by the scriptures it can not bee prooved that there be two seuerall distinct formes of ordinations the one called consecration proper to a Lord Bishoppe for the exercise of Discipline the other called ordination peculiar to a Pastor or teaching Elder for the ministration of the word and Sacraments Wherevnto lastlie If the Lord Bishop haue power to minister discipline by diuine right thē no more can he commit that his power to another thē he can commit the power which hee hath of preaching to another may be added another maine reason that Episcopall power in Englande to minister the discipline can not therfore be of divine institution because if it were of divine institution the Bishoppe could no more surrogate the same his episcopall power to his Suffragane to his Vicar generall or Rouland Allen to minister the censures of Christ in his owne name then he can depute them or any of them to minister the doctrine Sacramentes in his own name But how doth it appeare that the Vicar generall Rowland Allen or any other Presbyter did ever excommunicate by the power or in the name of the Bishoppe For the profe hereof we shall not need to search any other authenticall record then the precept and the practise before intreated of For it is not saide in the precept That the Presbyter being armed with authoritie from Christ but it is sayde that the Presbyter being armed with authoritie from the Bishoppe or Archdeacon shall denounce the sentence of excommunication the practise also of Doctor Hone every way confirmeth as much For therein Doctor Hone doeth not chalēge to be an officer vnto Christ but he sayeth that he is the officiall of the venerable Archdeacō of Surrey and that Maister Rowland Allen Presbyter by vertu of his office doth excommunicate the parties who obeyed not his mandates who made not their appearances before him c. If it be answered that Rowland Allen though he be not an immediate officer from Christ that yet nevertheles he is a mediate officer deputed to his office by an immediate officer vnto Christ vix the Lord Bishoppe or Archdeacon then we replie and say First that the Lord Bishoppe Archdeacon bee neither immediate or mediate officers appointed by Christ to be Ministers of his discipline Secondlie if they were immediate officers from Christ that yet they haue no authoritie by the law of Christ to transferre their right or any part thereof to an other person or to depute an other person in their name or by their authoritie to excommunicate As for these words viz In Dei nomine amen nos Iohānes Hone or nos Roulandus Allen c. sometimes vsed in their scedule of excommunication it is but a prophaning of the holie name of God whereby they make them selues guiltie of the taking of the glorious name of God in vaine And thus much touching both the question and answer whether the discipline of Christ may be ministred by the Bishoppes humane episcopall power yea or no. But now on the other side because no divine censure can lawfullie be executed in the church by that authoritie which is of humane institution if it be aunswered that the Bishop by reason of his pastorall Whether the L. Bishopp by pastorall authoritie may excommunicate a Pastor power which hee is saide to haue over all the Pastours and people of his Diocesse may lawfullie not onlie minister the worde and Sacraments but also the Discipline of Christ vnto them all then it followeth that by a Pastourall power one Pastour may be a Pastour of Pastors which is against the Scriptures and contrarie to the brotherly fellow-like authoritie which is common to all Pastours vnder the sunne and betwene whom touching their Pastourall functions there is to this day by the Scriptures as litle superioritie and as great a paritie as ever there was betwene Apostles and Apostles betwene Prophets and Prophets or betwene Evangelistes and Evāgelistes and as at this day there is betwene Bishops Bishops betwene Archbishops and Archbishops or betwene Patriarckes and Patriarckes yea and as is betweene Earles and Earles Dukes and Dukes Kinges and Kinges Emperours Emperours For no greater superioritie or preheminence hath any one Pastor over the person or function of an other Pastour touching the administratiō of any thing properly belōging Pastoures ouer small flockes are as truely pastors as Pastors ouer great flocks to either of their pastoral functions thē hath one Emperor over the person or function of an other Emperor or one King over the person or functiō of an other King or one Lord Bishop over the person or function of an other Lord Bishop or one Archbishop over the person or functiō of an other Archbishop or then had one Apostle over the person As great paritie betwene Pastors Pastors as between Apostles Apostles or function of an other Apostle Nay then hath one eye over an other eye one hand over an other hand one arme over another arme or one foot over another foote And therefore if touching the functions which Pastors either among them selues haue in common one with the other or which they haue over their flockes there be no disparitie but that the Pastors to whom small flockes are committed doe as reallie and as truelie participate of the nature of true Pastors as those great Pastours doe vpon whose great shoulders great burdens are imposed it behoveth great Pastors to prove vnto vs by the holie Scriptures that by the institution of their great pastorall functions they haue their power so enlarged as that thereby they may preach the Word minister the Sacraments and excommunicate and that on the other side the litle Pastours haue their power by the institution of their petie pastorall offices so streightned as whereby they may onlie preach the Word and administer the Sacramentes but not excommunicate it behooveth I say great Pastors to be able sufficiently to shew vnto vs these thinges out of the holy Scriptures or els it seemeth to stande with reason and equitie deduced from the same Scriptures that a Pastor over a few should haue like power to teach and to governe a few as a great Pastor over manie hath to instruct and to rule many Marie if they think that only great Pastors be true Pastors that great powers spirituall be only true powers spirituall then let them also conclude that onely great Knights be true Knights that only great Dukes bee true Dukes that onely great Kings be true Kings and that only great principalities temporall bee true principalities temporall Which conclusion Not onelie Kinges of great kingdomes but also Kinges of small kingdomes bee true kings if they shall iudge to be conclusionles because King Rehoboam had as large a patent to feede and to command two Tribes as King Solomon his Father had to command and to feede twelue or as the Archbishop of Yorke may suppose him self to haue over nine or tenne Counties as the
that the Author ought to haue proved them not to haue ben repugnant to the customes of the Realme but to haue bin in vse and practise before the making of that acte of submission For hee must proue sayth the Answerer that they are not repugnant to the customes of this Realme and shew vs how they haue bin vsed and executed heere before the making of the statute yea he can say that they are by lawe established among vs. Which points saith he because we learn by law quod facta noÌ„ presumantur matters in fact are not intended to be done vntill they bee proued so we must still put him to his proofes in the meane time say that hee hath gaped wide to say nothing to the purpose and that in his whole booke he hath talked but not reasoned All which asseveration of this Answerer if the same be true and if this plea be a good avermeÌ„t to barre the Author from having proved a learned ministerie to be commanded by the lawe dispensations for many benefices to bee vnlawfull excommunication by one alone to bee forbidden and civill gouverment to be vnlawfull in ecclesiastical persons then much more forcibly may this argument be retorted vpon all such as clayme alleage put in vre any portion of the forraigne canon law For sithence it hath never yet bene proved that the forraigne canon lawe vsed and executed at this day was accustomed vsed 25. H. 8. then because wee learne by law as he saith quod facta non presumantur wee must still put him his clients to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that their Advocat hath twisted for them but a bad threed when by his reason he hath vntwined all their lawes and broken a sunder the bands of their gouverment Moreover because it is not yet proved that the forraigne and papall canon law is not contrariant nor repugnant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme nor derogatorie to the prerogatiues of the regall Crown nay because the contradictorie hereof is affirmed and this denied and because we learne by law as he saith that matters in fact are not intented to be done â—ill they be proved so wee must still put the vpholders and executioners of this law to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that the forraign papall law is but a pretended necessary disused law that it is not inspired with the life of law and that it is fathered by them to be such a law as is an hedlesse a fetherlesse and a nocklesse arrow which is not fit to be drawn or shot against any subiect of the King And from this voydance abolition nullitie of forraigne and papall canon law because sublato principali tolluntur accessoria it followeth that all offices and functions of papall Archbishops papall Bishops papall Suffraganes papall Archdeacons papall Deanes and Chapters papall Priestes papall Deacons papall Subdeacons papall Chancelors papall Vicars generall papall Commissaries and papall Officials meerely depending vpon the authoritie and drawen from the rules and grounds of that lawe are likewise adnihilated and of no value Howbeit forso By the opinion of the CiviliaÌ„s the papal canon law seemeth to bee in force much as by the opinioÌ„ of some learned Civilians there seemeth vnto them a necessarie coÌ„tinuance of the same forraign and papall law by reason that Archbb. and Bishops doe now lawfully Apologie of certain proceedings in courts Ecclesiasticall as they say vse ordinarie Archiepiscopall and Episcopall iurisdiction which they could not as they thinke doe if the same common lawe were vrterly abolished and for so much also as some learned in the canon lawes do mainteyne that since the statut of 1. Eliz. c. 1. the Archbb. and Bb. cannot lawfullie clayme anie ordinarie spirituall iurisdiction at all but that the spirituall iurisdiction to be exercised by them ought to be delegated vnto them froÌ„ the King by a commission vnder the great Seale Forasmuch I say as there are these differences of opinions it seemeth expedient to be considered by what law by what authoritie Archbb. and Bb. exercise Archiepiscopal Episcopall power in the church And to the end this question may fully be knowen and no scruple nor ambiguitie be left what power spirituall may be intended to be exercised by them We distinguish spirituall power into a power properly called spirituall and into a power improperlie Power properly and improperly called spirituall or abusivelie called spirituall The power properly called spirituall is that spirituall power which consisteth and is conversant in preaching the Woord administring the Sacraments ordeyning and deposing Ministers excommunicating or absolving and if there be anie other spirituall power of the like propertie and nature Now that this power properly called spirituall could haue bin drawen from the person of our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene vnto Power properly called spirituall was neuer in the Queens person Archbb. and Bishops we denie For the Queenes Royall person being never capable of any parte of this spirituall power how could the same be derived from her person vnto them Nemo potest plus iuris in alium transforre quam ipse habet Archiepiscopall and Episcopall power therefore exercised in and about these mysteries of our holie Religion ordinarily necessarilie must belong vnto the Archbb. and Bb. by the canon of the holy Scriptures otherwise they haue no power properly called spirituall touching these things at all The power which improperlie is called spirituall Power improperly called spiritual is indeed but a temporall power is such a power as respecteth noâ— the exercise of any pastorall or ministeriall church to the internall begetting of faith or reforming of maners in the soule of man but is such a power as whereby publike peace equitie and iustice is preserved and mainteigned in externall things peculiarly appropried and apperteyning vnto the persons or affaires of the church which power indeede is properlie a temporall or civill power and is to be exercised onelie by the authoritie of temporall and civill Magistrates Now then to returne to the state of the point in question touching this later power improperly called spirituall by what law or by what authoritie the Archbishops and Bishops doe exercise this kind of power in the church I answer that they cannot haue the same from any forraign canon lawe because the same law with all the powers dependaÌ„ces thereof is adnulled And therefore that this their power must ought to be derived vnto theÌ„ from Bb. where From whence then is their power derived Herevnto we answere that before the making of that act spirituall iurisdiction did apperteyne vnto Bishops and that Bishops were ordinaries aswell by custome of the Realme canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall synodall as by forraign canon law And Bishops remaine ordinaries by custome provincial caÌ„oÌ„s and statute law though papal canon law be abolished that therefore these canons constitutions
ordinances provinciall or synodall according to the true intent of that act could not still haue bene vsed and executed as they were before if the Bishops had not still remained ordinaries Moreover it is cleare by two statutes that the Archbishops Bishops ought 25. H. 8. c. 20. 25. H. 8. c 16. to be obeyed in all maner of things according to the name title degree and dignitie that they shall bee chosen or presented vnto and that they may doe and execute minister vse and exercise all and euerie thing and thinges touching or perteyning to the office or order of an Archbishop or Bishop with all ensignes tokens and ceremonies therevnto lawfullie belonging as any Archbishop or Bishop might at any time heretofore doe without offending of the prorogatiue Royall of the Crown and the lawes and customes of this Realme Let it be then that by custome canons provintiall and statute law Bishops bee and doe remaine ordinaries yet aswell vppon those words of the statute 25. H. 8. without offending of the prerogatiue Royal as vpon the statute of 1. Eliz. c. 1. there remaineth a scruple and ambiguitie whether it be not hurtfull or derogatorie vnto the Kinges prerogatiue Royall that Ordinaries should vse and exercise their ordinarie power improperly called spirituall without a commission vnder the great Seale or that such their power should be as immoderate and excessiue now as in times past it was by the papall canon law Concerning the first by the statut of 1. Eliz. c. 1. and by the statute of 8. Eliz. c. 1. the Queene was recognized to be in effect the Ordinarie The Queen was supreme ordinarie of ordinaries of Ordinaries that is the chief supream and Souveraigne ordinarie over all persons in all causes aswell ecclesiasticall as temporall Where it seemeth to followe that all the branches streames aswell of that power which improperlie is called spirituall as of that power which properly is called temporal should haue bene derived originally vnto the Bishop from her Highnes person as from the onlie head fountaine of all the same spiritual power within her Kingdomes in such maner and from and by such commission vnder the great Seale as her H. temporal Officers Iusticers Iudges had their authorities committed vnto them And to this opinion Maister D. Bilson seemeth to accord For all power Pag. 348 saith he is not onely committed to the sword which God hath authorised but is wholie closed in the sword Against the head that it shall not be head to rule and guide the feete can be no prescription by reason Gods ordinance for the head to governe the bodie is a perpetual and eternall law and the vsurpation of the members against it is no prescription but a confusion and the subuersion of that order which the God of heaven hath immutably decreed and setled Besides there resteth saith the Remonstrance Pag. 114. 130. vnto the Bishops of this Realm none other but subordinate delegate authoritie and that the matter heads wherein their iurisdiction is occupied are by and from the Christian Magistrats authoritie In whom as supream Governour all iurisdiction within her dominions aswell ecclesiastical as civill by Gods and mans law is invested and their authoritie ecclesiastical is but subordinat vnder God the Prince derived for the most part from the Prince From which two statutes iudgements of the 1. Eliza. c. 1 8. Eliz. c. 1 Governours of the Church conteined in these two bookes for these two bookes were seene allowed by the Governors of the church I leaue it to be coÌ„sidered if the Bishop did exercise the same improper and abusive spirituall power and iurisdiction ecclesiasticall onelie and alonelie in their owne names stiles and dignities and vnder their owne seales of office that also by authoritie of forraigne and papall lawes if I say the Bishop did these things after this this manner I leaue it then to be considered whether their exercise of such power were derogatorie and preiudiciall in a very high degree to the prerogatiues of the Royall Crown or not For my part because I find by the forraigne canon lawe that papall Bishops be the Popes sonnes and are privileged to carry the the print image of the Pope their father namely that they haue plenitudinen potestatis within their diocesses as the Ex de Maior oâ—â— Pope pretendeth to have power over the whole worlde For quilibet ordinarius saith the same law in sua diocaesi est maior quolibet principe and because also not withstanding what socuer the Bb. haue written that they were the Queenes Bb. and had their authoritie derived vnto M. Bilson pag. 330. them from the Queene they did in her life time put the same papall law in execution by the same law did take vpon them plenitudinem potestatis within their Diocesses I for my part I say can not as yet otherwise conceyue but that exceedinglie they did intrude them selues into the Royall preheminences priviledges prerogatiues of the Queene For by what other authoritie then by a certain plenarie power did they in their owne names for the gouernment of the The Bb. by a plenarie power devised promulged new canons with out the Queens assent seuerall Churches within their seuerall Diocesses from time to time make promulge and by vertue of mens corporall oathes put in execution what new Canons Iniunctions and articles soever seemed good vnto them without any licence or coÌ„firmation from the Queene first had and obteyned therevnto By which pretensed plenarie power it seemeth that the statute made to bring the Cleargie in submission to the King was covertlie deluded and our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene cunningly bereaved of that regall authoritie over euerie partieular Diocesan or Ordinarie which notwithstanding by the Parleament was giuen vnto her Highnes over the whole body and state of the Clergie For if once there be no necessitie of the Kings licence assent or confirmation to such articles canons or iniunctions as euerie ordinarie shall make within his iurisdiction then must it bee intended that the statute of submission hath covertlie permitred severall members severally to doe to execute those things which apparantly in expresse termes the whole convocation was commaunded and with the same in verbo sacerdotij had promised not to doe then the which what can seeme more vnreasonable and absurd For then might all the Ordinaries ioyne hand in hand and agree all togither in one never in anie of their convocations assembled by the Kinges writt to devise make or promulge any canons Ecclesiasticall at all And what assent licence or confirmation from the King could then bee needfull Or how then was the Cleargie brought in submission to the King For then should it not be with them as it is in the proverbe A threefold coard is not easilie brokeÌ„ but then should it be with them contrarie to the proverbe for
honorable CouÌ„cell keeper of the Kings privie Seale or two of them calling vnto them one Bishop one temporal Lord of the Kings most honorable Councell the two chiefe Iustices of the Kinges bench and common Pleas for the time being or other two of the Kings Iustices in their absence haue full power and authoritie to punish after their demerits all misdoers being founde colpable before them If wee search our statutes besids the Courts and matters determinable in these spoken of before we shall find that the complaints of errour whether it touch the King or any other person 31. E 3. c. 21 made in the Exchecquer should be done to come before the Chancelor Treasurer who taking to them two Iustices other sage persons are duely to examine the busines and if any errour be found to correct amend the Roles c. By reason of delayes of iudgments vsed in the Chauncerie in the 14. E. 3. c 5 Kinges bench common bench and in the Exchecquer it was assented established and accorded that a Prelate two Earles and two Barons chosen by the ParleameÌ„t by good advise of the Chancelour c. shall proceed to take a good accord and to make a good iudgement When it was complayned vnto the King that the profites c. of his Realme by â—0 K. 2. c. 1 some great Officers c. were much withdrawen and cloyned c. it pleased the King c. to coÌ„mit the surveighing aswell of the estate c. of his house c. vnto the honourable Fathers in God William Archbishop of Canterburie and Alexander Archbishop of Yorke c. by a statute of commission for a 6. H. 6. Sewers by a statute for punishmeÌ„t of b 11. H. 5. c. 25. periurie by a statut against making or executing of actes or ordinances by any c 19 H. 7. c. 7. Maisters c. being not examined c. by the Lord Chancelour Treasurer or chiefe Iustices c. By a statute for the erection of the Court of d 27. H. 8. c 27. AugmeÌ„tation by a statute for erection of the Court of firste e 32. H. c. 45. fruits tenthes and lastly by an f 27. Eli. c. 8 acte for redresse of erroneous iudgements in the Court commonly called the Kinges Bench By all these statutes I say it is very apparant that the Administration of publike affaires in the coÌ„mon weale hath never bene vsually committed to the advisemnet discretion or definitiue sentence of any one man alone Which point is yet more fully and more perfectly Lord president and counsell in Wales Lord president couÌ„sell in the North parts Lord Deputie counsell in Irelande The Kinge and his honorable privie Counsel to be vnderstood by the establishment continuance of the Kings Lord President and Councell in Wales of the Kings Lord President and Counsel established for the North of the Kinges Lord Deputie and Councell within the Realme of Irelande of the Kings Highnesse most honorable privie Councell chosen by him for the assistance of his Royall person in matters apperteyning to his Kingly estate and lastly of the supreame and grand Councell of the three estates in Parleament for matters concerning The Kinge his grand Counsell in Parleament the Church the King and the common Weale For whether respect bee had vnto the secrete affaires of the Kings estate consulted vpoÌ„ in his Highnesse Councell Chamber by his privie Counsaylors or whether we regard the publike tractation of matters in Parleament there can bee no man so simple as not to knowe both these privie and open negotiatioÌ„s to be carried by most voyces of those persons who by the King are called to those honorable assemblies And what a vaine iangling then doth the Admonitor keepe how idlely and wranglingly doth he dispute when against the government of the church by Pastours and Elders he obiecteth that the same will interrupt the lawes of the Realme that it wil be great occasion of partiall affectionate dealing that some will incline to one parte and that the residue wil bee wrought to favour the other and that thereby it wil be a matter of strife discord schisme and heresies Howbeit if never any of these extremities and dangers haue fallen out in the common weale by any partiall or affectionate dealing of the Kings Deputies Presidents Iudges Iusticers and other Officers Ministers associated vnto theÌ„ for the administratioÌ„ of Iustice or equitie in any of the Kings civill Courtes howe much lesse cause haue we to feare any partialitie affectioÌ„ working inclination favour strife debate schismaticall or hereticall opinions if once Pastours and Elders in every Congregation and not thoroughout a Diocesse one Bishop alone had the spirituall administration of the Church-causes Can many temporall Officers Iusticers and Iudges rightly and indifferently administer the law and execute iustice and iudgment without that that some doe incline to one part without that the residue bee wrought to favour the other part And cannot spirituall Officers dispatch spiritual affaires without that that they be partially affectionally disposed What is it so easie a matter that the Ancients of God and the Ministers of Christ can the one part incline to righteousnes and the residue be wrought to favor wickednes can some incline to God and vnto Christ and can other some be wrought to follow Satan and Antichrist For what other controversie is required to be decided by Pastours and Elders then the controversie of sinne betwene the soule of man and his God And is there any Christian Pastour or Elder that wil be wrought rather to favour the sinne of a mortall man then the glorie of his immortall God But to leaue the state of the Kingdome and common weale and the good vsages and customes of the same let vs come to the state of the Church it selfe and to the lawfull government thereof established even amongst vs at this day The gouerment of the Church ought not to be by one alone For whatsoever our reverend Bishoppes practise to the contrarie yet touching ordination and deposition of Ministers touching excommunication and absolution touching the order and rule of Colleges Cathedrall churches and the Vniversities the ecclesiasticall law doth not commit the administration of these things and regiment of these places to any one person alone The Vniversities admit not the goverment of the Chancelour being present nor of his Vicechancelour The gouerment in the Vniuersities not by one alone him selfe being absent as of one alone the Doctors Procurators Regents non-Regents haue all voyces and by most of their voyces the Vniversitie causes take successe The businesses The goverment in Colleges not by one alone of Colleges by the statutes of their founders are commended to the industrie and fidelitie of the President Vice-president and fellowes vnto the Provost Viceprovost and fellowes vnto the Warden Sub-warden and fellowes vnto the Maister
ego sum via veritas vita He neuer said ego sum consuetudo Touching the iurisdiction of the Deane and Chapter the papall lawe being abrogated how the same may lawefullie now bee vsed otherwise then by sufferance and consent of the King and Realme I know not But of all spirituall authoritie exercised at this day in the Church of England the same semeth to draw most neare to the semblance of the gouernment practised by the Apostles and primitiue Church And might bee approued in many points if so bee the Deane and Chapter being as it were a Senate of preaching Elders did no more commit the execution of their ecclesiasticall iurisdiction to the wisedome of one Vicar general or principall official then they doe put over the leassing of their Landes or dividētes of their rentes to the onlie discretion of one of their Baylifes or Stewardes As for Bishoppes Suffraganes in Englande and in Wales how many there may be and what Cities and Townes are to be taken and accepted for their Seas it is at large expressed in a statute made for the nomination of Suffraganes By which statute also wee are given to vnderstand that it remayneth onely in the disposition and libertie of everie Archbishop Bishop within this Realm c. to name and elect two honest and discrete spirituall persons being learned of good conversation and them to present vnto the Kinge by their writing vnder their Seales making humble request to giue to one such of the saide two persons as shal please his Maiestie such title name stile dignitie of Bishop of such Seas specified in the said act as the Kings Highnes shall think most cōvenient for the same so it bee within the same Province whereof the Bb. that doth name him is Besides after such title stile and name given by the Kinge it is saide that the King shall present every such person by his letters patentes vnder his great Seale to the Archbishop of the same Province wherein the Towne whereof hee hath his title name stile and dignitie of Bishop and that the Archbishop shall giue him all such consecrations benedictions and ceremonies as to the degree and office of a Bishopps Suffragane shall be requisite It is further enacted provided that every person nominated elected presented and consecrated according to that acte shall be taken accepted and reputed in all degrees places according to the stile title name dignitie that he shall be presented vnto haue such capacitie power and authoritie honor preeminence reputation in as large ample maner in cōcerning the executiō of such cōmission as by any of the saide Archb. or Bb. within their Diocesse shall be given to the saide Suffragane as to Suffraganes of this Realm hertofore hath bin vsed accustomed And that no Suffr made cōsecrated by vertue of this act shall take or receiue any maner of profits of the places Seas wherof they shall be named nor vse haue or execute any iurisdiction or Episcopall power or authoritie within their said Seas c. but only such profites iurisdiction authoritie as shall be licensed and limited vnto them to take do and execute by any Archbishopp or Bb. within their Diocesse to whom they shall be Suffraganes vnder their seales And that no such Suffragane shall vse any iurisdiction ordinarie or Episcopall power otherwise nor longer time then shall be limited by such commission to him giuen vpon peyne c. From which Act touching the vse exercise of Episcopall power and censures by the Suffragane we may againe safely conclude that the Episcopall power graunted by the Bishops to be vsed by the Suffragane is not of diuine right and institution but only from humane devise and ordinance For the Suffragan could not exercise any power called spirituall or Episcopall vnles by the Bb. he were nominated by the King elected and presented by the Archb. consecrated and by commission vnder the Bb. seale authorized in what maner and for what time he should exercise the same Custome then being not from heauen but from the earth and againe the Bb. commissiō limiting the Suffraganes delegated power being of man and not of God it followeth necessarilie that that Episcopall power which the Bishoppes vse and exercise in England can not be diuine but humane Because Episcopall authoritie which is diuine being conveyed from the Royall and Souerayne authoritie of our Sauiour Christ the giuer of all power vnto euerie officer within his Church can not be transferred to any other person by the same Bb. by the King by the bodie of the state or by custome For the Kings person and bodie of the state not being made capable by the holie scriptures to vse and exercise that Episcopall power which is of diuine institutiō can neuer transferre the same to others whereof they be thē selues vncapable And to defende that custome or any municipall lawe should transferre diuine Episcopal power from a divine Bishopp to any humane officer is more erroneous And from hence if the now L. Bb. of London iudge his Episcopall power to belong vnto him by divine and that by the same right he haue power aswell to ordeyne depose suspend and excommunicate presbyters as to confirme boyes girles yong men maydens there seemeth to bee good reason that the same Bb. should make it apparantly knowne vnto the King Realm by what power or commission descended from heaven hee may delegate vnder his Seale the same his divine authoritie of ordination deposition suspension excommunication and confirmation vnto Doctour Sterne his now Suffragane of Colchester For if from the holy Scriptures hee can produce no warrant for the making of a delegation of any part of that Episcopal power which he holdeth to be cōmitted vnto him frō our Savior Christ then well may we conclude against the ordination deposition suspention excommunication confirmation made by the same his Suffragane that the same his Suffraganes ordination deposition c. is not divine For how can an ordination a deposition c. made by a Suffragane be divine when as the commission graunted by the Bishop is meerlie humane Wherefore seeing the Bishop himself hath plucked certeyne of his principall feathers from his own spirituall winges if so be his owne winges may be spirituall and imped them with an vntwysted thread of humane policie to the humane trayne of his Suffragane and seeing also his Archbishoppes grace of Canterburie in cases of his metropoliticall prerogatiue the Archdeacons London Midlesex Essex Hertforde the Deane of Paules and certeyne prebendaries in Paules the Deane of Westminster the Maister of the Savoy and divers other Persons haue by Papall privileges or by auncient custome prescribed almost all other partes of his Episcopall power there seemeth good reason that the Bishoppe should againe declare whether the Churches within the saide Diocesse after the decease or translation of his Lordshippe shall stande in neede of any Lordlie Successour to sitt
they being all fast knit and bound togither vnto the Kings authoritie by a coard of 24 threads might easilie be broken but being severed and pluct a sunder into 24. Bishops can make no lawe without leaue And yet everie Bb doeth make many lawes 24 partes one from the other the King with all his regall power might not beâ— able so much as to breake one of the least threedes wherewithall one of their cordes was twisted If the Lorde Maior the Sheriffes Aldermen and whole communaltie of the Citie of London should promise vnto the King vpoÌ„ their fidelities not to set anie price vpoÌ„ Wines or other victualles by their common Councell within the said Citie vnlesse the King vnder his privie signett should first authorize theÌ„ so to doe were it not a meere collusion of the Kings meaning if everie particular AldermaÌ„ should sett prices of such things in every particular Ward But against the collection made from the Statutes 1. 8. Eliza the iudgement of the diuinies aforesaid the A collection made against the former reason by an Apologie for sundry proced by iurisdi Eccl. pag. 5. author of an Apologie to his vnderstanding reckoneth the same collection to be a very simple collection against the same hee answereth and reasoneth in effect thus If as is collected all power spirituall by a commission vnder the great Seale must be derived from the Queene to warrant the execution of it vnto him that is to exercise it then must the like warrant bee procured for euery temporall office to execute his temporall office But euery temporall officer must not procure like warrant to execute his temporall office Therefore a commission vnder the great Seale must not be procured to warrant the execution of the said spirituall power The consequence of his maior proposition being false he laboureth notwithstanding to make the same good and in effect for the same argueth thus All temporall authoritie as absolutly and as really is revested in the person of the Queene as is the said spirituall authoritie Therfore as all spirituall officers for the execution of the said spirituall power must haue their authoritie derived vnto theÌ„ from the person of the Queen vnder the great Seale so likewise must all temporall officers for the execution of their temporal offices haue the like commission The consequence of which enthimeme followeth not though the antecedent be true For although as well all teÌ„porall as all the said spiritual authoritie improperlie so called was reallie absolutelie in the person of the Queene yet herevpon it followeth not that by one and the selfe same meanes alone and namelie by a coÌ„mission vnder the great Seale all temporall and the said spirituall power in euerie part and braunch thereof should be drawen alike froÌ„ the Queenes person For there be divers and sundrie meanes to derive temporall authoritie whereas there seemeth to be but one onely meanes to derive the said spirituall authoritie and then marke the substance of the Authors argument Some temporall Officers as Stewards of Leetes Constables sundry other Officers must not drawe their temporall authoritie from the Queene by a commission vnder the great Seale Therefore no spirituall officers as Archbishops Bb Archdeacons and sâ—de vacante Deanes and Chapiters must drawe any of their spirituall authoritie from the Queene by a commission c. Which argument drawen from a particular affirmatiue vnto a general negatiue what weaknes it hath euery yong Logician can discerne And as for Stewardes af Leetes though they haue no Though all temporal officers drawe not their power from the Kinge by the great Seale yet by one meanes or other wtdrawe it froÌ„ the King commission vnder the great Seale yet for the executioÌ„ fo their Stewarships they haue a coÌ„mission vnder the Seale of the Exchequer Constables Decennary or Tythingmen and Thirdboroughes haue their authorities derived vnto the from the Kings person by the verie originall institution of their offices Sherifs of Countries Coroners Escheators and Verderors haue their offices and their â—uthorities warranted vnto them by the Kings writts out of the Chancerie But 〈◊〉 was not the mind of the Law-makers saith the Author that the Ordinaries by a commission vnder the great Seale should draw their saide spirituall power from the Queene What the mindes of the Law-makers were touching this poinct it mattereth litle or nothing at all Neither is it to purpose whether a commission vnder the great Seale bee necessarily required or not required by vertue of that statut 1. Eliz. c. 1. to warrant the said spirituall power vnto Ordinaries Only it sufficeth that the Queen having all power improperly called spirituall invested in her Royall person being really actually seysed of all the said supreme spirituall authoritie could not haue any parte of the same spirituall power drawn from her but by some one lawfull and ordinarie meanes or other For if this rule be true in euerie coÌ„mon person quod meum est sine mea voluntate à me auferri non potest how much more doth the same rule holde in the Royall prerogatiues rightes privileges dignities and supremities of a King Wherefore to saie that all supreme and ordinarie power improperly called spirituall was really and actually inherers in the Royall person of the Queene and to say also that some of the same inferior and ordinarie power not derived froÌ„ the Queen was neuerthelesse in the persons of inferior ordinaries is as much to say that some braunches of a tree may receyue nourishment from ells-where then from the roote that some meÌ„bers of the bodie are not guided by the head and that some streames flow nor from their fountaines And now to coÌ„clude this part against the canon law their Offices and functions thereof I dispute thus The forreigne and papall canon lawe with all the accessories dependances Offices and functions thereof is vtterlie abolited out of the Realme Therefore the same lawe is no part of the lawes of the Realme and therefore also it is evident that there will not followe any alteration of the lawes of the Realme by the taking of it away Which canon law also with other lawes functions how easely the same without any inconveniences may bee supplied shall God willing be presentlie made apparant if first we shall aunswere to that challenge which the state of Prelacie may seeme to make for the continuance of their Lordly primacie Chalenge for Lordly primacy out of the great Charter anâ—vered out of the wordes of the great Charter Concerning which challenge namelie that by the great Charter Lordly Archiepiscopal and Episcopall primacie or iurisdiction belonging to the state of Prelacie is belonging vnto them I demand vnto what Church this great Charter was graunted And whether it were not graunted vnto the Church of God in England The words of the Charter are these Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta nostra confirmavimus pro nobis Mag. Charta c. 1.
if it may please him so to provide by Parleament may giue remedie vnto complaynants by writts out of the Chancerie and that complaints in such cases may effectuallie be redressed vpon such writts in the Kings Courts And if also sundrie matters of Tythes Testaments and Mariages be alreadie handled in the Kinges Courts if these things I say be so and so may be then with litle reason did the Admonitor warne vs that a verie great alteration of the common law must follow and that it will be no small matter to applie these things to the temporall law But the antecedent is true as hath bene alreadie shewed Therefore the consequent is true Admonition Iudgementes also of adulterie slauÌ„der c. are in these mens iudgmentes Pag. 78. mere temporall and therefore to be dealt in by the temporall Magistrate onely Assertion We are in deed of this iudgemeÌ„t that in regard of the Kinges Royall Office these iudgements of adultrie and other criminall causes comprised within this clause c. ought no more to be exempted from the Kings temporall Courtes then matters of theft murther treason and such like ought to be And for the mayntenance of our iudgementes wee affirme that there is no crime or offeÌ„ce of what nature or qualitie soever respecting any commaundement conteyned within either of the two tables of the holie law of God if the same bee nowe corrigible by spirituall power but that some fault and contempt one or other of the like nature and qualitie as comprised vnder the same commandement hath bene evermore and is now punishable by the Kings Regall and temporal iurisdiction For adulterie as the same is to be censured by penance in the Ecclesiasticall Courtes so is ravishment also buggerie sodomie to be punished in the Kings Court by payne of death And as hath bene accustomed that Ordinaries by ceÌ„sures of the Church may correct fornicators so fornication also as in some bookes written of the common lawe is reported hath bene in times passed presented and punished in leetes and Law-dayes in divers places of the Realme by the name of Letherwhyte whiche is as the booke saieth an auncient Saxon terme And the Lord of the Leete where it hath bene presented hath euer had a fyne for the same offence By the statute of those that be borne beyond the Seas 25. Ed 3. it appeareth that the Kinge hath cognizance of fome bastardie And nowe in most cases of bastardie if not in all by the statute of Eliza. the reputed father of a bastard borne is lyable to bee punished at the discretion of the Iustices of peace Touching periurie if a man loose his action by a false verdict in plea of land Periurie if punishable temporallie in some cases why not in all he shall haue an attaynt in the Kinges Court to punish the periurie and to reforme the falsitie And by divers statutes it appeareth that the Kings teÌ„porall Officers may punish periurie committed in the Kings teÌ„poral Courtes And though it be true that such periurie as hath risen vpon causes reputed spirituall haue bene in times past punished onlie by ecclesiasticall power and censures of the Church yet herevpon it followeth not that the periurie it selfe is a meere spirituall and not a temporall crime or matter or that the same might not to be civillie punished By a statute of Westminster 25. Ed. 3. it was accorded that the King his Vsurie heyres shall have the cognizance of the vsurers dead and that the Ordinaries haue cognizance of vsurers on lyfe to make compulsion by censures of the Church for sinne and to make restitution of the vsuries taken against the lawes of holy church And by another statute it is provided that vsuries shall 20. H. 3. c. 5. not turne against any being within age after the time of the death of his Auncestoure vntill his full age But the vsurie with the principall debt which was before the death of his Auncestor did remayne and turne against the heyre And because all vsurie being forbidden by the law of God is sinne detestable 13. Eliz. c. 8. it was enacted that all vsurie lone and forbearing of money c. giving dayes c. shall be punished according to the forme of that Act. And that everie such offendor shal also be punished corrected according to the Eccle. lawes before that tyme made against vsurie By al which statutes it seemeth that the cognizance reformatioÌ„ of vsurie by the lawes of the Realm partayneth onlie to the Kinge vnles the King by his lawe permit the Church to correct the same by the censures of the church as a sinne committed against the holy law of God Touching heresies and schismes albeit the Bishoppes by their Episcopall Heresies schismes are punishable by the Kings lawes and ordinarie spirituall power grouÌ„ded vpon canon lawe or an evill custome have vsed by definitive senteÌ„ce pronouÌ„ced in their Consistories to condemne men for heretickes and schismatickes and afterward being condemned to deliver them to the seculer power to suffer the paynes of death as though the King being custos vtriusque tabulae had not power by his Kinglie office to enquire of heresie to condemne an hereticke to put him to death vnlesse he were first condemned delivered into his hands by their spirituall power although this hath bene I say the vse in England yet by the statutes of Richard the second Henrie the fift it was lawfull for the Kings Iudges and Iustices to enquire of heresies and Lollardes in Leetes Sherifes turnes and in Lawdayes and also in Sessions of the peace Yea the King by the common law of the Realme revived 25. H. 5. c. 14. by an Act of Parleament which before by the Statute of Henrie the fourth was altered may pardon a man condemned for heresie yea and if it should come to passe that any heresies or schismes should arise in the Church of Englande the Kinge by the lawes of the Realme and by his Supreame Soveraigne power with his Parleament may correct redresse and reforme all such defaultes and enormities Yea further the King and his Parleament with consent of the Cleargie in their Convocation 1. Eliz. ca. 〈◊〉 hath power to determine what is heresie and what is not heresie If then it might please the King to haue it enacted by Parleament that they which opiniativelie and obstinatelie hold defende 1 Eliz 〈◊〉 1. and publish any opinions which according to an Act of Parleament alreadie made haue bene or may bee ordered or adiudged to be heresies should be heretickes and felons and their heresies If it please the Kinge heretickes may bee adiudged felons and hereâ—ies felonies to be felonies and that the same heretickes and felons for the same their heresies and felonies beeing araigned convicted and adiudged by the course of the common law as other felons are should for the same their heresies felonies suffer the paynes of death
subversion vpō any nation that purely and soundly in place therof hath embraced the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper It seemeth also to be equal for many ages past that the Bishop of Rome might haue supreame and absolute power over all persons states and causes not only in Rome Italy Spaigne Germany other forraigne Kingdoms but also in England and Scotland But as yet to the view of al the world it hath not proved perilous for the King Queen of England and Scotland to establish new lawes for the alteration of that ancient abuse And why hath it not bene dangerous so to do Why forsooth because there was evident vtilitie in doing of it But how could an evident vtilitie appeare before it was done How Forsooth because the holy law of God had warranted an alteration For faith having eyes to see the wisedom the power and the trueth of God in his word discerned a far of that the institution of the Lords Supper was long before the sacrifice of the masse And therefore our Kings by abandoning popery out of the Realme did not institute any new religion but onely they restored the old Now then if the same holy lawe of God doe condemne the choyce and thrusting of a Pastour vpon the people by one man alone and againe if the same lawe doe impugne the primacie of one Pastour over all Pastours as wel in a Diocesse or Province as in the whole West part of Christendome what daunger can it be not to disfrāchise the one sithence without any maner of danger we haue abolished the other or what perill can it be not to countenance the sonnes sithence without peril we haue discountenanced the father Especially seeing in this place of the admonition we haue a playne cōfession that the common maner of election of Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches was made by the people For if the examples of schisme discord Common manner of elections in the olde churches was by the people contention did commonly appeare in the olde churches while that maner of election did continue then by his owne mouth that maner of election was common and did continue in the olde churches Besides this inconvenience saith he caused Princes Bishops so much to entermedle in this matter From whence it necessarily againe followeth that by the holy Scriptures and law of God Princes and Bishops did not entermedle with that matter at all For had it bin simply lawful for thē to haue Bb. medle not with election of Pastours by the holie Scriptures dealt in those causes by the worde of God thē as well before schisme discord and dissention as afterward yea rather much more before then afterward For then by their own right might Princes and Bishops haue prevented all occasion of schisme and contention and haue so preserved the Church that no tumult or disorder should once haue bin raysed or begun therein Againe if by the lawe of God Princes Bishops had medled in these matters and had not entermedled by humane devise then lawfully by their authoritie alone might they haue chosen Pastours Elders and Deacons in the olde Churches which thing in this place by necessarie inference he denieth For schisme saith he caused thē to entermedle So as by his confession they were but entermedlers and entercommoners by reason of schisme not cōmoners and medlers by vertue of Gods word And yet now a dayes our reverend Bishops in this case are no more entercommoners with Princes and with the people they are no more entermedlers as in olde times they were but they haue now so farre encroched vpon the prerogatiues of the Prince and privileges of the people that neither Prince Bishops encroch vpon the right of prince and people nor people haue any commons in the election of Pastours Elders Deacons with them at all Besides if schisme and contention among the people were the reason why Bishops first entermedled in the choise of Pastours we now having no schisme nor contention about the choise of Pastours by the people and so the cause ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease But this effect is therefore still to be continued because otherwise the cause would a new sprout out and spring vp againe Nay rather inasmuch as for these many yeares we haue had schisme discord dissention because the Bishops wholy and altogether haue medled in the choise of Pastours and haue thrust vpon the people whatsoever Pastours please not the people but pleased themselves haue not suffered the people to medle no not so much as once to entermedle in these matters in as much I say as these things be so it seemeth most expediēt requisite necessarie for the appeasing pacifying of this discord the taking away of this schisme to haue that maner of election which was in the old Churches restored to the people and this wherein the Bishops haue entermedled without authoritie from the worde to be abolished that so againe the cause of schisme and strife which is now among vs ceasing the effect might likewise cease After I had ended this tract in this maner touching this poynt there came into mine handes a booke intituled The perpetuall gouernment of Christes church written by Thomas Bilson Warden of Winchester Colledge in the fifteenth chapter of which booke is handled this question viz to whom the election of Bishoppes and Presbiters doth rightlie belong and whether by Gods lawe the people must elect their Pastours or no. In whiche Chapter also the matter of schisme strife and contention is handled The finall scope and conclusion whereof is as the proposition importeth two fold First cōcerning Bishops then concerning Pastours The quarell taken against Bishoppes doth not so much touch sayth he the office and functions of Bishoppes as it doth the Princes prerogatiue When you rather thinke the Prince may not name her Bishoppes without the consent and election of the people you impugne nor vs but directlie call the Princes fact and her lawes in question As touching this poynt of the proposition because the people by any lawe or custome never chalenged anie right or interest in the choyse of the Kings Bishoppes we haue nothing to medle or to make about the choyse of any of his Kinglie Bishoppes The Kinge only hath power without the people to nominate his Kingly Bb. Nay we confesse as his Highnes progenitours Kings of England haue bin the Soveraigne Donours Founders Lords and Avowes of all the Bishoprickes in England without ayd of the people that so likewise it is a right and interest invested into his Imperiall Crowne that he onely his heyres successours without cōsent of the people ought to haue the free nomination appointment collation investiture and confirmation of all Bishoppes frō time to time to be placed in anie of those Bishoprickes yea we say further that the King alone hath not power onely to nominate collate confirme but also to
became followers of the evill maners of their teachers and no merveile if they verified the proverbe Like Maister like Man like Priest like People Eustatius Bishop of Antioch being a Sabellian hereticke Socr. lib. cap â—8 was deposed by the Counsell of Antioch after whose deposition a fiery flame of seditioÌ„ was kindled in Antioch because one sort of the common people sought to translate Eusebius Pamphilus from Caesarea to Antioch some other would bring againe Eustatius Eusebius Bishop of Nicomedia and Theognis Bishop of Nice beeing both Arians with their coÌ„federates raised skirmishes Socr. lib. 2. cap. 2. and tumults against Athanasius After the death of Alexander Bishop op Constantinople about the electioÌ„ of a Bishop there was greater sturre then ever before time and the Church was more greevously turmoyled The people were devided into two parts the one egerlie set with the heresie of Arius claue to Macedonius the other cleaved very coÌ„stantlie Socr. lib. 2 cap. 4. to the decrees of the Nicene Counsell and choose Paulus to bee their Bishop The cause of division among the Citizens of Emisa about the election of Eusebius Emisenus was for that he was Socr. lib. 2. cap. 6 charged with the studie of the Mathematickes and accused of the heresie of Sabellius After the death of Eusebius when the people of Constantinople had brought againe Paulus to be their Bishop the Arians chose Macedonius The authours and chiefe doers in that sturre were certaine Arian Bishops who before ayded Eusebius that turned vp Socr. lib. cap. 9. side down the whole state of the church These and sundry such like sturres discords factions dissentions are found to haue bin raised pursued by schismaticall and heretical Bishops their favourites followers in the olde Churches but that these or the like mischieves and inconveniences can be proved to haue fallen out by the election of parochiall Pastours in the olde churches we deny And why then should not the interest and freedome of faithfull Christian people wrested from them by cursings and fightings of faithlesse and antichristian Popes be restored to them againe And the cause ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease And therefore we humbly intreate the Lords Bishops that against the grounds of reason and nature against Christian equitie A request to the reuerend Bishoppes and society against the right freedome of the lawe of God against the principles of humaine fellowshippes against that which was in the beginning and against that which the Apostles left in the Churches by colour of lawes brought into the Church by the cursings and fightings of the late Romane Bishops they would not hencefoorth barre seclude the Kings Christian and faithfull people from giving their consents vnto their Pastours Yea and we further beseech their Lordships that as schollers vnto the Apostles and as servants vnto the olde way of reason of nature of the law of God of the equitie of Christ and of humane societie they would hereafter imbrace that way which was from the beginning which is the old way and the best way and not any loÌ„ger persist in a cursed and quareling way which is the new way and the worst way But if the Lordes spirituall A supplication to bee King by the Lords and commoÌ„s for the restitution of their right in the choyse of their Pastors of their owne accord shall not readily voutchsafe to yeelde vnto vs this our right at our intreaty then for my part I will briefly shew mine opinion what were expedient for the Lords and commons in open Parleament dutifully to pray and to supplicate at the Kings Maiestes hande Namely At the humble petitions and supplications of all his Lords temporall and Commons in Parleament assembled his Maiestie would be well pleased to giue his Royall assent to an Act to be intituled An Act for the restitution of the auncient right and freedome which the people of God in the old Churches had and which the people in England ought to haue in to or about the election of their Pastours and abolishing all papall power repugnant to the same For if as it is plainlie confessed the people of all Churches haue right and freedome by the law of God by the equitie of Christ by the grounds of reason and nature by the principles of humane fellowshipps and by that which was from the beginning to elect their Pastours and if also the same right and freedome being left to the old churches and especially to the Church at Ierusalem by the Apostles haue bene taken away by the cursings and fightings of the late Bishoppes of Rome then can not the people without violatioÌ„ of those lawes rules grouÌ„ds by any Episcopall power bee anie more excluded from their said right and freedome then could or might the ancient iurisdiction of the Crowne of England haue bene still vsurped by the Pope froÌ„ the Kings of Englande Admonition But alas the common people of Englande thorough affection and want of right iudgement are more easily wrought by ambitious persons to giue their consent to vnworthie men as may appeare in all those offices of gayne or dignity that at this daye remayne in the choyse of the multitude Assertion The Admonitor in one place of his admonition telleth vs that he must not put all that he thinketh in writing and yet he writeth in this place that thinge which might farre better haue bene vtterly vnthought then once written For could he thinke to winne the common people of England to a continuall good liking of high and stately Prelacie by vpbrayding and charging them to their faces in a booke dedicated vnto them with affection and wantinge of right iugement Was this the way to procure grace favour and benevolence at their handes And albeit this slaunder deserued rather to haue bene censured by the Commons in Parleament then by confutation to haue bene answered yet for the better clearing of the right iudgement of the common people givinge their consents to most worthie men in all offices of gayne or dignitie remayning in their handes I thinke it necessarie to shew the indignitie of this contumelie There be I confesse in London Yorke Lincolne Bristow Exceter Norwich Coventry and other principall Cities and Townes corporate Mayors Sheriffes Stewardes Recorders Baylifes ChaÌ„berlaynes Bridge-maisters Clerks Swordbearers Knightes Burgeses and such like offices some of dignitie and some of gayne but that the officers of these or any other places whether of dignitie or gaine be chosen by the multitude of those places is vtterlie vntrue for onely accordinge to their auncient customes priviledges and Charters by the chiefe Citizens Townsmen and Borough-maisters are those officers chosen The number also of which Electors in all places is not alike In London the Aldermen choose the Lord Mayor In other Cities and Townes sometimes eight and fortie sometimes fourteene sometimes twelfe sometimes only such as haue born office as Mayors Sherifes or Baylifes in the same places
the time prefixed hee should nominate at one time two Clerks to bee taken out of the Vniversities or other Schooles and Nurseries or of the Prophets that the same nomination be made vnto the Bishop and the said six Ministers to the ende that both the Clerkes being tried and examined by them the abler of the twoo might bee preferred to that charge And of this maner of presenting two Clerkes by the Patrone we haue a president not much vnlike in the statute for nomination of Suffraganes By which act every Archbishop and Bishop desiring to haue a Suffragane hath libertie to name and present vnto the Kinge two honest and discrete spirituall persons c. that the King may giue to one such of the saide two spirituall persons as shall please his Maiestie the tytle name stile and dignitie of a Suffragane Fourthly the Bb. and Presbiters hauing thus vpon triall and examination A minister found able for gifts is to be sent to the parish that his life may be examined and to haue the cōsent of the people founde one of the Patrones Clercks to be a fitt and able man to take vpon him the execution of the ministery in that Church whether it were not then meet convenient that by them hee should forthwith bee sent to the same Church aswell to acquaint the people with their iudgement and approbation of his gifts and abilitie to teach as also that for a time he should cōuerse abide amōgst them to the end his life manners and behauiour might bee seene into enquired after by their careful indeuours Fiftlie the people within a time to be perfixed not making and prouing before the Magistrate any iust exception against his life manners and conversations whether it were not then meete and conuenient that the Bishop with six other Ministers or moe of the same Deanrie authorized by the Kinge as aforesaid A man allowed for giftes and cōuersation is to bee ordeined with prayer fasting laying on of hands vnder some payne and within a certaine time should be bound in the presence of the Elders and people and in the same Church with fasting prayer and laying on of handes to ordeyne and dedicate him to the Ministerie and Pastorall charge of that Church Lastly these thinges being thus finished whether it were not then meete A Minister to be inducted into the Church by the Kinges writt convenient that the Bishoppes with the other Ministers and some of the chief of the people should giue the partie ordeyned a testimoniall vnder their handes or vnder some authenticall seale to certifie the Kings officer of the execution of his writt and that the Patron also should present the same person to the Kings officer humbly praying the same officer by authoritie to be derived from the King to cause him by some other writt to bee confirmed and really inducted into the possession of the same Church and into the mansion-house glebe-land and other profites Ecclesiasticall to the same apperteyning Oh! but this were a strange kinde of innovation and a dangerous attempt to To execute the premises no daungerous attēpt alter lawes setled especiallie in a setled estate of the Church Well well let my Lordes of the Clergie sing this song and pipe this melodie at their pleasure How be it for asmuch as this platforme in some parte thereof hath alreadie bene agreed vpon by divers Committees in Parleament in other some part thereof by lawes alreadie setled ought to haue bin practised and that in other some part thereof is an advancement of the Kings authoritie which last part also is lively pourtraicted out vnto vs by presidents from the Archbishop and Bishop them selues we shall through the grace of God and favour of the King be able well inough quite and cleane to wipe away all the spots of this calumniation And first touching the intimation and supplication to be made vnto the King Petition and intimatiō to the King agreable to laws setled that his H. would be pleased to cōmand every Minister to be presented by the patrone ordeyned by the Bb. Ministers and elected by the people and that the King being certified by them of the execution of his writt should vpon their testimoniall by another publike writt cause the Clerke ordeyned to be confirmed admitted and inducted to the real possession of the temporalities of the benefice This manner I say of intimation petition testimoniall admittance in substance and effect differeth but little from the forme of the petition nomination 25. H. 8. c. election investiture confirmation and consecration of the Arch-Bb and Bb. of this Realme For when soever the Church of Canterburie Winton or other Bishoppes sea becommeth destitute of a Pastor doth not the Deane and Chapiter of the same sea intimate vnto the King their want of a B. doth not the same Dean and Chapiter humbly supplicate his Maiesties favour and licence to elect an other And doth not the King vpon their supplicatiō by letters patents vnder his great Seale favourably grant their petition willing them vt talem eligant in Episcopum Pastorem qui Deo devotus Ecclesiae suae necessarius nobisque regno nostro vtilis fidelis existat And with the same letters patentes doth not the King sende a letter missiue conteyning the name and commendation of the person to bee elected After the election finished doth not the Deane and Chapiter intimat the same also vnto the King and humbly agayne pray the King to yeeld his Royall assent to the lord elected Wherevppon doth not the King againe direct his letters patentes of warrant to the Archb. or some other whō the King shall appoint to performe all things whiche accustomably are to bee done apperteyning to his confirmation and consecration according to the lawes and statutes of his Realme of England Lastly the consecration and cōfirmation being finished and the Bb. hauing done his homage sworne fealtie is not the Kings writt out of the Chancery directed to the Escheator to restore vnto him the temporalities of the same Bishopricke Yea and may not the Bishoppe also if it please him procure another writt out of the Chancery directed to his tenantes commaunding them to atturne and to take him for their Lord Now thē in this platform wherof mentiō hath bin made touching the placing of a parochiall Pastour any parochiall church with cure of soules being voyd when it is craved that the people of the same parish might intimate their want vnto the Kings officer and that the same officer might command the Patron to present the Ministers to ordeyn and the people according to the Kings lawes to assent vnto and approve the Clerk what other intent or meaning haue wee then that the King hath as ample and as lawfull The Kinge hath as large a power to command a Minister to be elected ordeined as a Bishop to be chosen consecrated a power to
then what force is my Lo. of Ca. iudgement who supposeth it vnlawfull for the Church to excommunicate a Prince to bee against him selfe for in the 137. page he telleth vs that happely it may be a fault yea a great fault that is found with the Bishops in these dayes that they doe not excommunicate the Prince and Rulers and so constraine them to doe that which by perswasion they will not doe If then excommunication bee so terrible to Princes and Rulers howe should it bee of so light accompt with subiects And if it bee so powerfull as it can constraine Princes and Rulers to do their duties how much more fearefull would it be to compell inferiours and men of low estate to liue soberly in their vocations I will not here debate the matter touching the excommunication of Princes Rulers much lesse touching the excommunication of the Prince and Rulers of our lande But I would gladly bee informed what they were or who they be that found great fault with the Bishoppes in these dayes for not endeavouring to excoÌ„municate the Prince and Governours The Papists they thinke it sufficient that the Prince and Governours be excommunicated by the Pope his Clergie The Ministers and people professing the Gospell and seeking for reformation of excommunication deny the Bishops to haue any divine power granted by the word of God to excommunicate a private man much lesse doe they thinke it lawful for them to excommunicate the Prince and Rulers Who then I say find fault with the Bishoppes that they doe not excommunicate the Prince and Governours and so constraine them to doe that which by perswasion they will not do For my part I caÌ„ not guesse whom he should meane vnlesse he ment to giue vs to vnderstand that some Prelatists haue consulted about the excommunicating both Prince Governors for not making sharper lawes against such as whom the Prelates and their favourits haue falsly slaundered to be pestilent fellowes movers of sedition enemies to Caesar troublers and subverters Act. 24 5. Act 1. 16. 20. 17. 6. of the state puritanes and I whot nâ—t what chiefe mainteyners of the sect of the disciplinarians vnlesse I say hee should minde some such Prelatists I can not guesse any subiects within the land to be so vndutifull as to find fault with the Bishops for not attempting to bring our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene deceased to theit excoÌ„munication And therefore to enforme the people of an Author and not to bring him foorth it argueth breadeth great suspicion that the enformer was the author himselfe Touching the loosenesse of some or of all in these dayes that are without the ExcommunicatioÌ„ toucheth them only which make professâ—on to be of the church Church if hee intend that they require discipline of sharper lawes by punishment of body and losse of goodes then excommunication and that they will more feare that maner of punishment I hold and affirme therein as he holdeth and affirmeth and yet I say that to the matter in question he hath fitted no other answer then as if he had answered a poke full of plummes or a buchet ful of peares for the controversie is not concerning those that are without but concerning those that are within not touching those that are not of the house-hold but touching them that are of the house-hold of faith and of God As for the first sort of which people the reverend Bishoppes with good leaue may procure what sharpe punishment they can devise for by the Church excommunicated they should never bee For how should any be thrust from the communion of the Church who neuer were in communion with the Church But it is to be feared that this sharpnes of punishment is not vrged so much to be inflicted vpon them that are without as vpon them that are within the bosome of the Church For though such as be without did a long time scorne sett naught by the sworde of excommunication whiche was not onely drawne out by the Chauncelours Commissaries and Officialls for every crust of bread and for every piece of bacon but also which was agayne put vpp for everie cracked grote and for everie Irish harper the reverend Bb. whose freehold by such coÌ„tempt was not touched were pacified and contented them selues well ynough by inflicting and releasing that manner of punishment but now for so much as they perceyue the children within the church to beginne seriously and religiouslie to stande against the vse of Lordlie and humane censures for the Crown Scepter of our Savior Christ and that the statelines of Prelacie must be taken one hole lower if the simplicitie of the holy ministerie bee exalted a degree higher they pretend Discipline by excoÌ„munication which is the sword of the sonne and heire of God to be too bluntlie pointed and too badlie edged to foyne or to strike withall Touching that very good manner of Discipline by the Ecclesiasticall commission which he saith hath done and doth daylie much good and would doe more if it were more common the people whom hee admonisheth haue iust cause of being desirous to vnderstande what manner of Discipline it is whiche Not one manner of Discipline vsâ—d by the ecclesiasticall coÌ„missioners is so highlie commended For all men know that the ecclesiastical commissioners vse not in all places and at all times one and the selfe same manner of Discipline For the same Commissioners for the same kinde of offences sometimes suspend sometimes depriue sometimes degrade sometimes excommunicate sometimes fine sometimes imprison sometimes commaund this penance sometimes that Nay sometimes having convented before them graue learned and godly Ministers for crimes supposed This Discipline was practised against maister Cartwhright Fenner Whight L. 〈◊〉 and others to be Ecclesiasticall for the same pretensed Ecclesiastical offences having deteyned them some yeares in durance for refusall of the oath ex officio in the end not having any other supposed iust cause of inflicting any punishment vpoÌ„ them by ecclesiasticall authoritie haue bin forced for a shewe to mainteyne their owne credites to cause accusations to be framed against theÌ„ by the Quenes Attourney in the high Court of Star-chamber as against violators of the dignities of the Royall Crowne whose innocencies by the verie witnesses produced by their meanes on the behalfe of the Queene haue notwithstanding bin fullie cleared from the faultes obiected and the Ministers discharged without any ordinarie punishment vsually infflicted by that Court vppon malefactours Nay further when the Ecclesiasticall Ecclesiastic discipline vsed by the high Commissioners against Ma. Vdall Commissioners had committed Maister Vdall to prison where hee remayned halfe a yeare for refusall of the oath ex officio touchinge his knowledge of the Author of a booke entituled The Demonstration in the end he was deliuered over as a fellon for makinge of the same booke and for the which hee was arayned and convicted and so died in prison
should we think Prelacie to be but eyther Oligarchie or Tyrannie For neither Monarchie may it be neyther Pollicie Prelacie either Oligarchie or tyrannie or polliticall estate can it be and other kinde of government besides these there is not anie For my part I more charitably iudge of the government of the Church by Prelacie then to match it with Tyrannie And although the Admonitor and the Pervsers and allowers of his booke were men in their generation wise yet had they well weighed the nature of the goverment of Oligarchie they would rather in this argumēt haue bin silent then vpon disclayme of Democracie and Aristocracie goverments both of them commendable in their kinde haue cast the commendation of their owne goverment of the Church by Prelacie to so desperat an estate as is the estate of Oligarchie Wherein if any doe glorie because not many of the best but some fewe of the wealthiest and richest sort doe governe then lett him hearken and cōsider what long since was preached before Pope Vrban the fifte by Act. Mo. one Nicolas Orem a man singularly commended for learning in his time Nicholas Orem his opinion of Oligarchie Amongst all the regiments of the Gentiles none saith he is more to be found wherein is to bee seene so great and exceeding ods thē in the policie of Priests Amongst whom one is drunken another is sterved amongst whom some be so high that they exceed all Nobles Princes of the Earth some againe be so abased that they are vnder all rascalls and such a common weath saith hee may well bee called Oligarchie But Thomas Aquinas he seemeth to set the discommodities of Oligarchie a pinne Thomas Aquinas what hee thinketh of Oligarchie higher for saith hee as a Kingdome hath in it the commodities of all other good regiments of Aristocracie that the Noblest and chiefest persons among Aristocracie a good regiment the people be taken to Councell of Policie or politicall estate where an assemblie of all estates is had whē the very best of all sorts are chosen to consult and deliberate of the publique weale so doeth Tyrannie conteine and hath in it all incommodities and vices of all naughtie corrupt regiments of Oligarchie it borroweth that the most wicked Oligarchie a corrupt regiment corruptest men be Counsaylors that as it were a route of Tyrants doe govverne The reasons and pillers of which Oligarchie are immoderatnes excessivenes disparitie and inequalitie passing and beyond all meane and measure Now if our reverend Bb. shall shew them selues to bee mal-contented with mee as though out of the opinions of these learned men I would gather that the governement of the Church by Prelacie is one of the corruptest governements I am to desire them to haue patience vntill they shall plainly demonstrate vnto vs that the same is not Oligarchie For if hereafter they shall revoke their former disgraceful iudgmēts against the discipline by Pastors and Elders conteyning in it the very nature of true Aristocracie and withall instruct vs better of the true nature of their own governement of the Church by Prelacie they shall finde vs plyable to their opinion so that it be grounded vpon the principles and reasons of trueth In the meane season after the fashion of the Admonitors maner of admonishing the people wee most humbly beseech the King and Parleament to bee enformed that it is greatly to be feared if Prelacie be Oligarchie that the Prelates will endevour It is to bee feared least by the exāple of Prelates Oligarchie bee brought in the common weale to transferre that maner of goverment frō the Church vnto the common weale And that the cōmon weale shall as miserably be rent torne with factions vproares as now the church is disquieted by schismes and divisions For if only a few of the richest and welthiest sort shal get an head and beare all the sway in the cōmon weale they shall thinke by the principles and reasons of Oligarchie that they haue iniury if they haue not as much to do in civil matters as the Prelats haue to doe in the matters of the Church And what hereof may follow as the Admonitor leaveth so doe I also leaue it to the iudgement of other Onelie if the way hereof alreadie hath bin troden out vnto them by some who A caueat against Oligarchie haue not written nor spoken but yet practised the principles and reasons of Oligarchie in the common weale onelie then this I say and adde as a caveat that the daunger to come is more heedefully to be prevēted For like as in good harmonie to make the Musike perfaict is required a moderate proportionate inequalitie of voyces which if it too much exceed taketh away all the sweet melodie so by too much immoderate inequalitie or disparitie of Citizens the common weale falleth to ruine But why may not the governement of the The gouerment of the Church by Prelacie is not Monarchicall Church by Prelacie be a Princely and a Royall governement In deed this question if it should be resolued by the rules and principles of the canon law I could hardly disproue that government to be Princelike for as hath bin saide before quilibet Ordinarius in sua Diocoesi est maior quolibet Principe Yea and every Bishop by the same lawe hath as absolute a spirituall power within his Diocesse as a Kinge hath a temporall power within his Kingdome But because that law with the rules principles thereof is or ought to be discarded out of this Kingdome we will not wade in it Only we say that the governement of the Church by Prelacie cannot bee any kinde of Royall and Monarchicall governement because Prelates haue not like power spirituall as Kings and Monarches haue power rēporall For there was never yet lex regia de Prelatorum spirituali imperio lata qua Prelatis Institut de iure natur gent ci § Sed quod in eos omne imperium suum potestatem aut Deus aut populus Dei contulerit And therfore where the people haue made the fore said regall law as there it is iustly said quodcunque Imperator per epistolam constituit vel cognoscens decreuit vel edicto praecepit legem esse constat and quod Principi placuit legis habet vigorem So likewise where there is no such regall law made in the church there it is as iustly affirmed quod Prelato placuit legis non habei vigorem quodcunque Prelatus per epistolam constituit cognoscens decrevit vel canone praecepit legem non esse constat And then how can every Prelate or why doth everie Prelate by his sole authoritie inioyne canons articles iniunctions and orders to be observed as lawes in all the Churches of his iurisdiction If the Admonitor supposed the governement If the gouvernment of the Church by Prelacie bee Monarchicall thē may the government by Pastors be
so to of the Church by Prelacie to be Monarchicall because the Queene was a Monarch and that the reverend Bishop governed vnder a Monarch then what did hee els but put a weapon into the handes of Pastors and Elders to prove their governement also to be Princelie and Monarchicall Because Pastors Elders desire not to haue that maner of governement to bee brought into the Church otherwise then by the Royall assent Souveraigne authoritie and expresse commandement of our most gratious King and Monarch Besids if any governement may be therefore saide to be a Monarchie because the same is derived from an earthly Monarch howe much more then may the governement of the Churches by Pastors and Elders be adiudged Monarchical by reason the same is deduced from our heavenly and everlasting Monarch For the reverend Bb. by their publike preachings apologeticall Ma. Horne Bishoppe of Winch. Ma. Iewell Bishop of Sali Mai. Bilson Bishoppe of Winch. writings testifie that power authoritie to ordeine and depose Ministers to excommunicate and to absolue to devise and to establishe rites and ceremonies in the church to define what is trueth to pronounce what is falsehood to determine what is schisme and to cōdemne what is heresie our reverend Bb. I say confesse this power to bee originallie decided vnto the true Bishoppes and Pastours of the Church from the Kinglie and Soveraine power of our Saviour Christ By what name therefore soever the gouvernment of Pastours and Elders in the Churches be called there is no manner of cause to dislike of the planting of that government in a Monarchie because the same is instituted by the Monarch of Monarches who is able and readie to vphold the state of al Monarchies in common weales togither with the state of Aristocracie in his No cause for a Monarch to feare that his Christian subiectes should haue the sence of Aristocracie in Church goverment Church Neither is there any cause for anie Monarch in the world to feare the making of christian commō people by familiar experience to haue the sence feeling of the principles and reasons of Aristocracie For if a people haue once submitted their necks to the yoke of Christ they can liue a peaceable godly life vnder all kinds of powers because they knowe all kind of powers to be the ordenance of God But especially there is not neyther euer was neyther euer can there be any cause for any King or Monarch of England greatly as the Admonitor insinuateth to feare that the common people will very easely transferre the principles and reasons of Aristocracie to the gouerment of the common weale and therevpon bee induced to thinke that they haue iniurie if they haue not as much to doe in civill matters as they haue in matters of the Church seeing they also touch their commoditie and benefit temporallie as the other doeth spirituallie And certes it seemeth that the Admonitor was drawen very drie of reason whē he was fayne to plucke this stake from the hedge to make a fire and to kindle the wrath of the Magistrate against the forme of discipline by Pastors and Elders For whether hee intendeth that the Pastors and Elders will thinke them selues to haue iniurie if they deale not in all causes of the commō weale as well as in all causes of their churches or whether he ment that the common people will easely transferre the government of the common weale from a Kingly Monarchie to a noble Aristocracie there is neither soothnes nor soundnes in his meaning For sithence Pastors disclaime to deale in civil matters the learned Ministers against the reuerend Bishopps by the holy rules of our faith mainteyne that it is not lawful for a Minister of the Gospell to exercise civill magistracy and that it is not lawfull for the man of God to bee intangled with the affaires of this life how is it probable that those Ministers will easely oppugne their owne knowledge by their owne cōtrary practise Or how is it probable that they would over-loade them selues with that burthen to ease the Church wherof they haue contentedly exposed thē selues into a number of reproches contempts bytings persecutions As for that other intendement of the Admonitors that it is greatlie to be feared that the commō people will easely transferre Monarchie vnto Democracie or Aristocracie if the principles and reason thereof by experience were made familiar in their minds this reason I say might seeme to carrie some shewe of affrighting a Monarch if the same were insinuated vnto a king whose people were neuer acquainted with the principles reasons of Democracie or Aristocracie but this feare being insinuated vnto our late Souveraigne Ladie the Queene whose people euer since the time they first begā to be a people haue had their witts long exercised with the The people of England haue their wits exercised with the sence of Democracie Aristocrarie sence and feeling of the reasons principles aswell of Democracie as also of Aristocracie what sence had the Admonitor to vrge this feare That in the Kingdome of Englande the common people haue alreadie the sence and feeling of the reasons principles of Democracie cannot be denied For in euerie cause almost aswell of criminall as ciuill iustice some few only excepted to be executed in the common weale by the common lawes of the Realm haue they not some hand and dealing in the same by one meanes or other Nay which is more haue they not the sence and feeling of the making and vnmaking their owne lawes in Parleament And is not their consultation in Parleament a mere Democraticall consultation As much also there is to bee avowed for the sence and feeling of the reasons and principles of Aristocracie to be alreadie in the minds of the Peres the Nobles the Iudges and other great men of the Realme For are not the Wisest the Noblest the Chiefest taken out of these by the King to bee of his Counsell and to be Iudges and Iusticers in his Courts Yea and is not their assembly also in Parleament a mere Aristocraticall assembly And what translation then is there greatly to be feared out of the Church to bee made into the common weale when the minds of all sorts of our common wealthes-men be already seasoned with the things which hee feareth And when the common weale is alreadie seysed of the principles and reasons which he would not haue familiarly known vnto it Wherefore that the King the Nobles and cōmons may no more be scarred with the strangenes of these vncouth and vnknowne greeke names of Democracie and Aristocracie writtē in his booke with great and capitall letters I haue thought it my duty by these presents to informe them that the govermēt of the church by Pastors and Elders nowe wanting amongst vs and desired to bee brought into the Church by the Souveraine authority of our King Nobles and commons in Parleament for the outward form
manner thereof is none other manner of gouerment nor forme of The maner of policie by Pastors and Elders in the Church is agreeable to the government in the cōmō weale pollicie thē such as they and their progenitors and Ancestors for many hundred yeares togither without interruption haue vsed and enioyed in the common weale And that therefore it will be a very easy matter to transferre the same to the gouerment of the Church For by the reasons and principles of their own gouerment in the common weale and by the sence feeling thereof they may wel be induced to thinke that they haue iniurie if they haue not as much to doe in matters of the Church as they haue to doe in matters of the common weale seeing they touch their commoditie and benefitt spiritually as the other doeth temporally And withall on the other side I shall doe my best indeavour to aduertise them that the gouernement of the Church by Prelacie is such a maner of gouernment as was neuer yet The government of the Church by Prelacie disagreeable to the government vsed in the common weale in the administration of iustice by any subiect no not touching the outward forme thereof once admitted into any part of common weale and that therefore the same if it may please the King will very easely bee sent and transmarined vnto Rome frō whence it first came where it had it originall and birth-right And to the end that we may clearelie discerne whether the nature of the gouerment of the Church by Prelacie or the nature of the gouerment desired to be planted by Pastors and Elders be more agreable to the nature of the pollicie receaued and vsed both by the Nobles and common people in the common weale it is necessarie that the manners and formes both of Prelaticall Pastorall gouernment be made familiar vnto the minde of the Reader And because wee haue alreadie declared the manner of the election and confirmation both of a Bishopp into his Episcopall Sea of a Minister into his Pastorall charge what the one is by the lawe alreadie established and what the other by a law desired to be established ought to be wee will not any more speake of their entrāce into eyther of their places vnles only a litle to recreate the Reader we merely note what answere some Bb. haue made when as long chasing after Bishopricks they haue chafed in their minds for feare of loosing their pray as was the answere of that Italian Bishopp The answer of an Italian Bishop loth to loose his Bishopricke who beeing thrise demaunded of the Archb. as the manner is vis Episcopari vis Episcopari vis Episcopari and being willed by one standing by thrise againe to aunswere as the maner is nolo nolo nolo He making no bones at the matter aunswered aloude with an oath Proh Deum dedine ego tot milia Florenorum pro volo Episcopari iam debeo dicere nolo or as was the answere of that English Bishop who having promised a Courtier one annuitie of xx pound during The answer of an English Bishop having obteyned his congedelier his life out of his Bishopricke if he could procure the speedie sealing of his congedelier within a while after whē it was sealed he rapt out an oath sware by Iesus God that the same Gentleman had done more for him then an other great Courtier who before hande for that purpose had receyued frō him one thousand markes But whether all Bishoppes buye their congedeliers dearer or better cheape is not a matter incident to this treatise onlie if they buie deare they may happelie think with them selues that they may sell deere vendere iure potest emerat ille prius setteth not anie price vpon any wares in the Royall exchange But to returne to our purpose whence by occasion of those Bishoplie oathes and answeres wee haue a little digressed let vs see what is the maner The maner of the administration of spiritual iustice in the Church by Prelacie and forme of the administration of spirituall iustice in the gouernment of the Church by Prelacie as the same is ordinarilie administred in all places throughout the Church of Englande Wherein that we be not mistaken it is to be vnderstood that the maner of administratiō of iustice wherof we speak is that administration of iustice onlie whiche respecteth the punishment of crimes eccllesiasticall to be inflicted by spirituall censures In all which cases penances suspension and excommunications in the Bishops consistorie proceed from the iudgement and authoritie of the Bishoppe alone if he bee present or from the sentence and power of his Vicar generall or Cōmissarie alone if he be absent Nay doth not everi such censure likewise in the Archdeacons consistorie proceede from the sole authoritie of the Archdeacon or if he bee absent from the sole authoritie of his officiall But if the like course of the execution of Iustice as this is can not be found to be an ordinarie course of Iustice in the common weale where Iustice is administred in criminall causes by the ministerie of a subiect I would faine learne what preiudice may be feared to redound vnto the cōmon weale if the administration of spirituall Iustice after a sort were established to be after the same manner in the Church after which civill Iustice is alreadie practised in the common weale I said after a sort to this end least I should bee mistaken For the meaning is not that spirituall Iustice should bee ministred exactly in No one subiect in the cōmon weale can alone exercise civill iustice in causes criminall every respect after the maner of civill Iustice but the comparison standeth onlie in this that as not any one temporall subiect alone hath authoritie to heare to examine and to iudge any one criminall cause in any Court of civill iustice in the common weale so likewise that not any one spirituall person alone should haue authoritie to be examiner and iudge of any one criminall cause in any Court of spirituall Iustice in the Church For if certain principall The administration of spiritual Iustice by Pastors Elders agreeable to the execution of civill iustice in the common weale godly persons associated vnto a learned and zealous Pastor in the presence and with the consent and authoritie of the people of every Parish did enioyne penance suspend or excommunicate a spirituall offendor were not this forme of administration of spirituall iustice more consonant agreeable and conformable to the daily executiō of civill Iustice in the Courts of the cōmon weale then is the administration of spirituall Iustice by the Bishopp alone or by his Vicar general alone in his Consistorie and to make this matter more familiar in the mind of the Reader for an instāce or two let vs suppose that Mai. Doctor Bancroft were still Parson of S. Andros Maister D. Bancroft with his assistāts letter able to
venerabilis viri domini Archidiaconi Surr. omnibus singulis rectoribus c. salutem Cùm nos rite legitime procedentes omnes singulos quorum nomina c. in noÌ„ comparendo coram nobis c. seu saltem in non satisfaciendo mandatis nostris c. pronunciaverimus contumaces ipsosque c. excommunicandos fore decreverimus Cumque discretus vir magister Roul Allen presbyter eosdeÌ„ omnes singulos subscriptos ex officio nostro excommunicaverit in scriptis iusticia id exigente vobis igitur committimus c. quatenus eos omnes c. sicut prefertur ex officio nostro mero excoÌ„municatos fuisse esse c. palam denuncietis c. Datum sub sigillo officialitatis nostrae 19. die Decembris Anno Domini 1587. John Hone Doctor of the Lawes Officiall of the venerable man the Archdeacon of Surr. to all and singular persons c. greeting Whereas we otherwise rightlie and lawfully proceeding all and singular whose naâ—â—s are vnderwritten in not appearing before vs or at least-wise in not satisfying our mandates haue pronounced contumacious and decreed them to be excoÌ„municated And whereas also the discrete man M. Rouland Allen presbyter out of our office hath excoÌ„municated all and singuler vnder written iustice so requiringe wherefore wee charge you that openlie you denounce and declare them everie of them so as aforesayd out of our office to be excoÌ„municated Giuen vnder the seale of our officialitie The 19. day of December 1587. By this practise it doth appeare that Doctor Hone and Rouland Allen canvased manie poore men verie piteouslie And that this poore curate Rouland Allen had a warme seruice to attend vpon Doctor Hone and to ierk those whose points soeuer hee should vntie But because this precept was an article concluded vpon by the reuerend Bishopps in their convocation and confirmed as I suppose by the Royall authoritie of our late Queene wee will forbeare to speake what we thinke might iustlie be spoken against the incoÌ„gruitie therof Onely this without offence to the reuerend Bishoppes wee may safely demaund sithence everie ordinarie whether he be a Bishopp or a presbyter by this article of their owne devise hath such an absolute power resiant in his person as that thereby thoroughout his whole iurisdiction he may thus coÌ„mit the execution of discipline by excommunication partlie to one laie person and partlie to one ecclesiastical person partly to a supposed spiritual Elder and partlie to a lay Elder sithence I say this is so we may safelie demande what reason they can produce to hinder the King from having authoritie to coÌ„mande three or foâ—re or if occasion The Kinge hathas good right to coÌ„mand excoÌ„munication to bee exercised by a Pastor and Elders as the Bb. haue to commit the same to a Curate and one lay Elder serue fiue or six lay Elders as they call them and one spirituall Pastor being a true spirituall Elder in deede all lawfullie chosen ecclesiasticall Officers in the house of God that they ioyntly should not execute the discipline of Christ viz. excommunication and other censures of the church in every Parish within his Kingdome If it bee aunswered that in this case the Presbyter alone doth excoÌ„municate is it not as if one should say that the executioner doth giue iudgmeÌ„t when at the coÌ„mandment of the Iudge he smiteth of the head or casteth downe the ladder or may not as much be said for the excommunication whereof wee speake that the Pastor onlie should excommunicate when by vertue of his office with the consent and not by the prescript of the Elders associated vnto him he should declare and pronounce the partie to be excommunicated But let it bee graunted that Rouland Allen denounceth the lesson which is writteÌ„ in the paper for him to read yet is it cleare by the precept that the same must bee done by the prescript of Doctor Hone. Besides Doctor Hone he citeth he precognizateth the parties and they being absent he pronounceth them contumaciter absentes and in paenam contumaciarum suarum huiusmodi decreeth them to be excoÌ„municate and are not al these necessarie partes incident to the execution of discipline by excommunication And how then can the Minister be saide to excommunicate alone when Doctor Hone of necessitie must play three parts of the foure without all or without any one of which parts the excommunication by reason of a nullitie is merelie voide Againe the acte being done as it were vno puncto at vno halitu and Rouland Allen and Doctor Hone having their commission from the Archdeacon in solidum how can their iudgement be devided Furthermore to say that Rouland Allen doth excommunicate by the authoritie of Doct. Hone were to overthrowe the intendement of the article Because by the scope of the article it is plaine that the Presbyter to be associated to the officiall must onlie derive his authoritie from one who hath taken ecclesiasticall orders But those orders Doctour Hone never tooke otherwise Rouland Allens presence had bene vnnecessarie and superfluous And therefore if the excommunication be of any validitie theÌ„ is discipline by excommunication in the Church of England exercised partlie by one laie Elder as they call him and partly by one Ecclesiasticall Elder wherein againe it is worthy the observation for the matter we haue in hand that Doctor Hone a mere laie temporall man hath authoritie from the Archdeacon to call and associate vnto him to prescribe Roul Allen a Presbiter an other mans hireling Curate in Southwark to excoÌ„municate not only the Parochians of an other Pastors charge but also any other Pastor whatsoever subiect to the Archdeacons iurisdiction And hath not the Kings Highnesse then as good right as great a priviledge and as high a prerogative to command Maister Doctor Andros or Maister Doctor King and lay Elders by a lawfull election to be associated vnto either of them to excommunicate either of their owne Parishioners for publike drunkennes or other notorious sinnes committed in their owne Parish For if it bee lawfull at the voice of a lay stranger that an hireling and stipendary Curate should chase an other mans sheepe out of his owne folde how much more is it lawful that a true sheepherde should disciplinate his own sheepe feeding and couchant within his owne pasture and within his owne fold Furthermore touching the admittance of governing Elders or lay Elders as they call them vnto the Minister of everie congregation according to the former patterne of one lay Elder that the same is not a matter so strange for lay men to bee ioyned in this charge of ecclesiasticall government as the opposites Lay men appointed by the Queenes iniuuctions to execute some part of discipline beare vs in hande to be it shall not be amisse to cal vnto their remeÌ„brances one of our late Soveraigne the Queenes iniuctions wherby certeyne lay persons called overseers were commanded to be chosen by
together with their functions are arbitrable ceremonious rituall traditionall or circumstanciall yea and removeable at the pleasure of the King and State Neither doth this disagree from that A Bishopp Pastor and Elder and our Lorde B. diffu which was erst sayd of a Bb. or Pastor that they be all one in respect of their function For it is not sayd that an humane Bishop and Pastor but that a Bb. and Pastor are all one For a Bb. simplie so called is not a Bishopp and Pastor in respect of his fellowe brethren but only in regard of his flocke which he ouerseeth feedeth and ruleth But a humane what a lord Bishopp is Bishopp is hee that is promoted vnto this dignitie by man and who by mans authoritie taketh vpon him superoritie preheminence ouer them which are equall vnto him touching their function that intangleth himselfe with civill gouernment and wordlie affaires and whose Bishopplie office consisteth not so much in the dispensation of Gods worde and Sacraments as in Lordlie Bishoplie apparell Crossing with the signe of the crosse confirmation of children sole imposition of hands sole excommunication sole enioyning of articles vpō the people and Clergie of his Diocesse consecration of oratories delegation of his episcopall authoritie to his Suffragane Vicar generall and principall officiall and other such humane and Bishopplie functions All which are after the customes preceptes and traditions of men And albeit D. O. by vertue of the Queenes congedelier were chosen by the Deane and Chapter of Lichfield in episcopum Pastorem ecclesiae Lichfieldensis yet is hee never intituled The Lorde Bishoppe of Lichfield is neuer honored with the title of being Lorde Pastor with the dignitie of being the Lord Pastor but onely with the honor of being the Lord Bishop of Lichfield so that one and the self same person being a Bishop and a Pastor may be a Lord Bishop over Pastours but not a Pastor over Pastors Wherevpon it followeth that the Pastorall Pastoral authoritie of a Lord Bb of other Pastours is equall authoritie which hee hath in common with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse is of no superioritie or proheminence aboue theirs and that touching the function both of his and their Pastorall cure charge there is a paritie betwene him and them by reason whereof he can haue no power over them because par in parem non habet imperium But why is it that he can not be called Pastor Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Pastor of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield and yet may be called Dominus Episcopus Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Bishoppe of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield Why but only for that there is custome tradition and the lawe of man for his episcopall iurisdiction and for that his pastorall function if hee haue any belongeth vnto him in common with his brethren the other Pastors iure divino The Bishoppe then having these two severall Whether a lord Bishop minister the doctrine sacrament and discipline of Christ by vertue of his lordlie episcopal or pastorall office and distinct offices imposed vpon his person the one by divine the other by humane lawe the one humane and episcopall the other without pompe pastorall there ariseth from thence this question by which of those two functions hee may lawfullie I meane according to Gods lawe minister the Doctrine Sacramēts censures of Christ If it be aunswered that it is lawfull for him by vertue of his Pastorall office to minister the doctrine and Sacramentes and by force of his humane Episcopall office to minister the censures of Christ then is not the answere fitted to the question the same being made â bene coniunctis ad male divisa For the censures of Christ as well as the doctrine of Christ being simplie of divine ordināce it must followe if his episcopall power be only of humane right pastoral power only of divine institution that the censures may be ministred by authoritie derived only from mā but the doctrine and sacraments by power derived onlie from God Which commixion of divine and humane right in the execution of the ordinances of God can no maner of wayes be sound pure and sincere and therefore also can not be pleasing vnto God For no more can the censures of Christ to the pleasure of God bee lawfullie administred by the authoritie of any one whose function is of man and not of God then could the sacrifice of God be offered by one who was a priest of man and not of God Now that humane episcopalitie or Bishoppisme in the Church of England is authorized and deduced from the power and law of Lordlie episcopalitie authorized onlie by the lawe of the Realme man viz. of the King Realme alone is evident as well by the donation endowment of the auncient Bishoprickes founded by the Kingly prerogatives of the Kings of this Realme as by the erection and establishment of the new Bishoprickes of Chester Gloucester Bristoll Peterborough and Oxford with their cathedrall Churches Seas Cities meeres and boundes of those humane Bishoppes for the exercise of their episcopall administration according to an act of Parleamēt authorizing the Kings Highnes to make Bishoppes by his letters patentes Nay further that humane episcopall iurisdiction within the meres Note that King Henry the eight by letters patents made Bb. therefore c. and boundes of every Diocesse within England is merelie of humane and not of divine iustitution appeareth by that power and authoritie which the Kinge hath in translating dissolving of Bishoprickes in conserving episcopall iurisdiction 31. H. 〈◊〉 c. 9 sometimes to such persons as be no Bishopps as did William the Cōquerour when he gaue Episcopall power to the Abbot of Battayle and lastlie by the verie maner and forme of the nomination licēce of election authoritie of investiture confirmation and consecration of Archbishoppes and Bishops established by the more positive lawe of the Realme But if it be aunswered that 25. H. 8. c. 20. the Bishoppe by his humane episcopall power doth minister the doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ then is the case worse with him then it was before because then not onlie the Discipline of Christ but also the doctrine Sacramentes of Christ should be ministred by that authoritie whiche is of humane institution Besides the answer should be vntrue because the Bishoppe at the time of his cōsecration doth not receyue anie authoritie to preache the worde and minister the Sacraments for that authoritie was then commited vnto him when first he was ordeyned to be a presbyter But the authorite which he receyueth at the time of his consecration is to correct and punish such as bee vnquiet disobedient and criminous within his Diocesse Whereby once againe is that confirmed which was erst said viz. That episcopall power in Englande is not of divine but of humane institution Especiallie for that
Archbishop of Canterburie cā haue over nine thirtie or fortie thē me thinketh it a matter very reasonablie of them to bee confessed that all true Pastors whether they bee great Pastors or litle Pastors may lawfullie exercise all maner of such true power spirituall as vnto true spirituall Pastors by the holie scriptures doeth apperteyne For if Bishops being great Pastours may therefore preach minister the Sacraments because they be as they say true Pastors thē also may litle Pastors therfore excommunicate because they bee as the scripture saith true Bishoppes Wherefore if the L. Bishopp of London by vertue of his Pastorall office as hee thinketh which with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse he hath in commō deriveth vnto him immediatlie from the word of God may lawfullie excōmunicate then the pastorall office which Maister Doctor Androes hath ouer the people of his Parish of St. Gyles without Creeplegate and the pastorall function which Maister Doctor Whyte hath ouer the people of St. Dunstones within Temple-barre beeing as absolutelie as immediatlie deduced vnto them out of the same word what profe can be made out of the worde that the Bishoppe being not Lord Pastour of the Pastours of his Diocesse may lawfullie by the worde excommunicate all maner of offendors both Pastors and people within his Diocesse and yet neuertheles that neither Maister Doctor Androes nor Maister Doctor Whyte by the same worde may excommunicate any one of their Parishioners at all Nay further what reason can there be afforded from the law of God that Maister D. Abbot Deane of Winchester that Ma. Browne Maister Barlowe and diuers other prebendaries in the church of Winchester hauing certeyne parochiall and pastorall churches annexed to his and their Deanrie and Prebendes and Maister D. Grey in his parish by their pastorall functions should haue absolute authoritie vnlesse it bee during the time of the L. Bishoppes trienniall visitation to exercise the discipline of Christ within their seuerall and peculier churches and yet notwithstanding that neyther Maister Richman nor Mai. Burden being both of them graue godlie learned Pastors should haue at any time anie pastorall authoritie to exercise any censure at all And as it is in the church of Winchester so is it in the church of Paules in the church of Salisburie in well nigh all if not in all the Cathedrall Collegiall Churches thoroughout the Realme The Deane Prebendaries and Canons hauing certayne parochiall Churches exempted from the Bishopp within their exempt and peculier iurisdictions by mere Pastorall authoritie for episcopal authoritie by the lawes of the Church haue they none may exercise all maner of spirituall censures and that aswell by their substitutes as by them selues Nay which is more in Cheshire Lancashire Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. vse some part of episcopall power Yorkeshire Richmondshire and other Northeren parts there be manie whole Deanries exempted from the Bishopps iurisdiction wherein the Deanes and their substitutes haue not onlie the probate of Wills and graunting of administrations but also the cognisance of ecclesiasticall crimes with power to vse the ecclesiasticall censures Yea and this authoritie of the executiō of ecclesiasticall censures haue those Deanes either long since by some papall priviledges Episcopall power to excōmunicate graunted by papall priuiledges or prescribed vse obteyned or els by long vse prescribed against the Bishopps Whereby againe it is clerelie convinced that Episcopall excommunication vsed in the Church of England is not of divine institution but onlie by humane tradition For were it of diuine right then could the same Power to excommunicate if it be of diuine right may not be prescribed no more bee prescribed or by papall immunitie be possessed thē could these Deanes prescribe power or bee enfranchised to preach the word or to administer the Sacramentes These things haue we thus at large more fullie intreated of to the end that the Kings Highnes and his Parleament and all sortes of people might well vnderstand howe it is not altogether an vnvsual and vnaccustomed thing in the Church of England that private inferiour ministers as they call them in their owne right and in their owne parochiall parishes without any authoritie from the Bishoppe should exercise even the highest censure of the Church And that in sundry places of the Realm there is no preeminence in the matter of the execution of the censures attributed to a Bb. aboue a Minister Nay whiche is more then is attributed to a Bb. aboue a No more preheminēce given to a Bb then to a Minister or to a lay man in some places for the vse of excōmunication lay man yea then to such a lay man who is authorized onlie by a lay man to his office Which is evident by the ecclesiasticall iurisdiction and censures exercised a long time by lay men in the peculiar iurisdictions of Newton Gronbie Anstic Soke of Rothelie Evington and other parishes hamlettes in the Countie of Leycester The officers of al which places for their spirituall authoritie having not had any other warrant then such only as hath bin signed sometimes vnder the hande and seale of the right Honorable the Earle of Huntingdon deceased sometimes of the Honorable Sir Henrie Grey knight sometimes of Henrie Skipwith Esquire and sometimes of others For the avoyding therefore of sundrie intollerable inconveniences whiche hitherto hath ensued for want of that authoritie which the Law setled doth enable every Minister with It is most expedient that all humane authoritie in the execution of spirituall censures bee vtterlie taken away and that the divine and Evangelicall censures of Christ bee ministred in every Congregation where learned and godly pastors with discrete Elders may bee had as from the minde of the Lord they were executed in the Apostolicall and primitiue church I had almost forgotten to speake of one common and vsuall kinde of iurisdiction spirituall in the vse of the censures of the church by the Archb. which in cases of their prerogatiue they haue prescribed against the Bb. over the presbyters and people of euery Bishoppes Diocesse and Archdeacons iurisdiction within their provinces of one other cōmon and vsuall kinde of pretensed spirituall iurisdiction and vse of the censures which the Archb. and sometimes the Deane and Chapiter sede Archiepiscopali or sede Episcopali vacante exercise and lastly of that spirituall kinde of iurisdiction censures so called of the Church whiche Suffraganes and Archdeacons haue and do vse As touching which supposed spirituall power both of the Archbishopps Archdeacons because the same their power doth only belong vnto thē iure consuetudinario non scripto by vnwritten and not by written lawe I must conclude against the iurisdiction of the Archbishopps prerogatiue and against the Archdeacons iurisdictiō in all cases as out of St. Cyprian King Henry the eight concluded against the Pope viz That their authorities can not be from Christ Because Christ saide