Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n law_n sin_n sin_v 3,553 5 9.3146 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A35951 An expositon of all St. Pauls epistles together with an explanation of those other epistles of the apostles St. James, Peter, John & Jude : wherein the sense of every chapter and verse is analytically unfolded and the text enlightened. / David Dickson ...; Expositio analytica omnium Apostolicarum Epistolarum. English Dickson, David, 1583?-1663.; Retchford, William.; Dickson, David, 1583?-1663. Epistle of Paul to the Hebrews. 1659 (1659) Wing D1403; ESTC R7896 807,291 340

There are 30 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

one man sin entred into the world and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all have sinned Another comparison is of Christ and Adam tending to shew that the righteousness of Christ is no less effectual to save those that are justified by Faith than the sin of Adam was of force to destroy those that are not justified There are six parts of the Comparison The first As by one man viz. Adam sin entred into the world and death by sin and so death passed upon all men that are the sons of Adam by nature in as much as in him as in a common parent all have sinned so by one man Christ Jesus the second Adam Righteousness entred into the world and Life by Righteousness and so life was communicated to all men which are the sons of Christ by grace such as all are which are justified by Faith in as much as in him as in a common parent surety and advocate all are justified This Antithesis remains to bee collected from what follows and especially from the end of ver 14. where Christ is made the Anti-type of Adam because hee is the Gate and Fountain of Righteousness and Life as Adam was the Gate and Fountain of sin and death Vers. 13. For until the Law sin was in the world but sin is not imputed when there is no Law 14. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adams transgression who is the figure of him that was to come Hee proves that sin entred into the world by one man Adam and was propagated to his posterity For from Adam to the Law written by Moses sin was in the world and imputed and that could not bee unless there had been some Law at least unwritten and innate for had there been no Law neither written nor innate sin could not bee imputed ver 13. but it was imputed because the punishment was inflicted If so bee the wages of sin is death it reigned from Adam to Moses not only over those that were of riper years but also over infants which sinned originally in him seeing all men were in Adam one man though not actually or after the similitude of Adams actual transgression ver 14. The sum of all is there was death the wages of sin therefore there was sin therefore a Law and sin from one passed unto all Hee calls Adam a type of him that was to come viz. of the second Adam Christ that wee might understand how Christ ought to answer in his saving effects to those destructive effects of Adam and that by the purpose of God who would represent Christ the Saviour of men in the lost original of mankind that Christ might bee no less acknowledged the Fountain Head and Root of Righteousness and Life to bee derived to those that are his as Adam was the Fountain Head and Root of propagating sin and death to his Vers. 15. But not as the offence so also is the free gift for if through the offence ●f one many be dead much more the grace of God and ●he gift by grace which is by one man Iesus Christ hath abounded unto many The second member of the Comparison wherein they disagree which is first briefly propounded afterward more largely explained The offence is not like the gift of God for that good which proceeds from God is of Divine efficacy and virtue therefore infinitely surpasses the evil which is from man Wherefore if the offence of one man i. e. Adam could bring forth death to many that were naturally propagated from him much more the infinite grace of God and the free gift of one m●n Jesus Christ who also is God shall abundantly convey life to them which are spiritually born of Christ. The sum of all is Hee would have us know that the grace of Christ is more potent to save than the sin of Adam to destroy and the gifts which are bestowed through the grace of God are more excellent than those which Adam lost Vers. 16. And not as it was by one that sinned so was the gift for the judgement was by one to condemnation but the free gift is of many offences unto Iustification The third branch of the Comparison shewing the dissimilitude between the evil that entred only by Adam sinning and the gift which is by Jesus Christ because the just judgement of God from one sin of Adam proceeded to the just condemnation of himself and of all that by the Law of Nature were comprehended in his loyns But grace or the free gift of God not only frees us from that one Original sin but from a multitude of actual sins committed by every one to a full justification from all sin The sum of all is condemnation is from one offence but the gift of grace is an acquittal from all offences Vers. 17. For if by one mans offence death reigned by one much more they which receive abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one Iesus Christ. The fourth branch of the Comparison with a confirmation of the former after this manner If by one only sin of Adam death entring as a King subdued mankind to it much more being justified by Faith receiving that abundant grace of God and the gift of Righteousness shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ By how much the more excellent therefore the Kingdome of Life is which makes its Subjects Kings and companions with Christ in Life Eternal than the Kingdome of death which destroyes all its subjects by so much the gift of Christ in respect to its efficacy excells the offence of Adam Vers. 18. Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation even so ly the righteousn●ss of one the free gift came upon all men unto ●ustification of Life The fifth branch of the Comparison As by the fall of Adam only the guilt came upon all that sprang of Adam by a natural propagation to their condemnation so by the obedience of Christ only wherein hee was obedient to his Father unto the death the satisfaction came to justification of all men which spring of Christ by a spiritual regeneration Vers. 19. For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many bee made righteous The sixth branch of the Comparison illustrating and ●onfirming the former after this manner As by the disobedience of Adam only it comes to pass that many are accounted and dealt with in the judgement of God as sinners because they are derived from him according to the flesh so by the obedience of Christ only many shall bee made righteous that is shall bee accounted as righteous to wit all they that are in Christ by Faith born of him after the Spirit For equal it is that the poyson of sin should not pierce deeper or the sin of Adam spread further upon his Off-spring than the virtue
contrary hee is condemned In the second verse a reason of this is subjoyned because the judgement of God is just and according to the merit of the deed condemns every sinner both him that judgeth and him that is judged Therefore hee which according to the judgement of God condemns another to death for sin condemns himself doing the like things Vers. 3. And thinkest thou this O man that judgest them which do such things and doest the same that thou shalt escape the judgement of God This Argument in the following part of the Chapter is confirmed removing the four pretended Objections whereby men may evade the force of the Argument Object 1. Hee securely contemns the judgement of God who because God hath hitherto spared him promiseth himself impunity or freedome from punishment when hee judgeth others I am not afraid saith hee of the judgement of God The Apostle refutes this Objection and proves it null by six Reasons Reas. 1. That such an imagination is vain and foolish for Thinkest thou c. which is the same as if hee had said In vain doest thou think to escape the judgement of God Vers. 4. Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and long-suffering not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance Despisest Reas. 2. Such an imagination puts contempt and abuse upon the riches of the bounty forbearance and gentleness of God when any one because God hath spared hitherto goes on in sin and conceives hopes to go unpunished Bounty Reas. 3. That the bounty of God ought to invite and move to repentance not to go on in sin out of hopes to go unpunished Vers. 5. But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thy self wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgement of God Hardness Reas. 4. That such a thought is the hardening of our hearts in sin and a sealing of them up that wee cannot repent Treasure Reas. 5. That hee who securely contemns the judgement of God heaps up unto himself a kinde of treasure of punishments from divine justice to the time of that last and terrible judgement wherein that whole treasure of punishments in the most righteous anger of God shall bee openly poured out upon him Vers. 6. Who will render to every man according to his deeds 7. To them who by patient continuance in well-doing seek for glory and honour and immortality eternal life 8. But unto them that are contentious and do not obey the truth but obey unrighteousness indignation and wrath 9. Tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man that doth evil of the Jew first and also of the Gentile 10. But glory honour and peace to every man that worketh good to the Jew first and also to the Gentile Reas. 6. God will give to every man in the day of Judgement according to his works good or evil his rewards of grace or punishments of his justice To wit eternal life to them that persevere in obedience to the truth hoping for a reward vers 6 7. And besides the signs of wrath in this life eternal death also after this life as it is just for an angry God to inflict upon the adversaries of the truth and the servants of unrighteousness verse 8. Hee confirms this reason in that God will have no respect to any Nation or outward Priviledges in the inflicting of his punishments But the Jews which had the chiefest favours of God should bee first in their punishments and that hee would inflict upon the soul and body of the Heathens or Gentiles their deserved torments verse 9. And to the same manner in his rewards without difference of Nations hee will glorifie i. e. with all gifts that may externally accomplish a man such as Glory and Honour and inwardly which is signified by Peace and will heap upon the pious and honest Jew according to all the priviledges which hee hath vouchsafed to that Nation and will crown the pious and honest Gentile in his place with eternal life verse 10. from whence it follows that hee is deceived who indulges hopes of impunity because God hath hitherto spared him Vers. 11. For there is no respect of persons with God Hee confirms the former reason from the equity of God in that hee is no respecter of persons and hee meets with the second Objection propounded verse 2. against the severe judgement of God against sinners Some might object In the executing of Judgement respect is to bee had as well of the Heathen who lives out of the Church without the knowledge of the Law or the doctrine of God as also of the Jew which is a Disciple of God and an hearer of the Law God forbid that either of them should perish for both seems unjust although they are sinners Hee refutes this Objection and proves it just that every sinner should perish by five Reasons Reas. 1. Because there is no respect of persons with God that hee should exempt from condemnation those that persevere in sin whether Jews or Gentiles for any reason which appertains to the person not the cause And here it is to bee observed that God looks with an equal eye upon the Jew and Gentile out of Christ not in the degrees of punishment but in the guilt of eternal death which all sinners are worthy of although not in the like degree Vers. 12. For as many as have sinned without Law do by nature the things contained in the Law those having not the Law shall be judged by the Law Reas. 2. This confirms and unfolds the other because they that have sinned without the Law scil written Against the Law written upon their hearts by nature even by the same Law within them shall perish without the written Law by the sentence of Justice And whoever have sinned in the Law or in the knowledge of the Law written shall bee condemned even by the sentence of the written Law Vers. 13. For not the hearers of the Law are just before God but the doers of the Law shall be justified Reas. 3. Especially intended against the Jews who according to the rule of Righteousness cannot bee accounted for Righteous before God even they that are hearers of the Law unless they perform perfect obedidience to the Law which because neither Jew nor Gentile can do by consequence neither can they bee exempted from deserved condemnation but on the contrary especially the Jews which are hearers of the Law and do not keep it are most worthy of judgement Vers. 14. For when the Gentiles which have not the Law do by nature the things contained in the Law these having not the Law are a Law unto themselves 15. Which shew the work of the Law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing witness and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another Reas. 4. Especially intended against the Gentiles which though they have not the written Law yet they have a Law within
of Christs obedience upon his And it is meer that as one sin of Adam was imputed to his children to condemnation and death so the intire obedience of Christ only should bee imputed to his sons to Justification and the obtaining of Eternal Life Vers. 20. Moreover the Law entred that the offence might abound but where sin abounded grace did much more abound 21. That as sin hath reigned unto death even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Iesus Christ our Lord. Hee illustrates and concludes this whole comparison by shewing the abundance of sin in those that are justified renders the grace of Christ more illustrious and this hee does by answering an objection concerning the end and use of the published Law It may bee questioned if death reigned by the Law of Nature not written before Moses what need was there of any written Law and seeing righteousness comes not by the Law as is said before to what end was the Law Hee answers by shewing a three-fold end of giving the Law First The Law entred that the offence might abound i. e. The Law forbidding sin and enjoyning righteousness in that space of time betwixt Adam and Christ came in that sin which was daily committed and yet because of ignorance not acknowledged might bee known to bee sin and that the natural wickedness of men might appear which occasions that by how much the more the Law requires righteousness by so much the more concupiscence is stirred up aga●nst the Law and that by this the sin which lyes hid in men might bee manifested and known to abound But where The second end that from the abundance of sin in those that were to bee justified the exceeding abundant grace of Christ towards those that are justified might appear seeing that where sin abounds in the conviction of men that are to bee justified there the grace of Christ justifying is found to super-abound Even as The third end that the power of sin as a King by the Law might more clearly appear shewing forth its condemning power the power of the righteousness of Christ as a Superiour King held forth in the Gospel might bee more ●minent prevailing not only to the abolishing of the Kingdome of sin but also to the conferring of Eternal Life upon those that are justified Therefore by how much the more the force of sin reigning over men not justified crowding them to the prison of Eternal death might more clearly appear by so much the more the virtue power and excellency of the grace of Christ overcoming and subduing sin leading men powerfully unto Eternal Life might more manifestly bee declared CHAP. VI. THe third proof of the Doctrine of Iustification freely by Faith in Christ in that it conduceth very much to the promoting of Sanctity and Holiness There are two PARTS of the Chapter In the first hee shews that by Faith in Christ or the Doctrine concerning the free ground of Iustification several wayes promotes endeavours after Sanctification to verse 12. In the other part hee exhorts those that are justified to follow after holiness to the end Vers. 1. What shall wee say then Shall wee continue in sin that grace may abound 2. God forbid how shall wee that are dead to sin live any longer therein By answering an objection which seems to arise from this Doctrine hee sets down a confirmation of the Proposition That this Doctrine of Grace or of Free Justification makes for the promoting of holiness Some may say Shall wee persevere in our sins wee that are justified by Faith that the grace of God may appear more abundant as this Doctrine of Free Justification by the imputation of the Righteousness of Christ seems to intimate Hee answers by denying and rejecting Far from us bee such a thought As if hee had said They that are justified by Faith ought not to indulge themselves in any sin but to endeavour after holiness And this Proposition hee confirms by ten Arguments Argum. 1. Wee are dead unto sin in as much as when wee gave up our names unto Christ that wee might bee justified and sanctified by him wee renounced sin that wee might not have any more to do with it than the dead have with the living Therefore wee that are justified ought not any longer to live in sin Vers. 3. Know you not that so many of us as were baptized into Iesus Christ were baptized into his death Argum. 2. Wee as you know which are freely justified by Faith in Christ are also taken into the fellowship of his Death by Baptism by which Sacrament wee have bound our selves to die unto sin and Christ hath bound himself unto us to communicate the power of his Death that wee might die unto sin Therefore wee ought not to undulge our selves in our sins but endeavour after holiness Vers. 4. Therefore wee are buried with him by Baptism into death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father even so wee also should walk in newness of life Argum. 3. Our communion with Christ in his Death is sealed to us in our Baptism for the abolishing of the old Man of Sin i. e. Not only that wee might bee bound to mortifie the old man but also that wee might bee made certain concerning the mortifying and subduing of sin by virtue of Christs Death Therefore wee ought not to indulge our selves in sin but endeavour the mortifying of it Argum. 4. As our communion with Christ in his Death is sealed to us in our Baptism so also in his Resurrection that as Christ was raised from the dead to a blessed and immortal life by the glory of the Father who powerfully raised him so should wee endeavour by Faith applying the virtue of Christ to arise from sin and to walk in newness of life to the glory of the Father powerfully renewing us Therefore ought wee not to continue in sin but follow after holiness Vers. 5. For if wee have been planted together in the likeness of his death wee shall bee also in the likeness of his resurrection Argum. 5. Drawn from our spiritual and neerest union with Christ by Faith which union is the ground of the communication of that virtue which flows from the Death and Resurrection of Christ for by Faith wee are planted into Christ as the Branch into the Vine and this ingrafting brings us into that conformity with the Death and Resurrection of Christ that wee dying unto sin Christ dying and following after newness of life Christ rising again may bee clearly seen in a certain likeness to himself Hence hee confirms his former Argument when wee are planted together with Christ by Faith wee are so neerly united to him that there follows of necessity a conformity with him in his death to the mortification of sin and in his resurrection to newness of life Therefore unless wee will acknowledge no union with him and implanting into him wee must renounce all sin and
sin taking occasion by the Commandement wrought in mee all manner of concupiscence for without the Law sin was dead Reason 2. Because the sin that dwells in us or the habitual pravity of our nature is the cause of actual sins but the Law is not the cause but the occasion to sin not given but taken For sin that dwells in us saith hee or the evil of nature taking occasion from the Law forbidding lust so much the more is inflamed and excited And indeavouring after what was forbidden begat in mee all manner of concupiscence and evil motions against the Law For without the Law Which hee confirms by a sign Because the Law not being known sin lies hid and is as dead but when the Law comes it is stirred up and appears as filthiness is not seen in the absence of the Sun but that arising it appears and stinks not by the Suns fault but by its own Therefore the Law is holy Vers. 9. For I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandement came sin revived and I died By his own experience hee further explains the matter shewing that formerly when hee was a Pharisee and unregenerate in his own opinion hee was alive that is very just and in no wise guilty of eternal death but when his eies were opened by the grace of God the true sense of the Law was unfolded then hee understood the force of sin and that hee was guilty of eternal death Vers. 10. And the Commandement which was ordained to life I found to bee unto death From this experience hee saith that hee learned two things First That the end of the command and the effect was good in it self because the command is good in it self and by it self ordained to life if men obeyed it The other that the effect of the Law by accident was death so farre as it threatned death to the sinner and urges him from justice with the sentence of death Vers. 11. For sin taking occasion by the Commandement deceived mee and by it slew mee 12. Wherefore the Law is holy and the Commandement holy and just and good The third Reason in defence of the Law The sin that dwells in us is the cause of death onely taking occasion from the Law or the command as hee had learned by experience for sin while hee thought of what was forbidden in the Law invited and inticed him to forbidden things and polluted him and so by the Command made him more and more obnoxious to death Therefore the Law is altogether holy and particularly that which forbids Concupiscence is holy just and good because it is given by an holy God according to equity and for our profit Vers. 13. Was that then which is good made death un●o mee God forbid But sin that it might appear sin working death in mee by that which is good that sin by the Commandement might become exceeding sinful The second Objection Some might say Therefore hath that which is good been the cause of death Hee answers by rejecting the reproach for the occasion is to bee distinguished from the cause and the use of a thing from the abuse of it Hee therefore acquits the Law and casts all the blame upon the sin that dwells in us Truly saith hee it is not the Law but sin that dwells in mee which is the cause of death and discovers it self to bee sin so farre forth as it is stirred up in mee and kindled by the good Law of God it enkindles rebellious motions to the Law of God and so much the more upon this account doth it cause death that so sin in mee by the Command might appear above measure sinful Which is spoken most seasonably to stop the mouths of all who otherwise would deny inborn concupiscence now natural to all to be sin was it not found to bee the cause of actual sins and death and this defence hee makes for the Law The third Part. Vers. 14. For wee know that the Law is spiritual but I am carnal sold under sin The third part of the Chapter wherein is set down the second head of comfort to those who bewail the imperfection of their obedience to the Law from the Apostles example wrastling with the same evil and getting the victory by the favour and benefit of free justification as appears from vers the last This is the force of the Argument I bewailing in my self the power of sin wrastle against it taking comfort from justification by faith in Christ Therefore you holy Champions take comfort in your wrastling and conflict In the conflict of the Apostle appears a threefold difficulty and a threefold victory in the retreat in all which are mixed some Arguments of comfort drawn from the Apostles experience The first difficulty arises from a threefold contention The first is of the Law and himself I saith hee with the rest of beleevers acknowledge the Law to bee spiritual which wholly favour● the holiness of the Spirit of God and is wholly referred to a spiritual course of life But when I look upon my self and compare the imperfection of my obedience with the spiritualness of the Law I am compelled in respect to the Old Man in mee not yet mortified to acknowledge my self carnal and as a slave sold to subjection under sin out of whose bonds I cannot deliver my self but I am carryed away whither I would not Vers. 15. For that which I do I allow not for what I would that do I not but what I hate that I do Hee proves what hee hath said and shews the second contest betwixt his actions and his judgement renewed That which I do I do not approve viz. when I examine my actions to the perfect Rule of the Law I am forced not to approve but condemn many things in my actions The third disagreement hee shews to bee betwixt his actions and his will renewed I do not that good which I would saith hee hindered by the body of death in mee and that evil which I hate that I do failing of the Rule where I would not for I would perform perfect obedience to the Law of God but I fall short and in many things I offend Vers. 16. If then I do that which I would not I consent unto the Law that it is good The first difficulty you have seen the victory follows and three Arguments of Consolation whereby the Apostle comforts himself and the rest of his fellow-combatants Argum. 1. I my self am in the number of those who bewail their imperfect holiness and finde the same conflict in my self as they do from the imperfection of my obedience Therefore they have Consolation that mourn over the imperfection of their holiness seeing they suffer nothing different from other Saints nay not from the Apostles themselves I consent Argum. 2. Of Consolation Because from this con●●ict it appears that sanctification is begun in him that wrastles and a consent to the Law of God that it is holy and good
for if I do what I wo●ld not then I assent to the Law of God that it is good and the same sign of their sanctification have all those that bewail the imperfection of their obedience Vers. 7. Now then it is no more I that do it but sin that dwelleth in mee Argum. 3. Of Comfort Because to him that laments his imperfection and disallows it that evil shall not bee imput●d which is also to bee understood of all the other holy Combatants but to sin dwelling in him Because God esteems those that weep over the evil of their nature from their better part viz. that which is renewed which doth and shall prevail in the mortification and abolition of sin that dwells in us from which renewed part hee is called the Christian Champion It is no more I saith hee but sin that dwells in mee Vers. 18. For I know that in mee that is in my flesh dwelleth no good thing for to will is present with mee but how to perform that which is good I finde not The other difficulty or sharp contest consisting in a threefold conflict First Betwixt himself and the Old Man or that part which was not yet renewed and himself the New Man or the renewed part and here hee himself renewed condemns himself unrenewed as void of any good and a fit receptacle for all evil I know saith hee that there doth not dwell in mee that is in my flesh or corrupt and unrenewed nature which I receive from my carnal Generation any spiritual good thing whereby I may please God Hee proves what hee said and propounds the second conflict betwixt his will renewed and the weakness of his flesh or his perverse nature hindring that the holy motions stirred up by the Spirit were not brought into act and performed Vers. 19. For the good that I would I do not but the evil which I would not that I do The third conflict betwixt the regenerated Will and the Flesh or the Old Man not onely hindring the execution of the Will renewed but also producing evil effects contrary to the renewed Will Some may wonder what hee means when hee speaks of the commission of evil seeing wee all know from the Scriptures how holily and unblameably our Apostle behaved himself in all things after his conversion But it will bee no wonder when wee consider that by reason of the abundant measure of holiness which was bestowed upon him hee could not behold those rebellious motions of his nature but hee would accuse himself of the omission of good and the commission of evil for hee took notice of those motions either hindring him from performing all the parts of his duty towards God and men which hee strictly desired to do or polluting some way or other all his actions in the sight of God What wonder therefore if after this manner hee set out himself as a great sinner Vers. 20. Now if I do that I would not it is no more I that do it but sin that dwelleth in mee The Conquest follows after this sharp conflict repeating the consolations of himself and the rest of the Saints That the sin committed would not bee imputed to him bewailing this his imperfection but to the corruption of his nature or his habitual corruption indwelling designed to destruction and abolition And because hee conflicted with sin therefore is hee denominated from the better and renewed part as above vers 17. and not from the worser part Verse 21. I finde then a Law that when I would do good evil is present with mee The third sharp Conflict follows consisting of a three-fold contention The first is betwixt himself regenerated endeavouring after holiness and an evil inclination cleaving unto him and impelling him with a kind of necessity and as it were by a Law inciting and provoking to evil Vers. 22. For I delight in the Law of God after the inward man 23. But I see another Law in my members warring against the Law of my mind and bringing mee into captivity to the Law of sin which is in my members The second Contention is betwixt the inner spiritual man renewed with his affections and the Law of God on the one part and the outward or Old Man not renewed furnished with his instruments and faculties with his rebellious motions on the other side Against the Law of God and the Law or inclination of his renewed mind fighting and sometimes prevailing and making him captive to the evil disposition of his nature This is the fight whereof hee speaks Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrary that you cannot do the things which you would Which wrastling onely they understand that feel it within them and the force of sin some way or other polluting their most holy actions all their life long Vers. 24. O wretched man that I am who shall deliver mee from the body of this death The third Contention is betwixt evil Concupiscence and the holy servant of God lying prostrate under the oppression of the conquering perverseness of his nature or this body of death groaning lamenting and crying out to God for deliverance Vers. 25. I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. After this feirce combate follows the victory and Comfort by faith in Christ justifying together with his thanksgiving to God his deliverer who hath provided comfort in his Son not for those that continue in sin but which bewail their sins and imperfections Vers. 25. So then with the mind I my self serve the Law of God but with the flesh the Law of sin At length with a composed mind after his being affected with sorrow for sin dwelling in him and with joy because of his hoped-for liberty by Christ the Apostle at length propounds himself a fellow-souldier with other Saints in this holy war against the remainder of sin After this manner I therefore an Apostle that for comfort to those who bewail their sins I may briefly recollect what I have spoken of my self I profess that I have not attained to that measure of Sanctity after which I aspire But together with the rest of the Saints mourning and conflicting under the hope of freedome I go forward and as if I was divided from my self the spirit and the flesh wrastling in me with my mind or my spiritual part delightfully I serve the Law of God but with my flesh or my unregenerate part I am as a Captive to the Law of sin or the prevalency of corrupt nature CHAP. VIII THe fift Confirmation of Justification by Faith is this That this way of Iustifying affords solid consolation not only against all evil to bee dreaded after this life but also against all troubles and afflictions to which the children of God are lyable in this life There are three parts of the Chapter The first is to comfort those that are Iustified against the fear of Condemnation which might trouble those that bewail the imperfection
of their Sanctification and the reliques of sin Which consolation hee appropriates to those that are justified endeavouring after holiness secluding those that are unregenerate and delight in sin to ver 9. which hee applyes to the Romans to ver 12. and thus applyed hee shews the use of it to ver 17. The second part contains the Consolations of the Iustified in respect to the calamities of this life to which the godly are lyable to ver 31. The third part contains the triumph of those that are justified over all their enemies to the end Vers. 1. There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Iesus who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit From what hath been spoken hee infers consolation to those that are justified against the fear of condemnation which the conscience of sin dwelling in us may easily affright us with There is no condemnation saith hee to those which by true Faith are ingrafted into Christ And because many profess the Faith they have not hee describes true Believers and justified persons from this property that they do not indulge themselves in sin neither do they willingly follow the guidance of the flesh and corrupt nature but walk after the Commands of God and the motions of the Holy Ghost inwardly perswading them to direct the course of their life according to the Rule of the Word of God Vers. 2. For the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Iesus hath made mee free from the Law of Sin and Death That this consolation belongs to them that are truly justified and endeavour after holiness hee proves by three Arguments Argum. 1. The Law of Faith of Life and the Spirit in Christ or the Covenant of Grace hath freed every Believer and mee in particular from the law of sin and death or the Covenant of Works Therefore to them that are justified truly united unto Christ there is no condemnation For by the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus hee understands the Law of Faith or the Covenant of Grace because by Faith or the Covenant of Grace the Spirit is received and communion with the Life of Christ. And by the Law of Sin and Death hee understands the Law of Works as Rom. 3.27 or the Covenant of Works by which Law or Covenant conviction of sin is made and condemnation unto death of them that are guilty Vers. 3. For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh Argum. 2. Seeing the Law was found weak to procure for us Justification by reason of the infirmity of the flesh or humane nature now corrupted not able to yeeld perfect obedience to the Law God sending his Son in the flesh of the same nature with us and in all things like unto us sin excepted in the flesh of his Son crucified condemned our sin that satisfaction being made for us it might bee abolished in us Therefore sin in us that are justified who are in Christ cannot bee the cause of condemnation and thus there is no condemnation to us Vers. 4. That the righteousness of the Law might bee fulfilled in us who walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Argum. 3. To this very end sin is condemned in Christ that is condemned and dead for us that wee being once dead and condemned in him it might appear that the Law is satisfied in us I say who follow not the lusts of the flesh but the guidance of the Holy Ghost Therefore now no condemnation remains us Vers. 5. For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh but they that are after the spirit the things of the spirit Hee gives four reasons why hee makes this consolation peculiar to them that follow after holiness secluding all that are unregenerate and continue in sin The first reason They that are carnal and unregenerate savour and affect only those things that are carnal and wicked but those that are regenerate savour and affect spiritual things Therefore its no wonder that only they that follow after holiness are admitted to the consolation of an immunity from condemnation and they which are carnal are excluded Vers. 6. For to bee carnally minded is death but to bee spiritually minded is life and peace Reason 2. The wisdome of carnal men which is the Governour of their counsels and actions and is carried only to those things which please the flesh whether in respect to God or eternal life and so it inclines to death But the wisdome of the spirit or an habit directing the actions of regenerate men is carried to those things which belong to spiritual life and peace Therefore it s no wonder if only they that are regenerate and spiritual are exempted from condemnation but not they that are carnal Vers. 7. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither indeed can bee Reason 3. Confirming the former the wisdome of the flesh it self the principal virtue of politick wits is enmity against God for it only seeks and cares for its own rejecting God neither is it subject to the Law of God or can bee subject for it cannot but subject to its own carnal ends the Soul Heaven God and all things and pursue after these so far as it thinks them conducible to carnal ends Therefore it s no wonder that carnal men are not freed from condemnation Vers. 8. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God Reason 4. Whoever are unregenerate in the state of corrupt nature or the flesh cannot please God because they cannot but follow after those things which please them Therefore no wonder they are not freed from condemnation Vers. 9. But yee are not in the flesh but in the spirit if so bee that the Spirit of God dwell in you Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ hee is none of his Applying the character of justified persons out of the judgement of charity to the Romans hee also applies to the same Romans to whom hee writes the consolation which arises from freedome from condemnation hee prudently in the mean time bespeaks them that they would not indulge hypocrisie in any and hee gives four Reasons of this application The first Reason You are not subject to the dom●nion of the flesh you are not unregenerate but in a spiritual condition following the guidance of the Spirit Therefore there is no condemnation to you or which is the same to you belongs the foresaid consolation Reas. 2. Confirming the former the Spirit of God dwelling in you framing your hearts and lives unto holiness for unless I should thus judge of you I should think you did not belong unto Christ for hee that hath not the sanctifying Spirit of Christ is not yet a living member of Christ Therefore there is no condemnation unto
faith at length howsoever they are esteemed amongst you shall bee punished by God Therefore bee yee not intangled in the same snares but repent and stand fast in the liberty Vers. 11. And I brethren if I yet preach Circumcision why do I yet suffer persecution then is the offence of the Cross ceased Hee refutes the calumny of his Adversaries and produces Arg. 13. Thou thy self dost teach Circumcision because thou hast circumcised Timothy Therefore undeservedly thou dost accuse us Hee answers by denying that hee taught Circumcision because although hee circumcised Timothy born of a Jewish mother for the use of Ceremonies with the Jews after the yoak of necessity was broken by the Decree of the Synod for a time it was left free yet hee never preached that Circumcision was to bee observed but hee both admonished the Jews concerning the abolition of Ceremonies and taught that legal Ceremonies upon no account should bee received amongst the Gentiles which hee proves because upon this ground hee suffered persecution by the Jews and because the Jews were not offended at the preaching of the Gospel or the Cross of Christ but freely tolerarated the Apostle if withall hee would promote the reception of Jewish customes amongst the Gentiles The strength of the Argument is this I had rather suffer persecution than preach that Circumcision is to bee joyned with the Gospel for if I should conjoyn them the offence of the Cross would cease the Jews would tolerate my preaching of Christ crucified But I dare not in the least depart from the purity of the Gospel Therefore yee must also stand fast in that Vers. 12. I would they were even cut off which trouble you At length shutting up the whole Disputation with an Apostolical Spirit hee both imprecates and denounces destruction to the Impostors by whom the Galatians were deceived The Second Part. Vers. 13. For Brethren yee have been called unto liberty onely use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another The second part of the Chapter follows wherein the reason of his imprecation is given viz. because the seducers called them back and drew them again under the yoak whom God called to liberty under the form of an exhortation hee gives three Precepts concerning the right use of Christian liberty Onely 1. That bridleing the flesh or the sinful lusts of corrupt nature lest that being unsubdued it should draw Christian liberty into a licentiousness to sin they may serve one another in the duties of love Vers. 14. For all the Law is fulfilled in one word even in this Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self Hee gives two reasons of this Precept 1. Because the Law is fulfilled in love and not in bare ceremonies Vers. 15. But if you bite and devour one another take heed yee bee not consumed one of another 2. Because unless they follow after love they will mutually devour and destroy one another by contentions Vers. 16. This I say then walk in the Spirit and yee shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh The second Precept is for the confirmation of the former that they follow the guidance of the Holy Ghost walking as hee himself out of the Scripture hath suggested to their hearts And that which The reasons of the Precept are six Reas. 1. Because so the lusts of the flesh shall not rule over you that yee may as servants obey its commands Therefore follow yee the guidance of the Spirit Vers. 17. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh and these are contrary the one to the other Reas. 2. Confirming the former because hee that follows the guidance of the Spirit will become victorious in the contest betwixt the flesh and the Spirit That this reason might bee plain the Apostle presupposes three things 1. Hee that is lead by the Spirit hath his nature partly renewed which is called the Spirit and partly corrupt which is called the Flesh. 2. Hee presupposes these two contrary principles with contrary endeavours to fight with one another that neither good nor evill without opposition and a mutual impediment can bee put in execution 3. Hee presupposes that the Holy Ghost doth help Beleevers in their striving by the Word and Grace From whence it is concluded that hee which hearkeneth to the Spirit will become victorious in striving Vers. 18. But if yee bee led by the Spirit yee are not under the Law Reason 3. Confirming the former Because they that are led by the Spirit are not servants to sin under the servile Covenant of the Law to whom onely the knowledge of sin is vouchsafed but not the victory or strength against sin but Gods Free-men are they who under the Covenant of Grace obtain strength of God for the resisting of sin Vers. 19. Now the Works of the flesh are manifest which are these Adultery Fornication Uncleanness Lasciviousness 20. Idolatry Witchcraft Hatred Variance Emulations ●rath Strife Seditions Heresies 21. Envyings Murders Drunkenness Revellings and such like of the which I tell you before as I have also told you in time past that they which do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Reason 4. Because if they do not follow the Spirit but rather the flesh doing the Works of the flesh of which sort hee reckons seventeen they shall not bee heirs of the Kingdome of God Vers. 22. But the fruit of the Spirit is Love Ioy Peace Long-suffering Gentleness Goodness Faith 23. Meekness Temperance against such there is no Law Reason 5. Because if they follow the Spirit and bring forth such fruit of whith sort hee reckons nine they will not have the Law against them i. e. cursing them and condemning them but for Reconciliation sake towards God they shall finde the Law their friend Therefore it behoved you to follow the Spirit Vers. 24. And they that are Christs have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts Hee proves that they shall not have the Law against them because they that are Christs and judicially crucified in Christ for satisfaction to the Law they are also judicially obliged to crucifie the body of sin i. e. corrupt nature with the affections and lusts Wherefore they that actually indeavour to peform that and to bring forth the fruit of the Spirit they cannot have the Law against them as they that now seriously indeavour to promote the scope and end of the Law Vers. 25. If wee live in the Spirit let us also walk in the Spirit Reason 6. Because by the Spirit wee have Consolation Peace and Joy wherein life consists Therefore wee ought to follow the guidance of the Spirit Vers. 26. Let us not bee desirous of vain-glory provoking one another envying one another The third Precept is especially concerning the shunning Ambition with the attendants of that vice viz. backbiting and envy with which evils the Churches used to bee infected But because the Doctors of the Church were chiefly obnoxious
an one Christ is i. e. how excellent hee is in the offices of his Apostleship or of his Prophetical and Priestly office wherein hee humbled himself and suffered Argum. 1. From Psal. 8.5 to this purpose The man Christ is highly accounted of with God and other men are subjected because of him if the Majesty of God and the Magnificence of his works bee compared with the meanness of humane nature or if it bee considered how great God is and how eminent his other works and how mean and low man is Therefore the excellency of Christ as man ought not to bee lessened with us because of the infirmities and sufferings of the humane nature which hee took Vers. 7. Thou madest him a little lower than the Angels thou crownedst him with glory and honour and didst set him ruler over the works of thy hands Argum. 2. From Psal. 8.6 Although Christ in the time of his humiliation was made lower than the Angels in respect to his sufferings in the flesh yet that humiliation was not perpetual but for a short time and onely in part in respect to the humane nature that suffered Because the price of Redemption being paid hee was raised from the dead exalted to the right hand of God and crowned with glory and honour declared Lord and King over all the works of God Therefore wee ought not to detract from him because of his sufferings in the flesh Vers. 8. Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet For in that hee put all in subjection under him hee left nothing that is not put under him But now wee see not yet all things put under him 9. But wee see Iesus who was made a little lower than the Angels for the suffering of death crowned with glory and honour that hee by the Grace of God should taste death for every man Argum. 3. From Psal. 8.7 Christ is the Lord of Angels even as hee is man For God hath put all the works of his hands without exception in subjection to him and so amongst the rest Angels Therefore c. But now Argum. 4. Propounded by way of Solution to an Objection Although yet wee see not all things subjected unto Christ in respect to his members which are daily opposed by very many enemies Yet wee see not with the eyes of Faith onely but even the light of reason by many tokens and are convinced by the multitude of miracles Christ after his humiliation below the condition of Angels now crowned with glory and honour in his own person in Heaven and sitting at the right hand of his Father till all his enemies bee made his foot-stool and thus wee see the victory of Christ begun Therefore wee must not detract any thing from the excellency of Christ because of his sufferings either in his own person or in his members A little Argum. 5. From the fore-telling of his humiliation Psal. 8.6 From the decree of God and to the fulfilling the Prophecies of Christ it behoved him to bee humbled and suffer death and to this end in a sort to bee made lower than the Angels that hee might suffer death Therefore c. Taste Argum. 6. Not unadvisedly or compelled by necessity did Christ suffer but freely or out of the gracious good will of God towards us hee tasted death for a short time not for himself but for all us his Sons that hee might bring us to salvation as it is expounded in the following verse Therefore his estimation is not to bee lessened because of his sufferings in his assumed flesh Vers. 10. For it became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many Sons unto Glory to make the Captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings Argum. 7. It was agreeable to the Glory of God who is the Author and End of all things seeing that his justice mercy wisdome power and the rest of his Attributes might bee manifested chiefly by the sufferings of Christ that hee might consecrate inaugurate consummate and every waies make him meet to bee Captain of our salvation the more conveniently by afflictions to bring many Sons his Elect to life and glory not by his Doctrine onely nor onely by the example of his life but also by the merit of his death undergone for the redeeming of them Therefore his excellency ought not to bee abated because of his sufferings in the flesh Vers. 11. For both hee that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one For which cause hee is not ashamed to call them Brethren Argum. 8. The Redeemer and the Redeemed Hee that sanctifies and they that are sanctified not onely by the decree of God and the predictions of Scripture but also from Justice it self are of one and the same Nature of the same Natural lump derived from the same Adam For the Justice and Wisdome of God required that in the humane Nature which had sinned sin should bee punished And therefore required that the Redeemer of men should bee truly man Therefore the reputation of Christ the Son of God because of his assuming the infirmities of humane Nature is not to bee diminished For which Argum. 9. Confirming the former The Messias would bee incarnate that wee might bee his Brethren and that hee might shew forth himself a Brother unto us And although hee is the Son of God yet hee is not ashamed to call the Redeemed or Elect his Brethren Therefore the reputation of Christ is not to bee lessened because of his sufferings in humane flesh but rather ought wee to boast in his relation to us and to glorifie him so much the more because of his sufferings for us Ver● 12. Saying I will declare thy name unto my Brethren in the midst of the Church will I sing praise unto thee This Argument hee proves by three Testimonies of Scripture The first is taken from Psal. 22.22 wherein Christ undertakes to pay the price of our Redemption and promiseth to preach the Righteousness purchased by his Obedience to his Brethren the Elect or the Church of the faithful in whose Congregations hee is present by his Spirit even after his ascension stirring up joy and thanksgiving in the hearts of the faithful by the preaching of Righteousness Vers. 13. And again I will put my trust in him and again Behold I and the children which God hath given mee The second Testimony is taken from Psal. 18.3 whence Christ is proved to bee man because put in the number of the Covenanters depending upon God by Faith Again Testimony the third From Isa. 8.18 where Christ is brought in by the Prophet associating himself with Children as his Brethren whom God had chosen and given to him to bee redeemed and saved whom hee presents with himself to the Father to bee glorified Vers. 14. Forasmuch then as the Children are partakers of flesh and blood hee also himself took part of the same that through death hee might destroy him that had the power of
As Beleef draweth us to an Union with God so misbeleef maketh a Separation 2. Mis-beleef is a special part of the hearts wickedness bewraying the enmity which naturally wee have against God as much as any ill For Mis-beleef denyeth to God the Honour of Truth Mercy and Goodness and importeth Blasphemies in the contrary 3. Mis-beleef is an ill in the heart making the heart yet worse and worse where it is and barring forth all the Remedies which might come by Faith to cure the heart 2. Hee warneth to take heed lest there be such an heart in any of them at any time Then 1. Mis-beleef is a subtil and deceitful sin having colours and pretences a number to hide it and must bee watched over lest it deceive and getting strength overcome 2. The Watch must bee constant at all occasions lest this ill get advantage when wee are careless and unattentive at any time 3. Watch must bee kept as over our selves so also over others lest any others mis-beleef not being marked draw us in the same snare with them 3. Hee describeth Apostacy by Mis-beleef and departing from the Living God Then 1. Beleeving is a drawing near to the Living God and staying with him 2. The loss that Mis-beleef bringeth should scare us from so fearful a sin 3. Departing from the true Christian Religion is a departing from the Living God whatsoever the Apostate or his Followers do conceive for God is not where Truth is not Vers. 13. But exhort one another daily while it is called To day lest any of you bee hardened through the deceitfulness of sin 1. Hee prescribeth a Remedy to prevent this ill to wit That they exhort one another daily while it is called To day That is Beside the publick Exhortation from their Preachers that every one of them mutually confer and stir up one another by speeches that make for decyphring the deceitfulness of Sin or preventing hardness of heart or confirming one another in the Truth of Religion and constant profession thereof Then 1. Private Christians not onely may but should keep Christian communion amongst themselves and mutually exhort and stir up one another 2. This is a necessary mean of preserving people from Defection 3. And a duty daily to bee discharged while it is to day that is as oft and as long as God giveth present occasion and opportunity for it lest a scattering come 2. The inconvenience that may follow if this be neglected is Lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin Then 1. There is none even the strongest of the Flock but they have need of this mutual help of other private Christians 2. Neither is there any so base or contemptible but the care of their standing in the Faith and of their safety belongeth to all 3. Sin hath many waies and colours whereby it may beguile a man and therefore wee have need of more Eyes than our own and more Observers 4. If it be not timeously discovered it will draw on hardness of heart so as a man will grow senseless of it confirmed in the habit of it and loath to quit it 3. In the former verse hee warneth them to beware of Apostasie in Religion and in this verse That they take course that they be not hardened in any sin in their conversation Then The ready way to draw on Defection in Religion is Defection from a godly Conversation And the way to prevent Defection in Religion is to study to Holiness of Conversation Vers. 14. For wee are made partakers of Christ if wee hold the beginning of our Confidence stedfast unto the end To stir them up to Perseverance hee layeth a necessity of holding fast gripe of the Principles of Christian Religion whereby they were perswaded to become Christians because onely so fellowship with Christ is gotten The Truth wherby they were begotten to Christian Religion hee calleth The beginning of our Confidence yea and of our Spiritual Subsistence as the word in the Original importeth Then 1. The Gospel is the beginning of our Confidence yea and of our Spiritual Subsistence of our new being that wee have as Spiritual Men in the State of Grace 2. The Man that renounceth the Grounds of the Gospel and persevereth not was never partaker of Christ. 3. Christian Religion is not a thing that a man may say and unsay keep or quit as Prosperity or Adversity Threatnings or Allurements do offer But such as must in all Estates upon all Hazzard be avowed Vers. 15. Whilest it is said To day if yee will hear his Voice harden not your hearts as in the Provocation 16. For some when they had heard did provoke howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses Now the Apostle draweth Collections from the words of the Prophet in the Psalm repeating the words of the Text● which spea● of the Provocation of the Fathers vers 25. Whereupon hee inferreth that there were some at least hearers of the Word which provoked God ●lbeit not all For whose cause David had reason to give Advertisement to their Posterity to beware of the like and the writer of the Epistle reason to apply the same unto them vers 16. Then 1. From the Apostles handling of the Text which hee hath in hand all must Learn not lightly to pass Scripture but to consider both what is said expresly in it and what is imported by consequence 2. Preachers practice is justified when they consider the circumstances of a Text and do urge duties upon their people or teach them Doctrine from the Text. Vers. 17. But with whom was Hee grieved forty years Was it not with that had sinned whose carcasses fell in the Wilderness Hee observeth another thing in his Text upon the persons with whom God was grieved that first they are marked to have sinned and afterwards punished Leaving to them to Gather That where Sin went before the Anger of God would follow upon the Sin and after the grieving of God Judgement light upon the Sinner Vers. 18. And to whom sware Hee that they should not enter into His Rest but to them that beleeved not 19. So wee see that they could not enter in because of unbeleef Hee hath yet another Observation upon the nature of the Sin whereby God was provoked to swear their damnation that sinned that is it was unbeleef vers 8. And formally deduceth his Doctrine by consequence That Misbeleef did stop the Sinners Entry into the Rest and made the Sinner to lye under an impossibility of entring vers 19. The use of which Doctrine hee presseth in the next Chapter Then 1. The Apostle leaveth us to gathe● That above all other Sins Mis-beleef provoketh God to indignation most 2. That as long as this Sin lyeth on and getteth way it is impossible for a man to enter into Gods Rest. This Sin alone is able to seclude him The Summe of Chap. IV. HEE presseth the use of the former Doctrine saying in substance Therefore be feared to be debarred
of the true Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the World And therefore when Attonement and expiation of sin is attributed to the Levitical sacrifices as Lev. 17.11 the form of speech is Sacramentall the property of the thing signified being ascribed to the sign as was marked before Quest. But do not we Christians make a commemoration of our sins year by year yea daily remembring even the sins of our youth deprecating the wrath which they deserve I answer It is true we do but not by way of offering a sacrifice as they for of them it is said here In those sacrifices there is a remembrance of sin Quest. What is the difference betwixt commemoration of sin without renewd sacrifice and commemoration of sin with renewed sacrifices betwixt the Jews commemoration of sins year by year spoken of in this place and the commemoration which true Christians do make I answer The Iew in his solemn Commemoration of sin by renewed sacrifice did really profess two things One That no sacrifice formerly offered was sufficient to expiate his sin or cleanse his conscience Another That he had not sufficiently holden by Faith that signified sacrifice which was to come but had need through the Spectacles and Transparent of these typical sacrifices enjoyned for his help to take a new view of that true sacrifice which was to come of both which the repeated sacrifice did bear witness But we by commemoration of our sins and not sacrificing profess That by Christs sacrifice already past Gods justice is so well satisfied as there is no need of new sacrifice nor of●ner offering of that one And therefore that we desire no other ransome but Christs which is payed already on the Cross but onely crave to have by Faith a better hold of Christ who hath payed the ransome for us that we may finde the vertue of his ransome yet more and more in our selves Quest. But what if with the commemoration of sins year by year and day by day we should pretend to joyn a Sacrifice that new expiation might be made by offering of Christ over again as is pretended to be done now adays I answer By so doing we should take away the Difference which the Apostle here putteth betwixt the Levitical sacrifices and Christ and make Christs no better than theirs We should avow That Christs sacrifice on the Cross done by himself was not a full ransome for our sins but that a mans offering were able to do that which Christs sacrifice on the Cross had not done Finally with the Iew we should avow that the true and satisfactory sacrifice were not as yet come nothing heretofore being done which were able to pacifie God or purge the Worshippers from the Conscience of sin For if a man think that the price of expiation of sin be already payed he doth but mock Gods justice and disgrace the Price payed if he presume to pay the Price over again Vers. 4. For it is not possible that the blood of Bulls and of Goats should take away sins He giveth a Reason why these Sacrifices could not pacifie the conscience even because it is not possible that they should take away sin Then 1. The conscience can never be purged except it see sin taken away by a perfect sacrifice and a ransome so worthy as justice may be satisfied 2. It is impossible that Attonement was properly made by the Levitical sacrifice but onely figuratively because here it is said It was impossible they could take away sins 3. Sin is not wiped away by any unworthy mean for sin being the breach of the Law of nature and of the written Law Gods Majestie so glorious his Justice so exact his Truth in threatning death to the offender so constant no less worthy sacrifice can expiate sin than that which is of value to answer all these Vers. 5. Wherefore when he cometh into the world he saith Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not but a body hast thou prepared me 6. In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure He proveth by testimony of the 40 Psalm vers 6 7 c. That these sacrifices did never by themselves pacifie God and therefore were not to endure longer than Christ should come to fulfil what they did signifie and so abolish them Then of necessity the Old Church was not altogether ignorant of the imperfection of their Legal service for removing of their sins and that the true expiation of their sins signified by these sacrifices was to be sought in the Messias 2. Christ is brought in by the Prophet coming into the world that is taking on our nature and manifesting himself in the flesh because by the Word he is set before the Church of that time as incarnate removing the Levitical Sacrifices and offering himself in their place Then the Word of God bringeth all Divine Truth to a present being unto Faith and so by prophecie made Christ incarnate present unto the Faith of the Fathers under the Law 3. Christs words unto the Father are Sacrifice and oblation thou wouldest not but a body hast thou prepared me Which is in substance the same with Mine ear hast thou opened or bored unto me in the Hebrew Psal. 40.6 For if the Father open the ear of his son by making him a wise servant for the work of Redemption If he bore his ear by making him a willing and obedient Servant then must he also prepare a Body unto him and bring him into the world by incarnation that he may accomplish that service as became Then 1. Christs Body is of Gods preparation and fitting made of God so holy and harmless so free of sin as it should be fit to be joyned with the God-head of the Son and fit to be an expiatory Sacrifice for sin 2. The Sacrifice of Christs Body and the obedience done to God in it by him is the Accomplishment and Substance of these Sacrifices 3. God was never pleased nor pacified by these Sacrifices in themselves but by Christs Sacrifice signified by them 4. God prepared a Satisfaction to himself for us when wee could not Vers. 7. Then said I Loe I come in the Volume of Thy Book it is written of Mee to do Thy Will O God Then said Christ Lo I come to do Thy Will O God That is When the Legal Sacrifices are found and declared unable to pacifie God Christ Then findeth it the fit time to come into the world and to do that which the Sacrifices did fore-signifie but could not effectuate Then 1. Christ did not think it the due time for himself to come into the world till it should be found that without him neither God could be satisfied nor man saved by any other mean but by his obedience 2. Christ assumed our nature and offered himself in our room to the Father willingly ready to perform what the Fathers Will could exact of us yea earnestly desired he to discharge that service for us Blessed
those true Principles concerning God ●hrough their own false reasonings they drew false conclusions about God and the worshiping of him Lastly They apparently manifested their ingratitude and folly by their works they framed the images of men and beasts whereby they would represent God or the properties of God to the eye thus as much as in them lay they changed the glory of God dishonoured by so vile a comparison into those abominable images Vers. 24. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts to dishonour their own bodies between themselves 25. Who changed the Truth of God into a Lie and worshipped and served the Creature more than the Creator who is blessed for ever Amen The impiety and unrighteousness of men against God being manifested in the Example of the Gentiles hee shews the wrath of God to bee poured out upon the wicked and withall the greatness of their iniquity In that God gave them up judicially to their own affections and most justly left them to themselves for a punishment of their abominable Idolatry That they which robbed God of his glory might suffer in and by themselves the foulest ignominy And that they which changed the glorious Attributes of God into lying images which are nothing less than what they are called should change themselves into beasts by their unbridled lusts They are said to worship and serve things created passing by the Creator For although Idolaters seem in the false representation of God by an Image to intend him honour and worship yet God altogether rejects that worship and leaves it wholly to the Image or Creature with whom hee will not by any means share his worship God is called in this place Blessed for ever that wee may know that the injurious carriage of Idolaters can detract nothing from the felicity of God But that his glory and blessedness will abide for ever to whom wee all of us ought with the Apostle to ascribe it saying AMEN Vers. 26. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections for even their women did change their natural use into that which is against nature 27. And likewise also the men leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust one toward another men with men working that which is unseemly and receiving in themselves that recompence of their errour which was meet In the Example of the Gentiles is propounded a further demonstration of mans unrighteousness and Gods wrath against the wicked To wit that God gave them up judicially to the hands of their own lusts and defiled spirits who served their own corrupt affections in matter of Religion that against Nature the men and women in their abominable Sodomitical filthiness below beasts in their unnatural lusts by way of requital should debase themselves who by their Idolatry had abased the glory of God in resembling him to Creatures and fictions of their own Vers. 28. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge God gave them over to a reprobate mind to do those things which are not convenient 29. Being filled with all unrighteousness fornication wickedness covetousness maliciousness full of envy murder debate deceit malignity whisperers 30. Back-biters haters of God despiteful proud boasters inventers of evil things disobedient to Parents 31. Without understanding Covenant-breakers without natural affections implacable unmerciful Hee proceeds further to manifest the unrighteousness of man and the wrath of God to wit That God most justly gave them up to a reprobate mind who refused to retain in their minds the knowledge of him which by the light of nature was apparent in all the works of Creation that being deprived of the use of common judgement as if they had turned beasts they ran mad into all wickedness against the Law of Nations and Nature without the least shew of Reason Filled That wee might not imagine them guilty of one fault onely the Apostle reckons up a Catalogue of about three and twenty with which these were filled that were left to themselves With all unrighteousness That is with all unrighteousness against their neighbour Fornication Under this hee comprehends all unlawful lying of the Man with the Woman Maliciousness That is a desire to hurt joyned with fraud and indeavour Wickedness That is a frowardness of mind openly discovering it self Malignity That is with roughness and harshness of manners Whisperers Such as privily back-bite their neighbours on purpose to dissolve the bonds of friendship Back-biters Such as injure the reputation and fame of others Haters of God Such are they who out of an evil conscience will not endure to hear any thing of God Spightful Such are those that are cruel oppressing others by force Boasters Such as make a shew of great matters Inventers of evil things Such as devise new kinds of sins Without understanding Such are they which are hurried like brute beasts without any shew of reason which way soever their lust draws them Vers. 32. Who knowing the judgement of God that they which commit such things are worthy of death not only do the same but have pleasure in them that do them The last demonstration of mans unrighteousness and the wrath of God in his justice leaving them to themselves appears with a threefold aggravation 1 They practised the foresaid wickednesses against the dictate of conscience for they knew that those wickednesses were displeasing unto God 2 They s●●ned against the knowledge of the judgement of God and the due desert of sin They knew them worthy of death that committed such things 3 They themselves onely did not commit such things but not onely by their silence but consent flattery and authority became Patrons to them that did confirming and hardening them in their sins This is the condition of the wisest men out of Christ who are so farre from the righteousness of works that they do nothing but abuse the known principles of Righteousness provoke the wrath of God against themselves and more and more pollute themselves with all manner of filthiness to their final perdition CHAP. II. IN this Chapter wee have the third Argument set down to prove the Position viz. CONCERNING THE RIGHTEOVSNESSE NOT BY WORKS BVY BY FAITH Which is propounded in the first and second verses in the remaining part of the Chapter it is confirmed and the objections removed Vers. 1. Therefore thou art inexcusable O man whosoever thou art that judgest for wherein thou judgest another thou condemnest thy self for thou that judgest doest the same things 2. But wee are sure that the judgement of God is according to truth against them which commit such things The third Argument against Justification by works from the self-condemnation of all men drawn from the last verse of the former Chapter Every man condemning others and doing the same things which hee condemns in his own judgement is condemned without excuse Therefore every man is so farre from being justified by works that on the
them and by nature do some external works of the Law although they have not the written Law yet that Law within them is a Law and that really and indeed written upon their hearts as their consciences witness accusing them when they do ill and excusing them when they do well Therefore they have nothing to pretend why they should not undergo deserved condemnation when they sin much less the Jews Vers. 16. In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my Gospel Reas. 5. Because in the day of judgement God will bring forth the secrets of the heart and according to this my doctrine in the Gospel will pronounce the condemnation of sinners to bee just whether Jews or Gentiles Therefore they cannot bee excused who sin but perish by their own just desert Vers. 17. Behold thou art called a Jew and restest in the Law and makest thy boast of God 18. And knowest his will and approvest the things that are more excellent being instructed out of the Law 19. And art confident that thou thy self art a guide of the blind a light of them which are in darkn●ss 20. An instructer of the foolish a teacher of babes which hath the form of knowledge and of the truth in the Law The third Objection But something must bee allowed to the priviledges of the Jews that they come not into the like condemnation with the Gentiles And here hee seems to conflict with some principal teacher of the Law and Patron of Righteousness by works and brings forth seven props of his vain confidence by way of concession granting all 1 The first that hee grants is the external honour of a worshiper of God Thou art called a Jew which was a name not of Nation only but of a confessor of the true Religion 2 A submission of mind to the doctrine of the Law Thou restest in the Law and thou applaudest thy self in this as an eminent benefit 3 Thou makest thy boast in God viz. that thou art of that people chosen above all other Nations in Covenant with God vers 17. 4 The knowledge of Gods will taken out of the Law 5 The discerning of good and evil and of things that differ and controversies by the benefit of the same Law verse 18. 6 The confidence of such abundant knowledge and certainty that they could teach others 7 That they had a systeme and collection of that knowledge which was here and there contained in the Law and that all the rest besides this our Rabbi are infants and foolish verse 19 20. Vers. 21. Thou therefore that teachest another teachest thou not thy self Thou that preachest a man should not steal doest thou steal 22. Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery doest thou commit adultery Thou that abhorrest idols doest thou commit sacriledge 23. Thou that makest thy boast of the Law through breaking the Law dishonourest thou God The Apostle answers the Objection and all these being granted hee shews them insufficient to righteousness by two Reasons Reas. 1. Because thou doest not teach thy self i. e. thou dost not shew forth thy doctrine by thy deeds but either pollutest thy self with those vices or the like which thou forbiddest in others Therefore those things suffice not to free thee from condemnation Vers. 24. For the Name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you as it is written Reas. 2. Confirming the former Because through your fault the Gentiles speak evil of God as if hee had or could bear prophane worshipers Therefore the forecited priviledges make nothing to Righteousness This reason hee confirmes by the testimony of Ezekiel 36.22 who complains of the Hypocrites of his time boasting in the same priviledges Vers. 25. For Circumcision verily profiteth ●f thou keep the Law but if thou be a breaker of the Law thy Circumcision is made uncircumcision The fourth Objection But because of the Covenant of God the sign whereof is Circumcision I shall not perish who am circumcised saith the Jew confiding in the outward Ceremony The Apostle answers and proves that Circumcision does not exempt us from condemnation or death by four Reasons Reas. 1. Because Circumcision if it bee joyned with perfect obedience to all the rest of the commandements if it could bee it would profit as a part of that obedience to justification by works for which the Jew did contend but if the transgression of the Law bee found in him that is circumcised as touching justification by works circumcision and uncircumcision will bee the same Therefore circumcision exempts not from condemnation Vers. 26. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the Law shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision Reas. 2. Because the Gentiles uncircumcision joyned with perfect obedience to the Law if it could bee shall bee of the same account with the Jews circumcision If so bee God require to justification by works nothing but a perfect observation of the Moral Law Therefore circumcision frees not from condemnation Vers. 27. And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature if it fulfil the Law judge thee who ●y the letter and circumcision dost transgress the Law Reas. 3. Because the Gentile being by nature uncircumcised if it was possible that hee could keep the Moral Law compared with thee who are outwardly circumcised and yet transgressest the Law by thy own judgement hee shall argue thee worthy of condemnation Therefore circumcision doth not free from condemnation Vers. 28. But he is not a Jew which is one outwardly neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh 29. But hee is a Jew which is one inwardly and circumcision is that of the heart in the spirit and no● in the letter whose praise is not of men but of God Reas. 4. Because neither the outward profession of the true Religion long ago erected among the Jewes by God himself is to be accounted for a true profession of the true Religion nor outward Circumcision of the flesh is to bee reckoned for true Circumcision ver 28. But hee is a true Professor of the true Religion who is such an one in the Spirit and that is true Circumcision which is of the heart spiritual in the inward soul and not that which is outwardly in the body or the letter which is commonly called Circumcision He that is a Jew indeed and that which is true and spiritual Circumcision hath commendation and praise not only among men who only see things that are open and manifest but with God who looks into the heart Therefore outward Circumcision perfects not our righteousness nor frees any man from condemnation ver 29. CHAP. III. THere are two parts of this Chapter in the FIRST he answers five objections against the foresaid Doctrine to ver 9. In the SECOND part he proceeds to prove the POSITION touching JUSTIFICATION NOT BY WORKS BVT BY FAITH Ver. 1. What advantage then hath the Iew or what profit is there of
misery are in their wayes 17. And the way of peace have they not known The fifth testimony is from Psalm 59.7 8. In which unregenerate men are pronounced guilty of cruelty violence oppression and man-slaughter who create nothing but misery and destruction to themselves and others in the whole course of their lives who are very far from procuring peace or any thing that is good either to themselves or others Vers. 18. There is no fear of God before their eyes The sixth testimony is from Psalm 36.2 Wherein unregenerate men by their deeds are condemned of prophaness and contempt of God for seeing they are void of the fear of God there is nothing to restrain them from falling headlong into all kind of wickedness Vers. 19. Now wee know that what things soever the Law saith it saith to them that are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world may become guilty before God Hee prevents an Objection lest any man should elude the force of the testimonies before recited as if they belonged but to some few and those certain impious men who lived in the times of David or Isaias Here hee shews that the common disposition of mankind is taxed which live unde● the Law or the Covenant of Works and not under grace and hereupon these fore-cited sentences of the Law are directed against all men under the state of corrupt nature chiefly the Jewes whereupon a threefold conclusion is inferred First from hence every mouth is stopped lest any man should glory in himself or excuse himself in the judgement of God Another conclusion Hence the whole world is made lyable to condemnation and obnoxious to punishment Vers. 20. Therefore by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh bee justified in his sight for by the Law is the knowledge of sin The third conclusion and principal drawn from the fore-cited testimonies therefore by the works of the Law no flesh shall bee justified in the sight of God for it matters not that some may bee justified by their works before men For by the Law Argument 5. Serving to prove the same assertion All men are convinced of sin and condemned by the Law for by the Law is the knowledge of sin not a procurer of righteousness to any one Therefore no man is justified by the works of the Law Vers. 21. But know the righteousness of God without the Law is manifested being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets 22. Even the righteousness of God which is by the Faith of Iesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe for there is no difference Argum. 6. Tending to the asserting of the affirmative part of the position Now in the Gospel the righteousness of God is manifested without the works of the Law approved by the testimony of Scripture to wit that the righteousness of God which is imputed and given to all believers apprehending by Faith the righteousness of Christ Jesus without distinction of Nations or persons therefore by this Righteousness alone which is through Faith in Jesus Christ are wee justified The Argument is good for if wee cannot bee justified by the works of the Law and yet there is another way to justify us found out to wit that which God commends to us in the Law and in the Prophets As for example when hee hath said in the Law In the Seed of Abraham all Nations shall bee blessed And in the Prophets The Iust shall live by Faith It 's fitting wee should believe our selves to bee justified only upon this latter ground to wit by Faith Furthermore seeing wee can conceive only a two-fold Righteousness one is of the Law or of works inherent or a mans own righteousness another which is Evangelical called the Righteousness of Faith or the Righteousness of Christ imputed unto us to wit that Righteousness which hee imputes to all that believe After the exclusion of the former Righteousness that being now impossible the other is of necessity to bee admitted which is commended to us in the Old Testament now revealed in the New and only is possible and acceptable to God deserving alone the name of Righteousness Vers. 23. For all have sinned and come short of the Glory of God 24. Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption that is in Iesus Christ. Argum. 7. Wherein is shewed the common disease of all men as also the necessity of the common remedy all men without exception have sinned and by Law are shut out from the glory of God or Eternal Life therefore all are no otherwise justified but freely or by Divine Grace through the Redemption of Jesus Christ that is to say they cannot otherwayes bee justified than by Faith in Christ the Redeemer who by his Blood hath purchased for us Righteousness and Salvation and hath freely of his Grace made it ours Vers. 25. Whom God hath set forth to bee a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God 26. To declare I say at this time his righteousness that hee might bee just and the Iustifier of him which believeth in Iesus Argum. 8. God hath set forth Christ that hee might bee a Reconcilement and Propitiatory Sacrifice whereby the wrath of God is appeased towards all that lay hold on him by Faith therefore it is not possible that a man should be justified but by Faith in Christ offering up this attonement in his Blood unless God should alter the means of appeasing himself To shew forth Argum. 9. God in this present time of the Gospel hath set forth Christ as the means of appeasing his anger to those that imbrace it by Faith that by this way of justifying his Righteousness might bee manifest in the time past in his forbearance and forgiveness of sins past which from the beginning of the world hee hath forborn and forgiven to wit that God did not pardon the sins of his own but upon the account of the Propitiatory Sacrifice of Christ which was to come and that without any violation of his Justice Therefore this ground of our Justification is no less to bee asserted than the glory of Gods Justice is to bee manifested The matter is clear For if Justification by Faith in the Blood of Christ shews that God never pardoned sins but upon satisfaction made to his Justice by the Blood of Christ certainly hee would have the righteousness of God concealed that would determine any other ground of our Justification than by Faith That hee might bee just This confirms the Argument that God hath set forth Christ that hee might bee a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood not only that hee might declare himself just in sending the promised Messias for whose sake freely and also justly hee would pardon sin but that hee might shew himself the Author and Doner of true Righteousness to us that were without any righteousness of our own by believing
of necessity the Justification of Abraham consisting not in the perfection of his works but in the remission of his sins Understand the same of the Justification of all which the Apostle even now hath shewed Vers. 9. Cometh this Blessedness then on the Circumcision only or upon the uncircumcision also for wee say that Faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness The second Part. The second part of the Chapter wherein hee proves this to bee the ground of Abrahams Justification and obtaining Eternal Life to wit by Faith is common to the uncircumcision or the Gentiles and to Circumcision or the Jews The question is propounded in this verse the answer whereof follows till hee hath proved it common both to Jews and Gentiles Vers. 10. How was it then reckoned when hee was in circumcision or in uncircumcision not in circumcision but in uncircumcision Hee proves this ground of Justification and obtaining of happiness to bee common to the uncircumcised or the Gentiles no less than to the Jews that were circumcised By seven Arguments Argum. 1. From the state of incircumcision where●n Abraham was when hee was pronounced righteous as it appears in the History Gen. 15.6 Righteousness was imputed to Abraham by Faith while hee was yet uncircumcised Therefore this way of Justification is common even to Believers while uncircumcised Vers. 11. And hee received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the Righteousness of the Faith which hee had yet being uncircumcised that hee might bee the Father of all them that believe though they bee not circumcised that Righteousness might bee imputed to them also 12. And the Father of Circumcision to them who are not of Circumcision only of our Father Abraham which hee had being yet uncircumcised Argum. 2. Abraham received from God the Sign of Circumcision as a Seal of the Covenant of Grace or the Righteousness of Faith which hee had yet being uncircumcised to that end that hee might bee the Father as well of the Faithful that were uncircumcised as of those that were circumcised which were the children of the flesh and also of the Faith of Abraham Therefore the righteousness of Faith is common to Believers both circumcised and uncircumcised or those that follow the steps of the Faith of Abraham not yet circumcised Abraham is called the Father of the Faithful because hee was the first eminent example of Faith the Righteousness which is imputed by Faith and by his example a Leader to all that they may believe Vers. 13. For the promise that hee should bee the heir of the world was not to Abraham or to his Seed through the Law but through righteousness of Faith Hee proves that Abraham was not the Father of any but Believers both circumcised and uncircumcised and with this hee adds a third Argument The Promise was made to Abraham and to his Seed that hee should bee afterwards heir of the Land of Canaan in a type and of the World and Heaven in truth being restored to that right which Adam lost and hee came not to this by the Law or upon the condition of works but by the absolute Promise being j●stified ●y Faith or having the Righteousness of Faith therefore his children are not they which are by the Law looking for righteousness by Works but only they which are of Faith looking for righteousness by Faith i. e. All and only they that believe circumcised and uncircumcised who have an equal community in the righteousness of Faith and the promise of the inheritance The Argument is valid for if Father Abraham is not heir of the world and hath any righteousness but by Faith certainly none are his sons but the faithful who have their righteousness by Faith and from Righteousness the Inheritance Vers. 14. For if they which are of the Law bee heirs Faith is made void and the promise made of none effect Argum. 4. This confirms the former Argument If those which are of the Law or seek Righteousness by Works are the children of Abraham and heirs of Life and partakers of Righteousness then Faith is vain and the Promise is void But this is absurd therefore they which are of the Law are not heirs but only Believers are the children of Abraham and heirs of Righteousness and Life The Argument is strong for if Righteousness and the Inheritance are given through Faith and the Promise then they are freely given But if by the works of the Law then of debt and merit and not of grace for merit or debt leaves no place for free grace and by consequence makes faith and the promise void Vers. 15. Because the Law worketh wrath for where no Law is there is no transgression Argum. 5. Confirming the former the Law worketh wrath to them that seek for Righteousness by their Works i. e. it pronounceth condemnation and death upon the guilty for their transgressions which should bee none if there was no Law Therefore they that are of the Law are not heirs of Righteousness and Life but all and only they which are of Faith both circumcised and uncircumcised Vers. 16. Therfore it is of Faith that it might bee by Grace to the end the Promise might bee to all the Seed not to that only which is of the Law but to that also which is of the Faith of Abraham who is the Father of us all Argum. 6. God hath determined that the Inheritance should bee of Faith to this end that it might appear to bee of Grace or through Grace therefore all and only Believers circumcised and uncircumcised are heirs The Argument is good because Faith and Grace concur mutually standing and falling together Faith is wholly maintained by Grace which Grace is only promised and given to them that believe It being granted that the Inheritance is through Grace it follows to bee through Faith also and it being granted that it is through Faith it follows that it is by Grace also and that Believers are heirs only through Grace That it might bee firm Argum. 7. The Inheritance is of Faith and by Grace that the Promise might bee firm to all the Seed not only to that which is of the Seed of Abraham by the Law of Nature and with all Believers i. e. to the believing circumcised Jews but also to that seed which is not after the flesh but only of the Faith of Abraham that is to the believing uncircumcised Gentiles Therefore unless wee would make the Promise of Righteousness and the Inheritance hanging it upon the condition of performing the Law infirm and uncertain the whole Seed of Abraham or all and only they that believe both circumcised and uncircumcised are heirs by Faith with Father Abraham who according to Faith is the Father of all us that believe both Jews and Gentiles The matter is clear because the Law or the condition of Works would render the Promise of the Inheritance infirm and altogether uncertain seeing that whatever depends upon our works can no wise bee firm both
her Husband liveth shee bee married to another man shee shall bee called an adulteress but if her Husband bee dead shee is free from that Law so that shee is no adulteress though shee bee married to another man As to the first part taking a comparison from Marriage hee shews that the Justified which are delivered from the conjugal Covenant of the Law and Espoused by a new Covenant of Grace to a new Husband Christ should bring forth the fruits of holiness in new obedience to the Law to the glory of our new Husband Christ. In the three first verses hee propounds the protasis of the comparison after this manner As no Law hath dominion over the dead as yee know but only over them that are alive ver 1. and particularly the Law of Marriage is dissolved the one being dead so that the Wife the Husband being dead without adultery may marry another ver 2 3. so you c. as it shall appear by and by Vers. 4. Wherefore my Brethren yee also are become dead to the Law by the Body of Christ that yee should bee married to another even to him who is raised from the dead that wee should bring forth fruit unto God The Apodosis of the comparison to this manner So you that were espoused formerly to the Law by a Covenant of Works Christ being dead for you that hee might satisfie the Law Justice and the Covenant of Works in our name you are judicially dead to the Law in the body of Christ for the Law or Covenant of Works hath slain Christ and you in him and by consequence you are delivered from the matrimonial Covenant of the Law so that without the breach of Justice you may enter into a new Covenant of Grace with Christ being raised from the dead To this end hee shews that the purpose of marriage being disannulled betwixt the Law of Works and us not that wee should live as wee list but being raised from a state of death by the Resurrection of Christ that wee should bee espoused to another Husband viz. to him which is raised from the dead i. e. to Christ who rose from the dead and hath raised us with himself to newness of life and hath espoused us to himself according to the Covenant of Grace that being married unto Christ wee might bring forth fruits of obedience to the glory of God There are five Arguments of consolation to the Justified who bewail the imperfection of their own obedience Become dead Argum. 1. You are freed from the Covenant of Works which admits no obedience besides what is perfect and every way compleat Therefore all you that are Justified have consolation which bewail the imperfection of your new obedience Of another Argum 2. You are now married to another Husband viz. to Christ who is raised from the dead who when hee could answer the imperfections of your obedience and according to the Covenant of Grace render your begun obedience acceptable unto God hee took it upon himself You have this consolation that mourn over the imperfections of your new obedience Fruit Argum. 3. Ye● are married unto Christ which is raised from the dead that you may not abide unfruitful but may bring forth fruit to the glory of God Therefore take yee comfort who bewail your imperfect obedience Vers. 5. For when wee were in the flesh the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death Argum. 4. Confirming the former from the change of our condition while wee were unregenerate and by consequence under a Law-Covenant evil affections by the holy Law of God were stirred up and put forth themselves powerfully in our members and all our faculties both of soul and body to the production of the deadly fruit of actual sin Therefore it will follow when wee are now regenerated and under the Covenant of Grace holy desires stirred up by the New Covenant powerfully shew forth themselves in our members to the bringing forth the fruit of good works unto God that wee might not abide unfruitful Which is no small consolation for if wee by Faith would lay hold upon the Covenant of Grace and would stir up our souls by the promises thereof applyed unto us there is no doubt but wee should more plentifully bring forth good works That is it which Christ saith Joh. 15.5 I am the vine yee are the branches hee that abides in mee and I in him hee brings forth much fruit for without mee you can do nothing Vers. 6. But now wee are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein wee were held that wee should serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter Argum. 5. Opening and confirming the former from the end of our changed condition Now to wit after Justification through the Grace of Christ wee are freed from the Law-Covenant that Covenant being dead in which wee were held or wee being dead in Christ in whom wee were contained judicially to that very end that wee should serve God by the power of the Holy Ghost bestowing new strength upon us by bringing forth new and spiritual fruit not superficial and hypocritical which the letter of the old legal Covenant now abolished at the most brought forth Therefore God will not fail of his end but will cause those that are justified bewailing their imperfect obedience to bring forth much fruit in the newness of the letter for the fruits which are brought forth by virtue of the Covenant of Grace are truly new and arise from the regenerating Spirit furnishing us with new strength forthwith to good works But the fruits which are brought forth by virtue of the Covenant of Works either are open rebellion of corrupt Nature against Gods Law or counterfeit obedience onely in the outward performance such as the fruits of the Pharisees are who in the letter that is the outward shew and formality obeyed without any renovation of the heart The second Part. Verse 7. What shall wee say then Is the Law sin God forbid Nay I had not known sin but by the Law For I had not known lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not covet The second part of the Chapter containing an Apology for the holiness of the Law in answering two Objections arising out of what was said before The first Objection seeing that evil and sinful motions are excited by the Law as was said the Law seems to bee sin or the cause of sin Hee answers by way of negation farre bee it from us to entertain any such thought hee gives three Reasons of his negation illustrated by his own experience wherein hee pleads for the Law The first Reason Because the Law discovers sin and manifests the evil that is in it which hee confirms by his own experience who had not known that lust which lurked in his heart to bee sin had hee not seen it forbidden by the Law Therefore the Law is holy Vers. 8. But
our liberty wee should disturb the Kingdome of Christ. Vers 18. For hee that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved of men Argum. 6. They that use these as meat drink and the like indifferent things wisely to the service of Christ taking them by his leave and abstaining that the work of Christ may bee promoted are acceptable to God and men Therefore wee are to use our Christian liberty without offence Vers. 19. Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace and things wherewith one may edifie another Argum. 7. By way of Consequence from the former Argument drawn by way of Exhortation So must wee use our liberty that by peace and edification of others the Kingdome of Christ may bee promoted Therefore wee must not use our Christian liberty but so far as it may bee most serviceable to peace and edification Vers. 20. For meat destroy not the work of God all things indeed are pure but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence Argum. 8. The work of God ought not to bee destroyed or the salvation of thy Brother brought into danger for a light matter as the use of a certain kind of meat at a certain time Therefore wee must not eat with offence All things Hee prevents an Objection Some might say all things are lawful i. e. those meats whereof wee speak Hee answers It is true considering the things by themselves but they are unlawful in case of scandal to him that eats with offence to them that are weak Vers. 21. It is good neither to eat flesh nor to drink Wine nor any thing whereby thy Brother stumbleth or is offended or is made weak Argum. 9. It is good to abstain from all meat and drink when there is danger that our Brother in the matter of Religion may bee made worse by our using meats and drinks Therefore in such a case wee ought to abstain Vers. 22. Hast thou Faith have it to thy self before God Happy is hee that condemneth not himself in that thing which hee alloweth Hee here meets with an Objection I have Faith concerning my liberty and it is necessary that I profess it Hee answers by denying that profession is necessary by way of fact in matter of scandal because liberty consists no less with abstinence than the use of the thing wherefore hee commands that the Objector bee content in such a case concerning the liberty of his Faith by an inward professing of it towards God Blessed Hee confirms his assertion by an Aphorism wherein the tenth Argument is contained Hee is blessed who in that hee certainly knows to bee lawful for him that hee may use it or refrain from it so using his liberty that by abusing of it to the offence of others hee make not himself guilty of condemnation Therefore in such a case wee must refrain Vers. 23. And hee that doubteth is damned if hee eat because hee eateth not of Faith for whatsoever is not of Faith is sin Argum. 11. There is danger lest a weak and doubtful person should bee drawn by the meer example of him that eats to eat with a doubting conscience and sin running headlong into the guilt of condemnation Therefore in such a case wee must abstain By this Argument hee deters the weak from eating with a doubtful conscience by the example of any man and hee deters the strong from unseasonable eating lest hee bee the cause of another mans sin and guilt Whatsoever Hee proves him to sin that eats with a doubting conscience because hee eats not of Faith or out of perswasion that the deed is lawful and whatever is not done of Faith that it may bee a lawful deed hee pronounceth it to bee sin CHAP. XV. THere are two parts of the Chapter In the former part the Apostle proceeds in his Exhortation to them that are weak in the Faith touching Christian Liberty how they should carry themselves towards the weak to vers 13. In the other part is contained the conclusion of the Epistle to the end Vers. 1. Wee then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak and not to please our selves That which concerns the first Because no agreement in differences about the use of things indifferent can probably bee expected without sin unless they that are strong carry themselves decently towards them that are weak in the use of their liberty Therefore hee exhorts that they would so do and bear the infirmities of the weak patiently bearing with them and by prudent counsel pardoning them as those that are weak in that matter The Arguments of his Exhortation are seven To bear Argum. 1. It 's the duty of the stronger both by the Law of Nature and by Divine Law to bear the burdens of the weak Therefore the strong in Faith in these things indifferent ought to bear with the infirmities of the weak Please Argum. 2. The stronger which refuse to perform this duty towards the weak will bee found guilty of self-love onely minding their own private advantages Therefore the weak are to bee born with Vers. 2. Let every one of us please his neighbour for his good to edification Argum. 3. Because every man is bound to please his neighbour when it may bee done to his edification and for his good Hee addes to Edification lest wee fall into sin for the sake of any one Vers. 3. For even Christ pleased not himself but as it is written The reproaches of them that reproached thee fell on mee Argum. 4. Whereby the former is confirmed from the example of Christ Christ not respecting his own profit but our infirmity and salvation pleased not himself but us which hee proves because our sins which in their nature are injuries unto God Christ bore that hee might free us from deserved punishments and hee put his shoulders to bear our burthen Therefore for the sake of them that are weak wee ought to depart from our right at least in things indifferent that they may bee saved Vers. 4. For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope Hee proves that this example is to bee imitated from the general scope of the Scriptures which is our edification in faith and obedience by promises precepts and examples that wee in all our tribulation patiently obeying the Will of God might have consolation and hope through the Scriptures Vers. 5. Now the God of patience and consolation grant you to bee like-minded one towards another according to Christ Iesus Hee concludes the Argument with prayer that God who is the fountain of patience and comfort would give unto them the same affection one towards another according to the example of Christ i. e. that they might think the same thing according to the doctrine of Christ and might love one another for if love abounded there would bee agreement in things indifferent Vers. 6. That you may
the Gospel or the Covenant of Grace through Christ is the Ministring of the Spirit because according to and by that the Holy Ghost is administred whereby the hearer is quickened and strengthened to embrace that which is propounded Killeth Compar 2. Confirming the former The Ministery of the Law of Works or the written Letter onely convinceth of sin and killeth the sinner by pronouncing to him the sentence of death But the Ministery of the Gospel or grace in the New Covenant sheweth liberty from sin absolves the sinner and so brings him life Vers. 7. But if the ministration of death written and engraven on stones was glorious so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance which glory was to bee done away 8. How shall not the ministration of the Spirit rather bee glorious In Stones Compar 3. The Law of Works which onely administers death for according to this Covenant no man doth obtain righteousness or life was engraven in stones to signifie that the heart by it cannot bee mollified nor renewed but remaineth dead But the Gospel of Grace is writ in the fleshy Tables of the heart i. e. in hearts by the power of the holy Ghost quickened and mollified it is so imprinted that the virtue of divine Grace may bee discerned in all the expressions of the heart Glorious Compar 4. The Ministery of the Covenant of Works which is the Ministery of death to all that have sinned was truly glorious as it appeared in Moses for justice is glorious in punishing of sin But the Ministery of the New Covenant which is the Ministery of the Spirit quickening is more glorious for as in Moses pronouncing the curse of the Law against sinners his bodily glory did shine but O how much spiritual glory doth shine in the face of Christ setting sinners at liberty by his Grace Vers. 9. For if the ministration of condemnation bee glory much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory Compar 4. The Ministery of the Law or the Old Covenant of Works is a Ministery of condemnation for sin therefore indeed glorious But the Ministry of the Gospel or the New Covenant is the Ministery of the Righteousness of Christ and absolution from sin and therefore so much the more glorious by how much absolution and justification do excel condemnation and sin Because by the Covenant of Works wee are all accused of sin wee are all condemned and made obnoxious to death Therefore its Ministery is called the Ministery of sin condemnation and death Vers. 10. For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect by reason of the glery that excelleth Compar 5. The Ministery of the Law although it was glorious was exceedingly excelled by the glory of the Ministery of the Gospel or of Grace that it not deserves to bee called glorious but let it vanish rather in comparison as the glory of the Stars when the Sun appears is obscured But the Ministery of the Gospel is simply and by way of excellency glorious Vers. 11. For if that which was done away was glorious much more that which remaineth is glorious Compar 6. The Ministery of the Covenant of Works in respect to the annexed ceremonies hath onely the glory of temporal dispensation because so long it was to endure whilst men in the infancy of the Church convicted of sins and of their own impotency to deliver themselves were taught to fly unto Christ and as it were by the hand of a School-master might bee led to him which manner of instructing the Church being now at its full growth and continuing under the brightne●s of the revealed Gospel is abolished as unprofitable But the Ministery of the New Covenant hath permanent glory until the glorious coming of Christ. Vers. 12. Seeing then that wee have such hope wee use great plainness of speech 13. And not as Moses which put a veil over his face that th● children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished Compar 7. The Ministery of the New Covenant is plain and perspicuous so that the Ministers thereof can plainly and confidently preach the way of Salvation having Christ now revealed who in times past being to come was hoped for But the Ministery of the Law as it did appear in the type of the Mosaical ministration was obscure and wrapped up in types Put Hee follows this comparison to the end of the Chapter illustrating the latter part thereof to the last verse in this sense Moses the Minister of the Law turned from the Tabernacle from the Altar from the Ark and the Propitiatory speaking with his face veiled signified to the people and typically related the nature of the legal Covenant of Works and of its Ministery divided from Christ and did also figure out the blindness of the people under the legal Covenant because they did not perceive Christ to bee the end of the Law and temporal ceremonies now abolished Vers. 14. But their minds were blinded for until this day remaineth the same veil untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament which veil is done away in Christ. 15. But even unto this day when Moses is read the veil is upon their heart The Apostle observes that now blindness also may bee perceived in the Iews who while they read the Old Testament they see nothing besides the veil of ceremonies because the veil of ignorance and infidelity remaineth upon their minds which veil represented by the type of the external veil covering Moses his face by Christ is taken away from all the Faithful for righteousness life virtue and lastly all grace and glory is published and communicated to the Faithful in Christ But hitherto this veil doth remain upon the hearts of the unbelieving Iews Vers. 16. Nevertheless when it shall turn to the Lord the veil shall bee taken away Hee hath hope of the Iews Conversion when by the Grace of God the heart of the Israelites or the Doctrine of Moses now veiled should bee turned by them to God i. e. should bee brought according to this typical signification to Christ who is the end of the Law Then the veil of ignorance and of the darkness of ceremonies should bee taken from them as the veil was taken from the face of Moses when hee entred in unto God sitting betwixt the Cherubins chiefly that they might see God their Lord and their Saviour Christ and might acknowledge him to bee the true end of the whole Law Vers. 17. Now the Lord is that Spirit and where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty The reason of this is given Because 1. Christ is the Spirit or the Soul of all ceremonies that a spiritual thing is signified by them 2. Christ is also the Spirit or the Soul of the Moral Law because hee fulfilled the Law in whom alone the perfect righteousness of the Law is to bee found 3. Christ
into Paradise or into that blessed seat of the Glory of God wherupon hee repeats the second time I kn●w a man and there heard ineffable words which is not lawful for a man to utter i. e. of whom something could not bee expressed other things it was not lawful for him to utter which otherwise had hee not been prohibited might have been uttered for those things which were revealed hee is certain did belong to his private confirmation and preparations for those conflicts hee was about to undergo Vers. 5. Of such an one will I glory yet of my self I will not glory but in my infirmities Argum. 7. That indeed hee was ready to boast to the glory of God of such a man i. e. of himself as the servant of God exalted after this manner But not concerning himself considered in himself for that hee had nothing in himself in which hee might glory except his infirmities Vers. 6. For though I would desire to glory I shall not bee a fool For I will say the truth But now I forbear lest any man should think of mee above that which hee seeth mee to bee or that hee heareth of mee Argum. 8. That although hee had sufficient matter of glorying offered upon this revelation that truly and solidly without vanity hee might much more glory but hee determined as yet sparingly to speak of this matter lest hee should stirre up too much esteem of himself Vers. 7. And lest I should bee exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations there was given to mee a thorn in the flesh the messenger of Satan to buffet mee lest I should bee exalted above measure Argum. 9. That the excellence of the Revelation was so great as that hee might beware of pride the Angel of Satan was sent for the Apostles humiliation A Thorn Hee describes the reason of his humbling so that hee intimates three Reasons of it Reason 1. That the matter of his humiliation was something of the reliques of sin in his flesh or his corrupt nature as yet not quite abolished viz. some motion of concupiscence tending to his further sinning which motion hee compares to a Thorn left in lopped wood because it was no less troublesome to him than a Thorn was wont to bee fastened in the foot of a travellour The Messenger Reason 2. Of his humiliation that this motion carried along with it a special temptation opening a way to the Devil making way to sin To buffet Reason 3. This Temptation sent from the Devil doth so much the more violently solicit him to sin that hee was compelled to implore divine assistance lest hee should bee overcome with the Temptation which exercise as it is not to bee wondred at by him that reads Chap. 7. Rom. So it is to bee acknowledged the most efficacious means for the humbling of the Apostle for hee that was wont to bear all troubles and fights both with his bodily and spiritual enemies couragiously hee is heard to howl and cry out in his combate with the flesh O wretched man that I am who shall deliver mee c. Vers. 8. For this thing I besought the Lord thrice that it might depart from mee The humiliation of the Apostle it self follows of which hee brings four Signs Sign 1. That hee had very often prayed unto God that hee would deliver him from the Tempter Vers. 9. And hee said unto mee My grace is sufficient for thee for my strength is made perfect in weakness Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities that the power of Christ may rest upon mee Sign 2. That hee rested in the answer of God in which hee certified him partly of the sufficiency of his Grace for the sustaining of his combating servant lest hee should bee overcome by the Tempter and for the washing away of all pollution which hee had contracted in his combate Partly concerning the end of his purpose in the exercise of his servants which is that by how much any servant of God is found more weak in any combate by so much the strength of God sustaining him might more clearly and perfectly demonstrate it self Most gladly Sign 3. That a more constant frame of humility would ensue upon this combate of his wherein hee determined to acknowledge his infirmities and weaknesses in all things to this very end that hee might experience the power of Christ dwelling in him and so much the more apparently manifested Vers. 10. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities in reproaches in necessities in persecutions in distresses for Christs sake for when I am weak then I am strong Sign 4. That hee had now learnt not onely to bear all afflictions couragiously for the Gospel which might make him more humble but out of them to take much pleasure Because when hee perceived himself most weak flying to Christ hee had experience of his more powerful presence for the sustaining and comforting him and likewise making him victorious The second Part. Vers. 11. I am become a fool in glorying yee have compelled mee for I ought to have been commended of you for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest Apostles though I bee nothing The second part of the Chapter contains his glorying in the manifestation of his Apostleship powerfully and sincerely administred amongst the Corinthians Hee clears this glorying from that folly which some might object laying the fault upon the Corinthians from whose neglect the necessity of the Apostles glorying did arise For they ought to assert his dignity against the false Apostles Hee saies I ought to bee commended by you or it was your part to defend mee hee brings nine Reasons of this Proposition and also of his glorying For in nothing Reason 1. Because although the Apostle was nothing in himself yet by the Grace of God hee was not inferiour to the chief Apostles the Corinthians being his witnesses Therefore hee ought to bee defended and commended by them Vers. 12. Truly the Signs of an Apostle were wrought among you in all patience in signs and wonders and mighty deeds Reason 2. Confirming the former Because amongst you the signs of my Apostleship appear partly in my patient enduring of labours troubles and injuries partly in the effects and signs of my Apostleship in miracles and powerful works Therefore I ought to bee commended by you Vers. 13. For what is it wherein yee were inferiour to other Churches except it bee that I my self was not burdensome to you forgive mee this wrong Reason 3. Because the Corinthian Church is endowed with such illustrious gifts of the Holy Ghost by my Ministery as any other Church founded either by other Apostles or by my self Therefore my Ministery ought to bee defended by you Except it bee that Reason 4. Because his zeal in propagating the Gospel amongst them was so great that hee preached the Gospel to the Corinthians freely wherein if there was any wrong by a civil Irony hee asks pardon intimating the benefit which was
and Gentiles become one seed i. e. one Christ mystical by faith Lastly vers 17. Hee concludes that this Covenant confirmed by a sacrifice after the manner of a Will and established by God with relation unto Christ could not bee made void or of none effect by the Law which was given four hundred and thirty years after The Promise Hee includes a reason why this Covenant could not bee changed by the Law viz. because the Covenant is Gods absolute promise which as it were obligeth God promising that he cannot change it But the Law hath the nature of a commandement which bindes not the Legislators but the subject For the Legislator can change Laws but hee cannot change absolute promises Therefore the Law after so many years made cannot disanull the Covenant or the promise absolutely made to Abraham Vers. 18. For if the inheritance bee of the Law it is no more of promise but God gave it to Abraham by promise Lest any one should object that the Law and the Promise may be conjoyned Hee answers and adds Arg. 16. If the inheritance be of the Law or works then not of the free promise for the one of these takes away the other but the inheritance is freely given to Abraham by a free promise Therefore not of the Law and consequently because the inheritance or life eternal is not of the Law or any works neither shall justification bee by the Law but only by grace through faith Vers. 19. Wherefore then serveth the Law It was added because of transgressions till the seed should come to whom the promise was made and it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator 20. Now a Mediator is not a Mediator of one but God is one Hee moves a question concerning the use of the Law inquiring to what purpose the Law was made Hee answers and adds Arg. 17. The Law is given that transgressions might bee manifest and held in as it were with some bridle untill Christ should come who is the seed to whom the promise of blessing is made Therefore seeing that onely the manifestation of sin cometh by the Law justification is not by the Law but by Christ or by faith And it was necessary to the manifestation of sin that the Law should bee renewed because the Jews sinned and yet did neither acknowledge the power of sin nor their own impotency to obey the Law Therefore the Law was urged until that compleat seed arose made up of Jews and Gentiles united the partition Wall between the Jews and the Gentiles being thrown down into one body with their head Christ by Faith Ordained Argum. 18. A terrible manner of giving the Law by the Ministery of Angels and by the hand of a Messenger or Mediator it was a sign rather of discord than of peace and concord betwixt God and men Because a Mediatour or a Messenger useth not to bee onely of one party seeing no man disagreeth with himself but of parties whereof one hath made a breach with the other But God is one and alwaies constant to himself Therefore the dis-agreeing party is man and the manner of making the Law did both signifie and argue that This is the force of the Argument which being granted reconciliation is not made but discord betwixt God and man remaineth by that Justification is not But the Law being given reconciliation is not made but discord betwixt God and the people remaineth as it appears from the manner of giving the Law Therefore Justification is not by the Law Vers. 21. Is the Law then against the Promises of God God forbid For if there had been a Law given which could have given life verily Righteousness should have been by the Law Hee propounds another question whether the Law is contrary to the Promise shewing to men the contrary waies of justifying Hee answers by denying and adds Argum. 19. If a Law had been given which could communicate life to sinners and strength for the performing those things that were commanded surely Justification had been by the Law wee may assume But such a Law is neither given to sinners nor can bee Rom. 8.3 Therefore Justification is not by the Law Vers. 22. But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin that the Promise by Faith of Iesus Christ might bee given to them that beleeve Argum. 20. The Law of God and the whole Scripture hath concluded all men and whatsoever commeth from man under sin and renders all men guilty of sin that now nothing else can remain to man but Faith in Jesus Christ by which the Promise of free blessing belongs to all that beleeve Therefore Justification is not by the Law but by Faith For if all are sinners no man by Works no man but by Faith can bee saved Vers. 23. But before Faith came wee were kept under the Law shut unto the Faith which should afterwards bee revealed Argum. 21. From the end and use of external Discipline before the comming of Christ in the Church of the Jews who were daily urged under a curse to perform Obedience to the Law according to the Covenant They were daily instructed by the yoak and observance of Ceremonies imposed touching due Obedience to the commands of their impotency to obey the Law and of their manifold sins they were also daily taught that they should flie to the Altar to sacrifice to washings that by this Discipline they might acknowledge themselves to be sinners and not to bee freed but by the oblation of the Lamb of God that was to come and by expiation in his blood or by Faith in the promised Messias From hence is the Argument wee Jews before the comming of Christ or before the full revelation of the Doctrine of Faith come were kept under the external Discipline of the Legal Covenant as under a Garrison circumscribed with boundaries that wee might not by any way turn our selves from the curse unless unto that Faith alone which was to bee revealed i. e to seek Righteousness and a blessing in the promised Messias Therefore wee are so far from Justification by the Law that on the otherside by the Discipline of the Law the ancient Church was shut up in streights and compelled to look unto Justification alone by Faith But the Discipline of the Law is abused by many to a contrary end yet this was the end of the Legal Discipline instituted by God Vers. 24. Wherefore the Law was our School-Master to bring us unto Christ that wee might bee justified by Faith Argum. 22. Illustrating and confirming the former The Law or the external form of the Legal Covenant like a School-Master sent to us by God did instruct our childish Church and lead it by the hand to Christ that wee might bee justified by Faith Therefore wee are so far from Justification by the Law that on the other side unless wee bee justified by Faith the Law is frustrated in its end For what else did the Law do by propounding moral Precepts
hence arose the unlike disposition of Ishmael and Isaac so great a discord that Ishmael persecuted Isaac and the dissimilitude of both their conditions in the upshot Ishmael is cast out of the family but Isaac obtains the Inheritance by which type God did figure out the divers conditions of the visible Church sprung from divers principles and causes For 1. As there are two wives Hagar and Sarah so there are two Covenants of God with men the Covenant of works or legal the Covenant of grace or the Evangelical 2. Both the wives had off-spring so both the Covenants had their worshippers and professors as born of the Covenant 3. As Hagar a young woman according to nature and the flesh brought forth but Sarah barren and an old woman according to the power of the divine promise So the Law or Covenant of works hath the ordinary strength of nature or the powers of free will for its foundation But the Gospel or Covenant of grace hath for its foundation the special grace of God 4. As Ishmael was of a servile and malicious disposition that hee would persecute his brother but Isaac indued with an ingenuous and godly disposition patiently indured persecution so how many justiciaries so ever seeking righteousness by works are of a servile and perverse disposition and they do vexe the true faithful of God But the truly faithful and Sons of the promise worship God with an ingenuous piety and do suffer persecutions as it behoves them Vers. 24. Which things are an allegory for these are the two Covenants the one from the Mount Sinai which gendereth to bondage which is Hagar In the third place the Apostle expounds the signification of the type as much as belongs to the present purpose and first hee shews that the two Wives are figures of the two Covenants whereof one is the Covenant of Works represented by Hagar The other is the Covenant Grace or faith represented by Sarah As to Hagar and the Covenant of Works the Apostle teacheth First That Covenant had its rise from Mount Sinai because in that mountain the Law was given and this Covenant was established betwixt God and his people Secondly hee teaches that this Covenant generated an off-spring to bondage or did render the Disciples and professours of it onely servants i. e. Mercenary worshippers of God who do nothing but the external work and brought to that either by fear or hope of a reward and they heing ignorant that this was the end of the Law that being sensible of our sins we might flye to Christ do abuse the Law being meer hypocrites seeking by it righteousness which they never obtain but being not freed remain in their sins Vers. 25. For this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and answereth to Ierusalem which now is and is in bondage with her children Hee shews the convenience of the exposition 1. From this because Mount Sinai situated in Arabia and far removed from the promised Land was called by the Arabians and Caldeans Hagar by the special providence of God 2. That it had affinity with the earthly Ierusalem as it was in the Apostles time or with the Jewish Synagogue which is said to bee in bondage with her children because shee was tenacious of the Covenant of works and continued with her Disciples in a servile condition strangers to the Redeemer and free deliverance by him Vers. 26. But Ierusalem which is above is free which is the mother of us all Hee expounds what is figured by Sarah the free-woman viz. The Covenant of Faith or Grace whereof the Church of the truly faithful is very tenacious which is the heavenly Ierusalem that is above created by God and studious of heavenly things the mother of all the faithful called both of Iews and Gentiles Vers. 27. For it is written Rejoyce thou barren that bearest not break forth and cry thou that travellest not for the desolate hath many more Children than she which hath an husband In the fourth place The Apostle proves the Exposition give● out of Isaiah 54.1 where the Church of the faithful the upper Ierusalem our Mother is represented by Sarah barren as if shee had been a Widow And the Synagogue of the Jews unfaithful and tenacious of the Covenant of Works is represented by fruitful Hagar dwelling with her Husband But the Church of the faithful before the comming of Christ was compared as it were to a barren Widow because her Husband the Covenant of Grace was unknown almost to all except a few who dispersed hither and thither did not make a company neither did Grace appear but lay hid like an Husband absent or dead under the covers of Ceremonies The Synagogue of unbeleeving Justiciaries is compared to a fruitful Wife dwelling with her Husband viz. the Covenant of Works conspicuous in the external dispensation of the Law And it is fore-told by the Prophet that it should come to pass that the Church of the faithful made fruitful by the Promises of God shall bring forth more children under the Gospel than the Synagogue hath brought Servants under the Law and therefore is commanded to rejoyce and praise God Vers. 28. Now wee Brethren as Isaac was are the children of Promise In the last place hee applies this typical history and partly admonishes the truly faithful Christians and partly comforts them by four Arguments Argum. 1. That wee are redeemed children justified by Faith and truly free born and regenerated by virtue of Evangelical Promises to the similitude of Isaac who is elder than those other Citizens of the heavenly Ierusalem that were after him Vers. 29. But as then hee hat was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit Argum. 2. Of consolation That suffering persecution by false Brethren Patrons of free will and Righteousness by Works were finde nothing unlike to Isaacs condition For when in Abrahams Family hee who is onely begotten by the ordinary strength of nature persecuted him who is begotten by a divine and spiritual way what wonder then if the same now bee usual amongst us Vers. 30. Nevertheless what saith the Scripture cast out the bond-woman and her Son for the Son of the bond-woman shall not bee heir with the Son of the free-woman Argum. 3. That the persecutors of the faithful and Patrons of Righteousness by Works seeing they are not set at liberty by the Son are to bee cast out of the society of the Saints and the inheritance of life eternal as it was figured by the sentence of God concerning the casting Ishmael with his Mother out of the family and excluding him from the inheritance that was to bee enjoyed with Isaac Vers. 31. So then Brethren wee are not children of the bond-woman but of the free Argum. 4. From the comparing of this verse with the former that seeing wee are not children of the bond-woman but of the free certainly wee shall obtain an inheritance of life eternal which Argument with the former as it
the Spirit not of the flesh by Faith and not by any natural bond or tye Vers. 33. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his Wife even as himself and the Wife see that shee reverence the Husband Letting the mystery pass hee returns to the Precepts touching the duties of Husband and Wife and in the last place adds Precept 3. wherein hee reduces all the duties of the Husband to sincere love such as is the love wherewith hee loves himself and this love hee presses upon them On the other side hee reduces all the duties of the Wife to fear and reverence towards her Husband that shee offend him not but indeavour in the Lord to please him in all things CHAP. VI. HEE proceeds to give Precepts touching oeconomical and common Christian duties There are two parts of the Chapter The first contains four Precepts touching oeconomical duties to vers 10. The other is the conclusion of the Epistle containing some common duties unto the end Vers. 1. Children obey your Parents in the Lord for this is right Precept 1. to children that they should honour their Parents and yeeld reverence and obedience to them in all things so far as is possible and pleasing to God the reasons hereof are four 1 Because it is required by all Law both of God and of Nature that children should obey their Parents Vers. 2. Honour thy Father and thy Mother which is the first Commandement with Promise Reas. 2. Because the obedience of children is expressly mentioned in the Commandements as a part of honour due to Parents and commanded in the Law Which is Reas. 3. Because this is the first command which hath a particular promise particularly applyed Vers. 3. That it may bee well with thee and thou mayest live long on the earth Reas. 4. Because the obedience of children towards their Parents conduces to the childrens good and hath a special blessing the lengthening of temporal life which Promise is either simply fulfilled or else by change of the benefit for one much better of a better life Vers. 4. And yee Fathers provoke not your children to wrath but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Prec 2. Touching the part and duty of Parents towards their children that on the one side by too much severity towards their children they abuse not their Fatherly power lest they drive their childrens affection from them and on the other side that by too much indulgence they do not nourish any childish malepertness in their children but that rather they strive to correct their vices and instruct them in good manners in the fear of the Lord. Vers. 5. Servants bee obedient to them that are your Masters according to the flesh with fear and trembling in singleness of your heart as unto Christ Prec 3. Of the duty of Servants towards their Masters the parts whereof are six 1 That they obey their Masters acknowledging their external servile condition to bee from God and that they are not freed from a political servitude by Christ who neither takes away nor changes Governments 2 That they remember that their Masters are not Masters of their consciences but of the flesh or outward man and in things which concern this life 3 That they serve them in reverence and in fear of their anger 4 That laying aside deceit they deal truly and sincerely with their Masters 5 That they serve them with reference to Christs command and so in obeying them they will serve Christ. Vers. 6. Not with eye-service as men-pleasers but as the servants of Christ doing the Will of God from the heart 5. With good will doing service as to the Lord and not to men 6 That without flattering deceit they take care of their Masters business no less in their absence than when they are present to over-look them and not onely that they may please their Masters but that they may please God Lastly That they serve not out of self-love or meer fear but out of good will as those that serve God and not men for hee serves God who obeyes him commanding him to serve his Master Vers. 8. Knowing that whatsoever good thing man doeth the same shall hee receive of the Lord whether hee bee bond or free Besides the Arguments which are tacitly couched in what went before to confirm this Precept hee adds the hope of reward which they shall receive from God who liberally rewards the works of his servants whether they bee free or bond in the flesh Vers. 9. And yee Masters do the same things unto them forbearing threatning knowing that your Master also is in Heaven neither is there respect of persons with him Prec 4. Concerning the duty of Masters towards their servants That proportionably making use of the same virtues they should exercise their masterly power over their servants after a Christian manner and particularly that they should bee moderate in threatnings lest they rule tyrannically over them Knowing Hee adds two reasons 1 Because they have the Lord above them who is able to revenge their weak tyranny 2 Because God is just who doth not respect the person of the Master or servant but beholds the cause and work of both according to equity The Second Part. Vers. 10. Finally my Brethren bee strong in the Lord and in the power of his might The other part of the Chapter contains the conclusion of the Epistle which hath in it four points In the first hee exhorts them to constancy in Faith and Holiness of life and to put on the spiritual armor against our enemies with whom wee must grapple as long as wee live Brethren saith hee bee yee strengthened in the Lord. The Arguments to press on this Exhortation are three Argum. 1. Because they have communion with the Lord in whom is power and strength in whom if yee continue by Faith and make use of his Grace hee will bee ready to help you with his power and effectual operation that so you will both dare to venture on and bee able valiantly to oppose all your enemies and hinderances Therefore bee yee strengthened in the Lord. Vers. 11. Put on the whole Armour of God that yee may bee able to stand against the wiles of the Devil Argum. 2. Because you are armed with all sorts of weapons which are necessary for your war which weapons hee exhorts them to put on that they may bee able to stand in the fight against the Devils assaults and treachery Vers. 12. For wee wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities against powers against the rulers of the darkness of this world against spiritual wickedness in high places Argum. 3. Because our strife is not meerly with men or against our own flesh or against men onely such a fight might seem tolerable but wee are to fight against the author of all these evils the Devil and the whole army of unclean spirits who are no weak and ordinary souldiers but all of them
that hee did in himself cease to bee what hee was but that hee laid aside the manifestation of his Glory and Majesty and so hid it under the form of a servant as if hee had had none or as if hee had so left it off that it could not bee perceived by the world nay nor by his servants that were eye-witnesses unless it were so much of it through the chinks of his Words and Works as was requisite for the dispensation of the Work of Redemption The degrees or parts of this voluntary humiliation or exinanition are five 1. That hee took or assumed the form of a servant or the true humane nature such as is found in the vilest servants or in men of the lowest rank and united the humane nature to himself by a personal union thus hee debased himself from Heaven to Earth 2 That in the humane Nature hee debased himself below the condition of free men to an external condition most reproachful among men which is servile for hee took upon him the form of a servant The likeness Hee shews the truth of his incarnation in that hee was made like to us as one of us in the essential parts of humane nature body and soul like in the natural properties of the humane nature and in all the affections like in the common infirmities which follow man-kind Lastly that hee is like to us in all things sin onely excepted Being found in fashion Hee confirms the truth of his incarnation that hee was found in fashion as a man for all that were conversant with him both good and bad by all waies whereby a man is known to bee a man observed and found that hee was true man and they did certainly know it from the true shape and substance of his humane body from the true actions of humane life and from the true properties of one truly man and from every fashion that any man is found in Hee humbled himself 3 That being now made man though hee was not obliged but by his voluntary Covenant because hee was not meerly man though truly man but God in the flesh whose flesh was the flesh of God and therefore being Lord of the Law hee was not subject to it to stay in the earth or to undergo the yoak of the Law imposed upon those that are meerly men yet hee humbled himself or by his voluntary disposition and order hee made himself in the state of humiliation less than his Father for in respect of the Divine Nature which is the same in both Father and Son hee could not bee less and took upon him the yoak of the Law appointed for meer men and not onely so but hee also absolutely submitted himself to perform all things which the Father should command for the perfecting the redemption of men Became obedient unto 4 That hee did all his life-time patiently bear the yoak hee took upon him fulfilling his Fathers commands in all things even unto death or the laying down his humane life for his sheep according to his Fathers command Of the Cross 5 That hee was obedient to the violent cursed most dishonourable death of the Cross. Vers. 9. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a name which is above every name 10. That at the name of Iesus every knee should bow of things in Heaven and things in Earth and things under the Earth 11. And that every tongue should confess that Iesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father Here in these three verses wee have Christs reward according to his humane Nature for his being humbled for us which is by his exaltation and that for us too Whence wee may gather Argument 8. to this purpose As Christ after hee had humbled himself to reconcile men unto God and to procure the confirmation of peace betwixt the parties was exalted by God and crowned with glory so you may expect exaltation if you humble your selves that yee may maintain the Churches concord Therefore if yee will keep the true way to glory you must imitate Christ and humble your selves for the preservation of unity Wherefore The meaning is this Because Christ of his own accord hath humbled himself for our sakes in our flesh being made obedient even unto death God hath for our sakes and in our flesh also advanced him to the highest honour For having raised Christ from the dead to a glorious and immortal life hee lifted him up to the highest Heaven and placed him at his own right hand in dignity and authority above all creatures hee hath according to his gracious will and the gracious dispensation of the business of our salvation given him a name above every name glorifying him with that glory which hee had from the beginning with the Father to wit by manifesting the glory of the deity which before was obscured and by making known the hypostatical union of the humane Nature commanding and causing that Christ crucified should bee preached rule bee adored bee called upon every where as true God and the onely begotten Son of God At the name The Apostle shews how the efficacy and effect of this exaltation of Christ doth follow viz. That every creature shall at length bee subject unto Christ so that unless it willingly submit it shall at last bee compelled to acknowledge his name or his power authority and dominion which is expressed by a Metonymy of bending the knee As to heavenly things there is no doubt but Angels and the spirits of just men shall bow the knee that is submit to him for spirits properly have no knees As to earthly things all men shall at last if not willingly at least unwillingly and compelled confess Christ crucified to bee the Judge the Lord and the Son of God And lastly for things under the earth by which name are understood the Devils and the spirits of the damned who are in prison All those unclean spirits shall appear before his tribunal whether they will or no and shall yeeld to the sentence of the Judge with acknowledgement of his dominion and Majesty And thus all his enemies whoever they bee that now oppose him shall bow the knee unto him And every tongue Lastly lest all acknowledgement of the name and power of Christ should wholly seem to bee deferred till the last judgement hee shews that it shall come to pass that every tongue or that of every Country and Nation Christ shall receive glory either in the voluntary confession and profession of the converted Gentiles that Christ is the Lord and that to the glory of the Father who will bee honoured in the glorifying of his onely begotten Son or seeing that many shall not bee converted it shall come to pass at last in the judgement of God that the dominion of Christ shall bee clearly and fully manifested when all creatures in Heaven in Earth and Hell shall acknowledge him to bee the Lord. Vers. 12. Wherefore my Beloved as yee have alwayes obeyed not
the whole body are or the gifts of some member may become as to use and profitableness of good to all the members Vers. 15. And let the Peace of God rule in your hearts to the which also yee are called in one body and bee yee thankful Exhortation 7. That if any contention should arise amongst them the Peace of God should bee appointed the Moderatour of contention and all affections and having as it were a reward in its hand should determine what is to bee done Hee calls the Peace of God that which is from God that which pleases God and that which doth not command the loss of truth or any virtue but of our carnal affections To which The Reasons of the Exhortation are three 1 Because God hath called you to peace with himself and that you should follow it amongst your selves 2 Because yee are all members of one body 3 Because yee owe this thankfulness to God who hath made peace with you when hee might have dealt with you as enemies Therefore following peace amongst your selves bee yee thankful Vers. 16. Let the Word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdome teaching and admonishing one another in Psalms and Hymns and spiritual Songs singing with Grace in your hearts to the Lord. Exhortation 8. To study the Word of God and imploy your selves in it there are five branches of the Exhortation 1 That they derive the Word of Christ or the Christian Doctrine propoun●ed in Scripture from the fountains and as a most acceptable guest entertain it in their minds and hearts that afterwards it might not depart from thence but there constantly abide 2 That they content not themselves that they have tasted the Word of Christ or that they have in some sort known it but they do their endeavour for the procuring a rich and plentiful measure of it to themselves 3 That from thence they learn to bee wise to their own salvation and the benefit of others 4 That they suffer the Word of Christ not to bee idle in them but that they prudently put it forth for the use of their neighbours that with mutual instructions they promote one anothers knowledge with mutual admonitions they may better order their conversations and every one stir up his own and others affections to the singing of holy Psalms Hymns and spiritual Songs composed of some spiritual matter by the Spirit and made for mutual edification 5 That they sing with their affections composed to holiness according to the measure of Grace given to them so that the Song may bee acceptable to God and may administer Grace to the hearers they beholding in the sincerity of their hearts the glory of God in their singing Vers. 17. And whatsoevr you do in word or deed do all in the name of the Lord Iesus giving thanks to God and the Father by him Exhortation 9. That they do all things in Christ i. e. in his name and authority through him or his grace and to him and his glory And because that cannot bee done but forthwith they must have new experiences of divine goodness towards themselves that they may give thanks to God alwaies in all things through Christ without whom God the Father will not bee praised by us nor will hee grant any thing to us but through his Son and in whom whatsoever things are sent in to us by God are turned to our good And these are the general Exhortations to common duties The Second Part. Verse 18. Wives submit your selves unto your own Husbands as it is fit in the Lord. The Other part of the Chapter follows containing special Exhortations to all degrees in a Family The Exhortations are five Exhort 1. Is to Wives with whom hee begins because their condition is harder and more difficult than mens and therefore it is no wonder if God speak first to them Hee requires of them that they bee subject to their own Husbands i. e. that they give them obedience honour and reverence but with a limitation in the Lord that their obedience bee in things lawful and for the command of the Lord to whom Wives are first subject and do owe obedience As it is fit The Argument of the Exhortation is from equity and comeliness for what is commanded is fitting from divine Ordination and from the Law of Nature Vers. 19. Husbands love your Wives and bee not bitter against them Exhort 2. To Husbands whom hee commands in the first place that they love their own Wives and that with a singular and holy affection and to rest satisfied in one Wife Further hee forbids them that they bee not bitter towards them either in word or deeds although they bee provoked by their infirmities but that they prudently rule them as it becomes Husbands Vers. 20. Children obey your Parents in all things for this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Exhort 3. To Children with whom hee begins as before with Wives and afterwards hee will begin with Servants because their condition is harder and they have need of the instruction of God that they do that which is necessary for them to do of their own accord hee requires of these obedience from the heart toward their parents in all things viz. which their heavenly Father hath not prohibited The Argument of the Exhortation is this because the performance of this duty is most acceptable unto God Vers. 21. Fathers provoke not your children to anger lest they bee discouraged Exhort 4. Especially to Fathers who use to bee more severe than Mothers That they by reproaches injuries and cruel chastisements do not alienate the mindes of their children from them Besides the reasons which are contained in the relation betwixt Fathers and Children he expresly adds this one lest children used more severely at length should despair of th●●r Fathers love and so bee discouraged Vers. 22. Servants obey in all things your Masters according to the flesh not with eye-service as men-pleasers but in singleness of heart fearing God Exhort 5. To servants wherein hee more largely insists because their condition is hardest The ●ranches of the Exhortation are six In the first hee mitigates the condition of servitude from this that it onely belongs to the carnal duties of this life and doth not infer any necessity of obeying in things unlawful In the second hee commands that they obey and serve in all things lawfull even when the commands are hardest 3. That they do that sincerely and faithfully not onely in the sight of their Masters but also when they are absent lest they bee accused of negligence 4. That they in sincerity of heart serve in the fear of the Lord. Vers. 23. And whatsoever yee do do it heartily as to the Lord and not unto men 5. That in all service the outward action draws its original from the minde and more inward affections from whence the outward action may bee derived 6. That they acknowledge the authority of God in the commands of their Masters and that
changeableness and the changing of the Levitical Priest-hood hath drawn along with it the mutability and change of the Levitical Law or Legal Covenant joyned with it that another Priesthood might succeed and another Law or another unchangeable Covenant Therefore the changeable Levitical Priesthood is not so excellent as that of Melchisedec or the immutable Priesthood of Christ. Vers. 13. For hee of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe of which no man gave attendance at the Altar 14. For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning Priesthood Argum. 4. Proving withall the Levitical Law was to bee changed with the Priesthood Christ● concerning whom these things are said in Psalm 110. belongs to another Tribe and that the Principal and most worthy viz. Iudah from whence it appears that our Lord sprang whereof none attends at the Altar none hath any command from Moses●o ●o exercise the Levitical Priesthood Therefore Christs Priesthood being introduced the Levitical is to bee done away with the Levitical Ceremonial Law and by consequence the Priesthood of Christ which sprang of the Principal Tribe is more excellent than the Levitical Vers. 15. And it is yet far more evident For that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another Priest Arg. 5. From the words of Psalm 110. proving the same that before Christ is another Priest from the Levitical between whom and Melchisedec his type there is a similitude Therefore is follows that the Priesthood of Christ doth not hang upon the Levitical Law and also because it is Melchisede●ian it is far more excellent than the Levitical Priesthood Vers. 16. Who is made not after the Law of a carnal commandement but after the power of an endless life Argum. 6. Christ is made a Priest not according to the Law which gave weak and carnal commandements concerning bodily Ceremonies as the Levitical Priests but after the power and virtue of an immortal or indissoluble life whereby Christ himself lives for ever and can as the author of life effectually bestow eternal life Therefore Christs Priesthood is more excellent than the Levitical Vers. 17. For hee testifieth Thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec Hee confirms this Argument from Psalm 110. wherein the Father declares his Son a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec and by consequence declares the virtue of Christs Priesthood to bee sufficient unto eternal life Vers. 18. For there is verily a disanulling of the Commandement going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof Argum. 7. Taken from the foresaid Psalm The Law or Legal Covenant with the Ceremonial Precepts and the whole Levitical Priesthood joyned to that Covenant by reason of the weakness and unprofitableness of it in it self for the expiation of sins and the justification of men and the bestowing of eternal life is abolished by the introduction of an eternal Priesthood viz. of Christ Therefore the Priesthood of Christ is more excellent than the Levitical Vers. 19. For the Law made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope did by the which wee draw nigh unto God Argum. 8. Confirming the former The Law or Legal Covenant under the Levitical Priesthood although it was a School-master unto Christ yet in it self it made nothing perfect it justified sanctified saved none But the Priesthood of Christ that better hope or Gospel that good prefigured and hoped for by the faithful under the Law being now introduced in the room of the Levitical Priesthood or Legal Covenant This I say brings perfection to the people of God and puts them into good hopes of life Therefore the Priesthood of Christ c. By the which Argum. 9. By the Priesthood of Christ or by that hope better than the Law or Levitical Priesthood wee that are at a great distance from God by nature all of us come near unto God to the Throne of his Grace which was the priviledge of the Priests onely or rather of the Chief Priest under the Legal types Therefore the Priesthood of Christ c. Vers. 20. And in as much as not without an oath hee was made Priest 21. For those Priests were made without an oath but this with an oath by him that said unto him the Lord sware and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec Argum. 10. The Levitical Priests without an oath by a Law changeable at the pleasure of God the Law-giver were made Priests But Christ as appears from Psal. 110. is declared a Priest for ever by the oath of God the Father Therefore the Priesthood of Christ c. Vers. 22. By so much was Iesus made a surety of a better Testament Argum. 11. Christ in his Priesthood is the Surety of a Covenant so much the more excellent by how much the Priesthood confirmed with an oath is more excellent than that which is mutable and commanded for a time Therefore his Priesthood is more excellent For where there is a Priest there is a Covenant the Surety whereof is a Priest the Covenant being legal and vanishing had for its Surety a typical Priest which prefigured the true Priest Christ that was to come But the Covenant of Grace hath Christ the true Priest for its Surety who first of all bound himself to give satisfaction to Divine Justice for our debt furthermore that as the friends of God in the Covenant of Grace wee should walk to life eternal There are other offices of a Surety but these suffice for the opening of the present Argument Vers. 23. And they truly were many Priests because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death 24. But this man because hee continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood Argum. 12. The Levitical Priests were many at one time and successively followed one another for one alone could not undergo all things belonging to the office and death did hinder that any one should abide long in his office But Christ alone executes his Priestly Office for ever having no Partner or Successor nor wanting any to substitute in his stead Therefore his Priesthood is more excellent than the Levitical Vers. 25. Wherefore hee is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him seeing hee ever liveth to make intercession for them Argum. 13. Following upon the former Christ our Priest living for ever and in the perpetual odour of his Sacrifice interceding for his is able to save and perfect to the utmost or every way to accomplish the sanctification and salvation of all the faithful or of all that come in to him But the Levitical Priests could not do that Therefore his Priesthood is more excellent than the Levitical Vers. 26. For such a● High Priest became us who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners and made higher than the Heavens Argum. 14. Christ as a Priest as it became our onely Redeemer hath more excellent
Vers. 14. wee learn That Christs Genealogy was well known in the Apostles times and no controversie about it And it sufficeth us that wee know this by the Apostles Testimony albeit wee could not lineally deduce the same 3. Observe how hee reasoneth That none of the Tribe of Juda attended the Altar because Moses spake nothing of that Tribe concerning the Priesthood Then Negative Conclusions in Matters of Faith and duties follow well from the Scriptures silence It is not warranted from Scripture therefore I am not bound to beleeve it The Scripture doth not require any such thing of mee therefore God accounteth it not service to Him to do it is good reasoning 4. From Vers. 15. The Apostle comparing the Proofs of his Argument calleth this last in plain tearms Far more evident Then Of Reasons drawn from Scripture by Consequence some will be less evident some more evident and yet all be good Reasons and prove the purpose strongly Vers. 16. Who is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandement but after the power of an endless life Hee entreth into a more particular comparison of the Levitical Priesthood and Christs to shew the weakness of the one in comparison of the other The Levitical Priests in their Consecration got a commandment for the exercise of bodily and carnal Rites some few years of their mortal life without power to convey the Grace signified by those bodily Rites But Christ in his Consecration is endued with power to confer grace and life eternal from Generation to Generation to all that seek the Benefit of his Priesthood Then wee may be assured of Christs power to make the means which hee useth for our salvation effectual as wee may be assured of his endless life Vers. 17. For Hee testifieth Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec He proveth this by Scripture because God calleth him a Priest for ever Therefore Hee hath power for ever as living for ever to make his own Priesthood effectual So The eternity of Christs Priesthood proveth it to be forcible to give eternal life For if it did not endure in his person it could not give eternal life and peoples hearts would not rest upon it with any ground And so it behoved to be renounced and another Priesthood sought But seeing it is not to be changed but shall endure Then of necessity it hath the thing to give us which wee are seeking that is eternal life Then As long as Christ endureth we want not a Priest to hear confession of sin to give absolution to bless us give us eternal life Vers. 18. For there is verily a disannulling of the Commandement going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof 1. By the same words of establishing Christs Priesthood Psal. 110. hee proveth that the Levitical Law was to be abolished when Christ came Because the establishing of Christs Priesthood and bringing it to light is the disanulling of the Levitical Then There needeth no more to declare That the Levitical Priesthood and Law is abolished and wee freed from the Ceremonies thereof but the coming of Christ and His entring to his Office of Priesthood 2. Hee giveth a reason of the abolishing of this Priesthood Because it was weak and unprofitable Quest. How can that be seeing it was ordained to strengthen the Beleevers then and was profitable for that end I answer It is called weak and unprofitable in regard of any power to make satisfaction to Gods justice for our sins or to purchase any salvation unto us For other waies as a mean to lead men for that time unto the Messias who should satisfie for us it was not weak nor unprofitable But to pacifie God and purchase salvation as the misbeleeving Iews did use it it was weak and unprofitable altogether Again being considered as a mean to prefigure Christ it was profitable still till Christ came namely for that end and use But when He is come no end nor use more for it but that it should be abolished having served the turn whereunto it was ordained Then 1. Levitical Ceremonies whatsoever use they might have had before Christ are weak and unprofitable after His comming 2. It is evil reasoning to say such Rites and Ceremonies were used before Christ came therefore they may be used now also Vers. 19. For the Law made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope did by the which we draw nigh unto God He proveth That those Rites were weak Because the Law whether Moral or Ceremonial could not perfect any thing that is justifie sanctifie and save any man 1. They served as a Pedagogue to lead a man to Christ for expiation of sin and purchase of salvation but could not effectuate this by themselves And this maketh good the Answer to the Question in the former Ver. Then To seek to bee perfected justified and saved by works is to seek that by the Law which could never bee brought to pass by it 2. What then doth perfect all Hee answereth The bringing in of a better Hope perfecteth all That is Christ then hoped for and looked unto who is that Better Thing even the End and the Signification of those Legal Ordinances being brought in unto Beleevers Hee doth perfect all Then 1. What the Beleevers could not get under the Law by their outward service they got it by Christ hoped for and beleeved into 2. The Beleevers of old rested not on the shadows but had the Eye of their Hope on Christ. 3. Hee commendeth this Better Hope that is Christs Priesthood hoped for under the Law Because by it wee draw nigh unto God Now Drawing nigh importeth a distance before drawing nigh and again Drawing nigh was the Priests prerogative under the Law Then By Nature and without Christ wee are Aliens from God and far away from Him But by Christ wee get Liberty to come nigh not onely as Gods people but as Priests through Christ to offer our Spiritual Oblations The Priests Priviledge of old is common to beleevers now Ver. 20. And inasmuch as not without an Oath He was made Priest 21. For those Priests were made without an Oath but This with an Oath by Him that said unto Him The Lord sware and will not repent Thou art a Priest for ever after the Order of Melchisedec 22. By so much was Iesus made a Surety of a better Testament 1. Hee goeth on to compare the Levitical Priesthood with Christs· Two Comparisons are here conjoyned First Levitical Priests were made without an Oath only by way of simple Ordinance and Direction God leaving room to himself how long hee pleased to hold on the Direction and when hee pleased to change it But Christ was made Priest with an Oath that hee should never be changed Then 1. When God gave forth the Ceremonial Law hee reserved room to himself to change it yea gave evidence that hee was to change it for hee obliged the people during his will but not himself
to dye The Articles of the Covenant also evinceth it to be a Testament and the promiser bound to make his word good and so to dye For Jer. 31. the Lord Christ promiseth to reconcile his people to God to take away their sins and to be their God Iustice required satisfaction of them before they could be reconciled Satisfaction they could not make themselves therefore he who promised to make the Reconciliation with God was bound to make the satisfaction for them to God and if satisfaction for them then to undergo the curse of the Law for them and so to dye Then 1. The New Covenant is of the nature of a Testament and the benefits promised therein to wit Remission of sins Reconciliation Sanctification and Life Eternal are Legacies freely left unto us by our Defunct Lord who was dead and is alive to execute his own will for evermore The Scripture is the instrument and evidence the Apostles Notaries the Sacraments are seals witnesses from Heaven the Father the Word and the Spirit witnesses on earth the Water the Blood and the Spirit 2. Christ Jesus is both the maker of the Covenant which is in Ier. 31. and the Mediator thereof also the Testator and Executor of that blessed Testament 3. Christs death was concluded and resolved upon and intimated before he came into the world Vers. 17. For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all whilest the Testator liveth He cleareth his reasoning from the nature of Testaments amongst men which not before but after a mans death have force But here it may be objected How can this be seeing by vertue of the testament of Christ benefits not a few were bestowed upon the Church before his death from the beginning of the world not onely Remission of sins and Eternal Life but also many graces and blessings in this life both bodily and spiritual I answer Albeit Christs death was not accomplished in act till of late yet for the certainty of his death to follow and the unchangeableness of his minde towards his Church before his death he was reckoned both with God and the Church for dead and the promise of laying down his life for his people accepted for the time as if it had been performed For which cause he is called Rev. 13.8 The Lamb slain from the beginning of the world And Christ was still represented as a slain man in all these Sacrifices which the Apostle pointeth at as meeting this doubt in the next words which follow hereafter Vers. 18. Vers. 18. Whereupon neither the first Testament was dedicated without blood He proveth the necessity of Christs death yet farther Under the Law his bloodshed was represented by types of bloody Sacrifices therefore it behoved those types to be answered by his real bloodshed and death Then 1. What the types of the Law did signifie Christ behoved to accomplish in verity 2. The Old Church was taught that by vertue of the blood signified by these types the Covenant stood betwixt God and them Vers. 19. For when Moses had spoken every Precept to all the people according to the Law he took the blood of Calves and of Goats with Water and Scarlet Wooll and Hyssope and sprinkled both the book and all the people 20. Saying This is the blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you 21. Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministery From Moses example we learn 1. That the Lords Word should be manifested to all the people and none of them debarred from taking knowledge thereof 2. That the Word must be spoken plainly with a distinct voyce in the common Language and not muttered in an unknown Tongue 3. That with the use of holy Rites appointed of God the Preaching of Gods Word should be joyned to shew the Institution and force of Gods Ordinances to his people 2. In that the Book and the People and Instruments of Service were all to be sprinkled we learn That every thing which we touch or meddle with or make use of is unclean unto us were it never so holy in it self except the Blood of Jesus make it clean unto us and cleanse us in the using of it Vers. 22. And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding of blood is no remission He saith Almost because of some purging which was done by washing and yet even that washing also drew the Vertue of Ceremonial purging from the Sacrifice whereunto the washing was annexed 2. In saying Without shedding of blood there is no remission of sins he teacheth us That wheresoever a sacrifice is offered for obtaining remission of sin there shedding of blood must really be and where an unbloody sacrifice is pretended to be offered for obtaining remission it serveth not the purpose because Without shedding of blood there is no remission Either therefore must such as pretend to offer Christ for obtaining the remission of sin grant that Christ is daily murthered by them and his blood shed anew in their pretended Offering or else that by their Offering no new Remission is purchased But the truth is Christs Blood is once shed and never to be shed again and that once Offering and Blood shedding is sufficient for everlasting remission without any new Offering of him again Vers. 23. It was therefore necessary that the Patterns of things in the Heavens should be purified with these but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices than these Another reason of the necessity of Christs death in force thus much If things figuratively holy behoved to be cleansed with the Typical Blood of Beasts Then things truly holy behoved to be cleansed with better blood even the blood of the Messias Hence we learn 1. That for the significations cause God would not have the Tabernacle nor any Instrument of Service about it to ●e esteemed holy till blood was shed to sprinkle it That it might be known thereby that without the shedding of Christs blood he would not accept of any thing from us as holy 2. That the blood of Beasts was sufficient to make representation but better blood even the Blood of the Messiah behoved to be shed to give the truth of the signification For as far as Heaven is above the earthly sanctuary and mens souls above the vessels thereof so far better behoved to be that blood which made souls acceptable to God and to get entrance into heaven than the blood of Levitical sacrifices was Vers. 24. For Christ is not entred into the Holy Places made with hands which are the figures of the true but into Heaven it self now to appear in the presence of God for us He cleareth the matter how Christ hath offered a better Sacrifice than the Levitical yea and behoved to offer a better because he is entered into a better Sanctuary another man in another manner and to another end than the High Priest under
the Law entred The comparison goeth thus 1. The Levitical High Priest entred into the material and artificial Sanctuary and a Typical sacrifice became him But Christ entred not into that Typical Sanctuary Therefore a Typical Sacrifice became not him 2. The Levitical High Priest entered bodily into the figurative Sanctuary But Christ did enter bodily into the true Sanctuary in Heaven it self 3. The High Priest entered in behalf of the people with the names of the twelve Tribes upon his breast and shoulders But Christ is entered in in behalf of us all his People to appear for us bearing the particular memory of every Saint in his Memory The High Priest entered in to appear for a short time and stayed not within the Sanctuary But Christ is entred in to appear now all the time from his Ascension unto this day and constantly still while it is called Now. Vers. 25. Nor yet that he should offer himself often as the High Priest entereth into the Holy Place every year with blood of others He proveth that he had offered a better Sacrifice than the Levitical because he behoved to offer an Offering not to be repeated as the Levitical and so a more perfect Offering The comparison goeth in dissimilitudes 1. The High Priest entered in with the blood of others But Christ entered in with his own blood 2. The High Priest made an Offering of other things than himself But Christ did offer himself Then the Offering of Christ is the personal action of Christ himself None can nor may offer him but himself For the Priest must be either better than the Sacrifice or as good at least as the Sacrifice But none can be so good as Christ nor be more excellent or better therefore none can offer Christ but himself 3. The High Priest offered his Sacrifice oftner But Christ offered not himself oftner than once Then to imagine an Offering of Christ often is both to give the lye to this Text and to make Christs Offering by repeating of it imperfect and like to the Levitical For if once offering of Christ be sufficient often offering is superfluous And if often offering be needful then that once offering was not sufficient and so was not perfect which were blasphemy to say 2. If any man pretend to offer Christ often it is not Christ that giveth him warrant so to do For here it is declared That he hath no hand in offering himself often Vers. 26. For then must be often have suffered since the foundation of the world But now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself He proveth That Christ cannot be often offered Because then saith he must he often have suffered Then 1. No Offering of Christ without the suffering of Christ His Passion and Death is inseparable from his Sacrifice If Christ were often offered he behoved to be often slain and put to death But that cannot be that he should suffer and be slain oftner therefore he cannot be offered up in a sacrifice oftener And they who will take upon them to offer Christ again and again take upon them to slay him and put him to new suffering again again 2. The offering of Christ in an unbloody sacrifice is a a vain imagination which the Apostle acknowledgeth not For if that were possible then were the Apostles words here false and his reasoning ridiculous which were blasphemy to say 2. Hee saith He behoved to have suffered often since the beginning of the World Because as often as new sins were committed and new Remission was to be bestowed as often behoved hee to have suffered to expiate these sins and to purchase the new Remission since the beginning of the World But this is impossible Therefore his Offering often is impossible Then 1. They who make it needful to offer Christ often make it needful also that Hee should have taken on flesh sooner than Hee did and been slain sooner than Hee was and slain as often as new sins were to be expiated and forgiven from the beginning of the world And so by this vain conceit they do ranverse all the wisdome of God about Christ and set to Him an Order and Course of their own making themselves wiser than God 2. It is by the Apostles estimation as vain a conceit and as impossible to offer Christ oftner than once now in the end of the world as to have offered Him before Hee came in the flesh since the beginning of the world 3. But now saith hee once in the end of the world hee hath appeared to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Then 1. No Sacrifice of Christ doth the Apostle acknowledge but such as is joyned with His bodily appearance in the world for that end Once hath Hee appeared and once onely hath Hee sacrificed Himself saith the Apostle 2. The Apostle understood no Offering of Christ but onely one and once to be offered for time fore-gone or time to come from the beginning of the world unto the end thereof 3. This one Offering once offered was sufficient to expiate the sins of the saved before it was offered and therefore must have force also to expiate the sins of the saved without repetition now after it is once offered 4. Whose sins Christ doth take away for those Hee appeared for those Hee made a Sacrifice of Himself And whose sins Hee doth not put away for those Hee appeared not Hee sacrificed not 4. In calling the time of Christs Suffering The end of the world hee giveth us to understand That there cannot be so much time betwixt Christs First and Second Comming as was betwixt the worlds beginning and his First Comming But a great deal of less time need force else were not that time the end of the world Vers. 27. And as it is appointed unto men once to dye but after this the Iudgement Another Reason to prove That Christ neither could nor should offer oftener than once from the Common Law laid upon man of Once dying Which Law Christ having once satisfied by dying when he offered up himself there is no reason he should offer himself again and so dye again 1. It is appointed saith hee for men once to dye Then 1. It is come by Gods just appointment that men should dye since His Law is broken by men 2. The Common Law of Nature appointeth but one death once to be suffered And though God by singularity of Miracles make some Exceptions yet the Common Law standeth for a rule beyond which no reason Christ should be tyed since his once dying is sufficient 3. Every man must take Dea●h to him and prepare himself to obey the Appointment 2. Hee saith After Death commeth Judgement Then 1. Every mans particular Judgement Day followeth his departure out of this life and general judgement abideth all at length 2 The time of Grace and mercy getting is onely in this life nothing but Justice remaineth either to absolve the
that is from the Doctrine of Grace in begun Knowledge Faith Love Renovation or any measure thereof Then 1. Albeit the Elect cannot fall away fully and finally yet some Professors in the visible Church may fall away from their Profession and what degrees of Grace they had attained unto for whose cause warning must be given to all as a mean to keep the Elect from a fall 2. Albeit the Elect cannot fall away finally from Grace yet may they fall for a time from the purity of the Doctrine of Grace and from some degrees of the work of Grace from the measure of their first love and zeal and at length fall into scandalous sins He joyneth another point of advertisement with the former That they beware lest any bitter root break forth whereby many be defiled that is left any scandalous sin break forth amongst them Then 1. As men do fall from any measure of the work of Grace so doth the bitter root of unmortified sin spring out and grow The ones decreasing is the others encreasing 2. When any scandal breaketh forth in the Church it troubleth the whole body and polluteth them by the contagion thereof till it be removed 3. Watch must be kept diligently by every man ●o curb this bitter root preventing the out-shooting thereof Vers. 16. Lest there be any fornicator or prophane person as Esau who for one morsel of meat sold his birth-right He expoundeth this bitter root in the example of fornication and prophanity like Esaus Then 1. Fornication and prophanity are the bitter roots of other evils and able to defile a Congregation 2. Such as count more of the satisfaction of their sensual lusts than of their spiritual Prerogatives do prove themselves prophane persons and are justly ranked in with Esau. Vers. 17. For ye know how that afterwards when he would have inherited the blessing he was rejected for he found no place of repentance though he sought it carefully with tears He sheweth Gods judgement on Esau to terrifie all men to hazard upon the sinful satisfaction of their own lusts at any time Then 1. Esaus judgement should be a terrour to all men to keep them from presuming deliberately to commit that sin which they know may cut them off from the Blessing because sundry times albeit not always God doth punish presumptuous sinners with giving over the man to his own ways and final impenitency 2. Esaus example sheweth how justly they may be deprived of the Blessing annexed to any Sacred Symbole or gracious Mean who do despise the mean whereby the Blessing is conveyed For the Birth-right amongst the Patriarchs was a pawn of the Blessing of being an Heir of Promise and therefore was Esau counted to reject the Blessing when he counted light of the Birth-right 3. His example sheweth how little sinners consider for the present what Merchandize they are making with Satan when they meddle with known sins and how they will be made to know it afterwards 2. He saith that afterwards he would have inherited the Blessing but was rejected Then It agreeth with the prophane mans disposition to desire the Blessing and yet despise the means whereby the Blessing is gotten ●o satisfie his fleshly lusts for the present and to desire the Blessing withall afterwards But God will neither sever the means from the Blessing nor joyn the Blessing with the satisfaction of mens lusts Therefore he who will have the Blessing must use the means to obtain the same and renounce the satisfaction of his sinful lusts or else be rejected when he thinketh to get the Blessing 3. He saith He found no place of repentance albeit he sought the blessing with tears That is he could not obtain that his father should repent the bestowing of the blessing beside him nor that God should repent his righteous judgement on him For repentance here is recalling the sentence given out And why Because he for all his tears and untimeous seeking of his sold blessing repented not himself of his sin for he continued as prophane as before and resolved to murther his brother as soon as he found opportunity Then 1. Esau did rue his deed but repented not his sin It is one thing to rue a deed done and another thing to repent the sin in doing of the deed and every known sin for that sins cause 2. Tears may follow upon ruing as well as on repenting and it is possible that the loss or harm procured by sin may draw forth the tear and not the sorrow for the offending of GOD by the sin 3. Esau here is not brought in dealing with God for pardon of sin and the heavenly inheritance but with the man who had the ministry of dispensing the earthly blessing onely We read then that a blessing was sought carefully from a man with tears and not obtained but we read not that Gods Mercy and Blessing was ever sought from himself carefully and not obtained Vers 18. For ye are not come unto the Mount that might be touched and that burned with fire not unto blackness and darkness and tempest Beside the example of Esau's judgement here is another reason to move us who are under the Gospel to beware of licentiousness and prophanity because we are delivered from the terrour of the Law ver 18 19 20 21. and brought by the Gospel to the society of so holy a company as beseemeth no prophane man to enjoy vers 22 23 24. The sum tendeth unto this You are not under the Law but under Grace Instead of saying whereof he saith You are not come unto Mount Sinai but unto Mount Sion For the LORDS manner of dealing with the people at Mount Sinai represented the state of men in nature under the Law liable to the Curse His manner of dealing with them at Mount Sion represented the state of men reconciled through Christ and under Grace Let us take a view of both as the Apostle setteth them before our eyes And first how the state of man unreconciled in Nature and under the Law and Curse thereof was represented 1. Before we come to Christ we have to do with God as a terrible Judge sitting on the Throne of his Justice shadowed forth by Mount Sinai 2. Our Judge is offended with us his wrath is kindled ready to consume us as his adversaries in our transgressions represented by the burning of the Mount 3. When God beginneth to shew himself as our Judge offended with us we are filled with confusion and perplexity and fire represented by Blackness and Darkness and Tempest Vers. 19. And the sound of a Trumpet and the voyce of Words Which Voyce they that heard entreated that the Word should not be spoken to them any more 20. For they could not endure that which was commanded And if so much as a Beast touch the Mountain it shall be stoned or thrust thorow with a dart What further 4. There is no flying from compearance before our Judge Summons and Citations go forth from
6. They who are united in the Faith of the Truth preached by us shall also be united with the Father and his Son Jesus Christ by virtue of the Holy Ghost Therefore c. Vers. 4. And these things write wee unto you that your joy may be full Reas. 7. The summe of our preaching which is written to you hath this end that yee being made certain of your election and glorification may have a true and spiritual joy and that your joy may remain and be perfected Therefore it is deservedly to be accounted the most excellent Vers. 5. This then is the message which wee have heard of him and declare unto you that God is light and in him is no darkness at all Reas. 8. The summe of our preaching is that God is light or a most present and perfect remedy against the evils of ignorance errours falshood vices and miseries which are in us and that God in himself is most free from these evils so that it is impossible for those that come unto him to be deceived not to be illuminated and directed not to be delivered from sins and misery and not to obtain eternal life Therefore it is necessary that my preaching and the rest of the Apostles should be excellent Vers. 6. If wee say that wee have fellowship with him and walk in darkness wee lye and do not the Truth The other part of the Chapter follows wherein hee propounds partly negatively and partly affirmatively the notes or signs of him that is a true Beleever who shall be partaker of the good things promised in the Gospel And the Notes are five Note 1. Is negatively propounded with his confirmation Hee that is a true beleever doth not walk in darkness is not given ever to sin leading his life according to the lusts of the flesh Because if any one profess himself to have communion with God who is light and holiness and in 〈◊〉 mean time walketh in the darkness of his sins hee is an hypocrite and a lyar seeing that hee doth not that which is right but that which hee professes with his mouth hee denies in his works Vers. 7. But if wee walk in the light as hee is in the light wee have fellowship one with another and the blood of Iesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin Note 2. Is propounded affirmatively Hee that walks in the light or hee that follows after holiness that hee may be conformable to God who is light and perfect holiness hee is a true beleever having communion truly with God and the Saints to whom the fruit also of Christs death to the remission of sins doth wholly belong Vers. 8. If wee say that wee have no sin wee deceive our selves and the truth is not in us Note 3. Is negative Hee that is a true Beleever is not so just in his own eies that hee denies that hee cannot sin either in word or deed or that hee hath not sinned after Justification or that hee as if hee could not want the daily intercession of Christ and the daily applying of his merit for the delivering of his conscience from new guilt is not touched with the sense of sin so that hee must forthwith flye unto Christ as his Redeemer For whosoever either in word or deed doth really so deny that hee hath sin in him for the present deceives himself and is an hypocrite in whom there is no sincerity Vers. 9. If we confess our sins hee is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness Note 4. Hee that is a true Beleever is so affected with the sense of his sins that hee acknowledgeth them before God and doth confess from his soul that hee deserves eternal death and that his guilt can no otherwise be expiated but by the merit of the blood of the Son of God and that hee cannot be sanctified but by the divine virtue of the Spirit of Christ or be free from the pollution of sin Faithful The Apostle promiseth to him that doth so confess his sins that upon the faithfulness and righteousness of God hee shall be absolved and purged from the guilt of sin or sanctified from the stain of it For God is faithful who hath promised these things and God is just who hath taken satisfaction from Christ the Surety hee doth not exact the debt from him for whom Christ hath satisfied but on the other side hee bestowes all the good things upon him that beleeves which Christ hath purchased for his salvation Vers. 10. If wee say that wee have not sinned wee make him a lyar and his word is not in us Note 5. Is negative Hee that is a true Beleever doth neither deny nor extenuate his sins past as if either with that Pharisee hee had performed all the commands of God from his youth or as if there was no original sin or as if it was not at all worthy of death Neither is hee impenitent as if the sins which hee had committed were light and venial which need not the expiation of the blood of Christ or as if there were not so much corruption in his nature but that by his free will hee might confide in his own strength to dispose himself for grace and merit it or at leastwise bee able to obtain it For hee that either so or by any other means directly or indirectly denies that hee hath not sinned and consequently denies that hee is not nor hath not been so guilty of death that hee needed such an expiation as the death of the Son of God is hee is a blasphemer against God accusing him of a lye who hath in his word condemned all as sinners and guilty of death and hath affirmed that there is no remission of sins but by the blood of his Son neither is the Word of God received by Faith at any time in his heart i. e. neither hath hee beleeved the Doctrine of the Law not yet of the Gospel CHAP. II. THe rest of the whole Epistle enforceth the use of the former Doctrine to which end five Exhortations are propounded The first to vers 9. The second to vers 15. The third to vers 18. The fourth to vers 29. The fifth to verse the last Vers. 1. My little Children these things write I unto you that yee sin not And if any man sin wee have an Advocate with the Father Iesus Christ the righteous The first Exhortation is to the following after holiness that they sin not The Reasons of the Exhortation besides a friendly compellation are eleven Reas. 1. Because this is the end and use of the Doctrine of the Gospel and the Apostles writing These things write I unto you that yee sin not saith hee Therefore follow yee holiness And if Reas. 2. If yee follow after holiness the sins which perhaps yee shall fall into shall bee taken away through the intercession of Christ Jesus our Advocate and Lord Therefore endeavour after holiness When hee names one
2. But for Christs Priesthood God is bound with an Oath Never to change it and it leaneth on his nature which cannot altar nor repent and upon his Oath which cannot be violated 2. Another comparison betwixt the Levitical Covenant and the Evangelical Covenant As far as the Oath is above the changeable commandement by so much is the new Covenant better than the Covenant under the Law Then 1. There was a Covenant or Testament whereby Beleevers were saved as well under the Law as under the Gospel 2. The Covenant now though in substance of salvation one with the former yet in the manner of down-setting the Articles and the form of it is better than the Covenant then more clear more free more full more largely extended and more firm 3. Christ is here called Surety of this Covenant Then 1. Christ must see the Covenant kept and be good for it 2. God hath Christ to crave for our performance of the Covenant and we have Christ to crave for Gods part of the Covenant Yea and Christ to crave to give us Grace to perform that which God requireth of us in his Covenant 3. Jesus is content to be Surety and the Father hath consented and ordained and made him Surety So it resteth only that wee bee content also and make much of Christ that hee may do all our work for us and all Gods work in us Vers. 23. And they truly were many Priests because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death 24. But this man because hee continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood Another Excellency of Christs Priesthood above the Levitical which may be branched out in th●se particulars following 1. The Levitical Priests were many both at one time and one after another by reason whereof that Priesthood was weakened while one part of the Office for such a time was in the hands of this man and another part for another time was in the hands of that man And because one man could not be ready to take the Sacrifices from all the people therefore several men behoved to take several parts of the burden But in Christs Priesthood there is but one man even himself His Priesthood is undivided no man beareth a part of the burden with him Hee alone attendeth all mens Sacrifices by himself Hee is at leisure for every mans employment at all times in the greatest throng of Sacrifices Then as long as Christ is at leisure no reason to employ another to carry our prayers 2. The Levitical Priesthood did pass from one person to another Death made interruption But Christs Priesthood cannot pass from his own person to any other neither death nor any other infirmity can interrupt his Office Then 1. To make any Priest by special Office in the New Testament beside Christ is to rent the Priesthood of Christ and make it imperfect like Aarons which for the same reason that it had many Priests was weak and imperfect and inferiour to Christs 2. To make Priests by office in the New Testament to offer up any corporal Sacrifice is to make Christs Priesthood separable from his own person which is against the nature of Christs Priesthood which cannot pass from one to another for so importeth the word 3. To make plurality of Priests in Christs Priesthood Vicars or Substitutes or in any respect partaker of the office with him is to presuppose that Christ is not able to do that office alone but is either dead or weak that hee cannot fulfil that office contrary to the Text here which saith Because hee continueth ever he hath an unchangeable Priesthood or a Priesthood which cannot pass from one to another Vers. 25. Wherefore hee is able also to save them to the uttermost which come unto God by him seeing hee ever liveth to make intercession for them 1. Hee sheweth the fruit of Christs keeping still the Priesthood altogether in his own person to be the perfect Salvation of all beleevers for ever Hee is able to save to the uttermost them that come unto God through him Then 1. Whosoever communicateth Christs Priesthood with any other beside his own person maketh Christ not able alone to save to the utmost those that come unto God through him 2. From this ground also it doth follow that Christ not only beginneth the beleevers salvation but perfecteth it also Hee doth not work a part of a mans salvation and leave the rest to his own merits or the merits of others but perfecteth it himself even to the uttermost 3. And if a man joyn any thing meritorious unto Christs Priesthood or any Mediatour for intercession beside him or seeketh by his own works to purchase salvation hee denieth Christ to be able to save him to the uttermost 2. Hee describeth Beleevers to be those that come to God through Christ. Then 1. Christ is the door and the way through which onely access is gotten to God By Saints or Angels there is not a way to come to God but by Christ onely 2. They that come not through him alone to God seclude themselves from the sufficiency of salvation to be had in him 3. The nature of beleeving is to make a man come towards God to get communion with him through Christ. 4. And none but such as come in Faith to God through Christ can take comfort from his Priesthood or look for salvation 3. Hee giveth a reason why perfect salvation is to be had for such as come to God through Christ Because Hee liveth for ever to make intercession for them Hee saith not to offer or cause to offer up the sacrifice of his body for them But Hee liveth and is not to be offered any more and liveth to make intercession Then 1. The sacrificing part is done and ended His intercession hath now the place and by his intercession wee get the merit of his death and passion applied unto us and not by any new oblation 2. If hee brook his life hee will not fail to intercede for us who come unto God through him and not through Saint or Angel or any person beside For hee liveth for ever to make intercession for us Vers. 26. For such an High-Priest became us who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners and made higher than the Heavens To the end hee may force the Hebrews to forsake the Priesthood of Levi hee draweth a strong reason from the nature of our estate under the Gospel Whereby hee proveth not onely that the Priests of Aarons Order are abolished but also every Son of Adam is excluded from the office of the Priesthood except Jesus Christ in his own person onely Because every Priest that wanteth the properties of Jesus Christ is unbeseeming for us under the Gospel A sinful man might have been a Priest under the Law to prefigure Christ before hee came But now no sinful man may be a Priest by office but Christ onely in whom there is no sin When the Sacrifice was a beast then a