Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	person_n	union_n	unity_n	3,713	5	10.0161	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A35959	Truths victory over error, or, An abridgement of the chief controversies in religion which since the apostles days to this time, have been, and are in agitation, between those of the Orthodox faith, and all adversaries whatsoever, a list of whose names are set down after the epistle to the reader : wherein, by going through all the chapters of The confession of faith, one by one, and propounding out of them, by way of question, all the controverted assertions, and answering by yes, or no, there is a clear confirmation of the truth, and an evident confutation of what tenets and opinions, are maintain'd by the adversaries : a treatise, most useful for all persons, who desire to be instructed in the true Protestant religion, who would shun in these last days, and perillous times, the infection of errors and heresies, and all dangerous tenets and opinions, contrary to the word of God.	Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Sinclair, George, d. 1696.	1684 (1684)	Wing D1412; ESTC R3405	145,943	378

the great city and exercises dominion over the Kings of the earth 6 He deceiveth them that dwell on the earth with lying wonders and miracles 2 Thes. 2. 9. Rev. 13 14 15 7 He causeth all sorts of Persons to receive his mark on their right hand or on their forehead Rev 13 16 17 8 To him agrees what Paul sayes and now ye know what with-holdeth namely the Roman Emperour that he might be revealed in his time 2 Thes 2 6 7 CHAP. XXVI Of the Communion of Saints Question I. ARE the Saints bound by profession to maintain an holy fellowship and communion in the worship of GOD in performing such other spiritual duties as tend to their mutual edification Ye Heb. 10. 24 25. Acts 2. 42. 46. Isa. 2. 3. 1 Cor. 11. 20. Well then did not the Donatists of old and Separatists now err who maintain that Hypocrites and wicked men do pollute and defile the worship of God not only to themselves but also to others that worship with them and that therefore we must separate from Communion in the worship of God because of them Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Church of the Iews in Christs time was very corrupt Matth. 15. 7. Mark 6 7 8. And yet both by his practise and his command he would not have his hearers to separate from it For he both observed the feasts and preached in their Synagogues Iohn 8. 1. Luke 4. 15. Iohn 10. 22. And he commands his hearers to observe what the Scribes and Pharisees bad them do Matth. 23. 2 3. 2 Because the Apostle is so far from commanding separation from the Church of Corinth that he praises their meetings 1 Cor. 5. 4. 1 Cor. 11. 20. 1 Cor. 14. 23. notwithstanding of the many gross scandals which were among them 1 Cor. 1. 11 12 13. 1 Cor. 5. 1 2. And 1 Cor. 15. 12 13. 3 Because the Apostles calls the Galatians the Church of Christ brethren and the children of God who were yet in some measure removed from GOD to another Gospel Nay says Paul O foolish or senseless Galatians who hath bewitched you that is so blinded the eyes of your understanding that ye cannot see the right truth as the Iuglars bewitch the outward eyes that men think they see that which they see not that ye should not obey the truth Gal. 3. 1. And yet since it was a constitute true Church it was his judgement there should be no separation from it notwithstanding of all the foresaid faults 4 Because the Church of Ephesus was a true Church though they made defection from their first love So was the Church of Pergamus though there were in it who held the doctrine of Balaam So was the Church of Thyatira notwithstanding that they suffered Iesebel that called her self a prophetess and taught the servants of Christ to commit Fornication and to eat things sacrificed to Idols 5 If we must separate from the Communion of the Church in things lawful for the faults of others of for the faults of Ministers and if their sins pollute the worship of God to others than we must not keep communion with any Church seeing there can hardly be a Church where there are not some hidden Hypocrites Nay where there are not some who are known to be such by the Minister Yet such are not to be excluded as Christ himself teaches Matth. 13. 24. to 31. See the 47. and 48. verses of that same chapter 6 If the worship be polluted to some for the faults of others with whom they worship then must the Word and Sacraments have their efficacy and worth from the Persons that worship and from the dispensers of them which is absurd 7 Because wicked and evil men do not pollute the worship to others but to themselves only as it appears from the man that wanted the wedding Garment Matth. 22. 11. And from those who did eat and drink unworthily at the Lords Table Such do not eat and drink damnation to others but to themselves 1 Cor. 11. 27 29. Quest. II. DOth this Communion which the Saints have with Christ make them in any wise partakers of the Substance of his God-head or equal with him in any respect No. Is there a mixture of the Divine Essence with the Substance of all the Creatures because the Divine Essence is infinite and every where present No. Doth every règenerate man that is united with God by vertue of this union become God the maker of Heaven and Earth No. Are all the Acts of a mans will and all his actions even his most cursed and wicked actions wholly Divine which to resist and contradict is rebellion against God No. Iohn 1. 14. Col. 1. 18 19. Well then do not the Familists err who teach that the Saints are made God and Christ by an Essential and Corporal Union with them Yes Do not likewise the Manicheans err who blasphemously taught that the Divine Essence was mingled with soul and body of every man and that therefore all his Actions were wholly Divine Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the personal union is given to none but to Christ only Iohn 1. 14. The Word was made Flesh that is a true man like unto us in all things yet without sin 2 Because in him dwelleth all the fulness of the God-head bodily Namely by an essential inhabitation of the Son of God in the humane nature by the uniting of his Divine Nature with the Humane in the unity of his Person Bodily that is Personally Essentially and Truely 3 Because the union of the Saints with Christ is by Faith not indeed by a personal Union Eph. 3. 17. 4 Because there is no man that sinneth not 1 Iohn 1. 8 10. 5 Because Gods Essence is most simple and single and infinitely above and beyond all creatures Exod. 3. 14. 6 Because holy holy holy is the Lord God of Hosts Isaiah 6. 3. 7 Because Solomon in his prayer says behold the heaven of heavens cannot contain thee how much less this house which I have builded to thy Name 1 Kings 8. 27. 8 Because the Prophet Isaiah says behold the Nations are as a drop of a bucket and are as the smallest dust of the ballance estemed chap. 40. 15. 9 Because the Manichean error is the outmost stretch of Satans invention beyond which he is not able to go They deserve not confutation but to be looked upon as Devils incarnate Quest. III. DOth the Communion of Saints which they have one with another take away or infringe the Title or propriety which each man hath in his own goods and possessions No. Acts 5. 4. Exod. 25. 14. Eph. 5. 28. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who affirm that the goods and possessions of the Saints ought to be common Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because in the time of the primitive Church no man was obliged out of necessity to deliver his goods Neither did believers loss their right

substance Yes Iohn 1. 1 14. 1 Iohn 5. 20. Heb. 2. 14 16 17. Luke 1. 27 31 35. Well then do not those Hereticks called Marcionits and the Anabaptists err who maintain That Christ is not a true Man but onely the Appearance Shape or Form of a Man Yes Do not likewise the Manicheans err who maintain That the Body of Christ is not of the substance of the Virgin Mary but a heavenly Body brought from Heaven to the Womb of the Virgin Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ is said to be made of a Woman Gal. 4. 4. 2 Because the Word was made Flesh Iohn 1. 4. 3 By an induction of the essential parts of a Man and sinless infirmities which were found in him First He was endued with a rational Soul Iohn 12. 27. Secondly He had a real and substantial Body and denyed he was a Spirit only Luke 24. 39. Thirdly Christ did hunger Mat. 4. 2. Fourthly He was wearied and thirsty Iohn 4. 6. Lastly He was sad he groaned in Spirit and was troubled Iohn 11. 33. and verse 15. He wept None of which sinless perturbations can agree to an Appearance Shape or Form of a Man 4 Because He was made of the seed of David according to the Flesh Rom. 1. 3. and descended of the Iews Rom. 9. 5. 5 Because the promises were made in the seed of Abraham Gen. 12. 3. and Gen. 18. 18. 6 Because He took not on him the nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren Heb. 2. 16 17. 7 Because otherwise he could not have satisfied in our place the Justice of GOD seing it had been unjust for another Nature to have suffered punishment than that Nature which had offended and sinned Quest. II. ARE there two whole perfect and distinct Natures in Christ the God-head and the Man-hood inseparably joyned together in one person Yes 1 Cor. 8. 6. Eph. 4. 5. Well then do not the Nestorians err who maintain the Union between the Divine and Humane Nature not to be Hypostatical but only by way of Assistence and that as there are two Natures in Christ so there are two Persons one proper to the Divine Nature another proper to the Humane Nature Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because unless Christ-God-Man were but one Person the Merit of his Death would not be of so great value as to redeem the Elect from infinite and eternal punishment seeing hence cometh all the value and worth of his death that the same Person who was God did suffer and die for us 2 Because otherwise Christ had been swallowed up and devoured by the wrath of God against the sins of the Elect which he himself undertook 3 Because Christ if he had not been both God and Man in one Person he could not have been a Mediator for a Mediator must be One 1 Tim. 2. 5. Quest. III. IS the Godhead and Man-hood in Christ united without Conversion Composition or Confusion Yes Luke 1. 35. Col. 2. 9. Rom. 9. 5. 1 Peter 3. 18. 1 Tim. 3. 16. Well then do not those old Hereticks the Eutichians err who maintain that as the Person of Christ is One so his Nature is made One by a composition or Confusion of the two Natures together Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because such a Composition is impossible seing the Divine Nature is most perfect and cannot lose any of its own perfection unless we would affirm the Divine Nature to be mutable and changeable 2 Because that same Christ who according to the Flesh descended of the Iews is over all God blessed for ever Rom. 9. 5. 3 Because this doctrine takes away all means of Mediation for by taking away the distinction between the Natures they take away the Natures themselves and so neither could Christ have suffered in our place because not Man neither could he have given any vertue value or worth to his sufferings because not God Quest. IV. DID Christ endure most grievous torments immediately in his soul Yes Mat. 26. 37 38. Luke 22. 44. Matth. 27. 46. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that the soul of Christ even from its first creation was never affected with any sadness or sinless perturbation of mind Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Scripture testifies that his soul was sad unto death Matth. 26. 37. 2 Because the Apostle Iohn testifies that when Christ saw Mary weeping for her brother Lazarus he groaned in Spirit and was troubled Iohn 11. 33. Iohn 12. 27. 3 Because his soul was exceeding sorrowful even unto death as was cited before Matth. 26. 37. 4 The same thing is proven from Christs desertion whereby the actual fruition and enjoying of Gods favour as to his sense was interrupted and broken in the midst for a time but in no wise altogether taken away which made him cry upon the Cross My God my God why hast thou forsaken Me. Matth. 27. 46. Eph. 5. 2. Quest. V. HAD the Lord Iesus by his perfect obedience and sacrifice of himself which he through the eternal Spirit once offered up unto God fully satisfied the Iustice of his Father Yes Rom. 5. 9. Rom. 3. 25 26. Heb. 9. 14 16. Heb. 10. 14. Well then do not some otherwise Orthodox err who deny Christs Active Obedience to be a part of his satisfaction performed in our place Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Active disobedience of the first Adam made us all sinners therefore we must be made Righteous by the Active Obedience of the second Adam Rom. 5. 19. 2 Because Christ not only offered himself to the death for us but for their sakes that is for the Elects sake he sanctified himself that is he gave up himself as a holy sacrifice Iohn 17. 19. 3 Because it behoved Christ to fulfil all righteousness Mat. 3. 15. 4 Because we stood in need not only of the expiation of sin for saving us from eternal death but of the gift of righteousness for obtaining eternal life according to that precept and demand of the Law Do this and thou shalt live And therefore Christ is not only called our Ransom but the end and perfection of the Law to every one that believeth Rom. 10. 4. That is the aim of giving the Law by Moses is that thereby men being brought to the knowledge of their sin should flie for refuge unto Christ and his righteousness as he that hath perfectly fulfilled the Law for us 5 Because the passive obedience of Christ was not in it self meerly and purely passive but his active obedience did challenge the chief and principal part in it Psal. 40. 7. Then said I lo I come in the volume of the book it is written of Me. With these words our Saviour Christ declareth his willing Obedience to accept of undergo and execute the Mediatorship by GOD imposed

because they think that all the Jewish ceremonies are still in force and binding us who live under the Gospel Page 141. Independents so called because they will have every particular Congregation to be ruled by their own laws without dependency upon any other Church Page 236 309 317. L. Libertines from the liberty and freedom they take and give to others to commit sin Their first Author was one Quintinus a Taylor in Picardy who taught that whatsoever good or evil we did was not done by us but by GODS Spirit in us and many other blasphemous opinions Page 44 106 114 155 175 189 245 246. Lutherians who so call themselves lyingly and falsely from Martin Luther that eminent Man of GOD. Page 43 65 69 86 112 139 157 244 265 269 271 280 298. M. Manicheans from one Manes a Persian by birth and a servant by condition The Manichean sect was the sink of all former Heresies p. 19 55 261 Macedonians so called from Macedonus Bishop of Constantinople 312. years after Christ. Their Heresie was condemned in the second general Council held at Constantinople by Gratian and Theodosius anno 380. His followers were called Pneumatomachians fighters against the holy Spirit from Pneuma a Spirit and Machesthai to fight Page 28. Marcionites from one Marcion a Paphlagonian near the Euxine Sea who was Cerdons scholar a grand Heretick He maintained Cerdons Heresies at Rome about 133. years after Christ. Page 55 283 334. N. Nestorians so called from Nestorius Patriarch of Constantinople who broached his errours under Theodosius the younger 400. years after Christ. They made Christ to have two Persons as he had two Natures This Heresie was condemned by the third general Council held at Ephesus under Theodosius the younger anno 431. Page 57. Novatians so called from Novatus who lived under Decius the Emperor 220. years after Christ. He was an African by birth P. 104 108 110 230. O. Origenists so called from famous Origen His errors began to spread about the year of Christ 247. under Aurelian the Emperour and continued above 334. years p. 332. P. Pneumatomachians See the letter P. Pelagians from Pelagius a Britain as they say by birth A Monk at Rome afterward a Presbyter under Theodosius the younger p. 45 64 91 115. Puritans otherwise called Kathari because they esteemed themselves purer and holier than others p. 66 104 230 239. Photinians from Photinus born in the lesser Galatia He began to spread his Heresies about the year 323. at Syrmium where he was Bishop under Constantius the Emperour p. 334. Papists are too well known They are to be found in every other page almost of the book Q. Quakers so called because sometimes they use to Quake and Tremble when they prophesy or when they are in a rapture p. 4 5 12 18 23 c. S. Socinians so called from one Faustus Socinus an Italian of Siena place all Religion in the old condemned Heresies following their Master a most vile Heretick p. 1 12 13 21 23 28 31 c. Sabellians so called from Sabellus an African by birth His Heresies began anno Christi 224. Page 23. Separatists so called because they withdrew themselves from the Christian Communion and fellowship of others in the Worship of GOD. p. 257. Scepticks commonly called Seekers maintain that the whole universal Church hath perished a little after the Apostles times and are not to this day restored until Christ from Heaven shall send new Apostles for raising up again the Church Visible p. 247. Sabbatarians so called because they observe the Jewish Sabbath imagining there is no precept or example in the New Testament for observing the first day of the week p. 192. T. Tritheits or Tritheitae so called because they divided the indivisible Essence of the Godhead into three parts the one they called the Father the other the Son the third the Holy Ghost p. 19 23. Tertullianists were so called from that famous Lawyer and Divine Tertullian who lived under Severus the Emperour about 170. years after Christ. p. 230. V. Vorstians from one Vorstus an old Heretick who taught that GOD had a Body and was endued with parts as the Anthropomorphitans affirmed p. 21 22. Vaninians from one Vaninus a great promotter of Atheism He was publickly burned at Tholouse p. 163. CHAP. I. Of the Holy SCRIPTURE Question I. IS the Light of Nature and the works of Creation and Providence sufficient to give that knowledge of GOD and of his Will which is necessary to Salvation No. 1 Cor. 1. 21. and 1 Cor. 2. 13 14. Well then do not the Socinians err who mantain That Men living according to the Law and Light of Nature may be saved Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because none can be saved unless they be born again by the incorruptible seed of the Word 1 Pet. 1. 23. 2 Because Christ is the Way the Truth and the Life and no man cometh to the Father but by the Son Iohn 14. 6. 3 Because there is none other Name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved but by the Name of Jesus Acts 4. 12. 4 Because men cannot believe in Christ without supernatural revelation and therefore cannot be sanctified or justified because all Justification Sanctification and Remission of sins are by GODS Grace and Faith in Jesus Christ Rom. 3. 24 25. Acts. 26. 18. Neither can men be so saved viz. by living according to the light of Nature because Salvation is promised onely to Believers in Christ Acts 16. 31. Iohn 3. 16. 5. Because all that know not GOD will be punished eternally 2 Thes. 1. 8. But men without supernatural Revelation cannot savingly know GOD 1 Cor. 1. 21. Matth. 11. 27. 6. Men destitute of supernatural Revelation cannot know their own corruption and misery by the first Adam nor the remedy which is offered by Christ the second Adam They are without GOD without Hope without the Promises without the Church and covenant of God and the mysteries of Faith are hid and unknown to them allanerly that perish and are lost Eph. 2. 11 12. Rom. 9. 4. 2 Cor. 4. 3. Mat. 13. 11 12. Matth. 11. 25 26 27. Quest II. ARE the holy Scriptures most necessary to the Church Yes 2 Tim. 3. 15. 2 Pet. 1. 19. Well then doth not the Popish Church err that affirmes the true Church to be infallible in teaching and propounding Articles of Faith both without and against the Scripture and that their unwritten Traditions are of Divine and equal Authority with the Canon of the Scripture Yes Do not likewise the Libertines and Quakers err affirming that GOD doth teach and guide the Elect into all truth by the alone instinct and light of the Spirit without any written Word whatsoever Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Scriptures are the foundation upon which the Church is built Eph. 2. 20. 2. Because all things are to be examined by the Rule of the Word as the noble Bereans

must do it also Now if the Father be God and the Son be God and the Spirit God also who have one and the same divine nature and essence indivisibly communicated to them and so if there be but one God and yet these three really distinct then they must be distinct persons in respect of their Personal properties seing they are Persons and distinct The Son as was said is called the express Image of the Fathers Person which evidently shews that the Father considered as distinct from the Son is a Person and subsists If then thus it be must not the Son as distinct from the Father and so lively and expresly representing his person be a person also having this from the Father The same must be true likewise of the holy Ghost who is GOD equal with both yet different from both for he who proceedeth from the Father and from the Son must differ from the Father and from the Son as he who is begotten must be distinct from him that begat him Some Quakers either ignorantly or perversely will have the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated substance as it is Heb. 11. 1. and thus they read Heb. 1. 3. the Character or Image of GODS substance which is to be understood of Christ say they not simply as GOD but as Man But they might as well have said it signifies confident or confidence because it is so translated 2 Cor. 9. 4. and 2 Cor. 11. 17. But they speak here consequentially to their own Tenets who in effect deny the Trinity and all distinction between the Father Son and holy Ghost not only in words but in very deed The Apostle in this place is proving Christ the Son of GOD to be Lord and Heir of all things because GOD created the Worlds by him He is the brightness of his glory the express Image of his person upholdeth all things by the Word of his power These Titles are here given to the Son of GOD as a Creator and a Preserver of all things which belong to him only according to his Divine Nature therefore these Titles must be understood of Christ forasmuch as he is the eternal Son of GOD and a Light from the Eternal Light of one Essence and Glory with the Father nevertheless distinguished from the Person of the Father by whom the Father executes his Operations and shews his Properties even as the Sun by its light doth shine Quest. V. IS the Son of God of the same substance Power and Eternity with the Father Yes 1 Iohn 5. 20. Rom. 9. 5. Isa. 9. 6. Well then do not the Arians err who maintain the Son to be a creature brought forth before the foundations of the World Yes Do not likewise the Socinians err who maintain the Son to have had no Existence before he was conceived in the Womb of the Virgin Mary Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From the Scriptures above cited 2 Because the Son is Omnipotent the Creator and Preserver of all things Rev. 1. 18. Col. 1. 16 17. 3 Because he is Omniscient and searcher of the heart Matthew 9. 3 4. Iohn 2. 25. Iohn 21. 17. Quest. VI. IS the Holy Ghost GOD Yes Acts 5. 3. 1 Cor. 6. 19 20. 1 Cor. 3. 16 17. Well then do not the Macedonians or Pneumatomachians Arians Socinians and many of the Anabaptists err who maintain the Holy Ghost to be a Creature as do the Macedonians or a Power Vertue or Efficacy of the Father as many Socinians and others do Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Holy Ghost is to be worshipped as God Matth. 28. 19. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Rev. 1. 4. 2. Because he is omniscient and knoweth all things 1 Cor. 2. 10 11. 3. Because he is omnipotent the maker and preserver of all things the worker of miracles and it is he that sanctifies and justifies the Believers Gen. 1 2. Psalm 33. 6. Matth. 12. 28. Compare Isaiah 6. 9. with Acts 28. 25 26 27. 4. Because Ananias is said to lie to the holy Ghost Acts 5. 3. and verse 4. he is said not to lie to men but to GOD. 5. Because Believers are said to be the Temple of God 1 Cor. 3. 16 17. And they are said 1 Cor. 6. 19. to be the Temple of the holy Ghost therefore the holy Ghost is God seeing to be the Temple of God and the Temple of the holy Ghost are the same 6. Because none can be properly sinned against but the true God therefore the Holy Ghost is God because many have been said to have sinned against the holy Ghost Matth 12. 31. Quest. VII DOth not the Holy Ghost eternally proceed from the Father and the Son Yes Iobn 15. 26. Gal. 4. 6. Well then doth not the Greek Church err who maintains the holy Ghost to proceed only from the Father Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because he is sent by the Son Iohn 15. 26. Acts 2. 33. 2. Because all things which are the Sons are the Fathers except the Personal Properties by which they are distinguished and all things are communicated from the Father to the Son and consequently the holy Ghost Iohn 16. 13 14 15. Matth. 11. 27. Iohn 17. 10. 3. Because Christ gave to his Apostles the Spirit by breathing it upon them Iohn 20. 22. To shew that he proceeded from himself 4. Because he is the Spirit of the Son no less than the Spirit of the Father Gal. 4. 6. 5. Because if the holy Ghost did not proceed from the Son as truely as from the Father he would not be a person really distinct from the Son which is contrary to Iohn 14. 16 17. 6 Because it is said Iohn 16. 14. He shall glorify me namely by his testimony gifts and miracles for he shall receive of mine that is the doctrine of Salvation which I have taught you he shall also reveal it unto you seing he shal receive the same from me and shall shew it unto you And Rom. 8. 9. He is called the Spirit both of the Father and of the Son It is said if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ that is the same Spirit which in the foregoing verse is called the Spirit of GOD namely the Father and is here also called the Spirit of Christ because he also proceeds from Christ and is procured for us by Christ Iohn 14. 26. Iohn 16. 7. CHAP. III. Of GODS Eternal Decrees Question I. DId God from all eternity by the most holy and wise Counsel of his Will freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass Yes Eph. 1. 11. Romans 11. 33. Heb. 6. 17. Romans 9. 15. 18. Well then do not the Socinians Arminians and Iesuits err who maintain the things which come to pass in time to fall out and come to pass without the Decree of God Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. From the knowledge of God whereby from all eternity he hath known all things infallibly which come to pass