33.18 the true reading is that Iacob came Shalem safe to the City Sichem as the Chalde interpreteth not to Shalem a City of Sichem Secondly that Salim where Iohn baptized is the same City which is called Shagnalim or Schalem belonging to the tribe of Benjamin 1 Sam. 9.4 wherefore this Shalem in Sichem hath no ground out of Scripture 2. Hierome saith that there was a towne neare to Scythopolis called Salem in his time where the ruines of Melchisedecks pallace were to be seene Answ. But whence shall it be knowne that Melchisedecks pallace sometime stood in that place this is warranted onely by an uncertaine report neither is it like that Melchisedeck being a King of one small City did build himselfe such a sumptuous and great Pallace whose foundation should continue so long above two thousand yeares 3. The City of Jerusalem was much out of Abrahams way as he returned from Dan but the other Salem was in his way Hierom. Answ. As though a small distance of way could hinder Gods purpose in causing Melchisedeck and Abraham to meet which might be either in drawing Melchisedech somewhat from home to salute the Patriarke or in moving Abraham to visit the City Salem famous for the true worship and service of God 4. But Hierusalem cannot come of Salem for so two words of divers languages should be mixed together the first name being Greeke the other Hebrew Answ. Hierome imagineth that the first part of this name should come of the Greeke Hieros holy for so Jerusalem was called the holy City But the Hebrewes doe better derive the name of Jerusalem they say Sem called it Salem and Abraham Jireh there the Lord will be seene Gen. 22.14 which both put together make Jerusalem which signifieth the vision of peace so Midras in Psal. 76. This derivation of Jerusalem is more probable than from the Greeke Iireh as Hierome or from Jebus and Salem which make Jebusalem and for better sound to the Jerusalem as Pererius Wherefore I preferre rather the opinion of Iosephus that this Salem was the same City which was called afterward Jerusalem for these reasons 1. Because there is no evident mention in Scripture of any other City called Salem but this converted into the name of Jerusalem two Salems we read not of one was Jerusalem 2. This is evident Psal. 76.2 In Shalem is his Tabernacle his dwelling in Sion Sion then and Shalem were both in one place 3. The Jewes also hold this tradition that the place where David and Salomon built the Temple in the floure of Araunah is the same place where Abraham built an Altar and would have sacrificed Isaack where Noah first built when he came out of the Arke where Cain and Abel offered c. This place then being consecrate with so many Altars and sacrifices is like to be the place where the greater sacrificer and high Priest Melchisedeck dwelt 4. The type also better answereth to the body that Melchisedeck a figure of the high priest Ihesus should there dwell where Christ afterward performed that great and divine act of his Priesthood in offering himselfe up in sarifice upon the Crosse at Jerusalem QVEST. XVIII How Abraham is blessed of Melchisedeck Vers. 19. HE blessed him c. 1. It is like that Melchisedeck used a more ample forme and manner of blessing which is here onely abridged by Moses Luther 2. Though Melchisedeck blesse Abraham first and then God herein hee offended not as the Hebrewes affirme and for that cause they say his Priesthood was translated to the posterity of Abraham for beside that the servants of God in their prayers being carried with zeale forget to observe order even this blessing pronounced upon Abraham is referred to the praise of God As also the Apostle otherwise collecteth that Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham in that he blessed him and that his Priesthood was not translated to Aaron but to Christ ex Mecrer 3. Abraham is blessed and God is blessed but God is blessed Benedictione laudis with the blessing of praise Abraham Benedictione opitulationis with the blessing of Gods helpe or assistance Cajetane 4. Neither is Abraham pronounced blessed onely herein because hee had obtained this victorie but aeterni faederis respectu in respect of the eternall covenant which God made with him and his seed Vatablus 5. And this is more than an ordinary blessing it is a Priestly benediction and it is set forth as an act of Melchisedecks Priesthood whereby he ratifieth the promise made to Abraham Calvin 6. Melchisedeck is found to be the first that giveth this title unto God in Scripture to be possessor of heaven and earth Tostatus whereby the true God is distinguished from all false gods QVEST. XIX How Abraham payed tithes Vers. 20. ANd he gave him tithes of all c. 1. Although it bee not expressed in the text whether Melchisedeck or Abraham gave tithes yet the Apostle cleareth this doubt that he received tithes of Abraham Heb. 7.6 and the text also giveth this sense for seeing Melchisedeck is named to be a Priest he was more fit to receive than give tithes 2. Some thinke that Abraham gave not tithes of all the goods recovered seeing â—e after refused to take so much as a shooe threed of that which belonged to the King of Sodome vers 25. He then gave tithes onely of his owne substance Calvin Mercer But though Abraham refused to touch any part of the Sodomites substance in himselfe for his owne use yet he might even of that offer the tithe unto God 1. Because it was his by common â—ight and the law of Nations 2. Because he giveth reason lest he should say that he had made Abraham rich which reason served onely against the private and proper use not the publike and religious use of those goods 3. If Abraham had not prevented them in giving the honour of the victory unto God the Sodomites would have offered the same things in sacrifice to their Idols Neither is the opinion of Cajetane to be allowed that Abraham gave not the just tenth part as afterward was appointed by the Law but a certaine portion in the name of the tenth for the Apostle sheweth that Abraham paid tithes properly and Levi in Abraham was tithed as the Levites received tithes afterwards Heb. 7.5 6. 4. Whereas Levi is said to pay tithes in Abraham being yet in his loynes and thereby proveth the Priesthood of Melchisedeck to be greater than of Levi that is so said because the Priesthood went then by carnall generation not by spirituall election as now under the Gospell 5. And though Christ were also in Abrahams loynes secundum substantiam corporalem in respect of his corporall substance yet he was not there secundum rationem conceptionis in regard of the manner of his conception because he was conceived by the holy Ghost But Levi was in Abrahams loynes both wayes and therefore the argument for superiority in Melchisedeck concludeth well
and blesseth God he blesseth neither bread nor wine the Preist blesseth and halloweth the cup. 4. He bringeth forth bread and wine to Abraham the Priest onely delivereth bread to the people and keepeth backe the cup. 5. Melchisedeck brought bread and wine in substance as is touched before the Masse-priest saith their substance is changed 6. Melchisedeck worshippeth God not the bread and wine the Masse-priest adoreth both So that in truth this example of Melchesedeck if they will stand to their tackling maketh altogether against the popish Masse sacrifice and nothing for it 4. Confut. Wherein Melchisedecks Priesthood consisted WHerein then the comparison holdeth betweene Christ and Melchisedeck the Apostle sheweth Heb. 7. 1. As Melchisedeck is interpreted a King of righteousnesse so our blessed Saviour was indeed a King of righteousnesse Isay. 11.4 With righteousnesse shall he judge the poore 2. Melchisedeck was King of Salem that is of peace Heb. 7.2 so the Messias is a Prince of peace Isa. 9.6 3. Melchisedeck was without father or mother that is they are not mentioned in the story but Christ was truly without father as he was man and without mother as God 4. Melchisedeck was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without genealogie so none can declare Christs generation as he is God Isa. 53.8 5. Melchisedeck had no beginning of his life or end of his dayes that is expressed in the Scripture but Christ the word is truly without beginning being from all eternity neither shall he have any end He is Alpha and Omega the beginning and the end Revel 1.8 6. As Melchisedeck was both a King and a Priest so our Saviour is Prince of all the Kings of the earth Revel 1.5 and he is our great high Priest Heb. 4.14 7. But especially in these three points following did Melchisedeck resemble our Saviour as Melchisedeck was not a Priest anointed with any materiall oyle as Aaron but declared so to be by Gods owne mouth and the testimony of the spirit so Christ was anointed by the spirit of God Luk. 4.18 and made a Priest by an oath The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 7.21 8. As Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham for he blessed him and than Levi that payed riches in Abrahams loynes Heb. 7.4.9.10 so the Priesthood of Christ is greater than the Priesthood of Aaron 9. But herein most of all is Melchisedeck likened to the sonne of God because he received his Priesthood from none nor passed it over to any other in like manner as Christ succeeded none so neither doe any succeed him but he endureth ever and hath everlasting Priesthood Heb. 7.24 Object As Christs Priesthood is everlasting so it was necessary that he should have a sacrifice which should continue for ever 1. Which cannot bee the sacrifice upon the Crosse for that was but once done 2. Therefore it can be no other than the sacrifice of the Eucharist 3. neither doth it suffice to say that the efficacie or vertue of his sacrifice upon the Crosse continueth for ever for in this sense Noahs sacrifice might be said to be eternall because the efficacie of it remaineth still in keeping the world from being destroyed by water Perer. disp 7. in 14. Genes Answ. 1. But the Apostle sheweth the contrary that the once oblation of Christs body is that everlasting sacrifice of our high Priest Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified 2. But the dayly sacrifice of the Masse it cannot be the Apostle saith which needed not dayly as those high Priests to offer up sacrifice Heb. 7.27 that cannot be an everlasting sacrifice which is dayly renewed and the sacrifice offered in the Church shall determine with the militant state thereof in earth and therefore cannot be everlasting 3. Noahs sacrifice procured no eternall or spirituall but a temporall benefit though to continue while this world lasteth and Christs sacrifice gave that durable force to Noahs sacrifice which was a figure thereof therefore Noahs sacrifice cannot be called everlasting or himselfe an everlasting Priest seeing that efficacie was not in himselfe or his sacrifice but in Christ the everlasting Redeemer and Priest 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Light afflictions goe before heavy judgements Vers. 2. THese made warre with Bala king of Sodom c. The Lord before he purposeth to bring an utter destruction upon any doth first admonish them with light punishments so he healeth with Sodome first they are scourged by these foure Kings of the East but seeing they received no warning thereby afterward the Lord rained upon them fire and brimstone Perer. We learne then that we should not neglect the gentle corrections of God lest they draw on heavy judgements thus God dealt with his owne people who were chastised sometime by a famine by the sword by the pestilence but when none of these would serve they were swept away and carried into captivity 2. Observ. To dwell among the wicked is dangerous FUrther in that Lot was carried away with the Sodomites we see that good men may together with the wicked taste of temporall judgements and what a dangerous thing it is to have any habitation or dwelling among the ungodly Muscul. therefore the Scripture saith Goe out of her my people that ye be not partakers in her sinnes that ye receive not of her plagues Revel 18.4 3. Observ. Rebellion no not against hard governours is to be attempted Vers. 4. TWelve yeares were they subject c. but in the thirteenth they rebelled first we see the justice of God in punishing the wicked life of the Sodomites with a tyrannicall government so the Prophet pronounceth this a curse upon the ungodly set thou a wicked man over him Psal. 109.6 Beside God punisheth the Sodomites for their rebellion where then a government is established though it be hard and unjust nothing is tumultuously to be attempted against it as the Lord commandeth that the King of Babylon who was but an hard Lord should be served and obeyed Ier. 27.8 Calvin 4. Observ. Riches evill gotten commeth to an evill end Vers. 12. THey tooke all the substance of Sodome c. They which used not their wealth to the good and comfort of the poore as the Sodomites did not Esech 16.49 doe heape it up to bee a prey for the enemie Calvin so the King of Babel boasteth That as a nest he had found the riches of the people Isa. 10.14 which they had first wrongfully scraped together 5. Observ. Gods enemies and the enemies of our Church our enemies Vers. 20. WHich hath delivered thine enemies c. Lots enemies are called Abrahams enemies and so indeed wee should account the enemies of Gods people and Church our enemies though in particular they have not hurt us Luther So the Prophet saith Doe not I hate them that hate thee c. I hate them with an unfained hatred as though
confutation 1. Confut. Against the vulgar Latine translation Vers. 18. ANd hee was a Priest c. The Latine text readeth here corruptly for hee was as though the bringing forth of bread and wine had beene an act of his Priesthood Indeed this copulative Vau sometime is used as a causall but then the sense apparantly giveth it as Genes 20.3 Thou art but dead because of the woman which thou hast taken for she is a mans wife in Hebrew and she is But here there is no such cause to annexe this clause as a reason of the former but rather it is to be joyned to that which followeth as the same copulative sheweth And he blessed him saying v. 19. wherefore not the producing of bread wine but the blessing of Abraham was the proper act of Melchisedecks Priesthood 2. Confut. Melchisedeck brought not out the bread and wine to sacrifice them BRought forth bread and wine c. 1. Whether Melchisedeck had before slaine sacrifices and made a feast not only of bread and wine but of flesh as Philo saith mactatis victimis splendidum opulum sâ—ciis omnibus dedit to Abraham and his company the text saith nothing and therefore I leave it as an uncertaine guesse sure I am that mactare victimas to slay sacrifices can in no sense be understood of sacrificing or offering of bread as Pererius goeth about to wrest it disput 5. in 14 Genes 2. Neither did he bring forth bread and wine to represent as Rabbi Moses thinketh sacrificia farmacea the sacrifices in the law of meale and floure 3. Much lesse did he offer them in sacrifice to God as Bellarmine and Pererius doe urge this place for the word jatsah here used is never taken to signifie to offer in sacrifice whereas Bellarmine and Pererius object that place Iud. 6.19 where Gideon is said to bring forth his gift and represent it where the same word is found it is evident that Gideon brought it forth the flesh and broth for the Angell to eat of whom he supposed to be a man for they used not to make pottage or broth to offer and the Angell bid him to offer it upon the stone which sheweth that Gideon had no such purpose before 4. Wherefore as Iosephus well noteth Melchisedeck milites Abraham hospitaliter accepit nihil eis ad victum deesse passus he entertained Abrahams souldiers with great hospitality suffering them to want no victuals Melchisedeck then brought forth the bread and wine for no other end but to refresh Abrahams company 1. For Melchisedeck is set forth both as a King and a Priest the producing of bread and wine was a princely gift the blessing of Abraham a priestly act 2. It was the use and manner to meet them that returned from battell with bread to refresh them therefore Moab and Ammon are accursed because they met not the Israelites with bread and water when they came out of Egypt Deut 23.4 3. Cajetane a chiefe pillar of the popish Church saith Nihil hic scribitur de oblatione sed de prolatione panis vini Nothing is written of the oblation but of the prolation or producing of bread and wine 4. Whereas Lyranus Tostatus and Bellarmine answer that Melchisedeck needed not to have brought forth bread and wine for their refreshing seeing they had sufficient already as Abraham saith vers 24. saving that the young men had eaten Pererius one of their owne friends doth easily remove this answer that this was unknowne to Melchisedeck what provision was in Abrahams campe and though hee had knowne it yet to shew his love and testifie his gladnesse he would notwithstanding have performed this friendly and liberall part Mercerus 3. Confut. Melchisedecks Priesthood consisted not in the sacrificing of bread and wine NOw it followeth to be declared wherein the priesthood of Melchisedeck consisted and in what principallity he represented the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. It consisted not in that Melchisedeck was a perpetuall virgin Perer. for if Sem were Melchisedeck which is most probable as before is declared he had a wife 2. Neither was he a figure of Christ because he sacrificed in bread and wine and so represented as the Papists imagine the unbloudy sacrifice of the Masse for these reasons 1. Because the Scripture maketh no mention of sacrificing but onely bringing forth bread and wine for Abrahams refreshing 2. That wherein Melchisedecks priesthood consisted must bee divers from the offering and sacrifices of Aaron but Aarons priests offered bread and wine Ergo herein consisted not Milchisedecks priesthood 3. There is a great unlikelinesse betweene Melchisedecks offering and the sacrifice of the Masse for he offered bread and wine in substance but the papists imagine that in the Masse there remaineth nothing but the formes not the substance of bread and wine 4. If Melchisedecks priesthood did stand in the oblation of bread and wine then every bald Masse-priest that sacrificeth in the Masse should be a Priest after Melchisedecks order whereas it is peculiar to Christ onely Psal. 110.4 Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck 5. Neither would the Apostle have omitted this speciall act of Melchisedecks priesthood wherein he represented Christ of purpose setting forth the comparison betweene Melchisedeck and Abraham for neither were thâ— faithfull Hebrewes uncapable of the doctrine of the Eucharist as Bellarmine imagineth seeing he treateth of as high mysteries as of baptisme and the resurrection chap. 6.2 and why should they be more uncapable than the Corinthians among the Gentiles whom Saint Paul instructeth concerning the Eucharist chap. 11. Neither as Pererius answereth was it a thing impertinent to make mention of Melchisedecks sacrifice of bread and wine if there had beene any such thing seeing the Apostle toucheth all other points of similitude and agreement betweene Christ and Melchisedeck and therefore would not have omitted this wherein they were most like 6. Whereas the fathers are objected that doe apply Melchisedecks bringing forth bread and wine to the Eucharist 1. The Apostle herein ought to prevaile more than all the fathers beside who maketh no such application 2. The Fathers doe not thereby shadow forth the Sacrament of the Eucharist as Ambrose saith Constat sacrificium pâ—riisse c. manere Melchisedeki instatutum quod totâ— orbe terrarum in sacramentorum erogatione celebratur c. The sacrifices of beasts are perished and the institution of Melchisedeck remaineth which is celebrated in the dispensation of the Sacraments The Fathers conclude a Sacrament not a sacrifice of bread and wine and so their testimonies make little for the popish sacrifice of the Masse 7. Many things are unlike betweene Melchisedecks producing bread and wine and the Masse Priests sacrificing He 1. presenteth them unto Abraham they offer them to God 2. Abraham and his company eat of Melchisedecks provision in the Masse the Priest doth all there is no eating or drinking 3. Melchisedeck blesseth Abraham
exceed the vulgar and common sort 4. Thus as God first made the creatures and last of all man whom he created for his glorie So after that God had appointed the Tabernacle to be made and every thing thereto belonging he in the last place setteth downe the office and ministration of the Priests who served to set forth Gods glory in the Tabernacle as man was created to that end in the world Borrh. 5. And to this end God ordained the ministerie of man in his service to succour and releeve the imbecillitie of the people who were not able themselves to endure the Lords voice Simlerus QUEST II. Why Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest Vers. 1. THy brother Aaron 1. The Lord maketh speciall choice of Aaron Moses brother for the Priesthood Propter principatum frequentia cum Deo colloquia Because of his preeminence and for the often conference they had with God and the great works which were done in Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron And therefore because in these respects they were more noble and famous than the rest of the people the Lord doth single out Aaron for this high office Simler 2. And the Tribe of Levi was taken from the rest of the Tribes Ad honorem Mosis Aaron ducum populi c. For the honour of Moses and Aaron the captaines of the people Ferus 3 And Aaron was appointed to be the high and chiefe Priest to be a figure and type of Christ Simlerus The divers glorious vestures made for the Priest doe shadow forth the most heavenly graces of the Spirit wherewith Christ was adorned Ferus And he is therefore called Moses brother Quiâ— enim ampliùs alâ—eri est fraterâ—â— foedere nexus quà m Christuâ— Mosi legi gratia novum Testamentum veteri For who can be neerer allied unto another by a brotherly league than Christ to Moses grace to the law the new Testament to the old Beda QUEST III Wherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree NOw Aaron in some things most fitly resembled Christ and in some things betweene them there is great difference First Aaron herein prefigured Christ both in his peculiar function in entring into the holy place to make attonement for the people So Christ is now entred into the heavens to appeare in the fight of God for us Hebr. 9.23 As also in those functions which were common to Aaron with the rest which were these three dâ—cendo precando offerâ—â—do in teaching praying offering or sacrificing So Christ hath taught and lightned the world with the revelation of his Fathers will and by the preaching of the Gospell Christ also prayeth and maketh intercession for his people Heb. 9.25 And he also offered up himselfe in sacrifice for our redemption Tit. 2.19 Hee gave himselfe for us that hee might redeeme us from all iniquitie But yet there is great difference betweene the Priesthood of Aaron which was the type and figure and the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. In the dignitie of their persons Aaron was a meere man Christ was both God and man 2. In their condition the Priests of the Law were men compassed with many infirmities and subject to sinne but Christ was holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 3. In the excellencie of the sacrifice they offered the sacrifices of beasts but Christ offered up his owne bodie as the Apostle saith Heb. 9.12 Neither by the bloud of goats and calves but by his owne bloud entred he once into the holy place 4. In the effect they differ the Priests of the law did not perfectly reconcile but onely shadowed forth by that typicall reconciliation the true remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ who hath obtained eternall redemption for us and hath redeemed us from the curse of the law Galath 3.13 5. In the continuance the Priesthood of Aaron was not to continue for ever but as the Apostle saith This man because he endureth for ever hath an everlasting Priesthood Heb. 2.24 6. In the manner of confirmation They were made Priests without an oath But this is made with an oath by him that said unto him The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 5.21 Marbach QUEST IV. Why Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron ANd although Aaron were a type and figure of Christ yet he is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not after Aaron not because there was no resemblance betweene Christ and Aaron but for that Melchisedeck and his Priesthood did in three things more lively set forth Christs Priesthood than did Aarons 1. In the eternitie thereof 2. Office and function 3. And name 1. As Melchisedeck is set forth without father and mother without beginning of his dayes or end of his life not that he was so indeed but they are concealed in storie to make him a more lively type and figure of Christ who was in respect of his Divinitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without mother in regard of his humanitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father 2 As Melchisedek was both a King and a Priest so Christ was a Priest in the expiation of our sinnes by the sacrifice of himselfe upon the crosse and a King both in gathering his Church together by the scepter of his word and governing them by his Spirit as also in that all power over all creatures and over the universall world is committed unto him 3. The name of Melchisedek fitly agreeth unto Christ which signifieth the King of righteousnesse and the place whereof he was King which was Salem that betokeneth peace did also set forth the peaceable Kingdome of Christ both making peace betweene God and us and taking away the wall of partition that was betweene the Jewes and Gentiles making of both one as the Apostle sheweth Ephes. 2.13 Now in Christ Iesuâ— yee which were once a farre off are made neere by the bloud of Christ for he is our peace which hath made of both one Marbach QUEST V. Why these Priestly garments are commanded to be made Vers. 2. HOly garments c. glorious and beautifull 1. These garments were called holy in two respects both because in respect of the end they were consecrated and ordained onely to holy uses and therefore the Priests onely were to put them on and none other beside and they were not at all times to use them but onely when they went into the Tabernacle when they went out they put them off as also in respect of the manner of consecration they were anointed with the holy oyle chap. 30. and so set apart for holy uses Tostat. quaest 2. 2. This apparelling of Aaron with such glorious apparell was commanded both in respect of themselves that they by these ceremonies might bee assured that their calling was of God Ferus 3. And in regard of the people hereby the Lord would
of the next sonne of Aaron which should succeed him which was Eleazar but of all the rest of his posteritie which should succeed Aaron in the priesthood and this order of consecration was rather fulfilled in them after they came into the land of Canaan and had a setled State there than in Eleazar in whose initiation and entrance into the Priests office many of these rites and ceremonies were omitted in respect of the necessitie of the time and place for hee is only said to have put on Aarons priestly cloathes there is no mention made of his washing anointing sprinkling 1. Some thinke that those things were done also though they are not there expressed as in Scripture many things belonging to the historie and narration are omitted But the ceremonies here prescribed to be done in Aarons consecration are not only omitted there in the narration but they could not be performed in act for the high Priest was ordinarilie to be brought to the doore of the Tabernacle and there to be first washed and then to put on the priestly garments but Eleazar was in mount Hor when hee put on Aarons cloathes where the Tabernacle was not for this was done in the sight of all the people who could not see what was done in the Tabernacle And if Aaron had died in the Tabernacle it should have been thereby polluted for the tent wherein any died was uncleane Numb 19.15 Againe the high Priest who was anointed in his head and hands was not to come neere any dead bodie Levit. 21.10 11. Eleazar then could not be anointed here in the presence of Aaron who died there before his face 2. Some other thinke therefore that Eleazar onely put on Aarons cloathes there the other ceremonies were performed afterward when they were come downe from the mount but Eleazar for the comfort of his father was there bid to put on his cloathes that hee might see his sonne consecrated in his stead before he died But this is not like for the ceremonies could not be kept according to the law of the consecration seeing the high Priest was first to he washed at the doore of the Tabernacle before hee put on the holie garments he was not by the usuall order to put on the Priests apparell first and then to bee washed Againe seeing Aaron by stripping off his cloathes was together with them deprived of his Priesthood Eleazar together with the cloathes received the full right and authoritie of the Priesthood as Vatablus well expoundeth those words of the Lord to Moses Numb 20.26 Cause Aaron to put off his garments and put them upon Eleazar his sonne that is constitues pontificem Eleazarum thou shalt appoint Eleazar Priest for his father 3. Some further may alleage that seeing Eleazar was consecrated to bee a Priest before there needed now no new consecration but onely the putting on of the priestly garments But this answer doth not fully satisfie though Eleazar were now consecrated with his father and in that respect needed not in all respects to bee consecrated as they which had received no such consecration for there were certaine peculiar things used in the consecration of the high Priest whose head and hands were anointed with the holie oyle Levit. 21.10 and so were not the inferiour Priests 4. Therefore Tostatus opinion upon the former reasons is most probable that Eleazar was made high Priest speciali modo after a speciall manner qu. 15. QUEST XXXVIII What services the high Priest was bound to do in the Sanctuarie Vers. 30. TO minister in the Sanctuarie or holy place 1. The holie place or Sanctuarie is taken divers waies 1. For the whole Tabernacle together with the outward court in which sense it is said that Aaron and his sonnes should beare the iniquitie of the Sanctuarie Numb 8.1 2. For the Tabernacle it selfe without the outwart court as Exod. 28.35 His sound shall be heard when he goeth into the holy place that is when he went into the Tabernacle 3. It is sometime taken for the outward court chap. 28.43 when they come to the Altar to minister in the holie place here it is taken for the Tabernacle 2. Aaron had foure services to doe in the Tabernacle 1. To set the bread in order upon the table Levit. 24.6 2. To dresse the lampes morning and evening Levit. 24.3 3. To burne incense upon the golden Altar chap. 30.7 4. To goe into the most holie place once in the yeere to make reconciliation Levit. 16. But the three first services were common unto the inferiour Priests the last was peculiar to the high Priest Tostat. qu. 16. 5. Augustine is here deceived with whom Borrhaius accordeth that the most holy place is here meant into the which the high Priest entred only once in the yeere for the high Priest did not then put on his glorious apparell as he did here at his consecration when he went into the most holie place but the common linen garments Levit. 16.4 QUEST XXXIX Of other rites belonging to the ramme of consecration Vers. 31. ANd seeth his flesh in the holy place Now follow other rites and ceremonies belonging to the ramme of consecration 1. The flesh thereof that is the third part remaining beside that which was offered upon the Altar and that which was due for this time unto Moses Osiand was to be boyled not upon the Altar nor yet in any prophane place but in the outward court here called the holy place 2. They must eat them at the doore of the Tabernacle after they had boyled them in some place of the court further off then they shall come neerer to the Tabernacle and there eat them Tostat. qu. 16. 3. A stranger shall not eat thereof not only they which were strangers from Israel but even the Israelites themselves not of the tribe of Levâ— yea the Levites not of the familie of Aaron could not eat hereof Tostat. Borrhaius Osiander though Simlerus thinketh otherwise understanding by strangers such as were polluted and uncleane because the lay people might eat of their peace offerings But though the people might eat of their ordinarie peace offerings yet here because the Priests were the offerers they only must eat thereof yea here is no exception of their wives or children Lippom. 4. The flesh and bread must be eaten the same day if any remained till the morning it should be burnt with fire this is required lest by reserving any part thereof either they might grow into contempt of the holy things making no difference between them and their ordinarie food which they might reserve at their pleasure or lest that which remained might be abused to superstition Simler And whereas in ordinarie peace offerings they might eat of it the next day but not upon the third day Levit. 7.18 but no part of this must be eaten the second day this was to shew that this ramme of consecration was a more holy thing than their ordinarie peace offerings Tostat. quaest 16.
the Tabernacle the Romanists would warrant their consecrating of Churches with oyle and other ceremonies and they hould it as a principle that it is not lawfull to say Masse in a Church not hallowed 2. By such ceremonies and rites they say religion and devotion is stirred up in mens minds 3. By such hallowing devils are expelled 4. Constantine when he had built a Chruch called thither the Nicene Fathers to consecrate it 5. Christ vouchsafed to be present at the dedication feast in Ierusalem Contra. As we condemne not a Christian dedication blessing and sanctifying of things without superstition as David dedicated his house which he had newly built Psal. 30. in the title which kind of sanctifying is done partly by prayer grounded upon Gods word as the Apostle sheweth 1 Timoth. 4.5 partly by the sober and right use of such things when they are employed to a good end as the Churches of Christians are hallowed and sanctified by the word of God and exercises of religion there used So yet such superstitious consecrations as with oyle tapers crossings and such like we utterlie condemne 1. There is no hallowing or sanctifying of any thing without the warrant of Gods word 1 Timoth. 4.5 but they have no word for such ceremonies to bee used 2. They make more account of their owne traditions than of Gods institution for every Priest may baptise but their Bishops onely hallow Churches 3. They commit idolatrie by this meanes in dedicating Churches to Saints and so take away part of Gods honour 4. They make these ceremonies a part of Gods worship and ascribe spirituall vertue unto them for they give indulgences and pardons of sinnes by the vertue of such hallowed Churches The former reasons are of no force 1. The typicall ceremonies of the Law such as was the anointing of the Tabernacle doe not bind us now they are abolished 2. True devotion and religion cannot be stirred up in the mind by humane rites and observations which are not grounded upon Gods word 3. By the same reason if by their anointing devils are driven out of Churches it were good that all houses and other places were anointed to drive away evill spirits but our Saviour sheweth that devils are cast out by prayer and fasting therefore not by such toyes 4. Constantines Church was consecrated by the prayers and thankesgiving of the Christian Bishops not by any such superstitious usages 5. The dedication of the Temple was a legall observation and concerneth us not now neither doth it follow because Christ observed it that it is to be kept still for he was also circumcised to shew his obedience to the Law Simlerus 3. Confut. That there is not in Orders imprinted an indeleble character Vers. 15. THe anointing shall bee a signe that the Priesthood shall be everlasting unto them Tostatus out of this place would inferre that in orders as likewise in Baptisme there is imprinted an indeleble character in the soule which can never be blotted out as these were but once anointed during their life to minister in the Priesthood qu. 4. Contra. 1. This place proveth no such thing for it is not spoken of the anointing of their persons which could be for no long continuance but of the anointing and consecrating of Aaron and his posteritie for the priesthood perpetually the anointing and consecrating of the Fathers could not print an indeleble character in their posteritie 2. This indeleble character or badge which they say is by Baptisme and Orders imprinted in the soule and can never be blotted out is but a device of their owne for what badge or marke of Iudas Apostleship could remaine when hee had betrayed his Master and manifestly shewed himselfe to be the child of perdition or what could be imprinted in Simon Magus soule by Baptisme of whom Saint Peter saith He had no part nor fellowship with them and his heart was not aright in the sight of God Act. 8.21 See more of this controversie Synops. Cont. 2. error 98. 4. Confut. Outward succession not alwaies required in the Ministerie Vers. 12. THou shalt bring Aaron and his sonnes c. The Romanists make this speciall exception against the Ministers of the Gospell that they can shew no lawfull succession which is required in an ordinarie calling nor yet miracles to prove their extraordinarie calling therefore they hold their calling to be none at all Contra. 1. Aaron was the Lords high Priest not by succession from any other but by consecration from Moses the civill governour at Gods appointment and so no doubt but Princes reformers of religion by their authoritie may establish Ministers and Preachers thereunto rightly called 2. Everie extraordinarie calling was not confirmed by signes as divers of the Prophets are not found to have wrought miracles 3. And though it were granted that the calling of the first Ministers of the Gospell were in respect of the manner extraordinarie yet because for the matter and doctrine it is not new but the same which the Apostles preached there need no miracles seeing the same faith was before ratified and sealed by the miracles wrought by the Apostles Simlerus See Synops. Centur. 1. err 20. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Not to come before the Lord without due preparation Vers. 31. THey washed their hands By this ceremonie was signified that none should assemble or draw neere unto God with impure and unwashen affections Oleaster As Moses also was bid to put off his shooes when hee drew neere unto the fire burning in the bush So the Apostle will have men to examine themselves before they come unto the Lords table 1 Cor. 11.28 2. Observ. Gods house is to be reverenced Vers. 34. THe glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle God shewed such glorious signes of his presence to the end his Tabernacle should be the more reverenced of all Marbach As Iacob said Gen. 28.17 How fearefull is this place this is none other than the house of God So David also saith Psal. 5.7 In thy feare will I worship toward thy holy Temple 3. Observ. The greater gifts one hath the more hee should humble himselfe Vers. 35. SO Moses could not enter Moses the more familiarly the Lord vouchsafed to speake unto tanto se humiliorem praebet c. sheweth himselfe so much the more modest and humble he will not presume to enter into the Tabernacle where Gods presence was though at other times the Lord had admitted him to familiar conference This example teacheth men that the more excellent gifts they have they should so much more shew themselves humble and lowly Gallas As Saint Paul though he laboured more than all the Apostles yet confesseth He was the least of the Apostles and not worthie to be called an Apostle Ves. 36. VVhen the cloud ascended the children of Israel went forward Oleaster hereupon giveth this good note Beatus homo quem direxeris Domine qui non se movet nisi signum ei ostenderis c. Happie
1. Obs. The mutabilitie of the honours of this life Vers. 1. WHen Moses kept the sheepe c. Moses which was before a man of authority brought up delicately in Pharaohs Court is now become a shepheard and keepeth the fields enduring both heat and cold Such is the mutabilitie and changeable state of this life that soone may a man bee brought from honour to contempt from wealth to woe from fulnesse to want as is set forth unto us in Iob. Simler Which should teach every man in his high and flowing estate to bethinke himselfe of adversity as Iob saith The thing which I feared is come upon me Iob. 3.25 2. Obs. Against vaine curiositie Vers. 5. COme not hither As the Lord inviteth us by faith to draw neere unto him so he misliketh carnall curiosity as the people were charged not to come neere mount Sinai to gaze upon God Marie Magdalene is forbidden to touch Christ the Apostles are rebuked for gazing up into heaven Acts 1. We are hereby taught not curiously to search into the secrets of God but that wee understand according to sobrietie Rom. 12.3 Simler 3. Obs. Gods children notwithstanding their afflictions are not forsaken Vers. 7. I Have surely scene the trouble of my people c. The Lord seeth and taketh knowledge of the troubles and afflictions of his people and notwithstanding these their grievous sufferings they are the people of God still Affliction therefore doth not separate us from God or make him unmindfull of his children Pellican Nay it is an argument rather that God loveth us and that wee are his children when he layeth his fatherly correction upon us as the Apostle saith If yee be without correction thâ—â— are ye bastards and not sonnes Heb. 12.8 4. Obs. Against the ambitiâ—us aspiring unto offices Vers. 11. WHo am I that I should goe unto Pharaoh Moses modesty in disabling himselfe and dâ—clining this honourable calling convinceth them of vaine ambition in these dayes who farre unlike Moses being unapt and unfit for their gifts yet aspire unto great places by favour and indirect meanes neither yet are they to be commended which doe on the other side hide their gifts and will by no meanes consent to be imployed in the publike affaires of the Church as Ammonius who when he was to be made a Presbyter cut off his eare that hee might bee refused for the maime of his body and threatned further to cut out his tongue if they did not desist in their purpose yet that is not the fault of this age but the contrary rather the ambitious hunting after preferments and honours Simler CHAP. IV. 1. The argument and Method IN this Chapter is set forth the confirmation of Moses in his calling and his obedience thereunto The first part is extended to verse 18. where as Moses maketh three severall excuses and exceptions so he receiveth three confirmations The first excuse is that the people will not beleeve vers 1. The confirmation followeth by three signes two of them are presently shewed before his face the turning of a rod into a Serpent vers 6. and making his hand leprous vers 6.7 both these signes are shewed and returne againe to their first nature then followeth the third signe which is promised but not presently effected by turning the water of the river into bloud vers 9. The second excuse is by Moses infirmity of speech v. 10. the confirmation followeth where the Lord first sheweth his power v. 11. then promiseth his assistance vers 12. The third exception that Moses taketh is an absolute refusall as being altogether unfit To this the Lord replieth 1. In shewing his displeasure 2. In promising the assistance of his brother Aaron where the fitnesse of his assistanâ— is shewed and his readinesse in meeting him vers 14. then the Lord promiseth to be with them both vers 15. Afterward the order and distinction of their offices is declared God will speake to Moses Moses to Aaron Aaron to the people vers 16. 3. The Rod is given him as a signe vers 17. The obedience is set forth first of Moses to his calling to vers 27. then of Aaron v. 28. with the successe thereof the beleefe of the people vers 31. In Moses obedience and execution 1. The preparation to his journey is described with his wife and children to vers 21. 2. Then the renewing of his charge and commission to vers 24. 3. A certaine accident by the way is mentioned what had like to have befallen Moses for want of his childs circumcision and how he escaped the danger to vers 27. 2. The divers readings Vers. 2. He said a staffe I.V. rather than a rod. B.G.S.L.A.P. the word is matteh of natah because a man leaneth upon his staffe and a staffe rather is fitter for a shepheard than a rod. Vers. 8. Nor hearken to the voice and the first signe I. better than the voice of the first signe B.G. cum cater as the next verse sheweth that the voice is to be referred to Moses If they will not beleeve these two signes nor hearken to thy voice Vers 9. And the waters shall be which thou takest out of the river they shall be turned I. V.A.P. shall be is twice repeated in the originall not once only as B.G.L.S. Vers. 10. Hearken to me my Lord. I.V. for me P. rather than I pray thee my Lord. L.S. or Oh Lord. B.G. Bi in me or to me where hearken or attend or some such word must be supplied so also vers 13. Vers. 11. Or him that seeth or the blinde B. G. cum caeter or him that hath his sense or the blinde I. but the word properly signifieth the seeing as Pikechim is taken Exod. 23.8 the seeing and the opposition of the privative here sheweth as much Vers. 25. Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife G.B. better than a stone B.V.S.A.P. or sharpe stone V. â—zor signifieth a rocke or stone and that which is sharpe as Psal. 89.43 it signifieth the sharpnesse of a sword and it is not like that Moses and his companie were without a knife being so fit an instrument for a shepheard Vers. 28. Then Moses told c. all the businesse and words of Iehovah for the which hee had sent him I.L. or which he had sent unto him S. better than to referre it to the Lord which had sent him V.B.G.A.P. as vers 30 sheweth And Aaron had told all the words which the Lord had spoken to Moses Vers. 31. They did obeisance and bowed themselves I. rather than bowed downe and worshipped G.B. cum cater for shachath signifieth to bow downe properly but with intent to worship 3. The explication of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Whether Moses offended with charging the people with unbeleefe Vers. 1. BVt loe they will not beleeve me c. The Hebrewes thinke that Moses sinned in charging the people with unbeleefe and therefore he was punished in that his hand became leprous But Moses
God 2. Neither was this sinne of Moses veniall that is a light and small sinne for such sinnes the Lord passeth over in his children but here he was angry with Moses If the Lord should bee angry with every small sinne and oversight of his children who should abide it 3. The forbearing of punishment sheweth not the smalnesse of the sinne but the greatnesse of Gods mercie 4. Cajetanes observation is false for the same phrase â—ichar aph Iehovah Iehovahs wrath was kindled is used upon occasion of great sinnes as when the people murmured Numb 11.3 and lusted for quailes vers 33. the same words are there put 4. This then may safely be held that although Moses at the first might in humility disable himselfe yet after God had given him satisfaction to all his doubts upon his foure severall refusals first for his owne insufficiencie and the greatnesse of the businesse Chap. 3.11 Secondly because they might inquire after Gods name Chap. 3.14 Thirdly he excuseth himselfe by the incredulity of the people Lastly by his owne imperfection of speech yet after all this to stand still upon his refusall sheweth no small infirmitie in Moses as it may appeare by the effect because God was angrie with him yet Gods anger is not such against his children as against the wicked for there he is angry and punisheth here he is angrie and rebuketh but withdraweth not his favour for immediatly the Lord concurreth with Moses desire and giveth him his brother to be his assistant Simler So that Gods anger here is as when the father is angrie with his child or one friend with another which notwithstanding is no breach of friendship QUEST XII Why Aaron is called the Levite Vers. 14. AAron thy brother the Levite 1. This is not added because the Priesthood should have belonged to Moses the Leviticall order to Aaron but that Moses was deprived of that honour for refusing his calling as Rabbi Salomon Pellican 2. But because there might bee other Aarons not of Levie this is expressed by way of distinction that Moses might know that the Lord did meane none other Aaron but his owne naturall brother of Levi Iun. Simler 3. And this might bee also a reason thereof because the Lord purposed to annex the Priesthood to Aaron and his posteritie Osiander QUEST XIII How Moses is said to be as God to Aaron Vers. 16. THou shalt bee to him in Gods stead This sheweth 1. that Moses should bee superior unto Aaron as his Prince as the Chalde Paraphrast and Aaron as his Chancelor Moses should give him direction from God what to speake Osiander 2. By this also Moses authority is signified by the which as in Gods place he ordained Aaron to be the high Priest Pellican 3. Likewise he is as God that is a wise counsellor and full of Gods spirit to whom Aaron should resort for counsell Vatab. Genevens 4. And as Aaron was Moses spokesman to the people so Moses should bee Aarons mouth to consult with God so the Septuagint and Latine read Thou shalt be for him in those things which appertaine to God 5. But Moses in another sense is said to bee Pharaohs God Exod. 7.1 not only to declare Gods will unto him but to execute Gods judgements upon him Genevens QUEST XIV Whether Moses did well being called of God in taking his leave of his father in law Vers. 18. THerefore Moses went and returned to Iethro 1. Some doe charge Moses here with an oversight that he presently dispatched not into Egypt but first tooke his leave of his father in law for Iacob went away without Labans privity and S. Paul saith that hee did not consult with flesh and bloud after he was called Galath 1. 2. Contra these examples are altogether unlike for Laban was unfriendly to Iacob and he feared he would worke him some displeasure and Iacob was then at his owne hand and kept sheepe for himselfe and beside he had in a manner sold over his daughters to Iacob and used them as strangers But Moses had a kinde and loving father in law he then kept his sheepe as hee covenanted and he entertained Zipporah still as his daughter and therefore Moses could not in humanity but take his leave of him 3. S. Paul consulted not with any for the approbation of his calling being therefore fully assured neither doth Moses conferre with Iethro to any such end but only to performe the office of humanity Simler 4. Wherefore the calling of God doth not take away civill duties toward parents and kindred saving where they are an impediment to our calling in which case wee are rather to forsake father and mother than to disobey God 5. Moses therefore taketh his leave of Iethro both because he purposed to carry away his wife and children and for that he had before covenanted to stay with Iethro chap. 2.21 Ferus QUEST XV. Why Moses concealed from Iethro the principall end of his going LEt me goe and returne to my brethren 1. Moses concealeth from his father in law the principall cause of his journey which was the calling of God both for that he sought Gods glorie and not his owne Ferus lest he should have seemed to boast of his visions Osiander and he doth keepe it secret of modesty least he might be thought to be a vaine man in telling such incredible things 2. In saying he went to see whether his brethren were alive and to visite them he dissembleth not though he went to doe more and it is evident by taking his wife and children with him that Iethro knew hee purposed not only to visite them but to stay there so that it seemeth likely that Moses imparted so much of his purpose concerning his stay there Simler and in generall also that he went for the comfort and profit of his brethren as Iosepus but in particular he kept secret the end of his going 3. Iethro being a good man would not hinder so charitable a worke though he had speciall use of him Ferus especially having such experience of the fidelitie and wisedome of Moses that without great cause he knew he would not desire to depart from him Simler QUEST XVI Whether God spake to Moses in Midian beside that vision in Horeb. Vers. 19. ANd Iehovah said to Moses 1. Some thinke that this sentence is transposed and that God thus spake unto Moses before he had moved his father in law Genevens Pellican But although such transposing of the order be usuall in Scriptures yet heere it need not to bee admitted for God might often appeare to Moses to confirme him Iun. and this was said in Midian the other vision was in Horeb the distinction of the place sheweth them to be divers apparitions Simler 2. The Lord to encourage Moses taketh away all doubts and telleth him that all which sought his life as well Pharaoh as the pursuers of the bloud of the slaine were dead Iun. And thus much Moses might impart also to his
and Levi is inserted Vers 14. THese bee the heads of their fathers houses c. Moses setteth downe the genealogie of certaine tribes that it might bee knowne for the more certaintie of the storie of what stocks those two famous Prophets Moses and Aaron came the Lords Ambassadors to Pharaoh and instruments of these great works and wonders wrought in Egypt and of the deliverance of the people Borrh. 2. And Moses setteth downe the generation of Reuben and Simeon which were the two elder that he might orderly proceed to Levi lest hee might have beene thought onely to set downe his owne petigree Simler 3. And these three tribes are specially named because they of all other were most hardly censured by Iacob Reuben for his incest and the other two for their murther lest they might have beene thought utterly to have beene rejected Perer. 4. Moses most insisted upon the genealogie of Levi because that tribe was afterward chosen for the dignitie of the Priesthood Simler QUEST IX How Reuben is said here to be the first borne Vers. 14. THe sonnes of Reuben the first borne 1. He was the first borne by nature but he lost the prerogative of the first borne by his incest unto the which belonged a double preeminence the one of a double part which right was transferred to Ioseph of whom came two tribes the other of dignitie and authoritie over the rest of the brethren which was conveyed to Iudah Perer. 2. Of Reuben and Simeon onely those are rehearsed that came downe with Iacob unto Egypt because Moses doth make haste to set downe at large the offspring of Levi descending even unto Phinehes the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron Iun. 3. Some names are elsewhere otherwise termed as he which is called Iemuel is named in the Chronicles Nemuel and Sahar Zerah Ohad here named is there omitted either because he died in Egypt or else his posteritie was extinct and ceased in the wildernesse Simler QUEST X. Of the age of Levi. Vers. 16. THe yeeres of the life of Levi were 137. Levi was elder than Ioseph by foure yeeres for hee was the third sonne of Lea borne in the third yeere of the second seven of Iacobs service in the end whereof Ioseph was borne hence divers certaine conclusions concerning the Chronologie of the Scripture may be inferred 1. That Levi was 43. yeere old when he came downe with Iacob into Egypt for then was Ioseph 39. 2. That Levi lived 23. yeeres after the death of Ioseph who lived an 110. yeeres for Levi was 4. yeere elder than Ioseph and lived 137. 3. That Levi lived after he came into Egypt 94. yeeres unto the which if we adde 43. yeeres which was his age before he went into Egypt we shall have the whole life of Levi 137. yeeres 4. Levi died 121. yeeres before the going of the Israelites out of Egypt for all the time of their aboad in Egypt was 215. whereof Levi lived 94. in Egypt which summe being deducted from 215. the residue is 121. yeeres 5. It is gathered that Levi died before Moses birth 41. yeeres for Moses was 80. yeeres old when Israel was delivered out of Egypt but Levi died 121. yeeres before that then it will follow that he died 41. yeeres before Moses ex Perer. QUEST XI Of the age of Kohath Vers. 18. KOhath lived 133. yeeres 1. Thus read both the Latine Septuagint and Chalde agreeable to the Hebrew So that Eugubinus is deceived that saith Kohath according to the Septuagint lived but 130. yeeres 2. Hence it is evident that Kohath died 2. yeere before Moses birth and 82. yeeres before the deliverance of Israel for Kohath comming downe with Levi into Egypt may be supposed to be borne the same yeere from whence to Moses birth are 135. yeeres unto which adde 80. yeeres of the life of Moses and we have the whole summe of 215. yeeres the whole time of the Israelites being in Egypt But hee lived onely 133. yeeres then he must be dead two yeeres before Moses birth 3. Hence Alexander Polyhistor is found to be in error who holdeth as Eusebius reporteth Kohath to bee but 40. yeere old when Levi died who was rather than 94. yeere old but 43 yeere younger than his father being borne the same yeere when Levi went downe into Egypt QUEST XII Of the age of Amram Vers. 20. ANd Amram lived 137. yeeres If Amram were borne 14. yeeres before Ioseph died and begat Moses in the 77. yeere of his age as Alexander Polyhistor in Eusebius accompteth then it is evident that he died 21. yeeres before the departing of Israel out of Egypt and in the 60 yeere of Moses age as may bee thus gathered Ioseph lived after Iacob came downe into Egypt 71. yeeres being then 39. and his whole age was 110. so Ioseph died 144. yeeres before the departure of Israel for the foresaid numbers of 71. and 144. put together make the above said summe of 215. yeeres it will then follow that Amram borne 14. yeeres before Iosephs death and living 137. yeeres died 121. yeeres before the going forth of Israel ex Perer. QUEST XIII Why the sonnes of Korah and Aaron are set downe Vers. 21. ALso the sonnes of Izhar 1. Moses in the rest of Levi his posteritie descendeth but to the fourth degree saving in Aaron and Korah because of the one came famous Phinehes and the sonnes of the other are expressed because they died not in their fathers rebellion Numb 16.11 2. Hebron or Chebron his posteritie is not set downe it may be he was obscure and therefore not mentioned Borrh. 3. The rest here also are expressed because elsewhere they are spoken of for the manifestation of the history as Nadab and Abihu Levit. 10.1 Mishael and Elzaphan Levit. 10.4 Eleazar Numb 20. and Ithamar Exod. 38.21 Iun. QUEST XIV Why Aaron tooke a wife of the tribe of Iudah Vers. 23. ANd Aaron tooke Elishebah daughter of Aminadab 1. These two Aminadab and Nahashon his sonne were Princes of Judah 2. Thus Levi and Iudah doe match in marriage together to signifie the conjunction and affinity that should bee betweene the regall and priestly office Simler 3. Hitherto the positive law of not confounding the tribes by marriage was not made and yet afterward notwithstanding it was lawfull for the Priests of Levi to take unto them wives of other tribes for because the Levites had no inheritance given them by such marriages there could follow no inconvenience by confusion of their inheritance So Iehoiadah the high Priest married the King of Judahs sister and Elizabeth wife to Zacharie the Priest was Cousin to Mary the blessed Virgin of Judah Simler QUEST XV. How Moses without ostentation setteth forth his owne commendation Vers. 27. THese are that Moses and Aaron c. 1. Some thinke that these words should be inserted by Ezra who digested the Scriptures into order because it seemeth not to stand with the modestie of Moses and Aaron to set forth such
that the Lord in sending these things flesh and bread which the people murmured for observeth the same order which they did in their murmuring they first complained for the want of their flesh poâ— and then for the scarcity of bread vers 3. QUEST XI Whether the rocke were first striken to bring out water or the flesh and bread first sent RVpertus here also moveth another doubt out of the 78. Psalme vers 20. Behold hee smote the rocke that the water gushed out c. can he give bread also and prepare flesh for his people For here the Prophet seemeth to invert the order of these miracles that first the rocke was smitten whereout the water gushed and that afterward the flesh and bread was given whereas the striking of the rocke followeth in the next chapter Exod. 17. 1. To this question he answereth by a distinction that Moses report of these miracles is historicall setting downe the order of time wherein they were done but the other in the Psalme is propheticall applied unto Christ the flowing of the waters out of the rocke signifieth the passion of Christ and the baptising into his death the Manna shadowed forth the Eucharist in the eating of his body now first we must be baptised in the name of Christ before we can be partakers of his body and bloud in the Eucharist 2. But wee need not for the dissolving of this question to runne unto any such mysticall sense for the people murmured twice for flesh once in the desert of Sin as is here expressed another time in Kibroth hattavah Num. 11. the first of these murmurings went before the smiting of the rocke in Râ—phidim the other followed after and of the latter speaketh the Prophet here when the Lord sent a fire among the people for their murmuring which was not done now but it happened afterward in the other murmuring as the story is extant Numb 11.1 And of the former sending of Manna and flesh speaketh the Prophet afterward in the same Psalme vers 24. Hee had rained 〈◊〉 Manna c. QUEST XII Why Moses biddeth Aaron to speake to the people and doth it not himselfe Vers. 9. ANd Moses said unto Aaron c. 1. Some thinke that Moses vouchsafeth not to speake unto this unworthy and unthankfull people and therefore appointeth Aaron to speake Pellican But this can be no reason because afterward Moses speaketh unto the people himselfe vers 15. 2. Some thinke that it was Aarons office to speake unto the people for God had made him Moses mouth chap. 4.16 and as Moses Prophet chap. 7.1 But although this order was observed in Egypt that the Lord spake to Moses Moses to Aaron Aaron to Pharaoh and to the Egyptians yet after they were come out of Egypt Moses used himselfe to speake unto the people as appeareth chap. 12.13 and 14. where it is said vers 31. They beleeved the Lord and his servant Moses 3. Therefore this rather was the cause why Moses thus spake unto Aaron because when these words were to be uttered Moses was to be with the Lord when his glory appeared in the cloud this then was the order wherein these things were done hitherto rehearsed in this Chapter First after the people had murmured then the Lord spake to Moses vers 4. which might be betimes in the morning after that Moses and Aaron spake to the people vers 6. then Moses gave that charge to Aaron of speaking further to the people vers â— This being done Moses went unto the place where the Lord appeared in the cloud Tostat. 4. Now Aaron spake unto all the Congregation either in calling the Elders and Rulers together who should speake to the people or else in causing himselfe proclamation to be made and notice to be given to the people which is most like for this might be sooner done and as all the people had murmured so it was fit they should all present themselves before the Lord. Tostat. ibid. QUEST XIII How the people are bid to draw neere before the Lord. Vers. 9. DRaw neere before the Lord. 1. The Lord in respect of his divine essence is every where and not in one place more than in another but by reason of some new effect and extraordinary manifestation of his presence he is said to be rather in one place than in another As here hee is said to bee in the cloud because there hee shewed his glory Tostat. 2. The people are called before the Lord which Pellican understandeth of the assembly and congregation where they should heare the Lords Prophets speake unto them but it is rather understood of Gods presence in the cloud that all the people should come forth of their tents and turne themselves toward the wildernesse and so behold the glory of God which appeared unto them as followeth in the tenth verse Tostat. Iun. For as yet there was neither Arke nor Tabernacle where they should appeare before the Lord. Simlerus QUEST XIV What cloud it was wherein the Lord appeared Vers. 10. THe glory of the Lord appeared in the cloud 1. Some thinke that this was not that cloud whereby the Lord directed the journeyes of his people but another because that cloud stood over the hoast but this was toward the wildernesse but this is no good argument for that cloud which did lead them went before them sometime neerer sometime further off 2. Others thinke that this was the cloud which rested upon Moses Tabernacle before the great Tabernacle was made which is mentioned chap. 33.7 but this is uncertaine Ex Tostat. 3. Therefore without further question it was none other cloud than that which was their guid which in the day was a cloudy piller in the night a piller of fire which was an evident testimony of Gods presence Iun. Oleaster Yet it is to be thought Gloriam Dei in solitâ— modo patefactam c. That the glory of God was manifested otherwise than it 〈◊〉 that iâ— in a more fearefull manner the more to terrifie the people Calvin Simler QUEST XV. When the Lord thus spake to Moses Vers. 11. FOr the Lord had spoken to Moses c. 1. Some thinke that Moses after he had given Aaron charge to speake to the people and was gone to appeare before the Lord that then the Lord spake thus to Moses which words he returning againe delivered to the people Tostat. But here is no mention that Moses spake those words in this place to the people only it is said The Lord spake or had spoken 2. Therefore it is the better opinion that the Lord had thus spoken unto Moses before he spake thus unto the people vers 6 7. but here it is expressely mentioned to shew Moses faithfulnesse that hee delivered nothing to the people but what he had received from God for here the very same words almost are rehearsed which Moses before had uttered to the people it is therefore better expressed in the prâ—terpluperfect tense
whole ministration of the old Testament and not to the law onely Quis dubitat per Angelos ministratam fuisse omnem veteris Testamenti dispensationem Who doubteth but that all the dispensation of the old Testament was ministred by the Angels Marlorat in 3. Galath v. 19. and Iunius in his Parallels upon that place Act. 7.53 saith to this effect that the Angels were ministri postea sermonis ad populum non authores legis that the Angels were ministers of the word afterward to the people but not authors of the law But this place being compared with Act. 7.53 and Galath 3.19 where it is said that the law was ordained by Angels it will draw also the word here said to be spoken by the Angels to be understood of the law 5. Iunius hath another exposition that the law was ordained inter Angelos among the Angels Annot Galath 3.19 and in his Parallels he saith the law was exhibited onely by Christ inter ordines Angelorum among the orders of the Angels but the phrase it selfe spoken by the Angels giveth more to be understood than among the Angels 6. Wherefore I preferre Chrysostoms exposition upon that place Galath 3.19 Sentit ipsos Angelos subministrasse ferenda legi He meaneth that the Angels did minister at the giving of the Law It is one thing for the Angels as Gods deputies to deliver the Law another as ministers and instruments As sometime the Prince may send Commissioners to execute his Edicts who doe supplie his person and authoritie sometime he being present in Majestie may by the mouth of another proclaime his Edict So at other times the Angels did speake in the name and person of God as the Angell did call to Abraham Genes 22. sometime they did attend as ministring spirits upon the Majestie of God as his Criers and Proclaimers So the law was delivered in mount Sinai by the authoritie of God himselfe appearing in Majestie who endited and framed the law but it might be proclaimed by the Angels concurring by their ministrie in the framing of that audible voyce and sound which was heard QUEST XXXVIII Why Moses is commanded to charge the people againe Vers. 21. GOe downe charge the people 1. Though this charge was given before yet the Lord commandeth it to be done againe Imminente jam hora ad majorem certitudinem The very houre being now instant for more certaintie Lyran. For they would the rather take heed Cum recentius in Dei prasentia mandarentur Being charged afresh and in the presence of God Tostat. 2. Another reason of renuing this charge was the stubborne nature of the people who had need often to be admonished and although Moses thought it not needfull againe to charge them as it appeareth by his answer and in a manner refusall vers 23. yet the Lord Sciebat sibi cum prafractis esse negotium Knew that he had to deale with such as were stubborne Calvin 3. And further though they had beene straitly charged before not to exceed their prefixed limits and bounds yet they would have adventured Ipso absente mora tamdiu curiâ—sâ— appetitu victi In Moses absence partly not enduring longer delay partly of a curious desire to have gone beyond their marks Galas 4. As also the charge is iterated in respect of the speciall interdict of the Priests who might have presumed being not before specially and in particular named the charge being given to the people in generall Simler QUEST XXXIX What Priests are here understood Vers. 21. ANd let the Priests also 1. Because the order of Priests was not yet instituted some thinke that is spoken by anticipation and prevention that afterward when the Priests should be ordained and consecrated they should be sanctified when they came into the presence of God Ex Lyran. But it seemeth by the sending downe of Moses that this charge was presently to be given by Moses and by the other to be executed And further it is said Let the Priests which come to the Lord be sanctified The Lord then speaketh of those Priests which already had accesse unto God not of those which should be assigned afterward Tostat. 2. Some thinke that by this word cohanim which signifieth as well Princes as Priests are understood the Tribunes Officers and Judges of the people which were before appointed by the counsell and advice of Iethro Lippom. Genevens But their office was to judge the people and heare their controversies the office of those Priests was to have accesse unto the presence of God in offering of sacrifices 3. Some thinke that the Priests were consecrated now but that it is set downe afterward Oleaster But this were without any necessitie to disturbe and transpose the order of the storie 4. Therefore their opinion is most probable who thinke that these Priests were the first borne to whom the prerogative of the Priesthood belonged till it was by Gods appointment setled in the Tribe of Levi But neither all the first borne in Israel that were consectated unto God were Priests as Iun. Borrh. For it is not probable in so great a multitude Singulis domibus proprios fuisse Sacerdotes That every house had his peculiar and proper Priest Calvin Neither were they onely Primogeniti Principum duodecim tribuum c. The first borne of the Princes of the twelve Tribes which offered sacrifice chap. 24.5 As R. Salomon Lyran. For so small a number of Priests sufficed not for the whole multitude They were then as well Filii primogeniti aliorum magnorum virorum The first borne sonnes of other great men which were the Princes of the families as the first borne of the Princes of the Tribes Tostat. quaest 12. 5. And by drawing neere unto God is not here meant that speciall kind of accesse to enquire of God which Moses did onely then and the high Priest afterward by his Vrim and Thummim but the comming unto God to minister as the Chalde interpreteth Tostat. Lippom. QUEST XL. Why Moses replieth as unwilling to goe downe Vers. 23. ANd Moses said unto the Lord. 1. Some thinke that Moses thus replied Quod non videbatur necessarium ut ista contestatio fierat As though it seemed not necessarie that this contestation should be made Tostat. But it is not to be thought that Moses would so contradict the Lord having beene of late in so great feare that the Lord spake unto him to comfort him 2. Some say that Moses thus spake not as though he tooke this charge to be superfluous but to shew his faithfulnesse that he had carefully before intimated to the people the will and pleasure of God therein Simler But the Lord was not ignorant what Moses had done that he needed to make repetition of his service 3. Some thinke that Moses Andiendo populo mandatum refricat That Moses thus answereth that hee might in hearing of the people rubbe their memorie lest they might forget any thing of the charge Pellican But Moses was
Samuel After the same manner when God made a covenant with Abraham and he had divided certaine beasts as God had commanded him and laid one part against another a smoaking firebrand went betweene representing God signifying that so he should be divided which violated the covenant So in this place not much unlike the bloud is parted in twaine shewing that so should his bloud be shed which kept not the covenant Tostat. qu. 11. QUEST XVIII Whether all the people were besprinkled with the bloud Vers. 8. THen Moses tooke the bloud and sprinkled it on the people c. 1. Some thinke that the people themselves were not sprinkled with the bloud for that had beene both too great a labour for Moses to goe in and out among the people to sprinkle them neither would the bloud have sufficed therefore either the twelve pillars were sprinkled with bloud which stood for the people or else the Elders were besprinkled in the name of the whole people as sometime they did represent the whole congregation as Deut. 21.6 Iun. Contra. 1. It is not like that the bloud was sprinkled upon the pillars for Moses saith This is the bloud of the covenant which the Lord hath made with you but with the pillars no covenant was made 2. The Elders were for the whole congregation in such actions which the people could not performe in their multitudes as when the Elders for the people laid their hands upon the sacrifice Lev. 4.15 which the people could not doe in their owne person and so they lay their hands upon the heifer Deut. 21.6 But here both the people might come together to be besprinkled and it was such an action the establishing of a covenant wherein the person and presence of the people was necessary 2. Tostatus therefore thinketh that Moses did sprinkle the bloud upon the people themselves and upon all of them either going in and out among them or they succeeding by companies one another quaest 13. 3. But as it is gathered out of the text that the people were present in person that as they for themselves promised obedience saying All that the Lord hath said will wee doe so they in their owne person had part of the bloud and because the covenant was made with the people therefore they also received the signe of the covenant and the Apostle also saith that Moses sprinkled both the booke and all the people Heb. 9.19 Yet it is not necessary to understand all the people in particular for a whole day nay many dayes had not sufficed to doe it but all the people which were in circuitu which were round about Moses and could well assemble together QUEST XIX When Moses and Aaron with the rest went up Vers. 9. THen went up Moses and Aaron c. 1. Some thinke that this was done when the Lord descended upon mount Sinai chap. 19. Pellican But as is shewed before quaest 1. then Moses was bidden to bring Aaron up with him but here Nadab and Abihu and 70. of the Elders also goe up therefore this was done in the same order as it is set downe that after Moses had performed all those rites and ceremonies in confirming the covenant betweene God and his people then they went up Iun. No◠cum historia transire putamus etiam rei gesta ordinem c. We thinke the history to passe on in order as the things were done Lippoman 2. Cajetane thinketh that this was the execution of the commandement given before unto Moses vers 1. But I rather thinke with Hugo de S. Victor that this charge was given to Moses after he was come downe from the mount and had performed all the rites of the covenant and that this part of the chapter from the second verse to the ninth in order goeth before the giving of that charge vers 1. for how could Moses otherwise be bidden to come up being in the mountaine already See before quest 1. 3. But herein Hugo is deceived he thinketh this to be but the third time that Moses ascended up to God the first was chap. 19. when he went up before the Law was delivered the second chap. 20. when he ascended to receive the ceremonials and judicials and the third time is here yet this was the fourth time for twice he ascended before the Law was given as is evident in the 19. chapter vers 3. and 20. QUEST XX. Wherefore those went up with Moses Vers. 9. ANd seventy of the Elders 1. Lyranus thinketh that these went up ad confirmationem legis for the confirming and further ratifying of the Law which they had received Tostatus misliketh this opinion and thus confuteth it that if they went up to that end oportebat ut cum Domino loquerentur it was requisite that they should all have spoken with God but so did they not and Moses onely drew neere unto God They all ascended to their places seniores remotiùs alii propinquiùs the Elders further off others neerer as Aaron and his sonnes but only Moses talked with God Lippoman 2. Neither yet did they only goe up to accompany Moses ad honorandum eum to honour him because he went now to receive the tables of the Law Tostat. For when Moses went up thus accompanied the Lord had not yet signified so much unto Moses that he would deliver him the tables of the Law for that followeth afterward vers 12. 3. Therefore the end of their going up was that after they had seene the Majesty of God and Moses talking with him testes veritatis essent they might be witnesses of the truth Simler Et res idoneis testibus probata indubiam fidem acquireret c. And the matter being proved by fit and sufficient witnesses might be undoubtedly beleeved Calvin And so by this meanes Moses ministery should be of the greater authority QUEST XXI How they are said to have seene God Vers. 10. THey saw the God of Israel and under his feet c. R. Abraham thinketh Istam visionem imaginariam That this vision was imaginary not to the externall but to the inward sense But this is not like that this should be as a Propheticall vision and revelation for they were not all Prophets unto whom this vision was shewed and as there was really objected to their sight in mount Sinai flaming fire so this was a reall vision like to that which Moses saw in the bush Exod. 3.2 Viderunt Deum Israel sed non sicut est They saw the God of Israel but not as he is for no man hath seene God Rupertus They neither saw God in his essence nor in his infinite Majesty Osiander But they knew him to be present Innotescente illis Domino in specie aliquae vel forma c. The Lord shewing himselfe in some forme and shape as it pleased him and as their infirmity could beare Lippoman Pellican 3. Neither yet did the Lord shew himselfe in any humane shape here as Lyranus thinketh to signifie Quod
them bring of the best and fittest oyle and did set them the very kinde 3. Iunius thinketh that although the first liquor of the olive be very commendable yet Primam undam praeli superat ea qua iâ—diculis solùm extunditur that which is beaten out with pestles doth excell the first liquor of the presse 4. But I rather incline to Pellicans opinion who thinketh the purer and thinner oyle to have beene used for the holy anointing and the second sort as the fittest though not the purest because it was a more fat and thicker oyle to be for the lamps There was beside these religious uses a prophane use of this oyle as either for meat Osiander or medicine This oyle is therefore prescribed to be beaten onely because tundendo sola caro frangitur in beating the flesh onely as it were of the olive is brused but it being ground the stones also are bruised together with the rest and so the oyle hath an impure mixture of the dregs Cajetan Vers. 20. That the lamps may alwayes burne 1. Some upon these words have thought that the light in the lamps never went out but burnt continually both day and night their reasons are these 1. Cajetane would prove it by these words That it may alwayes burne Hinc apparet quod indeficiens erat lumen candelabri tam die quam nocte Hence it appeareth that the light of the candlestick failed not neither by day nor night Tostatus answereth that here the word jugiter alwayes non significat temporis continuitatem doth not signifie a continuance of time but a perpetuall ordinance though interrupted So also Piscator expoundeth continually that is statis temporibus at set times continually as the daily sacrifice was called Iuge sacrificium a continuall sacrifice and yet it was offered but twice every day at morning and even 2. Simlerus thinketh that the lamps gave light by day because quia Sanctum fenestris caret the holy place wanted windowes and therefore for a supplie of them the lamps did burne upon the candlesticke So also Pelarg. QUEST XXI Whether the lamps burned in the Tabernacle both day and night BUt Pellican answereth Solis clarissimum jubar c. that the most cleare Sunne beames which shined by day needed not have any helpe of candle light for seeing all the East end was open onely a vaile drawen before it there might come in light enough the Tabernacle opening toward the most lightsome part of the heavens the rising of the Sunne to illuminate every part of the Tabernacle 3 Ribera would prove as much by that place Levit. 24.3 Aaron shall dresse them both evening and morning before the Lord alwayes They were dressed to that end evening and morning ut semper ar derout that they might alwaies burne But as Cajetane noteth concerning the sense of that place though he concurre in the same opinion Non tempus lucendi sed disponendi lucernas decernitur Not the time of giving light but of disposing the lights is there decreed So also Gallas expoundeth these words chap. 30.7 that Aaron every morning dressed the lamps Notari tempus ordinandi lucernas The time of setting in order the lamps is noted And the lamps were dressed in the morning that is cleansed from the soile which it had gathered in the night the Priest in the morning quicquid immunditiarum noctu contraxerit c. did purge and cleanse whatsoever uncleannesse was gathered in the night Vatablus in cap. 30.7 2. Therefore it is the better opinion that the lights burned onely in the night and were extinguished and put out in the morning 1. Tostatus and Oleaster doe prove it by the words following in this place in the next verse They shall dresse them from evening to morning They therefore burned onely till the morning which the Latine Interpreter thus expoundeth Vt usque manâ— luceat That it may give light till the morning and the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall kindle it or set it on fire from the evening till the morning 2. Piscator alleageth that place chap. 30.8 where the Priest is said to kindle the lamps or set them on fire in the evening the word is behaghaleth in causing them to ascend that is setteth them on fire Paguine because the fire ascendeth or goeth up but in the morning he is said onely behetibo to make good the lamps that is to cleanse them and dresse them 3. Vatablus and Iunius inferre as much upon that place 1 Sam. 3.3 Ere the light of God went out that the lamps burned all night and were put out in the morning 4. Pellican useth this reason Interdiu sole lucente omnia illustrante The Sunne shined by day and gave light to every place so that there was then no use of the candle light they burned not in the day Quia id divino operi non honorificum esset Because that had beene to the dishonour of that divine worke of God in creating the light of the Sunne if any should have thought it needed the helpe of humane and artificiall light 5. Beda upon this that the lamps burned onely in the night and were put out in the morning maketh this allusion Cùm nocte transacta seculi hujus mane futuri seculi inclaruerit c. When the night of this world being past the morning of the next world shineth cleere we shall then no more need lucerâ—a librorum the light of books the true light of the world shining upon us 6. Lyranus also thus expoundeth Semper id est qualibet nocte Alwaies that is every night Iosephus thinketh that all the seven lamps burned by night and three of them onely by day But upon the former reasons it is evident that the lampe burned not at all by day the reason why the seven lamps were all set on fire was this that though one or more by some negligence might goe out in the night yet not all that some might hold light out still and so there should bee alwaies light in the Tabernacle Pellican QUEST XXII What is meant by the Tabernacle of the Congregation and whether it be so rightly called Vers. 21. IN the Tabernacle or Tent of the congregation 1. Some doe read In Tabernaculo testimoâ—â—â— In the Tabernacle of the testimonie So the Latine and Septuag But there is another word which afterward followeth gheduth which signifieth the testimonie the word hâ—â—e used is mâ—ghâ—â—â— So Numb 17.4 both these words are used together in the Tent maghedh of the appointed meeting before the Arke gheduth of the Testimonie And here the Latine Interpreter to avoid the concurrence and repetition of the same word is forced to read Tabernaculum foederis the Tabernacle of covenant Neither was the candlesticke set in the place where the Arke of the testimonie was but in the holy place without the vaile therefore for distinction sake of the places it cannot be here called the Tabernacle of the testimonie Simlerus as Tostatus
doe not light candles at noone day but to qualifie the darknesse of the night Lactantius also saith Num mentis compos putandus c. Is hee to bee thought well in his wits who offereth the light of candles for a gift to the author and giver of light B. Babingâ— 6. Morall Observations 1. Observ. Our hearts must be purged of worldly thoughts in our prayers Vers. 4. THou shalt make unto it a grate As the speciall use of this grate was to avoid the ashes and imbers from the hearth where the fire burned so in the Altar of our hearts there must be craticula a grate quae cineribus excretis ignem splendentem foveat c. which may cherish the bright fire by separating the ashes c. Borrhaius Wee must purge our hearts of all earthly thoughts when wee offer up the spirituall sacrifice of prayer upon the Altar of our hearts which is the meaning of the Wise-man when he biddeth us take heed unto our feet when we enter into the house of God Eccles. 4. 2. Observ. We must humble our selves before God Vers. 6. THou shalt make bars unto the Altar They were to carrie it on their shoulders and not to refuse any the meanest service in Gods worship that men of never so high degree in the world should thinke themselves of no reputation before God as David humbled and abased himselfe when hee danced before the Arke 2 Sam. 6. Oleaster 3. Observ. The spirituall lights of the Temple are to be cherished Vers. 20. COmmand the people to bring oyle c. Hereupon Origen giveth this note Nisi dederit oleum populus extinguetur lucerna in Temple Unlesse the people give oyle the lampe will goe out in the Temple c. They then which by their light of doctrine doe lighten the Church ought to be maintained For such as labour in the Word are worthie double honour of reverence and releefe CHAP. XXVIII 1. The Method and Argument AFter the description of the Tabernacle finished followeth the institution of the Ministers of the Tabernacle the Priests whose apparell is described in this Chapter and their consecration with the execution of their office in the next In this Chapter which sheweth what Priestly garments should bee made for Aaron and his sonnes and how first it is shewed in generall to vers 6. then in particular to vers 43. In the generall summe these things are declared 1. For whom these garments should bee made vers 1. 2. To what end vers 2. 3. By whom vers 3. 4. How many vers 4. 5. And of what matter vers 5. In the speciall and particular explication first the garments peculiar to the high Priest are described to vers 40. then such as belonged to other inferiour Priests vers 40. to the end The high Priests garments were these 1. The Ephod both the matter thereof vers 6. the forme and fashion vers 7 8. the ornaments the two precious stones with their graving vers 10 11. their placing with their use vers 12. the instruments of the Ephod to fasten it vers 13 14. 2. The breast-plate is described 1. The matter vers 15. 2 The forme and fashion vers 16. 3 The ornaments of precious stones to be set in foure rowes to vers 21. 4. The instruments chaines and rings to fasten it vers 22. to 28. 5. The use thereof is expressed vers 29 30. 3. The robe is set forth 1. The matter thereof vers â—1 2. The forme of it vers 32. the ornaments with bels and pomgranats vers 33 34. 4. The use vers 35. 4. The golden plate is described with the matter forme instruments and use vers 36. to 39. 5. Then three other parts of the Priestly rayment are handled together the embroidered coat the miter and girdle vers 39. Secondly the speciall attire for Aarons sonnes whereof some were common both to Aaron and them are namely these foure their coats girdles and bonnets vers 40. with the use of them vers 41. and their linen breeches with the place where they shall weare them vers 42. and their use vers 43. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. A breast-plate or pectorall B.G.I.V. cum câ—ter better than a rationall that is a vesture shewing reason or judgement L. C. the word is coshen a pectorall Vers. 4. A broidered coat as woven with eyes or checker worke B.G.I.A.P. better than a strait coat L. S. C. V. the word shabats is better taken in the first sense to embroider or make with eyes as vers 14. Vers 9. Two sardonix stones I. So also Iosephus and so they are called Apoc. 21.29 better than Onyx stones B.G.L.C.P.A. or smaragdes S. shoham H.V. Vers. 14. Of a certaine length B. or equall I. better than at the ends G. V. the word is inigebalath conterminus ending together A.P. this word is omitted by the rest L.S.C. Vers. 17. A rubie or sardie c. see the severall names and divers readings of these precious stones afterward at large quest 21. Vers. 24. See also the divers readings of this verse quest 24. Vers. 30. Thou shalt put in the breast-plate c. Vrim and Thummim B. G. I. V. A. P. C. better than doctrine and veritie L. or manifestation and veritie S. the words of themselves are better retained which signifie illumination and perfection Vers. 36. Holinesse to the Lord. G.A.P.C.L.I. better than the holinesse of the Lord. B. S. V. the meaning is that all holinesse is to be ascribed unto God and it is better translated holinesse I.B.G. cum caeter than holy L.V.C. the word is kodesh which signifieth holinesse kadosh is holy Vers. 38. To make them acceptable B.G. cum caeter not that he may be acceptable L. the word is lahem to them Vers. 41. Thou shalt fill their hands B.G. cum caeter consecrate their hand L. P. offer their sacrifice C. consecrate their ministerie I. the first translateth the words the rest give the sense 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Wherefore the Lord instituted a Priesthood Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come unto thee c. 1. Ordo prâ—posterus here the order is inverted for first the garments were made and afterward Aaron came and his sonnes to bee adorned with them and consecrated Cajetan 2. And here they are bidden to come unto Moses to bee instituted and consecrated but first they were appointed and ordained of God so there was a double application or drawing neere of Aaron and his sonnes first they were applied sequestred and ordained by the Lord for his service then they were applied unto Moses to receive their consecration from him Tostat. 3. 3. This applying of Aaron unto Moses signifieth Nihil in Sacerdotibus plebeium requiri nihil populare c. That nothing in the Priests is required like unto the common people Ambros. But that they as they were called to a more excellent and eminent place so their gifts and conversation should
and taketh care for us and as our Priest hee did once for all offer up himselfe in sacrifice for us and still continueth our Mediatour Borrh. 4. Now the inferiour Priests garments are fitly applied to set forth the qualities and conditions of the faithfull which are the members of Christ as the other did shadow forth Christ our head 1. Beda by the linen garment interpreteth decorem castitatis the comelinesse of chastitie by the girdle vigilantem mentis custodiam the diligent watchfulnesse of the minde to keepe the same by the bonnets visus anditus gustus custodiam the diligent keeping of the sight hearing taste and of all the senses 2. Thomas maketh a more generall use Castitas significatur per femoralia c. Chastitie is signified by the breeches Puritas vita per lineam tunicam Puritie of life by the linen garment Moderatio discretionis per cingulum Moderate discretion by the girdle Rectitudo intentionis pertiaram And a right intention by the bonnet 3. But this application is more fit The linen garment signifieth our innocencie and righteousnesse which we receive in the lavacre of regeneration being cloathed with Christs righteousnesse as the Apostle saith All yee that are baptized unto Christ have put on Christ the girdle signifieth constancie in the truth as S. Paul saith Stand therefore your loines girded about with veritie Tiara protectionis divinae signa erant The bonnets were signes of the divine protection the linen breeches shew what care should be had of comelinesse and what reverence is to be used in the service of God Pelarg. Marbach Who addeth this further that as we put more comelinesse upon our uncomely parts as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.23 So our Saviour hath respect unto the vile and abject members of the Church such as are despised and counted base in the world 4. And like as we use three kinde of garments some for necessitie to cover our naked parts some for ornament and comelinesse and some for defence as militarie garments as here the Priests had their linen breeches of the first sort their linen coat of the second and their girdle of the third So unto a Christian are necessarie three kinde of spirituall garments the first is the garment of faith whereby our sins are covered secondly the ornaments of the soule are requisite whereby Christians must be adorned in the sanctitie and integritie of life thirdly they must put on their spirituall armour and take the sword of the Spirit the word of God whereby they may fight against Satan Simler Borrhaius 4. Places of Doctrine 1 Doct. None must intrude themselves into the callings of the Church Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come In that Aaron intruded not himselfe into the Priests office but was thereunto called Procopius giveth this note Qui temerario ansu ad se trahere sacerdotium c. He that will rashly draw unto himselfe the Priesthood shall suffer punishment So also Oleaster So the Apostle observeth upon this very example of Aaron No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Heb. 5.4 2. Doct. The agreement which ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state OLeaster noteth here further in that Moses who was the chiefe Magistrate called Aaron to the Priesthood the concord and amitie that ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is commended that as Ioash prospered while hee followed the direction of Iehoiadah so both the Ecclesiasticall state should imitate Iehoiadah to give holy counsell and direction unto the Magistrate and the Magistrate to be like Ioash in following the same 3. Doct. Profitable arts are the gift of God Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men whom I have filled with the Spirit of wisdome c. Gallasius hereupon thus writeth Omnem artem industriam c. Dei donum agnosco Every art and industrie which bringeth utilitie unto man I acknowledge to be the gift of God as the Prophet Isaiah saith that God instructeth the husbandman to have discretion Isa. 28.26 Men therefore to whom God hath given the knowledge of profitable and commendable arts should have a care to employ them to Gods glorie and not to abuse them to wantonnesse 4. Doct. Whatsoever is instituted in Gods service must proceed from his wisdome Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men in the Hebrew wise in heart Whatsoever is instituted in the service of God à sapientia Dei proficisci debet must proceed from the wisdome of God no humane device must have place or bee admitted there Simler Sauls policie in transgressing Gods Commandement in saving the best things of the Amalekites though hee thought hee did therein well and wisely yet was displeasing unto God 5. Doct. The sound of the Word in the Gospell exceedeth the sound of Aarons bels under the law Vers. 35. HIs sound shall be heard c. Herein as Lippoman well observeth appeareth the excellencie of the Gospell beyond the Law they heard then but the sound of Aarons bels Nunc audimus clarum sonitum Evangelii Now we heare the cleere sound of the Gospell c And as the understanding of a man exceedeth the capacitie of a childe and the cleere day the dawning so the cleere light of the Gospell excelleth the shadowes of the Law God providing better things for us as the Apostle saith that they without us should not be perfect Heb. 11.40 6. Doct. There ought to be order among the Ministers of the Church Vers. 40. THou shalt make for Aarons sons coats In that Aaron the high Priests coats were made more costly and glorious than his sons the inferiour Priests therein commendatur ordo inter Ecclesiae ministros is commended order among the Ministers of the Church that although Christ doe forbid bid his Disciples Luk. 22. to exercise dominion one over another as the Princes of the world doe Neutiquam tamen ordinem abrogat Yet he doth not abrogate order seeing he hath not onely distinguished them himselfe in gifts but in offices as the Apostle saith Ephes. 4. He hath given some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors c. Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Against the superstitious apparell of the Romish Priests Vers. 4. THou shalt make a breast-plate an Ephod and a robe and a broidered coat These Priestly garments being ceremoniall and typicall are now abolished Christ the true high Priest being come with his ornaments Therefore the Romanists doe plainly Iudaize in bringing againe into the Priestly order such varietie of garments as the Pall the Miter the Crozier staffe the Albe the Chimere the gray amice the Stoale with such like Their Priests come forth as though Aaron addressed himselfe with his attire to sacrifice at the Altar S. Paul hath given us a rule concerning these things which are but a shadow of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 But it will
should be there consecrated where the chiefe of their service and ministerie was to be executed 3. And there betweene the doore and the Altar was the brasen Laver where Aaron and the Priests were to wash themselves before they put on the holy garments thither therefore are they called because there they were to be washed with water Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST V. Why Aaron and the rest are washed and how Vers. 4. ANd wash them with water 1. Not with common or every water but with that which was in the brasen Laver chap. 30.18 Iun. 2. But here we must consider that alwayes the order of time is not set downe in Scripture in setting downe the storie of such things as were done for the brasen Laver wherein they were to be washed is afterward appointed to bee made chap. 30. Tostat. quast 2. 3. They were washed not onely their hands and feet as in their daily ministerie chap. 40.33 but in their whole bodie as thinketh Rab. Salomon because their first consecration required a more solemne oblation and washing than their daily ministration And like as the oyle was powred upon Aarons head but ran downe along upon his beard and other parts so it is like the water was applied to his whole bodie Lyran. Tostat. And this washing was a figure of Christs baptisme who went into the water when he was baptised Matth. 3. Simler 4. It was fit they should be washed before they put on the holy garments both for decencie and comelinesse that the soile of their bodie might be cleansed before they applied the precious and glorious apparell and for signification that they might thereby be admonished to cleanse and purge themselves from their sins and corruptions QUEST VI. Of the Priestly apparell which Aaron put on and why the girdle is omitted Vers. 5. PVt upon Aaron the tunicle c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that this was the linen garment which was common to Aaron and the inferiour Priests But it is shewed before chap. 28.39 that the high Priests linen coat was embroidered and so were not the other Priests linen coats 2. Tostatus also hath another conceit that the high Priest did put on this linen coat supervestes communes upon his common wearing apparell qu. 2. But that is not like for Aaron put off his cloaths when he was washed and then he is immediatly cloathed with his Priestly apparell 3. Because no mention is here made of the girdle Cajetan thinketh that cingulum erat commune pontifici sacerdotibus that there was one common girdle for the high Priest and the rest and therefore afterward vers 9. mention is made once for all of the girdles of the Priests But it is evident chap. 28.39 that the high Priests girdle was embroidered of needle worke whereas the common girdles were onely of linen Levit. 16.4 This rather is to be supplied out of Levit. 8.8 where he is girded with a girdle upon his coat and so Oleaster thinketh well that Aaron hath seven ornaments put upon him beside the linen breeches the tunicle the robe the Ephod the pectorall the girdle the miter and golden crowne 4. And whereas it is said and shall cleanse them with the broidered gard of the Ephod Tostatus following Iosephus thinketh that this was the girdle wherewith his garments were girded all together qu. 2. whereas it was the broidered gard which was in the nether part of the Ephod the laps whereof below did gird the Priest in the waste as a girdle Iun. Lippoman Simler Vatab. QUEST VII How Aaron was anointed and with what Vers. 7. ANd thou shalt take the anointing oyle 1. Though it be called oile yet was it more than oile for it was a precious ointment made of Rosin Myrrh Cinamom and other things as it is prescribed chap. 30. Iun. 2. The high Priest was anointed in his head but it is not expressed how the inferiour Priests were anointed it is like but in their hands though Tostatus useth but a slender conjecture to prove it because now their Bishops use to be anointed in the head the inferiour Priests but in the hands to signifie that the one receive a superioritie in their consecration the other but a kinde of service and ministerie for what warrant have they to use the Jewish rites and ceremonies under the Gospell in their consecrations 3. Now because it would seeme an uncomely thing that all Aarons garments should be besmeared with this ointment if it had beene powred on Aarons head R. Salomon thinketh that Moses tooke his finger and dipped it in the oile and so strake it on Aarons forehead But the text is against his conceit both in this place because it is said and shalt powre it upon his head and likewise Psal. 133. where it is expressed that the ointment ran downe upon Aarons beard and so to the skirts of his cloathing Tostat. qu. 2. QUEST VIII How the ordinance of the Priesthood is said to be perpetuall Vers. 9. THe Priests office shall be theirs for a perpetuall law 1. Whereas the like phrase is used chap. 28.43 This shall be a law for ever c. which some restraine unto the particular precept of wearing linen breeches because the law of comelinesse and decencie is perpetuall here it is evident that it is generally meant of the exercising and execution of the whole Priesthood Calvin 2. Therefore this ordinance is said to be eternall and perpetuall in respect of the subject because it was to continue toto tempore quo durarent sacrificia all the time that the sacrifices were to continue the sacrifices then in Christ being determined for the Jewes themselves at this day forbeare to sacrifice nay they would chuse rather to die than offer sacrifice out of the land of Canaan and especially because they have no Tabernacle nor Temple where onely by the law they were to sacrifice the law of the Priesthood must also cease the sacrifices wherein the Priesthood was exercised being abolished Tostat. cap. 28. qu. 21. 3. Augustine giveth another reason why it is called perpetuall quia res significaret aeternas because it signified eternall things So also Gloss. interlin it is so called quia perpetuam futuram id est Christianam religionem significabat because it signified the Christian religion which should be perpetuall And Calvine also approveth this sense Hac vera est ceremoniarum perpetuitas c. This is the true perpetuitie of the ceremonies that they have their being in Christ the substance and truth of them QUEST IX The spirituall application of Aarons manner of consecration NOw this manner of consecrating of Aaron by offering sacrifices washing putting on the Priestly apparell in being anointed hath this signification 1. The presenting of the bullocke to be sacrificed Aspersionem designat sanguinis Domini nostri doth signifie the sprinkling of Christs bloud Beda The two rams doe set forth Christ ex anima corpore c. consisting in his humane nature of bodie and soule Strabus
sprinkled Marbach 5. And further whereas Aaron with the rest of the Priests are thus sprinkled with bloud it is shewed summos Sacerdotes non fuisse ita perfectos c. that the high Priests of the Law were not so perfect that they needed not to be purged Osiand But they had need of another high Priest by whose bloud they should be sanctified QUEST XXIX How these things were put into the Priests hands and shaken to and fro Vers. 24. THou shalt put all this in the hands of Aaron and shake them to and fro c. 1. The Latine Interpreter here readeth amisse thou shalt sanctifie them which Tostatus would helpe out thus because divers ceremonies were used in the consecration of the Priests quaelibet earum sanctificaâ—io vocabatur every one of them was called a kinde of sanctifying But the word nuph signifieth to shake or move to and fro 2. Some doe translate it thou shalt lift up So Pagnin Oleaster who referreth it to the ascending and rising up of the vapour or smoake But this shaking to and fro was done before they were burned upon the Altar which followeth in the next verse and there is another word afterward used to shew the lifting up for the shaking to and fro is called tenupha and the lifting up terumah of rum to lift up 3. R. Salomon saith the manner of putting these things into the Priests hands and shaking them to and fro was this Moses did put them into their hands and then with his hands underneath theirs did shake them to and fro toward the East and West and then toward the North and South 4. And by this ceremony of putting those things into the Priests hands Moses delivered them jus talia possidendi right to enjoy such things they should be afterwards for the Priests use Lippom. QUEST XXX Whether Moses were indeed a Priest Vers. 26. ANd it shall be thy part 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth here corruptly erit in partem suam it shall be for his part that is Aarons for what Aarons part should be is afterward shewed vers 28. the word is lecha to thee as the Septuagint translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it shall be for thy part that is Moses should have the Priests part at this time 2. Lippoman hence would inferre that Moses was the high Priest both because he did consecrate the high Priest and he had the breast for his part which only belonged to the high Priest 3. I rather thinke with Osiander that Moses did at this time quodam modo fungi officio Sacerdotis c. after a sort execute the Priests office So also Simler Gallas Hee was in the Priests stead in the consecration of Aaron But if Moses had beene actually a Priest he could not afterward have resigned that office and calling neither can this be inferred upon that place Psalm 99.6 Moses and Aaron among his Priests that Moses was a Priest but it sheweth that Moses and Aaron were most excellent among the Priests as Samuel among those that called upon his name Vatabl. Or Moses was counted among the Priests because he did extraordinarily execute the Priests office as in the consecration of Aaron 4. Tostatus calleth Moses simplicem Levitam a simple or plaine Levite quaest 14 He was indeed of the tribe of Levi and in that sense Aaron also might be called a Levite but Moses was more than a Levite because hee both sacrificed and consecrated the Priests which the Levites could not doe QUEST XXXI Whether Aaron had the breast and shoulder of the ram of consecration Vers. 27. THou shalt sanctifie the breast of the shake offering and the shoulder of the heave offering 1. Whereas the right shoulder was shaken to and fro before and burnt upon the Altar this could not be the shoulder of the heave offering here spoken of for it was burnt already upon the Altar 2. Some thinke therefore that it was the left shoulder which is here called the heave offering and that Moses had that and the breast for his part at this time because he was now in the Priests stead Osiand Marbach But this is not understood of Moses that he should have them they are for Aaron and his sonnes vers 28. Moses part is set downe before what it should be vers 26. namely the breast And it was the right shoulder not the left which was given to the Priest Levit. 7.32 The left shoulder and the rest of the peace offering beside that which was due unto the Priest belonged unto the offerer 3. Therefore this Law here set downe is not concerning the ram of consecration out of the which Aaron had not now the Priests part because he and the other Priest were at that time but as the offerers and presenters but for the time to come an order is set what part they should have out of the peace offerings of the children of Israel namely the breast and the right shoulder Tostat. quaest 13. Iun. Gallas QUEST XXXII What difference there was betweene the shake-offering and heave-offering Vers 27. THe shoulder of the heave-offering c. 1. Some thinke that the breast was only shaken to and fro and therefore was called tenupha the shake-offering and the shoulder was onely lifted up so called also terumah Vatabl. Which Osiander calleth the one Movenda the sacrifice to bee moved or shaken the other Levanda to be lifted up and Iunius seemeth to be of the same opinion who readeth distinctly which was shaken to and fro that is the breast and which was lifted up that is the shoulder But the words following will not beare this sense which was heaved up of the ram of consecration Now no mention is made before of the heaving up of the shoulder but of the shaking of it to and fro with the other things which were put into Aarons hands vers 24. so that the right shoulder of the consecration ram was not onely lifted up but it was also shaken to and fro 2. The generall opinion therefore iâ— that as well the breast as the shoulder were first heaved up and downe and then shaken to and fro So R. Salomon Lyranus Simlerus Gallasius Tostatus with others But if they were both indifferently shaken to and fro and lifted up alike why are these speciall names given unto them Levit. 7.34 The breast shaken to and fro and the shoulder lifted up 3. Therefore I neither thinke that the breast was shaken onely nor the shoulder lifted up onely because the shoulder was shaken to and fro vers 24. and the breast together with the shoulder are indifferently vers 28. called an heave-offering neither yet is it like that there was no difference of motion in the shaking of them and the heaving them up seeing they have speciall names given them of their divers motions But it is most probable that the breast was more shaken to and fro than lifted up and therefore is called tenuphah of the more principall motion and the shoulder
lye See more Synops. Câ—ntur 1. â—â—r 77. 7. Controv. That the wicked doe not eat the body of Christ. Vers. 33. A Stranger shall not eat thereof Like as none which were not of Aarons family were admitted to the eating of this holy meat so none but those which are of Christs family indeed and doe beleeve in him can be partakers of his body and bloud for whosoever eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud saith our blessed Saviour hath everlasting life Ioh. 6.54 They therefore are grossely deceived who thinke that the wicked and unbeleevers doe eat the very flesh and drinke the very bloud of Christ in the Eucharist Simler for then it would follow upon our blessed Saviours words that they should have everlasting life also See more Synops. Câ—nt 3. â—rr 27. 8. Controv. Against the reservation of the Sacrament Vers. 34. IF ought of the flesh c. or of the bread remaine unto the morning thou shalt burne it with fire This was commanded lest that which remained of the holy flesh and bread might either bee prophaned or might bee superstitiously abused It therefore may seeme strange that the Romanists which are in other things so superstitiously addicted to the rites and usages of the Law doe not also follow the same herein but rather have taken up a contrary use in reserving the consecrate host hanging of it up in a pix and adoring it for this is a true position sacramenti ratiâ— non duraâ— extra usum that set apart the use and the sacramentall respect ceaseth Simler For as the water used in Baptisme is no more a sacrament extra usum out of the use but is as other common water so neither are the bread and wine in the Eucharist For the more full handling of this point I likewise referre the Reader to Synops Cent. 3. err 19. 9. Controv. Against the continuall sacrifice of the Masse Vers. 38. THis is that which thou shalt present upon the Altar c. two lambes c. day by day continually To this daily and continuall sacrifice the Romanists resemble and compare their continuall sacrifice of the Masse and they hold them as Antichrists that doe abolish it as Antiochus abolished the daily sacrifice Ex Simlero 1. There is no externall sacrifice now remaining under the Gospell daily to be iterated for Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Heb. 9.28 he is not then to be often sacrificed 2. Antiochus was the forerunner of Antichrist because he abolished the daily sacrifice before the time which was to continue untill the Messiah came but Christ himselfe by the one oblation of himselfe once offered was at his comming to abolish the daily sacrifice as it is prophesied Dan. 9.27 He shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease not only for that he tooke away from the incredulous Jewes their City Temple and sacrifice but because he was the body and substance of those sacrifices which are not now to be iterated and repeated seeing as the Apostle saith With one offering he hath consecrated for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 which sacrifice of Christ is often to be celebrated by way of thankfull commemoration not to be iterated by any externall oblation 10. Controv. That doe this in the institution of the Eucharist signifieth not to sacrifice this Vers. 39. THou shalt present or make ready one lambe in the morning The word in the originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ghashah thou shalt make that is sacrifice or offer The Romanists would take advantage by this word because to make here signifieth to sacrifice that it should be so taken when Christ said in the institution of the Sacrament hoc facite doe this as if he should say sacrificate sacrifice ye this Gallasius here maketh mention how a certaine Sorbonist then a Popish Bishop but illius harae porâ—us a swine out of the same stie to use his owne words in a certaine booke written against the Protestants did make this word a chiefe foundation of the Missall sacrifice Contra. 1. But this will affoord them small helpe for this word ghashah to doe is of a generall signification and is applied to divers senses according to the circumstance of the place as Genes 11.4 faciamus nobis nomen let us make that is get us a name Gen. 18.7 fecit vitulum he made the calfe that is killed it or made it ready Likewise 2 Sam. 13.6 Faciat mihi cibum let her make me meat that is prepare it it doth not therefore alwayes signifie to sacrifice And our Saviour when he saith this doe c. hath relation to the former words take eat as S. Paul sheweth 1 Cor. 11.24 2. The sacrifices of the Law were types and figures of Christs sacrifice the shadow of the body they did not prefigure aliud umbratile sacrificium another shadowing sacrifice such as is the imaginary sacrifice of the Masse 3. And there remaineth now no externall ceremoniall sacrifice but only spirituall by us to be offered unto God as S. Peter sheweth Ye are an holy Priesthood to offer up spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God by Iesus Christ 1 Pet. 2.5 Marbach See further of this controversie Synops. Cent. 3. err 31. Vers. 44. I will sanctifie also Aaron c. Cajetane out of this place would prove the Sacrament of Orders in the new Testament calling them Heretikes that deny it thus inferring Si specialis divina actio sanctificans Aaron c. If there were present a divine action sanctifying Aaron to execute his office much more in the time of grace specialis divina actio concurrit ad sanctificandum aliquos c. a speciall divine action concurreth to sanctifie some ut sacerdotio fungantur to execute the Priesthood 11. Controv. That there is no Sacrament of Orders COntra 1. Cajetanes argument is not good that where there is a grace conferred by an outward signe there necessarily should bee a Sacrament for presently upon Davids anointing by Samuel the Spirit of the Lord came upon him 1 Sam. 16.13 yet I thinke he will not make it a Sacrament to be anointed King 2. It is likewise false that alwayes the inward grace concurreth with the outward signe for this were to tye Gods grace and Spirit to the element Nadab and Abihu were consecrated as well as the rest of Aarons sonnes but they were not sanctified the very next day after their consecration ended which was the eighth day they were destroyed for abusing their office in offering strange fire Levit. 10.1 3. Neither is there now any externall Priesthood in the new Testament to be exercised in the Church but the Priesthood of the new Testament resteth in the person of Christ Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek Hebr. 7.21 See further Syn. Câ—ntur 3. â—ror 107. Controv. 12. Against Pythagoras concerning the lawfulnesse of the legall sacrifices NOw in the last place in that the Lord himselfe gave direction unto his people
sinne of idolatrie as Tostatus confesseth that he sinned Nec tamen sequitur ex hoc quòd fuit idololatra and yet it followeth not hereupon that he was an idolater for howsoever Aaron thought in his heart the verie making of an idoll to be worshipped erecting of an altar and offering sacrifice unto it all which Aaron did doe proclaime him guiltie of externall idolatrie QUEST LXII Why idolatrie is called a great sinne THis great sinne 1. Idolatrie is counted a great sinne even in the highest degree because it is a sinne committed directly against God not as other sinnes of the second table which are done against our neighbour which are also against God because they are against his Law but not directly against Gods honor as the sins against the first table are 2. And among all the sins of the first table there is none which so directly impugneth the honour of God as idolatrie for he which taketh Gods name in vaine or prophaneth the Sabbath is an enemie to Gods honour but yet such an one denieth not the Lord to bee God as idolaters doe Tostat. qu. 33. 3. Like as then in a Common-wealth all offences are against the King because they are against his Lawes but those which are against his person are most directly against him and among them treason specially which is intended against his life of the same nature is idolatrie which is high treason against God 4. Thomas saith Tantum est aliquod peccatum gravius quanto longius per ipsum homo à Deo separatur A sinne is so much the more grievous the further wee are thereby removed from God but by infidelitie and idolatrie one is furthest separated from God 5. Idolatrie also is a great and grievous sinne in regard of the judgement and punishment which it bringeth with it for here Aaron as much as in him lay aâ—â—er fit ultimam cladem had brought upon them utter destruction Calvin if Moses had not turned the Lords wrath they had all beene at once destroyed QUEST LXIII Why Moses onely rebuketh Aaron and forbeareth further punishment NOw that Moses spared Aaron from further punishment and onely rebuked him 1. Some make this to be the cause for that the Lord had revealed unto Moses Aarons sinne in the mount before he came downe at what time Moses prayed also for him seeing the Lord bent to kill him Tostat. qu. â—5 But that intreatie for Aaron was afterward at Moses second going up to God when hee fasted fortie dayes and fortie nights as before at that time he saith he prayed for Aaron Deut. 9.20 And seeing at this time the Lord purposed to destroy all the nation and so Aaron could not escape Moses now onely prayed in generall for all Israel that God would not destroy the whole nation 2. Others thinke that Moses did after a milde manner reprove Aaron quiae sic arguendi praelati because Prelates and Ecclesiasticall Governours are so to be reproved Ferus he thinketh he was now the high Priest So also Oleaster calleth him Pontificem summum the chiefe Priest But as yet Aaron was not consecrated as Lippoman inferreth upon these reasons Quia non illi improperatur conspâ—râ—atum sacerdotium He is not upbraided with defiling of his Priesthood by this meanes neither doe we read of his reconciliation afterward which should not have beene omitted in such a case of irregularitie 3. Procopius thinketh that Aaron was both spared at this time and afterward likewise when he repined against Moses cum propter alias causas tum propter sanctos ex ejus lumbis prodituros Both for other causes as also for those holy mens sakes which should come out of his loynes But if this had beene the reason all the tribes should have beene spared likewise because out of all of them came holy and worthy men Judges Prophets or Kings 4. But the causes rather were these 1. Aaron confessed his sinne and therefore Moses inclined to favour him 2. Moses afterward intreated the Lord for him and the Lord at his instance forgiving his sinne the punishment also was remitted Simler 3. Adde hereunto that Aaron was now appointed to be high Priest order was taken for his priestly apparell and his office what it should be and how he and his sonnes should bee consecrated all which had beene in vaine if Aaron now had perished 4. Beside Moses had direction from God to put divers of the people to the sword for this offence but for Aaron hee had no such commandement 5. But Augustine yeeldeth the best reason Novit ille cui parcat c. God onely knoweth whom to spare for amendment and whom not to spare at all or for a time for his wayes and judgements are past finding out qu. 148. 5. Now whereas Tostatus further reasoneth that Moses by all likelihood had prayed for Aaron in the mount because then the Lord did specially reveale unto him his sinne for otherwise Moses had knowne nothing of Aarons doings as he did as it appeareth by this reprehension it may be answered that it is not necessarie for this cause to presuppose any such notice to have beene given unto Moses in the mount for either Moses might by examination and inquirie after hee came downe learne out the truth or which is rather like Moses Aaronem vicarium constituerat had left Aaron his deputie governour when he went up into the mount Simler and therefore he was sure that such a thing could not bee attempted in the host without Aarons permission at the least and sufferance QUEST LXIV What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not Vers. 22. THen Aaron answered c. 1. Some things are to be commended here in Aarons confession 1. His modestie that being Moses elder brother yet hee calleth him Lord and submitteth himselfe unto him whereof these two reasons may be yeelded both because Moses was greater in office than Aaron both as a Prophet and Governour of Israel Tostat. qu. 32. and his owne conscience accused him agnoscebat sejure argui he knew he was worthily reproved 2. Aaron confesseth and acknowledgeth his fault in saying Let not the wrath of my Lord waâ— fâ—erce Agnoscit crimen hee therein yeeldeth himselfe to be in fault Borrh. 3. He maketh a full and large declaration of the manner rem gestam liberè confiâ—etur he freely openeth all the matter how it was done Pelarg. both what the people required and upon what reason and ground what he did and what came thereof rem ut gesta est simpliciter narraâ— he simply declareth the matter as it was done 2. But Aaron in some things sheweth his infirmitie 1. Peccatum culpam in alios trajicere studet Hee seeketh to turne over the sinne and offence upon others laying the fault upon the people Ferus 2. Aaron bewrayeth some hypocrisie that seeketh to extenuate his fault as much as he can being afraid nâ— aliquid de existimatione sua decodat lest he should lose any
instruments belonging to the candlesticke 46. qu. How much a talent was 47. qu. Of the mysticall application of the candlesticke Questions upon the six and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Of the name of the Tabernacle and which part of the Sanctuarie was properly so called 2. qu. Why the Lord appointed a Tabernacle to be erected and that in the wildernesse 3. qu. VVhy the Lord would not yet have a Temple built 4. qu. Of what stuffe these curtaines were made 5. qu. Of the manner of worke used in these curtaines 6. qu. Whether every curtaine were coupled by strings one to another or five onely to five 7. qu. Of the lamps and strings how they were set and placed in the curtaines 8. qu. How these first curtaines were disposed in the Tabernacle and how they hanged 9. qu. Of the difference and diversitie betweene the first curtaines and the second 10. qu. How the second curtaines were disposed and of the doubling of the sixth curtaine 11. qu. The great curtaine of the second sort consisting of six single curtaines what place of the Tabernacle it covered 12. qu. What was done with the cubit which was overplus on the two sides 13. qu. Of the two outward coverings whether they went all over the Tabernacle 14. qu. Of the mysticall application of the coverings 15. qu. How thicke the boords of the Tabernacle were 16. qu. Whether the tenons were in the sides or in the bottome of the boords 17. qu. VVhy three sides onely were covered with boords 18. qu. Of the sockets and footstalles their number and whether they were fastened in the ground 19. qu. Of the two corner boords what breadth they were of 20. qu. How the corner boords were joyned as twinnes 21. qu. Of the order and number of the bars 22. qu. Whether the middle barre went thorow the boords within 23. qu. Of the mysticall sense of the boords with their sockets and barres 24. qu. Of the vaile which hanged before the most holy place 25. qu. VVhat taches or hooks the vaile hanged under 26. qu. In what part of the Tabernacle the vaile was hanged up and why 27. qu. Why the Table was set on the North and the candlesticke on the South 28. qu. VVherein the first vaile and the second differed 29. qu. Why the first vaile had no Cherubims as the other 30. qu. What vaile of the Temple it was which was rent in the passion of our blessed Saviour 31. qu. Of the mysticall sense of these vailes Questions upon the seven and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest Why the Lord commanded an Altar to be made and of the bignesse thereof 2. qu. How fire was made upon the Altar framed of wood 3. qu. Whether the Altar were made of boords 4. qu. How this place agreeth with that Exod. 20.25 where the Altar is prescribed to be made of earth or unwrought stone 5. qu. What the hornes of the Altar were and to what use 6. qu. Of the vessels and instruments belonging to the Altar 7. qu. Whether all the instruments were of brasse 8. qu. Whether the grate made to the Altar were set within or without 9. qu. Of the rings of the Altar whether they were put to the grate or to the Altar 10. qu. Of the mysticall interpretation of the Altar 11. qu. VVhether one Court were made or two or more 12. qu. Why the Court was made and of what largenesse 13. qu. How the Tabernacle was situated in the middest of the Court. 14. qu. Of the hangings which compassed the Court the fashion and bignesse of them 15. qu. Of the situation and placing of these pillars 16. qu. Of the gate of the Tabernacle 17. qu. Whether any of the lay people were admitted into the outward Court 18. qu. Whether all the instruments of the Tabernacle were of brasse 19. qu. Of the mysticall application of the Court. 20. qu. What manner of oyle they are willed to bring 21. qu. Whether the lamps burned in the Tabernacle both day and night 22. qu. What is meant by the Tabernacle of the Congregation and whether it be so rightly called 23. qu. Whether it belonged to Aaron onely to dresse the lamps 24. qu. Of the mysticall application of the lamps and oyle thereof 25. qu. Of the description and situation of the whole Tabernacle 26. qu. Whether every part of the Tabernacle had a spirituall signification 27. qu. The spirituall use of the whole Tabernacle and the parts thereof Questions upon the eight and twentieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the Lord instituted a Priesthood 2. qu. VVhy Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest 3. qu. VVherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree 4. qu. VVhy Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron 5. qu. VVhy these Priestly garments are commanded to be made 6. qu. Of the cunning men that wrought in the Tabernacle 7. qu. VVhether this gift of cunning and wisdome remained in the workmen after the Tabernacle was finished 8. qu. Of the number of the Priestly garments and ornaments 9. qu. VVhat garments were peculiar to the high Priests what common 10. qu. VVhich garments were put on first which last 11. qu. Whether the Priestly garments might at any time be carried and used out of the Tabernacle 12. qu. Whether the high Priest did well in meeting Alexander in his Priestly attire 13. qu. Of the matter whereof the holy garment should be made 14. qu. Of the name of the Ephod and the divers kinds thereof 15. qu. How Gedeon offended in making an Ephod 16. qu. Of the fashion of the Ephod 17. qu. Of the two Onyx or Sardonix stones why they are called stones of remembrances 18. qu. Of the mysticall application of the Ephod and the two precious stones 19. qu. Why it was called the breast-plate of judgement 20. qu. Of the fashion of the breast-plate 21. qu. Of the twelve precious stones their names colours qualities and congruitie with the twelve tribes 22. qu. That it is not now certainly knowne what these precious stones were their qualities and signification 23. qu. How many rings the breast-plate had and how placed 24. qu. What is meant by the forepart thereof 25. qu. Whether the breast-plate were ever or never untied and loosed from the Ephod 26. qu. Whether the high Priest went into the most holy place in his glorious apparell 27. qu. What the Vrim and Thummim were 28. qu. How judgement was given by the Vrim and Thummim 29. qu. Whether the high Priest used to aske counsell of God by the Vâ—im or Ephod and what Ephod it was 30. qu. Of the mysticall application of the Priestly pectorall with the Vrim and Thummim 31. qu. Of the robe of the Ephod the fashion and matter thereof 32. qu. Of the bels which hung in the skirts of the robe 33. qu. Why the sound of the bels was to be heard 34. qu. Of the mysticall application of the robe 35. qu. Of the golden plate the
such like but in these cases the partie was uncleane sometimes onely to the even sometimes for the space of seven daies Levit. 15.13 18. The Priest therefore when any such uncleannesse was upon him could not enter into the Sanctuarie at all the washing of his hands and feet then at the brasen Layer would not serve the turne But though they were free from all other kinds of uncleannesse yet they were to wash their hands and feet alwaies when they went into the Tabernacle 3. The spirituall reason of the washing the hands and feet is this by the hands are understood the workes and operations by feet the affections of the soule Ministers and generally all that approach and draw neere unto God must be both of cleane heart and of cleane waies and workes when they come before God as for the hands the Apostle willeth that everie where men should lift up pure hands and concerning the feet the Preacher saith Take heed unto thy feet when thou entrest into the house of God QUEST X. What cloud this was which covered the Tabernacle Vers. 34. THen the cloud covered the Tabernacle c. 1. This was not another cloud beside that which was called the pillar of the cloud as some thinke but the very same both because of the appearance of it by night as fire as the other seemed as a pillar of fire in the night as also there was the same use of this cloud to direct them in their journeyes as of the pillar Exod. 13.21 Tostat. qu. 10. 2. Some thinke while the people camped about mount Sinai that this cloud vanished away which was the cause why the people desired gods to go before them and that now as soone as the Tabernacle was made it appeared againe But that is not like for chap. 13.22 it is said that the Lord tooke not away the pillar of the cloud by day c. And seeing the Manna did fall every day which was an evident signe of Gods presence among them though the cloud had not been in their sight that had been no cause to move thâ—â— to desire a guide Simler 3. This cloud which before also did direct them now commeth somewhat nearer and sitteth upon the Tabernacle Novae hic gratiae accessio commendatur in certiore symbolo c. this accession of new grace and favour is commended by a more certaine and evident signe Calvin 4. This cloud before rested upon the other Tabernacle which Moses had removed without the campe but now the great Tabernacle being built the Lord doth chuse it as his seat Tostat. qu. 10. QUEST XI How the glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle THe glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle 1. The Lord giveth here a double testimonie of his presence for the approbation of this worke made by his appointment there was a cloud without and inâ—us splendor gloriae Dei within the brightsome glorie of God Gallass For so the Apostle calleth the shining of Moses face the glorie of his countenance 1. Cor. 3. Oleaster 2. By this was signified both the presence of Christ in his Church because this cloud filled the Tabernacle within and the Lords protection of his Church the cloud covered it without Marbach 3. And as the glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle so in Christ who is the true Tabernacle the Godhead dwelleth bodily and essentially Osiander 4. Though the glorie of the Lord filled the earthly Tabernacle yet his glorie remained still in heaven onely the Lord vouchsafed there a visible signe of his presence that they might know him to be neere unto them as often as he was called upon Calvine QUEST XII VVhy it pleased God to make the cloud a signe of his presence IT hath pleased God diversly to use the clouds as symboles and signes of his presence so he set his bow in the clouds as a signe of his favour he went before his people in a cloud Christ was transfigured in the mount in a bright cloud when he ascended a cloud tooke him out of their fight and he shall come againe in the clouds to judge the quicke and the dead 2. First as the cloud engendreth raine doth shelter from the heat of the Sun so Christ by the influence and raine of grace doth comfort his Church and protecteth it in the heat of persecution Simler Secondly as the fiâ—e heateth giveth light and purgeth so Christ by his Spirit worketh all these in his Church comforting illuminating and purifying the same Pelarg. QUEST XIII Why Moses could not enter into the Tabernacle Vers. 35. MOses could not enter into the Tabernacle because the cloud abode there c. 1. Tostatus confuting Lyranus who thinketh that Moses did not enter into the Tabernacle propter reverentiam because of the reverence of the place and not for that the thicke cloud did hinder his â—ight affirmeth the contrarie that Moses rather entred not because of the thicke cloud But seeing that this was a lightsome cloud and therefore is called the glorie of the Lord it was not the thicknes of the cloud that could have been an impediment to Moses he therefore rather forbeareth to enter of reverencâ— as when it was said unto him while the fire burned in the bush come not hither c. Exod. 3. 2. Moses entred into the thicke cloud in mount Sinai but here he cannot enter Pellican maketh this the reason because now Moses representeth the people of the Iewes to whom the glorie of the Lord in the Tâ—bernacle was as a cloud But he as well represented the person of the people when he went up to receive the Law for them therefore that is no reason The cause then is this Moses durst not ascend up unto God into the mount uncalled he waited six daies in the mount and the seventh the Lord called unto him chap. 24 16 at this time therefore it was not lawfull for Moses to come neere being not called or bidden so to doe Gallas 3. And by this meanes the Lord would have his Tabernacle afterward reverenced of all into the which Moses had no entrance at this time for the great glorie of the Lord as for the same cause at the dedication of Salomons Temple the glorie of the Lord so filled the house that the Priests could not stand to minister because of the cloud the glorious light whereof they could not endure And thus the Lord would have his house reverenced because of his presence 4. But the cloud did not alwaies thus fill the house but at this time the Lord did it to sanctifie the Tabernacle with his presence The cloud had three positions or places sometime it was within the Tabernacle then none could enter as heere and Numb 12. when the cloud stood at the doore of the Tabernacle when the Lord called to Aaron and Miriam or it rested upon the Tabernacle then Moses and Aaron might enter but the campe removed not but when the cloud was lift up altogether from the
Tabernacle then the campe went forward Lyran. QUEST XIV In what order the campe marched Vers. 36. THe children of Israel went forward 1. The order how they marched is set forth Numb 2. the whole host was divided into foure squadrons and standards in the first quarter on the East was Iudah with Issachar and Zebulun on the South was Ruben Simeon and Gad on the North was Dan with Nepthali and Asher on the West side behind marched Ephraim Manassis and Benjamin â— And these went forward in such order that neither the standards were mingled together nor yet the tribes under the same standard nor the families in the same tribe but the standards tribes and families kept their distinct order 3. In the middest of the host went the Tabernacle with the host of the Levites round about Moses and Aaron with the Priests before the Gersanites behind the Merarites on the North and the Caathites on the South Gallas But howsoever it was with the rest it is verie like that Moses went first because he gave direction when the campe should set forward Calvin QUEST XV. Why it is called the Lords cloud and of foure miraculous things in it Vers. 38. THe cloud of the Lord. Though all the clouds and whatsoever else is in the heaven and earth bee the Lords yet this cloud after a more speciall manner is said to bee the Lords because of these speciall and extraordinarie properties which it had which were signes of the Lords speciall presence 1. The place and situation of it was extraordinarie for clouds remaine not neere the earth because by the reflexion of the beames of the Sun they are apt to be dispersed but this cloud rested upon the Tabernacle 2. Other clouds continue not they are soone dispersed and dissolved but this cloud remained in their sight for the space of fortie yeares 3. It was immoveable and immurable not subject to the force and violence of the winds and weather whereas other clouds are carried of the winds 4. It had an extraordinarie motion it was neither moved motu naturali by any naturall motion as the vapors and clouds ascend nor motu raptus by the rapt and swift motion of the heavens as the clouds that are aloft follow the motion of the celestiall spheres nor yet motu violentâ— by a violent motion as the clouds are forced of the winds for sometime this cloud moved against the wind but it had motum progressivum a kind of progresse and walking motion sometime forward sometime backward sometime on the right hand sometime on the left as it pleased God to point out the journeies of his people Tostat. qu. 13. Concerning other questions of the Tabernacle as how it was situated in the Court whether â—ust in the middest as being distant 35. cubits from the East end and as many from the West which is the opinion of Tostatus qu. 14 or rather it was fiftie cubits distant from the East end so that the forepart of the Court was a just square of fiftie cubits on each side as thinketh Lyranus which is the more probable See this handled before qu. 13. chap. 27. As likewise of the whole forme and fashion of the Tabernacle with the instruments thereof see qu. 25. chap. 27. To those places I referre the Reader not thinking it necessarie to repeate the same things againe 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. All things in the Church must be done in order Vers. 3. THou shalt put therein the Arke In that the Lord appointeth Moses in what order the Tabernacle should be set up and every thing placed therein it sheweth that both in the doctrine and discipline of the Chruch all things should be done in order Simler For God is not the author of confusion as the Apostle saith who willeth all things to bee done honestly and by order 2. Doct. The Sacraments depend not of the worthines of the Minister Vers. 9. THou shalt take anointing only Moses anointeth the Tabernacle not Aaron who was appointed to be the Priest to teach us that signes and Sacraments receive not their strength and vertue from the dignitie of the Ministers but from the institution of God Simler 3. Doct. How the Lord was present in the Tabernacle Vers. 34. THe glorie of the Lord filled the Tabernacle God was not so present in the Tabernacle as though that place could containe or comprehend his glorie for he dwelleth not in Temples made with hands but because there it pleased him to shew some visible signes of his presence God is said to be present three waies 1. After a generall manner by his power as he is in every place 2. More specially by his grace and so he is present only to the faithfull 3. The third kind of presence is quâ— nobis in Christo adest whereby God is present in Christ who assumed the humane nature unto his Divine in the unitie of person haec est prastantissima praesentia Divinitatis this is the most excellent presence of God in Christ both God and man Simler In that God is present with us to whom our nature is united in one person 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That Christs humanitie is not every where present BUt heere we refuse and reject that fourth kind of presence of Christ even in his humanitie as the Lutheranes hold whereof Marbachius thus writeth That the divine nature of Christ causeth that his humanitie which by the propertie of it owne nature which it reteineth for ever can be but in one place as once sit vbique maxime in Ecclesia should be everie where and most of all in his Church his reason is because the Godhead being everie where ipsam unionis cause gloria suâ— participem facâ— maketh the humanitie for the union sake partaker of his glorie Contra. 1. This assertion of Marbachius includeth a contradiction for how doth Christs humane nature retaine the naturall propertie thereof for ever in being but in one place at once if it be every where by vertue of the Godhead 2. If by vertue of this union the humane nature can doe all which the Deitie doth then the humane nature should be absorpt and as it were changed into the Divine 3. There is a mutuall communication of the properties betweene the two natures of Christ but such as destroyeth not the true properties of either but if this propertie of the Deitie were communicated to the humane nature to be everie where the humanitie of Christ should be altered in nature being without the true propertie thereof which is to be but in one place at once 4. And as the reason of this assertion is not sound so the conclusion it selfe of Christs omnipresence in his humanitie is contrarie to the Scriptures for Saint Peter saith Whom the heavens must containe untill the time that all things be restored 2. Confut. Against the superstitious hallowing of Churches Vers. 9. THou shalt take the anointing oyle 1. From this example of Moses anointing of