Selected quad for the lemma: order_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
order_n acknowledge_v world_n zion_n 14 3 9.3823 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A53732 The true nature of a Gospel church and its government ... by the late pious and learned minister of the Gospel, John Owen ... Owen, John, 1616-1683. 1689 (1689) Wing O815; ESTC R13410 211,358 294

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

21.17 1 Tim. 5.17 They are some of them on other accounts called Bishops Pastors Teachers Ministers Guides but what belongs unto any of them in point of Rule or what interest they have therein it belongs unto them as Elders and not otherwise Act. 20.17 18. SO under the Old Testament where the Word doth not signifie a difference in Age but is used in a moral sence Elders are the same with Rulers or Governours whether in Offices Civil or Ecclesiastical especially the Rulers of the Church were constantly called its Elders And the use of the Word with the abuse of the Power or Office intended by it is traduced to signifie Men in Authority Signeiores Eldermani in all places 2. CHURCH-Power acted in its Rule is called the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven by an expression derived from the Keys that were a sign of Office-Power in the Families of Kings Isa. 22.22 and used by our Saviour himself to denote the communication of Church-Power unto others which was absolutely and universally vested in himself under the Name of the Key of David Revel 3.7 Mat. 16.19 3. THESE Keys are usually referred unto Two Heads namely the one of Order the other of Jurisdiction 4. BY the Key of Order the Spiritual Right Power and Authority of Bishops or Pastors to Preach the Word to Administer the Sacraments Doctrinally to bind and loose the Consciences of Men are intended 5. BY Jurisdiction the Rule Government or Discipline of the Church is designed though it was never so called or esteemed in the Scripture or the Primitive Church until the whole nature of Church-Rule or Discipline was depraved and changed Therefore neither the Word nor any thing that is signified by it or which it is applied unto ought to be admitted unto any consideration in the things that belong unto the Church or its Rule it being expressive of and directing unto that corrupt Administration of things Ecclesiastical according unto the Canon Law by which all Church-Rule and Order is destroyed I do therefore at once dismiss all disputes about it as of things Foreign to the Gospel and Christian Religion I mean as unto the Institutions of Christ in his Church The Civil Jurisdiction of Supreme Magistrates about the externals of Religion is of another consideration But that these Keys do include the two-fold distinct Powers of Teaching and Rule of Doctrine and Discipline is freely granted 6. IN the Church of England as in that of Rome there is a peculiar distribution made of these Keys Unto some that is unto one special sort or order of Men they are both granted both the Key of Order and of Jurisdiction which is unto Diocesan Bishops with some others under various Canonical restrictions and limitations as Deans and Arch-Deacons Unto some is granted the Key of Order only without the least interest in Jurisdiction or Rule by virtue of their Office which are the Parochial Ministers or meer Presbyters without any additional Title or Power as of Commissary Surrogates or the like And unto a third sort there is granted the Key of Rule or Jurisdiction almost plenipotent who have no share in the Key of Order that is were never Ordained Separated Dedicated unto any Office in the Church such as are the Chancellors c. 7. THESE Chancellors are the only Lay-Elders that I know any where in any Church that is Persons entrusted with the Rule of the Church and the Disposition of its Censures who are not Ordained unto any Church-Office but in all other things continue in the Order of the Laity or the People All Church Rulers by institution are Elders To be an Elder of the Church and a Ruler in it is all one Wherefore these Persons being Rulers in the Church and yet thus continuing in the Order of the People are Lay-Elders whom I wonder how so many of the Church came so seriously to oppose seeing this Order of Men is owned by none but themselves The Truth is and it must be acknowledged that there is no known Church in the World I mean whose Order is known unto us and is of any publick consideration but they do dispose the Rule of the Church in part into the hands of Persons who have not the power of Authoritative Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments committed unto them For even those who place the whole external Rule of the Church in the Civil Magistrate do it as they judge him an Officer of the Church entrusted by Christ with Church-Power And those who deny any such Officers as are usually called Ruling Elders in the Reformed Churches to be of Divine Institution yet maintain that it is very necessary that there should be such Officers in the Church either appointed by the Magistrate or chosen by the people and that with cogent Arguments See Grot. de Jure Potestat Cap. 8. BUT this distribution mentioned of Church-Power is unscriptural nor is there any foot-steps of it in Antiquity It is so as unto the two latter Branches of it That any one should have the power of Order to Preach the Word to Administer the Seals to bind and loose the Conscience Doctrinally or Ministerially to bind and loose in the Court of Conscience and yet by the virtue of that Office which gives them this power not to have a Right and Power of Rule or Discipline to bind and loose in the Court of the Church is that which neither the Scripture nor any example of the Primitive Church doth give countenance unto And as by this means those are abridged and deprived of their power to whom it is granted by the Institution and Law of Christ as it is with all Elders duly called unto their Office so in the Third Branch there is a grant of Church-Power unto such as by the Law of Christ are excluded from any Interest therein The enormity of which constitution I shall not at present insist upon But Enquiry must be made what the Scripture directs unto herein And 1. THERE is a Work and Duty of Rule in the Church distinct from the Work and Duty of Pastoral Feeding by the Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments All agree herein unless it be Erastus and those that follow him who seem to oppose it But their Arguments lie not against Rule in general which were brutish but only a Rule by external Jurisdiction in the Elders of the Church So they grant the general Assertion of the necessity of Rule for who can deny it only they contend about the subject of power required thereunto A Spiritual Rule by virtue of mutual voluntary confederation for the preservation of Peace Purity and Order in the Church few of that opinion deny at least it is not that which they do oppose For to deny all Rule and Discipline in the Church with all Administration of Censures in the exercise of a Spiritual Power internally inherent in the Church is to deny the Church to be a Spiritual Political
Edification of the Church Catholick whereunto it is designed WHEREFORE our Lord Jesus Christ in his infinite Wisdom hath constituted his Churches in such a State and Order as wherein none of them are able of themselves always and in all instances to attain all the ends for which they are appointed with respect unto the Edification of the Church Catholick And he did it for this end that whereas the whole Catholick Church is animated by one spirit which is the bond of Union between all particular Churches as we shall see every one of them may Act the Gifts and Graces of it unto the Preservation and Edification of the whole HEREIN then we acknowledge lieth the great difference which we have with others about the state of the Church of Christ in this World we do believe that the mutual Communion of particular Churches amongst themselves in an equality of Power and Order though not of Gifts and Usefulness is the only way appointed by our Lord Jesus Christ after the Death of the Apostles for the attaining the general end of all particular Churches which is the Edification of the Church Catholick in Faith Love and Peace Other ways and means have been found out in the World for this end which we must speak unto immediately Wherefore it behoveth us to use some Diligence in the consideration of the Causes Nature and Vse of this Communion of Churches BUT it must be moreover premised that whereas this Communion of Churches is Radically and Essentially the same among all Churches in the World yet as unto the ordinary actual exercise of the Duties of it it is confined and limited by Divine Providence unto such Churches as the natural means of the discharge of such Duties may extend unto That is unto those which are planted within such Lines of Communication such precincts or boundaries of Places and Countries as may not render the mutual performance of such Duties insuperably difficult Yet is not the World it self so wide but that all places being made pervious by Navigation this Communion of Churches may be visibly professed and in some instances practised among all Churches from the rising of the Sun even unto the going-down of the same where the Name of Christ is known among the Gentiles wherein the true nature of the Catholick Church and its Union doth consist which is utterly overthrown by the most vehement pretences that are made unto it as those in the Church of Rome WHEREFORE such a Communion of Churches is to be enquired after as from which no true Church of Christ is or can be excluded in whose actual exercise they may and ought all to live and whereby the general end of all Churches in the Edification of the Catholick Church may be attained This is the true and only Catholicism of the Church which whoever departs from or substitutes any thing else in the room of it under that Name destroys its whole nature and disturbs the whole Ecclesiastical Harmony that is of Christs Institution HOWEVER therefore we plead for the Rights of particular Churches yet our real Controversy with most in the World is for the Being Union and Communion of the Church Catholick which are variously perverted by many and separating it into Parties and confining it to Rules Measures and Canons of their own finding out and Establishment For such things as these belong neither to the internal nor external Form of that Catholick Church whose Being in the World we believe and whose Vnion we are obliged to preserve And whoever gives any Description of or Limitation to the Catholick Church besides what consist in the Communion of particular Churches intended doth utterly overthrow it and therein an Article of our Faith. BUT this Communion of Churches cannot be duly apprehended unless we enquire and determine wherein their Vnion doth consist For Communion is an Act of Vnion that receives both its Nature and Power from it or by virtue of it For of what Nature soever the Vnion of things distinct in themselves be of the same is the Communion that they have among themselves IN the Church of Rome the Person of the Pope as he is Pope is the Head and Center of all Church Union Nor is there allowed any Vnion of particular Churches with Christ or among themselves but in and through him An Universal subjection unto him and his Authority is the original spring of all Church Vnion among them And if any one Soul fail herein if as unto things of Faith and Divine Worship he do not depend on the Pope and live in subjection unto him he is reputed a Stranger and For●●●ner unto the Catholick Church Yea they affirm that be a Man never so willing for and desirous of an Interest in Christ he cannot have it but by the Pope THE Communion of Churches congenial and suited unto this Union proceeding from it and exercised by virtue of it ariseth from a various contignation of Order or the erection of one story of Church Interest upon another until we come to the Idol placed on the top of this Babel So is this Communion carried on from the obedience and subjection of the lowest rubbish of Ecclesiastical Order unto Diocesans of them to Metropolitans of them to Patriarchs or Cardinals of them to the Pope or an ascent is made from Diocesan Synods by Provincial and National to those that are called Oecumenical whose Head is the Pope YET Two things must be farther observed to clear this Communion of the Roman Catholick Church as 1. That there is no ascent of Church-Order or Power by a vital Act of Communion from the lower Degrees Orders or Consociations and by them to the Pope as though he should receive any thing of Church-Power from them but all the plenitude of it being originally vested in him by these several Orders and Degrees he communicates of it unto all Churches as the Life of their Conjunction and Communion 2. That no Man is so jointed in this Order so compacted in this Body but that he is also personally and immediately subject to the Pope and depends on him as unto his whole profession of Religion AND this is that which constitutes him formally to be what he is that is Antichrist and the Church-State arising from its Union unto him holding him as its Head subsisting in a Communion by virtue of power received through various Orders and Constitutions from him to be Anti-christian For he and it are set up in the room of and in direct opposition unto the Lord Christ as the Head of the Catholick Church and the Church state thereon depending This we have described Ephes. 4.15 16. Speaking the Truth in Love may grow up c. As also Col. 2.19 Where there is a Rejection of them who belong not unto the Church Catholick taken from its Relation unto Christ and the nature of its dependance on him not holding the Head c. WHEN Men shall cease to be wilfully blind or when the powers of
Commission that Christ gave a Pastoral Relation or Presbytership which was included in their Apostleship and Exercised toward the Church of Jerusalem Such Presbyter-ship John and Peter both had Hence there remains no other Successors jure to the Apostles but ordinary Pastors and Teachers These are relative Officers and are always in and to some particular Congregations we know of no Catholick visible Church that any Pastors are ordained to 1. The Scripture speaks of no Church as Catholick visible 2. The thing it self is but a Chimaera of some Men's Brains it 's not in rerum naturâ for if a Catholick visible Church be all the Churches that I see at a time I am not capable of seeing much more than what can Assemble in one place And if it be meant of all the Churches actually in being how are they visible to me where can they be seen in one place I may as well call all the Cities and Corporations in the World the Catholick visible City or Corporation which all rational Men would call Nonsence Besides if all Organized Churches could be got together it 's not Catholick in respect of Saints Militant much less of Triumphant for many are no Church Members that are Christs Members and many visible Members are no true Members of Christ Jesus Where is any such Church capable of Communion in all Ordinances in one place and the Scripture speaks of no other Organized visible Church Again to a Catholick visible Church constituted should be a Catholick visible Pastor or Pastors for as the Church is such is the Pastor and Officers to the Mystical Church Christ is the mystical Head and Pastor he is called the chief Bishop and Shepherd of our Souls 1 Pet. 2.25 hence the uncalled are his Sheep as John 10.16 but to all visible Churches Christ hath appointed a visible Pastor or Pastors and where is the Pastor of the Catholick visible Church he is not to be found unless it please us to take him from Rome To say that all individual Pastors are Pastors to the Catholick Church is either to say that they are invested with as much Pastoral Power and Charge in one Church as in another and then they are indefinite Pastors and therefore all Pastors have mutual Power in each others Churches and so John may come into Thomas his Church and exercise all parts of Jurisdiction there and Thomas into John's or a Minister to the Catholick Church hath an universal Catholick Power over the Catholick Church if so the Power and Charge which every ordinary Pastor hath is Apostolick Or lastly he is invested with an Arbitrary Power at least as to the taking up a particular Charge where he pleaseth with a non obstante to the Suffrages of the People for if he hath an Office whereby he is equally and indisputably related to all Churches it 's at his liberty by virtue of this Office to take where he pleaseth But every Church-Officer under Christ is a visible relate and the correlate must be such whence the Church must be visible to which he is an Officer It 's absurd to say a Man is a visible Husband to an invisible Wife the relate and correlate must be ejusdem naturae It 's true Christ is related to the Church as mystical Head but it 's in respect of the Church in its mystical Nature for Christ hath substituted no mystical Officers in his Church There is a great deal of difference between the mystical and external visible Church though the latter is founded upon it and for the sake of it It 's founded upon it as taking its true spiritual Original from it deriving vital Spirits from it by a mystical Vnion to and Communion with Christ and his Members and it 's for the Sake of it all external visible Assemblies Ministers Ordinances are for the sake of the mystical Body of Christ for calling in the Elect and the Edifying of them to that full measure of Stature they are designed unto But the different consideration lies in these Things 1. That the mystical Church doth never fail neither is diminished by any Shocks of Temptation or Suffering that in their visible Profession any of them undergo whereas visible Churches are often broken scattered yea unchurched and many Members fail of the Grace of God by final Apostasy Likewise Christ's mystical Church is many times preserved in that State only or mostly when Christ hath not a visible organized Church according to Institution to be found on the Face of the Earth so it was with his Church often under the Old Testament-Dispensation as in Aegypt in the Days of the Judges when the Ark was carried away by the Philistins in the Days of Manasseh and other wicked Kings and especially in Babylon In such times the Faithful Ones were preserved without the true Sacrifices the teaching Priest and the Law. So hath it been in the days of the New Testament in divers places under the Draconick Heathen Persecutions and afterward in the Wilderness-state of the Church under the Anti-Christian Vsurpations and false Worship Which mystical State is the place prepared of God to hide the Seed of the Woman in from the Dragons Rage for the space of One thousand two hundred and sixty Days Again Vnto this Mystical Church is only essentially necessary a mystical Vnion unto the Lord Jesus Christ by the Gift of the Father Acceptation and Covenant-undertaking of the Son the powerful and efficacious Work of the Spirit of the Father and the Son working true saving Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and sincere Love to him and all his True Members Whereby as they have a firm and unshaken Vnion so they have a spiritual Communion though without those desirable Enjoyments of external Church Privileges and means of Grace which they are providentially often hindred from Visible Churches being but Christ's Tents and Tabernacles which he sometimes setteth up and sometimes takes down and removes at his Pleasure as he sees best for his Glory in the World. But of these he hath a special regard as to their Foundadation Matter Constitution and Order he gives forth an exact pattern from Mount Zion as of that Typical Tabernacle from Mount Sinai of Old. The Foundation part of a visible Church is the credible Profession of Faith and Holiness wherein the Lord Jesus Christ is the Corner Stone Eph. ij 20 Matth. xvi 18 This Profession is the Foundation but not the Church it self It 's not Articles of Faith or Profession of them in particular individual Persons that make an organized visible Church We are the Houshold of Faith built upon the Foundation c. 2. It 's Men and Women not Doctrine that are the Matter of a Church and these professing the Faith and practising Holiness The Members of Churches are always called in the New Testament Saints Faithful Believers They was such that were added to the Churches neither is every Believer so as such but as a professing Believer for a Man must appear
Order or Degree which also as unto the Scripture the most learned Advocates of Prelacy begin to grant 1. THE Apostle describing what ought to be the Qualifications of Presbyters or Elders gives this Reason of it because a Bishop must be so Tit. 1.5 6 7. Ordain Elders in every City if any be blameless c. for a Bishop must be blameless He that would prove of what sort a Presbyter that is to be Ordained so ought to be gives this Reason for it That such a Bishop ought to be intends the same Person and Office by Presbyter and Bishop or there is no congruity of Speech or consequence of Reason in what he asserts To suppose that the Apostle doth not intend the same Persons and the same Office by Presbyters and Bishops in the same place is to destroy his Argument and render the context of his discourse unintelligible He that will say that if you make a Justice of Peace or a Constable he must be magnanimous liberal full of clemency and courage for so a King ought to be will not be thought to argue very wisely Yet such is the Argument here if by Elders and Bishops distinct Orders and Offices are intended 2. THERE were many Bishops in one City in one particular Church Phil. 1.1 To all the Saints that are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons That the Church then at Philippi was one particular Church or Congregation was proved before But to have many Bishops in the same Church whereas the nature of the Episcopacy pleaded for consists in the Superiority of one over the Presbyters of many Churches is absolutely inconsistent Such Bishops whereof there may be many in the same Church of the same Order equal in Power and Dignity with respect unto Office will easily be granted but then they are Presbyters as well as Bishops There will I fear be no end of this contest because of the prejudices and interests of some but that the identity of Bishops and Presbyters should be more plainly expressed can neither be expected nor desired 3. THE Apostle being at Miletus sent to Ephesus for the Elders of the Church to come unto him that is the Elders of the Church at Ephesus as hath been elsewhere undeniably demonstrated Act. 20.17 18. unto these Elders he says Take heed unto your selves and to all the Flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you Bishops to feed the Church of God ver 28. If Elders and Bishops be not the same Persons having the same Office the same Function and the same Duties and the same Names it is impossible so far as I understand how it should be expressed For these Elders are they whom the Holy Ghost made Bishops they were many of them in the same Church their Duty it was to attend unto the Flock and to feed the Church which comprize all the Duties the whole Function of Elders and Bishops which must therefore be the same This plain Testimony can no way be evaded by pretences and conjectures unwritten and uncertain the only answer unto it is It was indeed so then but it was otherwise afterwards which some now betake themselves unto But these Elders were either Elders only and not Bishops or Bishops only and not Elders or the same Persons were Elders and Bishops as is plainly affirmed in the words The latter is that which we plead If the first be asserted then was there no Bishop then at Ephesus for these Elders had the whole oversight of the Flock If the Second then were there no Elders at all which is no good exposition of those words that Paul called unto him the Elders of the Church 4. THE Apostle Peter writes unto the Elders of the Churches that they should feed the Flock 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taking the oversight or exercising the Office and Function of Bishops over them and that not as Lords but as ensamples of Humility Obedience and Holiness to the whole Flock 1 Pet. 5.1 2 3. Those on whom it is incumbent to feed the Flock and to superintend over it as those who in the first place are accountable unto Jesus Christ are Bishops and such as have no other Bishop over them unto whom this charge should be principally committed But such according unto this Apostle are the Elders of the Church Wherefore those Elders and Bishops are the same And such were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Guides of the Church at Jerusalem whom the members of it were bound to obey as those that did watch for and were to give an account of their Souls Heb. 13.17 5. THE substance of these and all other Instances or Testimonies of the same kind is this Those whose names are the same equally common and applicable unto them all whose Function is the same whose Qualifications and Characters are the same whose Duties Account and Reward are the same concerning whom there is in no one place of Scripture the least mention of inequality disparity or preference in Office among them they are essentially and every way the same That thus it is with the Elders and Bishops in the Scripture cannot modestly be denied I do acknowledge that where a Church is greatly encreased so as that there is a necessity of many Elders in it for its Instruction and Rule that Decency and Order do require that one of them do in the management of all Church Affairs preside to guide and direct the way and manner thereof So the Presbyters at Alexandria did choose one from among themselves that should have the preheminence of a President among them Whether the Person that is so to preside be directed unto by being first Converted or first Ordained or on the account of Age or of Gifts and Abilities whether he continue for a Season only and then another be deputed unto the same Work or for his Life are things in themselves indifferent to be determined according unto the General Rules of Reason and Order with respect unto the Edification of the Church I shall never oppose this Order but rather desire to see it in practice namely that particular Churches were of such an extent as necessarily to require many Elders both Teaching and Ruling for their Instruction and Government for the better observation of Order and Decency in the publick Assemblies the fuller Representation of the Authority committed by Jesus Christ unto the Officers of his Church the occasional instruction of the Members in lesser Assemblies which as unto some ends may be stated also with the due attendance unto all other means of Edification and Watching Inspecting Warning Admonishing Exhorting and the like and that among these Elders one should be chosen by themselves with the consent of the Church not into a New Order not into a degree of Authority above his Brethren but only unto his part of the common work in a peculiar manner which requires some kind of Precedency Hereby no New Officer no New Order of Officers no New degree of Power or