Synagogue of the infallibility of their Popes as Peter's successors and of the indeficiency of their Church as built upon Peter when as neither had Peter himself any such priviledge as to be infallible The next story in this 16th of Matthew evinceth the contrary v. 23. Nor by the Rock whereupon Christ builds his Church is meant the person of Peter or Peter's confession personally as it had relation to him but as it is considered really in it self and is common to all the Disciples and to all visible Believers which may be thus confirmed 1. Because Peters confession must have relation to the matter which he confessed But Peter confessed not himself but Christ saying Thou art the Christ the Son of the living God Therefore his confession had relation to Christ not to himself 2. Because Peter confessed no more than that which he knew the other Disciples believed before he speake For Christ's question being general What say ye Peter answered as the mouth of the rest but the Apostles before he speak believed Christ confessed and not Peter confessing 3. Because this Rock is that confession whereupon Christ saith he will build his Church But whosoever shall truly believe that which Peter confessed viz. Christ the Son of the living God and confess or profess it in due order is accordingly built on this Rock though he had never heard of Peter's name Therefore the confession rightly understood had relation unto Christ and not to the person of Peter 4. Because the Rock signifieth that which is immoveable and impregnable such as is Christ and his truth But Peter's confession was movable and shaken at one time thrice denying this confession of his Lord. Therefore this confession which Christ calls the Rock had not relation to Peter but only to Christ Coroll 2 Then they that would have a particular Church to be impregnable stable and firm against the prevailing of the gates of Hell must see that it be built upon this Rock and not upon humane formes 1. That Christ himself be the builder of it according to his own institutions not the policies or customs of men 2. * Ex quo patet quòd Ecclesia non consistit in hominibus ratione potestatis vel dignitatis Ecclesiasticae vel saecularis c. sed in illis personis in quibus est notitia vera confessio fidei veritatis Lyra in loc That the materials of which it consists be such as believe and profess their Faith in Christ publickly before the Lord and his People 3. That they be firmly joyned together in one Congregation by an holy Covenant of subjection and submission to the Lord Jesus Christ and to one another in him and accordingly walk together in obedience to Christ and his Rules resisting Satan in all his Temptations and Machinations through Christ strengthning them without whom they can do nothing Joh. 15.5 and that they improve carefully and faithfully the power which Christ hath given them viz. the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven in opening and shutting binding and loosing according to Christ his appointment for the preserving of his Church safe in the purity of their Faith and Order against the gates of Hell which is the next thing to be handled The Second Part. CHAP. VI. Concerning the power given of Christ unto such a Church as the first and proper subject of it THe second branch or part of the Charter is concerning the Power given by Christ unto such Churches to have and use all the means appointed by him for their establishment against the the gates of Hell Mat. 16.19 And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven These words contain 1. A grant of Power 2. A ratification of that Grant We shall speak to them distinctly 1. To Christ his grant of Power and therein 1. Explicate the terms by shewing what is meant 1 by the Kingdom of Heaven 2. by the Keys of it 3 What this appropriation or application of them imports To thee I will give 1. By the Kingdom of Heaven is meant both the Kingdom of Grace Glory and that the Kingdom of Glory is also meant the following words shew when he saith What you bind on Earth is bound in Heaven c. 2. By the Keys which are a sign of Power and are put by a Metonimy for the Subject the Power it self is meant Church-power which is either Supreme and Soveraign in Christ only as Lord and Head of his Church who alone hath the Key of David which openeth and no man shutteth and shutteth and no man openeth in Rev. 3.7 or subordinate and delegate such as is in Christ's Stewards This is noted by Keys in the Plural number in this place which signifie all power delegated from Christ to dispense and administer all the holy things of his House according to Christ's will and in the order prescribed by him to that end For all power wherewith the Lord Jesus betrusteth his Church aims at this which is here expressed to open and shut to bind and loose 3. To thee I will give The Application of this Grant is to Peter in the name of the Church which Christ promised to build upon himself believed on and publickly professed as Peter did before him and his fellow-Disciples in Christs School at this time And the promise is more fitly given to Peter in the name of the Church than to the Church by name because it was not the Church that made this confession but Peter in the name of the Church But here we must make a little stand to examine the sundry claims which have been made to this Right upon several pretences from this Text. 1. Some looking at Peter as representing the Catholick visible-Church conceive that a general Council which they say is the Catholick Church representatively is the Church here meant to which Christ gives the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven But that cannot be For particular visible Churches in the Apostles dayes had and exercised the Keyes compleatly within themselves yet was there no general Council till the time of Constantine which was three hundred years after Christ 2. Others look at this Grant as peculiar to Peter considered as the Prince and chief of the Apostles and to the Popes of Rome as his successors But this Papal usurpation the Councils of Constance and Basil strongly and justly opposed shewing that the Keys which are here given to Peter are in Joh. 20.21 22 23. given to all the Apostles and that Peter himself is enjoyned in Mat. 18. to tell the Church 3. Others think that the Catholick Church considered not representatively but in it self is the first subject of the Keys Yet these differ among themselves For some affirm it of the invisible others of the visible Catholick Church As for the terms we know that visible invisible
Office-Power but all Power which serves to shut and open the House or City of God not power of the Steward only but the power of the Spouse and Wife of this great King to whom the Lord Christ as her Husband being gone into a far Country even to Heaven hath given power to admit into the Family and reject as occasion shall require and for those ends to judge also because such acts require judgment and to call the Steward to his place and to put him into it and to put a Key of Office by Election into his hand and therfore though all power be not formally in her yet it cometh originally from her Reas 2. Because Christ here giveth the Keys only to those to whom he giveth Official Warrant and Authority for the actual exercise thereof in opening and shutting binding and loosing i. e. only to Teachers and Elders Answ 1. Though it is true that Official Warrant and Authority is given only to Teachers Elders only Teaching and Ruling Elders have that formally Yet 2. The power of the Keys is far larger than office-Office-power viz. to admit reject c. 3. They have their Office from the Church and their office-Office-power by the Church originally Therefore there was power in the Church before office-Office-power which did communicate and conveigh office-Office-power to its Officers 3. Reas To bind and loose are acts of the office-Office-power of Pastors Rulers Feeders by publick and pastoral preaching which doth not belong to Believers Answ Binding and loosing taken in the largest sense as in this Text comprehend the exercise of all the acts of the Keys or church-Church-power and these acts are not only by publick and pastoral preaching for then the Ruling-Elder should have no Key to bind or loose but also by Admonitions Excommunications Admissions which issue from a power of judging not proper to the Pastors only but common to the People with them 2. Though the Keys be given to the Church yet she may not exercise any act proper to office-Office-Power without Officers whom she doth and must call to that end and submit to them in the due exercise thereof 4. Reas If this place give not warrant and authority to Officers what warrant have they for their Office-Power Answ 1. This place gives warrant for the People to choose their Officers according to Christ's appointment and the Church doth accordingly call them to that place and invest them with Office with voluntary professed subjection to them in the right exercise of that power of Office which belongs unto them in the Lord. 2. The several acts of Office-power to be exercised by them are abundantly warranted in other places of Scripture 5. Reas They to whom the Keys are here given doe authoritatively forgive and retain sins and their Acts are valid in Heaven but the Church of Believers wanting Officers cannot by any warrant of Scripture authoritatively forgive and retain sins Answ The word Authority sometimes is taken more generally for Power sometimes more strictly and properly for Ruling and Office-Power In the first sense the Church hath power to foregive judicially in 2 Cor. 2.10 in reference to their former censure The Officers forgive authoritatively in the second sense We proceed to the last interpretation 6. Others look at the Keys as given to Peter here in the name of a particular visible Church indefinitely taken not of this or that particular definite Church that all other Churches should receive the Keys from them or be subject to the power of the Keyes in their hands For that will not stand with the parity of Churches among themselves for par in parem non habet imperium Therefore the Church here intended must be taken generally and indefinitely as comprehending in it any particular visible Church one as well as another or the general Church as existing its particulars If it be objected against this that Peter was not a Member of such a Christian Congregation when Christ spake these words unto him I answer It is true for no such Church was then constituted No more was there a Presbytery then constituted when Christ directed Peter and the rest in case of private offence obstinatly persisted in after proceeding in the first and second step to tell the Church in Mat. 18. which yet they hold but not truly to be the Presbytery as we shall evince hereafter with the assistance of Christ But in the mean time all grant that that Rule serveth to order Members how to proceed in such cases when particular Churches should be constituted And the same reason is of force in this Text also Some have thought that Christ giveth the Keys in this Text not to the Church of Believers of which he spake in the former verse but to the Elders because he altereth the form of his speech for having spoken in the former verse of the Church in the third person saying Vpon this Rock I will build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it he saith not in this verse and I will give unto it the Keys but varying the person he turneth his speech to Peter saying and unto thee I will give the Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven but this is a mistake Here is no changing of person nor turning of speech in Christ's giving the promise of the Keys but as Christ began so he continueth his speech to Peter upon occasion of his confession In v. 17. Christ pronounceth Peter blessed from the cause of his confession In v. 18. he giveth a promise of reward to Peters confession that upon this as upon a Rock he will build his Church and establish it as impregnable against the gates of Hell In v. 19. he giveth unto Peter upon occasion of his publick confession in the name of the Church a promise of the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven Therefore this promise is given to the Church in Peter in such sort as though the use of the Keys be various according to the variety of callings in the Church yet the power it self of the Keys is here originally and primarily cōmitted to the * Toti Ecclesiae dedit Christus claves sed ita ut in Ecclesiâ certi essent qui clavibus utantur ad salutem Ecclesiae honoremque Dei Zanc. in praec 4. quaest 3. Vid. Park de Polit. Eccles l. 3 c. 3. Church in general existing in particular Churches I might produce sundry Writers both ancient and modern of other Countries and our own if need required to confirm this Exposition yea of the Authors quoted by Mr. P. not a few consenting herein but I shall only mention Cyprian and Augustine who in sundry places speak the same with us And these two I the rather name because I find in approved Histories that sundry Martyrs being confirmed in this Truth by their Testimonies have sealed it with their blood Hieronimus Savanarola a Godly learned Preacher in Florence a man endued with a Prophetical Spirit Illyr Catal Test verit cont
Papam p. 565. was there burnt for denying the primacy of the Pope teaching that the Keys were given Ecclesiae toti non uni Petro to the whole Church and that the Communion should be administred sub utrâque specie and against humane Traditions and the Popes indulgencies and the wicked lives of the Cardinals and Priests and for preaching free Justification by Faith in Christ and that the Pope is Antichrist This was about the year 1499. In our own Land John Lambert in the year Fox Martyrol i' th Reign of Hen. 8th 1538 was burnt to death by the sentence of King Henry the 8th himself sitting in judgement upon him with all his Nobles and Bishops by the wicked counsel of Stephen Gardiner upon 45 Articles whereof this was the 43d Article Whether he believed the Pope was Christs Vicar and had power on earth to bind and loose He denyed that the Pope was Christs Vicar and affirmed that the Keys were given to Peter not for himself alone but in the name of the Church and proved it out of Cyprian Idem ibid. de simplicitate Clericorum and Aug. de Agone Christiano Also Sir John Borthwick a Scottish Knight in the year 1540 was condemned by the Arch Bishop of St. Andrews then Cardinal of Scotland and the Popes Legate with sundry Popish Bishops upon ten Articles of which this was the first touching the Popes Supremacy grounded upon Mat. 16. To thee will I give the Keys which he from that place confuted affirming that the Keys were given to the Church in Peter which name was given him upon his confession of Christ in the name of the whole Church and confirmed his assertion out of Cyprian and Augustine So that this is no new nor singular exposition of these words or practice taken up by some few of late Not new for Cyprian wrote about the year 250 after Christ and Augustine about the year 410 the last of them about 1200 years since and the first above 1400 years past I shall add hereunto that before Cyprian Tertullian about the year 200 shews us that Church-censures were then performed by one particular Church within it self and not in any combination of Churches Tertull. Apolog. Cap. 39. Nor singular for sundry sorts of Writers in several Ages and Countries have consented therein I will not enter into that question about which there seems to be some difference in apprehensions between some Godly learned Brethren Whether the Keys are given to Peter under several considerations as an Apostle and as an Elder and as a professing Believer all being taken joyntly together or to a single Society or condition of men under some special Relation which share alike in the equality of this Power promised unto them For in the substance of the matter they agree 1. That the Keys are promised to Peter in the name of a Congregational-Church 2. That this power of the Keys cannot be given to one single Society formally in all the kinds of it because it requires several sorts of subjects formally different viz. some Ruling some Ruled some Teaching c. 3. That til a Congregational-Church be organized and compleated with all its Officers it cannot compleatly exercise the Keys commited to it 4. That nevertheless before it be compleated it hath power of the Keys and is the first subject of them either formally or virtually whereby all the Ordinances are administred or administrable among them I shall issue this point into one Doctrinal Conclusion 6. Concl. The subordinate ordinary Power of acting Church-affairs in the Order appointed by Jesus Christ for attainment of the ends of Church-Communion is given by Christ to a visible Congregation of confederate Believers as the first and proper subject of it In the handling of this point I shall note somethings 1. For Explication 2. Confirmation of it 3. Draw some Consectaries 1. For explication of it I shall endeavour to clear five particulars 1. What I mean by Subordinate Power Subordinate Power is that which wholly dependeth on Christs Ordinance and Institution who is the Supreme and only Monarch and Head of the Church and therefore his revealed Will must be attended in all Church-Administations as the only Rule from which they may not swerve to the right hand or to the left for any humane policies or pretences whatsoever by adding ought thereto or taking any thing therefrom To this Christ limited his Apostles who were the highest Officers in the Church Mat. 28.18 19 20. And accordingly Paul strictly charged Timothy and in him all the Churches and Church-Officers to keep this Commandment without spot unrebukable until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ c. 1 Tim. 6.13 14 15. They must assume to themselves only that power which he hath allotted them and not exercise it any otherwise than he hath allowed them 2. Why I add ordinary to subordinate It is added to difference that Power which resideth in the Church for continual use in ordinary dispensations from that which was in the Apostles for a time by the gift of Christ Both Apostolical-Power and church-Church-Power agree in this that they are received immediately from Christ For as he said to the Apostles whose sins ye remit they are remitted c. Joh. 20.23 So he said to the Church both here in Peter and in Mat. 18.18 Whatsoever ye shall bind or loose on earth c. So that neither did the Apostles receive their Power from the Church nor doth the Church receive its power from the Apostles but both immediatly from Christ and therefore as the Apostles had their Power before visible Christian-Churches were constituted so such Churches have and hold their Power when Apostles cease to be on earth But herein these two Powers differ 1. That Apostolical Power was centred in one single Person and extended it self to the circumference of all Churches Each Apostle had the Power of the whole Church and of all the Officers of the Church when he was absent from the Churches he could administer Seals and Censures as if he had the presence and concurrence of the Church and if he was present in any Church that wanted Officers an Apostle had power to execute every Office for the Church And this their Power extended it self as much to all Churches as to any one Their Line went out into all the World Psal 19.4 with Rom. 10.18 Mat. 28.19 For as the Father sent Christ the Mediator with fulness of Soveragin Power so Christ sent his Apostles with fulness of Ministerial Power Joh. 20.21 But Church-Power is not in one man but in a Society and to be exercised variously by several persons in that society according to variety of callings Are all Teachers 1 Cor. 12.29 Hence 2. That was extraordinary and to last but for a time but this is ordinary and to continue to the end Rev. 4.1 3. What the Church-Affairs are and what the acting them imports The Church-affairs are the Ordinances of Christ called here the
may by the eyes which are given to it for that end 2. The Confirmation or proof that such a Church is the first and proper subject of this power shall be double 1. By Scripture 2. By Reasons 1. By Scripture it may be proved from sundry Texts 1. This in hand clearly confirmeth it if that good ancient rule of expounding Scripture be received Dictorum intelligentia ex causis dictorum sumenda est For Christ's question to the Disciples which was the cause of Peter's confession here was only concerning the Faith common to the Church Whom say ye that I am Hereupon Peter in the name of the Disciples made this confession of Faith Quia Christus Petra Petrus populus Christianus August in Matth. de verbis Domini Ser. 13. Christ testified his approbation of it by calling him Peter not so much in respect of his Office as of his Faith thus publickly professed whence also visible Believers are called lively stones 1 Pet. 2.4 5. and Christ added to this praise of Peter a twofold promise 1. Of edifying and stablishing the Church upon this Rock 2. Of affording it sufficient means for the attainment of those ends viz. the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven c. Where the Kingdom of Heaven or visible Church of Christ on earth is compared to a City or House the Door or Gate whereof is Christ the Keys are all instituted means whereby an entrance into Christ and his Kingdom visibly is opened and shut the subordinate power whereof is here given to the Church immediately The second Text is in Mat. 18.17 18. Tell the Church if he hear not the Church let him be as an Heathen and a Publican For what you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven c. This cannot be meant of Elders assembling together and acting apart from the Brethren For no such assembly is called the Church in the New Testament much less is this power given to them for in case of scandal given by them they are under the power of the whole Church as well as other Members to be censured by them though when they keep the Rule they are as Elders Rulers in the Church It must therefore be meant of a Congregational-Church The third Text is in 1 Cor. 5. where Paul exhorted the Church at Corinth to exercise this their power which he calls the power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. whereby they were to deliver unto Satan that incestuous person v. 5. and were to purge out the old leaven v. 7. and were to judge those that are within v. 12. and to put away that wicked person from among them v. 13. and this Paul calls a punishment inflicted by many 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus he establisheth their power to bind and teacheth them how to use it and in like manner he exhorteth them upon the mans repentance to turn the Key and to open the Door of Christian liberties to him and to loose him from the former censure by forgiving him in a legal or judicial sense 2 Cor. 2.7 10. And that this Church at Corinth was a meer Congregational-Church it may be evinced from hence that the whole Church was no larger then was wont to meet together in one place 1 Cor. 14.23 for the ordinary worship of God 2. By Reasons 1. Because in such a Congregational-Church are all the causes of this power 1. Efficient the Institution and Ordinance of Christ who delegateth this subordinate power to whom it pleaseth him by his own appointment 2. The material cause visible Believers 3. The formal cause Covenanting together to walk in all the Ordinances of Christ and to submit mutually one to another in the Lord to be reclaimed if they err from the rules or to be censured by the power of the whole if they be found obstinate 2. Because there is no former subject of this power from whence a Congregational-Church might derive it but it is communicated by means of the Church to all that partake of it and it remaineth in the Church when others are removed They choose their own Elders therefore they had this power virtually in them before they had Elders and so could not derive it from them 2. All particular Churches are of equal power within themselves not one of them subordinate to another Therefore they derive it not from other particular Churches 3. Synods both lesser and larger are made up of the Elders and Messengers sent from particular Churches and have their being from them nor do they send them to them to borrow any Church-power but only light from them as the Church at Antioch did from the Church at Jerusalem Acts 15. Therefore they derive no Church-power from them Again when the Elders of particular Churches are dead or censured or rejected by the power of the whole for obstinacy in scandalous evils the Church still retaineth its power to choose others as a Corporation hath its full power still though the Magistrates be dead or cast out The same holds in Churches in Islands by their own confession when they cannot have the help of Synods Thus we prove Fire to be the first subject of heat because if it be in other things as in Water or Wood it is there by the means of Fire and when they are removed yet still it remains in Fire The like reason holds in this as you see to prove such a Church as this of which we speak to be the first subject of church-Church-Power or of the Keys 3. Because all the acts done immediatly by the Church in opening and shutting in binding and loosing flow from this power of the Keys given them by Christ and hold it forth 1. Their admitting Members is an act of this Power and holds it forth for till the Brethren be satisfied and approve ones fitness he cannot be received into their fellowship Act. 9.26 and 10.47 2. Their choosing Officers is an act of this Power which the Apostles would not violate in adding Deacons Act. 6.3 5. and Ruling-Elders to the Church Act. 14.23 and the same holds much more concerning Pastors and Teachers This power Cyprian acknowledged to be in the * Plebs obsequens praeceptis Dominicis Deum metuens ipsa maximè habet potestatem vel eligendi dignos sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi Quod ipsum videmus de Divinâ authoritate descendere Cypr. l. 1. ep 4. People principally to accept or refuse Ministers as they judged them worthy or unworthy 3. Their Ordination of Officers by deputing some chosen out of their own Body thereunto in the want of Officers is an act of this Power of the Keys residing in them For though the Offices of Elders in general and the Authority of their Office as they are Rulers is from Christ immediately yet the investing of this or that elect person with this Office Authority in relation to this or that Church by application of it to him in particular rather than to another this is by the
Church The Church may by communion of Churches upon orderly recommendation receive the members of other Churches unto fellowship of such Ordinances as are for the comfort and strengthning of the Saints as the Seals are and the Officers may administer them to such being accepted by the body for we have a warrant for so much from the Rule Rom. 16.1 3 Joh. 9. but not to act in judgement For the Church hath this priviledge proper to be judged by and to judg only those that are within 1 Cor. 5.12 whereas I alledged this Text against Mr. Paget to prove that Church-Ordinances belong only to the Members of some particular Church Mr. Rutterf meeting with that expression saith Mr. D. will have Pastors so far strangers to all Congregations save their own that he saith other Churches are without and have nothing to do to judge them and alledgeth for this 1 Cor. 5.12 But by those that are without Paul meaneth not those that were not of the Congregation but he meaneth Infidels and Heathen as in other Scriptures For Paul judged and excommunicated Hymeneus and Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 who were without the Church at Corinth Had Mr. Rutt been pleased to cast his eye upon my own defence of that passage In my Apolog Reply pag. 312 313. printed sundry years before he put pen to paper in these disputes about Church affairs he might have found that written by me touching the sense and my application of that Text which might have prevented his exagitating that matter Nor doth he with any congruity argue from Pauls Excommunicating Hymeneus and Alexander who he saith were without the Church at Corinth to prove that Pastors have any thing to do to judge judicially or excommunicate the members of other Congregations For Paul was an Apostle an extraordinary Officer had an illimited commission and a fulness of delegated power both in every Church and to administer Church-Ordinances without the fellowship of a particular Church when it could not be had and to execute all Offices in any Church where Officers were wanting But Pastors are ordinary Officers have a limited commission to do only the acts of the Pastoral Office and those only to that particular Church by which they are called unto Office Act. 20.28 1 Pet. 5.2 Therefore though Paul might excommunicate one that was not of that particular Church at Corinth yet the Pastor to the Church at Corinth might not Yet Paul could not excommunicate one that was no member of any Church but without as Infidels and Heathen are For that implies a contradiction To conclude The Apostle doth so appropriate Church-judgment to those that are within that particular Church 1 Cor. 5.12 Ye judge them that are within that he exempts from it in a due proportion all that are not members of that Congregation though there are degrees of being without some being totally without all Church-communion as Infidels and Heathen others though in Church-communion else-where yet not in communion of membership of that Church to whom he wrote to put away from them not one that was a member of another Church but him that was a member of that Church And in this sense Mr. Rutt saith Hymeneus and Alexander were without the Church at Corinth though members of some other Church for which cause the Church at Corinth could not excommunicate them yet Paul might and did by his Apostolical Power Thus by his own confession some are without a particular Church who yet are not Heathen or Infidels To conclude one may be said to be without this or that particular Church two ways 1. Simply and absolutely so Infidels and Heathen that are of no Church 2. Comparatively so the Members of other Churches compared with those that are of this Body 4. Corollary Then Churches gathered and Officers ordained in these days without Apostles are true Churches and true Church-Officers according to Christ and Churches thus Organized according to the Rules of the Word are true and intire Churches and the first subject of all Church-power as well as those Primitive Churches planted by the Apostles For the concurrence of the Apostles is not put into this Charter whereof we speak as a conditional Clause which might not have been omitted if Christ had intended that it should be always necessary He doth not say upon this Rock my Apostles shall build my Church and to my Church built by them I will give the Keys of the Kingdom but upon this Rock I will build my Church viz. by such Instruments as Christ will raise and use and bless in that work in every Age and to this Church thus built he gives the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven Object But Christ gave the Commission of gathering Churches to his Apostles in Matth. 28.18 19. And when he ascended up on high he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry and for the edifying of the Body of Christ Ephes 4.8 11 12. Answ Those and the like Texts of Scripture do indeed shew that God used Apostles principally in this work but not only For as to Teach and Baptize is common to other Teaching-Officers as well as Apostles so the gathering of Churches by making men Disciples of Christ was done by others besides Apostles even in the Apostles days Act. 11.20 21. The dispersed Disciples planted the Church at Antioch the Members whereof were first called Christians a Church whose planting Barnabas approved ver 23. 2. They shew that God would use Apostles herein for a time but not alwayes which I prove 1. From the proper work committed to them which was to make the first Models and Patterns of planting and gathering Churches which ordinary Instrumentts are bound to attend in the gathering and constituting of Churches 1 Cor. 3.6 10. and in that sense their work continues to the end of the World though their manner of working viz. from an immediate Call Inspiration and Infallible assistance proper to Apostles in making those Patterns was extraordinary and ended with their Office in the first Age since when there never have been Apostles in the World For though Matthias succeeded in the place of Judas by Gods Election Act. 1.26 yet after James was beheaded no Apostle was chosen to succeed him though the Apostles lived long after 2. The Apostle John who lived longest of the Apostles describeth by Revelation from Christ all the Officers that should be by Gods Ordinance in Christian Churches after that Age under four sorts of living Creatures which note the four sorts of ordinary Officers to continue in the Church after that Age viz. Pastors Teachers Ruling-Elders and Deacons Revel 4.1 6 7. Vers 19. And whatsoever thou shalt bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven Whatsoever thou shalt loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven THese words hold forth the Ratification of Christ's grant of the Keys unto a congregational-Congregational-Church with the chiefty
of power under Christ to manage the same within themselves for the attainment of the ends of Church-Communion And that this is spoken to Peter in the name of such a Church and that Christ intended to establish by this promise the compleat exercise of this power in such a Church being compleated with all itâ— Officers is clear from Matth. 18.18 where the same promise is given by name to such a Church The words therefore in summe hold forth a grant from Christ to his Church of an indispensable power of Church-censures within themselves which may be thus evinced The censure that is established in Heaven cannot be dispensed with nor reversed by any power on Earth But the censure that is administred by a Congregational-Church is established in Heaven Therefore it cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on Earth The Proposition a man would think might pass without opposition but I find this Objection made against it Obj. The sentence of an inferiour Judge or Court proceeding rightly is established in Heaven yet we may appeal from it Why will not the same hold in Church-censures also Answ 1. Because the promise of binding in Heaven is not given by Christ to the censures of Civil Courts For it is not a Civil but a Spiritual binding that is here meant 2. Because there is not par ratio between them The reason why appeals may be made from the sentence of inferiour Civil Courts and Judges is because there is a Supreme Court in being to which the appeal may be brought and there prosecuted and thereby determined as the inferiour Courts in Israel stood under the highest Synedrion but there is no such Supreme Court ordained by Christ over particular Churches The Assumption That the censure that is administred by a congregational-Congregational-Church is established in Heaven is expresly in the Text as it hath been expounded True say some what a particular Church binds on Earth clave non errante is bound in Heaven but the Church may err in Judgement therefore appeal may be made and then their binding power is gone Answ 1. If possibility of erring in Judgment be a warrantable ground of appealing from particular Churches then the appeal must be made to such a Tribunal and Judge as cannot err which is to be found only in Heaven 2. On this ground the universal Church represented in a general Council much more inferiour Synods and Classes should not have power to bind without appeals For a general Council may err and hath erred not seldom but often not in small matters only but in those of the greatest moment yea they may be as much inclined to err as particular Churches For the greatest part of visible Churches in the World are for the most part corrupt If it be said There are more eyes plus vident oculi quam oculus I answer True caeteris paribus viz. if they are equally near the mark but their sight is hindred more than particular Churches are in their proper concernments as they are further from the mark in such cases than particular Churches And if particular Churches have not full power of Excommunication because they may err be corrupt be partial be divided upon the same ground neither Classical National not Oecumenical Assemblies have any such power for they may err be corrupt be partial be divided also 3. Christ who well knew what is in man and what is best for the good of his people hath given unto his particular Churches notwithstanding their possibility of erring an indispensable power of judgment in their own matters within themselves The Doctrinal Conclusion to be insisted upon is this A Congregational Church of Christ 7. Conclu being compleated with Officers hath by the gift of Christ within it self compleat subordinate Church-power in all Church-affairs proper to it self When I say 1. It hath compleat or sufficient Church-power Thereby I mean 1. That it needeth not the influence of the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of any other Church or Churches or Classes or Synods to supply unto it any power that it wanteth in its own matters and 2. That it standeth not in subjection under any other Superior Ecclesiastical Judicatory so as that thereby the judicial Acts of a particular Church may be hindered or made void In a word Potestas uniuscujusque particularis Ecclesiae in re propria summa est The power of such a Church is Chief in things proper to it self 2. I add that this chiefty of power in a particular Church is subordinate To shew that the absolute Supremacy of power is in Christ that which the Church hath is only delegated from Christ When a particular Church is compleated with all its Officers the Government of it in respect of Christ the Head is perfectly Monarchical in respect of the Elders acting their Authoririty or Office-power it is Aristocratical and in respect of the Fraternity acting its Chuch-power in Judgment it is Democratical and in the concurrence of all the Members both Officers and Brethren acting according to their several interests it is Aristocratico-Democratical above which Christ hath not set any higher Ecclesiastical Judicatory on Earth subjecting particular Churches thereunto in re propriâ A clear proof of such power as that which hath been described you may see in the Church at Corinth excommunicating that incestuous person in 1 Cor. 5 1-5 Say not as some do That was not an act of Judicial power in that Church but of subjection to the Apostle who decreed it and judged him before and committed no more to the Church but the publishing of the sentence for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 5.3 though Paul as an Apostle judged that he should be excommunicated yet he so judged only dogmatically by teaching the Church what they ought to do in that case not judicially by his own sentence delivering him to Sathan and acâ—ordingly the Church cast him out by their own sufficiency of Church-power within themselves though in a way of subjection to the command of Christ delivered by Paul For 1. They delivered him to Satan in the Name and with the Power of the Lord Jesus v. 4. and that is the highest Power 2. The end and use of it was for the destruction of the flesh that his Spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus v. 5. which argueth that it proceedeth from a power of binding in Heaven as well as on Earth 3. When God blessed this sentence by making it effectual to work Repentance in him Paul exhorteth the whole Church to release and forgive him 2 Cor. 2 6-10 and doth not claim the Power over them of a Superiour Judge to absolve him by his own sentence without them Nor did he write to the Elders of sundry Churches but only to that particular Church both Elders and Brethren and thereby acknowledgeth the Power of Ecclesiastical Judgment to be so fully in them that As their not putting it into act retarded the sentence before
and their putting of it into act was a Judicial Act in them all ye judge them that are within 1 Cor. 5.12 So their forgiving him would be a Legal and Judicial acquitting him from thaâ— sentence 2 Cor. 2. This Church is our pattern and its practice in this is presidential to all particular Churches of Christ Reas 1 From the guilt which lyeth upon every such Church when any scandal given by their Members remaineth uncensured and unremoved Therefore Paul applyed this Reproof to the whole Church Brethren as well as Officers for their slowness to excommunicate that man 1 Cor. 5.2 And in like manner Christ reproveth the Angel and Church both of Pergamus Rev. 2.14 15. and of Thyatira ver 20. If these Churches had not sufficient power within themselves to purge out such Leaven why are they blamed for tolerating the same And why are not other Churches or the Classes blamed for neglect of exercising their power of Ecclesiastical Judicature over them if they stood under any such And what the Spirit speaketh to them he saith to other Churches also to beware of the like Remisness Which Admonition all particular Churches are bound to attend lest else the gates of Hell prevail against them through their neglect of exercising that power which Christ hath given them severally and respectively to preserve their Members and whole fellowship in Spiritual purity and safety Heb. 12.15 Reas 2 From the Analogy and agreement that is between the Spiritual power of a Congregational Church of Christ and the civil power of the most free and perfect Cities which Thucidides saith have three priviledges viz. to use 1. Their own Laws 2. Magistrates 3. Judgments whence he cals every such City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 other Cities were not accounted intire and perfect Cities of themselves but less worthy Members of those great and perfect Cities Grot. de jure bel pac l. 1. c. 3. p. 4 5 7. under whose Jurisdiction they were The summa potestas of those great and perfect Cities is that cujus actus alterius juri non subsunt ita ut alterius voluntatis humanae arbitrio irriti possunt reddi Now every particular Church of Christ being compleated with its Officers is a most perfect and free City the City of God Psal 48.1 The City of the great King ver 2. the visible Kingdom of the blessed and only Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 1 Tim. 6.15 and therefore it must necessarily have sufficient and compleat power within it self to manage the Keys without dependence on Classes c. in its own concernments Yet herein is a difference between such perfect Cities and the Churches of Christ That such Cities may part with their Liberty in some cases Liv. Dec. 1. l. 1. Idem Ibid. l. 7. Populum Campanum urbemque delubra Deûm divina humanaque omnia in vestraÌ„ P.C. ditioâ—em dedimus as being overmatched by a Potent Enemy In this case the Collatives yielded up themselves and their City and Liberties to Tarquinius Priscus King of the Romans or when they are in extream danger by an Enemy whom they would not have to rule over them and cannot defend themselves by any other means which was the case of Campani distressed by the Samnites which forced them to yield up themselves and all they had with all their Liberties unto the Romans which when they had done they were said to be facti alienae potestatis Yet it was presupposed that they had power in themselves thus to do as appears by that question Estne populus Collatinus in suâ potestate But Churches have not power to alienate from themselves their Church-Liberties which Christ hath purchased for them with his Blood and commanded them to stand fast in them Gal. 5.1 and to whom they must give an account how they have kept and managed the same Luke 16.2 Reas 3 From the Concession of those that oppose this Truth The power of Classes and Syn. p. 33. ad Calcem Mr. Pag. acknowledgeth that if a particular Church of God should sojourn among the Indians or among Hereticks where it could not obtain fellowship with other Churches out of it self Or if by violence or other unavoidable inconveniences any Church should be hindred from enjoying this benefit of combination with other Churches in Classical Government yet notwithstanding this want this Church should subsist still and be reputed a true Church Others say the same of a Church in an Island and add Mr. Herle Indep p. 2 that in such cases a single Congregation must not be denyed intireness of Jurisdiction Mr. Rutterf adds that when Churches cannot injoy the society of neighbouring Churches with that comfort and conveniency as their occasions may require among them Ordination and so Excommunication may be performed by the Congregation From this Concession it will follow that 1. A Congregational Church of Christ quà talis hath a lawful right in an intireness of Church-Government within it self by the gift of Christ yea that the Church-power Natively and Naturally lyes in the Congregation for such cases are ordinary and the first Synod which is looked at as presidential to all Synods was a concurrence of two Churches which were two hundred miles distant 2. The other Churches or Classes or Synods have no right to take away this power from it For none may put asunder what God hath joyned as well in this case as in that noted in Mat. 19.7 God hath joyned intireness of Jurisdiction in re propriâ to a particular Church who then shall sunder it from such a Church to place it in Classes as Superior Judicatories where God never put it 3. If the first Church in a Continent had this compleat power within it self before other Churches were gathered and the rising up of other Churches there long after should deprive them of it by setting up a Classis as a Superior Judicatory over them then the neighbourhood of Churches should not be a benefit but a disadvantage to them and would give them cause to complain unto God Thou hast multiplyed the Nation Pow. of Class Syn. p. 33. Idem p 34. but not increased our joy But they hold that every Church is bound to seek this dependency and union with other Churches as God shall give opportunity and means and cannot without sin neglect the same And lest we should think it but a matter Arbitrary at best they tell us it is of the same necessity for a Church to combine unto Classeâ— and Synods for their Spiritual Government if they have opportunity as to joyn a mans self as a Member to a particular Church if he hath means and opportunity to do it and conclude all that neglect to do it sin against the Communion of Saints and walk not as becometh the Body of Christ Rom. 12.5 1 Cor. 12.15 Ephes 4.16 Answ 1. The Proofs alleadged do shew that the Communion of Saints ought to be preserved and exercised in
Church-Communion by Believers joyning to a particular Congregation and walking in a Memberlike affection and fellowship with their Brethren unto mutual edification but they speak nothing for the subjection of particular Churches to Classes and Synods in re propriâ but rather intimate the contrary For the Apostle by comparing a Congregational-Church compleated with its Officers unto the Body of a man intire in all its Members sheweth that as the Body of a man being intire and sound hath compleat power within it self for all bodily actions so a particular Church being organized and governed by Christ the Head from whom the whole Body fitly joyned and compacted together by Joynts of supply according to the effectual working in the measure of every part maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of it self in love Ephes 4.15 16. without the influence of any Jurisdiction out of it self to supply a Superior Church-power which was wanting in this Body of Chirist a Congregational-Church and as the Body Natural being sound and of a good constitution hath sufficient ability in it self to purge out of it self Malignant Humors so such a Church hath sufficient power in it self to cast out vicious and hurtful Members without the intervention of Classical Jurisdiction over them 2. It is a sin against the second Commandment in such as having means and opportunity neglect to joyn as Members in a particular Congregation because it is God's Ordinance and revealed Will 2 Cor. 8.5 But Classical Jurisdiction over particular Churches and their subjection thereunto is no Ordinance of Christ and therefore it is so far from being necessary that it is not lawful but against the second Commandment which forbiddeth mens inventions in God's worship that it may establish only God's Ordinances therein Others argue thus As though a Town or Family being alone may govern as a compleat Body yet when it stands in a Common-wealth it may not be so independent but must submit to Combinations So though when a particular Congregation is alone it may govern as compleat yet not so when it is among other Churches Answ 1. There is not a like reason of Churches and of Towns or Families in this respect For civil Societies are more left to Rules of Humane prudence by the great Ruâ—â—â— of the World than Churches are Therefore civil Societies may be of several constitutions have different Laws and Priviledges and admit various forms of Government provided that they be not against Moral Rules and the good of the People But in this Spiritual Kingdom of Christ men may not alter the kind or Form of Church which Christ hath Instituted but must preserve inviolate the Laws Administrations Priviledges and Church-Government ordained by him without Addition Diminution or alteration Hence a particular Church may not alienate from it self in whole or part any Right Power or Priviledge given it by Christ 2. If such a Town or Family hath compleat power and Officers within it self it is not bound to submit to such Combinations in a Common-wealth except it be under a Superiour Power that can command the same Abraham having a compleat Family was not bound to combine with the Governments he dwelt amongst nor did he though he joyned in a League of amity and for mutual help with Aner Eschol and Mamre yet not to submit to their Government So neither is a particular Organical Church bound to submit to such Classical Combinations till it can be proved by Scripture that a Superior Power of other Churches can command the same 3. Though several Families not having compleat Government within themselves must combine in a Common-wealth yet not to yield up their Family-Government over their Wives Children and Servants respectively to rule them in common with other Masters of Families Much less may several Congregational-Churches give up the Government of themselves to Pastors of sundry Churches combined in a Classis to govern them in their proper Affairs such as Admission of Members Election and Ordination of Officers Administration of Seals and Censures 1. Corollary Then the censure of Excommunication is not a light matter but to be looked at as very weighty and formidable You see 1. That it is the Soveraign Remedy prescribde by Christ against the many Diseases whereunto the Body is subject the great preservative of the Churches peace and safety against the gates of Hell 2. That it is such a Power given by Christ to his Church as proveth Church-Societies to be the visible Suburbs of Heaven yea the Kingdom of Heaven begun on Earth seeing such an Heavenly Power is committed to them This is a greater work than Elijah did when he shut up Heaven that it rained not Jam. 5.17 For that was but an outward and temporal Judgment for three years and six moneths But this is Spiritual and for ever upon impenitent persons It is greater than Earthly Kings and Magistrates can do they can bind a Malefactor hand and foot and deliver him to the Jaylor and sentence him to banishment out of their Dominions but this Censure binds the Soul and Conscience delivers them to Satan and excludes obstinate impenitent sinners from the Kingdom of God that when this Censure is applyed by the Church according to Scripture-Rules Jesus Christ is with them to ratifie his Censure according to this Promise What you shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and to bless it to the attainment of its end the destruction of the flesh that the Spirit may be saved This is a singular Priviledge of Church-Members If they that are out of Church-fellowship bless themselves in their Liberty because they cannot be touched with Church-censures they shew their extream folly therein for they are left to the Sword of the Magistrate or to the immediate judgment of God as forlorn Creatures excluded from Spiritual helps suitable to their needs They are as Sheep whom no man taketh up or careth for in a Spiritual way Isa 3.13 14. It is therefore a special priviledge of Church-Members and much for the furtherance of their eternal Salvation if they improve it aright to the mortifying of those corruptions in them which could not be purged out and healed by easier means And this is the proper end of it that seeing themselves as Adam driven from the Tree of Life by the flaming Sword of a Cherubim or as Cain cast out from Gods face or as the Leper shut out from the fellowship of God's people or as that Incestuous Corinthian delivered up to Satan they may be ashamed humbled and effectually brought to Repentance and to hold it forth according to God's Rules If it work not this effect the fault is their own Yet it will not be without effect For as the Gospel is the savour of Death unto Death when it is not the savour of Life unto Life so this Gospel-Ordinance shall not be in vain but shall work one way or t'other either the destruction of the impenitent or the salvation of those that repent
which bound him to submit unto the judgement of the Church if he finde that through sinful prejudice he cannot receive the light held forth when he hath no objection of weight against it 2. Other Churches and the Elders of them ought to preserve the intireness of Power of every particular Church in re propriâ inviolate The Law of Love and Righteousness binds every man hereunto One Corporation must uphold the just Rights Liberties and Power of another If a man see his brothers Ox or Sheep go astray he must in any case bring them again unto his brother Deut. 22.1 much more if he see a Sheep of Christ go astray by sinful prejudice against the Church he must in any case convince him of his errour and bring him again to the Church as the Angel returned Hagar to Sarah her Mistress Gen. 16.8 9. For this purpose 1. They must not receive an accusation against an Elder much less against the Church and Eldership under two or three witnesses 1 Tim. 5.19 therefore much less from a Delinquent under publick censure and that in his one cause 2. If more joyn with him attesting what he saith they must see 1 Whether they do it in a way of faction siding with a censured Delinquent against the Church or no. If yea they must testifie against their way as contrary to Rule and avoid them as disturbers of the peace of the Church Rom. 16.17 If not they must inquire 1 whether they have pleaded with the Church it self Hos 2.2 in such manner as becometh such as would approve themselves to love the Truth and Peace Zach. 8.21 before they become accusers of the Brethren unto others 2 Whether they proceed peaceably or tumultuously and tumultuosly they do act if they seek nor Light in the use of Means first at home but refuse help that way when it is offered them that they may make trouble and disturbance to the Church by spreading their complaints abroad and those not to some one Church without whose help the question cannot be ended as the Church at Antioch sent to the Church at Jerusalem but to eight or nine Churches some nearer some far distant from the Church some 40 50 100 150 miles off and that without giving notice of their purpose to the Church or having their consent thereunto or so much as to the stating of the question If so they may clearly see an evil spirit working in the business with which others should have no fellowship 2 Cor. 12.20 3 Whether they do positively justifie the Delinquent in that for which he was censured and upon what grounds or only declare their good Opinion of the Delinquent in some respects and that they are not clear concerning the equity of the censure If the latter it is the duty of those to whom they thus speak to convince them of the error of their way 4 Whether they come only in a back-biting way or are willing to speak the same things publickly before the Church which they accuse privately If not they must be convinced of their sinning against common equity Act. 25.16 5 What the end is which they propound unto themselves in taking this course whether it be for light only or for the nullifying of the censure by the power of others If the former they cannot safely conclude any thing alterâ parte inauditâ remembring what Solomon saith Prov. 18.17 If the latter they must profess that they have no such Power but all that they can do is to inform themselves from the Church whether their report be true or not and to give such advise from Scripture as the case requires according to their judgement exhorting them in the mean space to attend the Rule in Memberlike submission to the Power of their Church according to God Quest But suppose that the party censured think he can prove that he is wronged is there no course to be taken for the freeing of him from a sentence that is unjust in his apprehension Answ If he hath held forth convincing light as he conceiveth to the Church to prove that he is wronged and hath waited patiently for redress but can find none and therefore desireth to joyn with some other Church he may remove his dwelling if no other Church be in the same place or without that if there be and he may offer himself to their fellowship making known to them his case If in other respects they approve him as one whose fellowship with them would be helpful or comfortable to them they will acquaint the Church whence he came with his desire and crave their advice which will draw from that Church a full Narrative of his Case Upon examination whereof these who desire his fellowship will labour with him to further his repentance and his holding it forth to the satisfaction of that offended Church according to Rule which being done the Church that was offended will be reconciled to him and forgive him and confirm their love to him in the Lord and recommend him to that fellowship where he desires to settle But if they will not the Church that hath thus far laboured in the business will acquaint other neighbour-Churches with the matter and crave their advice who finding either that the Church did err in judgement or that the Delinquent hath satisfied the Rule of Repentance will signifie their apprehensions to both the Churches and accordingly the party is either released by the one or received by the other each of them preserving its Church-power in re propriâ according to their light maintaining still Church-Communion notwithstanding their different apprehensions touching this matter 2. If the case be reducible to what is noted in the third Corollary there you may find a sufficient Remedy prescribed according to Congregational Principles without his remove 3. In some Cases a mischief is to be chosen before an inconvenience as Lawyers speak Better it is that the Church want a Remedy for a Case that may not happen in a mans life than to be under the continual droppings of Classical Jurisdiction over them in all Cases 4. We have formerly proved that Classical Jurisdiction is so far from being helpful to Churches that it frustrates Christs grant of Power to particular Churches in re propriâ FINIS
That therefore it may be effectual for their eternal good it is their duty when the sentence proceeds either according to the eighteenth of Matthew upon their not hearing the Church in less hainous offences or according to 1 Cor. 5. and Rev. 22.15 upon the hainous nature of scandals given by them against common light to humble themselves under the mighty hand of God that he may exalt them in due time 1 Pet. 5.6 and to cry mightily to him to add efficacy to his Ordinance by his Spirit that their spirits may be duly and truly humbled their corruptions powerfully mortified and their souls eternally saved Be sure that you take not part with your sin against the Ordinance but take part with the Ordinance against your sin and account it your honour to honour God and exalt his Rules and let others learn hereby to fear not joyning with the Church but persisting obstinately in sin 2. Corollary Then a Congregational Church such as hath been described is the highest Ecclesiastical Tribunal under Christ in its own matters This was revealed to John as that frame of Church-Government which should continue from the Apostles time unto the end of the World when he saw a Throne set in Heaven the Trinity sitting upon it and the four living Creatures between it and the four and twenty Elders who sate round about the Throne Rev. 4.1 -9. Thither appeals must be made according to Christ his Ordinance by an offended Brother after the first and second step or by any Member that finds himself over-rigorously dealâ— with by his Brethren in these steps Matth. 18.17 18. that there the Cause may be scanned and Sentence proceed according to Christ If the Church want sufficient light or consent for the sentence they are to seek help from others by their Light and Counsel but still preserving the power of Censure intirely in the Church where Christ hath placed it The wisdom of Christ the good of the Church and of every Member and the nature of the thing require that there be some chief Tribunal in the exerciâ—â— of Church-Government unto which Appeals must be last made Juridically and from which no Appeal may be granted and expected 2. That this chief Tribunal must have no Ecclesiastical Power above it and 3. That it may not be judially censured by any Power of the same kind All the question is which is the chief Tribunal That say some must be the Classes under which such Churches stand and the Synods under which the Classes are subordinate and they give this Reason Because the end for which the Keys are given to the Church is that all offences may be removed Mat. 18.15 16 c. Which they say cannot be done if you put the chief Power of Judgment into a Congregational Church For what if an Elder what if the whole Edership yea what if the whole Church offend The Church cannot censure their Elders for that were to rule their Rulers and to judge their Judges nor will they censure themselves But a Classis or Synod of many Elders may and will reform all by judicially censuring all Answ 1. This Argument is built upon a mistake or error in the foundation of it For the Rule prescribed in Matth. 18. is â—â—t for removal of all offences but of such private and less hainous offences as grow publick and notorious only by the obstinacy of the Delinquent For if offences be publick and heinous in themselves the Apostle doth not direct Churches to proceed by those steps 1 Cor. 5.11 Rev. 22.15 2. Nor doth it make the People Rulers of their Rulers or Judges of their Judges when we say that the Church hath a power over them in case of Delinquency For Excommunication is not an act of the highest Rule or Authority but of the highest Judgment and therefore the Power of it may well be in the whole Church as their Priviledge without any intrenchment upon the Rule and Authority of Elders wherein as Officers they are above the Brethren whilst they act according to Rule But if they become Delinquents then as Members they are under the Power of the whole The Church must submit to them as Rulers whil'st they rightly exercise the Authority of their Office in Preaching Administring the Seals holding forth light from Scripture to guide them in censure ordering Speech and Silence according to Rules of Order and Edification and in other Official Acts But they must submit to the Church questioning or proceeding to censure them with good advice of Neighbour-Churches and Elders who as they concurred in giving them the right hand of fellowship in their Ordination so they should concur in approving this Censure as justly inflicted by the Church from parity of reason The Mayor in a free City or Corporation is in the right Administration of his Office above the Court none but he can perform the Acts peculiar to his place yet if he corrupt the People pervert Justice or be any way grosly and scandalously delinquent the Court can censure and despose him For the whole hath Power over any Member to preserve its purity and peace and safety against any in the Body that would corrupt disturb or destroy the same And the Covenant binds every Member to be subject to the Power of the whole either to be reformed or removed from communion of it thereby 3. Their Plaister is not suitable to heal the Sores of the Church but it is either too broad when offences of Brethren may be healed by Church-censure within themselves or it is too narrow For 1. Those Assemblies are too seldom and cannot sit together long enough to remove the many offences that fall out frequently in Churches 2. Non can they Excommunicate a Church nor any Officer or Member of a particular Chuch by warrant from Christ 3. Classes and Synods and general Councils may be under just offences as well as Churches and who shall censure them 4. This Plaister hinders the healing of the Sores of Churches For Appellatio est jus per quod prima sententia tantisper extinguitur donec de causae cognitione ad superiorem devolutâ fuerit pronunciatum if a Delinquent disliking the Churches proceeding appeals from the sentence of the Church to the Classis and for the same reason from the sentence of the Classis to a Provincial Synod then to a National Synod then to an Oecumenical Council which may not assemble in an Age while the Appeal depends he shall stand as uncensured For this is the Law of Appeals Now how can that heal which is cross to the prescription of our Lord Jesus Christ the only wise Physician He saith Tell the Church and if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an Heathen Publican But he who appeals from the Church doth not hear the Church Therefore he that so doth deserves to be cut off by the sentence of Christ which this Tradition of Appeals from Churches in re propriâ