Selected quad for the lemma: opinion_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A09400
|
A discourse of conscience wherein is set downe the nature, properties, and differences thereof: as also the way to get and keepe good conscience.
|
Perkins, William, 1558-1602.
|
1596
(1596)
|
STC 19696; ESTC S110415
|
85,171
|
182
|
men to this ende no doubt that they might beleeue the accomplishment of the promise in themselues Secondly we learne that it is not presumption for any man to beleeue the remission of his owne sinnes for to doe the will of God to which we are bound is not to presume now it is the will of God to which he hath bound vs in conscience to beloâue the remiââion of our owne sinnes and therefore rather ãâã to doe it is pââ¦ous disobedience Thirdly we are here to âârke and to reââ¦ber with care the foundation of the ãâã certenâe of mans saloâion For if man be bound in conscience first to giue assent to the Gospât and secondly to applie ãâã to himselfe by true faith then without doubt a man by faith may be certenly perswaded of his owne ãâã and saluation in this ãâã without any extâordinarie reuelation Gods commaundements beeing in this and the like caseâ possible For commaundements are either Legall or Evangelicall Legall shew vs âât disease but giue vs no remedie and the perfect doing of them according to the intent of the law giuer by reason of mans weaknes and through mans default is impossible in this world As for Evangelicall commandements they haue this priuiledge that they may and can be performed according to the intention of the Lawgiuer in this life because with the commandement is ioyned the inward operation of the spirit to inable vs to effect the dutie commaunded and the will of God is not to require absolute perfection at our hands in the Gospel as in the law but rather to qualifie the rigour of the law by the satisfaction of a mediatour in our steads and of vs we beeing in Christ to accept the vpright will and indeauour for the deede as the will to repent and the will to beleeue for repentance and true faith indeede Now then if things required in the Gospel be both ordinarie and possible then for a man to haue an unfallible certaintie of his owne saluation is both ordinary possible But more of this point afterward Lastly all such persons as are troubled with ãâã distrustings vnbeleefe dispaire of Gods mercie are to learne and consider that God by his word bindes them in conscience to beâââue the pardon of their owne sinnes be they neuer so grieuous or many and to beâââe their own Election to saluation whereof they doubt Mââââhat are but civill haue care to auoid robbing and killing because God giues commaundements against stealing and killing why then should not we much more striue against our manifold doubtings and distrustings of Gods loue in Christ hauing a commandement of God that calls vpon vs and binds vs to doe so Thus we see how Gods word bindes consciences now conscience being thus bound againe bindes vs. The bonde of conscience is called Guiltines Guiltines is nothing els but a worke of the conscience binding ouer a man to a punishment before God for some sinne Thus much of the propet binder of the conscience now follows the improper The improper binder is that which hath no power or vertue in it selfe to binde conscience but doth it onely by vertue of Gods word or of some part of it It is threefold Humane lawes an Oath a Promise Touching humane lawes the speciall point to be considered is In what manner they binde That this may in part be cleared I will stande a while to examine and confute the opinion that the very pillers of the popish Church at this day maintaine namely that Civill and Ecclesiâsticall Iurisââction haue a coactive povver in the conscience and that the ãâã made thereby doe as truly and properly binde as they speake to mortall and venial sinne as Gods law it selfe The arguments which they commonly vse are these Argum. 1. Deut. 17. That man that vvill ãâã presumptuousây and not obây the auâ horitie of the priest or Iâdge shall ãâã and thââ shalt take away euill from Israel Here say they the precepts of the high priest are Imperia not âdmonitions or exhortations and they binde in conscience otherwise the transgressours thereof should not haue bin punished so seuerely Answ. The intent of this law as a very child may perceiuâ is to establish the authoriue and right of the highest appeales for all matters of controversie in the Synedrium oâ great court at Ierusa lem Therefore the words alleadged doe not giue vnto the priest a soveraigne power of making lawes but a power of giuing iudgement of controuersies and that according to lawes alreadie made by God himselfe from which iudgement there might be no appeale Nowe this power of determining doth not constraine conscience but the outward man to maintaine order and peace For what reason is there that that sentence which might be either a gainsaying of Gods law or a mistaking of it should binde the conscience to a sinne Againe not euery one that refused to subiect themselues to the sentence of this court were straightway guiltie of sinne for this did Ieremie the Prophet and Christ our Sauiour when they were condemned for wicked persons but he that presumptuously despised the sentence and by consequent the authoritie it selfe which was the ordinence of God was guiltie Lastly the seueritie of the punishment which is temporall death doth not argue any power in the iudge of binding conscience this they might haue learned of their owne Dâctââ ãâã who holdeth that they that binde any man to mortall sinne mâst be able to punish him with answeârable punishment which is eternall death Argumâ⦠Math. 16. What soeuer ye shall bind vpon ãâã shall be ãâã in heauen Here to binde is to make lawes ââ¦ning conscience according to Matth. 23. 4. They binde ãâã burââns and lay theââ ãâã mens ãâã Ansvver The ãâã power of binding and sooâ⦠is not belonging to any creature but is pâopââ to Christ who hath the keyes of heauen and hell he openeth and no man shâ⦠hâ ãâã ââd no man openeth Râ⦠3. 7. As for the power of the Church it is nothing but ãâã ministerie of seruice whereby men publish and proâ⦠that Christ bindeth or Idoâeth Againe this binding stands not in the power of making lawes but in remitting and retaining of mân's sinnes as the words going before declate v. 18. If thy brother sinne against thee â and Christ ââeweth hâ owne meaning when he ââith Whose sinnes ye remit they are remitted and ââhose sinnes ãâã retaine they are retained Ioh. 20. 23. ãâã before in the person of Peter promised them this honour in this forme of words Math. 16. I vvillgiue vnto thee the keyes of the king dome of âe ãâã what soeuer thââ shalt binde vpon earth shââ be boâ⦠in âe ãâã This which I say is approoued by consent of auncient Divines August Psal. 101. ser. 2. Remission of sâ⦠saith he is loosing therefore by the law of contraries binding is to hold sinne vnpardoned Hilar. vpon Math. cap. 18. Whome they binde on earth that is