Selected quad for the lemma: opinion_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
opinion_n	church_n	council_n	trent_n	1,107	5	10.4717	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66393	The difference between the Church of England, and the Church of Rome in opposition to a late book, intituled, An agreement between the Church of England, and Church of Rome.	Williams, John, 1636?-1709.	1687 (1687)	Wing W2701A; ESTC R38648	38,428	98

the Homily shews The third part of the Homily of Salvation The meaning of this Proposition or saying We be justified by Faith in Christ only according to the meaning of the old ancient Authors is this we put our Faith in Christ that we be justified by Him only that we be justified by Gods free Mercy and the Merits of our Saviour Christ only and by no vertue or good Works of our own The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Justification is not only the Remission of Sins but the Sanctification and Renovation of the inward man from whence a man of unjust is made just If any one shall say That men are justified either by the only imputation of Christs rightousness or by the alone Remission of our Sins excluding the Grace and Love which is spread in their Hearts by the Holy Ghost and doth inhere in them or that the Grace by which we are justified is only the favour of God let him be accursed It s call'd our Righteousness because we are justified by it inhering in us If any one shall say That the wicked is justified by Faith alone so that he understands nothing else to be required which may co-operate to obtain the Grace of Justification and that it is not at all necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the motion of his own will let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Placeth the nature of Justification in the forgiveness of Sin. 1. Saith Justification is not only the forgiveness of Sin but also that it is the Sanctification of our natures confounding Justification with Sanctification and that whoever holds the contrary is accursed 2. Saith We are accounted Righteous only for the merit of Christ. 2. Saith We are justified by a righteousness inhering in us The 12 th Article of the Church of England Of good Works Albeit that good Works which are the Fruits of Faith and follow after Justification cannot put away our Sins and endure the Severity of Gods Judgment yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ and do spring out necessarily of a true and lively Faith insomuch that by them a lively Faith may be as evidently known as a Tree discerned by the Fruit. Homily of good Works And first of Fasting To have any Affiance or to put any Confidence in our Works as by merie and deserving of them to purchase to our selves and others Remission of Sin and so consequently everlasting Life is meet Blasphemy of Gods Mercy and great Derogation to the Blood-shedding of our Saviour Jesus Christ. Sermon of Salvation part 3. Our own Imperfection is so great through the Corruption of Original Sin that all is unperfect that is within us Faith Charity Hope Dread Thoughts Words and Works and therefore not apt to merit or deserve any part of our Justification for us The Church of Rome The Council of Trent Justified persons are esteemed to have truly deserved eternal life If any one shall say The good Works of the justified are so the gifts of God that they are not also the good Merits of the person justified or that by the good Works which are done by him through the Grace of God and merit of Christ he doth not truly Merit an increase of Grace eternal Life and the obtaining of eternal Life if he shall depart in Grace and also an increase of Glory let him be accursed The Rhemists Annotations This place convinceth for the Catholicks that all good Works done by God's Grace after the first Justification be truly and properly Meritorious and fully worthy of everlasting Life and that thereupon Heaven is the due and just Stipend Crown or Recompence which God by his Justice oweth to the persons so working by his Grace for he rendreth or repayeth Heaven as a just Judg and not only as a merciful Giver and the Crown which he payeth is not only of Mercy or Favour or Grace but also of Justice The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. The best Works are imperfect and cannot endure the severity of God's Judgment 1. The good Works of the justified do truly merit eternal Life 2. To put any confidence in our Works and to think they merit everlasting Life is blasphemy 2. Whosoever saith they do not properly merit is accursed The 13 th Article of the Church of England Of Works before Justification Works done before the Grace of Christ and the Inspiration of his Spirit are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they Spring not of Faith in Jesu Christ neither do they make men to receive Grace or as School Authors say deserve Grace of Congruity Yea rather for that they are not done as God hath willed and commanded them to be done we doubt not but they have the nature of Sin. The Church of Rome It was a common Opinion in the Church of Rome that Works done before the Grace of Christ do make men meet to deserve Grace of Congruity or that man by the power of Nature can dispose himself for Justification Of this Opinion were Scotus Durandus Biel Cajetan c. Council of Trent If any one shall say That all Works before Justification for whatever reason they are done are truly sins or deserve the hatred of God Let him be accursed The Opposition The Church of England The Church of Rome 1. Works done before Justification do not deserve Grace of Congruity 1. Works done before Justification do merit it of Congruity 2. Works done before Justification have the nature of Sin. 2. Whoever shall say Works done before Justification are truly Sins is accursed The 14 th Article of the Church of England Of Works of Supererogation Voluntary Works besides over and above God's commandments which they call works of Supererogation cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety For by them men do declare that they do not only render unto God as much as they are bound to do but that they do more for his sake than of bounden Duty is required ‡ Whereas Christ saith plainly When ye have done all that are commanded to you say we are unprofitable Servants Second Part Of the Sermon of good VVorks Which Sects and Religions in the Church of Rome had so many hypocritical and feigned VVorks in their State of Religion as they arrogantly named it that their Lamps as they said run always over able to satisfie not only for their own Sins but also for all their Benefactors Brothers and Sisters of Religion as most ungodilly and trustily they had perswaded the Multitude of ignorant People keeping in divers places as it were Marts or Markets of Merit being full of their Holy Relicks Images Shrines and VVorks of overflowing Abundance ready to be sold. The Church of Rome The Catechism In this the goodness and clemency of God is to be praised who hath granted to our weakness that one may satisfie for another

Ancient and most other Churches in viz. Episcopacy and a Liturgy and it had been to the like purpose if he had also shewed their Agreement in the great Doctrines of Christian Religion And yet even here he fails again for he that concludes In a word the Agreement between the English Clergy and the Romanist about the immediate Divine Right of Episcopacy is so full c. doth before acknowledg that Ordination by Presbyters is granted in the Church of Rome to be valid and regular and that all those that hold the Supreme Jurisdiction of the Pope over the whole Catholick Church visible do hold the Divine Right of Bishops to be but mediate mediante Papa So that he is gone from an Agreement of Churches to an Agreement between Persons from a full Agreement in Opinion to an Agreement in Government and Worship from Worship to some parts of Worship from Demonstrations to Inferences and framed Propositions of his own from an Agreement at last to a Disagreement And now we may look back with some comfort to his bold offer and clear demonstration at the beginning when he saith The Author hath with some clearness demonstrated the Agreement of Opinion between the Church of England Men and the Church of Rome to be so exact and full that if the Government should so design it were but dictum factum according to their Doctrine and a Cassandrian Peace might be patch'd up presently with Rome He advances as if he were a kind of Plenipotentiary but it may be suspected he that has this way of Demonstration is not like to be very fortunate in the Negotiation Thus much shall suffice for our Author's way of Demonstration and his Attempt to shew the Agreement between the Church of England and Church of Rome leaving a fuller Answer to some of his particular Discourses to an abler Pen. But yet there remains another part toward a just state of the Controversy and that is as he well observed to let the World know how far these Churches differ as well as wherein they are agreed But that was a Province he had no mind to Prosecute as being tho more to the purpose yet not so much to his design For certainly he that will demonstrate the Agreement to be full and exact must either suppose there is no Difference or if there be that the Difference is not considerable enough to hinder the Agreement But if there be a Difference and the Difference in points Diametrically opposite and irreconcilable it is to no purpose to shew their Agreement were it so to be full and exact in others And that this is the case and the Disagreement far greater than the Agreement I shall endeavour to prove and that not from an Author or two or far-fetched Consequences and forced Interpretations and dubious Expressions but from sufficient Authorities and the avowed Principles of both Churches Such are the 39 Articles the Catechism the Homilies and Liturgy of the Church of England Such again are the Councils more especially the Council of Trent the Catechism ad Parochos the Rhemists Annotations the Missal and Breviaries according to which and the like a Papist Represented as the Mode of speaking has been of late doth believe In order to which I shall premise 1. That there are some Articles which both Churches do in express Terms agree in called by our Author the great Doctrines of Religion viz. Art. 1. of the Holy Trinity and so how Socinians can subscribe the Articles of the Church of England as this Author affirms I understand not Art. 2. of the Word or Son of God Art. 3. of the going down of Christ into Hell Art. 4. of the Resurrection of Christ Art. 5. of the Holy Ghost Art. 7. of the Old Testament Art. 8. of the Three Creeds Art. 12. of good Works Art. 16. of Sin after Baptism Art. 18. of obtaining eternal Salvation only by the Name of Christ Art. 23. of Ministring in the Congregation Art. 26. of the unworthiness of Ministers Art. 27. of Baptism Art. 33. of Excommunicate Persons Art. 38. of Christian mens goods Art. 39. of a Christian mans Oath Against these the Jesuit Johan Roberti hath little or nothing to object in his small Tract purposely written in Opposition to our Articles But of these Articles it is to be observed there are some which each party differs as much from the other in when they come to explain themselves as if there had been no agreement in Terms Thus it happens in Articles 3 d 7 th and 15 th as shall afterwards in part be shewed 2. There are other Articles wherein both Churches do agree in the Sence tho they differ in Terms or that are not so much Controversies between Church and Church as between private Doctors in each Church Of this Opinion is a Learned Forreigner of the Reformed Religion about the matter contained in Articles the 10 th and 17 th of Free will and of Predestination and Election Of the former he saith The difference that our Adversaries will object between them and us upon this point of Free-will is only imaginary and a meer cavil Of the latter he concludes Since we agree in the Fundamentals of this Doctrine as we have already set forth and that our Dissent is but with a few of their Doctors it would not be very hard I should think to find out such a bias of Temperament drawn from the Word of God in proposing of these Opinions and in Terms so proportioned to their Sublimity as all humble and moderate Spirits would find sufficient for their Satisfaction 3. There are other Points which are matter of Liberty and left undetermined in the Church of England And so She doth receive into her Communion as well those that deny as affirm But on the contrary the Church of Rome hath determined several Points of this Nature to be Matters of Faith and anathematized those that do not so receive them Thus they are accursed by the Council of Trent that say We are formally justified by the Righteousness of Christ the only formal cause of our Justification being the Justice of God as it s there declared cap. 8. or that we are justified by the alone Imputation of Christ's Righteousness Or that shall say Justifying Faith is nothing else than a trust or confidence in the Divine Mercy forgiving Sins for Christs sake c. In which and the like unless the Church of England will curse those whom She doth bless and cast out of her Communion such as She receives into it She can no more be reconciled to the Church of Rome than in those other Points that for the matter of them are held and declared by her self to be false and erroneous 4. There are Articles which the two Churches do in whole or in part so differ in that the Doctrine of the Church of England cannot be the Doctrine of the Church of Rome nor the Doctrine