Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n mystical_a person_n union_n 3,769 5 10.8414 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A68107 Of domesticall duties eight treatises. I. An exposition of that part of Scripture out of which domesticall duties are raised. ... VIII. Duties of masters. By William Gouge. Gouge, William, 1578-1653. 1622 (1622) STC 12119; ESTC S103290 610,068 716

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

very substance of the Saints their flesh and bones taken out of Christ as the substance of Eue was taken out of Adam Answ Not so if the words be literally taken For so may Christ rather be said to be of our flesh and of our bones because he tooke our nature and that from a daughter of Adam in which respect he is said to be of the seed of Dauid and of the Iewes as concerning the flesh Besides the Apostle expresly saith vers 32. that This is a great mysterie The mysterie therefore must be searched out For this end Christ must be considered as another Adam and so the holy Ghost stileth him The last Adam The second man that is a stocke a root that giueth a being to branches sprouting out of him 2. Quest What being is that which we receiue from Christ Answ Not our naturall being that we haue of the parents of our flesh but a supernaturall and spirituall being which the Scripture termeth a new birth a new man a new creature This spirituall being is not in regard of the substance of our soule or bodie or of any of the powers or parts faculties or members of them for all these we haue by lineall descent from Adam and all these haue all sorts of men as well they who are not of the Church as they who are of it but in regard of the integritie goodnesse and diuine qualities which are in them euen that holinesse and righteousnesse wherewith the Church is endued and adorned As we are naturall men we are of Adam as we are spirituall men we are of Christ 3. Quest Why is mention made of flesh and bones in this spirituall being Answ 1. In allusion to the creation of Eue that by comparing this with that this might be the better conceiued 2. In regard of the Lords Supper where the flesh of Christ is mystically set before vs to be spirituall food vnto vs. That as before vers 26. he shewed the mysterie of one Sacrament Baptisme here he might shew the mysterie of the other Sacrament The Lords Supper 3. In relation to Christs humane nature by vertue whereof we come to be vnited vnto Christ For the diuine nature of Christ is infinite incomprehensible incommunicable and there is no manner of proportion betwixt it and vs so as we could not be vnited to it immediately But Christ by taking his humane nature into the vnitie of his diuine nature made himselfe one with vs and vs one with him so as by his partaking of our mortalitie we are made partakers of his immortalitie 4. Quest Are we then vnited only to his humane nature Answ No we are vnited to his person God-Man For as the diuine nature in and by it selfe is incommunicable so the humane nature singly considered in and by it selfe is vnprofitable The Deitie is the fountaine of all life and grace the flesh quickneth not but that spirituall life which originally and primarily floweth from the Deitie as from a fountaine is by the humanitie of Christ as by a conduit-pipe conueyed into vs. 5. Quest How can we who are on earth be vnited to his humane nature which is contained in the highest heauen Answ This vnion being supernaturall and spirituall there needeth no locall presence for the making of it That eternall Spirit which is in Christ is conueyed into euerie of the Saints as the soule of a man is into euerie member and part of his bodie by vertue whereof they are all made one with Christ and with one another by one Spirit we are all baptized into one bodie which bodie is Christ This is to be noted against these two errours The first is this We are vnited first to the diuine nature of Christ which is euerie where and by vertue thereof to his humane nature Answ 1. The Deitie as we shewed is immediately incommunicable so as this cannot be 2. Our vnion with Christ is spirituall not physicall or naturall so as this locall presence needeth not The second errour is this The humane nature of Christ hath all the diuine properties in it so as it is euerie where present and by reason thereof we are vnited vnto Christ Answ This also is impossible and needlesse The properties of a true bodie cannot possibly admit the incommunicable properties of the Deitie that implieth direct contradiction which is that finite should be infinite Needlesse also this is because the vnion we speake of is as we said spirituall 6. Quest What kinde of vnion is this spirituall vnion Answ A true reall vnion of our persons bodies and soules with the person of Christ God and man For as the holy Ghost did vnite in the virgins wombe the diuine and humane natures of Christ and made them one person by reason wherof Christ is of our flesh of our bones so the spirit vniteth that person of Christ with our persons by reason whereof we are of his flesh and of his bones A great difference there is betwixt the kindes of these vnions for the vnion of Christs two natures is hypostaticall and essentiall they make one person but the vnion of Christs person and ours is spirituall and mysticall they make one mysticall body yet is there no difference in the reality and truth of these vnions our vnion with Christ is neuer a whit the lesse reall and true because it is mysticall and spirituall they who haue the same spirit ar● as truly one as those parts which haue the same soule The effects which proceed from this vnion doe shew the truth thereof for that spirit which sanctified Christ in his mothers wombe sanctifieth vs also that which quickned him quickneth vs that which raised him from death raiseth vs that which exalted him exalteth vs. The many resemblances which the Scripture vseth to set forth this vnion doe shew the truth thereof but most liuely is it set forth by that resemblance which Christ maketh betwixt it and his vnion with his Father I pray saith he of all his Saints That they may all be one as thou Father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in vs that they may be one as we are one This note of comparison as is not to be taken of the kinde but of the truth of these vnions our vnion with Christ is as true as Christs vnion with his Father So true is this vnion as not only Iesus himselfe but all the Saints which are members of this body together with Iesus the head thereof are called CHRIST 1 Cor. 12. 12. Gal. 3. 16. This is to be noted against their conceit who imagine this vnion to be only in imagination and conceit or else only in consent of spirit heart and will or at the most in participation of spirituall graces 7. Quest What is the bond whereby this vnion is made namely whereby Christ and the Saints are made one Answ There
For the Sonne of God assuming an humane nature into the vnity of his diuine nature and vniting them together without confusion alteration distraction separation in one person that which is done by one nature is done by the person and in that respect the Scripture oft attributeth it to the other nature as where it is said They crucified the Lord of glorie and God purchased the Churchwith his owne bloud 2. Though the diuine nature of Christ suffered not yet did it support the humane nature and adde dignity worth and efficacie to the sufferings of that nature 3. Christs diuine nature had proper and peculiar workes in the worke of redemption as to sanctifie his humane nature to take away our sinnes to reconcile vs to God and the like Thus then in three respects the whole person of Christ was giuen vnto vs. 1. In regard of the inseparable vnion of both natures 2. In regard of the assistance of the Deity in those things which the humane nature of Christ did 3. In regard of some proper actions appertaining to the Deity In that the person of Christ God-Man was giuen vp I gather that The price of our Redemption is of infinite value Nor Christ nor God himselfe could giue a greater Heauen and earth and all things in them are not of like worth Well therefore might Saint Peter call it pretious bloud and prefer it before siluer gold and all other things of price 1. What place can be left for despaire in those that know and beleeue the worth of this ransome 2. What can be held too deare for him that notwithstanding the infinite excellency of his person gaue himselfe for vs can goods can friends can children can liberty can life can any thing else 3. What iust cause haue we to giue vp our selues a liuing sacrifice holy and acceptable to him that gaue himselfe for vs 4. How vngratefull how vnworthy of Christ are they that for his sake will not forsake their vnstable honours fading wealth vaine pleasures garish attire and such like trash §. 32. Of Christs seeking the good of the Church The End why Christ gaue himselfe was for the Church so as Christ in his death aimed at our good He was made sinne for vs that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him he was made a curse for vs and hath redeemed vs from the curse of the Law he gaue himselfe for our sinnes that he might deliuer vs he laid downe his life for the sheepe This proues Christs giuing of himselfe to be a fruit of his loue for Loue seeketh not her owne Learne we hereby to apply all that Christ did to our selues If for vs he gaue himself he and all appertaining to him is ours Learne we also hereby how to manifest loue namely by seeking and procuring the good of others Let no man seeke his owne but euery man anothers wealth If this were practised would there be such oppressing such vndermining such deceiuing such wronging of one another as there is Too truly is the Apostles complaint verified in our daies All seeke their owne But let that minde be in vs which was in Christ Iesus and thus manifest our loue as we desire to partake of this fruit of Christs loue From hence by iust consequence it followeth that Christ merited not for himselfe Was there any need that Christ should come downe from heauen on earth to purchase any thing for himselfe When he was going out of the world thus he praied Now O Father glorifie thou me with the glorie which I had with thee before the world was Did Christ by any thing which he did on earth merit that glorie which he had before the world was All the exaltation whereunto he was aduanced euen in his human nature was due to the dignity of his person 1. Obiect He endured the crosse for the ioy which was set before him Answ He vsed that ioy which of right was due to him as an helpe to support him in the weaknesse of his humane nature not as a recompence which he should deserue 2. Obiect He became obedient to the death of the Crosse WHEREFORE God also hath highly exalted him Answ That particle wherefore doth not declare the cause but the order of his exaltation nothing a consequence that followed after his death After he had humbled himselfe so low he was most highly aduanced 3. Obiect Christ being man was bound to the Law and therefore for himselfe he ought to fulfill it Answ If he had beene meere man that were true But he vniting his humane nature vnto his diuine and making of both one person which person was God as well as man he was bound to nothing further then it pleased him voluntarily to subiect himselfe vnto for our sakes 2. If Christ were bound to the Law of dutie he must haue fulfilled it and if of dutie he was to fulfill it how could he thereby merit so high a degree of honour as he is aduanced vnto This conceit of Christs meriting for himselfe doth much extenuate the glorie of Christs grace and goodnesse in giuing himselfe §. 33. Of the particular ends why Christ gaue himselfe and of the condition of the Church before Christ tooke her EPHES. 5. 26. That he might sanctifie it and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word THe generall End of Christs giuing himselfe being before intimated in this phrase for vs is in this and the next verse particularly exemplified and that in two branches One respecteth the estate of the Church in this world v. 26. The other respecteth her estate in the world to come v. 27. The latter of these two is the most principall The former is subordinate to the latter an end for the accomplishing of the other end for the Church is here made pure that hereafter it may be made glorious In laying downe the former he noteth 1. The end whereat Christ aimed 2. The meanes wherby he effected that which he aimed at That end is set forth in these words that he might sanctifie it hauing cleansed it thus may they word for word be translated so as that which for order of words is in the latter place for order of matter is in the first place The word cleansing pointeth out our instification The word sanctifying expresseth our sanctification The meanes of effecting these are two 1. Baptisme comprised vnder this phrase washing of water 2. The word The two branches of the former end namely Cleansing and Sanctifying doe in generall imply two things 1. The Condition of the Church in it selfe 2. The Alteration thereof by Christ The condition is presupposed which is that she was impure polluted in the common estate of corrupt man Things in themselues pure are not cleansed but things foule and impure persons of themselues freed and exempted from a common misery need not anothers helpe to free and
these things in loue to themselues as superstitious persons to merit saluation by macerating their bodie others to free themselues from ignominie penurie slauerie torment or such like euils so as there is an apparent good that maketh them so to doe and not simply hatred of themselues They that so doe are either possessed with a Deuill or blinded in their minde or bereaued of their wits or ouerwhelmed with some passion so as they know not what they doe they doe it not therefore in hatred 2. Obiect Holy and wise men deliberately and on good aduice haue beaten downe their bodies and yeelded their liues to be taken away not accepting deliuerance Answ That was farre from hatred and in great loue to themselues as was shewed before §. 63. Of vnnaturall practises against ones selfe The forenamed doctrine discouereth many practises vsed by sundry men to be against nature and in that respect most horrible and detestable 1. The practise of the idolatrous Baalites who to moue their I doll to heare them cut themselues with kniues and lancers till the bloud gushed out vpon them Not much vnlike to whom are Popish Eremites Anchorites Monks flagellants Grandimontenses sundrie sorts of Franciscans and other Friers whereof some weare shirts of haire-cloth some shirts of maile next their bodie some goe bare-foot some daily whip themselues till bloud follow and some waste their bodies with lying hard watching fasting going on pilgrimage c. 2. The practise of Gluttons Drunkards vnchaste and voluptuous persons who to satisfie their corrupt humours impaire their health pull diseases vpon them and shorten their dayes 3. The practise of Swaggerers who by quarrels cause their flesh to be wounded and their liues taken away Among these may be reckoned such as bring themselues to great straits distresses and dangers for lucre sake and they who by felonie treason and the like euill deeds cast themselues vpon the sword of the Magistrate 4. The practise of them that giue the reines to griefe feare wrath and other like violent passions so as thereby they weaken their bodies and shorten their dayes 5. The practise of selfe-murtherers who herein breake the rule of loue as thy selfe and end their dayes in a most horrible sinne depriuing themselues of the time place and meanes of repentance so as whatsoeuer fond pretence they make for their sinne little better can be thought of them then that they thrust their soules headlong into hell vnlesse the Lord betwixt the act done and the expiration of their breath extraordinarily touch their hearts Religion nature sense and all abhorre this fearefull fact so as not only those who haue beene enlightned by Gods word but also the Heathen who had no other then the light of nature haue adiudged it to be a most desperate sinne §. 64. Of haters of others 2. By that affection which nature moueth men to beare to their flesh we may see how nature more preuailes with men then conscience and obedience to Gods word yea then the Spirit for where nature keepeth all men from hating their owne flesh nothing can keepe many husbands from hating their wiues and wiues their husbands nor brothers cosens neighbours yet these are our owne flesh no nor many of those who professe themselues to be of the mysticall bodie of Christ from hating one another What shall we say of these Is nature of greater power and more mightie in operation then the Spirit Surely such either deceiue themselues and others in pretending to be members of the bodie of Christ or else the Spirit is verie weake in them and the flesh beareth a great sway Let haters of their brethren thinke of this and bee ashamed §. 65. Of mans care in prouiding and vsing things needfull for his bodie The second euidence of that loue which a man beareth to himselfe is noted in two such branches nourisheth and cherisheth as comprize all needfull things vnder them so as the Apostle implieth thereby that Nature teacheth all men to prouide such things as are needfull for them needfull for life as food and needfull for health as apparell Nature is here propounded as a Schoolemaster to Christians this therefore which nature teacheth is a bounden dutie It is much insisted vpon by Salomon who in this respect saith It is good and comely for one to eat and drinke and enioy the good of all his labour If he be worse then an Infidell that prouideth not for his owne what is he that prouideth not for himselfe euen worse then a beast for nature hath taught the bruit beasts to nourish and cherish themselues If any thinke that it more befitteth beasts or naturall men then Saints let them tell me which of the Saints at any time guided by Gods Spirit hath wholly neglected himselfe To omit all others it is expresly noted of Christ that as there was occasion he slept he eat he rested and otherwise refreshed himselfe Obiect Though he were hungry and meat prepared for him yet he refused to eat Answ 1. Forbearing one meale is no great hinderance of cherishing the body 2. Extraordinarie and weightie occasions may lawfully make a man a little neglect himselfe that so he may shew he preferreth Gods glorie and his brothers saluation before the outward nourishing of his body to which purpose Christ saith My meat is to doe the will of him that sent me that is I preferre it before my meat And Saint Paul saith I will very gladly be spent for your soules We must here therefore take heed of the extremes on both hands 1. Of vndue and ouermuch neglecting our bodies so as the strength of them be wasted and the health impaired 2. Of too much caring for it so as vpon no occasion we will lose a meales meat or a nights rest Fasting and watching as occasion requireth are bounden duties But to returne to the point of nourishing and cherishing our flesh 1. For this end hath God prouided food apparell and all things needfull for our weake bodies that they should be nourished and cherished thereby not to vse them therefore is to refuse Gods prouidence 2. By well nourishing and cherishing our bodies they are the better enabled to doe that worke and seruice which God appointeth to be done but by neglecting them they are disabled thereto As this is a motiue so ought it to be an end whereat we aime in nourishing and cherishing our bodies §. 66. Of them that neglect to cherish their bodies Against this good instinct of nature doe many offend 1. Couetous misers who so doat vpon their wealth and so delight in abundance of goods treasured vp as they afford not themselues things needfull to nourish and cherish their bodies Salomon doth much taxe such of them he saith that riches are kept for the owners thereof to their hurt Daily experience giueth euidence to the truth thereof for beside that such
men make their riches to be snares and hinderances to keepe them from eternall life they make this present life to be very irksome filling their heads full of much carking care and keeping them from quiet rest Many in this case are so besotted as though they haue abundance yet they will not in health afford themselues a good meales meat nor seemly apparell nor in sicknesse needfull physicke no nor fire and such like common things Their case is worse then theirs who want for others will pitie and succour such as want but who will pitie and succour such 2. Such as are too intentiue vpon their businesses euen the affaires of their lawfull callings for in good things there may be excesse herein many Students Preachers Lawyers Tradesmen Farmers Labourers and others offend when they afford not seasonable times of refreshing and resting to their bodies but fast watch and toile too much in their calling They who by such meanes disable themselues doe make themselues guiltie of the neglect of so much good as they might haue done if they had nourished and cherished their bodies Some are so eager on their businesse that they thinke all the time mispent which is spent in nourishing and cherishing their bodies and thereupon wish that their bodies needed no food sleepe or other like meanes of refreshing These thoughts and desires are foolish and sinfull in many respects as 1. In manifesting a secret discontent and grudging against Gods prouidence who hath thus disposed our estate for the clearer manifestation of mans weaknes Gods care ouer him 2. In taking away occasions of calling vpon God and giuing praise vnto him For if we stood not in such need of Gods prouidence should we so oft pray vnto him for his blessing if by the good meanes which he affordeth vnto vs we felt not the sweetnesse and comfort of his prouidence should we be so thankfull to him 3. In taking away the meanes of mutuall loue for if by reason of our weaknesse we stood not in need of succour and help one from another what triall would there be of our loue 3. Such as sever these two duties of nature nourishing and cherishing and make them an hinderance one to another some so nourish their bodies as they cannot cherish them that is they spend so much in eating and drinking as they haue nothing to cloath themselues withall Others so cherish them as they cannot nourish them that is they so prancke vp themselues with braue apparell aboue their abilitie as they haue not competent food for themselues These fall into two contrarie extremes into the excesse in one thing and into the defect in another §. 67. Of contentment in that which is sufficient As the Apostle by naming these two nourish cherish sheweth that both of them are needfull so by naming them only and no more but them he sheweth that they two are sufficient whence we learne that Hauing food and raiment we must be therewith content The Apostle in these very words laieth downe this doctrine in another place The praier of Agur and the tenour of the fourth Petition proue as much Quest Is a man then strictly bound to care for no more then food to nourish and apparell to cherish him Answ So this nourishing and cherishing be extended to that estate wherein God hath set vs to the charge which God hath giuen vs and to the calling which he hath appointed unto vs we ought to care for no more Let vs therefore take heed of that excesse which ariseth from the corruption of nature and content our selues with that competency which nature requireth §. 68. Of Christs forbearing to hate the Church EPHES. 6. 29. Euen as the Lord the Church THis confirmation of the patterne of a mans selfe by a like patterne of the Lord hath relation to both the parts of the manifestation of a mans loue to himselfe both to the negatiue and so it sheweth that The Lord hateth not his Church And to the affirmatiue and so it sheweth that The Lord nourisheth and cherisheth his Church That difference which is made betwixt Esau a type of the world Esau haue I hated and Iaakob a type of the Church Iaakob haue I loued sheweth that the Lord is farre from hating his Church The world not the Church is the obiect of Gods hatred Obiect The Church her selfe and the enemies thereof oft conceiue by Christs dealing with her that he hateth her Answ It is the flesh abiding in them that are of the Church which maketh them so to conceiue not the spirit and in the enemies of the Church the flesh altogether reigneth But the things of God and his minde and affection nor can nor may be iudged by carnall eies eies of flesh The Spirit of God accounteth such things euidences of Gods Ioue which flesh iudgeth to be tokens of hatred namely corrections It is not because there is no matter of hatred in the Church that Christ hateth it not for by nature all are of one and the same cursed stocke children of wrath and after our sanctification is begun the flesh abiding in vs we daily giue much occasion of hatred if Christ should take that aduantage against vs which he might but it is that neere vnion which Christ hath made betwixt himselfe and the Church that keepeth him from hating her he hath made her his Spouse and he will not hate his Spouse all the occasion of hatred that she giueth he will either wipe away or couer Admirable is the comfort which euery true member of the Catholike Church may reape from hence for so long as the wrath and hatred of the Lord is turned from vs nothing can make vs miserable we may in this respect reioyce not only in prosperitie but also in all manner of affliction No calamitie can moue Christ to hate his Church but rather the more to pittie it as we doe our bodies Nay though by sinne he be prouoked and see it needfull to correct his Church yet in loue not in hatred in mercy not in wrath will he correct it What now if all the world have vs Seeing Christ hateth vs not we need not feare nor care The subiect which is sure of his Kings fauour little regardeth the hatred of others This therefore is to be thought of both to comfort vs vnder the crosse and to encourage vs against the hatred of the world That none may peruert this comfortable doctrine let me adde two caueats 1. That men deceiue not themselues with a naked name thinking themselues to be of the Church when they are only in it such may Christ hate 2. That being of the Church they waxe not insolent and too much prouoke Christ to anger for though he hate not such yet in wisdome he may so seuerely correct them as if he hated them and make them repent their folly and insolencie againe and