of Guise He had intelligence and accused the Lutherans of conspiracy and as it had been for the more safety he carrieth the King to Amboise a little town but a strong castle the King was easily induced to give him all authority against the Lutherans under Letters patent French Comment lib. 1. The Nobility were the more offended and rose together in January Ann. 1560 among them the chief were Lewes Prince of Condee Godefrid de Barri Lord of Renaude Their Counsell was to compell the Guises to give account how they had discharged their trust and if they were found unworthy to remove them and their conditions at that time were that nothing be attemped against the King nor his kinsmen nor the estate of the Realm but to preserve the liberty of the Realm from the tyranny of strangers so they called the Guises Their interprise was disclosed and disappointed for the Guises deceived some by means of Nemerose and prevented others ere they did meet at Amboise they took them by the way and killed many in the open field and condemned some for treason In a word all who were taken with arms were killed without mercy Afterwards Olivare the Chancellor who had condemned those persons of treason for this tumult of Amboise as it was called was grievously visited with sicknes and in his agony said He had deserved that judgement for condemning innocent men The Cardinal of Lorrain came to visite him but he said Thou Cardinal bringest mischief on us all c. Fre. Comment Ibid. New Edicts were set forth against the new Religion nevertheless the Guises considering that the cruel Edicts had given the occasion of this tumult resolve to abait of their severity and sent abroad Letters of pardon where of the summ was It is not the Kings mind to begin his reigne with slaughter of his subjects albeit they have deserved it but willing to shew mercy he grants a general pardon for all offences of religion if they will live Catholickly Popishly hereafter The Letters were published as it was expressed in them by authority of the King and advice of the Cardinals de Burbon de Lorrain de Chastilion and of the Dukes Monpensier de Guise de Miniers and d'Aumale Then the Cardinal de Lorrain a subtile and timorous man shewed himself favourable unto the Ministers of Gods Word and heard them and said He agreed with them in many articles of controversy Thuan. lib. 25. The Reformed Churches began to assemble the more freely but in Paris Roan and other parts many of them were murthered and for fear of troubles all men stood in awe of the Bishops A Counsell was called at Fountain-bleaw A Counsel at Fountainbleaw in August Ann. 1560 where were the King and his mother and his Queen three Cardinals and many of the Nobility The king exhorted them to speak freely and advise how his Royal authority and the utility of the subjects may be best preserved The Duke of Guise spoke first of his administration you may be sure never a word against himself Then Caspar Castilion the Admiral presented unto the king a supplication in the name of them who called themselves The faithfull Christians dispersed in diverse places of France It was read the summ was They did humbly beseech his Royall Majesty to examine their Religion by the written Word and untill then to cause those bloody persecutions to cease they protest that they have not attempted nor do intend any thing against him their lawfull king nor seek any licence unto any vice as they are falsely traduced but all their endeavour is to live worthily of the Gospell of Christ and because their private meetings were misinterpreted by their adversaries they humbly crave liberty for the publick ministry of the Gospell untill the controversies be more fully considered by the Councell Then the King commanded Janus Monluc Bishop of Valentia to declare his mind concerning these troubles He had a large oration to this purpose This distinction into two religions hath not begun within these two or three years but about fourty years ago three or four hundred Preachers have taught every where of Jesus Christ the Saviour and this sweet name of a Saviour hath easily taken place in the hearts of the people who were desirous of salvation when they found themselves as sheep straying without a shepherd The kings of France have endevoured by severe Edicts and punishments to root out that new doctrine but in vain the Presidents and Judges have done many things wickedly in this cause and covetously condemned men to death whose lands or riches they would transfer unto themselves or their friends Many Bishops reside not to attend their flocks or visite them seldom unless it be when they exact their revenues which they bestow on their lusts yea many Bishops are but children neither able nor willing to teach people especially those that are sent from Rome The Cardinals and Bishops give the offices of priests unto their servants cooks and barbers whence the name of a priest is in contempt among the people The way to cure those maladies is to fly unto God who is angry against such Church-men and seemeth to intend their distruction as he dealt once with the Jewes and some godly men should be sought and called from all parts of the Realm to consider of those and the like wickednesses And the King for his part will do well to see that the Name of God be not blasphemed as it hath been and that the Scriptures be plainly and purely expounded unto the people and in the Kings house should be godly discourses and exhortations that so the mouths of such may be stopped who shamefully say that God is not once named in presence of the King And I beseech you ô Queens grant this one thing if I dare be bold to beseech you that in place of unseemly and profane songs all your train would sing Psalms to the praise of God and be yee assured that God allowes not any company which glorifieth not Him And here be added more to prove that it is impious to forbid the singing of Psalms for this is not to contend against men but against God Another Remedy is a general Councel as the Fathers were wont in the Primitive times and I can not see how the Popes conscience can be at rest who seeing souls perishing with diversity of opinions seekes not means to recover them But if a general Councel shall be hindered the King shall do well to call a Councell of this Nation after the example of his Ancestors Charles the great and his son Lewes and the best learned of both parties should be called to dispute the principal grounds of Religion as the Emperour Theodosius did with the Arrians albeit they had been justly condemned at Nice and then he would have the articles that were disputed before him to be clearly published As for this Religion for which all those broils have arisen it is diversly entertained by
Purgatory was not known and then it was believed by some by degrees partly by revelations and partly by Scriptures and so at last it was believed generally by the whole Church we may easily understand some cause of pardons Seeing then Purgatory was so lately known who can now admire that there was no use of pardons in the primitive Church c. 4. A fourth device of the Friers 4. Meritum ex congruo condigno was the distinction of merit ex congruo condigno some holding the one part onely and some both parts but it was never universally approved among them seeing always some did abhor to say A man by his merits is worthy of the Kingdom of heaven Of which number were Guiliel Parisien Jo. Scotus Gregorius de Arimino Biel c. This particular leadeth to another consideration Their contrary doctrines of these Friers that as they do differ in degrees the latter sort for the most part being worse or more erroneous then their fathers and ready to produce a worse generation so they did and still do differ in contrary opinions for they preach not Christ of good will saith Agrip. de vanit scien cap. 97. but for contention so that there is more hope of agreement among Philosophers then among these School-men seeing they have darkened and killed all maner of Divinity with opinions of men and new errors c. and the posterity sweareth into the words or tenets of their Master and they are led captive by his opinion so that they will not yield unto contrary reasons nor Scripture This is clear by the families or Sects of Thomists and Scotists striving the one against the other not in Philosophical or indifferent points but in matters of greatest moment As for example 1. Thomas saith A man is accepted of God not for his vertue but by the grace of God which is the fountain of these vertues In 2. Sent. Dist 26. q. 1. ar 4. But Capreolus on that place bringeth Scotus Durand and Aureolus holding the contrary 2. Thomas saith A man deserveth glory ex condigno 1 2. qu. 114. ar 3. yet to make this smooth he hath devised that distinction that a work deserveth either as it proceedeth from free-will or as it proceedeth from God's grace and so on that part of Rom. 6. Jâ—ct 4. he saith If good works be considered in their own nature or as they proceed from mans free-will they deserve not eternal life ex condigno but onely as they proceed from the grace of the holy Ghost But Durand in 2. Sent. Dist 27. qu. 2. refuteth both the tenet and that frivolous distinction 3. Thomas proveth that a man cannot understand supernatural things without the light of grace In 2. Sent. Dist 28. qu. 1. ar 5. But Durand on that place striveth for the contrary 4. Thomas saith No man in this life without habitual grace can eschew all and every sin 1 2. qu. 109. But Scotus holdeth the contrary In 2. Sent. Dist 28. 5. Thomas saith None without the help of God can sufficiently prepare himself unto habitual grace loc cit ar 6. and there he declareth what it is to prepare himself to wit to turn unto God as he which hath his eyes turned from the Sun prepareth himself to receive the light of the Sun when he turneth himself unto the Sun Against this doth Durand dispute in 2. Sent. Dist 28. qu. 5. 6. Thomas saith Grace differeth really from vertue as the soul from the faculties in 2. Sent. Dist 26. qu. 1. ar 4. Scotus holdeth the contrary on that place 7. Thomas holdeth that want of original justice in babes is a sin ibid. Dist 30. qu. 1. ar 2. Durand on that place holdeth the contrary 3. Thomas saith Original sin cannot be properly called a quality or absolute form inclining to ill actions 1 2. qu. 82. ar 1. Gregor de Armi. on 2. Sent. Dist 30. qu. 1. ar 2. teacheth that according to Augustin original sin is a positive quality or carnal concupiscense by which man is inclined to sin actually 9. Thomas holdeth that every action of man if it be evil is properly a sin 1 2. qu. 21. ar 1. Gregory in loc cit holdeth the contrary 10. Thomas proveth that every act of man as it is an act is from God De malo qu. 3. ar 2. Capreolus on 2. Sent. Dist 37. qu. 1. ar 1. bringeth Durand Gregory and Aureolus disputing in the contrary 11. Thomas teacheth that to the goodness of an action is required the goodness of the matter and of the form and intention Capreolus on 2. Sent. Dist 38. bringeth sundry School-men holding that the goodness of intention is not necessary 12. Dominicans generally hold that the Sacraments do work grace after the maner of a knife cutting and framing a thing and not a vessel containing grace But the Franciscans deny all effective power in the Sacraments but bring the vertue of them from the onely power of God's promise so oft as the Sacrament is administred They do agree in the opere operato and differ in the maner Concil Trident. lib. 2. 13. Dominicans held that the Sacraments of the old Testament did not confer but onely fore-signifie grace which was to be given after the sufferings of Christ The Franciscans held the contrary ibid. 14. Thomas par 3. qu. 75. ar 4. saith It is necessary to believe that the body of Christ is in the Eucharist by the change of the substance of the bread into it But Bellarmin De Euchar. lib. 3. cap. 23. saith Scotus held that transubstantiation was not thought a doctrine of â—aith before the Lateran Councel and that there is not express Text of Scripture which without declaration of the Scripture can convince one to admit transubstantiation Certainly the opinion of Thomas was according to the sense of the article which Innocentius the III. did decree and howbeit the Romanists hold still the word transubstantiation yet they are all for the most part fallen upon another conceit that the substance of the bread evanisheth or is annihilated and the body of Christ cometh in stead of it And hence ariseth many questions among them as whether the body of Christ be eaten with the teeth and go into the belly whether the wicked do eat the body of Christ They who will read any School-man on Lombard Lib. 4. Dist 10 11. will finde many such questions concerning the Sacrament In a word all the huge volumes of Thomists and Scotists upon the Sentences are so many monuments of controversies betwixt antagonists in the Romish Church as lately Dr. T. Mortan hath proved the Protestant faith by testimonies of these School-men or as he speaketh even the enemies being judges Therefore all the boasting of Papists concerning the unity of their Church is indeed but to delude them which are not acquainted with their books Thus the Church was pitifully divided with these Sects and when the disciples of these School-men went abroad to preach one
HISTORY Of the CATHOLICK CHURCH From the Year 600 untill the Year 1600. Shewing Her DEFORMATION And REFORMATION Together with The RISE REIGN RAGE and BEGIN-FALL Of the ROMAN ANTICHRIST With many other profitable Instructions Gathered out of divers WRITERS of the several times and other HISTORIES BY ALEXANDER PETRIE Minister of the Scots Congregation at Rotterdam Psalm III. What we have heard and known and our Fathers have told us we will not hide them from their Children shewing unto the Generation to come the praise of the Lord and his strength and his wonderfull Works that he hath done Cyprian de zelo livore Evill shall be eschued the more readily if the beginning and greatness of it be known Origen contra Celsum Lib. 3. As he is deemed to have made progress in Philosophy who being acquainted with the disputes of different opinions hath chosen the best reasons among them So I am bold to say that he is the wisest among Christians who hath most diligently considered the several Sects of Jews and Christians HAGUE Printed by ADRIAN VLACK M. DC LXII HONI SOIT QVI MAL Y PENSE TO HIS HIGHNES WILLIAM THE III By the Grace of God PRINCE of ORANGE Count of Nassaw Catzenelbogen Vianden Dietz Lingen Moeurs Bueren Leerdam c. Marquess of ter Vere and Vlissingen Lord and Baron of Breda of the City of the Grave and Land of Kuyck Diest Grimbergen Herstall Kranendonck Warneston Arlay Noseroy S. Vijt Doesbourg Polanen Willemstadt Niewart Ysselstein S. Martensdijck Geertruydenberg Chasteau-regnard the High and Lower Swaluw Naeldwijck c. Vicount Hereditary of Antwerp and Besançon c. Marshal Hereditary of Holland c. I Will honour them that honour me saith the LORD But who can tell what shall be done unto them whom the Lord will honour Certainly those do honour him who serve him religiously They who are careless of Religion do pretend that they cannot serve God because there be so many Religions and they cannot know which is the right But if they were unfeignedly desirous to know they might be resolved since our Lord who is gracious mercifull and abundant in goodness and truth leaves us not in the mist or unto uncertainties but at several times and in divers waies hath spoken unto the Fathers by the Prophets and in the last daies hath spoken unto us by his Son and hath commanded all men to hear Him He is the Way the Verity and the Life none comes unto the Father but by Him On which words Chrysostom writes thus It is as if our Saviour had said I am the Way that is By me ye shall come The Verity because assuredly those things shall be which I have promised neither is any lie in me And the Life because Death cannot hinder you from me And since I am the Way ye need not another Guide Since I am Truth I speak no false thing Since I am Life although ye shall die ye shall injoy what I have promised And Cyrill Alexandr on the same words saith By three things we shall come into these Heavenly mansions by the action of true verity by right faith and the hope of eternal life of all which none is the giver none is the fountain nor is any the cause but our Lord Jesus Christ for he hath given commandments above the Law he hath shewed us the Way And he is also the Truth that is the true streightness and determination the uprightest rule and the best square of faith And he is also the Life for none but he can restore unto us that life which we hope shall be in holiness and blessedness without perishing He certainly shall raise us up though we die from that curse for sin and bring us into Heaven therefore all excellent things come and shall be unto us through him But those Worldlings say The Word of Christ is large and so many things are in it that we cannot search them Nevertheless He directs all men to search the Scriptures and the Evangelist teacheth that those are written that we might beleeve that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God and that beleeving we might have life through his name Yea in that written Word he hath certain rules and notes whereby the true Religion may be known Certainly that is the most true Religion which ascribes most glory unto God and most transcends the natural reason of men and most elevates the hearts and affections of men towards God and Heaven By application of those undoubted and unquestionable principles each one may understand that among all Religions the Reformed is the only true Religion for not only our Profession in the general but all the branches of our Doctrine are grounded on God's written Word and tend unto God's glory transcend our natural reason and lead men to think continually of God and to hope for blessedness in Heaven by Christ alone And amongst those who profess this Religion they are most devoted unto God and most constant in their profession who aim most at God's glory who are most acted by supernatural principles who do most think of God and whose hope of felicity in Heaven is most active And such as seek but their own or other mens interests or be led by political or human reasons mainly are the wavering Professors On the other side all other Religions though they pretend the glory of God they are not truly grounded on God's Word but are underpropped with natural reason and tend to earthly mindedness as appears by induction of the particulars wherein they differ from us some aiming at the advancement of mens abilities and others at worldly honour and gain This is clear in the Romish Religion for what else is the advancing of man's ability without or with a little help of God their Justification by works their Deifying of the Pope above all that is called God their equalling of Mens Traditions and Decrees with the Sacred Scriptures What else is their Mass their fancy of Purgatory c Here it is remarkable what is written by their Jesuit Cardinal Bellarmin de Indulg Lib. 1. Cap. 12. Sect. Rationes We see saith he that the amplest Indulgences are given for a very slight cause as when plenary Indulgence is given unto all who stand before the Door of St. Peter's Church and the Pope blesseth all the people solemnly And Sect. Observandum he saith That standing before St. Peter's Porch is a very light and slight cause if it be considered absolutely in it self and nevertheless it is a weighty and just cause because that frequency of the people at that time is a fit and usefull means of protesting their Faith concerning the Head of the Church and it serves for the honour of the Apostolical See which honour is the end of that Indulgence So he The Pope then and the People do aid one another mutually for the People confirms the Supremacy of the Pope by their presence and receiving that Indulgence and He by dispensing his
They shall give signs and wonders that the very elect if it were possible should be deceived Why speaks he as doubting seeing he fore-knows what shall be It is one of two because if they be elected they cannot be deceived and if they be deceived they are not the elect Therefore that doubting of our Lords words designeth tentation because they who are elected to persist shall be tempted to fall by the signs of the Preachers of Antichrist for they shake but fall not It is said therefore if it were possible because they shall tremble and neverthelesse they are called the elect because they fall not Again on Iob lib. 25. cap. 20. in that he saith He causeth an hypocrite to reign for the sins of the people Antichrist may be understood the head of hypocrites for that deceiver feigneth holiness that he may draw into wickedness but for the sins of the people he is suffered to reign albeit many have not seen his principality yet they serve his principality by their sins are they not his members who by a shew of affected sanctily would seem to be what they are not Certainly they come out of his body who hide their iniquities under the cover of sacred honour And in an Epistle to Wimund Bishop of Aversa which is in Gratian. dist c. 8. Sâ— consuetudin he saith If thou oppose custom observe what the Lord saith I am truth and life he saith not I am custom but I am truth And truly to use the words of blessed Cyprian Whatsoever custom how old soever is altogether to be postponed unto truth and custom contrary unto truth should be abolished In lib. 7. Ep. 1. unto Sabinian then his Resident at Constantinople amongst many particulars he saith Shew my most gracious Lords that if I their servant would have medled with the death of the Lombards this day that Nation should not have had either King Dukes or Counts and it might have been in utter confusion but because I fear God I am afraid to meddle with any mans death Certainlie his Successours neither have carried themselves as loyal servants of the Emperours nor have they feared God in this manner nor have they been so sparing of bloud In humilitie he first called himself The servant of the servants of God and his Successours retain the same Title but they will not willinglie hear the name given them by another Pol. Verg. de invent rer lib. 8. cap. 2. for they will be Lord of Lords Concerning the Lords Supper his words are remarkable in Dialog lib. 4. cap. 58. His bodie is taken and his flesh is divided for the salvation of the people his blood is now poured forth not into the hands of unbelievers but into the mouths of believers therefore let us consider what a sacrifice this is for us which for our absolution representeth or follows continuallie the Passion of the only begotten Son Here though he call the breaâ— Christ's bodie and flesh and the wine the blood and the Sacrament a sacrifice yet he shews 1. That the bread was then divided 2. The wine was given unto the people 3. That the Sacrament is a continual representation or imitation of Christ's passion All which are contrarie to the Doctrine of the Romish Church now nor can they consist with the opinion of transubstantiation Upon other occasions we shall yet see more of Gregorie 3. It was received by many of the ancients in the third Centurie and others Purgatory entreth by degrees following that the souls departing must be purged from corruption lest any unclean thing enter into heaven Origenes wrote this purgation must be by fire and thereupon many have written of a purging or purgation fire as Bellarmin lib. 1. de Purgator cap. 6. hath a role of such testimonies The Fathers did think that all men must passe that fire but they who had committed the most sins or had been most superficial in their repentance on earth must suffer the more pain So Gregor Nissen in Orat. pro mortuis saith He who goeth out of the bodie cannot be partaker of the Divinitie unless the purging fire cleanse away the filth of the soul And Origen in Psal 36. All men must come to that fire even Paul or Bellarm. de Purg. lib. 2. cap. 1. Theodoret. on Cor. 3. saith The day of the Lord shall reveal i. e. the day of judgement if any mans work abide Doctours teach heavenly things but the hearers do chuse according to their own mind what is to be done but in the day of the Lords coming there shall be a sharp and great examination and them that have lived rightly that fire shall make them more glorious then gold or silver but them who have committed iniquitie it shall burn up like wood and hay But the Teacher of good things shall not suffer punishment but shal be judged worthie of salvation for this he saith he shall be saved to wit the Teacher And the work shall be burned that is they who have made themselves evil work For if we read the words so we shall perfectly find the meaning of the words that are written c. Ye see he differeth from the former concerning the faithfull Teacher they who thought that all shall suffer did pray for the souls of all who die in hope of resurrection so excluding the Reprobates only as is manifest in some Greek Liturgies who say We offer unto thee O Lord sacrifice for the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles Martyrs and especially for the blessed mother of God and we remember all the faithfull who are dead Bellarm. loc Amongst others he quoteth Lactantius Firmian as a teacher of Purgatory his unsolid and different opinion is Institut lib. 7. cap. 21. thus All souls abide in one place untill the great day and then they must all be examined by fire they who have been perfectly righteous and who are they if the words be taken strictly shall not feel the fire they who have not been so godly shall quickly pass through the fire and be cinged about and the wicked shall burn for ever But Basilius surnamed the Great when he was a dying did expect to be received quicklie among the Angels and Gregor Nazianzen who writ his life did believe that his soul departing should be received in the eternal Tabernacles and with Basil behold the blessed Trinitie Neither did any of the Fathers before Augustine dream of such a place in Hell where they say this purging is before the day of judgement nor speak they of any place thereof and so they knew not of such an Inn in Hell which the Romanists now call the place of Purgatorie yea the Jesuits Duraeus cont Whitek fol. 338. and Bellar. de purgat lib. 2. cap. 2. say expresselie that the Fathers expound that Text 1 Cor. 3. of a metaphorical fire and in cap. 6. of that book Bellarm. saith neither the Fathers nor Gregorie himself know where Purgatorie is nor Petrus Damianus who lived 400. years after
verb. Apost saith This is the tradition of the Fathers and observed by the whole Church thar when the defunct are mentioned at the sacrifice we should pray for them who have departed in the Communion of the Bodie and Blood of Christ and that it should be told that it is offered for them It is without doubt that these things are available unto the defunct but such as have lived so before their death that they may profit them after death But they who have gone out of their bodies without faith which worketh by love such duties of holiness are bestowed on them in vain seeing while they were here they received no grace or received it in vain and did treasure unto themselves no mercie but wrath And Confess lib. 9. cap. 3. he praieth for his mother Monica and addeth Lord I believe that thou hast done what I crave yet approve the voluntaries of my mouth for she did crave to be remembred at thy Altar Bellarmine saith that the Church was wont to pray on the Feast daies for particular Saints as on the Feast of Leo they said We beseech thee Lord grant that this oblation may be helpfull unto Saint Leo But saith he this sentence is now changed And Ambrose did pray for the soul of Theodosius but as they who did so pray do never bring any warrant from Scripture for it so neither can they tell what to make of such prayers Epiphanius contra Aâ—ri haeres 75. saith These prayers and oblations were at first instituted partly as Thanksgivings unto God to glorifie him in his servants partly in commendation of their praises who sleep in the Lord partly that others might thereby be moved to the imitation of their godliness and partly to shew publickly the faith hope charitie and love of the living their faith saith he because albeit these were departed yet the living believe they are injoying a blessed life hope because they are awaiting the same their charitie because they retain a sweet remembrance of the departed and their esteem because they judge them who are departed in the fear of the Lord howbeit in a blessed estate yet to be inferiour unto Christ seeing they praied unto him for them So far he Augustine in the fore-named Sermon saith It is not to be doubted that the dead are helped by the prayers of the holy Church and sacrifices and alms that is given for their souls that the Lord would deal more mercifully with them than their sins have deserved Where Cyprian in 34. Epistle saith We offer sacrifices continually for them Pamelius expounds it not to be otherwise then in remembrance of them and he proves this out of the Canon of the Mass presently in use and out of Augustine in Ioh. tract 84. where he saith The Martyrs we remember at the Table not so as we remember others who rest in peace to pray for them also but rather that they would pray for us that we may cleave unto their steps This washing excuse doth add more guilt as followeth Bellarm. de Purgat lib. 1. cap. 18. saith Their prayers were thanksgivings to God for their glorie or petitioneth not that their Saints might be augmented in glorie but that their glorie might be augmented with us or that their glorie might be more known unto the world or they were petitions for some accidental glorie of their bodie at the resurrection And whereas it is commonly said He doth wrong unto a Martyr who prayeth for a Martyr Bellarmine saith it is to be meaned of them only who pray for remission of their sins or for essential glorie unto a Martyr which is not lawfull saith he Thus we see they are contrarie one to another concerning prayers for them who are in blessedness and albeit Augustine calleth it a tradition of the Fathers and saith that it was observed by the whole Church yet none of them can shew that it is a Tradition or that it was observed by the Church in the time of the Prophets or Apostles nor some hundred years after them As for the souls damned in Hell Epiphanius loc cit saith We remember sinners and seek mercie for them and our praiers are helpfull unto them although they take not away all the blot Chrysostom homil 22. ad pop Antioc saith Read the Scriptures of our Saviour and learn for none can help us when we depart hence into that place a brother cannot redeem a brother out of those endless torments nor one friend another nor the Parents their children nor the children their Parents But you will say where is the proof of that Behold him who was thrust out from the marriage and none interceding for him consider the five Virgins that were excluded and their neighbours not praying for them and Christ calling them fools Ye have heard how that the rich man had no pitie on Lazarus and when he was tormented he craved a drop of water and how Abraham could not ease his torment and on 1 Cor. 16. hom 41. he biddeth rejoice that the sins of the wicked are by their death come to an end lest their punishment were increased yet saith he strive so far as ye can to help them not with tears but with prayers supplications alms and oblations So is he contrarie to himself and which is especially to be marked in the first place he gives reasons of his doctrine and none for his exhortation save only that Job offered sacrifice for his children But we find not that Job offered for them when they were dead but while they were alive in their bodies Likewise Augustine a little before said that duties of pietie are bestowed on such in vain but in Enchir. cap. 68. he saith prayers for the damned if they be no ease unto the dead yet they are comfortable to the living but he shews not what manner of comfort Pope Gregorie the I. prayed for the soul of Trajan an heathen Emperour and Bellarmine loc cit saith this was an ungodly praier unless we will hold that it was a particular motion of the spirit So he will neither approve nor condemn the Pope but he condemneth the like praier But Augustine had a by-way of his own concerning a third sort of souls that were not reprobates and yet in pain he had been a Platonick and retains so much of the Elisian fields and thought that praiers for such souls is a propitiation to God for their relief as followeth But after the 600. year this opinion was received by many especially by the authoritie of Pope Gregorie the I. that praiers and oblations should be offered for the dead to the end their torments in Purgatorie may be eased or ceased Now if we compare the practice of the Fathers in the preceding 400. years with the opinion of Gregorie and of the Roman Church after him we find that both sorts praied for the dead but with great difference The Greeks thought that the elect souls were not in Heaven yet not any of them in
from her and Apollinaris who said Christ is God and flesh only and never assumed a reasonable soul and Pelagius who said Christ is not the redeemer of infants because they are conceived without iniquity and born of their mother without sin and have no sin to be forgiven them and so Christ is not the Saviour of all the Elect and also other Hereticks who deny the Lord who bought them with the price of his blood because they preach him not as truth sheweth him but as they have feigned and therefore are become strangers from the Redeemer they do expect nothing certainly but the pit of perdition He writ three Books on the Song of Songs whereof the first is only in refutation of another book writen by Julian his Epistle to Celanen in Campania a Pelagian for a tast behold what he saith in the 1. page Julian teacheth that we by arbitrement of free-will may do good things what we will albeit by the help of God's grace we may perfect them the more easily as Travellers may walk on foot but with less turmoil without doubt if they ride on a horse He hath no mind of the Apostle's admonition saying Work out your salvation with fear and trembling for it is God who worketh in you both to will and to do And which is more weighty he is an adversary to him who saith not Without me ye can do some little thing but saith he Without me ye can do nothing And he teacheth that those only can behold the hid mysteries of the Law whom instruction and piety hath made wise forgetting the grace of God which revealeth the hid things of Scripture even to the unlearned and Idiots as the Evangelist saith Then he opened unto them their understanding that they might understand the Scriptures And the Evangelist witnesseth that they were unlearned when he saith They seeing the constancy of Peter and John and knowing that they were without letters and idiots did admire And he saith that holy and generous love ingraft in us from the very beginning of light by the gift of nature and unto our last old age leaning to the power of the mind may continue without any loss of its vigour Certainly he beleeveth not the Lord's word Without me ye can do nothing Nor what the Apostle saith In many things we all offend In these words Beda confuteth both the Pelagians and Semipelagians Of justification he saith on Luke 1 The wisedom of the just is not to presume of righteousness by the works of the law but to seek salvation by faith that although they being under the works of the law yet they should understand that they are saved by the grace of God through Christ for the just shall live by faith and Peter saith of the yoke of the law that neither we nor our fathers were able to bear it but we beleeve to be saby the grace of Christ even as they And on 1 Pet. 4. God is honoured by our works when all that we do well or according to his will we give it not all unto our merits but to his grace and on the other side what evil we do we depute it only unto our ignorance and wickedness Of the Church he saith on Cant. lib. 5. cap. 6. The Church is called Catholick because it is built through all the parts of the World in one peace and one fear of God and is filled with one and the same consort of the Spirit from which unity of the Spirit she is called a Dove and she is called perfect not because she only is filled with the people of the righteous but also is perfected by receiving all divine graces and vertues Here is no mention of restraining or subjecting the Church unto the Bishop of Rome And de Tabernac lib. 2. cap. 2. It was said unto Peter metaphorically Upon this Rock that is on our Saviour whom he had confessed will I build my Church And on Revel 21 when it is said Foundations in the plural number the teachers or graces are meaned when Foundation in the singular number he is meaned who is foundation of foundations Here is no Prerogative of Peter above the other Apostles Of Prayer on Prov. chap. 2. he saith We should invocate or pray unto none but God Of Christ's redemption on 1 John chap. 2. at these words And not for ours only he saith The Lord is a propitiation not for them only unto whom living then in the flesh John did write but also for all the Church which is dispersed in the breadth of the World even from the first elect unto the last who shall be born untill the end of the World This he writeth expressely against the Donatists but when he speaketh of the Church throughout the World he condemneth the restriction thereof unto Rome or any other particular place and when he limiteth the propitation unto the Elect he condemneth the opinion of the universality of Christ's death for the Reprobates And in the same place he saith Behold how John observeth that humility which he teacheth Certainly he was a just and great man who had drunk the secrets of mysteries from the Lord's breast and nevertheless he saith not Ye have me your Advocate with the Father but We have an Advocate and he said We have and not Ye have he would rather put himself in the number of sinners that he might have Christ to be his Advocate than put himself an Advocate for Christ and be found among the proud which shall be damned For all doth the Head make request of whom it is written Who is at the right hand of the Father and intercedeth for us The Lord intercedeth for us not by words but by miseration and he addeth The Just because the just Advocate will not plead unjust causes How shall not the just one defend us in judgement if now we acknowledge and accuse our selves unjust Why shall he not be just who now by tears is earnest saevit against his own unrighteousness Here he speaketh expressly of intercession and he acknowledgeth no intercessour in Heaven but the Head for all who mourn for their sins Of perseverance he saith on Col. 4. at the end where the Apostle saith I give thanks unto God being confident that he who hath begun the good work in you he will perfect it untill What else doth he promise but perseverance till the end through the mercy of God And when the Apostle Jude saith Unto him who is able to keep you without offence doth he very clearly shew that perseverance in good until the end is the gift of God In the first place Beda sheweth the certainty of perseverance as a thing promised and in the other he teacheth that it is not the work of man by himself alone even though the man be renewed but it is the gift of God And on Rom. 8. he saith We should stand the Calling whereby they are elected not who are elected because they shall beleeve but who are
them which have not beleeved in him nor will ever beleeve as the Lord himself saith Matth. 20 The Son of man came ... to give his soul in redemption for many 4. That he beleeve and confess that the Almighty God saveth whom he willeth and that none at all can be saved but whom he will save and that all are saved whom he will save and therefore it is not at all his will those be saved whosoever are not saved as the Prophet saith Whatsoever the Lord willeth he doth that both in Heaven and on Earth And saith Prudent although there be some other things wherein he hath satisfied and subscribed in which being condemned in Pelagius the Church hath universally consented yet these being against him and his followers cleared from his froward expositions by the Apostolical See at the instance of the blessed Aurelius Bishop of Carthage and of Augustine with other 214 Bishops and being published unto all the World by many both Epistles and Books all the Church to day rejoiceth in confesseth preacheth holdeth and shall hold This Epistle of Prudentius is in the 2 tome of the French Councels and by it we may see not only his mind but the universal doctrine of all the Church in all the World as he affirmeth Although Histories do not express whether Aeneas did subscribe these Articles yet it may be gathered from the 99 Epistle of Lupus Ferarien where he commends this Aeneas and saith that Prudentius with the other Bishops did confirm his ordination By authority of Lotharius a Synod was held An. 855. at Valentia the Canons thereof follow hereafter For the present I add the words of Baronius concerning it generally saying The Bishops thought good to bring no other thing into the Church then what the most holy Fathers and faithfull Teachers of the Church had in all sincerity taught formerly in Affrica in the Councel at Carthage and in France in the Councel at Arausicane whereunto we should cleave in all points to wit that the godly are saved no other way but by the grace of God and the wicked are condemned for their own iniquity And that the wicked do not perish because as some say they could not be good but because they would not Then he sheweth that the Acts of this Synod were sent unto Hincmar and that he did by writing condemn these errours But Vsser taxeth Baronius that he hath written of this matter slenderly and from the writings of Hincmar and from Acts of Synods convinceth him especially he declareth from a book of the Church of Lions that there was diversity of opinions among them of Lions concerning the fifth Canon of this Synod which in the end of that book thinks the greatest difference between the Elect and the Reprobates to be that in the Reprobates remaineth the guiltiness of the first transgression which is taken from the Elect by the blood of Christ Also he sheweth that in the year 856 in the moneth of August Charls the Bald did call a Synod at Bonoile by Paris and another in September at Nielph where he gave unto Hincmar the Articles of the Synod at Valentia and what he had received from others in favour of Gotteschalk that Hincmar should answer unto them and that after three years Hincmar did return a great book of God's predestination and of man's free-will as Flodoard sheweth Hist lib. 3. cap. 13 and that the adverse party was not satisfied by that great volumn neither was the authority of the Valentian Synod lessned and therefore An. 859 Charls calleth another Synod in Audemantunno Lingonum where for the instruction of God's people the Canons of the Valentian Synod were voiced and confirmed again and proclaimed only in the fifth Canon they express not the four Articles because they perceive Hincmar was offended by so express condemning them as if they thereby had neglected the limits and law of charity and they did add the name of John Scot unto the nineteen Articles This Synod is called Lingonensis in Concil Gall. tom 3. After 14 daies was a more frequent Synod of twelve Provinces at Saponaria a Village of the City of Tullen where was King Charls and his Nephews Lotharius and Charls sons of the Emperour Lotharius there the Canons of the former Synod and the Carisiac Articles were read again and again great contention was between Remigius and Hincmar with their followers the one pleading for and the other against the Articles of Gotteschalk but as Hincmar writeth in an Epistle Dedicatory unto Charls the Bald the stir was calmed by the wisedom of the Arch-Bishop Remigius exhorting them all to bring unto the next Synod the books of the Catholick Doctours and as they shall find them agreeing unto the Apostolical and Catholick doctrine all should hold together unanimously It appeareth in the Acts of this Synod that it was so soon closed because of the murmurs in the country All this time Gotteschalk was still in Prison in the Monastery of Haultvillier whence he sent forth first a short confession and then a larger one confirmed by testimonies of Scripture and of the ancient Doctours In the end of the latter he craved that there might be a free Synod wherein truth might be made known unto all and errours altogether taken away and he lamenteth that for baseness of his person truth is despised and his adversaries follow not charity and refuse verity only that they may seem victorious Now of all that I have read concerning his Confessions and the writings of both parties I gather that at that time the greatest controversie was concerning the predestination of the wicked unto punishment howbeit there was also some difference concerning free-will and the efficient cause of conversion or of faith and good works And because Hincmar in his Epistle unto Whence was the word Prâ—destinatians Pope Nicolaus and Semipelagians make mention of Hereticks whom they call Praedestinati or Praedestinatiani here I add concerning that name that the first who mentioneth it was he who writ the continuation of Ierom's Chronicle for he about the 24 year of Arcadius and Honorius writeth saying At this time began the heresie of Praedestinati which had the beginning from Augustine So it is expressly saith Vsser in Histor Gottes cap. 2. in two old manuscripts one in the King's Bibliotheke and another in the Benedictines at Cambridge although in the Printed books it is not said from Augustine but from the books of Augustine being ill understood And certainly these words of Hincmar are frivolous since Pope Celestine did not write against such an heresie but against the Pelagians as is clear in his Epistles unto Augustine and he doth approve the doctrine of Augustine and Prosper in his Epistle unto Augustine which and the Epistles of Celestine are amongst the Epistles of Augustine writeth saying Many of the servants of Christ which are in the City Massilies think that in the writings of your Holiness against the Pelagian Hereticks whatsoever you
have disputed concerning the calling of the Elect according to the purpose of God is contrary unto the opinion of the Fathers and the mind of the Church But it is sure that the Massilians were Semipelagians And Arnobius on Psal 108. hath this note Mark saith he that it was of his will that he would not Because of the heresie which saith God hath predestinated some unto blessing and others unto damnation In a word whosoever pleaseth to search for this heresie he cannot find that ever there was such an one but that the Pelagians or Semipelagians have used the name to discredit the sound doctrine of Augustine and they seeing his books to be in high esteem and authority in the Church were afraid to put it upon him and they did wrest some conclusions out of his books which they did brand with the odious name of such an heresie 17. At this time was Published an Exegesis or Commentary on thirteen The Exegesis of the Epistle of Paul by Remigius is vindicated Epistles of the Apostle Paul which was lately Printed at Rome under the name of Remigius Rhemensis which lived about the year 540 a Jesuit Baptista Villapand gave out that he had found it at Saint Caecilia in Rome and did publish it as a rich treasure lying so long time in a manuscript Andr. Rivet in Critic sacr lib. 4. cap. 27. sheweth the vanity of the Jesuit seeing the same book was Printed above 30 years before that at Paris two several times and in the Book is mention of Gregory and Beda I add another reason that Exegesis on 2 Thess 2. at these words Except there come a falling away first All Kingdoms shall fall away from the Roman Empire and the man of sin to wit the Antichrist who although he is a man yet shall he be the fountain of all sins Be revealed and made manifest and the son of perdition i. e. a son of the Divel not by nature but by imitation and is called perdition because perdition shall come by him ..... He shall sit in the Temple of God shewing himself as if he were God This may be understood two waies And here he hath first that opinion that Antichrist shall be born at Babylon of the Tribe of Dan c. and then he addeth Or also he shall sit in the Temple of God i. e. in the Church shewing himself as if he were God for as the fulness of God-head did rest in Christ so in that man who is called Antichrist because he is contrary unto Christ the fulness of all wickedness and iniquity shall dwell because in him shall be the head of all wickedness the Divel who is the King above all the children of pride In these words the Apostle demonstrates unto the Thessalonians that the Lord shall not come to judgment untill there be a defection of the Roman Empire Note which now we see fulfilled and Antichrist appearing in the World who shall kill the Martyrs of Christ So far there It is true Chrysostom and others had long before expounded that Text in the same manner but none did apply it in that manner neither could it be applied before that time seeing the Empire of Rome though sometimes more weakned than at other times yet was never solow before the daies of Lotharius then every Nation had their own King and Lotharius had a part of France and a part of Italy and his Successour had no more but a part of Italy As for the appearing of Antichrist we have heard before in Sect. 14. what Gunther and Thietgaud writ unto Pope Nicolaus and in Sect. 15 what Luithpett writ unto King Lewis both which agree with this exposition and application Hence it followeth that this Commentary That Exegesis is not for but rather against Transubstantiation could not be written before this time Next consider for what cause the Jesuit and after him others do commend this Commentary to wit thereby they would prove the fancy of Transubstantiation to have been so old for on 1 Cor. 10. it is said The Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ Certainly first it is consecrate and blessed by the Priests and the Holy Ghost and then broken and now although it seem videatur or is seen to be Bread in verity it is the body of Christ of which Bread whosoever communicates he eats the body of Christ And again it is said there That Bread doth pass transit into the body of Christ neither are they two bodies but one body Because the explication of this testimony may serve for clearing many other such testimonies I will set before you the words preceding and following and then confer all together First a little from the beginning of that Chap. it is said He saith not The Rock did signifie Christ but as if it had been in truth The Rock was Christ though certainly it was not so by substance but by signification Likewise speaking of the two sons of Abraham he saith not These signifie the two Testaments but These are the two Testaments Christ then in respect of firmness is the Rock not by substance and the water which did flow out of the Rock signifieth the doctrine of Christ and the grace of the Holy Ghost of which in the Gospel Who thirsts let him come to me and drink c. It is also called a spiritual and following Rock because it signifieth spiritually Christ who followed them of which spiritual Rock following them they did drink because when human help failed them Christ was at hand giving help by whose powet who is the Word of God the Father they were delivered out of the Land of Aegypt and brought into the Land of Promise So far there And in the other place it is written thus The Cup is called Communication i. e. partaking because all do communicate of it and receive a part of the blood of Christ which it containeth in it And the Bread which we break on the Altar is it not a partaking of the Body of Christ Certainly first it is consecrate and blessed by the Priests and Holy Ghost and then it is broken and now although it seem videatur or it is seen to be bread in verity it is the body of Christ of which bread whosoever communicateth they eat the body of Christ because one Bread to wit of Christ and one Body to wit of Christ we many are who eat that Bread the flesh which the Word of God the Father did assume in the Virgins womb in the unity of person and the bread which is consecrate in the Church are one body of Christ for as that flesh is the body of Christ so that bread doth pass transit into the body of Christ neither are they two bodies but one body for the fullness of the God-head which was in him filleth also that bread and the same God-head of the Word which filleth Heaven and Earth and all things therein the same filleth the
Book Castigatio in Ecclesiasticum Ordinem he distinguisheth Church-men into Bishops or Priests as he speaketh and the Clerks of the first sort he expoundeth the first part of the third Chapter of 1 Tim. and he expoundeth the second part of the Clerks and from that Chapter he convinceth them both He nameth no other degree of Church-men but certainly he had named them if any other had been among them because he speaketh so distinctly of the several ranks of men both in State and Church He calleth the first sort oftest Sacerdotes simply but never Episcopos unless he add sive Sacerdotes The book is in Bibliotheca Patrum de la Bigne We may conclude then the ancient Britans had no Church-men above the degree of Priest-hood Now if that were added which followeth in this Chapter concerning Ireland we have found four National Churches that have been governed without Prelates to wit the Affrican ancient Britan the Scots and Irish some for the space of 500. years yea untill the Britans were subdued by the English and some for the space of 1000. or 1100. years And we have found that there was a Church-Council consisting partly of Rulers who were not Teachers besides that Ambrose and others testifie that such were every where Yea and in Rome it is most probable that the first Teachers Of the first Bishops of Rome were of equal Authority I say probable because Histories are not clear in this point Epiphanius Haeres 27. saith Peter and Paul were the first Bishops there but whether Linus and Cletus were Bishops there while the Apostles were alive I cannot well say It may be saith he because the Apostles went into other Nations to preach and Rome could not be without a Bishop for Paul went into Spain and Peter did oft visit Pontus and Bithynia and possibly when Clemens had refused I cannot say it certainly and Linus and Cletus were dead he was compelled to take the Bishoprick So conjunctuarily writeth Epiphanius Jerome in Catalog Scriptor saith Clemens was the fourth Bishop and he nameth Peter but not Paul Linus and Cletus but saith he many Latins say Clemens was next unto Peter Theodoret on 1 Tim. 4. saith They say Linus did succeed unto great Peter Io. Naucler in vol. 2. Generat 3. saith In the year of our Lord 70. Linus succeeded unto blessed Peter although blessed Peter had ordained that Clemens should succeed but Clemens considering that it was an ill example that one should succeed his Successor he renounced the Papacy and Linus was chosen then Cletus and fourthly Clemens Rufinus in praefa before Clemen Rocognit saith Some do ask seeing Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens how could Clemens writing unto James say that Peter had given unto him the Chair of Teaching we have this reason of it Linus and Cletus were Bishops of Rome before Clemens but while Peter was alive they had the charge of the Bishoprick and Peter fulfilled the Office of Apostleship Dion Petavius a Jesuit in Rationa par 1. lib. 5. cap. 5. saith When Peter was killed by Nero Linus governed the Church of Rome as ancient writers affirm and they assign unto him eleven years two moneths and some days so that he died in the year 78. Unto him succeeded Cletus whom Irenaeus calleth Anacletus and he sat twelve years and seven moneths and suffered martyrdom ann 91. and Clemens was his Successor The Jesuit Io. Hart in Collog cum Io. Reynold c. 6. se 4. affirmeth That Peter before his death ordained onely Clemens to be his Successor Others have other opinions as it is in Collog ca. cit se 3. therefore I said Histories are uncertain in this point albeit a great part of the Romish faith is grounded upon it but it is most probable that Clemens Linus Cletus and Anacletus were Sympresbyters and the writers in following Ages speaking conformable to their own practice do name some one and some another But it is more certain that others were the first preachers of equal Authority at Rome then that any of these four were the first preachers there That Peter or Paul were Bishops of Rome it is not probable because they were Apostles and did the work of their Apostleship and the Scripture sheweth their diligence from time to time and it is certain that in the mean while other preachers were at Rome whom Paul saluteth Rom. 16. Aquila Epenaetus Andronicus Junias c. these he calleth of note among the Apostles and his fellow-laborers in the Lord. Sedulius saith Whom he calleth fellow-laborers he meaneth in the work of teaching and it is not without reason thought that the Romans believed by their teaching Ambrose or whoever was the Author of the Commentaries saith Those were not idle at Rome for they were zealous in devotion And it is understood that all those whom Paul saluteth came for confirmation of the Romans for which cause he saith that not onely he but all the Churches of the Gentiles give them thanks and he admonisheth the Romans to obey them In 2 Tim. 4. Paul mentioneth Linus to have been at Rome at that time and in the same verse he nameth others before him to wit Eubulus and Pudens which he would not have done if Linus had been their Prelate Wherefore there was a Church at Rome before Peter or Paul came thither as Paul writeth unto them as a constituted Church and testifieth that their faith was spoken of throughout the world c. 1. 8. and their obedience was come abroad unto all men It is certain also that they had many Preachers and other Officers to whom he directeth chap. 12 6 7 8. nor can any man prove that those Preachers had superiority one over another therefore it deserveth consideration Whether the Roman Church was not once constituted with purity of Teachers and Whether the Church of Antioch was not of the like constitution See and consider Acts 13. 1. and many Elders or Bishops were at Ephesus Acts. 20. 17 28. and so at Thessalonica 1 Thess 5. 12. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Revel 2. will not prove any imparity seeing it is attributed unto all Priests generally Mat. 2. 7. and the the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is too weak a foundation for such a building seeing it implieth not always a singularity but often an indefinite thing and answereth unto our particle a or an oftner then unto the particle the and so it may well be translated there To an Angel seeing many Bishops were at Ephesus And this putteth the question out of all doubt to me that as the Scripture is the first and main foundation commanding to Ordain Elders or Bishops these are one in Scripture-language in every Church Acts 14. 23. or in every Town Tit. 1. 5. Or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Clemens Bishop of Rome in his Epistle ad Corinth So for Practice and History it cannot be shewed that when the constant Moderators were appointed under the name of
all joyn together against a common enemy so it was in the combat of the Friers The Dominicans did lay the grounds of their opinion on Scripture and doctrine of the Fathers and of ancient School-men And the other party when they could not finde the least taste of Scripture for maintaing their cause they have their refuge unto miracles and consent of the multitude Against them F. Iohannes de Vdine à Dominican useth this dilemma S. Paul and the Fathers said he either did believe as ye do that the blessed Virgin was free from the common law of men or they did not believe if they did believe it and spoke not at any time but universally without any mention of this exception why follow not ye their example but if they did believe the contrary then your opinion smelleth of novelty But F. Ierom Lombardel a Franciscan did affirm That the Church now hath no less Authority then the Primitive and therefore if by consent of the ancient Church the Fathers without exception spoke so we should invite an universal consent unto this exception from the common condition which opinion sheweth it self at this time by the celebration of this festivity So far P. Soave 15. Peter Abbot of Cluniac was in great account with Pope Eugenius II. Bernard wrote many Epistles unto him In Epist 277. he calleth him a vessel for honor full of grace and truth and endued with many gifts In an Epistle unto Eugenius he saith Albeit your person be set over Nations and Kingdoms to pull up and destroy to kill and scatter yet seeing you are neither God nor are you Jeremiah unto whom this was said you may be deceived you may be deceived by them who seek not Jesus Christ but themselves and lest this be if there be any faithful Son he should shew unto his Father faithfully what things he knoweth and which may be unknown unto you and he should â—orewarn and forearm you lest they of whom it is said the poison of aspsis under their tongue be able to corrupt your sincerety by their poison Here he professeth unto the Pope himself that he may err and be deceived Adversus Iudae lib. 1. If as you say and as the Apostle teacheth all men are condemned and all die in Adam then as the same Apostle teacheth all are justified in Christ and all are quickened for it is true what he saith As by one man sin came on all to condemnation so by one righteousness came on all to justification of life God by his essential goodness having pity on lost man and willing to save him but unless justly neither willing nor able while he sought in his eternal counsel how he might shew pity on the wretched and save his own justice this especially he thought most convenient whereby justice might be saved and man be delivered and grace be enlarged and God be glorified so God sent his own Son unto the sons of men that putting on mans nature and healing mans vices he should take in the assumed flesh not sin but the punishment of sin even bodily death and so by his single and temporary death he should deliver from a two-fold and that everlasting death by which dispensation mercy sheweth mercy and no prejudice done to justice when for the everlasting punishment of man a temporal punishment of God-man is offered which certainly is of great weight even in the ballance of justice that for rightly ordering the sins of the world the transitory death of the Son of God is more weighty then the everlasting death of the sons of men This is our sacrifice this is the burnt-offering of the Gospel of the new people which was offered once on the Cross by the Son of God and of man even by God Lib. 2. cap. 4. As before the Law and under the Law you see that many are honored with the title of righteousness even without legal customs so know thou that after the Law not onely many but all are justified by the onely grace of Christ Contra Petrobrus lib. 1. ep 2. When he said Do this he addeth in remembrance of me therefore the remembrance of Christ is the cause of the Sacrament and therefore lest it be forgotten which especially should be in our heart remembrance is tied unto the heart by this suitable sign as an unsoluble cord by which strong tie the redeemed should always think on the price of redemption and being thankful unto the Redeemer by faith working by love he should shew himself no way ungrateful for so great grace And the matter is of such worth that the mindes of men should be stirred up not dully but duly to think on it to love and embrace it It was expedient and just that the remembrance of Christ's humanity and death should be preserved not onely in the ears by hearing but also unto the eyes by sight Therefore to the effect that men might not onely learn by words but even familiarly feel by deeds that they die continually while severed from Christ and that they cannot live perpetually unless they be conjoyned and united unto Christ after the similitude of bodily meat and drink they receive Christ's body and drink Christ's blood not given by another not received from another but from Christ himself which will be after this life their food i. e. eternal life and blessedness Ibid. I hear that you say The Church of God consisteth in the unity of believers gathered together and this is clear unto us all unto this Church hath God the Father by the intercession of his Son given the holy Ghost that he may abide with her for ever to comfort her in this life and to glorifie her in that to come unto all the Churches of Christ which by their number make up the body of the one and Catholike Church we do owe honor and love by the bond of charity Lib. 5. cap. 16. Seeing thou art under one shepheard Jesus Christ seeing thou dwellest in the same fold of the Churches seeing thou livest in the one faith and hope of eternal things as well thou white as black Monk why pratest thou foolishly of divers fleeces why contend ye for no cause or for so foolish a cause why for so childish occasion do ye rent the chief garment of charity take heed lest that name of innocence whereby ye are called sheep cause that you be not of the number of these whom the great Shepheard will set on his right hand Catal. test ver lib. 14. 16. Peter de Bruis a Priest of Tolous preached in sundry places against the Popes and the doctrine of Rome calling the Pope the Prince of Sodom and Rome he called Babylon the mother of whoredoms and confusion he preached against the bodily presence of Christ in the Sacrament against the sacrifices of the Mass he condemned the worship of Images prayers to Saints the single life of Priests pilgrimages multitude of holy days c. Phi. Mornae in Myster iniq The
new Waldenses and sometimes he calleth them German Waldenses To come unto the judgement of the Reformed Bishop Ridley sometime Bishop of London who suffered martyrdom Ann. 1555. giveth them this testimony Those Waldenses were men of far more learning godliness soberness and understanding of God's Word then I would have thought them to have been in that time before I did read their books if such things had been published in our English tongue heretofore I suppose surely great good might have come to Christ's Church thereby The Letters of Martyrs printed Ann. 1564. pag. 78. Hier. Zanchius doubteth not to say When Religion decayed in the East God established it in the valley of Angronia and Merindol Tom. 4. co 720. and having seen their confession he saith of it in an Epistle unto Crato I read attentively and diligently with much delight the confession of the Brethren Waldenses which thou sentest unto me for I saw not onely all the doctrine agreeable unto the holy Scriptures but I think also I see the sincere and truly Christian godliness of their hearts for they seem to have had this onely scope in their confession not to destroy all whatsoever is in the Church of Rome as the Arrians do but to edifie their Churches according to the true and Apostolical and so the saving rule of godliness casting away what should be cast away and retaining what is to be retained which is the right and lawful form of reformation Oh that we were all prone unto the same study after the example of these good Brethren George Abbot contra D. Hill in answer to the first reason sect 29. saith For this cause Bellarmin in praefa generali Controvers joyneth these together as Hereticks the Berengarians Petrobrusians Waldenses Albigenses Wiclenists Hussites Lutherans c. And Lewes Richcom another of that Society in his defence of the Mass against the Lord Plessis saith That the Ministers for confirming their figurative sense in This is my body have none for their Doctors their Ancients and their Fathers but Berengarius Zuinglius Calvin Carolstad Wicleff the Albigenses and the Waldenses The Waldenses then saith Abbot and Albigenses are ours by confession of our adversaries and of these were no small company for as du Haillan Hist lib. 12. in the life of Philip III. King of France speaketh being driven from Lions they withdrew themselves into Lombardie where they so multiplied that their doctrine was spread through Italy and came as far as Sicily As the same Author writeth Philippus Augustus came to his Kingdom An. 1180. which is now more then 400. years since and in his time it was that the Albigenses did so increase in France that the Pope and Princes were afraid of their number he who readeth the story of them shall see that they are reported to have held many gross wicked and absurd opinions mingled with their true doctrine but du Haillan the best and most judicious Chronicler of France and no partial witness on our behalf since his profession touching Religion was such that he was employed to write that story by Henry III. had not so little wit but that he perceived these imputations to be laid on them in odium and of purpose to procure their defamation see how wisely he speaketh truth and yet so toucheth it that his fellows might not justly be offended at his words Although saith he those Albigenses had evil opinions yet so it is that those did not stir up the hate of the Pope and of great Princes against them so much as their liberty of speech did wherewith they used to blame the vices and dissoluteness of these Princes and of the Clergy yea to tax the vices and actions of the Popes this was the principal point which brought them into universal hatred and which charged them with more evil opinions then they had So far Abbot from Haillan It cannot therefore be ignorance so much as perverseness of the Papists when they glory of the antiquity of their Religion without opposition and upbraid us with late original they cannot deny that our Religion is older then Luther and according to the testimony of the before-named Reynerius the doctrine of the Waldenses was even from the days of the Apostles And for clearing that which du Haillan saith concerning their taxing the vices of the Clergy I shall shew out of their Apology which the Waldenses of Bohem wrote unto their King Ladislaus about the year 1509. the occasion of their first separation from the Roman Church there they say We wish your Majesty knew for what cause we did long agone forsake that The occasion of their separation Roman crew truly the execrable wickedness of the Prelates by the instigation of the Divel whose work it is to sow discord and contentions among brethren compelled us to leave them for they through blinde malice and insolent pride of the power of darkness were deboaching one against another and dispised the laws of peace Ecclesiastical love and they being void of all humanity did rattle one against another publikely not only with scurvy words but reproachful contumelious writings and were shamelesly stirred up one against another like Atheists they forsook the power of Ecclesiastical keys wholesome truth religious worship gracious piety sound faith the gifts of the â—â—versaries so that albeit many have written against them yet their testimonies are contrary As for the first He sheweth from M. Freher in Bohem. rer Hist printed at Hanoue pag. 231. The Leonists are chaste and pag. 232. they eschew whatsoever things are filthy 2. In the same place Freher saith In their language they are sparing they eschew lyes swearing and all things that are filthy so that they did forbid all swearing in common talk or for light causes which was frequent in these days saith he there And Reynerius in Summa de Cathar Leonist printed at Paris An. 1548. saith They dispence with oaths for eschewing death Hence it appeareth they granted that in some cases an oath is lawful but in that he addeth for eschewing death it is but a misinterpretation as is clear by what we have heard from Aen. Silvius and Naucler that they held No deadly sin should be tolerated even for eschewing c. 3. The above-named History pag. 222. saith When an Heresiarch a Glover in Cheron was lead unto death he said Ye do well to condemn us now for if our estate were not born down we would do unto the Clerks and Monks as they do unto us 4. In pag. 232. it is said They believe all the Articles of the Creed but they say Ave Maria and the Creed are not prayers As for the fifth and ninth in the same page it is said They pray seven times a day an elder beginneth the prayer and maketh it long or short as he thinketh expedient and the rest follow him Whence it is clear that they used other prayers or were not tied to prescribed or stinted forms The sixth and
eat the sins of the people and they spake as assuredly of the apparitions adjurations and responses of the dead as if they had learned them from the books of Tundalus and Brandarius or from St. Patrick's cave they play the Tragedies of them in Purgatory and the Comedies of Indulgences in Pulpits as on a Stage with so Soldier-like boldness so thrasonical boasting so arrogant eys changing their countenances stretching out their arms with so various gestures as the Poets feign Proteus transforming themselves they thunder unto the people with windy tongues and Stentor's voice But they which are more ambitious among them and would have the gallantry of eloquence and perfect knowledge these in crying I would say declaring sing poesies tell stories dispute opinions cite Homer Virgil Iuvenal Persius Livius Strabo Varro Seneca Cicero Aristotle Plato and for the Gospel and word of God they prattle meer toys and words of men preaching another gospel adulterating the word of God which they preach not in sincerity but for gain and reward and they live not according to the truth of the word but after the lusts of the flesh and when in the day they have spoken of vertue erroneously they bestow the night in the Stews and this is their way to go unto Christ c. Erasmus in his Annotations on 1 Tim. 1. at the word Vaniloquium speaketh of the School-men at that time thus What shall I say of ungodly questions which are made concerning the power of God and of the Pope whether God can command any evil as to hate himself and forbid all good even the love and worship of himself whether he can make a thing infinite in respect of all dimensions whether he could have made this world even from eternity in a better condition then he hath made it whether he could have made a man that cannot sin ..... There is more work concerning the power of the Pope while they argue of his two-fold power and whether he may abrogate what is decreed in the writings of the Apostles whether he may decree what is repugnant unto the doctrine of the Gospel whether he may make a new Article of faith whether he hath more power then Peter had or equal power whether he hath power to command the Angels whether he can make empty that which is called Purgatory whether he be a man only or as God whether he partaketh of both natures as Christ doth whether he be more merciful then Christ seeing we do not read that Christ did ever bring any out of Purgatory whether among all men the Pope alone cannot err Six hundred such questions are disputed in great volumes ...... and their schools are earnest about such questions and time the swiftest of all things is wasted with these questions which are propounded ridiculously and determined timerariously our time is short and it is a difficult thing to act the duty of a Christian rightly The third power of the Friers was to proclaim and sell Indulgences Because this falleth in often I will here only repeat the Indulgences words of Pa. Paulo in the first book of the Councel of Trent This manner of giving money for pardons was put in practise after the year 1100. for Pope Urban the II. having granted plenary Indulgences and remission of all sins to whosoever would fight in the holy Land to recover and set free the Sepulchre of Christ out of the power of the Mahumetans it is followed by his Suceessors of whom some as always new inventions are inlarged granted it unto those who would maintain a Soldier if they could not or would not go personally in these wars and thereafter Indulgences were granted unto such as would take Arms against Christians not obeying the Church of Rome and many times infinite exactions under these pretences And lib. 8. he saith It is sure and cannot be denied that in no Christian Nation of the East either in ancient or modern times was ever any use of Indulgences of any kinde whatsoever and in the West no proof of them can be brought before Pope Urban the II. from his time until the year 1300. it appeareth that the use of them was sparing and only imposed by the Confessor to free men from punishment after the Councel at Vienna the abuses did increase mightily Pol. Virg. de inven rer lib. 8. cap. 1. saith They reap no small harvest by these Indulgences especially Pope Boniface the IX in whose time such pardons were granted with a full hand not only at sometimes but as Platina witnesseth were sold dayly and every where as any other merchandise not without the dammage of the giver and receiver seeing by these as the vendible remedies or soul diseases many did the less abstain from sin and the power of the keys became contemptible and that was not without cause because as Jerome saith where a reward is the means or interveneth spiritual gifts become the more vile which oh if that age only had seen So far he 31. When the Tartars prevailed first in Asia the Kingdom of the Turks was overthrown and they were divided among themselves into seven families at last they became all subject unto the house of Othoman or Otman Laon. Chalcocon lib. 1. de Reb. Turc He was a victorious and cruel Tyrant and was declared first Emperor of the Turks about the year 1300. all his Successors have kept his name He conquered Prusa a City of Mysia An. 1303. and made it the seat of the Empire His Son Orcanes expelled the Tartars and others of them through dissensions among Christians have raised that great Empire of Asia and subdued the Empire of Constantinople as partly is said and more followeth CHAP. IV. Of BRITAIN 1. KIng Edward sent the marble Chair of the Scots unto London and Troubles between England and Scotland left nothing that he thought could excite the mindes of our Nation to any remembrance of former condition so he promised unto himself a final conquest but a fresh trouble ariseth upon occasion of his tyranny Robert Bruce the Son of the former competitor and John Cumine the Cousin-German of John Baliol beholding at Court the contempt which the Scots did suffer and considering how Edward had abused them against their native Countrey they thought upon a revenge yet they they durst not communicate their thoughts At last John perceiving the other pensive and thinking the same might be the cause of his sadness adventured first to discover his minde and he blamed himself and the other also that their Countrey-men had fallen into such miseries by their procurement and in the mean time were both frustrated There they promise taciturnity and mutual fidelity and they covenant that John shall never pretend any title unto the Crown but assist Robert to recover it and he shall have all the Lands belonging unto Robert and be second unto him in the Kingdom these things were written sworn and sealed Robert followeth King Edward still waiting opportunity Behold
Word Then he declared unto the people the cause of his death as is before in the mean while the Executioner was stripping off his clothes and turned his hands behinde his back and tied him to the stake with wet ropes whereas it hapned that his face was toward the East one cried That an Heretick should not have liberty to look East-ward So he was turned When his neck was tied unto the stake with a chain he said I will gladly receive this chain for Christ who was tied with a worse chain for my sake Under his feet they set two wet faggots mixed with straw and from the feet to the chin he was inclosed in wood Before the wood was kindled the Baron of Oppenheim and another Gentleman went and exhorted him that he would remember his salvation and repent of his errors He said What errors should I renounce whereas I know my self guilty of none as for those things that have been falsely alledged against me I know that I never did so much as think them for this was the chief aim of all my preaching to teach all men repentance and remission of sins according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and after the exposition of the holy Fathers wherefore I am ready to suffer death with a cheerful minde They left him wringing their hands and the fire was kindled Then he prayed with a loud voice Jesus Christ Son of the living God have mercy upon me He repeated these words thrice and the winde driving the flame into his face choaked him afterwards he moved the space that one may say the Lord's prayer thrice The head and neck that were above the chain they hewed into small pieces that it might be consumed the sooner They found his heart untouched among the ashes they struck it with their rods and burnt it alone They gathered all the ashes with great diligence and threw them into the river that the least remnant of him should not abide on the earth The History of John Huss Now that we may know wherein his doctrine differed from ours at this day I will but hint at them and add a little of his Prophesies Of all the Articles that he professed to believe more were imputed unto him as followeth in Chapter V. but he denied them none was different from our present Doctrine but the opinion of Transubstantiation which he held with the Romanists As for his Prophesies In Prague he saw a Vision he seemed to paint the Images of Christ and his Apostles but the Pope came and hindered him and caused his Servants to blot away the Images Then he saw other Painters in great number paint the same Images again and the Painters became so numerous that the Pope and his Cardinals were not able to abolish the Images In the Councel he said publickly When an hundred years are come ye shall answer unto God and unto me Those words were stamped on the coin of the Hussites When he was shut up among the wood to be burnt he said Out of my ashes a Swan shall arise which they shall not be able to burn as they do with the Goose Huss signifieth a Goose in the Bohemian Language By all which no doubt he foresaw the Reformation that followed an hundred years after his death Aeneas Sylvius in Histor Bohem. cap. 36. relateth this History briefly and howbeit he call him and his follow Jerome of Prague stubborn Hereticks as the Councel had called them yet when he commendeth the Epistle of Poggius unto Nicolaus concerning these two and inserteth another unto Leonard â—retin of Jerome's death certainly he thought well of these Martyrs no less then the writer did This Poggius was a Secretary of that Councel In the last Chapter I will touch the process against Jerome studying brevity And here I will remember a passage or two of the Epistles of Poggius ad Leonar Areti First He mentioneth his Epistle unto Nicolaus then coming to the cause of Jerome he saith I profess I never saw any man who in talking especially for life and death hath come nearer the eloquence of the Ancients whom we do so much admire it was a wonder to see with what words with what eloquence arguments countenance and with what confidence he answered his adversaries and declaimed his own cause That it is to be lamented that so fine a Wit had strayed into the study of Heresie if it be true that was objected against him ..... When many things were heaped against him to accuse him of Heresie and those things were proved by Witnesses it was permitted unto him to answer particularly he refused a long time because he should first plead his own cause and then answer to the railings of adversaries when this was refused he said How great is this iniquity that when I have been 340. days in most hard prisons in filthiness in dung in fetters and want of all things ye have heard my adversaries at all times and ye will not hear me one hour ..... ye are men and not gods ye may slip and er and be deceived and seduced c. Then every Article of accusation was read publickly and proved by Witnesses They asked him Whether he could object It is almost incredible to consider how cunningly he answered and with what Arguments he defended himself He never spake one word unworthy of a good man that if he thought in heart as he spake with tongue no cause of death could have been against him not of the meanest offence He said All those things were false and feigned by his adversaries He declared his own studies and life full of vertues And he spared not to commend John Huss calling him a good just and holy man who had spoken nothing against the Church of God but against the abuses pride and pompt of the Clergy and Prelates for whereas the revenues of the Church should be imployed on the poor and strangers he judged it unworthily bestowed on harlots feastings feeding of horses and dogs superfluous raiment and such other things unworthy of Christian Religion He quoted many Doctors for his opinions In the end Poggius saith O man worthy of everlasting remembrance among men This Epistle is also in Fascic rer expetend fol. 152. 12. In other places many others suffered death for teaching and speaking against the worshipping of Saints against transubstantiation the tyranny of the Pope c. These Articles were always objected unto them although they differed from the Romish Church in many other things Amongst those were Henry Crunfelder Priest of Ratisbon An. 1420. Henry Radgeber Priest there An. 1423. John Druendo of Noble birth and a Priest was burnt at Worms An. 1424. John Draendorf the same year Peter Thoraw at Spire An. 1426. John Rockenzan An. 1430. Matthias Hager An. 1458 c. 13. The Emperour Sigismund required Peter de Alliaco Cardinal of Overtures of Reformation Cambrey to put in form some Articles concerning the Reformation of the Church that might be propounded
and Gregory a Confessary Jerusalem named Dionysius and Isidore two Monks then but the one became Bishop of Sardeis and the other of Russia Their Commissions gave them power to substitute a Vicar if any necessity detained them But the Oratours of Basil took exception against the Commissions and they complained unto the Emperour that they tied the Deputies to admit nothing that was not done canonically nor conformable unto former Councels and holy Fathers of the Church nor admit any addition or change or novation of the Creed of Faith This limitation said John the Oratour cannot be accepted for how can I ingage my self to give entertainment unto such Deputies who are so tied If a question be propounded in this manner answer thus and if not you must do nothing Deputies should be left free unto their thoughts and confirm what shall be defined by the Synod you must therefore cause this to be amended or else in my judgement it will not be expedient unto your Majesty to go nor dare I hold up my face in the Synod The Emperour was perswaded to draw up another form of Commission and sent it unto the Patriarchs with his Letters where he said You may not be suspicious of us for we hold the same grounds with you nor will we change in the least from the oecumenial Councels and what we hitherto professed and be ye assured that we will doe no otherwise then as ye would but they must subscribe that form of Commission for the honour of the Synod and of their Deputies When they were come to Ferraria after the complements which were touched before the Patriarch sent the Bishops of Nicomedia and Tornob and the History Writer to see how the place of the Assembly was ordered There Cardinal Julian said unto them Here is the Pope's throne and on either side are seats on the one side for the Latines and on the other for the Greeks since the Synod consisteth of two Nations the Pope must sit in the midst as the chief and tie of both parties They answered Since there be two parties the Pope should sit with his party as the Emperour and the Patriarch are ordered to sit with their party Julian replied There must be a middle tie therefore the Pope must be in midst But said they A middle tie is not necessary or if you will have the Pope in the midst it followeth necessarily that the Emperour and the Patriarch should also be in the midst and sit with him or else they cannot sit Julian said One tie is sufficient to joyn the two parties but two or three cannot make one tie When this order was shewed unto the Emperour and Patriarch they would not be satisfied until that posture was changed and the Pope's throne be set on the side with the Latines And then they could hardly condescend for though the Pope's thrown were set on the side yet he would have a place made for the Emperour of Germany and over against his seat another for the Greek Emperour But the Greek Emperour said Why should a chair be for the German Emperor since there is none and why should the Pope have place distinct and above the Emperours The Patriarch said Why should the Pope be not only before both the Emperors but in so many degrees and accoutrements above mine Then said the Emperour with indignation All these toys are not so much for decorement of the place or for order of the Synod but rather for pride and earthly fancies and far from a spiritual disposition So the Emperours chair was set right over to the Pope's throne and the Patriarch's chair over against the empty seat for the Emperour of Germany There was strife also among the Deputies of the Patriarchs for place In the first Session April 9. nothing was done but they took possession of their places and the Bulls of convocation was read in Latine and Greek and it was condescended that there should be a cessation for four moneths that the Kings and Princes being advertised of their meeting might send their Vice-gerents unto the Synod unless it were private conferences for debating lesser differences In this time the Cardinal Julian invited some Greeks to dinner Some did refuse with fair excuses because the Emperour had forbidden them to argue at any time with the Latines privately or apart but the Bishops of Ephesus and Mitylene were perswaded after much entreating There the Cardinal adviseth the Ephesian to write unto the Pope in commendation of this noble work that he had begun and exhort him to continue in bringing the union to an happy issue He answered It seemeth in my judgement superfluous nor am I fit thereunto nevertheless if you think expedient I shall write and send it unto you and if it please you it may be directed unto the Pope In this Letter he said It were an easie thing unto him to accomplish the union because of his power in the Church and all the Latines yeild blinde obedience unto him as the Successour of Peter if he would but put away the word filioque out of the Creed and leave off the dead Sacrifice of unleavened bread the union would soon be confirmed and all Christians were made one Church So soon as Julian read this Letter he went quickly and delivered it unto the Emperour He was so inraged that he would have called him to account and punishment for it if Bessarion Bishop of Nice had not excused the matter as a slight conceit unworthy of censure and might do annoyance if it were taken notice of judicially Then a conference began of ten Church-men on each side and some Noble-men to sit apart as beholders Of the Greeks were the Bishops of Ephesus Monembasia Nice Lacedemon and Anchial Sylvester Sgurogulus ...... And of the Latines were two Cardinals Julian and of Firma Andrew Bishop of Rhodos c. Cardinal Julian asked Whether they had thought upon means of reconciliation The Bishop of Ephesus answered The best means is truth and if we have truth with us we will never seek another for we cannot finde a better means then truth The Latines would have disputed on the main controversies But the Greeks said That were contrary unto the former agreement They talked of Purgatory And the Bishop of Ephesus demanded Whence have ye that tradition how long time have ye had that opinion what is your opinion concerning it Julian answered The Roman Church had this opinion from Peter and Paul and have kept it always and thus it is ...... The Greeks declared their Doctrine that the souls of the godly receive the good things prepared for them and the souls of the wicked receive punishment untill they receive their bodies again Here John a Spanish Doctour of the Pope's Court propoundeth other questions concerning the being of Angels in a place with what wings do they flie what kinde of fire is that in Hell c. They spent some days upon such questions without any agreement In the
for the remission of sins This profession of our faith is confirmed by the words of Christ which are written by the Evangelists and Holy Paul Unto this profession may be added this body of Christ and his blood should according to the institution of Christ and his Church should be taken in both kindes of bread wine in remembrance of his death and of his blood shed as he said Doe this in remembrance of mee Then this death of Christ as it is declared in the Gospel and the fruits of his death should be preached as also the hope of his blood shed as the Apostle witnesseth saying So oft as ye eat of this bread and drink of this cup ye shall shew forth the Lords death untill He come Thirdly according to the sure knowledge of spiritual truth of which the Euangelist John doth write as also for assurance of giving taking using and of truth by faith in hope as the Lord saith Take and eat Take and drinke Fourthly for the conjunct use for according to the institution and practise of Christ and the primitive Church the Priest should then administer when the necessity of believers requireth and he should receive with them as He saith Doe yee this in remembrance of mee And Paul saith The cup which we blesse is it not the communication of the blood of Christ and the bread which we break is it not the partaking of the body of Christ for wee many are one bread and one body who are partakers of that one bread and one cup. Fifthly for distinction of believers from the unbelievers and unworthy and for excommunication and rebuke of those who being defiled with the spot of vices do refuse to amend Of this saith Paul I would not have you partakers with the Devils yee can not drinke of the cup of the Lord and the cup of Devils And again he saith Put away the evill from yourselves for if any who is called a brother among you be covetous or a fornicator or an idolater or a dronkard or a railer or a thief with such a one eat ye not Behold this is our faith most Gracious King concerning the body and blood of Christ which as we are afraid to change or forsake these things which our Lord JESUS hath been pleased to testifie and for which end we doe now declare it so neither dare we add any thing unto it which the Lord of the Sacrament hath not added as also the primitive Church which followed Christ in poverty and affliction in singleness of heart hath not altered the ordinances of his law Concerning this Sacrament which our Lord through his great mercy hath ordained for love of his elect have many contentions arisen in opinions expositions and addition of sanctions or decrees so that contrary unto the intention of the Lord's institution they have furiously raged against others even to take away their lives But we for eschuing so great mischief have our refuge unto the faith of Christ even unto his words and meaning so often repeated in his word so that what He commanded to believe we do believe it simply and what He hath commanded to do we would do it faith fully truly we doe not only believe that that bread is His body which being taken and blessed and broken He testifieth to be his body but also if He had taken a stone and said This is my body we would have fully believed it Because of this our simple faith and because we will not suffer ourselves to forsake it for the opinion of men wee are called hereticks likwise for the actuall use unto which the word of Christ and his Apostles and the example of the work of the same sacrament doe invite us because we doe and use it so with upright faith in remembrance of the death of Christ wee are condemned judged worthy of prison and are afflicted for wee being tied unto Christs command and dissuaded by his forbidding doe worship him with reverence and honour due unto him and we feare to worship any other thing as him only sitting at the right hand with the Father and the Holy Ghost Wherefore gracious King let your highness understand that we do so not in contumacy or any contempt but for feare of God and in obedience unto him and wee pray that your Highness would shew compassion on us who are condemned for the faith of Christ as wee wish that the most High would of his grace be pleased to preserve and keep your honour from his wrath By the same faith we believe that the ordination of priests is truly from the high Bishop and great priest that in stead of the embassage of Christ the ministery preaching of the gospell doctrine judging offering of prayers by men thanksgivings and praises may be done unto God by them And it is from God unto men that the promise of God may be verified in hope of the received true faith and by excommunication the wicked may be debarred from that good And by the same faith wee confesse that the promises of God may be verified in hope of the received true faith and by excommunication the wicked may be debarred from that good And by the same faith wee confesse that they who intend to ordain others should follow the example of Christ and should consummate his ambassage with a right mind without respect of persons free from covetousness and simony By the same faith we declare that they which are to be ordained or promoted to higher or inferior orders should excell other believers in a godly life and faith in Christ for a lively faith sanctifieth and maketh fit unto all offices and possesseth the blessing and life for good works of an honest conversation are the garments and ornaments of a priest to the glory of the heavenly Father and example of the people and shew the vertue of the word they should also have more aboundant gifts of the Holy Spirit to wit more servent love toward Christ confidence of their own and their nieghbours salvation trust in God equity of mind a wholsome feeling of faith in a good conscience theire feet prepared unto the Gospell of peace prudence of Spirit knowledge of Gods law discerning of Spirits and the like What clerck soever by such an ordination is advanced unto the priesthood wee professe that such an ordination is a Sacrament because it is a signe of the true priesthood of Christ Jesus and of his ordination by God the Father and a forme of the ministry as of the head of his Church to offer unto God the incense of truth in Christ Wee approve that three things are necessary unto the full gradation of a presbyter first the the triall of his life faith gifts and fidelity in lesser things that are intrusted unto him another prayers with fasting thirdly the giving of power with words suitable there unto and the imposition of hands for corroboration By faith wee doe testify that marriage is a lawfull honest and
in Christ Martin Bucer wrote Luther's words so quickly as he could and sent a copy thereof unto Beat Rhenan with these words in the end Luther in the solemnized Synod of his Brethren here was president of a learned dispute in a solemne manner and hath disputed some paradoxes which not only were above the opinion of us all but even seemed heretical for the most part marvelous was his Sweetness in answering incomparable was his patience in hearing and in dissolving knots ye might have seen the witt of Paul and not of Scotus he did so easily bring them all into admiration of him with his short answers that were taken out of the treasury of Divine Scriptures he agreeth in every thing with Erasmus in one thing he goeth beyond him that what the one doeth conveigh closely the other teaches plainly When Luther had returned he publisheth a Declaration of his propositions concerning indulgences and dedicates it unto Pope Leo in his epistle and in another unto the Bishop of Brandenburgh he shewes the motives of that his divulged declaration 1. To calme his adversaries 2. To satisfy the desires of many that he suffer them not to be deceived who think that he asserts all these seeing he doubteth of many of them and in some he is ignorant some he denieth and he asserts none of them pertinaciously And he entreates the Bishop of Brandenburgh to take his pen and blot out as he pleaseth or burn all in a fire seeing he doth only dispute but determines nothing Likewise unto the Pope saith he I do present myself prostrate at the feet of your blessedness with all that I have or am refresh kill call revoke approove disproove I will acknowledge your voice to be the voice of Christ presiding and speaking in you Schultet ibid. Luther had written many of his first propositions according to the current of the time which afterwards he did recall and refute The Emperour wrote unto the Pope advising him to put an end unto these disputations in time and the Pope sent word unto Hierom Auditor camerae then in Germany to summon Luther unto Rome Luther craveth to be examined in Germany in a place and before judges convenient Duke Frederik writes unto Thomas de Vio Card. Caietan the Legate that Luther may be heard in Ausburgh Then the Duke of Brunswyke amongst other invectives wrote that Luther had raised this tragedy by motion of Frederik Duke of Saxony for envy of Albert Bishop of Mentz because he keeps still the Bishoprik of Madenburgh Others said Luther was provoked for the losse of gain to his sect Concerning the first Luther wrote the contrary as is to be seen in his above named Apology in Sleida comment lib. 13 as also histories shew that Frederik was a prudent and peaceable Prince and the choise of Germany after the death of Maxilian but having understanding and following the Rule of Gods Word he preferreth the clearing of the truth in such a matter unto every thing and so when Maximilian and Leo commanded him in August An. 1518. to remove Luther from preaching the Duke considering the matter of Luther's doctrine and searching the sentences of Scripture quoted by him he would not withstand the truth when it was made cleare unto him Nor did he so trusting to his own judgement only but was inquisitive to know the judgement of others more learned and antient especially he wrote unto Erasmus who was then about 58 years of age and famous for learning protesting that he would that the earth did open and swallow him rather than he would mantain any opinion against his knowledge and conscience but he could not permitt an innocent man to be oppressed by these who were seeking their own interests and not the glory of Jesus Christ and therefore he be sought him to declare his judgement freely in these controversies So writes Erasmus in Epist. Roffens Episc dated prid Luc. Ann. 1519. Erasmus answereth at first darkly that in Luther were two faults he smote both at the head and belly of the Church that is the Pope and the monks which two should not be medled with Then the Duke was instant with him to shew his mind more clearly and Erasmus answereth Luther doth well in discovering errours and Reformation of the Church is very necessary the substance of his doctrin is true but his style would be more moderate both in writing and speaking against mens persons Whereupon the Duke wrote unto Luther that he should temper the vehemency of his invectives As for the aim of Luther Paul Langius a disciple of Tritemius and at that time a Monk Citicensis writes in Chronic. saying Martin a very perfect Divine profound incomparable endeavours to bring sacred Theology unto its originall dignity and primitive purity as also unto the Euangelicall sincere and simple innocency all seculare Philosophy being put clean away ..... he followes Simon de Cassia a most Christian Divine in former times despising all Philosophy teaches the Holy Scripture most purely declaring continually the most reverend and almost not-heard mysteries of Gods Word he became most famous through the world albeit like another Jerom he wanted not the envy of enemies and persecution of the Scholasticall Divines And the same Langius speaking of Carolstadius Luther and Melanchton saith They most purely do treat of Divinity the wheat of Gods Word without al chaff that is without all Philosophy and mixture of Syllogismes they have the Sacred Scriptures and especially the Gospell of Christ and epistles of Paul for their principles and foundation with the study of learning they powre into the breasts of their disciples the fear of God and seeds of all vertues by their word example and pen. And lest any should say that he speakes of them before their separation he addeth about the year 1520. He by his doctrin and admired preaching brought indulgences to nothing and called them altogether into doubt and diverted the people from buying affirming that they were not necessary unto salvation nor were availeable unto forgiveness of sin but were a neglecting of repentance and a casting loose and an impediment of all works of piety nor was such a treasure of the merits of Saints known in the primitive Church for the space of 1000 years and more .... affirming also that the Church of Rome is not the first and head of all Churches de Jure Divino and therefore unto this present time they persecute him like another Athanasius ..... and he hath taught other rare and sublime things which not only some Romanists but many of the most learned especially the Thomists cease not to maintain Nevertheless Martin a most learned and wise Divine in our age confirming and proving his doctrin by testimony of the Gospell and of the antient Orthodox Fathers hath remained invincible hitherto This and much more is written by that Monk not affirmatively but by admiration and doubting after the manner of many as he speakes untill it be decreed by
quench the thirst of our soul and deal with us as he did with the Fathers He said also God declares his will by dreames as he had done unto him selfe and had given him a command to kill all wicked men and pull down all Princes and Magistrats He taught also that all things should be common and all should have alike freedom and liberty without all subiectjon Sleidan Comment lib. 3. 5. In Apile 1525. the countrie-people in Suevia by the river Danube being deluded with such errours began to refuse obedience and they demand 1. liberty to choose their Ministers that will preach the word without mans traditions and decrees 2. liberty from all tieths except only corne and these to be diuided at the discretion of good men a part unto Ministers part unto the poor and part unto publik business 3. it is not equitable that heretofore they have been held in the condition of slaves seing they are made free by the blood of Christ They professe they do not cast off Magistrats but they will not endure that bondage unless it be cleared by testimony of Scripture that it is reasonable 4. It is not reason that they are forbidden to take wild beasts or fishes especially when the beasts destroy their cornefields from the beginning God hath given unto man power over all living creatures 5. it is a great prejudice of the people that woods are in the power of afew men 6. they demand that their Princes or Masters would moderate their dayly burdens of service according to the equity of the Gospell and lay no more upon them than was craved of old c. Ibid. Albeit the attempts of these men was alike against Popish Masters and others which were desirous of Reformation yet I can not find that any Popish person did endeavour to convince them by information Luther did publish books to refute them many times before they did publish their Demands he dissuadeth them from sedition as a most fearfull sin not only in the externall fact but even to be spoken or thought upon After the publishing of the Demands he told them they did wickedly in cloaking theire rebellion with the pretext of sinceer doctrine and equity seing God hath commanded to obey Princes and Masters then he sifteth their Demands severally and shewes that some of them are contrary unto the law of nature and equity and if any of them have any reason in them they should be examined by prudent men but they should not move broiles if their Masters will not let them have the liberty of the gospell they may go in quietness where they may have it but they should not use violence against their Masters He wrote also unto Princes and especially unto the Prelats that their hindering the liberty of the Gospell was a provocation of Gods wrath and their laying of intolerable burdens on their subiects for their own pleasure and prodigality was also offensive unto God and he exhorts them to use all meanes of peace rather then force seeing the issue of warrs is uncertain and arms are sooner taken up then can be layd off When they had taken arms he wrote the third time exhorting both to take away their controverfies by treaties of good and prudent men Many other preachers did also publish books shewing the craft of Satan in raising such broils at that time and that these should not be imputed unto the preaching of the truth as the aduersaries of truth did crie and it is no new thing that the iudgements of God upon men for their sins are imputed unto the Gospell seing in the days of the Apostles and of the primitive Church the heathens said that all their troubles came upon them for the Christian religion whereas God was offended for their idolatry and contempt of the Gospell as they proved by the testimonies of Tertullian in Apolog. and Cyprian contra Demetr Augustin de Civ Dei and others Abr. Scult Ann. ad An. 1525. When neither Princes would yield unto a treaty nor the Bowrs would lay down arms Luther wrote a fourth book exhorting all men as for the quenching a common fire to take arms against the rebells and kill them which had so basely denied obedience unto their Masters and had begun to usurpe other mens possessions and do cloke so vile villany with the name of Christianity Nevertheless these villains grew into a hudge multitude and divided themselves into three Armies one at Biberac another at Algovia and the third at the lake of Constance they took some towns as Winsbergh and Wirtsburgh they killed some Noble men as the Court of Helfenstein most unworthily The Princes that went against them were John Elector of Saxony and his uncle George Philip of Hassia Henry Duke of Brunswik c. In some places when they were put to flight they run into the river there were killed of them in severall places 50000. some write 100000 and the chief enticers wete taken and beheaded XXII Notwithstanding these broiles it pleased God to spread the Progresse the Reformation Reformation the same yeare Luther at that time did first administer the Lords supper in the German language and did ordain a Minister without the Popish rites And Zuinglius did also forsake the Latine language and the rites Albert Marques of Branbeburgh was entituled Master of the Teutonick Order but that year having warr with the King of Pole for some towns of Prussia and seeing no aid from the Emperour was content to agree upon condition that he should acknowledge the King as Superiour and possesse Prussia under the tittle of a Dukedom and then he authorized the Reformed religion through out that Province Gustavus King of Sweden sent for all the Prelats to come unto his palace and there without any noise gave them in their option to continue in their places and professe the Reformed religion or then to leave the Country Some gave him their oath of obedience and others went whether they pleased William Landsgrave of Hassia established the Reformed religion within his jurisdiction So it was established at Gorlik Lauba in Lusatia In Rhetia alone were reckoned 41. preachers of the Gospell So did Philip Count of Hanove Cristopher and Antony Counts of Altenburgh Delmenhorst Conrad of Tecklenburgh Linga and Baltasar Lord of Esens Witmund Vniformity in circumstantials is not necessary all within their territories and so did many other free towns In the year preceeding a motion was made to assemble a Synode of all the Reformed Churches for establishing an uniformity in rites or circumstantiall ceremonies Luther opposeth it asserting that it was not expedient albeit it was propounded in a good zeale yet it hath no precedent for even in the Councell of the Apostls they did treat more of works and traditions than of faith and there they had disputed for the most part concerning opinions questions yet he was no less suspicious of the name of a Councel as of the name
Counsell Nobility and Commons to be the only Heire and was crowned January 15 with many glad hearts all the Bishops except Owen Bishop of Carlile refuse to perform the solemnities of the Coronation because of her Religion At her coronation she did secure the kingdom by oath that she shall not marry a stranger nor would she make open declaration what doctrine she would follow only she set free all the prisoners for Religion many hundreds and promiseth that when she shall be established in her governement to establish religion by advice of Parliament and of learned godly men and causeth it be proclaimed that in the mean time none shall alter any ceremonies unless it be according to the rites of her own chappel and these were as it was ordered in her fathers time Speed Cambden She sendeth to make account unto the Pope of her assumption He answereth That kingdom was held in fee of the Apostolick See and it was her presumption to vsurp the name of Queen without his knowledge therefore she deserveth not to be heard unless she renounce her pretensions and submit herself unto his free disposition This soundeth harsh both to her and to the counsel therefore she will treat no more with him PeSoave in conc Tride Then knowing the difference of opinions in religion among her â—ubiects and willing to satisfie both parties according to reason she calleth a Parliament and by common aduice appointeth a Conference of eight persons on either side that after debating of reasons they might come to an happy agreement The persons were named the day appointed the questions were for the first concerning the vulgare tongue in Divine Service and the communion under both kindes order was prescribed that for avoiding heat of contention they shall not dispute by word but both parties shall write their reasons and give them in the first day and answers shall be prepared against the next day and all to be in English that every one may receive information Both parties were content But when the day was come the Papists alledge they understood not the ordinance concerning the disputation in write and they will dispute by voice only The second day they were pressed more instantly but as despising authority nor regarding their own credite or rather being convinced in their consciences they still refuse The third day both parties were required â—o produce their books and opinions All the Popish party excep the Bishop of Westminster plainly deny to let their books be read some spake unreverently even of excommunicating the Queen Sir Nicolas Bacon Lord Keeper and Nicolas archb of York were named by the Parliament to be Iudges of the Conference they take this carriage as a contempt both of Nobility and Commons as also of her Roiall Majesty Then the Bishops were required to give their oath of allegiance and Supremacy as in King Henry VIII time They refuse this also Wherefore the Bishop of Winchester who had shewed more folly than others was committed to the Tower afterwards he was set at liberty Boner Bishop of London who was the chief butcher in Mary's time was committed to the Marshall-sea some fled out of the Country and others were charged to answer before the Counsell some were confined not one more imprisoned and all the exiled bb and others in Q. Mary's time were recalled Franc. Mason Lib. 3. c. 1. A Parliament was held at Westminster where was much debate in matter of Religion and hote study on both sides In the goodness of God the Gospell had the upper hand the hope of the Popish falleth their rage is abated the supremacy of the Pope is denied the bloody Statutes of Q. Mary are repealed popish bb were deposed and good men put in their rooms the Masse is abolished altars are appointed to be removed and tables set for them the zeal of many pulling down the altars before that Act was approved Jo. Foxe in Acts. In a brief view behold the hand of God toward her afterwards 1. The king of France pretending right by his Queen Mary intended to inuade England but he was taken away II. Philip king of Spain sought her in marriage she abhorred that because he had married her Sister Therefore he sought to match her with Charles son of the Emperour Ferdinand but to the end he might bring the Nation to the house of Austria and because She refused he became her utter enemy yet to her greater glory 3. An. 1562. Arthur Pool of the house of York intended to bring an Army from France into Wales but he and his confederates were discovered before the execution of the plot and were condemned 4. As before the French king so again Philip sought â—ft that the Popes would accurse her that so he might have pretext to inuade her kingdom God hindered Paul 4. and Pius 4. from decerning it and more followes VI. In Aprile An. 1558. Walter mill priest of Lunan in Anguise was VValter mâ—ll martyr accused by the Bishop of Santan drews for leaving the Masse and that therefore he and John petrie priest at Innerkilor were condemned by the late Cardinal to be burnt wherever they should be apprehended Walter answered I served the Cure there before the Cardinals time 20. years with the approbation of all the parishoners but when the furious Cardinal persecuted mee and many more for the preaching of Godsword I was constrained to keep myself quiet and I went about reproving vices and instructing people in the grounds of Religion for which cause now I am taken When he was brought to triall in the Church before the Bishops of Santandrews Murray Briechin Caitnes the Abbots of Dumfermlin Lundors Balmerino and Couper and many Doctors of the University he looked so feeble partly by age and partly by hard usage that it was feared none could hear what he would answer yet he delivered his mind with such courage that his enemies were amased At first he kneeled to pray Andrew oliphant a priest said Sir Walter mill get up and answer for you keep my Lord here too long He continued yet praying and when he arose he said I should obey God more than man I serve a mighter Lord then your Lord is and whereas you call mee Sir Walter they call mee Walter and not Sir Walter I have been too long one of the Popes Knights now say what you have to say Oliphant asked What thinkest thou of priests marriage He answered I think it a blessed bond ordained by God approved by Christ and free to all sorts of men but yee abhor it and in the mean while yee take other mens wives and daughters yee vowe chastity and keep it not Oliphant sayd Thou sayst that there are not seven sacraments He answered Give us baptisme and the Lords Supper take yee the rest and part them among you Oliphant Thou saist the Masse is idolatry He answeres A Lord sends and calleth many to a dinner and when it is ready he tolleth the bell
were instant to begin and the most part condescend to treat of doctrin and Reformation jointly so that also a Letter was sent unto the Pope craving to further the Synod and to solicite the Princes for continuing peace among themselves as also other Letters were written unto the Emperour unto the French Roman Portugal Kings and other Princes requiring them to conserve peace to send Ambassadors to secure the high-wayes and to cause their Prelats resort unto the Synod Those Letters should have been read and sealed in the ensuing congregation but they could not agree what seal to use In a word before the next Session they could agree only that they should begin with heresy and because they were informed of more prelats a coming they delay the next Session untill Aprile 8. Again the Legats send for their oft demanded instructions and they advise to begin at the controversies between them and the Lutherans concerning the holy Scriptures and the abuses brought into the Church in that matter About that time the Conference in Germany was dissolved and the Pope thought it scandalous to delay any more so he gave information to begin according to the advice but so that they be slow in the Reformation Accordingly on February 22. 1546. it was ordained to read Luthers books and frame articles concerning the Scripture to be censured by the Divines and so matter to be prepared for Decrees As for abuses every one should call to mind what he thought needfull to be Reformed and what remedy is fittest The articles of doctrine were propounded of the sufficiency of the Scriptures 2. Of the number of the books 3. of the Latin Translation 4. Of the perspicuity of the Scriptures In the first article all did agree to make Traditions Of the Scriptures equal with the Scriptures excep Antonius Marinarus a Carmelite whose discourse was called Lutheran They all agree to canonize the Apocrypha on these two they spend sixe congregations In the third article was difference between them who were ignorant of the languages and a few having a taste of Greek Frier Aloisius de Catanea did prove by authority of Jerom and Cardi. Caietan that the Hebrew edition of the old Test and the Greek of the New are the pure fountains and all Latine translations are but impure brooks and so have been accounted in all time by past The greater number said This opinion openeth a door unto Lutherans the doctrin of the Roman Church is by Popes and Divines founded upon the Latine Bible and if it be lawfull to scan whether it be rightly translated the base Grammarians shall be preferred unto the Bishops and Cardinals and the Inquisitors shall have no place if they be ignorant of Hebrew and Greek Do Isidorus Clarus a Brescian and Benedict an Abbot discourse historically of the old and later Translations and of their account at the first and how at last that which is called vulgata was patched of them both Andreas Vega a Franciscan commends that Latine but preferreth the Hebrew and Greek In the end sixe Divines were deputed to correct the Vulgata to be printed by auhority of the Councel There was no less difference concerning the expounding of Scripture some alledging the authority of Car. Caietan said The Spirit of God is tied to no age and all men should be encouraged unto the diligent and sober study of Gods Worde Others said Vnbridled spirits must be curbed or else can be no hope to see an end of the late pretences neither do the Lutherans gain upon any but such who study the Scriptures the study of Aristotle is safer and the Word of God should be kept in due reverence from it is much derogated when it is too common Dominicus Soto a Dominican said In matter of faith every one should be tied to the exposition of the Church but in manners let every one abound in his own sense so that piety and charity be preserved otherwise men may fall into inconvenients by contrariety of expositions among the antient Fathers who never required that they should be absolutely followed The opinion prevailed which held that the Scriptures are already so well expounded that there is not hope of any more good and if any man will not be content with the Antients let him not trouble the world with his whimsies The Divines had discoursed so irresolutely that the Prelats who scarcely understood the discourses and yet have the power of suffrage doubted what to say in the canons and anathema's therefore overture was found to add anathema unto the Decree concerning the number and species of the books but the other canons should have no anathema lest they accuse their own Divines They talk of many abuses and a Decree was made against the pettiest for hast because the Session was approaching There the Decrees were read and the fifth Session was appointed to be Juny 17. Five Cardinals were present and 48 Bishops and none of them saith my author remarkable for learning The canons were sent to Rome The Court after information how particulares were debated began to think they must attend the Synod more narrowly therefore the Pope sendeth moe Cardinals and admonishes the Legats that the Decrees should not be published before they be advised at Rome he admonishes also to avoid too much flowness but bewar of celerity lest there be not time to receive order from him what to propound deliberat and conclude and spend not time in points not controverted as they had done now in some undoubted points finally take heed that the Papl authority be not permitted unto disputation At that time the Pope had deposed Herman Bishop of Colein for heresy as was pretended and ordained Adolph Count of Scavenburgh into his place and he wrote unto the Emperour for this effect Charles loved not Herman for the same heresy yet fearing that he would joyn with the ptotesâ—ants would not consent Hence arose a new jealousy between the Pope and the Empetour The Protestants complain that they were condemned not only being not heard but without the Councel by the Pope alone and therefore it is needless for them to go unto Trent IV. In the first congregation the Prelats urge two points of Reformation Sess V that were propounded and left-of in the former Session The Legats would treat of original sin Because they could not agree Letters were sent to Rome and in the mean while another order was prescribed for dispatching affaires to wit there must be a congregation of Divines to treat of doctrin and Canonists must be joyned with them when they come to Reformation yet so that Prelats might be present if they please And another Congregation of Prelats to frame the Heads of doctrin and Reformation which being examined and digested according to the most common opinion should be brought unto the generall congregation and there the voice of every one being known decrees may be framed by the determination of the greater part and then
respect of the vast charges of the Papal Chamber upon the Legats the poor Italian Bishops and other extraordinaries it were expedient to calculat the time of beginning and proceeding and that no hour be spentidly As also it is necessary that before hand his Ma. were assured of the Germans both Catholiks and Protestants and bind themselves unto the Decrees especially what things are already established should not be called into question As he had condescended to further the affairs of his Ma. by holding the Synod in that place so he craves that his sincerity be not abused unto a burdening of himself and hopeth if any shall attempt against him by caviliations or calumnies his Ma. will not marvel if he use the remedies that shall occur for defense of the authority which he hath received immediatly from God The Emperour returns answer extolling his wisdom both in remitting the Synod and in his considerations As for himself and Germany in a Decree at Ausburgh a yeare ago they all even Protestants had submitted themselves as the Copy which he sent shewes but of the particulars that are determined it will be expedient to speak of them when parties are brought together And he promiseth to be a Protector of his Holiness and of his life if occasion require About that time the Emperour propounded in another Diet at Ausburgh that now the Synod was to be opened at Trent It pleased the Popish but the Reformed submitted themselves conditionally 1. that the Pope should not preside but himself be subiect unto the Synod 2. the things that were acted against them should be rëexamined 3. The Divines of the Augustan Confession should have decisive voices Now the Emperour gives unto the Pope account of the absolute submission of the one party and of the conditions required by the other and he demandeth a copy of the Bull of convocation before it be published to the end he may make a Decree concerning it in the Diet and cause it be received by them all Those things did not please the Court of Rome and a Bull was sent conform to the late one for the Pope said If the Germans will refuse he is delivered from his fears of the Synod as also from the scandal for the want of it or if they accept it they shall not be able to practize any thing against him All both Papists and Protestants spoke against the Pop's pride appearing in that Bull but the Emperour calmed their animosities by fair promises He sent unto the Pope for more smooth words in the Bull but all in vain The opening of the Synod was appointed to be May. 1. An. 1551. In the beginning of the year the Pope consulteth how to have trusty Presidents and to save great charges many Legats must have much moneys and he dareth not trust one alone wherefore he sent Marcellus Crescentius Car. de S. Marcello Legat and two Nuntij Sebastianus Pighinus arch Bishop of Siponto and Aloiâ—us Lipomanus Bishop of Verona all of equal authority and as large as the Letters of his predecessor did bear he commanded them to open the Synod at the day appointed even though there were no other Prelats present VIII Very few Prelats came nevertheles a Session was held and a The Councel is opened Decree was published to wit The Synod is open and the next Session shall be September 1. At that day another Decree was made The third Session shall be October 2. In this second Session Letters were presented from Henry King of France the Inscription was offensive because he called A protestation of France against it them not a Synod but a Convent they refuse to open the Letter as not directed unto them Then said the Bishop of Mentz If yee will not receive Letters from the King of France calling you a holy Convent how will yee he arken unto the Protestants calling you a malignant Convent Then the Legate said The word may be taken in good part and otherwise wee protest that it shall not be prejudiciall The Contens of the Letter was to shew the equity on his part of the present warrs against the Emperour and Pope in protecting Octavius Farnes Duke of Parma he was devote unto the Apostolical See albeit he be compelled to take Arms agaigst Pope Julius he had sent unto Rome and there had protested that if the Pope do judge the protection of Parma which he had so lawfully undertaken even by the Pop's permission to be a just cause of stirring up all Europ into warr he was sory but it can not be imputed unto him who is most willing to accept the Decrees if due order be observed in making them If the Pope will continue in warring he can not send his Prelats unto Trent where they have not secure access nor can France be tied unto their Decrees but he will use the remedies of his Ancestors by National Councels When the Letters were read the Orator makes protestation to the same purpose The Speaker of the Synod after some private conference with the Legate said The Kings modesty is acceptable but they can not accept the person of the French Abbot who had made the protestation and according to Law they summon him apud acta to be present October 2 to receive answer and they forbid to make any note of these actions There was variety of opinions concerning this protestation The Imperialists said It is null because an Act of the greater part of any Vniversality is esteemed lawfull when the lesser being called will not be present and the French Bishops might have come without passing thorow any of the Pop's territories Others said To cal in word and exclude indeed is not to envite and albeit one may come from France to Trent not passing thorow the Pop's territoâ—ies yet he must come through the Emperours Laâ—â—s which is all one in respect of the time The Major part hath full authority when the lesser part can not or will not appear and is silent because silence presupposeth consent but when it protests it hath it's place especially if the hinderance be from him who calleth The French Orator said This can not be a lawfull Synod because the Presidents confer privatly with the Emperours Embassador nor communicat with any other and yet the Speaker saith The holy Synod receives the Letters and when the Letters were read the answer of the Presidents only was given in name of the Synod They can not say these are matters of smal importance seing it is a matter of dividing the Church But truly those and other delaying answers were devised untill they were informed from Rome In the mean while the French King was the more bitter against the Reformed lest he be suspected of Lutheranism The Prelats at trent held congregations now and treated of the Eâ—charist but after another manner A new methode of debating than they had done before because the Prelats understood not the subtilities of the Divines the Presidents gave
assembled for private ends beseeching the King to send his Prelats unto the Synod where they shall have all liberty adding albeit those shall not come the Synod shall not want it 's own reputation and requiring that he assemble not Nationall Synods which his Ancestors have abrogated and that he be not unthankfull unto God and the Church his mother but rather he should pardon personal offences for the publick good When the Protestants received that Safe-conduct to speak by anticipation they perceived â—he meaning of the Court and demanded one conforme to that which was granted at Basile unto the Bohemians without alteration of any word excep persons place and time The Pope would never grant that therefore the Protestants would never come unto the Synod excep some few as followes After the Session was a publick congregation it was resolved to treat of pennance and extrem unction and to proceed in the Reformation The former Act of their manner in discussing the articles was confirmed because the Divines had contentiously transgressed it Order is taken to hold congregations twice a day that the moe things may be dispatched before the coming of the Protestants Before the School-men were curious and scarcely intelligible Of pennance but then they becam inpertinent and ridiculous for they speaking of pennance for confirming their opinions brought all the places of Scripture where the Latine Translation hath confiteor or confessiâ— they alledge it was prefigured in the old Testament and he was called the most learned who brought manyest types of it they alledge all the signes of humility and out of the Fathers they report many miracles and the prosperous successes of them who were given much unto confession and the bad success of them who had despised it c. After such discourses the Presidents with such Deputies as they pleased to name framed the Decrees and sent them to Rome and when they were canvassed there they were propouâ—ded in the general congregation Sundry Divines spake against sundry parts of them as for example The Divines of Lovan and Colein spake against the reservation of some sins unto the Pope Those of Colein said The words Whose sins yee forgive c. are not meaned of the sacrament and they were not satiâ—fied that publick confession was omitted Of consession and absolution albeit so much mentioned by the Antients and so necessary The Franciscans said Contrition confession and satisfaction are not the parts of the sacrament because they are the acts of the receiver and not applied by the Minister They complained also that it is called heresy to say Sacramental absolution is declarative seeing Jerom Gratian and all the School-Divines have taught absolution is a declaration Many Fathers judged those remostrances considerable But Car. Crescentius said Those things were maturely established and may not be altered for satisfying the fancies of particular persons but if all be not satisfied it may be propounded generally in the congregation Whether the Decrees may be altered and then they may come to particulares And in privat he shew his mind unto some friends that they should not suffer men to speak so freely which were dangerous if the Protestants were come It is sufficient for the liberty of the Synod that men deliver their opinions when the articles are disputed but when all men are heard and the decrees are framed by the Deputies allowed by the Presidents examined and authorized at Rome it is too great licence to call them into question In the article of Reformation concerning episcopal jurisdiction the old contention was renewed the Prelats still aiming to recover their antient power and the Presidents striving to yeeld as little as they could but one thing moved them give way to many articles to wit the Canonists have a law Whatsoever is spoken generally touches not the Pope nor his Court unless they A mistery in forming the Decres be named Therefore the Presidents would never suffer the Pop's name be expressed and the prelates were satisfied hoping that the decrees being framed generally might at least make way for after-times So the Session was held November 25 and the next appointed to January 25. X. November 26. a general congregation gave order to discuss the Masse New projects and the communication of the cup as if nothing had been spoken thereof nevertheless in the ensuing Session nothing was spoken of that matter At Christmes the pope hearing that the Orators of the Duke of Witteberg and of Strawsburg were suiting at Trent for a Safe-conduct and the Emperour was soliciting the Councel for the same created 14. Cardinals under pretence of enemity of the French King and so he might counterpoise the French Cardinals who were many but truly it was to strengthen his own party in the Synod as he wrote unto the Legate he sent thanks unto the Nuntij for their former fidelity and promises if they shall continue for he feared they would take it ill that they had not also received red hats Much adoe was at Trent for purchasing the Safe-conduct but the Pope wrote unto the Presidents to entertain the Protestants with all possible courtesy knowing that it is necessary at some times to suffer indignity and patience brings honor in the end They should abstain from all publick colloquie in matters of Religion either by writ or mouth that they should endeavour to gain some Protestant Doctors and spare no cost But the Pope being peremptory whatsoever might happen not to yeeld and hearing that the Emperour had promised unto the Protestants that he will endeavour to attemper the papal authoâ—ity and that he sought to advance his own honor by debasing Papacy Vpon those motives the Pope enclineth unto the French King and hearkned unto Car. Tournon dealing for a Treaty with him and he considered that if that Treaty shall hold the dissolution of the Synod may follow without any shew of his desire In the mean while the Session was held January 2â— An. 1552 but the decrees were deferred untill the next Session March 6. and they determined to treat of Marriage and prosecute the reformation and publish the definitions of both Sessions together Concerning matrimony 34. articles were propounded in a congregation and after sundry debatings 6 canons were framed Wherefore the protestant Orators complained but the papalins would proceed the faster Vntill the Emperour gave command unto his followers that they proceed not but rather protest against the Papalins if persuasions can not prevail When those things were known at Trent in a generall congregation it was resolved to surcease from all Synodal act during the pleasure of the Synod This was displeasing unto the Pope and he wrote unto the Presidents to suspend the Synod as few dayes as they could and for reputation of the Councel they should resume their Actions without all other respect At this time the Elector Bishop left Trent fearing what was like to befall so did the Orator of Maâ—rice Duke of Saxony
obedience were to confesse himself a vassall This treaty continued a year and in end it was concluded that the Pope shall confirm the election without saying that obedience was demanded or not demanded promised or not promised Ibid. He lamented when he considered the renting of the Church with so many different opinions nevertheless he maintained peace and no way hindered the gospell and he maintained a Protestant Minister Phauserus in his Court for a space he was oft at Masse nor did abrogate papistry He said once to William Bishop Olovincensis There is no greater sin than to domineer over mens consciences At another time he said Who take on them to command mens consciences they climbe into the castle of heaven In the beginning of his reigne he refused to pay unto Solyman the acknowledgement which his father had covenanted to pay for the peaceable possession of his part of Hungary and in the year 1566. he had his first Diet at Ausburgh where he sought subsidy against the Turk The Protestants sought a confirmation of the peace in the cause of Religion and then it was established not only by universal consent but confirmed also by oath that the Catholicks should not trouble the Protestants in the exercise of their Religion nor in the possession of their goods moveable nor vnmoveable and that the Protestants should permit the like liberty unto the Papists within their dominions Under pain of Outlawry to the transgressors on both sides As also it should be free unto any person to turn from the one Religion unto the other if they do hold their lands of the Emperour immediatly but if any Archb. or other Prelat will embrace the Reformed Religion he should renounce his Benefice with all its revenues to be conferred on a Papist excepting those goods or Monasteries which belonged not unto them that are immediatly subject unto the Emperour and have been possessed by the Reformed since the year 1552 so that no plea of law should have any power against them c. This agreement is word for word in Geo. Schonbor Politic. Lib. 4. c. 6. After this Diet Maximilian inuaded Transsylvania and took Wesperin and Dodis Wherefore Solyman came with a hudge army to aid John Vaivoda Prince of Transsylvania and took some towns from the Emperour In the mean time Solyman dieth but his Captain Mahumet a Bassa conceiled his death untill Selim was created successor unto his father then they took mo towns that Maximilian sought peace and obtained it upon harder conditions than before The same year 1567. William à Grumbach a Noble man but a vassall of the Bishop of Wirtzburg took armes with the aid of the Marques of Brandeburg against his superior wherefore the Bishop outlawed him and brought him to poverty yet he found favour with John-Frederik Duke of Saxony and some others he with some horsemen inuades Writzburg and supriseth it ere the Bishop raised an army the surprisers were gone hither and thither They began another plot the Emperour sent Augustus Elector of Saxony against them he prevailed John-Frederik was sent prisoner into lower Austria Grumbach and his Chancelorr Duke Bruck were quartered Baron Baumgartner and some others were beheaded and the castle of Grimmenstain was made levell with the ground Such was the end of proud rebells Maximilian lived the rest of his dayes in peace An. 1470. the Turks wanne Nicosia a chief town of Cyprus and Famaugusta or Salamys after a years seege and contrary to the conditions of rendring Bragadin Governour of the town was excoriat quick at command of the Bassa Mustapha and others were most cruelly murdered So all Cyprus was taken from Crhistians Then the Venetians who had possessed it 200 years made a league with the Pope and King of Spain John Duke of Austria a sone of Charles V. was Generall of the Navy the battell was fought in the firth of Corinth alià s Golfo de Lepanto 25000. Turks were slain 4000. captive and almost all their Navy with rich spoile came into the handes of Christans 14000. captive Christians were delivered An. 1575. Maximilian sought by many meanes to have been chosen King of Poland and when Steven Prince of Transsylvania was preferred he was never seen to be jovaill again He caused his son Rodulph be chosen King of the Romanes in a Diet at Ratisbon and died in time of the Diet in Octob. 1576. Pet. Mexia II RODULPH II. immediatly after his coronation sent to Rome and sought not only confirmation but to be declared the eldest sonne of the Church He held his first Diet at Ausburg An 1582 where was no talk of Religion but only he urged the Gregorian Calendare and sought aid against the Turks He took armes against Gebhard Bishop of Colein because he forsook the Pope as followes An. 1584. Rodolph and Amurath III. Emperour of Turks made truce for 93 years but the same year in October 10000 Turks inuade the landes of Carniola they burnt and wasted sundry towns and villages and carried away Christians of both sexes in eaptivity within two dayes a company of Christians meet them in Croatia they deliver the Christians and routed the Turks Osiand In the year 1592. Amurath thought to have made conquest of all Hungary and entred into Croatia then followed continuall wars untill the year 1606 victory enclining now to the one hand and then to the other Rodulph had a league with the Duke of Muscove and received supplied both of men and money against Amurath Rodulph reigned 36. years CHAP. IIJ. Of Diverse COVNTRIES J. BY the preambulatory pieces before Ge. Cassanders consultation Consultatio Cassandri it is cleare 1. from the testimony of Ja. Thuan that the Emperour Ferdiâ—and was not satisfied with the Councel of Trent and though too late he perceived that he was deceived by Cardinal Moron wherefore he took another course to compose the controversies in Religion when he could not find remedy abroad he would do his best at home So with the advice of his son Maximilian he sent for George Cassander living then in Duisburg to shew some way of conciliating the controversies of the Augustan Confession His Letters were dated May 22. 1564. 2. The Emperours purpose was that if by the advice of prudent men he could effectuat no more yet he might have a setled form of Religion in Hungary Bohem and his other hereditary Dominions Cassander was not able to make travell because he was goutish But after another Letter from the Emperour and from King Ferdinand he wrot his Consultation for that effect before he sent it Ferdinand was gone and it was delivered unto Maximilian None hath written against the Consultatio it seemes Papists would not write against it because he holdeth that the Roman Church is a true Church albeit corrupt and it is a schism to depart from it The Reformed writ not against it because he maintaines the most and main articles of their doctrine The book is scarce to be had but in a big volume with
and this your country Beseeching your Majesty for the tender mercy of God to call unto your Majesty some of the wise discreet and indifferent and by their counsell to make a Moderate order that unquiet spirits may be ruled good men cherished and the hearts of all your subjects united to the maintaining of Godâ— glory preservation of your Majesty and estate and the comfort of all them who bewail this miserable dissolution With this supplication particular instructions were given unto the Commissioners for declaring these heads 1. How heavily the godly are offended and all the Church is scandalized that David Chalmers a man notoriously known unto his Majesty and Counsel to be not only a professed enemy against the truth of religion and plain practizer against it but against his Ma s authority estate in all parts where he traveleth having also lying upon his head the vile bruit and common suspicion conceived in the hearts of many upon no small obscure presumptions of the cruell and barbarous murder of the most Noble person of his Ma s Father of good memoâ—y Is so suddenly and with so small account entred in favor and received his Ma s pacification with Letters to dispossesse faithfull Ministers of their livings and possessions no due satisfaction being made to the Church a matter importing no less prejudice to his Mr s noble estate and that touching his Majesty in the hiest point of his honor and therefore his Majesty would be moved to look wisely upon the consequents of this and in consideration of this weighty grief would call back and suspend the effect and force of any thing granted unto him and the charge given to his reposition untill that after just lawfull tryall his innoceney be agnosced and the Church so much offended in his person be satisfied and the same satisfaction to be returned unto his Majesty from the Church 2. The young Laird of Fintry directed into this Country as wee are surely informed to practize with his Majesty and his lawfull Subiects for overthrownig of religion by power of friends now in Court and wheresoever he comes plainly maintaines papistry and under color of conference which by all means hy flyeth doth great scandall in the Counrry The third article is notoriously known By the 4. Article is meant the King of France the Duke of Guise and other Papists there and also within the Country as the Earls of Huntley Crawford and others The Church is hurt in her priviledges liberties as will appear in the article and as followes tacks of the thirds of Hadingtoun and Santandrews are set to the Laird of Seagy the Abbey of Arbroth to that Abbots young sone and the Abbot of Newbotle's sone is provided to that abbey The 9. and 10. are known as John Gairden is provided to the parsonage of Fordyce in the sixty year of God and standes stili titulare the Kings Majesty hath ser in tack the frutes of that Benefice to Rob. Stuart of Todlaw and command is given to the Lords of Session to grant Letters upon these tacks Alexander Arbuthnot is charged against the Acts of the Church to continue in the Colledge of Aberdien Under pain of horning The Ministers of the Chapter of Halirudhouse are charged by Letters of horning to subscribe a gift of pension to the Parson of Pennicook's wife and sone for their lyftimes against the same Acts c. VII The Act made Octob. 30. year 1576. concerning setting fues and tacks of Benefices and Church-livings is ratifyed with this declaration that under the said Act are and shal be comprehended all pensions factories and whatsoever disposition of a Benefice or any part thereof without the consent of the Generall Assembly And the disponers thereof shall incurr the penalty contained in the Act of July 2. year 1578. VIII The Synod of Lothian craves that the Assembly take order with John Spotswood for setting a tack of his Benefice without consent of the Assembly It is ordained that this particular be tryed by his own presbytery and be reported unto the next assembly IX Ministers bearing with people going in pilgrimage unto wells hard by their houses not only without reproof but entertaining them in their houses and who distribute the communion unto their flock and communicate with such guilty persons deserve deprivation X. Because by reading profane authours in Schools wherein many things are written directly contrary unto the grounds of religion especially in the Philosophy of Aristotle the youth being curious insolent do oft drink-in erroneous damnable opinions and grounding them upon the britle authority of these profane writers do obstinatly maintain their godless opinions in disputation and otherwise to the great scandall of the simple Regents and Teachers in Schools should vigilantly take heed if any thing be written in the profane Authours against the grounds of religion in teaching these they shall note and mark the places confute the errors and admonish the youth to eschue them as false and namely in teaching philosophy to note these propositions following as false and condemned by common vote of the Church Philosâ—phicall errors 1. Omnis finis est opus aut operatio 2. Civilis scientia est praestantissima ejusque sinis praestantissâ—mus est summum hominis bonum 3. Honesta jusâ—a sunt varia inconstantia adeò ut sola opinione constent 4. Juvenes rerum imperiti in libidinem proclives ab audienda morum Philosophia arcendi 5. Quod aliud ab aliis bonis per se bonum est causa cur caetera per se bona sunt non est summum bonum 6. Dei agnitio nihil prodest artifici ad hoc ut arte suabene utatur 7. Summum bonum vel minimi boni accessione augeri vel reddi potest optabilius 8. Paâ—per deformis orbus aut infans non potest esse beatus 9. Bonum aeternum bono unius diei non est magis bonum 10. Foelicitas est actio animi secundum virtutem 11. Potest aliquis studio suo felicitatem comparare 12. Homo in hac vita esse dici potest beatus 13. Post hane vitam nemo potest vel esse vel dici beatus nisi propinquorum vel amicorum ratione 14. Naturâ apti ad virtutem eam agendo comparamus 15. Virtus est habitus electivus in ea mediocritate positus quam ratio prudentis praescribit 16. Libera est nobis voluntas ad bene agendum 17. Mundus est Phyficè aeternus 18. Casus fortuna locum habent in rebus naturalibus humanis 19. Res viles inseriores non curat Dei providentia 20. Animae pars una vel etiam plures sunt mortales 21. Et quaecunque hinc pendent vel necessariò sequuntur And if any shall be found to do contrary to this act the censures of the Church shall proceed against him And also that no Master or Regent or any other assert or defend any
the King was commoved for the dis-honor he apprehended done unto him that day therefore they left off their commission and vvent to their lodgings The next day the King vvent to Lithgovv all that vvere not ordinary inhabitants in Edinburgh vvere commanded to leave it the Lords of the Session vvere vvarned to be ready to remove and to sit vvhere they shall be advertised by the next proclamation the Magistrates vvere commanded to search and apprehend the authors of that hainous attempt Some of the burgesses vvere committed to sundry vvards the Ministers of Edinb were commanded to enter into the castle of the town because the Kings wrath was hotest against them and to the end the chief Octavianes might use them at their pleasure After advice with some others it was thought expedient they should withdraw themselves till the present flamm were over For all the diligent inquisition which was made many daies no ground could be found of any conspiracy against the King or any other only when the tumult was raised one or two cried to have some of the Octavianes abusers of the King to take order with them for which words they were fined If there had been any intention to do harm unto any man what could have himdred then from doing it there was no party in readiness able to withstand them Yee see then the tumult of Decemb. 17. was no just cause to move the K. to charge the Government of the Church nor to wrong the wholl Nationall Church for the tumult of one town howbeit their fact had been grounded on bad intentions nor may Ks thrust Christs government to the door for the faults of men and bring-in what forms they please But as no just occasion was givē so that tumult can not serve so much as for a pretence seing as it is now discovered the alteration was intended before December 17. On the 20. day Pa. Galloway was sent unto the K. at Lithgow but was not suffered to come neer the King only a copy of a Band was sent unto him whereof mention was made before to be subscribed by the Ministers Under pain of losse of their stipends but he and others after him refused for many reasons The questions whereof mention was made before 55. in number came forth in print soon after and the Convention of the Estates and of the Ministry was appointed to be held at Perth February 29. for consulting upon and determining the jurisdiction spirituall of the Church alswell in application of doctrin as the whole policy in all these questions the main point of policy to wit the superiority of Bishops was conceiled howbeit chiefly aimed at In time of these sturs in Scotland began throughout England the more solemne and pious observation of the Lords The keeping of the Lords day began in England day upon occasion of a book set forth An. 1595. by P. bound Doctor of Divinity and enlarged with additions An. 1606. wherein these following opinions were maintained 1. The command of sanctifying every seventh day as in the Mosaicall decalogue is moral and perpetual 2. Whereas all other things in the Jewish Church were taken away priesthood sacrifices and Sacrament this sabbath was so changed that it still remaines 3. There is a great reason why we Christians should take ourselves as streightly bound to rest upon the Lords day as the Jewes were upon their sabbath it being one of the moral commandements whereof all are of equal authority 4. the rest upon this day must be a notable and singular rest a most carefull exact and precise rest after another manner then men are accustomed 5. Schollers on that day are not to study the liberal Arts nor Lawyers to consult the case nor peruse mens evidentes 6. Sergeants Apparitors and Sumners are to be restrained from executing their offices 7. Justices not to examin causes for the conservation of the peace 8. Ringing of more bells then one that day is not to be justified 9. No solemn feasts nor wedding dinners to be made on that day 10. all honest recreations and pleasures lawfull on other dayes as shooting fencing bowling on this day is to be forborn 11. No man to speak or talk of pleasures or any other worldly matter It is almost incredible how taking this doctrine was partly because of its own purity and partly for the eminent piety of such persons as maintained it so that the Lords day especially in Corporations began to be precisely keept people becoming a law to themselves forbearing such sport as by Statute were yet permitted yea many reioicing at their own restraint herein On this day the stoutest fencer layd down his buckler the skilfull Archer unbent his bow counting all shooting to be besides the Mark May-games and Morish-dances grew out of request and good reason that bells should be silenced from gingling about mens leggs if their ringing in Steepls were judged unlawfull some were ashamed of their former pleasures like children vvho grovvn bigger blush themselves out of their rattles and vvhistles Others forbear them for fear of their Superiors and many left them off out of a Politick compliance lest othervvise they might be accounted licencious Yet the learned vvere much divided in their judgement about these doctrines some embraced them as antient truths consonant to Scripture long disused and neglected and now seasonably revived for the encrease of piety Others conceived them grounded on a wrong bottom but because they tended to the manifest advancing of religion it was pitty to oppose them seing none have just reason to complain being deceived into their own good But a third sort flatly fell out with these positions as galling mens necks with a Jewish yoak against the liberty of Christians that Christ as Lord of the Sabbath had removed the rigor thereof and allowed men lawfull recreations that this Doctrine put an unequal Lustre on the Sunday on set purpose to eclipse all other holy dayes to the derogation of the authority of the Church that this strict observance was set up of faction to be a character of difference to brand all for Libertines who did not entertain it How ever for some years together in this controversy Dr bound alone carried the Garland none offering openly to oppose yea as he in his second edition observes many both in their preachings writtings and disputations did concurr with him in that argument and though Archb. Whitgift in the year 1599. by his Letters had forbidden those books any more to be printed and Sir John Popham Lord chief Justice in their year 1600. did call them in yet all their care did but for the present make the Sunday set in a cloud to arise soon after in more brightness for the Archb. his known opposition to the proceedings of the Anti-episcopal Brethren rendred his actions more odious as if out of envy he had caused such a pearle to be concealed and some conceived though it was most proper for Judge Popham's place to punish