them And if any Person that hath conceived any other Sence of the Form of the said Oath shall accept the same Oath with this Interpretation Sence or Meaning her Majesty is well pleased to accept every such in that behalf as her good and obedient Subjects and shall acquit them of all manner Penalties contained in the said Act against such as shall peremptorily or obstinately refuse to take the same Oath In the fifth Year of her Reign there is by Act of Parliament a Confirmation of this Sence by way of Proviso in these Words The Proviso in the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act made in the said first Year shall be taken and expounded in such Form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queen's Majesty's Injunctions published in the first Year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledg in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said Admonition more plainly may appear There may be a Doubt made about this Interpretation as whether it be not inconsistent with the Words of the Oath it seems to be rather a material Change of them than an Interpretation In the Oath it is All Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes in the Interpretation it is All manner of Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be The Oath seems to speak of one thing and the Interpretation of another the one of Causes and the other of Persons Ad leges per se requiritur potestas in persinam secundario â—…res 〈◊〉 Suarez 〈…〉 lib. 1. cap. 8. Answ There is no opposition or Inconsistency between these two Persons and Causes The principal Object of a Law is a Person and a Person with respect to his Actions a Person morally considered for a Person physical that is in his Being only and Nature as Man without moving or acting any thing good or evil is not the Object of a Law nor Actions of any kind or sort whatsoever as Actions and in that general Consideration do come under a Law but as they respect Persons and are some way or other the Actions of reasonable Creatures Tho a Law be made to punish the Exod. 21.29 Ox which goreth a Man that he dieth yet it is with respect to Man to let him know how much God is provoked by shedding Man's Blood as Gen. 9.5 1 Cor. 9.9,10 Doth God care for Oxen Doth God in his Law respect the Beast for it self is it not that Man may be instructed and restained Verse 10. He saith it altogether for our sakes The mentioning of Ecclesiastical Causes therefore doth imply Persons and Persons of the same Denomination to whom such Actions are peculiar that is Ecclesiastical Persons 2. And that this latter is an Interpretation of the former will thus appear The Oath in giving a Supremacy in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes might seem to imply Spiritual Things to be the immediate and proper Object of the Magistrates Power and spiritual Persons only for this because they had to do in spiritual Matters and to infer thence that the Christian Magistrate hath Power in spiritual Administrations as the Word and Sacraments after the same manner as hath the Ministers of Christ who have Power in these Things as the principal and immediate Object of their Function Which this Form af Expression in the Admonition doth clearly take away 1. In asserting that by the Words of the said Oath Kings or Queens of this Realm may not challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church 2. The mentioning Ecclesiastical Persons and not Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes at all implieth that the Persons of Bishops Presbyters and such like are primarily and immediately the Object of this Supreme Power and the Laws made by it upon another Consideration than as Bishops c. namely as being born within these her Majesty's Realms and Dominions and such Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be She hath the Sovereignty and Rule over them Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Things are mentioned in the Oath upon a twofold Account 1. Because the Civil Magistrate's Power and Jurisdiction really extends it self to the Duties of both Tables and hath to do with Matters and Causes as well as Persons that are spiritual as hereafter we shall shew but 2. Principally that a Calling or Employment in Church-Affairs whatsoever hath been formerly judged and practised doth no more exempt a Person and his Actings that is a Subject to the Queen upon any other account from her Secular Power than doth a Temporal Calling or Employment in any worldly Affairs There is something of Explication further in the Articles of Religion concluded in the Year 1562. The 37th Article is this The 37th Article professed in the Church of England The Queen's Majesty hath the chief Power in her Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any Foreign Jurisdiction Where we attribute to the Queen's Majesty the chief Government by which Titles we understand the Minds of some slanderous Folks to be offended we give not to our Prince the ministring either of God's Word or of the Sacraments The which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify But that only Prerogative which we see to have been given always to all Godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself that is that they should rule all Estates and Degrees committed to their Charge by God whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal and restrain with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England It is mentioned in the Admonition that the Queen 's Ecclesiastical Power is the same that was challenged and used by Henry the Eighth c. Which is supposed by some to be the same that was in the Pope the Person only and not the Power changed so that our Princes are but Secular Popes This Objection was strengthned by the Subtilty of Gardiner Whom Calvin terms Impostor ille in Am. 7.13 abroad and at home by a Sermon preached at Paul's-Cross in the Year 1588 by Dr. Bancroft who calls Queen Elizabeth a petty Pope and tells us her Ecclesiastical Authority is the same which the Pope had formerly This 37th Article removes the Scruple sufficiently 1. In asserting the Authority given to her Majesty to be no other but what we see to have been given to all Godly Princes in holy Scriptures c. And for what Power Henry the Eighth challenged 26 Henry 8. cap. 1. it was no new Jurisdiction wrested from
Congregation say our Brethren Jus divinum Regim p. 230. hath equal Power one as much as another according to the trite and known Axiom Par in parem non habet imperium An Equal hath no Power over an Equal ' Ecclesiae institutae parochiales integrae sunt inter se collaterales potestate Ecclesiastica aequales saith Voetius Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 3. Which you may English out of the English Puritanism thus ' Particular Churches are in all Matters equal and are entrusted by Christ with the same Ecclesiastical Power and Authority Cap. 2. §. 3 ' Jewel Reynolds Whitaker and most of our Divines against the Papists are large in their Disputes for a parity of Churches and Mr. Parker hath written a whole Chapter de paritate Ecclesiarum De Polit lib â—… cap. 21. Some make a particular Church to be of larger Extension as a Diocess a Province c. but that altereth not the State of the Question A DIGRESSION 1. Of Independentism Name and Thing 2. It s consistency with the Kings Supremacy THis State of a particular Church namely their equality in respect of Jurisdiction or coercive Power one over another was wont to be expressed by INDEPENDENCY which though now it be a term of Reproach yet formerly made use of by good Authors as very fit and significant to set forth this Priviledge of each particular Church compleat and intire namely their not Dependency or Subjection to the Jurisdiction of another Church as their Head and Superior Dr. Jackson in his learned Treatise of the Church Cap. 15. Cap. 119. useth this term frequently Unity saith he in one place of Discipline or of INDEPENDENT Judicature is essential and necessary to the Church as visible Hence there be as many distinct visible Churches as there be INDEPENDENT Judicatures Ecclesiastick Dr. Sibbs thus Gospel-anointings pag. 94. Particular visible Churches are now God's Tabernacle The Church of the Jews was a National Church but now God hath erected particular Tabernacles Every particular Church under one Pastor is the Church of God a several Church INDEPENDENT The Church of England saith the same Author is called a particular Church from other Nations because it is under a Government Civil which is not dependent on any other Foreign Prince Each Church saith Voetius Desp Caâ—… â—ap lib. 3. §. 3 c. 4. as it hath its proper Form of an Ecclesiastical Body or Society so it s endued with its proper Government and Jurisdiction which it exerciseth DEPENDENTLY upon Christ his Word and Spirit but INDEPENDENTLY in respect of all other Churches Mr. Bates Treatise printed Anno 1613. One Company of Men assembled hath no Authority to impose things upon many Churches 1. None now have Apostolick Authority 2. Each Congregation is a Body INDEPENDENT of any Ecclesiastical Power There is no Ordinance of God for this saith Mr. Banes that Churches within a circuit should be tyed to a certain Head-Church for Government pag. 8. and pag. 13. We affirm that no such Head-Church was ordained either vertually or actually but that all Churches were single Congregations equal INDEPENDENT each of other in regard of Subjection Every true Church saith one A Collection of sundry matters Anno 1601. now is an INDEPENDENT Congregation and in another place The Congregational Body Politick spiritually INDEPENDENT is Christ's Divine Ordinance in the Gospel One ordinary Congregation of Christians is a spiritual Body Politick INDEPENDENT That is it hath the Right and Power of spiritual Administration and Government in it self and over it self by the common and free consent of the People INDEPENDENTLY and immediately under Christ Confession of Faith p. Anno 1601. This was the Opinion generally of N. Conformists as is observed by one of themselves in the Name of the rest as also by B. Downam Sermon at Lambeth p. 5. They that is the N. C. say that every Parish by Right hath sufficient Authority within it self immediately derived from Christ for the Government of it self in all Causes Ecclesiastical To the Parishional Presbytery consisting of their parish-Parish-Bishop and his Elders they do ascribe that sufficient immediate and independent Authority for Ecclesiastical Government for every proper visible Church That Independency of Churches was asserted by those learned men of a former Age in relation only to a superior church-Church-power properly spiritual and such as is claimed jure divino and not in relation to that Ecclesiastical Power which is in or exercised from the Civil Magistrate Some of them have thus described a particular Church It 's a Body Politick spiritually independent or independent in relation to a spiritual Superiority which is expressed fully by him that wrote Church-Government with the Peoples consent pag. 115. Though we affirm the Church-Government is independent and immediately derived from Christ yet we affirm also that the Civil Magistrate is even therein that is in Ecclesiastical Matters Supreme Governor civilly And though nothing may be imposed on the Christian Churches against their Will by any spiritual Authority for so only we intend yet we affirm withall that the Civil Magistrate may impose on them spiritual Matters by Civil Power yea whether they like or dislike if it be good in his Eyes that is if he judge it within his Commission from God And such an Independency hath been pleaded for also and argued by them to be much more consistent with His Majesties Supremacy than a DEPENDENCY or Subordination of Churches to any spiritual Power And it was their professed Judgments That no External Power ought to be exercised in spiritual Matters any where within that space betwixt a particular Congregation instituted by Christ and the Catholick Visible Church by any person but the Civil Magistrate or by his Appointment Take their own Words They that make claim Jure Divino of Power and Jurisdiction to meddle with other Churches than that one Congregation of which they are Members do usurp upon the Supremacy of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath and ought to have a power of Jurisdiction over the several Congregations in his Dominions c. A Protestation of the King's Supremacy made and published in Anno 1605. §. 27 and in §. 28 The King himself is to be General Overseer of all the Churches within his Dominions and ought to employ under him fit persons to oversee the Churches in their several Divisions visiting them and punishing whatsoever is amiss in any of them Mr. Bradshew in the Vnreasonableness of Separation against Johnson writes thus It 's their principal Honour speaking of Archbishops and Bishops to be Commissioners and Visitors in Causes Ecclesiastical under the King over the Pastors and Churches of Provinces and Diocesses In his Answer to Johnson's first Reason And in his Answer to his second He questions him thus 1. Whether the Supreme Magistrate hath not Power to oversee and govern all the several Churches within his Dominion yea whether he be not
The best Fence against Popery OR A VINDICATION OF THE Power of the KING IN Ecclesiastical Affairs Being an ANSWER to the PAPISTS Objections against the Oath of Supremacy To which is added Queen Elizabeth's Admonition declaring the Sense of the said Oath and King James's Vindication of the Oath of Allegiance By a Learned Divine London Printed for J. Robinson in St. Paul's Church-Yard and S. Crouch in Cornhill THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy c. THE Supremacy of the Kings of England being eclipsed by the Bishop of Rome in both parts of it the State thought fit to enjoin a Provision of equal extension In relation to the Civil Rights of the Crown is the Oath of Allegiance and against the Encroachments upon the Ecclesiastical this of the Supremacy which being first enjoined containeth in a manner both This Oath hath given the Papists such a Blow as they could not but strike again and have poured out a Flood of Arguments and Absurdities against submitting to it which hath been a long time scattered and stick in the Minds of divers of his Majesty's Loyal Subjects who tho otherwise well affected yet by reason of some Doubts and Tenderness are at a stand to this day and scruple the taking of this Oath For whose satisfaction and clearing the Lawfulness of this Supremacy is the ensuing Discourse CHAP. I. §. 1 The Oath it self as now enjoined §. 2 The Occasion of this Oath §. 3 Various Forms of it and Alterations about it §. 4 Interpretations given of it in our Laws and Writers of Note §. 5 The Nature of our Assent and Stipulation The Oath of Supremacy I A.B. do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal And that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Iurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all Foreign Iurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors and to my power shall assist and defend all Iurisdictions Privileges Preeminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness his Heirs and Successors as united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm §2 For many Years there hath been a Contest about Jurisdiction and Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Matters between the Bishop of Rome and the Kings of England who hath got ground herein according as our Princes were found more weak necessitous or devoted to his Holiness Rome was not built in a Day By William the Conqueror Legates from the Pope to hear and determine Ecclesiastical Causes were admitted Henry the First after much Contest yields to the Pope the Patronages and Donations of Bishopricks and all other Ecclesiastical Benefices it being decreed at Rome that no Lay-Person should give any Ecclesiastical Charge King Stephen grants that Appeals be made to the Court of Rome In Henry the Second's Days the Pope gets the Clergy and Spiritual Persons exempted from Secular Powers The Bishop of Rome is now over all Ecclesiastical Persons and Causes even in these Dominions Supreme Head And having upon the matter made Conquest over more than half the Kingdom in the Times of King John and Henry the Third sets on for the whole and obtains of King John an absolute Surrender of England and Ireland unto his Holiness which were granted back again by him to the King to hold of the Church of Rome in Fee-farm and Vassalage Being now absolute and immediate Lord over all be endeavours to convert the Profits of both Kingdoms to his own Use so that Prince and People were hereby reduced to very great Poverty and Servitude Such Ruine being brought upon both Kingdoms by this Device and Engine the Claim and Exercise of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction over Persons and Causes by a Foreign Power the Nation was awakened both King Lords and Commons yea the Spiritual Lords themselves to join with more Vigor against this Foreign Usurpation To this purpose severe Laws were made in the Time of Edw. 1st 2d 3d. Richard the 2d and Hen. the 4th Notwithstanding these Laws and some formerly as the Constitutions of Clarendon by Hen. 2. partly by Sufferance and partly by Negligence the whole Nation being Catholick and held under a devotional Slavery there was no thorow or successful Contest against these Oppressions They remained unto and were complained of in Henry the Eighth's Days as of Appeals to Rome in Causes of Matrimony Divorce Tithes c. to the great Inquietation Vexation and Trouble Costs and Charges of the King's Highness and many of his Subjects 24 Hen. 8. cap. 12. In a further Complaint Anno 25 cap. 21. it is declared how that the Subjects of this Realm have been greatly decay'd and impoverished by intolerable Exactions of great Sums of Money claimed and taken out of this Realm by the Bishop of Rome as well in Pensions Censes Peter-Pence Procurations Provisions Delegacies Rescripts in Causes of Contention and Appeals as also for Dispensations Licenses Faculties c. who assumed a Power to dispense with all humane Laws Vses and Customs of all Realms And many the like Complaints were made to King Henry by his Parliament at several times as it appears in the Statutes of that Age In which Statutes as in that of the 24th of Hen. 8. c. 12. 25. c. 21. 26. c. 1 3. Anno 28. c. 1 7 10 16 and 35 c. 1. you have the whole Fabrick of Romish Usurpation laid level and all Ecclesiastical Power reduced within his Majesty's Dominions and placed in the Arch Bishop and other Ecclesiastical Persons under him by firm and severe Laws This being done the King is petitioned by his Lords and Commons That for further Corroboration of those Acts and utterly to exclude the long usurped Power Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome that an OATH containing the Substance and Effect of those Statutes be limited and tendred to his Subjects This Parcel of Sacred Worship an Oath is indulged to Mankind in Civil Affairs Such is the Falseness Unrighteousness and Uncertainty of Men as that human Societies could hardly subsist without it The Lord to repair our Credit hath formed Mens Hearts generally to a great and apparent Religion and Reverence of this Ordinance The Heathens themselves termed it Sacramentum as if the most eminent or only Thing Sacred and religiously to be observed It is so effectual a Means to establish a Reformation as Men will be kept firm by Oaths saith one Liv. Hist tho there were neither Laws nor Magistrates We are exposed to more Variety and Changes from Vnsteadiness in the Mind than from any thing that is without us Fix the
Conscience and you fix the Man whatever Evil he is thereby exposed to There is nothing generally more effectual to fix the Conscience than an Oath If I have sworn and invocated the Name of God in an Engagement it will be an End of all Strife and dispute with my self as well as with others Heb. 6.16 Our Counsels and Resolutions are in common apprehension become immutable when confirmed by an Oath ver 17. Whosoever saith Moses Numb 30.3 sweareth an Oath and bindeth his Soul by a Bond. It is the Bond of the Soul we have given Security for our Faithfulness from Heaven For removing the Romish Yoke which lay so heavy upon Prince and People Means hath been used again and again almost in each King's Reign for near Four Hundred Years but to no great effect Gospel-Light dawning about us and the binding of our Souls by an Oath hath been the fixing of this great Work and the best Fence against Popery that ever was set up I have spoken the more fully of the Occasion and this Means our Oath that we may not judg the taking of it to be a taking the Name of God in vain for as long as this Nation is in danger of Popish Tyranny in Ecclesiastical Matters so long is this Oath of absolute use and advantage as the best Security between Man and Man for Union against it §. 3 A Parliament being called in 22 Hen. 8. the King was recognized by the Clergy of that Convocation Supreme Head of the Church the Expression or Form hereof debated agreed upon and subscribed by each Person there was this Cujus Ecclesiae Anglicanae singularem Protectorem unicum supremum Dominum quantum per Christi leges licet supremum Caput ipsius Majestatem recognoscimus This Title was afterwards confirmed by divers Acts of Parliament and two Oaths formed to this purpose in one Parliament viz. 28 Hen. 8. the one more brief having with it the Succession of the Crown in cap. 7. the other more full and large and to this purpose only cap. 10. Some Years after viz. in An. 35 Hen. 8. a Revive of both these Oaths was made by the Parliament and with some Alterations reduced into one The Reasons there are given why this was done and it was resolved Those Oaths shall not therefore be administred and this Oath to stand in force and place of the two Oaths Which Oath began thus I A.B. having now the Vail of Darkness of the usurped Power of the See and Bishops of Rome clearly taken away from mine Eyes do utterly testify c. This Oath remained the same the rest of his Reign and all Edward the Sixth's time Queen Elizabeth in the first Year of her Reign made these Alterations 1. That Expression of Supreme Head c. went hardly down by some as taking too much from the Pope and as giving too much to any Secular Prince by others Tho Henry the 8th by his Letter written to the Clergy of York-Province Anno 1533. well defends it yet Queen Elizabeth by her Parliament 1 Eliz. 2. changed that Expression The Oath was altered to use Secretary Walsingham's Words In his Letter to Critoy Sec. of France into a more grateful Form the hardness of the Name and the Appellation of Supreme Head being removed 2. This Oath by that 35 of Hen 8. might be tendered to any Subject at the King's pleasure cap. 1. By the Statute 1 Eliz. 8. the urging of it was limited to certain Persons â—mployed in Publick Trust 3. The Penalty for refusing it at first was no less than High-Treason By the Statute 1 Eliz. the Punishment for Refusal is only a Disenablement to take any Promotion or exercise any Publick Charge yet with this Proviso if afterwards during Life there were a submitting to take this Oath the Person might be restored to his Office or Charge But by the Parliament in 5 Eliz. the Punishment whiâ—h as yet stands is greater The first Refusal of the Oath brings the Person within a Praemunire and if tendred a second time after the space of three Months and again refused by the same Person it is High-Treason This Severity in the Punishment is recompensed with a more gentle and indulgent Interpretation of the Oath as will appear in the following Section As we are not to swear rashly so our Laws do not give Oaths rashly but with great care and tenderness weighing and considering both the Matter Persons Penalties and the Season or Occasion being not willing their Laws or Punishments for breaking of them be a Snare or at any time more grievous to the Subject than the Necessity of State requires §. 4 The true Scope and Sence of this Oath may be gathered from the Laws and Statutes since established and some Light also from other Writers of Note Queen Eliz. within a little time after this Oath was reduced to the Form wherein now it stands in an Admonition annexed to the Injunctions declareth the Sence and Interpretation of it as followeth The Admonition annexed to the Queen's Injunctions THe Queen's Majesty being informed that in certain Places of this Realm sundry of her Native Subjects being called to Ecclesiastical Ministry in the Church be by sinister Persuasion and perverse Construction induced to find some scruple in the Form of an Oath which by an Act of the last Parliament is prescribed to be required of divers Persons for the Recognition of their Allegiance to her Majesty which certainly neither was ever meant â—ne by any equity of Words or good Sence can be thereof gathered would that all her Loving Subjects should understand that nothing was is or shall be meant or intended by the same Oath to have any other Duty Allegiance or Bond required by the same Oath than was acknowledged to be due to the most noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth her Majesty's Father or King Edward the Sixth her Majesty's Brother And further her Majesty forbiddeth all manner her Subjects to give ear or credit to such perverse and malicious Persons which most sinisterly and maliciously labour to notify to her Loving Subjects how by the Words of the said Oath it may be collected the Kings or Queens of this Realm Possessors of the Crown may challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church wherein her said Subjects be much abused by such evil disposed Persons For certainly her Majesty neither doth ne ever will challenge any other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the said noble Kings of famous memory King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth which is and was of ancient time due to the Imperial Crown of this Realm That is under God to have the Sovereignty and Rule ever all manner of Persons born within these her Realms Dominions and Countries of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be so as no other Foreign Power shall or ought to have any Superiority over
the Pope but a Power or Prerogative justly and rightfully belonging to him claimed and exercised by his Predecessors some hundreds of Years before his Time being anciently annexed to the Crown 2. In the latter part of the Article it is also evident For tho a Power in spiritual Causes be given to a Secular Prince yet it is not a spiritual Power and such a Jurisdiction as the Pope claims but such a Power only and in such a way as is put forth and exercised in ordinary Civil Affairs and the same in respect both to Ecclesiastical and Temporal Persons namely a restraining with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers So to restrain or coerce is an Authority or Jurisdiction peculiar to Civil Magistrates and by Christ himself denied to the highest Ecclesiastical Powers Ye know saith Christ Mat. 20,25,26 the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion over them and they that are great exercise Authority upon them but it shall not be so among you you Apostles and threatens the Use of the Sword in such Persons Mat. 26.52 King James speaking of the Oath of Supremacy ' In that Oath saith he is contained only the King 's absolute Power over all Persons as well Civil as Ecclesiastical excluding all Foreign Powers and Potentates to be Judges within his Dominions ' In his Apol. pag. 76. And more fully afterwards pag. 164. ' It implies saith he a Power to command Obedience to be given to the Word of God by reforming Religion according to his prescribed Will by assisting the spiritual Power by his temporal Sword by Reformation of Corruption by procuring due Obedience to the Church by judging and cutting off all frivolous Questions and Schisms as Constantine did and finally by making a Decorum to be observed in all indifferent Things for that purpose which is the only Intent of our Oath of Supremacy ' My Lord Coke out of 1º Eliz. and in the Words of the Statute gives this Interpretation ' There is saith he no Jurisdiction by this Act affixed to the Crown but was of Right or ought to be by the ancient Laws of this Realm parcel of his Jurisdiction and which lawfully had been or might be exercised within the Realm The End of which Jurisdiction and of all the Proceedings thereupon is that all Things might be in Causes Ecclesiastical to the pleasure of Almighty God Increase of Vertue and the Conservation of the Peace and Unity of the Realm as by divers places of the Act appears And therefore by that Act no pretended Jurisdiction exercised within this Realm being ungodly or repugnant to the ancient Law of the Crown was or could be restored to the Crown according to the ancient Right and Law of the same ' Coke de Jure Ecclesiastico fol. 8. Bishop Bilson a great Searcher into the Doctrine of the Supremacy of Kings gives this as the Sence of the Oath ' The Oath saith he expresseth not Kings Duty to God but ours to them As they must be obeyed when they join with Truth so must they be endured when they fall into Error Which Side soever they take either Obedience to their Wills or Submission to their Swords is their due by God's Law and that is all which our Oath exacteth ' And in a few Lines following he interprets what is meant by Supremacy ' We do not saith he give Princes Power to do what they list in the Matters appertaining to God and his Service Indeed we say the Pope may not depose them nor pull the Crown off their Heads In this only Sence we defend them to be Supreme that is not at liberty to do what they list without regard of Truth or Right but without Superior on Earth ' Dr. Morton against the Pope's Supremacy out of an Epistle of Leo to the Emperor speaking thus You must not be ignorant that your Princely Power is given unto you not only in worldly Regiment but also spiritual for the Preservation of the Church ' As if he had said not only in Cases Temporal but also in Spiritual so far as it belongeth to the outward Preservation not to the personal Administration of them And this is the Substance of our English Oath and further neither do our Kings of England challenge nor Subjects condescend unto ' pag. 26. Mr. Mason in his Vindiciae Ecclesiae Angliae Lib. 3. c. 5. speaking of Calvin's being offended verum si intellexisset nihil aliud sibi voluisse hunc Titulum c. ' Calvin would never have disallowed this Oath if he had understood by the Title of supream Governour in Ecclesiastical Things that nothing else had been claimed but an exclusion of Popish Tyranny and a lawful Power in the King over his Subjects which stands not in coyning new Articles of Faith or Forms of Religion such as were Jeroboam's Calves but in defending and propagating that Faith and Religion of which God in the Scripture is the undoubted Author In this sence and no other that ever we have heard of is the Title of Supream Governour given to and accepted by the King ' §. 5 This Oath hath matters contained in it as you may perceive that are not of one nature and kind the Assent and Stipulation required of us in respect to the several parts of it is likewise various and different As our Creed according to the different nature of the Articles is believed by the different Acts of Faith To what is contained in the former part of the Oath in these Words I do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supream Governour of this Realm c. Herein is required a true real and cordial Assent to and Profession of what is mentioned as also to give this Testimony with such Sincerity of Heart as in the Presence of God To swear positively to any dogmatical Assertion is not required it would be taking the Name of God in vain for if it be a certain and undoubted Truth in it self and to others as are Principles in Reason and Articles of Faith an Oath is vain for it ends no Strife Heb. 9. 2. If doubtful and a question whether true or not though such an Oath puts it out of question that I believe so yet not that it is a Truth My Belief though ever so much evidenced and confirmed doth not make a doubtful matter it self more credible nor is one Man's believing an Assertion any just ground for another Man to believe the same such an Oath is therefore in vain it 's not a fit medium to end such a Controversy 2. It is further said I do utterly renounce and forsake all Forreign Iurisdictions c. This requires not only the Sincerity of my Perswasion and Profession against the Title and Claim of all foraign Powers but upon Oath to forsake that is to abjure we abjure when we swear to quit and forsake To forsake a Power or Jurisdiction is to refuse and not to receive submit or
determined by the Civil Laws of the Magistrate And for Persons and Causes Spiritual or Ecclesiastical that are properly and indeed such as first-Table-Duties which contain matters of Faith and Holiness and what conduceth to the eternal Wellfare of Mens Souls an Interest and Duty there is in the Civil Magistrate more suo to give Commands and exercise lawful Jurisdiction about things of that nature And for Persons there is no Man for his Graces so spiritual or in respect of his Gifts and Office so eminent but he is under the Government of the Civil Powers in the Place where he lives as much in all respects as any other Subject CHAP. III. 1. Of Power its rise and original 2. Two sorts of Power in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Things 3. Their Agreement and 4. Difference of the one from the other §. 1 THere is a difference between Potentia and Potestas Potentia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Strength Force Robustness Such a Power is found not only in Men particular Persons as Sampson Goliah c. but in other inferior Creatures Potestas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jurisdiction Authority Job 40.18 this is peculiar to rational Creatures and as they are a Commonalty and in Society one with another Though Force and Strength as in singular Persons be sufficient for publick Actions yet without Authority we act not lawfully and having Authority if we have not Power and Strength sufficient we cannot act effectually therefore joyned together in a King Dan. 2.37 All Men by Nature are equal yet in the first forming of Man a Capacity is found in him with some remote Disposition to rule and obey as 1. A Sociableness let us make Man in our Image Vs and Our a Trinity in One his Creator Hence in each Man's Constitution a Propension and natural bent to Union This God himself observes It is not good for Man to be alone the Woman is created not only for a Companion but that Men and Women might increase and be multiplied 2. Multitudes of Men if not reduced into Subordination and Order having lost their original Righteousness will be a greater Evil than if each were alone by himself One Man will exalt himself over others and according to that brutish Force and Strength wherein he excelleth rob oppress murther and pillage others 3. Hence a necessity of Republicks and Commonweals that some Rules and Laws may be provided not only for Direction but for Correction if need be 4. Such Laws imply Authority and a Supremacy also in it for such Authority or Jurisdiction only is Legislative Man consists of Soul and Body This Principle of Civility or Sociableness whence Authority hath its Original and Rise is placed primarily in the Soul Society and Republicks are for the moral Good of Mens Souls therefore and not to accommodate the Body only The Powers also that are being ordained of God Rom. 13. who is the Father of Spirits ought to be managed and directed to Matters wherein our Souls and Spirits are concerned The Good and Evil for which these Powers are ordained is not limited to the Body or outward Man The Power of Parents and Masters in the Family it is civil not sacred yet ordained for the bringing up Children and Servants in the Nurture of the Lord. Ephes 6.4 There being a new Creation in and through the Lord Jesus Christ These Persons created of God partake of a Divine Nature and thence the like Propension to Union and a holy Fellowship with those whom Christ hath redeemed out of the World Therefore a special Provision is made by the Lord Jesus for such to joyn together in particular Societies or Churches Himself being appointed by his Father to be their King and Law-giver who hath left them Rules and Laws for managing the Affairs of these spiritual Corporations or Brotherhoods as the Scripture terms them Power also and Authority for putting these Laws in execution is given unto Churches So that there is a twofold Power or Authority to be exercised in Causes and over Persons Ecclesiastical or Spiritual the one placed in the Princes the other in the Churches of Christ 1. The difference betwixt these two Powers 2. The Necessity if the Civil Power in Ecclesiastial Matters notwithstanding Church-Power §. 2 What is common to both and wherein each of these Powers differ from the other shall briefly be shewed 1. They are Powers both a Subordination or Policy in the Church as well as in the Common-weal and an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Jurisdiction exercised in each You read of Authority or Jurisdiction not only in Civil Assemblies as Rom. 13. John 19.11 but also in Churches 2 Cor. 10.8 and 13.10 the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in both places 2. They are both from God and the Ordinance of God and ought to be submitted to for Conscience sake and are for Encouragement to those that are Good and for Wrath upon him that doth Evil and he that resisteth this Power in either resists the Ordinance of God and they that resist receive to themselves Damnation as the Apostle speaks as well in respect to the one as the other And both being from God they are also both Powers under God that is under his Designment and Limits as also his Direction and Guidance for his Glory as the ultimate and the good of Mankind as the penultimate end of both 3. This Power of Princes is termed spiritual Ratione objecti because it hath to do with Spiritual Persons and Causes In such like a sense and manner of Speech if it had the stamp of vulgar Use the Church-Power may be termed Civil or Temporal because all sorts of Persons and Causes without Difference are under the Power of it That as the secular Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae matters of Holiness and what 's opposite to it Blasphemy Heresy Perjury c. as well as Righteousness so Church-Power is Custos utriusque Tabulae Righteousness and second-Table-Duties and what is opposite as Rebellion Sedition Lying Stealing if any Man that is called a Brother be a Fornicator or a Drunkard or an Extortioner c. In all these and such Cases the Church-Power is applied in an Ecclesiastical or Spiritual way as in a Civil and Secular way the Magistrate deals with what are Duties of the first Table The Powers do mutually further each other and so ordained by God from whom they are both originally as they sweetly comply and agree being kept in their just Bounds each with other as Moses and Aaron David and Nathan Zerubbabel the Son Shealtiel and Joshua the Son of Josedech Jungamus Gladios said the Emperor to his Bishop let us joyn our Forces and purge the Land of Wickedness And our Senators in Parliament speak thus of these Both Authorities and Jurisdictions joyn together and the one helps the other Stat. 20. Hen 8. c. 12. §. 3 Their Differences are in these Particulars 1. Though both have in their respective way to do with
both Tables yet the Civil Magistrates Work lyeth most over Persons with respect to the Duties of the second Table as in matters of Justice and Righteousness in the managing whereof the very being of a Common-wealth principally consists its wel-being only as he hath to do in Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes So the Church-Power is chiefly and principally exercised in the ordering of Persons with respect to the first-Table-Duties and which appertains to Piety Wherein is the Being and constant Employment of Churches The other that is matters of Righteousness Justice Sobriety and the like are occasionally only and in ordine ad spiritualia under Church-Power and Censures 2. The Power of Churches is not only spiritual Ratione objecti because it s over spiritual Persons and Causes but ex natura rei a spiritual Power having Spirituality and its Denomination from more intrinsick Considerations as the Matter Form Subject Rule End c. and not from the Object only as that other Power which though it be in spiritual things yet it is not properly spiritual Power the Sword which it bears is not the Sword of the Spirit Ephes 6. which is the Word of God and this Word is eternal not temporal it endureth for ever the Power and Soveraignty of it is from Christ Râ—v 1.16 out of his Mouth went a sharp two-edged Sword his Sword and Power being spiritual it pierceth runs deep Heb. 4. even betwixt the Soul and the Spirit there comes no such Sword or Law from Civil Authority that Power in its greatest Efficacy reacheth not the Inner-Man though to be submitted unto for Conscience sake Indeed this Power is over spiritual Persons but not immediately and directly over their spiritual part By these Powers we are given up to a Prison to Banishment to Death but not to Satan It is not for cruciating the Souls and perplexing the Consciences of Men as is Church-Power where there is Cause 3. That of Secular Magistrates even in Spiritual Affairs and having to do primarily with the outward Man is more Authoritative it is Jurisdictio propriè dicta Legislative Coercive and in all respects the same as in Civil Matters what he doth in his own Name And truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Church-Power is not properly Jurisdiction or Authority as in the Church but as in Christ the Head of the Church as seated in the Church or Caetus fidelium it is only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ministerium not Dominium and acts all in the Name or Authority of Christ 4. They differ in Extension in respect to both Persons and Causes 1. church-Church-Power is limited to a particular Congregation as Family-Power to those of our own Houshold But this other Ecclesiastical Power seated in the same Person or Persons extends it self throughout a whole Kingdom yea sometimes to more than one But in some one Province or Kingdom you read in Scripture of many Churches This cometh to pass from another Difference between these Powers The Manage of Ecclesiastical Affairs as in Civil Magistrates may be delegated to other hands by way of Commission or Deputation they may ordain under them subordinate Thrones and inferior Powers acting in their Names which is Lordly and full of Honour and State But Churches may not do so by delegation of Power Representatives or any other Method or Way to stretch forth the Wing of their Authority like that of the Civil over all the Churches of a Nation or over more Congregations than one or a greater than ordinarily partake of all other Ordinances together is not at all suitable to a Church-Condition which is Ministerial not Lordly So Mr. Bradshaw as the Opinion of the Nonconformists ' We confine and bound all Ecclesiastical Power within the Limits only of one particular Congregation holding that the greatest Ecclesiastical Power ought not to stretch beyond the same And that it is an arrogating of Princely Supremacy for any Ecclesiastical Person or Persons whatsoever to take upon themselves Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction over many Churches much more over whole Kingdoms and Provinces of Churches ' Dr. Bilson speaks much to this purpose ' Tho saith he Of Supremacy pag. 238. Bishops may be called Governors in respect of the Soul yet only Princes be Governors of Realms Pastors have Flocks and Bishops have Diocesses Realms Dominions and Countries none have but Princes and Magistrates And so the Stile Governor of this Realm belongeth only to the Prince and not to the Priest and importeth a Publick and Princely Regiment The Common-Wealth saith Mr. Baxter Holy Common-wealth pag. 220. containeth all the People in a whole Nation or more as united in one Sovereign But particular Churches have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must unite as one Church but are as several Corporations in one Kingdom c. ' We see saith Sir Fr. Bacon Considerations about Church-Affairs in all Laws in the World Offices of Confidence and Skill cannot be exercised by Delegation all such Trust is personal and inherent and may not be transported and delegated as that of Kings which for the most part is hereditary and rather an Office of Interest than Confidence 2. In respect to Causes the Church-Power extends its Censures to no Causes but such as the other may as to Popery Heresy c. But in many Cases the Civil Magistrate extends his Care and Authority where church-Church-Power meddles not As to Jews and Pagans and such as are not Members of the Church some things may be done by the Magistrate even for these being Members of his Common-Wealth that may conduce to their spiritual Good The Church-Power is limited as 1 Cor. 5.12 So likewise whether the Crime committed be private or publick Matter of Scandal or not or the Person penitent or otherwise these Powers are at liberty to punish or pardon alike and as they shall judg it expedient to be severe or merciful accordingly They may form or reform the Laws and Statutes by which they govern making the same Fault Treason in one Age that in the next not so much as Imprisonment 1 Eliz. cap 1. with 35 Hen 8. But Church-Power is limited the same Crime the same Punishment ever not being in the Power of this Republick to vary in their Process in respect of lesser or greater Censures if the Crime be the same 5. In their Constitution or Tenure Licet omnis Potestas saith Carbo Carbo de Leg. lib. 2. cap. 8. tum Ecclesiastica tum Civilis sit à Deo tamen non codem modo nam politica licet universe sit jure Divino in particulari est jure Gentium Ecclesiastica omni modo est jure divino à Deo Government in general is of Divine Right but whether in this or that particular Form as in one or a few representing the rest this is humane and hath its Original from Man That Power which is termed an Ordinance of God in Rom. 13. is called an Ordinance of Man in 1
there is no means or provision so certain and generally effectual to send out Preachers to urge and constrain Men to hear and for all these purposes as this when the Magistrate according to his Trust and Duty puts forth his Authority in these Matters or that will so universally as an external means stir that Principle of Self-love in all Men to the seeking after what is good and the shunning of what is evil A Coercive Power of this Nature is placed in no other hand but his Ministers may preach and persuade but must be no Strikers 1 Tim. 3.3 Mat. 20. may not externally afflict and constrain Peter may not use his Sword in Christ's Quarrel God only and the Civil Magistrate further our Happiness by making us miserable Paul who had as much Power as any Man of that Order yet his Weapons were only spiritual and tho an Apostle yet could not do so much as the meanest Civil Magistrate in such a Coercive way for their Weapons will whether Men incline or not have an operation and constant effect less or more to whomsoever applied This Power therefore of the Civil Magistrate cannot well be wanted or if it be there is no ordinary means to be had for a supply in the room of it When there was no King in Israel every Man did what was right in his own Eyes Judg. 17.6 followed the Ways his Lusts led him to Suppose there be good Counsel and Instruction yet to many Persons it signifieth little for some Men are not corrigible by Words Prov. 29.19 The Foolishness that is bound up in our Hearts must by Correction be driven far from us Prov. 22.15 4. I shall conclude adding in the last place the Praise of Well-doing Rom. 13. The Countenance and Encouragement of the Magistrate to those that preach and those that obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ renders it even to a carnal Heart desirable The Lord gives this honour to a poor Servant faithful in his place that he adorns the Gospel Tit. 2.10 and renders it more acceptable and effectual So likewise the Conversation of a Wife that those who obey not the Word are without the Word won by such a Conversation 1 Pet. 3.1 that is won to the Love of the Word and the liking of those Ways that are according to the Word Much greater is that Honour and Ornament which comes to the Gospel when the Magistrate not only by his Conversation and personal Example but by his Laws and Authority sets himself to encourage all he can the Preachers and Professors thereof bearing them up against Despisers and Scoffers To the Church 2. In respect to the Church and such as are effectually call'd out of the World God hath promised and in the Scripture much comforted his People in this that they shall have great benefit by the Civil Magistrates that are over them as Isa 32.2 chap. 49.23 chap. 60.16 These Promises relate to Gospel-times And those Places Numb 27.16 and 1 Tim. 2. are equivalent to Promises a Prayer is as it were a Promise reversed what is spoken by the Lord in a Promise being returned is the strength and confidence of a Prayer Encouragements also to obey Precepts imply Promises so that of Rom. 13. and 1 Pet. 2. our Subjection is required upon this consideration that Kings are for the praise of them that do well Rom. 13. ordained of God to thee to the Church and to every Saint for good The Lord in this doth not only promise but as it were undertake for the Magistrate that he shall be such an one as those that are pious and righteous those that do well need not dread or fear to be under him A good Magistrate is a Blessing and matter of joy and rejoycing to the People of God Prov. 29.2 Eccles 10.17 a great Fruit and Evidence of his Love to them 1 King 10.9 and 2 Chron. 2.11 Because the Lord hath loved his People he hath made thee King over them it is so spoken of Solomon The Benefit and Good to the Churches and Saints from the Civil Magistrate may more particularly be judged of in these Considerations 1. Kings and Princes are an Ordinance of God or Medium by which in a more special and peculiar way he communicates his Power Wisdom and Justice for the governing of all Societies of Men. 1 Kings 3.28 All Israel feared the King for they saw that the Wisdom of God was in him to do Judgment So the Power and Justice and the like Attributes of God become visible in this Ordinance of God See Eccles 8.2 Numb 27.20 Prov. 16.10 and 21.1 It is brought as an Argument to Magistrates against Partiality and Bribery 2 Chron. 19.7 There is no Iniquity with the Lord our God nor respects of Persone nor taking of Gifts What is or is not in God should be or not be found in him that is a Magistrate They are therefore termed Gods because a visible Representation of God's Attributes is or ought to be in their Governing And as Christ is said to be present with those Officers in the Church which he hath appointed because there is a special Virtue and Efficacy of Christ manifest in their Ministry So in this great Ordinance of a Magistrate there is said to be a special Presence of God with him 2 Chron. 19.6 From the like Manifestation of God in his Wisdom Power Goodness c. for the Welfare of Societies There is such a Harmony and Neighbourhood between the outward and inward Man that what works upon the one affects the other When therefore the Ministry by Christ's presence works upon a Man's Soul the Man is of a better Behaviour outwardly and to Civil Relations So also being brought into to outward Subjection and Conformity by Magistracy the Mind and spiritual part is much the more fitted for Christian Communion Moral Vertues yea Civilities are much pressed upon Church-Members every where in the Epistlâ—… as to be kind courteous humble submiss self-denying Rom. 16. Pâ—… â—pends a whole Chapter in Greetings and Salutes Men and Women that are morose selfish stiff opinionative ill-bred such for the most part are burthensom in all and as much in these spiritual Societies as in any other 2. For Protection Church-Power neither judgeth or restraineth them that are without it is no Fence nor Security against the World The only Hedg about this Vineyard under God is the Sword of the Civil Magistrate â—…nts and Churches being called and separated out of the â—…ld are hated by the World and such a Seed of Enmity in them against the Members of Christ as if there were no higher Power to restrain being the far greater number they would utterly root us out The Church for Weakness and Helplesness is resembled by a Nurse-Child or Infant which needs the Care of those who have more Strength Isa 9.16 This religious Care and Tenderness is or ought to be in the Magistrate who is
of a particular Church hath Affinity with that of lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms Object §1 IT may be objected that Churches are spiritual Corporations and of a more peculiar Consideration in respect of their Government and therefore not to be reckoned with Civil at least not with Families or such mean and low Societies Answ Policy or Government in it self and all the sorts of it is from the Light of Nature and common Reason And this is generally supposed by all that tho the Subject Matter or Persons governed be of different kinds yet the Law and Forms of Government may be the same where so appointed by Christ And I rather insist on such a way of Discourse and Reasoning as most suitable to the Subject I am upon but especially because Subordination of Churches to Churches is argued from the Light of Nature and in this very Case termed by our Brethren a Divine Topick Now if we may argue and guide our selves in Church-Affairs by the Light that shineth forth from the natural Wisdom and Prudence of Man in the Government and managing of Kingdoms there is as much a Jus Divinum and ground of reasoning from the Light that appears in the prudent Constitution and Government of any other civil Society I have mentioned in the Considerations Cities Families and those lesser and contained as I term them Societies or Corporations with particulars Churches Because I humbly conceive the Policy and Government of each tho in other things different to be more proportionable and of greater Similitude in many things then between particular Churches and those greater and containing Bodies Kingdoms Empires or the like Churches thus humbly constituted and governed are most consistent with Civil Magistracy of what Form soever the Common-wealth shall be In Confirmation of this Agreement or Similitude I shall take for the most part the Concessions of the learned of each Perswasion The Instances or Particulars are these §. 2 1. Families tho contained under the National Government where they are sinuated yet are intrusted with a ruling and governing Power compleat and sufficient each in and for it self so are particular Churches 1. They are intrusted with a Government each for it self It is not sufficient saith Mr. Perkins Perk. on Rev. 2.20 for a Church to have the preaching of the Word but Church-Government This Church speaking of Thyatira is blamed because she did not use the Authority God had given her There is given to the Ministers of each particular Congregation according to Episcopal Ordination established by our Law not only a Power to preach c. Take Authority to preach the Word of God but they are made Rectors Governours in those particular Churches and it 's said to them Whose Sins thou dost remit they are remitted and whose Sins thou dost retain they are retained by which Words the Keys of Discipline are given them see Bilson Perpet Govern p. 213. ' By Order of the Church of England saith Bishop Vsher Reduct of Episc p. 2. all Presbyters are charged to administer the Doctrine and Sacraments and the Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same And that they might the better understand what the Lord hath commanded therein the Exhortation of St. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination Take heed to your selves and to all the Flock among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so taken in Mat. 2.6 and Rev. 12.5 and 19.15 rule the Congregation of God which he hath purchased with his Blood ' ' Mr. Hooker Ho. Eccl. Pol. lib. 3. Sect. 1. tells us that for Preservation of Christianity there is not any thing more needful than that such as are of the visible Church have mutual Fellowship and Society one with another In which Consideration the Catholick Church is divided into a number of distinct Societies every of which is termed a Church within it self not an Assembly but a Society A Church as we are now to understand it is a Society that is a number of Men belonging to some Christian-Fellowship the Place and Limits whereof are certain having communion in the publick Exercise of such Duties as are mentioned Acts 2.47 As those of the Mystical Church by their inward Graces differ from all others which are not of the Body and those that are of the visible Body of the Church have the Notes of external Profession Even so these several Societies or Churches have Properties belonging to them as they are publick Christian Societies And of such Properties it may not be denied that one of the very chiefest is Ecclesiastical Policy We use the name of Policy rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatsoever besides belongeth to the ordering of the publick Affairs of the Church of God ' In which words he asserts not each particular Church to have Government in it self but this Government as a Property or Propriety by which it 's distinguished from the Mystical as also the Catholick visible Church So that he doth not as some of late make the Catholick visible Church the first Subject of the Keys but each particular Society or Church supposing that great Body of Christians to be only and immediately under the Spiritual Government of Christ Jesus 2. Compleat and sufficient It is not to be understood of such a perfection as may not with much advantage receive help both from the Power of the Magistrate as I have shewed before as also from the Counsel and Advice of other Churches But I mean an essential Compleatness or Sufficiency not being deficient in any material requisite for Government This that learned Author expresseth in those last Words ' We use the Word Policy saith he rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatever besides belongeth to the ordering of the Affairs of the Church of God Every particular Church saith Mr. Cartwright Against Whitgift lib 3 pag 147. having an Eldership is a Catholick Church of Christ under whom Pastors Doctors and Elders are the ministerial and immediate Governors In which Words he intimateth a Compleatness in each particular Church for Government and Privileges as much as if the Catholick visible Church were Organical and a governing Church ' The Power of Jurisdiction saith one Rutherf Due Right 〈◊〉 Presbyt pag. 307. is as perfect and compleat in one single Congregation as in a Provincial as in a National yea as in the Catholick visible Body ' All Things are yours saith Paul to a particular Church 2 Cor. 3. To this purpose Mr. Parker Parker's Polit. lib 3. cap. 13. Sicut non pars c. As a particular Church is not a maimed or half but a whole and perfect Body so it is possessed with the whole and entire Church-Government and not
with a part only 2d Instanceâ—… This Oeconomick and Domestick Power is intrinsick and essential to a Family and is a Power derived immediatly from the Lord by the Light of Nature and hath not its original from any Power on Earth Families being much more ancient than Common-Wealths So Government or Discipline is intrinsick and inseparable from the very Essence of a Church received immediately from Christ and not the Grant or Constitution of any Secular Prince or State Churches are endued saith Dr. Jackson Jackson of the Church cap. 8. §5 with a Judicature immediately derived from Christ and independent upon any Earthly Power or any Power whatsoever on Earth whether Spiritual or Temporal Bishop Bilson expresseth it thus Bilson of Suprem p. 171. The Things comprised in the Church and by God himself commanded to the Church these Things are specified in pag. 227. to be the Word Sacraments and Vse of the Keys or Ecclesiastical Power and Cure of Souls are subject to no mortal Creature Pope nor Prince And those of another Persuasion are to the same purpose ' The Church saith Mr. Rutherford Peaceable Plea p 300. hath the Keys from Christ equally independent upon any mortal Man in Discipline as in Doctrine A Power and Right to Discipline saith the same Author Due Right of Presbyt cap. 9. §. 9 is a Property essential to a Church and is not removed from it till God remove the Candlestick and the Church cease to be a visible Church ' Potestas ipsa de jure c. Power saith Dr. Ames Cas con lib 4. cap. 24. p. 4. is so much the Right of a Church as it cannot be separated because necessary and immediatly floweth even from the Essence of each true Church There are Authorities enow to be produced from the Writings of the Learned for the confirmation of this particular All grant there is a Government jure divino I speak not of this or that Form and by the appointment of Jesus Christ It is denied by none but Erastus and those that follow him who may as well deny Praying Preaching or Sacraments jure divino It is as expresly ordained that Discipline be exercised in the Name of Christ as to preach pray or baptize in his Name There are certainly Things of God that are not the Things of Caesar And if those Things upon which Christ hath put his Name be not peculiarly his I know not where we shall find the Joint As we say there were Families so particular Churches before any Commonwealths were and Christian Churches and Discipline exercised many Years before any Emperors or Kings were Christian And therefore as Families have many Privileges so peculiar and by the Law of Nature so much theirs as are never touched or infringed by the Supreme Power of any Nation So likewise it is with Churches they have very many Privileges so evidently theirs from the Law of Christ and their spiritual Constitution as Christian Magistrates will do their utmost to preserve and cherish and not in the least infringe It is a part of Magna Charta 3 Hen. 3. cap. 1. Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta confirmavimas pro nobis Heredibus nostris in perpetuum quòd Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra Libertates suas illaesas And it is mentioned in the Oath our Kings take at their Coronation that He shall keep and maintain the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Holy Church 3d Instance A third Particular or Instance of what we have supposed in the former Considerations is this The lesser Corporations Cities Families and the like have not Authority or Jurisdiction one over another It is the same with Churches each having the Fountain and Original of their own Power as before is shewed immediatly proceeding from Christ in themselves and not elsewhere or one from another cannot by any Art or Device of Man be made to rise up above it self as it doth if one Church exerciseth a Power or Jurisdiction over another There is no Invention of Man that by contriving Pipes or any other Artifice can make Water freely and naturally run higher than the Spring-Head Tho that Jurisdiction which hath its rise in a particular Church be pumped up into a Classis or Synod it is but the same it was before Synods saith Parker out of Chamier Polit lib. 3. cap. 13 §9 nullam habeant Authoritatem c. They have no Authority but what is derived from particular Churches So Voetius Disp de Polit. Eccles p 5. There seems to be a great Emphasis in those Particles of Propriety Children obey your Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes 6.1 so to Servants And speaking of the Relation of Husbands and Wives by which is set forth our Obedience to Christ and his Officers it is more appropriate Ephes 5.24 As the Church is subject to Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriis viris not only theirs but their own Husbands It is said 1 Tim. 3.4 One that ruleth well his own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So of Ministers Know them that labour among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and are over you in the Lord 1 Thess 5.12 and in Heb. 13.17 it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Duces vestri your Captains Officers in Churches being as exactly limited as in an Army There is no Power in a Superior to command where no Obligation upon the Inferior to obey And therefore the Lord seems by these Expressions to limit both Church and Family-Power within their own Walls This is the Judgment of the Learned of each Persuasion Bishop Davenant Nota est Jurisconsultorum regula c. It is a ' known Rule of Lawyers A Sentence given by him that is not his Judg is void in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private Persons that are of other Churches how much less then over the Churches themselves such Sentences were to be slighted and contemned as of a Judg that presumeth to make Laws out of the bounds of his own Jurisdiction ' Nec potest nec debet saith the same Author elsewhere De judice cont cap. 16. p. 90 particularis una Ecclesia judiciaria authoritate aliam sibi non subjectam a Catholica abscindere quaelibet enim Ecclesia filios suos ad consensionem in Doctrina publicê stabilita censuris adigit Sed fratres Ecclesiarum externarum monet pro officio charitatis non punit pro imperio potestatis Dr. Field as a common Resolution of Divines tells us Of the Church lib 5. That if a Bishop ventures to do any Act of Jurisdiction out of his own Diocess that is his particular Church so cap. 30. as to excommunicate or absolve or the like all such Acts are utterly void and of no force The same thing saith Dr. Crakanthorp cont Spal cap. 28. pag. 177. ' Every
bound so to do 2. Whether for his further help and assistance herein he may not make choice of grave learned and reverent men to assist him in the same Government 3 Whether by vertue of his Power these persons thus called to assist the Supreme Magistrate may not lawfully try the Gifts of Ministers within his Dominions convent them before them examine how they have behaved themselves in their places and punish the blame-worthy In a Petition also to King James for Tolleration That your Highness would afford us and assign to us some persons qualified with Wisdom Learning and Vertue to be under your Highness our Overseers for our more peaceable orderly and dutiful carriage of our selves both in our worshiping God and in all other our Affairs at your pleasure To whom with all Readiness and Subjection we are willing to be accomptable and answerable always The opinions of learned men about Church Matters Government especially were collected together in a Treatise which was put into Latin by Dr. Ames and in an Epistle of his prefixed avouched by him who was a man much studied in those Controversies to be the Judgment of Cartwright Fenner Fulk Whitaker Rainolds Perkins Brightman and those that were more Ancient As Wichliff Tyndal Regers Bradford Gilby Fox Moore Dearing Noel Greenham Dogmata ista c. These Tenents saith he were either their Principles or so conjunct with them as not to be denied theirs Christ Jesus saith the Author hath not subjected any Church or Congregation of his to any other Superior Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction than unto that which is within it self the Civil Magistrate alone upon Earth hath power to punish a whole Church or Congregation Cap. 2. §. 3 and more fully in §. 12 They hold and believe saith he that the Equality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority of Churches and Church Ministers is no more derogatory and repugnant to the State and Glory of a Monarch than the parity or equality of School-masters of several Schools or Masters of several Families Yea they hold the clean contrary that Inequality of Churches and Church Officers in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority was that principally that advanced Antichrist unto his Throne and brought the Kings and Princes of the Earth unto such vassalage under him And that the Civil Authority and Glory of Secular Princes and States hath over decayed and withered the more that Ecclesiastical Officers of the Church have been advanced and set up in Authority beyond the limits and confines that Christ in his Word hath prescribed unto them And in Cap. 6. §. 6 They are said to deny a principal part of the Kings Supremacy that hold any Jurisdiction or Offices over Churches jure divine and not by the will and pleasure of the King and Civil States of the Realm And from what is said cap. 5. §. 12 It is evident that this way is as little prejudicial to the Subjects Liberty For it s expresly there said If any Member of a Congregation being under a crime shall of himself forsake Communion with the Church that then the Ecclesiastical Officers have no authority or jurisdiction over him but only the Civil Magistrate Parents or Masters c. So that as persons are free otherwise than from conscience of duty to joyn with these Assemblies so also to leave them remaining always under the Magistrates Ecclesiastical power and care I have made this Digression not only for the matters sake which is very sutable to our present Subject but also to vindicate the Congregational way 1. That it is not such a Novelty as is pretended This of the equality of Churches and thence and Independency from which we are reproachfully surnamed seems to be the worst of our Tenents Yet it appears to be no other but what the reverend and learned of a former age have asserted Nor do I know any other of their opinions or practices but may as easily be remonstrated to be the assertions of those holy men Nor secondly inconsistent with civil Magistracy or with their Power in Ecclesiastical Affairs And as a further Testimony hereof they take the Oaths both of Allegeance and Supremacy Professedly assent also to All the Articles of Religion which concern only the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrin of the Sacraments comprised in a Book entituled Articles whereupon it was agreed by the Arch-bishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the whole Clergy in the Convocation Anno 1562. for the avoiding of diversity of Opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion as is required by Stat. 13 Eliz. cap. 12. And do humbly hope living peaceably under his Majesties Government they shall obtain their share in that Indulgence his Majesty graciously purposed to shew to such persons as through want of full satisfaction differ in smaller matters from the present Establishment 4 Instance A fourth Particular which ariseth from the former is this Families being not subordinate one to another they cannot associate or unite into any large or great Body and therefore do and may more conveniently retain their Government though it be peculiar and distinct in any Common-wealth of what form soever without prejudice to the Peace and Welfare of it So is it with Churches their State and Government as it is appointed by Christ is such as is consistent with and no prejudice unto any civil Powers under whom they are situated And that upon this account principally Having no Dependency in Respect of Power or Jurisdiction one on another they cannot in their own Sphere enlarge themselves by Subordinations to a political Body of any such Extension and Greatness as may render their Obedience or Compliance more doubtful or uncertain It is matter of Jealousie with Princes and States when there is in their Dominions a Body large and extensive firmly joyned and compact in it self of an interest peculiar and not holding of them Particular Churches are of a small compass sometimes comprehended in One ordinarily but of a few Families So that in this respect though their Interest and Government be peculiar they may retain it and for substance the same as Families do throughout the World Which will further appear in the following Considerations 1. It is granted on all hands That the Lord hath limited his Church to a Government which is perpetual and for substance to be the same in all places As also that the Nations from their Civil Government variously and as they judge most prudent 2. Since the Wall of partition by Christs Death was broken down The Gospel and Christian Churches were by Christs commission to be planted in all parts of the World It stands therefore with common reason that the Church Government Christ hath left us is of that Nature as without any substantial Alteration may comply with and not be prejudicial to any Civil Government 3. If particular Churches by Union become one body for extention as large as the Civil State There will hardly be a
That the Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons and other Ecclesiastical Persons have no manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but by from and under the King 's Royal Majesty By the Statute also of 1 Edw. 6. c. 2. All Courts Ecclesiastical within the Realms of England and Ireland ought to be kept by no other Power or Authority either Foreign or within the Realm but by the Authority of His most Excellent Majesty And it was further Enacted That all their Process shall issue out under the King's Seal and His Name and Style c. but since repealed Dr. Cosens in his learned Defence of them and their Proceedings asserts thus They are saith he warranted by the Statute and Canon Law of this Nation professing also that there were Reason enough against those Ecclesiastical Proceedings if they were not claimed from the Crown but from some other Authority immediately as the Popish Clergy did theirs from by the means and direction of the Pope Apol. Part 1. Cap. 1. 2. Our Convocation or General Synod which makes Laws and Canons about matters that are more spiritual This is an ancient Court and hath formerly been in it self of great Authority in Ecclesiastical Regulations it 's not so now but dependent upon the Civil Magistrate for whatsoever Jurisdiction or Coercive Power there exercised which will appear in these Particulars 1. There are no Laws or Canons made by the Bishops and others of the Clergy in the Convocation that oblige under any Penalty without the Stipulation and Assent of the Civil Magistrate be it either in matters of Faith or Discipline The 39 Articles and Canons about them concluded upon by the Synod in Anno 1562. engaged no man under any Penalty in our Law to believe profess or subscribe until they had an Assent or Establishment by the Civil Powers Nor can they proceed against any Crime as Heresie Apostasie or gross Enormity in Doctrine but what our Laws declare to be such Nihil habet vim legis priusquam Regius assensus fuerit adhibitus iis quae Synodus decernanda censuerit Cosins Polit. Ta. 1. a. And for matters of Discipline and Worship it appears by the Letters Patent Copies whereof are annexed to the Canons published in Anno 1603 and 1640. That 1. All power to meet confer treat debate and agree upon any matter for common good is from such Licence Power and Authority as is granted to the Archbishops Bishops Chancellors and other Members of the Convocation from His Majesty of His special Grace and by virtue of His Prerogative Royal and Supreme Authority in Ecclesiastical Causes And 2. the Synod having treated of concluded and agreed upon Canons Orders c. To the end and purpose by His Majesty limited and prescribed unto them they are to offer and present the same to His Majesty in writing He upon mature consideration taken thereupon may allow The Licence to the Convoc in Anno 1640. approve confirm and ratifie or otherwise disallow anihilate and make void such and so many of the said Canons Orders c. as he shall think fit requisite or convenient And none of those Canons c. shall be of any force effect or validity in Law but only such and so many of them and after such time as His Majesty by His Letters Patents shall approve and confirm the same The Civil Magistrate may suspend for what time he shall please yea wholly deprive any Bishop or Bishops from their Office and Place in this Synod who are the chiefest Members thereof He may Commissionate also by Writ * Cook Instit pag. 4. cap. 74. what other Persons He shall please to sit in Convocation with them And if occasion be He may likewise wholly constitute another Synod and nominate each particular Person of what Quality and of what Number of His Natives as He shall please and give them like Authority in Ecclesiastical matters So was that Synod of the 32. appointed by Hen. 8. and afterwards by Edw. 6. to do the work of a Synod and present a Body of Ecclesiastical Canons for Confirmation by the Magistrate Field Of the Church Lib. 5. cap. 53. Princeps potest assignare nominare authoritatem dare quandocunque quamdiu ipsi placuerit hujusmodi indigenis subditis quos idoneos censuerit c. Dr. Cosin de Pol. Tab. 1. a. 3. These Laws saith * De Ju. Ec. pag. 9. Cook are termed Regiae Leges Ecclesisiasticae and another such Ecclesiastical Laws as now are in force are called the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws for that now all Jurisdiction whether it be Temporal or Ecclesiastical is the Kings And if there be any thing difficult or doubtful in these Laws the Interpretation is ultimately to be given in the Civil Judicatures So Cook 's Instit pag. 4. cap. 74. To the King also is the last Appeal to be made and Delegates appointed by Him give final Determination in Controversies after adjudged by those Laws and Canons in any yea the highest of those Ecclesiastical Courts Vltima Appellatio sit ad Principem non extra Regnum saith Dr. Cosen and tells us it is a Jurisdiction Coronae Regiae de Jure debita * Dr. Ridley's view pag. 110. * 25 Hen. 8. c. 19. * 15 Hen. 8. c. 21. 4. The King's Majesty may dispense with any of those Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws indulge the Omission of what is enjoined by them make void the Crime and remove the Penalty incurred by breach of them yea and give Faculty to do or practise otherwise any Synodical Establishment or long usage to the contrary notwithstanding in what offends not the Holy Scripture and Laws of God 5. The King may exempt Persons and Societies from the Jurisdiction of the Ordinary or Bishop or any else who are to execute these Canons This my Lord Coke asserts De Jure Eccles and as a Prerogative annexed to the Crown He gives many Instances of such Dispensations in several Kings Reigns both ancient and of later times For doubtless what Power He grants and is exercised under Him may be re-assumed by Him And Priviledge even whole Parishes if he please from Episcopal or Synodical Jurisdiction and such Parishes are said to be Regiae Majestati immediate subditae Mocket de Ecclesiastica Ang. Pol. pag. 294. And many Parishes to this day stand thus exempted by the favour and grant of Princes formerly The Dutch and French Churches in several Parts of this Kingdom by Patent from Edw. 6. were exempted from the then Establishment and exercised a Discipline and Forms of Worship according to their own Perswasion our Synod and Ecclesiastical Courts having by vertue of this Exemption nothing to do with their Ministers or Churches which Priviledge hath been confirmed to them by our Kings that Reigned since and are enjoined to this day His Majesty that now is by His Prerogative in Ecclesiastical Matters notwithstanding the present Form of Worship and Ceremonies Graciously indulged Tender Consciences a
cognizance whereof is taken by a Synod at Edenhurgh Civil censures are for Satisfaction of the whole Nation and not the Parish or Borough only where the crime was committed but in a Church-censure the particular Assembly being only and no other Congregation or person morally leavened and charged with the offence are principally and in the first place concerned to have satisfaction of the repentance and submission of the person offending For by this means only their Lump or Church becomes again unleavened 4 Disparity 4. The other End before mentioned and Vse of Appeals is that our Judges and their Sentence be censured and judged by superior Tribunals To which proceeding the Judges in Civil Judicatures are liable but there is not the like Subordination in Churches for these Reasons Vnaequaque res per quascunque res nascitur per easdem dissolvitur 1. All the Power and Authority placed in their Inferior Courts is no other but the influx of the supream Civil Powers to whom we always make our last Appeal and therefore proper to them to suspend Actings nay utterly to destroy in part or in whole what Jurisdiction is derived from them as appears in the Constitution of all Kingdoms But it is not so here a particular Church The Court we are to Appeal from hath not its Being or Jurisdiction from a Classis or Synod * Ecclesia Parochialis est Ecclesia vera essentialiter integraliter absque ulla correspondentia vel Synodo Voet. de Syn. pag. 13. these rather derive their Power from it being Representatives only as our Brethren have formerly written Particular Churches they term Ecclesiae primae and Synods Ecclesiae ortae Again if Synods as they grant exercise over Churches a Power only cumulative not destructive How can they Excommunicate a Church seeing Excommunication renders a Society as Heathens and Publicans which is to unchurch them as Mr. Rutherford rightly affirms * Parker de Polit Eccles lib. 3. cap. 13. * It is an authoritative unchurching of an obstinate Church we plead for Ruth peaceable Plea cap. 15. p. 223 and p. 222. Excommunication is an authoritative unchurching 2. Although whole Churches may be punished for male Administration by the Civil Magistrate yet may not an Ecclesiastical Power meerly such do the like for to destroy or save whole Societies for the Evil of a major part or a few persons is the prerogative of the Lord himself which he communicates also in some cases to Civil Magistrates his Deputies but in no case to Churches it being an Authority high and Princely and not at all sutable to such as have only a Ministry and not a Dominion Bishop Davenant tells us Brotherly Communion c. 9. p. 102. That a Censure is not to be drawn on the whole Body of the Church for as the Laws forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that those that are innocent may be intangled in the censure So Right and Religion forbids to exclude whole Churches from the Communion of the Faithful because this cannot be done without an injury and contempt to many that be innocent What ever formerly of this same unchurching power in Synods hath been asserted yet since upon further debate we are told this same Excommunicating of whole Churches is a thing not known in the Presbyterian Government and not the Churches but particular persons in the Churches are censured Assemb disputes pag. 180. But how can we say single persons only are to be censured and not the whole Church Whenas we know the contending parties of what condition soever are both equally liable to the Censure of the Judge Now when matters are brought by Appeal to a superior Court the Court Appealed from is a Party and in this respect upon no higher terms than the pars appellans though a single person But grant it be so and that the object of a Censure from a Synod be only particular members Then 1. Churches cannot have such a remedy as in Civil States for Appeals of this Nature are not to be made to any but persons invested with such a power as may suspend or make void in part or in whole the power of that Court by whom the wrong hath been done and Appealed from as hath been shewed Excommunicatio ejusque denunciatio post appellationem legitimam latam est nulla Nardus p. 53. col 2. 2. If there be no Power in a Synod of such a proportion superior to a Church as to censure it by Excommunication or Suspension at least Then will the Members of this Church by admitting such Appeals be necessarily under a twofold Jurisdiction not subordinate which tends to the greatest confusion imaginable For if the Synod and the Church in their Light and Apprehensions vary about the condition of an Offender one of them may in Conscience be bound to justify whom the other condemns 3. There is no supply of a supposed Defect or Addition of what was not before for if their superior powers Excommunicate particular Members only and not the whole Church This is nothing more than each particular Church hath power to do And it is as much an Ordinance of Christ where two or three that is a lesser number are gathered together as where a greater a Censure by the Church at Keneria is as much a Censure as if by Corinth If a Quarter Sessions Execute a man it s as much a Judicial deal as if judged by the Assize Kings-Bench or Parliament The reason is obvious it s the Law that judges him not this or that Judicature So it is the Law and appointment of Christ that Excommunicates not this or that Presbytery greater or less and this Law is the same to all We come now to the other part of the Argument drawn from the light of Nature If Appeals be not there will be a defect in Christ's Government Persons are left without remedy for wrongs done by whole Churches I answer with Suarez in the same case Argumentum est saith he De virtute Tom. 4. p. 99. ab specie ad genus negativum defensio est genus latius patet quam appellatio Potest enim ad superiorem recurrere per simplicem quaerelam vel per modum supplicationis c. quod est sufficens remedium diversum appellatione multo magis decens religiosum statum It is an Argument from the Species to the Genus there are other ways of defence We may have recourse to a Superior by simple Complaint or by way of Supplication which is a sufficient remedy and divers from an Appellation and much more becoming the state of Religion thus that Author More particularly we therefore Answer 1. There may be a sufficient defence or remedy though not by Appeals 2. There may be Appeals though not in such a way 1. For the first this Address or Recursus to others Superior or equal is not for the putting forth any Act of
Jurisdiction or Compulsion Such persons interpose by way of Intreaty Perswasion Pleading the Cause of the wronged Reproving Threatning or in such way as a single Pastor may deal with any of his people Thus Paul often in a difference between Philemon and Onesimus Philem. vers 10. I beseech thee for Onesimus Phil. 4.2,3 I beseech Evodias and Syntiche It was upon some breach in the Church 1 Cor. 1.10 Now I beseech you Brethren that there be no Division This interposition of the Apostle with the Corinths was upon the desire of the House of Cloe ver 11. There may also be more earnest Pleadings Reasonings Rebukes Hos 2.2 yea openly and before others The Apostles were equal in Authority yet Paul did not only Reason and Plead with Peter but Rebuke and Reprove him publickly and before others Gal. 2.11,14 And in his dealing with Barnabas Pauls spirit did rise higher and yet no Power or Jurisdiction exercised or might be by one Apostle over another Act. 15.39 If Synods be applyed unto only for Counsel and advice in differences and difficult cases it is a provision not to be despised Scripture-light in an instruction or reproof is cogent by what hand soever administred but more especially when in the way of an Ordinance or Appointment of Christ As are Pastors and Synods though intrusted with a Declarative Authority only Let it be consider'd how the greatest reformation made in the Hâ—…s and Lives of men and women is ordinarily by the applicatiâ—…â—f the Word of God in the Ordinance of Preaching which is the instruction Reproofs c. of a single Minister who hath not power to Excommunicate such as despise his Doctrine Faith comes by Hearing not by Discipline Until they be judged believers they are without 1 Cor. 5. If this means or such a Doctrinal Application by a single Minister be sufficient to make such Reformation upon single persons and those that as yet own not Christ or have Conscience of an Ordinance why should we not expect the like fruit where many Ministers are Synodically gathered for the Reformation of whole Churches persons professing to understand and reverence so solemn an Ordinance of Christ though there be no coercive Power intrusted with it to enforce Submission 2. There may be Appeals though not in the same Series but to a Tribunal extrinsecal and not meerly Spiritual as when we appeal to the Civil Magistrate or such as are appointed by him over Ecclesiastical matters For 1. if the King in his Laws and the Church in their Synodical Canons command and forbid one and the same things as is asserted And 2. if the persons commanded stand as much in a Civil Relation to their Prince being Subjects as they do in a spiritual Relation to the Church as Members Doubtless the Christian Magistrate having a Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters as in Civil and especially being assisted by the Councel and Advice of Synods is a sufficient and â—…ectual means to reform the miscarriages of particular Churches if appealed unto Receptum est in Gallia ab Ecclesiasticis posse provocari ad ad carias supremas Parliamentorum P. Gr. Tholos l. 50. c. 2. §. 36 Ruther Due Right cap. 6. §. 5 pag. 396. The truth is though Churches were threatned or struck with the highest censures being meerly Spiritual and from a National Synod the highest Throne Were it not from foresight that if such Discipline be despised the Magistrates Sword by some Corporal punishment will second it there would be little fear or dread of those Synodical censures And if so as it is apparent to the most in a National or Provincial Church as ordinarily constistituted it is no otherwise Common Reason will direct us rather to go immediatly by Appeals to the Civil Magistrate or his Delegates than in such a compass as to drive the cause from a Consistory to a Classis from thence to a Provincial Synod and after that to a National Assembly and when all this is done there is little to any purpose done if not seconded by a secular arm Hence our learned Brethren formerly admitted no other Appeals of this nature but to the Civil Magistrate as we have fully shewed in the former Digression To which we add what is by that Author further said Cap. 2. If the Brethren or Officers in a Church be perverse and will not hearken to Reason they that are wronged are to crave the assistance of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath Power and who ought by the Civil Sword and Authority procure to all Members of the Church Governors or others freedom from all manifest injuries and wrongs The manner how the Civil Magistrate is to proceed in Church-causes is there also described to us in the words following Though the Civil Magistrate cannot absolve the Excommunicate person c. or take away this power from the Church yet when they or any of them shall apparently abuse the same he is bound by the Law of God and by virtue of his Office grounded upon the same to punish them severely for it and to force them by Civil Mulcts to rectify c. THus I have done with that first Consideration upon the account whereof the Vsefulness and Necessity of the Civil Magistrates Ecclesiastical power is affirmed Which is in respect to the well-being of Churches There is another consideration remaining now likewise to be prosecuted shewing the like necessity of this Power in respect and relation to the well-being of the Commonwealth The Knowledge and true Worship of God and the means hereof the word of God is a national gift He hath given his Law to Jacob he hath not dealt so with other Nations Psal 147. It was true then for Israel had this priviledge as a peculiar but now it is otherwise And where the Lord is so bountiful to a Nation thus to give the means of Life and Salvation it is a Depositum Governors must account for The whole Nation becomes peaceable prosperous or otherwise according as the matters of God and his Worship are more or less Religiously attended by the Governors and People thereof This Consideration is urged by Bishop Davenant to this purpose Daven de judu cont ca. 36. p. 91. Regis potestas judiciaria se extendit ad ea omnia sancienda quae rem publicam florentem conservant atque ad ea tollenda c. The Kings Legislative power extends to the establishming of whatsoever may preserve a Commonwealth in a flourishing State and the taking away of all such things as may prejudice or ruine it But the Religious Worship of God is granted of all even of the very Heathens as of concernment to the well-being of the Republick and the neglect of it to the eversion of it The careful and orderly management of Religious affairs being a special means and way to make the Republick prosperous the care whereof lieth upon the Magistrate It is necessary that he both judge of and