the Punishment which as yet stands is greater The first Refusal of the Oath brings the Person within a Praemunire and if tendred a second time after the space of three Months and again refused by the same Person it is High-Treason This Severity in the Punishment is recompensed with a more gentle and indulgent Interpretation of the Oath as will appear in the following Section As we are not to swear rashly so our Laws do not give Oaths rashly but with great care and tenderness weighing and considering both the Matter Persons Penalties and the Season or Occasion being not willing their Laws or Punishments for breaking of them be a Snare or at any time more grievous to the Subject than the Necessity of State requires § 4. The true Scope and Sence of this Oath may be gathered from the Laws and Statutes since established and some Light also from other Writers of Note Queen Eliz. within a little time after this Oath was reduced to the Form wherein now it stands in an Admonition annexed to the Injunctions declareth the Sence and Interpretation of it as followeth The Admonition annexed to the Queen's Injunctions THe Queen's Majesty being informed that in certain Places of this Realm sundry of her Native Subjects being called to Ecclesiastical Ministry in the Church be by sinister Persuasion and perverse Construction induced to find some scruple in the Form of an Oath which by an Act of the last Parliament is prescribed to be required of divers Persons for the Recognition of their Allegiance to her Majesty which certainly neither was ever meant ne by any equity of Words or good Sence can be thereof gathered would that all her Loving Subjects should understand that nothing was is or shall be meant or intended by the same Oath to have any other Duty Allegiance or Bond required by the same Oath than was acknowledged to be due to the most noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth her Majesty's Father or King Edward the Sixth her Majesty's Brother And further her Majesty forbiddeth all manner her Subjects to give ear or credit to such perverse and malicious Persons which most sinisterly and maliciously labour to notify to her Loving Subjects how by the Words of the said Oath it may be collected the Kings or Queens of this Realm Possessors of the Crown may challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church wherein her said Subjects be much abused by such evil disposed Persons For certainly her Majesty neither doth ne ever will challenge any other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the said noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth which is and was of ancient time due to the Imperial Crown of this Realm That is under God to have the Sovereignty and Rule over all manner of Persons born within these her Realms Dominions and Countries of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be so as no other Foreign Power shall or ought to have any Superiority over them And if any Person that hath conceived any other Sence of the Form of the said Oath shall accept the same Oath with this Interpretation Sence or Meaning her Majesty is well pleased to accept every such in that behalf as her good and obedient Subjects and shall acquit them of all manner Penalties contained in the said Act against such as shall peremptorily or obstinately refuse to take the same Oath In the fifth Year of her Reign there is by Act of Parliament a Confirmation of this Sence by way of Proviso in these Words The Proviso in the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act made in the said first Year shall be taken and expounded in such Form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queen's Majesty's Injunctions published in the first Year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledg in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said Admonition more plainly may appear There may be a Doubt made about this Interpretation as whether it be not inconsistent with the Words of the Oath it seems to be rather a material Change of them than an Interpretation In the Oath it is All Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes in the Interpretation it is All manner of Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be The Oath seems to speak of one thing and the Interpretation of another Ad leges per se requiritur potestas in persmam secunderio in res altas Suarez de Le◠lib. 1. cap. 8. the one of Causes and the other of Persons Answ There is no opposition or Inconsistency between these two Persons and Causes The principal Object of a Law is a Person and a Person with respect to his Actions a Person morally considered for a Person physical that is in his Being only and Nature as Man without moving or acting any thing good or evil is not the Object of a Law nor Actions of any kind or sort whatsoever as Actions and in that general Consideration do come under a Law but as they respect Persons and are some way or other the Actions of reasonable Creatures Tho a Law be made to punish the Ox which goreth a Man that he dieth Fxod 21.29 yet it is with respect to Man to let him know how much God is provoked by shedding Man's Blood as Gen. 9.5 1 Cor. 9.9 10. Doth God care for Oxen Doth God in his Law respect the Beast for it self is it not that Man may be instructed and restained Verse 10. He saith it altogether for our sakes The mentioning of Ecclesiastical Causes therefore doth imply Persons and Persons of the same Denomination to whom such Actions are peculiar that is Ecclesiastical Persons 2. And that this latter is an Interpretation of the former will thus appear The Oath in giving a Supremacy in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes might seem to imply Spiritual Things to be the immediate and proper Object of the Magistrates Power and spiritual Persons only for this because they had to do in spiritual Matters and to infer thence that the Christian Magistrate hath Power in spiritual Administrations as the Word and Sacraments after the same manner as hath the Ministers of Christ who have Power in these Things as the principal and immediate Object of their Function Which this Form af Expression in the Admonition doth clearly take away 1. In asserting that by the Words of the said Oath Kings or Queens of this Realm may not challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church 2. The mentioning Ecclesiastical Persons and not Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes at all implieth that the Persons of Bishops Presbyters and such like are primarily and
Whit. Tract 3. c. 6. p. 181. in an external and visible way These visible Bodies are either greater and containing as Empires Kingdoms Provinces c. Or those that are less and contained as Cities Colledges Parishes Families and the like whether they be Civil or Ecclesiastical These lesser though they have the Compleatness of a Body or Corporation each in its kind and sufficient Power to govern it self yet not to govern one another A Church hath not Authority to govern a Church nor a Family or the chief in it to govern a Neighbour-Family The Light in the least Star is sufficient for it self but not to rule the Day or the Night as the Sun and Moon These lesser Bodies are therefore so composed in their several Regiments that many of them together may lie in the Bosom of a greater Corporation and it will be for their better and more comfortable subsisting and Government There is no external Coercive or ruling Power that falls in and fills up the space betwixt those great and Catholick Bodies the World and the Church and those lesser and lowest Regiments and Societies but what is or ought to be expected by or from the Civil Magistrate who is to be acknowledged of his Subjects whether Ecclesiastical or Civil under God to be over all Consid 3 3. These lesser Societies therefore ordinarily are found under a twofold Regiment or Discipline The one intrinsecal and peculiar which in Families is received from the Light of Nature and from the Light of Institution in Churches The other more General and Common And these lesser Bodies come under it by reason of their Situation being within the Confines of such a Republick they are under the Jurisdiction of the Princes thereof De Episc lib. 3. c. 5. Each Prince saith Mason hath Power in subditos suos ac proinde in Ecclesiam modo subditi sunt Ecclesiae If situated where there is no formed Common-wealth King or Supream Power over them they are as a Free-State each Family City and Church immediately under God and Christ and no other Power but what it hath in it self which being a Power not derived from the Magistrate but peculiar to a Family or Church remains in them though no Magistrate Such was the Family and Church-state in the time of the Patriarchs for two thousand Years Consid 4 As it is a Happiness to a People that live in Empires and Kingdoms that these are parcels of that World which hath the righteous God to govern it who is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 2 Kings 19.15 So is it likewise to these lesser Bodies a Family or a Church that they are situated under the Wing of a Christian and well-governed Common-wealth Where their Governours may be under some Government and in Wrongs and Disorders they may have the Benefit of a Magistrate's Authority to appeal unto CHAP. V. 1. The first Objection answered 2. The Government of a particular Church hath Affinity with that of lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms Object § 1. IT may be objected that Churches are spiritual Corporations and of a more peculiar Consideration in respect of their Government and therefore not to be reckoned with Civil at least not with Families or such mean and low Societies Answ Policy or Government in it self and all the sorts of it is from the Light of Nature and common Reason And this is generally supposed by all that tho the Subject Matter or Persons governed be of different kinds yet the Law and Forms of Government may be the same where so appointed by Christ And I rather insist on such a way of Discourse and Reasoning as most suitable to the Subject I am upon but especially because Subordination of Churches to Churches is argued from the Light of Nature and in this very Case termed by our Brethren a Divine Topick Now if we may argue and guide our selves in Church-Affairs by the Light that shineth forth from the natural Wisdom and Prudence of Man in the Government and managing of Kingdoms there is as much a Jus Divinum and ground of reasoning from the Light that appears in the prudent Constitution and Government of any other civil Society I have mentioned in the Considerations Cities Families and those lesser and contained as I term them Societies or Corporations with particulars Churches Because I humbly conceive the Policy and Government of each tho in other things different to be more proportionable and of greater Similitude in many things then between particular Churches and those greater and containing Bodies Kingdoms Empires or the like Churches thus humbly constituted and governed are most consistent with Civil Magistracy of what Form soever the Common-wealth shall be In Confirmation of this Agreement or Similitude I shall take for the most part the Concessions of the learned of each Perswasion The Instances or Particulars are these § 2. 1. Families tho contained under the National Government where they are sinuated yet are intrusted with a ruling and governing Power compleat and sufficient each in and for it self so are particular Churches 1. They are intrusted with a Government each for it self It is not sufficient saith Mr. Perkins for a Church to have the preaching of the Word Perk. on Rev. 2.20 but Church-Government This Church speaking of Thyatira is blamed because she did not use the Authority God had given her There is given to the Ministers of each particular Congregation according to Episcopal Ordination established by our Law not only a Power to preach c. Take Authority to preach the Word of God but they are made Rectors Governours in those particular Churches and it 's said to them Whose Sins thou dost remit they are remitted and whose Sins thou dost retain they are retained by which Words the Keys of Discipline are given them see Bilson Perpet Govern p. 213. By Order of the Church of England saith Bishop Vsher all Presbyters are charged to administer the Doctrine and Sacraments Reduct of Episc p. 2. and the Difcipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same And that they might the better understand what the Lord hath commanded therein the Exhortation of St. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination Take heed to your selves and to all the Flock among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so taken in Mat. 2.6 and Rev. 12.5 and 19.15 Ho. Eccl. Pol. lib. 3. Sect. 1. rule the Congregation of God which he hath purchased with his Blood Mr. Hooker tells us that for Preservation of Christianity there is not any thing more needful than that such as are of the visible Church have mutual Fellowship and Society one with another In which Consideration the Catholick Church is divided into anumber of distinct Societies every of which is termed
immediately the Object of this Supreme Power and the Laws made by it upon another Consideration than as Bishops c. namely as being born within these her Majesty's Realms and Dominions and such Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be She hath the Sovereignty and Rule over them Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Things are mentioned in the Oath upon a twofold Account 1. Because the Civil Magistrate's Power and Jurisdiction really extends it self to the Duties of both Tables and hath to do with Matters and Causes as well as Persons that are spiritual as hereafter we shall shew but 2. Principally that a Calling or Employment in Church-Affairs whatsoever hath been formerly judged and practised doth no more exempt a Person and his Actings that is a Subject to the Queen upon any other account from her Secular Power than doth a Temporal Calling or Employment in any worldly Affairs There is something of Explication further in the Articles of Religion concluded in the Year 1562. The 37th Article is this The 37th Article professed in the Church of England The Queen's Majesty hath the chief Power in her Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any Foreign Jurisdiction Where we attribute to the Queen's Majesty the chief Government by which Titles we understand the Minds of some slanderous Folks to be offended we give not to our Prince the ministring either of God's Word or of the Sacraments The which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify But that only Prerogative which we see to have been given always to all Godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself that is that they should rule all Estates and Degrees committed to their Charge by God whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal and restrain with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England It is mentioned in the Admonition that the Queen 's Ecclesiastical Power is the same that was challenged and used by Henry the Eighth c. Which is supposed by some to be the same that was in the Pope the Person only and not the Power changed so that our Princes are but Secular Popes This Objection was strengthned by the Subtilty of Gardiner abroad Whom Calvin terms Impostor ille in Am. 7.13 and at home by a Sermon preached at Paul's-Cross in the Year 1588 by Dr. Bancroft who calls Queen Elizabeth a petty Pope and tells us her Ecclesiastical Authority is the same which the Pope had formerly This 37th Article removes the Scruple sufficiently 1. In asserting the Authority given to her Majesty to be no other but what we see to have been given to all Godly Princes in holy Scriptures c. And for what Power Henry the Eighth challenged it was no new Jurisdiction wrested from the Pope but a Power or Prerogative justly and rightfully belonging to him 26 Henry 8. cap. 1. claimed and exercised by his Predecessors some hundreds of Years before his Time being anciently annexed to the Crown 2. In the latter part of the Article it is also evident For tho a Power in spiritual Causes be given to a Secular Prince yet it is not a spiritual Power and such a Jurisdiction as the Pope claims but such a Power only and in such a way as is put forth and exercised in ordinary Civil Affairs and the same in respect both to Ecclesiastical and Temporal Persons namely a restraining with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers So to restrain or coerce is an Authority or Jurisdiction peculiar to Civil Magistrates and by Christ himself denied to the highest Ecclesiastical Powers Mat. 20 25 26. Ye know saith Christ the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion over them and they that are great exercise Authority upon them but it shall not be so among you you apostles and threatens the Use of the Sword in such Persons Mat. 26.52 King James speaking of the Oath of Supremacy In that Oath saith he is contained only the King 's absolute Power over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions In his Apol. pag. 76. And more fully afterwards pag. 164. It implies saith he a Power to command Obedience to be given to the Word of God by reforming Religion according to his prescribed Will by assisting the spiritual Power by his temporal Sword by Reformation of Corruption by procuring due Obedience to the Church by judging and cutting off all frivolous Questions and Schisms as Constantine did and finally by making a Decorum to be observed in all indifferent Things for that purpose which is the only Intent of our Oath of Supremacy My Lord Coke out of 1º Eliz. and in the Words of the Statute gives this Interpretation There is saith he no Jurisdiction by this Act affixed to the Crown but was of Right or ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of his Jurisdiction and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The End of which Jurisdiction and of all the Proceedings thereupon is that all Things might be in Causes Ecclesiastical to the pleasure of Almighty God Increase of Vertue and the Conservation of the Peace and Unity of the Realm as by divers places of the Act appears And therefore by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being ungodly or repugnant to the ancient Law of the Crown was or could be restored to the Crown according to the ancient Right and Law of the same Coke de Jure Ecclesiastico fol. 8. Bishop Bilson a great Searcher into the Doctrine of the Supremacy of Kings gives this as the Sence of the Oath The Oath saith he expresseth not Kings Duty to God but ours to them As they must be obeyed when they join with Truth so must they be endured when they fall into Error Which Side soever they take either Obedience to their Wills or Submission to their Swords is their due by God's Law and that is all which our Oath exacteth And in a few Lines following he interprets what is meant by Supremacy We do not saith he give Princes Power to do what they list in the Matters appertaining to God and his Service Indeed we say the Pope may not depose them nor pull the Crown off their Heads In this only Sence we defend them to be Supreme that is not at liberty to do what they list without regard of Truth or Right but without Superior on Earth Dr. Morton against the Pope's Supremacy out of an Epistle of Leo to the Emperor speaking thus You must not be ignorant that your Princely Power is given unto you not only in worldly Regiment but also spiritual for the Preservation of
consisting of their parish-Parish-Bishop and his Elders they do ascribe that sufficient immediate and independent Authority for Ecclesiastical Government for every proper visible Church That Independency of Churches was asserted by those learned men of a former Age in relation only to a superior church-Church-power properly spiritual and such as is claimed jure divino and not in relation to that Ecclesiastical Power which is in or exercised from the Civil Magistrate Some of them have thus described a particular Church It 's a Body Politick spiritually independent or independent in relation to a spiritual Superiority which is expressed fully by him that wrote Church-Government with the Peoples consent pag. 115. Though we affirm the Church-Government is independent and immediately derived from Christ yet we affirm also that the Civil Magistrate is even therein that is in Ecclesiastical Matters Supreme Governor civilly And though nothing may be imposed on the Christian Churches against their Will by any spiritual Authority for so only we intend yet we affirm withall that the Civil Magistrate may impose on them spiritual Matters by Civil Power yea whether they like or dislike if it be good in his Eyes that is if he judge it within his Commission from God And such an Independency hath been pleaded for also and argued by them to be much more consistent with His Majesties Supremacy than a DEPENDENCY or Subordination of Churches to any spiritual Power And it was their professed Judgments That no External Power ought to be exercised in spiritual Matters any where within that space betwixt a particular Congregation instituted by Christ and the Catholick Visible Church by any person but the Civil Magistrate or by his Appointment Take their own Words They that make claim Jure Divino of Power and Jurisdiction to meddle with other Churches than that one Congregation of which they are Members do usurp upon the Supremacy of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath and ought to have a power of Jurisdiction over the several Congregations in his Dominions c. A Protestation of the King's Supremacy made and published in Anno 1605. § 27. and in § 28. The King himself is to be General Overseer of all the Churches within his Dominions and ought o employ under him fit persons to oversee the Churches in their several Divisions visiting them and punishing whatsoever is amiss in any of them Mr. Bradshew in the Vnreasonableness of Separation against Johnson writes thus It 's their principal Honour speaking of Archbishops and Bishops to be Commissioners and Visitors in Causes Ecclesiastical under the King over the Pastors and Churches of Provinces and Diocesses In his Answer to Johnson's first Reason And in his Answer to his second He questions him thus 1. Whether the Supreme Magistrate hath not Power to oversee and govern all the several Churches within his Dominion yea whether he be not bound so to do 2. Whether for his further help and assistance herein he may not make choice of grave learned and reverent men to assist him in the same Government 3 Whether by vertue of his Power these persons thus called to assist the Supreme Magistrate may not lawfully try the Gifts of Ministers within his Dominions convent them before them examine how they have behaved themselves in their places and punish the blame-worthy In a Petition also to King James for Tolleration That your Highness would afford us and assign to us some persons qualified with Wisdom Learning and Vertue to be under your Highness our Overseers for our more peaceable orderly and dutiful carriage of our selves both in our worshiping God and in all other our Affairs at your pleasure To whom with all Readiness and Subjection we are willing to be accomptable and answerable always The opinions of learned men about Church Matters Government especially were collected together in a Treatise which was put into Latin by Dr. Ames and in an Epistle of his prefixed avouched by him who was a man much studied in those Controversies to be the Judgment of Cartwright Fenner Fulk Whitaker Rainolds Perkins Brightman and those that were more Ancient As Wichliff Tyndal Rogers Bradford Gilby Fox Moore Dearing Noel Greenham Dogmata ista c. These Tenents saith he were either their Principles or so conjunct with them as not to be denied theirs Christ Jesus saith the Author hath not subjected any Church or Congregation of his to any other Superior Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction than unto that which is within it self the Civil Magistrate alone upon Earth hath power to punish a whole Church or Congregation Cap. 2. § 3. and more fully in § 12. They hold and believe saith he that the Equality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority of Churches and Church Ministers is no more derogatory and repugnant to the State and Glory of a Monarch than the parity or equality of School-masters of several Schools or Masters of several Families Yea they hold the clean contrary that Inequality of Churches and Church Officers in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority was that principally that advanced Antichrist unto his Throne and brought the Kings and Princes of the Earth unto such vassalage under him And that the Civil Authority and Glory of Secular Princes and States hath ever decayed and withered the more that Ecclesiastical Officers of the Church have been advanced and set up in Authority beyond the limits and confines that Christ in his Word hath prescribed unto them And in Cap. 6. § 6. They are said to deny a principal part of the Kings Supremacy that hold any Jurisdiction or Offices over Churches jure divino 〈…〉 will and pleasure of the King and Civil States of the 〈◊〉 And from what is said cap. 5. § 12. It is 〈◊〉 that this way is as little prejudicial to the Subjects 〈…〉 expresly there said If any Member of a Congregation 〈…〉 crime shall of himself forsake Communion with the Church that then the Ecclesiastical Officers have no authority or jurisdiction over him but only the Civil Magistrate Parents or Masters c. So that as persons are free otherwise than from conscience of duty to joyn with these Assemblies so also to leave them remaining always under the Magistrates Ecclesiasticul power and care I have made this Digression not only for the matters sake which is very sutable to our present Subject but also to vindicate the Congregational way 1. That it is not such a Novelty as is pretended This of the equality of Churches and thence an Independency from which we are reproachfully surnamed seems to be the worst of our Tenents Yet it appears to be no other but what the reverend and learned of a former age have asserted Nor do I know any other of their opinions or practices but may as easily be remonstrated to be the assertions of those holy men Nor secondly inconsistent with civil Magistracy or with their Power in Ecclesiastical Affairs And as a further Testimony hereof they take the Oaths both of Allegeance and Supremacy
The Oath of Allegiance I A B do truly and sincerely acknowledg profess testify and declare in my Conscience before God and the VVorld that our Sovereign Lord KING CHARLES is Lawful and Rightful KING of this Realm and of all other his Majesty's Dominions and Countries And that the Pope neither of himself nor by any Authority of the Church or See of Rome or by any other means with any other hath any Power or Authority to Depose the KING or to dispose any of his Majesty's Kingdoms or Dominions or to Authorize any Foreign Prince to invade or annoy Him or his Countries or to discharge any of his Subjects of their Allegiance or Obedience to his Majesty or to give License or Leave to any of them to bear Arms to raise Tumults to offer any Violence or Hurt to his Majesty's Royal Person State or Government or to any of his Majesty's Subjects within his Majesty's Dominions Also I do swear from my Heart That notwithstanding any Declaration or Sentence of Excommunication or Deprivation made or granted or to be made and granted by the Pope or his Successors or by any Authority derived or pretended to be derived from him or his See against the said King his Heirs or Successors or any Absolution of the said Subjects from their Obedience I will bear Faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors and him and them will defend to the uttermost of my Power against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever which shall be made against his or their Persons their Crown or Dignity by reason or colour of any such Sentence or Declaration or otherwise and will do my best endeavour to disclose and make known unto his Majesty his Heirs and Successors all Treasons and Traiterous Conspiracies which I shall know or hear of to be against him or any of them And I further swear That I do from my Heart abhor detest and abjure as Impious and Heretical this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes which be Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murthered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever And I do believe and in my Conscience am resolved that neither the Pope nor any other Person whatsoever hath Power to absolve me of this Oath or any part thereof which I acknowledg by good full Authority to be Lawfully ministred unto me and do renounce all Pardons and Dispensations to the contrary And all these Things I do plainly and sincerely acknowledg and swear according to these express VVords by me spoken and according to the Plain and Common Sence and Understanding of the same VVords without any Equivocation or Mental Evasion or secret Reservation whatsoever And I do make this Recognition and Acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon the true Faith of a Christian So help me God The Oath of Supremacy you may see at large in this Book page 2. THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy AND Power of the King IN Ecclesiastical Affairs With Queen Elizabeth's ADMONITION declaring the Sence and Interpretation of it confirmed by an Act of Parliament in the 5th Year of her Reign Together with a Vindication of Dissenters proving That their particular Congregations are not inconsistent with the King's Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Affairs With some Account of the Nature Constitution and Power of the ECCLESIASTICAL COVRTS By P. NYE a Congregational Divine sometime Minister in London In the Epistle to the Reader is inserted King James's Vindication and Explication of the Oath of Allegiance LONDON Printed for Jonathan Robinson in St. Paul's Church-Yard and Samuel Crowch in Cornhill 1683. The Publisher to the Reader THE reprinting of this judicious and learned Treatise of Mr. Nye 's is occasioned by the re-imposing of the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy on the City of London at this Juncture for Election of Common-Councel-Men some supposing that many Dissenters will refuse the said Oaths or at least that of the Supremacy but by what is here said it will appear King James in his Catalogue of Tortus's Lies saith The Puritans do not decline the Oath of Supremacys but do daily take it c. and the same Supremacy is defended by Calvin himself Instit l. 4. c 20. Bp Andrews says the same Tortura Torti p. 110. that the Principles of Dissenters are not inconsistent with the King's Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Affairs and as a further Testimony hereof as they have* formerly so they are again ready to take the said Oaths and professedly assent also to all the Articles of Religion which concern only the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrine of the Sacraments comprised in a Book entituled Articles c. printed 1562 and so do humbly hope living peaceably under his Majesties Government they shall obtain that Indulgence which his Majesty hath often graciously promised and which they formerly enjoyed his Majesty having told us in his Declaration for Indulgence It being evident by the sad Experience of twelve years that there is little fruit of forcible courses And in his gracious Speech Febr. 5. 1672 assured the Parliament that he had hitherto found the good Effect of the said Indulgence The Reverend Author hath said nothing of the Oath of Allegiance supposing no Protestant scruples that unless it be such as scruple all manner of Swearing but that all may understand the nature and design of both I will here insert the Words of King James in his Apologie for the Oath of Allegiance p. 46 c. in his Answer to Card. Bellarmin 's Letters Viz. As the Oath of Supremacy was devised for putting a Difference between Papists and them of our Profession so was this Oath of Allegiance which Bellarmine would seem to impugn ordained for making the Difference between the civily obedent Papists and the perverse Disciples of the Powder-Treason In King Henry Eighth's time was the Oath of Supremacy first made by him were Thomas Moor and Roffensis put to death partly for refusing it From his time till now have all the Princes of this Land professing this Religion successively in effect maintained the same and in that Oath only is contained the King's Absolute Power to be Judge over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions Whereas this last made Oath containeth no such matter only medling with the Civil Obedience of Subjects to their Sovereign in meer Temporal Causes And that the Injustice as well as the Error of Bellarmin's gross mistaking in this Point may yet be more clearly discovered I have also thought good to insert here immediately after the Oath of Supremacy the contrary Conclusions to all the Points and Articles whereof this other late Oath doth consist whereby it may appear what unreasonable and rebellious Points he would drive my Subjects unto by refusing the whole Body or that Oath as it is conceived For he that shall refuse to take this Oath must of necessity hold
all or some of these Propositions following 1. That I King James am not the lawful King of this Kingdom and of all other my Dominions 2. That the Pope by his own Authority many depose me If not by his own Authority yet by some other Authority of the Church or of the See of Rome If not by some other Authority of the Church and See of Rome yet by other means with others help he may depose me 3. That the Pope may dispose of my Kingdoms and Dominions 4. That the Pope may give Authority to some Foreign Prince to invade my Dominions 5. That the Pope may discharge my Subjects of their Obedience and Allegiance to me 6. That the Pope may give Licence to one or more of my Subjects to bear Arms against me 7. That the Pope may give leave to my Subjects to offer Violence to my Person or to my Government or to some of my Subjects 8. That if the Pope shall by Sentence excommunicate or depose me my Subjects are not to bear Faith and Allegiance to me 9. If the Pope shall by Sentence excommunicate or depose me my Subjects are not bound to defend with all their power my Person and Crown 10. If the Pope shall give out any Sentence of Excommunication or Deprivation against me my Subjects by reason of that Sentence are not bound to reveal all Conspiracies and Treasons against me which shall come to their Hearing and Knowledg 11. That it is not heretical and detestable to hold that Princes being excommunicated by the Pope may be either deposed or killed by their Subjects or any other 12. That the Pope hath Power to absolve my Subjects from this Oath or from some par thereof 13. That this Oath is not administred to my Subjects by a full and lawful Authority 14. That this Oath is to be taken with Equivocation mental Evasion or secret Reservation and not with the Heart and good Will sincerely in the Faith of a Christian Man These are the true and natural Branches of the Body of this Oath The CONTENTS CHAP. I. THe Occasion of this Oath various Form and Alteration of it Interpretations of this Oath given in our Laws and Writers of note The nature of our Assent and Stipulation CHAP. II. What is ment by Things and Persons Spiritual or Ecclesiastical in the proper as also in the vulgar use of these Terms CHAP. III. Of Power its rise and original Two sorts of Power in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Things their Agreement and Difference CHAP. IV. Of the necessity and usefulness of a Jurisdiction over Persons and in Causes Ecclesiastical besides what is in Churches and Church-men This Power is placed in Kings and such as are the supream Governours in a Common-wealth CHAP. V. The Government of particular Churches hath Affinity with Families Cities and the like lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms confirmed in six Instances A Digression Of Independency Name and Thing its consistency with the King's Supreamacy CHAP. VI. Of the Jurisdiction over particular Churches placed in Ecclesiastical Persons as it is 1. Exercised with us in this Nation 2. As it is in other Reformed Churches herein Of Appeals that are properly such in Ecclesiastical Matters these are always to be to the Supream Civil Magistrate only or to such as are appointed by him A Post-script giving some account of the congregational way from such Principles of it as are laid down in this Treatis THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy c. THE Supremacy of the Kings of England being eclipsed by the Bishop of Rome in both parts of it the State thought fit to enjoin a Provision of equal extension In relation to the Civil Rights of the Crown is the Oath of Allegiance and against the Encroachments upon the Ecclesiastical this of the Supremacy which being first enjoined containeth in a manner both This Oath hath given the Papists such a Blow as they could not but strike again and have poured out a Flood of Arguments and Absurdities against submitting to it which hath been a long time scattered and stick in the Minds of divers of his Majesty's Loyal Subjects who tho otherwise well affected yet by reason of some Doubts and Tenderness are at a stand to this day and scruple the taking of this Oath For whose satisfaction and clearing the Lawfulness of this Supremacy is the ensuing D. scourse CHAP. I. § 1. The Oath it self as now enjoined § 2. The Occasion of this Oath § 3. Various Forms of it and Alterations about it § 4. Interpretations given of it in our Laws and Writers of Note § 5. The Nature of our Assent and Stipulation The Oath of Supremacy I A. B. do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal And that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Iurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all Foreign Iurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors and to my power shall assist and defend all Iurisdictions Privileges Preeminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness his Heirs and Successors as united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm § 2. For many Years there hath been a Contest about Jurisdiction and Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Matters between the Bishop of Rome and the Kings of England who hath got ground herein according as our Princes were found more weak necessitous or devoted to his Holiness Rome was not built in a Day By William the Conqueror Legates from the Pope to hear and determine Ecclesiastical Causes were admitted Henry the First after much Contest yields to the Pope the Patronages and Donations of Bishopricks and all other Ecclesiastical Benefices it being decreed at Rome that no Lay-Person should give any Ecclesiastical Charge King Stephen grants that Appeals be made to the Court of Rome In Henry the Second's Days the Pope gets the Clergy and Spiritual Persons exempted from Secular Powers The Bishop of Rome is now over all Ecclesiastical Persons and Causes even in these Dominions Supreme Head And having upon the matter made Conquest over more than half the Kingdom in the Times of King John and Henry the Third sets on for the whole and obtains of King John an absolute Surrender of England and Ireland unto his Holiness which were granted back again by him to the King to hold of the Church of Rome in Fee-farm and Vassalage Being now absolute and immediate Lord over all he endeavours to convert the Profits of both Kingdoms to his own Use so that Prince and People were hereby reduced
Nature but from the Quality of the Persons who were made Judges of them They being spiritual Men the Causes come to be called spiritual Causes after their Names and Quality that were set over them These Causes growing and increasing in after-times according as spiritual Persons were able by the Popes assistance to rifle from Princes the managing of them require more hands than those to whom first committed namely the Bishops and such as were in holy Orders they therefore took in for Assistants a great number of others as Archdeacons Chancellors Commssiaries Officials c. and these are denominated Spiritual from those Causes and their assistance of Bishops in the managing of them and their Courts Spiritual Courts There are Persons that are truly spiritual The spiritual Man saith Paul judgeth all things 1 Cor. 2.14 and Gal. 6.1 Ye that are spiritual c. That is such as have Grace and Holiness He also that hath spiritual Gifts and in a Gospel-Office or Calling is a spiritual Person 1 Cor. 14.37 a Man of God 2 Tim. 3.17 1 Pet. 2.5 And there are Matters or Causes that are truly spiritual as the Law is spiritual Rom. 7. The Gospel and preaching of it is a sowing of spiritual things 1 Cor. 9. the Worship and Service of God 1 Cor. 12. and 14.12 and all Gifts and Ordinances of Christ are spiritual Yea whatsoever things natural or moral that are helps to the Persons worshipping and by which the Worship it self becomes more orderly and to Edification and in the defect whereof the Name of God is taken in vain and Ordinances of Christ become less acceptable and effectual these Things and Circumstances in some sence may be termed Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Persons and Causes of each sort whether vulgarly or properly termed Spiritual or Ecclesiastical are some way or other under the Magistrates Government The former of these those spiritual Persons and Courts and Causes appertaining to them in the first framing of this Oath were principally if not only intended and aimed at as appeareth in the Statutes before mentioned And indeed the greatest Contention between the Pope and our Princes in all time hath been about Ecclesiastical Matters of that nature being then judged of greatest prejudice in respect both to the Honour and Wealth of this Nation For those matters more truly spiritual and nearly relating to God and his Service the Ignorance of the times was such his Impositions both in Doctrine and Worship though very sinful unsound and superstitious were generally recelved by Prince and People in this Nation without resisting or complaining There can be no question but these matters being indeed temporal properly belong to the Secular Powers For for the space of three hundred Years this Distinction was not known saith Sir John Davis or heard of in the Christian World the Causes of Testaments Matrimony Sir J. D. in his Reports the Case of Premunire c. termed Ecclesiastical or Spiritual were meerly Civil and determined by the Civil Laws of the Magistrate And for Persons and Causes Spiritual or Ecclesiastical that are properly and indeed such as first-Table-Duties which contain matters of Faith and Holiness and what conduceth to the eternal Wellfare of Mens Souls an Interest and Duty there is in the Civil Magistrate more suo to give Commands and exercise lawful Jurisdiction about things of that nature And for Persons there is no Man for his Graces so spiritual or in respect of his Gifts and Office so eminent but he is under the Government of the Civil Powers in the Place where he lives as much in all respects as any other Subject CHAP. III. 1. Of Power its rise and original 2. Two sorts of Power in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Things 3. Their Agreement and 4. Difference of the one from the other § 1. THere is a difference between Potentia and Potestas Potentia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Strength Force Robustness Such a Power is found not only in Men particular Persons as Sampson Goliah c. but in other inferior Creatures Potestas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jurisdiction Authority this is peculiar to rational Creatures Job 40.18 and as they are a Commonalty and in Society one with another Though Force and Strength as in singular Persons be sufficient for publick Actions yet without Authority we act not lawfully and having Authority if we have not Power and Strength sufficient we cannot act effectually therefore joyned together in a King Dan. 2.37 All Men by Nature are equal yet in the first forming of Man a Capacity is found in him with some remote Disposition to rule and obey as 1. A Sociableness let us make Man in our Image Vs and Our a Trinity in One his Creator Hence in each Man's Constitution a Propension and natural bent to Union This God himself observes It is not good for Man to be alone the Woman is created not only for a Companion but that Men and Women might increase and be multiplied 2. Multitudes of Men if not reduced into Subordination and Order having lost their original Righteousness will be a greater Evil than if each were alone by himself One Man will exalt himself ever others and according to that brutish Force and Strength wherein he excelleth rob oppress murther and pillage others 3. Hence a necessity of Republicks and Commonweals that some Rules and Laws may be provided not only for Direction but for Correction if need be 4. Such Laws imply Authority and a Supremacy also in it for such Authority or Jurisdiction only is Legislative Man consists of Soul and Body This Principle of Civility or Sociableness whence Authority hath its Original and Rise is placed primarily in the Soul Society and Republicks are for the moral Good of Mens Souls therefore and not to accommodate the Body only The Powers also that are being ordained of God Rom. 13. who is the Father of Spirits ought to be managed and directed to Matters wherein our Souls and Spirits are concerned The Good and Evil for which these Powers are ordained is not limited to the Body or outward Man The Power of Parents and Masters in the Family it is civil not sacred yet ordained for the bringing up Children and Servants in the Nurture of the Lord. Ephes 6.4 There being a new Creation in and through the Lord Jesus Christ These Persons created of God partake of a Divine Nature and thence the like Propension to Union and a holy Fellowship with those whom Christ hath redeemed out of the World Therefore a special Provision is made by the Lord Jesus for such to joyn together in particular Societies or Churches Himself being appointed by his Father to be their King and Law-giver who hath left them Rules and Laws for managing the Affairs of these spiritual Corporations or Brotherhoods as the Scripture terms them Power also and Authority for putting these Laws in execution is given unto Churches So that there is a twofold Power or Authority
to be exercised in Causes and over Persons Ecclesiastical or Spiritual the one placed in the Princes the other in the Churches of Christ 1. The difference betwixt these two Powers 2. The Necessity if the Civil Power in Ecclesiastial Matters notwithstanding Church-Power § 2. What is common to both and wherein each of these Powers differ from the other shall briefly be shewed 1. They are Powers both a Subordination or Policy in the Church as well as in the Common-weal and an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Jurisdiction exercised in each You read of Authority or Jurisdiction not only in Civil Assemblies as Rom. 13. John 19.11 but also in Churches 2 Cor. 10.8 and 13.10 the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places 2. They are both from God and the Ordinance of God and ought to be submitted to for Conscience sake and are for Encouragement to those that are Good and for Wrath upon him that doth Evil and he that resisteth this Power in either resists the Ordinance of God and they that resist receive to themselves Damnation as the Apostle speaks as well in respect to the one as the other And both being from God they are also both Powers under God that is under his Designment and Limits as also his Direction and Guidance for his Glory as the ultimate and the good of Mankind as the penultimate end of both 3. This Power of Princes is termed spiritual Ratione objecti because it hath to do with Spiritual Persons and Causes In such like a sense and manner of Speech if it had the stamp of vulgar Use the Church-Power may be termed Civil or Temporal because all sorts of Persons and Causes without Difference are under the Power of it That as the secular Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae matters of Holiness and what 's opposite to it Blasphemy Heresy Perjury c. as well as Righteousness so Church-Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae Righteousness and second-Table-Duties and what is opposite as Rebellion Sedition Lying Stealing if any Man that is called a Brother be a Fornicator or a Drunkard or an Extortioner c. In all these and such Cases the Church-Power is applied in an Ecclesiastical or Spiritual way as in a Civil and Secular way the Magistrate deals with what are Duties of the first Table The Powers do mutually further each other and so ordained by God from whom they are both originally as they sweetly comply and agree being kept in their just Bounds each with other as Moses and Aaron David and Nathan Zerubbabel the Son Shealtiel and Joshua the Son of Josedech Jungamus Gladios said the Emperor to his Bishop let us joyn our Forces and purge the Land of Wickedness And our Senators in Parliament speak thus of these Stat. 20. Hen 8. c. 12. Both Authorities and Jurisdictions joyn together and the one helps the other § 3. Their Differences are in these Particulars 1. Though both have in their respective way to do with both Tables yet the Civil Magistrates Work lyeth most over Persons with respect to the Duties of the second Table as in matters of Justice and Righteousness in the managing whereof the very being of a Common-wealth principally consists its wel-being only as he hath to do in Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes So the Church-Power is chiefly and principally exercised in the ordering of Persons with respect to the first-Table-Duties and which appertains to Piety Wherein is the Being and constant Employment of Churches The other that is matters of Righteousness Justice Sobriety and the like are occasionally only and in ordine ad spiritualia under Church-Power and Censures 2. The Power of Churches is not only spiritual Ratione objecti because it s over spiritual Persons and Causes but ex natura rei a spiritual Power having Spirituality and its Denomination from more intrinsick Considerations as the Matter Form Subject Rule End c. and not from the Object only as that other Power which though it be in spiritual things yet it is not properly spiritual Power the Sword which it bears is not the Sword of the Spirit Rev. 1.16 Ephes 6. which is the Word of God and this Word is eternal not temporal it endureth for ever the Power and Soveraignty of it is from Christ out of his Mouth went a sharp two-edged Sword his Sword and Power being spiritual it pierceth runs deep Heb. 4. even betwixt the Soul and the Spirit there comes no such Sword or Law from Civil Authority that Power in its greatest Efficacy reacheth not the Inner-Man though to be submitted unto for Conscience sake Indeed this Power is over spiritual Persons but not immediately and directly over their spiritual part By these Powers we are given up to a Prison to Banishment to Death but not to Satan It is not for cruciating the Souls and perplexing the Consciences of Men as is Church-Power where there is Cause 3. That of Secular Magistrates even in Spiritual Affairs and having to do primarily with the outward Man is more Authoritative it is Jurisdictio propriè dicta Legislative Coercive and in all respects the same as in Civil Matters what he doth in his own Name And truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Church-Power is not properly Jurisdiction or Authority as in the Church but as in Christ the Head of the Church as seated in the Church or Caetus fidelium it is only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministerium not Deminium and acts all in the Name or Authority of Christ 4. They differ in Extension in respect to both Persons and Causes 1. church-Church-Power is limited to a particular Congregation as Family-Power to those of our own Houshold But this other Ecclesiastical Power seated in the same Person or Persons extends it self throughout a whole Kingdom yea sometimes to more than one But in some one Province or Kingdom you read in Scripture of many Churches This cometh to pass from another Difference between these Powers The Manage of Ecclesiastical Affairs as in Civil Magistrates may be delegated to other hands by way of Commission or Deputation they may ordain under them subordinate Thrones and inferior Powers acting in their Names which is Lordly and full of Honour and State But Churches may not do so by delegation of Power Representatives or any other Method or Way to stretch forth the Wing of their Authority like that of the Civil over all the Churches of a Nation or over more Congregations than one or a greater than ordinarily partake of all other Ordinances together is not at all suitable to a Church-Condition which is Ministerial not Lordly So Mr. Bradshaw as the Opinion of the Nonconformists We confine and bound all Ecclesiastical Power within the Limits only of one particular Congregation holding that the greatest Ecclesiastical Power ought not to stretch beyond the same And that it is an arrogating of Princely Supremacy for any Ecclesiastical Person or Persons whatsoever to take upon themselves Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction
over many Churches much more over whole Kingdoms and Provinces of Churches Dr. Bilson speaks much to this purpose Of Supremacy pag. 238. Tho saith he Bishops may be called Governors in respect of the Soul yet only Princes be Governors of Realms Pastors have Flocks and Bishops have Diocesses Realms Dominions and Countries none have but Princes and Magistrates And so the Stile Governor of this Realm belongeth only to the Prince and not to the Priest and importeth a Publick and Princely Regiment The Common-Wealth saith Mr. Baxter containeth all the People in a whole Nation Holy Common-wealth pag. 220. or more as united in one Sovereign But particular Churches have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must unite as one Church but are as several Corporations in one Kingdom c. We see saith Sir Fr. Bacon in all Laws in the World Considerations about Church-Affairs Offices of Confidence and Skill cannot be exercised by Delegation all such Trust is personal and inherent and may not be transported and delegated as that of Kings which for the most part is hereditary and rather an Office of Interest than Confidence 2. In respect to Causes the Church-Power extends its Censures to no Causes but such as the other may as to Popery Heresy c. But in many Cases the Civil Magistrate extends his Care and Authority where church-Church-Power moddles not As to Jews and Pagans and such as are not Members of the Church some things may be done by the Magistrate even for these being Members of his Common-Wealth that may conduce to their spiritual Good The Church-Power is limited as 1 Cor. 5.12 So likewise whether the Crime committed be private or publick Matter of Scandal or not or the Person penitent or otherwise these Powers are at liberty to punish or pardon alike and as they shall judg it expedient to be severe or merciful accordingly They may form or reform the Laws and Statutes by which they govern 1 Eliz. cap 1. with 35 Hen 8. making the same Fault Treason in one Age that in the next not so much as Imprisonment But Church-Power is limited the same Crime the same Punishment ever not being in the Power of this Republick to vary in their Process in respect of lesser or greater Censures if the Crime be she same 5. In their Constitution or Tenure Licet omnis Potestas saith Carbo tum Ecclesiastica tum Civilis Carbo de Leg. iib. 2. cap. 8. sit à Deo tamen non eodem modo nam politica licet universe sit jure Divino in particulari est jure Gentium Ecclesiastica omni modo est jure divino à Deo Government in general is of Divine Right but whether in this or that particular Form as in one or a few representing the rest this is humane and hath its Original from Man That Power which is termed an Ordinance of God in Rom. 13. is called an Ordinance of Man in 1 Pet. 2. Church-Power and Government being spiritual hath all particulars for substance both in respect of Persons and Administrations for matter and manner appointed by Jesus Christ and in all Nations to be the same Civil Power even in Ecclesiastical Matters in many things for substance is left to the Prudence of the State in which it is exercised and in the Forms of it various according to the manner of the Nation As for Instance Inspection into Religious Assemblies visiting and observing their Demeanour receiving Complaints by reason of Wrongs Disorders c. These things may be done by the Civil Magistrate in his own Person or by Persons authorized from him these Persons may be many or but one in a Division these Divisions of larger or less Compass And for the manner of Procedure it 's various as Ecclesiastical Courts differ in their manner of Process from Civil or of a Method or Way of handling Causes different from each be established by Law it is equally warrantable There are particular Directions left by Christ according to which the Officers and Persons more especially entrusted with this Power are designed to and invested in their Places and Charge as Election Ordination c. with Fasting and Prayer The other Powers are setled upon and claimed in such ways as the respective Law of Nations design as by Birth Lot Victory Donation or the like as well as Election insomuch as a Woman or Child may have a rightful Claim to this Supreme Trust and the Management of it by themselves or others as shall be appointed CHAP. IV. § 1. Of the Necessity and Vsefulness of a Jurisdiction over Persons and in Causes Ecclesiastical besides what is in Churches § 2. This Power is placed in Kings and such as are the Supreme Governors in a Common-Wealth § 1. FOr the second we shall shew how necessary and useful Civil Power is even in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Matters notwithstanding the other It is not to be denied that Souls were converted and Churches established and kept up when there was no Assistance but rather Opposition from the Princes of the Earth as in the Apostolick and Primitive Times The Benefit we have now by Christian Mgistrates was then more abundantly supplied the Infancy of Christianity requiring more by the Miracles wrought and the constant Direction and Care of Apostolick and extraordinary Persons who were gifted by Christ for that purpose All the ordinary Helps that now we have by external and more sensual or carnal Means contributing any thing to these great Works is only a pious and Christian Magistracy where a Nation is blessed with it The Benefit hereof is much in a spiritual respect both to the World as likewise to the Church 1. It is tho remote a great Help to bring Men out of their natural Condition unto Life and Salvation We are exhorted to pray for Kings and such as are in Authority 1 Tim. 2. The reason v. 4. For God will have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledg of the Truth As the Knowledg of the Truth is a means to bring a Soul into a saving State so is the Magistrate being enlightned himself a great Means to bring us to the knowledg of the Truth Those Men were in a great Distance from God in a Rage against Christ and Religion Psal 2.1 they did combine against the strict Ways of the Gospel these poor Heathens being notwithstanding given to Christ by Election v. 8. David useth a twofold Method for reducing them The first is a representing their wretched and miscrable Condition while in this State of Enmity ver 9. Then 2. deals with their Princes and Rulers to be forthwith instructed and serve the Lord i.e. as Kings and Magistrates in their publick Capacity But must not the People be instructed also Such Magistrates will speedily provide and take care for their People that they may be brought to the knowledg of the Truth and therefore it needs not to be mentioned The Magistratical
Power conduceth to this Work divers ways 1. By setting up and protecting a Gospel-Ministry He only can subserve Providence by sending or giving way to others to send forth fit Persons and enforce a Maintenance for their Encouragement in this Work By such a Word of Providence it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we come to hear and by hearing we believe Rom. 10.17 He can urge his People to come to the Means and outwardly conform to the same and so bring them to the Knowledg of the Truth the very Knowledg whereof tho not saving is a means at least to restrain our inbred Corruption and to work preparatively to Conversion bringing Men into a Condition not far from the Kingdom of Heaven as Christ speaks 2 Pet. 2.20 2. The Civil Magistrate hath Power to punish and reward and so to work upon the Passions of Fear Desire Hope c. Man even in his Natural Estate hath free Will in Moral Actions if it be excited and drawn forth The Passions are so seated betwixt the Will and Senses that outward and sensual Objects work effectually upon it the Motions of the Will in this our State of Corruption depending more upon the visions of what is sensual Hominem etsi timore poenae fugiat peccatum paulatian affectum animum ad illud amittere è contrario concipere odium illius idecque etiam vitare â—ccatum Ariag de Leg. Disp 13. § 9. Hos 2.6 than what is a rational Good or Evil. The most commanding and stirring Passion and with most life and vigour in a natural Man is Self or Self-Love it is the first Principle usually that God excites in us towards Conversion as in the Parable of the Prodigal and divers other Scriptures Sickness Poverty and the like Occurrence of Providences Punishments for Sin being sanctified by the Lord work much upon us so Miseries inflicted upon the more obstinate from Magistrates in Justice for evil-doing have the same Operation and by reason hereof gross Corruptions are kept in and restrained whereby the Habits of Sin decrease and become less rank in the Soul It is a hedging our Way with Thorns as the Prophet speaks A great part of the World lies without the Pale of the Church and the severity of its Judicature reacheth them not This Power is exercised only on Church-Members we have nothing to do to judg them that are without 1 Cor. 5.12 13. tho they be Fornicators or Covetous or Idolaters or Drunkards or Extortioners Churches in respect of Censures and Punishment leave them to God by the Magistrate or the like Providential way to judg them vers 13. 3. Impedimenta removendo he removes corrupt Teachers that slay Mens Souls Mich. 2.11 by crying Peace prophesying of Wine c. indulging Sinners in their Security and such as by Errors and false Doctrine poyson Mens Souls to their eternal perdition by restaining Stage-Plays not permitting Brothel-Houses and the like Fomenters of Sin Now there is no means or provision so certain and generally effectual to send out Preachers to urge and constrain Men to hear and for all these purposes as this when the Magistrate according to his Trust and Duty puts forth his Authority in these Matters or that will so universally as an external means stir that Principle of Self-love in all Men to the seeking after what is good and the shunning of what is evil A Coercive Power of this Nature is placed in no other hand but his Ministers may preach and persuade 1 Tim. 3.3 Mat. 20. but must be no Strikers may not externally afflict and constrain Peter may not use his Sword in Christ's Quarrel God only and the Civil Magistrate further our Happiness by making us miserable Paul who had as much Power as any Man of that Order yet his Weapons were only spiritual and tho an Apostle yet could not do so much as the meanest Civil Magistrate in such a Coercive way for their Weapons will whether Men incline or not have an operation and constant effect less or more to whomsoever applied This Power therefore of the Civil Magistrate cannot well be wanted or if it be there is no ordinary means to be had for a supply in the room of it Judg. 17.6 When there was no King in Israel every Man did what was right in his own Eyes followed the Ways his Lusts led him to Suppose there be good Counsel and Instruction yet to many Persons it signifieth little for some Men are not corrigible by Words Prov. 29.19 The Foolishness that is bound up in our Hearts must by Correction be driven far from us Prov. 22.15 4. I shall conclude adding in the last place Rom. 13. the Praise of Well-doing The Countenance and Encouragement of the Magistrate to those that preach and those that obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ renders it even to a carnal Heart desirable The Lord gives this honour to a poor Servant faithful in his place that he adorns the Gospel Tit. 2.10 and renders it more acceptable and effectual So likewise the Conversaetion of a Wife that those who obey not the Word 1 Pet. 3.1 are without the Word won by such a Conversation that is won to the Love of the Word and the liking of those Ways that are according to the Word Much greater is that Honour and Ornament which comes to the Gospel when the Magistrate not only by his Conversation and personal Example but by his Laws and Authority sets himself to encourage all he can the Preachers and Professors thereof bearing them up against Despisers and Scoffers 2. In respect to the Church To the Church and such as are effectually call'd out of the World God hath promised and in the Scripture much comforted his People in this that they shall have great benefit by the Civil Magistrates that are over them as Isa 32.2 chap. 49.23 chap. 60.16 These Promises relate to Gospel-times And those Places Numb 27.16 and 1 Tim. 2. are equivalent to Promises a Prayer is as it were a Promise reversed what is spoken by the Lord in a Promise being returned is the strength and confidence of a Prayer Encouragements also to obey Precepts imply Promises so that of Rom. 13. and 1 Pet. 2. our Subjection is required upon this consideration that Kings are for the praise of them that do well Rom. 13. ordained of God to thee to the Church and to every Saint for good The Lord in this doth not only promise but as it were undertake for the Magistrate that he shall be such an one as those that are pious and righteous those that do well need not dread or fear to be under him A good Magistrate is a Blessing and matter of joy and rejoycing to the People of God Prov. 29.2 Eccles 10.17 a great Fruit and Evidence of his Love to them 1 King 10.9 and 2 Chron. 2.11 Because the Lord hath loved his People he hath made thee
a Church within it self not an Assembly but a Society A Church as we are now to understand it is a Society that is a number of Men belonging to some Christian-Fellowship the Place and Limits whereof are certain having communion in the publick Exercise of such Duties as are mentioned Acts 2.47 As those of the Mystical Church by their inward Graces differ from all others which are not of the Body and those that are of the visible Body of the Church have the Notes of external Profession Even so these several Societies or Churches have Properties belonging to them as they are publick Christian Societies And of such Properties it may not be denied that one of the very chiefest is Ecclesiastical Policy We use the name of Policy rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatsoever besides belongeth to the ordering of the publick Affairs of the Church of God In which words he asserts not each particular Church to have Government in it self but this Government as a Property or Propriety by which it 's distinguished from the Mystical as also the Catholick visible Church So that he doth not as some of late make the Catholick visible Church the first Subject of the Keys but each particular Society or Church supposing that great Body of Christians to be only and immediately under the Spiritual Government of Christ Jesus 2. Compleat and sufficient It is not to be understood of such a perfection as may not with much advantage receive help both from the Power of the Magistrate as I have shewed before as also from the Counsel and Advice of other Churches But I mean an essential Compleatness or Sufficiency not being deficient in any material requisite for Government This that learned Author expresseth in those last Words ' We use the Word Policy saith he rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatever besides belongeth to the ordering of the Affairs of the Church of God Every particular Church Against Whitgist lib 3 pag. 147. saith Mr. Cartwright having an Eldership is a Catholick Church of Christ under whom Pastors Doctors and Elders are the ministerial and immediate Governors In which Words he intimateth a Compleatness in each particular Church for Government and Privileges as much as if the Catholick visible Church were Organical Rutherf Due Right or Presbyt pag. 307. and a governing Church The Power of Jurisdiction saith one is as perfect and compleat in one single Congregation as in a Provincial as in a National yea as in the Catholick visible Body All Things are yours saith Paul to a particular Church 2 Cor. 3. Parker's Polit. lib 3. cap. 13. To this purpose Mr. Parker Sicut non para c. As a particular Church is not a maimed or half but a whole and perfect Body so it is possessed with the whole and entire Church-Government and not with a part only This Oeconomick and Domestick Power is intrinsick and essential to a Family 2d Instance and is a Power derived immediatly from the Lord by the Light of Nature and hath not its original from any Power on Earth Families being much more ancient than Common-Wealths So Government or Discipline is intrinsick and inseparable from the very Essence of a Church received immediately from Christ and not the Grant or Constitution of any Secular Prince or State Jackson of the Church cap. 8. § 5. Churches are endued saith Dr. Jackson with a Judicature immediately derived from Christ and independent upon any Earthly Power or any Power whatsoever on Earth whether Spiritual or Temporal Bilson of Suprem p. 171. Bishop Bilson expresseth it thus The Things comprised in the Church and by God himself commanded to the Church these Things are specified in pag. 227. to be the Word Sacraments and Vse of the Keys or Ecclesiastical Power and Cure of Souls are subject to no mortal Creature Pope nor Prince And those of another Persuasion are to the same purpose The Church saith Mr. Rutherford hath the Keys from Christ Peaceable Plea p. 300. equally independent upon any mortal Man in Discipline as in Doctrine Due Right of Presbyt cap. 9. § 9. A Power and Right to Discipline saith the same Author is a Property essential to a Church and is not removed from it till God remove the Candlestick and the Church cease to be a visible Church Potestas ipsa de jure c. Power saith Dr. Ames is so much the Right of a Church Cas cen lib 4. cap. 24. p. 4. as it cannot be separated because necessary and immediatly floweth even from the Essence of each true Church There are Authorities enow to be produced from the Writings of the Learned for the confirmation of this particular All grant there is a Government jure divino I speak not of this or that Form and by the appointment of Jesus Christ It is denied by none but Erastus and those that follow him who may as well deny Praying Preaching or Sacraments jure divino It is as expresly ordained that Discipline be exercised in the Name of Christ as to preach pray or baptize in his Name There are certainly Things of God that are not the Things of Caesar And if those Things upon which Christ hath put his Name be not peculiarly his I know not where we shall find the Joint As we say there were Families so particular Churches before any Commonwealths were and Christian Churches and Discipline exercised many Years before any Emperors or Kings were Christian And therefore as Families have many Privileges so peculiar and by the Law of Nature so much theirs as are never touched or infringed by the Supreme Power of any Nation So likewise it is with Churches they have very many Privileges so evidently theirs from the Law of Christ and their spiritual Constitution as Christian Magistrates will do their utmost to preserve and cherish and not in the least infringe It is a part of Magna Charta Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta confirmavimus 3 Hen. 3. cap. 1. pro nobis Heredibus nostris in perpetuum quòd Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra Libertates suas illaesas And it is mentioned in the Oath our Kings take at their Coronation that He shall keep and maintain the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Holy Church A third Particular 3d Instance or Instance of what we have supposed in the former Considerations is this The lesser Corporations Cities Families and the like have not Authority or Jurisdiction one over another It is the same with Churches each having the Fountain and Original of their own Power as before is shewed immediatly proceeding from Christ in themselves and not elsewhere or one from another cannot by any Art or Device of Man be made to rise up above it self as it doth if one Church exerciseth a Power or Jurisdiction over another There is
no Invention of Man that by contriving Pipes or any other Artifice can make Water freely and naturally run higher than the Spring-Head Tho that Jurisdiction which hath its rise in a particular Church be pumped up into a Classis or Synod it is but the same it was before Synods saith Parker out of Chamier Polit lib. 3. cap. 13 § 9. Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 5. nullam habeant Authoritatem c. They have no Authority but what is derived from particular Churches So Voetius There seems to be a great Emphasis in those Particles of Propriety Children obey your Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to Servants 1 phes 6.1 And speaking of the Relation of Husbands and Wives by which is set forth our Obedience to Christ and his Officers it is more appropriate Ephes 5.24 As the Church is subject to Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriis viris not only theirs but their own Husbands It is said 1 Tim. 3.4 One that ruleth well his own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So of Ministers Know them that labour among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and are ever you in the Lord 1 Thess 5.12 and in Heb. 13.17 it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Duces vestri your Captains Officers in Churches being as exactly limited as in an Army There is no Power in a Superior to command where no Obligation upon the Inferior to obey And therefore the Lord seems by these Expressions to limit both Church and Family-Power within their own Walls This is the Judgment of the Learned of each Persuasion Bishop Davenant Nota est Jurisconsultorum regula c. It is a known Rule of Lawyers A Sentence given by him that is not his Judg is void in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private Persons that are of other Churches how much less then over the Churches themselves such Sentences were to be slighted and contemned as of a Judg that presumeth to make Laws out of the bounds of his own Jurisdiction Nec potest De judice cont cap. 16. p. 90. nec debet saith the same Author elsewhere particularis una Ecclesia judiciaria authoritate aliam sibi non subjectam a Catholica abscindere quaelibet enim Ecclesia filios suos ad consensionem in Doctrina publicè stabilita censuris adigit Sed fratres Ecclesiarum externarum monet pro officio charitatis non punit pro imperio potestatis Dr. Field Of the Church lib 5. as a common Resolution of Divines tells us That if a Bishop ventures to do any Act of Jurisdiction out of his own Diocess that is his particular Church so cap. 30. as to excommunicate or absolve or the like all such Acts are utterly void and of no force The same thing saith Dr. Crakanthorp cont Spal cap. 28. pag. 177. Jue divinum Regim p. 230. Every Congregation say our Brethren hath equal Power one as much as another according to the trite and known Axiom Par in parem non habet imperium An Equal hath no Power over an Equal Ecclesiae institutae parochiales integrae sunt Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 3. inter se collaterales potestate Ecclesiastica aequales saith Voetius Which you may English out of the English Puritanism thus Particular Churches are in all Matters equal and are entrusted by Christ with the same Ecclesiastical Power and Authority Cap. 2. § 3. Jewel Reynolds Whitaker and most of our Divines against the Papists are large in their Disputes for a parity of Churches and Mr. Parker hath written a whole Chapter de paritate Ecclesiarum De Polit lib 3. cap. 21. Some make a particular Church to be of larger Extension as a Diocess a Province c. but that altereth not the State of the Question A DIGRESSION 1. Of Independentism Name and Thing 2. It s consistency with the Kings Supremacy THis State of a particular Church namely their equality in respect of Jurisdiction or coercive Power one over another was wont to be expressed by INDEPENDENCY which though now it be a term of Raproach yet formerly made use of by good Authors as very fit and significant to set forth this Priviledge of each particular Church compleat and intire namely their not Dependency or Subjection to the Jurisdiction of another Church as their Head and Superior Dr. Jackson in his learned Treatise of the Church Cap. 15. Cap. 119. useth this term frequently Unity saith he in one place of Discipline or of INDEPENDENT Judicature is essential and necessary to the Church as visible Hence there be as many distinct visible Churches as there be INDEPENDENT Judicatures Ecclesiastick Dr. Sibbs thus Gospel-anointings pag. 94. Particular visible Churches are now God's Tabernacle The Church of the Jews was a National Church but now God hath erected particular Tabernacles Every particular Church under one Pastor is the Church of God a several Church INDEPENDENT The Church of England saith the same Author is called a particular Church from other Nations because it is under a Government Civil which is not dependent on any other Foreign Prince Each Church saith Voctius Desp Cau. Pap. lib. 3. § 3. c. 4. as it hath its proper Form of an Ecclesiastical Body or Society so it s endued with its proper Government and Jurisdiction which it exerciseth DEPENDENTLY upon Christ his Word and Spirit but INDEPENDENTLY in respect of all other Churches Mr. Bates One Company of Men assembled Treatise printed Anno 1613. hath no Authority to impose things upon many Churches 1. None now have Apostolick Authority 2. Each Congregation is a Body INDEPENDENT of any Ecclesiastical Power There is no Ordinance of God for this saith Mr. Banes that Churches within a circuit should be tyed to a certain Head-Church for Government pag. 8. and pag. 13. We affirm that no such Head-Church was ordained either vertually or actually but that all Churches were single Congregations equal INDEPENDENT each of other in regard of Subjection Every true Church saith one now is an INDEPENDENT Congregation A Collection of sundry matters Anno 1601. and in another place The Congregational Body Politick spiritually INDEPENDENT is Christ's Divine Ordinance in the Gospel One ordinary Congregation of Christians is a spiritual Body Politick INDEPENDENT That is it hath the Right and Power of spiritual Administration and Government in it self Confession of Faith p. Anno 1601. and over it self by the common and free consent of the People INDEPENDENTLY and immediately under Christ This was the Opinion generally of N. Conformists as is observed by one of themselves in the Name of the rest as also by B. Downam Sermon at Lambeth p. 5. They that is the N. C. say that every Parish by Right hath sufficient Authority within it self immediately derived from Christ for the Government of it self in all Causes Ecclesiastical To the Parishional Presbytery
relation between them and you being such as Fast and Pray and Mourn and Rejoyce yea Eat and Drink with you daily at the same Table of the Lord and are intrusted with the Care of your Souls from the hand of Christ This cannot be where the Pastoral or Ministerial Work is divided and the Keys of the Church hung apart Those that instruct us not nay are Strangers to us Rule over us Rebukes and Chastisements in this spiritual way are from those whose Faces we never saw or know so much as by name It 's true we may argue thus They are strangers expect no favour therefore or mercy from them if you offend this procures Obedience indeed but it is in a servile way The mind of Christ is that as our Submission to himself so to his Ministers who even in Censures act in his Name be affectionate filial and drawn by the cords of love Thus have I gone through with the Instances promised with what brevity the nature of the matter would permit By which it is not intended to parallel these Societies in respect to the intrinsick Form of Government peculiar to each for that in a Church is from the Institution of Christ rather than the light of Nature but the more general state and habitude of Ecclesiastical Government as Churches stand disposed to the Civil Magistrate or one to another and what the light of Nature and common Reason contribute hereunto being so much insisted upon What hath been said I hope tends to Union and Accommodation Those that hold any spiritual Government Jure Divino and by the appointment of Jesus Christ do not deny it to a particular Church And those that hold none yet are at a lesser distance from such who claim so-little CAP. VI. A second Objection Of the Jurisdiction over Particular Churches in Synods Ecclesiastical Courts c. § 1. as exercised with us § 2. and in other places Object 2. THere are Synods Consistories Colloquies and other Ecclesiastical Courts which exercise an Authority in spiritual matters over Churches Therefore that of the Magistrate before mentioned is not so necessary Answ It is humbly denied and asserted That these greater Assemblies a Synod Classis Coloquie and the like either have no such coactive Jurisdiction as we mentioned or are dependent upon the Civil Magistrate for it This we shall shew by declaring more fully what Ecclesiastical Power is exercised by Synods or such Courts 1. In this Kingdom 2. In other Reformed Churches The Ecclesiastical Courts in this Kingdom are of two sorts 1. There are we know Spiritual Courts so termed such as the Prerogative the Arches Court of Faculties the Archdeacons and Commissaries Courts These claim only from the Civil Powers as was shewed before Pag. 45 46. In the Statute of 37 Hen. 8. c. 17. it is declared That the Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons and other Ecclesiastical Persons have no manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but by from and under the King 's Royal Majesty By the Statute also of 1 Edw. 6. c. 2. All Courts Ecclesiastical within the Realms of England and Ireland ought to be kept by no other Power or Authority either Foreign or within the Realm but by the Authority of His most Excellent Majesty And it was further Enacted That all their Process shall issue out under the King's Seal and His Name and Style c. but since repealed Dr. Cosens in his learned Defence of them and their Proceedings asserts thus They are saith he warranted by the Statute and Canon Law of this Nation professing also that there were Reason enough against those Ecclesiastical Proceedings Apol. Part 1. Cap. 1. if they were not claimed from the Crown but from some other Authority immediately as the Popish Clergy did theirs from by the means and direction of the Pope 2. Our Convocation or General Synod which makes Laws and Canons about matters that are more spiritual This is an ancient Court and hath formerly been in it self of great Authority in Ecclesiastical Regulations it 's not so now but dependent upon the Civil Magistrate for whatsoever Jurisdiction or Coercive Power there exercised which will appear in these Particulars 1. There are no Laws or Canons made by the Bishops and others of the Clergy in the Convocation Nihil habet vim legis priusquam Regius assensus fuerit adhibitus iis quae Synodus decernanda censuerit Cosins Polit. Ta. 1. a. that oblige under any Penalty without the Stipulation and Assent of the Civil Magistrate be it either in matters of Faith or Discipline The 39 Articles and Canons about them concluded upon by the Synod in Anno 1562. engaged no man under any Penalty in our Law to believe profess or subscribe until they had an Assent or Establishment by the Civil Powers Nor can they proceed against any Crime as Heresie Apostasie or gross Enormity in Doctrine but what our Laws declare to be such And for matters of Discipline and Worship it appears by the Letters Patent Copies whereof are annexed to the Canous published in Anno 1603 and 1640. That 1. All power to meet confer treat debate and agree upon any matter for common good is from such Licence Power and Authority as is granted to the Archbishops Bishops Chancellors and other Members of the Convocation from His Majesty of His special Grace and by virtue of His Prerogative Royal and Supreme Authority in Ecclesiastical Causes And 2. the Synod having treated of concluded and agreed upon Canons Orders c. To the end and purpose by His Majesty limited and prescribed unto them they are to offer and present the same to His Majesty in writing He upon mature consideration taken thereupon may allow approve The Licence to the Convoc in Anno 1640. confirm and ratifie or otherwise disallow anihilate and make void such and so many of the said Canons Orders c. as he shall think fit requisite or convenient And none of those Canons c. shall be of any force effect or validity in Law but only such and so many of them and after such time as His Majesty by His Letters Patents shall approve and confirm the same The Civil Magistrate may suspend for what time he shall please yea wholly deprive any Bishop or Bishops from their Office and Place in this Synod who are the chiefest Members thereof He may Commissionate also by Writ * Cook Instit pag. 4. cap. 74. what other Persons He shall please to sit in Convocation with them And if occasion be He may likewise wholly constitute another Syond and nominate each particular Person of what Quality and of what Number of His Natives as He shall please Field Of the Church Lib. 5. cap. 53. Princeps potest assignare nominare authoritatem dare quandocunque quamdiu ipsi placuerit hujusmodi indigenis subditis quos idoneos censuerit c. Dr. Cosin de Pol. Tab. 1. a. and give them like Authority in Ecclesiastical matters So was that
otherwise that are spiritual yield Appeals but it 's upon this Supposition that the Cause at last will be brought to a Tribunal that is Infallible Licitumest saith P. de Aragon in re grave cuique causam suam defferre ad sedem Apostolicam Aragon in 2.2 q. 69. a. 3. D. Th. quando vel ex imperitia vel ex Passione inferiorum judicum qui homines sunt ac decipi possunt injuriam patitur The Pope cannot be deceived he is more than a Man 2. Matters of Fact by reason of Appeals come to be sentenced at a great distance from the place where the Crime and Offence lieth which in Worldly Concernments may with more Righteousness be done than in what is Spiritual and of Church Cognizance 1. Transgressions come under a Civil Judgment as materially considered and according to the gross Act but brought to the Church not as Sins simple but as Scandals and Offences which is a Consideration not so obvious but requires good judgment in the Witnesses as well as in the Judges The Obstinacy also or Penitency of the Person offending accordingly as Testimony shall be given of either is a more difficult matter to make out than either the Sin it self or the Scandal Repentance Godly Sorrow or the contrary is the principal thing to be regarded in Church-process Repentance I say in truth and sincerity so far as we can judge in a seeing and not blind charity It is not only the Passion Sorrow or Shame but Godly Sorrow which is more spiritual and deeper in the heart and requireth much and particular knowledge of the Person and his temper and such as cannot be attained at a distance but by frequent and familiar Converse To sit in the Stool of Repentance stand in a White Sheet or do Penance as it 's termed these are as the fruits of the flesh manifest and judged of at the greatest distance it 's not so deep Prov. 20.5 as we need much understanding to draw it out 2. The Censure whether binding or loosing is to be executed always by the particular Church where the Offender is a Member those persons above all others are to have a particular knowledge of his Crime and true Repentance they are to forgive and confirm their love 2 Cor. 2.7 Mat. 18.15 17 or otherwise to withdraw from him If THY Brother offend thee let him be unto THEE an Heathen c. The Execution of the Censure being by each Brother of that Church it is necessary the Examination of the matter be before them Spiritual Duties are not to be performed upon an implicit Faith What knowledge but by remote heresay can a Church in the Orchades have of a mans repentance or obstinacy the ultimate tryal and cognizance whereof is taken by a Synod at Edenhurgh Civil censures are for Satisfaction of the whole Nation and not the Parish or Borough only where the crime was committed but in a Church-censure the particular Assembly being only and no other Congregation or person morally leavened and charged with the offence are principally and in the first place concerned to have satisfaction of the repentance and submission of the person offending For by this means only their Lump or Church becomes again unleavened Disparity 4 4. The other End before mentioned and Vse of Appeals is that our Judges and their Sentence be censured and judged by superior Tribunals To which proceeding Vnaequaque res per quascunque res nascitur per easdem dissolvitur the Judges in Civil Judicatures are liable but there is not the like Subordination in Churches for these Reasons 1. All the Power and Authority placed in their Inferior Courts is no other but the influx of the supream Civil Powers to whom we always make our last Appeal and therefore proper to them to suspend Actings nay utterly to destroy in part or in whole what Jurisdiction is derived from them as appears in the Constitution of all Kingdoms But it is not so here a particular Church The Court we are to Appeal from hath not its Being or Jurisdiction from a Classis or Synod * Ecclesia Parochialis est Ecclesia vera essentialiter integraliter absque ulla correspondentia vel Synodo Voet. de Syn. pag. 13. Parker de Polit Eccles lib. 3. cap. 13. It is an authoritative unchurching of an obstinate Church we plead for Ruth peaceable Plea cap. 15. p. 223 and p. 222. Excommunication is an authoritative unchurching these rather derive their Power from it being Representatives only as our Brethren have formerly written Particular Churches they term Ecclesiae primae and Synods Ecclesiae ortae Again if Synods as they grant exercise over Churches a Power only cumulative not destructive How can they Excommunicate a Church seeing Excommunication renders a Society as Heathens and Publicans which is to unchurch them as Mr. Rutherford rightly affirms 2. Although whole Churches may be punished for male Administration by the Civil Magistrate yet may not an Ecclesiastical Power meerly such do the like for to destroy or save whole Societies for the Evil of a major part or a few persons is the prerogative of the Lord himself which he communicates also in some cases to Civil Magistrates his Deputies but in no case to Churches it being an Authority high and Princely and not at all sutable to such as have only a Ministry and not a Dominion Bishop Davenant tells us That a Censure is not to be drawn on the whole Body of the Church Brotherly Communion c. 9. p. 102. for as the Laws forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that those that are innocent may be intangled in the censure So Right and Religion forbids to exclude whole Churches from the Communion of the Faithful because this cannot be done without an injury and contempt to many that be innocent What ever formerly of this same unchurching power in Synods hath been asserted yet since upon further debate we are told this same Excommunieating of whole Churches is a thing not known in the Presbyterian Government and not the Churches but particular persons in the Churches are censured Assemb disputes pag. 180. But how can we say single persons only are to be censured and not the whole Church Whenas we know the contending parties of what condition soever are both equally liable to the Censure of the Judge Now when matters are brought by Appeal to a superior Court the Court Appealed from is a Party and in this respect upon no higher terms than the pars appellans though a single person But grant it be so and that the object of a Censure from a Synod be only particular members Excommunicatio ejusque denunciatio post appellationem legitimam latam est nulla Nardus p. 53. col 2. Then 1. Churches cannot have such a remedy as in Civil States for Appeals of this Nature are not to be made to any but persons invested with such a power as may
suspend or make void in part or in whole the power of that Court by whom the wrong hath been done and Appealed from as hath been shewed 2. If there be no Power in a Synod of such a proportion superior to a Church as to censure it by Excommunication or Suspension at least Then will the Members of this Church by admitting such Appeals be necessarily under a twofold Jurisdiction not subordinate which tends to the greatest confusion imaginable For if the Synod and the Church in their Light and Apprehensions vary about the condition of an Offender one of them may in Conscience be bound to justify whom the other condemns 3. There is no supply of a supposed Defect or Addition of what was not before for if their superior powers Excommunicate particular Members only and not the whole Church This is nothing more than each particular Church hath power to do And it is as much an Ordinance of Christ where two or three that is a lesser number are gathered together as where a greater a Censure by the Church at Keneria is as much a Censure as if by Corinth If a Quarter Sessions Execute a man it s as much a Judicial deal as if judged by the Assize Kings-Bench or Parliament The reason is obvious it s the Law that judges him not this or that Judicature So it is the Law and appointment of Christ that Excommunicates not this or that Presbytery greater or less and this Law is the same to all We come now to the other part of the Argument drawn from the light of Nature If Appeals be not there will be a defect in Christ's Government Persons are left without remedy for wrongs done by whole Churches I answer with Suarez in the same case De virtute Tom. 4. p. 99. Argumentum est saith he ab specie ad genus negativum defensio est genus latius patet quam appellatio Potest enim ad superiorem recurrere per simplicene quaerelam vel per modum supplicationis c. quod est sufficens remedium diversum appellatione multo magis decens religiosum statum It is an Argument from the Species to the Genus there are other ways of defence We may have recourse to a Superior by simple Complaint or by way of Supplication which is a sufficient remedy and divers from an Appellation and much more becoming the state of Religion thus that Author More particularly we therefore Answer 1. There may be a sufficient defence or remedy though not by Appeals 2. There may be Appeals though not in such a way 1. For the first this Address or Recursus to others Superior or equal is not for the putting forth any Act of Jurisdiction or Compulsion Such persons interpose by way of Intreaty Perswasion Pleading the Cause of the wronged Reproving Threathing or in such way as a single Pastor may deal with any of his people Thus Paul often in a difference between Philemon and Onesimus Philem. vers 10. I beseech thee for Onesimus Phil. 4.2 3. I beseech Evodias and Syntiche It was upon some breach in the Church 1 Cor. 1.10 Now I beseech you Brethren that there be no Division This interposition of the Apostle with the Corinths was upon the desire of the House of Cloe ver 11. There may also be more earnest Pleadings Hos 2.2 Reasonings Rebukes yea openly and before others Gal. 2.11 14. The Apostles were equal in Authority yet Paul did not only Reason and Plead with Peter but Rebuke and Reprove him publickly and before others And in his dealing with Barnabas Act. 15.39 Pauls spirit did rise higher and yet no Power or Jurisdiction exercised or might be by one Apostle over another If Synods be applyed unto only for Counsel and advice in differences and difficult cases it is a provision not to be despised Scripture-light in an instruction or reproof is cogent by what hand soever administred but more especially when in the way of an Ordinance or Appointment of Christ As are Pastors and Synods though intrusted with a Declarative Authority only Let it be consider'd how the greatest reformation made in the Hearts and Lives of men and women is ordinarily by the application of the Word of God in the Ordinance of Preaching which is the Instruction Reproofs c. of a single Minister who hath not power to Excommunicate such as despise his Doctrine Faith comes by Hearing 1 Cor. 5. not by Discipline Until they be judged believers they are without If this means or such a Doctrinal Application by a single Minister be sufficient to make such Reformation upon single persons and those that as yet own not Christ or have Conscience of an Ordinance why should we not expect the like fruit where many Ministers are Synodically gathered for the Reformation of whole Churches persons professing to understand and reverence so solemn an Ordinance of Christ though there be no coercive Power intrusted with it to enforce Submission 2. Receptum est in Gallia ab Ecclesiasticis posse provocari ad ad curias supremas Parliamentorum P. Gr. Tholos l. 50. c. 2. §. 36. Ruther Due Right cap. 6. §. 5. pag. 396. There may be Appeals though not in the same Series but to a Tribunal extrinsecal and not meerly Spiritual as when we appeal to the Civil Magistrate or such as are appointed by him over Ecclesiastical matters For 1. if the King in his Laws and the Church in their Synodical Canons command and forbid one and the same things as is asserted And 2. if the persons commanded stand as much in a Civil Relation to their Prince being Subjects as they do in a spiritual Relation to the Church as Members Doubtless the Christian Magistrate having a Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters as in Civil and especially being assisted by the Councel and Advice of Synods is a sufficient and effectual means to reform the miscarriages of particular Churches if appealed unto The truth is though Churches were threatned or struck with the highest censures being meerly Spiritual and from a National Synod the highest Throne Were it not from foresight that if such Discipline be despised the Magistrates Sword by some Corporal punishment will second it there would be little fear or dread of those Synodical censures And if so as it is apparent to the most in a National or Provincial Church as ordinarily constistituted it is no otherwise Common Reason will direct us rather to go immediatly by Appeals to the Civil Magistrate or his Delegates than in such a compass as to drive the cause from a Consistory to a Classis from thence to a Provincial Synod and after that to a National Assembly and when all this is done there is little to any purpose done if not seconded by a secular arm Hence our learned Brethren formerly admitted no other Appeals of this nature but to the Civil Magistrate as we have fully shewed in the former Digression To which we add what
exercised about the concernment only of a particular Congregation and therefore we may well assert with that learned Bishop B. Sanderson of Episcopacy pag. 24. It 's very hard to give a satisfactory difference betwixt such an Ecclesiastical Power and the Oeconomical both claiming by Divine Right why the one should be more injurious to Regal Power than the other We can further say the Power we claim is no other but such also as hath been always owned by our Laws and Writers of Note to be immediately from God and peculiar to his Holy Service and the Sacred Function of the Ministery with those other Parochial Duties as to Preach the Word Administer Sacraments and the like The word Sacraments and the use of the Keys saith B. Bilson are things comprised in the Church lie not open with other State-matters and by God commanded to the Church Of Supremacy p. 170. 227. Against Harding p. 6. c. 9. D. 1 2. Also D. Field of the Church lib. 5. c. 53. and are subject to no mortal Creature Pope or Prince We teach not Princes saith Bishop Jewel to offer up Incense or Sacrifice asVzziah did or to preach or administer Sacraments or to bind or to loose Each of these Duties are such and so spiritual as our Princes openly and in their Laws disown them as not depending upon their Administration or Authority In the 37th Article of the English Confession it is thus We give not to our Princes the Ministring either of God's Word or the Sacrament And in the Admonition c. Kings and Queens of this Realm Possessors of the Crown challenge not Authority and Power of Ministery of Divine Offices in the Church II. The Power or Jurisdiction exercised over these particular Assemblies or their Officers hath its station in a higher Region and such as in which all Christian Magistrates in the world judge themselves interessed and that what is done in this kind by any Person or Assembly be by a Power derived from them and subordinate to them So our Law 27 H. 8. c. 17. The Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons and other Ecclesiastical Persons have no manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but by from and under the King 's Royal Majesty And in the Statute of 1 Edw. 6. c. 2. All Courts Ecclesiastical within the Realms of England and Ireland ought to be kept by no other Authority either Foreign or IN THE REALM but by the Authority of His most Excellent Majesty It is evident therefore that those Superior Powers of what Form or Denomination soever they be that are over these Congregations have their motions in Caesar's walk But the holy and spiritual Duties peculiar to particular Congregations are expresly remitted to them and their Ministers as the things of God and not of Caesar 3. Our situation is low and quite beneath those Orbs wherein the transactions of a National concernment move and are managed How Religion and Reformation thrive in a Nation and is encouraged by the Governors thereof we have a sence and form our thoughts and most effectual prayers and endeavors accordingly We are engaged hereunto as Members of the Catholick Church and particularly concerned in the welfare of our Native Countrey otherwise our Principles are to keep within our Congregational Precinct and not to give Laws or exercise Power over others or to engage our selves unless thereunto by Authority called in more publick Affairs Nor do we believe as we have jointly professed there is Power given by Christ to any Synod or Ecclesiastical Assemblies to Excommunicate Confession of Faith pag. 61. Sect. 22. or by their Publick Edicts to threaten Excommunication or other Church-Censures against Churches Magistrates or their People upon any such account And therefore we may be freed from the jealousie of being Troublers or Retarders of others in the work of Reformation or publick Settlement Or were we or could we be so in the Reformation not long since attempted otherwise than by not joining to further what our Consciences were not clear in or in not putting our neck voluntarily into a Yoke we conceived was not Christs and therefore would not be easie in the service of Christ 4. We have been blamed more than once for this Surname INDEPENDENT though a title not of our own choice as an insolent assuming Epist ad Buch. pag. 91. Miror etiam viris piis c. saith Spanhemius Truly I marvel that holy men so I judge them though dissenting from us should not themselves be dissatisfied with the very title an Independent Church which seems to me not to stand with the modesty of Christians The defects of all men through the blindness of their minds since the Fall is so great and obvious as no Person or Society can assume to it self an INDEPENDENCY in this respect without intollerable Pride Independency in respect of Power only is another thing Power simply and in it self is no Virtue though Justice Prudence and Fortitude by which it is managed are Not to be in Power is no Sin nor Moral Defect more than not to be Rich or in Honour It is not so much the Praise as the Charge of him that receiveth it the honour and glory of him that can give it of him only it hath its proportion and doth not become greater or less from any worth or industry found in those that receive it as Moral Virtues do Power doth not vary in its kind though the wisdom and ability to manage it be greater or less in him that hath it So that Power whether absolute or limited whether dependent or independent is a most inconsiderable thing in its self to be proud of or glory in If saith the Apostle there be any virtue if there be any praise Phil. 4.8 It is Virtue not Power we should be ambitious of being an excellency in it self and without it Power will be but a lifting us up to our own destruction Whatsoever Virtue or Gift is desirable for the manage of that Power Christ hath intrusted us with we further seek after in consulting other Churches and endeavour that all matters difficult and of common concernment may be proceeded in with joint consent We professedly depend upon Synods for Counsel which comes forth ordinarily from such Assemblies better digested and in a more perfect maturation their part being to advise and give Councel onely for men will not easdy spend much time to untie a knot if there be a knife at hand to out it 5. The Apostle Paul amongst other Reflections met with this from the false Apostles who gave him out in their reckoning as one that made some carnal advantage the scope of his Opinions 2 Cor. 10.2 3. with this hard measure we have met from first to last I am therefore willing to leave some account in the hand of my Friends being now aged and near my period of those Principles that have long through grace kept me and others steady in this perswasion Not only in and through these late Changes and Disputings but divers years before and when no such Encouragements were as are surmised to be our aim but the contrary The Apostle inserts in the midst of his Church-Disputes a whole Chapter in the praise of Charity and tells us in seeking our own for want hereof we are easily provoked and behave our selves unseemly 1 Cor. 13. and apt to think and surmise evil As for me to use David's words the Lord hath upheld me in mine integrity The reflecting thoughts whereof Psal 45.12 have been as the consolation of God in my Soul when I lay many days together by the Graves side Providence hath brought me back into a troublesom world where with patience and perseverance through Christ I shall wait until my Course be finished following peace with all men in the way of holiness without which no man shall see God P. NYE FINIS