Selected quad for the lemma: order_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
order_n	appoint_v	church_n	power_n	2,255	5	5.3261	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A69228	A discourse of the Sabbath and the Lords Day Wherein the difference both in their institution and their due observation is briefly handled. By Christopher Dow, B.D.	Dow, Christopher, B.D.	1636 (1636)	STC 7088; ESTC S110113	45,823	80

doe not so strictly observe the outward ceremoniall rest as they were bound to doe Secondly I say that our Church is so farre from abridging God of one day in seven that it gives more as having appointed and consecrated divers Holy dayes to the same solemne and publike worship of God which is enjoyned to bee performed upon the Lords Day For these though they may admit some difference in regard of their accidentall dignity in as much as those benefits commemorated in them are greater or lesser yet in regard of their essentials they are equall as being all of them dedicated to the honour of the same God in memory of some great and speciall benefits vouchsafed to the Church and therefore doe goe pari passu in our Canons and in our ancient Statutes which require the same observance of both under the same penalty And therefore those who stand so much for a whole Day of seven to be consecrated to God if the worship of God were all they affected might see that there is a compensation made for the defect which they so much complaine of in our observation on the Lords Day and they themselves might doe well to take advantage by a religious observation of these dayes to make up their failings on the Lords Day But this they are so farre from that they account the observation of these dayes a breach of the fourth Commandement and thinke it a sin to make more Holy dayes then one in seven In which regard it cannot be judged altogether impertinent if I here take occasion to vindicate the practise of our Church from their unjust censures And in the first place I may returne their own Argument upon them and say Is it not reason that God should now under the Gospel have more set dayes to commemorate his benefits then one in seven as well as under the Law Vnder the Law we know they had beside their weekly Sabbaths the Passeover Pentecost and the Feast of Tabernacles and not onely those which had Gods expresse command for their Institution but the Feast of Purim and of the Dedication which as I have before shewed were ordained by the Church without any expresse command of God and observed by our Saviour himselfe whose example alone if any thing is sufficient to exempt us from scrupling at the like now in the time of the Gospel Secondly if they will not runne cleane counter to their owne principles and deny the morality of the fourth Commandement altogether they must acknowledge thus much at least to bee moral That there ought to be a certaine part of our time given to God and some dayes set apart for his publique worship Now these being left undetermined in the word of God if it bee not in the power of the Church to determine them I wonder how that precept should be observed And if the Churchupon this ground have reason and power to appoint any one Day why not more seeing her power is not limited or restrained within any other bounds but those generalls of decency and order which I presume no man will say are transgressed in the ordination of those Holy dayes which are observed among us Thirdly to this that such times are in the generall commanded by God wee may adde two things more which being well considered will abundantly discharge the observation of such dayes from superstition and those are First that the duties therein required are no other then such as according to the word of God ought to bee performed by all Christians For what else is required on those dayes but the solemne prayers and prayses of God in the Church joyned with the hearing of his Word and a speciall commemoration of his benefits which as on those dayes were received And which of all these is not required in the word of God And if it bee lawfull yea commanded that wee should performe those duties at all times and upon all occasions they cannot at any time whensoever they are performed justly bee termed superstitious or which must follow by consequence unlawfull 2. The other thing to bee considered is That the grounds and occasions of the Churches determination of these duties unto those speciall dayes which wee observe are such as deserve no lesse As being reall great and generall benefits vouchsafed by God unto his Church First they are true and reall not imaginary fictions founded upon the fained actions or falle martyrdomes of titular Saints such as are many in the Romish Church Secondly they are great not ordinary or common benefits and therefore require a more then ordinary acknowledgement Thirdly they are generall the good whereof redounds not to a few but to the whole body of the Church and so if our acknowledgement bee answerable it must be publike and solemne performed joyntly by all those that are partakers of the benefits Now if wee shall runne thorough the whole Kalender take an impartiall view of all our Holy dayes wee shall not find so much as one among them all of which thus much may not truely bee affirmed For they may almost bee ranked under two heads First such memorable steps in the story of our blessed Saviour as by which the great worke of our redemption advanced unto its happy accomplishment Secondly the memorialls of that goodnesse and glory which he afterwards manifested to the world by his holy Apostles Evangelists and Martyrs whom he honoured so much as to make them founders of that Kingdome which cost him his dearest blood to count them worthy to suffer death for his sake Concerning the former I suppose there is none but will say in the words of the Psalmist as our vulgar translation reades them The mercifull and gratious Lord hath so done his marvellous workes that they ought to be had in remembrance And what better meanes can be devised then the appointing of set solemne dayes for their commemoration I cannot see And this was the Churches aime in appointing these dayes So S. Austine We saith he dedicate and consecrate to God the memory of his benefits in solemne feasts and set dayes least in the revolution of times ingratefull forgetfulnesse should creepe upon us The like may be said of the latter For if our Saviour appeared so glorious in them and by them conveighed so great and generall blessings to his Church what reason can bee alleadged why the Church may not retaine an annuall honourable memoriall of them to the glory of him whose instruments they were The Psalmist tells us that the righteous shall bee had in everlasting remembrance And the Wiseman That the memory of the just shall be blessed And therefore to have some dayes in which the memories of those who were in their generations most famous for righteousnesse may with blessing be perpetuated is but their due and agreeable to his will who hath granted them that honour so that we may justly solemnize the dayes wherein those barning and shining lights first

and that not in a common banke but every man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by himselfe Againe grant that S. Paul as he did not had enjoyned Christians to meete on that day and at their meeting to make a Collection for the poore yet could not this serve for a sufficient institution of that Day to succeede the Jewes Sabbath unlesse such collections did involve in them all the service of God on that day to be done or were so connected with them that they could not bee separated which no man I suppose will affirme To leave these therefore who out of an over-weening conceit of the day are willing to catch at any shadow that may seeme to countenance it and gaine to it the reputation of Divine institution Let us pitch upon that which is certaine which though it rise not so high as an immediately-divine authority yet is sufficient to ground our practise upon and to exact the due observation of the Day First then it is most certaine that our Blessed Saviour did honour this day with his most glorious resurrection and by his often apparitions upon it to his Disciples and thereby as it were pointed out this day to his Disciples as worthy to be made choice of to be celebrated in honour of him who on that day began his glorious exaltation after his triumph over Principalities and powers upon his Crosse whom he there spoyled having nayled to it and thereby cancelled the hand-writing of Ordinances that was against us that is the obligation to observe the Jewish rites and ceremonies and among these their Sabbath which from that time forward the Apostle would have no man to judge Christians in who as they were freed from it by the death of Christ so by his resurrection they had ground sufficient ministred to direct them to the observation of a new Festivall Whence S. Augustine saith The Lords Day was declared to Christians by the resurrection of our Lord and from that time began to be celebrated So that for ought that appeares our Saviour did not command the first day of the weeke to be observed Hee did to use the words of the same Father Vouchsafe to demonstrate and consecrate it or as he else-where speakes The raising againe of our Lord promised us an everlasting Day and consecrated for us the Lords Day Secondly it is no lesse certaine that the Apostles upon this ground no doubt did observe this Day and had thereon their holy assemblies as Acts 20. 7. And that for the same cause the Apostle designed it for the storing up of their almes that the memory of the benefits which on that day they obtained might make them more readily contribute to the necessities of their brethren as S. Chrysostome hath observed upon 1. Cor. 16. 1. And lastly that in the time of the Apostles it obtained the name of the Lords Day as appeares Revel 1. 10. Thirdly that the ages of the Church immediately after the Apostles whether by constitution or onely in imitation of them is not knowne nor much materiall did observe this Day as the Christians Festivall stiling it the Lords Day and conveighed the same practise by continuall succession even to this day as the late learned Bishop of Winchester shewes avowing it on his credit That there is not an Ecclesiasticall Writer in whom it is not to be found Wee finde thus much then without contradiction That it hath been the practise of the Christian Church to observe the Sunday or Lords Day and that ever since yea in the very Apostles times a practise warranted by the example of the Apostles and the honour vouchsafed to that day by our Blessed Saviour himselfe Whence we may conclude with a late learned Divine That the Christian Church did not erre when in stead of the Sabbath it appointed the Lords Day to bee observed of which there is mention made in the Scripture though there be no Precept for the observation of it In which words of his I will observe three things First that he saith the Church not the Apostles or Apostolicall men for though that be most probable and hath for it the authority of S. Augustine and for that it hath beene ever observed by the Church it may justly be ascribed to them yet because if they did it they did it not as therein reporting the immediate Precept of Christ nor by any power that was properly Apostolicall but by vertue of their Pastorall power and office which was common to them with their Successours it may be termed an Ordinance of the Church and it little concernes us to know whether it were delivered by the Apostles themselves or their next after-commers Secondly The Church appointed this Day but whether at the first by expresse constitution it were commanded or by custome onely observed it appeares not Aquinas attributes it to both and how ever thus much is out of question that this Custome or Constitution was afterward by many Canons of the Church and Constitutions of Christian Emperours ratified and approved and many things ordained tending to the right due observance of it Thirdly That the Christian Church did not herein erre as having sufficient to warrant it out of Scripture though there be no Precept for it Yea and if the Scripture did yeeld no example of this practise or other ground for it in particular yet had not the Church erred in ordaining it For things pertaining to order decencie in the Church such as is among others the particular determination of the set times of Gods worship being undetermined in the word of God are in the power of the Church to be ordered so as they be done according to the generall Lawes of nature and without contradiction to any positive Law in Scripture Neither is it derogatorie to the word of God or any whit detracting from the perfection of it to affirme that though it sufficiently and abundantly containe in it all things necessary to salvation yet it hath left a number of other things free to be ordered at the discretion of the Church And as to take from the Scripture the sufficient determination of things necessary to salvation were an injurie and an impairing of that honour which God challengeth to his word and the Church of God hath ever deservedly yeelded to it so it were no lesse injurie to the Church of Christ to abridge it of the power of determining of this and such like things which being not of absolute necessity are yet convenient and profitable For this prerogative power the Church of God hath ever obtained and enjoyed even when it was most obliged to hold to the letter of the Law prescribing the Ceremonies belonging to the service of God that it might without imputation of adding to or altering the law of God from time to time appoint sundry rites and observances not any where prescribed in the Law Such were the appointment of the