Selected quad for the lemma: opinion_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
opinion_n	mortal_a	sin_n	venial_a	597	5	12.4318	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13155	An abridgement or suruey of poperie conteining a compendious declaration of the grounds, doctrines, beginnings, proceedings, impieties, falsities, contradictions, absurdities, fooleries, and other manifold abuses of that religion, which the Pope and his complices doe now mainteine, and vvherewith they haue corrupted and deformed the true Christian faith, opposed vnto Matthew Kellisons Suruey of the new religion, as he calleth it, and all his malicious inuectiues and lies, by Matthevv Sutcliffe.	Sutcliffe, Matthew, 1550?-1629.	1606 (1606)	STC 23448; ESTC S117929	224,206	342

in 1. sent dist 2. hold contrary Richardus in 1. sent dist 3. holdeth that the mysterie of the Trinitie may be demonstrated by naturall reasons Scotus Maronis and Thomas affirme the contrary About the faculties of the soule called potentiae the schoolemen are diuided into three sectes as may appeare by their disputes lib. 1. sent dist 3. some hold they are all one with the substance of the soule others that they are accidents the third that they are betweene substances and accidents Abbot Ioachim and Richard de sancto victore taught that the diuine essence might generare gigni the contrarie is taught by Peter Lombard and his followers Peter Lombard lib. sent 1. dist 17. taught that charity wherewith we loue God and our neighbour is the holy ghost and that it is not any thing created but now most of his followers in this point forsake him In the 24. dist of his first booke of sentences Peter Lombard saith that the words of number spoken of God are spoken only relaturely and that the word Trinity implieth nothing positiuely but onlie priuatiuely which because it ouerthroweth the mysterie of the holy Trinity is almost generally contradicted by his followers In the 44. distinction of the same booke he saith that God can alwaies doe whatsoeuer he could euer doe and that he willeth whatsoeuer hee would at any time and knoweth whatsoeuer hee knew at any time but his Disciples hold direct contrary Thomas p. 1. q. 46. art 2. holdeth that the world or at the lest some creature might haue beene from euerlasting so likewise holdeth Bonauenture and some others Richardus maintaineth the opposite opinion and that rightly for that the other sauoureth of Arianisme The master of sentences in 4. dist 1. and Gabriel and Vega lib. 7. pro Conc. Trid. c. 13. hold that not onely substances but accidents also are created Alexander Hales q. 9. m. 6. q. 10. m. 1. and Thomas p. 1. q. 45. art 4. affirme that onely substances are created About this question an omnium aeuiternorum sit vnum aeuum vel multiplex there are 5. different opinions the first of Scotus the second of Thomas the third of Durand the fourth of Henricus the fifth of Bonauenture Likewise about this question quae sit ratio formalis cur Angelus sit in loco there are fiue opinions all repugnant one to another Thomas and Richardus doe affirme that two Angels cannot be in one place together Scotus Occham and Gabriel hold the contrarie Thomas holdeth that Angels haue not intellectum agentem possibilem Scotus doth directly contradict him Scotus and Gabriel teach that both Diuels and good Angels doe vnderstand naturally both our thoughts and the thoughts one of another but to Thomas p. 1. q. 57. art 4. this seemeth absurd Antisiodorensis lib. 2. sum saith that Christ had Angelum custodem other schoolemen denie it Scotus in 2. sent dist 1. holdeth that the soule and an Angel do not differ as two diuers kinds others teach contrary Some doctours hold that Angels consist of forme only others hold contrarie as appeareth by their disputes in 2. sent dist 3. The second councell of Nice Act. 5. determineth that Angels soules are corporall nemo dixerit saith the councell vel angelos vel daemones velanimas incorporeas but this opinion will not now bee beleeued of any learned Papists Why then should they rather beleeue that synode in the article of worship of images than in this Scotus saith that the will is the only subiect of sinne Thomas denieth it Concerning the place of paradise there are three different opinions some hold that it reacheth to the circle of the Moone Thomas in 2. dist 17. and Bonauenture doe place it vpon a high mountaine they know not where others place it in the East Concerning the nature of free wil there are diuersities of opinions among schoolemen and others as Iosephus Angles in lib. 2. sent dist 24. and 25. sheweth particularly Richardus holdeth that freewill cannot be changed by God others for the most part hold the contrary Thomas Bonauenture and Setus hold that grace is not a qualitie infused but a qualitie inherent in the soule Alexander Hales and Scotus hold that it is a quality infused Iosephus Angles in lib. 2. sent dist 26. rehearseth three seuerall opinions of schoole-doctors about the diuision of grace in gratiam operantem cooperantem whereby it may euidently appeare that Papists in talking of grace goe about to shut out Gods grace Most schoolemen and others affirme that Adam and Eue beleeued not Gods words concerning the forbidden fruit Bellarmine lib. 3. de amiss grat c. 6. saith they beleeued In the same booke c. 9. Bellarmine saith Adams offence was greater then that of Eue contrary both to ancient doctors and to schoolemen Lib. 5. de amiss grat c. 17. he sheweth great diuersities of opinions among his schoolemen fellowes about orginall sinne and himselfe dissenteth from all About the conception of the blessed Virgin whether it was in originall sinne or not there haue beene not onely contradictions but also tragicall stirres and contentions Certeine schollers of Aquinas beleeue and teach that no man being of yeares of discretion can be iustified by the absolute power of God without the act and concurrence of free will Scotus Vega and Caietan hold contrary both their opinions are touched by Iosephus Angles in 2. sent dist 27. Richardus in 2. dist 27. art 2. q. 1. Scotia in 1. dist 17. q. 1. art 1. and Durand in 1. dist 17. q. 2. and others hold that a man may merit the first grace do Congruo Gregorius Arimineusis in 2. dist 26. Lyra in Ioan. 1. Waldensis and others denie it Sotus lib. 2. de not grat c. 4. saith that the former opinion is neere to Peligiamsine Gregorius Ariminensis and Capreolus in 2. dist 27. q. 1. hold that no man without the illustration of Gods speciall grace can attaine to the knowledge of any moral truth but Thomas and Scotus in 2. dist 27. doe hold contrary Durand placeth originall sinne in the carnall appetite Thomas placeth it in the whole substance of the soule Scotus differeth from both and placeth it in the will of man Iosephus Angles in 2. dist 27. rehearseth three seuerall opinions about this question whether a sinne of omission may be committed without a positiue act The same man reckoneth 5. different opinions about the difference of mortall and veniall sinnes and three opinions concerning this question what is sinne of malice Catharin and Caietan doe striue about faith of infants and diuers other matters and greater would the contention haue beene if the matter had not been taken vp or at least silence commanded by the Pope Bellarmine lib. 1. de pontif Rom. c. 12. saith that the keies of the church are nothing but order and iurisdiction the Master of sentences and Caietan de iust auth pontif Rom. hold that they containe somewhat more Pighius lib. 4. hierarch eccles c. 8.