by them guiding vs and beeing a law vnto vs. Rom. 8. 3. 14. Thirdly God by manifold afflictions nurtures and schooles vs partly to preuent sinnes to come and partly to humble vs for that which is past 1. Cor. 11. 32. Ier. 31. 18. The vse Seeing the law is abrogated as I haue said we must be a free and voluntarie people seruing God not of constraint but willingly as if there were no law to compell vs. All nations shall flow as waters to the mountaine of the Lord. Isa. 2. 2. Thy people shall come willingly in the day of assemblie Psal. 110. 3. In the daies of Iohn Baptist the kingdome of heauen suffered violence Ieremie saith they shall teach euery man his neighbour and his brother Ierem. 31. 31. because men shall learne freely without compulsion or calling vpon Here is the fault of our times Many say in heart to Christ Depart from vs we will none of thy waies and many againe are zealous for the things of this life but for duties pertaining to Gods worship and the saluation of their soules they are neither hot nor could This negligence and slacknes is full of danger and therefore with speede to be amended For cursed is he that doth the worke of God negligently and the Lord will spue out such persons 26 For ye are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus 27 For all ye that are baptised into Christ haue put on Christ. 28 There is neither Iew nor Grecian there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Iesus Paul had said before v. 25. that the beleeuing Iewes after the publishing of the Gospel were no more vnder the law as vnder a schoolemaster In this 26. v. he renders a reason hereof and it may be framed on this manner If we Iewes were still vnder the law as vnder a schoolemaster then we should be still after the manner of seruants but we are not after the manner of seruants because we are children for euen ye Galatians and that all of you are children of God not by Circumcision or by the keeping of the law but by faith in Christ. Againe that they are children of God he prooues it thus Ye are baptised into Christ and in baptisme ye haue put on Christ in that ye are ioyned with him and haue fellowship with him who is the naturall sonne of God therefore ye are sonnes of God It may be saide All children of God all baptised all put on Christ how can this be seeing some are Iewes some Gentiles some bond some free some men some women The answer is made v. 27. there are differences of men indeede but in Christ all are as one In these words I consider two things The first is the benefit or gift bestowed on the Galatians which is sonne-ship Adoption or the condition of Gods children The second is the description of this benefit by foure arguments The first is by the circumstance of the persons ye all are children of God The second is the inward meanes namely faith in Christ Iesus The third is the outward meanes or the pledge of adoption ye are all baptised into Christ. The last is the foundation of adoption and that is to put on Christ or to be one with him For the better conceiuing of the benefit three questions may be mooued The first is whose sonnes the Galatians were Ans. The sonnes of God It may be saide how the sonnes of God I answer againe God is called a father in two respects first he is a father in respect of Christ the essentiall word and then God signifies the first person Againe God is called a father in respect of men Elect to saluation then the name God is put indefinitly and it comprehends not onely the first person but also the sonne and holy Ghost For all three doe equally regenerate them that are adopted And Paul saith of the Godhead indefinitly there is one God and father of all Eph. 4. 6. And when we pray saying Our father c. we inuocate not onely the first person but also the Sonne and holy Ghost And the sonne of God is expressely called the Father of eternitie in respect of vs Isa. 9. 6. and he is said to haue his seede Isa. 53. 11. The second question is in what respect are the Galatians the children of God Ans. A childe of God is two waies by nature by grace The childe of God by nature is Christ as he is the eternall sonne of God A child by grace is three waies By creation thus Adam before his fall and the good angels are the children of God Secondly by the personall vnion thus Christ as he is man is the child of God Thirdly by the grace of adoption thus are all true beleeuers and in this text the Galatians are saide to be the children of God In this grace of adoption there be two acts of God one is Acceptation whereby God accepts men for his children The other is Regeneration whereby men are borne of God when the Image of God is restored in them in righteousnes and true holines The third question is what is the excellencie of this benefit Ans. Great euery way Ioh. 1. 12. he which is the child of God is heire and fellowheire with Christ Rom. 8. 17. and that of the kingdome of heauen and of all things in heauen and earth 1. Cor. 3. 22. he hath title in this life and shall haue possession in the life to come Againe he that is Gods child hath the angels of God to tend on him and to minister vnto him for his good and saluation Heb. 1. 14. The first argument whereby the adoption of Gods children is set forth is concerning the persons to whome it belongs in these wordes All ye are the children of God So Paul saith all the Ephesians are Elect. Eph. 1. 3. And Peter calls all them to whome he writes 1. Pet. 1. 1. Elect and Iohn 1. epist. 3. the children of God And herein they follow the iudgement of charitie leauing all secret iudgements to God Here I obserue one thing that euery grieuous fall doth not abolish the fauour of God and extinguish the grace of regeneration For the Galatians erred in the foundation of religion and had fallen away to an other Gospel and yet Paul saith that they were for all this the children of God and not some but all of them This truth may be seene by experience The child of God before his fall hath a purpose not to sinne in the time of temptation when he is in falling he hath a strife after he is fallen he lieth not in his fall as wicked men doe but he recouereth himselfe by new repentance And this shews that the child of God by his fall doth not returne againe to the estate and condition of wicked men When S. Iohn saith he that is borne of God sinnes not his meaning is this he that is borne of God
whereof he declared and made manifest in the flesh after his resurrection Thus was he made Lord by declaring himselfe to be so indeede Rom. 1. 4. 1. Tim. 3. 16. Thus we see how God sent forth his sonne the vse follows This act of God in sending declares his infinite loue for this sending was for their sakes that were the enemies of God And it further signifies vnto vs the most free loue of God For nothing in vs mooued him to send but his owne goodnes This loue of God must mooue vs to loue God againe and to be thankfull The sonne of God takes not to himselfe the office of a Mediatour but he is called and sent forth of the father whereby two things are signified one that the office of a Mediatour was appointed of the father the other that the Sonne was designed to this office in the eternall counsell of the blessed Trinitie And so that we may please God in our callings and places we must haue a double assurance in our consciences one that the offices and callings which we performe are good pleasing vnto God the second that we are designed and called of God to the said offices and callings By this must we stay our minds in all our miseries The sonne is sent forth that is he comes from his father laies aside his maiestie and takes on him the condition of a seruant The same minde must be in vs to humble and abase our selues before God to thinke better of others then of our selues to be content with our condition to be well pleased when we are despised and contemned because we are worthie of it This is to conforme our selues to Christ. That the sonne of God himselfe must be sent forth from the bosome of his father this shewes the greatnes of our sinne and miserie which was the occasion of this sending And this must teach vs with bitternes to hate and detest our sinnes which fetched the sonne of God from heauen and to humble our selues with Dauid euen to the deepes and thence to pray to God for his mercie Psal. 130. 1. The second point namely the Incarnation of the sonne is expressed in these words Made of a woman that is made man or made flesh of a woman The Word was made flesh Ioh. 1. 14. Here three questions are to be handled The first is why the Sonne was made flesh Ans. There be two speciall causes hereof First the order of diuine iustice requires that Gods wrath should be appeased and a satisfaction made in the same nature in which his maiestie was offended Now the offence was in mans nature and therefore in it must satisfaction to God be performed Secondly the Mediatour betweene God and man must be both for nature and condition in the meane betweene God and man that is both God and man and thus the sonne of God is a perfect Mediatour The second question is how farre forth the sonne of God was made flesh I answer three things The first that he tooke vnto him the whole and perfect nature of man in respect of essence namely the intire substance of a reasonable soule and humane bodie Here remember that quantitie that is length breadth and thicknes is not an accident which may passe and repasse but it is of the substance of euery bodie therefore of the bodie of Christ. And for this cause it is impossible that the bodie of Christ in his quantitie beeing foure or fiue foote in length should be included in the compasse of a peece of bread that is but two or three inches in quantitie The second is that the sonne of God â—ooke vnto him the properties of mans nature the powers of life sense motion the facultie of reason will and affection The third is that he tooke to him the infirmities and miseries of mans nature Here two caueats must be remembred The first that he tooke to him onely such infirmities as are meere infirmities and no sinnes For example vpon the words of Christ Let this cuppe passe Matth. 26. some say that their was obliuion in Christ but this may not be said For obliuion is a sinne namely a forgetting of that which a man ought to remember there may be in Christ or other men a suspending of the Memorie by some externall and violent cause without obliuion The second caueat is that the sonne of God tooke to him the infirmities which pertaine to the nature of man and not such as pertaine to the persons of men as dropsies gouts consumptions and such like For he tooke not the person of any man but the nature of all men with all the appurtenances thereof except sinne The third question is How was he made flesh Ans. The flesh or manhood of Christ was first framed then sanctified and then vnâ—ted to the godhead of the sonne And thus was he made man Remember here that the forming of the flesh of Christ the sanctifying of it and the personall Vnion are all together for time and I distinguish them in this sort onely for doctrines sake In the framing of the manhood I consider the matter and the manner The matter was the substance of the Virgin signified in these words Made of a woman By this Christ is distinguished from all men in the world from Adam because he was neither of man nor woman but of â—edde clay From Eue because shee was made of man and not of woman From all that come of Adam and Eue for they are both of man and woman whereas Christ is of woman and not of man Againe Paul addes these words made of a woman to note the accomplishment of the promise the seede of the woman shall bruise the serpents head Gen. 3. 15. The manner of framing is expressed when Paul saith made not begotten of a woman The manhood then of Christ was framed without naturall generation by an extraordinarie worke of the holy Ghost Here a doubt is answered Some man may say if he were made of a woman he comes of Adam and consequently he is a sinner Ans. The order set downe by God with Adam in the creation is that whatsoeuer he looseth all his posteritie shall loose that comes of him by generation Vpon this order all that are begotten of Adam with the nature of man receiue the sinne and corruption of nature And so should Christ haue done if he had descended of Adam by generation But considering his flesh was made of the substance of a woman and not begotten of any man therefore he takes the nature of man and not the corruption of nature The sanctifying of the manhood of Christ is a worke of diuine power whereby at the time of the framing thereof it was filled with the gifts of the holy Ghost aboue measure that he mightin both natures be a perfect Sauiour Here obserue that Christ by the actions of his life did not merit for himselfe glorie and eternall happines because he was most worthie of all glorie and honour
are first to be taught and that by men where reuelation is wanting This kind of teaching is the foundation of the schoole of the Prophets and it hath bin from the beginning The Patriarkes till Moses were Prophets in their families they taught not onely their families in generall but also their first borne that they might succeede as Prophets after them There were 48. cities of the Leuites dispersed through all the tribes where not onely the people were taught but also schooles erected that they might be taught which were to be Priests and Leuites Num. 37. One citie among the rest is called Cireath sephar Iosu. 15. 15. that is the citie of bookes or as we say the Vniversitie Samuel a yong man was sent to the Tabernacle in Shilo to be taught and trained vp of Eli the Priest Samuel when he was iudge of Israel erected Colledges of Prophets and ruled them himselfe 1. Sam. 10. In the decaied estate of the ten tribes Elias and Elizeus set vp schooles of the Prophets in Bethel Carmel c. and the yong students were called the sonnes of the Prophets 2. king 2. 3. Christ himselfe beside the sermons made to the people trained vp and taught himselfe his 12. Apostles and his 70. disciples Paul commaunds Timothie to teach that which he had learned to such as shal be fit to teach others 2. Tim. 2. 2. Furthermore this teaching is of great vse For it serues to maintaine the true interpretation of scripture the puritie of doctrine and it is a meanes to continue the ministerie to the ende of the world The meanest arte or trade that is is not learned without great teaching then much more teaching is required in diuinitie which is the arte of all arts The true interpretation of scripture and the right cutting of the word is a matter of great difficultie and a matter whatsoeuer men think of the greatest learning in the world Therefore it is necessarie that teachers should first be taught and learne aright the Gospel of Christ. Eleauen hundred yeares after Christ men began to lay aside Moses and the Prophets and the writings of the new Testament and to expound the writings of men as the Sentences of Peter Lumbard Hence ignorance superstition idolatrie come headlong into the world Seeing then the teaching of them that are to be teachers is of such antiquitie and vse all men are to be exhorted to put to their helping hands that this thing may goe forward Princes are to maintaine it by their bountifulnesse and authoritie as they haue done and doe still and that which they doe they must doe it more Parents must dedicate the fittest of their children to the seruice of God in the ministerie and not to vse it in the last place for a shift as they doe For commonly the eldest must be the heire the next the lawyer the youngest the diuine Students must loue and affect this calling aboue all other 1. Cor. 14. 1. Lastly all men must make praier that God would prosper and blesse all Schooles of learning where this kind of teaching is in vse Here againe it appeares that Christ is God and more then a meere man because he is opposed to man and that Paul receiued authoritie and the keies of the kingdome of heauen immediately of Christ as well as Peter 13. For ye haue heard of my conuersation in time past howe that I persecuted the Church of God extreamely and wasted it 14. And profitted in the Iewish religion aboue many of my companions of mine owne nation and was much more zealous of the Traditions of my fathers In the former verse the Apostle set downe that he learned the Gospel not of man but of Iesus Christ immediately This in the next place he goes about to prooue at large His reason is framed thus If I learned the Gospell of any man I learned it either before or after my conuersion but I learned it neither before nor after my conuersion of any man The first part of his reason is here confirmed thus before my calling and conuersion I professed Iudaisme and I liued accordingly persecuting the Church and suppressing the Gospel of Christ and profiting in my religion aboue many others therefore I was not then fit to heare and learne the Gospell of Christ of any man This argument he further confirmes by the testimonie of the Galatians thus That this was my conuersation in Iudaisme ye are witnesses for ye haue heretofore heard as much In the example of Paul two points are generally to be considered The first that the distinction of man and man ariseth not of the will or naturall disposition of man but of the grace and mercie of God For Paul an Elect vessell for nature and disposition before his conuersion is as wicked as any other And he saith Rom. 9. 11. that the difference betweene man and man before God is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercie Therefore it is a Pelagian errour to thinke that men doing that which they can doe by nature occasion God to giue them supernatural grace The second point is that Paul here makes an open and ingenious confession of his wicked life past And hence I gather that this Apostle and consequently the rest writ the scriptures of the new Testament by the instinct of Gods spirit and not by humane pollicie which no doubt would haue mooued them to haue couered and concealed their owne faults and not to haue blazed their owne shame to the world And therefore the bookes of scripture are not bookes of pollicie as Atheists suppose to keepe men in awe but they are the very word of God Againe the end of this plaine confessiō is that Paul might thereby cōfirme and iustifie his owne calling to the office of an Apostle This serues to giue a checke to such persons as vse to sit and rehearse their wicked liues past in boasting and reioycing manner In Pauls example there be two things to be considered his profession before his calling and his conuersation His profession was Iudaisme and this hindred him from imbracing the gospell It may here be demanded what Iudaisme or the Iewish religion is Answer In the daies of Christ and the Apostles there were three speciall sects among the Apostles Esseis Sadduceis and Pharises And the Pharises were the principall and their doctrine was commonly imbraced of the Iewes And therefore by Iudaisme as I take it Phariseisme is here meant Nowe the principall doctrines of the Pharises were these I. They held that there was one God and that this God was the father without any distinction of persons for when Christ mentioned the distinction of the father and the sonne they would not acknowledge it Iohn 8. 19. II. They acknowledged in the Messias but one nature for when it was asked thē howe Christ beeing the sonne of Dauid should neuerthelesse be his Lord they could not answer Math. 22. III. They held that the
the secrets of our hearts to God Whereas Paul saith that a Mediatour is not of one but a third betweene two at the least it may be demaunded how Christ can be mediatour betweene man and God considering he is God Ans. Though Father Sonne and holy Spirit be one and the same in respect of Godhead yet are they distinct in respect of person or in respect of the manner of subsisting so as the Father is the father not the Sonne or holy Ghost the Sonne the sonne and not the Father or the H. Ghost the holy Ghost the holy Ghost and not the father or the sonne The sonne then and the father beeing persons really distinct the sonne may be and is Mediatour first of all in respect of order to the father and in him to the sonne and the holy Ghost For the three persons beeing of one nature and will when the father is appeased in him also the sonne and the holy Ghost are appeased Thus Iohn saith If any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the father It may be said that Christ cannot be Mediatour to himselfe Ans. In Christ consider his nature and his Office By nature he is the sonne of God by office he is Mediatour and thus he is God-man or Man-god and as Mediatour by voluntarie dispensation he is inferiour to himselfe as he is the essentiall sonne of God And in the same manner Christ as God-man is Mediatour to himselfe as he is the sonne of God For as he is the sonne of God he is the partie offended as he is Mediatour God-man he is the partie that makes reconciliation Lastly the propertie of God must be obserued that he is vnchangeable Iam. 1. 17. Mal. 3. 16. It may be obiected that God is saide in Scripture to repent Ans. God is said to repent not because he changeth either nature or will but because he changeth his actions of mercie and loue into effects of anger after the manner of men Againe it may be obiected that God changed the law and abolished ceremonies Ans. This God did by an vnchangeable decree before all worlds and so the change is in the law and not in God For God can decree to change this or that without change The vse Gods vnchangeablenes is the foundation of our comfort Saint Paul saith If we loue God we are knowne of him 1. Cor. 8. 3. Now the first we may certenly finde in our selues namely the loue of God and Christ and for the second God is vnchangeable For they which are once knowne of God are euer knowne of him and that euen then when they feele nothing but Gods anger Againe we are put in minde to be vnchangeable in good things as in faith hope loue good counsells honest promises and such like specially in the maintenance of true religion For we ought to be like vnto God It is the poesie of our grations Queene Semper eadem Alwaies one and the same no doubt in good things specially in the religion established among vs. The same must be the minde of all good subiects and all good people 1. Cor. 15. 58. 21 Is the law then against the promise of God God forbid for if there had beene a law giuen which could haue giuen life surely righteousnesse should haue beene by the law 22 But the Scripture hath included all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ should be giuen to them that beleeue In these words Paul propounds and answers an other obiection in number the fourth The occasion of the obiection is taken out of the former words in which Paul saith the law is for transgressions It may be framed on this manner If the law serue to conuince and condemne vs of sinne it serues not to giue life but to kill and so it is contrarie to the promise which giuethlife The answer is made negatiuely God forbid And a double reason is rendered of the deniall The first is this If the law could giue life it should also giue iustice or iustifie and so it should be contrarie to the promise because then there should be two contrarie waies of iustification one by faith alone the other by faith with workes Therefore in that it kills and condemnes it is not contrarie to the promise The second reason is in the 22. verse Things subordinate whereof one serues for the other are not contrarie the law and the promise are subordinate for the law prepares the way for the accomplishing of the promise in that it shuts all vnder sinne that the promise may be giuen to them that beleeue in Christ. The vse In that Paul reiects the blasphemous obiection with God forbid we are taught to auoid things said or done to the dishonour of God with loathing and detestation When it was related to Ahab and Iezabel that Naboth had blasphemed God they beeing idolaters solemnise a fast pretending danger by the sinne 1. King 21. 12. Caiphas supposing that Christ had blasphemed rent his garments Math. 26. When Iob did but suspect his children of blaspheming God he called them and sanctified them Iob 1. 5. It is the fault of our daies that many blaspheme by cursing swearing c. without feare and many doe it as many dissolute souldiers in a brauerie and hearers thereof for the most part are nothing mooued thereat so ordinarie is the offence This shewes the wickednes of our times In the first reason Paul deliuers a notable conclusion namely that the thing which is the meanes to procure life vnto vs is also the meanes of our iustice or iustification before God And good reason For iustice causeth life and that which giueth life first of all giueth iustice Hence it followes that workes cannot meritoriously deserue eternall life For if life be by the workes of the law then iustice also but that cannot be for we must first of all be iustified before we can doe a good worke Let the Papists consider this Againe they which teach that faith is alone in iustification and that both faith and workes concurre as causes of saluation are deceiued For by the former conclusion of Paul if workes be causes of saluation then must they also haue a stroake in our iustification which they haue not And therefore they are the way of our saluation but not any cause at all Lastly here we see that many among vs doe not hold Christ or beleeue in him aright for their iustification because they hold him without change of heart and life For by Pauls conclusion whome Christ quickneth them he iustifieth and whome he doth not quicken them he doth not iustifie Examine thy selfe then if Christ haue sanctified and renewed thy heart thou art iustified if thy heart be yet vnsanctified and thy life vnreformed deceiue not thy selfe with fond imaginations thou art not yet iustified The 22. verse followeth containing the second reason And first let vs consider the meaning of the words The Scripture the words are in the Originall thus That
appearance of humilitie Col. 2. 23. And the true worshippers of God in the new Testament worship him in spirit and trueth Ioh. 4. v. 24 The fulnesse of time or the full time is that time in which the captiuitie of the Church endeth and her libertie begins This time was ended 4000. yeares from the creation and it is called a full time because it was designed and appointed by the will prouidence of the heauenly father For he is Lord of time and all seasons are in his hand and his will or prouidence makes times fit or vnfit Marke then that is the onely full and fit time for the inioying of any blessing of God which he by his prouidence appointeth This must teach vs when by praier we aske any good thing at Gods hand not to prescribe any time vnto God but to leaue it to his prouidence Againe if thou liue in any miserie waite on the Lord and be content For that is the fit best time of thy deliueraÌ„ce which God hath appointed Lastly thou must be admonished to pray to god for grace and mercie and to turne to him this daie before to morrowe For this is the time which God hath appointed for these duties this is the day of grace and therefore the onely fit time Heb. 3. 7. Psal. 32. 6. Thus much of the similitude nowe I come to the first reason whereby Paul confirmes his maine argument Christ hath purchased and procured your libertie therefore the time therof is come and past For the better clearing of this reason Paul sets downe the waie and order which was vsed in procuring this libertie And it containes fiue degrees The first is the sending of the sonne the second his incarnation the third his subiection to the law the fourth our redemption from the laws the fift the fruition of our adoption v. 4. 5. The first the sending of the sonne is in these words In the fulnesse of time God sent forth his sonne That we may attaine to the sense of this great Mysterie sixe questions are to be propounded The first is what is meant by God Answ. The father the first person Eph. 1. 3. Blessed he God the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ 2. Cor. 1. 3. and Ioh. 20. 17. And he is called God not because he partakes more of the godhead then the sonne or the h. Ghost but because he is the first in order of the three diuine persons and he is the beginning of the sonne and the H. ghost and hath no beginning of his own person because he doth not receiue the godhead by communication from any other In this respect he is called God more commonly then the sonne or the holy Ghost The second question is How the father sends the sonne Answ. By his counsell and eternall decree whereby the sonne was designed to the office of a Mediatour and consequently to become man Act. 2. 23. And thus is he said to be sealed of the father Ioh. 6. 27. and to be sanctified and sent into the world Ioh. 10. 36. And therefore this sending implies no alteration or change of place The third question is whether the sonne was sent with his owne consent or no Ans. Yea the decree of the father is the decree of the sonne and the holy Ghost because as they are all one in nature so are they all one in will All the persons then haue a stroke in this sending yet for orders false the father is said to send because he is first The fourth question is how the father can send the sonne considering they are both one Ans. In the doctrine touching the Trinitie Nature and person must be distinguished Nâ—ture is a substance common to many as the Godhead A person is that which subsisteth of it selfe and hath a proper manner of subsisting as the father begetting the sonne begotten the H. Ghost proceeding Now the father and the sonne are one indeed for nature or godhead but they are not one for person Nay thus they are really distinct The father is not the sonne nor the sonne the father And thus doth the father send the son The fift question is why the sonne is so called Ans. Because he was begotten of the father by a perfect and eternall generation not to be vttered of man or conceiued And we must be warned not to conceiue it in any carnall or humane manner For an earthly father is in time before his sonne and the sonne after but God the father and the sonne are coeternall and not one before or after the other for time An earthly father is forth of the sonne and the sonne forth of the father but God the father is in the sonne and the sonne in the father An earthly child is from his father by propagation but the sonne is from the heauenly father not by propagation but by communication of substance Lastly the heauenly father begettes the sonne by communication of his whole substance and so doth no earthly father The last question is whether the Sonne be God For it is here said God sent his Sonne Ans. He is God For he that is sent forth from God was before he was sent forth And the sonne is said to be sent forth because he was with God the father before all worlds Ioh. 1. 1. and because he came from the bosome of his father v. 18. Obiect I. The sonne is sent of the father and he that is sent is inferiour to the father and he that is inferiour to God is not God Ans. Two equalls by common consent may send each other and therefore sending alwaies implies not inequalitie Againe inferioritie is of two sorts inferioritie of nature and inferioritie of condition The first doth not befall Christ because for nature he is one and the same with the father The second agrees vnto him because of his owne voluntarie accord he abased himselfe and tooke vpon him the shape of a man Phil. 2. 5. Obiect II. God hath his beginning of none the sonne hath his beginning of the father therefore he is not God Ans. The sonne in respect of his person is of the father but in respect of his godhead he is of none The sonne of God considered as he is a sonne is of the father God of very God But considered as he is God he is God of himselfe because the godhead of the sonne is not begotten more then the Godhead of the father Obiect III. The sonne was made Lord in time Act. 2. 36. therefore no God Ans. Christ as he is the sonne of God was not made Lord in time but is by nature an eternall Lord as the father And he is said to be made Lord in respect of his condition as he is God-man and that in time in respect of both his natures In respect of his manhood because it is receiued into the vnitie of the second person and exalted to the right hand of God in heauen In respect of his Godhead the maiestie and Lordship
therefore thou maist not compell the Gentiles to liue as Iewes Here first let vs obserue the force of euill example it compells men to be euill Therefore let all superiours Magistrates Ministers and all gouernours of families looke to their examples For if they be euill they constraine others also to be euill Here againe we see what wonderfull subiection the ancient beleeuers yeelded to the ministerie of the word For if the actions of the Apostles compelled men to do this or that what then did their doctrines and heauenly exhortations do When Iohn the Baptist preached the kingdome of heauen suffered violence and the violent tooke it to themselues When the disciples preached in Iewrie they saw Satan falling downe from heauen like lightning The weapons of Paul were spirituall to cast downe holds and to bring euery thought in subiection to God Here the fault of our time is to be considered We haue the forme of godlines in hearing and in outward profession but we want the power of it For we doe not in heart yeeld subiection by suffering our selues to be vrged and compelled to obedience by the authoritie of the ministerie Thirdly here we see wherein stood Peters sinne namely in that he constrained men to a necessarie obseruation of the Ceremoniall law by his example binding the Gentiles to the doing of that which the Gospel hath made free Therefore great is the wickednes of the Romane religion in that it placeth a necessitie in many things in the vse whereof Christ hath procured vs an holy and Christian libertie In this respect the vowes of perpetuall continencie of pouertie and regular obedience are falsly tearned states of perfection and are indeede estates of abomination 15 We which are Iewes by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles 16 Know that a man is not iustified by the workes of the law but by the faith of Iesus Christ which I say haue beleeued in Iesus Christ that we might be iustified by the faith of Iesus Christ and not by the works of the law because by the workes of the law no flesh shall be iustified Here Paul laies downe the second reason of his reproofe it is framed thus That which we defend both in iudgement and practise that must we vrge and not the contrarie but iustification by faith without workes we defend both in iudgement and practise therefore we must vrge it and not the contrarie namely the necessarie obseruation of the law The maior is wanting the minor is expressed in the 16. v. and it is amplified by an argument of things diuers thus Though we be Iewes to whome the law was giuen yet we forsake the law and looke to be iustified by the faith of Christ. Secondly the minor is confirmed by a testimony of the psalme v. 16. by the workes of the law no flesh shall be iustified Here two points are to be handled One of the distinction of the Iewes and Gentiles the other of iustification Touching the distinction of Iewes and Gentiles sundrie points are to be handled The first what is the cause of this distinction Ans. The good will and pleasure of God Moses saith God chose the Israelites â—boue all nations Deut. 7. 6. he loued them Deut. 10. 15. when he deâ—â—ded the nations lacob was his portion Deut. 32. 8. He knew them aboue all nations saith Amos 3. 1. And he chose them because he loued their fathers Deut. 4. 37. Hence we gather the free Election of God and that they are deceiued who thinke that there was no difference of Iewes and Genâ—â—les in respect of God but in respect of themselues because the one imbraced Christ the other refused Christ. But there cannot be a refusall where the Messias was not knowne and among the Gentiles he was not so much as named Rom. 15. 20. The second point is wherein stands the difference of Iewes and Gentiles Ans. Here the Iewes are opposed to sinners of the Gentiles and therefore by the Iewes are meant an holy and peculiar people The distinction therefore lies in this that the one was holy the other prophane the one in the couenant the other out of the couenant Rom. 9. 4 5. Psal. 147. 20. Here two errours must be auoided One that the difference lay in earthly things which is not true For the law was giuen to the Israelites and it was a schoolemaster to Christ Gal. 3. and an introduction to a better hope Hebr. 7. 19. The second errour is that they differed onely in this that Christ was more plentifully and fully reuealed to the Iewes more darkly and sparingly to the Gentiles But it was otherwise For the Gentiles were without God and Christ Eph. 2. 12. and they were left to themselues to walke in their owne â—aies Act. 14. 16. The third point is how long this difference indured Ans. Till the death of Christ. For the disciples were forbidden to goe into the way of the Gentiles Math. 10. 5. And Christ saith that he was not sent but to the lâ—st sheepe of the house of Israel Mat. 15. 22. It may be obiected that here we see the difference of Iewes and Gentiles is stâ—nding long after the ascension of Christ. Ans. Christ in his death did fully merit the abolishment of this difference Eph. 2. neuerthelesse the execution of this abolishment was by degrees and it was at this time begunne by the ministerie of the Apostles yet not accomplished The last point is that the Iewes are an holy people by nature not because holines is conuaied to them by generation but because euen from their beginning and birth by vertue of the couenant they are holy If the roote be holy the branches are holy Rom. 11. 16. If either of their parents beleeue their children are holy 1. Cor. 7. 14. In a ciuill contract the father and his heire make but one person and the father couenants for himselfe and his posteritie euen so in the couenant of grace he beleeues for himselfe and withall makes his posteritie partaker of the said couenant and thus the posteritie becomes holy It may be obiected that whatsoeuer is borne of flesh is flesh Ans. The parent sustaines a double person First he is to be considered as a child of Adam and thus he brings forth a child hauing with Adams nature Adams corruption Againe he is to be considered as a beleeuer and thus albeit he doth not propagate his faith and holines to his child yet by meanes of his saith his child is in the couenant and consequently is to be accounted holy in the iudgement of charitie till God manifest the contrarie Againe it may be obiected that if the children of beleeuing parents be borne holy they want originall finne Ans. The children also sustaine two persons First they are to be considered as children of the first Adam and thus they are conceiued and borne in sinne and are children of wrath Againe they are to be considered as children of beleeuing parents and thus by meanes of the
seeke deliuerance This conformitie with Christ in his passion is an infallible worke and token of the child of God and a signe that we are crucified with Christ. Againe here we are to take notice of the false faith of many men They can be content to beleeue that Christ was crucified for them but there they make a pause for they doe not beleeue that they are crucified with Christ. Their faith therefore is but halfe a faith and their profession is according For they haue the forme of godlines without the power thereof They thinke that they beleeue the Articles of faith aright but they are deceiued For to beleeue in Christ crucified is not onely to beleeue that he was crucified but also to beleeue that I am crucified with him And this is to know Christ crucified Lastly here we are to consider the abomination of the Church of Rome For it most abuseth that which is the greatest treasure in the world namely Christ crucified For they make a very Idol of him in that they worship him in at and before painted and carued Crucifixes For there is no such Christ in heauen or in earth that wil be present when we pray and heare vs at Crucifixes Againe they giue Latria diuine honour to deuised and framed crucifixes and thus they robbe Christ of his honour Thus much of our Communion with Christ in his passion now followes the second part of preparation namely Abnegation J liue yet not I any more that is I liue a spirituall life yet not as I as a naturall man For in that regard I carrie my selfe as a man crucified or after the manner of a dead man suffering nothing that is in me by nature to raigne in me that Christ alone may liue and raigne in me Here is a notable dutie to be learned we beeing crucified with Christ must carrie our selues as men crucified and that in three respects First in respect of corruption of sinnefull nature For in regard of our sinnes we are to esteeme our selues vnworthie of meat drinke sleepe breathing yea we are to esteeme ourselues to be as vile as any of the creatures vpon earth and we are to denie vngodlines and worldly lusts not suffering any of them to raigne ouer vs. Secondly we must carrie our selues as dead men in respect of the good things that belong to nature as honours riches pleasures friends all which in respect of preparation of minde we must daily forsake for Christs sake not suffering any of them to take place in our hearts Lastly we must be as dead men in respect of our owne reason and will and we must tread them vnder foote making Gods will our wisdome and will and giuing it lordship and dominion ouer vs our owne wills in the meane season lying dead in vs. Thus are we to carrie our selues as dead men and we are to be carefull of it that God may haue pleasure in vs we must forget our owne people and our fathers house Psal. 45. 10. That we may buy the pearle we must sell all we haue our wills our affections and the dearest things in the world He that would liue when he is dead must die while he is aliue and we must now lay out our selues as dead persons Corruption of nature reason and will must be dead in vs that Christ alone may liue and raigne in vs. The third point concerning spirituall life is touching the Originall and well-spring thereof in these words That Christ may raigne in me For the better conceiuing whereof three points are to be obserued The first that Christ is not onely the Author with the father the H. Ghost but also the Roote of life hauing life in himselfe that he may conuaie it to all that beleeue in him He is the true vine and we are the branches Ioh. 15. 1. he is an appointed head to his Church Eph. 1. 22. he is the prince of life Act. 3. 15. he is a quickning spirit 1. Cor. 15. 45. And in this regard is he said to liue in vs namely as a roote in the branch or as the head in the members The second point is that there must be an Vnion with Christ before we can receiue life from him and he liue in vs. If ye abide in me and I in you ye shall bring forth much fruit Ioh. 15. 4. We must be grafted with him before we can be conformable to his death and resurrection Rom. 6. 5. And againe we must be taken out of the wild oliue and set in the true oliue Rom. 11. 24. Thus much Paul signifieth when he saith Christ liues in me Of this coniunction two things must be noted The first that it is a substantiall vnion in that the person of him that beleeueth is vnited to the person of Christ. For we must eate the flesh of Christ and drinke his blood before we can haue life abiding in vs Ioh. 6. 53. and our bodies are members of Christ. 1. Cor. 6. 15. Againe this Vnion is spirituall because it is made by the bond of one spirit 1. Cor. 12. 13. By one spirit we are baptised into one bodie And no man is to maruaile that we on earth should be ioyned to Christ in heauen By ciuill contract man and wife are one flesh though distant many miles asunder why then may not we be ioyned to Christ by vertue of the couenant of grace considering no distance of place can hinder the beeing of the spirit of Christ in vs. The third point is that after this vnion with Christ he must further communicate himselfe vnto vs before we can liue by him and he in vs. To this purpose S. Iohn saith that God hath giuen vs life that this life is in the sonne that he which hath the sonne hath life 1. Ioh. 5. 12. For the conceiuing of this truth two questions may be demanded One in what order Christ giues himselfe vnto vs Ans. Christ first of all giues his flesh and blood that is himselfe and then secondly his gifts namely the efficacie and merit of his death The institution of the Lords Supper sheweth plainly that we are not partakers of the benefits of Christ vnlesse first of all Christ himselfe be giuen vnto vs. The second question is how Christ can be said to liue in vs Ans. He is not in vs in respect of locall presence but by the supernaturall and speciall operation of his spirit 1. Cor. 6. 17. The operation of the spirit is threefold The first is when God imputes the righteousnes of Christ to them that beleeue and withall giues the Right of eternall life and the Earnest of this right namely the first fruits of the spirit Hereupon iustification is called the Iustification of life Rom. 5. The second is Viuification by the vertue of the resurrection of Christ. Phil. 3. 10. And this vertue is the power of the Godhead of Christ or the power of the spirit raising vs to newnes of life as it raised Christ from the death
me doth it Here marke Paul calls concupiscence in himselfe after regeneration sinne and that properly because he saith it is the same that maketh men to sinne And Col. 3. 5. he saith Mortifie your earthly members and among the rest he nameth euill concupiscence And to the Ephesians 4. 22. Be ye renewed in the spirit of your mindes Therefore after baptisme some portions remaine still of the old man or of originall sinne S. Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 1. 8. If we say we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues Answer is made that this is spoken of veniall or small sinnes but how can they be small sinnes that are to be washed away with the blood of Christ as he saith v. 7. And if these words be spoken of infants as they are then must Concupiscence be a sinne in them for they haue no actuall sinnes Lastly Christ saith Ioh. 13. 10. He that is all washed must haue his feete that is his carnall affections washed Here obserue two things One that defilements of sinne remaine in them that are washed The second that they are after the first washing to be done away by Christ and not by the acts of our pennance The grounds of Popish doctrine in this point are two The first is this They make three degrees of Concupiscence The first is the pronesse in the flesh to rebell against the law of the minde or the proâ—esse to euill The second stands in the first motions to sinne which goe before consent of will The third stands in acts of lust ioyned with consent of will This third they say is forbidden in the moral law which forbids and condemnes voluntarie concupiscence and the two first are not Because as they speake concupiscence it selfe with the first motions are not in mans power and therefore they are rather to be tearmed defects or infirmities then sinnes and that men are no more to be blamed for them then for the diseases of their bodies Ans. The doctrine is false for it is an euident truth that Concupiscence with the first motions thereof to euill is condemned in the Morall law It is a Principle in expounding the law where any actuall sinne is forbidden there all causes occasions furtherances thereof are likewise forbidden Therefore considering actuall concupiscence ioyned with consent is forbidden in the law Originall concupiscence with the first motions thereof beeing causes of the former are likewise forbidden And Paul saith he had not knowne Lust to be sinne vnlesse the law had said Thou shalt not lust Rom. 7. 7. Now he was a Doctor of the law and knew that lust with consent was a sinne for thus much the light of nature teacheth therfore the law speakes of an higher degree of lust namely of lust going before consent The second ground is this When sinne is remitted it doth not make men guiltie but ceaseth to be a fault Originall sinne therefore ceaseth to be sinne after baptisme Ans. Though actuall guilt be taken away yet potentiall guilt remaineth namely an aptnes in Originall sinne to make men guiltie and though it be not the fault of this or that person yet it is a fault in nature or as it is considered in it selfe The vse If Originall sinne remaine after baptisme to the death then we must humble our selues and vse to the very death the plea of mercie and pardon denying our selues and resting on Christ. Againe if persons baptised be sinners to the death it may be demaunded what difference there is betweene the godly and vngodly Ans. In them that are regenerate there is a sorrow for their inward corruptions and for their sinnes past with a detestation of them and withall there is a Purpose in them to sinne no more and with this purpose there is ioyned an endeauour to please God in all his commandements so as if they doe sinne they can say with good conscience that they sinned against their purpose and resolution This cannot the vngodly man doe The third point is how baptisme conferres grace Ans. It conferres grace because it is a meanes to giue and exhibit to the beleeuing minde Christ with his benefits and this it doth by his signification For it serues as a particular and infallible certificate to assure the partie baptised of the forgiuenes of his sinnes and of his eternall saluation And whereas the Minister in the name of God applies the promise of mercie to him that is baptised it is indeede as much as if God should haue made a particular promise to him In this regard baptisme may well be said to conferre grace as the Kings letters are said to saue the life of the malefactour when they doe but signifie to him and others that the kings pleasure is to shew fauour Againe baptisme may be saide to conferre grace because the outward washing of the bodie is a token or Pledge of the grace of God and by this pledge faith is confirmed which is an instrument to apprehend or receiue the grace of God And this confirmation is made by a kind of reasoning in the minde on this manner He that vseth the signe aright shall receiue the thing signified I saith the partie baptised beeing of yeares vse the signe aright in faith and repentance therefore I shall receiue the thing signified remission of sinnes and life euerlasting A king saith to his subiect He that brings the head of such a traytour shall haue a thousand poundes Well the head of the foresaid traytour is cut off and he that hath the head may say Here is a thousand pounds or this will bring me a thousand pounds because it is vnto him as a pledge vpon the kings word of the reward of a thousand pounds And so is the washing in baptisme an infallible pledge to him that beleeues of the pardon of his sinnes Thus doe the sacraments conferre grace and no otherwise One reason for many may be this The word of God confirs grace for it is the power of God to saluation to them that beleeue and this it doth by signifying the will of God by the eare to the mind now euery sacrament is the word of God made visible to the eye the sacrament therefore confirs grace by vertue of his signification and by reason it is a pledge by the appointment of God of his mercie and goodnes It may be said a sacrament is not only a signe and a seale but also an instrument to conuay the grace of God to vs. Answer It is not an instrument hauing the grace of God tyed vnto it or shut vp in it but an instrument to which grace is present by assistance in the right vse thereof because in with the right vse of the sacrament God conferres grace and thus is it an instrument and no otherwise that is a morall and not a physicall instrument The doctrine of the Papist is that the sacrament conferres grace by the worke done that is that the outward action of the Minister conferres grace by his owne force when
at the very first moment of his conception Againe obserue that Christ in his manhood increased in grace as in age and stature Luk. 2. And this increase was without all imperfection for in his infancie Christ receiued a full measure of grace fit for that age when he was twelue yeares old he receiued a further measure fit for that age and so when he was thirtie yeares old And thus increase of grace and the perfection thereof stand both together And this increase is not onely in respect of experience and the manifestation of Grace before God and men but also in respect of the habit or gift though the Schooles for 400. yeares haue taught the contrarie euer since the daies of Lumbard The third thing is the Vniting of flesh to the Godhead of the Sonne and that is done when the sonne of God makes the flesh or nature of man a part of himselfe and communicates vnto it his owne subsistance The like example to this is not to be found againe in the world yet haue we some resemblance of this mysterie in the plant called Misselto which hath no roote of his owne but growes in a tree of an other kinde and thence receiues his sappe And so the manhood of the sonne hath no personalitie or personall subsistance but is receiued into the Vnitie of the second person and is sustained of it It must here be obserued that there is a difference betweene the manhood of Christ and all other men Peter is a person subsisting of himselfe and so is Paul and euery particular man but so is not the manhood of Christ and therefore it is to be tearmed a nature and not a person And it is no disgrace but an exaltation to the nature of man that is subsists by the vncreated subsistance of the second person It may be obiected that all beleeuers are ioyned to the sonne of God as well as the flesh of Christ I answer they are so but in an other kind and in a lower degree by communication of grace and not by communication of personall subsistance Thus we see how the sonne was made flesh the vse follows Hence we learne to vse all meanes that we may become newe creatures and be borne of God God becomes man that we men might be partakers of the diuine nature Christ is made bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh by his incarnation that we might be made bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh by regeneration The sonne of God was made the sonne of man that we which are the sonnes of men might be made the sonnes of God To be made flesh is the abasement of the sonne in this abasement he goes on till he become euen as a worme of the earth Psal. 22. 7. so must we abase our selues till we be anihillated and brought to nothing then shall we be like to Christ and filled with the good things of God Our sinnes are a wall of partition betweene God and vs so as we are farre from God and God from vs Isa 59. 2. and this partition is of our own making and by this means we haue no accesse to God of our selues though we pray vnto him and fill heauen and earth with our crie Now the sonne of God made man is Immanuel that is God with vs Isai 7. 14. and his incarnation is a meanes whereby we haue accesse to god and he is nere vnto vs when we pray vnto him in trueth 2. Chron. 15. 2. This must teach vs to drawe nere to God in the hearing and obeying of his word in praier and in the vse of the holy Sacraments If this be not done great is our wickednesse and great shall be the punishment Iob. 21. 14. Psal. 73. 27. The incarnation of Christ is the foundation of all our comfort and all good things which we inioy By it God comforts Adam The seed of the woman shall brnise the serpents head Iacob is comforted by the vision of a ladder reaching from heauen to earth and this ladder is the sonne of God made man Ioh. 1. 51. Iob comforts himselfe in this that his Redeemer of his own flesh as the word signifieth liueth Iob. 19. 25. In the old testament they which sought vnto God came to the Arke or Propitiatorie and there were they heard and receiued the blessings of God Now Christ God and man is in stead of the Arke Rom. 3. 25. and therefore we must come to him if we would receiue any good thing of God The godhead is the fountaine of all good things and the flesh or manhood is a pipe or conduit to conuaie the same vnto vs. If we would then receiue true comfort we must hunger and thirst in our hearts after Christ and by our faith eate his flesh and drinke his blood Ioh. 6. 54. 56. The third point or degree is the subiection of the sonne of God to the lawe expressed in these words made vnder the lawe Here two questions are to be answered The first is who is made subiect to the law I answer the sonne of God And this may not seeme strange that he which is Lord of the law should be subiect to the law for he must be considered as he is our pledge and suretie Heb. 7. 22. and as one that standes in our place roome and stead and before God represents the person of all the elect and in this respect is he subiect to the lawe not by nature but by voluntarie abasement and condition of will The second question is how the sonne of God was subiect to the lawe Answ. By a twofold obedience namely by the obedience of his passion and by his obedience in fulfilling the lawe The obedience of his passion stands before God as a satisfaction for the breach of the law In it consider two things the foundation of the passion and the passion it selfe The foūdation is that the sonne of God was made sinne for vs 2. Cor. 5. 21 that is all the sinnes of all the Elect were imputed to him and he in our roome and place was recounted a sinner The passion it selfe is the curse of the law laid on the sonne of God namely the first death and the paines of the second death which is in effect and substance the paines of hell as I haue shewed in the 3. chap. v. 13. of this Epistle By the second Obedience in fulfilling the lawe the sonne of God performed for vs all things contained therein that we might haue right to life euerlasting and that according to the tenour of the law Leuit. 18. 5. Doe all these things and liue Of this obedience 2. questions are demanded The first is whether it be necessarie for the iustification of a sinner Answ. It is The summe of the lawe is Loue God with all thy heart and thy neighbour as thy selfe Now euery iot and title of the lawe must necessarily be fulfilled Math. 5. 18. Much more then the summe and substance of the lawe And
by name Exod. 33. 17. Againe it is a perpetuall and vnchangeable knowledge For whome God once knowes he neuer forgets Isai 49. 15. The third estate of the Galatians is their estate in their reuolt or Apostasie in these words How turne ye again to impotent and beggarly rudiments whereunto as from the beginning ye will be in bondage againe or thus to which ye will doe seruice againe as from the beginning The words carrie this sense How turne ye againe that is it is an intollerable offence in you hauing knowne God to returne againe to the rudiments of the law By rudiments we are to vnderstand Circumcision the Iewish sacrifices and all the ceremonies of the law of Moses And it may not seeme strange that they are called impotent and beggarly rudiments For they must be considered three waies with Christ without Christ and against Christ. With Christ when they are considered as types and figures of Christ to come and as signes of grace by diuine institution for the time of the old Testament Without Christ when they are vsed onely for custome whether before or after the death of Christ. Against Christ when they are esteemed as meritorious causes of saluation and the iustification of a sinner is placed in them either in whole or in part as though Christ alone were not sufficient In this respect Paul calls them impotent and beggarly rudiments And Paul hauing said that the Galatians returned againe to the rudiments of the lawe in the next words he shewes howe they doe it namely by seruing them againe They serued or yeilded seruice to them three waies In opinion because they iudged them to be necessarie parts of Gods worshippe and means of their saluation In Conscience because they subiected their consciences to them In affection because they placed part of their affiance in them for their iustification and saluation It may be demanded howe the Galatians can be said to returne againe to the rudiments of the law serue them againe that were neuer vsed to them before Answ. In the speach of Paul there is that which is called Catachresis that is a kind of speaking somewhat improper in respect of finenesse and Elegancie The like we haue Ruth 1. 22. when Ruth is said to returne to Iuda with Naomi yet shee was neuer there before Neuerthelesse the speach in sense is most significant and proper For Paul no doubt signifies hereby that when the Galatians subiected themselues to the rudiments of the law and placed their saluation in part euen in them they did in effect and in trueth as much as returne againe to their old superstitions serue againe their false gods Here then we haue a description of the Apostasie of the Galatians It is a voluntarie sinne for Paul saith ye will serue after the knowledge of the truth in which they returne againe to the rudiments of the law by yeelding subiection and seruice to them which act of theirs is indeede as much as if they had serued againe their false gods Here some may say if this be so then they sinned against the holy Ghost Ans. The sinne against the holy Ghost is indeede a voluntarie sinne but that is by reason of the obstinacie and malice of the will and this offence in the Galatians was voluntate onely by infirmitie Againe the sinne against the holy Ghost is an vniuersall Apostasie in respect of all the Articles of religion for that sinne makes men crucifie Christ crucified Heb. 6. 5. and to tread vnder foote the sonne of God the Apostasie of the Galatians was particular onely in the article of iustification The vse In that the Ceremonies of the law set vp against Christ in the cause of our iustification and saluation are called impotent and beggarly rudiments Paul teacheth a waightie conclusion That Christ stands alone in the worke of redemption without collegue or partner without deputie or substitute whether we respect the whole worke of redemption or the least part of it Againe that all the workes of mediation stand alone by themselues and admit nothing to be added and adioyned to them There is no other name whereby we can be saued beside the name of Christ. Act. 4. 12. Christ saues them perfectly that come vnto him Heb. 7. 25. In him we are complete Col. 2. 10. He alone treads the winepresse of Gods wrath and none with him Isai 63. 3. If Christ be a Sauiour he must be a perfect Sauiour considering he is God and man and beeing a perfect Sauiour in himselfe he needs no partner and because he is euery where 〈◊〉 all times therefore he needs no deputie in his stead Again euery worke of redemption is acted by whole Christ according to both his natures and as there are in him two natures so are there two operations of the said natures and as both natures concurre to make one person so the operatiōs of both natures concurre to make the compound worke of a mediatour which is an admirable worke not meerely humane but theandricke that is humane-diuine For this cause no action pertaining to redemptiō can be performed by a mere creature whether man or angel Obiection I. Ioh. 20. 23. The Apostles haue the power to remit and retaine sinnes therefore it is not proper to Christ. Answ. To remit by meriting and by efficacie in the conferring of pardon is proper to the mediatour The Apostles and other Ministers remit by preaching and by declaring remision The ministers of the word doe not procure our reconciliation with God as Christ doth but they exhort men to be reconciled to God 2. Cor. 5. 20. Obiect II. 1. Pet. 3. 18. Baptisme saueth therefore not Christ alone Ans. Baptisme saueth by signifying and by sealing vnto vs the grace and mercie of God and the effecting of our saluation is in the same place ascribed to Christ and his resurrection The conclusion then of Paul is to be remēbred for it serues as in engyne to ouerturne the maine grounds of poperie The primacie of the Pope is a certen estate in which he is substituted into the place and roome of Christ for he takes vpon him to make lawes that properly and truely binde conscience euen as the lawes of God Againe he takes vnto him a proper and iudiciall power to remit or retaine the sinnes of men Nowe these actions indeed are the proper actions of God Christ no meere creature is capable of them In this respect the primacie of the Pope is an impotent and beggarly inuention Again the Romish relligion beside the al sufficient oblation of Christ vpon the crosse lets vp the sacrifice of the masse for the sinnes of the quicke and the dead besides the Intercession of Christ it sets vp the Intercession of Saints and Angels beside the perfect satisfaction of Christ it sets vp humane satisfactions beside the infinite merit of Christ it maintaines and magnifies the merit of humane workes But all these are but impotent and beggarly deuises of men
will be iustified by one act of the law is bound to performe the rest for his iustification Abolished from Christ that is Christ is become an idle and emptie Christ vnto you Whosoeuer are iustified by the law that is are of opinion that they are to be iustified by the workes of the law For indeede a sinner cannot be iustified by the law but onely in his owne false opinion Grace that is the loue and fauour of God The resolution The third verse is a confirmation of the reason in the second verse and it may be framed thus He which is bound to keepe the whole law hath no part in Christ he which is circumcised is bound to keepe the whole law therefore he which is circumcised hath no part in Christ. The 4. verse is a repetition of the second verse with a declaration therof for he shewes what he meanes by circumcision namely iustification by circumcision and consequently by the whole law And therefore when he had said If ye be circumcised he changeth his speach saying Whosoeuer is iustified by the law Againe least men might thinke it a small matter to be abolished from Christ he shewes that it is indeede to fall from grace The vse These verses are as it were a thunderbolt against all Poperie And first of all I vrge the argument of Paul against the Popish Church and against the Popish religion If ye be iustified by the law ye are abolished from Christ and fallen from Christ. Answer is made that the words are to be vnderstood of such workes of the law as are from nature and goe before faith and not of such workes as are from grace and follow faith for such workes they say are from Christ and stand with him I answer the words of Paul are to be vnderstood of all workes of the law whether they be from nature or from grace For this Epistle of Paul was written about sixe yeares after the conuersion of the Galatians therefore they were and had bin long regenerate persons now men regenerate looke not to be iustified by works of nature but by good workes which are workes of grace And Paul saith Eph. 2. 10. We are not saued by workes which God hath ordained that we should walke in and these are the best workes that are or can be Againe Tit. 3. 5. Of his mercie he saued vs and not of workes of righteousnes By this text we further see that we and the Papists differ not about circumstances vnlesse Grace and Christ be circumstances Againe we see that the Church of Rome is indeede no Church because by maintaining iustification by works it is abolished from Christ and fallen from grace Againe I vrge Pauls argument against them on this manner He which is debter to the whole law hath no part in Christ he which is iustified by workes is debter to the whole law therefore he which is iustified by workes hath no part in Christ Let them answer if they can I turne the same argument another way thus He which is iustified by workes is bound to keepe the whole law but no man can keepe the whole law therefore no man can be iustified by workes They answer to the minor by making a double fulfilling of the law one for this life the other for the life to come and both in their kind perfect The fulfilling of the law for the time of this life they say it is to loue God aboue all creatues in truth and that he which doth thus much fulfills the law and is no offender Hereupon they inferre that works may be answerable to the law and be opposed to the iudgement of God And for this doctrine they alleadge S. Augustine I answer againe that Paul in this place takes it for a confessed truth that no man can fulfill the law and he vrgeth it as a great inconuenience that any man should be bound to keepe the whole law And before he hath said He which is of the workes of the law is cursed Gal. 3. 10. which could not be if there were a fulfilling of the law for the time of this life As for Augustine it is true he makes two fulfillings of the law and one of them for the time of this life but this he saith is imperfect and this imperfection he makes to be a sinne whereas the Papists of our time teach that men may fulfill the law for the time of this life without sinne Where Paul saith If ye be circumcised marke how the false Apostles abuse circumcision It is by diuine institution a seale of the righteousnes of faith and they make it a meritorious cause of saluation It is indeede rather Gods worke then our worke and they make it their owne worke and that meritorious before God Like doe the Papists at this day Baptisme is a signe and seale of Gods mercie by diuine institution and they turne it into a physicall cause which containes and conferres grace In like sort they turne the workes of the spirit almes praier fasting contrition yea their owne traditions confession satisfaction and such like into meritorious causes of iustification and life And this is the fashion of deceiuers to retaine the names of holy things but not to retaine the right vse of them As here we see Circumcision was an obligation to the keeping of the whole law in the old Testament so is baptisme in the new an obligation or bond whereby we haue bound our selues to liue according to all the lawes of God Matth. 28. 19 20. This discouers the Atheisme and vnbeleefe of persons baptised in these our daies for few there be that thinke vpon and performe this obligation We are further to obserue the condition of the law It is wholly copulatiue All the parts of it are linked one to another He that is bound to one commandement is bound to all he that keepes one indeede keepes all he that breakes one in respect of the disposition of his heart is a breaker of all Iam. 2. 10. he that makes no conscience to keepe some one commandement if occasion be offered will breake any Hence it followes that true regeneration is that which is a reformation and change according to the whole law of God and containes in it the seedes of all good duties Christ saith He that is washed is all cleane Ioh. 13. 10. Iosias turned to God according to the whole law Zacharie and Elizabeth walke in all the commandements of God without reproofe Luk. 1. Dauid saith He shall not be confounded when he hath respect to all the commandements of God Psal. 119. 6. On the contrarie he which hath many excellent things in him if he liue in the manifest breach of some one commandement is sound in none nay indeede he is guiltie of all Herod did many good things and yet all was nothing because he liued in incest Mark 6. 20. The deuill is able to bring a man to perdition as well by one sinne as by many Whereas Paul saith
death yet would a Christian man abstaine from these things because he knowes that they displease Christ and he is gouerned with another spirit to which they are contrarie Also these words are a reason of v. 16. There is no law against them that doe these things therefore walke in the spirit 24 For they that are Christs haue crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts The scope In these words Paul prooues that which he said immediatly before namely that there is no law against spirituall men And of this he giues a double reason One is spirituall men are Christs therefore there is no law against them The second is this that is crucified in spirituall men which the law condemneth namely the flesh with the affections and lusts therefore there is no law to condemne the spirituall man In the words I consider three points The first is What is a Christian Ans. A Christian is one that is Christs saith Paul And he is Christs fiue waies I. by the right of creation And so are all men II. by right of redemption 1. Cor. 6. 19. III. by the free gift and donation of God the father Ioh. 17. 11. this donation is begunne in the eternall Election of God and it is accomplished in our effectuall vocation IV. by propagation For all true beleeuers spring out of the blood of Christ and are of his bone and of his flesh as Eue was of the bone and flesh of Adam V. by our donation in baptisme in which we consecrate our selues to God and to Christ. The vse This must teach vs to resigne our selues to Christ and to suffer him to raigne in our hearts and to take the yoke of the Gospel vpon vs. But alas it is farre otherwise with many of vs. For some liue in the transgression of the very law of nature so farre are they from obseruing the Gospel Others thinke it sufficient to follow the teaching of nature If they worship God in some generall manner if they liue peaceably and hurt no man and meane well as they say then all is well and the doing of further duties is reputed curious precisenes And such persons vsually reduce religion to the practise of nature They will be saued by faith but their faith is nothing els but fidelitie They say they worship God but this worship is nothing els but their good meaning and their good dealing These men are content that Christ shall be theirs but they will not be Christs and suffer him to haue a Lordship ouer them II. If thou be Christs then commend thy soule and life and all that thou hast into the hands of Christ. This was the practise of Dauid Psal. 22. of Christ vpon the crosse of Paul 2. Tim. 1. 12. And this practise is the onely way to obtaine safetie and protection For Christ no doubt will keepe his owne III. Comfort If thou be Christs he will care for thee and nothing shall be wanting vnto thee that is for thy good Ioh. 17. 24. Rom. 8. 33. Therefore remember this lesson Neuer grieue ouermuch neuer care ouermuch neuer reioyce ouermuch in the things of this world If thou werest at thine own disposing and finding it were somewhat but there is one that cares for thee namely Christ. The second point to be considered is what is the flesh Ans. It is the corruption of the whole nature of man For the right conceiuing of this we must make a distinction of three things Mans nature the faculties of nature and the corruption of both which corruption hath two parts the losse of the image of God and a pronnes to all wickednes Moreouer this distinction must be without separation of nature from faculties or of corruption from either so as we may say truly that the nature and the powers of the soule of man are corrupted In the flesh are two things Affections and Lusts. By affections vnderstand inordinate affections which shew themselues and beare sway in carnall men as anger in Cain loue of pleasures more then of God in the men of the last times 2. Tim. 3. 3. immoderate sorrow in Ahab when he could not obtaine Naboths vineyard 1. King 21. 4. Lusts are inordinate and infatiable desires after the things of this world as riches honours pleasures c. of this sort are couetousnes gluttonie pride the lust of the flesh c. The vse By this we see what a Carnall man is namely one that is carried away with some inordinate affection or some inordinate lust Herod did many good things at the aduise and motion of Iohn Baptist whome he reuerenced yet was he a carnall man For he was possessed with an inordinate loue of his brothers wife Iudas a disciple of Christ yet a carnall man because he was carried away with the inordinate lust of couetousnes The third point is touching the office of a Christian man And that is to crucifie the flesh with the affections and lusts For the better conceiuing of this Crucifying must be distinguished It is either the action of Christ or our action Crucifying which is the action of Christ is threefold The first is vpon the crosse where Christ stood in our roome and bare the burden of our sinnes and made an Expiation of them In this respect we are said to be crucified with him Gal. 2. 19. The second is in vs when Christ conuaies the vertue of his death into the hearts of them that are ioyned to him for the causing and effecting of the death of sinne The third is in baptisme whereby Christ seales the two former to them that beleeue Rom. 6. 6. The crucifying which is our action is nothing els but the Imitation of Christ crucified on this manner He was first attached so must we bring our selues into the presence of God He was arraigned so must we set our selues at the barre of Gods iudgement He was accused so must we indite and accuse our selues of our owne sinnes at the barre of Gods iudgement He was condemned and so must we iudge our selues that we be not iudged of the Lord. After iudgement we must proceede to execution of the flesh and that is to vse meanes to crucifie it and they are three The first is by faith to applie to our selues Christ crucified and that is to beleeue not onely that Christ was crucified for vs but that we also were crucified with him Where this faith is sinne shall no more haue domion The second is to beate downe the flesh by the sword of the spirit and that is done by a serious application of the commandements and the threatnings of God to our seuerall affections and lusts The third is to flie the occasions of euery sinne and to cut off the first beginnings of euill The vse This doctrine serues to condemne the drowsie Protestants of our time who professe Christ without making any change in life and conuersation For they are Saints in the Church but in their common dealings they are as worldlings II. Secondly
that may be simply to euery one to hinder all euill whereas to the nature of the generall or vniuersall good 〈◊〉 things appertaine First that all things should be good in some measure of goodnes Secodly that some things should be better then others Thirdly that those things that are defectiue in goodnes that is euills should be ordayned to the common good as in a well ordered house all the parts thereof are good in their kind Secondly some better then others as Paul saith In a great house there are vessells of gold and siluer of wood and stone some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. 20. Thirdly those that are destitute of goodnes as sinkes draughts and other like places seruing for base though necessarie vses are ordained to the common good of the whole house which it cannot want And therefore if the master builder to preuent these particular euills should leaue them out of his building he should preiudice the common good of the whole house which cannot be without them Thus much of the first part namely the duty Now I proceede to prosecute the second which shews first to whome we must do good and secondly the order to be obserued therein We must do good vnto all but specially to those which are of the houshould of faith Touching the first It may seeme that some among the Galatians were of the Pharises mind who thought they were bound to loue their friends but not their enemies or of this perswasion that they were not bound in coÌ„science to do good vnto the healthen amongst whom they liued as being professed enemies of Christ opeÌ„ persecutors of his Church But Paul teacheth theÌ„ vs another lesson wheÌ„ he coÌ„mands vs to do good vnto all sutable to that of our Sauiour Christ loue your enemies blesse them that curse you doe good to them that hate you pray for them that hurt you and persecute you Matth. 9. 44. Let vs consider the good Samaritans practise Albeit there was mortall hatred betwixt the Iewes and the Samaritans Ioh. 4. 6. Yet he seeing his deadly enemie wounded and halfe dead had compassion vpon him powred wine and oyle into his soares bound vp his woundes set him on his owne beast brought him to an Inne and made prouision for him the like ought we to doe euen to our enemies as occasion shall serue Luk. 10. 30. For if we must doe good to our enemies beast his oxe or asse going astray in bringing him home againe Exod. 23. 4. Much more ought we to doe good to our enemie himselfe For the more beneficiall and communicatiue we shewe our selues to be the greater goodnesse we shewe to be in vs as the fountaine which powreth forth his streames vnto all and the candle which standeth vpon a candlestieke shineth vnto all and not to it selfe being couered with a bushell The reasons why we ought to doe good vnto all euen to our enemies are principally foure The first may be taken from the grounds of loue and beneficence which are in all men euen in the wicked themselues nowe the grounds of loue are specially three the first is the image of God which beeing in all men yea euen in prophane persons in part ought to be the loadstone of loue to draw our affection vnto it The second is communion and fellowship in the same nature and therefore we ought to be beneficiall vnto men because they are men though we will not doe good homini yet we must doe it humanitaâ—i as the Philosopher said The third is participation in the death of Christ in that all men haue part in Christ as well as we for any thing we knowe Secondly God whose example we are to followe as hath beene said is good and bountifull vnto all causing his sunne to shine as well vpon the badde as the good and his â—aine to fall as well vpon the ground of the vniust as of the iust beeing kinde vnto the vnkind and to the wicked Thirdly we must doe to others as we would they should doe to vs. Therefore if we beeing in distresse would be glad to receiue good at the hand of a wicked man we ought in the like case to doe good vnto him Fourthly our profession and the reward which we looke for require this at our hands for if we doe good vnto them onely that doe good vnto vs or if we be friendly to those onely that are friendly to vs what singular thing doe we for euen the Publicans doe the like and so hauing our reward here in this life we can expect none other after this life Matth. 5. 47. The second point which containeth the order to be obserued in doing good is laid downe in these words Let vs doe good to all but specially to those which are of the houshould of faith By them of the houshold of faith we are to vnderstand those which by faith are of the same familie with vs namely of the same Catholike church vpon earth the house of God beeing often put to signifie the Church of God as 1. Tim. 3. 15. The house of God is called the Church of God the ground and pillar of trueth Ebr. 3. 2. Moses was faithfull in all Gods house that is his Church and thus this phrase is expounded Eph. 2. 19. Ye are no more strangers and forrainers but citizens with the Saints and of the houshold of God So that by them of the houshold of faith we must vnderstand onely the faithfull Indeed among men not onely children but also man-seruants and maide-seruants are counted to be of the family but God accounts them onely to be of his house that are Saints by calling and sonnes by faith The rest are bastards and not sonnes they are it may be in the house but not of the house for true sauing faith doth characterize those that are of the familie of faith euen as fanaticall dreames fantasticall opinions allegorizing of the literall sense of the scripture denying the resurrection of the flesh doe characterize those that are of the familie of loue Hauing the meaning coÌ„sider the dutie which is to do good principally to the faithfull the Saints seruants of god that is we must do good vnto theÌ„ before others more theÌ„ to others which are not of the same familie as Dauid saith My well-doing reacheth not to thee but to the saints that are in the earth them that excel in vertue Psal. 16. 2 3. For it is alone as if the Apostle should haue said As it is fit and conuenient that they that are of the same familie should be helpefull and beneficiall one vnto another rather then to those that are of another family So it is requisite that those which are members of the same bodie nay sonnes and daughters brethren and sisters hauing the same God for their father the same Church for their mother Christ for their elder brother begotten of the same immortall seede nourished with the
The condition of faithfull Ministers is to be full of troubles 647. 28 In what case a Minister in his preaching may vse Philosophie testimonie of Prophane writers and quotations of Fathers 541. 25 Ministers that labour in the word may lawfully take wages though they haue sufficient of their owne 543. 18. Abuse of the Ministers prooued to be the abuse of God 548. 11 Of Professours deriding defrauding Ministers of the word 549. 1. Why Ministers are not to sell the preaching of the word 437. 26. What they are to aime at in their preachings and what not 537. 20 A Minister is to teach his Auditors onely the word of God and why 540. 23. whether Ministers are to be maintained by common contribution and liberalitie of the people or not 533. 37 That it is more conuenient for Ministers to be maintained by set stipends arising from goods proper to the Church then by voluntarie contribution sundrie reasons 534. 17 obiection That the Ministers place is an easie office answered 535. 1 what a Minister is 171. 20 the Deuill cannot worke a true Miracle 171. 33 how Mocking is persecution 362. 9 the Modestie of Paul 19. 34 the practise of the godly to Mourne for other mens sinnes 337. 27 Obiections in defence of Murther remooued 437. 7 N The kinds of Nakednes 266. 28 Nature doth counterfeit grace and how 330. 28 A naturall man can doe the workes of the morall law yet in him they are sinnes 224. 25 Nature and Person distinguished 279. 32. what Nature is ibid. Naturall and carnall men are of two sorts 463. 13 Necessitie is twofold 369. 35 how we must loue our Neighbours 328. 6. what the loue of our Neighbour is vide Loue. how the whole law is fulfilled in the loue of our Neighbour 405. 15 who is our Neighbour 405. 27 In some cases we must loue our Neighbour more then our selues 405. 34. Of the loue of our Neighbour vide Loue. The new Creature or new man old man what it is 637. 1 The vses of this that we are new creatures in Christ. 638. 23 Greater power required in the regeneratioÌ„ of man then in the creation of the world 639. 3 how men are Nothing of theÌ„selues vide Men. O Foure things in an Oath 65. 15 The forme of an oath is to be plaine and direct in the name of God and not of creatures 65. 35 An Oath is to be vsed onely in the case of extremitie 66. 13 Obseruation of daies and times 314 4. The Gospell must be preached though all men be offended 396. 15. Men haue an ouerweening of themselues naturally 507. 8 The cause of it 508. 10 Such notably deceiue themselues 508. 30. It is the poison of loue 510. 25 Whether a man may not iudge himselfe to haue a greater measure of gifts then they that haue lesse 510 38. The remedies of this euill 511. 36 Outward priuiledges or dignities are of no moment in the kingdome of Christ. 382. 1. 24 P How a pacification is to be made in religion 338. 29 Papists teach and maintaine the worship of false Gods 305. 1. c. Papists and we differ not about circumstances 376. 15 Mo pacification with the Papists for religion but ciuill societie 408. 25. Papists teach Idolatrie foure waies vide Idolatrie Papists vrge their owne ceremonies more strictly then Gods truth 617. 28. Papists like to the false teachers in Pauls time in making things which be signes of saluation meritorious causes of it 618. 4 The Popes Prelats of Rome like to false teachers in compelling men to obserue that which they themselues will not obserue 518. 23. The Popish Church like to false teachers in pretending religion and conscience for their ease and cloaking of their impietie 624. 3 It is shewed in two particulars especially ibid. In pardon there be foure degrees 70. 28. Parents sustaine a double person 115. 12. Of Parents authoritie ouer their children vide children Parents truly punished in their childrens punishment notwithstanding it is not felt by them whereof be foure reasons 522. 14 Foure Principall duties to be performed by the people to the pastors and what they be 531 34 Pastors are to haue not only countenance but maintenance of the people 532. 6 Whether pastors are to be maintained by coÌ„tributioÌ„ or not 533. 37 Reasons to prooue that it is more conuenient for ministers to liue vpon set stipends then voluntarie contribution 534. 17 Obiections that the Pastors office is an easie office vide Ministers We must patiently tary for the reaping of our heauenly reward vrged from Gods patience towards vs. 582. 37 Gods patience waiting for the amendment of our liues set dowe by sundry degrees 583. 20 Mischeifes into which we runne vnto vnlesse we patiently expect god for our reward 584. 22 Reasons why Paul did write the epistle to the Galatians with his owne hand 607. 38 Paul subscribed all his epistles with his owne hand 608. 16 Pauls coÌ„uersion how wrought 50. What was gods preuenting grace in Pauls conuersion 50. 10 Whether Paul was an agent or Patient in his conuersion 51. 26 Whether violence was offered to his will in conuersion 52. 2 The dignitie of Paul aboue the other Apostles 5. 28 Two causes why Paul writes his epistles in the name and with the consent of the brethren 6. 4 The true signe of euery of Pauls epistles discouered and the false remooued 608. 27. 609. 20 Why Paul would not take wages of the church of Corinth and some others foure reasons 536. 25 Peace outward or inward 644. 12 Peace with the creatures which be of foure sorts ibid. 14 Peace of conscience double with god with our selues ibid. 33 Peace with our selues threefould ibid. 34. Of peace of conscience ibid. 35 What peace is and what be the parts of it 10. 16 Peace without grace is no peace 12. 6. How we must haue peace with all men 408. 17 Peace is threefould 408. 35 Three rules for the maintaining of Church peace 408. 36 For the inforcing of the duties of peace there be seuen speciall reasons 410. 35 What peace is for the maintenaunce whereof obserued two rules 444. 34. 37. The people punished for Achans sinne how it may stand 526. 15 There is a double perfection 188. 36. Hatred of Gods grace in men is the beginning of al persecution 362. 12. Persecution what 42. 30 Of the wicked persecuting the good 361. 33. Perseuerance crowneth all our good workes 585. 31 Person and nature distinguished 279. 32. What a person is 279. 33 Of Peters supremacie 94. 11 Pharisisme what it is and the principall doctrine thereof 41. 17 Philosophie not condemned 434. 21. The errors of Philosophie 4â—4 26 There is lawfull pilgrimage 59. 32 Popish pilgrimage condemned for two causes 59. 39 Polygamie not approoued but tolerated for two reasons 342. 9 Reasons for Polygamie answered 342. 29. What poore to be releiued 98. 17 Pastors care of the poore wherein it consists 98. 25 Postscripts no part