Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n person_n son_n unity_n 4,772 5 9.3919 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A57980 A survey of the spirituall antichrist opening the secrets of familisme and antinomianisme in the antichristian doctrine of John Saltmarsh and Will. Del, the present preachers of the army now in England, and of Robert Town, by Samuel Rutherfurd ... Rutherford, Samuel, 1600?-1661. 1648 (1648) Wing R2394; ESTC R22462 573,971 671

There are 13 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

but the Son of God became flesh in us that is weak in the Saints who beare his image therefore Gorton expounding flesh and blood Joh. 6. saith p. 106 107. By blood is here meant the life Spirit and power of the Son of God as he discends from the Father even as the life spirit power vertue and vigour of the Son of man runnes in the blood in creatures and such is the life discent and power of the Son of man as he is of the life discent and power of the Father from above and so is God blessed for ever Amen So the Apostle this is he that came by water and blood that is by weaknesse and strength that is by weaknesse in us or in our nature then not in Christ personally but by power in God or in that nature divine so is he said in the like sense to be crucified in the flesh but quickned in the Spirit then it s but metaphoricall flesh and blood that Christ took not reall and materiall but in regard the Saints that bear his image are men Christ is a man in them and Christ weak in them that is Christ lives in them according to the wisdome skill strength study and forecast about the things of God that a creature meerly as he is a creature is able to procure and bring forth now the best thing that is in man saith he p. 106. which is his wisdome is enmity with God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can be so we have from these Familists an imaginary and a Metaphoricall Saviour And if we eat the flesh of Christ and drink his blood saith he p. 107 108. that is if we eat and communicate with that weaknesse and frailty that is naturally in man and which the Son of God assumed and took into unity he saith not unto the unity of the second person with himself without alike drinking in and communication with that spirit and life wherein he visits us and comes into our nature from on high even out of the bosome of the Father then doe we surfeit and suffocate the Spirit so is flesh eaten to the body without drink and dye in our selves and in our sins and so also if we neglect that weaknesse that is in us as though no such thing were and dreame of an high and spirituall estate which doth not arise out of and is the result through the wisdome of God of that weaknesse that is in us then doe we either sink in our folly and become sottish the things of God being drunk up onely with the things of this naturall life else are we puffed up and become giddy in our selves thinking that we know something when indeed we know nothing as we ought In all these Familists 1 Deny the Trinity three persons in on God And if the reader consider it Saltm speaketh the same way with Gortine and H. Nich. Sparkles of glory p. 288. Others say he meaneth himselfe and Familists whom he divideth from Protestants the mystery of salvation is no other then Immanuel or God with us or God in flesh Christ being no more but an anoynted one and that anoynted one is our nature or weakenesse anoynted with the spirit even God himselfe who is strength There is not a word here of God and man in one person and of true God consubstantiall with the Father and man like us in all things except sinne in the unity of one person but Christ is our nature in every Saint and beleever and weaknesse anoynted with the spirit Then every saint is Christ and Christ hath no body and soule of his owne but every beleever Goded deified and anoynted with the spirit is Christ. 2 Christ is not one single man who was crucified on Mount Calvery But every weake beleever made of flesh and a fraile bodie and of a soule Goded and anoynted with the spirit is God manifest in the flesh and another Messiah we have not but every Saint is his owne Saviour Christ is nothing but mysticall Christ by his spirit dwelling in the flesh and weake nature of all Saints is not this the Antichrist who denyeth that Christ is come in the flesh Now Christ suffers in us saith Gortyn p. 105. Because no other creature in the creation was made according to the Image of God but man alone and so no other creature in regard of degeneration can bear the image of death and hell but man alone Then the Father and Spirit suffers in us and our weaknesse because of the unity of images that is in God and in us If this be all here is no incarnation or suffering personall in the Sonne more then of the Father and the Spirit 2 This is but the imaginary and Metaphoricall Saviour of H. Nich. and unclean Familists for if flesh and blood be but Metaphors that is the weakenesse and nothingnesse of man and blood be Metaphorically only the power of the divine nature and if the blood and water that issued from Christs side was not materiall blood and water and if Christs being crucified according to the flesh and his living according to the Spirit be but faire Metaphors as we say the Medows laugh when they are but vigorous greene and flourishing and are not capable of materiall laughter more then of a reasonable soule then surely Christ was not true man borne of the virgine Mary but a Metaphoricall man that is weake in us who alone are his Image by creation 3 Then dyed hee but in phantasie and Metaphorically for his fl●sh that hee was crucified in is not true flesh nor the true manhood assumed in the unity of his person but only it is Metaphorically the weaknesse that is in us And John saith Hee saw the water and the blood that came out of his side and did beare record and his record is true yea they heard Christ with their ears they saw him with their bodily eyes and looked on him and their hands handled the Lord of life John leaned on his bosome they pierced his hands and his feet they parted his garments among them they tooke downe his body off the Crosse folded it in clean linen layed him in a new Tombe hee truely rose againe eate with his Disciples when they doubted if it was he he called to them to make their senses and fingers witnesses a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see I have 1 Joh. 1.1 2 3. Joh. 19. Mat. 26 27 28. Luk. 22.23 ch 24.39 40 41. And he was seene of all the Disciples and was seen of more than five hundred brethren at once 1 Cor. 15.5 6. And hee shewed himselfe to his Disciples after his suffering by many infallible proofes being seene of them fourty days and spake of the things concerning the Kingdome of God yea Paul saith Act. 20. ●28 God purchased a Church by his blood Our Divines with good reason say Here is concluded against the Socinians a real satisfaction a true real not a morall
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15. he never once saith Christ the Sonne of God was made true and very man in all things like unto us sinne excepted or the second person of the Trinity assumed the nature of man in the unity of his person or Christ was the true Sonne of David borne of a woman c. as Scripture and Divines speak but by the contrary only in this appearance of flesh he was a figure of God whose designe it is to make his Saints his temple his tabernacle his body and God thus manifested in the flesh that is God by his Spirit giving us faith and a new birth to be the Sonnes of God in whom he dwells by faith is the Immanuel God with us that is all the God-man or God incarnate which this spirit of the Antichrist will yeeld to us is nothing but every Saint anointed is Christ and Immanuel now the Father and Spirit both make the Saints the Temple of God the new creation the body of Christ thus and so the Son is no more God incarnate then the Father and God is thus manifested in the flesh in making us his dwelling house and Temple and body by faith as Saltmarsh is sure not to speak against but with the heretickes who denyed Christ to have a true body or to be true man but only to be a figure or appearance of a man or a man in representation in forme in meer shape not truly and really so as the Discipl●s heard saw with their eyes and looked on and their hands handled the Lord of life 1 Joh. 1.1 of him they said He is not here he is risen againe except ye beleeve that I am he yee shall dye in your sinnes And in his crucifying saith Saltmarsh p. 13.14 all his first glory in which he appeared revealed that old designe of God that mystery hid from ages and now made manifest to the Saints nayling all the flesh of his Saints to the same crosse and being lifted up drawes all men to him which is the mystery of the Gospel or Christ crucified H. Nicholas document c. 3. sen. 5. to be borne of the Virgin Mary out of the seed of David after the flesh is to be borne of the pure doctrine of H.N. out of the seed of love How Christ nailed all the flesh of his Saints to the crosse except mystically and figuratively and in a spirituall sense I know not but this is all Christs dying on the crosse except Familists say that Christ dyed not really and truly but only in a figure or they say Christ as an extraordinary holy man was God manifested in the flesh and that he was not the consubstantiall Son of God but being a man Godded with the holy being of love dyed as an example of singular love and patience and most submissive obedience and so nailed to his crosse all the flesh of his Saints exemplary that we should follow him as the Socinians teach and so his death must be no reall no true satisfaction nor any satisfactory ransome to justice for us but that God forgave all men their sinnes without a price or ransome of blood and Christ gave not himselfe as a reall ransome price or satisfaction for our sinnes but dyed as a rule and patterne of holinesse that we should imitate him and without his but by our owne personall merits wee might be saved as we were saved by following the godly lives of other holy men The Scripture saith he nailed his owne flesh to the crosse for so it is 1 Pet. 2 24. Who his own selfe bare our sinnes in his body on the tree And Act. 13.28 Though they found no cause of death in him yet desired they Pilate that he should be slaine 29. And when they had fulfilled all that was written of him they tooke him downe from the tree and laid him in a sepulcher but God raised him from the dead Now the man Christ that was nailed to a tree and buried in the grave of Joseph of Arimathea that same man God raised from the dead but Christ nailed not the Saints flesh and the bodies of beleevers of Saltmarsh and others really to the crosse nor were their bodyes really laid in Josephs new tombe nor did God truly and really raise them from the dead only in a spirituall meaning we dyed are buried with Christ and partakers of his resurrection But saith Peter Act. 5.30 The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom ye slew and hanged on a tree But Saltmarsh saith the Christ crucifying and nailing all the flesh of his Saints to the same crosse and being lifted up drawes all men to him is the mystery of the Gospel or Christ crucified But Christ crucifying the flesh and sinfull corruption of beleevers in the same crosse is Christ mystically and spiritually and by the merit of his bloody death mortifying sin in the Saints and the sufferings of the Saints are not satisfactory to divine justice as Christs sufferings were but castigatorie to deaden them to the lusts of the flesh and the Saints sufferings are not Christ crucified nor Christ on the crosse drawing all men to him For Christ died and was but once really and truly in his blessed flesh and humane nature crucified Heb. 9.26 27 28. Matth. 27.34 35. Marke 14.24 Luke 23. v. 33 34. Joh. 19.23 on Mount Calvarie But the Saints were not really crucified with him for many of them were not borne when he dyed I have observed before that Gortyn and H. Nicholas make the Saints who beare the image of God suffering and persecuted in the world to be Christ crucified and nothing else because saith Gortyn Christ being the Lord of life cannot dye nor suffer in himselfe and therefore hee suffers in his Saints and so every suffering Saint is all the crucified Christ that these men grant Yea H. N. never confesseth Christ to be true God and very man but sometime the sabbaoth is Christ Evang. c. 2. s. 15. or the service of love is Christ. Exhor 14. s. 1. or the godly being in men is Christ Evang. 13. s. 16. or the eldest Elder of the family of love is Christ that is H.N. or a godly life is Chri●t so are we saved by our owne good works And Saltmarsh saith p. 14. Now all this of this new or second creation as they are spirituall and heavenly are only in and through the same Spirit and discerned in the same Spirit Hence a Christ of flesh and blood who is true man and dyed for us is but Christ in the letter and the Protestant legall Christ that as a killing letter killeth and perfecteth nothing and cannot give life but the true Christ is a Spirit and spirituall and discerned in the Spirit that is to say only the family of love knoweth by the Spirit abstracted from Scripture and from all flesh and letter the true God manifested in the flesh of every Saint and crucified in beleevers and disclaimeth the
were in the matter of Oathes Magistracy Pedobaptisme confuted by Hallerus and by Kolvius at Bern and forced to say The Spirit taught them otherwise then the Letter of the Scripture spake And also at Zosing in Argovia An. 1532. Conradus Grebelius with his labouring to seduce many were confuted and cast out of Sengall Thomas Schuker the Disciple of Melchior Rinkius beheaded with a sword his brother Leonard by the impulsion of the Spirit at Sengal but it was not the Holy Ghost who leadeth us in Scripture truth saying in that The will of God was done and it was finished this made a Spirit without Scripture hatefull to many having made much adoe with their Scriptures Spirit at Str●asbrough Wormes Ausbourg Vlmes and being driven out of Helvetia and High-Germany they carried their plague to Mor●via and adjoyned to themselves seditious men in Bohemia Poland Hungaria Austria and Silesia Balthasar Hubmeier for tumults in Moravia was burnt at Vienna Hence in West-phalia Frizland Holland and especially at Munster arose new Revelations In comes An. 1533. John Becold out of his own element of a Tailor amongst the Prophets with the Prophet Baker John Matthiz and some of Munster Ro●mannus a faint and fained confuter of Anabaptists turnes to them and with him Herman Strepeda Hen. Rullius and Godfrey Stralen strengthen them they were confuted in a publick dispute and ordained to depart the City of Munster and did depart but they partly steal in again in the night partly hide themselves and make themselves masters of the city one Warendrop a Godsmith prophesies that John of Leiden must be King of the whole earth and King of Jerusalem that all Princes must obey him Becold appoints Bernard Knippe●dolling and Kippenbrugh Consulls the Christian Magistrates are deposed John Matthiz after a revelation from heaven commands all books to be burnt except the Bible all Gold and Silver to be brought and laid downe at his feet that all might be common Truteling a Smith called them dirty Prophets therefore Matthiz shot him dead and Matthiz himselfe not long after was cut off by the enemy Righteous is the Lord. Becold after three dayes lying in a fancied transe commands Polygamy in obedience to his own Vision marries three wives then other three til he came to fifteen Becold according to the prophesie of a Tailor is made a most Gorgeous King and sent out twenty eight Apostles to shew his Kingdome was above Christ he would have this number twice twelve Apostles and four Angels as Evangelists sent to the foure corners of the earth to Preach Tailor Becold King of Kings all of them were killed some say one only returned to give an account of spreading the spirit of Anabaptisme Becold appointing a great Lords Supper the King Tayler came in to see the Guest●s and findes a man and reading on his face the want of a wedding garment others say he saw him to be a Iudas killeth the innocent man presently After he had prophecied the Towne of Munster now beseiged should be supplied and killed one of his wives who said his prophecies came not to passe he and Knipperdoling were deservedly after Torturing Killed and hanged in an iron cage in the Cathedrall pin●cle The Tenents of Anabaptists in which they side with Antinomians are these more of this see in the writers cited The Reformation of Luther and others was Legall Literall carnall not Spirituall So Del. The Father Son and Spirit are not three distinct persons and in essence and nature one God so Familists deny Christ to be God and make every Saint equall with Christ. 3 The Lord Iesus did not really and truely but in imagination take our nature Antinomians say a beleever is God incarnate Godded and Christed Theol. Ger. c 22. Rise reig er 11. 4 The doctrine of Christ before his suffering is not so much to be observed as after his death for Peter resisted ill Saltm saith Shadowes flying away pag. 7 8 9. Christ and Iohn Baptist preached legally and spake not fully of free grace 5 Christ hath removed the Law and all its obleiging power and now the pure Gospell and Command of faith is our onely rule so Antinom 6 Christ reformed the ten commandes and brought in a more perfect rule Antinomians say they have nothing to doe with Moses and the Law The Law is now in the Spirit saith Saltmash free grace 146. Del. ser. p. 19.26 7 In the old Testament oaths were permitted perjury only forbidden all oathes are forbidden in the new the Sabbath was kept then not now so our Antinomians and Familists of new E. 8 They deny that the soules of the Godly or wicked goe to heaven or Hell till the day of Iudgement and deny the resurrection of the same body that was buried or that flesh and bloud ●shall rise againe contrary to Scripture Iob 19.26 27 28. Esay 26.19 Ezek. 37 11.12 Daniel 12.2.13 Phil. 3.19 20. 1 Cor. 15. 53. Ioh. 20.27 So say Antinomians life eternall is in this life the resurrection is past that the soule is mortall 9 The visible Church consisteth of those that are perfect and onely of those so Antinomians 10 None can with a good conscience exercise the office of a Magistrate under the New Testament Familists say its against Christian liberty 11 Vniversities Schooles humane arts ought not to be Saltmarsh they are legall and litterall 12 That its unlawfull to goe to law and that warres are unlawfull See Del. serm 6 7 8. 13 These Anabaptists called Libertines deny all Scripture as a dead Letter all preaching Sacraments church assemblies singing of Psalmes praying all ordinances and say the Spirit the inward anoynting and the internall word that proceeds immediately out of the mouth of God as Gideons sword is the onely meanes of Gospell-reformation so Antinomians reject all Ordinances as legall and say the spirit is all and some as Del. serm Beacon Catechism tit say the joyfull knowledge of God and man and all things else that relate to either is alone in the Spirit by Iesus Christ he counts all ordinances and externall duties and worship triviall and indifferent O therefore preface if distempered Christian Nations he excepteth not Papists Arminians Socinians c. were once wise to forbeare this clashing and dashing themselves in pieces one against another for matters externall triviall and circumstantiall in religion and would content themselves with that which is alone saving c. To the Antinomian Beacon Idolatry Angell-worship preaching praying scriptures duties of the Law precepts of the Gospell of nature of grace opinions c. all controversies in Religion these in which the distempered nations now contravert yea Church-government sacraments ministers are matters externall triviall and circumstantiall in religion not things in which salvation consisteth not to be contended for on either side 14 The second rancke of Anabaptists called concionatores preachers denyed all the Old Testament
Life to come which yet the Apostle Heb. 6.1 2. maketh fundamentals of salvation though the Chapter tells us in the Title of the last discovery and highest concerning the whole mystery of God to men But in that Chapter 1. He denieth the Trinity and maketh the three persons as Mr. Beacon doth in his Catechisme also p. 47 48 49 50 51. but manifestations of God Thus God being infinitly one yet in a three-fold manifestation saith he to us of Father Son and Spirit c. a person is not a manifestation but hath need to be manifested to us and denying the personall union of the second person with the Man Christ he makes it but God present with men and Angels in the manifestation of grace and salvation and with Devills and wicked men in the manifestation of Law and Justice So God is no more united to our nature in the man Christ then he is united to Angels and Devills and to elect men and the wicked and the reprobate and Christ is no more God-man in one person then he is God-Angel or God-Devill I tremble to speake it in one person and Christ is just God-man the Sonne of Mary born of a woman and of the seed of David as he is God-Peter God-Paul God Cain God-Judas Iscariot for saith he p. 199. God makes out himself in an image in this creation or nature therefore he takes to himself one part of it into union to himselfe according to one way of manifestation called in the Scripture light love grace salvation Father Bridegroome glory and that part which injoyes God in this manifestation is called the Angels the Saints the elect the Sonne the Tabernacle of God the new Jerusalem the Temple the Spouse he taketh to himselfe the other part of the creation and there he is present but not in this way of grace and light but of another manifestation called Law justice wrath everlasting burning and these are called devills wicked men flesh which live in God and subsist in him as creatures in their being Now the Scripture cals this the great mystery of godlinesse God manifested in the flesh Saltmarsh maketh this as great a mystery God manifested in the Devill to cast him into hell And as the new Jerusalem the Spouse is Christ or God in the flesh of the Saints and Angels by grace and salvation and Christ liveth in Paul and Paul is by grace Godded and Christed and the Angel Gabriel Godded and Christed so Christ lives in Cain Judas Beelzebub by justice and condemnation and the union of God is neither personall in the son of Mary nor in Sathan but only in the effects of grace and salvation in all the elect and by Law and justice in all the damned Angels and men and here is the mystery God is all that part of the creation that commeth under the name of reasonable creatures men and Angels and all the Angels and men created of God were crucified with Christ and all are the Lord of glory by union so that as Libertines made God the soule forme and life of all things men and devills and said that God wrought all good all ill in the creatures and no creature was to be praised for doing well nor to be blamed or punished for ill doing because God is the Author of righteousnesse and sinne so the Familists say that Christ is the form and soul of men elect and reprobate of Angels elect reprobate and that God works in them is united to them and they are meer passive organs in all good or ill So I beleeve Saltm and the Familists do subvert the whole faith and hold nothing with us but doubt of all But I returne to that I said there is a twofold infallibility now though beleevers have not that infallibility proper to Prophets and Apostles in prophesying and writing Scripture yet must we not runne to the other extremity and say as these that fight for Liberty of conscience that there is not since the Prophets and Apostles fell asleep any infallible perswasion and certainty of faith but all our knowledge is conjecturall and a meere fluctuation and fleeting opinion and a faith for a yeare a month or an houre which wee may lay aside the next month and that anointing even the Spirit of God infuseth in us opinions of God contrary among themselves and false and true which is the present judgement of our minde which we are to stand to and to suffer for or to deny as we see the times goe For 1. The Scripture tells us of a sure perswasion of things beleeved Luke 1.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Luke holdeth forth to Theophilus a certainty of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that thou mayest know the certainty of these things whereof thou hast been instructed So the word imports a certainty Act. 5.23 Act. 21.34 Act. 22.30 Act. 25.26 Act. 2.36 Let all the house of Israel know 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 assuredly A full and certaine perswasion excludeth all doubting and deception or mistake and this the Saints have and may have Col. 2.2 That their hearts might bee comforted unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Thess. 1.5 The Gospel came not to you in word only but in much assurance Rom. 4.21 being fully perswaded This was the perswasion of a faith and such a faith as by which wee are justified without workes Rom. 14.5 Let every one be fully perswaded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in his owne minde 2 Tim. 4.17 That by me the preaching might bee fully knowne Nor is that perswasion of Pauls Apostolicke or by revelation extraordinarily but common to all Christians Rom. 8.38 For I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels c. shall be able to seperate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord 2 Tim. 1.12 I know in whom I have beleeved and I am perswaded that hee is able to keepe that which I have committed to him against that day This certaine perswasion must bee certaine and infallible both to themselves and grounded upon the promise and truth of God who cannot lye Tit. 1.2 Yea and our Divines with good warrant say the Catholicke in visible Church is thus farre infallible that in 1 fundamentalls 2 necessary for salvation they cannot 3 finally and totally erre and fall from the faith But all our Divines and your owne confession of the Assembly at Westminster saith ch 31. Art 4. All Councells generall or particular since the Apostles times may erre and many have erred To which I answer No Councells nay nor the whole invisible Church is infallible in the sense that the Apostles are infallible both in beleeving and teaching by immediate inspiration and so their word is not a rule of faith 2. A Generall Councell conveened in Councell may erre in particular Synodicall acts that is for a time and in some points as the Synod meaneth but it followeth
as infallible as the Scripture which I expresly deny and lay the rationem credendi all the weight burden and warrant of the obligation of conscience that the decrees or constitutions of an Assembly can lay on not on the fallible and weake authority of the Church or men but on the matter of the decrees because or in so farre as it is the necessary matter of the word or agreeable to the word of God Now may not the Reader consider this logicke The Gospell that M. Burton preacheth obligeth all his flocke absent or presenct for their presence maketh it not to bee Gospell and that not because of the authority of M. Burton who is but a sinfull man but because the Gospell he preacheth is necessary truth and agreeable to the Scriptures ergo whatsoever M. Burton preacheth is no lesse infallible then the decisions of the Apostles The Antecedent is most true and more I doe not say but the consequence is most blasphemous and false yet are all the lawfull Pastors in Britaine to preach the sound word of God after the example of the Prophets the Apostles ergo whatever all the faithfull Pastors in Britaine preach is as infallible as the decisions of the Apostles the Antecedent I can owne as a truth of God but the consequence is M. Burtons 2. He addes to my words and saith M. Rutherfurd tells us whatsoever is by these Commissioners determined and concluded is matter necessary and agreeable to the word of God This I say not I never thought whatsoever they say is matter necessary find these words under my hand and I will crave M. Burton and all the Church of England pardon But I know Generall Assemblies can reele and erre Every man is a lyar I never say whatsoever is concluded by them is necessary I say what is determined by them is de jure that is ought to be agreeable to Gods word for I shew that Generall Assemblies have their warrant from Act. 15. and my meaning and words are clear These are M. Burtons words not mine What is determined by them binds not as or because it s from men but as agreeable to the word of God M. Burton expones my is as hee pleaseth best and hath need to crave God pardon for that hee rashly and ignorantly I say no more fathers untruths on his innocent brother who writeth and speaketh honourably and respectively of him for let logicke of conscience be judge if this be a good consequence What a Generall Assembly determines bindeth no farther but as it is necessary and as it is agreeable to the word ergo Whatsoever a Generall Assembly determines is necessary and is agreeable to the word of God it followeth in no sort at all yea the ●u●t contrary followeth ergo if it be not necessary and in so farre as it is not agreeable to the word it obligeth-neither these that are present nor absent and is not infallible at all 4. I may say without any just ground of offending either M. Burton or any of his way that write against Synods that had they rightly understood the state of the question between P●otestants and Papists they would not have so inconsiderately clashed with the word of God and all the Reformed Churches in Christendome for we deny 1. All absolute unlimited and infallible authority to Synods Papists presse that Councells cannot erre and in so doing they make them Lords and Masters of the conscience of the people of God and Independents and others charging this upon us cannot before the barre of the alone King and head of the Church beare out their charge and the like unlimited and boundlesse power of Civill and politick ratifying and passing in penall lawes what the Church or Synods determine we deny to any Magistrate on earth M. Burton 9 10 11 12. will not and cannot make good his bitter virulent and unchristian challenge he layes on his innocent brethren who may and I hope doe in humility and confidence claime a Saintship and interest in the Lord Jesus as well as he That they with Diotrephes exalt mans power above all that is called God are Antichrists Apostates from the truth doe carry on the mystery of iniquity this he also must answer for as a slander laid on all our Reformers Calvin Luther Beza yea on Reynold Whittaker Perkins c. all the Protestant Churches all the hoast of Protestant Divines But 2. All the power and authority of Synods we conceive to be ministeriall not Lordly limited regulated by the onely word of God in the scripture and in matters circumstantiall of order and decency as time place persons observe I say not in mysticall Religions Ceremonies called but unjustly indifferent or the like by the law of nature rules of pietie charity and Christian prudency for the edification of our brethren and the glory of God and a lawfull Synod wee judge hath power ministeriall from Christ to passe constitutions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 decrees Acts 16.4 Lawes I doe not call them because Christ is the onely Law-giver King and head of his Church his Officers are onely servants and Heralds to hold forth his Lawes and these constitutions condemning Arminianisme Socinianisme Familisme Antinomianisme c. as sometimes Mr. Burton being but one single Pastor by word and writ condemned them and that in the name and authority of Christ as hee then said and commanding in the Lord that they consent to the forme of sound doctrine rebuking all that subvert soules and trouble the Churches Acts 15.23 24. are to be obeyed and the conscience submitted to them not absolutely not for the sole will and meere authority of the Heralds as if they were infallible not with blind obedience not without reclamation or appeale if they be either contrary or beside the scriptures but conditionally in so farre as they are agreeable to the Word of God even as the single Independant Congregation is to be heard in things lawfull under paine of excommunication as our brethren say from Matth. 18. and yet Matth. 18. sets not up Antichrist and caries not on the Mystery of iniquity And wee teach that the Magistrate as the Minister of God after due examination according to the word is obleiged to adde his civill sanction to these constitutions and to guard the Ministers with his Sword and to punish Arminians Socinians Familists c. as Mr. Burton cryed against them of old and appealed to the supreame Magistrate the Kings Majesty against them though wee judge the Magistrates sword in all this keepes such a distance from the conscience that this is so farre from being a State Government of the Church that these constitutions have no power at all over the conscience from the sword and are alike binding and were Acts 15. Though the Magistrate were not on earth and though hee should oppose them as hee did then And we thinke Arminians Socinians and Familists who deny all power of Synods lesse or more except onely Sir if
made perfect and wholly of the essence of God the father said Thou art my son this day have J begotten thee nor is it impossible that God can make his owne sonne a God though unrenewed men understand not this Antinomians speake not so honourably of Christ for Rise Reig. er 11 every beleiver is God incarnate But Christ is here in words made the substantiall son o● God by Swenckfield 5 Christ in both natures is the onely begotten son of God and Lord of glorie and King of the Church in both natures 6 Christ now at the right hand of God having obtained fully al the power honor and kingdome and essence of God worketh as much for our salvation as man as he doth as God 7 Whole Christ undivid●d according to both natures perfects the iustification and washing of a sinner by the spirit and whole Christ according to both natures undevided obtaineth the state of the second person in the Trinity as one and coequall God in power and honor with the Father Familists make God in his nature and essence to dwell and worke in all creatures especially in the regenerate But these are but fanci●s 1. Because after Christ was raised from the dead to the glory of the Father and so en●red into his glory there is evidence that his manhead was entered in no degrees of communion in the essence power and glory of God equally with God because there remaineth a body with flesh and bones that may be touched and handled Luk. 24.36.37 38 39 40. with the print of the nailes in his hands and sides Ioh. 20 27. now there is nothing of the nature essentiall honor and glory of God an infinite Spirit that fills heaven and earth yea or of any spirit in a body of bones flesh hands and feet and having in it such materiall and sensible qualities as the impression of wounds 2. Christ did eat with his disciples after his resurrection Ioh. 21.12 13 14 and so after he was entered in some degrees of glory and was seene of five hundred brethren at once 1 Cor. 15.6 Of Cleophas of the twelve Apostles of Paul also now what ever partaketh of the essence of a Spirit cannot eat nor be seene with bodily eyes and the disciples with their bodily eyes saw him ascend to heaven even till the clouds tooke him out of their sight Acts 1. 3 The eyes of all beleevers and reprobates even his enemies that peirced him in the generall Iudgement shll see him in which state Swenckefeldius dreames that the manhood is fully changed in the essence of God Rev. 1.7 now that the bodily eyes of men and of Reprobate men shall see the essence of God who is invisible 1 Tim. 1.17 is a dream for He dwels in light which no man can approach unto though we nothing doubt but the man Christ as man is elevated now in heaven to our uncomparable comfort to such eminency of glory above Men and Angels as the capacity of a created thing can receive 4. the Manhood of Christ is a creature having beginning and a cause of being in time Mat. 1. Luk. 2 in the fulnes of time Gal. 4. 4 was borne of a woman Now what is man borne of a woman that he should be equall in essence and nature with God who is like unto God Angels and created powers cannot answer the question God is essentially eternal and eternity differenceth him from all things beside himselfe Esay 9.6 chap. 43.10 Before me there was no God neither shall there be after me c. 40.28 Psal. 99.1 2. Psal. 102.26.27 1 Tim. 1.17 it 's then an everlasting contradiction that a creature in time can be a creator and a God before time or pertake of the essence of the eternall God for God must then create another God different in number from himself 5 our bodies shal be made conform to the glorious body of Christ. Phil. 3.21 if the Manhood of Christ and so his body which is a part thereof be changed into the essence of God we must be like the very invisible and eternall essence of an infinite Spirit and there is no glorifying of our bodyes then nor any resurrection nor any caughting up of our bodyes to the aire to be ever with the Lord but an utter extinction and an anhihilation of our bodyes and the body of Christ. Hence the flesh profiteth not then the manhood does not spiritually quicken give the Holy Ghost justifie as Swenckefield sayes but Christ God doth these 7 The cheife argument of Swenckefeld was because Christ as man obtained a name above all names was adored as man but if ●his stand sure then in the state of humiliation aswell as glorification the manhood was changed in the nature of God which yet Swenckefeldius denyes for in the state of humiliation what is proper to the Godhead is ascribed to the Man●hood per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as God purchased a Church by his blood whereas God hath no blood they Crucified the Lord of glory and by this argument we may well inferre that the God-head in the state of humiliation was changed into the manhood and flesh which is blasphemous for so should God die as man dyed and there was a booke given out in the name of Swenckefeldius that denyes the manhood of Christ after his resurrection to be a creature and calleth all of the contrary minde Creaturistae hence 8 These wilde assertions of Swenckefeldius The Gospell is the Essence of God faith and ioy in the heart is the essence of God 9 He charged Luther with these The preached word is the substantiall word of God the flesh of Christ is not glorified a renewed man hath not free will God dwells not in beleivers Good workes profit not to salvation the preaching of the word and Sacraments are effectuall without God As Famil and Antin●m charge us with many of these because we cannot say that a beleiver is so Christed that he is very Christ himselfe and God incarnate and as free from sin as Christ. 10 The doctrine contained in the scriptures is not properly the word of God but improperly by a Metonimy where the signe is put for the thing signified Christ only is properly and essentially the word of God Swenck liber de sacris liberis pa. 27 28. Antinomians say the Scripture and the Law is but a dead letter not the word of God so Del. in his whole sermon rejects all that is externall in the Gospel-reformatinn makes nothing in it but the Spirit and the incommunicable act of Redeeming which is onely in Christ to worke our conversion to God Before I proceed Swenckefeldians and Antinomians erre for its said of the ten Commandements Exod. 20.1 And God spake all these words All the Prophets cry Thus saith the Lord. Luk. 1.70 He hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets 2 Chro. 36.21 The word of the Lord by the mouth of Ieremiah Esa. 1.20 The mouth of the Lord hath
Historicall Literall and Grammaticall sense but in the Mysterious Allegoricall and Spirituall sense is the way of Legalists who say they follow the Letter and know nothing of the Spirit but the Letter killeth and the Spirit quickneth Read Philosophy dissected and the peeces called Theologia Germanica and the Bright Star and H. Nicholas his Exhortations and Documentals and you shall find strange Allegories And Saltmarsh is as Monkish in Allegories as they 2. Antinomians tell us often of imputed righteousnesse which supposeth Christ was a true reall Man and God-Man in one person and that we are saved by the merit an satisfaction of his obedience and death imputed to us But Saltmarsh and Familists her● tell us Christ is a meere figure sampler document or example onely in which God discovers to us grace and love And all that is spoken of Christ as in that person not in that person really but figuratively as in that person that was borne of a virgin who was circumcised c. is spoken in figure of the whole nature What Was not Christ reall and very Man our only surety Mediator High Priest who offered a reall sacrifice for us Is he nothing but a figure and if Adam was not the first man in whom all stood and fell so that all have sinned in him neither can Christ be the second Man in whom all his sonnes are justified redeemed and saved But Familists deny that Adam was the first man in whom all stood and fell as Saltmarsh told us before and therefore Familists deny that doctrine of the first and second Adam Rom. 5. and 1 Cor 15. 3. It is a mystery that all that Christ did from his childhood to his crucifying death and crosse was a discove●y of God by this Figure in the whole mystery how God is in all his and works and hath his times of Law-crucifying c. Was his crucifying but a discovery or a document of God by this figure The Scripture riseth higher He was wounded for our transgression he was bruised for our iniquity the chastisement of our peace was upon him with his stripes we are healed Esai 53. And him that knew no sinne God made sinne for us that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him as it is 2 Cor. 5.21 And in his own selfe on the tree he bare our sinnes 1 Pet. 2.24 The Familists make Christ a discovery and a teaching figure not a true Man The Socinians make him a Man but a meere example of patient suffering if we follow him his example will save us but they denyed he payed a reall satisfactory ransome to Gods justice for us 4. By Christs death say they God witnesseth to his people that he is their God and they his people by killing all their strength and life and power of the first creation and carrying it up to a more excellent and glorious life his own Spirit How killed Christ the strength life and power of the first creation Christ is but a figure and Christ but suffers sayth Gortine and dies in us when we who beare his Image For Man saith Saltmarsh p. 3 4. is created according to the Image of God which was Jesus Christ doe suffer and die for God cannot die And to this agreeth well what Saltmarsh saith p. 288. Others say he himselfe and Familists in opposition to Protestants who make Gospel-administration to stand in repentance faith sanctification justification 285 286. the mystery of salvation is no other then Immanuel or God with us Christ being no more but an anointed one and that anointed one is our nature or weaknesse anointed with the Spirit even God himselfe who is strength And this mystery of great and exceeding glory is revealed in peeces and parts and after the manner of men according to the infirmity of our flesh within the Christian in graces c. and in the Scriptures or expressions and formes without the Christian then is Christ crucified nothing but a beleever graced within with Gods Image And p. 283. he saith O how doth the pure appearance of God powre shame upon all flesh and fleshly glory Either by letter or by graces the day of the Lord will be upon all our Cedars and Okes. Now a Saint anointed is God manifested in the flesh to Saltmarsh and will the Lord powre shame on God manifested in the flesh or is the day of the Lord against Christ ●evealed within the Christian in graces and in the Scriptures without the Christian Then is Gods wrath kindled against grace within and Scripture without brave Divinity The Scripture saith not that Christ on the Crosse killed the strength life and power of the first creation that is Gospel-grace beleeving and God manifested in the Saints that is the new creature in them and the first creation that is as they say the natu●rall faculties of knowing willing nilling so as the holy Ghost and the Lord Jesus must come in place of these faculties and in us love feare beleeve rejoyce and we all our powers that we had in creation must be dead passive organs Industry Arts Sciences Tongues Labouring acting of Duties quite removed as flesh and corruption and we turned in all spirit See Rise reign Er. 1 2. For Saltm saith Sparkles of Glory 230 231. all other askings or seekings of God which are not thus in Spirit or in the will or mind of God in some evidence or pure work of the Spirit is but the askings of creatures as creatures All exhortations in Scripture to this duty as Seek yee my face Pray continually are onely then rightly effectually and properly applied and obeyed when the Spirit of God doth it in the Christian when the Spirit of God breathes in and reveals the will of God and acts in the duty or expressions and the Christian speakes in himselfe or the presence of others that mind of God and so the Spirit of God cloathes it selfe in flesh or letter or expressions as to the outward man If by a pure work of the Spirit Saltmarsh mean that the Spirit acteth as the principall determining moving acting cause carrying on the work so as our Spirit and naturall faculties of mind will affection have their own subordinate and inferiour active influence in the work the holy Ghost helping our infirmities it is good but this is no new light nor Familisticall secret of all Spirit but that which Protestants teach against Den and other Arminians old liers and new lights But ● feare a pure work of the Spirit is as much as the Spirit acts purely wholly only in praying and all supernaturall acts and the naturall faculties strength power and life of the first creation are destroyed and annihilated so as we are dead passive Organs doing nothing but the Spirit doth all as Libertines say Second causes work nothing but God as the soul of all worketh all in all creatures This is the secret and so the praying and all the supernaturall duties of beleevers are pure
have the Old man in beleevers shut up under the Law and the New man above all Law or subject to none at all as Familists and Libertines when they sinned said Non ego pecco sed asinus meus not I but the flesh doth sinne or sense reason the Old man doth sinne because the Old man onely is under the Law not the New man 2. Guiltinesse and sinne is a thing that falleth on the person not on a part of man 3. The command is given to the person the person is the subject of punishment and condemnation not his sense only 4. Thus Denne and Saltmarsh say Faith righteousnesse light joy and peace is in conscience in the sense f●●sh conversation is sinne yet nothing that can condemne because the conscience is washed in justification but sinne is in the conversation saith Denne and in the sense reason or flesh saith Saltmarsh so here originall sinne shall be no sinne CHAP. XV. Antinomians hold the justified to sinne before men and as touching their conversation not before God and as touching their conscience SO Antinomians say the justified have no sinne in their conscience nor can God see any sinne in their conscience yet there is sinne in their conversation and flesh But 1. sin Originall and the flesh lusting against the Spirit dwelleth inherently in its essence being a blot in the conscience and whole man though guilt and actuall condemnation bee removed so was Paul a wretched man onely for sinne in mind will conscience affection no ill but the ill of sinne could make him cry out of his wretched condition 2. The justified must be as perfect as Angels if no sinne dwell in them and they need not pray for pardon wanting all sin 3. Sin in conversation as murther in the hands oppressing of men blasphemy in the tongue are against the Law of God and must be sinnes in the conscience else they are against no Law of God which make the sinnes of the justified and their doing golden graces CHAP. XVI Justification is close mistaken by Antinomians when they judge it to be an extirpation of sinne Root and branch as Papists fancie venials to remaine onely in the justified IUstification to us is not as Antinomians dreame an utter extirpation of sinne in its essence root and branch for Papists conceive of justification so as nothing that is sinne remaineth in the justified but some gentle venials which we can satisfie for our selves but we judge justification to be a judiciall and law-removall of the guilt or obligation to eternall punishment 1. It is a judiciall and forinsecall Law-declaration that is opposed to condemnation but this removeth Law-guiltinesse to die not the intrinsecall inherent blot of sinne as if the sinner had never sinned and were now no sinner 2. By it the sinner is not as Antinomians say as righteous as Christ because Christ could say in truth I have no sinne but wee even being justified are lyars if we say we have no sinne 3. Sin dwelleth not in Christ at all nor was there in him flesh and concupiscence lusting against the Spirit as in us For it is cleare from the Scriptue that sinne dwelleth in the justified CHAP. XVII Christ not formally the sinner as Antinomians dreame NOr was Christ so made sinne as the intrinsecall guilt of sin was laid on him as Crispe saith Christ was onely the Adulterer the Idolater the sinner imputatively not inherently and formally in that he did beare the satisfactory punishment of wrath and hell due to our sinne 1. Christ was so made sinne not in the imagination but really suffering in our person yet so as sinne physically and inherently in its blot remaines in us and after wee are justified wee have sinne We are sold under sinne and carnall in many things wee offend all Now its blasphemy to say that Christ was so sinfull as we are 2. Nor is the surety the principall any way save onely legally penally imputatively the debtor there is no injustice in the surety as in the principall in borrowing money and profusely wasting it and wronging his brother nor can the surety bee called formally the unjust man the waster though he be legally the debtor and holden in justice and really not in imagination to pay the summe so was Christ never inherently and formally the sinner as the snow is formally white because Christ in himselfe in his physicall person and natures was innocent holy harmelesse undefiled separated from sinners even while he was a surety for sinners 3. Scripture expoundeth Christs bearing of our sinnes not as if the essence forme and intrinsecall fundamentall and essentiall guilt of sinne had been on him then he should have been a sinner as we are and so not a sinlesse sacrifice for sinne but in bearing the punishment due to us in his owne body on the tree in being wounded for our transgressions but it s the Antinomian● way to confound Sanctification and Justification and to make us as inherently and intrinsecally in our very persons holy sinnelesse righteous free of the indwelling of Originall sinne and the old man and the flesh as Christ himselfe and this is the Famil●sts principle That Christ hath Goded and Christed a Saint and Christ is incarnate and maned in the beleever so that the beleever is God manifested in the flesh and dwelling personally in us all the sinnes that a beleever commits are no more sinnes then the actions of Christ for all our sinnes were swallowed up and annihilated in Christ He that is borne of God say they cannot sinne and M. Towne telleth us that justification is regeneration and to faith there is no sinne CHAP. XVIII That we are not justified untill we beleeve WEe hold against Antinomians that we are never justified till we beleeve They say from eternity we were justified or from the time that the Messiah dyed all sins were finished and wee justified or from our birrh But justification in Gods decree and purpose from eternity is no more justification then Creation sanctification glorification the crucifying of Christ and all things that fall out in time for all these were in the eternall purpose of God 2. In justification our sinnes are in their guilt fully done away as a thick cloud cast in the bottome of the sea remembred no more sought for and not found if all this was done from eternity beleevers were never sinners never children of wrath really as Paul saith never dead in sinnes never enemies to God or ungodly they were onely such in a mentall consideration 3. It is true God loved his chosen ones from eternitie to salvation and from that love sent his Sonne to die to wash justifie and sanctifie them but this is not their justification but a fruit of justification in time When our time is the time of love and wee are dying in our owne
our or his owne lusts for us but in reall and personall acts of obedience to be deadned to to the world Gal. 6.14 To abstaine from fleshly lusts that warre against the soule from fornication uncleanesse inordinate affection evill concupiscence and such sinnes for which the wrath of God commeth on the Children of disobedience to wit on the Gentiles that never heard the Gospel now in reason wrath cannot come on the heathen who never heard of Christ because they beleeve not that he of whom they never heard hath crucified those sinnes for them on the crosse CHAP. XL. Antinomians the perfectists of our time say wee and our works are compleatly perfect ANtinomians ascribe not onely an imputative perfection in that Christs perfect righteousnesse is made ours but also an inherent perfection to the Saints But wee judge our state and persons through Christ to be perfect but our duties and begunne sanctification are not perfect but is so in growing as the Moone as a vessell not full to the brime and banks of the soule it receives quarts and gallons more It s true justification removeth the evill of works as touching all guilt or obligation to eternally revenging justice But as Christs grace addeth to our good works no dignity and perfection of meriting as Papists say so doth it not remove the inherent blot of sinne that cleaveth to our good works so as it should give to these works inherent perfection and remove their sinnefull defects for as sinne dwelleth in our persons after wee are justified though it bee not imputed so doth sinne cleave to our most gracious acts but is not accounted on our score because the surety hath answered our bill and removed the sinnefull imperction from them but hath not made them inherently perfect so as there should remaine nothing in the works of the justified that is contrary to the Law of God But the truth is Antinomians with no face of truth can say that Christ removeth the sinnefull imperfections that adhere to our good works done by the Grace of Christ when we are in the state of justification because if nothing wee doe in the state of justification be sinne since pardoned sinnes to Antinomians are no sinnes and have lost the nature and being of sinne being remitted and pardoned before they be committed these sinnes that cleave to our good works are no sinnes and so the good works must be perfect as the person is perfect 1. Because Antinomians go upon this ground that nothing inherent in the persons not the in-dwelling corruption of nature nor the adherent sins that cleave to our works nor any thing a justified man can doe is sinne or contrary to the Law but that person or works being pardoned both are as perfect as the person and works of Christ. A most blaspemous ground for what we want of perfect sanctification and wee want much in this life so farre are we sinnefully imperfect 2. Paul acknowledgeth his sinnefull imperfection I find a Law in my members rebelling against the Law of my minde not as if I were already perfect 3. In many things we offend all If any man offend not in word the same is a perfect man Hence the man that is perfect sinnes not but there is none in the earth that sinneth not and doth good 4. Wee crave pardon of sinnes as we seeke dayly our dayly bread It s contrary to Christian humility to say wee are perfectly cleane Object God can accept nothing that is unperfect and sinnefull because they are accursed Gal. 3.10 For God is veritie it selfe and will not suffer the losse of the least jot of the righteousnesse the Law requireth But all our best works are polluted with sinne Towne Answ. This proveth with the Papists that God cannot judge us righteous by faith because wee are sinners in our selves 2. God cannot accept sinnefull works as no sinnefull works at all he cannot accept of sinnes as no sinnes and of our good works as not polluted with sinne in themselves his judgement then should not be according to truth true but he can well accept our works though polluted with sinne as pardoned and washen not from their sinnefull imperfections inherent or adherent to them for then they should be intrinsecally perfect and God should judge amisse of them but as washen from their guilt and obligation to eternall wrath so he can well judge them perfect in Christ. 3. Legally cleane so as they shall never actually condemne us and 4. that of meere grace CHAP. XLI Antinomians say we are compleatly saved in this life as in heaven SO we thinke Antinomians faile wickedly with Libertines who say We are as actually saved and as perfectly as the glorified in heaven and not in hope onely or in reall beginning in regard of Christs sitting in heaven and therefore good workes can no more bee the way to heaven saith Towne then my walking in the Citie in which I am already can be my walking to the City But so while we are absent from the Lord in the body even in this life wee should be in heaven whereas the dissolution of our earthly tabernacle the raysing of us up at the last day are betweene us and the full redemption of our bodies And this is that which Libertines and Familists say that all the resurrection of the body and life eternall they know is our union with Christ in this life the Grammar of Hymeneus and Philetus who said the Resurrection was already past 3. We know but in part our love is not perfected in this life 1 Cor. 13.11 12 13. And we are not perfect men in Christ till we meet all in the unity of Faith Ephes. 4.13 3 The generall assembly of all the first borne is not yet convened we need a Temple and Ordinances and a Sunne and a Moone in the other life the Lambe shall be our Temple 4. The other life is such as in it wee can neither marry nor dye but are as the Angels Luk. 22.36 37. Phil. 3.20 21. 1 Cor. 15.40.41 5. Antinomians say this dreaming that we are as cleane of sinne as Christ and so Christed and Goded with Christ as the Libertine Pocquius said Calvin in Opus pag. 463. and Nicholas the Libertine cap. 34. 6. Paul saith Wee are saved by hope and wee hope not for what wee have already Our life is hid with Christ in God 1. He that beleeveth hath life not in the compleat and full fruition yet really in the certaintie of faith and hope 2. In the right claime purchased by Christ. 3. In the beginning first fruits and the degrees of grace tending to glory CHAP. XLII Our happinesse is in sanctification as well as in justification OUr happinesse is not meerely passive as Towne saith and in being justified as if that were all for though our blessednesse be in justification as the cause and fountaine in that sinne
the Angel and prevailed he wept and made supplication to him Gen. 32.24 25 26. nor is this an old Testament-Spirit the parable of the unjust Judge and the Widdow is in scope a doctrine of prevailing with God by importunitie of prayer Iames bringeth the example of Elias for the prevailing of prayer and Christ This kinde of devill is not cast out but by fasting and prayer and so the Spirit of adoption worketh freely Object 2. Saltmarsh The Spirit worketh not freely when wee take in Christ but by the way and rest not wholy on him Answ. They looke on Christ by the by who take in their good works as fellow-causes with Christ thinking to be heard for them Christ is but a by-Mediator if he bee not whole Mediator it s a practicall error naturally in us to improve the the sufficiencie and incomparable weight of Christ to little purpose and dote more upon done duties then on Christ yet this is not our Doctrine but our sinne that we are to be humbled for Obj. 3. Saltmarsh When we are in bondage to some outward worship of circumstances as time place person the Spirit works not freely Answ. It may be Saltmarsh thinketh the Lords day under the New Testament legall men of his gang doe it 2. And not to pray but at such houres as the Spirit moves him because the Spirit onely and the Spirit acting and ravishing is the only obliging Law and command under the New Testament the Letter or written Scripture to pray continually in all things to give thanks to bee abundant in the worke of the Lord to be rich in good works and to make our selves friends with the Mammon of unrighteousnesse at any time ere we bee put out of our stewardship except when the Spirits wind bloweth faire that so they may receive us into the everlasting habitations is a law bondage yea to abstaine from adulterie murther swearing except the Spirits acting which is our onely obliging Law now is a legall not a Gospel-service nor can a beleever sin when he commits adultery murther for hee doth nothing against the only obliging New Testament Law the acting of the Spirit when the Spirit actually doth not act him and stirre him to duties of charitie and love of the brethren and doth not actually deterre and pull him back by his immediate impulsions and breathings from adulterie and murther I desire an answer intimating a difference between sins of Adultery and Murther and so sinfull omission of duties of Chastity and saving the life of innocent brethren for a Moneth which must involve a sinnefull not-loving our brother for a Moneth and the not praying to God for thirty dayes as the heathen Kings Law was upon supposition that the Spirit act not and stirre not up to prayer for thirty dayes and if so it is a question if Adultery be sinne and if abstinencie from Adultery upon the conscience of the seventh Command be not an impeaching of the free working of the Spirit of Adoption and a spece of legall bondage As for Saltmarsh his fourth ground of bondage to wit that to doe any thing from the power of an outward commandement or precept of the Word that it brings forth but finer hypocrisie and his seventh To take any outward thing to move them rather then apply Christ for strength life and Spirit is meere bondage I have answered alreadie it is an Enthusiasticall opposing of the working of word works and well grounded experiences of the Saints to the actings of the Spirit and a looseing of us from beleeving and obeying Scriptures from trembling at the Word and a most wicked way of Enthusiasme Object 5. Saltmarsh when they doe because of some vow or covenant they have made c. It is more properly the service of the Old Testament and part of their bondage for wanting the power and fulnesse of the Spirit of adoption to worke them to obedience freely from within they were under the power of outward principles to put them on from without Answ. 1. If nothing move men to doe but the Letter of the Covenant Vow or Promise not the Spirit of grace then can the Spirit never be said to worke Legally or not freely because the Spirit works not at all nor can this bee called properly the service of the Old Testament except Antinomians say the Spirit of grace wrought none at all in the Old Testament but onely the Letter contrary to all the heavenly Psalmes made by the Holy Ghost and the acts of faith in Moses David Job Jeremiah which every Page of Old Testament refuteth and we must say meere nature and the dead Letter without the Spirit acted them So Hebr. 11. Psal. 51.10 and infinite other places on the contrary 2. Nor can yee say by the same reason that a naturall conscience a desire of a name lest they should be reputed covenant-breakers moved these in the Old Testament to act for so none could have been tearmed men according to Gods heart nor perfect and upright men as David Job Ezechiah Noah because upon this Antinomian ground they were all but fine hypocrites If I mistake not Saltmarsh condemneth all who have taken the Covenant in the three Kingdomes and are moved for feare of the oath of God to stand to it as Legalists and Old Testament Spirits The Covenant that Asa Josiah caused the people to stand too was a Law-bondage that we are not now obliged to and upon the same grounds to keepe faith and promise upon lawfull contracts and oathes between King and people or made to God to keepe Marriage-covenants contracts legues and bargaines betweene man and man which we conceive to be of the Law of Nature must all be the proper service of the Old Testament and contrary to the Gospel to keepe my lawfull promise made to a man to pay my debt because I promised when I borrowed money To keepe the Covenant of God made in Marriage because it is an outward covenant is to doe because of some Covenant and to be in Law-bondage and to doe as being under the power of outward principles and Paul must writ to Philemon as under the bondage of the Old Testament If Onesymus hath wronged thee or oweth thee ought put it on my count if he should pay Philemon seeing he became his debter by an outward promise and covenant he did not pay him by the Spirit of adoption working freely but by a Legall Spirit as being under the Law not under grace by this learning A Jesuiticall way to loose men from all covenants promises bargaines in buying and selling treatise and Indentures betweene persons Nation and Nation to loose us from all the bonds of the Law of Nature and Nations and free us from that which is the Law and the Prophets Whatsoever yee would men should doe to you the same doe ye to them Then shall nothing bind us under the New Testament Doth the Spirit of
the Spirit not that wee are partakers of the essence or substance of the Godhead or equall with Christ in any respect hee speaketh soundly as the confession of Britaine cleareth but his words are not sound 2. Whoever except Henry Nicholas and David Georgius spake as Del who saith The Spirit of God dwels in our flesh till the whole body of sinne bee destroyed and the naturall man be made spirituall If his meaning be as Familists and Antinomians dreame that Christ incarnate is nothing but every godly man Christed and made conforme to the image of Christ we are at a point and know his minde so teach the New England Familists and the Author of the Bright Starre who tells us of God humanized and that the Crosse of God is God 3. The Spirit dwelleth not in our flesh that is in our sinfull and unrenewed part for so is flesh taken Rom. 7. who dreamed that grace dwelleth in originall sinne or if by flesh he meane the naturall man or the carnall man or the outward man that is in our person hee then thinks this outward and naturall man or our body is turned in a spirit or spirituall nature so as we are made by justification spirituall as Angels and need no more Ordinances Word Seales reading the written Scripture then if we were glorified Saints as Saltmarsh speaketh of the beleevers and as he himselfe saith You may as well goe about to bring the Angels of heaven under an outward and secular power as the faithfull who being borne of the Spirit are more spirituall then they If so then beleevers being more spirituall then Angels and so l●sse literall and lesse carnall because by imputed righteousnesse they are Christed and Godded and so the body of sinne destroyed by the the imputed righteousnesse of Christ fully and compleatly then as Angels need no secular power because they are spirituall so need they not heare the Morall Law preached nor the threatnings thereof nor need they give attendance to reading nor need they marry nor can they die nor sin as our Saviour saith and that because they are spirituall if then beleevers be more spirituall as Del saith they need farre lesse then Angels the written Word or the Preaching of the Law or any Ordinances nor should they marry or dye nor can they sinne nor lie nor whore nor steale nor kill but bee as the Angels of heaven I cannot but professe my jealousie of all Familists I much feare when Del saith beleevers are more spirituall then Angels and that the naturall man must bee made spirituall which is done saith he by the imputed righteousnesse of God Pag. 6.7 that hee mindeth with Mistresse Hutchi●on that these who are united to Christ have in this life new bodies and two bodies 1 Cor. 6.19 And that the soules of men are mortall in regard of generation like the beasts Eccles. 3.8 but made immortall by the purchase of Redemption And that the Resurrection Joh. 5.28 is not meant of the Resurrection of the body but of our union here and after this life with Christ. And so taught that abominable Priest Anto. Pocquius and the Quintists with him with Phyletus and Hymeneus that the Resurrection of the dead was in this life and that we are not saved in hope onely in this life but really and compleatly before we die and the same perfection of life eternall in this life is taught by Antinomians to wit by Towne and Saltmarsh the colleague of Del. These must lie upon Antinomians while they condemne their Fathers the Familists upon whose principles they walke which they have never yet done nor have they denyed the foule Heresies that are in the Story of the Rise raigne ruine of Antinomians 4. Ecclesiasticall reformation in the intention of the work hath no kindly ends that are fleshly and carnall and therefore is as constant as internall reformation except Master Del meane so much as the Nicholaitans doe that the Letter of the Scripture and all Ordinances externall Word scales prayer reading bookes under the Gospel are abolished to the just man and onely the Spirit leadeth him yea that these are all Elementish Ceremoniall carnall and fleshly and that its unpossible that any act meditation thin●ing aspiring or working can be sufficient to attaine the seeing of God in this life that no discourse exercise nor rule of Law Gospel Scripture or Ordinance or any meane can bee interposed betweene the soule and God that wee are onely passive in receiving the will of God that we and all our acts of the soule of willing loving trusting hoping c. are annihilated and turned to nothing in a spirituall communion with God And the reason of the constancy of externall reformation in its owne nature I give Because as grace in the soule being a beam and day of eternall and unchangeable love is ever like God the Author constant and so like its Father so is externall Reformation constant for the Letter of Law and Gospel commands ever and immutably a perfect conformity betweene the outward man and God that eyes eares hands confession of Christ before men hearing the Word reading praying abstinence from fleshly lusts be ever the same according to the rule of the Gospel as internall Reformation is constant It s true outward Reformation is not constant in the sinnefull intention of the worker because it takes not hold of the heart and therefore the ends of externall Reformation in the intention of men is often sinnefull fleshly carnall yea devillish and so unconstant in good and therefore it s a vaine thing for M. Del to argue from the abused and sinnefull ends of men against outward Reformation which of the owne nature is an Ordinance of God 5. All the differences between inward and outward Reformation prove an excellencie of Christs inward Reformation above mens outward Reformation which is most true but proveth not but outward Reformation is a good Ordinance of God for honouring of God before men 2. For an externall blamelesse profession and confession of Christ and his truth before men is commanded in the Gospel Math. 10 32.3● And ab●●inence ●rom grosse and scandalous sinnes Del pag. ●0 If the Church be to be redeemed Christ must redeeme it if it be governed Christ must governe it if it be to be protected Christ must protect it if it be to bee saved Christ must save it 1. God hath committed the care of reforming the Church to Christ onely and to no body else and this is a thousand times better for the Church then if hee had committed it to all the Princes and Magistrats in the world All things are given to me of my Father Christs love to redeeme is his love to reforme he will not break the bruised r●ed c. and he reformes not ruggedly and with violence Answ. This Argument shall prove that none ought to come out to helpe
intimam et ineffabilem transmutationem peccati nostri in illius justitiam Fides nobis Christum affert hoc est unam carn●m os ex ossibus nostris omnia communia cum illo facit Luth. Homo eum fiducia possit gloriari in Christo dicere Meum est quod Christus vixit egit dixit passus est mortuus est non secus quam si ego illa vixissem egissem dixissem passus essem mortuus essem sicut sponsus habet omnia quae sunt sponsae sponsa habet omnia quae sunt sponsi omnia enim sunt communia utriusque sunt enim una caro Ita Christus ecclesia sunt unus spiritus Conclusion 6. Antinomians contend as I prove at length from their writings that there is no sin in the beleever more then in Christ that Justification is a taking away of sin root and branch in its essence and nature so that pardoned sin is no sin and hath lost the nature of sin the justified man is but a sinner seemingly not in Gods but in the worlds account So blasphemously they speak But Luther and all Protestant Divines say they are licencious teachers and gratifie the flesh and belie the Holy Ghost that so teach Luther who ever is justified he is still a sinner yet he is as it were fully and perfectly reputed righteous the Lord pardoning and shewing mercy Saltmarsh contradicting Luther saith the Scripture calleth us being justified ungodly and sinners and children of wrath not that wee are so but seeme so or not in Gods account but the worlds so De● Crisp Town Eaton Luther We are just and declared to be the Sonnes of God but sin originally remaineth in us rebelling against us we are not free from all pollutions It s better that Peter and Paul falling in unbelief be accursed then that one iota of the Evangell passe away All the Saints have sin and are sinners and also none of them doe sin they are righteous according to that which grace hath wholled and sinners in that in which they are to be wholled By Gods mercy the Saints when they are hardned fall in manifest sin and with so great care God is forced to save them that contrary to mercy he leades them to mercy and by sin freeth them from sin Luther Peccator est adhuc quisquis justificatur tamen velut plene et perfecte justus reputatur ignoscente et miserente Deo Luth. Sumus quidem justi declarati filii regni sed peccatum originis manet adhuc rebellans in nobis Non sumus puri ab omnibus vitiis inquinamentis Melius est Petrum Paulum in infidelitatem lapsos imo Anathema haberi quam unum iota Evangelii perire Luth. Omnes sancti habent peccatum suntque peccatores nullus peccat iusti sunt juxta illud quod gratia in iis sanavit peccatores juxta quod adhuc sanandi sunt Luth. Proinde fit miserante Deo ut si sint Sancti crassioris duritiae cadant aliquando in man●estarium opus peccati tantaque curâ illos Deus cogitur servare ut contra misericordiam suam eos ad misericordiam perducat per peccatum a peccato liberet It is a proverb saith Luther they must have strong bones who can bear many faire dayes of prosperity Oportet esse ossa robusta qui serant dies bonos So say I not sinning and not being acquainted with our own weaknesse in falling in sin hath broken many bones and the falls of David and Peter hath cured their bones Relativè non formaliter a●t substantialiter est peccatum sublatum lex abolita mors destructa By way of relation not formally nor essentially is sin taken away the Law abolished death destroyed Heare this Antinomians who teach that sin pardoned loseth the nature and being of sin so that God can see no sin in a beleever Originis peccatum transit reatu manet actu Luth. Deus peccata delet quoad remissionem culpae ipsam vim peccati non quoad rem seu materiam peccati Haec vi● peccati per miseri●ordiam gratuitam tollitur tamen manēt verae hujus veneni reliquiae ergo utrumque verum est Quod nullus Christianus hab●t peccatum quod omnis Christianus habet peccatum-hinc duplex p●ccatum apud Christianos peccatum remissum peccatum reliquum quod extirpandum abluendum est Christianus non est formaliter justus non justus secundum substantiam aut qualitatem sed est justus secundum praedicamentum ad aliquid nempe respectu divina gratiae tantum remissionis gratuitae quae contingi● agnoscentibus peccatum credentibus Sin originall passeth away after baptisme in the guilt it remaineth actually God taketh away our sins as touching the remission of the fault and the power of sin not according to the thing it self and the matter of sin this power of sin through free mercy is removed and yet the true reliques of this poyson remaineth then both is true none in Christ hath sinne every one in Christ hath sinne there is a twofold sinne in Christians a sinne pardoned and a sinne remaining a sin to be rooted out a sin to be washen out Luther A Christian is not formally just he is not just according to the substance or quality but according to relation to wit in regard of grace only and of remission of sinnes which befalleth freely to such as confesse their sins and beleeve This is our very doctrine point blanke contrary to Antinomians Crisp saith Sin is taken away as money removed out of a place it was once in it is no more in its being and nature there then if it had never been there The beleever is as just and as clean from sinne as Christ God cannot see sinne in a beleever because pardoned sinne as lost the nature of sinne and both his person and his workes are perfect and sinlesse before God The devill cannot teach more fleshly doctrine for we are only by justification just by a relative righteousnesse as the prodigall bankerupt is just legally and free from debt for which is his surety hath satisfied But the bankerupt personally inherently subjectively and in himselfe is an unjust waster a theef and a robber and hath in him still a sinfull disposition to take one new debt except both inherent and assisting grace hinder him there is not this injustice in the surety far lesse can any such thing be dreamed to be in Christ nor is pardoned sinne taken away in its nature and being as mony removed out of a place it s only in its law obligation and rigid power of condemning removed as if it never had been and we with Luther say that sinne remaineth formally and essentially sin in the compleat being and nature of sin both in our person and
best workes after we are pardoned and justified though God see it not as a judge therfore to condemne us the sting and condemning guilt of sin not the sinne it self in its nature and being is removed as a Serpent without a sting hath still the being and nature of a Serpent A Lion chained that it cannot devoure is still a Lion so is sin pardoned still sin in the kinde and nature of transgression against a divine Law Luther Haec est justitia infinita omnia peccata in momento absorbens quia impossibile est quod peccatum in Christo haere at qui credit haeret in Christo est que unus cum Christo habens candem justitiam c●m ipso Luther Impossibile est ut peccet filius Dei quicunque tametsi verum est quod peccat sed quia ignoscitur ei ideo vero etiam peccans non peccat Non videt Deus dubitationem de voluntate ejus diffidentiam alia p●ccata quae adhuc hab●o Don●● enim vivo in carne verè peccatum est in me Luth. Peccatain nobis manent quae Deus maxime odit ideo propter illa oportet nos habere imputationem justitiae Luther Non est dicendum quod baptismus non tollat omnia peccata Verè enim omnia tollit non secundum substantiam sed plurimum secundum substantiam totum secundum vires ejus simul quotidie etiam tollens secundum substantiam ut evacuetur Luther Renatus non peccat peccat peccat in opere eodem propter voluntatem carnis non peccat propter contrariam voluntatem spiritus Quotidie peccat omnis homo sed quotidie poenitet Toto vitae tempore durat peccatum in carne nostrâ adversatur Spiritui sibi adversario Quare omnia opera post justificationem sunt aliud nihil quam paenitentia aut bonum propositum contra peccatum Luther Quotidie Spiritualiter in quolibet Christiano subinde invenitur per vices tempus legis gratiae Luth. Multae horae sunt in quibus cum Deo rixor impatienter ei repugn● mihi judicium Dei displicet ipsi vicissim displicet mea impatientia hoc tempus legis est in quo Christianus sub carnem semper est car● concupiscit c. Tempus gratiae est cum cor iterum ●●igitur dicit Quar● tristis es anima mea c. Qui istam artem bene nosset ille merito diceretur Theologus Ego mei similes vix tenemus hujus artis prima elementa Luther Imo quo quisque magis pius est hoc plus sentit illam pugnam Ego Monachus statim putabam actum de sal●te meâ si quando s●ntiebam co●cupiscentiam carnis tent●bam multa confitebar quotidie sed nihil prorsus proficiebam si tum recte intellexissem Pauli sententiam Caro concupiscit adversus Spiritum non usque adeo me a●●lixissem sed ut hodie soleo cogita●●em Martine tu non carebis probus peccato quia carnem adhuc habes Staupicius dicere solitus millies vovi me probi●rem fore ●●nquam praesti●i amplius non v●vebe Luther Hoc quod verê peccatum est contra legem lex pro peccato non potest accusare in piis Luth. Peccatum remissum est quod fiduciâ misericordiae contritum est ne damnet ne accuset tamen propter hanc carnem adhuc pullulat militat in carne Cavendum ne illas peccati reliquas extenuemus vilescit enim purgator Luther Manent in nobis reliquiae peccatorum quae quotidianâ remissione opus habent Luther Remissa quidem tecta sunt omnia peccata sed nondum expurgata haeret in nobis tantum libidinis superbiae odii sed occultae etiam maculae dubitatio imputientia Luther In carne nostra etiam cum justificati sumus reliquiae peccati manent ne scilicet sumus otios● s●d habeamus exercitia pietatis Peccatum sicut Augustinus loquitur actu manet reactu tamen transit hoc est res ipsa qu● verè peccatum e●t remissa est â Deo tolleratur ea manet in carne reliqua nec dum plane mortua est nisi quòd per Christum caput serpentis contritum est lingua tamen adhuc mi●at cauda minatur ictum Luth. Quid Inquies an non decalogus praestari debet si autem praestatur an non ea justitia est Respondeo volumus decalogum praestare servare sed cum largâ hoc est verè Evangelicâ dispensatione seu distinctione Quia accipimus tantum primitias Spiritus gemitus Spiritus in corde manent item caro nostra cum suis libidinibus ac concupiscentiis hoc est tota arbor cum fructibus etiam manet haec causa est cur decalogus nunquam plenò praestari possit Luther The infinit justice of God in a moment swalloweth up all sin because it is impossible that sin remaine in Christ and hee that beleeves in Christ remaineth in Christ and is one with Christ having the same righteousnesse with him It is unpossible that a Son of God should sin though it be true that he sin but because his sin is pardoned therefore when he truly sins he sins not Because of saith God seeth not my doubting my unbeleefe my sadnesse of spirit and other sinnes which I have yet in me for so long as I live in the flesh it is truly sinne that is in me but because I am under the shadow of Christs wings I am protected as a chicken under an hen Sins remaine in us which God hateth for them therefore we must have the imputed righteousnesse of Christ. We must not say that baptisme takes not away al our sins for it truly takes them all away not in their essence or nature but in some respect in their nature and wholly in their dominion and it removes them daily in their being and nature through the growth of sanctification that sin at length may be fully exhausted and spent Luther A renewed man sins and sins not hee sins in the same worke in regard of the will of the flesh he sins not because of the contrary will of the spirit Luther every renewed man daily sins and daily repents All our life sin dwells in our flesh and resists the spirit as an adversary therefore all our works after justification are nothing but repentance or a good purpose against sin Luther Every day there is by course spiritually in every Christian a time of the Law and of Grace There bee many houres in which I quarrell with God and impatiently fight against him the wrath and judgement of God displeaseth me and again my impatience displeaseth him this is the time of the Law in which a Christian is under the flesh for the flesh ever lusts against the Spirit and the Spirit