al bodies turn to dust doo not Divines say al shal rise in such stature as at Christs age Why not then the first coagulation so wel as an inform infirm Embryon cannot omnipotence extend a Body into any dimensions so wel as amend al imperfections Thes are arcan mysteries known only to him that knows al and can doo al in al But Insusiasts are equaly engaged to answer it sith the power to prepare a Body for the Souls union is defeated or destroyed and by consequence so many Souls lost which by divine preordination should be created and infused but it crosseth not Traduction and men must be wise to sobriety not searching into Gods secrets Arg. 'T is improbable that impure material seed should be the conduit to convey a power of producing so pure a substance or divine Spirit Ergo c. Answ No more then that the Body a meer putrid mass should be the seat or subject of the Soul it self which is a divine immortal immaterial essence Arg. Spirits doo not multiply or beget one another nor can Angels propagat or generat becaus Spirits but Mans Soul is a Spirit so scripturaly stiled Ergo c. Answ Simple Spirits cannot propagat and Angels are individuals subsisting alone but human Souls organized and united to Bodies wherin they exist being so ordained to preserv the race of Mankind Som distinguish that Compounds generat and principal parts only propagat but this is a vain evasion no veritable satisfaction for propagation properly pertains to Kinds generation to Individuals and both to Compounds nor are the terms convertible in the abstract for every generation is not propagation but in the concret or subject what ever is generated is propagat and reciprocaly To apply it neither Soul nor Body is truly said to beget or be begot but the whol Man who begets and is begot completly but the parts incompletly Arg. Marsilius Ficinus prescribes three sorts of production 1. The making of Mans Soul from nothing into being caled Creation 2. The mutation of a lifeless Body into an Animal by the Soul hight Formation 3. The change of an Embryo into the whol Compound clyped Generation The object or Terminus of Creation is immortality of Formation a Soul not considered simply but as in a Body of Generation an Animal consisting of both Now saith he in every Generation is a decision of somthing from the Begetter which a Soul hath not becaus it admits no division nor decision Ergo it cannot generat Answ The Traductists exclud the fiâ—st branch except with reference to Adams Soul soly yet grant immortality to be the Terminus in production of al. The other two they apply to Compounds only wherein the Soul sends no material seed or substance by decision as the Body doth but only a procreativ virtu with the spirit of seed to produce the like spiritual substance the maner wherof is inscrutable as is also original sin for Man is Natures miracle and Epitomâ— of al Creatures yet differs from al having an immortal spirit in a corruptible casknet and his generation wonderful Arg. Beasts Souls dy becaus bred of seed or with it Ergo if Mens Souls be ingendred in the same sort by or with the conveience of seed they must likewise perish Answ This is non causa pro causa for Beasts souls dy not soly becaus bred of seed but specialy becaus formed at first intirely of the common corruptible Chaos But God made mans Body of dust wherto it must return but infused or inspâ—red a Soul which is immortal or eviternal like Angels partaking the same divine origin Arg. If the Soul proceds from both Parents Souls then either two grow into one or their Souls are extracted and they remain Soulless or part of their Souls passeth and so are divisible But al thes are gross enormites and neither possible Ergo Traduction is no way tolerable Answ Al thes inferences are impertinent for both Parents concur to beget the Body too yet two grow not together nor are they impaired but God ordained in cours of Nature that both Sexes shal cooperat in generation so from their Bodies flows a material seed with a corporific virtu to beget a Body and from their Souls proceds an animific power with the seeds spirit to produce a Soul both which conjoining is cald Prolific in regard of the Compound yet neither are the Parents Souls nor any part of them no more then their Bodies extracted or exhausted but only an energy issuing from them to generat a new Arg. The Soul exerciseth her essential operations to Wil and Understand without help of bodily organs as appears being separat Ergo it needs no Parents seed to its production for as every thing works so is its essence and contrarily as Aristotle avers who concluds mans Soul not to depend of the body L 2. de gen Anim. c. 3. becaus it works within it Answ The Soul while it is in the Body useth its organs in hir chief operations of Wil and Intellect though when separat she needs them not nor is Parents seed the efficient of producing to depend theroâ— but only the instrum ut to carry virtu of producing a new Soul with the seed which impeacheth not the exerciâ—e of hir chief operations without organs in the Body nor is ther any sap or solidity 〈◊〉 this Argument against Traduction any way however wrested Arg. The Soul dies not with the Body Ergo 't is not generated with it For ther is the same reason of generation and corruption sith the Souls presence is the caus of life as the Suns is of light and absence of death as his is of darknes so if the Bodies procreation caus the Souls production its death must be hir perdition Answ This is pithier then a former viz. whatever is generated shal be corrupted But the Bodies generation doth not caus the Souls production sith 't is generated with it not by it and though it giv the Body life as the essential Form yet dies not with it as not proceding from it but from the Parents Souls Arg. Aristotle asserts That the Mind or Intellect alone coms from without and is of divine origin Ergo not generated by Parents as Bodies be Answ 'T is thought thos words Sola mens foris adveâ—it were foisted into the Text without any coherence
the maners of the Mind and Faculties of Soul depend wherin Children may resemble their Progenitors though in countenance complexion or constitution more like to strangers so ther is no certain or convincing Argument for Traduction to be taken from such variable observations Ob. If aformativ faculty in seed to build the Body proced from Parents Souls then doth also an animific virtu to produce the Soul But al sides grant the one Ergo the other folows For if Parents Souls impart to it a power to prepare a place that power is able to beget a Soul Sol. The formativ animific or rather Prolific faculty preparativ to sit the matter for union proceds from Parents Souls but not procreativ to beget a Soul being only able to build the bodily part and make it ready for reception of the Soul when it shal be infused Repl. This seems a meer Postulatum without proof not rendring any reason why 't is able to prepare a place and not procreat the Soul For what belongs to every Kind cannot sans derogation or disparagement be denied to the noblest Creature but the intire production of Individuals with their principal parts both matter and form pertains to al Species els Ergo to Mankind also Sol. 'T is no disparagement but a dignity that God deigns to creat in Man a divine paâ—t yet he may be said to beget Individuals intire for perpetuity of his Kind viz. praeparando uniendo though he begets not the Soul it self hic murus abeneus esto this is the main Anchor-hold Ob. David saith Man is conceived in sin which either is Psal 51. 5. impressed before the Souls infusion or the Soul corrupted at conception and first creation or an inanimat Embryo the subject of sin or els the Soul is traducted which salvs and saâ—isfies al scruples but the three first are absonous Ergo the last alone authentic Sol. Som say Parents sin committed in procreation is ther meant but that in al lawful Marriages is sanctified and who can cal that polluted which God hath cleansed Others fly to the Souls infusion at first conception which must eeds be els it wil not hold water But most say the very seed is defiled with an hereditary stain as 't is with the seeds of sundry diseases which is not properly sin til the Soul be infused being the sole subject therof â—trum horum mavis for men wil never agree in this intricat Maze Ob. Al Accidents folow their Form nor can subsist without their Subject but vegetation is visible and vigorous in an Embryo before the quickning or motion Ergo the Soul or Subject must needs be ther at conception and consequently traducted or generated Sol. Zanchy answers how orthodoxly judg ye that in building L. 2. de Hom. creat c. 5. Mans Body as it hath first the form of blood next of milk then of flesh and last a human shape so at first is no Soul but only an energy in the spermatic spirits to produce a vegetant Soul when the Embryo livs as a Plant then that Soul perishing the Sentient is generated and that livs as an Animal which being also extinct the Rational succeds or supervens not produced from the same energy nor from Parents Souls but created and infused by God This implies a duple death upon extinction of the two first Souls Others say the Vegetant powers arising from seed spirits and blood are cherished by warmth of Natures Garden the Womb til time of motion but ever after the new infused Soul exerciseth al functions til it brings the Embryo to birth and perfection Thus they are puzled touching the time when 't is infused but certainly the quickning is very uncertain Repl. The proper source and principal subject of al such Faculties is a Soul not seed spirits or blood Ergo either the seed had a Soul begetting energy or they were faculties of the succeding Soul and so subsisted alone without a subject or els are Creatures distinct and remain divided but the two later assertions are gross absurdities and the first rests irrefragable that the seed carries an animific virtu or Soul-begetting energy from the Parents Souls by natural traduction which best salvs the propagation of original sin Sol. Som say thos Faculties predepend on the Seminal Form til infusion of the Intellectual yet how can that being inanimat be the subject of vegetation or motion Or if it were a Soul how did it vanish it died not as Zanchius dreams nor is swalowed up of the succeding Soul nor can ther be any coition or coalition of Souls Others forced by thes pressures hold 't is created at conception which is more tenible of the two exercising hir functions gradualy as organs are apparated and accommodated For that time is fixed but the quickning sooner or later according to the Embryos vivacity and other various contingents but God is not tied to creat Souls upon al human casualties til his set appointed time yea Christs conception at the Angels salutation Ave Maria is cald his incarnation which is the production of his whol Humanity and his Mother went immediatly to hir Cosin Elizabeth then impregnant of John Baptist who being filled with the Holy Ghost caled hir the Mother of our Lord so that he was then Luke 1 43. perfect God and Man at first conception and the Babe leaped in her Womb for joy being before quick as plainly appears Ob. Mans Soul is impure at first conception and the whol Man polluted for what is born of flesh is flesh saith Christ but God John 3 6. creats nothing impure Ergo the Soul is not created but conceived and generated impure from the Parents Souls Sol. God creats the Soul in substance found sans stain but corruption or contagion caled Concupiscence is not of the Father saith S. John but of the World for the guilt of original sin is imputed to the whol Man so soon as both parts are united Ob. Adams Rib was made a complet woman and the Soul therin becam hirs no new being infused Ergo every Soul is not created Sol. The School-men say Eves Soul was created and infused though it be not expressed yet the extraordinary creation of the first Woman extends not to the ordinary production of al others nor is it clear that the Rib was animat or the Soul therof made hirs Repl. In this case it holds for the Infusiasts infer that al Mens Souls are created becaus Adams was Ergo it folows of al Women from Eve Sol. The reason is not semblable for he was the root of al Mankind Male and Female therfore al our souls infused as his was but not she of Womankind so it skilleth not whether hirs was created ex nihilo or diffused from that animat Rib sith 't is not reveled Ob. Christ took his whol Humanity from the Virgin by the Holy Ghosts overshadowing Ergo both Body and Soul cam from hir Sol. He took only Flesh from her which includs the whol
be guilty of sin if his Soul com immediatly from God sav only by propagation Or how can Adam be our Father if the whol Man descends not from him One cannot be a proper Father of the whol unless he beget both parts for to supply meer matter which is elementar makes not a Father sith the Form only denominats which if he doth not generat he can no more be a Father then to Fleas and Lice which are bred of his Body Nay if Fatherhood consists chiefly in giving the Form God is rather the tru Father from whom the principal part proceds then Parents which beget the baser The Soul is Mans essential part without which he is no Man How then can he procreat a Creature like himself if he produce not the Soul specialy sith al agree that he propagats such an accident as sin which inheres in the Soul as its sole subject Can he propagat an unnatural accident Sin which cannot be without the Soul and not a natural essence the Soul without which can be no Sin The faculty of propagation pertains to the Soul so wel as Body yea hath its chif seat in the Soul soly for the Body is as a Pen in the Writers hand but the Soul principal Scribe or Secretary sith then such as the caus is such is the effect the Soul must produce a Soul and whol Man a whol Man not an inform lump which without a Soul is neither Man nor Beast but the Soul stil accompanies the Seed at first conception and gradualy builds the Body fitly framing al the organs from the first rudiments to ful perfection Nor can such effects be doon Exerâ— 6. 55. 5. but by a Soul as subtle Scaliger provs He allegeth many mo Arguments against Infusion and answers al advers Reasons but becaus they are already produced on both parts 't is nausity to serv forth twise sod Coleworts but having refuted Infusiasts and rejected Traductists he vents his own novel Invention His Grounds are thes 1. God created three sorts of spiritual A new opinion Natures 1. Angels so sublime as they cannot join with Bodies 2. Beasts Souls so material as they cannot be separat from Bodies 3. Mens Souls in a mean which can both liv without Bodies after death like Angels and unite with Bodies in this life like Beasts Souls So he ordained That Angels shal neither increas nor decreas Sensitiv Souls both increas and decreas But Rational increas or multiply not decreas or perish Hence he infers that Angels are crated immediatly by God only Beasts Souls procreated mediatly one from another But Mens Souls partly produced by Gods immediat power and partly by mediat propagation or such a production as coms neerest to creation 2. Mans Soul is indued with power to use bodily organs in attaining knowledg of al sensible things yea our knowledg of God ariseth ordinarily from Sens ordered by Reason which is a mean between Beasts sens and Angels Intelligence Therfore God united the Soul with a Body which it naturaly desires being incomplet without it nor knows ought ordinarily but by it As then al ordinary faculties and works are doon mediatly by corporal Natures so is their origin or Of-spring or els could not hav such sympathy with a Body Yet as the Nature and Works therof are som way extraordinary without abov al Elementar Natures so God proportioaly hath a supernatural extraordinary work in producing it different from al others 3. Elementar Natures cannot be produced without a more excellent external efficient then themselfs viz. the Sun and celical bodies by their light motion and influence for so al sublunars depend on them for being beside the matter wherof they are particularly compounded and peculiar Forms but the Soul having a Spiritual kind of composition nobler then the rest from Parents by seed requires a spiritual extern efficient beside it self which must needs be God the Father of Spirits sith Stars being bodies cannot produce Mans Soul to which they are far inferior 4. Human conception often fails and is not so frequent as in other Creatures which argues it is not of Nature alone but by Gods more special power and providence then in other generations If then he acts more in Mans conception why shal not the Soul be produced then without a duple task of creating and infusing at quickning When Rachel rashly cried Giv me Children els â— dy Jacob wisely answered Am â— in Gods stead so 't is said of Ruth The Lord gav hir conception who only opens and shuts the Womb but 't is no wher said he creats Souls For he sets a constant cours with his conserving blessing concurring that like shal produce their like 5. As God eternaly decreed of Man both who shal com into the World how many and when so he works in his conception more then in al others which must needs be as immediat efficient of his Soul wherby he blesseth or blasteth conception ordering it by a special providence according to his decree contrarily sundry inconveniences arise from creation that som Children are fully formed which dying before the Soul is infused cannot com to Judgment that God may be glorified and so his work shal be frustrated 6. 'T is evident in promiscuous copulations of Men or Women with Beasts that Gods efficient power is joined with the Souls propagation sith such bestial births are not indued with Reason nor shal com to Judgment though their sensitiv Entelechy is sharper and subtler then other Animals as Apes and Baboons are supposed to spring primitivly from such unnatural mixtions or conjunctions Nor is the Soul immediatly created by God sans natural means sith Children begot in Incest or Adultery hav it which God shal seem to approv or further when he might hinder it being not bound to infuse Souls This Reason may be retorted sith he is not bound to assist at such coitions being a most free Agent and not a Natural so he cannot be an external efficient as the Sun is in other generations 7. Sith Nature by divine Ordinance produceth daily out of dead Elementar matter admirable powers of Seing Hearing Phantasy Memory belonging to brute Beasts the maner wherof our Reason cannot conceiv how much more can the God of Nature produce out of Mans more excellent Nature others like to it though we cannot comprehend the manner how Nor is corporal Seed which is of far purer temper and subtler Spirits then in other Animals an unfit Instrument to propagat a Rational Soul specialy sith the Spirits in Seed are of sublime Nature which hav neer affinity with the Soul 8. God hath set a natural order That a whol Man shal beget the whol both Body and Soul yet not one the other nor Soul a Soul alone or Body a Body but the Soul a Soul immediatly by the Body and Body a Body by the Soul but both jointly a whol Man for they are Individualy united and their operations concur so Man propagats like other
Animals but by Gods immediat power in maner aforsaid 9. The Soul being not produced simply by Natures power nor made of meer corporal matter transcends the common condition of al corporeal Creatures and is in it self immortal having God the extern efficient to produce it 10. The Soul being propagated from Parents is polluted with Natures stain contracted from Adams sin which is derived from Parents to Children with the whol Man as the adequat subject of it yet God in no fault sith our Souls are not corrupted by him but from our Parents and our selfs If any cannot conceiv how one Soul produceth another which is the hardest knot let him consider how it can be united to a Body and organized with it which wil allay the difficulty For if Angels hav aereal bodies as many Antients deem or at least are not pure Spirits compared to God muâ—h more may Mens Souls hav such a spiritual composure as meerly resembles Matter and form in Bodies which may wel accord with the maner of propagation prespecified and no way repugn the Souls divine essence If this way oppugn Reason yet 't is safer then that which repugns Religion By this Card our Author sailing betwixt Scilla and Charybdis Conclusion discovered Pachinus a middle Promontory in Sicil as Columbus did Cuba viz. that as the Sun is external efficient in the general generation of al Sublunars beside their internal particular principles so is God in the special production of every Mans Soul beside the peculiar Parents Souls working virtualy in the seed as his pretended premisses prov Which he farther confirms thus 1. Ther is no diametral Conformation difference between Soul and Body but they may be naturaly coupled together For though the Soul be not visible yet hath it a spiritual substance not simply pure but the lowest degree of Spirits prone to unite with corporeal natures and so may be propagated with them as united to them 2. Every Nature the more excellent 't is hath a neerer union with the first Being on which it depends and is more immediatly moved by it whence it folows that the Soul being more excellent and neerer to God then any corporal Creature in which he works more immediatly then others after they are made so he doth in the first production of it 3. Nothing is generated but hath som extern efficient Caus which in Coporeals is the Celical bodies whence 't is said the Sun and Man be get a Man as the Sun and Lion a Lion But the Soul being a Spirit and made at first by God can hav no other extern efficient sav the same immediat power So it may more truly be said God and Man generat the Soul God as efficient and Parents as his procreant instruments to produce what how and when he pleaseth according to his eternal Decree Nor is it absurd that Man hath two extern efficients but rather an honor that God and Nature concur to his generation 4. Mortality proceds not from natural generation but divine malediction for had not Man sinned his Body should be eviternal so wel as Soul Ergo if it were compounded and generated in a corporal way which is not so yet it folows not to make it mortal 5. Whatever hath being immediatly from God cannot be annihilated but by his immediat power which is the tru caus of immortality Hence the Body being produced soly by Natures power doth dy or perish yet the Soul produced by immediat act of the Deity can never dy but by the same power which gav it life Thus it appears that though the Soul be produced as aforesaid yet is it immortal sith 't is neither made of corporal matter nor generated in meer natural maner Nor is God faulty though we be sinful sith being wholy in Adam and actualy one with him our whol Nature is so defiled and Gods pure ordinance in producing Souls depraved that a total corruption passeth in the very conception and we stained with original sin at our very first being To cleer the Case he frames som objections against this middle way 1. Ob. If the Soul be resolved into a first principle of Adams Soul whence al are derived as Mixtils are into Elements it must needs be mortal as al such are Ergo 't is not so derived or els 't is mortal Sol. The comparison is unlike for Mixtils are compact of Elements into which they resolv but Mens Souls not compounded of Adams no nor Bodies nor one of another but of the same nature and so simple as his Nor doth it folow if the Soul be compounded like Elements it must inevitably be mortal for death and corruption coms not from composition or propagation but meerly from malediction for sin the wages wherof is death 2. Ob. If God cooperats with Man in producing Souls he no less rests from his works then in jugial creating them of nothing for the thing is the same and terms little differing Ergo this novity of a middle way to make God the external efficient is very vanity and of no validity Sol. Here is no creation of nothing but production of a thing from former principles Nor doth it repugn Gods creatifie rest to concur in other works of providence government and the Souls spiritual acts nor in assisting its production as an extern efficient which tends only to preserv Mankind specialy sith it hath no mediat maner in ordinary cours of nature sav only Gods immediat concurrence in extraordinary maner 3. Ob. If Man cannot generat his like without Gods special extraordinary help he is in this behalf inferior to Beasts as Traductists urge against Creation Ergo c. Sol. Not so for Beasts beget also by the Heavens help as exterior efficients If then Mans Soul for excellence hath a far sublimer supercelical efficient And he acts so much in generation of his like as other Creatures doo in theirs 't is rather a dignity abov al then any disparagement at al. So this exception holds against jugial creation wherin Man no whit concurs which may seem a derogation but not against natural propagation 4. Ob. If God be immediat extern efficient of our sin-polluted Souls by natural propagation he is Author or accessary to sin rather then by creation Ergo c. Sol. Nothing less for he is only external efficient of the Soul not of sin which coms from corrupt Parents who supply the internal matter of the whol Man wherin sin consists sith generation is not of Parts but Persons it being his just ordinance in nature That as the Tree is so shal the fruit be Sith then he made Man perfectly good at first to beget Children perfect like himself who prevaricated and polluted al his Progeny or Posterity God performs his part stil to confer his efficient power in the perpetual production of Mankind And as he first infused his Soul so he stil concurs in producing it though not in the same sort yet sin is meerly accidental in respect of
him who is neither Author nor accessary but 't is propagated in generation by the first Mans fal or fault through the loins of perpetual posterity one from another It rests to present som gleanings gathered from the said Corollary Treatis which tends to this Theory 1. Creation is a metaphysical production of a Thing out of Nothing immediatly by God so the first Chaos caled Heaven and Earth was made of meer nothing and the rest mediatly out of it but Adams Body of Earth mediatly and his Soul immediatly of nothing by a middle way of Production 2. Propagation is a Natural act or faculty wherby a living Creature begets his like for continuance of the Kind this is the proper perfection of every Animal Vegetant Sentient Intelligent being the most excellent faculty ingrafted in Nature by Gods special charge and blessing of Increas and multiply which is duple 1. Equivocal when Plants or Animals are bred of putrefaction as Weeds Magots Eeles c. 2. Univocal when ech Animat brings its like as Wheat Wheat Whale a Whale Eagle an Eagle Lion a Lion Man a Man This is doon by the seed of generation which contains the whol Nature to continu the Species for ever wheras Individuals are al mortal or momentany So Mans seed Natures quintessence containing the whol Kind is lodged in a place fit for propagation of another conspecifical which generation being Mans perfection he cannot be said propagat either part but the whol or a third consisting both of Form and Matter Hence our propagation from Adam is a deduction of the whol Man according to Natures cours in turning our potential being into act which derivs his Nature to us but if the Soul be fetch'd from Heaven and Body from Earth how shal both ends be brought together or what shal this mix'd action be caled Simple Creation it cannot be nor pure propagation but a Mungrel like a Mule For Creation and Propagation differ divesly 1. One is Gods work by himself of meer nothing wrought by his sole Word and Wil the other Natures of som preexistent matter according to ech Creatures kind by Gods ordinance setled in Nature 2. That is doon in an instant by an infinit essence which requires no time this by previous preparations or gradual perfections which take time tho the very conception is acted in a moment 3. One is performed without any motion or mutation but in the other the same matter is changed or varied into several forms 4. In the first things are not made of one substance with the Creator but in the last both hav the same substance 5. In Creation privation preceds the habit power act and darknes light but in Propagation contrary habit foregoes privation as sight blindnes act power and light darknes The Reasons that Mans Soul cannot be propagated by cours of Creation are thes 1. It impugns Gods Justice to put a 1. Reason pure innocent essence into a condition to be instantly damned for anothers sin which it must be if an Embryo dies before born and baptised To this 't is said the new Soul is guilty by union which is a greater aspersion on divine Justice but no salvo for if it be in no fault why shal it be guilty and punished for Adams fal If it be replied That God so eternaly Decreed this farther aggravats nor doth it appear that he so Decreed which to aver without warrant is most hainous for if he Decreed as Supralapsarians harshly hold that al should sin and suffer death in Adam 't is requisit to be by just means which if it may be doon by Traduction rather then Creation yea by that way and not this then is that to be counted Gods Decree Can Justice it self deal unjustly surely in equity is no iniquity God promiseth and proclameth that a faultless Child shal not suffer Ezek. 18. 20. for his Fathers guilt why then shal a good Soul be so deeply punished for anothers sin to whom it is scars kin sith Adam that sinned was no simple Soul but a Man 2. If the Soul be immediatly created pure it cannot be polluted by a Body which of it self is not the subject of sin nor can defile a spiritual substance being the first mover of al acts in the Body and it should rather sanctify that then be stained by it So it may better be defended that we hav original righteousnes becaus the Soul coms from God then original sin becaus the Body coms from Adam If it should be granted that the Soul is polluted by yeelding to bodily lusts yet this is actual sin not original corruption Nor can it com from a pure created Soul To this 't is said That at the instant of Creation God bereavs al supernatural gifts for Adams laps which though it put not evil into the Soul yet original sin necessarily flows or folows This seems uncouth that God shal at once doo and undoo or make and mar so soon as 't is made or giv goodness and take it away instantly Nay if it be created in infusing 't is void of supernatural gifts and so cannot be deprived of what it never had But if it be created without thos gifts which to us are supernatural he creats it evil as al Men are without such nor can a Soul be good without them If then God makes it so that it must needs be evil he makes it evil sith he makes it that it cannot be good Yet if al the premisses be conceded 't is never the neer to salv original sin sith this is not to sin in Adam but to becom sinful for him So it results that the Soul if created good cannot possibly contract Adams sin nor can al Mens wits or wiles cleerly shew how a Soul created pure can be polluted and al shifts hitherto devised are silly Cobweb Lawns pervious to every ey The last refuge that it coms neither by Soul nor Body but by union of both sith by it we becom Sons of Adam and so his sin made ours is Mr. Calvins curious conceipt but scars satisfactory For it is a spiritual Lepry which hereditarily infects the whol Man with al parts and powers If then the Soul at first union be pure and Body polluted the Child shal be half holy and half sinful Or if both be clean at first how can union make both or either unclean for when two good are conjoined both becom better Hence som say Adams sin is only imputed not inherent and so we only reputed corrupt Indeed Christs righteousnes is realy ours by imputation and a voluntary institution as a Covenant of Grace differs from ordinary Justice in cours of Nature sith 't is free to shew mercy without caus but not to punish without du desert Nor can this sin be justly imputed to al unles the whol Man be propagated for 't is a real infection of the whol Nature both Body and Soul 3. As by Gods Ordinance original sin passeth from one to al
Mankind so by propagation al Mankind proceds out of one and as that sin overspreads the whol Man so both parts being infected must needs be propagated Again as this sin is seated specialy in the Soul so 't is chiefly propagated according to Natures cours Hence three points rest to be proved 1. That original sin passeth only by propagation as Scriptures universaly testify By one man death passed upon al becaus al sinned in him and 't is imputed to his Posterity becaus al were in him as the Root or Stock and al descend out of him so his sin becoms ours both by imputation and propagation but by the first becaus of the last For 't is not anothers sin imputed which is not ours but that made ours by propagation actualy which before was only potentialy This is cleer by the Antithesis between the first and secund Adam as in one al dy so in Christ shal al be made aliv The one being Root of Mankind in whom al are by Nature the other Head of the Elect in whom they are al by Grace Such then are deceived as deem Adams sin only imputed like Christs righteousnes sith this last is the Creators voluntary Institution and work of meer Mercy but the first a necessary operation of the Creature and work of Justice So the Antithesis holds tru thus As in Christ we fulfilled the Law suffered death and attained salvation being members of his Body by Grace So in Adam we eat the forbiden fruit becam Satans bondslaves and were in state of damnation being al members of his Body by Nature So Christ derivs his righteousnes to his Children by spiritual regeneration as Adam did his sin to al Men by natural generation Ergo as Christs righteousnes is not imputed but by means of regeneration wherby we becom members of his Body So Adams sin cannot be imputed but by generation wherby we descend from him as his members If Adams sin be simply imputed becaus we are Men as he was who received or lost for himself and al Mankind then must it be imputed to Christ as Man so wel as to us which is not so for our sinning in him and being sinfully propagated from him makes us liable which Christ was not becaus sanctified in the womb by the holy Ghost at first conception but al els derived from him and his sin to us through one anothers loins 2. Original sin cannot be propagated unles the whol Man and both Parts be which necessarily flows from the premisses for except the whol Man descends from him the whol cannot be infected sith neither Soul nor Body alone is the subject of sin but the Person Or if the whol be not the subject 't is not properly sinful The Law likewise is given to the whol and the Person punished or rewarded 3. The whol Man cannot be propagated unles the Soul be sith the whol consists of its parts To say the Soul coms from Adam quoad existentiam unionem non quoad essentiam is sly Sophistry not real or rational for then Man contributs but the worst part not the whol nor half Nor is it tru that Adam is caus of the union but rather God if he creats the Soul Nor if the Soul be infused can any tel how long time after conception during which space the Woman works alone But if the whol Man be said properly to proced from Adam becaus the body doth much more may it be verified to com from God becaus the Soul doth so the union rather to be ascribed to God as the noblest suprem Agent then to Man the baser and inferior If then the whol Man and both parts be not propagated it results that we were in Adam wherin we are not viz. the Person that we sinned in him without that without which he could not sin viz. the Soul That the whol Man was in Adam yet never cam from him That we lost in him which we never had of him viz. original righteousnes That he shal stil be ful of Souls which he never had That the whol person proceds from him yet not that which makes the whol 4. Christs Soul was not created but his whol Humanity taken from the Virgin for his birth life death are curiosly and circumstantialy recorded by the Evangelists but no Soul creation which they would not omit being so pregnant a proof that he was without sin if it was created pure Nor is any Souls creation since Adams specified in Scripture Christ is caled the seed of the Woman and Davids seed according to the flesh which imports the whol Humanity as opposed to his Deity but if his Soul was created the imputation of Adams sin to al Men must be likewise lâ—able to him as Man Ad hereto That the Soul and Body as 't is in al others were conceived at once for the divine Nature being immediatly united to the Soul and by it to the Body the Soul must be produced in the moment of conception with the Body or els the Deity was first united to a brute Body which is brutish to imagin The truth is his Soul being united with the Body into one Nature at first conception becam one Person with the eternal Word by a miraculous working of the holy Ghost who purified the Womb that the Birth becam exempt from sin So his whol Humanity Soul and Body was deduced from Adam and separated from the Virgin by the holy Ghost But a Soul cannot be produced by Natures ordinary cours no more then a Body without concurrence of both Sexes Souls yet being performed by supernatural power 't is a tru Soul and so is the Body both which joined in one Person make a perfect Man as Eve was a very Woman though taken out of Man and Christ tru Man taken only out of Woman For in Mans quadruple production â—â— a duple concordance Adam made immediatly by God without Man or Woman Eve mediatly out of Man without Woman Christ immediatly out of Woman without Man but al els mediatly by both 'T is said the holy Ghost sanctified part of the Virgins substance assumed by the Godhead to make Christs Person which terms are tru if wel understood For by part of hir substance is meant the whol Nature or both parts not Body only whereof his Humanity was framed By sanctifying is not meant clensing that portion from sin but consecrating it to that holy purpos indowing it with gifts fit for so divine union yet was it free from sin or rather never sinful by reason of this union For al substances were created exceeding good and depend immediatly on God Nor is sin essential to Mans Nature but accidental cleaving to the person by Adams fal and not properly in the substance of Human Nature Nor are evil actions or affections stiled simply sinful but the Man sith sin consists not in any pravity of matter but in the corrupt Wil or intent of the dooer Nor is ther any Law to punish parts or substances
Adams sons in their time and order to rais them faln and sav them lost which S. Austin terms the Grace of Christ For in Man is no merit of Grace but only an occasion of God to shew it which yet he is free to receiv or refuse Nor is the good use of former Graces any merit or caus of giving mo which are so freely given as the first els Grace were no Grace This Grace being one in essence hath divers denominations according to the difference of relations and effects the most usual distinction is into preventing working or exciting Grace and folowing coworking or helping but to divide it into sufficient and efficacious is an idle buz For how can it be Grace or sufficient which never produceth any effect sith if it becom effectual it loseth the name of sufficient and is one with the other for al Grace in it self is sufficient or efficient alike but the defect in the subject or som other caus Yet Grace may be caled effectual from the event as issuing from Gods special mercy guided by Prescience not els Lapsed Man hath a necessity of Grace as S. Austin maintains against Pelagius who denied original sin or any loss to Adams Of-spring by his fal holding Mankind so sound as God made it as ther needs no Grace al which are gross errors For Man without God can doo no good becaus the Commandments are beyond his strength without Grace to which nothing is impossible and 't is most just the Creature should rely on the Creator that he may stil apply to him The Air is not a lucid body like the Sun for then it would continu so stil in absence of his light So Man is illightned by Gods presence but in his absence immediatly darkned whom we forsake wilfully The power of Grace is glorious such as wrought in Christ when he rose from the dead whence our conversion is Eph. 1. 19 20. caled a new Birth a new Creation and first Resurrection For the power to Wil good is created again as at first sith our indeavors are vain unles they be stirred and void unles helped as Bernard saith The habits of Faith and Lov are no more in our Rom. 7. 18. power then a blind Man can giv himself sight he may hav present to wil but to doo what the Law injoins he finds not except the Spirit help him So that when we are ready to receiv Phil. 2. 12. 1â— Gods mighty power he works and givs our desire hence S. Paul exhorts to work our Salvation having power given to work by him which works both to wil and doo Yet when Man wilfully resists his power he yeelds out of wil not weaknes and lets him fal into a reprobat sens who wil not necessitat or hold up any in obstinat disobedience for that power which builds up supernatural things doth not destroy natural such as is the liberty to disobey being before the Fal. Touching universal Grace Origen extends it to al Men and Devils whom S. Austin refuts Huber held universal Election 2 de Civ 〈◊〉 that Christs death brought al into state of Salvation whom the Lutherans and Synod of Dort condemn Andradius and other Papists say that Ethnics hav sufficient saving Grace by Natures light which if they use wel Gospel Grace shal be reveled to them Al which are evident errors but three Orthodox 1. That 3 Pregnâ—â— Points as Christ took the Nature of Man not of Angels so he paid the price of Redeeming al Mankind as our common Catechism teacheth I beleev in God the Father who made me and al the World in God the Son who redeemed me and al Mankind and in God the holy Ghost who sanctifies me and al the Elect. 2. That the promiss of the Gospel is universal to al within hearing and may be seriously profred to al Men as 't is preached to Pagans for our Church wils al to receiv the Promisses as they be generaly held forth in holy Scriptures 3. That with the Promiss and Word of the Gospel ther goes ordinarily sufficient Grace of the Spirit to work beleef and obedience in al under the Gospel but that al doo not obey proceds from Men being wanting 〈◊〉 Cor. 2. 1 2. to Gods Grace not for any defect on his part as S. Paul plainly provs Now wheras 't is said how Christ laid down his life for his Sheep for Gods Children and for his Church but elswhere that he died for al Men interpret as they list or like yet must such Texts be cautiously and conscientiously construed lest they clash one against another It may wel cohere that God in mercy to Mankind sent his Son to dy for al being no accepter of persons willing primarily to sav al but foreseing the fruit or success of his death that som would thankfully embrace it and the rest not he accepted even thos few and sent his Son by a secundary wil to sav them in whom he would glorify his bounty who could hav changed the cours of his Graces and Government to sav mo if he pleased Hereof S. Chrysostom speaks 't is meet every one be no less thankful then as if Christ cam into the World for his sake only sith he would not refuse it even for one so mightily he lovs every particular with the same measure of affection as he doth al Mankind therfore he was offred a Sacrafice for our whol Nature which he assumed into his Person being sufficient to sav al but wil be useful or available only to Beleevers yet was he not scared from this dispensation for the paucity but as the Feast was prepared for Luke 14. 16. c. al yet such as were invited would not com the Lord did not presently take away what was provided but caled in al sorts of Guests So doth God S. Austin saith as to the valu or virtu of the price so far as concerns al Mankind Christs blood is a Redemption of the whol World but such as liv without Faith and the mystery of new Birth are Aliens therto When therfore by that one Nature of us al which he took for al our sakes we are truly said to be al Redeemed yet not al freed from captivity for the cup of immortality hath enough to profit al yet to such as wil not drink 't is nothing profitable 13. Free-wil is more debated then wel discerned how far the 13 Freewil Liberum ad 〈◊〉 prints remain since Adams fal 'T is a natural power in a Rational Creature to wil or nil chuse or refuse be it good or evil This is looked on with great prejudgment and by Dr. Abbot somtime Bishop of Sâ—rum scornfully stiled Tomsons strumpet but sundry Fathers stifly defend hir as the Hand-maid of Grace against the Manichees and other Heretics 'T is a tru saying If ther be not Grace how shal God sav the World and 't is as tru if ther be not Free-wil how shal he judg the
sin to one and punish him for it with eternal death or to ordain Men to perdition simply without looking at sin but they say he may doo the one without wrong to Justice Ergo the other So saith Doctor Twiss If God may decree Men to Hel for Adams sin derived to them by his sole constitution he may so justly doo it without any such ordination Indeed 't is al one to decree a Mans misery as to involv him in a sin which shal make him miserable but neither is just nor agreeable to the Judg of the World Is it justice to require Faith in Christ of thos to whom he hath by flat decree denied it Yet so they fain God to doo For Zanchy saith Every Man sans exception even Reprobats is bound to beleev that he is chosen in Christ to salvation or els he sins grievously as Christ saith The Spirit shal convince the World of sin becaus they beleeved not in me This they generaly hold yet absolut Reprobats John 16 9 cannot justly be bound to beleev becaus barred by divine Decree and hav no power to doo it shal any be tied to impossibilities If al be immutable more Medorum their endevor is vain and al preaching vain For 't is not Gods serious Wil they shal beleev whom he doth not furnish with necessary power but rather the contrary that they shal not beleev The Devils hav no part in Christ or the new Covenant and therfore not bound to beleev in the one nor punishable for transgressing the other no more can God justly require Faith of Reprobats or destroy them for not beleeving if they hav no more part in Christ or the Covenant then Devils which wil make the doctrin that Christ died for al Men a flatâ—ly What can be more injust then to punish Men for omitting to doo which his own Decree makes impossible for them to perform Som answer that Gods Decree is just tho it seem hard to 1 Defens Mans erring understanding This is fals and the contradictory tru that nothing is truly Answer just which human understanding purged from prejudication hath in al places and persons judged unjust becaus God by Natures light and general notions of good and evil of just and unjust imprinted in Mens hearts sufficient ability to judg in such cases If a Man bids his Son or Servant to eat and punish him for not eating yet resolvs he shal hav no meat may we not say he is unjust both in the precept and punishment Semblably 't is in God sith Virtues in Men are but the Image of his perfections being in substance the same tho infinitly differing in degrees God cals Men to be judges of his wais and Ezek. 18. 25. works judg ye hous of Israel are not my wais equal and yours unequal The high mysteries of Christs Incarnation birth by a Virgin resurrection of the Body and such like which are proper objects of Faith God never offers to Mens trial but rather derides those which presume to judg them by Reason becaus they be supernatural and Man no competent judg by natural understanding but he makes him judg in the equity of his Decrees and Wais who is able to discern what is just in divine acts Others say the Scriptures define thes Decrees to be 2 Defens Gods Wil which is the rule of righteousnes Ergo they must needs be just This Rule is much abused by the Patrons of absolut Reprobation Answer for Gods Wil is no rule of justice to himself as if things were just becaus he wils or works them but his justice is rather a rule of his Wil and Works who decrees and executs becaus they agree to that justice which dwels in the divine Nature So S. Jerom saith God commands nothing sav what is honest but doth not make things honest which are abominable implying that he doth not wil a thing and so make it good but willeth it becaus 't is antecedently good So Zanchy makes Gods justice antecedent to his wil and therfore the rule of it rather then regulated by it nor can God wil ought which is not just in it self So Gods Wil is no rule of justice to himself but to us who must square al our thoughts words and works by it as suprem rule of them Nor are thes absolut decrees of salvation and damnation any parts of his reveled Wil in Scripture which to assert is to beg the question This is al their ground to gain credit as al sects use to doo but a fals foundation unles they may sens it as they list For absolut Reprobation repugns right reason and begets absurdities which no Truths doth sith sundry truths are reveled in holy Writ abov reason but none contrary to it Faith and Reason Scripture and Nature are Gods excellent gifts which never diametraly differ tho ther is a disproportion betwen them if then absolut Reprobation be unjust it cannot be justified by Scripture Therfore to say Gods Wil is the rule of Justice and this a part of his reveled Wil both which propositions are untru is but a sly evasion and colorable collusion They say farther That God is not bound to restore Men power 3. Defens to beleev having lost it by their own fault as a Master is not tied to renew his Servants stock having misimploied it 'T is tru God is bound to none being a most free dispenser Answer of his own favors wher what and to whom he wil sith none is afore hand with him Who hath given to him first and it shal not be recompenced again Yet is he conditionaly bound both by decreing being liable to his own Ordinance or els should be mutable by promising which is a kind of debt â—ith 't is just to perform and by giving Men a Law to keep which without supernatural Grace they cannot When God commanded his Creatures to increas and multiply he gav them a generativ faculty when Christ bad the lame Man rise and walk he added ability to his lims so when the suprem Law-giver imposeth a Law he givs the people power to keep it els he becoms a hard Master as the evil Servant stiled his reaping wher he sowed not being the tru proper caus of transgressing it When God gav Adam a spiritual Law to obey he conferred such strength answerable to doo it as S. Austin saith he had a power or possibility not to fal tho not such as he could not fal To apply al If God entred into a new Covenant with Men which he needed not and required obedience of al promising eternal life to thos that observ it and everlasting death to such as disobey then no doubt he is bound to restore ability of beleeving unto al nor can justly punish the disobedient without it no more then a Magistrat having put out an Offenders eys can require him to read and put him to death for not reading so 't is injustice in God to punish such for not beleeving
were ordeined Bishops Presbyters and Deacons as is evident in the new Testament The next succession is cleer by testimony of Clement and other Apostilic Men beyond exception or evasion al which entring by the Dore are as tru Shepherds Stewards Fathers Rulers and Watchmen over the Flock being caled the Light of the World Salt of the Earth Fishers of Men Stars in his right hand Angels of the Churches c. who are charged to Preach the Word in season and out to feed Lambs to care for the Flock to fulfil their Ministry to exhort command and Rebuk with al Authority to whom Christ gav many peculiar privileges and promises of special assistance Hence 't is cleer as the Noonday that som not al and thos ordeined not voluntiers are sent successivly by Christs authority to doo the work of the Ministry which dreadful imploiment injoined with a bitter Wo if neglected the very Angels wil not undergo unles sent nor then without horror much less should sinful Men to whom a duple Wo is du desperatly dare to intrud being unsent uncaled unordeined and unfurnished which is proud presumption As then som are duly invested with Ministerial power and strictly injoined to use it for the Churches good so al others not impowered tho never so wel gifted are flatly forbid to usurp that sacred Office or confer what they never received on others which neither Melchisedec Moses Aaron Samuel nor any of the Prophets no nor Christ John Baptist the Apostles Evangelists or any tru Bishops and Presbyters ever durst to arrogat without divine mission or commission mediatly or immediatly derived from Christ This Ministerial Ordination hath continued abov sixteen Centuries by lawful succession even to wonder amidst al Persecutions Confusions and changes of Human affairs For Christ promiseth to be with his Church and Ministers to the Worlds end and Helâ—gates shal not prevail against them This laying on of Hebr 6. 1 3. Hands in Ordination is reckoned among the fundamental Principles of Religion joyned with Faith Repentance Baptism Resurrection and last Judgment nor can Confirmation be duly doon to the Baptised and Catechised sav by such as are ordeined therto which to gainsay is as if Men should reject thos other grand Articles forecited Surely al divine Ministrations of Preaching Celebrating the Sacraments and other Ordinances necessary to the being so wel as wel being of a Church had ceased long since if God had assigned no peculiar Men to hold forth the great Salvation which leavs Men excuseless sith they are taught by such as hav special Characters or Letters of Credence from Christ if they wil not hear Moses and the Prophets or Men sent by him whom wil they beleev Ther be four sorts of Laborers in Gods harvest som sent by him soly as Moses most Prophets the twelv Apostles St. Paul som by Gods assignation but Mans Ordination as Aaron Josua Elisha Timothy som by Ordination of the Church yet of Christs institution as al Evangelical Ministers duly ordered som not sent by God or Man but run or rush in of themselfs as fals Prophets Deceivers Intruders Sectists and al Satans Disciples who boast of extraordinary Enthusiasm as Angels of light saying Thus saith the Lord When he never sent nor spak by them For no Beleever though indued with great Gifts and Graces as St. Ambros had before he becam Bishop ought to assum Ministerial power for then every Christian of both Sexes as ther be sundry She-Preachers which pretend to the Spirit in thes licentious times may claim the Keis to themselfs and dispens Holy things to others or rule Christs Houshold in his stead which repugns common Reason as if every domestic Servant or Scullion should chalenge the Stewards place or every Member arrogat the office of Eys Toung or Hands becaus they belong to the same Soul Body and Head Sith then no Natural Moral or Religious gifts or abilities can instate any to be a Magistrat Judg Ambassador or public Officer unles he be invested by the Fountain of Civil power So ther should be a right derivation of Spiritual Power from Christ Jesus as Head either immediatly as the Apostles had or mediatly as Bishops and Presbyters since who without fraud force or unjust Usurpation received it from the Apostles by Praier Benediction and imposition of Hands in Christs name Which pregnant truth morosely to deny is as if an Hog should answer al Arguments with grunting Yea to act against so strong a stream of authority befits only Ranters Seekers Shakers and Enthusiasts or Jews Turcs and Infidels but not sober Christians or Members of the Church which ever enjoyed a tru succession of ordeined Ministry wherby the Gospels light is continued to this day amidst al Pagan persecutions Heresical confusions and Schismatical Fractions bent to undermine it Al Nations by Natures lore owned som Deity and had peculiar Persons to execut Religious Rites nor did ever any sober Men reject Gods service for Ministers faults frailties or infirmities For a Divine must be distinguish'd from the Man sith Gods power works with human weaknes nor need we be more nice or nauseous Lastly ther is a necessity of ordeined Ministry sith none of free accord wil undergo so hard and hazardous a task in times of primitiv Persecutions to hold forth the doctrin of a crucified Saviour as al carnal Men deemed it unles they had the duty of divine caling laid on their Consciences Yet however in the Gospels Halcyon serenity many new Teachers out of avarice or popular ambition rush rashly upon it which the best Men durst not weild without weeping as St. Austin did when he was made Presbyter and trembling thos rigid storms of yore would hav quenched the now so forward flashes of thes Sparks when to be a Prelat or Presbyter was to expose themselfs to fire and fagot wild Beasts jaws and a thousand tortures So unles divine authority had imposed and special Grace assisted together with promises of eternal Glory doubtles the glorious Gospel of salvation had yet this time bin buried in oblivion fith none had heard or beleeved that report if none had dared to preach or publish it as Men sent and ordeined did Nor would any els be so fool hardy to hazard al worldly interests honor estate liberty life on such an uncouth unwelcom unsafe message unles they had bin conscious of a special duty laid on them by divine authority derived in that solen sacred Ordination of Ministry Whence St. Paul denounced a Wo to himself if he preached not the Gospel For every one that can handle the Hod Hammer or Trowel is not instantly an Architect Nor can every gifted Man supply the place of such a Workman as hath both Materials Tools Art and Approbation Ther is great ods betwen plausible cunning to draw Disciples and sincere conscience to make folowers of Christ betwen intruding popular Masters and tru ordeined Ministers betwixt clambring over the wal like Robbers or Plunderers and
For it neerest resembles Gods protopatern setled among the Israelits who had Heads of Elders like Bishops with Priests and Levits as Epist ad Evag. Presbyters and Deacons according to S. Jeroms parallel Now Christ and his Apostles in their institution much regarded Judaic customs as to Baptise with Water to use Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper to solemnize Weekly the Lords Day in the Sabbaths stead to giv Pastors and Teachers power of the Keis nor is any express precept or evident precedent against Episcopat either commanding parity or forbidding Luk 11. 25. 26. orderly superiority in Church or Commonweal Christ indeed inhibits his Apostles who were coequal or coordinat to exercise dominion like secular Princes which is a Rule for al Churches not to use any preeminence by ambition tyranny violence or usurpation on the Bodies Estats Lifes or Liberties of Men in Worldlings way yet such courses beside factious emulations are so incident to som insolent Presbyters as to the proudest Prelats Our Saviours sens is plain that what ever parts power place gifts or Graces any Minister hath abov others he should use them with humility to Gods Glory and the Churches good laying aside the levan of imperious oppression but the very Apostles who had a priority of place with parity of power among themselfs exercised superiority of jurisdiction over al other Disciples and Beleevers who obeied them as Fathers doing the like to Bishops after them St. Paul being to leav the World left a patern of Church-Government which was constantly pursued in ordeining Titus and Timothy Bishops giving them personal power to ordein censure rebuk or silence al Elders and Deacons under their charge Which Blondel confesseth to be a perpetual precedent for Church regiment 'T is a poor cavil to say they were Evangelists designed to Preach not to govern sith that takes not away their power of rule for then no Presbyters can Preach except they be Evangelists nor being such can preside in their Consistories At the same rate we may argu that none but the chief Appostles may feed Christs Lambs or Sheep becaus he committed the charge by a triple command to Peter the chiefest Or that the power to ordein Elders by laying on Hands to receiv accusations against them to rebuk censure silence excommunicat and restore belong soly to Apostles and Evangelists whereas a succession is necessary for Church societies so wel as civil as that vehement charge laid on Tymothy to 1 Tim. 5. 21. 1 Tim. 6. 14. keep thâ—s things unpartialy and unblamably til our Lord Jesus Christ com plainly shews For he declining daily to death could not doo it but only transmit the patern to posterity which he performed by a public way of Government This prime practis both in the Apostles dais and after is seen in the seven Asian Churches and in others registred by Fathers Councils and Histories What insuing times observed is evident among al Christians of the Eastern Greec Muscovit Abyssen and Indian Churches which retain Bishops to this day For no Presbyters ever exercised Ordination or Jurisdiction by sole peculiar power without presence and presidence of an Apostle or Bishop Presbytery is named but in two Texts of Scripture one being falsly alleged for ruling Lay Elders which are not preceptiv or institutiv but only narrativ without expressing any joint power office or authority of Presbyters with Presidents much less without or against them St. Jude puts foul marks on such Jude v 8 11. 19. As despised Dominion or speak evil of Dignities denouncing Wo against their seditious practises who are cruel like Cain covetous as Balaam and ambitious as Corah and his complices Such factious disturbers of Order prescribed by God in his Church St. Peter cals Presumpâ—uous Selfwilled and dispisers 2 Pet. 2. 10. of Dignities Whom thes Apostles would not so sharply check unles ther had bin som eminences in the Church so wel as among the Jews which thos mutinous Men confronted or contemned For they were too wary to oppose Civil powers whol Sword was too keen but the Ecclesiastic Orders Dignities and Dominions were obvious or obnoxious to al turbulent tumultuary Spirits who under vele of Christian liberty and pretensions of the Spirit the better to set off their Schisms and separatings oppugned authority even in the Churches Infancy 5. Common Reason requires a power and polity in the Church so wel as in Cities Armies or any Civil societies For the Lord of his Church hath not divested or denied it good government which may lawfully be used with Wisdom and discretion nor may Ministers which excel others in age prudence and gubernativ gravity be barred to employ their Gifts in sutable differences for the Churches behoof Only Christ requires humility in priority which many Prelats had and mo Presbyters wanted and service in superiority proportioned to their parts which God givs not in vain For som Ministers are young proud prone to faction and passion whos folly and fervor needs a bridle of Episcopal authority to curb them beyond common contemptible parity This St. Jerom owns as the ground of that Government to represâ— Schisms nor can such a Paternal preeminence prejudice any in preferring one worthy Person to rule the rest so that his Presidential priority be kept within du bounds of humility For woful experience shews how the want herof hath occasioned many main mischiefs by swarms of Sects both here and elswher If any allege vulgar dislikes of Episcopat this makes most for it sith what the many-headed multitud most decry who wil cry Hosanna and Crucifigâ— with one breath wise Men most approv yea the best Christians seing the misery of change rather desire regulated Prelacy then any other Church-Polity For headlâ—ss Presbytery and scattered Independency are disliked by moderat Men as a remedy wors then the malady 1. For the novity becaus neither was heard of in 1500. yeers and the last scars of twelv yeers standing nor hav they the vote of any general Council or practis of the Catholic Church 2. They hav prevailed here to justle out Episcopy by force in broken bloody times being planted not by Preaching or Patience under persecution but by the Sword and watered with their Brethrens blood as Roâ—ulus founded Rome or as Tâ—â—iâ— Tarquins Wife drov hir Chariot over hir Father Servius mangled Corps wheras Prelacy was decreed in al the World as St. Jerom In Ep. ad Titum avows with wisdom peace and charity by consent of Churches 3. Becaus neither of thes two wais hath such plenary approbation as the old had in al Parliaments and Convocations since this Nation Christianized 4. Sith the same or wors inconveniences obtruded to Episcopy in its declining age appeer in the bud or prime of thes new wais so much pride avarice ambition vanity uncharitablenes with more prophanes Atheism Heresy Blasphemy licentiousnes faction bitternes contention confusion then ever attended Episcopacy beside needless scandal given to other
against them hath lost al power to both and marred al by overweening Ther were many excellent Prelats antient and modern whos incomparable worth while som puny pety Presbyters scornfully or scurrilously vilified they seem as so many Daws perching on Pauls pinacles or like living Dogs bearding dead Lions Nor doo such impotent impudent toungs tuned to vulgar ears against Episcopal caling becom Men which pretend to piety learning goodnes gravity charity civility or common christianity Bishops personal faults can no more be excused then Presbyters or any others in the exercise of their Functions But som malecontents like water violently pent up by Fludgates violently break forth and bear away the whol sluce of Government which might be better managed or moderated by du bounds set to both Ordinary Ministers seem as younger Brothers who lived handsomly or happily under their Fathers tuition scattered or exposed to al injuries and miseries that many as prodigal Sons are fain to feed on the husks of popular favors who may not repine at the measure offred by others which they insolently meted to their Fathers Elies scandalous Sons annulled not their service or sacrifices much less the Priestly Office which depends not on the persons administring but Gods authority commanding and right investiture into the Function So that the misdemenors or miscarriages of Bishops and Ministers may blot or blemish the beauty but not bereav the being of Religious duties or their calings no more then lapses after Baptism doo unbaptise any Christian Wherher Bishops ordeined Presbyters by divine Apostolic right or exercised Ordination Confirmation and Jurisdiction only by ecclesiastic custom in order of place among Presbyters it needs no curious debat But certes tru Episcopat is every way lawful and Ministers regularly ordeined right Pastors maugre al Traducers malice or gainsaying Nor was Christs Gospel or Ordinances any other way dispensed and dispersed sav only by succession of Episcopal Ordination which custom was ever deemed to be derived from Christ by his Apostles with a command of continuation Ignatius 〈◊〉 Ep. aâ— Epâ— compares the harmony betwen a Bishop and his Presbyters to the strings of a wel set Harp yea to the accord betwen God the Father and Son as Mediator wher the samenes of divine Nature is an order of Priority in relation If the pipes of Ministerial power first laid in the Head-spring be stopped or defiled as al that passeth through earthen vessels wil in time which hav flowed so long in a du cours of Ordination they must not presently be cut off or dammed up nor the water diverted by Independent Wels and broken Buckets but rather clensed and repaired to carry holy Water like the Temples Vessels in their primitiv purity which is easily doon if pride policy and mundan interests be separated from thos of Christ and his Church by cashiring al sordid sinister ends of self-profit in Church Reformations O utinam If Ananias and Saphira were smiten for dissembling how much more shal such sacrilegious spirits which rob the Church instead of reforming As to Presbytery the Vocation is valid and venerable if in juncture with Bishops like Tortesses which are safest under that shel but som proud Presbyters casting it off stripped themselfs of their strongest shield being becom naked feeble and contemptible fit to be trampled under Rustic feet One rub rests touching Peoples right to chus and ordein Ministers Peoples Right which som say is essential and Ministry invalid without it But this pretext relies on a fals liberty which sundry sorts of Sectists jugging together like Partridges in smal Covies of fained Churches or Bodies assum to appoint their own Ministers and wil hav none sav such as shal comply with their humor whence their Chaplains flatter them to arrogat a power in al Church affairs which belongs not to them For they hav no such right either eminently as the Executioners power is in a Judg or virtualy as life in the Sun or causaly as heart in Fire or derivativly as the chief Magistrats power is in mean Constables and other Officers so it can only be exorbitantly as Corah claimed to make Priests and Rulers in Moses and Aarons rooms and Wat Tyler under Richard 2. for Gods Word yeelds no such precept or precedent in the Jewish Church for People to chus Priests or meddle with matters of holy concernment Nor did Christ alter any thing in extern maner or Ministry as to venture it on the rock of vulgar rudenes or rashnes which attends their weak heads and wild hands in Religious Rites but commended that care to his chosen Apostles and their Successors wherof Plebeians are incompetent and incapable If they should be supposed sufficient to try Ministers ability yet hav they no right to Ordein no more then a wise Man can send an Ambassador in his Princes name sith 't is delegated soly to such as Christ hath designed to dispens Ordination and not to the multitud be their gifts or graces never so good or great The People somtimes recommended Men to be Ordeined or accepted such Acts 6. 5. as the Apostles or Elders appointed but it never was derived from them as the Fountain nor conveied by them as fit conduits by which this holy stream of the Sanctuary is to flow Wise modest humble Christians are of al most shy to undergo such bold things as having no cal or command from Christ or his Church nor can expect a blessing on their rash attempts yet in our Church no Orders were conferred without the Peoples presence and Presbyters coassistance If People had sole power to ordein Ministers what sorry choice would they make how weakly would they examin how wildly ordein and what slovenly hands impose for they are more pleased with familiar rusticity then learned gravity and prefer a confident Mechanic to the ablest Dâ—vine People may so wel be Preachers and Baptisers as Ordein any to be their Teachers who may so wel exercise the Ministerial power as confer it on others But if al hav right to the Keis as Stewards or Ministers of holy things then 't is not tru That Christ gav som to be Apostles Pastors and Teachers so every part may Eph 4. 11. 1 Cor. 12. 22. chalenge to be an Ey which peece of prophane confusion no Church ever allowed The Peoples presence at Ordination or acceptance of their Minister is a matter only of human prudence and civil compact for that particular place but no owning of power derived from Christ by Church Rulers to officiat for their Souls good Nor doth it indow him with any power but only appropriat him to take care of such a People For though Beleevers in primitiv times did oft express their lov to Bishops and Presbyters by their presence and cheerful concurrence in matters tending to public peace and good Government so far as modest discretion deemed decent yet they never presumed to claim hands in ordination but only requested the Rulers that such
the last universal Judgment for that is committed to the Son but in particular over the Churches Enimies in the fourth Monarchy and Papacy which Daniel saw til the Beast was â—lain and his Body given to the burning flame and the power of the other Beasts cam to an end for a term was set how long eâ—h should last and the Saints shal be given into the fourth Beasts hand so long as the Whore rides the Bâ—ast til a time times and dividing of time but at end of these three times and half the judgment shal sit and his power totaly abolished yet the World not destroyed but al kingdom dominion and greatnes under Heaven given to the Saints of the most High whos kingdom is everlasting and al dominions shal serv him Saint Paul's words The Lord shal destroy him 2 Thes 2. 8. with the brightnes of his coming are expounded in the Apocalyps but it seems the two judgments ch 19. and 20. are Rev. 19. 11. c. different and not reduced to one self time sith one thousand yeers intervene for the two great Guests the Beast and fals Prophets are lodged in a Lake of fire and brimstone but their Host the Devil associated to them a thousand yeers after at end of the World when the last judgment is immediatly held Weigh al wel and God giv thee wisdom unto Salvation The Author intimats that Christ shal com to destroy the Churches Enimies A. 1655. finito and bind the Devil in chains a thousand yeers at end wherof he shal judg the World yet protests he wil not presume to penetrat too far into thes secret sublime mysteries which he borows from Master Mede He exhorts us out of the Apocalyps to address our Rev. 3. 20. 21. ears and hearts to the Son of God Who stands at dore and knocks saying If any wil hear my voice and open dore I will sup Rev. 1. 3 6 8. with him and he with me to him that overcoms wil I grant to sit Rev. 22. 7 14. with me on my Throne as I overcam and sat down with my Father on his Throne Blessed is he that keeps the sayings of this Books Prophecy nay blessed are they that doo his Commandments that they may hav right to the Tree of life and enter the Gates into the City To him which is was and is to com the Almighty be glory and dominion for ever Amen The sum of al his Explications is 1. The last act of Reformation Summary and releas of Protestants in Silesia Rev. 11. 7. 2. The three yeers and half when the Witnesses bodies ly in the street Ibid. v. 8 9. 3. The continuance of war in thos Kingdoms til the Martyrs innocent blood be avenged 4. The sudden fal of a strong Pillar or Protector of the Papacy 5. The exaltation of an Evangelical Head or Protestant Patron 6. A Reformation in Germany 7. The destruction of Rome City 8. The end of the Turcs Empire Rev. 11. 14. Rev. 16. 12. 9. The Jews Conversion Ibid. 10. The Papists sedulity to gather their utmost forces Rev. 16. 13. Rev. 19. 16. 11. The total ruin of al the Papacy Rev. 16. 18. 21. Rev. 19. v. 20. 21. 12. The fulfilling of Gods mystery Rev. 10. 7. Wherby the Devil is shut up in the bottomless Pit the Son of God takes possession of the Kingdoms the Church fares in peace and tranquillity al which he writes to comfort his afflicted Countrimen and draws al Chronical lines to one Center of A. 1655. as the common gulf which is a conjectural crotchet no certitudinal conclusion wheron Men may rely One yeer and half wil bewray the verity or vanity therof to Gods glory and Mens satisfaction who must stil wait and watch but not sift or serch into his secret hidden Counsils The future contingents which he proposeth to be shortly expected A. 1655. are thes 1. Romes final ruin 2. The Papacies total confusion 3. The Jews conversion 4. The Turcs Empires abolition 5. The Churches restauration 6. Christs readvention al which materials he hath from Mr. Mede Neither of them handle the Lambs mystical mariage with Rev. 19 7. his spiritual Spous which Dr. Preston compares to civil carnal Nuptials in â—iv respects 1. As Parents consents is requisit in the contract so God the Father hath freely given his Son to us and us to him 2. Both Parties must mutualy consent to be wedded so Christ the Husband as the Man stil is Suitor tho the Woman most needs it for hir perfection first invites us to this match and the holy Ghost prepares our hearts to intertain it 3. Both make a Covenant Christ on everlasting one to bestow himself and al that is his salvation remission of sins grace glory on us if we giv our selfs intirely to serv him Thes are but the Espousals 4. Ther folows a solen union or celebration of Mariage betwen both which is doon in Baptism when as we promiss in Weâ—lock to take ech other renouncing al other so here we vow by word of mouth or sureties to forsake the World Flesh and Devil with al their Works cleaving soly to Christ both in prosperity and persecution and keep our Souls chast to him not prostituting them to unclean lusts or service of any Creatures 5. The Nuptial consequents correspond in both which is an inseparable union of hearts and communion of goods my Beloved is mine and I his what Christ hath is made ours and our his our debts becom his as al his riches righteousnes honors and privileges ours by imputation O what a blessed condiâ—on is it to say with the Spous in the Cantiâ—les I am my Beloveds and his desire Câ—nt 7. 10. is toward Me He feedeth me among the Lilies O let his pretious Blood make my scarlet sins so whit as Wool or as the Snow in Salmon In this peece are mo tedious repetitions then in al the work els which is doon purposly to make it more obvious or perspicuous unto every common capacity Quae placuere semel decies repetita placebunt Sunt patefacta sacro mysteria magna Joanni Quae Deus in seclis efficienda dâ—cet To holy John great mysteries were told Which to be doon in Times God doth unfold Medus vir celebris nulli bonitate secundus Artibus Ingenio Judicioque praeit Quaeque revelavit mysteria magna Joanni Christus in illius sunt patefacta libro Mede was a rare Man for goodnes next to none In Learning Wit and Judgment cheif alone And what high hid things Christ to John declared Are in his Apocalyptic Book explaned Mira brevi obvenient Germanus praedicat Author Si modo venturis est adhibenda fides Mira canit quae anno simul efficienda propinquo Vix credenda tamen dum patefacta forent Strange things saith a German shortly shal befal If faith to futures may be giv'n at al. Wonders he tels which next yeer doon must be Yet scars to be beleevd til
spotless and blameless of him in peace accounting his long suffering for Salvation as our beloved Brother Paul according to the wisdom given him hath writ to you who in al his Epistles wherin are som things hard to be understood which the unlearned and unstable wrest to their own destruction as they doo other Scriptures speaks of thes things viz. Rom. 2. 4 5 6 7. 1 Cor. 1. 7 8. 1 Cor. 3. 13. 2 Cor. 7. 11. Phil. 1. 10. Ph. 2. 15. Ph. 3. 10. Col. 3. 4. 5. 1 Thes 2. 12. 1 Th. 3. 13. 1 Th. 5. 32. 2 Th. 1. 8 11. 1 Tim. 6. 14 25. Tit. 2. 12. 13. Heb. 12. 14 28 29. For better understanding St. Peter of the Worlds conflagration or combustion consider thes circumstances 1. That the old Hebrew the Scriptures language hath no one word to express the univers of superior and inferior Bodies caled in Greec Cosmos in Latin Mundus in English World but Heaven and Earth jointly so when St. Peter saith the World then being perished by water but the Heavens and Earth now are reserved to fire he might convertibly utter the Heavens and Earth then perished by water as the World now shal by fire so a new Heaven and Earth in Scripture notion imply a new World 2. That no other World or Heaven and Earth shal perish by fire then what before perishd by water as the antithesis argues which is the sublunar whos Heaven is Air and Earth the whol Geographic Globe both which were vitiated or defiled by the deluge and the Creatures destroied or much depraved Such a World then and no other Heaven or Earth shal suffer a secund flood of Fire for restauration as it had before a deluge of Waters for corruption This is a witty novity as ther be sundry such now adais but scars Orthodox sith 't is a Catholic Tenet that the Ethereal Heavens with al their Starry host shal be burnt up 3. That the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated Elements is not distinguished from Heaven and Earth ther named becaus Heaven includs Air and Earth Water so three Physical Elements are implied and Fire if it be a fourth or not rather a quality of intens heat inherent in another Body must burn the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and can be none of that to be burnt So it must be rendred the whol Host of them or Furniture belonging to them as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies the works or Host of the Earth which shal be burnt Gen 2. 1. For Moses saith The Heavens and Earth were finished with al the Host of them which the Septuagints stile Furniture So the meaning is the Heavens and Host therof with the Earth and works or Furniture therin shal be fired The Scripture specifies three Heavens 1. Empyreal of Glory whos Host or Army are invisible Angels and blessed Spirits 2. Ethereal or Starry whos Host are shining Stars and Planets 3. Aereal or Sublunary whos Host are either visible as Meteors and Fowls or invisible as evil Spirits and Fiends with their Prince of the Air Satan the Devil To apply it St. Peter cannot intend the Empyreal which is increat and impassible nor Ethereal which is of vast immensity and sublimity in regard wherof this lower world is but a point or Center nor did thos two receiv any curs for Mans sin or contagion or contamination by the Deluge nor doo any of Gods enimies dwel ther to defile them So it rests That the Aereal only with al their Host shal be burnt up at last day Thes Heavens then shal melt with fervent heat being a metaphor taken from refining Metals which is his meaning who expounds dissolving by melting or purifying as the Septuagints stil interpret that word by refining but when the Aereal is so refined the Ethereal Lights wil shine to them on Earth far more glorious as passing their rais through a purer medium so that the world shal seem renewed As to the word passing away 't is an Hebraism signifying any change of a thing from the old Estate so al imply a secession from their pristin condition but no utter abolition by Fire more then the former destruction by Water If any ask whether the Host of invisible Spirits shal suffer by it 'T is answered That they shal not be burnt as the visible yet shal be exiled or excluded from thos lofty mansions into lower Dungeons as St. Jude intimats The Angels which lost their Jude v. 6. first estate and left their habitations he hath reserved to everlasting chains of darknes at the Judgment of that great Day Ther is another exposition to the same effect for Christ describing Mat. 24 29. the coming of this day useth prophetic expressions that the Sun shal be darkned and Moon giv no light the Stars shal fal from Heaven whos powers shal be shaken this cannot be construed literaly sith som Stars are bigger then the Earth and cannot fal on it nor can be darkned being essentialy lucid bodies so the meaning may be the World is either Mundus continâ—ns viz. the whol frame of Heaven and Earth or contentus viz. the Inhabiters and kingdoms therin so the Heaven of this politic world is the Soveraign part therof whos Host and Stars are the ruling powers or Magistrats and Earth the Pezantry or Plebeians together with al terren creatures serving mans use such acceptions are usual in the Prophets as Poets strains are to us If this notion of the contained world be admitted the whol Host of Heaven and Earth high and low Princes and Pesants Men and Beasts shal be consumed at Christs coming to judgment but wheras at the Flood the Contained only perished yet the Containing was also corrupted or contamined In the destruction by fire it shal be contrary For the world of wicked ones being destroyed the Heavens and Earth Containing shal be purged or purified for the righteous to possess This exposition is not so proper as the former yet if ther be som whom neither can satisfy but wil needs hav the Fire totaly to annihilat this visible world it may be answered that the judgment Day shal last a thousand yeers so saith he but none els and this Fire not be at beginning when Christs Enimies with Satans Kingdom shal be destroyed and then a restauration buâ— at end or evening shal be an utter annillation of the whol Creature so Saint Peters words may bear thus however Heaven and Earth shal in fine perish by Fire yet before that be we look for new or the worlds restauration to anteced this abolition according to his promiss Howbeit this suits not so wel with his chief scope nor with the Prophets promiss pointed at which specifies such a Fire only as shal forego a restauration and not caus a final abolition of the whol Univers with al therin nor hath it any ground in Scripture or if any such annillation shal be it stands with reason to be by Gods immediat hand or
Witchcraft Witches justly punished with death for their fals beleef that they can doo such mischief and a wil or purpose to act it their Trade being neerer to a new Religion then a Craft or Science Such as are content to be poor may easily resolv to Censure be honest so thos that hold Hel to be no real place and Devils meer Metaphors must of cours deny Witchcraft yea many who pretend to be wise pious professors are too incredulous of Witches contrary to the faith of al Gods People Exod. 22 18. both Jews and Christians who wil not suffer a Witch to liv as God commanded The best is only privat persons deny it but al public Princes and Christian Common-wealths make strict Laws against it Saul destroied Wisards and such as had familiar Spirits yet in distres caused a Witch of Endor to rais Samuel as the spectre seemed with whom he consulted Serjeant Glyn who at last Lent Assises in Cornwal condemned eght Witches upon pregnant presumptions and personal confessions can scientiously satisfy any Man that ther be such impious confederats with Satan els al Laws and Magistrats that question them for their fals imaginations or intentions to work mischief if they can doo none were most unjust and to execut them bloody De Regno purae Caliginis Of pure Darknes Kingdom BEside al Soveraign powers Divine and Human precited Eph. 6. 12. Mat. 12. 26. Mat. 9. 34. Eph. 2. 2. John 16. 11. the Scriptures specify rulers of this Worlds Darknes even the Kingdom of Satan and Principality of Beelzebub over Devils or Phantasms in the Air as Satan is stiled Prince of the power of the Air and Prince of this World becaus he rules in this Worlds darknes So they under his dominion in opposition to the Faithful caled Children of the Light are properly Children of Darknes The Kingdom of Darknes is a confederacy of Deceivers who Kingdom of Darknes to get dominion over Men in this World devise erroneous doctrins to extinguish the Light both of Nature and Scripture p. 333. c. therby to seduce silly Disciples and so disprepare them for the Kingdom of God to com Fabula narratur mutato nomine de te Let the name changed be The tale is told of thee The darkest part of Satans Kingdom is without Gods Church among such as beleev not in Christ yet doth not the Church like the Land of Goshen enjoy al Light necessary to the work injoined by God but as Men born blind hav no Idaeâ— of any bodily Light nor can any conceiv greater then he hath perceived somtimes by his own senses so is it with the Light of the Gospel and understanding too that none can imagin any greater degree therof then he hath attained Ther be four causes of spiritual Darknes 1. By abusing or abolishing the Scriptures Light for weer 1 Caus not knowing the Scripture the chief is wherto almost al the rest are consequent or subservient wresting it to prov Gods Kingdom so oft cited to be the Church or multitud of Christians now living or that shal rise at last day but the Kingdom of God was first erected by Moses ministry over the Israelits so saith he but none els cald his peculiar People which after ceased when they refused to be longer governed by God and chose Saul Since which time God had no proper Kingdom by pact or covenant but only as he ever was is and shal be universal King of al Creatures ruling according to his absolut Wil and infinit Power Nor are any now under any King or Kingdom by pact sav our secular Soveraigns til Christ shal com again to reign eternaly on Earth Succedaneal to this said error is that Christ now in Heaven hath som one Man or Assembly by whos mouth he speaks givs Laws and which represents his Person This regal power under him the Pope claims generaly over al the Church but in particular stats the Pastors or Presbyteries of thos places which begets such darknes in Mens understandings Hence results another error that a Christian Kingdom had need to receiv his Crown by a Bishop as if the claus of Dei gratia depended on that Ceremony So al Ecclesiastics assume the title of Clergy caling al others Laity or People simply Hence also arose the distinction betwen Emperors Civil Laws and Popes Canons which last were but bare Canons or Rules voluntarily received by Princes til Charlemaign becam Emperor but afterward as the Popes power increased becam commands or Laws and Emperors allowed them For the Pope pretending al Christians to be his Subjects makes it capital for any not to be of Roman Religion but tolerats Jews Mahometans and Pagans to enjoy their own Rites if they offer no scandal A secund abuse of Scripture is turning consecration into conjuration or inchantment for to consecrat is to offer giv or dedicat decently and devoutly any thing to God by separating it from common use or prophane to be holy and peculiar for Gods service by his Ministers hands but when Papists pretend to change the nature or quality of a thing as in the Lords Supper to make Bread and Wine by saying this is my Body this is my Blood to be Christs very Body and Blood it must either be Gods extraordinary work which 't is not being doon daily and frequently or a vain impious conjuration wherby they would hav Men beleev a change of Natures contrary to the testimony of their sight and other senses If the Aegyptian Sorcerers who turnd their Rods to Serpents and Waters to Blood or at least to seem so had made no change in shew but only outfaced the King that they were Serpents which looked like Rods would not al Men tax them for Liers Thus Priests tel the People that they hav turned Bread into a Man nay a God requiring Men to worship it which is gross Idolatry The words this is my Body or represents my Body can extend soly to the Bread which Christ consecrated with his own hands for he said not the Bread wherof any Priest shal say this is my Body shal be instantly transubstantiated into it nor was this doctrin harched in the Church of Rome til under Innocent the third not 500. yeers ago when the Popes power was at highest and Peoples darknes heaviest that Men could not see the Bread they eat specialy being stamped with Christs figure on the Cross as if the very wood was transubstantiated which they ate together with the Body So at Baptism they use many Charms in name of the holy Trinity with the sign of the Cross at naming ech Person as in consecrating holy Water the Priest saith I conjure thee Creature of Water in the name of God the Father Almighty and Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord and by virtu of the holy Ghost that thou becom conjured Water to driv away al the Enimies powers c. The like is doon in Benediction of Salt and Hony mixd therwith
certain Philosophia prima on which al other ought to depend consisting chiefly in right limiting the fignifications of most universal names or appellations to avoid ambiguity or equivocation in reasoning Such are caled Definitions as of Body Time Place Matter Form Essence Subject Substance Accident Act Power Finit Infinit Quantity Quality Motion Action Passion c. necessary to explane a mans conceptions concerning the Nature and Generation of Bodies which Theory is termed Metaphysics Thes mixd with Scripture to make School Divinity teach that ther be certain Essences abstract or separat from Bodies caled substantial Forms for interpreting which Jargon take these solid grounds 1. The univers or Mass of al created things is corporal or an aggregat Body having the Dimensions length bredth depth of maâ—nitud so is every part of it a Body with like dimensions but what is not Body is no part of it and consequently Nothing or No wher becaus the univers is al in al. Yet it follows not that Spirits are Nothing or No wher sith they hav dimensions though commonly caled incorporeal 2. Of Words som are the names of things conceived as of al Bodies in the World som names of Ideas Images and Imaginations of things which we see or remember as Definition Affirmation Negation Syllogism Interrogation Promiss Covenant and other forms of Speech som names of names or several sorts of speech as Universal Plural Singular som to shew the dependance or repugnance of one name to another as when 't is said a Man is a Body being but several names of the same thing Man by coupling them together with the word is in Latin est which signify their consequence and may be expresd by placing two names in order without est or is if it were the custom But what then wil becom of thos terms Entity Essence Essential derived from it with many mo depending on them as commonly applied so they are no names of things but signs which notify how we conceiv the consequence of one Name or Attribut to another as when we say a Man is a living Body we mean not that the Man is one thing a living Body another and Is or Being a third but that Man and living Body is one thing becaus the consequence is tru being signified by the word Is so to be a Body walk speak see and lik Infinitivs which signify just the same are the names of just Nothing 3. This doctrin of separated Essences built on Aristotles vain Philosophy frights men with empty names as Birds are scared from Corn with a bare doublet hat and crooked stick from obeying the Laws of their Country for hence 't is inferred that a Mans Soul or Lâ—f can walk after death and is seen among Graves that the figure color and tast of bread hath being ther wher they say is no Bread but Christs Body that Faith Wisdom and other spiritual Virtues are somtime poured into a Man somtime blown from Heaven which beleefs lessen Subjects dependance on Soveraign power for who wil obey his Country Laws if he expects obedience to be blown into him or who wil not obey a Pâ—irst that can make God rather then his Soveraign or God or who that fears Ghosts wil not honor such as can make holy water to chase them away This Error of separated Essences draws on divers other absurdities for if thos forms be real they must hav som place but becaus they hold them incorporeal they doo not but only invisible sans dimension and Place must be filled with corporals they are driven to devise a ridiculous distinction that they are in place Definitive non circumscriptive when circumscription is the defining or determining of a thing to its place and so both terms of their distinction are the same Touching Mans Essence Soul they say 't is al in the whol and al in every part who wil swalow such gudgeons or beleev thes gulleries Yet they must who beleev the real existence of a Soul or Spirit separat from the Body If it be asked how a Soul can be tormented with fire being incorporeal They only say it cannot be known how fire can burn Souls Sith motion is change of place proper only to Bodies they are troubled to resolv how a Soul can go hence to Heaven Hel or Purgatory without a Body Or Mens Ghosts with Cloths can walk by night Haply 't is definitive non circumscriptive or spiritualy not corporaly and temporaly Are not inanimats compounds consisting of two constiâ—ntiv Quaere parts matter and form which last distinguisheth one kind from another as a Stone from Iron And are not animats so differenced by their several specifical Souls as a Man Mous Marygold If it be said they differ in external shape of Body which is sufficient how doo we differ from Mairmen in shape not at al sav only in rational Souls which they hav not nor any use of Reason more then brute Beasts Much more may be alledged 4. For eternity they wil not hav it an endless succession of time for then they can render no reason how Gods Wil or Decrees to com should not be before his Prescience of the same as an efficient caus before the effect or Agent before the action but a standing stil of the present caled in Schools Nunc stans which they nor any els understand more then they can Hic stans for an infinit immensity of place or the like Wheras we hold a Body having many parts to hav many places for them they teach that by Gods Almighty power one may be in many places or many in one at once as if it were a magnifying of Divine power to say that which is is not or that which has bin hath not bin Such incongruities with many mo Men fal into who disputing Philosophicaly of divine nature in stead of admiring or adoring it heap absurdities one upon another Of Physics or natural Philosophy they render no secundary Physics subordinat causes of events but empty words if ye ask why som Bodies sink down to Earth and others ascend They say from Aristotle 't is through heavines if ye ask what heavines is they say an endevor tending to the Earths Center or to be below is not this like a Horsin a Mâ—â— to say Bodies ascend or descend becaus they doo They say 't is becaus the Center is a resting place for al heavy things wher they desire to be as if stupid inanimats can discern the place they aim at or desire rest like animals or a peece of Glass were less safe in a window then faling to ground If yâ— ask why the same Body without adding or subtracting seems somtime greater somtime lesser They say it only seems so being ratified or condensed as if ther can be matter which hath not a determined quantity and one Body greater then another or as tho a Body were made without any quantity and more or less of it put in afterward to appeer more or less dens
or thin For Mans Soul they say 't is created by pouring in and poured in by creating what 's that For the caus of Sens they make an ubiquity of Species or shews of objects which appeering to the Ey make sight to the Ear hearing to the Palat tast to the Nostril smelling and to the rest of the Body feeling For the caus of willing to doo any act they make the faculty or wil it self doo somtime one thing somtime another making the Power caus of the act as if on should assign Mens ability to doo any things the very â—aus of good or evil acts Yet oftimes they put their own ignorance to be caus of natural events or effects but disguised in other words as when they make Fortune a caus of contingents wherof they know no caus or when they ascribe effects to occult qualities not known to them nor as they sâ—rmise to any els or to Sympathy Antiphaty Antiperistasis specifical properties which neither signify the agent producing nor operation produced being only Clokes to cover ignorance Their Moral and Politic Philosophy hath the like or greater Politics absonances for if any doo injury or injustice contrary to Law they say God is prime Caus of the Action but not of the injustice or deviation this is vain Philosophy as to say that one makes a right and crooked line but another the incongruity or inconformity This distinction was devised to defend the doctrin of Free wil not subject to Gods wil. Why not to vindicat God from being Author of sin notwithstanding Quaere his absolut irrespectiv Decree to Reprobat men who must needs sin Aristotle defines Good and Evil by mens appetit which may seem tru sith every one is ruled by his own list or lore but in a Common-wealth the measure is fals wher not mens privat appetits but public Law of the State is sole Rule yet their doctrin soly practised wher every one doth what seems good in his own eys To make lawful mariage unchast or impure as they doo who deny it to the Clergy under color of continual chast continence to attend at the Altar and administer the holy Eucharist is vain Philosophy wherby they make mariage a moral vice and themselfs by abstaining spiritual like the Angels in Heaven From Aristotles Civil Polity they cal al Common-wealths sav the popular such as then Athens was Tyranny and al Kings Tyrans so they termed thirty Legislators set up by the Lacedemonians who subdued Athens thirty Tyrans and Democraty liberty yet Tyran truly taken signifies simply a Monarch but when that Government grew odious in all Greece it was branded with the Popular hatred of Tyranny and when Kings were expeld from Rome they did the like So when the same men are displeased with Democraty or Aristocraty they nickname the first Anarchy the last Oligarchy or Tyranny of a few Hence riseth another error of Aristotle that Laws not men should govern as if men wil be ruled by words or paper and not by men which hav power by the Sword to punish or put them to death giving life to the Laws this is a pestilent pernitious error wherby they seduce men so oft as they like not their Governors to rais war against them which the Clergy cherisheth Another error in Civil Philosophy which they never learned of Pagans is to extend the Law the Rule only of actions to mens very thoughts and Consciences by examination or inquisition of what they hold tho they conform in Words and Actions Herby they are forced to answer the truth of their thoughts or an untruth for fear of punishment Another error not drawn from Heathens is that a privat Man without the CoÌ„mon-wealths authority may interpret the Law by his own Spirit but are not Scriptures wher they are a Law made a Law by the CoÌ„monwealths authority and consequently a part of the Civil Law So they which impropriat Preaching to one certain Order of Men wher the State leavs it free commit the like error for if the State forbids me not to Preach none els can If I be among Judians or Infidels shal I being not in Orders think it sin to Preach Christ Jesus or expound Scriptures In such cases of necessity say they wher is no Ministry it may be doon without mission as wherever a dispensation is du for necessity ther needs none when no Law forbids it Ergo to deny thes functions to whom the civil Soveraign denies them not is to take away lawful liberty The Schoolmens writings are mostly insignificant terms or trains of strange barbarous words otherwise used then in common Latin language which would pose Cicero Varro or any Grammarian of antient Rome For let any try whether he can translat them into any modern Toung which if he cannot how can that be intelligible in Latin which is not so in other languages Howbeit this insignificance of speech is no fals Philosophy but both a quality to hide the truth and make Men think they hav it being skild in School-notions and so desist from farther serch of it in others He saith elswher what kind of felicity God ordains for them that devoutly serv him one shal no sooner know then enjoy being Quaere jois now so incomprehensible as the School-mens words beatific Vision unintelligible but doth not that signify to enjoy the perpetual presence of the divine Trinity as Men delight in ech others company face to face Which if Christ must reign on a new finit Earth with his Saints for ever none ever shal doo For beatific Vision is to see the blessed Trinity face 4 Caus to face in his eternal mansion The last caus of spiritual Darknes is to mix uncertain Traditions and untru Histories like the golden legion of fals fictious miracles in Saints lifes of Ghosts Goblins and Apparitions alleged by Romish Doctors to varnish their Doctrins of Hel Purgatory Exoâ—cisms and such like Which tho som pious Fathers Pope Gregory 1. St. Bernard c. broched yet they were Men and might take it on trust from others as Beda also did but if any speak it of their own knowledg 't is no confirmation of such vanity but a detection of their fraud fallacy or frailty The suppression of tru Philosophy by Men that hav no authority nor sufficient study may be joind with the introduction of falsâ— for our late Navigators and al learned Men acknowledg Antipodes as it appeers daily more that yeers and dais are determined by the Earths motions yet such as only supposed it heretofore were punishd by Ecclesiastic power What reason had they Is it becaus 't is contrary to tru Religion That cannot be if the opinions be truâ— let the truth be first disquired by competent Judges or refuted by such as pretend to know the contrary Is it becaus they disturb Government or Religion established Let the Teachers be silenced or punished by civil Rulers who can chastise disobedience in thos that teach
worth In Arts Wit and Learning to set it forth No one Mans Ey tho sharp and sound al doth see Many known things you know yet retractant be Postscripta subjuncta Postscripts subnected MAn's Soul at first Creation on the sixth day was infused 1 Thesis or breathed into Adam by God a Living Rational Intellectual Spirit distinct from the Body Invisible Immaterial Immortal having a power dower or faculty by his general blessing of Increas and multiply to beget a substance like Light from Light endued with the same qualities of intellect Rationality and Immortality as al other Creaturs doo in their several kinds God can doo no wrong nor ly nor sin being contrary to 2 Thesis his Nature who is Essentialy and Abstractly Justice Verity and Goodnes it self Al that he doth is just but to say 't is al just becaus he doth it is a pure error for Justice is a cardinal Moral virtu the same to God and Man by Nature nor can God make an unjust act just becaus he doth it A Pope in Consistory having denounced Fiatur which a Cardinal whispered was fals Latin broke forth furiously into thes words in contemptum omnium Grammaticorum Fiatur 'T is not so with God who wil not make an unjust thing just nor untruth truth but if he should Reprobat Men of meer free pleasure by absolut irrespectiv Decree to shew his power Soveraignty or Dominion over al his Creatures it were a flat unjust act which al the water in Thamis cannot wash whit becaus he did it but to make Man a free Creature able to stand or fal and foreseing in his simple intelligence who wil embrace the means ordained by him for salvation and who refuse or resist his Grace to elect the one and reject or Reprobat the other is tru Justice mixd with Mercy which is al that God doth in his Decrees of Election and Reprobation Before Kings converted to Christianity the Apostles held 3 Thesis al Ecclesiastic power in their hands and after them such as they ordained to succed who appointed others subordinat caled Elders to preach the Gospel by imposition of hands which imports a giving of the holy Ghost or Spirit of God inabling them with gifts fitting to discharge that office as Moses laid his hands on Josisa being to succed him Now the Divine Trinity Mr. Hobbs in Unity is that the Person of God was represented by Moses and the high Priests in the old Testament but by Christ during his abode on Earth and by his Apostles with their lawful Successors ever since The holy Spirit wherby the Apostles spake is God the son who represented his Father is God and Man but the Father as represented by Moses and the high Priests is the same God Hence thos terms Father Son holy Ghost or Spirit are never used for God in the old Testament becaus they be Persons denomined of representing which could not be til divers Men had born Gods Person in â—uliâ—g or directing under him The holy Spirit is somtime stiled Paracletus properly Assister or caled to help but commonly translated a Comforter who givs gifts or graces to Men fit for such spiritual offices wherto they are ordained Presbytery or Ministry is of divine right instituted by Christ in calâ—ng seventy Disciples whom he sent as Harbingers to Preach and prepare the way and confirmed by the Apostles to whom they were subordinat in ordaining Elders every wher So is Episcopat by the same right of Christs chusing twelv Apostles and their substituted Bishops to succed them but Presbyterial single Government without Bishops by a motly mixture of Ministerial and Laic Elders a meer novity deviâ—â—d by Mr. Calvin when the Genevans had expeld their Soveraign Prelat which exigent was caus of this change This is most tru in point of fact VLTIMAT END Valedictio ad Lectores A Farewel to the Readers Pro libito Lectoris habent sua fata Libelli Noster expectet publica Fata liber On Readers pleasure Books doo depend And let my Book the Fate attend Opinion is a lofty Roial Dame Who 's plumes are raisd on Air of vulgar Fame Who Courts hir Grace shal with Ixion find In Juno's stead an empty Cloud or Wind. Let such as list hir giddy favor curry I like not to be tossd with common whoorry Fair Readers which to take or leav are free Scorn to return base Censures for a fee. Let Critics Momes and Mimics doo their worst He that regards their scoss shal be accurst My resolution fears not Censors knocks Nor shal this Book unles it fal ' mongst Blocks VALETE FAREWEL Postscriptum dc Formis A Postscript of al Forms Mr. Pemble a late learned Oxford Man holds which few els doo that al inanimat Forms and two Souls Vegetant Sentient are no distinct substaances but only the crasis or temperament of qualities in every Compouâ—d or Subject His grounds or proofs are thes if the Form of a natural Boâ—y be a substance it must be either material and corporeal or immaterial and spiritual but 't is neither Som say 't is an imperfect substance in a middle degree between it and an accident which is a silly shift or shelter For an imperfect substance wil require a new Predicament and Peripatetics repute Form most sublime yea the perfection of matter in it self most imperfect but a middle nature betwen both is a meer Chimaera or Catamountain not contained in any Category nor hath it any Entity That Form is no material substance thes Reasons evince 1. That which informs the matter i. so pierceth into al parts and principles as to giv specifical essence is not material or corporeal becaus one Body cannot penetrat another nor material substance matter 2. Every corporeal thing is of it self quantitativ and divisible but a form according to Aristotle is indivisible void of quantity 3. Nothing generable or corruptible is material or corporeal sith matter according to Aristotle cannot be begot or perish but al forms except Mans Soul vanish or perish and new are ingendered 4. Principles of Constitution are divers or distinct in essence and proper passions els al things generable would be uniform and homogeneal but if forms be material they differ not from matter sav in som degrees of subâ—â—ety and purity which suffice not to take away uniformity nor diversity 5. A form is the fountain or origin of al actions but if it be material matter is also activ not purely passiv for it hath that activ virtu from matter not elswher or els cannot be a Principle That 't is not an Immaterial spiritual substance thes pregnant Arguments prov 1. Whatever is bred of matters essence must be material as what is generated of pure Air is Aerial but a Form is not material as foreproved or being Immaterial cannot be bred from the essence of matter nor can Principles be ingendred one of another 2. A Form cannot proced from the accidents of matter sith no
fit matter wil serv as sundry Plants propagat sans Seed and som Animals of putrefaction 28. Summarily the Souls vegetant in Plants and sentient Summary in Animals whether general wherby they becom Plants and Animals or special specifical which distinguish them into Kinds are only the nobler Temperament of more activ qualities in a subtler matter whether propagated of Seed or other wais ingendered but no substances This needs no other proofs then thos already alleged to refute the Substantiality of Forms but why Man 's Soul should be a substance rather then Beasts many of which are so intelligible and docible as most of simple People witnes the dancing Hors cald Asinago no satisfactory reason can be rendred in nature sav only som dark places of Scripture The result of al is that no substance ever dies or perishes for matter is invariable and al Forms of Inanimats together with the Vegetant and Sentient Souls meer mortal accidents or temperaments only Mans Soul is a substance or Spirit infused or inspired at first by God which is immortal and livs of it self for ever Thes are his Principles of new Philosophy touching the origin of Forms and Souls which let every one relish as his palat affects Now to answer Objections Ob. If the Soul be only a Temperament every natural Body that hath a tempered Crasis shal be Animat but 't is not so Ergo a Soul is no Temperament Sol. This Argument consists of meer affirmativs in the secund Figure and therfore is a filthy Paralogism but every Temperament of Inanimats is not fit for a Soul Ob. A Temperament is changed according to age place and diet but a Soul is not so changed Ergo 'tis no Temperament Sol. Forms are changed or varied gradualy as foreshewed but in the argument is a duple error 1. That it doth not distinguish betwen a total essential and partil gradual change of Temperament for in the total is not only a mutation but corruption of the Soul and makes nothing to purpose in the partil is a change more or less which doth not vary or alter the kind as a tender young Plant being removed from its natural Soil to a Forren grows better or wors without changing the kind yet the unity of Form remains with an alteration in the degrees of perfection 2. That a transition from other Animals to Man is improper for if his Bodily temper change yet the Soul being a distinct substance varies not but in al els Soul and Temperament are one Ob. If the Soul be a Temperament ther be in Animats so many Souls as Tempers one of the rind and wood in Trees another of Flesh and bones in Animals but in every Animat is one only Soul Ergo 'tis no Temperaments Sol. The Peripatetics place two Souls at least in every Animat and three in Animals but divers forms in Inanimats essentialy distinct so according to them 't is no absurdity to grant plurality of Souls yet is ther no plurality of substances but diversity of Temperament Ob. If the Soul be but a Temperament of humors and spirits it could not bridle the Bodies passions or perturbations but it doth and is not led by them Ergo c. Sol. This is tru in Mans Soul which somtimes bridles or moderats passions and somtimes yeelds to them but in no other Animats whos Soul not only folows but is Temperament it self Ob. That can be no Accident or Temperament from which the noblest faculties and functions of imagining remembring and perceiving or judgin â—ensitiv objects proced but Beasts Souls hav such operations remblable to Mans Ergo they are not Accidents Sol. Al such operations are meerly Organical in a material subject and depend on it the Organ is a pure cleer activ Animal spirit sited in the Brain as the seat of Sensation which Spirit is not only the Organ but first Principle therof For in al Animal Spirits two things are found viz. matter and mixture of lifely qualities matter is the first Subject and Organ of Sens qualities the first caus or origin and in both commixd consist al the faculties of apprehension imagination and memory which Brutes hav Thes Spirits are the sole Instruments of al Sensation but no substance useth or ruleth them being the first caus of Sens That which they cal Soul must be either material or immaterial if material 't is either purer then the Spirits which cannot be sith they are purest or viler and impurer but 't is absurd to grant that to the baser which is denied to the best if immaterial let them answer al arguments alleged against Forms Ob. 'T is abov or beyond the power of purest matter indued or invested with most exquisit qualities to judg remember desire shun c. but Brutes Souls doo al this Ergo c. Sol. 'T is not nor is it more strange that such effects should proced from the Temperament of Brutes Brains then doo other admirable properties as in the Magnet and many mo simples from Inanimats Temperament which is weaker then Animals Thes are magnalia Dei Gods wonderful works which Men must admire not inquire Lastly he treats of Mans Souls origin which was first in intention Upshot and sole scope of this Subject or Speculation touching whos essence that 't is a rational immortal substance or spirit none but Atheists or Sadduces wil doubt but of the origin is much dispute Som deem they were al created eternaly and reserved in blessed Seats or Stars til they be incorporated into Bodies Som that they be created by Angels Som that they be generated by the Soul of the World and made of Celical Substance Som that they consist of Elements Som that they are framed of Gods own substance Som that they be produced by the Heavens as an extern Efficient Som that they propagat successivly one from another Som that they are continualy created and infused in the Body by God like Adams first Soul which is the common Tenet Thes two last Opinions rejecting al the rest as futilous and frivilous he debats more freely and fully which he that lists may contemplat but being before abundantly agitated in the first Thesis shal be suppressed or superseded Touching the Vegetativ and Sensitiv Souls 't is probable they Censure are a meer Temperament of qualities or life it self nor doth Scripture them to be substances but they vanish or perish with the Bodies like forms of Inanimats and new ingendred or educed from the power of matter by the efficient Caus For God made al Creatures in their kinds intire Bodies at once both Plants and Animals but Created Man in his own Image thâ— Body first of Dust or Earth from the previous preexistent Chaos like other Creatures into which he breathed the Spiracle or Spirit of Life even a Rational Soul being far more divine and immortal then the rest as al Orthodox writers agree Hence 't is said Man becam a living Soul meaning that his Soul should liv for ever as he had doon in Body too had he not eaten the forbidden fruit contrary to Gods command upon pain of temporal and eternal death yet afterward in mercy he ordained a remedy that the Womans Seed even Christ our blessed Saviour should bruis the Serpents head by dying for the sins of al such as shal penitently beleev in him Peroratio ad Theologos A Conclusion to Divines Haec quicunque legent Medici Theoremata sacra Censuras rigidas parcite ferre precor Who shal a Phisitions sacred Theses read I pray spare to giv Censures ful of dread Nunc opus exigitur Laus Patri debita summo Christo incarnato Spirituique sacro The work 's now doon to God the Father du prais To Christ incarnat and th' holy Ghost alwais ALLEUIA
the whol and every part to make a perfect Woman so caled becaus taken totaly out of Man sans mention of any Soul infusion It appears not that the Soul therein died nor can her Soul be caled part of his more then her body though both extracted from him nor can two be confused but the same transfused in al and every part as the Souls Nature is whol in the whol and whol in every part of the body Of Christ S. Luke speaks God sent the Angel Gabriel to a Virgin espoused to Joseph who said Hail Mary lo thou shalt Luke 1. 26. to the 36. bear a Son and cal his name Jesus Then said she How shal this be sith I know not a man He answered The Holy Ghost shall com upon thee and power of the most high overshadow thee therefore that holy thing to be born of thee shal be caled the Son of God So the manner of his conception was metaphisical or miraculous without male-seed ineffably and incomprehensibly by the Holy Ghost yet was he according to his whol humanity conceived formed fostered in the womb nine Solar moneths or 39 weeks the usual time or term of womens gravidation as other Embryons being like to us in al things save sin only from which he was priviledged becaus the Vessel divinely purified So that if other Souls be created his was if generated his was likewise The debate then concerns al mankind and every individual Soul which is a perplexed knot to unty and intricat Maze to tread aright This blindness bewrais our innat ignorance who scars know what a Soul is whence it proceeds or how 't is produced Nosce teipsum being the hardest lesson to learn which none ever wel attained Ignorant Homines quae sit Natura Animai Lucretius Nata sit an contra Nascentibus insinuetur An simul intereat nobiscum morte direâ—pta An tenebras Erebi visat vastasque lacunas An Pecudes alias divinitus ingrediatur What the Souls nature is men know not wel Nor whether bred or in Babes infus'd can tel Whether by death with us it quit doth quel Or els goes to the dark deep Cels of Hel Or by Gods power in other Creatures dwel God knows himself and â—hen al things intuitivly in himself but man other things betteâ— then hiâ—self yet how can one take measure of any thing saith Pliny that is ignorant of himself To pass by al abstrus virtues of Vegetals arcane miracles of Minerals admirable properties of precious Stones and view their outer surface or color only Who can tel why Grass is green a Ruby red or Pearl pale But what strange strife hath been about the principles of our Nature and production of both Parts For the corporeal how doe Phisitians and Philosophers jar or jangle about the seed whence it should proced Archelaus asserts it a milky slime or mud drawn from the earth A cold muddy conceipt Pythagoras the scum or froth of our best blood A frothy fancy Alcmaeon part of the Brain A brainless buz Plato a distilling marrow of the back bone Democritus a substance extracted from al members Zeno Mans spirit and spoil of his Soul Epicurus a fragment both of Body and Soul Hippocrates a portion of radical moisture Aristotle an excrement of the last concoction in the solid parts Others blood refined by heat of the Genitals Al which are lame not expressing the efficient matter or form For seed materially consists both of Blood and Spirit concocted into a white frothy humor by the Testicles which Females hav latent tho not prominent for the use of procreation and from them not of brain back bone or other part soly derived But whether females send or spend any operativ geniture is much controverted The Perepatetics deny it But Galenists contest that no conception can be without concurrence of both Parents seed which is indubitably the truest Opinion The spiritual part affords much more matter or fuel of altercation about the Soul 1. What it is Aristole refels divers Tenets but his own description halts at last 't is easy to say what 't is not not what ' t is It is no temper of elements nor blood nor energy of life nor Galens Crasis but in general an essential quickning form which givs Plants a life vegetant Beasts a sentient comprising the Former and Men an intelligent including both as a Pentagon contains a Tetragon and that a Trigon For Souls being Forms and thos relativs not subsisting alone but as parts of compounds are hatdly defined or disquired 2. What manner of substance it is whether corporal or incorporeal for God only is simply immaterial and al things els in som sort corporal tho not visible as neither is pure Air. Hence divers Divines aver Angels to be corporeal becaus finit and limited to place being bounded as it were with a superfiâ—ies that they cannot be ubiquitants every wher or elswher at once Much more then Mens Souls which liv in Bodies The Schools say a Body is in place circumscriptivly a Spirit definitivly be it so but is not definit so to be here as not to be elswhere Doo not Spirits ascend descend and change place Is not their motion made in time tho very swift Are not thes acts proper passions of a Body though impalpable invisible imperceptible God then is a Spirit in creat purely immaterial Angels creat comparatly material and so are Souls separat much more thos in Bodies But what maner of substance whether aereal etherial or subtler sublimer essence none save the Father of Spirits can define or determin 3. How it attains or acquires knowledg Whether by remembrance of what it knew before as Plato affirms supposing a precreation which is improbable Or by the senses service as Aristotle asserts which is ignoble Or by her own inbred seeds of understanding which is most honourable the senses conduce much to manure the mind and improv science but our Soul of it self apprehendeth judgeth retaineth reasoneth resolveth without instruction though better or wors according to the various temper or symetry of the brain hir chief organ For 't is absurd that so divine an essence should rely on vile deceitful sens which only comprehends accidents color sound savor odor not the forms or nature of things much less Natures secrets or universal insensible objects Nay if science com from sense then such as hav sharpest sight hearing c. should be wisest or wittiest which oft befals contrary and men born deaf dumb or blind are of acutest entelechy therfore that principle of Peripatum Nothing is in the intellect which was not first under sens can scars stand sound for though it be furthered by sens yet it depends not thereon sith the senses are subordinat and know nothing without it 4. How many Souls cohabit in one body whether three or but one Som say three whereof the Vegetativ and Sensitiv dy with the body but intellectiv livs eternaly The most orthodox allow only one
Spirit of Wisdom and mad Men are said to be possessed with a Spirit Thes are al the acceptions and wheâ— none can answer or satisfy that words Sens in Scripture it fals not under Human understanding and Faith consists not in our Opinion but submission specialy wher God is said to be a Spirit or wher by Spirit is meant God For his Nature is incomprehensible and we know not what he is but that he is The Spirit of God moved on the Waters If God heself be meant hereby then is motion and place proper to Bodies only Spirit of God Gen 1. v. 2. Gen. 3. 1. ascribed to him but the like words are used at the universal Deluge I wil bring my Spirit Wind Air or moving Spirit and the Waters shal be diminished Both which may be caled Gods Spirit being his special work Pharach cals Josephs Wisdom Gen. 41. 38. the Spirit of God And God saith Speak to al that are wise hearted whom I hav filled with the Spirit of Wisdom to make Exod 28. 3. Aaron garments to consecrat him 2. Isaiah speaks thus of the Messiah The Spirit of the Lord shal abide on him the Spirit of Wisdom and Vnderstanding the Spirit of Counsil and Fortitud the Spirit of the fear of the Lord. Isai 1. 2. 3. Wher is manifestly meant so many Gifts or Graces of God not Ghosts or Goblins 3. Extraordinary Zele and courage in defens of Gods People is stiled the Spirit of God Judg. 3. 10. ch 6. 34. ch 11. 29. ch 13. 25. ch 14. 6. So 't is said The Spirit of God cam on Saul 1 Sam. 11. 6. 1 Sam. 19. v. 20. against the Amonits and his Anger was kindled greatly no Ghost but a vehement heat of vengeance So Gods Spirit cam upon him being among the Prophets that praised God in songs which was no Ghost but a sudden unexpected zele to join with them in holy Hymns or musical harmony 4. A fals Prophet said to Michaiah which way went the Lords Spirit from me to thee This cannot be any Ghost for Micai 1 Kings 22 24. declared the event of that Battel before as from a Vision not from a Spirit speaking in him So though Prophets spake by Gods Spirit or special gift of Prediction yet their knowledg was not by any Ghost within them but by som supernatural Dream or Vision Was not that inspiration by God 5. 'T is said God made man of dust and breathed into his Nostrils Quaere Spiraculum vitae the breath of life and he was made a living Soul This breath only signifies life not any Individual inspired Soul As Job saith So long as Gods 〈◊〉 is in my Nostrils that is so long as I liv or breath So Ezeâ—â—â—l The Spirit of Life was in the wheels not any Soul but they had life Again The spirit entred Ipse dixit Job 27. 3. Ezek. 1. 20. into me not any Ghost or Spiritual substance possessed his Body and set me on my feet meaning I recovered vital strength to go 6. God saith I wil take of the Spirit upon thee and put it on them the seventy Elders and they shal bear the burden of the People with thee Whereupon two of them Eldad and Medâ—d Prophecied whom Josua not knowing they had authority praied Moses fo forbid but he refused wishing God Nâ—mb 11. 17 25. would put his Spirit on al the People to make them Prophets or giv them authority subordinat to his own So Josuae was ful of the Spirit of Wisdom becaus Moses laid his hands on him viz. ordained him to prosecut the work of bringing Gods People into the promised Land which he-self began but could not Dâ—ut 34 9. finish So Saint Paul saith If any man hath not Christs Spirit not his Ghost but submission to his Gospel he is none of his So saith St. John hereby ye shal know the Spirit of God every Spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is com in the flesh is of God Rom. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 meaning the Spirit of Christianity or main Article of Faith that Jesus is the Christ but not of any Ghost or Goblin Thos words Luke 4. 1. Jesus ful of the holy Ghost are expresd or expounded Mat. 4. 1. Marc. 1. 12. by Spirit which means zele to doo the work for which God the Father sent him into the World but to interpret it of the third Person in holy Trinity is to say God was filled with God which is most improper oâ— insignificant Spirit literaly implies a thin real substance and metaphoricaly som extraordinary ability of Body and affection of Mind but to translat it Ghost which imports imaginary Inhabitants oâ— Mens Brains ther is no reason or Censure cauâ— By his leav Saint Lukes words ful of the holy Ghost which the other Evangelist hav not refer to Christs Person for it folows he returned to Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the Wildernes al which three relat alike to Christ but our Interpreters generally expound this of the third Person in Trinity nor is it incongruous to say God-Man was â—d by God but 't is more presumptuous if one Writer wâ—l seem wiser then al his Felows 7. The Disciples seing 〈◊〉 walk on the Sea supposed him a Spirit or Aerial Body 〈◊〉 Phantasm for al saw him which Mat. 14 26 Marc 6 49. could not be a delusion of the Brain incident to one at once or a very few surprised with like fear but a Body only compact â—â—cts 12. 15. of Air. When Saint Peter was excarcerated by an Angel and the Maid said he knoâ—kd at dore the rest thought hiâ— mad and said it was his Angel which is a corporeal substance compact upon occasions els the Disciples folowed the Jews and Gentils Opinion that ther be real Apparitions or Spectres which the one stiles Spirits or Angels Good and Evil the other Demons both evil and good For God can form subtle substantial Bodies to use as Ministers or Messengers so Angel signifies in extraordinary metaphysical maner Cannot the Devil doo the like Did he not assum the similitud â—â—are of Samuel when the Witch of Endor caused him to confer with Saul for Samuels Soul it could not be though Saul surmised it to be hâ—s Ghost Such Angels so formed are Corporal substances which take up room as Air doth and mov from place to place in time but are no Spiritual Ghosts in no place or no wher or definitly here as not to be elswher seeming somwhat yet be Nothing For thos thin Substances though invisible as Air hav the same real dimensions greater or lesser as material grosser Bodies Thus the Spirit of God is taken 1. For Wind or Breath See the seven Marginal â—gures 2. For extraordinary gifts 3. For vehement Affections 4. For the gift of Prediction 5. For Life 6. For subordination to Authority 7. For Aerial Bodies Now for Angel 't is generaly a Messenger or spicialy Gods
Angel what Messenger which relats any thing that makes known his extraordinary presence or power principaly by Dream or Vision The Scripture speaks not of their Creation but cals them ministring Spirits and Spirits as is said somtime signify thin imperceptible Bodies as Air Wind vital or animal Spirits somtime Images of the phansy in Dreams and Visions which are no real substances but intentional or accidental appeerances in the brain yet when God raiseth them supernaturaly to signify his Wil they are termed his Messengers or Angels Were not multituds of real individual Angels created by Qâ—â—â— God as Divines deem or define to wait on his Wil Or are the Good only formed on occasions and dissolved again If so then doth not God ceas from his work but creats new thin Aerial Bodies continualy Here he hath a large discurs that the Jews from the Gâ—ntils not by any proof or pressure in the old Testament hâ—ld thos apparances which God somtime raiseth in Mens phâ—â—sy for his service caled Angels to be real substances or permanent Creatures wherof som which they thought behoâ—ful or beneficial they caled Angels of God but such as they deemed hartful evil Angels foul Fiends Spirits or Devils For they â—sâ— eâ—ed Pythonists mad-Men Lunatics Epilectics or the like Demoniacs Then he shews how the word Angel in the old Testament is only an Image supernaturaly raised in Mans imagination to signify Gods presence in executing som supernatural work but no permanent Creature or incorporeal Ghost Touching Angels names in Daniel Michael Gabriel by the Dan. 12. 2. first is meant Christ under the title of a great Prince but the last was a supernatural Vision by which Daniel deemed or Dan. 8. 16. dreamed as divers doo that two Saints talked together and one said to the other Gabriel make this Man to understand Dan 9. 21 the Vision but God needs not to difference his servants by names which are helps only for weak short mortal memories nor can it be proved in the old Testament that Angels except when they are put for Men made Messengers or Ministers of Gods Wil Words or Works are permanent or incorporeal individuals as the Schools say The chief places alleged in the Mat. â—5 41. new Testament are thes Go ye cursed saith Christ into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels This indeed provs their permanence but not immateriality sich no simple 2 Pet. 2. 4. spirits are patible of material fire St. Paul saith know ye not that we shal judg the Angels St. Peter if God spared not Jâ—dâ— v. 6. the Angels that sinned but cast them into Hel St. Jude the Angels which kept not their first estate he reservs in everlasting chains under darknes unto the Judgment of the great Day Thes prov both the permanence of Evangelical nature and immateriality also For as incorporeal is taken for not Body not for a subtle invisible Body an incorporeal substance is a contradiction and to an Angel or Spirit in that sens incorporeal substance is a Cambridg Bul and in effect to say ther is no Angel or Spirit at al. He was of Opinion that Angels were only supernatural apparitions of the Phansy raised by God to notify his presence and precepts to Mankind specialy to his chosen People but confesseth that upon so many pregnant places and Christs plain words he beleevs ther be real substantial permanent Angels yet not incorporeal immaterial indefinit or nothing 'T is wel he sees his error in this point which argues he may overween in others and it were to be wished he would review sundry strange singularities to retract what he finds faulty or erroneous but not seduce or lead on the silly sort who are apt to clasp any shadows Was not the Angel Gabriel who audibly annunciated to Quaere the Virgin Mary hir present Conception by the holy Ghost Rev. 12 7. the same with Daniels so caled And Michael who with his Angels fought against the great red Dragon and his Angels the same Inspiration literaly as Spirit is a thin Air implies a blowing Inspiration into Man som thin air vapor or wind as one fils a bladder with his breath but if Spirits exist only in the phansy 't is but the blowing in of a Phantasm which is improper or impossible to say of such things as only seem to be somwhat yet are nothing The word is used in Scripture Metaphoricaly soly as when God inspired into Adam the breath of Life vital Gen. 2. 7. motion is meant Why not rather his rational Soul the fountain of Life and Quaere motion which was infused at creating and created in infusing as St. Austin asserts St. Paul saith Al Scripture is given by inspiration of God 2 Tim 3 16. speaking of the old Testament which is tru of the new Testament but 't is a Metaphor that God inclined the Spirit or mind of thos writers to pen infallibly tru as they did by his special dictat or direction St. Peter saith Prophecy cam not in old time by 2 Pet 1. 21. Mans Wil but thos holy Men spake at the holy Spirit moved them Here holy Spirit signifies Gods voice by supernatural Dream or Vision which is not inspiration nor when Christ breathed on his Disciples saying Receiv the holy Spirit was that John 20. 22. breath the very holy Ghost but only a sign of thos spiritual Graces he gav them So when 't is said of our Saviour or others he was ful of the holy Spirit 't is not meant any infusion of Gods substance but accumulation of his gifts whether supernaturaly attained as the firy cloven toungs sat on the Acts 2. 3 4. Apostles filling them with the holy Ghost or ordinarily acquired by industry as Men get learning by study which in al Cases are Gods gifts alike Thou then that hast received more then others must be most thankful Infusion and inspiration are not taken properly as if good or bad Spirits entred into Men but only for Gods imparting his Graces or Virtues which are not to be poured in as Bodies into Barrels but instilled ordinarily or supernaturaly Gods Kingdom is taken by most Divines metaphoricaly Kingdom of God Chap. 35. for eternal felicity after this life in the highest third Heaven which they cal the Kingdom of Glory or somtime for sanctification the earnest of it clyped the Kingdom of Grace but properly in Scripture 't is Gods real Monarchy or Soveraignty over any Subjects by their own consent or Covenant so the Israelits peculiarly chose God for their King upon his promising them the Land of Canaan but very seldom metaphoricaly and then 't is used for dominion over sin in the new Testament only becaus such a dominion every subject in Gods Kingdom shal hav without prejudice to the Soveraign From the Creation God reigned over al Men naturaly by his might and commanded his peculiar Subjects by voice as