Bishop then having these two severall and distinct offices imposed upon his person the one by divine the other by humane Law the one humane and Episcopall the other without pomp and pastorall there ariseth from thence this question by which of those two functions hee may lawfully I meane according to Gods Law minister the Doctrine Sacraments and censures of Christ If it bee answered that it is lawfull for him by vertue of his Pastorall office to minister the doctrine and Sacraments and by force of his humane Episcopall office to minister the censures of Christ then is not the answer fitted to the question the same being made à bene conjunctis ad male divisa For the censures of Christ as well as the doctrine of Christ being simply of divine ordinance it must follow if his Episcopall power be onely of humane right and pastorall power be onely of divine institution that the censures may bee ministred by authority derived onely from man but the doctrine and Sacraments by power derived onely from God Which commixion of divine and humane right in the execution of the ordinances of God can no manner of wayes be sound pure and sincere and therefore also can not be pleasing unto God For no more can the censures of Christ to the pleasure of God be lawfully administred by the authoritie of any one whose function is of man and not of God than could the sacrifice of God bee offered by one who was a priest of man and not of God Now that humane Episcopality or Bâ—shoppisme in the Church of England is authorized and deduced from Lordly Episcopality authorized only by the Law of the Realme the power and Law of man viz. of the King and Realme alone is evident as well by the donation and endowment of the Bishoprickes founded by the Kingly Prerogatives of the Kings of this Realme as by the erection and establishment of the new Bishopricks of Chester Gloucester Bristoll Peter borough and Oxford with their Cathedrall Churches Seas Cities meeres and bounds of those humane Bishops for the exercise of their Episcopall administration according to act of Parliament authorizing the Kings Highnesse to make Bishops by His Letters Patents Nay further that humane Episcopall Note that King Henry the eight by letters Patents made Bish therefore c. 31. H. 8. c. 9 jurisdiction within the meres and bounds of every Diocesse within England is meerely of humane and not of divine institution appeareth by that power and authority which the King hath in translating and dissolving of Bishopricks in conserving Episcopall jurisdiction sometimes to such persons as be no Bishops as did William the Conqueror when hee gave Episcopall power to the Abbot of Battaile and lastly by the very manner and forme of the nomination licence of Election and authority of investiture confirmation and consecration of Archbishops and Bishops established by the more positive Law of the Realme But if it bee answered 25. H. 8. c. 20 that the Bishop by his humane Episcopall power doth minister the Doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ then is the case worse with him than it was before because then not onely the Discipline of Christ but also the doctrine and Sacraments of Christ should bee ministred by that authority which is of humane institution Besides the answer should be untrue because the Bishop at the time of his consecration doth not receive any authority to preach the Word and minister the Sacraments for that authority was then committed unto him when first he was ordained to be a Presbyter But the authority which hee receiveth at the time of his consecration is to correct and punish such as bee unquiet disobedient and criminous within his Diocesse Whereby once againe is that confirmed which was erst said viz. That Episcopall power in England is not of divine but of humane institution Especially for that by the Scriptures it can not be proved that there bee two severall and distinct formes of ordinations the one called consecration proper to a Lord Bishop for the exercise of Discipline the other called ordination peculiar to a Pastor or teaching Elder for the ministration of the Word and Sacraments Whereunto lastly may bee added another maine reason that Episcopall power in If the Lord Bish have power to minister disâ—ipline by divine right then no more can he commit that his power to an other than he can commit the power which hee hath of preaching to another England to minister the Discipline can not therefore bee of divine institution because if it were of divine institution the Bishop could no more surrogate the same his Episcopall power to his Suffragane to his Vicar generall or Rouland Allen to minister the censures of Christ in his owne name than hee can depute them or any of them to minister the doctrine and Sacraments in his own name But how doth it appeare that the Vicar generall Rowland Allen or any other Presbyter did ever excommunicate by the power or in the name of the Bishop For the proofe hereof we shall not need to search any other authenticall record then the precept and the practice before intreated of For it is not said in the precept that the Presbyter being armed with authority from Christ but it is said that the Presbyter being armed with authority from the Bishop or Archdeacon shall denounce the sentence of excommunication the practice also of Doctor Hone every way confirmeth as much For therein Doctor Hone doth not challenge to be an Officer unto Christ but he saith that he is the officiall of the venerable Archdeacon of Surrey and that Master Rowland Allen Presbyter by vertue of his office doth excommunicate the parties who obeyed not his mandates who made not their appearances before him c. If it be answered that Rowland Allen though he be not an immediate officer from Christ that yet neverthelesse he is a mediate officer depuâ—ed to his office by an immediate officer unto Christ viz. the Lord Bishop or Archdeacon then wee reply and say First that the Lord Bishop and Archdeacon be neither immediate or mediâ—te Officers appointed by Christ to bee ministers of his discipline Secondly if they were immediate officers from Christ that yet they have no authority by the Law of Christ to transfer their right or any part thereof to an other person in their name or by their authoritie to excommunicate As for these words viz. In Dei nomine Amen nos Iohannes Hone or nos Roulandus Allen c. sometimes used in their scedule of excommunication it is but a prophaning of the holy name of God whereby they make themselves guilty of the taking of the glorious name of God in vaine And thus much touching both the question and answer whether the discipline of Christ may be ministred by the Bishops humane Episcopall power yea or no. But now on the other side because no divine censure can lawfully be executed in the Church by that authority
AN ASSERTION FOR True and Christian CHURCH-POLICIE Wherein Certain Politike Objections made against the planting of PASTOURS and Elders in every Congregation are sufficiently ANSWERED And Wherein also sundry projects are set downe how the Discipline by Pastors and Elders may be planted without any derogation to the Kings Royall Prerogative any indignity to the three Estates in Parliament or any greater alteration of the laudable Lawes Statutes or Customes of the Realme than may well bee made without damage to the people IN DOMINO CONFIDO London Printed 1642. To the Right Honourable the LORDS and COMMONS Assembled in High COURT of Parliament Right HONOURABLE c. THe Ensuing Treatise which I am bold to present to Your wisedomes view containes principall politicall reasons grounded upon the Lawes of this Kingdom for the removing of the present Hierarchie and planting of a Governement by Pastors and Elders The appellation of Lay Elders hath beene very displeasing to many whereas the Elder intended to be planted is not lay but in regard of the service wherein hee is to bee imployed Ecclesiasticall The Author was an elaborate Student in the civill Law and a professor of it He was esteemed learned by the best of that profession as also by Divines and common Lawyers learned Sir Edward Cook late Chiefe Justice of the Kings Bench Sir Christopher Yelverton late Judge of the Common Pleas Sir Henry Finch late the Kings Serjeant at Law and others have given testimony of him The Treatise is an answer to diverse passages in a Book written by D. Whitgift late Archb. of Canterbury intituled An admonition to the Parliament The Author as I doubt not but will appeare to your Wisedomes hath written with the spirit of meekenesse and humility submitting all to the judgement of an High Court of Parliament hee disputes with the Great Bishop in a Scholasticall way without one syllable of reviling or bitter language which he ever detested Hee discovers the foundation of the Hierarchie to be totally illegall and to bee abolished by the abolition of the Papall Canon Law which appeares to be abolished by the statute of 25. of Henry 8. cap. 9. The truth whereof being discovered by the Authors means to the said learned Judge Sir Edward Cooke hee did most ingenuously acknowledge and did avow he never understood the statute so well before yet affirmed he thought he had read the said statute an hundred times May it please you in your wisedomes to commend the Treatise to bee viewed by the learned Gent. of the long Robe whose awfull judgments I shall ever honour Most true it is I dare averre there is little written in this Kingdome tending to the removall of the Episcopacie from Legall and Politicall arguments but the Author hath the arrowes in his quiver I say not that others have borrowed light from his Candle Right Honourable and Right worthy I shall humbly take further boldnes humbly presuming upon your Honourable favours if this poore model find acceptance in your sight to present you with a new impression of an abstract written in time of famous Queene Elizabeth a Book well knowne to learned King Iames by the same Author whose memory I am bound by nature to Honour Give mee leave onely now to make knowne unto you the Title and severall Treatises contained in it It is intituled An abstract of certaine Laws Canons and Constitutions Synodall and Provinciall in force within the Queenes dominions and for the most part unknowne to the subject It containeth these principall Treatises 1. That a learned Ministery is commanded by Law 2. That Pluralities are forbidden by Law 3. That it is unlawfull to make a Minister without a title 4. That it is unlawfull for a Clerk to have civill authority This abstract was seemingly answered by the rayling stile of a then Doctor Cozens but by a further incounter and the counterpoyson yet extant written by the same Author he departed the Field with Honour such was the opinion of many learned among others of the foresaid Reverend Judge Sir Henry Yelverton This treatise was never questioned nor quarreld for ought I ever heard Yet was the Author well knowne to many of the Bishops You may happily in your Wisdomes conceive some things might have beene omitted as not wholly incident to the time and some abbreviated in regard of the shortnesse of your time and of the high affaires now in hand But may it please you being about so to doe I found the light must have bin much Eclipsed and the truth obscured I am over bold most humbly to commend the defence of what he writes grounded upon the laws of the Kingdome to your most Honourable protection It shall be enough for me to attend among the meanest of your servants having heretofore had the happinesse to have bin a member though unworthy of the Honourable House of Commons Presenting your honours and your grave wisdomes with my heartiest prayers and humblest service In most humble manner I intreate your pardon of and for The Contents THe defenders of the Hierarchy confesse their government is not apostolicall pag. 2. The bringing in of the discipline desired causeth no alteration of temporall laws nor the officers of a kingdom 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 No feare that prophane men will overthrow the Gospell if the forme of Church government be altered 10. The description of lukewarme professors that will be of that religion the King will be of 11. The Puritan protestants can never overthrow the Gospell 13. Neither can the Papist because he is overthrown by the Gospel 13 The planting of an Apostolicall government will draw no alteration of the Lawes of the Realme 14. The whole Papal Law is totally abolished by the statute of the 25 of Henry 8. c. 19. of the submission of the Clergie as appeares by the body of the statute and the proviso from the 15. to the 20. Canon and civill Lawes no part of the Lawes of the Realme but by sufferance 15 An imbasement for Civillians to have preferment by the offices of the Canon Law that ought not to be used 17 18 19. Whence it followeth that the papall Canon Law being abolished the papall offices and functions of Archbishops and Bishops are also abolished being grounded upon the same Law 20 Power properly and improperly called spirituall 20 21 Bishops remaine ordinary by custome provinciall Canons and statute Law though papall lawes be abolished 21 The King though Supreame governour of the Church cannot give Archbishops and Bishops spirituall power properly called spirituall that power must be derived from the Scripture 20. The Bishops did use a plenary power devised and promulged new Canons without the Queenes assent 23 All the Bishops together can make no new Law and yet every Bishop doth make many lawes 24 All temporall officers do draw their power from the King one way or other 25 The Charter of England confirmeth not the power of Archbishops or Bishops because their power appeares not by the
regall Crown nay because the contradictorie hereof is affirmed and this denyed and because we learn by law as he saith that matters in fact are not intended to be done till they be proved so we must still put the upholders and executioners of this law to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that the forraigne and Papall Law is but a pretended necessary and disused law that it is not inspired with the life of Law and that it is fathered by them to be such a Law as is an headlesse a fetherlesse and a nocklesse arrow which is not fit to be drawne or shot against any subject of the King And from this voidance abolition and nullitie of forraigne and papall Canon Law because sublato principali tolluntur accessoria it followeth that all offices and functions of papall Archbishops papall Bishops papall Suffraganes papall Archdeacons papall Deanes and Chapters papall Priests papall Deacons papall Subdeacons papall Chancellors papall Vicars generall papall Commissaries and papall Officials meerely depending upon the authoritie and drawne from the rules and grounds of that Law are likewise adnihilated and of no value Howbeit for so much as by the opinion of some learned Civilians By the opinion of the Civilians the papall Canon law seemeth to be in force there seemeth unto them a necessary continuance of the same forraigne and papall Law by reason that Archbishops and Bishops doe now lawfully as they say use ordinarie Archiepiscopall and Episcopall jurisdiction which they could not as they thinke doe if the same common law were utterly abolished and for so much also as some learned in the Canon lawes do maintaine that since the statute Apology of certain proceedings in Courts Ecclesiastical of 1 Eliz. c. 1. the Archbishop and Bishop cannot lawfully claim any ordinarie spirituall jurisdiction at all but that the spirituall jurisdiction to be exercised by them ought to bee delegated unto them from the King by a Commission under the great Seale Forasmuch I say as there are these differences of opinions it seemeth expedient to be considered by what law and by what authoritie Archbishops and Bishops exercise Archiepiscopall and Episcopall power in the Church And to the end this question may fully bee knowne and no scruple nor ambiguitie be left what power spirituall may be intended Power properly and improperly called spirituall Queens Injunct and execut of justice to be exercised by them We distinguish spirituall power into a power properly called spirituall and into a power improperly or abusively called spirituall Ther power properly called spirituall is that spirituall power which consisteth and is conversant in preaching the Word administring the Sacraments ordaining and deposing Ministers excommunicating or absolving and if there bee any other spirituall power of the like property and nature Now that this power properly called Power properly called spirituall was never in the Queenes person spirituall could have beene drawne from the person of our late Soveraigne Lady the Queene unto Archbishops and Bishops we deny For the Queenes Royall person being never capable of any part of this spirituall power how could the same bee derived from her person unto them Nemo potest plus juris in alium transferre quam ipse habet Archiepiscopall and Episcopall power therefore exercised in and about these mysteries of our holy Religion ordinarily and necessarily must belong unto the Archbishop and Bishop by the canon of the holy Scriptures otherwise they have no power properly called Power improperly called spirituall is indeed but a temporall power spirituall touching these things at all The power which improperly is called spirituall is such a power as respecteth not the exercise of any pastorall or ministeriall Church to the internall begetting of faith or reforming of manners in the soule of man but is such a power as wherby publike peace equitie and justice is preserved and maintained in externall things peculiarly appropried and appertaining unto the persons or affaires of the Church which power indeed is properly a temporall or civill power and is to bee exercised onely by the authoritie of Temporall and Civill Magistrates Now then to returne to the state of the point in Question touching this later power improperly called spirituall by what law or by what authoritie the Archbishops and Bishops doe exercise this kinde of power in the Church I answer that they cannot have the same from any forraigne Canon Law because the same Law with all the powers and dependences thereof is adnulled And therefore that this their power must and ought to be derived unto them from Bb. where From whence then is their power derived Hereunto we answer that before the making of that act spirituall jurisdiction did appertaine unto Bishops and that Bishops were ordinaries aswell by custome of the Realme canons constitutions and ordinances provincial and synodall as by forraigne canon law And that therefore these canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall or synodall according to Bishops remaine ordinaries by custome provinciall Canons statute law though papall Canon law be abolished 25. h. 8. c 20. 25. h 8. c â—6 the true intent of that act could not still have been used and executed as they were before if the Bishops had not still remained ordinaries Moreover it is cleare by two statutes that the Archbishops and Bishops ought to be obeyed in all manner of things according to the name title degree and dignitie that they shall be chosen or presented unto and that they may doe and execute minister use and exercise all and every thing and things touching or pertaining to the office or order of an Archbishop or Bishop with all ensignes tokens and ceremonies thereunto lawfully belonging as any Archbishop or Bishop might at any time heretofore do without offending of the prerogative royall of the Crown and the laws and customes of this Realm Let it be then that by custome canons provinciall and statute law Bishops be and do remaine ordinaries yet aswell upon those words of the statute 25. H 8. without offending of the prerogative Royall as upon the statute of 1. Eliz. cap. 1 there remaineth a scruple and ambiguitie whether it be not hurtfull or derogatorie unto the Kings Prerogative Royall that Ordinaries should use and exercise their ordinarie power improperly called spirituall without a commission under the great Seale or that such their power should be as immoderate and excessive now as in times past it was by the Papall Canon law Concerning the first by the Statute of 1 Eliz. c. 1. and by the Statute of 8 Eliz. c. 1. the Queene was recognized to be in effect the Ordinarie of Ordinaries The Queen was supreme ordinary of ordination that is the chief supreme and soveraign Ordinary over all persons in all causes aswell Ecclesiasticall as Temporall Where it seemeth to follow that all the branches and streams aswell of that power which improperly is called spiritual as of that power which properly is called
was common and did continue in the old Churches Besides this inconvenience saith he caused Princes and Bishops so much to intermeddle in this matter Frow whence it necessarily againe followeth that by the holy Scriptures and law of God Princes and Bishops did not entermeddle with that matter atal For had it been simply lawfull for them to have dealt in those causes by the word of God then aswell before schisme discord and dissention as afterward yea rather much more before than afterward For then by their owne right might Princes and Bishops have prevented Bishops nâ—eddle not with election of Pastors by the holy Scriptures all occasion of schism and contention and have so preserved the Church that no tumult or disorder should once have beene raised or begun therein Againe if by the law of God Princes and Bishops had medled in these matters and had not intermedled by humane device then lawfully by their authoritie alone might they have chosen Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches which thing in this place by necessary inference he denieth For schisme saith he caused them to intermeddle So as by his confession they were but intermedlers and entercommoners by reason of schisme and not commoners and medlers by vertue of Gods word And yet now a dayes our reverend Bishops in this case are no more intercommoners with Princes and with the people they ate no more entermedlers as in old times they were but they have now so far incroached upon the prerogatives of the prince and privileges of the people that neither prince nor people have any commons in the election of Pastors Elders and Deacons with them at all Besides if schism and contention among the people Bishops â—n croach upon the â—ighâ— oâ— pâ—â—â—ce and people were the reason why Bishops first entermedled in the choice of Pastours we now having no schisme nor contention about the choice of Pastours by the people and so the cause of ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease But this effect is therefore still to bee continued because otherwise the cause would a new sprout out and spring up againe Nay rather inasmuch as for these many yeares we have had schism discord and dissention because the bishops wholly and altogether have medled in the choise of pastours and have thrust upon the people whatsoever pastours please not the people but pleased themselves and have not suffered the people to meddle no not so much as once to intermeddle in these matters in as much I say as these things be so it seemeth most expedient requisite and necessary for the appeasing and pacifying of this discord and the taking away of this schism to have the manner of election which was in the old Churches restored to the people and this wherein the bishops have intermedled without authoritie from the word to be abolished that so againe the cause of scbism and strife which is now among us ceasing the effect might likewise cease After I had ended this tract in this manner touching this point there came into mine hands a booke intituled The perpetuall government of Christs Church written by Thomas Bilson Warden of Winchester Colledge in the fifteenth chapter of which booke is handled this question viz. to whom the election of Bishops and Presbyters doth rightly belong and whetherby Gods law the people must elect their pastours or no. In which chapter also the matter of schism strife and contention is handled The finall scope and conclusion whereof is as the proposition importeth twofold First concerning Bishops then concerning Pastours The quarrell taken against Bishops doth not so much touch saith hee the office and functions of Bishops as it doth the Princes prerogative When you rather thinke the Prince may not name her Bishops without the consent and election of the people you impugne not us but directly call the Princes fact and her lawes in question As touching this point of the proposition because the people by any law or custome never challenged any right or interest in the choise of the Kings bishops wee have nothing The King only hath power without the people to nominate his Kingly Bb. to meddle or to make about the choise of any of the Kings Bishops Nay we confesse as his highnesse progenitors Kings of England have beene the Soveraigne Donours Founders Lords and Avowes of all the Bishopricks in England without aid of the people that so likewise it is a right and interest invested into his Imperiall crowne that he only his heires and successors without consent of the people ought to have the free nomination appointment collation investiture confirmation of all the Bishops from time to time to be planted in any of those Bishoprickes yea and wee say further that the King alone hath not power onely to nominate collate and confirm but also to translate yea and if it please him to depose all his Kingly Bishops without any consent of his people at all For say we ejus est destruere cujus est construere ejus est tollere cujus est condere Neither will we dislike but rather content our selves that our late Queens Bishops if they shall finde favour in the Kings eyes should be also the Kings Bishops conditionally they submit themselves to the lawes and prerogatives of the Kings Crowne content themselves with the only name of Kingly and Princely Bishops and not challenge any more unto themselves the sole titles of Godly and Christian Bishops as though without injurie to the law of â—od and Gospell of our Saviour Christ they could not bee dispossessed of their Lordly Bishopricks And therefore our most humble prayer to the King is that his Majestie would bee pleased that such his Kingly Bishops may not henceforth over crow and justle out Gods Bishops nor have any primacie over Gods Bishops And withall that the King himselfe would vouchsafe to hearken to the doctrine of such as are indeed Gods Bishops rather than to the Counsell of those who lately were the Queenes bishops As touching the second part viz. whether the people by Gods M. Bilson confirmeth the peoples election of their pastor p. 339. law must elect their Pastours or no Master Bilson by reasons and proofes brought for the first use of it rather confirmeth than impugneth the same For saith hee Well may the peoples interest stand upon the grounds of reason and nature and bee derived from the rules of Christian equitie and societie That each Church and people stand free by Gods law to admit maintaine or obey no maâ— as their Pastour without their liking unlesse by law custome or consent they have restrained themselves Then the people had as much right to choose their 360 Pastour as the Clergie that had more skill to judge that the Apostles left elections indifferent to the people and Clergie at Jerusalem That the Apostles in the Acts when they willed the Church at Jerusalem to choose the seven did not make any remembrance or
matters of civill justice are heard examined and adjudged by one man alone If for the common benefit of the Tenants against incrochments over-laying of commons wast nuisances or such like any paine is to bee offered or presentment made the same is not set or made by the Steward Sheriffe or other Officer alone but by the common voyce and consent of all the homagers and sutors to the Court The Steward indeed is the director and moderator of the Court the giver of the charge and the mouth of the whole Assembly to pronounce and enact the whole worke of their meeting but hee is not the onely inquisitor the presenter the informer or the Judge to dispose all things according to his owne discretion Besides matters of the Kings peace are not committed in any Countie or other place within the Realme onely to one Justice of the peace alone For neither at the generall Sessions of the peace nor at any other lesse publike meetings any person for any offence Breaches of the Kings peace not punishable by one alone whereof hee standeth indighted or for which hee is punishable can bee fined amerced or bodily punished at the discretion of one Justice alone but by the greatest part of the Iustices assembled his penaltie is to bee imposed upon him Furthermore this manner of the examination of the fact and declaration of the Law for the tryall of the fact and judgement of the Law doth not reside in the brest of one Iuror or Iudge alone In the Court of the Kings Bench if a Prisoner hee brought to the Barre Iustice in any of the B. Courts is not executed by one Iudge alone and confesse not the Crime by the Iustice of that Court hee can receive no judgement unlesse hee bee first indicted by inquisition of twelve grand Iurors at the least and afterward againe bee tryed by other twelve brought judically into the Court face to face Yea and in this Court neither the interpretation of the common Law nor the exposition of any statute dependeth upon the opinion credit or authority of one Iudge or not of the Kings chiefe justice himselfe alone for his other three brethren and Co-juges varying from him in point of law may lawfully over-rule the Court. The same manner of Judgement for the Law is in use and is practized by the Judges in the Court of common Pleas and by the Barons of the Exchequer in the Latin Court of the Exchequer And not In the Courts of Equitie are many assistants Court of requests only in these Courts of law and Justice but also in all the Kings Courts of equitie and conscience it is not to be seene that any one person alone hath any absolute power without assistants finally to orâ—er judge and decree any cause appertaining to the jurisdiction of those Courts In the Court of Requests there are not fewer than two yea some times three or foure with Master of Requests in commission to heare and determine matters of equitie in Court of Wards that Court. In the Court of Wards and liveries there sitteth not only the Master of the Wardes but also the Kings Attourney the Receiver and other Officers of the same Court. In the Court of Court of the Chequer Chamber the Exchequer-chamâ—er with the Lord Treasurer who is chief and president of that Councell yet with him as assistants doe sit the â—hancellour of the Exchâ—quer the Lord Chiefe Baron High courts of Chancerie and the other Barons Whatsoever dâ—cree finall is made in the Kings high Court of Chancerâ—e the same is decreed not by the Lord Chancellour alone But by the Lord Chancellour and the high Court of Chancerie wherein the Master of the Roles and the twelve Masters of the Chancerie as coadjutors doe sit and give assistance In the most honourable Court of Starre-Chamber the Lord Chancellour the Lord Treasurer and the president of the Court of Star-chamber 3 H 7 c. 1 2 H 8 c 20 Kings most honourable Councel and Keeper of the Kings privie Seale or two of them calling unto them one Bishop and one temporall Lord of the Kings most honourable Councell the two chiefe Justices of the Kings bench and Common pleas for the time being or other two of the Kings Justices in their absence have full power and authoritie to punish after their demerits all misdoers being found culpable before them If we search our statutes besides the Courts and matters determinable in these spoken of before we shall finde that the complaints of errour whether it tâ—uch the King or any other person made in the Exchequer should bee 31 E 3 c 21 done to come before the Chancellour and Treasurer who taking to them two Justices and other sage persons are duely to examine the businesse and iâ— any errour be found to correct and amend the 14 E 3 c 5 Roles c. By reason of delayes of judgements used in the Chancerie in the Kings bench common bench and in the Exchequer it was assented established and accorded that a Prelate two Earles and two Barons chosen by the Parliament by good advice of the Chancellour c. shall proceed to take a good accord and to make 10 K. 2 c. 1 a good judgement When it was complained unto the King that the profits c. of his Realme by some great Officers c were much withdrawne and eloyned c. it pleased the King c. to commit the surveying aswell of the estate of his house c. unto the honourable Fathers in God William Archbishop of Canterburie 26 H. 6 b 11 H. 7 c. 25. c 19 H. 7 c. 7. and Alexander Archbishop of Yorke c. by a statute of commission for Sowers by a statute for punishment of perjurie by a statute against making or executing of acts or ordinances by any c Masters being not examined c. by the Lord Chancellour d 27 H 3 c. 27 c 32 H. c. 45. f 27 E c. 8 Treasurer or chiefe Justices c. By a statute for the erection of the Court of d Augmentation by a statute for erection of the Court of first e fruits and tenths and lastly by an f act for redresse of erroneous judgements in the Court commonly called the Kings bench By all these Statutes I say it is very apparant that the Administration of publike affaires in the common weale hath never beene usually committed to the advisement discretion or definitive sentence of any one man alone Which point is yet more fully and more perfectly Lord president and councell in Wales Lord president and councell in the North parts Lord Deputie councell in Ireland The King his honourable privie Councell The King and his grand councell in Parliament to be understood by the establishment and continuance of the Kings Lord President and Councell of Wales of the Kings Lord President and Councell established for the North of the Kings L. Deputie and Councel within
be licensed and limited unto them to take doe and execute by any Archbishop or Bishop within their Diocesse to whom they shall be Suffraganes under their seales And that no such Suffragane shall use any jurisdiction ordinary or Episcopall power otherwise nor longer time than shall bee limited by such Commission to him given upon paine c. From which Act touching the use and exercise of Episcopall power and censures by the Suffragane wee may againe safely conclude that the EPISCOPALL power granted by the Bishops to be used by the Suffragane is not of divine right and institution but onely from humane device and ordinance For the Suffragan could not exercise any power called spirituall or Episcopall unlesse by the Bishop hee were nominated by the King elected and presented by the Archbishop consecrated and by commission under the Bishops seale authorized in what manner and for what time he should exercise the same Custom then being not from heaven but from the earth and again the Bishops Commission limiting the Suffraganes delegated power being of man and not of God it followeth necessarily that that Episcopall power which the Bishops use and exercise in England can not be divine but humane Because Episcopall authority which is divine being conveyed from the Royall and Soveraigne authority of our Saviour Christ the giver of all power unto every officer within his Ceurch cannot bee transferred to any other person by the same Bishop by the King by the body of the state or by custome For the Kings Person and body of the state nor being made capable by the holy Scriptures to use and exercise that Episcopall power which is of divine Institution can never transferre the same to others whereof they bee themselves uncapable And to defend that custome or any municipall Law should transfer divine Episcopall power from a divine B. to any human officer is more erroneous And from hence if the now L. Bish of London judge his Episcopall power to belong unto him by divine and that by the same right he have power as well to ordaine depose suspend and excommunicate Presbyters as to confirme boyes girles young men and maidens there seemeth to bee good reason that the same B. should make it apparently knowne unto the King and Realme by what power or commission descended from heaven hee may delegate under his Seale the same his divine authority of ordination deposition suspension excommunication and confirmation unto Doctor Sterne his now Suffragane of Colchester For if from the holy Scriptures hee can produce no warrant for the making of a delegation of any part of that Episcopall power which hee holdeth to bee committed unto him from our Saviour Christ then well may we conclude against the oâ—dination deposition suspension excommunication and confirmation made by the same his Suffragame that the same his Suffraganes ordination deposition c. is not divine For how can an ordination a deposition c. made by a Suffragane be divine when as the Commission granted by the Bishop is meerely humane Wherefore seeing the Bishop himselfe hath plucked certaine of his principall feathers from his own spirituall wings if so be his own wings may be spirituall and imped them with an untwysted thread of humane policy to the humane trayne of his Suffragane and seeing also his Archbishops grace of Canterbury in cases of his metropoliticall prerogative the Archdeacons London Midlesex Essex Hertford the Deane of Pauls and certaine Prebendaries in Pauls the Deane of Westminster the Master of the Savoy and diverse other Persons have by Papall priviledges or by ancient custome prescribed almost all other parts of his Episcopall power there seemeth good reason that the Bishop should againe declare whether the Churches within the said Diocesse after the decease or translation of his Lordship shall stand in need of any Lordly Successor to sit in the same Sea for any other profitable use or purpose than only for wearing of a white rochet walking with a pastorall staffe keeping seven yeares Sabboth from preaching in his Parish Church at Fulham consecrating of Chappels hallowing of Fontes Christening as they call it of Belles whiting of Walles painting of Tombes garnishing of Sepulchers preserving of superstitious Monuments in glasse Windowes repairing and gilding rotten and outworne Crosses confirming Leases of Benefices with cure of soules upon small rents improprying Churches or such like For if the great things of the Episcopall power may bee transferred either by expresse or by secret consent either by commission or custome and that as well to an inferiour as to a superior as well to a Suffragrane a Deane an Archdeacon and a Prebendary as to an Archb. then it seemeth reasonable that the smaller things before spoken of may well be performed without any Lordly authority When I had thus finished according to our line that which I first undertooke against the Admonitors pre ensed dangerous alterations innovations and inconveniences and was also purposed to have added that which in mine opinion seemeth to prove that which the Admonitor by his opinion denyeth viz. that the externall government of the Church should alwayes and in all places be one when I say I had thus purposed by reason of some other present and for the time more necessary occasion I was driven to alter my minde and to shew the same in a place somewhat more convenient And yet in the meane while it shall not be amisse but a thing very necessary in this place so to cleare the state of the question betweene the Admonitor and me as the same being rightly before hand understood there might no prejudicate opinion be conceived against the truth The Admonitor against the not having one forme of externall policy in all ages and states of the Chutch of Christ alleadgeth that in Denmarke they have Bishops both in name and in office that in Saxony thâ—y have Arcbishops and Bishops iâ— office but not in name that in Tigure they have no Senate of Elders nor the discipline by excommunication which they more mislike that in Geneva in Scotland and in other places they have a government not much unlike that platforme which is desired to be among us that in Saxony and Basil they kneele at the Lords Supper all Tigure they sit and it is brought unto them and that in other places they goe and receive it for the more expedition as they passe And that he doubteth not but that the learned men whom God sent to instruct those Churches in which the Gospell in those dayes was first received have bin directed by the spirit of God to retaine this liberty that in externall government and other outward orders they might choose such as they thought in wisdome and godlinesse to be most convenient for the state of their Countrey and disposition of the people Vnto all which wee answer briefly viz. that Bishops both in name and in office being of divine institution ought as well to be in the Church of England as of Denmarke
108 How a Minister ought to be called to a place of his examination and approbation by Ministers and the Parish and of his ordination and actuall calling to a place 108 This way laid down before is no such innovation as is pretended it being agreeable to the ancient Lawes of the Land 100 The spirit of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets how to be 112 What is to be done if suit fall out betwixt two Patrons 113 Patrons not so strictly curbed is pretended 114 Prophets to be taken from the Schooles of the Prophets upon difference in judgment of the abilities of men what then to be done 114 Concerning refusall upon non abilitie 116 The benefits insuing the platforme of ordination and required 117 118 What perfection is required in a Minister 120 Prelacy and a learned Ministery cannot stand together 120 That objection answered that the reward of learning being taken away learning it selfe must needs fall to the ground 121 Prelacy the bane of learned Ministers 122 That argument answered concerning the drawing of Schollers out of the Vniversities before they are fit 123 124 The argument concerning excommunication answered by whom excommunication ought to be performed 125 126 127 what it is 128 The inconvenience of the Bishops excommunication 129 It hath many deformities 130 By the Bishops excommunication one may be a communite 130 Excommunication toucheth them only who professe themselves members of the Church 133 The different manner of discipline exercised by Ecclesiasticall Commissioners severall instances in diverse persons set down 134 135 136 The Articles objected by her Majesties High Commissioners for causes Ecclesiasticall against G. B. of B. and F. B. of B. in the County of L. with observations on the Bishops proceedings 1637. 138 139 140 141. with a Copy of the Arch-bishops Letter and answer from the Bishop to that Letter The Argument concerning the bringing in of Aristocracy into the Church answered 143 Prelacy either oligarchie or tyrannīe 144 It is to be feared lest by the examples of the Prelates Oligarchie be brought into the Common-Wealth and therefore a caution is put in against it 145 The government of the Church by Prelates is not Monarchicall 145 If it be so then the government by Pastors may be so too 145 No cause for the Monarch to feare Aristocracy in Church government 147 Pastors disclaime to meddle in civill matters 147 The people of England are rather possessed with the sense of Democracy and Aristocracy 148 The manner of Policy by Pastors and Elders in the Church is agreeable to the government in the Common-wealth but the government by Prelacy is disagreeable 149 The answer of an Italian Bishop being asked vis ne Episcopari And the answer of an English Bishop having obtained his Congedelier 149 150 The manner of administration of justice spirituall in the Church by Prelacy 150 The administration of Iustice spirituall by Pastors and Elders agreeable to the execution of civill justice in the Common-weale 151 No matters of justice civil administred by one alone in the Common-wealth 150 152. Severall ordinances set downe in severall Courts how they proceed 152 153 154. The Government of the Church ought not to bee by one alone 155 156. Severall ordinances thereof in the same pages No exception to bee taken against Lay Elders to be authorized by the King in every Parish since the King authorizeth Lay Elders in Ecclesiasticall commission 157 Discipline of excommunication exercised by one Lay Elder and one Ecclesiasticall Elder an instance of this discipline set downe 157 158 The King hath as good right to command excommunication to be exercised by a Pastor and Elders as the Bishops have to commit the same to a Curate and one Lay Elder 159 Lay men appointed by the Queenes injunctions to execute some part of discipline 160 Every Minister ought to minister the discipline of Christ in his owne cure by consent of Parliament 161 The Minister by promise bindeth himselfe to minister the discipline of Christ 162 The not disposing in particularity all rites and ceremonies of discipline doth not hinder the exercise of discipline by the Minister 163 To what persons the discipline of Christ by Scripture is committed and whether the persons be arbitrable or no 164 165 A Bishop Pastor and Elder and our L. Bishop differ 165. and what a L. Bishop is No Lord Bishop called L. Pastor Pastorall authority of a L. Bishop and of other Pastours is equall 166 Whether a L. Bishop minister the doctrine Sacraments and Discipline of Christ by vertue of his Lordly Episcopall or Pastorall office 166 Lordly Episcopality authorized only by the Realme 167 If the L. Bishop have power to minister Discipline by divine right then no more can hee commit that his power to an other than hee can commit the power which he hath of preaching to another 168 Whether L. Bishops by Pastorall Authority may excommunicate a Pastour 169. Pastors over small Flocks are as truly Pastors as Pastors over great Flocks 169. As great parity between Pastors and Pastors as between Apostles and Apostles 169 Not onely Kings of great kingdomes but also Kings of small kingdomes bee true Kings 170. Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. use some part of Episcopall power 171 Episcopall power to excommunicate granted by papall priviledges or prescribed Vse 171. Power to excommunicate if it be of divine right may not bee prescribed 171. No more preheminence given to a Bishop than to a Minister or to a Lay-man in some places for the use of Excommunication 172 AN ASSERTION FOR True and Christian Church-Policie Wherein certaine politike Objections made against the planting of Pastors and Elders in every Congregation are sufficiently answered And wherein also sundry projects are set downe how the Discipline by Pastours and Elders may be planted without any derogation to the KINGS Royall Prerogative c. ADMONITION THE reason that moveth us not to like of this Pag. 79. platform of Government is that when we on the one part consider the things that are required to be redressed and on the other the state of our Countrey People and Common weale we see evidently that to plant those things in this Church will draw with it so many and so great alterations of the state of Government and of the Lawes as the attempting thereof might bring rather the overthrow of the Gospell among us than the end that is desired ASSERTION THe benefit of all exceptions and advantages to the invaliditie uncertaintie imperfections and insufficiency of this admonitory bill and matters therein contained alwayes saved for answere to so much as concerneth this clause and every other clause and article of the bill hereafter following and without that that there is any matter or thing in the same bill of admonition materiall to be answered unto and not herein or hereby sufficiently answered confessed and avoided traversed and deemed is true in such manner and forme as in the same is set forth and declared
temporall should have beene derived originally unto the Bishop from her Highnesse person as from the only head and fountain of all the same spirituall power within her Kingdomes in such manner and form and by such commission under the great Seal as her H. temporall Officers Justicers and Judges had their authorities committed unto them And to this opinion Master D. Bilson seemeth to accord For all power Pag. 348. saith he is not only committed to the sword which God hath authorised but is wholly closed in the sword Against the head that it shall not be head to rule and guide the feet can be no prescription by reason Gods Ordinance for the head to governe the body is a perpetuall and eternall law and the usurpation of the members against it is no prescription but a confusion and the subversion of that order which the Pag. 114. 130. God of heaven hath immutably decreed and setled Besides there resteth saith the Remonstrance unto the Bishops of this Realme none other but subordinate and delegate authoritie and that the matter and heads wherein this jurisdiction is occupied are by and from the Christian Magistrates authoritie In whom as supreme Governour all jurisdiction within her Dominions aswell Ecclesiasticall as Civill by Gods and mans law is invested and their authoritie Ecclesiasticall is but subordinate under God and the Prince derived for the most part from the Prince From which two Statutes and judgements of the gorernours of the Church contained in these two bookes for these two 1 Eliz. c. 1 8 Eliz. c. 1. books were seen and allowed by the Governours of the Church I leave it to be considered if the Bishop did exercise the same improper and abusive spirituall power and jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall only and alonely in their owne names stiles and dignities and under their own seales of office and that also by authoritie of forraign and Papall laws if I say the Bishop did these things after this and this manner I leave it then to be considered whether their exercise of such power were derogatory and prejudiciall in a very high degree to the prerogatives of the Royall Crown or not For my part because I finde by the forraign Canon Law that Papall Bishops bee the Popes sonnes and are priviledged to carry the print and image of the Pope their father namely that they have plenitudinem potestatis within their Diocesses as the Pope pretendeth Ex. de Major obe to have power over the whole world For quilibet ordinarius saith the same law in sua Dioecesi est major quolibet principe and because also notwithstanding whatsoever the B b. have written that M. Bilson pag. 330. they were the Queenes B b and had their authoritie derived unto them from the Queene they did in her life time put the same Papall Law in execution and by the same law did take upon them plenitudinem potestatis within their Diocesses I for my part I say can not as yet otherwise conceive but that exceedingly â—hey did intrude themselves into the Royall preeminences priviledges and prerogatives of the Queene For by what other authoritie than by a certaine The Bb. by a plenary power devised and promulged new Canons without the Queenes assent plenarie power did they in their owne names for the government of their severall Churches within their severall Diocesses from time to time make promulge and by vertue of mens corporall oathes put in execution what new Canons Injunctions and Articles soever seemed good unto them without any licence or confirmation from the Queene first had and obtained thereunto By which pretensed plenarie power it seemeth that the statute made to bring the Clergie in submission to the King was covertly deluded and our late Soveraigne Lady the Queene cunningly bereaved of that regall authoritie over every particular Diocesan or Ordinarie which notwithstanding by the Parliament was given unto her Highnesse over the whole body and state of the Clergie For if once there bee no necessitie of the Kings licence assent or confirmation to such Articles Canons or Injunctions as every Ordinarie shall make within his jurisdiction then must it be intended that the Statute of submission hath covertly permitted severall members severally to doe and to execute those things which apparently and in expresse terms the whole convocation was commanded and with the same in verbo sacerdotii had promised not to doe then the which what can seeme more unreasonable and absurd For then might all the Ordinaries joyne hand in hand and agree all together in one never in any of their convocations assembled by the Kings Writ to devise make or promulge any Canons Ecclesiasticall at all And what assent licence or confirmation from the King could then be needfull Or how then was the Clergie brought in submission to the King For then should it not be with them as it is in the proverbe A threefold cord is not easily broken but then should it be with them contrary to the proverbe for they being all fast knit and bound together unto the Kings authoritie by a cord of twenty foure threads might easily be broken but being severed and pluckt assunder into twenty foure parts one from the other the 24 Bishops can make no law with out leave And yeâ— every B. doth make many lawes King with all his regall power might not be able so much as to break one of the least threads wherewithall one of their cords was twisted If the Lord Major the Sheriffs Aldermen and whole communaltie of the Citie of London should promise unto the King upon their fidelities not to set any price upon Wines or other victuals by their common Councell within the said Citie unlesse the King under his privie signet should first authorize them so to doe were it not a meere collusion of the Kings meaning if every particular Alderman should set prices of such things in every particular ward But against the collection made from the Statutes 1 8 Eliz. and the judgement of the divines aforesaid A collection made against the former reason by an Apologie for sundry proceed by jurisdi â—â— pag. 5. the author of an Apologie to his understanding reckoneth the same collection to be a very simple collection and against the same he answereth and reasoneth in effect thus If as is collected all power spirituall by a commission under the great Seale must bee derived from the Queene to warrant the execution of it unto him that is to exercise it then must the like warrant bee procured for every temporall office to execute his temporall office But every temporall officer must not procure like warrant to execute his temporall office Therefore a Commission under the great Seale must not be procured to warrant the execution of the said spirituall power The consequence of his major proposition being false he laboureth notwithstanding to make the same good and in effect for the same argueth thus All temporall authoritie as
written of the common law is reported hath beene in times passed presented and punished in leets and law-dayes in divers parts of the Realme by the name of Letherwhyte which is as the booke saith an ancient Saxon terme And the Lord of the Leet where it hath beene presented hath ever had a fine for the same offence By the statute of those that be borne beyond the seas it appeareth that the King hath cognizance 25. Ed 3. of some bastardy And now in most cases of bastardie if not in all by the statute of Eliz. the reputed father of a bastard borne is lyable to be punished at the discretion of the justices of peace Touching perjurie if a man lose his action by a false verdict in plea Perjurie if punishable temporally in some cases why not in all of land he shall have an attaint in the Kings Court to punish the perjurie and to reforme the falsitie And by divers statutes it appeareth that the Kings temporall Officers may punish perjurie committed in the Kings temporall Courts And though it be true that such perjury as hath risen upon causes reputed spirituall have beene in times past punished only by Ecclesiastical power and censures of the Church yet hereupon it followeth not that the perjurie it selfe is a meere spirituall and not a temporall crime or matter or that the same might not to be civily punished By a statute of Westminster 25. Edw. 3. it was accorded that the Vsurie King and his heires shall have the cognizance of the usurers dead and that the Ordinaries have cognizance of usurers on life to make compulsion by censures of the Church for sinne and to make restitution of the usuries taken against the lawes of holy Church And by another statute it is provided that usuries shall not turne against any being â—0 h. 3. â— 5. within age after the time of the death of his Ancestor untill his full age But the usurie with the principall debt which was before the death of his ancestor did remaine and turne against the heire And because all usurie being forbidden by the law of God is sinne and detestable it was enacted that all usurie lone and forbearing of money c. giving dayes c. shall be punished according to the forme of that Act. And that every such offender shall also bee punished and corrected according to the Ecclesiasticall lawes before that time made against usurie By all which statutes it seemeth that the cognizance and reformation of usurie by the lawes of the Realme pertaineth onely to the King unlesse the King by his Law permit the Church to correct the same by the censures of the Church as a sin committed against the holy law of God Touching heresies and schismes albeit the Bishops by their Episcopall and ordinarie spirituall power grounded upon Canon law or an evill custome have used by definitive sentence pronounced in their Consistories to condemn men for heretikes and schismatikes and heresies schismes are punishable by the kings laws afterward being condemned to deliver them to the secular power to suffer the paines of death as though the king being custos utriusque tabulae had not power by his kingly office to inquire of heresie to condemn an heretike and to put him to death unlesse he were first condemned and delivered into his hands by their spirituall power although this hath been I say the use in England yet by the statutes of Richard the second and Henry the fifth it was lawfull for the Kings Judges and Justices to enquire of heresies and Lollards in Leets Sheriffs 25. h. 5. c. 14. turnes and in Law dayes and also in Sessions of the peace Yea the King by the common law of the Realme revived by an act of Parliament which before the Statute of Henry the fourth was altered may pardon a man condemned for heresie yea and if it should come to passe that any heresies or schismes should arise in the Church of England the king by the Lawes of the Realme and by his Supreme and 1 Eliz c. 1. Soveraigne power with his parliament may correct redresse and reforme all such defaults and enormities Yea further the king and his 1 Eliz. c. 1. parliament with consent of the Clergie in their Convocation hath power to determine what is heresie and what is not heresie If then it might please the king to have it enacted by parliament that they which opiniatively and obstinately hold defend and publish any opinions which according to an Act of Parliament already made have beene or may be ordered or adjudged to bee heresies should bee heretikes If it please the King heretikes may be adjudged felons and heresies felonies and felons and their heresies to be felonies and that the same heretiks and felons for the same their heresies and felonies being arraigned convicted and adjudged by the course of the common law as other felons are should for the same their heresies and felonies suffer the paines of death there is no doubt but the King by vertue of his Soveraigne and Regall Lawes might powerfully enough reforme heresies without any such ceremoniall forme papall observance or superstitious solemnitie as by the order of the Canon Law pretended to bee still in force have beene accustomed And as these offences before mentioned bee punishable partly by temporall and partly by Ecclesiasticall authoritie so drunkennesse absence from divine service and prayer fighting quarrelling and brawling in Church and Churchyard defamatorie words and libels violent laying on oâ— hands upon a Clarke c. may not onely bee handled and punished in a court ecclesiasticall but they may also be handled and punished by the King in his temporall courts By all which it is evident that the Clergie hath had the correction of these crimes rather by a The cognizance of all crimes as well as of some crimes â—â— the law of God belong to the King custome and by sufferance of Princes than for that they be meere spirituall or that they had authoritie by the immediate law of God And if all these as well as some of these crimes by sufferance of Princes and by a custome may be handled and punished spiritually then also if it please the King may all these as well as some of these crimes without a custome be handled and punished temporally For by custome and sufferance only some of these crimes be exempted from the cognizance of the King and therefore by the immediate law of God the cognizance as well of all as of some oâ— these crimes properly appertaineth unto the King And then the judgement of those men who defend judgements of adulterie slander c. to be more temporall and by the temporall Magistrate only to be dealt in seemeth every way to be a sincere and sound judgment Howbeit they doe not hereby intend that the party offending in any of these things and by the Kings law punishable should therefore wholly bee exempted and freed
Seniour or Deacon Therefore much lesse shall every Parish be burdened to find a company of Seniours c Where the Admonitor complaineth that many parishes are not Tolerable and intolerable Ministers able to finde one tolerable Minister we would gladly learne by what brand tolerable Ministers are knowne from intolerable Ministers according as the Lords spirituall judge or judge not of tolerable and untolerable Ministers For if all reading Ministers as needes with them they must bee or else why doe they tolerate them bee tolerable Ministers what a vaine and idle distinction hath hee coyned touching the scarcitie of maintenance for tolerable Ministers Considering all Ministers by intendment of law bee able to reade and considering also a very small maintenance is esteemed to bee a tolerable maintenance for reading Ministers For else why doe the great Bishops in their great Churches of Commendams and the rich Doctors in their rich Churches of non residencies make so small allowances to their reading and stipendarie Curates And where then is that parish in England that is not able to maintaine a tolerable Minister ADMONITION The next Argument that the people might not choose their Pastours Pag. 78. Elders and Deacons as is required is drawne partly from a feare that the same will be a matter of schisme discord and dâ—ssenâ—ion in many places partly from affection and want of right judgement of the people partly from the unrulinesse of the Parishes and partly from the broyle and trouble which may follow ASSERTION Vnto this objection if I should answer nothing at all but only should The objection of feare c. answered deny that any feare or any other inconvenience at all pretended in this place is to be feared to ensue my simple negation were more to be tolerated than his simple affirmation for by the canon Law non inficienti sed ponenti incumbit onus probandi And yet because Doct. in â—si cui de prebâ—â—â— the Lord hath spoken unto Iosua and in him unto us all that wee should not feare nor be discouraged to observe and to doe all that is written in the law for then sâ—ith the Lord shalt thou make thy way prosperous and then shalt thou have good successe therefore in the word of the Lord I say that none of all this feare broyle trouble or turmoyle is to be feared at all Nay that it is most assuredly and without all doubt to be hoped and looked for that he would so blesse the attempt of putting this order in execution as that the peoples approbation and allowance of their Ministers should be a matter of all peace quietnesse unitie concord good successe and prosperitie to the whole Church of God in England For what an heathenish incredulitie were it for us to reply upon the erroneous conceit of a timorous and suspicious fancy that feare and I wot not what unrulinesse and unquietnesse shall follow when wee receiving the lawes of peace from the Prince of peace have his most stable truth that his peace shall rest upon us and that all feare and evill successe shall cease and vanish away No busie headed body therefore shall be able to leade any man away to disquiet either Church or common wealth otherwise than as the Church in all ages by the malice of Satan and his instruments hath evermore beene disquieted if once the holy law of the Gospell touching this point were observed and put in ure And if it be feared that the choice to be made by the people of God and which is allowed unto them by the holy laws of God would prove to be a matter of schisme discord and dissention how much more reason have we to feare that the fiâ—e of schisme discord and dissention being blowen already should not breake out and fame among us if still one man alone be suffered to thrust upon the people of God not tolerable Ministers according to Gods heart but intolerable Ministers according to mans tradition The Admonitor hath insinuated unto us often in his Admonition that it is dangerous to innovate And so I say too unlesse there be evident â—â—de constitu prim L. 2. utilitie of innovation For saith the Emperour in rebus novis constituendis evidens esse utilitas debet ut ab eo jure recedatur quod diu aequum visum est But is it not as perillous yea sometimes much more perillous not to innovate for proof whereof it shall suffice to take witnesse of our owne times and of our owne experiences It seemed equall a long time and for many yeares that the Sacrifice of the Masse with all the pelf and trumperie thereof should not once be Dangerous to innovate unlesse ther be evident utilitiâ— of innovation spoken against But we all know that the abandoning thereof hath not yet brought any perillous subversion upon any nation that purely and soundly in place thereof hath embraced the holy sacrament of the Lords Supper It seemeth also to be equall for many ages past that the Bishop of Rome might have supreme and absolute power over all persons states and causes not onely in Rome Italy Spaine Germany and other forraigne kingdomes but also in England and Scotland But as yet to the view of all the world it hath not proved perillous for the King and Queene of England and Scotland to establish new laws for the alteration of that ancient abuse And why hath it not been dangerous so to do Why forsooth because there was evident utility in doing of it But how could an evident utilitie appeare before it was done How Forsooth because the holy law of God had warranted an alteration For faith having eyes to see the wisedome the power and the truth of God in his word discerned a far off that the institution of the Lords Supper was long before the sacrifice of the masse And therefore our Kings by abandoning poperie out of the Realme did not institute any new religion but onely they restored the old Now then if a same holy law of God do condemn the choice and thrusting of the pastour upon the people by one man alone and again it the same Law doe impugne the primacie of one pastour over all Pastours as well in a Diocesse or Province as in the whole West part of Christendome what danger can it be not to disfranchise the one sithence without any manner of danger we have abolished the other or what perill can it be not to countenance the sonnes sithence without perill we have discountenanced the father Especially seeing in this place of the admonition wee have a plaine confession that the common manner of election of Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches was made by the people For if the examples of schism discord and contention did commonly appeare in the old Churches while that manner of election did continue then by his owne mouth Common manner of elections in the old churches was by the people that manner of election
bishops and societie against the right and freedome of the law of God against the principles of humane fellowships against that which was in the begining and against that which the Apostles left in the Churches by colour of lawes brought into the Church by the cursings and fightings of the late Romane Bishops they would not henceforth barre and seclude the Kings Christian and faithfull people from giving their consents unto their pastours Yea and we further beseech their Lordships that are schollers unto the Apostles and as servants unto the old way of reason of nature of the law of God of the equitie of Christ and of humane societie they would hereafter imbrace that way which was from the beginning which is the old way and the best way and not any longer persist in a cursed and quarrelling way which is the new way and the worst way But if the Lords spirituall of their own accord shal not readily vouclsafe to yeeld unto us this our right at our intreatie then for my part I will briefly shew mine opinion what were expedient for the A supplieation to the king by the Lords and commons for the restitution of their right in the choice of their pastors Lords and commons in open parliament dutifully to pray and to supplicate at the Kings Majesties hand Namely At the humble petitions and supplications of all his Lords temporall and commons in Parliament assembled his majestie would bee well pleased to give his Royall assent to an act to be intituled An act for the restitution of the ancient right and freedome which the people of God in the old Churches had and which the people of England ought to have in to or about the election of their Pastours and abolishing all papal power repugnant to the same For if as it is plainly confessed the people of all Churches have right and freedome by the law of God by the equitie of Christ by the grounds of reason and nature by the principles of humane fellowships and by that which was from the beginning to elect their pastours and if also the same right and freedome being left to the old Churches and especially to the Church at Ierusalem by the Apostles have beene taken away by the cursings and fightings of the late Bishops of Rome then cannot the people without violation of those lawes rules and grounds by any Episcopall power be any more excluded from their said right and freedome than could or might the ancient jurisdiction of the Crowne of England have beene still usurped by the pope from the Kings of England ADMONITION But alas the common people of England thorough affection and want of right judgement are more easily wrought by ambitious persons to give their consâ—nt to unworthy men as may appeare in all those officâ—s of gaine or dignitie that at this day remaine in the choise of the multitude ASSERTION The Admonitor in one place of his admonition telleth us that he must not put all that he thinketh in writing and yet he writeth in this place that thing which might far better have been utterly unthought than once written for could he thinke to win the common people of England to a continuall good liking of high and stately prelacie by upbraiding and charging them to their faces in a book dedicated unto them with affection and wanting of right judgement Was this the way to procure grace favour and benevolence at their hands And albeit this slander deserved rather to have beene censured by the Commons in Parliament than by confutation to have beene answered yet for the better clearing of the right judgement of the common people giving their consents to most worthy men in all offices of gaine or dignitie remaining in their hands I thinke it necessarie to shew the indignitie of this contumelie There be I confesse in London Yorke Lincoln Bristow Exceter Norwich Coventry and other principall Cities and townes corporate Majors Sheriffes Stewards Recorders Bailiffes Chamberlains Bridge-masters Clerkes Swordbearers Knights Burgesses and such like offices some of dignitie some of gaine but that the officers of these or any other places whether of dignitie or gaine be chosen by the multitude of those places is utterly untrue for onely according to their ancient customes priviledges and Charters by the chief Citizens Townsmen and Borough-masters are those officers chosen The number also of which Electors in all places is not alike In London the Aldermen choose the Lord Major In other Cities and Townes sometimes eight and forty sometimes fourteene sometimes twelve sometimes only such as have borne office as Majors Sheriffes and Bailiffs in the same places nominate and elect their new Major Sheriffs and Bailiffes But that the Aldermen principall Towns-men Borough-masters and men having born chief offices in those cities towns and boroughs have easily been wrought by ambitious persons to give their consents unto unworthy men though it have pleased the Ll. Bb. with seene and allowed to have spred and published this saying yet that the same saying is wholly unworthy of any credit to bee given unto it or to bee regarded of any wise and indifferent man let the sober and peaceable elections made of the worthies of the land hereafter mentioned be witnesses The officers in Cities and townes corporate chosen with out contention and ambitious working of unworthy men And to leave to speake of the election of the Lord Major of the Citie of London Sheriffs Aldermen Wardens of companies Chamberlains bridge-masters and other annuall officers of honour and dignitie let us consider whether the Citizens of London have beene wrought by ambitious persons to choose M. Wilbraham M. Onslie M. Bromley to be their Recorders â—ll three afterward the Queenes solicitors and M. Bromly Lord Chancellor of England and let us consider whether the same Citizens as men of affection and want of right judgement did elect to be Recorders of the same Citie M. Serjeant Fleetwood Master Serjeant Flemming Master Serjeant Drue and how Master Crooke a man wise learned and religious and a Counseller and justicer within the principâ—litie of Wales The Recorder of the towne of Bedford is the right honourable the Lord S. Iohns of Bletsoe The Recorder of Bristoll was a long time Master Poppam now Lord chief Justice of England The Recorder of Northampton before he came to be Judge in the Kings bench was Master Serjeant Yelverton a favouter of the truth and an upright Justicer The Recorder of Warnick was Master Serjeant Puckering afterward Lord keeper of the great seale And of the same towne the Recorder now is a worthy Knight descended from a noble house Sir Foulke Grevile The Recorder of Coventrie is Sir Iohn Harrington Knight a man zealous for the true feare of God The Recorder of Chichester was M. Serjeant Lewkner now chiefe Justice in the principalitâ—e of Wales The Recorder of Norwich was Master Cooke the Kings Atturney generall And who soever shall enquire after the names and after the manner of election
company of him so excommunicated And for that cause also should excommunicate them as is here supposed lawfull to bee done were it not a cleare case that the body of that Church must now bee taken to consist only in the person of the Ordinarie and one member to become the whole body For if all under his jurisdiction were once excommunicated how could then any be in communion with him And if they all were once excommunicated must not the Ordinarie then alone be the common union and so make a communitie And what a deformed kind of excommunication then is that kinde of excommunication whereby it may fall out that to be one is to be many and that to be a Church a companie a societie and a fellowship is to be one of which nature and of which kind that manner of excommunication which by Pastours and Elders is to bee executed cannot be as hath already beene proved If then excommunication now used bee a deformed kind of discipline and therefore as we say to be no more tolerated and if excommunication by Pastours and Elders be a kinde of discipline for the inconvenience thereof as he saith not to be planted what manner of discipline by excommunication The Admonitor would have no excommunication at all would he have in these dayes trow we would hee have none at all verily I suppose none at all For so doe his words plainly insinuate by two reasons following First saith he the loosenesse of these dayes require discipline of sharper lawes by punishment of bodie and danger of goods which they do and will more feare than they will excommunication Secondly wee have saith he a good manner of discipline by the Ecclesiasticall commission which doth much good and would do more if it were more common But why did he not speake plainly and why did hee not affirme devoutly that discipline by excommunication was good where the Church was in persecution and that it is not necessarie nor so convenient under a Christian Magistrate as it may be otherwise For if Pastors and Elders were appointed joynt officers only for times of persecution and not to be under Christian Princes it followeth these joynt officers ceasing that all accessories appendices and consequences of their joynt offices must also cease unlesse it can be proved out of the holy Scriptures that the offices of Pastours ought still to continue and that the Offices of Elders ought not to continue because the offices of Elders with all their appendices have beene translated by our Saviour Christ unto Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons their Chancellours Commissaries and Officials For unlesse these Officers be Christs Officers the discipline which they use cannot bind the consciences of the people of God And for this cause is it very probable that he so commendeth discipline of sharper lawes and discipline by the Ecclesiasticall commission For if these officers by their discipline have not to do with the consciences of men then is it no marvaile that men feare not their discipline And therefore if they will be still officers it is requisite that they call for such a discipline as might cause men to stand in awe of their authoritie But were they indeed the officers of God and had they indeed the authoritie from God to execute discipline by excommunication as Pastours and Elders did in the Primitive Church then were the loosenesse of this age never so great yet that the children of God in England would more fear the losse of goods lands bodies or lives than the censure of Gods officers is one of the Admonitors paradoxes And here I appeale the consciences of all the reverend Bishops and Prelates in the land and let them answer me hardly if they judge themselves to bee the children of God and had seven times seven thousand lives whether they had not rather seven thousand times be committed to the Goaler of Winchester than once be delivered over to the Goaler of Hell And are not all the children of God in England their brethren And are they not all led by one and the selfe same spirit And how then can they lesse feare excommunication which is a deliverie of the soule to Sathan than the punishment of body and danger of goods And yet touching this point of Excommunication hee seemeth to be against himselfe for in the 137. page he telleth us that happily it may be a fault yea and a great fault that is found with the bishops in these dayes that they doe not excommunicate the Prince and Rulers and so constraine them to doe that which by perswasion they will not doe If then excommunication bee so terrible to Princes and Rulers how should it be of so light account with subjects And if it be so powerfull as it can constraine Princes and Rulers to doe their duties how much more fearefull would it bee to compell inferiours and men of low estate to live soberly in their vocations I will not here debate the matter touching rhe excommunication of Princes and Rulers much lesse touching the excommunication of the Prince and Rulers of our land But I would gladly be informed what they were or who they be that found great fault with the Bishops in these dayes for not endeavouring to excommunicate the Prince and Governours The Papists they thinke it sufficient that the Prince and Governours be excommunicated by the Pope and his Clergie The Ministers and people professing the Gospell and seeking for reformation of excommunication deny the Bishops to have any divine power granted by the Word of God to excommunicate a private man much lesse doe they thinke it lawfull for them to excommunicate the Prince and Rulers Who then I say find fault with the Bishopâ— that they do not excommunicate the Prince and Governours and so constraine them to do that which by perswasion they will not doe For my part I cannot ghesse whom he should meane unlesse he meant to give us to understand that some Prelatists have consulted about the excommunicating both Prince and Governors for not making sharper Lawes against such as whom the Prelates and their favourites have falsly slandered to be pestilent fellowes movers of sedition enemies to Caesar troublers and subverters of the state Act. 24. 5. Act. 1. 16. 20. 17. 6. Puritans and I wot not what chiefe maintainers of the sect of the disciplinarians unlesse I say he should mind some such Prelatists I can not ghesse any subjects within the land to bee so undutifull as to find fault with the Bishops for not attempting to bring our Late Soveraigne Lady the Queene deceased to their excommunication And therefore to enforme the people of an Author and not to bring him forth it argueth and breadeth great suspicion that Excommunication toucheth them onely which make profession to be of the Church the enformer was the Author himselfe Touching the loosenesse of some or of all in these dayes that are without the Church if hee intend that they require Discipline of sharper
untill hey shall plainly demonstrate unto us that the same is not Oligarchy For if hereafter they shall revoke their former disgracefull judgements against the discipline by Pastours and Elders containing in it the very nature of true Aristocracie and wiâ—hall instruct â—s better of the true nature of their owne government of the Church by Prelacie they shall find us filyable to their opinion so that it be grounded upon the principles and reasons of truth In the meane season after the fashion of the Admonitors manner of admonishing the people wee most humbly beseech the King and Parliament to be enformed that it is greatly to bee feared if Prelacy bee Oligarchie that the Prelates It is to bee feared least by the example of Prelates Oligarchie be brought in the common-weale will endeavour to transferre that manner of government from the Church unto the Common-Weale And that the Common-Weale shall as miserably be rent and torne with factions and uproares as now the Church is disquieted by schismes and divisions For if onely a few of the richest and welthiest sort shall get an head and beare all the sway in the Common-Weale they shall think by the Principles and reasons of Oligarchie that they have injuâ—y if they have not as much to doe in civill mattes as the Prelates have to doe in the matters of the Church And what hereof may follow as the Admonitor leaveth so doe I also leave it to the judgment of other Only if the way hereof already hath beene troden A caveat against Oligarchie out unto them by some who have not written nor spoken but yet practised the principles and reasons of Oligarchie in the Common-Weale onely then this I say and adde as a Caveat that the danger to come is more heedfully to be prevented For like as in good harmony to make the Musicke perfect is required a moderate and proportionate inequality of voices which if it too much exceed taketh away all the sweet melody so by too much immoderate inequality or disparitie of Citizens the Common-Weale falleth to ruine But why may not the Government of the Church by Prelacie The government of the Church by Prelacy is not Monarchicall be a Princely and a Royall Government Indeed this question if it should bee resolved by the Rules and Principles of the Canon Law I could hardly disprove that government to be Princelike for as hath been said before quilibet Ordinarius in Diocoesi est major quolibet Principe Yea and every Bishop by the same Law hath as absolute a spirituall power within his Diocesse as a King hath a temporall power within his Kingdome But because that Law with the rules and principles thereof is or ought to be discarded out of this Kingdome we will not wade in it Only wee say that the government of the Church by Prelacy cannot bee any kinde of Royall and Monarchiall government because Prelates have not like power spirituall as Kings and Monarchs have power temporall For there was never yet lex regia de Praelatorum spiâ—ituali imperio lata qua Praelatis in eos omne imperium suum potestatem aut Deus aut Institut de jure natur gent ci § Sed quod populus Dei contulerit And therefore where the people have made the fore said regall Law as there it is justly said quodcunque Imperator per Epistolam constituit vel cognoscens decrevit vel edicto praecepit legem esse constat and quod Principi placuit legis habet vigorem So likewise where there is no such regall Law made in the Church there it is justly affirmed quod Praelato placuit legis non habet vigorem quodcunque Praelatus per Epistolam constituit cognoscens decrevit vel canone praecepit legem non esse constat And then how can every Prelate or why doth every Prelate by his sole authoritie injoyne Canons Articles Injunctions and orders to bee observed as Lawes in all the Churches of his jurisdiction If the Admonitor supposed the government of the Church by Prelacy to bee Monarchiall because the Queene was a Monarch and that If the government of the Church by Prelacy be Monarchicall theÌ„ may the government by pastors beâ— so to the Reverend Bishop governed under a Monarch then what did he else but put a weapon into the hands of Pastors and Elders to prove their government also to be Princely and Monarchiall Because Pastors and Elders desire not to have that manner of government to bee brought into the Church otherwise than by the Royall assent Soveraigne authoritie and expresse commandement of Our most Gratious King and Monarch Besides if any government may bee therefore said to be a Monarchy because the same is derived from an earthly Monarch how much more than may the government of the Churches by Pastors and Elders bee adjudged Monarchicall by reason the same is deduced from our heavenly and everlasting Monarch For the Reverend Bishops by their publike M. Horne bishop of Winch. M. â—ewell bishop of Sali M. Bilson bishop of Winch. preachings and apologeticall writings testifie that power and authoritie to ordaine and depose Ministers to excommunicate and to absolve to devise and to establish rites and Ceremonies in the Church to define what is truth to pronounce what is falsehood to determine what is schisme and to condemn what is heresie our Reverend Bishops I say confesse this power to be originally decided unto the true Bishops and Pastors of the Church from the Kingly and Soveraigne power of our Saviour Christ By what name therefore soever the government of Pastours and Elders in the Churches be called there is no manner of cause to dislike of the planting of that government in a Monarchy because the same is instituted by No cause for a Monarch to feare that his Christian subjects should have the sense of Aristocracy in Church government the Monarch of Monarches who is able and ready to uphold the state of all Monarchies in Common-Weales together with the state of Aristocracie in his Church Neither is there any cause for any Monarch in the world to feare the making of Christian common people by familiar expâ—rience to have the sense and feeling of the principles and reasons of Aristocracy For if a people have once submitted their neckes to the yoke of Christ they can live a peaceable â—nd godly life under all kindes of powers because they know all kind of powers to be the ordinance of God But especially there is not neither ever was neither ever can there be any cause for any King or Monarch of England greatly as the Admonitor insinuateth to feare that the common people will very easily transferre the principles and reasons Aristocracie to the government of the Common-Weale and thereupon be induced to thinke that they have injury if they have not as much to doe in civill matters as they have in matters of the Church seeing they also touch their commoditie and benefit
English Bishop having obtained his congedelieâ— oath Proh Deum dedine ego tot millia Florenorum pro volo Episcopari jam debeo dicere nolo or as was the answer of that English Bishop who having promised a Courtier one annuitie of twenty pound during his life out of his Bishopricke if hee could procure the speedy feâ—ling of his congedelier within a while after when it was sealed he rapt out an oath and sware by Jesus God that the same Gentleman had done more for him than an other great Courtier who before hand for that purpose had received from him one thousand markes But whether all Bishops buy their congedeliers dearer or better cheape is not a matter incident to this treatise only if they buy deare they may happily thinke with themselves that they may sell deare vendere jure potest emerat ille prius setteth not any price upon any wares in the Royall Exchange But to return The manner of the administration of spirituall Iustice in the Church by Prelacy to our purpose whence by occasion of those Bishoply oathes and answers we have a little digressed let us see what is the manner and forme of the administration of spirituall justice in the government of the Church by Prelacy as the same is ordinarily administred in all places throughout the Church of England Wherein that wee be not mistaken it is to be understood that the manner of administration of justice whereof we speake is that administration of justice only which respecteth the punishment of crimes Ecclesiasticall to bee inflicted by spirituall censures In all which cases penances suspension and excommunications in the Bishops consistory proceed from the judgement and authority of the Bishop alone if he be present or from the sentence and power of his Vicar generall or Commissary alone and if he be absent Nay doth not every such censure likewise in the Archdeacons consistory procâ—ed from the sole authority of the Archdeacon or if hee bee absent from the sole authority of his officiall But if the like course of the execution of Justice as this is cannot bee found to bee an oâ—dinary course of Justice in the Common-Weale where Justice is administred in criminall causes by the Ministery of a subject I would faine learne what prejudice may bee feared to redound unto the Common Weale if the administration of spirituall Iustice after a sort were established to bee after the same manner in the Church after which civill Iustice is already practised in the Common-Weale I said after a sort to this end least I should bee mistaken For the meaning is not that spirituall Iustice should be ministred exactly in No one subject in the Common Weale can alone exercise civill justice in causes criminall every respect after the manner of civill Iustice but the comparison standeth onely in this that as not any one temporall subject alone hath authority to heare to examine and to judge any one criminall cause in any Court of civill justice in the Common-Weale so likewise that any one spirituall person alone should have authority to be examiner and judge of any one criminall cause in any Court of spirituall Iustice in the Church For if certaine principall and godly persons associated unto a learned and zealous Pastor in the presence and with the consent and authority of the people of every Parish did enjoyne penance suspend or excommunicate a spirituall The administration of spirituall Iustice by pastors and Elders agreeable to the execution of civill justice in the Common-Weale Master D. Bancroft what his assistants Letter able to represse puritans in one parish D. Stanhope alone to represse all in a Diocesse offendor were not this forme of administration of spirituall Iustice more consonant agreeable and conformable to the daily execution of civill Iustice in the Courts of the Common-Weale than is the administration of spirituall Iustice by the Bishop alone or by his Vicar generall alone in his Consistory and to make this matter more familiar in the mind of the Reader for an instance or two let us suppose that Master Doctor Bancroft Parson of S. Andros in Holborne had chosen Master Harsnet to be his Curat and withall that Master Dodge Master Mercury Master Flower and Master Brisket all chiefe attendants on his late great Lord and Master were inhabitants within the same Parish and thâ—t the chiefe men of the same Parish had chosen those to be assistants to him and to his Curat for the inquisition of the demeanours of all the Puritans and Precisians within his Parish let this I say be supposed would not hee and they trow we thinke it a high scorne and an indignitie to be offered unto their Masterships in case it should bee insinuated that Master Doctor Stanhope were better able with one little blast of breath upon a peece of paper to blow away all Puritanisme out of the Citie and Diocesse of London than these great Chapleins and discreet Gentlemen with their thunderings and with their lightnings were able to fright the same out of one poore Parish in HOLBORNE And againe to make this matter yet a little more familiar to the minde of the Reader let us suppose again that thundering Master Merbury now Lecturer in the Church of Saint Mary Overis were Pastor of the same Church and had to be his assistants in the Ministery but simple M. Butterton and that they two for the Elders of the same Church to be chosen by the Parish had such and such and such men lovers of all honesty and godlinesse and enemies unto all dishonesty and ungodlinesse could not these learned and grave Ministers with the assistants of such wise and godly Borough-Masters bee as well able to reforme Papists Atheists Swearers prophaners of the Sabbath drunkerds adulterers and such like within the Borough of Southwarke as is Master Doctor Ridley to bring to any good amendment of life all such kind of persons within the whole Diocesse of Winchester If the examination and judgement of all theeveries pickeries burglaries robberies murders and such like were committed to Master Dâ—ctor Ridley alone for the Diocesse of Winchester and to Master D. Stanhope alone for the Diocesse of London were it not like that for one such malefactor as there is now we should shortly have an hundred And therefore to hold us still to the point in question it is very plaine and evident that this manner of spirituall justice mentioned to be executed by the Pastors and Elders is more correspondent to the administration of civill justice in the Common-Weale than is that manner of the execution of spirituall Iustice by Doctor Stanhope or Doctor Ridley by the Bishop of London or by the Bishop of Winchester For to begin with our meanest and basest Courts let them shew unto us any Court Leete Law-dayes Matters in Leets and Law dayes not overruled by one alone or Sheriffes turnes within any County City Towne Borough Village or Hamblet within the Realme wherein
intreate our most gracious Soveraigne Lord the Kâ—ng that where in any parish there shall bee found a learned preaching Minister resident upon his benefice that there be would be pleased by his authoritie royall under the broad Seale to enable him and some other godly and faithfull Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens Borough-masters or other chiefe men of the same parish to execute spirituall justice against drunkards adulterers swearers railers and such like ecclesiasticall offenders inhabitants only within the same parish For in this case we say as the reverend Bishops say bonum quò communius eo melius If any exception should be taken or challenge made scoffingly and with scornfull termes against these lay parochians as hereto fore hath beene used against lay-Elders or lay-Aldermen No exception to bee taken against lay Elders to be authorized by the king in every parish sithence the King authorizeth lay-Elders in ecclesiasticall commission as they call them let him that taketh such exception advise himselfe well and remember before he speake that in speaking he controle not the policie the practice the wisedome and the authoritie of our late Queene deceased and of our Soveraigne Lord the King now raigning who authorized and doth authorise lay men to bee Ecclesiasticall commissioners Which kinde of lay men or lay Elders as they call them that they have joyned in the exercise of the chiefest censure of the Church viz. excommunication with Ecclesiasticall persons hath beene already proved by the sentence of excommunication pronounced against E. by Master W. and his associates whereof divers were lay men Againe if one lay Elder dwelling at Winchester may call and associate unto himselfe one Ecclesiasticall Elder dwelling at S. Georges in Southwarke to excommunicate any parochian or Minister subject unto the Archdeacon of Surrey in what parish soever of the same jurisdiction the partie shall dwell if it be lawfull I say for every Ordinarie to joyne one lay Elder and one Ecclesiasticall Elder Discipline of excommunication exercised by one lay Elder and one Ecclesiasticall Elder together in commission the one to pronounce sentence of contumacie the other to denounce sentence of excommunication for every spiritual contumacie committed within his jurisdiction what reason can any man pretend why it should not be much more lawfull for the King by his Royall authoritie to appoint a learned and preaching Pastour with the assistance of some companie of faithfull inhabitants of the same parish to exercise all manner of spirituall justice within their owne parish If the King shall stand in doubt whether any Discipline by excommunication bee exercised after this and this manner in the Church of England then to put his highnesse out of all doubt hereof may it please the King to consider the precept of the reverend Bishops made in their convocation together with the practice of the venerable Archdeacon of Surr. following The precept is this Vnusquisque Vicarius generalis Officialis seu Commissarius qui ordines ecclesiasticos non susceperit eruditum aliquem presbyterum sibi Arriculo pro Clero c. de buibusdam circa excom excessib coercend 1584 accerset associabit qui sufficienti authoritate vel ab ipso Episcopo in jurisdictione sua vel ad Archidiacono presbytero existente in jurisdictione sua munitus idque ex praescripto judâ—cis tunc praesentis excommunicationis sâ—ntentiam pro contumacia denunciabit Every Uicar generall Officiall or Commissarie which hath not taken upon him ecclesiasticall orders shall call and associate unto him some learned Presbyter who being armed with sufficient authoritie from the Bishop in his jurisdiction or from the Archdeacon being a Presbyter in his jurisdiction shall denounce and that by the prescript of the judge present the sentence of excommunication for contumacie Now the manner of the practice of this precept ensueth in D. Hones practice of the Bishops aâ—â—icle these words Iohannes Hone legum Doctor Officialis venerabilis viri domini Archidiaconi Surr. omnibus singulis rectoribus c. salutem Cùm nos rite legitime procedentes omnes singulos quorum nomina c. in noÌ„ comparendo coram nobis c. seu saltem in non satisfaciendo mandatis nostris c. pronuncia verimus contumaces ipsoque c. excommunicandos fore decreverimus Cumque discretus vir magister Roul Allen presbyter eosdem omnes singulos subscriptos ex officio nostro excommunicaverit in scriptis justitia id exigente vobis igitur committimus c. quatenus eos omnes c. sicut profertur ex officio nostro mero excommunicatos fuisse esse c. palam denuncietis c Datum sub sigillo officialitatis nostrae 19. Die Decembris Anno Domini 1587. John Hone Doctor of the Lawes Officiall of the venerable man and Archdeacon of Surr. to all and singular persons c. greeting Whereas we otherwise rightly and lawfully proceeding all and singular whose names are under-written in not appearing before us or at least-wise in not satisfying our mandates have pronounced contumacious and decreed them to be excommunicated And whereas also the discreet man M. Rowland Allen presbyter one of our office hath excommunicated all and singular under written justice so requiring wherefore wee charge you that openly you denounce and declare them and every of them so as aforesaid out of our office to bee excommunicated Given under the seale of our officialitie The 19. day of December 1587. By this practice it doth appeare that Doctor Hone and Rowland Allen canvaced many poore men very piteously and that this poore curate Rowland Allen had a warm service to attend upon D. Hone and to jerk those whose points soever hee shall untie But because this precept was an article concluded upon by the reverend Bishops in their convocation and confirmed as I suppose by the Royall authoritie of our late Queene wee will forbeare to speake what we thinke might justly be spoken against the incongruitie thereof Only this without offence to the reverend Bishops wee may safely demand sithence every ordinarie whether he be a Bishop or a Presbyter by this article of their owne device hath such an absolute power resiant in his person as that thereby thorowout his whole jurisdiction he may thus commit the execution of Discipline by excommunication partly to one lay person and partly to one ecclesiasticall person partly to a supposed spirituall elder and partly to a Lay elder sithence I say this is so we may safely demand what reason they can produce to hinder the King from having authoritie to command three or foure The K. hath as good right to command excommunication to be exercised by a Pastor Elders as the Bb. have to commit the same to a Curate one lay Elder or if occasion serve five or six lay elders as they call them and one spirituall pastor being a true spirituall elder in deed all lawfully chosen ecclesiasticall Officers in the house of God that
which is of humane institution if it be answered that the Bishop by reason Whether L. Bishopâ— by pastorall authority may excommunicate a Pastor of his pastorall power which he is said to have over all the Pastors and people of his Diocesse may lawfully not onely minister the Word and Sacraments but also the Discipline of Christ unto them all then it followeth that by a Pastorall power one Pastour may bee a Pastour of Pastors which is against the Scriptures and contrary to the brotherly and fellow-like authority which is common to all Pastors under the Sunne and betweene whom touching their Pastorall functions there is to this day by the Scriptures as little superiority and as great a paritie as ever there was betweene Apostles and Apostles betweene Prophets and Prophets or betweene Evangelists and Evangelists and as at this day there is betweene Bishops and Bishops betweene Archbiâ—hops and Archbishops or betweene Patriarkes and Patriarkes yea and as is between Earles and Earles Dukes and Dukes Kings and Kings Emperours and Emperours For no greater superiority or preheminence hath any one Pastor over the person or function oâ— an other Pastour touching the administration of any thing properly belonging to either of their pastorall functions than hath one Pastors over small flockes are as truly pastors as pastors over great flocks As great paritie betweene pastors pastor as between Apostles and Apostles Emperor over the person or function of an other Emperor or one King over the person or function of an other King or one Lord Biâ—hop over the person or function of an other Lord Biâ—hop or one Archbiâ—hop over the person or function of an other Archbishop or than had one Apostle over the person or function of an other Apostle Nay then hath one eye over an other eye one hand over an other hand one arme over an other arme or one foot over another foote And therefore if touching the functions which Pastors either among themselves have in common one with the other or which they have over their flockes there be no disparity but that the Pastors to whom small flockes are committed doe as really and as truly participate of the nature of true Pastors as those great Pastors doe upon whose great shoulders great burthens are imposed it behoveth great Pastors to prove unto us by the holy Scriptures that by the institution of their great pastorall function they have their power so enlarged as that thereby they may preach the Word minister the Sacraments and excommunicate and that on the other side the little Pastours have their power by the institution of their petie pastorall offices so streitned as whereby they may only preach the Word and administer the Sacraments but not excommunicate it behoveth I say great Pastors to bee able sufficiently to shew unto us these things out of the holy Scriptures or else it seemeth to stand with reason and equity deduced from the same Scriptures that a Pastor over a few should have like power to teach and to governe a few as a great Pastor over many hath to instruct and to rule many Marry if they thinke that onely great Pastors bee true Pastors and that great powers spirituall bee onely true powers spirituall then let them also conclude that onely great Knights be true Knights that onely great Dukes be true Dukes that onely great Kings be true Kings and that onely great principalities temporall bee true principalities temporall Which conclusion if they shall judge to be conclusionlesse because King Rehoboam had Not only Kings of great kingdomes but also Kings of small kingdomes bee true Kings as large a Patent to feede and to commmand two Tribes as King Salomon his Father had to command and to feede twelve or as the Archbishop of Yorke may suppose himselfe to have over nine or tenne Counties as the Archbishop of Canterbury can have over nine and thirtie or fortie then me thinketh it a matter very reasonably of them to be confessed that all true Pastors whether they be great Pastors or little Pastors may lawfully exercise all manner of such true power spirituall as unto true spirituall Pastors by the holy Scriptures doth appertaine For if Bishops being great Pastors may therefore preach and minister the Sacraments because they be as they say true Pastors then also may little Pastors therefore excommunicate because they bee as the Scripture saith true Bishops Wherefore if the Lord Bishop of London by vertue of his Pastorall office as he thinketh which with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse he hath in common deriveth unto him immediately from the Word of God may lawfully excommunicate then the Pastorall office which Master Doctor Andrews hath over the people of his Parish of Saint Giles without Creeplegate and the Pastorall function which Master Doctor White hath over the people of Saint Dunstones within Temple-barre being as absolutely and as immediately deduced unto them out of the same word what proofe can bee made out of the word that the Bishop being not Lord Pastour of the Pastours of his Diocesse may lawfully by the word excommunicate all manner of offenders both Pastors and people within his Diocesse and yet neverthelesse that neither Master Doctor Andrewes and Master Doctor White by the same word may excommunicate any one of their Parishioners at all Nay further what reason can there bee afforded from the Law of God that Master Doctor Abbot Deane of Winchester that Master Browne Master Barlow and diverse other Prebendaries in the Church of Winchester having certaine parochiall and Pastorall Churches annexed to his and their Deanry and Prebendes and Master D. Grey in his Parish by their pastorall functions should have absolute authority unlesse it bee during the time of the L. Bishops trienniall visitation to exercise the discipline of Christ within their severall and peculiar Churches and yet notwithstanding that neither Master Richman nor Master Burden being both of them grave godly and learned Pastors should have at any time any pastorall authority to exercise any censure at all And as it is in the Churth of Winchester so is it in the Church of Pauls in the Church of Salisbury and in well nigh all the Cathedrall and Collegiall Churches throughout the Realme The Deane Prebendaries and Canons having certaine parochiall Churches exempted from the Bishop within their exempt and peculiar jurisdictions by meere Pastorall authority for Episcopall authority by the Lawes of the Church have they none may exercise all manner of spirituall censures and that as well by their substitutes as by themselves Nay Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. use some part of Episcopall power Episcopall power to excommunicate granted by papall priviledges or prescribed use Power to excommunicate if it be of divine right may not be prescribed which is more in Cheshire Lancashire Yorkeshire Richmondshire and other Northern parts there be many whole Deanries exempted from the Bishops jurisdiction wherein the Deanes and their substitutes have
nor only the probate of Wills and granting of administrations but also the cognisance of Ecclesiasticall crimes with power to use the Ecclesiasticall censures Yea and this authority of the execution of Ecclesiasticall censures have those Deanes either long since by some papall priviledges obtained or else by long use prescribed against the Bishops Whereby againe it is cleerely convinced that Episcopall excommunication used in the Church of England is not of divine Institution but only by by humane tradition For were it of divine right then could the same no more bee prescribed or by papall immunity bee possessed than could these Deanes prescribe power or be enfranchised to preach the word or to administer the Sacraments These things have we thus at large and more fully intreaâ—ed of to the end that the Kings Highnesse and His Parliament and all sorts of people might well understand how it is not altogether an unusuall and unaccustomed thing in the Church of England that private and inferiour ministers as they call them in their owne right and in their owne parochiall Parishes without any authority from the Bishop should exercise even the highest censure of the Church And that in sundry places of the Realme there is no preeminence in the matter of the execution of the censures attributed to a Bishop above a Minister Nay which is more than is attributed to a Bishop No more prcheminence given to a B than to a Minister or to a lay man in some places for the use of excommunication above a Lay man yea than to such a lay man who is authorized onely by a lay man to his office Which is evident by Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction and censures exercised a long time by Lay men in the peculiar jurisdictions of Newton Gronbie Anstie Soke of Rothely Evington and other parishes and Hamlectes in the Countie Leycester The Officers of all which places for their spirituall authority having not had any other warrant than such only as hath beene signed sometimes under the hand and seale of the right Honourable the Earle of Huntingdon deceased sometimes of the Honourable Sir Henry Grey Knight sometimes of Henry Skipwith Esquire and sometimes of others For the avoyding therefore of sundry intolerable inconveniences which hetherto hath ensued for want of that authority which the Law setled doth enable every Minister with It is most expedient that all humane authority in the execution of spirituall censures bee utterly taken away and that the divine and Evangelicall censures of Christ bee ministred in every Congregation where learned and godly Pastors with discreet Elders may bee had as from the minde of the Lord they were executed in the Apostolicall and Primitive Church I had almost forgotten to speake of one common and usuall kinde of jurisdiction spirituall in the use of the censures of the Church by the Archbishops which in cases of their Prerogative they have prescribed against the Bishops over the Presbyters and people of every Bishops Diocesse and Archdeacons jurisdiction within their provinces of one other common and usuall kinde of pretensed spirituall jurisdiction and use of the censures which the Archbishop and sometimes the Deane and Chapter sede Archiepiscopali or sede Episcopali vacante exercise and lastly of that spirituall kinde of jurisdiction and censures so called of the Church which Suffraganes and Archdeacons have and doe use As touching which supposed spirituall power both of the Archbishops and Archdeacons because the same their power doth not only belong unto them jure consuetudinario non scripto by unwritten and not by written Law I must conclude against the jurisdiction of the Archbishops Prerogative and against the Archdeacons jurisdiction in all cases as out of St. Cprian King Henry the eighâ— concluded against the Pope viz That their authorities can not bee from Christ Because Christ said ego sum via veritas vita He never said ego sum consuetudo Touching the jurisdiction of the Deane and Chapter the papall Law being abrogated how the same may lawfully now bee used otherwise than by sufferance and consent of the King and Realme I know not But of all spirituall authority exercised at this day in the Church of England the same seemeth to draw most neare to the semblance of the government practised by the Apostles and Primitive Church And might be approved in many points if so be the Deane â—nd Chapter being as it were a Senate of preaching Elders did no more commit the execution of their Ecclesiasticall juridiction to the wisdome of one Vicar generall or principall officiall than they doe put over the leassing of their Lands or dividents of their rents to the only discretion of one of their Bayliffes or Stewardes As for Bishops Suffraganes in England and in Wales how many there may be and what Cities and Townes are to be taken and accepted for their Seas it is at large expressed in a statute made for the nomination of Suffraganes By which statute also wee are given to understand that it remaineth onely in the disposition and liberty of every Archbiâ—hop and Bishop within this Realme c. to name and elect two honest and discreete spirituall persons being learned and of good conversation and them to present unto the King by their writing under their Seales making humble request to give to one such of the said two persons as shall please His Majesty such title name stile and dignity of Bishop of such Seas specified in the said act as the Kings Highnesse shall thinke most convenient for the same so it bee within the same Province whereof the Bishop that doth name him is Besides after such title stile and name given by the King it is said that the King shall preseâ—t every such person by his Letters Patents under his great Seale to the Archbishop of the same Province wherein the Towne whereof he hath his title name stile and dignity of Bishop and that the Archbishop shall give him all such consecrations benedictions and ceremonies as to the degree and office of a Bishops Suffragane shall be requinte It is further enacted and provided that every person nominated elected presented and consecrated according to that act shall be taken accepted and reputed in al degrees and places according to the stile title name and dignity that he shall be presented unto and have such capacity power and authority honour preeminence and reputation in as large and ample manner in and concerning the execution of such Commission as by any of the said Archbishops or Bishops within their Diocesse shall bee given unto the said Suffragane as to Suffraganes of this Realme heretofore hath beene used and accustomed And that no Suffragane made and consecrated by vertue of this act shall take or receive any manner of profits of the places and Seas whereof they shall be named nor use have or execute any jurisdiction or Episcopall power or authority within their said Seâ—s c. but onely such profits jurisdiction and authority as shall