all People we knoâ Dissenters in this Diocess do most need sucâ help the weakest of them being often accoâed with Questions more proper for studied Dâvines than poor Countrey-People and if thâ Answers of these poor People do not relish ââ shall have it published that the Dissenters here are a most ignorant People insulted over and exposed to Contempt Therefore we thought it necessary in our Circumstances because of our Love to the Truth and to the Weakest ââ these who adhere to it to afford what Heââ we could Acknowledging that this presââ Undertaking might have been performed ââ greater Advantage by some abler Pen which iâ hoped will yet be done but whatever weaknes appear in this little Tractat shall not be imputable to many but to some of those to whom the Authors Admonition was Directed and therebâ concerned to exoner their Conscience by making it appear that neither trifling Scruplâ Peevishness nor perverse Obstinacy but meer ây that our Consciences cannot be stretched to âhe Latitude that others take in the VVorship of GOD hath procured the following Resoâution to the Authors Query If it be displeasing to him it 's that which we could not prevent but himself might have prevented it by permitting us to Live in Peace without such Queries For he could not but foresee our Answer would be conformed to our own Principles and Practice though we have no Pleasure in provocking him or any other being desirous to live Quiet and Peaceable in the Land giving thanks to GOD the Author of all Good and to his Majesties Clemency under whose happy Government we enjoy Protection and to whom we owe most entire Acknowledgements of Gratitude which we are desirous to testifie on all Occasions and at this present are confident that when many are found Guilty of these execrable Conspiracies to take away his Precious Life there shall not one of our Principles be stained with Disloyalty but all in a cheerfull readiness for his Majesties Preservation and Service There is one thing more that the Reader is desired to Notice that notwithstanding the Exceptions hereafter mentioned stand in the Way of our Communion with the Establisht Church yet we doubt not but many of that Communioâ are Godly Persons and are known to be of suâ a Christian-Conversation that we could free partake with them in Gospel-Ordinances pâviding we could obtain it without danger of Siâning nor do we take it on us to Judge theâ for following their own Judgement only â cannot see with their Eyes nor they with ouâ but must wait untill GOD reveal it to them wâ are otherwise minded Perswading our Selâ that the Sober and Judicious of another Persâsion whom we Love and Honour in the LORâ will not Condemn but rather approve of oâ Ingenuity in allowing Men to know the weigâ of these Reasons that binds Us up from tâ Communion which otherwise we would Coâ for the Churches Peace This ingenuous Apology is neither for Ostentation nor Irritation but a necessary Vindication of our Practice unto which we are pressed IN laying open Our Exceptions we shall begin with that which is the Root of all these Eclesiastick-Impositious whereby our Consciences are Burdened and our Selves âhrust out from Communion with You in the âublick Worship of GOD Our Ministers and âheir Ministry is Rejected if they Subscribe not âo this Article Cannon 36. viz. That the Book of Common Prayer and of Ordering of Bishops Priests ând Deacons containeth nothing in it contrary to the âord of GOD and that it may Lawfully so be used ând that he Himself will use the Form in the said Book ârescribed in publick Prayer and Administration âf the Sacraments and none other Here is a plain and full Extrusion of all Miniâers who are not for Bishops over Presbyters for âhe Canon mentioneth only such Bishops or will âse any other Form in Prayer than the Service âook to this Form of Service the People must âlso subject for no other Church-Communion is allowed them but where these are Consented uâ to But this our Consciences being Directed bâ the Word of GOD cannot Comply with coâplaining of it as a most heavy Imposition And this Jurisdiction of Bishops over Presbyters is the Ground of our first Exception and thâ because the Office of a Bishop having Authoriâ over other Ministers of the Gospel is not founâ in the Scriptures and therefore wanteth Diviâ Institution And if such a Bishops Commission â not found there then We are not obliged to suâject to him as an Officer in the House of GOD Such therefore as will stand on no lower Grounâ for Prelacy in the Church than Scriptural-Authârity are obliged to make it appear And We dâsire no more but direct us to any Scriptures whâ this Commission is granted if this could be doâ ye would not only save us a Labour of proving Negative but should also find us as comformabâ in Point of Subjection as any of your own Coâmunion but after frequent and according â our Measure serious reading the Book of GOD We could never yet observe a Bishop set ovâ Presbyters but We frequently find that a Bishoâ Presbyter are one office as hereafter shal appeaâ Reason 1. If Christ had instituted the Offiâ of a Prelate or Bishop over Presbyters then tâ said Office would be mentioned in some of theâ Scriptures which designedly giveth an accountâ all Church-Officers in the Gospel-Church But in none of these Scriptures is there any mention of a Prelate or Bishop over Presbyters Therefore Christ hath not instituted the said Office For the first Proposition that if there were Institution for such an Officer he would be mentioned in these Scriptures is evident because the Apostle setteth himself to shew what Offices Christ had set in his Church both Extraordinary and Ordinary And who dare say that the Apostle failed in the Enumeration being inspired by the Holy Ghost and how can it be imagined that so eminent a Church-Officer making so great a Figure in the Church could be omitted was it not of great Importance for the Church of GOD in all succeeding Generations to know if there was One appointed to have Authority over many other Ministers without whose placet they should âeither have Power to Ordain other Ministers âor Govern their Flocks If Christ had instituted such an Officer would he not have given some ântimation of Him That other Ministers might âave known it was their Duty conscientiously to Obey Him But we have no where any such Intiâation from Christ or any of his Apostles but the contrary as shall appear And that a Bishop over Presbyters is invisible ây any of these Scriptures where Church-Officers are purposely enumerated the Reader shall havâ them in ready and full view 1 Cor. 12. 28. And GOD hath set some in thâ Church first Apostles secondary Prophets thirdly Teachers after that Miracles then Gifts of Healinâ Helps Governments Diversities of Tongues Rom. 12. 6. Having then Gifts differing accordinâ to the Grace
was the Will of GOD that such an Officer as a âshop over Presbyters should be in the House â GOD that they might obey him in the LORâ 3. The Apostle in the following Words giveâ Warning that after his Departure grievous Wolvâ shall enter in among them not sparing the Flock aâ verse 30. of their own selves shall Men arise speaâing perverse things to draw away Disciples after theâ Yet for all this Danger he giveth no Direction set up a Bishop over other Ministers for presâving the Flock nor any Intimation that it wâ the Will of GOD to provide such a Remedy aâterwards But requireth the Pastors to Watch aâ commendeth them to GOD and the Word of hâ Grace which was able to Build them up wheâ by we may see they are remitted to the word for Dârection in what concerneth his Church and nâ to invent without the Word a Remedy of theâ own devising 4. From the same Scripture â are also instructed that the instituted Pastors â the Church are to feed and take heed unto all â Flock over which the Holy Ghost hath maâ them Overseers And therefore Gospel-Ministeâ are to have no greater Charge than such as thâ may perform all the Duties belonging to a Pastoâ to all the Flock And if any Minister assumâ greater Charge than he can perform these Duâ unto then it is not that Charge that the Holy Ghâ hath committed to him If it be said that the Bishop feedeth the Flock â his Substituts such as he is pleased to appoint Answ But quo jure by what Right or Authoâty can he substitute another to do that which he âth assumed for his own Work and personal Perârmance it was a doubt that the learned Sir Franâ Bacon said he could never be resolved of how a Man that had a Trust committed to him for his perânal Faithfulness could delegate that Trust to another âd if a Bishop say he never engaged to Feed so âany then it may be justly replyed he was never âastor to so many Why then should he presume âe Title and Name of their Pastor When he ââweth it simply impossible for him to Teach âd Feed them or the twentieth part of them acârding to the Duty of a Pastor It 's also to be observed that as by this and maâ other Texts the Ministers of the Gospel have âual Pastoral Authority de jure so we find in the âriptures that de facto they are placed in Possessiâ of this ministerial-Ministerial-Power and exercise it with âvine Approbation For Presbyters ordain Miâsters as 1 Tim. 4. 14. and are therein approved â the Apostle Timothy being charged not to neâct the Gift he had thereby received 2. A Comânity of Presbyters exert their Power in Church âscipline and are required by the Apostle so to â 1 Cor. 5. 4. and 5. verses This Sentence was âicted by many not by one assuming the sole Power of Jurisdiction to himself which is câsonant to our Saviours Doctrine Matth. 18. 1â who requireth the offended Brother to tell â Church not a single Person if Christ had coâmitted the Power of Discipline to One than â Complaint of the offended Brother should hâ been to that One for to whom should he Coâplain but to such as had Power to do him Justiâ and remove the Offence But we see Christ's âpointment is not to make Application to One â to the Church Therefore it 's no Institution Christ that authoritative church-Church-Power be loâed in one Person So also we find that Presbyters are Constituâ Members of that famous Juridical Synod at Jeâsalem Acts 15. the Apostles and Elders came to âther to consider the Matter in which Assemâ there is not one found to Over-rule the Rest â assuming a negative Voice Though some presâ had more just Authority in the Church than â now on Earth can pretend to yet all had fâ liberty to speak their Judgement and all carâ by Suffrages and that which was concluded plâed the Apostles and Elders and is published in â Name of the Apostles and Elders whereby it's parent that in the Apostles time Presbyters â in the actual exercise of Church-Government âtherwise the Decrees of the Synod had never â published in their Name We shall not at prâ multiply Arguments but let these three be duely ânsidered 1. That the Office of a Prelate canât be found in the Roll of Church-Officers 2. ârists Discharging his Ministers to be one of âem Greater than another And 3. The Diâe Institution of parity among Ministers Object Timothy and Titus are called Bishops in â Bibles therefore Bishops are by Divine Instiâtion Answ All Gospel Pastors are Bishops accorâg to the Word of GOD and therefore tho' âey were Bishops which cannot be granted ât the Episcopal Cause gaineth nothing because âshops above Presbyters are never found in our âbles 2. These Postscripts to the 2d Epistle to Tiâthy and the Epistle to Titus are not Canonick âripture but added several Ages after the Canon Scripture was closed and after the Church beân to degenerat which is irrefragably evinced Mr Pryn in his Unbishoping of Timothy and âus and is acknowledged both by Papists and âers that the most antient Copies have no such âstscripts and therefore our Bibles have these âstscripts still at some distance from the rest of âse Epistles But the Difference is not altogeâer so observable now as formerly when these âstscripts were purposely Printed in very smal âaracters to make the Difference discernable by all who read them 3 Timothy is expresly âled an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4. 5. and therefore coâ not be a Bishop neither in Scripture sence aâ Pastor to a particular Flock whom he might pâsonally oversee nor in the Prelatical sence as a âocesan Bishop because an Evangelist was noââmited to any particular bounds as hath been cleâed already And to say that Timothy was Bishâ of Ephesus is against reason for Timothy was pâsent with the Apostle Paul when he commitâ the Charge of the Flock to the Presbyters in coâmon but no mention of Timothy as their Bishopâ whom the Charge had chiefly belonged if he hâ been the only Bishop of Ephesus As for Titus he was employed in the like Gâpel-Service from one place to another as Timâ was But it 's said Tit. 15. That he was left in Cretâ ordain Elders in every City therefore he had Episâpal Jurisdiction Answ 1. Timothy and Titus were both exâordinary Officers in the Church as appears â their constant Travels from place to place thâ Work being to erect Churches and plant Bishâ or Presbyters in these Churches but not to Bishops of them themselves their Power beâ greater than ordinary Bishops or Pastors as is â served by Chrysostom on Eph. 4 that their Work â to plant Churches and Bishops or Elders to be theiââdinary Pastors 2. Seing Titus was to ordain Elâers in every City of Crete then where was his own âiocess For it cannot be supposed that he did ârdain himself Bishop of one of these Cities 3.
to â cramental Obligation already and no Man hath Aâthority to impose another Obligation in tâ same Complex sacramental Action These are some of the Reasons that it's hopâ will justifie our not Complying with the Sign the Cross in Baptism and may satisfie those of ânother Perswasion that we do not indulge peeviâ Scruples against it but are over-awed with tâ Word of GOD not daring to add to it or off any Worship which He hath not commanded Our 5th Exception is your peremptory requiâing the Re-Ordination of our Ministers otherwiâ by your Laws they shall be no Ministers amoâ you nor to any others so far as your Power câ reach And this we judge a rejecting of us altogâther and a manifest Injury to the Church of GOâ for first our Ministers of the Presbyterian Perswâsion are Elected and Ordained according to tâ Rules of Scripture the People Electing a Presbâtry Ordaining It were good if you were able â say as much for your selves 2. As our Ministers Ordination is Scripturaâ it is the same Ordination approved and practisâ by the Reformed Churches Abroad allowing â Bishops Superior to Presbyters as appears âainly by their Confessions of Faith of which âu may now take a taste The French Confession Art 30. We Believe that the True Church ought to be Goverâd by that Regiment or Discipline which Our Lord âsus Christ hath Established viz. That there be in it âastors Elders aend Deacons We Believe that all true âastors in whatsoever Place they be placed have the âme and equal Authority among themselves given unâ them under Jesus Christ the only Head The Confession of Belgia Art 31. In whatsoever Place of the World the Ministers of âe Word of GOD do keep they have all of them the âme and equal Power and Authority being all of âem equally the Ministers of Christ the only univerâl Head and Bishop of the Church The latter Confession of Helvetia The Power that is given to the Ministers of the âhurch is the same and alike in all in the beginning âe Bishops or Elders did with a common Consent and âabour Govern the Church no Man lifted up himâlf above another These and the like Confessions of other Reformed Churches are the publick Standard aâ Authentique Testimony of their Judgement Aâ therefore the privat Sentiments of a few late Fâreign Divines writing in Favour of another Gâvernment of the Church whether by Mis-infâmation or declining from their own professâ Principles are not to be valued Though soâ are now at great Pains to scrape together if not procure Epistles from Forreigners approving Episcopal Government and so to impose on tâ credulous a belief that the Churches Abroad aâ of the same Mind But the publick Records these Churches are a permanent Testimony agaiâ them so that it 's evident the Government of the Churches being by Ministers in parity of powâ there can be no Episcopal ordination among theâ 3. If Ordination performed by Ministers in pârity of Power be not valide but Null and Voiâ for the want of Prelacy then their Ministeriâ Administrations are also null void as perforâed by non habentibus Potestatem and if so then thâ great Body of Protestants have neither lawfâ Pastors to Feed them nor due Administration Sacraments nor are so much as professed Chrisâans wanting Baptism the publick Badge of Châstianity For if Ministers be not lawfully Authârized and Ordained they cannot warrantably Baâtize in the Name of the Father Son and Hoâ Ghost it being a Profanation of that Ordinanâ fâr any others to Administer it Let us then make Supposition that a baptized Member of the Reârmed Churches Abroad should seriously enâuire at any of you whether he were Lawfully âaptized or not for you give him Occasion to âoubt whether such a Minister had Authority to âaptize him what would be your Answer if you ây he was not lawfully baptized because the Miâister wanted Episcopal-Ordination then you âake your selves Schismaticks of the highest âorm Unchurching so many True Churches of âhrist And if you say he was lawfully Baptized âen the Minister who baptized him was lawfully ârdained and if he was lawfully Ordained by Miâisters in parity of Power Abroad why then are âot Ministers lawfully Ordained at Home being Ordained in the same manner without Episcopal Ordination And if lawfully Ordained why is Reârdination required If you will please patiently to âeflect on your own Way as to the Point of Reârdination it will be hard to make one part of it âonsist with another for if ye own the Gospel-Adâinistrations of Ministers Ordained without a Bishop you are thereby engaged to own their Orâination as valide And that you do acquiesce in âheir Gospel Administrations as valid is manifest for instance if one baptized by a Presbyter who âever had Episcopal-Ordination shall come to âe a Member of your Communion you require no Re-baptising and if ye have other Pre-requiâ for Confirmation ye will confirm and admit â to the Lords Supper and if afterward he sâripen farther and be qualified for Church-âders you will make a Minister of him this aâ many other Instances are sufficient to Prove yâ convinced and satisfied that the Gospel-Admiâstrations of such Ministers are Valide before GOâ and Man Let the Reader then Judge how congruous it is for you to require their Re-orânation after upon the matter you have acknoâledged the validity of their Ordination already 4. We humbly offer it to Consideration tâ a Bishop over Presbyters not being by Divine stitution hath no greater Power in Ordinatiâ than any other Gospel-Minister because all tâ Power he hath by Commission is as a Presbyter Scriptural Bishop and as such all such have qual Ministerial Power granted by the Gospâ Charter as hath been abundantly evinced alrâdy and therefore Ordination is as valide withâ a Bishop as with him if a Presbytry Ordaiâ Which is the Scripture Patern And many Instâces might be given of the Ordination of Miâsters without a Bishop Gelas in act Concil Nicâ Asserteth that Presbyters Ordain though the Bishoâ not present and Ambrose on the Ephes saith the saâ and your own Bishop Stilling fleet in his Iren. pâ 380. 381. affordeth you plenty of such Instanâ where Ordination of Ministers was performed âithout a Bishop And though the Kingdom of âotland did early receive the Christian Faith yet âe find by Johanes Major de gestis Scot. lib. 2. âp 2. That there was no Episcopal Ordination in that âurch before An. 430. and that they were instructed âe Episcopis So Fordon Scot. Chron. lib. 3. cap. 8. ânte Palladij adventum habebant Scoti fidei Doctores Sacramentorum Ministratores Presbyteros solumâodo vel Monachos ritum sequentes Eclesiae primitivae âeir Teachers and such as administred the Sacraâents were only Presbyters or Monks following âe Custom of the primitive Church Having now discovered some of the strongest âross-bars that are laid in our Way obstructing âr Communion in Worship with the established âhurch We shal come
to be Bishops of Cities and from thence an Episcopal Line of Succession is drawn not only from their Times but from their Persons Answ That Apostles were Bishops of any Ciây or Diocess is false because they were not limited to any certain place as all Diocesan Bishops are and therefore it implyes a Contradiction that they were limited and not limited But if any shall say it will make no Contradiction to be limited in one Respect and unlimited in another Râspect that is the Apostles Charge might be limâted as they were Bishops but unlimited as theâ were Apostles Answ This Distinction leaveâ the Difficulty untouched and is but a begging â the Question to suppose they had any limiteâ Charge as Bishops which can never be proveâ by Scripture Reason or Antiquity For 2. No Man had Power to restrict their Chargâ whom Christ had left free 3. As no other Men had Power to alter or makâ narrower Limits to the Apostolick Charge so neâther had they Power themselves to alter theiâ own Commission by being bound as Pastors â Bishops of a particular Charge For thereby theâ should be disabled to discharge the general Coâmission of Preaching and Planting Churchâ through the World 4. This were a degrading of the Apostolicâ Office to reduce it to the Office of a Bishop or Pâstor therefore ignominious to the Apostles bâsides the confounding of these two most distinâ Offices of Apostle and Pastor by all which it is aâ parent that a Bishop over Presbyters hath no claiâ to that Office by Succession to Apostles and tâ maxime holdeth sure Apostolo in quantum est Apâstolus non succeditur All the rest of the Sacred Roll of Church-Oâficers shall be easily dispatched For Prophets who are twice enrolled next to the Apostles will sustain no Debate whether Propheâying be taken more strictly for predicting things âo come or more largely for opening the Mysteâies of Religion or expounding the Scriptures For in the first sence Bishops are so Modest as not âo claim it Though some had that extraordinaây Gift in the Apostles times In the second sence ât importeth no Authority over other Ministers and therefore can do them no service The next are Evangelists but nothing can deâcend from that Office for the Office of Bishops because it 's agreed on all Hands that Evangeâists were the Apostles Adjuvants travelling from âlace to place on Gospel-Service without any fixâd residence either in Parish or Diocess and thereâore no claim is made to that for it would deprive âhem of a fixed Diocess As for Teachers since teaching of it self implyâth no Authority over other Teachers it can yeild âo Argument for Episcopal Authority whither ây these Teachers be understood such Doctors of âivinity as are set a-part for instructing and preâaring others for the Ministerial Calling or for âxplaining of Scriptures neither of them can ârove Authority over others of the same Office âd therefore is not pleaded As for Pastors we acknowledge these to be the âdinary established Ministers of the Gospel unto whom the Charge of Feeding the Flock is coâmitted and these in Scripture are called Bishoâ or Presbyters all of them by the Gospel-Chartâ under one Commission for equal Authority and Power in the Church as hereafter GOD willing shaâ plainly appear As for Governments and these who Rule whâ come in among the last of the Roll they are dâstinct Officers in the Church being neithâ Teachers nor Pastors but such as Rule as is âvident 1 Tim. 5. 17. where they are said to â worthy of double Honour specially such as Lâbour in Word and Doctrine here are Elders tâ Rule who do not teach and therefore Bishops caâ not make this Officer their Claim because a Bâshop must be apt to teach and if he only Rule anâ do not Teach Some will be sure to call him Ruling-Elder which he is not fond of As for Ministring and Exhorting they are tâ low for a Bishops Character and therefore nâ pleaded By all this Pains taken in searching for a Bâshop Superior to Presbyters the candide Readâ will perceive that we do not willfully blind foâ our selves but are willing to search the Scripturâ and be determined by them but in all these Scâptures where Church-Officers are particularly â numerated there is no such Church-Officer to âound as Bishop over other Ministers of the Gâpel either in express Words or by any true Consequence from them and therefore we cannot âubject to the said office as an Institution of Christ A second Reason shall be taken from the Words âf our Saviour Luke 2â 24. And there was also a âtrife among them which of them should be accounted âe Greatest and He said unto them the Kings of the Gentils exercise Lordship over them and they that exâcise Authority upon them are called Benefactors but âe shall not be so but he that is Greatest among you let âm be as the Younger and he that is Chief as he that âoth Serve The paralel place is Matth. 20. 25. and by âese Scriptures Christ Dischargeth Prelacy aâong his Servants or that one of them should be âreater than another Therefore We cannot conâorm to it For clearing of this that Christ hath ârohibited one of his Ministers to be Greater than âother Consider first that the Apostles tho' generally âodly Men yet by reason of remaining Corrupâon did too much affect Preheminence which âised Heat and Strife among them a Disease not âsily câred 2 Christ perceiving this proud Debate rebukâh it by shewing it shall not be with them as with âreat Men of this World in their exercise of âordship and Authority for none of them shall be âreatest or Chief 3. It cannot be said without Violence to tââ Text that Christ doth only reprove the affectiâ of Greatness tho' that be reproved yet it is nâ all that is reproved for Superiority it self or oâ of them to be Greater than another is discharge Christ's Words are it shall not be so the Thing self is forbidden besides the Love of it he shâ not be Greatest whither he Love it or not Thâ maketh it evident to be a meer perverting of tâ Text contrary to our Saviours express Wordâ when Men say that nothing is here discharged bâ the Love of Greatness for Christ doth not say tâ Kings of the Gentiles Love to exercise Authoritâ but it shall not be so among you but they do eâercise Authority and it shall not be so among yoâ 4. Nor can it be said that only Tyrannical Dâmination is forbidden by these Scriptures becaââ the word here is ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã ãâã which signifieth laâfull Authority and commonly taken in that seâ so Matth. 8. 9. I am a Man under Authority the same word so also it 's made use of to signiâ Christs own Power John 17. 2. Thou hast given Hâ Power over all Flesh so that the same Authorâ that is lawfull among others yet shall not be uâped by any of his Servants over one another 5. Whatever might be the
to Which is the thâ Thing to be considered Our Reasons are First The Law of God is Perfect unto which â must not add Deut. 4. 2. It pleaseth God to give â Perfect Rule for our Worship as to the Object âdorable and the Acts of Worship He requireth pleasing to Himself and the very Manner of âorship acceptable to Him And whatsoever âeaketh not according to this Law we are obligâ to Reject as having no Light in it Isaiah 8. 20. âd therefore finding nothing in the Laws of âOD for such Worship as is imposed by the Sign â the Cross we cannot Comply with it 2ly We find in the Scriptures the LORD deâaring his Indignation against all Worship that is ât commanded by Himself Jer. 7. 31. And they âve Built the High-Places of Tophet c. which I âmmanded them not neither came it into my Heart So âr 19. 5. The same Guilt is charged in like manâer because the LORD Commanded it not nor spake â nor came it into his Mind It will be no Evasiâ for any Man to say that the Evils mentioned â these Scriptures were Gross and Abominable Iâolatries because whatever Displeasure GOD âd against these Execrable Inhumanities and Iâolatries Yet it pleaseth Him to Declare that âis not Commanding should have been sufficient to â deter them from all such Practices What can âe more plain then that GOD maketh that the âery Reason why there should have been no such âorship because He did not Command it And âis is written for our Instruction to make us abâain not only from all Worship contrary to the âord of GOD but that also which is besides or without the Word of GOD And sheweth it tâ Dangerous unsound Divinity that if Men doâ Act or Worship contrary to the Word of GOâ therefore they are in the way of GOD apprâed of Him 3ly That Worship without Institution is â lawfull is clear by that plain and full Warnâ given by Christ himself Matth. 15. 9 In vaiâ they Worship Me teaching for Doctrines the Câmandments of Men Where we may see that all sâ Worship as hath nothing for its Authority but â Commandments of Men is Vain and therefâ will not be accepted of GOD This Scriptâ hath so much Light and Brightness coming foâ from Him who is the Light of the World and â so plainly against the Inventions of Men in â Worship of GOD that some having no other â to Defend themselves give no other Answer â that this Scripture is the common Cant of Dâsenters But is that an Answer that Men dare gâ an Account of to GOD What a poor Shift â this be found when Men shall be Judged for âtruding what Worship they please upon the Hâ Majesty of GOD. And from this same Scripture We are yet fâther instructed that Vain Worship beareth â Name of Worship not that it is accepted Worshâ but presumed by such as offer it Which aâ maketh Null the Evasion of these who knowâ thâir Religious Ceremonies have no Authority â the Commandments of Men Therefore do â call them Worship sometimes saying they are â substantial Worship sometimes not tmmediat ârship sometimes not proper Worship as Men in âubt what to call them and afraid to give them âwfull a Name as Worship yet being obtruded GOD as Worship they bear that Denominatiâ 4. The Evidence of this doth yet farther apâr if we consider that the most ample Commisâ given to Gospel-Ministers is to Teach the âservation of whatsoever Christ himself hath âmmanded Matth. 28. 20. Teaching them to obâe all Things whatsoever I have commanded you âe Ministers are instructed to Adhere to their âsters Commands neither imperiously to Imâse Commands of their own upon the Conscienâ of Christians nor the Commands of other âen Their Commission for Doctrine Worship âscipline Government and Practice extenâg no further than Obedience to the Commands Christ Which doth also farther confirm that âs not sufficient that what we pretend as Serâe to Him be not against his Commands but ât all Christs Worship and Service must have âe Authority of his own Commands Whereby â manifest that no Minister hath Power to Reâre much less under Penalties to command the Performance of such Service and Acts of Worâ as their Master hath no where required and wâ he urgeth such Obedience he Acteth with Commission and not as the Servant of Christ therefore every Minister of Christ should bâ readiness to satisfie the Consciences of the Peâ of GOD that what he Imposeth must be Permed because his Master hath Commanded We speak not now of common Circumstances due Decency and Order which are not esseâ to Worship These are not the Debate nor shoâ be scrupled providing there be not an over-sâching of Decency and Order and thereby â Acts of Worship Introduced and Imposed which Case we are not oblig'd to blind obedieâ And it 's very remarkable that on these Terâ Teaching to Observe whatsoever CHRIST â commanded He promiseth to be with his Servâ to the End of the World As therefore Minisâ would expect Divine Assistance and Countenaâ they must closly Adhere unto and be Limiteâ his Commission in his own Service Judicâ Melancthon lamented that Men understood nâ greatness of that Sun to forge Worship without a âmand of GOD And who can Love GOD anâ Honour but lament the same For if we Dâ his being LORD of his own Worship we gâ far in denying Him to be our LORD and Laâver or that He is concern'd how He be Worâ âd which is no better Having declared himself â a special manner Jealous as to his Worship âarned and Pious Augustin Epist 119. Comâineth bitterly not only against the growing âber of Ceremonies in his time but against the âture of them that they were quasi observationes âcramenti servilia Onera resecandae that they âre observed as Sacraments slavish Burdens and to â cut off Yet these Ceremonies of Mens Invention âe so pleasing to corrupt Nature and begun in his âe to be so Countenanced that he saith ibid. Liberiâ improbare non audeo I dare not more freely reprove âm speaking as a Man oppressed with Grief for âe Additions made and Corruptions in the âorship of GOD and declared his Desire that Men would content themselves with that which the âipture requireth in the Service of GOD. A 2d Reason Why we except against the Use the Sign of the Cross is because it 's made aâher Dedication of the same Persons already Deâated to GOD in Baptism and therefore casteth â Imputation of insufficiency on the instituted Deâcation performed in Baptism For if baptismal âedication were not presumed to be imperfect ây is there another Dedication immediatly adâd to the first For Clearing and Vindicating this Exception âm being a groundless Scruple let it be consideâd That it 's Agreed on all Hands in the Sacrament of Baptism the Persons baptized are Dâcated to GOD This the Author acknowledgâ Appendix to his 2d Admonition page 16. I â