some according to the original word here 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 correcting disorders and Ordaining Ministers both which plainly argue Episcopal authority for no single Presbyter was ever allowed even by our Antiepiscopal men to manage such a power Now as according to the Apostles word Heb. 7.7 the less is blessed of the better so must the correction of what is amiss and the power of conferring an Ecclesiastical office upon any be in a Superiour also I know well what is usually objected here viz. That Titus was an Evangelist that is say some an Assistant to the Apostle in his peregrinations among the Churches and therefore was endowed with an extraordinary power insomuch that his office was not capable of a Succession My answer hereto is this It is granted that Titus for some time removed from place to place with the Apostle as the exigency of his work required one while at Jerusalem another while at Crete from thence to Nicopolis he is ordered by the Apostle to come unto him after that he is sent to Corinth from whence he is expected at Treas and met with Paul in Macedonia whence he is sent again to Corinth c. as some have traced him in his several Stages Yet nevertheless though he was such a temporary Itinerant with the Apostle and if they will needs have it so though he executed the office of an Evangelist in so doing It followeth not that his first Commission for Crete was thereby revoked But that he did the office of an Evangelist while he attended the Apostle may be granted as he did while he was resident in Crete that is by labouring in the Word and Doctrine For after all that can be said other Evangelist Titus never was nor can he ever be proved to be Add hereunto Neither can it be found that ever Titus had such a peculiar charge given unto him in any of those places where he either accompanied the Apostle or was employed by him as he had in Crete For was he ever appointed to such a work either in Jerusalem or in Corinth or in Macedonia or in Dalmatia or in any place else besides Crete Surely it cannot be imagined but that these places might need the care and vigilancy of a Titus as well as that to which he was consign'd If therefore such an office of Government fixed upon one person in one place over a numerous Clergie was for the advancement of the Gospel of such nacessity in the dayes of the Apostles who were not at all wanting in the discharge of their duty without all contradiction it is at least as necessary now unless we will say that the care of the Churches well-fare was confin'd unto those Primitive Times and not to be extended to after-ages All which considered It is more then probable that the Apostle did devolve a power upon Titus not of an Evangelist in the late upstart sense but that which is indeed Episcopal superiour to that of an ordinary Presbyter and not onely so but that this was to be a president for the Government of the Churches to the end of the world Especially when we look upon the reason which the Apostle annexeth to the seventh verse in these words For a Bishop must be blameless c. Which for my part I conceive to be the ground of the Apostles own act in leaving Titus at Crete for the ends and purposes there premised knowing him to be a fit instrument for such a weighty employment and not at all to shew the qualification of the persons whom he should ordain as it hath been commonly understood Such qualification the Apostle had described in the sixth verse saying If any be blameless that is as a late Writer glosseth upon it approved by the testimony of the Church to be under no scandalous sin The husband of one wife that is One who lives not with a second wife after putting away the first Having faithful children that is such if he have any as have all received the Faith For if he bring not up his own children to be Christian what hope is there that he will be fit to convert others Not accused of riot or unruly that is who live temperately and regularly Meaning that Titus should not ordain any but those that are thus qualified in respect of their own vertuous living the Christian education of their children But now if he should again in the seventh verse repeat the same qualification of unblameableness as referring to the same persons his words would border too much upon an uncomely tautology which was never incident to that spirit by which he wrote As I said therefore before so I say again when the Apostle had declared how the persons should be qualified whom Titus should ordain he proceedeth to give Titus himself a reason implying withal the justification of his own Act why he left him in Crete about such an important business as to correct disorders and to ordain Elders For saith he A Bishop that is one who must be employed in these things must be as I have found thee to be blameless as the steward of God not self-willed c. Otherwise with what face can he lay hands upon any looking for such qualifications as are just and fit for such offices if they be wanting in himself Or how can he correct disorders in others if he himself be blame-worthy Knowing therefore thee to be in all points fitted for this great work I left thee in Crete c. So that the intent of the Apostle here plainly is this partly to satisfie Titus concerning his leaving him there as being for a purpose of an extrordinary concernment but chiefly to shew the qualifications of the persons to be employed in correcting and ordaining upon whom he sets an honourable mark of distinction for his works sake calling him BISHOP whereas the persons or dained he had before distinguished by a title proper to their office calling them Presbyters This is one interpretation of the Apostles meaning which I humbly submit to the judgement of the Church It is clear without any wrest or ambiguity and upon which it plainly follows that Bishop and Presbyter are not one and the same but distinct in their offices and it is hereby as plain likewise that the office of Bishop distinct from that of a Presbyter is of divine inslitution If this sense will not be allowed by our Opponents as for my part I know not why it should be rejected Let them consider a second Whereas the Apostle saith that He left Titus in Crete to ordain Elders in every City shewing in the sixth verse how they should be qualified viz. That they be blameless c. And thereupon alledgeth his reason in the seventh verse For a BISHOP must be blameless c. He implieth the great care that Titus should have in ordaining Elders because from among them BISHOPS were to be chosen for the Government of the Churches whom it concern'd in regard of their power
and authority above all others to be blameless as the Stewards of God not self-willed c. From whence I collect that the office of BISHOP and Presbyter are not one and the same Some Objections possibly will be made against this interpretation also but let judicious and sober-minded men judge whether they be of such weight so as to carry the Apostles sense against it I confess great is the confidence that hath been built upon this imaginary Identity from whence hath sprung much trouble to the Church of God and none have exceeded therein so much above measure as those persons who with a strange kinde of affectation called themselves by that Uncouth name of Smectymnuus For they led on with this Errour that BISHOP and Presbyter are one and the same take upon them to tax the Apostles reasoning as inconsequential and his demand as they call it Unjust unless he subscribe to their opinion Which censure they are likewise pleased to stretch out further by a similitude according to their fancy If a Chancellour say they in one of our Vniversities should give order to his Vice-Chancellour to admit none to the degree of a Bachelour in arts but such as were able to preach or keep a Divinity-Act for Bachelours in Divinity must be so what reason or equity were in this So if Paul leaving Titus in Crete should give order to him not to admit any to be an Elder but one thus and thus qualified because a Bishop must be so Had a Bishop been an Order or Calling distinct from or superiour to a Presbyter and not the same this had been no more rational or equal then the former Thus They. But the sense of the Apostle being rendred as before which for ought that I can see may very well be so Their similitude or somewhat alike unto it may be retorted upon them in this manner If a Chancellour in one of our Universities should give order to his Vice-Chancellour to admit none to the degree of a Bachelour in Divinity but such as were learned in the Scriptures of good report and of a grave and sober conversation for Doctours in Divinity who are to be taken out of that lower degree must be so there would be both reason and equity in such a Command so when the Apostle gives order to Titus not to admit any to be a Presbyter but one that is blameless because a BISHOP who is to be chosen out of the Presbytery must be so I hope the Divine spirit of this Doctor gentium may pass without control and not have an imputation of irrationality any more put upon him though it be affirmed as the truth is that the office of a BISHOP is here distinguished by him from that of a Presbyter and made Superiour unto it Let none now think of me that because of this my free manner of writing I have design'd thereby to make way for a Polemical dispute with some persons of note that are contrary minded in this case they would mistake me much that should judge so of me I am not willing to be reckoned among the disputers of this world And I do confess my self the unfittest of many upon sundry accounts for such an undertaking besides there hath been too much wrangling already among us Animosities have encreased to the great decay of brotherly-Love in the management of this controversy occasioned chiefly by this pretended Identity Jam. 1.20 But the wrath of man saith the Apostle worketh not the Righteousness of God And what have all the Jehu-like sallies and furious heats of the adversaries of Episcopacy at length produced What I say whereby Gods name may be honoured or his Church edified Is not the shame of their nakedness made bare to the view of all men Oh that God would now give repentance unto all those that are conscious to themselves of a guilt herein Even those very persons that I mentioned before who were the Ring leaders in this difference have reason sadly to lay it to heart if they be yet living who had they but followed that Counsel themselves which they gave unto that Reverend BISHOP with whom they did contend their offense had not been so great viz. To have written more cautiously and to have given less scope to their luxuriant pen for as they did let it run into causeless aggravations it did certainly bring too great a scandal upon Religion and made good their adversaries charge against them But since things that are past cannot be wholly recalled Oh that they would give glory to God in confessing their Errour and endeavour to repair again those breaches which their inadvertency hath made by a publick retractation They are men that pretend much to tenderness of Conscience and therefore I presume are not of that proud Cardinal's spirit who confessed there was need enough to reform the abuses of the Romish-Church but he could not endure that Luther a poor beggarly Friar as he call'd him should give the first Onset unto it I hope better things of these men as to this case in their capacity and that they will not disdain for this once to receive a word of Exhortation from one that is least esteemed in the Church because they know well that the more inconsiderable the person is as to his outward estate that gives them an advice of such concernment as this they may the more magnifie God's name in a ready consenting thereunto But to return to our purpose I have here offered my conceptions in the expounding of this Scripture which hath been so much controverted of late humbly presenting them to the judgment of the Church not knowing that ever yet any expositour Antient or Modern hath rendred the sense of it so before If the glory of God may hereby be advanced and the Churches peace promoted I have my aime and it shall be the Crown of my rejoycing to my dying day But as to the Objection that hath thus let out my thoughts so far towards this subject I will be confident that either of these interpretations that are here given will sooner be received by those that are wise and moderate then our adversaries wrest which hath hitherto created so much trouble unto us The result will be this Episcopal Government is warranted by the word of God therefore it is no superstition to have it reestablished in our Church nor no transgression of the Law of Christ to yield subjection unto it And now to finish this matter whereas there hath been a Cry made Away with Superstition and Away with Idolatry Away made Away with Superstition and Away with Idolatry Away with Liturgy and Away with Bishops we may clearly see by what is here written that this clamour is altogether causeless Poor people that are thus wosully deluded the Lord pitie them and the Lord forgive them for they know not what they say Much more reason surely is there to cry out with a shout Blessed be God for Liturgy and Episcopacy whereby we
Church of Rome If then that Cause so much pleaded for had such ill Consequents attending upon it may we not well say Sublatâ Causâ tollitur Effectus When the Cause is taken away the Effect will follow At least as I said before there is great hope it shall follow especially now when God hath in Mercy set over us a Man of Understanding and Knowledge Pro. 28.2 to lengthen out the State and Tranquillity of our Countrey when for the Transgressions of it it was by the Intrusion of Usurpers neer unto utter ruine A Man I say after his own heart Tutour'd and Bred up by him like David in the school of affliction Whose Heart is also fixed upon God to serve him in Righteousness and true Holiness A Prince so pious that he makes it his work and accounts it his glory to have true Religion established amongst his people in the Power and Purity of it See his Majesties Proclamation May 30. 1660. Witness his extreme dislike of Profaness which he hasted to publish the very next day after his happy Return unto us Commanding it to be read in all Churches monethly for six moneths after But well worthy indeed to be set up in them as a perpetual Monument of Piety to all Generations Wherein he declares the Purpose and Resolution of his Religious Heart in these words We will not exercise just Severity against any Malefactours sooner then against men of Dissolute Debauched and Prophane lives with what parts soever they may be otherwise qualified and endowed Requiring all Majors Sheriffs and Justices of the Peace to be very vigilant and strict in the Discovery and Prosecution of all Dissolute and Profane Persons such as blaspheme the Name of God by profane swearing and cursing or revile and disturb Ministers and despise the publick worship of God Witness also the Declaration which his Majesty set forth Octob. 25 immediately following concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs wherein he hath made known to God and the world That his Resolution is and shall be to promote the Power of Godliness to encourage the Exercises of Religion both publick and private and to take care that the Lords Day be applied to Holy Exercises without unnecessary divertisements and that Insufficient Negligent and Scandalous Ministers be not permitted in the Church Which being so What is it but a profane slander of the footsteps of Gods Anointed both of Christ himself and his Vicegerent over us to amuse the world with false reports of a return to profaness as if the Times were now become so loose that Wickedness should be established by a Law Whereas there was never more likelihood then now if the Devil through the turbulent spirits of factious Schismaticks did not hinder it for Religion to prosper and Holiness to flourish Away then with Profaness and let Superstition pack together with it for what entertainment is it like here to finde When King Charls the Sufferer L. Bishop of Winton the sonne of King Charls the Martyr as a Reverend Father of our Church hath worthily proclaimed him is new by the Divine Power and Goodness settled upon his Throne to be the Defender of that Faith for which he suffered That Faith I say which the Church of England professeth in opposition to the Church of Rome From which as it was observed by that Loyal and Peace-making Parliament that first so happily brought the Nation under his Majesties Government neither the Temptation of Allurements Perswasions and Promises from seducing Papists on the one hand nor the Persecution and hard Vsage from some seduced and mis-guided Professours of the Protestant Religion on the other hand could at all prevail upon him to make him swerve in the least Degree But chose rather still to suffer Afflictions though never so grievous as Moses did then to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season by so doing For which his Name shall be sweet and his Memorial precious in all the Churches of Christ to the end of the World I say then again Is it like that Superstition in any kinde should be Tolerated much less shall it be Established under the Government of so famous a Sufferer for the Protestant Profession yea and so active a Defender of it who hath made it manifest that his Care and Study is for the propagation thereof And who hath solemnly professed that nothing shall be proposed to testifie his Zeal and Affection for it to which he will not readily consent It will be objected What do we hear Words when we see Deeds Is there not an Actual return to Superstition in this Land now when the Ceremonies which were cast out are brought in again and the Liturgie restored And what are these but either the Issues of Will-worship which the Holy Scripture doth condemn or the Bratts of Babylon which should be taken not to be cherisht but to be dasht against the stones Besides Is not the Government also by Bishops set up again in its former Height which is not warranted by the word of God If we then should consent to these things How shall we like unto Jesus Christ our Pattern in the Text continue faithful with God in our Conformity to his Rule which he hath set us I answer First we may be still the same in a constant Adherency to the Foundation though we may as Divine Providence leads us whether it be in Judgment or in Mercy vary sometimes from that which is Circumstantial of which nature are those things that are here objected unto us and our fidelity to the former wil certainly entitle us to a faithful Imitation of Jesus Christ notwithstanding our change in the latter Nay is it not a great weakning of the Foundation and an injurious imputation put upon the Master-Builder to lay so much weight upon Circumstantials as to make them Unchangeable when they are not of his particular appointment though allowed by him to be annexed to his Building It is Superstition doubtless so to set up External Rites in competition with the Everlasting Rule of the Gospel as if they were not upon any Emergency whatsoever to be altered or removed And it is as ranck Superstition on the other side after they have been removed and restored again Superstitio ex super stando qua significatur nimium ese Sen. Epist 123. pertinaciously to stand in opposition against them especially when Experience hath made it manifest that the removal of them hath introduced much disorder and profaness in the service of God But we may appeal unto Christ himself to Judge in this Case Whether or no when a Christian Magistrate that truly feareth God taking notice of a great decay of Religion which by a wild and lawless Liberty hath been brought amongst his Subjects shall for the improvement of Piety recommend unto them a Form of Divine Service accompanied with such Rites and Ceremonies as are in force by Law and in the observing whereof True Religion hath formerly flourished Whether I say