that Judgment being according unto Works answered and the Impertinency of it declared Pag. 211. CHAP. VII Imputation and the nature of it The first express Record of Justification determineth it to be by Imputation Gen. 15.6 Reasons of it The Doctrine of Imputation cleared by Paul the occasion of it Maligned and opposed by many Weight of the Doctrine concerning Imputation of Righteousness on all hands acknowledged Judgment of the Reformed Churches herein particularly of the Church of England By whom opposed and on what Grounds Signification of the Word Difference between reputare and imputare Imputation of two kinds 1. Of what was ours antecedently unto that Imputation whether good or evil Instances in both kinds Nature of this Imputation The thing imputed by it imputed for what it is and nothing else 2. Of what is not ours antecedently unto that Imputation but is made so by it General nature of this Imputation Not judging of others to have done what they have not done Several distinct Grounds and Reasons of this Imputation 1. Ex Justitia 1. Propter Relationem foederalem 2. Propter Relationem Naturalem 2. Ex voluntaria sponsione Instances Philem. 17. Gen. 43.9 Voluntary sponsion the Ground of the Imputation of Sin to Christ. 3. Ex injuria 1 King 1.21 4. Ex mera Gratia Rom. 4. Difference between the Imputation of any Works of ours and of the Righteousness of God Imputation of Inherent Righteousness is Ex Justitia Inconsistency of it with that which is Ex mera Gratia Rom. 11.6 Agreement of both kinds of Imputation The true nature of the Imputation of Righteousness unto Justification explained Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. The thing it self imputed not the effect of it proved against the Socinians Pag. 226. CHAP. VIII Imputation of Sin unto Christ. Testimonies of the Antients unto that purpose Christ and the Church one Mystical Person Mistakes about that State and Relation Grounds and Reasons of the Vnion that is the foundation of this Imputation Christ the Surety of the New Covenant in what sense unto what ends Heb. 7.22 opened Mistakes about the Causes and Ends of the Death of Christ. The New Covenant in what sense alone procured and purchased thereby Inquiry whether the Guilt of our sins was imputed unto Christ. The meaning of the words Guilt and Guilty The Distinction of Reatus culpae and Reatus paenae examined Act of God in the Imputation of the Guilt of our Sins unto Christ. Objections against it answered The Truth confirmed Pag. 246. CHAP. IX Principal Controversies about Justification 1. Concerning the nature of Justification stated 2. Of the Formal Cause of it 3. Of the Way whereby we are made partakers of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. What intended by the Formal Cause of Justification declared The Righteousness on the account whereof Believers are justified before God alone inquired after under those Terms This the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto them Occasions of Exceptions and Objections against this Doctrine General Objections examined Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ consistent with the Free Pardon of Sin with the necessity of Evangelical Repentance Method of Gods Grace in our Justification Necessity of Faith unto Justification on supposition of the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Grounds of that Necessity Other Objections arising mostly from mistakes of the Truth asserted discussed and answered Pag. 289. CHAP. X. Arguments for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Our own Personal Righteousness not that on the account whereof we are justified in the sight of God Disclaimed in the Scripture as to any such end The truth and reality of it granted Manifold Imperfections accompanying it rendering it unmeet to be a Righteousness unto the Justification of Life Pag. 315. CHAP. XI Nature of the Obedience or Righteousness required unto Justification Original and Causes of the Law of Creation The Substance and End of that Law The Immutability or unchangeableness of it considered absolutely and as it was the Instrument of the Covenant between God and Man Arguments to prove it unchangeable and its Obligation unto the Righteousness first required perpetually in force Therefore not abrogated not dispensed withal not derogated from but accomplished This alone by Christ and the Imputation of his Righteousness unto us Pag. 340. CHAP. XII Imputation of the Obedience of Christ no less necessary then that of his suffering on the same Ground Objections against it 1. That it is impossible Management hereof by Socinus Ground of this Objection That the Lord Christ was for himself obliged unto all the Obedience he yielded unto God and performed it for himself answered The Obedience inquired after the Obedience of the Person of Christ the Son of God In his whole Person Christ was not under the Law He designed the Obedience he performed for us not for himself This Actual Obedience not necessary as a qualification of his Person unto the discharge of his Office The Foundation of this Obedience in his being made Man and of the Posterity of Abraham not for himself but for us Right of the Humane Nature unto Glory by virtue of Vnion Obedience necessary unto the Humane Nature as Christ in it was made under the Law This Obediencs properly for us Instances of that nature among Men. Christ obeyed as a publick Person and so not for himself Humane Nature of Christ subject unto the Law as an Eternal Rule of dependance on God and subjection to him not as prescribed unto us whilest we are in this World in order unto our future Blessedness or Reward Second Objection that it is useless answered He that is pardoned all his sins is not thereon esteemed to have done all that is required of him Not to be unrighteous Negatively not the same with being righteous Positively The Law obligeth both unto punishment and obedience how and in what sense Pardon of Sin gives no title to Eternal Life The Righteousness of Christ who is one imputed unto many Arguments proving the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto the Justification of Life Pag. 361. CHAP. XIII The Difference between the two Covenants stated Arguments from thence Pag. 396. CHAP. XIV All Works whatever expresly excluded from any interst in our Justification before God What intended by the Works of the Law Not those of the Ceremonial Law only Not perfect Works only as required by the Law of our Creation Not the outward Works of the Law performed without a principle of Faith Not Works of the Jewish Law Not Works with a conceit of Merit Not Works only wrought before believing in the strength of our own wills Works excluded absolutely from our Justification without respect unto a Distinction of a First and Second Justification The true sense of the Law in the Apostolical Assertion that none are justified by the Works thereof What the Jews understood by the Law Distribution of the Law under the Old Testament The whole Law a perfect
alone others Faith and Works also and that in the same kind of necessity and use That whose consideration we at present undertake is the second thing proposed And indeed herein lies the substance of the whole controversie about our Justification before God upon the determination and stating whereof the determination of all other incident Questions doth depend This therefore is that which herein I affirm The Righteousness of Christ in his Obedience and Suffering for us imputed unto Believers as they are united unto him by his spirit is that Righteousness whereon they are justified before God on the Account whereof their sins are pardoned and a Right is granted them into the Heavenly Inheritance This Position is such as wherein the substance of that Doctrine in this important Article of Evangelical Truth which we plead for is plainly and fully expressed And I have chosen the rather thus to express it because it is that Thesis wherein the Learned Davenant laid down that common Doctrine of the Reformed Churches whose defence he undertook This is the shield of Truth in the whole cause of Justification which whilst it is preserved safe we need not trouble our selves about the Differences that are among Learned men about the most proper stating and declaration of some lesser concernments of it This is the Refuge the only Refuge of distressed Consciences wherein they may find Rest and Peace For the confirmation of this Assertion I shall do these three things 1 Reflect on what is needful unto the Explanation of it 2 Answer the most important general Objections against it 3 Prove the Truth of it by Arguments and Testimonies of the holy Scripture As to the first of these or what is necessary unto the Explanation of this Assertion it hath been sufficiently spoken unto in our foregoing Discourses The Heads of some things only shall at present be called over 1. The Foundation of the Imputation asserted is Union Hereof there are many Grounds and Causes as hath been declared But that which we have immediate respect unto as the Foundation of this Imputation is that whereby the Lord Christ and Believers do actually coalesce into one mystical Person This is by the Holy Spirit inhabiting in him as the Head of the Church in all fulness and in all Believers according to their measure whereby they became members of his mystical Body That there is such an Union between Christ and Believers is the Faith of the Catholick Church and hath been so in all Ages Those who seem in our days to deny it or question it either know not what they say or their minds are influenced by their Doctrine who deny the Divine Persons of the Son and of the Spirit Upon supposition of this Vnion Reason will grant the Imputation pleaded for to be reasonable at least that there is such a peculiar Ground for it as is not to be exemplified in any things natural or political among men 2. The Nature of Imputation hath been fully spoken unto before and thereunto I refer the Reader for the understanding of what is intended thereby 3. That which is imputed is the Righteousness of Christ and briefly I understand hereby his whole Obedience unto God in all that he did and suffered for the Church This I say is imputed unto Believers so as to become their only Righteousness before God unto the Justification of Life If beyond these things any Expressions have been made use of in the Explanation of this Truth which have given occasion unto any Differences or Contests although they may be true and defensible against Objections yet shall not I concern my self in them The substance of the Truth as laid down is that whose Defence I have undertaken and where that is granted or consented unto I will not contend with any about their way and methods of its Declaration nor defend the Terms and Expressions that have by any been made use of therein For instance Some have said that what Christ did and suffered is so imputed unto us as that we are judged and esteemed in the sight of God to have done or suffered our selves in him This I shall not concern my self in For although it may have a sound sense given unto it and is used by some of the Antients yet because offence is taken at it and the substance of the Truth we plead for is better otherwise expressed it ought not to be contended about For we do not say that God judgeth or esteemeth that we did and suffered in our own persons what Christ did and suffered but only that he did it and suffered it in our stead Hereon God makes a Grant and Donation of it unto Believers upon their Believing unto their Justification before him And the like may be said of many other Expressions of the like nature These things being premised I proceed unto the consideration of the general objections that are urged against the Imputation we plead for And I shall insist only on some of the principal of them and whereinto all others may be resolved for it were endless to go over all that any mans Invention can suggest unto him of this kind And some general considerations we must take along with us herein As 1. The Doctrine of Justification is a part yea an eminent part of the mystery of the Gospel It is no marvel therefore if it be not so exposed unto the common notions of Reason as some would have it to be There is more required unto the true spiritual understanding of such mysteries yea unless we intend to renounce the Gospel it must be asserted that Reason as it is corrupted and the mind of man destitute of Divine supernatural Revelation do dislike every such Truth and rise up in Enmity against it So the Scripture directly affirms Rom. 8.7 1 Cor. 2.14 2. Hence are the Minds and Inventions of men wonderful fertile in coyning Objections against Evangelical Truths and raising cavils against them Seldom to this purpose do they want an endless number of sophistical Objections which because they know no better they themselves judge insoluble For carnal Reason being once set at liberty under the false notion of Truth to act it self freely and boldly against spiritual mysteries is subtile in its arguings and pregnant in its Invention of them How endless for instance are the Sophisms of the Socinians against the Doctrine of the Trinity and how do they triumph in them as unanswerable Under the shelter of them they despise the force of the most evident Testimonies of the Scripture and those multiplied on all occasions In like manner they deal with the Doctrine of the satisfaction of Christ as the Pelagians of old did with that of his Grace Wherefore he that will be startled at the Appearance of subtile or plausible Objections against any Gospel mysteries that are plainly revealed and sufficiently attested in the Scripture is not likely to come unto much stability in his Profession of them 3. The most of the
became him to fulfil all Righteousness Whereas therefore he was neither made Man nor of the Posterity of Abraham for himself but for the Church namely to become thereby the Surety of the Covenant and Representative of the whole his obedience as a Man unto the Law in general and as a Son of Abraham unto the Law of Moses was for us and not for himself so designed so performed and without a respect unto the Church was of no use unto himself He was born to us and given to us lived for us and died for us obeyed for us and suffered for us that by the obedience of one many might be made Righteous This was the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and this is the Faith of the Catholick Church And what he did for us is imputed unto us This is included in the very notion of his doing it for us which cannot be spoken in any sense unless that which he so did be imputed unto us And I think Men ought to be wary that they do not by distinctions and studied evasions for the defence of their own private opinions shake the Foundations of Christian Religion And I am sure it will be easier for them as it is in the Proverb To wrest the Club out of the hand of Hercules then to dispossess the minds of true Believers of this perswasion That what the Lord Christ did in Obedience unto God according unto the Law he designed in his Love and Grace to do it for them He needed no Obedience for himself he came not into a capacity of yielding Obedience for himself but for us and therefore for us it was that he fulfilled the Law in Obedience unto God according unto the terms of it The Obligation that was on him unto Obedience was originally no less for us no less needful unto us no more for himself no more necessary unto him then the obligation that was on him as the Surety of the Covenant to suffer the penalty of the Law was either the one or the other 3. Setting aside the consideration of the Grace and Love of Christ and the compact between the Father and the Son as unto his undertaking for us which undeniably proves all that he did in the pursuit of them to be done for us and not for himself I say setting aside the consideration of these things and the Humane Nature of Christ by virtue of its union with the Person of the Son of God had a right unto and might have immediately been admitted into the highest Glory whereof it was capable without any antecedent Obedience unto the Law And this is apparent from hence In that from the first instant of that Vnion the whole Person of Christ with our Nature existing therein was the object of all Divine worship from Angels and Men wherein consists the highest Exaltation of that Nature It is true there was a peculiar Glory that he was actually to be made Partaker of with respect unto his antecedent Obedience and Suffering Phil. 2.8 9. The Actual Possession of this Glory was in the Ordination of God to be consequential unto his obeying and suffering not for himself but for us But as unto the right and capacity of the Humane Nature in it self all the Glory whereof it was capable was due unto it from the instant of its union For it was therein exalted above the condition that any Creature is capable of by meer Creation And it is but a Socinian fiction that the first Foundation of the Divine Glory of Christ was laid in his Obedience which was only the way of his Actual Possession of that part of his Glory which consists in his Mediatory Power and Authority over all The Real Foundation of the whole was laid in the Vnion of his Person whence he prays that the Father would glorifie him as unto manifestation with that Glory which he had with him before the World was I will grant that the Lord Christ was Viator whilest he was in this World and not absolutely Possessor yet I say withal he was so not that any such condition was necessary unto him for himself but he took it upon him by especial Dispensation for us And therefore the Obedience he performed in that condition was for us and not for himself 4. It is granted therefore that the Humane Nature of Christ was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle affirms That which was made of a Woman was made under the Law Hereby Obedience became necessary unto him as he was and whilest he was Viator But this being by especial Dispensation intimated in the expression of it He was made under the Law namely as he was made of a Woman by especial Dispensation and Condescension expressed Phil. 2.6 7 8. The Obedience he yielded thereon was for us and not for himself And this is evident from hence For he was so made under the Law as that not only he owed Obedience unto the Precepts of it but he was made obnoxious unto its Curse But I suppose it will not be said that he was so for himself and therefore not for us We owed Obedience unto the Law and were obnoxious unto the Curse of it or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Obedience was required of us and was as necessary unto us if we would enter into life as the answering of the Curse for us was if we would escape Death eternal Christ as our Surety is made under the Law for us whereby he becomes liable and obliged unto the Obedience which the Law required and unto the penalty that it threatned Who shall now dare to say that he underwent the Penalty of the Law for us indeed but he yielded Obedience unto it for himself only The whole Harmony of the Work of his Mediation would be disordered by such a supposition Judah the Son of Jacob undertook to be a Bondman instead of Benjamine his Brother that he might go free Gen. 44.33 There is no doubt but Joseph might have accepted of the stipulation Had he done so the service and bondage he undertook had been necessary unto Judah and righteous for him to bear howbeit he had undergone it and performed his duty in it not for himself but for his Brother Benjamine and unto Benjamine it would have been imputed in his liberty So when the Apostle Paul wrote those words unto Philemon concerning Onesimus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vers. 18. If he hath wronged thee dealt unrighteously or injuriously with thee or oweth thee ought wherein thou hast suffered loss by him put it on my account or impute it all unto me I will repay it or answer for it all He supposeth that Philemon might have a double action against Onesimus the one injuriarum and the other damni or debiti of wrong and injury and of loss or debt which are distinct actions in the Law If he hath wronged thee or oweth the ought Hereon he proposeth himself and obligeth himself by his express Obligation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
sympathy in the same body seeing that being the Word of God he would take the form of a Servant and be joyned unto the common habitation of us all in the same nature took the sorrows or labours of the suffering members on him and made all their Infirmities his own and according to the Laws of humanity in the same body bare our sorrow and labour for us And the Lamb of God did not only these things for us but he underwent torments and was punished for us that which he was no ways exposed unto for himself but we were so by the multitude of our sins and thereby he became the cause of the pardon of our sins namely because he underwent Death Stripes Reproaches translating the thing which we had deserved unto himself and was made a Curse for us taking unto himself the Curse that was due to us For what was he but a substitute for us a price of Redemption for our Souls In our person therefore the Oracle speaks whilst freely uniting himself unto us and us unto himself and making our sins or passions his own I have said Lord be merciful unto me heal my Soul for I have sinned against thee That our sins were transferred unto Christ and made his that thereon he underwent the punishment that was due unto us for them and that the Ground hereof whereinto its Equity is resolved is the Vnion between him and us is fully declared in this Discourse So saith the Learned and Pathetical Author of the Homilies on Math. 5. in the works of Chrysostom Hom. 54. which is the last of them In carne sua omnem carnem suscepit crucifixus omnem carnem crucifixit in se. He speaks of the Church So they speak often others of them that he bare us that he took us with him on the Cross that we were all crucified in him as Prospher He is not saved by the Cross of Christ who is not crucified in Christ. Resp. ad cap. Gal. cap. 9. This then I say is the Foundation of the Imputation of the sins of the Church unto Christ namely that he and it are one Person the Grounds whereof we must enquire into But hereon sundry Discourses do ensue and various Enquiries are made What a Person is in what sense and how many senses that word may be used what is the true notion of it what is a natural Person what a legal civil or political Person in the Explication whereof some have fallen into mistakes And if we should enter into this Field we need not fear matter enough of debate and altercation But I must needs say that these things belong not unto our present occasion nor is the Union of Christ and the Church illustrated but obscured by them For Christ and Believers are neither one natural Person nor a legal or political Person nor any such Person as the Laws Customs or Usages of men do know or allow of They are one mystical Person whereof although there may be some imperfect Resemblances found in natural or political Unions yet the Union from whence that Denomination is taken between him and us is of that nature and ariseth from such Reasons and Causes as no Personal Vnion among men or the Vnion of many persons hath any concernment in And therefore as to the Representation of it unto our weak understandings unable to comprehend the depth of Heavenly mysteries it is compared unto Vnions of divers kinds and natures So is it represented by that of Man and Wife not unto those mutual affections which give them only a moral Vnion but from the extraction of the first Woman from the flesh and bone of the first man and the Institution of God for the Individual Society of Life thereon This the Apostle at large declares Ephes. 5.25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32. Whence he concludes that from the Union thus represented we are members of his Body of his flesh and of his bone ver 30. or have such a Relation unto him as Eve had to Adam when she was made of his flesh and bone and so was one flesh with him So also it is compared unto the Union of the Head and Members of the same natural Body 1 Cor. 12.12 and unto a political Vnion also between a Ruling or political Head and its political Members but never exclusively unto the Union of a natural Head and its Members comprized in the same Expression Ephes. 4.15 Col. 2.19 And so also unto sundry things in nature as a Vine and its Branches Joh. 15.1 2 3. And it is declared by the Relation that was between Adam and his posterity by Gods Institution and the Law of Creation Rom. 5.12 c. And the Holy Ghost by representing the Union that is between Christ and Believers by such a variety of Resemblances in things agreeing only in the common or general notion of Vnion on various Grounds doth sufficiently manifest that it is not of nor can be reduced unto any one kind of them And this will yet be made more evident by the consideration of the Causes of it and the Grounds whereinto it is resolved But whereas it would require much time and diligence to handle them at large which the mention of them here being occasional will not admit I shall only briefly refer unto the Heads of them 1. The first spring or cause of this Vnion and of all the other causes of it lieth in that eternal compact that was between the Father and the Son concerning the Recovery and Salvation of fallen mankind Herein among other things as the effects thereof the Assumption of our nature the foundation of this Union was designed The nature and terms of this Compact Counsel and Agreement I have declared elsewhere and therefore must not here again insist upon it But the Relation between Christ and the Church proceeding from hence and so being an effect of infinite Wisdom in the Counsel of the Father and Son to be made effectual by the Holy Spirit must be distinguished from all other Vnions or Relations whatever 2. The Lord Christ as unto the nature which he was to assume was hereon predestinated unto Grace and Glory He was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fore-ordained predestinated before the foundation of the World 1 Pet. 1.20 That is he was so as unto his Office so unto all the Grace and Glory required thereunto and consequent thereon All the Grace and Glory of the Humane Nature of Christ was an effect of free Divine preordination God chose it from all Eternity unto a participation of all which it received in time Neither can any other cause of the Glorious Exaltation of that portion of our nature be assigned 3. This Grace and Glory whereunto he was preordained was twofold 1 That which was peculiar unto himself 2 That which was to be Communicated by and through him unto the Church Of the first sort was the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Grace of Personal Vnion that single effect of Divine Wisdom whereof
or that we may be interessed in it that it may be made ours which is all we contend for And this is our actual coalescency into one mystical person with him by Faith Hereon doth the necessity of Faith originally depend And if we shall add hereunto the necessity of it likewise unto that especial Glory of God which he designs to exalt in our Justification by Christ as also unto all the ends of our Obedience unto God and the Renovation of our Natures into his Image its station is sufficiently secured against all Objections Our actual Interest in the satisfaction of Christ depends on our actual Insertion into his mystical Body by Faith according to the Appointment of God 4 thly It is yet objected That if the Righteousness of Christ be made ours we may be said to be Saviours of the World as he was or to save others as he did For he was so and did so by his Righteousness and no otherwise This Objection also is of the same nature with those foregoing a meer Sophistical Cavil For 1. The Righteousness of Christ is not transfused into us so as to be made inherently and subjectively ours as it was in him and which is necessarily required unto that effect of saving others thereby Whatever we may do or be said to do with respect unto others by virtue of any power or quality inherent in our selves we can be said to do nothing unto others or for them by virtue of that which is imputed unto us only for our own benefit That any Righteousness of ours should benefit another it is absolutely necessary that it should be wrought by our selves 2. If the Righteousness of Christ could be transfused into us and be made inherently ours yet could we not be nor be said to be the Saviours of others thereby For our nature in our individual persons is not subjectum capax or capable to receive and retain a Righteousness useful and effectual unto that end This capacity was given unto it in Christ by virtue of the Hypostatical Vnion and no otherwise The Righteousness of Christ himself as performed in the Humane Nature would not have been sufficient for the Justification and Salvation of the Church had it not been the Righteousness of his Person who is both God and Man for God redeemed his Church with his own Blood 3. This Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us as unto its ends and use hath its measure from the Will of God and his purpose in that Imputation And this is that it should be the Righteousness of them unto whom it is imputed and nothing else 4. We do not say that the Righteousness of Christ as made absolutely for the whole Church is imputed unto every Believer But his satisfaction for every one of them in particular according unto the Will of God is imputed unto them not with respect unto its general ends but according unto every ones particular Interest Every Believer hath his own Homer of this Bread of Life and all are justified by the same Righteousness The Apostle declares as we shall prove afterwards that as Adams actual sin is imputed unto us unto condemnation so is the Obedience of Christ imputed unto us to the Justification of life But Adams sin is not so imputed unto any person as that he should then and thereby be the cause of sin and condemnation unto all other persons in the World but only that he himself should become Guilty before God thereon And so is it on the other side And as we are made Guilty by Adams actual sin which is not inherent in us but only imputed unto us so are we made Righteous by the Righteousness of Christ which is not inherent in us but only imputed unto us And imputed unto us it is because himself was Righteous with it not for himself but for us It is yet said That if we insist on personal Imputation unto every Believer of what Christ did or if any Believer be personally Righteous in the very individual Acts of Christs Righteousness many Absurdities will follow But it was observed before that when any design to oppose an Opinion from the absurdities which they suppose would follow upon it they are much enclined so to state it as that at least they may seem so to do And this oftimes the most worthy and candid Persons are not free from in the heat of Disputation So I fear it is here fallen out For as unto personal Imputation I do not well understand it All Imputation is unto a person and is the Act of a person be it of what and what sort it will but from neither of them can be denominated a Personal Imputation And if an Imputation be allowed that is not unto the persons of men namely in this case unto all Believers the nature of it hath not yet been declared as I know of That any have so expressed the Imputation pleaded for That every Believer should be personally Righteous in the very individual Acts of Christs Righteousness I know not I have neither read nor heard any of them who have so expressed their mind It may be some have done so but I shall not undertake the defence of what they have done For it seems not only to suppose that Christ did every individual Act which in any instance is required of us but also that those Acts are made our own inherently both which are false and impossible That which indeed is pleaded for in this Imputation is only this That what the Lord Christ did and suffered as the Mediator and Surety of the Covenant in answer unto the Law for them and in their stead is imputed unto every one of them unto the Justification of Life And sufficient this is unto that end without any such supposals 1 From the Dignity of the Person who yielded his Obedience which rendered it both satisfactory and meritorious and imputable unto many 2 From the Nature of the Obedience it self which was a perfect compliance with a fulfilling of and satisfaction unto the whole Law in all its demands This on the supposition of that Act of Gods Soveraign Authority whereby a Representative of the whole Church was introduced to answer the Law is the Ground of his Righteousness being made theirs and being every way sufficient unto their Justification 3 From the constitution of God that what was done and suffered by Christ as a publick person and our surety should be reckoned unto us as if done by our selves So the sin of Adam whilst he was a publick Person and represented his whole Posterity is imputed unto us all as if we had committed that actual sin This Bellarmin himself frequently acknowledgeth Peccavimus in primo homine quando ille peccavit illa ejus praevaricatio nostra etiam praevaricatio fuit Non enim vere per Adami inobedientiam constitueremur peccatores nisi inobedientia illius nostra etiam inobedientia esset De Amiss Grat. Stat. Peccat lib.
the Son of God was never absolutely made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law nor could be formally obliged thereby He was indeed as the Apostle witnesseth made so in his Humane Nature wherein he performed this Obedience made of a Woman made under the Law Gal. 4.4 He was so far forth made under the Law as he was made of a Woman For in his Person he abode Lord of the Sabbath Mark 2.28 And therefore of the whole Law But the Obedience it self was the Obedience of that Person who never was nor ever could absolutely be made under the Law in his whole Person For the Divine Nature cannot be subjected unto an outward work of its own such as the Law is nor can it have an Authoritative commanding power over it as it must have if it were made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law Thus the Apostle argues That Levi paid Tithes in Abraham because he was then in his Loyns when Abraham himself paid Tithes unto Melchisedec Heb. 7. And thence he proves That he was inferior unto the Lord Christ of whom Melchisedec was a Type But may it not thereon be replied that then no less the Lord Christ was in the Loyns of Abraham then Levi For verily as the same Apostle speaks he took on him the Seed of Abraham It is true therefore that he was so in respect of his Humane Nature but as he was typed and represented by Melchisedec in his whole Person without Father without Mother without Genealogy without beginning of Days or End of Life So he was not absolutely in Abrahams Loyns and was exempted from being tithed in him Wherefore the Obedience whereof we treat being not the Obedience of the Humane Nature abstractedly however performed in and by the Humane Nature but the Obedience of the Person of the Son of God however the Humane Nature was subject to the Law in what Sense and unto what Ends shall be declared afterwards it was not for himself nor could be for himself because his whole Person was not obliged thereunto It is therefore a fond thing to compare the Obedience of Christ with that of any other Man whose whole person is under the Law For although that may not be for himself and others which yet we shall shew that in some cases it may yet this may yea must be for others and not for himself This then we must strictly hold unto If the Obedience that Christ yielded unto the Law were for himself whereas it was the Act of his Person his whole Person and the Divine Nature therein were made under the Law which cannot be For although it is acknowledged that in the Ordination of God his Exinanition was to precede his Glorious Majestical Exaltation as the Scripture witnesseth Phil. 2.9 Luk. 24.26 Rom. 14.9 yet absolutely his Glory was an immediate consequent of the Hypostatical Vnion Heb. 1.6 Matth. 2.11 Socinus I confess evades the force of this Argument by denying the Divine Person of Christ. But in this Disputation I take that for granted as having proved it elswhere beyond what any of his followers are able to contradict And if we may not build on Truths by him denied we shall scarce have any one principle of Evangelical Truth left us to prove any thing from However I intend them only at present who concur with him in the matter under debate but renounce his opinion concerning the Person of Christ. 2. As our Lord Jesus Christ owed not in his own Person this Obedience for himself by vertue of any Authority or Power that the Law had over him so he designed and intended it not for himself but for us This added unto the former consideration gives full evidence unto the Truth pleaded for For if he was not obliged unto it for himself his Person that yielded it not being under the Law and if he intended it not for himself then it must be for us or be useless It was in our Humane Nature that he performed all this Obedience Now the susception of our Nature was a voluntary Act of his own with reference unto some end and purpose and that which was the end of the Assumption of our Nature was in like manner the End of all that he did therein Now it was for us and not for himself that he assumed our nature nor was any thing added unto him thereby Wherefore in the issue of his Work he proposeth this only unto himself That he may be glorified with that Glory which he had with the Father before the World was by the removal of that veil which was put upon it in his Exinanition But that it was for us That he assumed our nature is the foundation of Christian Religion as it is asserted by the Apostle Heb. 2.14 Phil. 2.5 6 7 8. Some of the Antient Schoolmen disputed That the Son of God should have been incarnate although Man had not sinned and fallen The same opinion was fiercely pursued by Osiander as I have elswhere declared but none of them once imagined that he should have been so made Man as to be made under the Law and be obliged thereby unto that Obedience which now he hath performed But they judged that immediately he was to have been a Glorious Head unto the whole Creation For it is a common notion and presumption of all Christians but only such as will sacrifice such notions unto their own private conceptions That the Obedience which Christ yielded unto the Law on the Earth in the state and condition wherein he yielded it was not for himself but for the Church which was obliged unto perfect Obedience but was not able to accomplish it That this was his sole End and Design in it is a Fundamental Article if I mistake not of the Creed of most Christians in the World and to deny it doth consequentially overthrow all the Grace and Love both of the Father and Son in his Mediation It is said That this Obedience was necessary as a Qualification of his Person that he might be meet to be a Mediator for us and therefore was for himself It belongs unto the necessary constitution of his Person with respect unto his Mediatory Work But this I positively deny The Lord Christ was every way meet for the whole Work of Mediation by the ineffable union of the Humane Nature with the Divine which exalted it in Dignity Honor and Worth above any thing or all things that insued thereon For hereby he became in his whole Person the object of all Divine Worship and Honor for when he brings the first begotten into the World he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Again That which is an effect of the Person of the Mediator as constituted such is not a qualification necessary unto its constitution that is what he did as Mediator did not concur to the making of him meet so to be But of this Nature was all the Obedience which he yielded unto the Law for as such It
THE DOCTRINE OF Justification by Faith Through the IMPUTATION OF THE Righteousness of Christ EXPLAINED CONFIRMED VINDICATED By JOHN OWEN D.D. Search the Scriptures Joh. 5.39 LONDON Printed for R. Boulter at the Turks-head over against the Royal-Exchange in Corn-hill 1677. TO THE READER I Shall not need to detain the Reader with an Account of the nature and moment of that Doctrine which is the entire subject of the ensuing Discourse For although sundry Persons even among our selves have various Apprehensions concerning it yet that the knowledge of the Truth therein is of the highest Importance unto the Souls of men is on all hands agreed unto Nor indeed is it possible that any man who knows himself to be a sinner and obnoxious thereon to the Judgment of God but he must desire to have some knowledge of it as that alone whereby the way of delivery from the evil state and condition wherein he finds himself is revealed There are I confess multitudes in the World who although they cannot avoid some general Convictions of sin as also of the Consequents of it yet do fortifie their minds against a practical Admission of such Conclusions as in a just consideration of things do necessarily and unavoidably ensue thereon Such Persons wilfully deluding themselves with vain hopes and imaginations do never once seriously enquire by what way or means they may obtain peace with God and Acceptance before him which in comparison of the present enjoyment of the pleasures of sin they value not at all And it is in vain to recommend the Doctrine of Justification unto them who neither desire nor endeavour to be justified But where any Persons are really made sensible of their Apostasie from God of the evil of their natures and lives with the dreadful consequences that attend thereon in the wrath of God and eternal punishment due unto sin they cannot well judge themselves more concerned in any thing than in the knowledge of that divine way whereby they may be delivered from this condition And the minds of such Persons stand in no need of Arguments to satisfie them in the Importance of this Doctrine their own concernment in it is sufficient to that purpose And I shall assure them that in the handling of it from first to last I have had no other design but only to enquire diligently into the divine Revelation of that way and those means with the causes of them whereby the Conscience of a distressed sinner may attain assured peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. I lay more weight on the steady Direction of one Soul in this enquiry than in disappointing the Objections of twenty wrangling or fiery Disputers The Question therefore unto this purpose being stated as the Reader will find in the beginning of our Discourse although it were necessary to spend some time in the Explication of the Doctrine it self and the terms wherein it is usually taught yet the main weight of the whole lies in the Interpretation of Scripture Testimonies with the Application of them unto the experience of them who do believe and the state of them who seek after Salvation by Jesus Christ. There are therefore some few things that I would desire the Reader to take notice of that he may receive benefit by the ensuing Discourse at least if it be not his own fault be freed from prejudices against it or a vain opposition unto it 1. Although there are at present various contests about the Doctrine of Justification and many Books published in the way of controversie about it yet this Discourse was written with no design to contend with or contradict any of what sort or opinion soever Some few passages which seem of that tendency are indeed occasionally inserted But they are such as every candid Reader will judge to have been necessary I have ascribed no Opinion unto any particular Person much less wrested the words of any reflected on their Persons censured their Abilities taken advantages of presumed prejudices against them represented their Opinions in the deformed Reflections of strained Consequences fancied intended notions which their words do not express nor candidly interpreted give any countenance unto or endeavoured the vain pleasure of seeming success in opposition unto them which with the like effects of weakness of mind and disorder of affections are the animating principles of many late controversial Writings To declare and vindicate the Truth unto the Instruction and Edification of such as love it in sincerity to extricate their minds from those difficulties in this particular Instance which some endeavour to cast on all Gospel mysteries to direct the Consciences of them that enquire after abiding Peace with God and to establish the minds of them that do believe are the things I have aimed at And an Endeavour unto this end considering all circumstances that station which God hath been pleased graciously to give me in the Church hath made necessary unto me 2. I have written nothing but what I believe to be true and useful unto the promotion of Gospel Obedience The Reader may not here expect an extraction of other mens notions or a collection and improvement of their Arguments either by artificial Reasonings or ornament of Style and Language but a naked enquiry into the nature of the things treated on as revealed in the Scripture and as evidencing themselves in their power and efficacy on the minds of them that do believe It is the practical direction of the Consciences of men in their application unto God by Jesus Christ for deliverance from the Curse due unto the Apostate state and Peace with him with the influence of the way thereof into universal Gospel Obedience that is alone to be designed in the handling of this Doctrine And therefore unto him that would treat of it in a due manner it is required that he weigh every thing he asserts in his own mind and experience and not dare to propose that unto others which he doth not abide by himself in the most intimate recesses of his mind under his nearest approaches unto God in his suprisals with Dangers in deep Afflictions in his preparations for death and most humble Contemplations of the infinite distance between God and him Other Notions and Disputations about the Doctrine of Justification not seasoned with these ingredients however condited unto the palate of some by skill and language are insipid and useless immediately degenerating into an unprofitable strife of words 3. I know that the Doctrine here pleaded for is charged by many with an unfriendly aspect towards the necessity of personal Holiness Good Works and all Gospel Obedience in general yea utterly to take it away So it was at the first clear Revelation of it by the Apostle Paul as he frequently declares But it is sufficiently evinced by him to be the chief principle of and motive unto all that Obedience which is accepted with God through Jesus Christ as we shall manifest afterwards However it is
3.9 2 Cor. 4.6 The nature of Faith thence declared Faith alone ascribes and gives this glory to God Order of the Acts of Faith or the method in believing Convictions previous thereunto Sincere assent unto all Divine Revelations Acts 26.27 The Proposal of the Gospel unto that end Rom. 10.11 12 13 c. 2 Cor. 3.18 State of Persons called to believe Justifying Faith doth not consist in any one single habit or act of the Mind or Will The nature of that assent which is the first Act of Faith Approbation of the Way of Salvation by Christ comprehensive of the special nature of justifying Faith What is included therein 1. A Renuntiation of all other ways Hos. 14.2 3. Jer. 3.23 Psal. 7.16 Rom. 10.3 2. Consent of the Will unto this Way Joh. 14.6 3. Acquiescency of the Heart in God 1 Pet. 1.21 Trust in God Faith described by Trust the Reason of it Nature and Object of this Trust inquired into A double consideration of special Mercy Whether Obedience be included in the nature of Faith or be of the essence of it A sincere purpose of Vniversal Obedience inseparable from Faith How Faith alone justifieth Repentance how required in and unto Justification How a condition of the New Covenant Perseverance in Obedience is so also Definitions of Faith Pag. 125. CHAP. III. Vse of Faith in Justification various Conceptions about it By whom asserted as the Instrument of it by whom denied In what sense it is affirmed so to be The expressions of the Scripture concerning the use of Faith in Justification what they are and how they are best explained By an Instrumental Cause Faith how the Instrument of God in Justification How the Instrument of them that do believe The use of Faith expressed in the Scripture by apprehending receiving declared by an Instrument Faith in what sense the condition of our Justification Signification of that Term whence to be Learned Pag. 146. CHAP. IV. The proper sense of these words Justification and to justifie considered Necessity thereof Latine derivation of Justification Some of the Antients deceived by it From Jus and Justum Justus filius who The Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vse and signification of it Places where it is used examined 2 Sam. 15.4 Deut. 21.5 Prov. 17.15 Isa. 5.23 Chap. 50.8 1 King 8.31 32. 2 Chro. 6.22 23. Psal. 82.3 Exod. 23.7 Isa. 53.11 Jere. 44.16 Dan. 12.3 The constant sense of the word evinced 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vse of it in other Authors to punish What it is in the New Testament Matth. 11.19 Chap. 12.37 Luk. 7.29 Chap. 10.29 Chap. 16.15 Chap. 18.14 Acts 13.38 39. Rom. 2.13 Chap. 3.4 Constantly used in a forensick sense Places seeming dubious vindicated Rom. 8.30 1 Cor. 6.11 Tit. 3.5 6 7. Revel 22.11 How often these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are used in the New Testament Constant sense of this The same evinced from what is opposed unto it Isa. 50.8 Prov. 17.15 Rom. 5.16 18. Rom. 8.33 34. And the Declaration of it in Terms equivalent Rom. 4.6 7. Rom. 5.9 10. 2 Cor. 5.20 21. Matth. 1.21 Acts 13.39 Gal. 2.16 c. Justification in the Scripture proposed under a Juridical Scheam and of a forensick Title The Parts and Progress of it Instances from the whole Pag. 169. c. CHAP. V. Distinction of a First and Second Justification The whole Doctrine of the Roman Church concerning Justification grounded on this Distinction The First Justification the nature and causes of it according unto the Romanists The Second Justification what it is in their sense Solution of the seeming Difference between Paul and James falsly pretended by this Distinction The same Distinction received by the Socinians and others The latter termed by some the continuation of our Justification The Distinction disproved Justification considered either as unto its Essence or its Manifestation The Manifestation of it twofold initial and final Initial is either unto our selves or others No Second Justification hence insues Justification before God Legal and Evangelical Their distinct natures The Distinction mentioned derogatory to the Merit of Christ. More in it ascribed unto our selves then unto the Blood of Christ in our Justification The vanity of Disputations to this purpose All true Justification everthrown by this Distinction No countenance given unto this Justification in the Scripture The Second Justification not intended by the Apostle James Evil of Arbitrary Distinctions Our First Justification so described in the Scripture as to leave no room for a Second Of the Continuation of our Justification Whether it depend on Faith alone or our Personal Righteousness inquired Justification at once compleated in all Causes and Effects of it proved at large Believers upon their Justification obliged unto perfect Obedience The commanding Power of the Law constitutes the nature of Sin in them who are not obnoxious unto its curse Future Sins in what sense remitted at our First Justification The Continuation of Actual Pardon and thereby of a justified Estate on what it doth depend Continuation of Justification the act of God whereon it depends in that sense On our part it depends on Faith alone Nothing required hereunto but the Application of Righteousness imputed The Continuation of our Justification is before God That whereon the Continuation of our Justification depends pleadable before God This not our Personal Obedience proved 1. By the experience of all Believers 2. Testimonies of Scripture 3. Examples The Distinction mentioned rejected Pag. 189. CHAP. VI. Evangelical Personal Righteousness the nature and use of it Whether there be an Evangelical Justification on our Evangelical Righteousness inquired into How this is by some affirmed and applauded Evangelical Personal Righteousness asserted as the condition of our Legal Righteousness or the Pardon of Sin Opinion of the Socinians Personal Righteousness required in the Gospel Believers hence denominated Righteous Not with respect unto Righteousness habitual but actual only Inherent Righteousness the same with Sanctification or Holiness In what sense we may be said to be justified by Inherent Righteousness No Evangelical Justification on our Personal Righteousness The Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ doth not depend thereon None have this Righteousness but they are untecedently justified A charge before God in all Justification before God The Instrument of this charge the Law or the Gospel From neither of them can we be justified by this Personal Righteousness The Justification pretended needless and useless It hath not the nature of any Justification mentioned in the Scripture but is contrary to all that is so called Other Arguments to the same purpose Sentential Justification at the last day Nature of the last Judgment Who shall be then justified A Declaration of Righteousness and an Actual Admission unto Glory the whole of Justification at the last day The Argument that we are justified in this life in the same manner and on the same Grounds as we shall be judged at the last day
Rule of all Inherent Moral or Spiritual Obedience What are the Works of the Law declared from the Scripture and the Argument thereby confirmed The nature of Justifying Faith further declared Pag. 400. CHAP. XV. Of Faith alone CHAP. XVI Testimonies of Scripture confirming the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Rightesness of Christ. Jere. 23.6 Explained and vindicated Pag. 419. CHAP. XVII Testimonies out of the Evangelists considered Design of our Saviours Sermon on the Mount The purity and penalty of the Law vindicated by him Arguments from thence Luk. 18.9 10 11 12 13. The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican explained and applied to the present Argument Testimonies out of the Gospel by John Chap. 3.14 15 16 17 18 c. Pag. 425. CHAP. XVIII Testimonies out of the Epistles of Paul the Apostle His design in the Fifth Chapter to the Romans That Design explained at large and applied to the present Argument Chap. 3.24 25 26. explained and the true sense of the words vindicated The Causes of Justification enumerated Apostolical Inferences from the consideration of them Chap. 4. Design of the Disputation of the Apostle therein Analysis of his Discourse Ver. 4 5. particularly insisted on their true sense vindicated What Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham Who it is that worketh not In what sense the ungodly are justified All Men ungodly antecedently unto their Justification Faith alone the means of Justification on our part Faith it self absolutely considered not the Righteousness that is imputed unto us Proved by sundry Arguments Pag. 431. Chap. 5. Ver. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18. Boasting excluded in our selves asserted in God The design and sum of the Apostles Argument Objection of Socinus removed Comparison between the two Adams and those that derive from them Sin entered into the World What Sin intended Death what it compriseth What intended by it The sense of those words in as much or in whom all have sinned cleared and vindicated The various oppositions used by the Apostle in this Discourse Principally between Sin or the Fall and the Free Gift Between the disobedience of the one and the obedience of another Judgment on the one hand and Justification unto Life on the other The whole Context at large explained and the Argument for Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ fully confirmed P. 464. Chap. 10. V. 3 4. explained and insisted on to the same purpose Pag. 489. 1 Cor. 1.30 Christ how of God made Righteousness unto us Answer of Bellarmine unto this Testimony removed That of Socinus disproved True sense of the words evinced P. 497. 2 Cor. 5.21 In what sense Christ knew no sin Emphasis in that expression How he was made Sin for us By the Imputation of Sin unto him Mistakes of some about this expression Sense of the Antients Exception of Bellarmine unto this Testimony answered with other Reasonings of his to the same purpose P. 502. The Exceptions of others also removed Gal. 2.16 Pag. 513. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Ephes. 2.8 9 10. Evidence of this Testemony Design of the Apostle from the beginning of the Chapter Method of the Apostle in the Declaration of the Grace of God Grace alone the cause of Deliverance from a State of Sin Things to be observed in the Assignation of the Causes of Spiritual Deliverance Grace how magnified by him Force of the Argument and evidence from thence State of the Case here proposed by the Apostle General determination of it By Grace ye are saved What it is to be saved inquired into The same as to be justified but not exclusively The causes of our Justification declared Positively and Negatively The whole secured unto the Grace of God by Christ and our Interest therein through Faith alone Works excluded What Works Not Works of the Law of Moses Not Works antecedent unto believing Works of true Believers Not only in opposition to the Grace of God but to Faith in us Argument from those words Reason whereon this exclusion of Works is founded To exclude Boasting on our part Boasting wherein it consists Inseparable from the Interest of Works in Justification Danger of it Confirmation of this Reason obviating an Objection The Objection stated If we be not justified by Works of what use are they answered Pag. 516. Phil. 3.8 9. Heads of Argument from this Testimony Design of the Context Righteousness the Foundation of Acceptance with God A twofold Righteousness considered by the Apostle Oppossite unto one another as unto the especial end inquired after Which of these he adhered unto his own Righteousness or the Righteousness of God declared by the Apostle with vehemency of speech Reasons of his earnestness herein The turning point whereon he left Judaism The opposition made unto this Doctrine by the Jews The weight of the Doctrine and unwillingness of Men to receive it His own sense of Sin and Grace Peculiar expressions used in this place for the Reasons mentioned concerning Christ. Concerning all things that are our own The choice to be made on the Case stated whether we will adhere unto our own Righteousness or that of Christs which are inconsistent as to the end of Justification Argument from this place Exceptions unto this Testimony and Argument from thence removed Our Personal Righteousness Inherent the same with respect unto the Law and Gospel External Righteousness only required by the Law an impious Imagination Works wrought before Faith only rejected The Exception removed Righteousness before Conversion not intended by the Apostle Pag. 256. CHAP. XIX Objections against the Doctrine of Justification by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. Nature of these Objections Difficulty in discerning aright the sense of some Men in this Argument Justification by Works the end of all declension from the Righteousness of Christ. Objections against this Doctrine derived from a supposition thereof alone First principal Objection Imputed Righteousness overthrows the necessity of an holy Life This Objection as managed by them of the Church of Rome an open calumny How insisted on by some among our selves Socinus fierceness in this charge His foul dishonesty therein False charges on Mens opinions making way for the rash condemnation of their persons Iniquity of such censures The Objection rightly stated Sufficiently answered in the previous Discourses about the nature of Faith and force of Moral Law The nature and necessity of Evangelical Holiness elswhere pleaded Particular answers unto this Objection All who profess this Doctrine do not exemplifie it in their lives The most holy Truths have been abused None by whom this Doctrine is now denied exceed them in holiness by whom it was formerly professed and the power of it attested The contrary Doctrine not successful in the Reformation of the lives of Men. The best way to determine this difference The same Objection managed against the Doctrine of the Apostle in his own days Efficacious prejudices against this Doctrine in the minds of Men. The whole Doctrine of
Apprehensions who cryed Sirs What must I do to be saved 2. With respect unto this state and condition of men or men in this state and condition the enquiry is What that is upon the account whereof God pardoneth all their sins receiveth them into his favour declareth or pronounceth them Righteous and acquitted from all Guilt removes the Curse and turneth away all his wrath from them giving them Right and Title unto a blessed Immortality or life Eternal This is that alone wherein the Consciences of sinners in this estate are concerned Nor do they enquire after any thing but what they may have to oppose unto or answer the Justice of God in the commands and curse of the Law and what they may betake themselves unto for the obtaining of Acceptance with him unto life and salvation That the Apostle doth thus and no otherwise state this whole matter and in an Answer unto this Enquiry declare the nature of Justification and all the causes of it in the third and fourth Chapters of the Epistle to the Romans and elswhere shall be afterwards declared and proved And we shall also manifest that the Apostle James in the second Chapter of his Epistle doth not speak unto this Enquiry nor give an Answer unto it but it is of Justification in another sense and to another purpose whereof he treateth And whereas we cannot either safely or usefully treat of this Doctrine but with respect unto the same Ends for which it is declared and whereunto it is applied in the Scripture we should not by any pretences be turned aside from attending unto this Case and its Resolution in all our Discourses on this subject For it is the Direction Satisfaction and peace of the Consciences of men and not the curiosity of Notions or subtilty of Disputations which it is our Duty to design And therefore I shall as much as possibly I may avoid all those Philosophical Terms and Distinctions wherewith this Evangelical Doctrine hath been perplexed rather than illustrated For more weight is to be put on the steady Guidance of the Mind and Conscience of one Believer really exercised about the Foundation of his peace and acceptance with God then on the confutation of ten wrangling Disputers 3. Now the Enquiry on what account or for what Cause and Reason a man may be so acquitted or discharged of sin and accepted with God as before declared doth necessarily issue in this Whether it be any thing in our selves as our Faith and Repentance the Renovation of our Natures inherent habits of Grace and actual works of Righteousness which we have done or may do or whether it be the Obedience Righteousness Satisfaction and Merit of the Son of God our Mediator and Surety of the Covenant imputed unto us One of these it must be namely something that is our own which whatever may be the Influence of the Grace of God into it or causality of it because wrought in and by us is inherently our own in a proper sense or something which being not our own not inherent in us not wrought by us is yet imputed unto us for the pardon of our sins and the Acceptation of our Persons as righteous or the making of us Righteous in the sight of God Neither are these things capable of mixture or composition Rom. 11.6 Which of these it is the Duty Wisdome and safety of a convinced sinner to rely upon and trust unto in his Appearance before God is the sum of our present Enquiry 4. The way whereby sinners do or ought to betake themselves unto this Relief on supposition that it is the Righteousness of Christ and how they come to be partakers of or interested in that which is not inherently their own unto as good Benefit and as much Advantage as if it were their own is of a distinct consideration And as this also is clearly determined in the Scripture so it is acknowledged in the Experience of all them that do truly believe Neither are we in this matter much to regard the senses or arguings of men who were never throughly convinced of sin nor have ever in their own persons fled for Refuge unto the Hope set before them 5. These things I say are always to be attended unto in our whole Disquisition into the nature of Evangelical Justification For without a constant respect unto them we shall quickly wander into curious and perplexed Questions wherein the Consciences of guilty Sinners are not concerned and which therefore really belong not unto the substance or truth of this Doctrine nor are to be immixed therewith It is alone the Relief of those who are in themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guilty before or obnoxious and liable to the Judgment of God that we enquire after That this is not any thing in or of themselves nor can so be that it is a Provision without them made in infinite Wisdom and Grace by the mediation of Christ his Obedience and Death therein is secured in the Scripture against all contradiction And it is the fundamental Principle of the Gospel Math. 11.28 6. It is confessed that many things for the Declaration of the Truth and the order of the Dispensation of Gods Grace herein are necessarily to be insisted on such are the nature of Justifying Faith the place and use of it in Justification the Causes of the new Covenant the true notion of the Mediation and Suretiship of Christ and the like which shall all of them be enquired into But beyond what tends directly unto the Guidance of the Minds and satisfaction of the Souls of Men who seek after a stable and abiding foundation of Acceptance with God we are not easily to be drawn unless we are free to lose the Benefit and Comfort of this most important Evangelical Truth in needless and unprofitable contentions And amongst many other miscarriages which men are subject unto whilst they are conversant about these things this in an especial manner is to be avoided 1. For the Doctrine of Justification is directive of Christian Practice and in no other Evangelical Truth is the whole of our Obedience more concerned For the Foundation Reasons and Motives of all our Duty towards God are contained therein Wherefore in order unto the due improvement of them ought it to be taught and not otherwise That which alone we aim or ought so to do to learn in it and by it is how we may get and maintain peace with God and so to live unto him as to be accepted with him in what we do To satisfie the Minds and Consciences of men in these things is this Doctrine to be taught Wherefore to carry it out of the understandings of ordinary Christians by speculative notions and distinctions is disserviceable unto the Faith of the Church Yea the mixing of Evangelical Revelations with Philosophical Notions hath been in sundry Ages the Poison of Religion Pretence of accuracy and artificial skill in Teaching is that which giveth countenance unto such a
but also the manner of our Participation of it or its Communication unto us from Faith to Faith the Faith of God in the Revelation and our Faith in the Acceptation of it being only here concerned is an eminent Revelation Righteousness of all things should rather seem to be from Works unto Works from the Work of Grace in us to the Works of Obedience done by us as the Papists affirm No saith the Apostle it is from Faith to Faith whereof afterwards This is the general Thesis the Apostle proposeth unto Confirmation and he seems therein to exclude from Justification every thing but the Righteousness of God and the Faith of Believers And to this purpose he considers all Persons that did or might pretend unto Righteousness or seek after it and all ways and means whereby they hoped to attain unto it or whereby it might most probably be obtained declaring the failing of all persons and the insufficiency of all means as unto them for the obtaining a Righteousness of our own before God And as unto Persons 1. He considers the Gentiles with all their notions of God their Practice in Religious Worship with their Conversation thereon And from the whole of what might be observed amongst them he concludes that they neither were nor could be justified before God but that they were all and that most deservedly obnoxious unto the sentence of Death And whatever men may discourse concerning the Justification and Salvation of any without the Revelation of the Righteousness of God by the Gospel from Faith to Faith it is expresly contradictory to his whole Discourse chap. 1. from ver 19. to the End 2. He considers the Jews who enjoyed the written Law and the Priviledges wherewith it was accompanied especially that of Circumcision which was the outward Seal of Gods Covenant And on many Considerations with many Arguments he excludes them also from any possibility of attaining Justification before God by any of the Priviledges they enjoyed or their own compliance therewithall chap. 2. And both sorts he excludes distinctly from this priviledge of Righteousness before God with this one Argument That both of them sinned openly against that which they took for the Rule of their Righteousness namely the Gentiles against the Light of Nature and the Jews against the Law whence it inevitably follows that none of them could attain unto the Righteousness of their own Rule But he proceeds farther unto that which is common to them all And 3. He proves the same against all sorts of Persons whether Jews or Gentiles from the consideration of the universal depravation of nature in them all and the horrible effects that necessarily ensue thereon in the Hearts and Lives of men chap. 3. So evidencing That as they all were so it could not fall out but that all must be shut up under sin and come short of Righteousness So from Persons he proceeds to Things or Means of Righteousness And 4. Because the Law was given of God immediately as the whole and only Rule of our Obedience unto him and the works of the Law are therefore all that is required of us these may be pleaded with some pretence as those whereby we may be justified Wherefore in particular he considers the Nature Use and End of the Law manifesting its utter insufficiency to be a means of our Justification before God chap. 3.19 20. 5. It may be yet objected That the Law and its works may be thus insufficient as it is obeyed by Vnbelievers in the state of Nature without the Aids of Grace administred in the Promise but with respect unto them who are Regenerate and do believe whose Faith and Works are accepted with God it may be otherwise To obviate this Objection he giveth an Instance in two of the most eminent Believers under the Old Testament namely Abraham and David declaring that all Works whatever were excluded in and from their Justification chap. 4. On these Principles and by this Gradation he peremptorily concludes That all and every one of the Sons of men as unto any thing that is in themselves or can be done by them or be wrought in them are guilty before God obnoxious unto Death shut up under sin and have their mouths so stopped as to be deprived of all pleas in their own excuse that they had no Righteousness wherewith to appear before God and that all the ways and means whence they expected it were insufficient unto that purpose Hereon he proceeds with his Enquiry how men may be delivered from this condition and come to be justified in the sight of God And in the Resolution hereof he makes no mention of any thing in themselves but only Faith whereby we receive the Attonement That whereby we are justified he saith is the Righteousness of God which is by the Faith of Christ Jesus or that we are justified freely by Grace through the Redemption that is in him chap. 3.22 23 24 25. And not content here with this answer unto the enquiry how lost convinced sinners may come to be justified before God namely That it is by the Righteousness of God revealed from Faith to Faith by Grace by the blood of Christ as he is set forth for a Propitiation He immediately proceeds unto a positive exclusion of every thing in and of our selves that might pretend unto an Interest herein as that which is inconsistent with the Righteousness of God as revealed in the Gospel and witnessed unto by the Law and the Prophets How contrary their Scheme of Divinity is unto this Design of the Apostle and his management of it who affirm that before the Law men were justified by Obedience unto the Light of Nature and some particular Revelations made unto them in things of their own especial private concernment and that after the giving of the Law they were so by Obedience unto God according to the Directions thereof as also that the Heathen might obtain the same benefit in compliance with the Dictates of Reason cannot be contradicted by any who have not a mind to be contentious Answerable unto this Declaration of the mind of the Holy Ghost herein by the Apostle is the constant Tenour of the Scripture speaking to the same purpose The Grace of God the Promise of Mercy the free pardon of Sin the Blood of Christ his Obedience and the Righteousness of God in him rested in and received by Faith are every where asserted as the causes and means of our Justification in opposition unto any thing in our selves so expressed as it useth to express the best of our Obedience and the utmost of our personal Righteousness Wherever mention is made of the Duties Obedience and personal Righteousness of the best of men with respect unto their Justification they are all renounced by them and they betake themselves unto Soveraign Grace and Mercy alone Some places to this purpose may be recounted The Foundation of the whole is laid in the first Promise wherein the Destruction of
Righteousness of God communicated unto us by Jesus Christ. And whereas he was opposed herein with some severity by the most learned persons of those days to countenance himself in his singularity he pretended that there were twenty different Opinions amongst the Protestants themselves about the formal cause of our Justification before God This was quickly laid hold on by them of the Roman Church and is urged as a prejudice against the whole Doctrine by Bellarmine Vasquez and others But the vanity of this pretence of his hath been sufficiently discovered and Bellarmine himself could fancy but four Opinions among them that seemed to be different from one another reckoning that of Osiander for one De Justificat lib. 2. cap. 1. But whereas he knew that the Imagination of Osiander was exploded by them all the other three that he mentions are indeed but distinct parts of the same entire Doctrine Wherefore until of late it might be truly said that the Faith and Doctrine of all Protestants was in this Article entirely the same For however they differed in the way manner and methods of its Declaration and too many private men were addicted unto Definitions and Descriptions of their own under pretence of Logical accuracy in Teaching which gave an appearance of some contradiction among them yet in this they generally agreed that it is the Righteousness of Christ and not our own on the account whereof we receive the pardon of sin acceptance with God are declared Righteous by the Gospel and have a Right and Title unto the Heavenly Inheritance Hereon I say they were generally agreed first against the Papists and afterwards against the Socinians and where this is granted I will not contend with any man about his way of declaring the Doctrine of it And that I may add it by the way we have herein the concurrence of the Fathers of the Primitive Church For although by Justification following the Etymology of the Latine word they understood the making us Righteous with internal personal Righteousness at least some of them did so as Austin in particular yet that we are pardoned and accepted with God on any other account but that of the Righteousness of Christ they believed not And whereas especially in their Controversie with the Pelagians after the rising of that Heresie they plead vehemently that we are made Righteous by the Grace of God changing our Hearts and Natures and creating in us a principle of spiritual Life and Holiness and not by the endeavours of our own free will or works performed in the strength thereof their words and expressions have been abused contrary to their Intention and Design For we wholly concur with them and subscribe unto all that they dispute about the making of us personally Righteous and holy by the effectual Grace of God against all merit of works and operations of our own free Will our Sanctification being every way as much of Grace as our Justification properly so called and that in opposition unto the common Doctrine of the Roman Church about the same matter only they call this our being made inherently and personally Righteous by Grace sometimes by the name of Justification which we do not And this is laid hold on as an Advantage by those of the Roman Church who do not concur with them in the way and manner whereby we are so made Righteous But whereas by our Justification before God we intend only that Righteousness whereon our sins are pardoned wherewith we are made Righteous in his sight or for which we are accepted as Righteous before him it will be hard to find any of them assigning of it unto any other causes then the Protestants do So it is fallen out that what they design to prove we entirely comply with them in but the way and manner whereby they prove it is made use of by the Papists unto another End which they intended not But as to the way and manner of the Declaration of this Doctrine among Protestants themselves there ever was some variety and Difference in Expressions Nor will it otherwise be whilst the Abilities and Capacities of men whether in the conceiving of things of this nature or in the expression of their conceptions are so various as they are And it is acknowledged that these Differences of late have had by some as much weight laid upon them as the substance of the Doctrine generally agreed in Hence some have composed entire Books consisting almost of nothing but impertinent Cavils at other Mens Words and Expressions But these things proceed from the weakness of some men and other vitious habits of their minds and do not belong unto the cause it self And such Persons as for me shall write as they do and fight on until they are weary Neither hath the multiplication of Questions and the curious discussion of them in the handling of this Doctrine wherein nothing ought to be diligently insisted on but what is directive of our practice been of much use unto the Truth it self though it hath not been directly opposed in them That which is of real Difference among Persons who agree in the substance of the Doctrine may be reduced unto a very few Heads As 1 There is something of this kind about the nature of Faith whereby we are justified with its proper Object in Justifying and its Use in Justification And an Instance we have herein not only of the weakness of our Intellects in the Apprehension of spiritual things but also of the remainders of confusion and disorder in our minds at least how true it is that we know only in part and prophesie only in part whilst we are in this life For whereas this Faith is an Act of our minds put forth in the way of Duty to God yet many by whom it is sincerely exercised and that continually are not agreed either in the nature or proper object of it Yet is there no doubt but that some of them who differ amongst themselves about these things have delivered their minds free from the prepossession of prejudices and notions derived from other artificial Reasonings imposed on them and do really express their own conceptions as to the best and utmost of their Experience And notwithstanding this Difference they do yet all of them please God in the exercise of Faith as it is their Duty and have that respect unto its proper Object as secures both their Justification and Salvation And if we cannot on this consideration bear with and forbear one another in our different conceptions and expressions of those conceptions about these things it is a sign we have a great mind to be contentious and that our confidences are built on very weak foundations For my part I had much rather my Lot should be found among them who do really believe with the heart unto Righteousness though they are not able to give a tolerable Definition of Faith unto others then among them who can endlesly dispute about it with seeming
may have and not be justified and if they have not a Faith of another kind they cannot be justified For Justification is no where ascribed unto it yea it is affirmed by the Apostle James That none can be justified by it 2. It may produce great Effects in the Minds Affections and Lives of Men although not one of them that are peculiar unto justifying Faith Yet such they may be as that those in whom they are wrought may be and ought in the Judgment of Charity to be looked on as true Believers 3. This is that Faith which may be alone We are justified by Faith alone But we are not justified by that Faith which can be alone Alone respects its influence into our Justification not its nature and existence And we absolutely deny that we can be justified by that Faith which can be alone that is without a principle of spiritual Life and universal Obedience operative in all the works of it as Duty doth require These things I have observed only to obviate that Calumny and Reproach which some endeavour to fix on the Doctrine of Justification by Faith only through the Mediation of Christ. For those who assert it must be Solifidians Antinomians and I know not what such as oppose or deny the necessity of universal Obedience or Good Works Most of them who manage it cannot but know in their own Consciences that this Charge is false But this is the way of handling Controversies with many They can aver any thing that seems to advantage the cause they plead to the great scandal of Religion If by Solifidians they mean those who believe that Faith alone is on our part the Means Instrument or Condition of which afterwards of our Justification all the Prophets and Apostles were so and were so taught to be by Jesus Christ as shall be proved If they mean those who affirm that the Faith whereby we are justified is alone separate or separable from a principle and the fruit of Holy Obedience they must find them out themselves we know nothing of them For we allow no Faith to be of the same kind or nature with that whereby we are justified but what virtually and radically contains in it universal Obedience as the effect is in the cause the fruit in the Root and which acts it self in all particular Duties according as by Rule and Circumstances they are made so to be Yea we allow no Faith to be justifying or to be of the same kind with it which is not its self and in its own nature a spiritually vital principle of Obedience and Good Works And if this be not sufficient to prevail with some not to seek for advantages by such shameful calumnies yet is it so with others to free their minds from any concernment in them For the especial nature of Justifying Faith which we enquire into the things whereby it is evidenced may be reduced unto these four Heads 1 The Causes of it on the part of God 2 What is in us previously required unto it 3 The proper Object of it 4 It s proper peculiar Acts and Effects Which shall be spoken unto so far as is necessary unto our present design 1. The Doctrine of the Causes of Faith as unto its first Original in the Divine Will and the way of its communication unto us is so large and so immixed with that of the way and manner of the operation of efficacious Grace in Conversion which I have handled elsewhere as that I shall not here insist upon it For as it cannot in a few words be spoken unto according unto its weight and worth so to engage into a full handling of it would too much divert us from our present Argument This I shall only say that from thence it may be uncontroulably evidenced That the Faith whereby we are justified is of an especial kind or nature wherein no other Faith which Justification is not inseparable from doth partake with it 2. Wherefore our first Enquiry is concerning what was proposed in the second place namely what is an our part in a way of Duty previously required thereunto or what is necessary to be found in us antecedaneously unto our Believing unto the Justification of Life And I say there is supposed in them in whom this Faith is wrought on whom it is bestowed and whose Duty it is to believe therewith the work of the Law in the Conviction of sin or Conviction of sin is a necessary Antecedent unto Justifying Faith Many have disputed what belongs hereunto and what effects it produceth in the mind that dispose the Soul unto the receiving of the Promise of the Gospel But whereas there are different Apprehensions about these effects or concomitants of Conviction in Compunction Humiliation Self-judging with sorrow for sin committed and the like as also about the Degrees of them as ordinarily pre-required unto Faith and Conversion unto God I shall speak very briefly unto them so far as they are inseparable from the Conviction asserted And I shall first consider this Conviction it self with what is essential thereunto and then the effects of it in conjunction with that temporary Faith before spoken of I shall do so not as unto their nature the knowledge whereof I take for granted but only as they have respect unto our Justification As to the first I say The work of Conviction in general whereby the Soul of man hath a practical understanding of the nature of sin its Guilt and the Punishment due unto it and is made sensible of his own interest therein both with respect unto sin original and actual with his own utter disability to deliver himself out of the state and condition wherein on the account of these things he findeth himself to be is that which we affirm to be antecedaneously necessary unto Justifying Faith that is in the Adult and of whose Justification the Word is the external means and instrument A Convinced sinner is only Subjectum capax Justificationis not that every one that is convinced is or must necessarily be justified There is not any such disposition or preparation of the subject by this Conviction its effects and consequents as that the form of Justification as the Papists speak or justifying Grace must necessarily ensue or be introduced thereon Nor is there any such preparation in it as that by virtue of any divine Compact or Promise a Person so convinced shall be pardoned and justified But as a man may believe with any kind of Faith that is not justifying such as that before mentioned without this Conviction so it is ordinarily previous and necessary so to be unto that Faith which is unto the Justification of Life The motive is not unto it that thereon a man shall be assuredly justified but that without it he cannot be so This I say is required in the Person to be justified in order of nature antecedaneously unto that Faith whereby we are justified which we shall prove with the ensuing
And this must diligently be considered that by our regard by Faith unto the Blood the Sacrifice the Satisfaction of Christ we take off nothing from the free Grace Favour and Love of God 3. All those wherein the Wisdom of God in the contrivance of this way of Justification and Salvation is proposed unto us Ephes. 1.7 8. In whom we have Redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins according to the Riches of his Grace wherein he hath abounded towards us in all Wisdom and Vnderstanding See chap. 3.10 11. 1 Cor. 1.24 The whole is comprized in that of the Apostle God was in Christ reconciling the World unto himself not imputing their Trespasses unto them 2 Cor. 5.19 All that is done in our Reconciliation unto God as unto the pardon of our sins and Acceptance with him unto Life was by the presence of God in his Grace Wisdom and Power in Christ designing and effecting of it Wherefore the Lord Christ proposed in the Promise of the Gospel as the Object of our Faith unto the Justification of Life is considered as the Ordinance of God unto that End Hence the Love the Grace and the Wisdom of God in the sending and giving of him are comprised in that Object and not only the Actings of God in Christ towards us but all his Actings towards the Person of Christ himself unto the same End belong thereunto So as unto his Death God set him forth to be a Propitiation Rom. 3.24 He spared him not but delivered him up for us all Rom. 8.32 And therein laid all our sins upon him Isa. 53.6 So he was raised for our Justification Rom. 4.25 And our Faith is in God who raised him from the dead Rom. 10.9 And in his Exaltation Act. 5.31 Which things compleat the record that God hath given of his Son 1 Joh. 5.10 11 12. The whole is confirmed by the Exercise of Faith in prayer which is the Souls Application of it self unto God for the participation of the Benefits of the Mediation of Christ. And it is called our Access through him unto the Father Eph. 2.18 Our coming through him unto the Throne of Grace that we may obtain Mercy and find Grace to help in time of need Heb. 4.15 16. and through him as both an High Priest and Sacrifice Heb. 10.19 20 21. So do we bow our Knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Ephes. 3.14 This answereth the Experience of all who know what it is to pray We come therein in the name of Christ by him through his Mediation unto God even the Father to be through his Grace Love and Mercy made partakers of what he hath designed and promised to communicate unto poor sinners by him And this represents the compleat Object of our Faith The due Consideration of these things will reconcile and reduce into a perfect Harmony whatever is spoken in the Scripture concerning the Object of Justifying Faith or what we are said to believe therewith For whereas this is affirmed of sundry things distinctly they can none of them be supposed to be the entire adequate Object of Faith But consider them all in their Relation unto Christ and they have all of them their proper place therein namely the Grace of God which is the Cause the pardon of sin which is the Effect and the Promises of the Gospel which are the Means of communicating the Lord Christ and the benefits of his Mediation unto us The Reader may be pleased to take notice that I do in this place not only neglect but despise the late Attempt of some to wrest all things of this nature spoken of the Person and Mediation of Christ unto the Doctrine of the Gospel exclusively unto them and that not only as what is noisome and impious in it self but as that also which hath not yet been endeavoured to be proved with any Appearance of Learning Argument or Sobriety CHAP. II. The Nature of Justifying Faith THat which we shall now enquire into is the Nature of Justifying Faith or of Faith in that Act and Exercise of it whereby we are justified or whereon Justification according unto Gods Ordination and Promise doth ensue And the Reader is desired to take along with him a supposition of those things which we have already ascribed unto it as it is sincere Faith in general as also of what is required previously thereunto as unto its especial Nature Work and Duty in our Justification For we do deny that ordinarily and according unto the method of Gods proceeding with us declared in the Scripture wherein the Rule of our Duty is prescribed that any one doth or can truly believe with Faith unto Justification in whom the Work of Conviction before described hath not been wrought All Descriptions or Definitions of Faith that have not a respect thereunto are but vain speculations And hence some do give us such Definitions of Faith as it is hard to conceive that they ever asked of themselves what they do in their Believing on Jesus Christ for Life and Salvation The Nature of Justifying Faith with respect unto that Exercise of it whereby we are justified consisteth in the Hearts Approbation of the way of Justification and Salvation of sinners by Jesus Christ proposed in the Gospel as proceeding from the Grace Wisdom and Love of God with its Acquiescency therein as unto its own Concernment and Condition There needs no more for the Explanation of this Declaration of the Nature of Faith than what we have before proved concerning its Object and what may seem wanting thereunto will be fully supplied in the ensuing Confirmation of it The Lord Christ and his Mediation as the Ordinance of God for the Recovery Life and Salvation of sinners is supposed as the Object of this Faith And they are all considered as an Effect of Wisdom Grace Authority and Love of God with all their actings in and towards the Lord Christ himself in his susception and discharge of his Office Hereunto he constantly refers all that he did and suffered with all the Benefits redounding unto the Church thereby Hence as we observed before sometimes the Grace or Love or especial Mercy of God sometimes his actings in or towards the Lord Christ himself in sending him giving him up unto Death and raising him from the dead are proposed as the Object of our Faith unto Justification But they are so always with respect unto his Obedience and the Atonement that he made for sin Neither are they so altogether absolutely considered but as proposed in the Promises of the Gospel Hence a sincere Assent unto the divine Veracity in those Promises is included in this Approbation What belongs unto the Confirmation of this Description of Faith shall be reduced unto these four Heads 1 The Declaration of its contrary or the nature of privative unbelief upon the proposal of the Gospel For these things do mutually illustrate one another 2 The Declaration of the Design and End of God in and
by the Gospel 3 The Nature of Faiths compliance with that Design or its Actings with respect thereunto 4 The Order Method and Way of Believing as declared in the Scripture 1. The Gospel is the Revelation or Declaration of that way of Justification and Salvation for sinners by Jesus Christ which God in infinite Wisdom Love and Grace hath prepared And upon a supposition of the Reception thereof it is accompanied with Precepts of Obedience and Promises of Rewards Therein the Righteousness of God that which he requires accepts and approves unto Salvation is revealed from Faith unto Faith Rom. 1.17 This is the Record of God therein that he hath given unto us Eternal Life and this Life is in his Son 1 Joh. 5.10 So Joh. 3.14 15 16 17. The Words of this Life Act. 5.20 All the Counsel of God Act. 20.27 Wherefore in the Dispensation or Preaching of the Gospel this way of Salvation is proposed unto sinners as the great Effect of divine Wisdom and Grace Vnbelief is the Rejection Neglect Non-admission or Disapprobation of it on the Terms whereon and for the Ends for which it is so proposed The Unbelief of the Pharisees upon the preparatory Preaching of John the Baptist is called the rejecting of the Counsel of God against themselves that is unto their own Ruine Luke 7.30 They would none my Counsel is an Expression to the same purpose Prov. 1.30 so is the neglecting of this great Salvation Heb. 2.3 Not giving it that Admission which the Excellency of it doth require A disallowing of Christ The Stone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet. 2.7 The Builders disapproved of as not meet for that Place and Work whereunto it was designed Act. 4.14 This is Unbelief To disapprove of Christ and the Way of Salvation by him as not answering Divine Wisdom nor suited unto the End designed So is it described by the refusing or not receiving of him all to the same purpose What is intended will be more Evident if we consider the proposal of the Gospel where it issued in Vnbelief in the first preaching of it and where it continueth still so to do 1. Most of those who rejected the Gospel by their Vnbelief did it under this notion that the way of Salvation and Blessedness proposed therein was not a way answering Divine Goodness and Power such as they might safely Confide in and Trust unto This the Apostle declares at large 1 Cor. 1. so he expresseth it ver 23 24. We Preach Christ crucified unto the Jews a stumbling block and unto the Greeks foolishness But unto them that are called both Jews and Greeks Christ the Power of God and the Wisdom of God That which they declared unto them in the preaching of the Gospel was That Christ died for our sins according to the Scripture chap. 15.3 Herein they proposed him as the Ordinance of God as the great effect of his Wisdom and Power for the Salvation of sinners But as unto those who continued in their Vnbelief they rejected it as any such way esteeming it both Weakness and Folly And therefore he describeth the Faith of them that are called by their Approbation of the Wisdom and Power of God herein The want of a comprehension of the Glory of God in this way of Salvation rejecting it thereon is that Unbelief which ruines the Souls of men 2 Cor. 4.3 4. So is it with all that continue Vnbelievers under the proposal of the Object of Faith in the Preaching of the Gospel They may give an Assent unto the Truth of it so far as it is a meer Act of the mind at least they find not themselves concerned to reject it Yea they may Assent unto it with that Temporary Faith which we described before and perform many Duties of Religion thereon Yet do they manifest that they are not sincere Believers that they do not believe with the Heart unto Righteousness by many things that are irreconcileable unto and inconsistent with Justifying Faith The Enquiry therefore is wherein the Vnbelief of such persons on the Account whereof they perish doth consist and what is the formal nature of it It is not as was said in the want of an Assent unto the Truths of the Doctrine of the Gospel for from such an Assent are they said in many places of the Scripture to believe as hath been proved And this Assent may be so firm and by various means so radicated in their minds as that in Testimony unto it they may give their Bodies to be burned as men also may do in the confirmation of a false perswasion Nor is it the want of an especial fiduciary Application of the Promises of the Gospel unto themselves and the belief of the pardon of their own sins in particular For this is not proposed unto them in the first preaching of the Gospel as that which they are first to believe and there may be a believing unto Righteousness where this is not attained Isa. 50.10 This will evidence Faith not to be true but it is not formal unbelief Nor is it the want of Obedience unto the precepts of the Gospel in Duties of Holiness and Righteousness For these commands as formally given in and by the Gospel belong only unto them that truly believe and are justified thereon That therefore which is required unto Evangelical Faith wherein the nature of it doth consist as it is the foundation of all future Obedience is the Hearts Approbation of the way of Life and Salvation by Jesus Christ proposed unto it as the Effect of the infinite Wisdom Love Grace and Goodness of God and as that which is suited unto all the wants and whole design of Guilty Convinced sinners This such Persons have not and in the want thereof consists the formal Nature of Vnbelief For without this no man is or can be influenced by the Gospel unto a Relinquishment of sin or encouraged unto Obedience whatever they may do on other grounds and motives that are forraign unto the Grace of it And wherever this Cordial sincere Approbation of the way of Salvation by Jesus Christ proposed in the Gospel doth prevail it will infallibly produce both Repentance and Obedience If the Mind and Heart of a Convinced sinner for of such alone we treat be able spiritually to discern the Wisdom Love and Grace of God in this way of Salvation and be under the power of that perswasion he hath the ground of Repentance and Obedience which is given by the Gospel The receiving of Christ mentioned in the Scripture and whereby the Nature of Faith in its exercise is expressed I refer unto the latter part of the Description given concerning the Souls Acquiescency in God by the way proposed Again Some there were at first and such still continue to be who rejected not this way absolutely and in the notion of it but comparatively as reduced to practice and so perished in their unbelief They judged the way of their own Righteousness to be better as
that which might be more safely trusted unto as more according unto the mind of God and unto his Glory So did the Jews generally the frame of whose minds the Apostle represents Rom. 10.3 4. And many of them assented unto the Doctrine of the Gospel in general as true howbeit they liked it not in their Hearts as the best way of Justification and Salvation but sought for them by the works of the Law Wherefore Vnbelief in its formal nature consists in the want of a spiritual discerning and Approbation of the way of salvation by Jesus Christ as an Effect of the infinite Wisdom Goodness and Love of God For where these are the Soul of a convinced sinner cannot but embrace it and adhere unto it Hence also all Acquiescency in this Way and Trust and Confidence in committing the Soul unto it or unto God in it and by it without which whatever is pretended of Believing is but a shadow of Faith is impossible unto such persons For they want the foundation whereon alone they can be built And the consideration hereof doth sufficiently manifest wherein the nature of true Evangelical Faith doth consist 2. The Design of God in and by the Gospel with the Work and Office of Faith with respect thereunto farther confirms the Description given of it That which God designeth herein in the first place is not the Justification and Salvation of sinners His utmost compleat End in all his Counsels is his own Glory he doth all things for himself nor can he who is infinite do otherwise But in an especial manner he expresseth this concerning this way of Salvation by Jesus Christ. Particularly He designed herein the Glory of his Righteousness To declare his Righteousness Rom. 3.25 Of his Love God so loved the world Joh. 3.16 Herein we perceive the Love of God that he laid down his life for us 1 Joh. 3.16 Of his Grace accepted to the praise of the Glory of his Grace Ephes. 1.5 6. Of his Wisdom Christ Crucified the Wisdom of God 1 Cor. 1.24 might be known by the Church the manifold wisdom of God Ephes. 3.10 Of his Power It is the Power of God unto Salvation Rom. 1.16 Of his Faithfulness Rom. 4.16 For God designed herein not only the Reparation of all that Glory whose Declaration was impeached and obscured by the Entrance of sin but also a farther Exaltation and more eminent Manifestation of it as unto the Degrees of its Exaltation and some especial Instances before concealed Ephes. 3.9 And all this is called the Glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ whereof Faith is the beholding 2 Cor. 4.6 3. This being the principal Design of God in the way of Justification and Salvation by Christ proposed in the Gospel that which on our part is required unto a participation of the Benefits of it is the Ascription of that Glory unto God which he designs so to Exalt The Acknowledgment of all these glorious properties of the Divine Nature as manifested in the provision and proposition of this way of life Righteousness and Salvation with an Approbation of the way it self as an effect of them and that which is safely to be trusted unto is that which is required of us and this is Faith or Believing Being strong in Faith he gave Glory to God Rom. 4.22 And this is in the nature of the weakest degree of sincere Faith And no other Grace Work or Duty is suited hereunto or firstly and directly of that tendency but only consequentially and in the way of Gratitude And although I cannot wholly Assent unto him who affirms that Faith in the Epistles of Paul is nothing but Existimatio magnifice sentiens de Dei Potentia Justitia Bonitate si quid promiserit in eo praestando constantia because it is too general and not limited unto the way of Salvation by Christ his Elect in whom he will be glorified yet hath it much of the Nature of Faith in it Wherefore I say that hence we may both learn the Nature of Faith and whence it is that Faith alone is required unto our Justification The Reason of it is because this is that Grace or Duty alone whereby we do or can give unto God that Glory which he designeth to manifest and exalt in and by Jesus Christ. This only Faith is suited unto and this it is to believe Faith in the sense we enquire after is the Hearts Approbation of and consent unto the way of Life and Salvation of sinners by Jesus Christ as that wherein the Glory of the Righteousness Wisdom Grace Love and Mercy of God is exalted the praise whereof it ascribes unto him and resteth in it as unto the Ends of it namely Justification Life and Salvation It is to give Glory to God Rom. 4.20 to behold his Glory as in a Glass or the Gospel wherein it is represented unto us 2 Cor. 3.18 To have in our Hearts the Light of the Knowledge of the Glory of God in the Face of Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 4.6 The contrary whereunto makes God a liar and thereby despoileth him of the Glory of all those holy properties which he this way designed to manifest 1 Joh. 5.10 And if I mistake not this is that which the Experience of them that truly believe when they are out of the Heats of Disputation will give Testimony unto 4. To understand the Nature of Justifying Faith aright on the Act and Exercise of saving Faith in order unto our Justification which are properly enquired after we must consider the order of it first the things which are necessarily previous thereunto and then what it is to believe with respect unto them As 1. The state of a Convinced sinner who is the only Subjectum capax Justificationis This hath been spoken unto already and the necessity of its precedency unto the orderly proposal and receiving of Evangelical Righteousness unto Justification demonstrated If we lose a respect hereunto we lose our best Guide towards the Discovery of the Nature of Faith Let no man think to understand the Gospel who knoweth nothing of the Law Gods constitution and the nature of the things themselves have given the Law the precedency with respect unto sinners for by the Law is the knowledge of sin And Gospel Faith is the Souls acting according to the mind of God for deliverance from that state and condition which it is cast under by the Law And all those Descriptions of Faith which abound in the Writings of Learned men which do not at least include in them a virtual respect unto this state and condition or the Work of the Law on the Consciences of sinners are all of them vain speculations There is nothing in this whole Doctrine that I will more firmly adhere unto than the necessity of the Convictions mentioned previous unto true Believing without which not one line of it can be understood aright and men do but beat the Air in their contentions about it See Rom. 3.21 22
his Priestly Office And therefore is Justification either expresly or virtually assigned unto them also Gen. 3.15 1 Joh. 3.8 Heb. 2.13 14 15 16. Rom. 4.25 Act. 5.31 Heb. 7.27 Rom. 8.34 But yet wherever our Justification is so assigned unto them they are not absolutely considered but with respect unto their relation to his Sacrifice and Satisfaction 3 All the means of the Application of the Sacrifice and Righteousness of the Lord Christ unto us are also included therein Such is the principal Efficient cause thereof which is the Holy Ghost whence we are said to be justified in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God 1 Cor. 6.11 and the instrumental cause thereof on the part of God which is the Promise of the Gospel Rom. 1.17 Gal. 3.22 23. It would therefore be unduly pretended that by this Assertion we do narrow or straiten the Object of Justifying Faith as it Justifies For indeed we assign a respect unto the whole Mediatory Office of Christ not excluding the Kingly and Prophetical parts thereof but only such a notion of them as would not bring in more of Christ but much of our selves into our Justification And the Assertion as laid down may be proved 1. From the Experience of all that are justified or do seek for Justification according unto the Gospel For under this notion of seeking for Justification or a Righteousness unto Justification they were all of them to be considered and do consider themselves as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 guilty before God subject obnoxious liable unto his wrath in the curse of the Law as we declared in the Entrance of this Discourse Rom. 3.19 They were all in the same state that Adam was in after the Fall unto whom God proposed the Relief of the Incarnation and Suffering of Christ Gen. 3.15 And to seek after Justification is to seek after a discharge from this woful state and condition Such persons have and ought to have other designs and desires also For whereas the state wherein they are antecedent unto their Justification is not only a state of Guilt and Wrath but such also as wherein through the Depravation of their Nature the power of sin is prevalent in them and their whole Souls are defiled they design and desire not only to be justified but to be sanctified also But as unto the Guilt of sin and the want of a Righteousness before God from which Justification is their Relief herein I say they have respect unto Christ as set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood In their Design for Sanctification they have respect unto the Kingly and Prophetical Offices of Christ in their especial exercise But as to their freedom from the Guilt of sin and their Acceptance with God or their Justification in his sight that they may be freed from condemnation that they may not come into judgment it is Christ crucified it is Christ lifted up as the brazen Serpent in the Wilderness it is the Blood of Christ it is the Propitiation that he was and the Atonement that he made it is his bearing their sins his being made sin and the curse for them it is his Obedience the End which he put unto sin and the Everlasting Righteousness which he brought in that alone their Faith doth fix upon and acquiesce in If it be otherwise in the Experience of any I acknowledge I am not acquainted with it I do not say that Conviction of sin is the only antecedent Condition of actual Justification But this it is that makes a sinner subjectum capax Justificationis No man therefore is to be considered as a person to be Justified but he who is actually under the power of the Conviction of sin with all the necessary consequents thereof Suppose therefore any sinner in this Condition as it is described by the Apostle Rom. 3. Guilty before God with his mouth stopped as unto any pleas defences or excuses suppose him to seek after a Relief and Deliverance out of this estate that is to be justified according to the Gospel he neither doth nor can wisely take any other course than what he is there directed unto by the same Apostle ver 20 21 22 23 24 25. Therefore by the Deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin But now the Righteousness of God without the Law is manifested being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets Even the Righteousness of God which is by Faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe for there is no difference For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Whence I argue That which a Guilty condemned sinner finding no hope nor Relief from the Law of God the sole Rule of all his Obedience doth betake himself unto by Faith that he may be delivered or justified that is the especial Object of Faith as Justifying But this is the Grace of God alone through the Redemption that is in Christ or Christ proposed as a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood Either this is so or the Apostle doth not aright guide the Souls and Consciences of men in that condition wherein he himself doth place them It is the Blood of Christ alone that he directs the Faith unto of all them that would be justified before God Grace Redemption Propitiation all through the Blood of Christ Faith doth peculiarly respect and fix upon This is that if I mistake not which they will confirm by their Experience who have made any distinct observation of the actings of their Faith in their Justification before God 2. The Scripture plainly declares that Faith as Justifying respects the sacerdotal Office and Actings of Christ alone In the great Representation of the Justification of the Church of Old in the Expiatory Sacrifice when all their sins and iniquities were pardoned and their persons accepted with God the acting of their Faith was limited unto the Imposition of all their sins on the head of the Sacrifice by the high Priest Lev. 16. By his knowledge that is Faith in him shall my righteous Servant justifie many for he shall bear their iniquities Isa. 53.11 That alone which Faith respects in Christ as unto the Justification of sinners is his bearing their iniquities Guilty convinced sinners look unto him by Faith as those who were stung with fiery Serpents did to the Brazen Serpent that is as he was lifted up on the Cross Joh. 3.14 15. So did he himself express the nature and actings of Faith in our Justification Rom. 3.24 25. Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set
1 All our sins past present and to come were at once imputed unto and laid upon Jesus Christ in what sense we shall afterwards enquire He was wounded for our Transgressions He was bruised for our Iniquities the chastisement of our peace was upon him and with his stripes are we healed All we like Sheep have gone astray we have turned every one to his own way and the Lord hath made to meet on Him the Iniquities of us all Isa. 53.6 7. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the Tree 1 Pet. 2.24 The Assertions being indefinite without exception or limitation are equivalent unto Vniversals All our sins were on him he bare them All at once and therefore once died for all 2 He did therefore at once finish Transgression made an End of sin made Reconciliation for Iniquity and brought in everlasting Righteousness Dan. 9.24 At once he expiated all our sins for by himself he purged our sins and then sate down at the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 1.3 And we are sanctified or dedicated unto God through the offering of the Body of Christ once for all for by one Offering he hath perfected consummated compleated as unto their spiritual state them that are sanctified Heb. 10.10.14 He never will do more than he hath actually done already for the Expiation of all our sins from first to last for there remaineth no more sacrifice for sin I do not say that hereupon our Justification is compleat but only that the meritorious procuring cause of it was at once compleated and is never to be renewed or repeated any more All the enquiry is concerning the renewed Application of it unto our Souls and Consciences whether that be by Faith alone or by the works of Righteousness which we do 3 By our actual Believing with Justifying Faith believing on Christ or his Name we do receive him and thereby on our first Justification become the Sons of God Joh. 1.12 That is joynt heirs with Christ and heirs of God Rom. 8.17 Hereby we have a Right unto and an Interest in all the Benefits of his Mediation which is to be at once compleatly justified For in him we are compleat Col. 2.10 For by the Faith that is in him we do receive the forgiveness of sins and a lot or inheritance among all them that are sanctified Act. 26.18 being immediately justified from all things from which we could not be justified by the Law Act. 13.39 yea God thereon blesseth us with all spiritual Blessings in heavenly things in Christ Ephes. 1.3 All these things are absolutely inseparable from our first believing in him and therefore our Justification is at once compleat In particular 4 On our Believing all our sins are forgiven He hath quickened you together with him having forgiven you all Trespasses Col. 2.13 14 15. For in him we have Redemption through his Blood even the forgiveness of sins according unto the riches of his Grace Ephes. 1.7 which one place obviates all the petulant exceptions of some against the consistency of the free Grace of God in the pardon of sins and the satisfaction of Christ in the procurement thereof 5 There is hereon nothing to be laid unto the charge of them that are so justified For he that believeth hath Everlasting Life and shall not come into Condemnation but is passed from Death unto Life Joh. 5.24 And who shall lay any thing unto the charge of Gods Elect it is God that Justifieth it is Christ that died Rom. 8.33 34. and there is no condemnation unto them that are in Christ Jesus ver 1. For being justified by Faith we have peace with God chap. 5.1 And 6 we have that Blessedness hereon whereof in this life we are capable Rom. 4.5 6. From all which it appears that our Justification is at once compleat And 7 it must be so or no man can be justified in this world For no time can be assigned nor measure of Obedience be limited whereon it may be supposed that any one comes to be Justified before God who is not so on his first Believing For the Scripture doth no where assign any such time or measure And to say that no man is compleatly justified in the sight of God in this life is at once to overthrow all that is taught in the Scriptures concerning Justification and therewithall all peace with God and comfort of Believers But a man acquitted upon his legal trial is at once discharged of all that the Law hath against him 2. Upon this compleat Justification Believers are obliged unto universal Obedience unto God The Law is not abolished but established by Faith It is neither abrogated nor dispensed withall by such an Interpretation as should take off its obligation in any thing that it requires nor as to the degree and manner wherein it requires it Nor is it possible it should be so For it is nothing but the Rule of that Obedience which the nature of God and man make necessary from the one to the other And that is an Antinomianism of the worst sort and most derogatory unto the Law of God which affirms it to be divested of its power to oblige unto perfect Obedience so as that what it is not so shall as it were in despight of the Law be accepted as if it were so unto the End for which the Law requires it There is no medium but that either the Law is utterly abolished and so there is no sin for where there is no Law there is no Transgression or it must be allowed to require the same Obedience that it did at its first Institution and unto the same degree Neither is it in the power of any man living to keep his Conscience from judging and condemning that whatever it be wherein he is convinced that he comes short of the perfection of the Law Wherefore 3. The Commanding Power of the Law in positive precepts and prohibitions which Justified Persons are subject unto doth make and constitute all their inconformities unto it to be no less truly and properly sins in their own nature than they would be if their persons were obnoxious unto the Curse of it This they are not nor can be for to be obnoxious unto the Curse of the Law and to be justified are contradictory but to be subject to the Commands of the Law and to be justified are not so But it is a subjection to the commanding power of the Law and not an obnoxiousness unto the Curse of the Law that constitutes the nature of sin in its Transgression Wherefore that compleat Justification which is at once though it dissolve the Obligation on the sinner unto punishment by the Curse of the Law yet doth it not annihilate the commanding Authority of the Law unto them that are justified that what is sin in others should not be so in them See Rom. 8.1.33 34. Hence in the first Justification of believing sinners all future sins are remitted as unto
any actual Obligation unto the Curse of the Law unless they should fall into such sins as should ipso facto forfeit their justified estate and transfer them from the Covenant of Grace into the Covenant of Works which we believe that God in his Faithfulness will preserve them from And although sin cannot be actually pardoned before it be actually committed yet may the obligation unto the Curse of the Law be virtually taken away from such sins in justified persons as are consistent with a justified estate or the Terms of the Covenant of Grace antecedently unto their actual commission God at once in this sense forgiveth all their Iniquities and healeth all their Diseases redeemeth their life from Destruction and crowneth them with loving kindness and mercies Psal. 103.2 3. Future sins are not so pardoned as that when they are committed they should be no sins which cannot be unless the commanding power of the Law be abrogated But their respect unto the Curse of the Law or their power to oblige the justified person thereunto is taken away Still there abideth the true nature of sin in every inconformity unto or transgression of the Law in justified persons which stands in need of daily actual pardon For there is no man that liveth and sinneth not and if we say that we have no sin we do but deceive our selves None are more sensible of the Guilt of sin none are more troubled for it none are more earnest in supplications for the pardon of it than justified persons For this is the effect of the Sacrifice of Christ applyed unto the Souls of Believers as the Apostle declares Heb. 10.1 2 3 4 10 14. that it doth take away Conscience condemning the Sinner for sin with respect unto the Curse of the Law But it doth not take away Conscience condemning sin in the Sinner which on all considerations of God and themselves of the Law and the Gospel requires Repentance on the part of the sinner and actual pardon on the part of God Whereas therefore one Essential part of Justification consisteth in the pardon of our sins and sins cannot be actually pardoned before they are actually committed our present enquiry is whereon the continuation of our Justification doth depend notwithstanding the Interveniency of sin after we are justified whereby such sins are actually pardoned and our persons are continued in a state of Acceptation with God and have their right unto Life and Glory uninterrupted Justification is at once compleat in the Imputation of a perfect Righteousness the Grant of a Right and Title unto the heavenly Inheritance the actual pardon of all past sins and the virtual pardon of future sins but how or by what means on what terms and conditions this state is continued unto those who are once justified whereby their Righteousness is everlasting their Title to Life and Glory indefeazable and all their sins are actually pardoned is to be enquired For answer unto this enquiry I say 1 It is God that Justifieth and therefore the continuation of our Justification is his Act also And this on his part depends on the immutability of his Counsel the unchangeableness of the everlasting Covenant which is ordered in all things and sure the Faithfulness of his Promises the Efficacy of his Grace his complacency in the Propitiation of Christ with the power of his Intercession and the irrevocable Grant of the Holy Ghost unto them that do believe which things are not of our present enquiry 2. Some say that on our part the continuation of this state of our Justification depends on the Condition of Good works that is that they are of the same consideration and use with Faith it self herein In our Justification it self there is they will grant somewhat peculiar unto Faith but as unto the continuation of our Justification Faith and Works have the same influence into it Yea some seem to ascribe it distinctly unto Works in an especial manner with this only proviso that they be done in Faith For my part I cannot understand that the continuation of our Justification hath any other dependencies than hath our Justification it self As Faith alone is required unto the one so Faith alone is required unto the other although its operations and effects in the discharge of its duty and office in Justification and the continuation of it are divers nor can it otherwise be To clear this Assertion two things are to be observed 1. That the continuation of our Justification is the continuation of the Imputation of Righteousness and the pardon of sins I do still suppose the imputation of Righteousness to concur unto our Justification although we have not yet examined what Righteousness it is that is imputed But that God in our Justification imputeth Righteousness unto us is so expresly affirmed by the Apostle as that it must not be called in question Now the first act of God in the imputation of Righteousness cannot be repeated And the actual pardon of sin after Justification is an effect and consequent of that imputation of Righteousness If any man sin there is a Propitiation deliver him I have found a Ransome Wherefore unto this actual pardon there is nothing required but the application of that Righteousness which is the cause of it and this is done by Faith only 2. The Continuation of our Justification is before God or in the sight of God no less than our absolute Justification is We speak not of the sense and evidence of it unto our own Souls unto peace with God nor of the evidencing and manifestation of it unto others by its effects but of the continuance of it in the sight of God Whatever therefore is the means condition or cause hereof is pleadable before God and ought to be pleaded unto that purpose So then the enquiry is What it is that when a Justified person is guilty of Sin as guilty he is more or less every day and his Conscience is pressed with a sense thereof as that only thing which can endanger or intercept his justified Estate his Favour with God and Title unto Glory he betakes himself unto or ought so to do for the continuance of his State and pardon of his Sins what he pleadeth unto that purpose and what is available thereunto That this is not his own Obedience his personal Righteousness or fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant is evident from 1 the experience of Believers themselves 2 Testimony of Scripture and 3 the Example of them whose cases are recorded therein 1. Let the experience of them that do believe be enquired into for their Consciences are continually exercised herein What is it that they betake themselves unto what is it that they plead with God for the continuance of the pardon of their Sins and the acceptance of their persons before him Is it any thing but Soveraign Grace and Mercy through the Blood of Christ Are not all the Arguments which they plead unto this end taken from the
the Righteousness of Christ is so far imputed unto us that on the account thereof God gives unto us Justifying Grace and thereby the Remission of Sin in their sense whence they allow it the meritorious cause of our Justification But on a supposition thereof or the reception of that Grace we are continued to be justified before God by the works we perform by vertue of that Grace received And though some of them rise so high as to affirm that this Grace and the works of it need no farther respect unto the Righteousness of Christ to deserve our second Justification and life eternal as doth Vasquez expresly in 1.2 q. 114. Disp. 222. cap. 3. Yet many of them affirm that it is still from the consideration of the merit of Christ that they are so meritorious And the same for the substance of it is the Judgment of some of them who affirm the continuation of our Justification to depend on our own works setting aside that ambiguous term of merit For it is on the account of the Righteousness of Christ they say that our own works or imperfect obedience is so accepted with God as that the continuation of our Justification depends thereon But the Apostle gives us another account hereof Rom. 5.1 2 3. For he distinguisheth three things our Access into the Grace of God 2 Our standing in that Grace 3 Our Glorying in that station against all opposition By the first he expresseth our absolute Justification By the second our continuation in the state whereinto we are admitted thereby and by the third the assurance of that continuation notwithstanding all the oppositions we meet withal And all these he ascribeth equally unto Faith without the intermixture of any other cause or condition And other places express to the same purpose might be pleaded 3. The examples of them that did believe and were justified which are recorded in the Scripture do all bear witness unto the same Truth The continuation of the Justification of Abraham before God is declared to have been by Faith only Rom. 4.3 For the instance of his Justification given by the Apostle from Gen. 15.6 was long after he was justified absolutely And if our first Justification and the continuation of it did not depend absolutely on the same cause the instance of the one could not be produced for a proof of the way and means of the other as here they are And David when a justified Believer not only placeth the Blessedness of man in the free Remission of sins in opposition unto his own works in general Rom. 4.6 7. but in his own particular case ascribeth the continuation of his Justification and acceptation before God unto Grace Mercy and forgiveness alone which are no otherwise received but by Faith Psal. 130.3 4 5. Psal. 143.2 All other works and duties of obedience do accompany Faith in the continuation of our justified estate as necessary effects and fruits of it but not as causes means or conditions whereon that effect is suspended It is patient waiting by Faith that brings in the full accomplishment of the Promises Heb. 6.12 16. Wherefore there is but one Justification and that of one kind only wherein we are concerned in this Disputation The Scripture makes mention of no more and that is the Justification of an ungodly person by Faith Nor shall we admit of the consideration of any other For if there be a second Justification it must be of the same kind with the first or of another if it be of the same kind then the same person is often justified with the same kind of Justification or at least more than once and so on just reason ought to be often Baptized If it be not of the same kind then the same person is justified before God with two sorts of Justification of both which the Scripture is utterly silent And the continuation of our Justification depends solely on the same causes with our Justification it self CHAP. VI. Evangelical Personal Righteousness the Nature and Vse of it Final Judgment and its respect unto Justification THe things which we have discoursed concerning the first and second Justification and concerning the continuation of Justification have no other Design but only to clear the principal subject whereof we treat from what doth not necessarily belong unto it For until all things that are either really heterogeneous or otherwise superfluous are separated from it we cannot understand aright the true state of the Question about the nature and causes of our Justification before God For we intend one only Justification namely that whereby God at once freely by his Grace justifieth a convinced sinner through Faith in the Blood of Christ. Whatever else any will be pleased to call Justification we are not concerned in it nor are the Consciences of them that believe To the same purpose we must therefore briefly also consider what is usually disputed about our own personal Righteousness with a Justification thereon as also what is called sentential Justification at the day of Judgment And I shall treat no farther of them in this place but only as it is necessary to free the principal subject under consideration from being intermixed with them as really it is not concerned in them For what Influence our own personal Righteousness hath into our Justification before God will be afterwards particularly examined Here we shall only consider such a notion of it as seems to enterfere with it and disturb the right understanding of it But yet I say concerning this also that it rather belongs unto the Difference that will be among us in the Expression of our conceptions about spiritual things whilst we know but in part than unto the substance of the Doctrine it self And on such differences no breach of Charity can ensue whilst there is a mutual Grant of that liberty of mind without which it will not be preserved one moment It is therefore by some apprehended that there is an Evangelical Justification upon our Evangelical Personal Righteousness This they distinguish from that Justification which is by Faith through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ in the sense wherein they do allow it For the Righteousness of Christ is our Legal Righteousness whereby we have pardon of sin and acquitment from the sentence of the Law on the account of his satisfaction and merit But moreover they say that as there is a Personal inherent Righteousness required of us so there is a Justification by the Gospel thereon For by our Faith and the plea of it we are justified from the charge of Unbelief by our sincerity and the plea of it we are justified from the charge of Hypocrisie and so by all other Graces and Duties from the charge of the contrary sins in Commission or Omission so far as such sins are inconsistent with the Terms of the Covenant of Grace How this differeth from the second Justification before God which some say we have by works on the supposition
unto the ultimate manifestation of Divine Glory in the Creation and Guidance of all things are sufficiently manifest And whence it appears how little force there is in that Argument which some pretend to be of so great weight in this cause As every one they say shall be judged of God at the last day in the same way and manner or on the same Ground is he justified of God in this life But by Works and not by Faith alone every one shall be judged at the last day Wherefore by Works and not by Faith alone every one is justified before God in this life For 1. It is no where said that we shall be judged at the last day ex operibus but only that God will render unto men secundum opera But God doth not justifie any in this life secundum opera Being justified freely by his Grace And not according to the Works of Righteousness which we have done And we are every where said to be justified in this life ex fide per fidem but no where propter fidem or that God justifieth us secundum fidem by Faith but not for our Faith nor according unto our Faith And we are not to depart from the expressions of the Scripture where such a difference is constantly observed 2. It is somewhat strange that a man should be judged at the last day and justified in this life just in the same way and manner that is with respect unto Faith and Works when the Scripture doth constantly ascribe our Justification before God unto Faith without Works and the Judgment at the last day is said to be according unto Works without any mention of Faith 3. If Justification and eternal Judgment proceed absolute-on the same Grounds Reasons and Causes then if men had not done what they shall be condemned for doing at the last day they should have been justified in this life But many shall be condemned only for sins against the light of nature Rom. 2.12 as never having the written Law or Gospel made known unto them Wherefore unto such persons to abstain from sins against the light of nature would be sufficient unto their Justification without any knowledge of Christ or the Gospel 4. This Proposition that God pardons men their Sins gives them the Adoption of Children with a right unto the Heavenly Inheritance according to their Works is not only foraign to the Gospel but contradictory unto it and destructive of it as contrary unto all express Testimonies of the Scripture both in the old Testament and the new where these things are spoken of But that God judgeth all men and rendreth unto all men at the last Judgment according unto their Works is true and affirmed in the Scripture 5. In our Justification in this life by Faith Christ is considered as our Propitiation and Advocate as he who hath made Atonement for sin and brought in everlasting Righteousness But at the last day and in the last Judgment he is considered only as the Judge 6. The end of God in our Justification is the Glory of his Grace Eph. 1.6 But the end of God in the last Judgment is the Glory of his remunerative Righteousness 2 Tim. 4.8 7. The Representation that is made of the final Judgment Math. 7. and Chap. 25. is only of the visible Church And therein the plea of Faith as to the profession of it is common unto all and is equally made by all Upon that plea of Faith it is put unto the trial whether it were sincere true Faith or no or only that which was dead and barren And this trial is made solely by the fruits and effects of it and otherwise in the publick declaration of things unto all it cannot be made Otherwise the Faith whereby we are justified comes not into Judgment at the last day See Joh. 5.24 with Mark 16.16 CHAP. VII Imputation and the Nature of it with the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ in particular THe first express Record of the Justification of any sinner is of Abraham Others were justified before him from the Beginning and there is that affirmed of them which sufficiently evidenceth them so to have been But this Prerogative was reserved for the Father of the Faithful that his Justification and the express way and manner of it should be first entered on the Sacred Record So it is Gen. 15.6 He believed in the Lord and it was counted unto him for Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was accounted unto him or imputed unto him for Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It was counted reckoned imputed And it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed unto him but for us also unto whom it shall be imputed if we believe Rom. 4.23 24. Wherefore the first express Declaration of the nature of Justification in the Scripture affirms it to be by Imputation The Imputation of somewhat unto Righteousness And this done in that place and instance which is Recorded on purpose as the president and example of all those that shall be justified As he was justified so are we and no otherwise Under the new Testament there was a necessity of a more full and clear Declaration of the Doctrine of it For it is among the first and most principal parts of that Heavenly mystery of Truth which was to be brought to light by the Gospel And besides there was from the first a strong and Dangerous Opposition made unto it For this matter of Justification the Doctrine of it and what necessarily belongs thereunto was that whereon the Jewish Church broke off from God refused Christ and the Gospel perishing in their sins as is expresly declared Rom. 9.31 10.3 4. And in like manner a dislike of it an Opposition unto it ever was and ever will be a principle and cause of the Apostasie of any professing Church from Christ and the Gospel that falls under the power and deceit of them as it fell out afterwards in the Churches of the Galatians But in this state the Doctrine of Justification was fully declared stated and vindicated by the Apostle Paul in a peculiar manner And he doth it especially by affirming and proving that we have the Righteousness whereby and wherewith we are justified by Imputation or that our Justification consists in the non-Imputation of sin and the Imputation of Righteousness But yet although the first Recorded instance of Justification and which was so recorded that it might be an example and represent the Justification of all that should be justified unto the end of the World is expressed by Imputation and Righteousness imputed and the Doctrine of it in that great case wherein the eternal welfare of the Church of the Jews or their ruine was concerned is so expressed by the Apostle yet is it so fallen out in our days that nothing in Religion is more maligned more reproached more despised then the Imputation of Righteousness unto us or an Imputed Righteousness A putative Righteousness the
God Wherefore the Covenant of Grace could not be procured by any means or cause but that which was the cause of this Covenant of the Mediator or of God the Father with the Son as undertaking the work of Mediation And as this is no where ascribed unto the Death of Christ in the Scripture so to assert it is contrary unto all spiritual Reason and Understanding Who can conceive that Christ by his death should procure the Agreement between God and him that he should dye 3. With respect unto the Declaration of it by especial Revelation This we may call Gods making or establishing of it if we please though making of the Covenant in Scripture is applied principally if not only unto its execution or actual Application unto Persons 2 Sam. 23.5 Jerem. 32.40 This Declaration of the Grace of God and the provision in the Covenant of the Mediator for the making of it effectual unto his Glory is most usually called the Covenant of Grace And this is twofold 1. In the way of a singular and absolute Promise so was it first declared unto and established with Adam and afterwards with Abraham The Promise is the Declaration of the Purpose of God before declared or the free Determination and Counsel of his Will as to his dealing with sinners on the supposition of the Fall and their forfeiture of their first Covenant state Hereof the Grace and Will of God was the only cause Heb. 8.8 And the Death of Christ could not be the means of its procurement For he himself and all that he was to do for us was the substance of that Promise And this Promise as it is declarative of the Purpose or Counsel of the Will of God for the Communication of Grace and Glory unto sinners in and by the mediation of Christ according to the Ways and on the Terms prepared and disposed in his Soveraign Wisdom and Pleasure is formally the New Covenant though something yet is to be added to compleat its Application unto us Now the substance of the first Promise wherein the whole Covenant of Grace was virtually comprized directly respected and expressed the giving of him for the Recovery of Mankind from sin and misery by his death Gen. 3.15 Wherefore if he and all the Benefits of his Mediation his Death and all the Effects of it be contained in the Promise of the Covenant that is in the Covenant it self then was not his death the procuring cause of that Covenant nor do we owe it thereunto 2. In the additional prescription of the way and means whereby it is the Will of God that we shall enter into a Covenant state with him or be interessed in the Benefits of it This being virtually comprized in the absolute Promise for every Promise of God doth tacitly require Faith and Obedience in us is expressed in other places by the way of the Condition required on our part This is not the Covenant but the Constitution of the Terms on our part whereon we are made Partakers of it Nor is the Constitution of these Terms an effect of the death of Christ or procured thereby It is a meer effect of the Soveraign Grace and Wisdom of God The things themselves as bestowed on us communicated unto us wrought in us by Grace are all of them effects of the death of Christ but the Constitution of them to be the Terms and Conditions of the Covenant is an Act of meer Soveraign Wisdom and Grace God so loved the world as to send his only begotten Son to dye not that Faith and Repentance might be the means of Salvation but that all his Elect might believe and that all that believe might not perish but have Life Everlasting But yet it is granted that the Constitution of these Terms of the Covenant doth respect the foederal Transaction between the Father and the Son wherein they were ordered to the praise of the Glory of Gods Grace and so although their constitution was not the procurement of his Death yet without respect unto it it had not been Wherefore the sole cause of Gods making the New Covenant was the same with that of giving Christ himself to be our Mediator namely the Purpose Counsel Goodness Grace and Love of God as it is every where expressed in the Scripture 4 thly The Covenant may be considered as unto the actual Application of the Grace Benefit and Priviledges of it unto any persons whereby they are made real partakers of them or are taken into Covenant with God And this alone in the Scripture is intended by Gods making a Covenant with any It is not a general Revelation or Declaration of the Terms and Nature of the Covenant which some call an universal conditional Covenant on what Grounds they know best seeing the very formal nature of making a Covenant with any includes the actual Acceptation of it and Participation of the Benefits of it by them but a Communication of the Grace of it accompanied with a prescription of Obedience that is Gods making his Covenant with any as all Instances of it in the Scripture do declare It may be therefore enquired what respect the Covenant of Grace hath unto the Death of Christ or what Influence it hath thereunto I answer supposing what is spoken of his being a surety thereof it hath a threefold respect thereunto 1. In that the Covenant as the Grace and Glory of it were prepared in the Counsel of God as the Terms of it was fixed in the Covenant of the Mediator and as it was declared in the Promise was confirmed ratified and made irrevocable thereby This our Apostle insists upon at large Heb. 9.15 16 17 18 19 20. And he compares his Blood in his Death and Sacrifice of himself unto the Sacrifices and their Blood whereby the Old Covenant was confirmed purified dedicated or established ver 18 19. Now these Sacrifices did not procure that Covenant or prevail with God to enter into it but only ratified and confirmed it and this was done in the New Covenant by the Blood of Christ. 2. He thereby underwent and performed all that which in the Righteousness and Wisdom of God was required that the Effects Fruits Benefits and Grace intended designed and prepared in the New Covenant might be effectually accomplished and communicated unto sinners Hence although he procured not the Covenant for us by his death yet he was in his Person Mediation Life and Death the only cause and means whereby the whole Grace of the Covenant is made effectual unto us For 3. All the Benefits of it were procured by him that is all the Grace Mercy Priviledges and Glory that God hath prepared in the Counsel of his Will that were fixed as unto the way of this communication in the Covenant of the Mediator and proposed in the Promises of it are purchased merited and procured by his Death and effectually communicated or applied unto all the Covenanters by virtue thereof with others of his Mediatory Acts. And this
And for which the Father loved him Joh. 10.17 18. There was therefore no reason why God should hate Christ for his taking on him our Debt and the payment of it in an Act of the highest Obedience unto his will 2 God in this matter is considered as a Rector Ruler and Judge Now it is not required of the severest Judge that as a Judge he should hate the guilty person no although he be guilty Originally by Inhaesion and not by Imputation As such he hath no more to do but consider the guilt and pronounce the sentence of punishment But 3 suppose a person out of an Heroick generosity of mind should become an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for another for his friend for a good man so as to answer for him with his life as Judah undertook to be for Benjamin as to his liberty which when a man hath lost he is civilly dead and capite diminutus would the most cruel Tyrant under Heaven that should take away his life in that case hate him would he not rather admire his worth and vertue As such an one it was that Christ suffered and no otherwise 4 All the force of this exception depends on the ambiguity of the word hate For it may signifie either an aversation or detestation of mind or only a will of punishing as in God mostly it doth In the first sense there was no ground why God should hate Christ on this Imputation of guilt unto him whereby he became non propriae sed alienae culpae Reus Sin inherent renders the Soul polluted abominable and the only Object of Divine Aversation But for him who was perfectly Innocent Holy Harmless undefiled in himself who did no sin neither was there guile found in his mouth to take upon him the guilt of other sins thereby to comply with and accomplish the design of God for the manifestation of his Glory and infinite Wisdom Grace Goodness Mercy and Righteousness unto the certain expiation and destruction of sin nothing could render him more glorious and lovely in the sight of God or man But for a will of punishing in God where sin is imputed none can deny it but they must therewithal openly disavow the satisfaction of Christ. The heads of some few of those Arguments wherewith the Truth we have asserted is confirmed shall close this Discourse 1. Unless the guilt of sin was imputed unto Christ sin was not imputed unto him in any sense For the punishment of sin is not sin nor can those who are otherwise minded declare what it is of sin that is imputed But the Scripture is plain that God laid on him the Iniquity of us all and made him to be sin for us which could not otherwise be but by Imputation 2. There can be no punishment but with respect unto the guilt of sin personally contracted or imputed It is guilt alone that gives what is materially evil and afflictive the formal nature of punishment and nothing else And therefore those who understand full well the Harmony of things and Opinions and are free to express their minds do constantly declare that if one of these be denied the other must be so also and if one be admitted they must both be so If guilt was not imputed unto Christ he could not as they plead well enough undergo the punishment of sin much he might do and suffer on the occasion of sin but undergo the punishment due unto sin he could not And if it should be granted that the guilt of sin was imputed unto him they will not deny but that he underwent the punishment of it and if he underwent the punishment of it they will not deny but that the guilt of it was imputed unto him For these things are inseparably related 3. Christ was made a Curse for us the Curse of the Law as is expresly declared Gal. 3.13 14. But the Curse of the Law respects the guilt of sin only So as that where that is not it cannot take place in any sense and where that is it doth inseparably attend it Deut. 27.26 4. The express Testimonies of the Scripture unto this purpose cannot be evaded without an open wresting of their words and sense So God is said to make all our Iniquities to meet with upon him and he bare them on him as his burden for so the word signifies Isa. 53.6 God hath laid on him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Iniquity that is the guilt of us all ver 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and their sin or guilt shall he bear For that is the intendment of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where joyned with any other word that denotes sin as it is in those places Psal. 32.5 thou forgavest 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Iniquity of my sin that is the guilt of it which is that alone that is taken away by pardon That his Soul was made an Offering for the guilt of sin that he was made sin that sin was condemned in his flesh c. 5. This was represented in all the Sacrifices of old especially the great Anniversary on the day of expiation with the Ordinance of the Scape Goat as hath been before declared 6. Without a supposition hereof it cannot be understood how the Lord Christ should be our 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or suffer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in our stead unless we will admit the exposition of Mr. Ho. a late Writer who reckoning up how many things the Lord Christ did in our stead adds as the sense thereof that is to bestead us then which if he can invent any thing more fond and senseless he hath a singular faculty in such an Employment CHAP. IX The formal cause of Justification or The Righteousness on the Account whereof Believers are justified before God Objection answered THe principal differences about the Doctrine of Justification are reducible unto three Heads 1 The nature of it namely whether it consist in an internal change of the Person justified by the infusion of an Habit of inherent Grace or Righteousness or whether it be a Forensick Act in the judging esteeming declaring and pronouncing such a person to be Righteous thereon absolving him from all his sins giving unto him Right and Title unto life Herein we have to do only with those of the Church of Rome all others both Protestants and Socinians being agreed on the Forensick sense of the word and the nature of the thing signified thereby And this I have already spoken unto so far as our present design doth require and that I hope with such evidence of Truth as cannot well be gainsayed Nor may it be supposed that we have too long insisted thereon as an opinion which is obsolete and long since sufficiently confuted I think much otherwise and that those who avoid the Romanists in these Controversies will give a greater appearance of fear than of contempt For when all is done if free Justification through the Blood of Christ and the Imputation of his Righteousness be
5. cap. 18. And elsewhere That the actual sin of Adam is imputed unto us as if we all had committed that actual sin that is broken the whole Law of God And this is that whereby the Apostle illustrates the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto Believers and it may on as good grounds be charged with absurdities as the other It is not therefore said that God judgeth that we have in our own persons done those very Acts and endured that penalty of the Law which the Lord Christ did and endured For this would overthrow all Imputation But what Christ did and suffered that God imputeth unto Believers unto the Justification of Life as if it had been done by themselves and his Righteousness as a publick person is made theirs by Imputation even as the sin of Adam whilst a publick person is made the sin of all his Posterity by Imputation Hereon none of the absurdities pretended which are really such do at all follow It doth not so that Christ in his own person performed every individual Act that we in our circumstances are obliged unto in a way of Duty nor was there any need that so he should do This Imputation as I have shewed stands on other Foundations Nor doth it follow that every saved Persons Righteousness before God is the same identically and numerically with Christs in his publick capacity as Mediator For this Objection destroys it self by affirming that as it was his it was the Righteousness of God-Man and so it hath an especial nature as it respects or relates unto his Person It is the same that Christ in his publick capacity did work or effect But there is a wide difference in the consideration of it as his absolutely and as made ours It was formally inherent in him is only materially imputed unto us Was actively his is passively ours was wrought in the Person of God-man for the whole Church is imputed unto each single Believer as unto his own concernment only Adams sin as imputed unto us is not the sin of a Representative though it be of his that was so but is the particular sin of every one of us But this Objection must be further spoken unto where it occurs afterwards Nor will it follow that on this supposition we should be accounted to have done that which was done long before we were in a capacity of doing any thing For what is done for us and in our stead before we are in any such capacity may be imputed unto us as is the sin of Adam And yet there is a manifold sense wherein men may be said to have done what was done for them and in their name before their actual existence so that therein is no absurdity As unto what is added by the way that Christ did not do nor suffer the Idem that we were obliged unto whereas he did what the Law required and suffered what the Law threatned unto the disobedient which is the whole of what we are obliged unto it will not be so easily proved nor the Arguments very suddenly answered whereby the contrary hath been confirmed That Christ did sustain the place of a surety or was the surety of the New-Covenant the Scripture doth so expresly affirm that it cannot be denied And that there may be sureties in cases criminal as well as civil and pecuniary hath been proved before What else occurs about the singularity of Christs Obedience as he was Mediator proves only that his Righteousness as formally and inherently his was peculiar unto himself and that the Adjuncts of it which arise from its relation unto his person as it was inherent in him are not communicable unto them to whom it is imputed It is moreover urged That upon the supposed Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ it will follow that every Believer is justified by the works of the Law For the Obedience of Christ was a legal Righteousness and if that be imputed unto us then are we justified by the Law which is contrary unto express Testimonies of Scriptures in many places Ans. 1 I know nothing more frequent in the Writings of some Learned Men then that the Righteousness of Christ is our legal Righteousness who yet I presume are able to free themselves of this Objection 2 If this do follow in the true sense of being justified by the Law or the Works of it so denied in the Scripture their weakness is much to be pitied who can see no other way whereby we may be freed from an Obligation to be justified by the Law but by this Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ. 3 The Scripture which affirms that by the deeds of the Law no man can be justified affirms in like manner that by Faith we do not make void the Law but establish it that the Righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in us that Christ came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it and is the End of the Law for Righteousness unto them that do believe And that the Law must be fulfilled or we cannot be justified we shall prove afterwards 4 We are not hereon justified by the Law or the Works of it in the only sense of that Proposition in the Scripture and to coin new senses or significations of it is not safe The meaning of it in the Scripture is that only the doers of the Law shall be justified Rom. 2.13 and that he that doth the things of it shall live by them chap. 10.5 namely in his own person by the way of personal Duty which alone the Law requires But if we who have not fulfilled the Law in the way of inherent personal Obedience are justified by the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us then are we justified by Christ and not by the Law But it is said that this will not relieve For if his Obedience be so imputed unto us as that we are accounted by God in Judgment to have done what Christ did it is all one upon the matter and we are as much justified by the Law as if we had in our own proper persons performed an unsinning Obedience unto it This I confess I cannot understand The Nature of this Imputation is here represented as formerly in such a way as we cannot acknowledge from thence alone this inference is made which yet in my judgment doth not follow thereon For grant an Imputation of the Righteousness of another unto us be it of what nature it will all Justification by the Law and Works of it in the sense of the Scripture is gone for ever The Admission of Imputation takes off all power from the Law to justifie for it can justifie none but upon a Righteousness that is originally and inherently his own The man that doth them shall live in them If the Righteousness that is imputed be the Ground and Foundation of our Justification and made ours by that Imputation state it how you will that Justification is of Grace and not of the Law
ever Wherefore it is only thus far broke as a Covenant that all Mankind having sinned against the Commands of it and so by Guilt with the Impotency unto Obedience which ensued thereon defeated themselves of any Interest in its Promise and possibility of attaining any such interest they cannot have any Benefit by it But as unto its power to oblige all mankind unto Obedience and the unchangeable Truth of its Promises and Threatnings it abideth the same as it was from the Beginning 2 ly Take away this Law and there is left no standard of Righteousness unto mankind no certain boundaries of Good and Evil but those pillars whereon God hath fixed the Earth are left to move and flote up and down like the Isle of Delos in the Sea Some say the Rule of Good and Evil unto men is not this Law in its original constitution but the Light of Nature and the Dictates of Reason If they mean that Light which was primogenial and concreated with our natures and those Dictates of Right and Wrong which Reason originally suggested and approved they only say in other words that this Law is still the unalterable Rule of Obedience unto all mankind But if they intend the remaining Light of Nature that continues in every individual in this depraved state thereof and that under such additional Depravations as Traditions Customs Prejudices and Lusts of all sorts have affixed unto the most there is nothing more irrational and it is that which is charged with no less inconvenience than that it leaves no certain Boundaries of Good and Evil. That which is Good unto one will on this Ground be in its own nature evil unto another and so on the contrary and all the Idolaters that ever were in the World might on this pretence be excused 3 ly Conscience bears witness hereunto There is no Good nor Evil required or forbidden by this Law that upon the Discovery of it any man in the World can perswade or bribe his Conscience not to comply with it in Judgment as unto his concernment therein It will accuse and excuse condemn and free him according to the sentence of this Law let him do what he can to the contrary In brief it is acknowledged that God by virtue of his supream Dominion over all may in some Instances change the nature and order of things so as the Precepts of the Divine Law shall not in them operate in their ordinary efficacy So was it in the case of his command unto Abraham to slay his Son and unto the Israelites to rob the Aegyptians But on a supposition of the continuance of that order of things which this Law is the preservative of such is the intrinsick nature of the Good and Evil commanded and forbidden therein that it is not the subject of divine Dispensation as even the School-men generally grant 10. From what we have discoursed two things do unavoidably ensue 1. That whereas all mankind have by sin fallen under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of this Law and suffering of this Penalty which is Eternal Death being inconsistent with Acceptance before God or the enjoyment of Blessedness it is utterly impossible that any one individual person of the posterity of Adam should be justified in the sight of God accepted with him or blessed by him unless this Penalty be answered undergone and suffered by them or for them the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 herein is not to be abolished but established 2. That unto the same End of Acceptation with God Justification before him and Blessedness from him the Righteousness of this Eternal Law must be fulfilled in us in such a way as that in the Judgment of God which is according unto Truth we may be esteemed to have fulfilled it and be dealt with accordingly For upon a supposition of a failure herein the sanction of the Law is not Arbitrary so as that the Penalty may or may not be inflicted but necessary from the Righteousness of God as the supream Governour of all 11. About the first of these our Controversie is with the Socinians only who deny the satisfaction of Christ and any necessity thereof Concerning this I have treated elsewhere at large and expect not to see an Answer unto what I have disputed on that Subject As unto the latter of them we must enquire how we may be supposed to comply with the Rule and answer the Righteousness of this unalterable Law whose Authority we can no way be exempted from And that which we plead is that the Obedience and Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us His Obedience as the surety of the New Covenant granted unto us made ours by the gracious Constitution Soveraign Appointment and Donation of God is that whereon we are judged and esteemed to have answered the Righteousness of the Law By the Obedience of One many are made Righteous Rom. 5.19 That the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.4 And hence we argue If there be no other way whereby the Righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled in us without which we cannot be justified but must fall inevitably under the Penalty threatned unto the Transgression of it but only the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us then is that the sole Righteousness whereby we are justified in the sight of God But the former is true and so therefore is the latter 12. On the supposition of this Law and its original obligation unto Obedience with its Sanction and Threatnings there can be but one of three ways whereby we may come to be justified before God who have sinned and are no way able in our selves to perform the Obedience for the future which it doth require And each of them have a respect unto a Soveraign Act of God with reference unto this Law The first is the Abrogation of it that it should no more oblige us either unto Obedience or Punishment This we have proved impossible and they will wofully deceive their own Souls who shall trust unto it The second is by transferring of its Obligation unto the End of Justification on a surety or common undertaker This is that which we plead for as the substance of the mystery of the Gospel considering the Person and Grace of this Undertakers or Surety And herein all things do tend unto the Exaltation of the Glory of God in all the holy properties of his nature with the fulfilling and establishing of the Law it self Math. 5.17 Rom. 3.31 chap. 8.4 chap. 10.3 4. The third way is by an Act of God towards the Law and another towards us whereby the nature of the Righteousness which the Law requireth is changed which we shall examine as the only reserve against our present Argument 3. It is said therefore that by our own personal Obedience we do answer the Righteousness of the Law so far as it is required of us But whereas no sober person can imagine that we can or that any one in our lapsed
for himself in a way of Duty And the truth is if the Obedience of Christ had respect unto himself only that is If he yielded it unto God on the necessity of his condition and did not do it for us I see no foundation left to assert his merit upon no more then I do for the Imputation of it unto them that believe That which we plead is That the Lord Christ fulfilled the whole Law for us he did not only undergo the penalty of it due unto our sins but also yielded that perfect Obedience which it did require And herein I shall not immix my self in the debate of the distinction between the Active and Passive Obedience of Christ. For he exercised the highest Active Obedience in his suffering when he offered himself to God through the Eternal Spirit And all his Obedience considering his Person was mixed with suffering as a part of his Exinanition and Humiliation whence it is said That though he were a Son yet learned he obedience by the things that he suffered And however doing and suffering are in various categories of things yet Scripture testimonies are not to be regulated by Philosophical artifices and terms And it must needs be said that the Sufferings of Christ as they were purely penal are imperfectly called His passive Righteousness For all Righteousness is either in habit or in action whereof suffering is neither nor is any Man righteous or so esteemed from what he suffereth Neither do sufferings give satisfaction unto the commands of the Law which require only Obedience And hence it will unavoidably follow that we have need of more then the meer sufferings of Christ whereby we may be justified before God if so be that any Righteousness be required thereunto But the whole of what I intend is That Christs fulfilling of the Law in Obedience unto its commands is no less imputed unto us for our Justification then his undergoing the Penalty of it is I cannot but judge it sounds ill in the ears of all Christians That the Obedience of our Lord Jesus Christ as our Mediator and Surety unto the whole Law of God was for himself alone and not for us or that what he did therein was not that he might be the end of the Law for Righteousness unto them that do believe nor a means of the fulfilling of the Righteousness of the Law in us especially considering that the Faith of the Church is That he was given to us born to us that for us Men and for our salvation he came down from Heaven and did and suffered what was required of him But whereas some who deny the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us for our Justification do insist principally on the second thing mentioned namely the unusefulness of it I shall under this first part of the charge consider only the Arguings of Socinus which is the whole of what some at present do indeavor to perplex the truth withal To this purpose is his discourse Part 3. cap. 5. de Servat Jam vero manifestum est Christum quia homo natus fuerat quidem ut inquit Paulus factus sub lege legi divinae inquam quae aeterna immutabilis est non minus quam caeteri homines obnoxium fuisse Alioqui potuisset Christus aeternam Dei legem negligere sive etiam universam si voluisset infringere quod impium est vel cogitare Immo ut supra alicubi explicatum fuit nisi ipse Christus legi divinae servandae obnoxius fuisset ut ex Pauli verbis colligitur non potuisset iis qui ei legi servandae obnoxii sunt opem ferre eos ad immortalitatis firmam spem traducere Non differebat igitur hac quidem ex parte Christus quando homo natus erat a caeteris hominibus Quocirca nec etiam pro aliis magis quam quilibet alius homo legem divinam conservando satisfacere potuit quippe qui ipse eam servare omnino debuit I have transcribed his words that it may appear with whose weapons some young Disputers among our selves do contend against the Truth The substance of his Plea is That our Lord Jesus Christ was for himself or on his own account obliged unto all that obedience which he performed And this he indeavors to prove with this Reason Because if it were otherwise then he might if he would have neglected the while Law of God and have broken it at his pleasure For he forgot to consider That if he were not obliged unto it upon his own account but was so on ours whose cause he had undertaken the obligation on him unto most perfect obedience was equal to what it would have been had he been originally obliged on his own account However hence he infers that what he did could not be for us because it was so for himself no more then what any other man is bound to do in a way of duty for himself can be esteemed to have been done also for another For he will allow of none of those considerations of the Person of Christ which makes what he did and suffered of another nature and efficacy then what can be done or suffered by any other Man All that he adds in the process of his discourse is That what ever Christ did that was not required by the Law in general was upon the especial command of God and so done for himself whence it cannot be imputed unto us And hereby he excludes the Church from any benefit by the Mediation of Christ but only what consists in his Doctrine Example and the Exercise of his Power in Heaven for our good which was the thing that he aimed at But we shall consider those also which make use of his Arguments though not as yet openly unto all his Ends. To clear the Truth herein the things insuing must be observed 1. The Obedience we treat of was the Obedience of Christ the Mediator But the Obedience of Christ as the Mediator of the Covenant was the Obedience of his Person For God redeemed his Church with his own Blood Acts 20.28 It was performed in the Humane Nature but the Person of Christ was he that performed it As in the Person of a Man some of his acts as to the immediate principle of operation are acts of the Body and some are so of the Soul yet in their performance and accomplishment are they the acts of the Person So the Acts of Christ in his Mediation as to their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or immediate operation were the actings of his distinct Natures some of the Divine and some of the Humane immediately But as unto their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the perfecting efficacy of them they were the Acts of his whole Person His Acts who was that Person and whose Power of Operation was a property of his Person Wherefore the Obedience of Christ which we plead to have been for us was the Obedience of the Son of God but
〈◊〉 I Paul have written it with my own hand that he would answer for both and pay back a valuable consideration if required Hereby was he obliged in his own person to make satisfaction unto Philemon but yet he was to do it for Onesimus and not for himself Whatever Obedience therefore was due from the Lord Christ as to his Humane Nature whilest in the form of a servant either as a Man or as an Israelite seeing he was so not necessarily by the necessity of nature for himself but by voluntary condescension and stipulation for us for us it was and not for himself 5. The Lord Christ in his Obedience was not a private but a publick person He obeyed as he was the Surety of the Covenant as the Mediator between God and Man This I suppose will not be denied He can by no imagination be considered out of that capacity But what a publick person doth as a publick person that is as a Representative of others and an undertaker for them whatever may be his own concernment therein he doth it not for himself but for others And if others were not concerned therein if it were not for them what he doth would be of no use or signification Yea it implies a contradiction that any one should do any thing as a publick person and do it for himself only He who is a publick person may do that wherein he alone is concerned but he cannot do so as he is a publick person Wherefore as Socinus and those that follow him would have Christ to have offered for himself which is to make him a Mediator for himself his offering being a Mediatory act which is both foolish and impious so to affirm his Mediatory Obedience his Obedience as a publick person to have been for himself and not for others hath but little less of impiety in it 6. It is granted That the Lord Christ having an Humane Nature which was a Creature it was impossible but that it should be subject unto the Law of Creation For there is a Relation that doth necessarily arise from and depend upon the Beings of a Creator and a Creature Every rational Creature is eternally obliged from the Nature of God and its Relation thereunto to love him obey him depend upon him submit unto him and to make him its End Blessedness and Reward But the Law of Creation thus considered doth not respect the World and this life only but the future state of Heaven and Eternity also And this Law the Humane Nature of Christ is subject unto in Heaven and Glory and cannot but be so whilest it is a Creature and not God that is whilest it hath its own Being Nor do any Men fancy such a transfusion of divine properties into the Humane Nature of Christ as that it should be self-subsisting and in it self absolutely immense for this would openly destroy it Yet none will say that he is now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law in the sense intended by the Apostle But the Law in the sense described the Humane Nature of Christ was subject unto on its own account whilest he was in this World And this is sufficient to answer the Objection of Socinus mentioned at the entrance of this Discourse namely That if the Lord Christ were not obliged unto Obedience for himself then might he if he would neglect the whole Law or infringe it For besides that it is a foolish imagination concerning that holy thing which was hypostatically united unto the Son of God and thereby rendered incapable of any deviation from the Divine Will the eternal indispensible Law of Love Adherence and Dependance on God under which the Humane Nature of Christ was and is as a Creature gives sufficient security against such Suppositions But there is another consideration of the Law of God namely as it is imposed on Creatures by especial dispensation for some time and for some certain end with some Considerations Rules and Orders that belong not essentially unto the Law as before described This is the nature of the Written Law of God which the Lord Christ was made under not necessarily as a Creature but by especial dispensation For the Law under this consideration is presented unto us as such not absolutely and eternally but whilest we are in this World and that with this especial end that by Obedience thereunto we may obtain the reward of Eternal Life And it is evident that the Obligation of the Law under this consideration ceaseth when we come to the injoyment of that Reward It obligeth us no more formally by its command Do this and live when the life promised is injoyed In this sense the Lord Christ was not made subject unto the Law for himself nor did yield obedience unto it for himself For he was not obliged unto it by virtue of his created condition Upon the first instant of the Vnion of his natures being holy harmless undefiled and separate from sinners he might notwithstanding the Law that he was made subject unto have been stated in Glory For he that was the object of all Divine Worship needed not any new Obedience to procure for him a state of Blessedness And had he naturally meerly by virtue of his being a Creature been subject unto the Law in this sense he must have been so eternally which he is not For those things which depend solely on the Natures of God and the Creature are eternal and immutable Wherefore as the Law in this sense was given unto us not absolutely but with respect unto a future state and reward so the Lord Christ did voluntarily subject himself unto it for us and his Obedience thereunto was for us and not for himself These things added unto what I have formerly written on this subject whereunto nothing hath been opposed but a few impertinent cavils are sufficient to discharge the first part of that charge laid down before concerning the impossibility of the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us which indeed is equal unto the Impossibility of the Imputation of the Disobedience of Adam unto us whereby the Apostle tells us That we were all made sinners The second part of the Objection or Charge against the Imputation of the Obedience of Christ unto us is That it is useless unto the persons that are to be justified For whereas they have in their Justification the pardon of all their sins they are thereby righteous and have a right or title unto Life and Blessedness For he who is so pardoned as not to be esteemed guilty of any sin of omission or commission wants nothing that is requisite thereunto For he is supposed to have done all that he ought and to have omitted nothing required of him in a way of duty Hereby he becomes not unrighteous and to be not unrighteous is the same as to be righteous As he that is not dead is alive Neither is there nor can there be any middle state between Death and life Wherefore
Righteousness of Christ is imputed unto us or in the sight of God we can never be Justified Nor are the cavilling Objections of the Socinians and those that follow them of any force against the Truth herein They tell us that the Righteousness of Christ can be imputed but unto one if unto any For who can suppose that the same Righteousness of One should become the Righteousness of many even of all that believe Besides he performed not all the Duties that are required of us in all our Relations he being never placed in them These things I say are both foolish and impious destructive unto the whole Gospel For all things here depend on the Ordination of God It is his Ordinance that as through the offence of One many are dead so his Grace and the Gift of Grace through one man Christ Jesus hath abounded unto many and as by the Offence of one Judgment came upon all men unto Condemnation so by the Righteousness of One the free Gift came upon all unto the Righteousness of life and by the Obedience of One many are made Righteous as the Apostle argues Rom. 5. For God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.3 4. For he was the End of the Law the whole End of it for Righteousness unto them that do believe Chap. 10.4 This is the Appointment of the Wisdom Righteousness and Grace of God that the whole Righteousness and Obedience of Christ should be accepted as our compleat Righteousness before him imputed unto us by his Grace and applied unto us or made ours through believing and consequently unto all that believe And if the actual Sin of Adam be imputed unto us all who derive our Nature from him unto Condemnation though he sinned not in our Circumstances and Relations is it strange that the actual Obedience of Christ should be imputed unto them who derive a Spiritual Nature from him unto the Justification of life Besides both the Satisfaction and Obedience of Christ as relating unto his person were in some sense infinite that is of an infinite Value and so cannot be considered in Parts as though one Part of it were imputed unto one and another unto another but the whole is imputed unto every one that doth believe And if the Israelites could say that David was worth ten thousand of them 2 Sam. 21.3 we may well allow the Lord Christ and so what he did and suffered to be more than us all and all that we can do and suffer There are also sundry other mistakes that concur unto that part of the Charge against the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ unto us which we have now considered I say of his Righteousness for the Apostle in this case useth those two words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Righteousness and Obedience as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same signification Rom. 5.18 19. such are those that Remission of Sin and Justification are the same or that Justification consisteth only in the Remission of Sin that Faith it self as our Act and Duty being it is the Condition of the Covenant is imputed unto us for Righteousness or that we have a personal inherent Righteousness of our own that one way or other is our Righteousness before God unto Justification either a Condition it is or a Disposition unto it or hath a congruity in deserving the Grace of Justification or a down-right merit of Condignity thereof For all these are but various expressions of the same thing according unto the Variety of the Conceptions of the Minds of men about it But they have been all considered and removed in our precedent Discourses To close this Argument and our Vindication of it and therewithal to obviate an Objection I do acknowledg that our Blessedness and life eternal is in the Scripture oftimes ascribed unto the death of Christ But it is so 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the principal Cause of the whole and as that without which no imputation of Obedience could have justified us for the Penalty of the Law was indispensibly to be undergone 2. It is so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not exclusively unto all Obedience whereof mention is made in other Places but as that whereunto it is inseparably conjoyned Christus in vita passivam habuit actionem in morte passionem activam sustinuit dum salutem operaretur in medio terrae Bernard And so it is also ascribed unto his Resurrection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto Evidence and Manifestation But the Death of Christ exclusively as unto his Obedience is no where asserted as the Cause of eternal life comprizing that exceeding Weight of Glory wherewith it is accompanied Hitherto we have treated of and Vindicated the Imputation of the Active Obedience of Christ unto us as the Truth of it was deduced from the preceding Argument about the Obligation of the Law of Creation I shall now briefly confirm it with other Reasons and Testimonies 1. That which Christ the Mediator and Surety of the Covenant did do in Obedience unto God in the discharge and Performance of his Office that he did for us and that is imputed unto us This hath been proved already and it hath too great an Evidence of Truth to be denied He was born to us given to us Isa. 9.6 For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us Rom. 8.3 4. Whatever is spoken of the Grace Love and Purpose of God in sending or giving his Son or of the Love Grace and Condescention of the Son in coming and undertaking of the Work of Redemption designed unto him or of the Office it self of a Mediator or Surety gives Testimony unto this Assertion Yea it is the Fundamental Principle of the Gospel and of the Faith of all that truly believe As for those by whom the Divine Person and Satisfaction of Christ are denied whereby they evert the whole Work of his Mediation we do not at present consider them Wherefore what he so did is to be enquired into And 1. The Lord Christ our Mediator and Surety was in his Humane Nature made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 under the Law Gal. 4.1 That he was not so for himself by the necessity of his Condition we have proved before It was therefore for us But as made under the Law he yielded Obedience unto it this therefore was for us and is imputed unto us The exception of the Socinians that it is the Judicial Law only that is intended is too frivolous to be insisted on For he was made under that Law whose Curse we are delivered from And if we are delivered only from the Curse of the Law of Moses wherein they contend that there
men are extortioners unjust adulterers or even as this Publican I fast twice in the week I give tithes of all that I possess And the Publican standing afar off would not lift up so much as his eyes unto Heaven but smote upon his Brest saying God be merciful unto me a sinner I tell you that this Man went down unto his house justified rather then the other For every one that exalteth himself shall be abased and every one that humbleth himself shall be exalted That the design of our Saviour herein was to represent the way of our Justification before God is evident 1. From the description given of the persons whom he reflected on V. 9. They were such as trusted in themselves that they were righteous or That they had a Personal Righteousness of their own before God 2. From the general rule wherewith he confirms the judgment he had given concerning the persons described Every one that exalteth himself shall be abased Ver. 14. And he that abaseth himself shall be exalted As this is applied unto the Pharisee and the Prayer that is ascribed unto him it declares plainly That every plea of our own works as unto our Justification before God under any consideration is a self exaltation which God despiseth and as applied unto the Publican that a sense of sin is the only preparation on our part for acceptance with him on believing Wherefore both the persons are represented As seeking to be justified for so our Saviour expresseth the issue of their address unto God for that purpose the one was justified the other was not The Plea of the Pharisee unto this end consists of two parts 1. That he had fulfilled the condition whereon he might be justified He makes no mention of any merit either of congruity or condignity Only whereas there were two parts of Gods Covenant then with the Church the one with respect unto the Moral the other with respect unto the Ceremonial Law he pleads the observation of the condition of it in both parts which he sheweth in instances of both kinds only he adds the way that he took to further him in this obedience somewhat beyond what was injoyned namely That he fasted twice in the week For when Men begin to seek for Righteousness and Justification by Works they quickly think their best reserve lies in doing something extraordinary more then other Men and more indeed then is required of them This brought forth all the Pharisaical Austerities in the Papacy Nor can it be said That all this signified nothing because he was an Hypocrite and a Boaster for it will be replied That it should seem all are so who seek for Justification by Works For our Saviour only represents one that doth so neither are these things laid in Bar against his Justification but only that he exalted himself in trusting unto his own Righteousness 2. In an ascription of all that he did unto God God I thank thee Although he did all this yet he owned the aid and assistance of God by his Grace in it all He esteemed himself much to differ from other Men but ascribed it not unto himself that so he did All the Righteousness and Holiness which he laid claim unto he ascribed unto the benignity and goodness of God Wherefore he neither pleaded any merit in his Works nor any Works performed in his own strength without the aid of Grace All that he pretends is That by the Grace of God he had fulfilled the Condition of the Covenant and thereon expected to be justified And what ever words Men shall be pleased to make use of in their Vocal Prayers God interprets their minds according to what they trust in as unto their Justication before him And if some Men will be true unto their own Principles this is the Prayer which Mutatis mutandis they ought to make If it be said that it is charged on this Pharisee that he trusted in himself and despised others for which he was rejected I answer 1. This charge respects not the mind of the person but the genius and tendency of the opinion The Perswasion of Justification by Works includes in it a contempt of other means For if Abraham had been justified by Works he should have had whereof to glory 2. Those whom he despised were such as placed their whole trust in Grace and Mercy as this Publican It were to be wished that all others of the same mind did not so also The issue is with this person That he was not justified neither shall any one ever be so on the account of his own Personal Righteousness For our Saviour hath told us That when we have done all that is when we have the testimony of our Consciences unto the integrity of our obedience instead of pleading it unto our Justification we should say that is really judge and profess that we are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unprofitable servants Luk. 17.10 As the Apostle speaks I know nothing by my self yet am I not thereby justified 1 Cor. 4.4 And he that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and hath nothing to trust unto but his service will be cast out of the presence of God Matth. 25.30 Wherefore on the best of our obedience to confess our selves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to confess that after all in our selves we deserve to be cast out of the presence of God In opposition hereunto the state and prayer of the Publican under the same design of seeking Justification before God are expressed And the outward acts of his Person are mentioned as representing and expressive of the inward frame of his mind He stood afar off he did not so much as lift up his eyes he smote upon his brest All of them represent a person desponding yea despairing in himself This is the nature this is the effect of that conviction of sin which we before asserted to be antecedently necessary unto Justification Displicency sorrow sense of danger fear of wrath all are present with him In brief he declares himself guilty before God and his mouth stopped as unto any apology or excuse And his prayer is a sincere application of his Soul unto sovereign Grace and Mercy for a deliverance out of the condition wherein he was by reason of the guilt of sin And in the use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there is respect had unto a propitiation In the whole of his address there is contained 1. Self-condemnation and abhorrency 2. Displicency and sorrow for sin 3. An universal Renuntiation of all Works of his own as any conditions of his Justification 4. An acknowledgment of his sin guilt and misery And this is all that on our part is required unto Justification before God excepting that Faith whereby we apply our selves unto him for deliverance Some make a weak attempt from hence to prove that Justification consists wholly in the remission of sin because on the prayer of the Publican for Mercy and Pardon he is said to be
purpose in this Evangelist the sum of the Doctrine declared by him is That the Lord Jesus Christ was the Lamb of God which takes away the sins of the World that is by the sacrifice of himself wherein he answered and fulfilled all the typical sacrifices of the Law That unto this end he sanctified himself that those who believe might be sanctified or perfected for ever by his own offering of himself That in the Gospel he is proposed as lifted up and crucified for us is bearing all our sins on his Body on the Tree That by Faith 〈◊〉 him we have adoption justification freedom from judgment and condemnation with a right and title unto Eternal Life That those who believe not are condemned already because they believe not on the Son of God and as he elswhere expresseth it make God a lier in that they believe not his Testimony namely That he hath given unto us Eternal Life and that this life is in his Son Nor doth he any where make mention of any other means cause or condition of Justification on our part but Faith only though he aboundeth in Precepts unto Believers for Love and keeping the commands of Christ. And this Faith is the receiving of Christ in the sense newly declared And this is the substance of the Christian Faith in this matter which oft-times we rather obscure then illustrate by debating the consideration of any thing in our Justification but the Grace and Love of God the Person and Mediation of Christ with Faith in them CHAP. XVIII The nature of Justification as declared in the Epistles of S. Paul in that unto the Romans especially Chap. 3. THat the way and manner of our Justification before God with all the Causes and Means of it are designedly declared by the Apostle in the Epistle unto the Romans Chap. 3.4 5. as also vindicated from Objections so as to render his discourse thereon the proper Seat of this Doctrine and whence it is principally to be learned cannot modestly be denied The late exceptions of some That this Doctrine of Justification by Faith without Works is found only in the Writings of S. Paul and that his Writings are obscure and intricate are both false and scandalous to Christian Religion so as that in this place we shall not afford them the least consideration He wrote 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he was moved by the Holy Ghost And as all the matter delivered by him was sacred Truth which immediately requires our Faith and Obedience so the way and manner wherein he declared it was such as the Holy Ghost judged most expedient for the edification of the Church And as he said himself with confidence That if the Gospel which he Preached and as it was Preached by him though accounted by them foolishness was hid so as that they could not understand nor comprehend the Mystery of it it was hid unto them that are lost so we may say That if what he delivereth in particular concerning our Justification before God seems obscure difficult or perplexed unto us it is from our prejudices corrupt affections or weakness of understanding at best not able to comprehend the glory of this Mystery of the Grace of God in Christ and not from any defect in his way and manner of the Revelation of it Rejecting therefore all such perverse insinuations in a due sense of our own weakness and acknowledgment that at best we know but in part we shall humbly inquire into the Blessed Revelation of this great Mystery of the Justification of a sinner before God as by him declared in those Chapters of his glorious Epistle to the Romans and I shall do it with all briefness possible so as not on this occasion to repeat what hath been already spoken or to anticipate what may be spoken in place more convenient The first thing he doth is to prove all men to be under sin and to be guilty before God This he giveth as the conclusion of his preceding discourse from Chap. 1.18 or what he had evidently evinced thereby Chap. 3. ver 19 23. Hereon an inquiry doth arise how any of them come to be justified before God And whereas Justification is a sentence upon the consideration of a Righteousness his grand inquiry is what that Righteousness is on the consideration whereof a Man may be so justified And concerning this he affirms expresly that it is not the Righteousness of the Law nor of the Works of it whereby what he doth intend hath been in part before declared and will be further manifested in the proofs of our discourse Wherefore in general he declares that the Righteousness whereby we are justified is the Righteousness of God in opposition unto any Righteousness of our own Chap. 1.17 Chap. 3.21 22. And he describes this Righteousness of God by three properties 1. That it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without the Law Ver. 21. separated in all its concerns from the Law not attainable by it nor any works of it which they have no influence into It is neither our obedience unto the Law nor attainable thereby Nor can any expression more separate and exclude the Works of Obedience unto the Law from any concernment in it then this doth Wherefore what ever is or can be performed by our selves in obedience unto the Law is rejected from any interest in this Righteousness of God or the procurement of it to be made ours 2. That yet it is witnessed unto by the Law Ver. 21. The Law and the Prophets The Apostle by this distinction of the Books of the Old Testament into the Law and the Prophets manifests that by the Law he understands the Books of Moses and in them Testimony is given unto this Righteousness of God four ways 1. By a declaration of the causes of the necessity of it unto our Justification This is done in the account given of our Apostasie from God of the loss of his Image and the state of sin that insued thereon For hereby an end was put unto all possibility and hope of acceptance with God by our own Personal Righteousness By the entrance of sin our own Righteousness went out of the World so that there must be another Righteousness prepared and approved of God and called The Righteousness of God in opposition unto our own or all Relation of Love and Favor between God and Man must cease for ever 2. In the way of recovery from this state generally declared in the first Promise of the Blessed Seed by whom this Righteousness of God was to be wrought and introduced for he alone was to make an end of sin and to bring in Everlasting Righteousness 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dan. 9.24 That Righteousness of God that should be the means of the Justification of the Church in all ages and under all dispensations 3. By stopping up the way unto any other Righteousness through the Threatnings of the Law and that Curse which every transgression of it was attended withal
Works of the Law are excluded it is certain that it is by Faith alone in Christ that we are justified All Works are not only excluded but the way unto their return is so shut up by the Method of the Apostles Discourse that all the reinforcements which the wit of man can give unto them will never introduce them into our Justification before God 3. He asserts from hence that we do not make void the Law through grace but establish it v. 31. which how it is done and how alone it can be done hath been before declared This is the Substance of the Resolution the Apostle gives unto that great Enquiry how a guilty convinced Sinner may come to be justified in the sight of God The sovereign Grace of God the Mediation of Christ and Faith in the Blood of Christ are all that he requireth thereunto And whatever notions men may have about Justification in other respects it will not be safe to venture on any other Resolution of this case and enquiry nor are we wiser than the Holy Ghost Rom. Chap. 4. In the beginning of the fourth Chapter he confirms what he had before doctrinally declared by a signal instance and this was of the Justification of Abraham who being the Father of the Faithful his Justification is proposed as the pattern of ours as he expresly declares vers 22 23 24. And some few things I shall observe on this instance in our passage unto the fifth Verse where I shall fix our Discourse 1. He denies that Abraham was justified by Works vers 2. And 1. These Works were not those of the Jewish Law which alone some pretend to be excluded from our Justification in this place For they were the Works he performed some hundreds of years before the giving of the Law at Sinai wherefore they are the Works of his Moral Obedience unto God that are intended 2. Those Works must be understood which Abraham had then when he is said to be justified in the Testimony produced unto that purpose But the Works that Abraham then had were Works of Righteousness performed in Faith and Love to God Works of New Obedience under the Conduct and aids of the Spirit of God Works required in the Covenant of Grace These are the Works excluded from the Justification of Abraham And these things are plain express and evident not to be eluded by any Distinctions or Evasions All Abraham's Evangelical Works are expresly excluded from his Justification before God 2. He proves by the Testimony of Scripture declaring the Nature and Grounds of the Justification of Abraham that he was justified no other way but that which he had before declared namely by Grace through Faith in Christ Jesus vers 3. Abraham believed God in the Promise of Christ and his Mediation and it was counted unto him for righteousness vers 3. He was justified by Faith in the way before described for other Justification by Faith there is none in opposition unto all his own Works and Personal Righteousness thereby 3. From the same Testimony he declares how he came to be Partaker of that Righteousness whereon he was justified before God which was by imputation it was counted or imputed unto him for Righteousness The Nature of Imputation hath been before declared 4. The especial Nature of this Imputation namely that it is of Grace without respect unto Works he asserts and proves vers 4. from what is â—â—ntrary thereunto Now to him that worketh is the reward â—ot reckon'd of Grace but of Debt Where Works are of any consideration there is no room for that kind of Imputation whereby Abraham was justified for it was a gracious Imputation and that is not of what is our own antecedently thereunto but what is made our own by that Imputation For what is our own cannot be imputed unto us in a way of Grace but only reckon'd ours in a way of Debt That which is our own with all the effects of it is due unto us And therefore they who plead that Faith it self is imputed unto us to give some countenance unto an Imputation of Grace do say it is imputed not for what it is for then it would be reckoned of Debt but for what it is not So Socinus Cum fides imputatur nobis pro justitia ideo imputatur quia nec ipsa fides justitia est nec vere in se eam continet De Servat Part. 4. cap. 2. which kind of Imputation being indeed only a false Imagination we have before disproved But all works are inconsistent with that Imputation whereby Abraham was justified It is otherwise with him that worketh so as thereon to be justified then it was with him Yea say some all Works that are meritorious that are performed with an opinion of Merit that make the Reward to be of debt are excluded but other Works are not This distinction is not learned from the Apostle For according unto him if this be merit and meritorious that the Reward be reckon'd of Debt then all Works in Justification are so For without distinction or limitation he affirms that unto him that worketh the reward is not reckon'd of Grace but of Debt He doth not exclude some sort of Works or Works in some sense because they would make the reward of Debt but affirms that all would do so unto the exclusion of gracious Imputation For if the foundation of Imputation be in our selves Imputation by Grace is excluded In the fifth Verse the Sum of the Apostles Doctrine which he had contended for and what he had proved is expressed But to him that worketh not but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly his Faith is counted for Righteousness It is granted on all hands that the close of the Verse his Faith is counted for Righteousness doth express the Justification of the person intended He is justified and the way of it is his Faith is counted or imputed Wherefore the foregoing words declare the Subject of Justification and its qualification or the description of the Person to be justified with all that is required on his part thereunto And first it is said of him that he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who worketh not It is not required unto his Justification that he should not work that he should not perform any Duties of Obedience unto God in any kind which is working For every person in the world is always obliged unto all Duties of Obedience according to the light and knowledg of the Will of God the means whereof is afforded unto him But the expression is to be limited by the Subject matter treated of He who worketh not with respect unto Justification though not the design of the Person but the Nature of the thing is intended To say he who worketh not is justified through believing is to say that his Works whatever they be have no influence into his Justification nor hath God in justifying of him any respect unto them Wherefore he alone who worketh not is
believe is represented in the words of the Apostle He doth therefore use his utmost endeavor to wrest and deprave them And yet although most of his Artifices are since traduced into the Annotations of others upon the place he himself produceth nothing material but what is taken out of Origen and the Comment of Pelagius on this Epistle which is extant in the Works of Jerome and was urged before him by Erasmus The substance of what he pleads for is That the actual transgression of Adam is not imputed unto his posterity nor a depraved nature from thence communicated unto them Only whereas he had incurred the penalty of death all that derive their nature from him in that condition are rendred subject unto death also And as for that corruption of nature which is in us or a proneness unto sin it is not derived from Adam but is an habit contracted by many continued acts of our own So also on the other hand that the Obedience or Righteousness of Christ is not imputed unto us Only when we make our selves to become his Children by our obedience unto him he having obtained eternal life for himself by his obedience unto God we are made partakers of the benefits thereof This is the substance of his long Disputation on this subject De Servator lib. 4. cap. 6. But this is not to expound the words of the Apostle but expresly to contradict them as we shall see in the insuing consideration of them I intend not an Exposition of the whole discourse of the Apostle but only of those passages in it which evidently declare the way and manner of our Justification before God A comparison is here proposed and pursued between the First Adam by whom sin was brought into the World and the Second Adam by whom it is taken away And a comparison it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of things contrary wherein there is a similitude in some things and a dissimilitude in others both sorts illustrating the truth declared in it The general Proposition of it is contained in Ver. 12. As by one Man sin entred into the World and death by sin and so death passed on all Men for that all have sinned The entrance of sin and punishment into the World was by one Man and that by one sin as he afterward declares Yet were they not confined unto the person of that one Man but belonged equally unto all This the Apostle expresseth inverting the order of the Effect and Cause In the entrance of it he first mentions the cause or sin and then the effect or punishment By one Man sin entred into the World and Death by sin But in the Application of it unto all Men he expresseth first the effect and then the cause Death passed on all Men for that all had sinned Death on the first entrance of sin passed on all that is all Men became liable and obnoxious unto it as the punishment due to sin All Men that ever were are or shall be were not then existent in their own persons But yet were they all of them then upon the first entrance of sin made subject to death or liable unto punishment They were so by vertue of Divine Constitution upon their foederal existence in the one Man that sinned And actually they became obnoxious in their own persons unto the sentence of it upon their first natural existence being born children of wrath It is hence manifest what sin it is that the Apostle intends namely The actual sin of Adam the one sin of that one common person whilest he was so For although the corruption and depravation of our nature doth necessarily insue thereon in every one that is brought forth actually in the World by Natural Generation yet is it the guilt of Adams actual sin alone that rendred them all obnoxious unto death upon the First entrance of sin into the World So death entred by sin the guilt of it obnoxiousness unto it and that with respect unto all Men universally Death here compriseth the whole punishment due unto sin be it what it will concerning which we need not here to dispute The wages of sin is death Rom. 6.23 and nothing else Whatever sin deserves in the Justice of God whatever punishment God at any time appointed or threatned unto it it is comprised in death In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death This therefore the Apostle lays down as the foundation of his discourse and of the comparison which he intends namely that in and by the actual sin of Adam all Men are made liable unto death or unto the whole punishment due unto sin That is the guilt of that sin is imputed unto them For nothing is intended by the imputation of sin unto any but the rendring them justly obnoxious unto the punishment due unto that sin As the not imputing of sin is the freeing of Men from being subject or liable unto punishment And this sufficiently evidenceth the vanity of the Pelagian Gloss that Death passed upon all meerly by vertue of natural propagation from him who had deserved it without any imputation of the guilt of sin unto them which is a contradiction unto the plain words of the Apostle For it is the guilt of sin and not natural propagation that he affirms to be the cause of Death Having mentioned sin and death the one as the only cause of the other the guilt of sin of the punishment of death sin deserving nothing but death and death being due unto nothing but sin he declares how all Men universally became liable unto this punishment or guilty of death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in quo omnes peccaverunt in whom all have sinned For it relates unto the one Man that sinned in whom all sinned which is evident from the effect thereof in as much as in him all died 1 Cor. 15.22 Or as it is here on his sin Death passed on all Men. And this is the evident sense of the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is not unusual in the Scripture See Matth. 15.5 Rom. 4.18 Chap. 5.2 Phil. 1.3 Heb. 9.17 And it is so often used by the best Writers in the Greek Tongue So Hesiod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 modus in omnibus rebus optimus So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in vobis situm est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc in me situm est And this reading of the words is contended for by Austine against the Pelagians rejecting their eo quod or propterea But I shall not contend about the reading of the words It is the artifice of our adversaries to perswade Men that the force of our Argument to prove from hence the imputation of the sin of Adam unto his posterity doth depend solely upon this interpretation of these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by in whom We shall therefore grant them their desire that they are better rendred by eo quod propterea or quatenus
Righteous and the Sons of God then may Christ by the imputation of our unrighteousness be said to be a sinner and a child of the Devil Ans. 1 That which the Scripture affirms concerning the imputation of our sins unto Christ is that he was made sin for us This the Greek Expositors Chrysostome Theophylact and Oecumenius with many others take for a sinner But all affirm that denomination to be taken from imputation only he had sin imputed unto him and underwent the punishment due unto it as we have Righteousness imputed unto us and enjoy the benefit of it 2 The imputation of sin unto Christ did not carry along with it any thing of the pollution or filth of sin to be communicated unto him by transfusion a thing impossible so that no denomination can thence arise which should include in it any respect unto them A thought hereof is impious and dishonourable unto the Son of God But his being made sin through the imputation of the guilt of sin is his honour and glory 3 The imputation of the sin of Fornicators Idolaters Adulterers c. such as the Corinthians were before their Conversion unto Christ doth not on any ground bring him under a denomination from those sins For they were so in themselves actively inherently subjectively and thence were so called But that he who knew no sin voluntarily taking on him to answer for the guilt of those sins which in him was an act of Righteousness and the highest Obedience unto God should be said to be an Idolater c. is a fond imagination The denomination of a sinner from sin inherent actually committed defiling the Soul is a reproach and significative of the utmost unworthiness But even the denomination of a sinner by the imputation of sin without the least personal guilt or defilement being undergone by him unto whom it is imputed in an act of the highest Obedience and tending unto the greatest glory of God is highly honourable and glorious But 4 The imputation of sin unto Christ was antecedent unto any real union between him and sinners whereon he took their sin on him as he would and for what ends he would But the imputation of his Righteousness unto Believers is consequential in order of nature unto their union with him whereby it becomes theirs in a peculiar manner so as that there is not a parity of reason that he should be esteemed a sinner as that they should be accounted Righteous And 5 we acquiesce in this that on the imputation of sin unto Christ it is said that God made him to be sin for us which he could not be but thereby and he was so by an act transient in its effects for a time only that time wherein he underwent the punishment due unto it But on the imputation of his Righteousness unto us we are made the Righteousness of God with an everlasting Righteousness that abides ours always 6 To be a child of the Devil by sin is to do the works of the Devil Joh. 8.44 But the Lord Christ in taking our sins upon him when imputed unto him did the work of God in the highest act of holy Obedience evidencing himself to be the Son of God thereby and destroying the work of the Devil So foolish and impious is it to conceive that any absolute change of state or relation in him did ensue thereon That by the Righteousness of God in this place our own Faith and Obedience according to the Gospel as some would have it are intended is so alien from the scope of the place and sense of the words as that I shall not particularly examine it The Righteousness of God is revealed to Faith and received by Faith and is not therefore Faith it self And the force of the Antithesis is quite perverted by this conceit For where is it in this that he was made sin by the imputation of our sin unto him and we are made Righteousness by the imputation of our own Faith and Obedience unto our selves But as Christ had no concern in sin but as God made him sin it was never in him inherently so have we no interest in this Righteousness it is not in us inherently but only is imputed unto us Besides the act of God in making us righteous is his justifying of us But this is not by the infusion of the habit of Faith and Obedience as we have proved And what act of God is intended by them who affirm That the Righteousness of God which we are made is our own Righteousness I know not The constitution of the Gospel Law it cannot be for that makes no Man righteous And the Persons of Believers are the object of this act of God and that as they are considered in Christ. Gal. 2.16 The Epistle of the same Apostle unto the Galatians is wholly designed unto the vindication of the Doctrine of Justification by Christ without the Works of the Law with the use and means of its improvement The sum of his whole design is laid down in the repetition of his words unto the Apostle Peter on the occasion of his failure there related Chap. 2.86 Knowing that a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Jesus Christ even we have believed on Jesus Christ that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ and not by the Works of the Law for by the Works of the Law shall no flesh be justified That which he doth here assert was such a known such a fundamental principle of Truth among all Believers that their conviction and knowledge of it was the ground and occasion of their transition and passing over from Judaism unto the Gospel and Faith in Jesus Christ thereby And in the words the Apostle determines that great inquiry how or by what means a Man is or may be justified before God The subject spoken of is expressed indefinitely A Man that is any Man a Jew or a Gentile a Believer or an Vnbeliever The Apostle that spake and they to whom he spake the Galatians to whom he wrote who also for some time had believed and made Profession of the Gospel The answer given unto the question is both Negative and Positive both asserted with the highest assurance and as the common faith of all Christians but only those who had been carried aside from it by Seducers He asserts that this is not this cannot be by the Works of the Law What is intended by the Law in these disputations of the Apostle hath been before declared and evinced The Law of Moses is sometimes signally intended not absolutely but as it was the present instance of Mens cleaving unto the Law of Righteousness and not submitting themselves thereon unto the Righteousness of God But that the consideration of the Moral Law and the duties of it is in this Argument any where excepted by him is a weak imagination yea it would except the Ceremonial Law it self for the observation of it whilest
He is utterly mistaken for the Apostle doth not ascribe Justification partly to Works and partly to Faith but he ascribes Justification in the sense by him intended wholly to Works in opposition to that Faith concerning which he treats For there is a plain Antithesis in the Words between Works and Faith as unto Justification in the sense by him intended A dead Faith a Faith without Works the Faith of Devils is excluded from having any influence into Justification Fourthly He adds that the Apostle compares this Faith without Works unto a rich man that gives nothing unto the poor ver 16. and a Body without a Spirit ver 26. wherefore as that knowledg whereby a rich man knows the wants of the poor is true and real and a dead body is a body so is Faith without Works true Faith also and as such is considered by Saint James Ans. These things do evidently destroy what they are produced in the confirmation of only the Cardinal helps them out with a little Sophistry For whereas the Apostle compares this Faith unto the charity of a man that gives nothing to the poor he suggests in the room thereof his knowledge of their poverty And his knowledge may be true and the more true and certain it is the more false and feigned is the charity which he pretends in these words Go and be fed or cloathed Such is the Faith the Apostle speaks of And although a dead body is a true body that is as unto the matter or substance of it a Carcass yet is it not an essential part of a living man A Carcass is not of the same nature or kind as is the body of a living man And we assert no other difference between the Faith spoken of by the Apostle and that which is justifying than what is between a dead breathless Carcass and a living animated body prepared and fitted for all vital acts Wherefore it is evident beyond all contradiction if we have not a mind to be contentious that what the Apostle James here derogates from Faith as unto our Justification it respects only a dead barren lifeless Faith such as is usually pretended by ungodly godly men to countenance themselves in their sins And herein the Faith asserted by Paul hath no concern The consideration of the present condition of the profession of Faith in the World will direct us unto the best exposition of this place Thirdly They speak not of Justification in the same sense nor unto the same end It is of our absolute Justification before God the Justification of our persons our acceptance with him and the grant of a right unto the Heavenly inheritance that the Apostle Paul doth treat and thereof alone This he declares in all the causes of it all that on the part of God or on our part concurreth thereunto The evidence the knowledge the sense the fruit the manifestation of it in our own Consciences in the Church unto others that profess the Faith he treats not of but speaks of them separately as they occur on other occasions The Justification he treats of is but one and at once accomplished before God changing the relative state of the person justified and is capable of being evidenced various ways unto the glory of God and the consolation of them that truly believe Hereof the Apostle James doth not treat at all for his whole enquiry is after the nature of that Faith whereby we are justified and the only way whereby it may be evidenced to be of the right kind such as a man may safely trust unto Wherefore he treats of Justification only as to the evidence and manifestation of it nor had he any occasion to do otherwise And this is apparent from both the instances whereby he confirms his purpose The first is that of Abraham ver 21.22 23. For he says that by Abrahams being justified by Works in the way and manner wherein he asserts him so to have been the Scripture was fulfilled which says that Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And if his intention were to prove that we are justified before God by Works and not by Faith because Abraham was so the Testimony produced is contrary yea directly contradictory unto what should be proved by it and accordingly is alledged by Paul to prove that Abraham was justified by Faith without Works as the words do plainly import Nor can any man declare how the Truth of this proposition Abraham was justified by Works intending absolute Justification before God was that wherein that Scripture was fulfilled Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness especially considering the opposition that is made both here and elsewhere between Faith and Works in this matter Besides he asserts that Abraham was justified by Works then when he had offered his Son on the Altar the same we believe also but only enquire in what sense he was so justified For it was Thirty years or thereabout after it was testified concerning him that he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness and when Righteousness was imputed unto him he was justified And twice justified in the same sense in the same way with the same kind of Justification he was not How then was he Justified by Works when he offered his Son on the Altar He that can conceive it to be any otherwise but that he was by his Work in the offering of his Son evidenced and declared in the sight of God and man to be justified apprehends what I cannot attain unto seeing that he was really justified long before as is unquestionable and confessed by all He was I say then justified in the sight of God in the way declared Gen. 22.12 And gave a signal Testimony unto the sincerity of his Faith and trust in God manifesting the truth of that Scripture he believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness And in the quotation of this Testimony the Apostle openly acknowledgeth that he was really accounted Righteous had Righteousness imputed unto him and was justified before God the reasons and causes whereof he therefore considereth not long before that Justification which he ascribes unto his Works which therefore can be nothing but the evidencing proving and manifestation of it whence also it appears of what nature that Faith is whereby we are justified the Declaration whereof is the principal design of the Apostle In brief the Scripture alledged that Abraham believed and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness was fulfilled when he was justified by Works on the offering of his Son on the Altar either by the Imputation of Righteousness unto him or by a real efficiency or working Righteousness in him or by the manifestation and evidence of his former Justification or some other way must be found out 1 That it was not by Imputation or that Righteousness unto the Justification of life was not then first imputed unto him is plain in the Text