ceased but such as had their chiefe use not for beleevers in the Church but unbeleevers out of the Church but governments are of perpetuall necessary use in the Church even as teachers and helpers unlesse wee shall say that Anarchy were fitter for a setled Church-government Object 3. But why may not these Governours be the Pastors in the church who have received an ordinary power of Government in the Church Answ The order in which the Apostle reckoneth these governments will not suffer that for here the Apostle reckoneth five severall rankes the former expresly precedent in order before the other God saith he hath set in his Church First Apostles secondly Prophets thirdly Teachers after that Miracles which is a fourth ranke then in the fift place gifts of healing and helpes governments diversities of tongues Now if by Government had been meant Pastors he would not have reckoned them in a lower order so farre after Teachers seeing they are of the same rank with them Object Why but here helpes or Deacons are set before Governments which argueth the Apostle did not regard to rank them in due order Answ It is evident by the words of order which the Apostle useth that he intendeth to reckon the foure first sorts in their due order and the fift sort of them all in a latter order after the former though in a promiscuous manner without respect of order amongst themselves for so he saith First Apostles secondarily Prophets thirdly Teachers after them Miracles then gifts of healing helpes Governments diversitie of tongues As Apostles are before Prophets so are Prophets before ordinary teachers the teachers before workers of Miracles the Miracles before them that have the gifts of healing for the gifts of healing follow after works of miracles with a note of order Then But all those last foure gifts of healing helpes Governments diversities of tongues are reckoned without respect of order amongst themselves What order is due to them is not expressed in this Scripture though it be in some other at least for some of them but cleare it is all these last foure sorts are reckoned in order after the first foure sorts Object 4. But it may be the Church in which the Apostle saith all these members are set is not meant every particular Church but the Catholick Church for every particular Church had not Apostles and Prophets Answ It is true every particular Church had not severall Apostles apart by themselves nor was it needfull they should after that Churches were once planted but every particular Church had need of his own Governours within it selfe or else wee shall make one Church subordinate to the Government of another which is incompatible to the Church of the new Testament The Lord having instituted and ordained no particular Church but the Church of a Congregation for the administration of his Ordinance unto which Congregationall Church he hath also appointed the same sort of Officers without preferment of one before another Object 5. For humane wisdome is pregnant and full of objections and exceptions against the ways and Ordinances of God may be say some these Governours are no other but Arbitrators which the Apostle biddeth the Corinthians set up in the Church for the deciding of differences amongst brethren 1. Cor. 6.4 But now since God hath set up Christian Magistrates there is no more need of such Arbiters to be chosen by each Church to compound their difference Answ These Arbiters in the Church had not place or office of Government but of Counsell onely to direct brethren in the judgement of right and wrong equitie and inequitie nor was such a power of such Arbitration any speciall gift for the Apostle thinketh every member of the Church even the least capable enough of it and sufficient for it Nor is it well said since God hath set up Christian Magistrates there need no Arbiter to be set up in the Church nor Church Governours For it is plaine the Apostle maketh it a fault or defect in the Church of Corinth that any of their members went to law at all for such suites as the least member of the Church if he were called to heare the case might arbitrate and determine and he maketh it a further fault that they goe to law under Infidels Now therefore saith he there is utterly a fault among you that brother goeth to law with brother and that under Infidels ver 6 7. The former is a defect of brotherly love the latter is a neglect of the honour of Christ and of his Church and before Infidels If brother goes to law with brother before Christian Magistrates the latter of these faults is avoyded but not the former Neither may it be thought as some have done that the benefit of Christian Magistracy taketh off the necessitie of Church-Government For the government of the Church is as the Kingdome of Christ is not of this world but spirituall and heavenly The power of the keys is far distant from the power of the sword and though one of them may need the helpe of the other when they goe astray yet when they are rightly ordered and administred the one of them doth not intercept but establish the execution of the other A third witnesse to the office of ruling Elders in the Church is that well knowne and much agitated Text in Timothy 1 Tim. 5.17 The Elders who rule well are worthy of double honour especially they who labour in Word and Doctrine This text though it have been much vext and rackt to looke and speake another way yet when all is done it still giveth a cleare and stedfast evidence to this office The most learned Adversaries of this Ordinance would fasten foure other interpretations of the place and each of them as they pretend more pertinent to the scope and sense of the Apostles words then this of ruling Elders 1. Say they by ruling Elders may be meant Deacons for the Apostle giving Timothy to understand what manner of persons they be with whose maintenance the Church is to be charged having before informed him of widowes now telleth him the Deacons also are to be maintained yea and with a double portion above them and either the Deacons are not to be maintained at all at the Churches charge or else the Apostle provideth for their maintenance in this place or no where Answ 1. There is no man to be maintained at the Churches charges but either in respect of his present poverty and necessity or in respect of his office which calleth him off from the attendance to the maintenance of his private family unto the publike service of the Church In the former case if it fall out that the Deacons be in necessity they may be supplied with some maintenance from the Church as well as any other of the poore brethren and so though this Text sayth nothing concerning them yet other Scriptures take care for them for the Deacons by the very institution of their office were to
Lay-men but our ruling Elders wee utterly deny them to be Lay-men as the word is commonly meant in this controversie but Church-officers set apart to their office by the election of the people and by imposition of hands but if they were Lay-men which they are not yet you see it is no strange or unheard of matter that Churches should be bountifull to the maintenance of sundry sorts of Church Rulers who are meerly Lay-men as their adversaries misconceive these to be yea what were the many Cloysters of Munks and Friers and Nuns in the times of Popery were they Preachers of the Word were they not Lay-men women and yet did the Churches of those times grudge them their maintenance upon pretence of their laity But the world will love his own be there never so many idle Droans or stately Rulers of mans own devising the Church must supply them not only with maintenance but with magnificence but let the Lord appoint ruling Elders according to the simplicity of the Gospel to assist his Ministers in the work of government that they might attend the more to labour in the Word if they shall expect from the Church any maintenance for their works sake Oh! that seemeth a strange matter and unheard of from all antiquity till this present age The second Reason why lay Elders as they miscall them ruling Elders as we with Paul call them are not meant in Pauls Text is because Paul mentioning the Presbyters but once in all his Epistles excludeth all lay Elders from that Presbytery Neglect not saith he the grace which is in thee which was given thee by prophecy with impositions by the hands of the Presbyterie 2 Tim. 4.14 This Christian Presbyterie gave imposition of hands to ordain Ministers but lay Elders had no right to impose hands to that purpose therefore Lay-men were none of this Presbyterie for if the Presbyterie be taken for the company of Elders none were of that company but such as might give imposition of hands or if Presbyterie be taken for the office of an Elder then none might take that function on him but must receive imposition of hands as Timothy did then Lay-men which neither give nor receive imposition of hands are wholly debarred both from the degree and from the society of the Presbyterie that was in Pauls time Our answer consisteth of three points First Lay Elders wee disclaim but ruling Elders though not attending to preaching as they have their election from the people who are the body of the Church so are they ordained set apart from amongst the people by imposition of hands of the officers of the Church who are the Presbyterie the company of Elders for by Presbyterie we conceive cannot be there meant the office of an Elder for hee speaketh of such a Presbytery as laid on hands now it is not the office of an Elder but the company of Elders that lay on hands Answ 2. When it is said no man can give what hee hath not received the light of Nature the law of Moses the Gospel of Christ do all of them make a ready answer for us The law of Nature tels us It is not necessary that they that give should alwayes formally have before-hand received that power which they give it is enough if they have received it virtually For instance a multitude of free people may elect and ordain a King over them and yet none of them had before hand received Kingly power it is enough they have a virtuall power to set up and to submit unto any lawfull forme of government which they see good for themselves in the land The people of Israel to wit some in the name of the rest for all could not at once impose their hands upon the Levites Numb 8.10 and yet they were not Levites themselves nor had received imposition of hands themselves and yet may neverthelesse impose hands upon others In the Gospel of Christ the power of the Keys is given to the Church to Peter not as an Apostle nor as an Elder but as a profest believer in the name of believers and upon occasion of the profession of his faith Mat. 16.16 to 19. whereupon the binding and loosing which is the power of the Keys is attributed to the whole Church Mat. 18.17 18. If then the power of the Keys which is the whole body of church-Church-power be given to the body of the Church though it be not in their power to exercise their pastorall preaching of the Word and administring of the Sacraments yet it is in their power to elect such whom God hath furnished with gifts among them unto such offices as may dispense all the holy things of God to them and by imposition of hands to dedicate them to God and to the publique service of his Church Now if the whole Church have this power to impose hands upon their officers in their first ordination how can it seem a strange and unheard of thing or an absurd matter that ruling Elders should together with the Pastor and Teachers all of them making up the Presbyterie of the Church impose hands in the name of the Lord and of the Church upon the ordained Answ 3. Besides there be that conceive and that not improbably that in ancient time the children baptized in the Church were not received to the Lords Supper nor into the full fruition of all Church liberties untill that they being grown up to yeers did publikely before the Church professe their faith and ratifie the covenant made for them in Baptisme and so were confirmed as they which is but a small remnant in comparison 300. yeares were spent in the Primitive persecutions whereof wee have few monuments of Antiquitie extant written in that time those wee have speake so of Elders as doe indifferently comprise as well Ruling Elder as Teaching Elders Ignatius his Presbyters whom he stileth the Court of God the Combination of the Apostles of Christ the holy Assembly and Counsellors and Assessors of the Bishops with all these Epithets may as well agree to Ruling Elders as to Preachers The Scripture doth not disdaine to admit Civill Magistrates into the fellowship of Gods Tabernacle Psal 82.1 And why not then the Rulers of his Church For Tertullian his Elders who were Presidents over the Censures of the Church and attained that honour not by Bribes but by approved Testimony Apologetic Chap. 29. what is there in his whole description of them but is compatible to Ruling Elders as well as to Preaching Yea Cyprian who lived in those ancient bloudy but zealous times doth expresly acknowledge Elders that were not Preachers For it evidently appeareth in the fift Epistle of his fourth Booke that he ordained Calinus and Ancellus to be Presbyters of his Church who were no Preachers but readers onely and yet were to be maintained Sportulis communibus that is at the common charge of the Church with the Presbyters and to sit with himselfe in their growne yeares It appeareth also in
The Ruling Elders having received the keys of Christs House as his Stewards it doth belong to their Power 1. To open and shut the doores of Christs House or Church that is to admit and receive all members and Officers into place in the Church with the consent of the Church and to keepe out the unworthy Hence Ministers are said to be ordained and admitted into office by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4.14 And if Ministers be admitted through their hands into office in the Church how much more private members after due tryall 2. If they have power to open the doores of the Church by admitting officers and other members into the Church and keeping out the unworthy shutting the doores against them Then they have also power with the consent of the Church and their fellow Elders as in the former to cast out of the Church by Excommunication such as fall into scandalous offences within the Church and doe persist therein For Ejusdem porestatis est destituere cujus est instituere The same keys that have power to open the doores have power to shut it 3. As it is the office of a Steward in a family so it is of the Elders in the Church To see that none live Inordinately without a calling or idlely in a calling but every one imployed and set a worke to his Lords advantage 2 Thes 3.10 11 12. 4. As a Steward in the family is not to suffer any members in the family to hinder his fellows in his Lords work so neither ought the Ruling Elder to suffer any to walke scandalously in the Congregation for that hindereth edification which is the worke that each one in his place is to set forward in the house of God And the Church-Rulers are to attend to see it done accordingly 5. It is the Ruling Elders office to prepare matters for the Congregation as much as may be to prevent their trouble by keeping out such complaints and other matters as are not yet ripe for the Churches cognizance And by ordering such things as are to be presented to them Paul consulteth with the Elders as well as with the Apostles at Jerusalem before he presented himselfe to the agitation of the Church Act. 21.18 to 24. 6. It belongeth to the Ruling Elders as well as to the Teachers to moderate the carriage of all matters in the Congregation Assembled as to call on Strangers of other Churches or members to speak upon occasion Act. 13.15 And such as may call men forth to speak may call for silence when speech is unseasonable 7. Those Elders of Ephesus whom Paul sent for to wit both the Teaching and Ruling Elders Acts 20.17 those he commands to feed the flock of God ver 28. which implyeth they should be able not onely to rule but to instruct the people though not by attending to a word of Exhortation which is the Pastors office nor by attending to a word of doctrine which is the Teachers office yet by attending to a word of Admonition For the Apostle maketh Admonition the worke of them that are over the Church in the Lord 1 Thes 5.12 that is that Rule over them The same word which is ascribed to Ruling Elders 1 Tim. 5.17 whom he joyneth with those that labour in word and doctrine in both places And indeed Rule without counsell and instruction is dumbe Thus all Elders are apt to teach according to 1 Tim. 3.5 8. It is a part of their office though it be not theirs alone to visit the sick especially when they are sent for and together with some counsell and admonition to pray for them and to helpe forward their spirituall estate as Jam. 5.14 15 16. Wee have been the more large in clearing the severall sorts of these Elders which Christ hath ordained in his Church because wee finde Satan hath been very busie to set the wits of men a work both to confound the severall Functions of the Pastor and Teacher and utterly to abandon the office of a Ruling Elder Now for Deacons which are the other ordinary Officers ordained by Christ for the perpetuall service of the Church All men doe acknowledge them both to be Instituted expresly in the Scriptures Acts 6.2 to 6. 1 Tim. 3.8 to 13. and continued in the Church throughout all ages though not without sundry mixtures of corruptions in the practise of the Church which is impertinent to our purpose to prosecute who onely intend to declare and cleare our owne practise and proceedings Deacons therefore wee reserve in our Churches but without distinction of pre-eminence of some of them above others much lesse over the Ministers and Elders Neither doe wee imploy them about the Ministery of the Word nor about the Government of the Church For the Apostles thought themselves unmeet both to attend to the Ministery of the Word and to prayer and to serve Tables also And therefore the worke which the Apostles laid downe and which the Deacons were elected and ordained to take up was the serving of Tables Act. 6.2 to wit the serving of all those Tables which pertained to the Church to provide for which are the Lords Table the Tables of the Ministers or Elders of the Church and the Tables of the poore brethren whether of their own body or strangers for the maintaining whereof wee doe not appoint them to goe up and downe to collect the Benevolences of abler Brethren but as the Apostles received the oblations of the Brethren brought and laid downe at their feete Acts 4.35 and thereby made distribution as the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 use of the Church required so the Deacons being ordained to take up and execute that part of the office which the Apostles laid downe they receive the Oblations of the Brethren every Lords day brought unto them and laid downe before them or else brought unto them on the week day and distribute the same as the use and need of the Church doth require SECT III. AS for Widowes whom Paul speaketh of as Vervants to the Church 2 Tim. 5.9 10. wee look at them as fit Assistants to the Deacons in ministering to the sick poore Brethren in sundry needfull services which are not so fit for men to put their hands unto onely wee finde it somewhat rare to finde a woman of so great an age as the Apostle describeth to wit of threescore years and withall to be so hearty and healthy and strong as to be fit to undertake such a service SECT IV. HAving thus declared what are the Officers wee desire to supply each of our Churches withall wee come now to declare in what manner they are Chosen and Ordained unto their Offices When therefore any of the Churches are destitute of any of these Officers the Brethren of the Church according to the Apostles advice in defect of Deacons and so in defect of all other Officers they look out from amongst themselves such persons as are in some measure qualified according to
of the Apostolicall Churches In the choosing of an Apostle the voices of people went as farre as any humane Suffrages could goe of an hundred and twenty they chose two and presented them before the Lord and his Apostles And because and Apostle was immediately to be called of God out of those two God chose one Act. 1.15.23.26 Act. 14.23 The Apostles are said to have ordained Elders by lifting up of hands to wit of the people as the originall word implieth And the multitude of the Disciples are directed by the Apostles to look out and choose seven Deacons Act. 6.3.15 The practice of succeeding Churches for many yeares after is plaine from Cyprians words Lib. 1. Epist 4. Plebs maxime potestatem habet vel dignos Sacerdotes eligendi vel indignos recusandi Object 2. It is also demanded by what warrant doth a particular Church depute such who are not Presbyters to lay their hands upon Presbyters Were it not more regular and orderly to repaire to some Bishop to receive imposition of hands from him or as the Presbyters in every Church in Crete received imposition of hands from Titus who was left in Crete with Episcopall Authoritie for that very end Tit. 1.5 or rather then take imposition of hands from lay-men as they are called why doe not the Churches rather intreat the Elders of other Churches to supply the defect of their owne Presbytery by the Presbyters of other Churches Ans The warrant by which each particular Church doth depute some of their own body though not Presbyters to lay their hands upon those whom they have chosen to be their Presbyters is grounded upon the Power of the keys which the Lord Jesus Christ who received all fulnesse of Power from the Father hath given to the Church For the power of the keys is the power of opening and shutting binding and loosing Matth. 16.19 And this is given to the whole Church met together in his name Mat. 18.18 Whatsoever saith Christ speaking of the Church yee shall binde on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever yee shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven which is the whole ministeriall power of the Keys SECT VII Object 1. THe Church is not the first subject and receptacle of all Ecclesiasticall power For though the Church elect a Pastor or other Elder yet the office of a Pastor is from Christ Eph. 4.8 And so is his Authoritie from Christ also And if he have neither his Office nor his Authoritie from the Church how can he be ordained by the imposition of the hands of the Church Answ 1. Though the office of a Pastor in generall be immediately from Christ and the authoritie from him also yet the application of this office and of this authoritie to this elect person is by the Church and therefore the Church hath sufficient and just warrant as to elect and call a Presbyter unto office so to ordaine him to it by imposition of hands They that have Power to elect a King have power also to depute some in their name to set the Crowne upon his head Answ 2. As the Authoritie of the Pastor and other Elders is not from the Church but from Christ so neither is their Office and Authoritie from the Bishop nor from the Presbytery nor from the Classis of Presbyteries If therefore that were a just impediment why the Church should not lay hands upon their elect Pastors or Elders because neither their office nor their Authoritie is from the Church then neither may the Bishop nor the Presbytery nor the Classis lay their hands upon them because their office and Authoritie is no more nor so much from them as from the Church nor by this Argument might the Apostles themselves if they were present ordaine Officers because neither the office nor the Authoritie is from the Apostles but from Christ onely Neither will it follow from hence as some object that if the Elders received their ordination from the Church then they should execute their office in the Churches name or that then they may be more or lesse diligent in their office at the Churches appointment or that then the Church hath a Lord-like power over them or that then the Elders must receive their errand from the Church as an Ambassadour doth from him from whom he receiveth his Commission or that then the Church in defect of all Officers may performe all duties of their Officers as to administer Sacraments and the like None of all these things will follow For 1. Most of these Objections doe strike as much against imposition of hands by Bishops or Presbyters 2. Though the Elders doe receive the application of their office and of their power by the Church yet not from the Church or if from the Church ministerially onely as instruments unto Christ So that they cannot choose or ordaine whom they please to what office they please but whom they see the Lord Jesus hath prepared and fitted for them and as it were chosen and ordained to their hands nor may they inlarge or straiten the limits of his office whom they doe elect or ordaine but as the Lord hath prescribed nor can they give him any errand but onely a Charge to looke to the ministery which he hath received from the Lord nor have they any more Lordly power over him then he over them but both ministeriall as they have received from the Lord neither may they administer Sacraments in defect of all Officers because that by appointment from Christ pertaineth onely to such as are called by office to preach the Gospel Mat. 28.19 20. As for mutuall instruction and admission election and ordination of Officers opening of the doores of the Church by admission of members and shutting the same by Church-Censures these things they may doe if need be without Officers yea and if all their Officers were found culpable either in hereticall Doctrine or scandalous crime yet the Church hath lawfull Authoritie to proceed to the censure of them all For they that as a Church might admonish Archippus Col. 4.17 might in case he had not hearkened to their admonition have proceeded against him to Excommunication And they that might so proceed against one of their Officers might in like sort upon like ground proceed against them all which they could not doe if the Church did receive the power of the keys not immediately from Christ but from the Presbyters And yet in such cases our Churches are never wont to proceed but in the presence and with the consent and approbation of other Churches as knowing that in such weightie cases in the multitude of Counsellors there is safetie And as the Church doth not choose any Elders but in the presence and with the approbation of other Churches so neither doth it proceed to the censure of them but with the like grave and solemne assistance Object 2. The Apostles received the power of the keys immediately from Christ Joh. 20.23 And therefore the Church
2 Cor. 8.1 2. 2. In the Epistles to Timothy and Titus there is no difference at all put of any one Bishop above his fellows except onely the difference of Ruling and Teaching Elders 1 Tim. 5.17 And those as they are not set over many Churches so neither are any of them set above his fellowes onely the Preachers are allowed more reverence and maintenance then the Rulers If the Holy Ghost had appointed some singular Bishops above the rest of any transcendent and eminent office he would have appointed him also some eminent and transcendent proper work of his office But what shall that be shall it be Ordination as Hierome saith speaking of the Bishops in his time Quid facit Episcopus excepta ordinatione quod Presbyter non facit Why that is a work of Rule or shall it be hearing accusations against Elders and censuring them accordingly as 1 Tim. 5.19 20 Why that is a work of Rule also Now the Apostle acknowledgeth no Acts of Rule nor any Elders or Bishops that doe Rule as worthy of greater honour then such Elders as labour in Word and Doctrine 1 Tim. 5.17 It is therefore apparently contradictory to the institutions given by Paul in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus to set up any eminent or transcendent Bishop in the Church in respect of Rule or exercise of office of more honour and power then pertaineth to all the Ministers of the Word So that evident it is that neither Ordination nor Jurisdiction which are both of them Acts of Rule are to be fetched from transcendent Bishops but pertaine indifferently to all the Presbyters SECT IX Object BUt if no transcendent acts of Jurisdiction and rule be reserved unto one Bishop alone above other Ministers how cometh it then to passe that in Rev. 2.3 each singular Angel in the Churches of Asia is admonished and reproved alone for all the faults that are found in his Church whereof he is the Angel Why should one Angel alone be charged with the guilt of all those faults in the Church if it were not in his hand alone to redresse and punish them Answ It is an usuall thing with John and found also in other Scriptures to use the name of Angel not singularly for one person but collectively for a company administring the same work As the seven Angels that sounded the seven Trumpets and the seven Angels that powred out the seven Vialls were not seven singular persons but seven companies or sorts of persons performing that service And when David saith the Angel of the Lord pitcheth his Tent about them which feare him Psal 34.7 He speaketh not of one Angel alone but of many of them For one alone cannot pitch his Tents about all them that feare God And that John in the second and third Chapters of the Revelation did not meane by the Angel of the Church one singular person but the whole company of the Ministers of the Church the whole Presbytery of persons more then one it is evident by his speech unto them as unto many The Devill saith he shall cast some of you into Prison Rev. 2.10 Some of you Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which implies more then one And againe in Rev. 2.24 speaking unto the Angel of the Church of Thyatira But unto you * Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 you in the plurall I say and unto the rest of Thiatira which argueth that the Angel distinguished from the rest of the Church was more then one person For he saith unto you in the plurall number Object But now say some Let it be so then if such eminent and transcendent Bishops that is Diocesan Bishops who claime a peerelesse power in Ordination and Jurisdiction to themselves alone have no foot-hold in the Scripture then let them neither have name nor place portion right nor memoriall in the Christian Churches of the new Testament But yet neverthelesse the Apostle is cleare for a Presbytery and acknowledgeth imposition of hands even upon Timothy how much more upon other Elders by the Presbytery 1 Tim. 4.14 Answ Wee willingly also acknowledge the same where God hath furnished any Church with a Presbytery To them it pertaineth to ordaine by imposition of hands any Elders or Deacons that shall be chosen by office by the Church committed to them But if the Church want a Presbytery for want of Elders they want a warrant to repaire to the Presbytery of another Church to impose hands upon their elect Elders Our Reasons be Reason 1 First Ordination by imposition of hands is a work of Church Power as all men acknowledge Now as no Church hath Power over another but all of them stand in Brotherly equalitie one towards another so the Presbytery of one Church hath no Power over the Elders of another As the Apostles having all of them received the same Commission Joh. 20.23 had none of them power over another so the Churches having received all of them the same power of the keys as hath been shewed above they none of them have power over another and therefore no power of ordination of one anothers Officers Reason 2 As every Church hath equally received the same power of the keys so ought they to maintaine and stand fast in the same The power of the keys as it is a priviledge and libertie purchased to the Church by the bloud of the Lord Jesus so at a lesse rate it may not be alienated from the Church Christ by his death and resurrection hath obtained all power both in heaven and in earth Mat. 28.18 Phil. 2.8 9 10. And looke where he hath communicated the same by his Testament ratified in his bloud there it ought to remaine and not to be removed out of their hands by the hand of man or Angel Whence it appeareth unlawfull for any Church of Christ to put over that power which they have received of Christ out of their own hands into the hands of the Presbyters of other Churches The Apostles having received all of them equall power from Christ it was not lawfull for them by common consent to have conferred upon Peter and Paul James and John a transcendent government over them all If some of the Apostles seeme to be pillars as is said of Peter James and John Gal. 2.9 and so more eminent in gifts then all their brethren it may put upon their brethren an expediency and sometimes a necessitie to call upon them for more counsell but not to call them to more Authoritie In like sort if a Church in a Citie and the Officers thereof be of more eminent gifts and graces then a Church in a village it is a just occasion for the Church in the village to listen the more after the counsell of the Church in the Citie but not to submit the more unto their Authoritie in the way of subjection And so it is true a Classis of the Presbyters of many Churches may excell in more varietie of all abilities then the
Presbytery of any one Church yet that onely reacheth to make their counsell the more weightie and acceptable but not to invest them with more rule or more authoritie Thirdly If a Church shall send to the Presbyters of another Church for ordination of their Elders they may as well repaire and submit to them for censuring of their offenders And would not that be a manifest transgression of the royall law of Church-Government Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. If a Brother see his brother falne into a scandall and after dealing with him first himselfe alone and then with the conviction of two or three witnesses find him to give no satisfaction at all whither shall the offended brother repaire If to the Church whereof the brother offending is a member that is indeed according to the rule but what need is there then or what ground of repairing to the Presbyters of other Churches by what Authoritie shall they proceed to censure the offender that is a member of another Church Indeed if a Brother offended shall complaine to the Church whereof the offending brother is a member and the Church neglect to doe their dutie through prejudice or partialitie or other remisnesse it may then be lawfull to make use of the brotherly love and brotherly communion which one Church oweth and beareth to another The brother offended and not satisfied with the proceedings of his own Church against the offence may then repaire to the Elders of other Churches and crave their judgement and counsell in the case in hand and if they doe not approve upon good inquirie the proceedings of their sister-Church they may admonish the Elders of that Church touching what they judge amisse But if the Elders hearken not unto them the Elders who admonish them being unsatisfied may acquaint their own Church with the offence of their neighbour Church and then in the name of the Lord and of their own Church they may admonish them thereof by Letters and Messengers sent to them to that purpose If yet the Church admonished hearken not unto them the Church offended may and ought to acquaint their neighbour Churches therewithall who may joyne with them either in convincing the offending Church of their sin and so prevaile with them unto reformation or else if they persist in obstinacy they may from thenceforth withdraw all continuance of brotherly communion with them till they acknowledge their transgression which is as farre as Churches may goe in a Church-way in case of obstinacy of a neighbour-Church in any offence and so farre they may goe according to the proportion of the rule Mat. 18.15 16 17. Look what rule a brother is to attend unto in seeking to heale the offence of a brother the same rule may and ought a sister-Church to attend unto in seeking to heale an offending sister-Church And looke as Paul who had received the same equall power of the keys with Peter reproved Peter openly when he was to be blamed Gal. 2.11 so one Church who hath received the same equall power of the keys with another may reprove another Church openly when they are to be blamed And looke by what power they may reprove them by the same they may proceed to withdraw from them if they hearken not to their reproofe according to God But all this notwithstanding they will not allow a brother offended to complaine to the Presbyters of another Church till he see no hope of removall of the offence by his own Church at home CHAP. III. Of the Addition of Members to the Church SECT I. THe Church being thus gathered and furnished with such Officers in such manner as the Lord hath appointed looke as in the first Primitive Church the Lord added to them daily such as should be saved Acts 2.47 so doe wee admit and receive from the Lord such as he sendeth and addeth to us The first and lowest number of a Church to which the other members are added is not expresly limited in the Word onely it is not so low as some have conceived to consist onely of two or three it is a mistake of that place Mat. 18.20 where a promise of Christs presence is made to two or three to conceive it made to the lowest number of a Church-body for those two or three are not considered there as a Church-body but as a sufficient number of witnesses to joyne with a brother offended in convincing and admonishing the brother that gave the offence against whom if he doe not hearken to them they are then further to proceed and to tell the Church Which argueth that they themselves are not a Church but a smaller company agreeing in a dutie of brotherly love either to heale an offending brother by their own admonition or to witnesse against him before the Church and yet they have a speciall promise of Christs presence with them in the dutie lest they might thinke such a labour of love undertaken in vaine But the Church must needs be a greater number then two or three seeing these two or three are to referre the person and the cause to a greater body then themselves for though there might be a domesticall Church in Adam and Eve at the beginning yet such a Church which Christ hath instituted in the new Testament consisteth of a greater number The very Officers of a Church compleatly furnished are no lesse then foure a Pastor a Teacher an Elder a Deacon and therefore the body of the Church had need to be of a greater number then so And though the essence of a Church may consist without the integritie of all his members as a lame man that wanteth some of his members may have the essence of a man yet under seven a Church can hardly consist of so many members as doe performe any part of a Church-body To such a body how many members may be added is not limited expresly in the Word onely it is provided in the Word that they be no more then that all may meet in one Congregation that all may heare and all may be edified For as hath been noted above the Apostle so describeth the whole Church as meeting in one place 1 Cor. 14.23 But if all cannot heare all cannot be edified Besides the Apostle requireth that when the Church meeteth together for the celebrating of the Lords Supper they shall tarry one for another 1 Cor. 11.33 Which argueth the Church indued with onely ordinary Officers should consist of no greater number then that all might partake together of the Lords Supper in one Congregation and therefore such Parishes as consist of 15000. though they were all fit materialls for Church-fellowship yet ought to be divided into many Churches as too large for one When the hive is too full Bees swarme into a new hive so should such excessive numbers of Christians issue forth into more Churches Whence it appeareth to be an error to say there is no limitation or distinction of Parishes meaning of Churches jure divino for though
and my Spirit with the power of the Lord Jesus Christ to deliver such a one unto Satan Where Paul saying in the verse foregoing that he had judged already that so it should be done doth not argue that now the Church was at hand he took the power of judging the Cause wholly unto himselfe and the publication and declaration of it onely in the Church but that he had seene already evident cause to judge the partie worthy to be cast out but directed them to doe it with all the power that is requisite to that action As 1. In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ in whom the principall power of all Church-censures resteth 2. When they that is the whole Church are gathered together not the Bishops nor the Presbyters alone 3. And Pauls spirit with them to wit so much of Apostolicall Authoritie being committed to the Church and present with it in such cases 4. He speaketh of the power of the Lord Jesus with them in this action which holdeth forth their Authoritie 5. When the Excommunicate person was humbled under this Censure Paul beseecheth them to forgive him to comfort him to confirme their love unto him 2 Cor. 2.7 8. Now they who have power of forgiving an offender have power also of binding him under wrath Ejusdem potestatis c. ligare c. solvere Object 1. All this argueth no more but that some in the Church had this power to wit the Presbytery of the Church but not the whole body of the people Answ 1. There is no word in the Text that attributeth any power to the Presbytery apart or singularly above the rest But as the reproofe is directed to them all for not mourning and taking the offence to heart that the offender might be taken away from amongst them ver 1.2 so is Commandement directed to them all when they are gathered together to proceed unto the casting of him out In like sort in the end of the Chapter he exhorteth them all againe Put away therefore saith he from amongst you that wicked person ver 13. and that by a judiciall power to wit as under Christ doe not yee judge them that are within ver 12. And lest this Judgement should be restrained to the Presbyters onely he magnifieth the judgements of the Saints taking occasion from hence to stretch their Judicature in some cases even to Civill matters also Know yee not saith he that the Saints shall judge the world yea the Angels 1 Cor. 6.2 3. And thereupon he incourageth them to betrust the deciding of any Civill Cause depending between Brethren to the Judicature of the meanest Brother in the Church ver 4. rather then to fly suddenly unto Civill Magistrates especially amongst the Heathen Object 2. But if the power of Judicature be committed to the whole Church together with the Presbyterie then all the multitude shall be made Governours and who then shall be governed Answ The multitude of Brethren are governed by the Elders so long as they rule aright to wit whilest they hold forth the Word and voyce of Christ which the sheep of Christ are wont to heare Joh. 10.4 But in case the officers do erre and commit offence they shall be governed by the whole body of the Brethren though otherwise the Brethren are bound to obey and submit to them in the Lord Heb. 13.17 Object 3. A democraticall government might do well in Athens a city fruitfull of pregnant wits but will soone degenerate to an Anarchie a popular tumult amongst rude common people Answ 1. It is unworthy the spirit of so godly learned a man as maketh this objection to preferre Athens before Jerusalem pregnant wits before sanctified hearts Answ 2. Though the government were democraticall as it is not yet there is no tumultuous disorder where not the will of each man beareth the sway but the voyce of Christ alone is heard who is the Head and wise Monarch of the Church Object If it be said tumult and disturbance and confusion cannot be avoided where the multitude have all of them not only leave but power to speak and one will be ready to take the word out of the others mouth and one of them to thwart and contradict one another and will not this make the Church of Christ a confluence of Cyclops Answ All such disorder is easily and timely prevented by the Elders who have power from Christ to restrain any mans speech whilest another is speaking and to cut off any means speech that groweth either impertinent or intemperate the Elders having received in speciall manner the power of the keys they have power to open and shut the dores of speech and silence in which respect the government of the Church is not meerly democraticall but as the best governments be of a mixt temper in respect of Christ whose voyce only must be heard and his rule kept it is a Monarchy in respect of the peoples power in choosing officers and joynt power with the officers in admitting members in censuring offenders it is a Democracy in respect of the officers instruction and reproof of the people in the publike ministery and in ordering of all things in the Assembly it is an Aristocracy what is found good in any civill government is in Church-government and what is found evill is by the wisdome of Christ safely avoided and prevented But that we may more distinctly declare our selves wherein lyeth the difference of their mutuall authority both of the Church over the Elders and the Elders over the Church wee conceive the Church exerciseth severall acts of authority over their Elders to wit in three cases 1. In calling and electing them to office and in ordaining them also thereunto in defect of their Presbyterie 2. In sending them forth upon the publike service of Christ as the whole Church at Jerusalem sent forth chosen Ministers with letters of instruction to Antioch and other Churches Acts 15.22 Now the Ambassador is not greater then he that sent him but usually inferiour Job 13.16 3. In case of offence given by any Elder or by the whole Eldership together the Church hath authority to require satisfaction of them and if they do not give due satisfaction to proceed to censure according to the qualitie of the offence For wee see when some of the Church of Jerusalem tooke offence against Peter for communicating with the Gentiles and contended with him about it Peter condescended to give ample and due account of his actions to the fatisfaction of them all Acts 11.2 to 8. If admonition and in some cases excommunication be ordinances of God sanctified for the healing of the soules of Gods people gone astray it were a sacrilegious injury to the Elders to deprive them of the benefit of such wholsome medicines when the estate of their soules should come to stand in need thereof and it being a ruled case Cujus est instituere ejus est destituere If Plebs obsequens praeceptis Dominicis ipsa
is ready to send and commend such of their members as their selves may spare and are fit for office but not called to office amongst themselves to supply the necessities of their Brethren SECT VI. A Sixth way of communion amongst our Churches is by way of admonition as it one Church should be credibly given to understand of some scandall arising in another Church whether by corruption in doctrine or in manners and upon diligent search and inquiry the report is found true the Church hearing thereof sendeth Letters or Messengers or both unto the Elders of that Church where such offence is found and exhorteth them to take a speedy and diligent course for the redresse thereof but if the Elders of that Church should be remisse therein or be faulty themselves they then certifie the whole Church thereof to call upon their officers as Paul sent to the Church of Coloss to call upon Archippus to take diligent heed to the fullfilling of that work of the Ministery which hee had received of the Lord Col. 4.17 If the Church heare them the scandall is removed if it heare them not the Church offended herewith taketh in the help of two or three Churches more to joyne with them in their exhortation or admonition It still the Church where the offence lieth persisteth in the neglect of their duty and of the counsell of their Brethren either the matter would be referred to a Congregation of many or all the Churches together if need should require or else if the offence be evident and weighty and of ill though not generall consequence the Churches offended with them would as justly they might withdraw themselves from the right hand of fellowship and so forbeare all such exercises of mutuall brotherly communion with them which all the Churches of Christ are wont to walke in one towards another We have never yet been put to the utmost extent of this duty towards any of our Churches The Lord hitherto so farre preventing with his grace that no Church hath stood out so long in maintaining any offence found amongst them But if it should so fall out which God forbid wee look at it as our dutie to be faithfull one Church to another in like sort as the Brethren of the same Church are called to be faithfull one towards another Doe not Churches injoy brotherly Communion one with another as well as brethren of the same Church The Church in the Canticles tooke care not onely for her own members but for her little sister which had no breasts Cant. 8.8 And would shee have taken no care of having her breasts healed if her breasts had been distempered and given corrupt milke The Apostles had a publick care by vertue of their office of all the Churches 2 Cor. 11.28 And is the publick spirit of grace and love dead with them ought not all the Churches of Christ to have a care and watchfull eye over the publick good of one another Though not virtute officii yet intuitu charitatis SECT VII THe seventh and last way of the Communion of our Churches is by way of propagation or multiplication of Churches Though this was a peculiar eminency of the Apostolike calling for them in their life-times to travell into all Nations to preach the Gospel to beget Disciples to gather them into Church-estate and so to plant Churches wheresoever they came yet that which they did by vertue of their office is reserved unto the Churches of Christ to prosecute and carry along according to their measure throughout all generations and in all Nations for the inlargement of the kingdome of Christ unto the end of the world The power of the keys which was immediately given by Christ unto his Apostles is also given by Christ unto all the Churches in that fulnesse of measure which the establishment and enlargement of Christs kingdome doth require If then any particular Church of Christ shall come in processe of time to be so farre multiplyed as that like Bees when the hive is too full they are necessarily occasioned to swarme forth as it is indeed the case when the voice of their Ministers cannot reach to all in such or in the like case the Church surcharged with multitude may send forth sundry of their members fit for the purpose to enter into a Church-estate amongst themselves or if a number of godly Christians shall come over into a Countrey where they finde the Churches so full that they cannot with conveniency joyne with them the Church may comfortably encourage them to enter into holy Covenant amongst themselves They may also commend both unto the one Company and unto the other such able gifted men whom they may fitly choose to be Ministers and Officers to them and both then when they enter into Covenant and gather into Church-estate as hath been shewed in the beginning as also when they goe about to choose and ordaine Church-Officers amongst themselves the Churches already established ought to be ready to helpe them with their presence counsell and assistance so farre as shall be found requisite for the propagation and enlargement of the kingdome of Christ in the multiplication of Churches according to the order of the Gospel Thus have wee given unto all our holy Brethren throughout the Churches of our Lord Jesus a just and true account of all our proceedings in Church-affaires so farre as concerneth our way and order amongst our selves If wee fall short of the Rule in some thing or other goe astray it is our humble and earnest request unto all our godly learned Brethren that they will be pleased Erranti comiter monstrare viam but if the way wee walke in be found upon serious and mature consideration to be agreeable to the rules of the Gospell as wee verily beleeve it is let all the upright in heart be intreated in the name of the Lord Jesus not to judge or speake evill of the wayes of Christ before his people But rather seeke how to addresse themselves and to call on others to walke in the straight steps of the Lord Jesus in the kingdome of his grace till wee shall all come to meete him in the kingdome of his glory CHAP. VII Of the way of reformation in the Congregations in England SECT I. WEE take not upon us as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to prescribe unto our Brethren in England men of their Churches and eminent lights in the world what course to take in pursuing and perfecting the great worke of Reformation in England Nay wee know our own Tenuity the store of busines enough which wee have to attend unto neere home Neverthelesse as wee cannot cease to pray for and seek their good as our own so wee cannot but rejoyce with them to behold that open doore which God hath set before them and with that all their hearts were so far enlarged towards the Lord and to his waves as wee heare his hand is enlarged towards them Onely being absent in body but present in
Bishop which was the cause why the good old Bishop Valerius was hardly spoken of for suffering Augustine a Presbyter though a learned Presbyter to preach before him which is said never any African Bishop had allowed before him Now whence should such an offence as was taken against Valerius arise but from translating the silence of Ruling Elders from Preaching in the presence of Pastors and Teachers unto those Presbyters also who were called oft to preach the Word freely and diligently as well as the Bishops themselves But when through corruption of times Bishops claimed to themselves the principall pastorall cure of Soules then it was taken for an offensive matter that Teaching Elders should preach before them as before it was unwonted for Ruling Elders to preach before the Teaching ordinarily Object But there remaines one objection or two which some learned and prudent men have made against the office of Ruling Elders Object 1. It is not credible that the office of Ruling Elders should be of Divine or Apostolicall Institution and no footsteps left of it in any Church of Christ for these many hundred yeares Popery it selfe though it corrupted all Ordinances yet retaineth some footsteps of every Ordinance of Christ though much perverted from the first Institution But there are no footsteps at all of those Ruling Elders extant in any Church but those of Genevah and such as have followed their patterne For though some tell us of Church-Wardens and Vestry men in the Parish Churches of England who assist the Preachers in the governing of the Church yet there is a great difference between them and Ruling Elders For these Church-Wardens and Vestry men are appointed not for assistance to the Ministers in governing the Church but for other purposes As Church-Wardens for keeping the Churches stock and laying it out upon necessary repaires of the place of Gods Worship called the Church and the Vestry being a company of the wisest and richest Parishioners that have been or are to be Church-Wardens are exercised in auditing the accompts of the Church-Wardens and Collectors for the poore And though now and then they are taken up in admonishing an unruly neighbour yet they doe it not by Authoritie as Rulers but by Christian discretion and charitie Answ Wee doe not say that Church-Wardens and Vestry men are the same with Ruling Elders for though they are both chose by the body of the Church yet in the choice the qualifications of Ruling Elders are not attended to nor are they so ordained either with the like holy Solemnitie or invested with the same measure of spirituall power nor allowed to continue for life as Ruling Elders are and ought to be But yet such as they be wee may see in them some footsteps and remnants and as it were Rudera of that holy and ancient Ordinance so much as is escaped out of the ruines of Antichristian Apostasie For to say nothing of Chancellors Commissaries and Officialls who are meere Lay Elders and yet administer Church-Government not in one Church onely but in many scores of Churches what other thing soundeth the very name of Church-Wardens Guardiani Ecclesiae but Church-Guardians or Church-Rulers And what is the company of Vestrymen but a kinde of a Consistory Secondly Though by the Sophistry of Satan and of his Vicar the man of sin a great part of this care is transformed from ordering the spirituall body of the Church to take care of the body of the materiall Church or Temple yet what power of Government is left in any Congregation besides Preaching the Word the Church-Wardens and Vestery men doe assist the Ministers in managing the same they observe all scandalous disorders that are found in any of the Church-Ministers or people they admonish the offenders And though they be over-rulers to present all disorders to the Cathedrall Church and the Officers thereof which of right they should complaine of when the offenders are incorrigible onely to their own Congregation yet it is an usuall thing for the Bishop and his Officers to returne such offenders having first paid them their fees to the Minister and Church-Wardens to make acknowledgement of their offences before them and to professe their amendment of which also they must bring a Certificate under the Minister and Church-Wardens hands Yea of our knowledge there be some peculiar priviledged Churches in England exempted from the Jurisdiction of the Bishop and his Officers where the Church-Wardens and Ministers either by themselves or with the consent of the Congregation doe transact all that Government which in other Churches the Bishop and his Officers doe invade and usurpe as to admonish offenders to enjoyne acknowledgement of scandalous offences and to debarre from the Sacraments c. And by this means they represse idlenesse drunkennesse swearing Sabbath-breaking and the like disorders with better successe then other Townes can doe who have the helpe of Major and Justices but not so much spirituall power in the Church but by that power which is still left in some Churches unto their Ministers and Guardians or Rulers it may not obscurely appeare that anciently they did enjoy it amongst themselves before one Church began to Lord it over another Object The other Objection which is made against Ruling Elders is That it is a matter of perilous consequence to set up Rulers in the Church and that by Authoritie from the Word of God when yet the Word hath no where set forth the limits and bounds of their Authoritie Answ The word of God hath clearly enough limited the bounds of a Ruling Elders Calling and the worke of his Rule For since all Ecclesiasticall power is the power of the keyes not of the Sword Matth. 16.19 And the Kingdome of Christ is not of this world Joh. 18.36 It is plaine no Church-Governour may take up the power of the sword to wit Civill Jurisdiction without usurpation The power of the sword is Princely Lordly But the power of the Keys is onely Stewardly and Ministeriall For so it is said the Keys of the House of David to Eliakim Isa 22.22 And he was over the House Ver. 15. Which phrase of being over the House is translated properly Gen. 43.19 Steward of the House Seeing then the Kingdome of Christ is spiritnall and not worldly and the Government of his Kingdome is not Lordly but Stewardly and Ministeriall evident it is that these Ruling Elders in the Church may onely attend to works of spirituall and ministeriall Rule And further because such acts of spirituall Rule as are dispenced in the preaching of the Word the Ruling Elders are not called to attend unto but that worke is left unto Pastors and Teachers Therefore plaine it is that what acts soever of spirituall Rule and Government Christ hath committed to his Church over and above the Ministery of the Word and Sacraments All such acts of Rule are committed to the Ruling Elders and none but such To Instance then in the particular duties of the Ruling Elders Office
some publick offence which they lie under as hath been already opened Surely though this third reason reach not Infants yet the two former doe and prevent as their Parents of just claime of the Lords Supper so them of due right of Baptisme with us For neither have wee power over them neither have they communion with any particular Church being dismissed from the Church where they were baptized and recommended to none Against this sundry things are objected and such as seeme of much weight as 1. That the Sacrament of Baptisme hath been administred to some who were no members of any visible Church and therefore why not to the Children of non-members as Philip baptized the Eunuch Acts 8.37 38. and Peter baptized Cornelius and his houshold Acts 10.47 48. Paul baptized Lydia and her houshold the Gaoler and his houshold Acts 16.15.33 To which wee answer three things * First The Apostles had an unlimited power and might baptize beleevers professing the faith and their seed wheresoever they came but the power of Pastors and Teachers is limited to their own particular visible Church which hath called them to minister unto them * Secondly It cannot be proved that the Apostles or Evangelists baptized any but such as either were members of some visible Church before they preached to them or else they gathered them into a visible Church estate before they baptized them * The Eunuch in Acts 8. was a Proselyte to the Church of Jerusalem for the Text saith he came up to Hierusalem for to worship Acts 8.27 Neither let any man object that his membership at Hierusalem would not intitle him to Baptisme seeing Baptisme is a Sacrament of the Christian Church not of the Jewish * for whatsoever member of the Jewish Church as beleeved in Christ as the Messiah and professed that faith he was capable of Baptisme for such they were whom John baptized Mat. 3.6 and Christs Disciples Joh. 4.2 yea all the Israelites were baptized in the cloud and in the Sea in the dayes of Moses 1 Cor. 10.2 * As for Lydia and the Gaoler and both their families they lived together in the same Citie of Philippi Act. 16.12 where was a company also of other brethren ver 4. and from the beginning of the Gospel which doubtlesse was when he preached to them Acts 16. he speaketh of them as a Church Know yee Philippians saith he that in the beginning of the Gospel no Church communicated with mee as concerning giving and receiving but yee onely Phil. 4.15 Which evidently holdeth them forth as a Church at that time and that Paul did first gather the brethren there into a Church when he baptized Lydia and the Gaoler and others there And indeed the Commission which Christ gave his Apostles holdeth it forth that they were by preaching to make Disciples before they baptized them and their children Mat. 28.19 Now a Disciple as the meaning of the word implyeth is a Scholler in Christs schoole and therefore when the Apostles were directed to make Disciples before they did baptize them they were not onely to convert them to the faith but also to gather them as Disciples or Schollers into a Schoole of Christ and the Schoole of Christ is every particular visible Christian Church wherein some are teachers some are Disciples or Schollers and his Discipline is exercised amongst them Neither is it credible that the Apostles would baptize any that is apply to them the seale of the Covenant given unto the Church before they had taught them the Covenant it selfe and entred them into it in which regard wee cannot easily thinke that when Peter baptized Cornelius and his family he did onely perceive they had received the holy Ghost and evidently professed the same in new tongues Acts 10.45 46 47. but that he did also gather them into one body directing them to the spirituall use of the newly received gifts in the Communion of Saints and baptized them into the fellowship of the Lord Jesus and of one another in his Name Thirdly Wee answer as the Apostles were transcendent Officers of the Church so they received transcendent power to administer their worke As the Father sent Christ so Christ sent them Job 20.21 to wit Cum amplitudine plenitudine potestatis with all fulnesse of power so that any one Apostle received both the gifts and power of all the Officers of the Church Any Apostle might doe the worke not onely of an Apostle but of a Prophet of an Evangelist of a Pastor of a Teacher of a Deacon Rev. 1.1 They doe foretell as Prophets things to come Acts 27.22 They travelled up and downe not onely to plant Churches but to water Churches as Evangelists Acts 15.41 They as Pastors feed the flock of Christ with wholsome words of exhortation 1 Tim. 2.7 Joh. 21.25 They as Teachers of the Gentiles as Paul speaketh of himselfe taught them in the mysteries of the kingdome of God They as Elders ruled the Church not as Lords but as examples to the flocke and as Deacons they received the oblations of the Church and distributed the same according to the necessitie of the Saints Yea Acts 4.35 though when the Apostles came where Churches were planted they did put forth no act of transcendent authoritie but did all with the consent of the Church yet in the absence of the Churches they might doe any act which any Church and all the Officers thereof might doe together As for ought wee know they might in such a case impose hands alone so Paul might set apart Timothy to some speciall office 2 Tim. 1.6 they might alone deliver unto Satan 1 Tim. 1.20 they alone might baptize in as much as the presence and the power and fellowship of any one of them did comprehend as much as the presence and power and fellowship of the whole Church together * their acts therefore in such transcendent cases are not patterns nor presidents for us but according to the measure of the gift of Christ wee are to move in our owne line and to act onely as the Ministers of Christ and his Church in the presence and fellowship of the Church 2. It is objected againe that children of excommunicated persons such as being cast out are not holden as members of the Church have yet right unto Baptisme and therefore it is not well done of us to deny the Baptisme of the children of such as are not Members That children of Excommunicated persons have right to Baptisme they prove by sundry Arguments 1. From the consideration of the divers sorts of Members some are members not actually but in the eternall Counsell of God as Paul before his conversion 2. Some are member onely in shew and appearance as hypocrites which are as woodden legs fastned to the body 3. Some are lively members knit to Christ by faith to the brethren by the spirit of love 4. Some are decayed members which though they belong to Gods Election