a bloudy Passion These things at the first blush look as if they could not be congruously done But I answer The corrupt Reason of Man which would shape all things according to its own model and Idea hath under colour of avoiding indecencies and inconveniencies made very strange work about this Mysterie In the Pagan Sophi it looked upon a crucified God as meer folly and indecency In the unbelieving Jews it reproached Christ as a Talui a poor hanged man altogether incapable to be a Messiah or Saviour In the Hereticks of the Church it tore and mangled his sacred Person all to pieces and that under pretence of avoiding one inconvenience or other Arius that he might not fall into that Gentile-vanity a plurality of Gods took away Christs Deity Apollinaris spared his Deity but took away his humane Soul the room of that being better supplied by the Deity Saturninus and Basilides took away his body leaving only a Phantasm a meer Vmbra in the room of it or if there must be a real Body Apelles thought fit that it should be a Sydereal one which in his passage from Heaven he assumed and after his Resurrection restored again Nestorius Noli gloriari Judaee non crucifixistl Deum So Nestorias lest the impassible Deity should suffer would have two Christs one the Son of man who suffered another the Son of God who dwelt in the other as in his Temple Eutyches supposing that there could not be two Natures in Christ without two Persons thought it convenient that after the Union there should be but one Nature in Christ the humane Nature being swallowed up in the Divine And the reason of all this is because as an Ancient hath it touching the Eutychians In hanc insipientiam cadunt qui cum ad cognoscendam veritatem aliquo impediuntur obscuro non ad propheticas voces non ad Apostolicas literas non ad Evangelicas authoritates sed ad semetipsos recurrunt ideo magistri erroris existunt quia veritatis discipuli non suere Leo primus Epist 10. they look not so much to the Sacred Scriptures as to themselves being willing that their own Reason should be Umpire in sacred Mysteries they become Masters of Errour who would not be Disciples of Truth By this heap of Experiments we may plainly see that the decorum of this Mysterie is too great a thing to be judged by humane Reason if we will know any thing of it we must address our selves to the divine Oracle Jesus Christ the infinite increated Wisdom of God who never had so much as an indecorous thought delighted in the sons of men Prov. 8.31 in the prospect of a future Incarnation It was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a thing becoming him to fulsil all righteousness Matth. 3.15 when yet it could not have become him in an unbocoming Nature There was a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a must upon his Death and Sufferings Mutth 16.21 when yet it was utterly impossible that my necessity should press him into an indecency There was therefore an excellent congruity in this Mysterie God indeed was made flesh but how Non mutando quod erat sed assumendo quod non erat not by changing his Deity but by assuming his Humanity Majesty was humbled not in it self but in the assumed flesh which was as a Veil over all the Glory The change and death was not in the Divine but Humane nature which was taken into his Sacred Person in the Incarnition and suffered death in his Passion upon the Gross There was a just decorum in all Nay in this very Mysterie at which humane Reason cries out of indecency God hath hid such an Abyss of Wisdom as no created Understanding is able to fathom a glimpse of which appears in the next particular 2. That part of Holiness by which God doth all things for himself for his own Glory eminently appears in Jesus Christ In general it appears that God is the great Center the ultimate end of all and all creatures none excepted are as so many Lines and Mediums tending thereunto The Humane nature of Christ a Creature above all creatures lifted up above the highest pitch of Angels elevated into an Union with an insinite Person was not yet a Center to it self It had no subsistence of its own neither did it operate for it self I seek not mine own glory saith Christ Joh. 8.50 Nay He adds If I honour my self my honour is nothing as much as to say a creature referred to it self is an unprofitable Nullity In all his Doings and Sufferings he did but minister to the Will and Glory of God in the end he will deliver up the Kingdom to the Father that God may be all in all 1 Cor. 15.24 28. Hence it is demonstratively evident that no Creature no not the highest is or can be an End or Center to it self all of them are but as Medium's to the glory of God all must circulate into their first Fontal-principle that it in all things may be glorified In particutar the Glory of God breaks forth in this Dispensation Jesus Christ who in respect of the eternal genetation is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the splendor or glorious effulgence of his Fathers glory is in the Incarnation the Glass or bright Evidence of the Divine Excellencies Never was there such a Constellation of Attributes as here Wisdom in the deep of its unsearchable Counsels laid the great plot of our Salvation Justice was paid to the full in Sufferings infinitely valuable such as did more than ballance the sufferings of a World Holiness was abundantly gratified in the pure and spotless obedience of our Saviour which was as a Gloss and living Commentary upon the whole Law Mercy and Love opened a bosom of infinite sweetness to receive penitent souls into favour and a blessed Immortality Power raised up an humane Nature in an extraordinary way and then shewed forth it self therein in the glory of innumerable Miracles Truth triumphed in that He who is the complement of the Law the substance of the Shadows and the Center of the Promises was come into the World Never did the brightness of Glory so excellently manifest it self as upon the Theatre of Christs humane Nature Hence Heaven and Earth ring with the high Praises of it At his Nativity an Host of Angels cry out Glory to God in the Highest Luke 2.14 In the Church there is glory to him by Jesus Christ throughout all Ages world without end Ephes 3.21 Saints and Angels must now fall upon their faces and say Blessing Glory and Wisdom and Thanksgiving and Honour and Power and Might be unto our God for ever and ever Amen Revel 7.12 Eternity it self will be little enough to spend in the praises of this incomparable Mysterie 3. Holiness as it imports an hatred of sin signally demonstrates it self in this Dispensation God hath many ways manifested his hatred of sin It appears in the Threatning in which he speaks as
World notwithstanding its deep Corruption and the opposition of Potentates and Philosophers to the Gospel The instruments mean that the Power might be of God The Gospel proposes super-rational Mysteries super-moral Virtues super-mundane rewards things so much above us that without a Divine Power the proposal would have been fruitless IN the next place I come to consider the Power of God Power being a Perfection must needs be in him and being as all other Attributes are his very Essence it must needs be infinite The very light of Nature reveals this Attribute In the Grecian Philosophers he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Omnipotent Nihil est quod Deus efficere non posset saith Tully Ludovicus Vives wonders Comment in Aug. de Civit. l. 5. c. 10. that so learned a Man as Pliny should cavil at Gods Omnipotence as if he could not do all things because he could not dye In Scripture he is called Gibbor a mighty one Shaddai an All-sufficient God he is the only Potentate 1 Tim. 6.15 He can do every thing Job 42.2 Nothing is too hard for him Gen. 18.14 Power belongeth to him Psal 62.11 Whatever is an act of Power that he can do that he cannot do contradictories is not Impotency but Power and Perfection for him to lye were to deny his own Truth for him to dye were to cast off his Immortality for him to make a thing be and at the same instant to make it not to be were to act repugnantly and overturn his own action These argue Impotency not Power We may more properly say that these cannot be done than that God cannot do them he can do all things which being done do argue Power or Perfection but what argues Impotency can no more fall upon him than darkness can seize upon the Sun This excellent Attribute of Power was eminently set forth in Christ He is called the power of God 1 Cor. 1.24 Divine Power shews forth it self in him in several respects First it breaks out in his Incarnation The word was made flesh John 1.14 He who was in the form of God took upon him the form of a servant Phil. 2.6 7 that is he who had the Essence and Majesty of God assumed so low a thing as an humane Nature He did not lay down his Deity but assumed an Humanity two Natures a Divine and Humane were in one person Never did God come so near the Creature as here He was in the world by his Universal Presence he was in the Temple in types and symbols in the Saints he is by his Grace in Heaven he is in immediate Glory but in the Incarnation he is hypostatically in an humane Nature The person of the Word which was from Eternity an Hypostasis to his Divine Nature became an Hypostasis to his humane Nature in time O what wonders of Power are here Here God was made Man the Creator became one with his Creature Had the whole world been crowded into a single Atom it would have been infinitely a less wonder than this the putting a greater finite into a less cannot be comparable to the taking of finite into infinite Here are two Natures a Divine and an Humane in themselves infinitely distant met in personal conjunction finite is not absorp't by infinite infinite is not changed by finite Here Eternal dwells in the same person with Temporal yet runs not into succession immortal dwells with mortal yet falls not into passion Here an humane Nature is united to a person infinitely simple and infinitely compleat yet he loses not his simplicity nor yet doth he receive any additional perfection Here 's an humane Nature without any Personality of its own Naturally the humane Nature of Christ would have had a Subsistence of its own a Personality would have flown from it but the resultance was miraculously prevented the want of its own finite Subsistence was supplied by the Presence of an infinite one Mr. Jeans of the words Incarn fol. 81. the Son of God communicated his Hypostasis to it to sustain it Here we have in some respect more of Divine Power manifested than there was in the making of the World When meer nothing was by an Almighty word elevated into Elements Plants Beasts Men Angels still it was but into finite but here a finite humane Nature was taken into infinite and between the infinite God and the humane Nature the disparity must be far greater than it is between a world and nothing Here indeed God did not create an infinite that being impossible but he came as near it as possibly could be by assuming a finite Nature into himself All other Creatures are comparatively extra Deum but here the humane Nature was in the very instant of its production interwoven with the infinite Person of the Son Thus we see that in this stupendious work Divine Power acted magnificently and congruously to its own infinity never any work did so fully answer and correspond to Omnipotence as this A second instance of Power we have in the Conception of our Saviour his body was not formed in an ordinary way by the concurrence of Man and Woman but in a way super-natural A Virgin was with Child As the body of the first Adam was wonderfully framed out of the dust so the body of the second was admirably framed out of the Virgin That a Virgin should be with Child was a great an high Miracle far above all the Power of Nature How then was it effected The Evangelist tells us The Holy Ghost came upon her the power of the highest did overshadow her Luk. 1.35 This is a sublime tremendous Mystery the Holy Ghost as the word overshadow imports did as it were cast a Cloud over her to teach us that we should not over-curiously pry into so great a Work as this was The body of our Saviour was not produced spermatically out of the substance of the Holy Ghost but Operatively by the Power of it The matter of his body was from the substance of the Virgin the active Principle was the infinite Spirit The seed of Man was not here used it was not congruous that he who had God for his Father should have any Man to be so it was a miraculous extraordinary operation Hence Christ is called The stone cut out of the mountains without hands Dan. 2.34 There was an Almighty Power in the framing his humane Nature the Tabernacle of his body was not pitched by Man but by the Lord Heb. 8.2 There was a supernatural operation in the making of it it is called a tabernacle not made with hands that is to say not of this building Heb. 9.11 It was not made in a natural ordinary way of generation It 's true he took part of our flesh and blood but the manner of framing his body was in an extraordinary way the structure of it was Divine and much above that of our bodies Another instance of the Divine Power we have in the Miracles wrought by Jesus
cast an aspiring glance after them Upon the whole matter we see this first Obstacle is such as no creature in Heaven and Earth was able to remove out of the way 2. Ex parte creaturae the impossibility is apparent may we look up to Heaven There seems to be a division above a kind of variance among the divine Attributes On the one hand Mercy that tender indulgent Attribute seems to melt and cry out over fallen man What! shall man made after the divine Image a poor seduced creature shall he nay his whole race Eternally perish shall I have never a Monument among the sons of men nay nor in the whole Creation shall nothing of the humane nature serve God or enjoy him On the other Justice pleaded That every one must have his due the wages of sin is death the Majesty of Heaven must not be offended nor his sacred Law violated without a just recompence Holiness which cannot but abhor sin could do no less than stand on the same side Truth remembred that that threatning moriendo morieris Thou shalt surely die was too sacred a thing to be made nothing of some way or other it ought to be satisfied Thus the Attributes themselves seem to be at a distance 3. Could a Ransom be found out to the content of Justice how should man depraved polluted man be made capable of receiving such a benefit who should unscale his eyes that he might look upon such a mystery who should break his iron-sinewed will that he might yield to such terms as Salvation was to be given upon It is certain that blind impenitent creatures cannot enter into Heaven before they can arrive thither their eyes must be opened upon the great Offer their hearts must be dissolved into the divine Will and how this shall come to pass is another difficulty Now after the difficulties let us see the admirable solution of them when all finite understandings were posed and nonplust at the case of fal'n man when neither men nor Angels could so much as start a thought touching a remedy infinite Wisdom found out a way of Salvation for us The incomparable contrivance was thus A creature a finite person could not satisfie Justice but an infinite one shall do it There are three persons in the sacred Trinity but the Son of God shall do it He shall assume an humane nature in it He shall obey and die upon a Cross and thereby he shall satisfie divine Justice and purchase Grace and Eternal life for us That the Son should do it rather than any other person was very congruous many ways Gods beloved One was fit to reconcile us his essential Image was fit to repair the gracious one none could be more meet to usher in Adoption than Gods natural Son nor to enlighten the World than the brightness of his glory the Eternal Word Incarnate must needs be an excellent Prophet the middle person in the sacred Trinity a most congruous Mediator The blessed Father shewed forth himself in a former work in Creation the holy Spirit appears in a subsequent work in Sanctification it was therefore very meet that the Son the second person in the Trinity should manifest himself in the middle work in Redemption But that we may look a little further into this admirable Design it will not be amiss to fix our eyes upon those rare Conjunctions which the divine Wisdom hath framed in order to our Salvation 1. There is a Conjunction of Natures God and Man in one person Jesus Christ who was consubstantial with the Father as to his Divinity was made consubstantial with us as to his Humanity Heaven and Earth were united together in an ineffable manner the distance between God and man was as it were filled up in this wonderful Incarnation supremum insimi did attingere infimum supremi the creature came as near God as possibly could be Admirable are the tendencies of this Union He was Man that he might be capable of suffering and that by suffering he might satisfie in the same Nature which had sinned He was God that he might stamp such an infinite value upon his sufferings that those though but the sufferings of one might answer for a World and though but temporal sufferings might counterpoise Eternal He was Man that in condescension to our weakness he might speak to us through a vail of flesh He was God that he might speak to our hearts in divine illuminations in words of life and power He was Man that he might be touch'd with a feeling of our infirmities and melt into tender compassions towards us He was God that he might break all the powers of darkness and erect an holy Throne in our hearts This was the first fundamental Conjunction a thing worthy to attract from us a much higher admiration than what is due to the Wonders in Nature 2. There is a Conjunction of Justice and Mercy These in men do usually like the Sun and Moon reign by turns but in this wonderful Dispensation these are in exercise and glory both at once Justice appears in that Jesus Christ our Sponsor was smitten and wounded to death and that an accursed one for our sins Mercy shines forth in that Sinners repenting and believing are spared nay and advanced to glory Justice did not spare the Surety but exacted all Mercy doth not exact ought from the believer but forgive all The sufferings of Christ respect both Attributes they satisfied the Law and founded the Gospel Justice had a full compensation and Mercy sprung up in promises of Grace and Life 3. Holiness in God which hates sin is the fundamental root of that Justice which punisheth it Punishment issues out of Justice Justice springs out of Holiness Now that Holiness may be contented and so Justice satisfied not only in it self but in its very foundation there was in Christs Sufferings a Conjunction of punishment and obedience It 's true the Socinians think these two altogether inconsistent Si Christi passiones rationem obedientia habent rationem poenae habere non possunt obedientia enim virtus est poena autem propter inobedientiam infligitur Schlict contr Meisn 128. because obedience is a Virtue but punishment is inflicted for disobedience But in Scripture the thing is clear there was a virtuous action in his Passion a signal obedience in his Sufferings he poured out his soul he was obedient unto death Pure entire obedience run through his whole life to the last gasp upon the Cross it was not at all broken or interrupted by the bloody Agony nor lost or forsaken in that night of desertion when he cryed out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me His Sufferings were very penal in themselves and inflicted by Justice yet freely undertaken and obedientially undergone Here therefore was an admirable work of Wisdom his Sufferings as penal satisfied Justice and as obediential gratified Holiness 4. The Truth of God was concerned in that first Threatning Thou shalt surely
to have it here the consequence must needs be sure and infallible Upon the whole matter it appears that no tolerable account can be given of Christs Sufferings unless Justice were satisfied and declared therein But to explicate this more distinctly I shall a little consider three things 1. God the great Rector who inflicted those Sufferings on Christ 2. Christ the Patient who bore them 3. The Sufferings in themselves and in their fruits 1. God the righteous Rector who inflicted them was one of infinite Mercy Mercy in men though but finite is sometimes a remora to punishment Joseph being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a just that is as the word there must be taken a merciful man would not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 make Mary a publick spectacle of Justice Matth. 1.19 But though God were one of infinite Mercy and that not meerly resident in his Nature but as it were in motion triumphantly going forth in a most compassionate design towards mankind yet he would have Justice satisfied in the Sufferings of his Son To declare I say at this time his righteousness saith the Apostle Rom. 3.26 Observe it was at this time it was then a day of Salvation a Jubilee of Redemption to Mankind yet for all that Justice must have its due and be declared in the Sufferings of Christ But here the Socinians object That infinite Justice and infinite Mercy are opposites and cannot both be together in God or if they were God who cannot act contrary to any thing in his Nature could neither punish because of his Mercy nor yet pardon because of his Justice But I answer Mercy and Justice are not opposites in Man After the Idolatry of Israel in the Molten Calf Moses would in Justice have every one slay his Brother yet in an high excess of Mercy and Charity he would pray Forgive their sin if not blot me out of thy book Exod. 32.27 32. Neither are they opposites in God when he proclaims his Name in those stately Titles The Lord merciful gracious long-suffering abundant in goodness and truth keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin He yet adds in the close of all That he will by no means clear the guilty Exod. 34.6 7. Mercy and Justice in God have different objects the Penitents who partake of Mercy are not the objects of Justice the Impenitents who feel Justice are not the objects of Mercy Yet these Attributes are not contrary the one to the other being both Divine Perfections they can no more be contrary the one to the other than the Divine Essence which both of them are can be contrary to it self Cruelty not Justice is opposite to Mercy Injustice not Mercy is opposite to Justice Neither doth God in pardoning or punishing act contrary to any thing in his Nature In pardoning Penitents he acts not against his Justice for that was satisfied in their Sponsor Jesus Christ In punishing Impenitents he acts not against his Mercy for that as the Socinians themselves confess extends not to obstinate sinners neither are they at all capable of it These two Attributes do mutually illustrate one another the Mercy of God is the more Illustrious because when Justice was inexorable it sent his Son to suffer for us The Justice of God is the more glorious in Christs Sufferings because they were inflicted by one whose Mercy was infinite in his nature and in his design towards Men. 2. Christ the Patient who bore those Sufferings may be considered under divers respects each of which shew Justice to be Illustrious in his Sufferings Take him as Man Justice appears in that the penal Sufferings were in the same nature which had sinned The nature of Angels was not assumed the facrifice of Beasts would not serve the turn neither had the same nature with man but that Justice might be exact that the Sufferings might be in the same nature which had sinned the Son of God was made flesh and suffered in it as an expiatory Sacrifice for us Notable is that of the Prophet All their wickedness is in Gilgal there I hated them Hos 9.15 Sin was found in the humane Nature and there it must be punished Take him as the Son of God Justice appears in that so great so dear a person suffered for us David spared Joab because he was a great a potent man in the Army And Absolom because he was a dearly beloved Son In the former he said The Sons of Zerviah are too hard for me and in the latter Deal gently with the young man But though Jesus Christ was very great God and Gods Fellow one who thought it no robbery to be equal with God though he was very dear a Son and an only begotten the Fathers essential Image and eternal joy Yet for all this standing in the room of sinners he must not be spared It was a great Wrath in Henry the Second of France Thuan. l. 20.564 which made him by a passionate throw to smite though but occasionally his own Son then sitting at his feet But oh how great how wonderful was the Justice of God in Christs Sufferings when no greatness no dearness though infinite did obviate or turn away the stroke When he bruised and wounded to death his own Son and that intentionally and on purpose to vindicate the Honour of his Justice and Law In other punishments he falls but upon meer Creatures but here with Reverence be it spoken He falls upon himself the Son of God very God and a dearer or greater person there could not be was the sufferer Further take him as an holy Innocent One Justice which usually hath only to do with sinners will yet appear He was Holiness it self in his Divine Nature He was holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners in his Humane yet if he will stand as a Surety for mankind he cannot be excused It is observable in Scripture that penal Sufferings stay not meerly at the offenders door but run over upon those in conjunction with him Achan sinned in the accursed thing and his Sons and Daughters were stoned and buried with fire David sinned in numbring the people and no less than seventy thousand subjects fell by a Pestilence But the Holy Jesus is an instance above all others their Sufferings fell indeed upon Relations yet still upon sinners here they fell upon the Holy One. Justice is illustrious when sinners suffer in conjunction with sinners but how highly doth it act when Innocency it self suffers in conjunction with them I mean as a Sponsor on their behalf But here the Socinians cry out Nibil divinae justitiae magis contrarium est quà m insontem sontis loco puniri Volk de Sat. Quid hoe aliud est quam saevum tyrannum facere Sclicting cont Mels Insignis immanitas atque saevitia potius quà m liberalitas appellanda est Soc. de Servat pars 3. c. 2. That if God should punish the innocent for the guilty Christ for us Sinners he
would be unjust a cruel Tyrant one like Hannibal who looked upon a ditch full of Humane blood as a fair spectacle Unto which I answer the Scripture is very pregnant our sins were laid upon him they were condemned in his flesh he bore them in his body he was wounded and bruised for them and that even unto death and that not a meer simple death but one that had a penal curse in it And if these phrases express not punishment no words can do it Yet for all this corrupt Reason is so desperate that rather than subscribe to the Sacred Oracles it will blaspheme and call God Tyrant Indeed an innocent cannot be punished for the guilty compulsorily but Christ suffered by consent Lo I come to do thy will O God Heb. 10.7 The Law of Redemption was in his heart he gave himself for us an offering and a sacrifice Eph. 5.2 And what is freer than Gift or what colour of Injustice can there be in such a Suffering The Reason and Justice of all Nations agree in this that one may by his own consent be punished for another It 's true he cannot justly consent to suffer in that which he hath not a just power over Men have not such a power over their lives as they have over their estates The only blemish in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of old who engaged life for life was this That they had not a just power over their lives to give them as a Compensation for others but Christ might justly consent he had power over his own life I have power saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 authority to lay down my life and authority to take it up again Joh. 10.18 Hence it appears that his consent to suffer punishment for us was a very just valid one it being in that which he had authority over and where there is such a just consent there an innocent one may suffer for the guilty It 's true an innocent one meerly as such cannot be punished neither did our Saviour suffer as such but as one in conjunction with us as our Goel and Sponsor who undertook to bear the punishment of our sins It could not be unjust for him to undertake it and after undertaking it could not but be just for him to perform it especially seeing his person could not sink under his Sufferings and his Sufferings could not be in vain or to no purpose He rose as a glorious Victor and out of his Penal Evils sprung that great Good the Redemption of a World 3. The Sufferings of Christ are to be considered in themselves and in their fruits Take them in themselves Justice appears in the proportionableness of them in punishing Justice holds the Ballance it weighs and measures out Penal Evils for Moral Judgments on Sinners are called the portion of their measures Jer. 13.25 as being inflicted in a due proportion Now the Sufferings of Christ were proportionable in divers respects 1. There was a proportion between the seats of Suffering in Christ and the seats of Sin in us Man sinned in his body Sin was organically and instrumentally there proportionably Christ suffered in his body no part of it but was racked upon a tormenting Cross because our Corporeal Parts had been weapons of Iniquity Justice made his the subjects of Misery Man sinned in his Soul there was the prime and chief seat of Sin proportionably Christ suffered in his Soul nay there was the prime and chief seat of Suffering because the main residence and venom of sin was in our Souls the greatest pressure and bitterness of wrath was upon his He was exceeding sorrowful even to death He was sore amazed and as it were fainted away yea for very anguish he sweat drops of blood and upon the Cross cryed out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me All this befel him who was fortitude and constancy it self Under the Law Justice had eye for eye tooth for tooth wound for wound stripe for stripe in Jesus Christ it had a Suffering body and soul as a Compensation for the sinning bodies and souls of Men. 2. There was a proportion between the Penal Sufferings in Christ and those in the threatning of the Law Christ suffered not the very Idem neither indeed could he do so because there was a change of person and in strictness Si alius solvit alind solvitur but his Sufferings came as near to those in the Law as could possibly stand with a just decorum to his Sacred Person as little was abated as might be This will appear by the many steps of his Humiliation He the Son of God very God assumed our frail Nature But might this infinite and wonderful Condescension satisfie Justice for the sin of the world no He must be under the Law and fulfil all Righteousness Well that being done might that obedience wherein so high an Honour was reflected upon the Law as that it was obeyed perfectly in all things and that by its Maker satisfie for sin No that alone was not enough there must be shedding of blood or no Remission But if there must be blood might not a few drops of his blood the same being of an infinite value do the work No the Law calls for Death without that he could not be an expiatory Sacrifice for us But if a Death must be might not a simple one being of so great a person serve the turn No the Law pronounces a Curse and that he was made the marks and tokens of Wrath were upon him and why all this but that God would have his Sufferings comply and come as near the terms of the Law as might be It 's true he did not bear the accidentals of punishment his Sufferings were not eternal but in the Law punishment is eternal only as it relates to a finite Creature which can never satisfie but not as it relates to a mighty Sponsor who could pay down all at once and swallow up death in Victory He suffered not the worm of Conscience or Desperation But the first of these is from Sin inherent and putrifying in Conscience and the second from the Imbecillity of of the Creature sinking under its burden neither of which could be in him He bore not the accidentals of punishment but as great a person as he was the essentials could not be abated There was in his Sufferings Paena sensûs when the fire of wrath melted him into a bloody sweat and paena damni when the Eclipse of favour made him cry out of forsaking Though God in his Soveraignty would relax the Law and introduce his own Son as a Sponsor to satisfie for us yet his Son standing in that capacity He would in Justice have him suffer as near the penalty in the Law as could be 3. There was a proportion between the Sufferings of Christ and the Sin of a World Sin is an infinite evil and his Sufferings to compensate it were of an infinite value Sufferings are not to be estimated
he would strip himself of his Orient pearl that he would give his Son his eternal Joy out of his bosom to assume an humane Nature and in it to bear the horrible stroke of Justice which was due to us for our iniquities In giving Laws and Promises God gives but a created Image of his Sanctity and Grace but in giving his Son he gave his essential increated Image to suffer in the flesh for us that his holy Image broken in the fall might be repaired again in us When we were off from God the Center of Souls and wandring in the foul ways of sin God out of his immense Love sent no less person than his only begotten Son to seek us and bring us back unto himself that we might be for ever happy in the fruition of him The greatness of this Love will yet further appear if we consider the manner how the Son of God was given for us The lower a man stoops and condescends to do another good the higher and more eminent is his Love the steps wherein the Son of God came down and humbled himself for us evidently declare the infinite height of that Love which made him stoop so low to compass our Salvation The first step was his Incarnation the word was made flesh he who was in the form of God took on him an humane Nature In the Creation infinite produced finite but here infinite assumed finite there Eternal brought forth Temporal but here Eternal took Temporal into it self and what a wonderful Condescension was this It 's true Reason in the Socinian laughs at it but Faith in the Christian must needs admire it Had the greatest Monarch on Earth confined himself to the poorest Cottage there it would have been nothing to God Tabernacling in the flesh Should the highest Angel in Heaven have put off his Perfections and come down into an humane Nature and from thence have passed into a brutal bestial one and so on into a tree or stone and at last into nullity it would not have been a Condescension comparable to that of the Son of God coming in the flesh His Sacred Person was infinitely more above humane Nature than an Angel is above matter or nullity it self and what unparallel'd Love was here The Creator became a Creature the Son of God assumed our nature and that after it was in us tainted with sin Dr. Bates of the Attributes fol. 171. The natural distance saith that excellent Man between God and the Creature is infinite the Moral between God and the sinful Creature if possible is more than infinite Yet the mercy of our Redeemer overcame this distance What an extasie of Love transported the Son of God so far as to espouse our nature after it was defiled and debased with sin He was essential Innocence and Purity yet he came in the similitude of sinful flesh which to outward view was not different from what was really sinful Thus he St. Austin calls Love junctura duo copulans a coupling of two together That after man had rent off himself from God by his Apostacy God should assume an humane Nature into himself to make up the breach and reduce Man into an Union with himself again Miror Deum in utero Virginis miror omnipotentem in cunabulis miror quemodo verbo Dei caro adhaeserit Cypr. de Nat. Christi must needs be Love in a transcendent excess infinite This made St. Cyprian overlook the wonders in Nature that he might ravish himself in the admirations of an Incarnate God The Condescension was here so great that God seems to neglect his own Majesty that he may comply with our necessities yet infinite Love would have the Son of God stoop a little lower and do honour to that Sacred Law which we had violated His humane Nature being an inmate in his infinite Person could not but have a right to Heaven and might have been immediately rapt up thither but Love set him another task He the great Lawgiver was made under the Law He who knew the Father in an infinity of light now knew him in a finite Reason He who embraced the Father in an infinity of Love now loved him in a finite Will He who was Lord of all was subject to Parents and Magistrates He who upholds the world went up and down as a man doing of good he stooped as low as the Ceremonial Law His pure flesh was circumcised he kept the Passeover and so obedientially stood under his own shadow This is a Condescension much greater than if all the Angels in Heaven had put themselves under the Laws of the lowest matter yet infinite Love would have the Son of God go down a little lower We have him hungry thirsty weary weeping suffering the contradiction of Sinners enduring the temptations of Satan all his life-through a man of sorrows at last we have him bleeding on a Cross hanging there as a spectacle of shame his hands and his feet were pierced his body was racked and tortured to death in a stinking Golgotha But which was the greatest of all he bore the Wrath of God and what was that Wrath which was due to the sin of a World or what those Sufferings which satisfied Justice for it What a great thing was the Passion of God and how much beyond the dissolution of a World Words cannot utter it thoughts cannot measure it That Love must be no less than immense which made the Son of God stoop so low to take us up out of the ruins of the Fall The Love of God will yet more appear if we take notice of the persons for whom Christ was given it was for man poor impotent man a creature worth nothing a bankrupt in Spirituals one void of all those Primitive Excellencies which at first Crowned the humane Nature for him it was that God was at so vast an expence as that of his own blood Spond Annal. Anno 431. 'T was great Charity in Paulinus Bishop of Nola that he would give himself in pawn to the Vandals for a poor Child but it was transcendent superlative Love in God to give his Son one worth Millions of Worlds and as rich in Excellencies as a Deity could make him to be emptied and humbled to death for poor worthless worms such as we are Ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ that though he was rich yet for our sakes he became poor that ye through his poverty might be rich saith the Apostle 2 Cor. 8.9 The Riches of a God were laid out to set up broken man again But further it was for Sinners for Enemies such as were in Arms against God such as had broken his Laws despised his Authority cast off his Soveraignty and as much as in them lay stained his Glory These were the persons upon whose Salvation infinite Love set so high a rate that rather than fail the Life of God should be paid down for it The Apostle notably sets forth this
working When Satan who labours to emulate Divine Works doth wonders the end of them declares their Original suitably to the Author they serve only to lead men into lies and Idolatries Antichrist comes with lying wonders 2 Thes 2.9 Lying wonders in themselves as being phantasms and mockeries of sense and lying wonders as tending to confirm men in false Doctrine and Worship but the Miracles of Christ being real ones were done to ratifie the super-natural Truths and pure Worship of God The Jews have a rule that we should believe him who doth Miracles unless he be the Author of Idolatrous Worship had they adhered to this rule they could not but have embraced our Saviour who with so many Miracles sealed up the true Doctrine and Worship of God 2. The Miracles of Christ were not a few but very numerous not in one or two places but diffused over the Creation thereby to proclaim that the Creator was come down to redeem the World There were Miracles upon the Water he turned it into Wine John 2.9 Shewing himself to be the Lord of Nature here doing that in an instant which he doth every year in the Vine Miracles in the Sea a fish brings him the tribute-money Matth. 17.27 to declare that all Creatures were Tributaries to him After an whole nights toil to no purpose the Net being let down at his word enclosed a great multitude of fishes Luk. 5.5 6. So that the awe of his Divine Power fell upon all the Spectators Miracles upon the Sea and Air together in a Tempest he rebuked the winds and the Sea and there was a great calm Matth. 8.26 as a proof that all the Elements were his servants Miracles upon the loaves in multiplying of them John 6.11 and upon the fig-tree in making it to wither away Matth. 21.19 as a clear demonstration that his blessing and curse were great things Miracles upon the bodies of men in healing all manner of sickness and disease Matth. 4.23 and upon their souls too in making them every whit whole John 7.23 in token that he was the great Physician of both Miracles in Heaven at his Birth a star conducted the Wise-men to him Matth. 2.2 at his passion the Sun was darkned Matth. 27.45 The star waited upon its Creator at his Birth the Sun sympathized with him in his Passion Miracles upon the Devils in casting them out by his Word Matth. 8.16 A sure sign that the Powers of Hell could not stand it out against him Very various are the Miracles of our Saviour recorded in Scripture But if all had been written the world could not have contained the books saith St. John Chap. 21. vers 25. The words are Hyperbolical yet they import that many of his Works were not committed to Writing Arnobius enumerates the miraculous Works of Christ and then cries out Adv. Gent. l. 1 Quid simile Dii omnes a quibus opem dicitis aegris periclitantibus latam When did the Pagan Cods do the like from whom you say that help is afforded to men in sickness or danger Never was there such plenty of Miracles as here 3. The Miracles of Christ were very great He did those works which no other man did Joh. 15.24 It was never so seen in Israel Matth. 9.33 I shall instance in two or three things First he raised up the dead The maid in her Fathers house the young man carried out upon the byer and Lazarus four days dead and stinking in the Grave What things are these How much above all the Powers in Nature In the sixth Council at Constantinople Crab. Tom. 2.386 Polychronius a Monothelite in Confirmation of his opinion offered to raise up a dead man but upon tryal he could do nothing at all which made the people cry out Novo Simoni Anathema Polychronio seductori populi Anathema The Emperor Basilius being in great grief for his deceased Son Spondan Annal 879. Theodorus Santabarenus presented his Son to him as alive but this was but a meer spectrum an illusion of sense After a few kisses and embraces the Emperor saw his Son no more Apollonius did call up the Ghost of Achilles that is to say a Devil De Verit. Relig. as the noble Mornay speaks Elisha raised the Shunamites Son to life but he was only a Minister and a Type of Christ the Power of God did the work but our Saviour raised the dead by his own Divine Power Another instance is his restoring sight to one born blind John 9. Touching which the blind man saith Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind vers 32. It was a work fit for the Messiah It is indeed storied that Vespasian the Emperor restored sight to the blind but it may be the person was not really blind at least not naturally Satan as Bellarmine well observes might possibly reside in his Eye and impede the use of that part that he might seem to cure when he did but cease to hurt But our Saviour by a Power above Nature and Art did cure one really and naturally blind and that with Clay a thing in it self more probable to put out Eyes than to cure them And so there was as the Rabbins speak Miraculum in miraculo one Miracle within another much as it was when the bitter waters were made sweet by salt 2 King 2.21 Another instance we have in his casting out Devils this was the Finger and Power of God It is said indeed that Apollonius did cast Devils out of Men But how Rayn de lib. Ap. Tom. 2. fol. 990 991. It was in the very Method and Discipline of Devils by such words and symbols as they themselves had prescribed so it was not an ejection but a going out by consent to honour the Sacraments of their own making But our Saviour did not cast them out in their own way but whether they would or not by his Almighty Power It is further to be noted that soon after the Death of our Saviour the Devils Oracles were struck Dumb. The Oracle told Augustus That the Hebrew Child bid him leave that house and be gone to Hell no more answers were to be expected from thence Whereupon Augustus erected an Altar in the Capitol with this inscription upon it Haec ara est primogeniti Dei the Altar of the first-begotten of God The Evangelical light made the Oracles cease the Priests of Delphos were brought to beggery Plutarch Morn de Ver. writing touching the ceasing of Oracles at last cometh to this point That the Spirits were mortal and by their Death the Oracles ceased Oh! what an one was our Saviour who made the Pagan Gods shrink and hide their heads What a Divine Light was he who chased away those false Lights These Works were for Greatness such as became God manifest in the flesh 4. The Miracles of Christ were excellently suited to the Evangelical design Miracles in their general Nature are
this is but it was never so manifested as in Jesus Christ If ever any creature might preserve it self one would think that the highest noblest of all should do so his human nature was lifted above the top of the Creation above the highest Angel It was which never any Creature was before assumed into the Person of God yet it had no subsistence of its own it did not preserve it self it was held by that Deity which it did cohabit with in the Person of the Word still it was a Creature it could not like the Deity spread it self over the World it was not a self-subsistent or independent upon its Creator Here we plainly see that no creature no not the highest can support it self in being without Providence Ellhardus Lubinus in his Book De Causa Mali hath drawn a very ingenious Scheme to shew the dependence of the Creature upon God he sets the summum Ens uppermost under it the scale of Creatures in their order first Angels then Men then Beasts then Vegetables then meer being under all imum nihil As far as the summum Ens draws any thing ex imo nihilo out of meer nothing so far it ascends the scale into being or life or sense or reason or Angelical perfection As soon as he leaves it it sinks down into the imum nihil into nothing This doth in a very lively manner set forth the dependence of the creature upon its Maker but it was never so fully set forth as in Jesus Christ His human nature though above the whole scale of creatures is supported by the Deity No creature now may presume that it can be a self-subsistent or stand upon its own bottom all must confess a Providence supporting and bearing of them up in being The second act of Providence is Ordinative it directs and governs all God steers the ship of the World and all the passengers in it He orders the great House and all the Families of creatures in it Providence turns every wheel in nature and when there is a wheel within a wheel intricacy and seeming crossness of motion yet there is an eye in the wheel a wise Providence which preserves order in confusions All things are directed by congruous means to their proper end There are millions of creatures which know not what an end is but Providence conducts them thither Millions of Events are casual as to us but there is a certainty in Providence Millions of acts are free as to us yet Providence hath a soveraignty over them In all things God is Alpha and Omega the first Mover and the last End the wise Disposer and sure Moderator of every thing for his own glory This great Truth is excellently set forth in Christ Three things will make this evident 1. There was a signal Providence over Christ 2. There was a great Providence over the fruit of his Satisfaction in raising up a Church 3. All other Providences may be reduced to the other two 1. There was a signal Providence over Christ Gods eye and heart were upon the Temple which was but a type how much more intent must they be upon Christ who is the substance Providence all-along had an eye upon him It watched over his Genealogy a deluge swept away the corrupt World but Noah must have an Ark the true Noah the Messiah who is our rest and comfort was to come from him Abraham's body and Sarah's womb were both dead yet there must be an Isaac that the true Isaac the joy of the Father may come in the flesh from him Isaac was in a sort offered up that he might be a type of Christ but not sacrificed and actually slain that Christ might come from him Judah and Tamar commit incest yet Providence is not at a stand no Medium is too hard for it even this way come the Holy One into the flesh Ruth must leave her Countrey and be married to Boaz that David and afterwards Christ the true David whose Kingdom was to be perpetual might come from thence The whole Scripture aims at Christ but the Book of Ruth seems to be penned on purpose to shew forth his Genealogy The Tribe of Judah was carried to Babylon the Family of David was brought into a very low mean condition but Judah must return again the withered stem of David must bud and bring forth the Messiah and that when it was in the lowest ebb The Lamp of David was almost quite extinct but at the coming of the Messiah it was turned into a glorious Sun which should reign for ever When Christ was to come Providence took order that it should be in due circumstances a long train of types and sacrifices such as filled many ages passed before his appearance There was Gallicinium Prophetarum the Cock-crowing of the Prophets before the rising of this Sun John Baptist came a little before to prepare the way of the Lord by Sermons of Repentance At last he came in the fulness of time in the prae-appointed hour when the Gentiles were desperately corrupted when the Jews were horribly degenerate then he came to heal the world He was born in the right place Augustus's Tax calls up Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem the House of Bread that there our Saviour the true Bread from Heaven might be born He being God and Man in one person Providence took order that all along there should be an appearance of Majesty and Meanness At his birth there was a Star directing to him wise men worshipping him an Host of Angels congratulating the good tydings yet himself an Infant wrapped in poor clouts and laid in a Manger In his life he east out Devils yet was tempted he healed infirmities yet was weary The glory of Mysteries and Miracles brake forth from him yet he was in the fashion and frailty of a man The Officers a little before his death went backward and fell to the ground yet he was apprehended He was crucified through weakness but liveth by the power of God He hung upon a Cross but even there triumphed over all the powers of darkness All which suits to God in the flesh Nothing more sublime than God nothing more vile than Flesh Accordingly in our Saviour there appeared a mixture of glory and weakness To add but one thing more Providence would have the righteousness of his life and the sufferings of his death to be such as might be a full and ample Satisfaction for the sin of the world and so it was The righteousness of his life highly honoured the rule of the Law the sufferings of his death were accommodated as much as could be to the curse of the Law Here the two great things in which the Law hath as high a completure as could possibly be in a Sponsor on our behalf that is fulfilling the righteousness and bearing the curse of the Law were both eminently comprised Here the two great Attributes of God which called for a Satisfaction that is his Holiness which perfectly hates
saved without any respect to Christ or faith in him and what need then was there of Christ or his satisfactory sufferings for us the great work might be done without him Hence it appears that to deny Original sin is to cast off Christ and Grace The Jewish Rabbins who made the evil figment in mans heart to be but a light matter small as a thread weak as a woman ruleable by the good figment of our own reason were very ignorant of that great point of Regeneration Hence Nicodemus a Master in Israel was startled and stood at a maze at our Saviours Doctrine about it How can a man be born when he is old can he enter the second time into his mothers womb and be born saith he Joh. 3.4 Such carnal and gross expostulations could never have dropt from him if he had had a true sense of Original sin but for want of that Regeneration was a strange and unintelligible mystery to him The Pagan Philosophers had some glimmerings of Original sin hence they complained that the soul had lost her wings and crept upon these lower things that it was in the body as a prison and there lookt out at the grates of sense that it was fallen from the happy Region and inclined to evil But because these were but glimmerings they did not so much as dream of Grace or Regeneration because they did not see the depth and venom of our Original wound they thought there was medicamentum in latere enough in the Power and Free-will of the soul to heal it self they reckoned all virtues to be among the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the things in our power and accounted the will to be such a mistress of it self that it might make it self good and excellent at its pleasure By all these instances we see plainly that the Doctrine of Original sin is very useful and momentous Original sin is set forth by many names in Scripture It is called Sin The sinning sin The sin that dwelleth in us The sin that doth easily beset us The Law of sin and death The Law in the Members The flesh and the old man The root of bitterness The plague of the heart in the Fathers it is called the paternal poyson The first radical sin The venom and stroke of the old serpent The contagion of the ancient death The weight of the ancient crime The injury of our Original And St. Austin that he might ascertain that in which he opposed the Pelagians called it Original sin from whence that name was afterwards frequent in the Church it was so called partly because we have it in our Original it is interwoven with our nature and may say to every one of us As soon as thou wert I am partly because it is derived to us from Adam the head and original of mankind * Non peccat iste qui nascitur non peccat ille qui genuit non peccat iste qui condidit per quas rima◠inter tot praesidia innocentiae peccatum fingis ingressum Aust de Nup. l. 2.28 Hence when Julian the Pelagian argued thus against Original sin He sins not who is born he sins not who begets he sins not who creates By what chinks or cranies among so many guards of innocence Quid quaerit latentem rimam cum habeat a pertissimam januam Per unum hominem ait Apostolus quid quaerit amplius do you feign that sin did enter St. Austin answers him thus Why doth he seek a chink or a crany when he hath an open gate By one man saith the Apostle what would he have more It is that one man Adam the original of mankind by whom sin entred into the world it is by him that it is derived to us That one Text touching the one man is enough to break and sweep away all the subtile cobwebs which the Pelagians and Socinians have spun out of their Wit and carnal Reason to oppose the Doctrine of Original sin Original sin consists in two things 1. In that Adams first sin is imputatively ours 2. In that we have an inordination and inherent pravity derived upon us from him The first thing is Adams first sin imputatively ours not that God reputes us to have done it in our own person not that it is imputed to us in the full latitude as it was to Adam We sinned not as the head and root of mankind we murdered not the whole humane nature we did not usher in sin and death upon the world no as the Apostle saith this was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by one Adam but as soon as any man becomes proles Adae in conjunction with him it is imputed to him pro mensura membri in such sort and proportion as is competent to him being a part and piece as it were of Adam 12. Quest 81. Art 1. Aquinas illustrates this by a notable instance Murder as a sin is not imputable to the hand in it self as distinct or separate from the body but as it is a Member in man and moved by his Will in like manner the sin of Adam is imputed to us not so properly as we are in our selves but as we are parts and pieces of him and derived our nature from him Adams sin was past before we were born It is therefore as Bellarmine well expresses it Nobis communicatur co modo quo communicari potest id quod transiit nimirum per imputationem De Amiss Grat. l. 5. c. 17. communicated to us in that manner as a thing past can be communicated namely by imputation we did not personally commit it It is therefore imputed to us in that measure as is fit and just for it to be imputed to those who are parts and members of Adam In that capacity it is constructively and interpretatively ours and accordingly God justly reckons and imputes it unto us That this is so I shall offer some Considerations 1. That of the Apostle is very pregnant by one man sin entred into the world and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned Rom. 5.12 In the Original it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him that is in Adam all have sinned Those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are Relative Three things as St. Cont. 2. Epist Ptl. l. 4. c. 4. Austin observes are set down in this verse before Adam Sin and Death those words relate not to sin for Sin in the Greek is a Feminine nor to death for men do not sin in death but dye in sin therefore they relate to Adam in him all have sinned It 's true others take the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 causally for that all have sinned But I think that as I said before they are to be taken Relatively in him all have sinned Thus those three things which the Apostle conjoyned together in this verse that is the propagation of sin the original of death and the foundation of both very well cohere
together in this manner The first we have in those words By one man sin entred into the world The second in those Death passed upon all The third in those In him all have sinned Thus those phrases sin entred death passed have a plain explication Sin did not stay in Adam but it entred into the world But if Adams sin be not imputatively ours how did it enter It entred by Imitation say the Pelagians but how vain is this Sin entred upon all upon whom death passed and death passed upon all without exception But neither infants who sin not actually or after the similitude of Adams transgression nor those adult persons who sin actually but never so much as heard of Adams sin could have sin from Adam by Imitation We are all sinners and children of wrath not by Imitation but by nature Adams sin was not meerly his own but ours by Imitation Thus sin entred into the world and as a penal fruit of it death passed upon all it did not stay at Adam but passed upon all and if Adams sin became not ours how should that be The Apostle doth not barely set down sin and death but sets them down in their order and connexion First sin entred and then death passed and that not as a meer infelicity or misery but as a just punishment for sin Hence it is observable that the Text saith That death came by sin and so passed upon all The Particles by and fo shew that death passed upon all as a punishment If Adams sin were not all mens how could death pass upon infants who have no actual sin God is not cannot be unjust where there is no fault there is no room for punishment if infants in no sense transgressed the Command in Adam the death in the threatning cannot fall upon them De Incar c. 14. Quâ justitiâ parvulus subjicitur peccati stipendio si nulla est in eo peccati pollutio saith Fulgentius With what justice can an infant be subject to the wages of sin if the pollution of it be not in him May there be poena sine causa a punishment without a why or a wherefore It cannot be If therefore even Infants in Adam died as the Apostle speaks 1 Cor. 15.22 then in Adam all sinned as he tells us in the frequented Text. That this is the genuine meaning of it doth not only appear by the Text it self but by that which followeth By one mans disobedience many were constituted sinners v. 19. No. unimputed sin can do this If therefore Adams sin constitute us sinners it is imputed to us To say as the Socinians and some others do to constitute us sinners is only to make us obnoxious to death and so to be treated as sinners is a thing vain and repugnant to the Text. To be treated as a sinner is not to be constituted such To be treated as a sinner when a man is not such is very unjust and unequal To be a sinner is to be culpable or guilty of a fault and the proper signification must be retained The Apostle in this Chapter evidently distinguishes between sin and death transgression and condemnation and makes Adam the origine of both first of sin and then by sin of death Therefore Adam first makes us sinners and then obnoxious to death Thus the words being taken relatively In him all have sinned the conclusion is plain That Adams sin is imputed to us Nay if the words be taken causally for that all have sinned the conclusion is the very same If death passed upon all men because all have sinned then Infants because death passes upon them have sinned And how have they sinned Not in their own persons they are not capable of sinning actually but in Adam the root of mankind Not by an Imitation they are not capable of such a thing but by a participation of the first sin which by a just Imputation becomes theirs 2. The capacity which Adam was in is very considerable He was not considered as a meer individual person but as the Principle and Origine of Human nature The admirable endowments of righteousness and immortality were trusted and deposited in his hands not meerly for himself but for his posterity The command was not given to him as to a singular person but as the Root and Head of Mankind The Covenant made with him run thus If he did as he was able obey the command he should transfer innocency and life to his posterity If not he should transfer sin and death to it We were in him naturally as latent in his Joins and legally as comprized within the Covenant This is very clear because the death in the threatning annexed to the command given to him falls upon his posterity Had not the command extended to his children the threatning could not have reached them Had not they sinned in Adam their Head and Root death could not have faln upon them in such sort as it doth that is in a state of infancy void of any actual sin of its own This being the true state of things it is no wonder at all that Adams sin should be imputed to us as parts and pieces of him Adam was here considered as the Root and Origine of mankind his Person was the fountain of ours his Will the representative of ours Omnes nos unus ille Adam We were one with him and branches of him Hence we sinned in his sin and putrified in him as in the root These things if weighed give an easie solution to all the cavils and objections which the Pelagians and their followers make against the imputation of Adams sin to us First They say Deus qui propria peccata remittit non imputat aliena God who forgives us our own sins doth not impute to us another mans But here is a great mistake as if Adams sin were just nothing at all to us Adam was the Root and bore all mankind in himself we were seminally and legally in him His sin therefore was not alien altogether to us but in a sort our own We sinned in him as our Head We fell with him as the branches fall with the body of the Tree St. Austin saith Contr. Jul. l. 6 cap. 4. Though Adams sin were alien proprietate actionis yet it was ours contagione propaginis Gregory Nazianzen speaking of Adams sin cryes out pathetically O infirmitatem meam O my infirmity St. Serm. 1. Dom. 1. Post 8. Epiph Bernard notably expresses it Culpa aliena est quia in Adam omnes nescientes peccavimus nostra quia etsi in alio nos tamen peccavimus nobis justo Dei judicio imputabatur licet occulto Adams sin was alien to us because we ignorantly sinned in him yet it was ours because we sinned though in another and it was to us imputed by the just though secret counsel of God Again they say That which is properly sin in us is voluntary and an act of our will but Adams was
unrighteous Person cannot possibly enter into the holy Heaven where Eternal Life is given to the Righteous The main Quaere in Justification is What it is that constitutes us righteous before God Righteousness relates to some Law we are under a double Law the one the Law of Nature or Creation which calls for perfect Obedience in every point The other the Law of Grace which accepts of sincerity we must if justified be made righteous to both these accordingly I shall discourse of both We are under the Moral Law of Nature this is immortalized by its own intrinsecal rectitude it so naturally results out of the Relation which Man stands in towards God that as long as God is God the Supream Truth and Goodness and Man Man a Creature endued with Reason and Will it cannot cease to be or to oblige it is not imaginable that such a thing as Reason should be unbound to look up to the original Truth from whence it came or that such a thing as Free-will should be unbound to embrace that infinite Good which made it this Law stands faster than the pillars of Heaven and Earth it hath a double Sanction a promise of Eternal Life upon perfect obedience and a threatning of eternal Death upon the least Transgression The promise though never abrogated by God could not of it self bud or bring forth Life a Sinner because a Sinner not being capable of perfect obedience could not have Life from that promise cessat materia There could be no person capable of the promised Life the Law was weak though not in it self yet through the Flesh the sin of Man Man sinned away the Promise but the Threatning he could not sin away nay by his sin he put himself under the Curse and Wrath of it Sin made him a fit object and fuel for these the case standing thus how or which way should a Sinner be justified as to the Law In a Sinner there was matter enough for the Treatning but more for the Promise Death might justly seize him but Life he was not payable of by vertue of that Law here infinite Wisdom found out that which no created Eye could spy out a way of Justification without abrogating the Law thus therefore it was contrived the Law being under the power of the Legislator was relaxed though not abrogated there may be a double notion of the Law either it may be taken as it is in it self in summo apice in its primordial rigor requiring perfect personal obedience from us and thus it doth not cannot justifie us there is a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an utter impossibility upon it Rom. 8.3 Righteousness could not come by the Law nay in this sense it worketh wrath it condemns and curses the Sinner or else it may be taken as it is by the great Legislator relaxed to admit of a satisfaction in our Sponsor Jesus Christ and thus it hath its end its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Righteousness which satisfied it in him thus it cannot condemn Believers a satisfied Law so far as it is satisfied hath nothing to say against them who partake of that satisfaction That of Learned Mr. Gataker is remarkable Justificatio nostri tum ab Evangelio tum à Lege pendet à Lege quatenùs eidem satisfit pro delictis adversùs eam admissis ab Evangelio quatenùs satisfactio non à nobis sed à Christo Vicariâ operâ pro nobis exhibetur The Gospel reveals such a Sponsor as hath satisfied the Law for us the Law being satisfied cannot condemn those who partake of that satisfaction It appears by this That Christ's Righteousness is that which constitutes us righteous as to the Law only here many worthy learned Divines are at a difference how it doth so doubtless it doth it in a way of Imputation but the mode of that Imputation is not agreed on Some say that Christ's Righteousness is the meritorious cause of our Justification and so imputed to us in the effects in that pardon which discharges us from the Law Others That it is it self in some sort imputed to us and so becomes the material cause of our Justification I take it our former Divines who disputed with the Papists about Imputed Righteousness are of the latter opinion Hence Bishop Davenant saith De Just hab fol. 364 373. that Ipsissima Christi obedientia nobis imputatur quasi esset nostra personalis The very obedience of Christ is imputed to us as if it were our personal Righteousness And again he saith that In se it is causa meritoria Justificationis but as it is apply'd to Believers Subit vicem causae formalis it is in the room of a formal cause 'T is true he saith That it is imputed to us ad aliquem effectum not that it is imputed only in the effect but that it is imputed in a measure and to some intents though not in the full latitude or as it is in Christ The Learned Professors of Leyden determine thus Mirum hîc videri non debet Christi Justitiam non meritoriae solùm sed materialis imò formalis causae rationem habere cum id diversimodè fiat nempe quâ illud est propter quod in quo sive ex quo per quod justificamur To quote no more If Christ's Righteousness be only a meritorious cause of Justification then our former Divines have striven in the dark the Controversies between them and the Papists in this point have been but a vain jangling no Papist ever denied that Christ merited Justification for us no Protestant should ask any more The Council of Trent laying down the causes of Justification saith Chistus suâ sanctissimâ Passione in ligno Crucis nobis Justificationem meruit pro nobis Deo Patri satisfecit Here our Divines should have acquiesced in silence but surely they thought there was somewhat more in it For my own part I conceive Christ's Righteousness is so far imputed to us as to be the matter of our Justification before I come to offer my Reasons I shall lay down several things tending to explain my meaning in this point First There is a double Imputation The one when a thing inherent or transient is imputed to the very Subject or Agent of it The other when it is imputed to those in conjunction with the Subject or Agent as being parts and portions of him The first Imputation is according to the course of Nature the second is according to some just constitution made touching the same the former is unquestionable the latter is that which is to be cleared that such an Imputation is possible and when it is done truth may appear by these Instances The primitive Righteousness of our Nature was only inherent in Adam Yet was it imputed to us we were by God esteemed as righteous in him else we are not fallen Creatures neither do we need any such thing as Regeneration Adam's sin was an act done by him yet