Selected quad for the lemma: power_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
power_n	authority_n	bishop_n	presbyter_n	4,112	5	10.2023	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A26279	Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The orthodox government of the Church of England by bishops, presbiters, and deacons, asserted from the practice of the apostles, the testimony of councils, synods, fathers and doctors, from the apostles time to this day ...		1680 (1680)	Wing A43; ESTC R22486	17,618	40

institute he made Timothy and Titus Episcopos Cleri gregis quoad regimen in ecclesia Bishops of the Clergy and their Flocks and to have Ecclesiastical Government over them whereas before they were but Presbyters or Disciples brought up under him by this Institution were other Presbyters made subordinate to them in governing and teaching the Church which to prove I thus argue He that is ordained and so ordained that he hath power constituere presbiteros per civitates to ordain Presby ters in every City is greater than those who have no such power in their Cities and Churches and they who may correct what is defective are superior to those for whom matters defective are corrected but Timothy and Titus had such power given them and did so correct things defective and none of the Presbyters had the same from the Apostles no not Timothy nor Titus whilst onely Presbyters therefore I conclude undeniably that Timothy and Titus were Superiors as Bishops over the Presbyters in their several Charges and Divisions Timothy in Ephesus and Titus in Creet That they had this Power given them by Paul appears Tim. 1.5.22 Lay hands suddainly on no man Tit. 1.5 For this cause I left thee in Creet that thou should'st set in order things which were wanting and ordain Elders in every City as I had appointed thee If any other in those Churches could have ordained Presbyters why was Timothy sent to Ephesus and Titus left at Creet for this very purpose And if the Cretians could have set in order things defective what need was there that Titus alone should have this Commission St. Jerom no great Friend to Episcopacy gives us in his Epistle to Evagrius pag. 329 this as a Distinction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remarkable betwixt a Bishop and a Presbyter saying quid facit excepta ordinatione Episcopus quod non facit Presbiter What does a Bishop except the Ordaining of Others which a Presbyter does not And it is worth the observation what the Antient Father and Champion for the Blessed Trinity Athanasius hath in his Second Apologie viz. That Colithus a Presbiter of Alexandria had constituted Presbyters But what became of them Recissa est haec ejus ordinatio omnes ab eo constituti in Laicorum ordinem redacti fuere The ordaining of others by him was made invalid and they who were ordained by him were degraded and made Laicks So then you see that Bishops are Eminenter superiores presbiteris Eminently superiour to Presbyters having power affirmative and negative by the Opinion and Practice of the Antient Fathers This confirmes what the Apostles had taught and practised and appointed others in place above the ordinary Presbyters to do Now I come to shew the Second Difference betwixt a Bishop and a Presbyter And wherein a Bishop hath eminentem superioritatem a clear Superiority above a Presbyter that is in Excommunication which was called Mucro Episcopalis the Episcopal Weapon and was a Power given to Bishops Successors of the Apostles and was ever practised by them This appears in that an Account of it was and is expected at their hands as it is manifested by the quarrel which our blessed Saviour had against the Angel of the Church of Pergamus namely that he suffered some of his Church who held the Doctrine of the Nicholaitans and against the Angel of the Church of Thiatira that he suffered the woman Jesabel to teach and seduce the people By this it is apparent that Christ expected they should do what they had by their places power to do namely that they being Angels of their Churches whom I affirm to be also Bishops thereof and Successors to the Apostles as is sufficiently proved by the most reverend and learned Archbishop of Armagh and Beza himself calling them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men in place above others should Hereticos coercere ex Ecclesia ejicere keep under Hereticks and cast them out of the Church If here it be objected that we must not argue from dark and mystical places of Scripture such as is the Apocalypse I answer that I argue from a plain place and from the plain words and direct Scope of the place and not from the mystical Sence or Interpretation neither can we here admit of that distinction that Angelus is in this place to be taken Collectively pro tota Ecclesia for the whole Church For I conceive there is not a word in Scripture but hath its weight and was it not as easy to have said Ecclesiae as Angelo Ecelesiae if Angelo had not something more in it then Ecclesiae and why not Angelus Ecclesia the Angel the Church but Angelus Ecclesiae the Angel of the Church if it had been to be taken Collectively but the terms are different and of a distinct force like those panis Domin● the bread of the Lord and panis Dominus bread representing the Lord. Besides to come to Timothy and Titus they are enjoyned to command others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not to teach other Doctrine and obturaro ora deceptorum hereticos rejicere to stop the mouths of deceivers and to reject Hereticks these things were commanded them and an Account accordingly expected of the performance thereof which manifestly proves that every Church had its Angelum who had Episcopal Authority and Jurisdiction eminent above other inferiour Clergy-men and not many Angels in each of these Churches all of equal Authority and place or at least the Angel in each of the seven Churches was so absolute in his power that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chief Governour the Presbyters only Assistants to him he a Spiritual Justice and of the Quorum they of the Council The difference also of Episcopal Authority from that of Bresbyters appears in the Cause of Excommunication where there was an Appeal to the Synods which either confirmed or disolved them but none to the People none to the Presbyters this is confirmed by the antient Council at Nice Can. 5. and at Antioch Can. 6. and Jerom himself writing to Riparius concerning Vigilantius an heretical Presbyter is angry that the Bishop under whom he was did acquiescere ejus furori non virga Apostolica virgaque ferrea vas inutile confringere tradere ad interitum Carnis ut spiritus salvus fiat did quietly give way to his fury and not rather break in pieces that unprofitable vessel with his Apostolick Staff and rod of Iron and deliver him up to the destruction of the Flesh that his Soul might be saved And it seems strange to me that any should think that our Blessed Saviour his Executioners Administrators and Assigns knew not the meaning of his Will and Testament as well as we in these days Christ who ascending to Heaven gave Gifts to many would not deny this Gift so necessary He I say giving supereminent Gifts to the Apostles ad fundandam ecclesiam for the founding of his Church would not deny to their Successors those which were necessary

ecclesiae fundatae to the Church being founded and so necessary that nothing more concerns the Church Would he not or could he not inform his Trustees how he pleased to have his Church his Houshold governed in his absence To say he would not is derogatory to his Wisdom and Goodness to say he could not to his Almighty Sovereign Power I therefore conclude these Points First That Ordination of Presbyters was left to Timothy and Titus as to men of higher place and Authority and not to the Presbyters who were of inferior Degree Secondly The Power given to the Angels of Ephesus and the other Churches puts a difference of Superiority betwixt a Bishop and an ordinary Presbyter and other the Teachers of the Churches and gives them commission prae ceteris tam Clericis quam Laicis above others both Clergy and Laity yea a coercive and castigative Power Object Further they object That Episcopacy is not jure divino because Christ did not command it in the Gospel Answ To this I answer That jus divinum aliter in se habet in credendis aliter in agendis There is a difference of divine Right in matters to be believed and matters to be done In matters of Faith there must be textus manifestus aut convincens deductio a clear Text or a sound Consequence As for example In the beginning God made all things that is textus manifestus but there is onely convincens deductio concerning the Mystery of the blessed Trinity which is only proved thus There came down at Christs Baptism the Holy Spirit in the form of a Dove and a voice was heard saying This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Here we find the Spirit in the form of a Dove there is heard a voice and Christ is seen in the water we know by the light of Scripture and the light of Nature that there is but one God and that from one all things are and that in one they terminate And that there is aliud medium copulans primum ultimum one between both coupling the first and the last Seeing also we read that there is a Father a Son and a Spirit and that there is but one God We hence infer by necessary deduction that there are three persons and but one God Besides this deduction is further confirmed by that Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These three are one which in some sort is textus manifestus a clear Text. Now a Matter of Fact may be inferred to be jure divino as I suppose if I prove 1. First That the same Fact was the Practice of the Apostles 2. Secondly that it is Analogical to the Institution of the Church of the Jews which was settled according to Gods Appointment by the Mediation of Angels by the Ministry of Moses and Aaron 3. Thirdly That it is pointed at and insinuated in the New-Testament 4. Fourthly That it hath successively continued since the Apostles time as elsewhere so particularly in Brittain If these points can be proved concerning the Fact in question viz. Government by Bishops I hope none will deny it to be jure divino Now for Proof and Confirmation that Episcopacy is jure divino I will prove these Points and then say something concerning the Practice of other Churches And first St. Paul the Apostle and Dr. of the Gentiles gave Power and Authority to Timothy and Titus ordinare dignos to ordain men worthy and to examine such as were faulty to reprove and discharge such as were guilty and did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 teach other Doctrine and were offensive to the honour of their Callings and to cherish such as did well Those things are evident in the Epistles of Paul to Timothy and of that to Titus From Pauls Practice of Superiority over these two and from the Institution of Timothy and Titus to be Bishops I prove Episcopacy to be practised by the Apostles to make which good I thus argue If St. Paul himself practised eminent superiority and in the Epistles alledged gave all that power which of right Bishops challenge or doth belong to the definition of a Bishop to Timothy and Titus then Paul himself did not only practice Episcopacy but did also Constitute them Bishops but verum prius ergo posterius That he had 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bishoprick as the other Apostles had see Acts 1.20 and did diligently run his course therein no man will deny and that he gave Power to Timothy and Titus the same which he himself had To Ordain to Punish to Convent to Reward duplici honore with double honour the Epistles alledged do sufficiently prove Therefore Paul himself practised superiority and constituted Timothy and Titus Bishops in place superiour to Presbyters whom they had Authority to Ordain Convent and Punish Object If they object That Presbyters with a President may do the same even all things which are commanded Timothy and Titus and therefore these things were spoken to Timothy and Titus and to their Presbyters Collectively in the Persons of Timothy and Titus Answ I answer Their Old Friend Collectively will do them as little good here as elsewhere for this is but petere principium an Evasion which I have formerly taken away And now further I argue Such as the Charge is such is the Power but the Charge is personal that is given to Timothy and Titus particularly and therefore the Power and Authority given is personal to them for their time and to their Successours in place after them and not to them and the Presbytery Collectively nothing in place where such Charge is given doth intimate the Presbyters or Deacons interposing themselves in these Episcopal Actions with Timothy and Titus If they will have these Priviledges and Performances to belong to their President they must plead them due to him as he is Successor to Timothy and Titus and so he is in effect if you give him Continuance in his place a Bishop indeed The bare Name of a President cannot make him of a different Calling from a Bishop whenas he acteth the part of a Bishop in all those points by St. Paul prescribed The Practice of all times especially the first Century warrants not a Monthly or Yearly President doing nothing for Ordination Convention Punishment and Reward without the Advise and Consent of a company of Presbyters But it allows Bishops Superiority to Presbyters and Presbyters to Deacons yea it placed Bishops Successours to the Apostles as were Timothy and Titus and Presbyters and Deacons subordinate to Bishops as to the Apostles whilst the lived St. Ignatius the next Bishop to Evodius he received Episcopal Charge from the Apostles and writing to them at Antioch when he was carried Prisoner to Rome he uses these words to the Laity Obsequium prebete presbyteris Diaconis be ye obedient to your Presbyters and Deacons and addeth to the Presbyters pascite gregem apud vos donec Deus ostendit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 feed the

Matter is true And Cognitio est rerum conceptarum per experientiam scientia Knowledge is a sure Apprehension of the Matters we conceive by experience of their Causes and undoubted Grounds of Truth And Resolutio is dubii depositio the abandoning of all Doubting I am past Opinion and acknowledge my self satisfied and well resolved that Episcopacy is Jure Divino and endeavour to give an Account thereof in this Treatise I will not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 withstand or resist or seek Evasions or subtil Answers to evade or elude Gods Truth Nor do I love 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be in Suspence Having well weighed the Truth here asserted I find cause to say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Great is the force of Truth and hath prevailed And to satisfie the World what Reason I have for this my Confidence I leave a Testimony thereof in this Discourse I therefore define Episcopum to be Presbiterum cum additamento superioritatis quoad regimen in Ecclesia A Bishop to be a Presbiter having an Addition of Superiority for the Governing of Gods Church His Charge is to Oversee the Clergy and their Flocks the Word I confess in a large signification may be taken for a Major of a City in Homer Ajax is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Bishop or Orderer of his Army But our Episcopus est cleri gregis in sua diocesi is Overseer of his Clergy and Flock bounded within his own Diocess He is also Presbiter an Antient and therefore Experienced and Able to inform and direct As for the Inferiour Presbiter or Ancient and Diaconus Minister or Servant they are distinct and subordinate to the Bishop or Superiour Presbiter both in the New Testament and in the Practice of the first Century and in all Ages even to this Day Let it not trouble any man that the Apostles sometimes term themselves and Bishops by the Title of Presbiters they call themselves also Diaconos Deacons in a general Notion our Presbiteri●●s would have Bishops to be pastores jure divi●o praesides jure ecclesiastice principes jure hum●no diabolico Pastors by Gods Law Presidents by Ecclesiastical Law Lords by Humane and Diabolical Law How little ground they have for this let my ensuing Discourse testifie Our Bishop is a Presbiter or Ancient Pastor set in eminent superiority over the Clergy and their Flocks with relation to the Government of them in Matters Ecclesiastical and such I say the Apostles instituted and to them gave a Charge how to demean themselves 〈◊〉 perpetual Succession whereof by practice hath continued from Christs Time to this Day Now for jus divinum I take that to be of Divine Right which is warranted in Sacred Scripture de credendis agendis in matters to be believed and done Let this serve for the present it will be more enlarged occasionally in some part of this Treatise Only here I add that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Practice of the Apostles which never was questioned and excepted against and is recorded in the Canonical Scripture hath in it a jus divinum and shews what is of Divine Right de facto These things premised I proceed to Objections against my Assertion and answer them particularly Object Eminent Superiority and Lordly Authority over the People is that which the Lords of the Gentiles may and do challenge and practice as their due jure humano by Humane Right and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Law of things opposite Eminent Superiority and Lordly Authority over the Clergy and People of God is that which Bishops ought not to challenge or practice jure divino For Proof they bring Matth. 20.25 26. The Princes of the Gentiles dominantur Lord it and Rule over them but you non sic Or it shall not be so with you And the 1 of Pet. 5.2 3. Feed the Flock of the Lord taking the Oversight thereof not by constraint but willingly not churlishly or covetously for filthy Lucre but of a ready Mind neither as being Lords over Gods Heritage Ans To this I Answer That the Measure of Domination not the Matter lies in the word sic and so is expounded by the other words not by constraint but willingly not churlishly or covetously not as though ye were Lords dominering over them but that ye may be Ensamples to the Flock Non herile aut regale imperium exercentes sed pastorali superioritate paterna gubernatione utentes Not exercising a Master-like or Kingly Command but using a Pastoral Superiority and Fatherly Government And so this rather as I conceive confirms Superiority and Episcopacy than destroys it For the word sic so takes not away the Legality but qualifies the Power given by saying nay commanding let it be used sic so which I prove to be the meaning of the Apostle by this Argument The Practice of the Apostles is not contrary to Christs and their own Doctrine and the Sence thereof but the Apostles did practice Eminent Superiority and such lawful Authority as Christ forbids not over the Clergy and Flock and instituted Successors therefore their Doctrine allowed the same And so that cannot be meant by the words above which is pretended viz. That there should be a Parity in the Clergy and that Episcopacy is Dominium in Clerum a Lordly Rule over the Clergy and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an usurped Authority The Successors which they instituted are warranted by Christ when he said I am with you to the end of the World that is I am with you while you live and with Successors in your stead governing and teaching the Church to the Worlds end Hence it was that the Apostles ordained Bishops to succeed them So did the ancient Fathers in the purer times and this Course hath continued ever since The Practice of the Apostles was in superiority over others of the Clergy and to the Bishops whom they constituted to succeed themselves in place over the Clergy they gave a superior authority Neither did they either practice or ever mention that parity in power which the Presbyterians so much endeavour to introduce And therefore the Apostles never understood the words as these men do viz. that they should disallow of Bishops in superior authority above other of the Clergy To make the Practice of the Apostles evident I appeal to Paul who gave to Timothy and Titus Episcopal Power to the one in Ephesus to the other in Creet Now to clear this let us first oleanse the Spring-Head and then the Streams will run clear down to after-times I have above to this end defined Episcopum if we observe what he is then shall we evidently see whether St. Paul did institute such a Calling or no. Of Civil Bishops I speak not but of Spiritual and a Bishop of this kind I defined to be presbiterum cum additamento superioritatis quoad regimen in ecclesia He governs the Clergy and their Flocks in Spiritual matters Bishops of this kind St. Paul did