unfit to partake in the Seal of the Covenant c. He replies in these words Though they be not fit to make such profession of visible faith as to admit them to the Lords Table yet they may make profession full enough to receive them to Baptisme or to the same estate Isâ—mael stood in after Circumcission And to one who complained of being in the dark about the truth asserted in Mr. Cottons printed Book concerning the Baptisme of Infants and that amongst other made this Objection when said that Scrupler a child comes to know that his Parents are no visible Saints but appear to be contrary both in Life and Doctrine and the children had only words and water poured on them how came these persons to have right to it the Parents having no visible faith to act in that Ordinance and their children likewise being uncapable to hold forth the acts of faith before men He thus Answereth Ieroboam and his wife were neither of them visible Saints in your Sense but appeared to be contrary both in Life and Doctrine yet the Circumcision of their Son was not in vain to him 1 Kings 14.13 In this Case when the faith of the Parents is wanting and yet they still live within the Pale of the Church though the Church be Corrupt and the Parents also yet here the Speech of the Apostle takes place what though some believed not shall their unbelief make the faith of God of none effect God forbid Rom. 3. 3 4. now the Faithfulness of God who keepeth Covenant and mercy to thousands supplies the defect of the Faith of the next Parents and maketh good his Covenant to the Children in respect of the Faith of their former Ancestors in Elder Ages But against this sâ—me may object a passage in Mr. Cottons Book of the way of the Chuâ—ches pag. 81. where it is said where neither of the Parents can claim right to the Lords Supper their Infants cannot claim right to Bâ—ptisme therefore it mâ—y seem that Mr. Cottons Iudgement was not as haâ—h been now declared Unto this let the judicious Reâ—der attentively hear the Answer which is 1. In that very Book of Mr. Cottons there are sundry passages which plead for an Enlargement of Baptisme further then to the Immediate Children of persons in full Communion even to the Children of such Parents who have such a faith as denominateth them Christian Believers in opposition to Pagan Infidels yea if there be a Christian Sponsor for the Child of a Stranger or wicked man it may be baptized see the way pag 87. 88. 106 115. 2dly That Book of the way was printed from an imperfect Copy in which respect it is not to be wondâ—ed at if there be therein some passages contradictory to Mr. Cottons known Iudgement 3. Mr. Coâ—ton himself was much troubled when he saw that Book come forth and was desirous that the Reader should understand that his Judgement in such things wherein the Book of the way is discrepant from that of the Keyes should be sought for not in the Book of the way but in that of the Keys And that no one may think that these things are Imaginary or conjectural only let us hear Mr. Cotton speaking in his own words in his printed defence against the Imputations of Mr. Cawdrey written not long before his death and Published by Doctor Owen In which Book pag. 36. 37 38 39. The truth is saith Mr. Cotton that many years ago I was seriously moved by some of our Brethren and Fellow Elders here to draw up an Historical narration of our Church way together with some familiar Grounds of the same briefly In short time as God helped I dispatched it which when our Brethren had perused it I saw they did not close with it yet a Brother going for England got some where a Copy of it and presented it to some of the Congregational way there and I afterwards heard neither did they close with it and in particular not with that passage which is here recited which since appeareth more openly by the Asterisk put upon that passage and upon sundry other in the Book but before I saw that and had only heard that they did not fully accord I hoped that it had met with a timely Suppression rather then an Impression for I heard no more of it for two or three years after mean while perceiving that one main point of dissatisfaction was the Authority given to the Fraternity I consiered more seâ—iously and distinctly of the whole power of the Keys and expressed my apprehensions in that treatise of the Keys which our Brethren here did well accept and so did the Brethren of like Judgement in England and some of them were pleased to arrest it with the Preface that is now Extant before it This was sundry years after the Treatise of the way had been finished and carryed to England and as I hoped suppressed but it seemeth some Brother there caused his Copy which was indeed abrupt in the Entrance and imperfect otherwise to be published in print which when I saw it troubled me not a little as knowing that the discrepant Expressions in the one and in the other might trouble Friends and give Advantages to Adversaries I suffered both to stand as they did especially seeing I could not help it the Book of the way being published without my Consent and both the way and the Keys past my revoking so that if the Replier find some discrepancy in one of these Books from the other Let him know that the Doctrine of the way in such few points wherein it differs from the Keys was not mine when the Keys was published much less when the way was published which was many years after though it had been penned many years before Thus much may suffice for the clearing of Mr. Cottons Judgement concerning the Subject of Baptisme In the same year and in the same Vessel with Mr. Cotton came into this Country that famous Mr. Thomas Hooker late Pastor of the Church in Hartford upon Connecticot Now that in Mr. Hookers Judgement the Children concerning whom the Question is have a continued standing and membership in the visible Church upon which hinge the Controversy about the Enlargement of the Subject of Baptisme turns is evident from a passage in his most Judicious and accurate Survey of Church Discipline in which Book pag. 4â— are these words in some Cases saith Mr. Hooker an Implicit Covenant may be fully Sufficient as Suppose a whole Congregation should consist of such who were Child on to the Parents now deceased who were Confederate their children were true members according to the Rules of the Gospel by professing of their Fathers Covenant though they should not make any personal and vocal Expression of their Engagement as the Fathers did Also he lays it down for a Maxim that faederati sunt baptizandi proving by several Arguments that Confederates are the proper Subject of Baptisme see in the same Book part
a publick person in the first transgression therefore the first transgression was imputed to his posterity not only to him Rom. 5.12 but in his after transgressions he was in this respect but a single not a publick person therefore they are imputed only unto him and not to his Posterity 2 Object Members are compleat or incompleat Children are members incompleat not compleat Answer 1. Did this distinction hold yet that the incompleatness of Childrens membership is not such why they should be hindred from being baptized is clear from Pedo-Baptisme 2dly Members are to be considered either in respect of their Communion or in respect of their membership In respect of their Communion they may be said to be compleat or incompleat because Communion receives more or less and may be enjoyed either in whole or in part But if members be considered in respect of membership which is the present Query then they cannot be said to be compleat or incompleat because membership being a Relation doth not receive more or less as a little member is as truly a member as the greatest the hand of a Child is truly a hand and member of the whole as the hand of a man Object 3. Membership is Immediate viz when these that are Adult Confederate in their own persons Mediate viz when Infants Confederate in a publick person as Mankind Confederated in Adam 1 Answer Though Adam Confederated in his own person i. e. although it be the person of Adam that Confederated yet Adam himself Confederated not as a single person but as a publick person so as though Adam and the Parents of Children Confederate Immediately i. e. in their own persons yet do they not confederate as single persons In this notion Scil. of not confederating as single persons the Condition of both mediate and Immediate members are alike 2dly The validity of membership depends not upon the Instrument or medium to wit the Parents standing as a publick person in the Act of Confederation but upon the Institution of God in Christ the value and virtue of the effect here cannot depend upon the medium which is it self also an Arbitrary Effect but upon the supream and Independent Cause The membership of a male Child Confederating mediately i. e. in the publick person of the Moâ—â—â—r excelleth the membâ—rship of the Mother Confederating â—mmâ—â—iâ—tely in hâ—r own person because the Mother though shâ— be a Church member yeâ—â—s not capable of being a member coâ—â—tâ—â—uent oâ— the Church for only Brethren constitute a Church in that they alone be capable of being the Subject of the power of the Keyes 1 Cor. 14.34 1 Tim. 2.12 so as should the Brethren dye the Sisterâ— surviving could not continue a Church but would immediately cease to the Church members yet her male Child is not only a Church member but is also capable of being a member Constituent of the Church 3 dly The Cause why a member is not admitted to such and such Communion is not any defect in membership but some defect concerning the qualification of the member The mother notwithstanding her membership is inferiour to the membership of her male Child she being as was said before a member of the Church but not a member Constituent of a Church is admitted to the Supper yeâ— the Child is not A man or woman Adult Confederating in their own persons Immediately upon some offence possibly falling out or discovered between their Admission and intended Baptisme may not be baptized where as a Child Confederated in his publick person is to be baptized Object 4. Children in their non-Age are by their Parents only materially and not by themselves formally and actually members Answ Members potentially are such only in possiblity but aâ— yet non-members actually Membership is had two wayeâ— either by Confederating in a publick person or by Confederating in our own-persons Children are actually and formally members by Confederation in their publick person not in their own persons they who have the matter and Form of membership are actually members Children Confederate in their Parents have the matter and Form of membership viz. Holiness Mal. 2.15 Rom. 11 16. 1 Cor. 7.14 And Confederation in their Parents as their publick person Gen 17. Acts 2.39 therefore Infants Confederate in their Parents w re actually and formally not potentially Cirumcised under the Law they are actually formally not potentially baptized under the Gospel therefore they are actually and formally and not only potentially members If Mankind Confederated actually in Adam their publick person when they did not so much as exist in their proper persons then may children actually existing in their proper persons actually Confederate in their publick person But Mankind not yet existing in their proper persons Confederated in Adam their publick person Peccatum Alâ—â—i non fuit alienum sâ—deâ—am no strum peccatâ—m Adami fuit volunt â—â—ium 〈◊〉 modo respectu nostâ—i quia ut fuimus in Adamo nostâ—o Pa entes it a volâ—â—mus in iâ—lo Vedelius de Deâ— creat qu. 105. sâ—u voluntas illa Adami fuit voluâ—tas totiu Maâ—sae That Speech of Thomas though used by him to another purpose may aptly be applyed here peccatum Adami fuit gravius nostris secundum circumsiantiam personae non autem secundum speciâ—m â—om 〈…〉 .163.3 If children so soon as they exist are actually guilty of a Covenant broken then children as soon as they exist are capable of actually Confederating breaking of a Covenant supposes the being of a Covenaâ—t that cannot be broken that never had a being Abâ—â—st Tertii adjecti ad est secundi adjecti valet Consequentia But children so soon as they exist are guilty of a Covenant broken witness Original Sin actually inflicted upon children as the punishment of their Sin in Adam God doth not punish actually such as are only Sinners potentially but as yet have not actually sinned Neither doth childrens incapacity to exert Church acts deny them to be actually Church members for then Brethren under offence before any Censure brethren infirmed by some sinless Accident yea brethren when asleep should all of them be potentially only and not actually Church members Nor doth Childrens incapacity to Vote or Constitute a Church deny them to be actually Church members for thence iâ— would follow that the Sisters were only potentially and not actually Church members More needs not to be said of Mr. Nortons Judgement concerning this Subject we come to Mr. Shepards sometime Pastor of the Church in Cambridg in New-England who besides his eminent abilities was a man of much real and living Communion with God and therefore more like to know the mind of Christ then many others Now in a Letter of his Dated Iune 1649. which was not three monethe before his decease he does assert and prove that Children are members of the visible Church and that their membership continues when Adult and that the Children of Believers are to be accounted of the Church â—â—til they
to the other Question about Communion and Consociation of Churches Now concerning that it is less needful to produce many Testimonies that there in the Synod Introduceth not any Innovation For some that dissented from the Answer to the first Question about Baptisme yet in this last concurred yea there was an unanimous and universal Assent to the Answer given to this second Question as the Author of the Antisynodalia Americanâ— does acknowledge where pag. 12. it is said in the second Question we do fully agree with the rest af the Synod in all the Propositions laid down about it together with the Proofs thereof we shall therefore amongst our New English Worthies only mention the Judgement of Mr. Cotton concerning this Question which what it is may be seen largly expressed in his Book of the Keyes pag. 54 c. And there are those that will remember that when that eminent Minister of Christ Mr. Mitchel was ordained Pastor of the Church in Cambridg Mr. Cotton giving in the Name of the Messengers of Churches the right hand of Fellowship seriously advised him to endeavour And that faithful man was ever mindful of that solemn Advice that that Ordinance of Consociation of Churches might be duly practised greatly bewailing the defect of these Churches as to that particular yea Mr. Cottons heart was much upon this thing in his latter time foreseeing that without it these Churches and the Congregational way could not stand He did therefore not long before his decease draw up some Propositions which are expressive of the way and manner of this Consociation pleaded for which because they are as being written by his hand they cannot but be of great weight and worth we shall therefore here insert and publish them Propositions Concerning Consociation and Communion of Churches tendred to the Elders and Brethren of the Church for their Consideration and acceptance according to God Proposition I. Every true Church of Christ viz. a particular Congregation furnished with a Presly ery and walking in the truth and peace of the Gospel hath received from the Lord Jesus full Power Ecclesiastical within it self both of Liberty to receive her own members to choose her own Officers and the like And also of Authority to Administer Sacraments Censure her own offenders and restore penitents Mat. 18 18 1 Cor 5. Acts 6.2 c. and 14 23. so as this Consociation and Communion of Churches ought not to hinder the exercise of this power but only by Counsel from the word to direct and strengthen their hands in the right Administration thereof upon all just occasions Proposition II. Althought the Apostles of Christ were Independent on each other and had equally the highest Power Ecclesiastical under Christ and were led with Infallible Assistance of the Spirit in the exercise thereof yet Paul with Barnabas and Titus went up to Jerusalem and that by Revelation not only to Confer and Consult with the Apostles about his doctrine left he had or should run in vain Gal 2.1 2. but also Consociated or made Agreement with them by mutual giving the right hand of Fellowship to dispose the Course of their Ministry and Provision for the poor that so they might procure the more free and effectual passage of the fruit of the Gospel and the work of their Ministry and therefore it may seem much rather not only lawful but also very profitable and needful for ordinary Elders and Churches though equal in Power wanting that Infallible Assistance of the Spirit to Comer and Consult and Consociate or agree together about all such weighty matters in which Counsel and Concurrences to avoid Suspition of prejudice and partiality and so to expedite the free passage of the Gospel in the hands of them all Proposition III. If when Peter gave offence at Antioch the Apostle Paul took Liberty to rebuke him before them all though he was his equal in place and power and that no doubt out of that duty of love and faithfulness which he owed unto him and to the truth Peter also submitting thereunto then it may well stand with the equality of Churches out of their duty of Love and Faithfulness to admonish each other in case of publick offence and submit to such admonition from the word in meckness of wisdom as to the will and Authority of Christ and to give such Satisfaction as the Rule doth require Proposition IV. Out of Question the Lord Iesus the boad King and Compassionate high Pâ—â—â—st and Saviour of his body the Church hath as great a Love and care of the purity Peace and Edisocation of whole Churches as of particular Saints as is evident by those Epistles sent to the Churches of Corinth Galatia and the seven Churches of Asia to heal the publick Errors diffentions and other Corruptions found in them and therefore câ—â—tainly he hath appointed and sanctified some sufficient meane to preserve their purity and peace to heal and help the evils and distempers of whole Churches as well as of particular Believers Now then since Apostles and other extraordinary Officers are ceased that had power in all Churches and only Love remaineth what other Ecclesiastical help is there left without infringing the power of particular Churches but the Exercise of brotherly Love mutual watchfulness Brotherly Care and Counsel which Elders and Churches ought therefore to practice towards each other in this way of Brotherly Communion and Assistance on all just occasions Proposition V. Upon these and other Scripture grounds and Examples and for the ends above said it is very meet and requisite according to our present practice that when any Company of Christians intend to unite themselves into the Fellowship of a Church or being in a Church state to elect and ordain any Elders over them that in due time they signify their intentions to the Neighbouring Churches walking in the order of the Gospel if such may be had desiring their presence Assistance and right hand of Fellowship that as a Church is a City set upon a Hill so the Acts thereof may not be as a Light put under a Bushel but may so shine forth to all other Churches beholding and approving their orderâ—y proceedings as they may the more readily give them the right hand of Fellowship and walk with more freedom of Spirit in Brotherly Love and Communion with them in the Lord. Proposition VI. In such matters of publick Censure wherein through the obscenity and difficulty thereof or otherwise there doth arise differences tending to dangerous Divisions and distractions in the Church or offence to other Churches In all such Caâ—es it is meet and requisite that the Church proceed advisâ—dâ—y with the Counsel and Concurrence of the Elder or Elders with other Judicious and impartial Brethâ—â—â— of other Churches clearing up from the Word what is the mind and will of Christ to be done Proposition VII Not only in matters of Censure but also in other Cases of Doctrine or practice wherein for want of Light or of the
that Assembly in his Catechisme concerning Church discipline pag. 224 226 227. thus expresses his Judgement Churches being gathered and setled according to the mind of Christ ought to preserve a mutual holy Communion amongst themselves and to exercise it in the discharge of those duties whereby their mutual good and Edification may be promoted In desiring or making use of the Counsel and advice of one another in such Cases of doubt and difficulty whether Doctrinal or practical as may arise in any of them Acts 15.2 6. And from hence it follows that in Case any Church either by error in Doctrine or praecipitation or mistake in other Administrations do give offence unto other Churches those other Churches may require an account from them admonish them of their faults and withhold Communion from them in Case they persist in the error of their way and that because in their difficulties and before their miscarriages they were bound to have desired the advice Counsel and Assistance of those other Churches which being neglected by them the other are to recover the end of it unto their utmost ability Gal 2.6 11. And hence also it follows that those that are rightly and justly Censured in any Church ought to be rejected by all Churches what ever both because of their mutual Communion and because it is and ought to be presumed until the contrary be made to appear that in Case there had been any difficulty or doubt in the proceedure of the Church they would have taken the advice of those Churches with whom they were obliged to Consult Thus far Doctor Owen Likewise Doctor Thomas Goodwin and Mr. Philip Nye in that worthy Epistle which they have prefixed before Mr. Cottons book of the Keyes in which Epistle the Congregational way is truly stated and asserted as it differs from both the extreams viz. from Presbyterianisme on the one and Brownisme on the other hand do declare their Concurrence with him in acknowledging that an Association or Communion of Churches sending their Elders and Messengers into a Synod is an Ordinance of Christ unto whom Christ hath in Relation to rectifying male Administrations and healing Dissentions in particular Congregations and the like Cases committed a due and just measure of power suited and proportioned to those Ends and furnished them not only with ability to give Counsel and Advice but further upon such like occasions with Ministerial power and Authority to determine declare and injoyne such things as may tend to the reducing Congregations to right order and Peace see pag. 4. 6 7 10. Moreover that the practice of Congregationals ha's been according to this Profession may be seen in the Apologetical Narration published by Doctor Goodwin Mr. Philip Nye Mr. Sydrach Simpson Mr. Burroughs and Mr. Bridg. In as much as those famous Apologists as Paul speaks concerning Iames Cephas and Iohn amongst the Apostles seem to be Pillars and worthily are they so accounted amongst Congregationals Since also that Apologetical Narration though printed is in the hands of but few with us we shall therefore here transcribe and insert some pages of it And therein they thus declare see pag. 15. to pag. 22. And whereas say they the Common prejudice and exception laid into all mens thoughts against us and our opinions is that in such Congregational Government thus entire within it self there is not allowed sufficient remedy for miscarriages though never so gross no relief for wrongful Sentences or persons injured thereby no room for Complaints no powerful or effectual means to reduce a Church or Churches that fall into Heresie Schisme c. but every one is left and may take Liberty without controul to do what is good in their own eyes we have through the good Providence of God upon us from the avowed declarations of our Judgements among our Churches mutually during our Exile and that also confirmed by the most solemn Instance of our practice wherewith to vindicate our selves and way in this particular which upon no other occasion we should ever have made thus publick God so ordered it that a Scandal and offence fell out between those very Churches whilst living in this Banishment whereof we our selves that write these things were then the Ministers one of our Churches having unhappily deposed one of their Ministers the others judged it not only too suddain an act having proceeded in a matter of so great moment without consuiting their Sâ—ster Churches as was publickly professed we should have done in such Cases of concernment but also in the proceedings thereof as too severe and not managed according to the Rules laid down in the Word In this Case our Churches did mutually acknowledge and submit to this as a Sacred and undoubted Principle and Supream Law to be observed amongst all Churches that as by virtue of the Apostolical Command Churches as well as particular men are bound to give no offence neither to Iew nor Gentile nor the Churches of God they live amongst So that in all Cases such offence or differences by the Obligation of the Common Law of Communion of Churches and for the Vindication of the glory of Christ which in Common they hold forth the Church or Churches challenged to offend or differ are to submit themselves upon the Challenge of the offence or Complaint of the person wronged to the most full and open tryal and examination by other Neighbour Churches offended thereat of what ever ha's given the offence And further that by virtue of the same and like Law of not partaking of other mens sin the Church offended may and ought upon the Impenitency of those Churches persisting in their Errors and miscarriage to pronounce that heavy Sentence against them of withdrawing and Renouncing all Christian Communion with them until they do repent and further to declare and protest this with the Causes thereof to all other Churches of Christ that they may do the like And what further Authority or proceedings purely Ecclesiastical of one or many Churches towards another whole Church or Churches offending either the Scriptures do hold forth or can rationally be put in Execution without the Magistrates interposing a power or another nature unto which we upon his particular Cognizance and Examination of such Causes profess ever to submit and also to be most willing to have recourse unto for our parts we saw not then nor do yet see And likewise we did then Suppose and do yet that this Principle of Submission of Churches that miscarry unto other Churches offended together with this other that it is a Command from Christ enjoyned to Churches that are finally offended to denounce such a Sentence of non Communion and withdrawing from them whilst Impenitent as unworthy to hold forth the Name of Christ these Principles being received and generally acknowledged by the Churches of Christ to be a mutual duty as strictly enjoyned them by Christ as any other that these would be as effectual means through the blessing of Christ to awe