〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because in respect of the circumstances of the matter it abateth the seueritie of Iustice and moderateth and tempereth the extremitie of the law which the Graecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the extremity of law And it is of two sorts 1. Publicke or the Iudges equitie supplying the place of that person wherby he bendeth the law vnto the cause in hand that is he doth not respect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the extremitie of law but applieth the meaning purpose of the law to the manner of the cause On the contrary the cause is bended to the law when in iudgement the extremity of law is retained and no equity admitted in respect of any circumstances And then Summum Ius summa iniuria Extreame law becomes extreame wrong In this respect it is said Ecclesiastes 7.14 Be not iust ouer much neyther make thy selfe ouer wise And Prouerb 30.33 Hee that wringeth his nose ouermuch causeth bloud to come out Yea the Lord himselfe adddeth exceptions of certaine cases to the extremitie of the law as to the law of manslaughter And lawes are generall and vniuersall rules which doe not presently fit euery particular matter and case in question And therefore they are to receiue a fit interpretation by the industrie of the Iudge In this respect Christ defendeth his disciples for plucking the eares of corne vpon the sabbath day And Dauid for the same reason contrarie to the law did eate of the shew bread a 1 Sam. 21 6 Mat. 12 3 And this is publike equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Priuate equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of euerie priuate man is that which 1. tolerateth the infirmitie of our neighbour 2. It couereth secret faults 3 It interpreteth doubtfull actions or words not to the worst but in the best sence where there appeare no manifest tokens of malice It doth not lay open to the world secret offences but cureth them by Instruction Counsell Admonition and brotherly reproofe Of which we read Phil. 4.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let your moderation your equitie your gentlenesse mildnesse and patient minde be knowne to all men 3 The chiefe equitie or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is that of Christ in that hee tooke the punishment of our sinnes and laid it vpon himselfe prayed for his enemies and left pardon and forgiuenes readie for all repentant sinners at what hower soeuer 4 Lastly priuate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or equitie or moderation remitteth ofences yealdeth from his owne right both in defending and reteyning the good and in repelling the euill and in reuenging of iniuries for the peace sake What politicke lawes are to be allowed Those which are agreeable to the law of nature whereof the decalogue is an abridgement and composed for the safetie of the people or those which doe not swarue from the eternall rule of the honouring of God and louing our neighbour and are made by a lawfull magistrate Those that are made after any other manner they are no better then tyrannicall bonds Isa 10.1 What things are there that giue weight and strength to the law 1 The example of the magistrate if he be a liuing law that is if he expresse in his life that which he commaundeth in his lawes for Regis ad exemplum totus componitur orbis The kings example beares such sway That all the people goe that way 2. A care of the keeping of the lawes that they bee not made like spiders webs 3. Equitie in the obseruing of them that Crowes may not bee fauoured and Doues censured that is the wicked spared and the innocent punished 4. The speedie execution of the Lawes Doth the Iudiciall lawe of Moses binde the Christian magistrate No not precisely as it was appropriated to the people of the Iewes during the gouernment of Moses Law For the lawe as the rule is bindeth none but those for whome it was made And The Lawe was giuen for a certaine time and is of no authoritie after that time But it doth binde him so farre forth as it commaundeth equitie and setteth downe punishments for sinne though not the peculier manner of the punishment which is to bee tempered according to the estate of the time place and country It is lawfull therefore for Christians to vse the Lawes of their owne nations beeing agreeable vnto reason Are tythes abolished because the Lawe Ceremoniall is abolished No because the Precept of Tythes was not simply ceremoniall but partly morall imprinted in the rationall nature which teacheth that stipends are due to such as watch for the common good The which the Apostle prooueth by arguments a 1 Cor. 9 taken from the Lawe of nature and the common custome of men saying Who goeth to warre of his owne cost or who planteth a vineyard and eateth not the fruit therof and this Christ confirmed Mat. 10 10. The Labourer is worthy of his hire But the determination of a certaine portion suppose the tenth rather then the seuenth ninth eleuenth or twelfte was a Iudiciall precept which may without sinne and ought to be obserued if it be set downe by the authoritie of the Magistrate What is vnderstoode by this name Subiect The whole multitude of people who are gouerned and the name of a subiect is more generall then the name of a citizen For euery citizen is a subiect to the Soueraine Magistrate but euerie subiect is not a cytizen For hee vpon whome onely burdens and seruices are imposed and not honours that is offices and dignities he in that common wealth in the which he liueth is not a citizen but a subiect but if in the same common wealth in the which he liueth he be partaker both of dignities seruices either in whole or part with the rest who liue vnder the same Lawes hee is a citizen a citizen also one is said to bee either in respect of his country or common wealth in which hee is borne or inrolled but a subiect in respect of the Magistrate Who are the Magistrates subiects All and euery one who liue in his Kingdome of what condition soeuer whether high or lowe politick or Ecclesiasticall persons so euen Aaron the Priest should haue obeyed Moses the ciuill Magistrate a Ex. 4 15 32 21 so the Prophets who when they were ruled by the spirit of God did couragiously constantly perform the office of reprehension cōmitted to them of God yet to their kings princes whom they did reprehend as in was meet they did reuerēce Christ the high Priest our maister did acknowledge the Magistrate and obeyed him in ciuill things b Mat. 17 24.27 the like Paul performed and commaunded Rom. 13.2 Let euery soule Emphatically that is euery man without exception bee subiect to the higher powers Whereupon Chrysostome saith that this commaundement is giuen to all to Priests and to Monks and not onely to Lay people the Apostle in the beginning declareth when hee saith Let euery soule be
If the man be deade the woman is free from the lawe of her husband o Rom. 7.2.3 so as she is no adulteresse if she be maried to another and 1. Tim. 5.14 Let younger widowes mary and 1. Cor. 7.37 The woman is bound by the law vnto her husband being aliue but if her not first second or third but indefinitely husband be dead she is at libertie to marie another So may a man also by the same lawe Thirdly Abraham the father of all beleeuers maried Cethura after Sarahs death p Gen. 25.1 Fourthly because it is better to mary then to burne q 1. Cor. 7.9 15. and vers 8. 9. he commaundeth the vnmaried and widowes to mary if they cannot liue continently also If the vnbeleeuer will depart let him depart A brother or sister is not subiect in such like things vers 15. VVhat is contrarie to this doctrine The errour of Tertullian Hierome and others who to the end they might condemne second mariages do affirme that mariage is not dissolued no not by death VVhat things are required in the right and lawfull contract of Matrimonie Two things fitnesse which is not so much ro be gathered by the number of yeares as by the ablenesse of the bodie and lawfull consent What is consent It is a will proceeding from a sound and perfect iudgement whereby errour of the person craft drunkennesse foolishnesse parents threats iust feare externall compulsion and such like are excluded from contracting matrimonie all which must bee away to the ende that the will may be sound free and proceeding from a right iudgement So when the parents and brother of Rebecca sate in commission with Abrahams seruant about her mariage they said Call the maid that we may know her willing consent Gen. 24.57 VVhich is a lawfull consent That which agreeth both with the lawe of God and nature and with the honest constitutions of men VVhat doth the law of God and mercie require Honour and obedience toward our parents and shame and reuerence towards our kindred What is the honour due vnto the parents That the children contract not matrimonie without their parents counsell and will First for that the first man Adam tooke not a wife without Gods will and consent a Gen. 2.22 where God is said not only to haue created her but also to haue brought her vnto Adam Secondly because children are not at their ownâ—â—isposing but in their parents power Thirdly for that the Fathers Abraham Isaac b Gen 24.3 4. Iacob c 28.1.12 yea and Ismael d 21.21 though fierce otherwise and Sichem a Gentile e 34.4 shewed that mariage is not to be contracted without the parents consent Fourthly Paule saith Children obey your parents in all things f Eph. 6.1 Col. 3.20 and therefore in that matter of mariage Fiftly God did not ratifie a vow made by children without the parents knowledge or consent g Num. 30.6 much lesse matrimonie made by contract without parents consent Esay married wiues both which grieued and vexed his parents h Gen. 26.34 And the Scripture prescribeth precepts vnto the parents about giuing their children in mariage i Deut. 7.3 Ier. 29.6 1. Cor. 7.37 further Christ saith that the law of honoring parents is violated when the children take the parents goods without their knowledge and offer it vnto God in the temple k Mat. 15.5 How much more is that law violated when children withdraw themselues out of their parents power Which they doe when they contract matrimonie without their parents knowledge or consent But yet the godly Magistrate is to consider whether the parents haue reasonable or else vnreasonable cause to withstand and hinder it What contrarieth this doctrine The opinion of the Papists who do ratifie secret mariages contracted without either the parents knowledge or consent and that their consent is of honestie only and not of necessitie and with such mariages approue of rape when as a maide is taken violently out of her fathers house that after she is defloured she may be takeÌ„ to wife What doth modestie or reuerence towards kindred require That matrimonie be not contracted betweene those of consanguinitie affinitie within those degrees which are forbidden both by Gods law l Leuit. 18.6 and the honest constitution of Princes For such mariages are called vnlawfull and incestuous because they are not approued by publike lawes and ceremonies for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth the mariage girdle which declared those mariages which were lawfull and publikely approued others which are made against the constitutions of Princes are called vnlawfull What rules are to be obserued in contracting matrimonie God hath propounded three in his law First mariage is forbidden in infinitum in the right line so well ascending as descending because the gâ—â—â—ter or superior in the right line hath alwaies the place of the father in respect of the yonger And the Scripture saith A man shall leaue father and mother and shall cleaue vnto his wife So Iohn cannot marrie his mother grandmother great grandmother c. nor his daughter neece cousin c. So Martha may neither be married to her father grandfather great grandfather nor to his son nephew nor cousin of the son or daughter n Leuit. 18.7.10 2. In the collaterall and equall line that is betweene brothers and sisters onely either of one parent or both ver 9.11 For wheras the first brothers married their sisters it is to be vnderstood of necessitie and by diuine dispensation seeing there were no other women in the world there was a precept of multiplying mankind o Gen. 1.28 3. In the collaterall and vnequall line as thou maist not marrie thy aunt by father or mothers side and so ascending for they are to thee instead of parents and so Martha may not marrie her vncle by the father or mothers side So though for the vncle to marry his brother or sisters daughter be not expressely forbidden yet because à simili from the like the like precepts are deduced thou maist not marrie thy brothers daughter nor his daughters daughter because thou art to them in their parents stead In the 18. of Leuit. see this at large Now for affinitie the law forbiddeth the son to marie his stepmother the father his sonnes wife or his daughter in lawe or her daughter and these are in the right line In the collaterall line the brother cannot marrie his brothers wife his wiues sister his wife liuing nor his fathers brothers wife nor the children of his sonne or daughter in law See Leuit. 18.15.16.17.18 Is this Leuiticall lawe concerning degrees a law ceremoniall or iudiciall or naturall and morall It is naturall and conformable vnto the law of nature and therefore not to be remitted by any but by God onely because euen the Gentiles were obliged and bound vnto it and the Scripture calleth more or lesse all
Act. 7 53. Ye haue receiued the Lavv by the ordinance of Angels And Gal. 3.19 The Lavv vvas ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator or messenger that is it was giuen to Moses his Messenger by the ministerie of Angels 2. Moses who was specially appointed by God Exod. 19.3.20 Iohn 1.17 The Lavv vvas given by Moses which is confirmed Act. 7.38 For Moses being the messenger betwixt God the people n Deut 5 5 comming downe twise from the mount brought to the Israe it es the two tables of the Law which hee had receiued from God by the ministery of Angels What is the matter or argument or obiect of the Lavv The loue of God and of our neighbour Mat. 22.37.39 Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God vvith all thy heart and vvith all thy soule and vvith all thy thought and thy neigbour as thy selfe Of hovv many sorts is the Lavv of Moses Of three sorts Morall Ceremoniall and Iudiciall Deut. 6.1 These are the Precepts and ceremonies and iudgements which the Lord commanded Rom. 9.4 To the Israelites pertaine the couenants and the seruice of God and the giuing of the Lawe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Whereof the first sort are common to Iewes and other nations the latter sorts were priuate and proper to the Lawes of that people and bodie What is the Morall Lawe It is a precept and ordinance made by God containing a rule of liuing godly and iustly before God requiring of all men a perfect and perpetuall obedience towards God and such a Lawe it is as promiseth eternall life to them who perfectly obey but threatneth death and damnation to them who performe it not perfectly according to those sayings Hee that doth these things shall line in them Leuit. 18.5 Deut. 27.26 Gal. 3.12 Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.10 Cursed is he who doth not all the words of the Lawe And it is called Moralis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because it is a perpetuall rule to liue by by which euery mans manners are to be tried both towards God and towards his neighbour this is summarily comprized in the ten Commandements or Decalogue Exod. 20.10 What difference is there betwixt this morall Law and mens Lawes which concerne manners A very great difference For humane Lawes do onely require or forbid outward workes and a discipline onely for fashion and orders sake and onely require of vs an inward moderation of our affections after the iudgement of our owne minde But the lawe of God doth not onely require outward deedes but a conuersion of mans whole nature vnto God absolute obedience and an orderly framing of all affections to the eternall rule of Gods minde and also spirituall motions agreeing entirely and purely with the law Which thing Paule meaneth when hee saith Rom. 7.14 The Lawe is spirituall And Deut. 6.5 Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thyne heart and thy neighbour as thy selfe Also these words declare so much Thou shalt not couet Exod. 20.17 Besides in mans lavves are denounced temporall in Gods both temporall eternall punishments Is the Morall Law another Lawe then the Lawe of Nature No. What needeth then the promulgation of the ten Commandements 1. Because since Adams fall darknesse hath surprised the mindes of men which maketh the knowledge of the Law of Nature more obscure as also his assent to obey is weake and there is a great obstinacie and resistance of the inferiour partes in him 2. Because God would by this new publication declare and testifie that hee is author of the Lawe of nature and of the naturall notions in man also he signified hereby that hee would not haue his Law to be forsaken 3. He would haue the expresse voice of his iudgements against sinne to bee extant and that it should bee knowne that punishments fell not by chance but by the order and appointment of God 4. That there might appeare a certaine manner and order of worshipping God What is the end of the Law 1. Tim. 1.5 The end of the commaundement is loue out of a pure heart a good conscience and faith vnfained Can we performe that obedience to the Law which it requireth That euen the regenerate can not doe it it is proued not onely by vniuersall experience and testimonies of Scripture as Ecclesiastes 7.21 Prouerb 20.9 1. King 8.46 There is not a iust man vpon the earth which doth good and sinneth not Psalm 14.2.2 In thy sight shall none that liueth be iustified And Rom. 7.21 When I would doe that vvhich is good for hee speaketh in that place of one and the same worke which is good euill is present with me Phil. 3.12 Not as though I had already attained to it or were already perfect but also the new way into heauen shewed vnto vs that is Iesus Christ our Lord doth clearely euict annd manifest it For if righteousnesse be of the lavv saith Paule Gal. 2.21 Christ dyed in vaine Is God therefore vniust because he requireth these things of vs vvhich vve cannot doe Farre be it we should say so for he asketh againe of vs that which is his owne and which before hee had giuen vs for hee gaue to our first parents in their creation a power and ability to performe the Law Euen as if one should lend any man money and the debter should by his negligence and fault spend or lose it and is no more able to pay notwithstanding the creditor can not bee proued to deale vniustly if he demaund the lent money of him his heires But hovv can these tvvo sayings vvhich are thought to bee Ieroms be reconciled Cursed is hee vvho saith that God commanded impossible things and cursed is he vvho saith the Lavv is possible They are to be reconciled by a distinction of times and subiects God did not commaund impossible things namely to our first parents before the fall neither also to the regenerate vnto whom the Law is possible by grace And this is 1. First by imputation of Christs satisfaction and remission of sinnes for Christ is the end or scope the fulfilling or perfection of the Lavve for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth Rom. 10.4 And Ambrose saith He hath the fulfilling of the Lavv that beleeueth in Christ 2. Secondly by the beginning of a renouation which is wrought by the holy ghost vnto some degree of a good conscience according to which they are called perfect a Phil. 3.15 1 Cor. 2 6. but are so by an imperfect perfection b Philip. 2 12 In this sense the commandements of God are not grieuous c 1. Iohn 3 5 because they haue the forgiuenesse of sinnes ioyned to them d Rom 6 14 and because the spirit of renouation worketh in the beleeuers such a will that they are delighted in the Law of God e Rom 7 22 But the Law is impossible namely to a man in this corrupt nature in his owne strength and actions and the Scripture feareth not to
respect of that morall kinde of Lawes which takes order that the disturbers of humane societie may be punished that honest and lawfull peace be maintained that the publike safetie and quiet be preserued and that iudgement and iustice preuaile What things are Disparata i. disagreeing or of other nature then the Law The Gospell is of another nature of which we will speake in next place What opinions do oppose this doctrine of the Law 1 The error of the Manichees who say the Law is euill because it worketh wrath Rom. 4.15 whereas it doth not worke this effect properly but through the transgression of him that breaketh it 2 Of the Pelagians who thought themselues to be so disposed and able by nature as to performe it 3 Of the Antinomi and Libertines who thinke that Christians haue no more need of the morall Law and that the ten commandemens are not to be preached in the Christian Church because the faithfull are borne againe of the spirit 4 Of the Pharisees who thought the fulfilling of the law to be easie possible c Mat. 19.20 and that some of the commaundements were great commaundements as those which concerned more grosse sinnes murder adultery periurie some they thought were the least commaundements the transgressing whereof God did not regard as the inward affections wandring from the law of God d Matt. 5.19 Also that error of the same Pharisees and of the Ebionites who taught that the obseruation of the ceremoniall law was to be ioyned with the Gospell 5 Of the Papists who affirme that perfect obedience to the law may be performed by a regenerate man pro statu viatoris as he is in the estate of a pilgrime that the scripture doth ascribe to the godly diuers seuerall works whereof some are good and such as satisfie the law some euill and resisting the law that the law doth not require of men any more perfect obedience then that which may be performed in this life yea moreouer that a man may doe more then he ought if he will which workes they call Workes of supererogation and that therefore men become iust before God through the obseruation of the law and doe deserue by it eternall life 6 The same Papists foolish and peruerse imitation who bring into the Church the Leuiticall ceremonies 7 Of those brainsicke heads who will haue Christian common weales to be gouerned onely by the politicke lawes of the Iewes 8 Of the Anabaptists who faine that the Patriarches beleeued nothing of the Gospell or promises of eternall life but that they were onely fed with the outward and corporall promises because they are said to haue beene in the law a Rom. 3.19 and vnder the law b Gal. 4.3.5 as also because it is written Math. 11.13 that the law was vntill Iohn came To conclude all errors concerning the true meaning of the law as also all sins which are against euerie of the ten commandements The twentieth common Place Of the Gospell What doth the word Euangelium signifie IT properly signifyeth a good ioyfull happie and glad tidings or message in which sense Aristophanes vseth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I told them good tidings So in Appians writing of the murder of Cicero 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carrying the good newes to Anthonie 2 It signifieth a reward giuen to them who brought good tidings Hom. odyss 14. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Let this be my reward for my good newes that when he shall returne to his house you cloath me with good apparell Ierkin and Coat 3 It signifieth a Sacrifice offered for good newes receiued Xenophon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he offered Sacrifice vpon receipt of his good newes But in what signification doth the Scripture vse this word Euangelium or Gospell 1 As the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to report ioyfull things Isa 52.7 How beautifull vpon the mountaines are the feete of them who bring the glad tidings of peace and tidings of good for which word the Prophets vse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to report good newes so the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue termed Euangelium or Gospell a Marc. 1.15 that notable and ioyfull report of saluation procured by Christ to them that beleeue or a solemne preaching of the grace of God manifested and exhibited in Christ Luk. 2.10 I bring you tidings of great ioy that shall be to all people for this day is borne vnto you a Sauiour which is Christ the Lord. 2 By Metonymie it is taken for the historie concerning Christ concerning things which he taught and did b Act. 1.1 And in this sense we reckon foure Gospels Sometimes also it signifieth the publication of the doctrine of the Gospell the preaching and notifying of the same as 1. Cor. 9.14 Liue of the Gospell that is of the preaching of the Gospell and 2. Cor. 8.18 Whose praise is in the Gospell But what is the reason of this name Because as to malefactors condemned to a most grieuous and ignominious punishment for their offences nothing can happen more ioyfull and acceptable then that being freed from the sentence of condemnation they should enioy the libertie and glorie of kings so likewise to men cursed for their sins and condemned eternally nothing can happen better or more welcome then to heare that being free from the sentence of him that condemned them that they are reckoned and are indeed in the number of the sonnes of God What is the Gospell It is a heauenly doctrine brought out of the secret bosome of God the Father by the Sonne preached by the Apostles and comprehended in the bookes of the new Testament bringing a a good and ioyfull message to all the world namely that mankinde is redeemed by the death of Christ the onely begotten sonne of God so this remission of sinnes saluation and eternall life is prepared for all men if so be they repent and beleeue in Iesus Christ VVho is the author or efficient cause of the Gospell God who hath vouchsafed to reueale his hidden purpose and good pleasure concerning our redemption whereupon it is called the Gospell of God Rom. 1.1 A fellow cause or ioynt cause is the word that is the Sonne of God who comming out of the fathers bosome hath declared it to vs as he first pronounced the promise of the Gospell in Paradise Gen. 3.5 The seed of the woman shall breake the Serpents head By what instrumentall cause or by whose meanes was the Gospell made knowne to the world 1 By an Angell of God who soone after Christ was borne said Luke 2.10 I bring you tidings of great ioy c. For this day is borne vnto you a Sauiour c. 2 By Iohn who preached the summe of the Gospell shewing Christ and calling him the Lambe of God that is a Sacrifice appointed by God to make satisfaction for the sins of the world In which
end which is common both to the Law and Gospell or in the manner of obtaining righteousnesse for the doctrine of the law is the law of works which preacheth of doing and giueth the reward to him that doeth the law but the Gospell is the law of faith which imputeth faith unto righteousnesse to him that doth not worke but beleeueth in him who iustifieth the vngodly Rom. 3.21 4.5 10.5 Moreouer the law requireth of man a mans owne proper righteousnes and perfect obedience to all the commandements of God which he is bound in his owne behalfe to performe Leuit. 18.5 Mat. 19.17 If thou vvilt enter into life keepe the commaundements but to him that hath not this obedience it threatneth a curse b Deut 7 2. Gal. 3 10 But seeing it is impossible for man to attaine this end by reason of the corruption of the flesh c Rom 8 3.7 the Gospell offereth vs the righteousnes of another namely of Christ to be receiued of vs by faith that they which beleeue the Gospell may haue by imputation that which the law requireth to be in a man by propertie Rom. 5.19 By one mans obedience shall many be made righteous And Christ is the fulfilling of the law vnto righteousnes to euery one that beleueth Rom. 10.4 or which commeth to the same effect we may thus say The law demādeth the sum of our debt the Gospell publisheth the remission of it 3 They differ in the forme or difference of the promises for the promises in the law of eternal life temporall benefits are conditional That is they require the condition of perfect fulfilling the law as a cause as for example If thou do these things thou shalt liue in thē where the particle If for because expresseth the cause for our obediēce is required in the law as a cause But the promises of the gospel are free are not giuē because of fulfilling the law but frely for Christs sake Therfore whē it is said If thou beleeue the particle If is not causal but syllogistical that is it sheweth a consequence neither is there signifyed by it a cause or desert but a mean instrumēt without which applicatiō of Christs benefits cānot be made Therfore the particle freely doth especially make a difference betwixt the gospel the law Rom 3.24 Being iustified freely by his grace through the redemption of Iësus Christ which grace is set forth by many parables in the gospell 4 They differ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say by the effects adiuncts efficacy office of either of them For first the law teacheth good works neither doth it minister strength to the auditors therof by which they may performe those works neyther changeth the minds of men for of the law Moses speaketh thus Deu. 29.4 Ye haue heard seen but God hath not giuen you an vnderstanding hart But the gospell endoweth the saints with the holy ghost which spirit doth also giue that which the gospell requireth to wit faith Ier. 31.33 I will write my law in their hearts not with inke but vvith my spirit And the Apostle Gal. 3.2 speaketh thus This one thing I vvould knovv of you haue you receiued the spirit by the vvorks of the lavv or by the hearing of faith Therfore Paul 2. Cor. 31.8 calleth the lavv the ministery of death vvritten in the tables of stone but the gospell the spirit planted in the heart and ver 9 he calleth the law the ministery of condemnation but the gospell the ministery of righteousnes 2. Againe the law sheweth the disease accuseth exasperateth and laieth open sins but doth not take them away Rom. 3.20 But the gospell couereth sin and healeth the disease by declaring and pronoūcing free pardon of sins by Christ alone for this cause no man could euer be iustified by the law but by faith of the gospell we are all iustified 3. In the law is reueiled the wrath of God vpon euery man in the gospell without the law is reueiled the righteousnes of God from faith vnto faith Rom. 1.17 3.21 5 Lastly the Law and the Gospell do differ in the application to the obiectes or degrees of men for as the Apostle commaundeth 2. Tim. 2.15 that Doctors should rightly cut the word of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the preaching of the law properly belongeth to the impenitent and they who are not yet conuerted and those who continue in their sinnes hypocrites and secure persons as Christ Mat. 22.37 vseth the threatning of the law against a proud Lawyer Therefore saith the Apostle 1. Tim. 1.9 The law was made for the vniust But the Gospell belongeth to the repentant Therefore Christ in Luke 4.18 out of Isay 61.1 teacheth that the Gospell is to bee preached to them that are poore in spirit and of a contrite heart Therefore also Luke 7.48.50 he preached grace and mercie to the penitent woman Is it necessarie and profitable to know the difference of the Law and Gospell It is for the name it selfe doth cleeeely proue that the law is one kinde of doctrine and the Gospell another 2 Because the not knowing of this difference is a fountaine of error obscuring the light of the doctrine of Christ of the righteousnes of faith of perturbations of conscience On the contrarie by the difference of them both the office and benefits of Christ are better vnderstood 3 The Church is discerned and acknowledged from other sects and true faith and conscience is kept in great and true horrors of conscience What things are repugnant heerto 1 The error of the Papists who make no difference betwixt the Law and the Gospell but transforme rhe Gospell into a law and call it a more perfect law saying also that the old law was a law of feare the new a law of loue and that Christ hath merited and doth giue to vs that grace whereby we may fulfill the commaundements and by them attaine righteousnesse and eternal life 2 Of the Monks who cal those things which Christ Mat. 5 38. 6.31 19.11.12.21 speaketh to expound the lawe to lance the conscience and to stirre them vp to a desire of himselfe counsels onely necessary for them who desire something more perfect then the law of Moses commaundeth of this nature they faine three things chiefly to be deliuered by him 1. of not reuēging 2 of pouerty 3. of virginity but the precepts they say are necessary to al men where as on the cōtrary there is not the least word which Christ spoke which wee must not obey 3 The error of Pelagius and the Schoolemen who haue taught that the Patriarches were iustified and saued by obseruation of the law of nature the Iewes by keeping the law of Moses but Christians by obseruation of the new law of the Gospell The two and twentieth common Place Of the difference of the old and new Testament What signifieth the word Testament PRoperly it signifieth the iust and true meaning of our
and a better life What be the benefites or the effects of this kingdome of grace Righteousnesse peace and ioy in the holy Ghost h Rom. 14.17 that is peace ioy happinesse light the knowledge of God begunne indeede here but made perfect in heauen or in the kingdome of glorie whereby it is manifest that this kingdome is not earthly but spirituall and heauenly i Ioh. 18.6.36 Which be the parts of the kingly office of Christ Two Vocation and Iudgement Vocation or calling by the word of truth and that double 1. whereby in generall Christ inuiteth all men indifferently to the embracing of his Gospell hauing appointed the ministery of the word to that end and purpose k Mat. 22.14 2. Speciall whereby by the labour of his Ministers he doth effectually illuminate and call vnto the knowledge of himselfe the elect by the inward operation of his spirit in his time appointed l Rom. 8.30 The other part of his kingly office is Iudgement m Ioh. 5.17 which he exerciseth after two maner of wayes 1. In this life both toward the elect partly in iustifying them or absoluing them from their sins which is the office of a Iudge partly by defending them against all kind of enemies as also toward the reprobate afflicting them with temporall punishments or else killing them with the word and moreouer by casting forth superstitions and brideling the furie of Satan and vngodly men n Psal 110.12 2. In the world to come by summoning both of them before his Tribunall seate and giuing sentence according to his word 3. By glorifying his elect and adiudging the wicked to eternall punishment Seeing the kingdome of Christ is eternall Psal 45.7 o Mat. 16.27 25.31.32 c. Why is it said that in the last day 1. Cor. 15.24 he shal render vp the kingdome to God euen the Father Not because he shall vtterly depriue himselfe of his kingdome but because that the manner of administration which Christ vseth for the gathering and preseruing of his Church in this world shall then cease What things are contrary to the doctrine of the office of Christ 1. The error of Stancarus who referred those things which belong to the whole person as to be Mediator to the humane nature apart and of Osiander who ascribed the office of a Mediator to the Diuinitie alone 2. The error of the Papists concerning the authoritie of the Pope of the Church of Councels in deuising new articles of our faith and expounding of scriptures and bringing in mens traditions into the Church The same mens error concerning the merites of workes satisfactions and the sacrifice of the Masse substituted into the roome of Christ and of the priesthood and sacrifice wherein most blasphemously they say they offer vp Christ for the quicke and the dead and of inuocation and intercession of Saints 3. The errour of the Popes supremacie of Christ his Vicarship whereof he hath no need 4. The error of the Iewes who dreame of Christ his earthly kingdome The third common Place concerning the holy Ghost To what things in the Scriptures is this name Spirit attributed SOmetime to things created sometimes to the Creator whence we may make a double spirit one created another vncreated but yet by proportion because the word Spirit doth principally agree to the Creator and to the things created lesse principally When it is attributed to the creatures it is vsed two wayes sometimes it signifies the substance sometimes the qualitie The substance either bodily but by a metaphor as Iohn 3.8 The Spirit that is the wind bloweth where it listeth or else spiritually and that either the soule as Psal 33.6 Into thine hands O Lord I commend my spirit that is my soule Act. 7.59 Lord Iesu receiue my spirit or else the Angels and those either good Heb. 1.14 the Angels are called ministring spirits or else as Luke 11.26 The vncleane spirit taketh to himselfe seuen other spirits worse then himselfe When it signifieth a qualitie it is vsed sometime for the opinion and affection as Math. 5.3 Blessed are the poore in spirit or else for the breathing and motion of the mind whether it be good which proceedeth from the good spirit of God or euill which is stirred vp by the euill and vncleane spirit as also from our owne euil will And hence it is that the gifts of God are called the spirit but by a metonymie as when Elizeus saith Let thy spirit be double vpon me 2. King 2.9 And when God saith vnto Moses Num. 11.17 I will take of thy spirit and giue it to the Elders And that either in speciall as Esa 11.2 The Spirit of wisedome for the gift of wisedome infused by the holy Ghost c. Ephes 1.17 The Spirit of meeknesse for meeknesse which the holy Ghost infuseth into the hearts of the faithfull so the Spirit of faith 2. Corint 4.17 and the Spirit of loue 2. Tim. 1.7 So on the contrary the spirit of couetousnesse the spirit of giddinesse the spirit of drunkennesse Esa 10.14 the spirit of slumber of fornication b Esa 29.10 Hos 4.12 are vsed for those vices Or else in generall all the gifts of the holy Ghost but those especially which in times past in the beginning of the preaching of the Gospell were bestowed vpon the beleeuers for the confirmation of the heauenly doctrine c 2. Cor. 11.4 Besides this word Spirit signifieth a qualitie when it is opposed against the flesh and againe it signifies another qualitie when it is opposed to the letter What doth the Spirit signifie then when it is opposed to the flesh It signifieth the grace of regeneration that is whatsoeuer in man either the mind or the will or in the affections is regenerate and renewed by the holy Ghost as Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh Now the flesh being opposed against the spirit signifieth whatsoeuer is not as yet regenerate in vs to wit the pronenesse of the affection and carnall qualitie of the flesh and sinne d Joh. 3.6 which striueth against the spirit so that one and the selfe same faithfull man so long as he liueth here may be said to be both flesh and spirit as Paule sheweth by his owne example e Rom. 7. But what doth the word Spirit signifie when it is opposed to the letter It signifieth the power and efficacie of the holy Ghost ingrauing in our hearts the righteousnesse of Christ and by that meanes the law of God it selfe and bowing our hearts to the obedience thereof as it is 2. Cor. 3.6 The letter killeth but the spirit giueth life that is the bare law considered without Christ without the operation and efficacie of the holy Ghost killeth by the corruption of our nature but the Gospell by the Spirit of Christ which it hath ioyned with it giueth life Sometimes also Paule calleth the externall signe in the ceremonies the letter being
him and made not many but one onely wife nor brought diuers but one wife vnto him Also whoredome adulteries detestable sodomy and buggery with beasts do repugne this doctrine Leuit. 18.20 Rom. 1. Leu. 18.20.22.23 20.10.11.12.13 Rom. 1.26.27 Heb 13.4 1. Cor. 7.2 What kind of men may marry Mariage is honorable amongst all men and the bed vndefiled wherefore all sorts of men may marry yea it is necessary and inioyned them which cannot liue continently Let euery man haue his owne wife where the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let him haue is commanding not leauing it free Whether is it lawfull for the Ministers of the Church to marrie Yea because God hath made them also fit for marriage and procreation of children Gen. 1.27 2.18.24 Heb. 13.4 and the law of nature alloweth of coniunction betweene male female Secondly because it is holy good and honorable amongst all men and the bed vndefiled For Christ calleth mariage a diuine coniunction and therefore holy when he saith Those whom God hath ioyned together And Paul saith Mariage Mat. 19.6 1. Tim. 4.4.5 1. Cor. 7.14 1. Tim. 2.15 Tit. 1.15 1. Tim. 3.2 Tit. 3.6 meate and such like are sanctified by the word and prayer Also the vnbeleeuing man is sanctified by the beleeuing wife Also the woman is saued by bringing forth children in faith To conclude To the cleane all things are cleane And Paphnutius said in the Nicene Synode that it was chastitie for a man to lie with his owne wife Sozom. lib. 1. cap. 23. Thirdly because a Bishop saith the Apostle of the Gentiles must be vnreproueable the husband of one wife not of one Church as the Romanists say for the Apostle speakes not in that place of the Bishops office but of the qualitie of his persoÌ„ nor forbids him to marry any other if his first wife die for he that marieth a second wife after the death of the first is the husbaÌ„d of one wife if he be content with his own wife but he wil haue an honest man to content himself with one wife not to haue two or moe wiues at one time after the maner of the Iewes Gentiles 4. Because the Ministers of the Gospel represent not the Leuiticall priests who yet did not perpetually abstaine from their wiues but onely whilest they serued about the holie things in the Temple for they were types and figures of Christ our Mediator whose more then angelike puritie they ought euery way to represent beyond the custome of men Also when they were to enter into the tabernacle they abstained from wine a Leu. 10.9 from the buriall of the dead b 21.1 and from shauing c vers 5. wherein notwithstanding the Romish priests do not imitate them but yet they that are godly know how to moderate the vse of mariage for a time as also how to possesse their vessels in holiâ—â—sse d 1. Thess 4.4 And that they must sometimes refraine that they may giue themselues to prayer e 1. Cor. 7.5 which yet Paul will not haue to be perpetuall Fiftly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or inuersion because the priests prophets prophetesses Apostles as Peter Philip and others mentioned 1. Cor. 9.5 apostolicke men for Polycrates sonne to Gregorie Nazianzene Bishop of Ephesus saith he was the eight Bishop and sprung from Bishops his auncestors were married f Euseb lib. 5. Eccl. hist Sixtly because Daniel giueth Antichrist this note to rule in the Church not regarding women but defiling the Church with filthie and incestuous lusts g Dan. 11.37 And Paule plainely calleth the Law of being vnmarried in generall a doctrine of diuels h 1. Tim. 4.1 Seuenthly because Christ saith They worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines mens precepts i Mat. 15.9 19.12 willing all men to vse mariage except those whom either nature hath made vnfit or some casualtie made vnable or some speciall grace hath made continent so as that they can liue purely without mariage To all others Christ saith All are not capable hereof saue onely they to whom it is giuen and againe 1. Cor. 7.2 Euery one hath his proper gift one thus another thus And 1. Cor. 12.4 There are diuersitie of gifts which one and the same spirit worketh diuiding to euery one priuatly their proper gift as he will Eightly because the single life of the Romanists aboundeth with prodigious and infamous lusts yea euen amongst those Fathers that would be thought to liue like Curius but yet are Epicures Ninthly out of the Decrees of the third Councell of Carthage holden in the yeare of our Lord 421. in which the heresie of Pelagius was condemned at which Councell Augustine was also present it is plaine that Bishops were married For the twelfth Canon is in effect this We decree that the sonnes or daughters of Bishops or any Cleargie man shall not marrie with heathen people or Heretickes and Scismatickes Whether doth the Apostle 1. Timoth. 5.11 condemne those widowes whose marrying haue made voide their first faith giuen to God to keepe themselues continent This maketh nothing for the Nuns vowes wherin at least is to be obserued that which the Apostle requireth the younger widowes for danger of incontinencie saying ver 14. I would haue the younger to marrie But he teacheth that the younger widowes were not to be admitted vnto the number of the Deacons for that they are vnfit for that office who are tied with the bond of matrimonie But youth did often sollicite the yonger widowes to mariage which they could not contract without some offence and signe of lightnesse What thinke you then of vowes Some are holy and free touching things lawfull and possible and out of Gods word and will but others wicked compelled rash besides and often against Gods word and vndertaken besides the gifts giuen by God The first I thinke are to be obserued but these to be broken l Deut. 23.21 according to the old saying In an ill promise break thy faith in a wicked vowe change thy decree What things repugne this Doctrine The opinion of Pope Syricius and of the Romanists who blasphemously pronouÌ„ce contrary to the Apostle m Heb. 13.4 that mariage is an vncleanenesse pollution of the flesh They forbid the maried holy orders vrging the vowe of perpetual single life and forswearing mariage against the expresse word of God to those that are to bee ordained They call the solemne vowe of continencie an impediment hindring contract in matrimony and breaking the contract made nor that it is lawfull after the solemne vowe such as the Monkes and Nunnes make They say that the single life is an Angelicall kinde of life deseruing remission of sins Whether may a man mary another wife his first wife being dead Hee may First because that saying of God It is not good for man to bee alone n Gen. 2.18 is generall and perpetually true Secondly the Apostle saith
couplings contrarie vnto them in euery prohibition filthinesse and abhomination before God And certainly that generall proposition in the sixth verse Let no man go vnto her that is neare of kindred a Leuit. 18.6 agreeth with the lawe of nature And Christians are bound by the iudgement of Paule vnto the obseruation of the Leuiticall lawe touching degrees 2. Cor. 5.1 How then is that to be vnderstood Deuteronom 25.5 where the wife of the brother dying without issue is to be marâ—ied vnto the other brother and that example of Iudah who gaue his first sonnes wife after his death vnto his second sonne and after he was dead promised her to his third sonne also Gen. 38.8 whereas the Lord in Leuit. expressely forbiddeth the brother to marrie his brothers wife b Leuit. 18.9.16.18 I answer that the law Leuit. 18.9 is simply common vnto all nations as the lawe is of not stealing But that law Deuteronom 25.5 is either not to be vnderstood of a naturall brother but of the next of consanguinitie in another degree for they are all called brethren amongst the Hebrewes or else that it was a peculiar priuiledge granted after a sort vnto the Israelites that the familie should be conserued in the name of the first born and that the first birth of Christ which should neuer die should be signified Aug. quaest 61. in Leuit. What then shall we thinke of Abraham who married his brother Arans daughter c Gen. 11.29 of Iacob who married two sisters both aliue together d 29.16 and of Moses who was borne of a mariage betweene the nephew and the aunt e Exod. 2.1 6.20 as the Hebrew word is taken Numb 26.59 Either that those mariages were made both while there were but a few of the holy seede and also in the publike confusion God dispensing with and tolerating it or that those Patriarchs sinned and are not to be excused in all things and we are not to iudge by examples but by lawes But may a faithfull man marrie an vnbeleeuing woman No except the vnbeleeuing person promise consent to the true religion And thus Moses married a wife of Aethiopia and Iacob Labans daughter For God forbad his people to ioyne in matrimonie with the other nations f Deut. 7.3.4 And although that precept be iudicial yet it appertaineth vnto all if the reason be considered for he giueth a plaine moral reason which is at this day in force For she will seduce thy son that he shall not follow me but rather serue strange Gods the same is repeated in the Kings g 1. Reg. 11.1 2.4 also coÌ„firmed by Salom. example And besides the vnequall matches of the sons of God with Caines posteritie k Gen. 6.2 brought a pernitious corruption into all the world But the commandement of Paul is expresse Be not vnequally yoaked with infidels l 2 Cor. 6.14 and againe Let them marrie in the Lord m Cor. 7.39 that is religiously and in the feare of God What are the constitutions of Princes concerning this That a guardian shall not marrie his ward an adopting father his adopted daughter or an adopting mother her adopted sonne As also that brethren and sisters children shall not marrie Yet must the Magistrate abolish that law which teacheth that witnesses at the font may not marrie nor that he may marry her for whom he witnesseth at baptisme Do these lawes bind Christians They do so farre foorth as they agree with Gods word For each one must obey his gouernor when he can do it without breach of pietie and the libertie of conscience that is if it be not a sinne to conscience if it be done otherwise so as mariages contracted against these constitutions be not disanulled How is the coupling in mariage called in the Scriptures 1. Coniugium wedlocke of that common yoake wherewith the man and wife are ioyned into one flesh and as it were into one man 2. Matrimonium mariage of the end for a woman is married vnto a man to this end that she may be a mother of children and mariage is as it were Matriage of a mother 3. Connubium couering and in the plurall number nuptiae à nubendo that is of couering for as the heauen is sometimes couered ouer with clouds so were virgins in old time couered n 1. Co. 11.5.10 with a veile when they were brought vnto their husbands and that both to testifie their bashfulnesse and modestie and also their subiection and obedience or anothers power ouer them As the example of Rebecca testifieth who when she saw her husband Isaac she couered her selfe with a veile o Gen. 24.64 Like vnto which is that spreading abroad of the garment in Ruth 3.9 and Isa 4.1 What is against this 1. Mariages euery where graÌ„ted by that impure Antichrist between Vnkles and sisters daughters against all law both of God and man 2. The imagination of the Papists who say that indeed by the law of nature it is forbidden the father to marry the daughter or the mother the son but the forbidding of all other persons in Leuit. is a meere positiue law concerneth the Israelites only That Christians are not tied to those laws therfore the Pope may dispense 3 The Iewes error that those persons whosoeuer are not expressed in Leuiticus are also not forbidden to marie for then it would follow that the nephew might marie the grandmother because it is not forbidden by name wheras nature sheweth it to be wicked VVhat is Mariage An inseparable coniunction excepting the causes expressed in the written word of God of one man and one woman a Mat 19.9 Rom. 7.2 1. Cor. 7.27 being fit of yeares lawfully consenting into one flesh instituted by God for mutual help as wel in diuine as humane things for procreation if God will giue them of children and bringing them vp in the feare of God for God his Church and common wealth How manifold is mariage Twofold begun or promised consuÌ„mated ratified perfected VVhat is betrothing or contracting It is mention and promise of a future mariage called Sponsalia sponsals a spondendo of promising for that they were wont in old time to assure their daughters vnto them to whom they had promised to marie them to couenant that they in like sort should marie them and hence proceeded the names of Sponsus Sponsa the man-spouse and the woman-spouse How many kindes of Sponsals or contracts are there Two one conceiued by words de futuro for to come as they speake in schooles either plainely as I will take the to be my wife as if I should say I promise that I will sell thee my house for there is difference betweene promising and doing Or else vpon condition as If my parents consent if I may haue her dowrie Likewise if the contracters be vnder age or one of them in sense of the Law such contracts are de futuro
Diuortium Diuorce IT is called Repudium of refusall for a shamefull thing Diuortium of diuerting and going into diuers parts or as some thinke of the diuersity of minde because he that is the cause of Diuorce is of another minde now than when he married the Hebrews call it Cheritot or cutting off the Greekes dissolution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 departing cutting off as Mat. 19.8 for it was not lawfull for the wife to depart from her husband or giue him a bill of Diuorce but for an husband separating himselfe from his wife it was lawfull to giue such a Bill ſ Mat. 5.31 19.8 Deut. 24.1.2 Mal. 2.16 Is there any difference betweene Repudium and Diuortium None at all in the Scriptures Yet Modestinus saith that Repudium is betweene the bridegroome and bride but diuorce between the husband and wife after that marriage is consummated Which distinction we will obserue and first of the first Whether is mariage to be broken off by mutuall consent as it is by consent contracted No because it is not done by humane consent onely as other contracts of humane societie but by the diuine authoritie and what God hath conioyned let no man separate t Mat. 1◠6 In what cases is Repudium vsed or spousals dissolued There are seauen such cases recorded 1 If either of them fall into infamie after the betroathing for some crime 2 If either of both fall into any grieuous infirmitie of bodie or minde such as should cause the vse of mariage to be loathsome or contagious as leprosie epilepsie palsie frensie c. And indeed it were very expedient to forbid such to marie by the Laws seeing that they doe seeme to haue single life imposed vpon them from Heauen and are depriued of power to vse mariage for who can marie with a good conscience that by mariage must needes vndoe himselfe and others and beget children to perpetuall miserie and the generall hurt of the weale publike 3 If the bridegroome commit filthinesse with any of his brides kindred that mariage shall be dissolued though the party innocent be vnwilling and the incestuous person punished 4 Malitious and daily absence but yet he that is absent against his will whilst the three publishings are performed in the Church is no forsaker 5 Apostacie from the true religion and worshippe of God 6 So great offence of the mindes of the bride bridegroome as that they cannot by any meanes be reconciled and they haue not lyen together least some hainous thing might follow of such constrained mariages yet so as that they be punished for their breaking of couenant 7 If such a maime happen in the meane time as whereby the person is become loathsome prouided that they haue not lyen together Hereunto adde adultery which dissolueth the bonde both of contract of matrimonie Also contracts betweene those that are vnder age or done without parents or friends authoritie or error of person or quality as Lea for Rachel or a seruant for a freeborne or by force or feare or els vnder condition onely all which may be dissolued so that there haue beene no voluntarie coupling or consent How many waies is consummated mariage broken Two 1 When that which of it selfe and by right is none is counted for none or else is ipso iure declared to be none 2 When that which was confirmed is for lawful causes broken For whas causes is mariage declared ipso iure to be none 1 When the fault is in the contract of mariage 2 When it is in the persons contracting When is the fault in the consent or contract of mariage When the contract is either filthy or vnlawful or vniust VVhen is the consent filthy 1 When it is contrarie to the lawe of God and nature and is contracted vnder the degrees of God forbidden 2 Vnlawfull when it repugneth the edicts of Godly Magistrats But yet this difference is to be noted that wicked contracts within the degrees forbidden by Gods lawe neither can nor ought to be confirmed either by humane dispensation or Ecclesiasticall benediction or carnall copulation But contracts within degrees forbidden by the Magistrate may be permitted by some dispensation where necessitie and reason requireth it VVhat contract is vniust That which is done by children that are vnder the gouernment of their Parents against their consent and authoritie iudging well and rightly which if the Parents will by no means ratifie Mat. 19.6 it ought to be none for as Christ saith That which God hath ioyned together let no man set asunder so that which man conioyneth against or besides Gods word God will haue separated What fault is that betweene the persons which maketh mariage ipso iure to be none Wheras she that was maried for a maid is found by certain testimonies to haue bin defiled for such a one ought by the law of god to be stoned to death as an adulteresse b Deut. 22.29 Caus 29. quest 1. Can 1. Wheras the Canonists say notwithstāding that fornication following mariage only hurteth 2 If either of thē hauing som natural impotēcy be vnfit for mariage or if either of thē haue concealed some defect or incurable disease which was not knowne before mariage as to be an Eunuch either by nature or other casualty Mat. 19.12 such a defect forbiddeth mariage when one erreth the other deceiueth according to that rule Errantis voluntas nulla an erring will is no will and that contract of good faith where craft hath beene cause is ipso iure none And forasmuch as God reprooueth deceipt fraud and errour he is not to be called the author of such mariages How many waies is mariage made said to be dissolued By two 1 By death as the Apostle reasoneth a 1. Cor. 7.39 Rom. 7.2.3 Mat. 22.30 against Tertullian Montanus and Hierom. And Christ teacheth that in heauen they neither marie nor giue in mariage 2 Mariage is dissolued by Diuorcement Doth it agree with Gods Lawe for a man to put away his wife Not simply for it is neither simply commaunded nor forbidden but permitted by giuing of a bill of Diuorce for hereof Moses hath a politike but not a morall law b Deut. 24.1 But the reason of this Lawe seemeth not so much to be necessary as of rash leuitie and hardnesse of heart There was indeede some reason of necessitie in respect of the wiues for it was fitter for them to be once dimitted than to be alwaies in ill handling or els in danger of life Therefore the Lord appointed for such as would not be perswaded to keepe their wiues not Diuorcement but a manner of Diuorcing to wit to giue a bill of Diuorce for the wiues safety against her husbands crueltie and that not without his owne infamie But the rashnesse of husbands exceeded which for euerie occasion sought to be diuorced and this rashnesse was to be bridled Whereupon Christ saith Moses suffered you to put away your
will be thy God and of thy seede after thee Gen. 17.7 Is Originall sinne the sinne of another or is it euery mans proper sinne It is another mans sinne because being committed by Adam it is deriued to vs from the same author and yet is not lesse proper to any one of vs then it was to Adam First because Adam sinned not as a priuate man but as head of all mankind 2. Because as mans nature communicated by him becomes euery mans owne nature so also his sin communicated by propagation and death vvhich entred by sin becomes euery mans ovvne sinne 3. Because the opposition betwixt the obedience of Christ the disobedience of Adam requireth it to be so d Rom. 5.18.19 As therefore the obedience of Christ is so communicated to his members that euery faithfull person may call it his owne so the vnrighteousnes of Adam is so made common to all men that euery man is punished for his owne fault May the sinnes of other parents be said to be conueyed into their children as the sinne of Adam is said to be The case differeth because that first sinne was not so much personall and proper to Adam as natural that is common to al mens nature which originally and naturally was in his Loynes therfore truely originall But other sinnes of Adam and of other men were truely personall Of which Ezech. 18.20 The sonne shall not beare the iniquitie of the father but the soule that sinneth shall die Yet it shall be no absurditie if wee say that the sinnes of our next parents and auncestors are communicated to their children by corrupt seed their bodie being first stained with sinne and after the soule being infected by the bodie whence is is said Exod. 20.5 I will visite the iniquitie of the fathers vpon the children But that children are not alwaies borne like to their wicked parents it proceedeth from the speciall grace of God Is Originall sinne a Substance or an Accident It is no substance for then it should be either a soule or a bodie but the bodie and soule in respect of the substance are the good creatures of God which are also as yet created by God wherefore they are not sinne Neither is it a substantiall propertie or any thing substantiall in man but it is an outward and accidentall qualitie which notwithstanding is called natural not that it hath proceeded from nature insomuch as it is created but because it seizeth vpon men and possesseth them as by right of inheritance and cleaueth to the nature of man his strength and naturall faculties and is naturally bred in man Ephes 2.3 By nature wee are the sonnes of wrath Rom 7.17.20.21 The Sinne that dwelleth in me the euil which is present with mee saith the Apostle Is it an accident which may be separated from man Augustines words may serue for answere hereunto Lib. 1. de Concupiscentia c. 25. Originall sin is remitted not so as it is no longer originall sinne but so that now it is not imputed the guilt thereof is past and gone the actuall being of it remaineth therefore also doth death it selfe remaine What is the subiect of Originall sinne The whole man both in bodie and soule from head to foote with all his powers and faculties of bodie and soule as well the higher as lower as vnderstanding will sense Whereupon the Apostle Ephes 4.17.18 affirmeth the minde is addicted to vanitie the thought to blindnesse and the heart to wickednesse Rom. 8.7 The wisdome of the flesh is enmitie against God The same thing is manifest by our renewing which the Apostle attributeth to spirit soule and bodie a Rom. 12.1 Ephes. 4.33 1 Thessa 5.23 How many parts are there of this corruption Two A defect and concupiscence or a peruerse and inordinate inclination to euill The defect is a wanting of Originall righteousnesse as there are in the minde of man blindnesse and ignorance of heauenly things in the will and heart a turning away from God or a depriuation of the loue of God and men b Rom. 3.23 1. Cor. 2.14 The naturall man perceiueth not the things of Gods spirit Concupiscence is not a naturall desire of meat drinke generation and delight in the senses neither motions of the heart such as affections are neither onely a disorder of appetites and desires but it is a readie inclination of all our strength to doe those things which are forbiddeâ— in the lawe of God of which nature is darknesse of our vnderstanding doubting in our mindes of God and of his prouidence in our will and heart contumacie and stubbornnesse against God Because Paule saith Rom. 7.18 I know that in me that is in my flesh there dwelleth no good and vers 23. I see another Lawe in my members resisting the Lawe of my minde doth it therfore follow hence that the highter part of the soule is not the subiect of concupiscence but onely the sensitiue part No for he doth not oppose flesh and members to the minde that is reason such as it is without the light of the holy Ghost but he opposeth the flesh to the spirit that is to spirituall gifts or regeneration in as much as it is begunne in man by the Holie Ghost But are that priuation of Originall righteousnesse and concupiscence sinnes They are 1. Because that priuation is transgression of the law 2. Because it is a sin not to be such a one as God commands thee to be But concupiscence it selfe also is a sinne because Deut. 10.16 we are commanded to circumcise the foreskins of our hearts and in the law it is said Thou shalt not couet Exod. 20.17 3. Because Rom. 7.7 the Apostle teacheth that concupiscence remaineth euen in the regenerate which constantly hee calleth a sinne against which we must without ceasing fight and he plainly affirmeth that it disagreeth with Gods Law I had not knowne saith hee that concupiscence is sinne except the Lawe had said Thou shalt not couet Whosoeuer looketh vpon a woman to lust after her hath already committed adultery with her in his heart Mat. 5.28 And 1. Iohn 2.16 The concupiscence of the flesh is not of the father And the Apostle calleth euen that euil which he willeth not that is to which hee yeeldeth not consent Rom. 7.19 I do not that good I would but that euill which I would not Lib. 3. contra Iul. Therefore Augustine ascribeth three things to concupiscence that it is sinne and the cause of sinne the punishment of sinne What is Originall sinne therefore Anselmus thus describeth Originall sinne It is a wanting of originall righteousnesse which ought to be in man We describe it in this maner It is not onely a priuation of Originall righteousnes but both a deprauing and corruption of mans nature spread vpon al parts of the soule propagated from Adam to his posteritie and it is a guiltinesse wherby euen the newe borne infants are also corrupt by Adams fall and are therefore
guiltie of Gods anger and eternall death vntil pardon be granted and except the benefit of Christ help a Ioh. 1.29 and besides these it comprehendeth those workes which the corruption of our nature bringeth forth in vs which the Scripture calleth The workes of the flesh b Gal. 5.19 By what names is this sinne called in the Scriptures The sinne that dwelleth in a man because it remaineth continually in the flesh vntill death but in them who are not regenerate it raigneth in the regenerate it only dwelleth and not raigneth c Rom. 7.17.20 Malum adiacens The sinne which easilie cleaueth to vs and compasseth vs round about occupying all our strength e Heb 12.1 The sense and vnderstanding of the flesh f Rom. 8.6 Also it is absolutely and simply called Sinne g Rom 7 8. Because it is the source and fountaine of all sinnes The bodie of sinne h Rom. 6.6 because in it are gathered together all sins which breake forth when occasion is giuen The Lawe of the â—â—mbers i. because all the members of soule and bodie i Rom. 13.4 that is all the parts powers of man obey it as a Law Flesh k Gen. 6 3. concupiscence c. to which is opposed the Spirit which signifyeth the grace of regeneration l Gal. 16.17 The heart of man m Gen 8 21 Also old Adam n Rom 6 6. How doth Originall sinne differ from actuall sinne As the tree differeth from the fruite or the roote from the branches Originall sinne is like a tree and a roote out of which euill fruites and boughes do spring namely actuall sins not only outward but also inward Out of the heart proceede euill thoughts saith Christ Mat. 15.19 Gal. 5.19 In that place are recited the workes and fruites of the flesh that is of originall sinne Moreouer in actuall sinne the matter of the sinne remaineth not for when a man hath either committed adulterie or spoken blaspheamie those actions straight cease to be when the thing is done notwithstanding the offence to God and the guilt remaine still But in originall sin the matter therof passeth not away for wee finde in experience that the corruption of nature sticketh by vs seeing still we run into sinne and are vntoward to heauenly things both in body and soule What is the end or wage of Originall sin Eternall damnation together with all the mischiefes incident to this life a Gen 2 17 3 19 What is the effect thereof It deceiueth it worketh all concupiscence it killeth b Rom. 5 12 17 What vse is there of this Doctrine concerning Originall sinne A threefold vse 1. That wee may acknowledge our vncleannesse and that laying away all arrogancie wee may betake our selues and flie to Christ our Sauiour 2. That in what manner we vnderstand that the vnrighteousnesse of Adam is imputed to vs in the same maner we may beeleeue that wee by the righteousnesse of Christ are accounted truly and perfectly iust before GOD as the Apostle teacheth Rom. 5.15 3. That because our birth and generation was and is full of vice wee may know we haue neede of a regeneration according to that Ioh. 3.5 Except a man be borne againe he cannot enter into the kingdome of Heauen How is this Doctrine opposed By sundry errors 1. Of the Pelagians who denie that Originall sinne is deriued by propagation to posteritie but say it is conueyed only by imitation and example They also affirme that death is the condition of mans nature although Adam had not fallen Also that Adams sinne hurt no man but himselfe onely Also they say that infants when they are borne doe not bring with them a prauitie of nature resisting the law of God contrarie to Pauls assertion Rom. 5 12. 2. By the Monkes who denie that Originall sinne is a sin worthy of death but either a guiltinesse onely of another mans faults or onely a fewell and matter to feede sinne contrarie to Pauls speach Ephes 2.3 where he saith VVe are the children of wrath Also they determine that it is onely in the bodie in the senses and inferiour faculties but not in the minde and will Also that by Baptisme not only the guilte but the euill and prauitie of concupiscence is taken away that concupiscence is not a sinne but a natuall appetite or desire that it is onely in the sensual appetite giuen vnto man that by striuing with it he may more more be sharpened to follow vertue and may binde God to himselfe by his greater desert Also they say that infants damned for Original sin only haue not poena sensus no punishment of feeling in their bodies but only poena damni or punishment by losse of the sight and enioying of God although it be credible that those are more gently to bee punished in whom originall sinne hath not yet broke forth into workes Also that Marie the mother of our Lord was conceiued borne without originall sin which iudgment also they hold of Iohn Baptist therefore that Christ died not for Marie and Iohn Baptist because he died for originall sinne onely which they wanted yet Mary reioyced in God her Sauiour and Iohn confesseth that he is not worthie to beare the shoes of Christ 3 Of those who say the corruption onely of nature is imputed to vs not the guilt also of Adam and contrarily of those who say the guilt and not the corruption is to be vnderstood by the name of originall sinne 4 Of those Papists who hold that onely actuall sinnes are forbidden by the law and that therefore a man may satisfie the Lawe 5 Of the adherents of Flauius Illiricus who teach that it is not an accident but the verie nature of man and the substance thereof corrupted contrarie to that saying of Paule Rom. 7.21 Sinne is present with me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and contrarie to those testimonies which teach that God is author of mans nature euen since his fall and also against those places whereby wee learne that Christ tooke our humane nature and substance and redeemed man but not sinne 6 Of the Philosophers who call that only sinne which resisteth reason whereas reason it selfe can doe nothing but erre vntill it be enlightened by the light of God 7 Of the Libertines who define and restraine sin to be only that wherein a man thinketh himselfe to sinne 8 The blasphemie of the Manichees who say that sinnes proceed of God ⧠The sixteenth Place of Actuall sinne VVhat is actuall sinne IT is a fruit of Originall sinne when the lawe of God is actually violated to wit euery action affection speech or omission disaagreeing with Gods will whereby a man becomes guiltie anew and is guiltie of Gods anger and eternall death Of which Iames speaketh 1.15 Concupiscence after it hath conceiued bringeth forth sinne and sinne finished bringeth forth death whereby Concupiscence he vnderstandeth the roote that is Originall sinne by sinne finished
actuall sinne that is a fruit of the same nature and qualitie How is it deuided Into two parts 1. As it is considered in it selfe without anie relation for of the sinnes produced and arising from Originall sinne some are onely inward namely doubtings of God the inflaming and kindling of euill affections euill thoughtes wicked wils whether those willes be informes without forme or full and resolute as the Schoole-men speake Other are externall which shew and manifest themselues by their outward workes and vse in their committing some outward helpe and seruice of the bodie 2 As it is considered before or after the Doctrine of the Gospell was deliuered concerning Christ Iustification and Regeneration Of how many kindes is sinne considered in it selfe before or without the doctrine of Christ Of two kindes Of omission and Commission a Iacob 4.17 The first is when wee doe not euill but omit that good which God commaunds vs to doe The second when we commit that euill which he forbids vs to doe The first proceedeth from thence for that wee are vnfitt for good things the latter from this ground because we are prone to all euill 2 In respect also of the obiect some sinne is said to be committed against God some against our neighbour 3 In respect of the law some sinne is dead some liuing The dead sinne is which though it be in vs yet is not acknowledged for sinne neyther doth it so rage as it vseth after the knowledge of the lawe a Rom. 7.9 The liuing sinne is that which is acknowledged to be such and outrageth in vs after the knowledge of the law 4 In respect of the inward beginning or originall of sinne some sinne is of infirmitie which through our weaknesse stealeth vpon vs against our wils and conceits as sodaine anger vaine thoughts desire of things vnlawfull Another sinne is of ignorance of which it is spoken Psal 19.13 Leuit. 5.27 And Christ sayeth Luc. 23.34 Father forgiue them for they know not what they doe Another sinne is of Malice which is of two sortes one directly opposing grace is blasphemie against the holy Ghost of which we will speake in proper place the other not directly resisting grace and the holy Ghost such are the particular fals against the precepts of the ten commaundements as Idolatry adultery c. In respect of the complement of Christs redemption those sinnes are called past which were done in all that time before he suffered and present committed since the manifestation of the Gospell by which through the bloud of Christ free pardon of all sinnes both past and present is offered to mankind Rom. 3.24 How is sinne deuided being considered after the Doctrine deliuered by Christ Three waies The first wherby one sinne is called the sinne which reigneth or the sin which sinneth another kind of sin which reigneth not or sinneth not The sin reigning is when a man not regenerate serueth as it were looseth the bridle to sinne and with whole hart and determinate purpose is caried and rusheth forward to sinne This also is called voluntarie because it is done of set purpose and entent wittingly with the whole will and against the conscience to which sinne he is said to liue whosoeuer is in the flesh and is said also to be dead in his sinnes b Eph. 2.5 Col. 2.13 who is entangled more in his sinnes is drowned and dead in them The Sinne which raigneth nâ—t is when a man regenerate being drawne backe and reclaymed by Gods spirit is not caried with all his force to sinne and it is called Inuoluntarium that which is not with the will because the godly doe wrestle against it Rom. 7.19 That euill which I would not that I doe To which also they d Rom. 6.2 are said to be dead in which the vigor and power of sinne which by a borrowed speech is called the life of sinne is extinguished by the power of Christ with whom they are vnited and incoporated by faith and contrarily they are said to liue to God or to righteousnes or to Christ who labour to attaine innocency and righteousnes e Rom. 6.10.11 1. pet 2 24. Whence is their diuision taken From the Epistle to the Romans 6.12 Let not sinne raigne in your mortall bodie that you should obey sinne in the lusts of the bodie AndVerse 14. Let not sinne raigne ouer you for you are not vnder the law but vnder grace and out of 1. Iohn 3 6. Whosoeuer remaineth in him sinneth not Whosoeuer sinneth hath not seene him nor knowen him and vers 9. Whosoeuer is borne of God committeth not sinne because his seed remaineth in him And yet notwithstanding in the same Epistle cap. 1.8 If we say that we haue no sinne we deceiue our selues and the truth is not in vs. VVhat is the second diuision Sinne eyther Mortall or Veniall VVhat doe the Papists say eyther of these to be They say that Mortall sinne is the works of the flesh reigning But Veniall sinne say they is the concupiscence or desire of the flesh which doth not long tarie in the heart And therefore they scarce acknowledge originall sinne to be a sinne which they will haue to be washed away with light sprinkling of water ex opere operato as they say by the worke wrought Is this diuision to be receiued Not simply 1. Because euerie sinne whether great or little maketh a man guiltie of eternall death a Rom. 5.14 6.13 2 Because Concupiscence it selfe is by the nature thereof a sinne for it is against the law of God Thou shalt not couet Exod. 20 17. And Gen. 6.5 8.21 Euerie thought of mans heart from his childhood is onely euill 3 Because Iames. 2.10 saith Whosoeuer shall keepe all the law and shall offend in one is become guiltie of all Namely because though he hath not broken totum legis the whole entire law in euerie part yet he hath broken totam legem the whole lawe and the effect thereof by violating the Maiestie of the Lawgiuer 4 This is also manifest both by the consideration of the nature of God and also of the nature of sinne for no man can violate the infinite Maiesty of God venially but he shall be guiltie of infinite punishment and that infinite puritie of God cannot endure so much as the least spot or stayne in a sinner Therefore he is deceiued who thinketh there is any sinne before God Which draweth not with it the weight of his eternall anger Are therefore all sinnes equall Thus farre they are equall that euen the least thought of the least sinne doth a thousand times deserue eternall death according to that saying Gal. 3.10 Cursed is euerie one that abideth not in all things which are written in the booke of the law that he may doe them And Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Yet notwithstanding in comparison of one with another some sinnes are more grieuous then other as they goe astray more
or lesse from the ordinances of God and as the obiects varie as it is a more grieuous sinne whereby a man offendeth against God immediately then against man and it is a greater sinne whereby we sinne against our parents then that whereby we sinne against others On the contrarie he sinneth lesse that stealeth being compelled by hunger then he who prouoked by lust committeth adulterie with his neighbours wife a Prouerb 6.20 Also sinnes differ in degrees as to be angrie or to couet an other mans wife is a sinne but it is a greater sinne to kill or to commit adulterie b Mat. 5.21.22 27 28. Also they differ according to the varietie of circumstances and causes c Mat. 11.22 24. Moreouer the law it selfe distiguisheth the workes of the first and second table d Exod. 34.1 And Christ saith to Pilate Iohn 19.11 He that deliuered me vnto thee hath the greater sinne therefore also are they not to be punished with equall punishments How farre therefore may that diuision be admitted Not in respect of the qualitie of the sinne but in respect of the persons which sinne insomuch as they eyther beleeue or not beleeue For that is mortall sinne which maketh all who beleeue not guiltie of eternall death And such are the sinnes of all men vntill they beleeue that is vntill by faith they receiue remission of sinnes But veniall sinne is not that which doth deserue pardon but that which freely is forgiuen pardoned for Christs sake to them which beleeue such is the sin of all who truly beleeue For that which of it selfe and in it owne nature is mortall becommeth veniall in the beleeuers by the grace and mercie of God whilest it is pardoned and forgiuen them according to that Rom. 8.1 There is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Iesus for they come not into iudgement but haue passed from death to life Iohn 5.24 In a word to the elect all their sinnes euen the greatest are veniall and pardonable through Christ e Ioh 5.16 but to the reprobate no sin there is which is not mortall f Rom. 6 23 What is the third diuision Some sinne is said to be Pardonable some Vnpardonable What sinne is Pardonable Euerie sinne which is committed against the Father and the Sonne g Mat. 12.31 that is euerie transgression of Gods law which is repented of which is remitted of God if the transgressor cease to sinne and flie to Christ the Mediator otherwise not therefore it is called Pardonable from the euent not because of the nature thereof How doth remissible or pardonable sin differ from veniall sin Remissible or Pardonable is that which may be forgiuen to al that beleeue Veniall is that which is actually remitted to the beleeuer What things do oppose this doctrine 1 That distinction of the Papists of sinne into mortall and veniall which is vnproper except in the diuers respects of the elect and reprobate 2 That Paradoxe of the Stoicks who did therefore make all sinnes to be equall because sinne is that thing whatsoeuer is not lawfull We grant indeed the vnlawfulnesse to be alike in all kindes of sinne ⧠The seuenteenth Place of sinne against the holy Ghost VVhat is the sinne which cannot be pardoned IT is a kind of sinne so deadly that eternall death ensueth it without any hope of pardon or forgiuenesse or it is the sinne which is not repented of How is it called It is called the Sinne against the holy Ghost blasphemy of the holy Ghost that is against the holy Ghost a Mat 12 13 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The sinne which is vnto death b 1 Iohn 5 18 But what is this sinne That we may the better vnderstand it testimonies of Scripture are to be gathered by which we may vnderstand both what it is and what it is not First therefore commeth to our hands that saying 1. Ioh. 5.17 All vnrighteousnesse is sinne but not vnto death VVho so knoweth that his brother sinneth a sinne which is not vnto death let him aske and life shall be giuen him which sinneth not vnto death there is a sinne vnto death I say not that thou shouldest pray for it Heere sinne vnto death is distinguished from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vnrighteousnesse which is the transgression of the whole law Hence therefore I gather that the sinne against the holy Ghost is not any transgression of the morall law neyther vniuersall nor particular eyther of ignorance or infirmitie or of malice committed against the law 2. That place of Mathew is to be remembred Mat. 12.31 Whosoeuer speaketh against the son of man it shal be forgiuen him and of Paule 1. Tim. 13. He confesseth that he was a blasphemer of Christ a persecutor a violent man but yet notwithstanding that hee obtained mercie because he did it of ignorance through vnbeleefe From whence I gather that blasphemie persecuting of Christ of his gospell which proceedeth of ignorāce is not a sin against the holy Ghost 3 Hence commeth to our consideration Peters deniall of his master who denied Christ and that when his owne conscience cried against it and with an execration a Mat. 26.69 but this was done through the horrour of the danger at hand neither did his iudgement consent with his tongue and that faith for which the Lord prayed it might not faile b Luc. 22.32 was not extinct but laboured and boyled within him otherwise he would haue ioyned himselfe to the persecutors of Christ when on the contrarie weeping bitterly he flung out of doores From whence I conclude that the deniall of Christ proceeding from infirmitie and not from a purpose to forsake Christ but so that a man may finde out some way for his own safegard is not the sinne against the holy Ghost although nothing commeth neerer it then this deniall c Marc. 3.28 Luk. 12.10 4 Let vs consider that saying of our Lord Mat 12.31 and in the verses following where he obiecteth to the Pharisees blasphemie against the holy Ghost who not onely despised Christ and his Gospell but also said that Christ cast out diuels by Beelzabub the prince of the diuels when as notwithhāding they knew Christ by the Prophets his owne doctrine and miracles and were not ignorant that those works of Christ were done by the power of the holy Ghost Hence therefore I gather by the place a concreto that the matter or generall difference of sinne against the holy Ghost is To denie Christ being knowne and his holy Gospell and against a mans owne knowledge and conscience to ascribe to Sathan that worke which is proper to the holy Ghost And this is one manner and one kinde of sinne against the holy Ghost which was the Pharisees sinne Such is theirs who haue knowne the truth haue neuerthelesse not submitted themselues to the truth but reuile and slaunder the truth calling it hereticall erroneous and diabolicall Lastly consider we of
againe to repentance For whereas true repentance commeth from Gods spirit and we obtaine the spirit of God in Christ alone by faith therefore they can neuer repent who haue sinned against the holy Ghost and therefore can neuer obtaine pardon For if they repented certainly they should obtaine pardon as God promiseth by Ezechiel cap. 18.21 That he will be mercifull when a sinner shall truly be turned seeing God can no more despise him who truly repenteth then his owne spirit b 1 Ioh. 5.16 How doth vnpardonable sinne differ from mortall sinne 1 Because all vnpardonable sinne is mortall but not all mortall sinne vnpardonable 2 Because the mortall sinne becommeth veniall when they doe now beleeue who before did not beleeue but vnpardonable sinne neuer becommeth veniall because they neuer repent or beleeue who haue this sinne What sinnes come neere to this sinne 1 The sinne of the diuels who wittingly and willingly persecute the knowen truth with horrible hatred and furie 2 Denying of Christ proceeding of infirmitie 3 Sinnes against a mans owne conscience often repeated and fallen into are the way to sinne against the holy Ghost for as it is said of diseases of the bodie so fitly it may be applied to the diseases of the soule Too late is helpe of medicine found When old disease hath gotten ground What opinions are contrarie to this Doctrine The errour of the Donatists and Nouatians who denied that they who fell could haue pardon or remission of sinnes abusing that place Heb. 10.26 Whereas there is great difference betwixt the fall of them who sinne knowing of it and their fall who professedly do altogether depart and reuolt from Christ are delighted with impietie and make warre against the truth Otherwise Dauids and Peters cases were desperate yea we were all gone contrarie to that saying of Christ Forgiue seuentie times seuen times Math. 18.22 and Ezech. 18.21 At what time soeuer a sinner repenteth I will no more remember his sinnes And likewise this is contrarie to the examples of Dauid Ezechias Manasses Peter who were receiued into fauour and mercie ⧠The eighteenth common Place Of free will after the fall of man VVhat is vsually vnderstood in this disputation by the name of freewill A Faculty or power of mans mind or vnderstanding to discerne and know good or euill of the will to choose or refuse eyther and of the strength to performe eyther good or euill What is the reason of this name Liberū arbitriū In respect of the mind which sheweth the obiect to be chosen or refused it is called Arbitrium will and in respect of the will which voluntarily and of the owne accord followeth or tefuseth the iudgement of the vnderstanding it is called Liberum free Is there such free will in man after the fall There can be no answer made simply to this question but there is need of a twofold distinction for mens actions are to be distinguished whereof some are naturall and sensuall as to eate to drinke to moue from place to place some morall and animall or pertaining to the reasonable part of the soule such are priuate actions Oeconomicall or Politicall also outward actions in Gods worship and some are supernaturall or spirituall In the first sort of actions man hath choise left vnto him In the second the minde is much darkened the iudgement is not sound nor the will chearefull neither the strength able to performe Thereupon came that speech of Medea Video meliora proboque Deteriora sequor I see the better and approoue it But still the worse my mind doth couet In the third kind another distinction must be vsed for a man after the fall is considered in three respects before his conuersion and regeneration in his conuersion and after his conuersion VVhat thinke you then of the free will of man before his conuersion I thinke it is altogether wicked and euill for the soule though it remaine whole in the essence thereof with her powers the wil vnderstanding yet the strength ability of these powers vnto any spirituall good is lost For the vnderstanding is plainely blinde in heauenly matters destitute of the true knowledge of God and of the wholsome vnderstanding of the word according to Dauids saying Psal 14.3 a Rom. 3.11 There is not a man that vnderstandeth And of Paul 1. Cor. 2.14 The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God And Rom 8.7 The wisdome of the flesh is enemy to God for it is not subiect to the law of God neither indeed can be And Ephe. 4 23. he biddeth vs be renued in the spirit of our mind by the spirit of the mind vnderstāding the principal part of the whol 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Philosphers terme it The wil is altogether turned away from God Psa 53.3 There is none that seeketh God they are al gone astray 3 Our strength and endeuors are taken quite away they altogether become vnprofitable in the same Psalme b Rom. 3.3 And 1. Cor. 12.3 No man can say that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost And 1. Cor 3.5 We are not sufficient of our selues to thinke any good thing And Phil. 2.13 It is God who worketh in vs both to will and to do Are we therefore like senselesse stocks in regard of spiritual things No for man is not spoyled by sin of the power of vnderstanding or willing but his vnderstāding is become blind his wil peruerse But what doth not Paule say Rom. 2.14 That the Gentiles by nature do the worke of the law in the 15 verse that they shew the worke of the law written in their hearts The Apostle speaketh of that natural knowledge which is writtē in the minds of all men which is sufficient to take away from men all pretence of ignorance and to make them vnexcusable but he speaketh not of abilitie to fulfill the law And Paule saith not that the Gentiles did the law but the things of the law that is certaine outward works agreeing in some sort with the law for in other places of Scripture as in Ierem. 31.33 they are said to haue the law writtē in their harts whose harts God hath circumcised by his holy spirit c Deut. 30.6 But the Gentiles excelled in notable gifts which gifts seeme to shew that mans nature is not altogether corrupted 1 The corruption and faultines of their nature was not purged away but kept in and restrained by God least that like a wild beast it should violently be caried to the mischiefe of mankinde 2 Those gifts were not common giftes of nature but speciall graces of God which he dispenseth and distributeth to men otherwise in themselues profane diuersly and in certaine measure that he may thereby prouide for the welfare of mankinde 3 Whatsoeuer in their actions was praise-worthie was polluted with ambition and was farre frō a desire of illustrating gods glory 4 They were not vertues properly but Images and
say concerning the obseruation of the Law that it is a yoak which neither the Apostls nor they which beleeued neither the primitiue Church nor the fathers could beare Act. 15.10 which thing surely is to be vnderstood also of the iustified regenerate persoÌ„s What is the first vse of the Morall Lavv There is a threefold vse of it to Restraine to condemne to Teach 1. The first is outward which is also called Paedagogicall Disciplinarie and politique which by feare of punishment and the terrour of Gods reuenge doth restraine euen the vnregenerate men from the outward worke of sinne and it is necessarie to preserue the publique societie and communitie amongst men to maintaine peace Which vse Paul commendeth 1. Tim. 1.9 when he saith The Lavv vvas not giuen for the righteous man not onely in regard of iustification or condemnation but in respect of compulsion as the mother loueth and cherisheth her owne childe of her owne accord not beeing compelled by the Law though the Lawe coÌ„maund this also but vnto the vniust to the disobedient c. And this vse may serue to keepe euery man in the limits of his dutie and to rule his outward maners with which vse the Pharisees and Hypocrites contented themselues In respect whereof also Paul Phi. 3.6 saith that before his conuersion he was vnrebukeable What is the second vse It is inward or secret which smiteth the conscience of man doth detect conuince and condemne sin and bringeth man forth to Gods iudgement seate and maketh him subiect to the sentence of Gods curse Of this vse it is saide Rom. 3.20 By the lavv is the knowledge of sinne And chap. 7.9 I liued sometimes vvithout the law that is through my security I felt not the iudgement of the Law but when the commaundement came sinne reuiued and I became dead that is I vnderstood I was worthy of death and damnation In respect of this vse the Lavv is said to worke vvrath Rom. 4.15 because it denounceth the wrath of God and proclaimeth vs subiect to Gods anger And 2. Cor. 3. The Law is the ministerie of death that is it causeth by the acknowledgement of sinne to vnderstand that wee are worthy of death that is condemnation This property the law hath in it not by any fault in it self for in the owne nature it is good and holy but through the fault of our corrupt nature For as the touch stone is not gold but a meanes to discouer pure Gold from counterfaite so the lawe is not the cause of sin but a touchstone discouering iust from vniust Rom. 7.5.7 This vse serueth to terrifie them that are desperate and forlorne and to bring them in awe who are not desperate and to prepare them to seeke remedy and to receiue that remedy which is offered to them in Christ In which respect the law is said to haue bin our Schoole-master to bring vs to Christ Gal. 4.24 For where as it reproued all men of vnrighteousnesse it likewise admonisheth theÌ„ that righteousnes was to be sought in Christ except they would rather perish An example of this vse we haue in Dauid after hee heard himselfe rebuken by Nathan 2 Sam. 12.1 13. and in Ezechiah who saith Esai 38.13 Like a Lyon he hath broken all my bones And Act. 2.14.23.37 When as at that Sermon of the law made by Peter wherein hee obiecteth to them ingratitude towards god and murder of Christ the innocent that is the breaking of both tables of the lawe they being pricked in their hearts said vnto the Apostles Men and brethren vvhat shall wee do To whom Peter answereth Repent you vers 38. For as lime is set on fire by the water and quenched with Oyle so by accident sinne is encreased by the Lawe and the terrours and astonishments of the heart daunted by the iudgement and sentence which the lawe awardeth are healed by oile powred vpon that is by hearing the comfort of the Gospell What is the third vse It is a spirituall vse because it belongeth to men regenerate by Gods spirit whom it teacheth and instructeth in the true worship of god the rule of liuing rightly Concerning this god by Ezechiell speaketh Chap. 20.19 VValke yee in my precepts c. In respect of this Law Dauid commendeth the Law diuersly magnifieth it The Law of the Lord is vnspotted conuerting soules the Statutes of the Lord are right reioycing the heart the commandemeÌ„t of the Lord is cleeere and giueth light to the eyes c a Psal 19.8.6 Haue they who are regenerate by the holy Ghost any neede of the Law seeing they haue the Holy Ghost for their teacher and leader They haue neede 1. Because mans reason easilie wandereth and erreth from the way as soone as it is not ruled by gods word 2. God will not haue vs by our endeauour and at our owne pleasure to inuent workes or seruice for him but he will haue vs gouerned by his word Psal 119.105 Thy word is a Lanthorne vnto my feete And Mat. 15.9 In vaine they worship me teaching Doctrines and commandements of men 3. That rule of liuing godly and well which the Holy ghost teacheth is no other then that which the law prescribeth 4. Because of the reliques of the flesh for the faithfull are not in all parts regenerate and therefore ir is expedient that they be daily more instructed concerning the will of god and that their slouthfulnesse should be stirred and as it were spurred forward by exhortations ready to obey VVhat is the ceremoniall Lavv It is that which prescribed in Ecclesiasticall rites and outward ceremonies as 1. Sacrifice 2. Other holy things as places and vessels or set times and solemnities 3. Sacraments 4. Certaine obseruations in meate a Deut. 14.6 12 21 apparrell b Leui p 17 12. plowing c deut 22.5 11. sowing d Vers 19 vncircumcision of trees e Lev. 19.23 fouling f Deut. 22 6 and many other thing as also the outward worshippe of God the vse lasted whilest Moses gouernment endured both in the Tabernacle which was made to be caried about and also in Solomons Tâ—mple which was seated in one place as likewise without the Temple VVhat vvas the vse of Ceremonies and Sacrifices 1. That they might be Images or pictures of the inward worship which was due vnto God 2. That they might shew the vncleannesse of sinne which cleaueth to man and that they might testifie what men deserue in themselues namely death and eternall damnation and thus farre they were appurtenances of the morall Law 3. That they might be visible sermons to the godly of Christs passion and death by which they should be deliuered from that misery in this respect they were as it were certaine types of the Gospell in which consideration the Law is sâ—â—de and that chiefely to bee a Schoole-maister to bring vs to Christ a Gal 3.24 For Circumcision did mistically preach the promised seede of Abraham Washings
admonished them of the vncleannesse which was to be cleansed away by the bloud of Christ Sacrifices did typically shadow out that Sacrifice which was to follow Whereupon Col. 2.7 and Heb. 10.1 The Law had the shadowe of good things to come not the very image of things but the body was Christ 4. That they might be signes and sacraments whereby the holy Ghost might be effectuall and this not ex opero operato for the worke sake as it was wrought but beeing vsed in faith In which sence Sacrifices are called an attonement for sinne b Leuit. 19 27 5. That they might bee markes of their profession signes distinctions or as it were a wall to separate the Church of Israell from other nations and to driue them from the Idolatrie of other nations What vvas the Iudiciall or Politique Lavv It was a commaundement cōcerning outward actions by which the ciuill societie of the Israelites should bee gouerned or you may call it the Ciuil Law of the Israelites concerning Magistrates distinction of gouernments distribution of inheritances punishment of offences the distinction and proprietie of inheritances the order and processe of Iudgements Contractes Rites of Mariage Diuorces bondage the order and lawes of warre witnesse vsurie of raising seed vp to a mans brother punishment of blasphemie periurie profaning of the Sabaoth and ceremonies sedition disobedience manslaughter damage done to a man either in goods or bodie adulterie whoredome theft and to conclude of all outward offences against euery commaundement of the Decalogue What vvas the vse of the Iudiciall Lavv 1 The maintaining of the State according to the condition of time place and nation 2. Secondly that there might bee an apparant and notable difference betwixt that state wherein the Messias shouldbe borne and that of other nations Hovv farre is the Morall Lavv abrogated 1. In respect of iustification we must thinke alike of all parts of it namely that no man is iust or accepted vnto eternall life for any workes of the Law 2. In respect of obedience wee must make a difference in the parts of the Law and the Morall Law hath two parts as it were precepts or the rule of life and an appendix concerning promises or threatnings 3. In regard of the rule of mens liues the Law shall not bee abolished either in this life or the life to come for so much as concerneth the cōmaundements For God requireth a perpetual loue towards himselfe and his creature in his place and in this respect Christ testifieth that He came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it that One iotte of the Lavv should not passe avvay but it should bee fulfilled 4. In regarde of the appendices and appurtenances all the promises of the Lawe are ratified to the regenerate in Christ a Rom. 8.4 Now for the threatnings the inexorable seueritie of the Lawe and the seuere exacting of obedience these are abolished to the regenerate Rom. 6.14 You are not vnder the Lavv but vnder grace Also Chap. 8.1 There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesu Also Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the Law becomming a curse for vs. Also cap. 4.4 Christ became subiect to the Law that hee might redeeme them vvho vvere subiect to the Lavv. But the vnregenerate are subiect to the whole Lawe and the sentence of condemnation which it pronounceth according to that which is saide Gal. 3.10 Cursed is he that doth not all things vvhich are vvritten in the booke of the Lavv. Is the ceremoniall lavv abrogated It is abrogated not in respect of the signification or Scripture that it should no more bee read for this may serue to confirme and instruct vs concerning Christ but in regard of the vse and outward obseruation For Dan. 9.27 it is saide Hee that is Christ shall confirme the couenant vvith many for in one vveeke and in the middest of the vveeke hee shall cause the sacrifices and oblations to cease And Christ saith Math. 11.13 The Lavv the Prophets vvere vntill Iohn came And Iohn 1.17 The Lavve vvas giuen by Moses but grace and truth came by Iesus Christ Therefore by a publike decree of the Holy ghost in an assembly or counsell of the Apostles Act. 15.6 the ceremonies were abrogated so as they are not to bee called againe seeing Christ of whome they were a type is alreadie come and hath fulfilled them all and hath put out the hand vvriting of ordinances vvhich vvas against vs. Colos 2.14 That is the ceremonies which were vsuall instruments which testified our guiltinesse and vncleannesse So Heb 10.14 for by one oblation hath hee made perfect for euer those who were to be sanctified This was also signified by renting of the veile of the Temple at Christs passion a Mat. 27.5 Therefore saith Paule Gal. 5.2 If you be circumcised Christ shall nothing profit you In stead of this Law the Lord hath appointed the administration of Sacraments to be obserued in the Christian Church according to his direction vnto the end of the world Marc. 16.15 Goe preach and baptize And 1. Cor. 11.26 Shew forth the Lords death till hee come But for those things which pertaine to the order of administring them those hee left free to the Churches disposition Is the iudiciall law in like maner abrogated It is abrogated in regard of the Obligation namely for so much as no cōmon wealth is boūd to receiue the politick Lawes of the Israelites as also in regard of the manner limitation forme and decreeing of punishments or the appointment of them to be set downe according to certaine circumstances which thing is left to the libertie and disposition of good princes accordingly as place time and person shall require For the Ciuill Law bindeth onely those to whome it is giuen Moreouer that law which is made onely for a certaine time doth not stand in force after that time but this Law was onely giuen for a time Gen. 49.10 The Scepter shall not bee taken away from Iuda and the Lawgiuer from the middest of his people vntill Silo come To the same effect is also that saying of Christ Luk. 16.16 The Law and the Prophets that is the gouernment and policie of Moses was vnto Iohn Therefore the Iudiciall Law was positiue and therefore Christians are not compelled to gouerne their Common wealths in the same maner in which the Israelites common wealth was gouerned but it is lawfull for them to vse the politique Lawes of their Nations which agree with the Lawes of Nature and the tenne Commaundements according to that Commaundement Rom. 13.1 Let euery soule bee subiect to the higher powers a 1 Pet. 2.13 Againe God by a notable iudgement hath destroyed the politique gouernment of Moses b Dan. 9.26 27. Mat. 24.15 But yet it is not abrogated in respect of the substance end or that naturall and vniuersall equitie which groundeth vpon the Law of God and of nature and in
afflicted consciences and refresh them whereupon it is called the good word of God e Heb. 6.5 6 To heale them who are sicke in spirit therefore it is called the wholsome word f Tit 2.8.6 7 To quicken them who are dead in their sinnes therefore it is called the word of life g Philip. 1.16 8 To pacifie troubled consciences therefore it is called the Gospell of peace h Ephes 6 5 9 To establish the kingdome of God therefore it is called the Gospell of Gods kingdome 10 To turne vnto death to the vnbeleeuing but vnto life to thē which beleeue i Marc. 1.14 for which cause it is called the sauour of death vnto death 2. Cor. 2.16 but this is accidentall and the Jauour of life vnto life As an oyntment giueth strength to the Done but destroyeth the beetle of life saith Nyssenus Finally to preserue vs vnto eternall life whereupon it is called the Gospell of our saluation l Ephes 1.13 But whence proceedeth this efficacie of the Gospell From God alone by the holy Ghost and hereupon Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is called the power of God to saluation vnto euerie one that beleeueth by a definition taken from the effect So 1. Cor. 1.18 that is it is a liuely and powerfull instrument of Gods power which sheweth it selfe in working in vs the knowledge of our saluation therefore it is named the Scepter◠of Gods power m psal 110 2 and the arme of God n Isac 53.1 But in the 14. of the Reuelation vers 16. it is called the eternall Gospell not in respect of the dispensation which had the originall in Christs time and shall make an end with this world but in regard of the efficacie and vertue which beginning from the creation of the world shal last for all eternity How many parts of the Gospell are there Two 1. Preaching Repentance 2. And promise of Iustification or remission of sinnes Luke 24.47 Is it the proper office of the Law or of the Gospell to preach repentance If by the name of repentance you vnderstand not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not contrition and sorrow for sinne but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a sauing conuersion to God by faith it is the dutie and office of the Gospell being taken for the whole ministerie of the New Testament not of the Law 1 Because that which offereth us grace to that also it belongeth to inuite vnto repentance but the offer of grace is made by the Gospell Therefore Christ will haue repentance to be preached in his name Luke 24.46 2 Because Baptisme which is a visible preaching and marke of repentance which consisteth in mortification of sinne and raysing vp of the new man a Rom. 6.3 is not a Sacrament of the law but of the Gospell b Mark 16.16 3 Because true repentance cannot be without regeneration but no man is regenerated c 1 Pet. 1.23 but by the Gospell the holy Ghost working within him by faith b Mark 16.16 4 Because faith and repentance are vnited by an inseparable coniunction but faith is preached by the Gospell and is infused into men by the meanes thereof and is wrought in our heartes by the holy Ghost d Iohn 17 20. Thererfore also repentance 5 Because the Law worketh death 2. Cor. 7.10 therefore it worketh not that griefe which is according to God and therefore not true repentance neither 6 Because repentance and forgiuenesse of sinnes are ioyned together by an vnseparable bond e Luk. 24.46 7 Because that which Luke 9.6 calleth to preach the Gospell the same is expounded by Marke to preach that men should repent that he may teach vs thus much that the Gospell is the preaching of repentance and of forgiuenesse of sinnes in Christs name Notwithstanding we confesse that the law is a preparation to repentance and that it detecteth the sinnes knowne to it f Rom. 3.20 but the Gospell onely inuiteth vs to the true and sauing repentance for them What opinions are against this doctrine 1 A sinister and peruerse exposition of the words of Augustine De fide operibus cap. 9. That the proper doctrine of the Gospell is not onely concerning faith but also concerning the works of the faithfull Of Ierome in his preface vpon Marke saying that there are foure qualities of the Gospell 1. Precepts commaunding to decline from euill 2. Commaundements enioyning vs to do that is good 3. Testimonies shewing vs what we must beleeue concerning Christ 4. Testimonis of examples which shew perfection as Learne of me for I am lowly and meeke Mat. 11.29 2 The blasphemie of the wicked who say the Gospell is a firebrand of sedition and a foule puddle and sinke fraught with many mischiefes The one and twentieth common Place Of the agreement and difference of the Law and Gospell Are the Law and Gospell doctrines one opposite to another NO but onely diuers and seuerall so as in some things they agree in others there is a great difference In what things doe they agree 1 In the efficient cause For one and the same God is author of the Law and Gospell 2 In their last end for God doth require the verie same thing in the Law and Gospell if we consider the last end namely ful perfect and spirituall righteousnesse which leadeth to eternall life for without perfect righteousnesse that is entire obedience to Gods law no man entereth into life and looke what things the Law requireth namely satisfaction for both the fault and punishment and most perfect obedience these doth the Gospell bring to them which beleeue in Chtist and so by the Gospell the Law is established not destroyed Rom. 3.31 But wherein doe they differ 1 In the manner of knowledge for the Law is knowne in some sort by nature for as it is said Rom. 2.15 The Gentiles shew the worke of the Law vvritten in their hearts But the Gospell is not perceiued by no sharpnes of reason But of it it is said Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at anie time the sonne vvho is in the bosome of the father he hath reuealed him to vs. And Ephes 1.9 a Colos 1.16 2 Tim 1 10 The Gospell is called a Mysterie that is a secret hidden from euerlasting and made manifest by the ministerie of the spirit And 1. Cor. 1 23. We preach Christ crucified foolishnesse to the Gentiles and a stumbling blocke to the Iewes And 2.7 We speake the vvisedome of God in a mysterie euen the hid vvisedome vvhich God hath determined before the vvorld vnto our glorie vvhich none of the Princes of this vvorld hath knowen 2 Againe in order of the manifestation because the law goeth before the Gospell followeth by nature publication and ministerie Also in respect of the minister for the minister of the law was Moses the minister of the Gospell is Christ a Ioh 1 17 7 22 Likewise in the maner of comming to the
of the Iewes and Gentiles or the whole company of them who are receiued into the couenant for the Old couenant properly belonged to Abraham and the Israelites his posteritie Deut. 32.8 VVhen the most high God diuided to the nations their inheritance when he separated the sons of Adam he appointed the borders of the people according to the number of the children of Israell d Gen. 15.18 17.7 for the Lords portion is his people Iacob is the lot of his inheritance But the new couenant belongeth to all nations to whome God hath vouchsafed the light of the Gospell Mark 16.15 Go yee into all the world and preach the Gospell to euerie creature Hee that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued c. Act. 10.15.34.35.43 Rom. 1.16 3.29 As in many other places But may not God seeme mutable or vnlike himselfe seeing hee hath changed that which once hee purposed No in no case for neither hath hee changed his purpose nor done any thing disagreeing with it but hee sheweth himselfe most wise because in diuerse ages he knoweth how to vse diuerse meanes to bring his elect to the knowledge of their saluation in Christ according as hee saw the estate of both that is as both old and latter times required Euen as the Physition taketh one course of cure in a childe another in a man of ripe age according to the diuersitie of their constitutions and yet can hee not therefore bee tearmed inconstant or vnlike himselfe Therefore Paule Ephes 3.10 calleth this dispensation of the couenant the manifolde and diuerse wisdom of God because God in his wisdome doth in other maner call the Gentiles then in old time he did the Iewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhat therefore is the Old Testament It is a solemne maner of confirming the Couenant comprehended in the Morall Law the ceremonies and Sacrifices ordained to this end that the promise of grace and eternall life for Christes sake might bee kept with condition of faith obedience through faith on mans part to be performed What is the new Testament It is a full manifestation of Gods grace which hath shined to the world since Christs comming into the world which is effected without the strict and hard exacting of the Law and the administration of the ceremonies VVhen was this ordained In Paradise straight after the fall of our first parents for at that time was vttered the first promise pertaining to the Gospell concerning Christ to come a Gen. 3.15 and afterwards it was made to a certaine familie namely of Abraham b Gen. 12.3 17 4 5 19. 22 18 It was performed at the time when Christ was exhibited and confirmed by his bloud and death But why is one and the same Testament called Old and New c Luk 22 20 It is Old in regard of the promise New in regard of Christ alreadie exhibited Also it is Old in respect of the adiunct For the publishing of the Lawe did in time goe before the sending of Christ and that ample declaration of the Gospell or new as it were renewed as Iohn 13.34 The Lord there calleth the commaundement of Loue a new commaundemen wholy renewed or which must be euer new Besides because it was confirmed by Christs death For a Testament is confirmed and in force when the testator is dead otherwise it is not of force whilst he liueth who made it Heb. 9.17 Who made this will or Testament The sonne of God VVho are the hearers All that beleeue VVhat is the inheritance All the benefits which the death of Christ hath procured vs. VVhat are the tables of the Testament The holy Bible or holy Scripture VVhat seales are there to this Testament The Sacraments which in the Old testament were circumcision and the Passeouer but in the new Baptisme the Lords Supper What is the vse of this Doctrine It sheweth that there was alwaies one way to attaine saluation namely by faith in the free promise of Christ and that there was one and the same Church in the old and new Testament What opinions are against this Doctrine 1. The errour of Sernetus and certaine Anabaptists who faine that the people of Israell was fatted pampered in this life without any hope of heauenly immortalitie euen as swine or beasts are for the slaughter 2 The madnes of them who falsely imagined a threefold way of saluation namely the Law of Nature the Law of Moses and the Law of Christ as if there had beene three seuerall couenants of God differing in substance The three and twentieth common place Of the passion and death of Chist What vnderstand you by this terme of the passion of Christ 1 I vnderstand by a Synecdoche a part for the whole whatsoeuer Christ suffered from the first moment of his conception as for example his lying in the maunger when hee was newely borne when there was no roome for his mother in the Inne Luk. 2.7 And afterwards when vpon the eight day after his natiuitie hee shed his bloud in the circumcision the same Chap. vers 22. and from thence vntil the time wherein hee was offered a sacrifice for vs vpon the Altar of the crosse but especially all kinde of iniuries and that horrible punishment which was executed vpon him vnder Pilate 2. The passions of Christ are called the crosses or calamities of Christes mysticall bodie which is the Church or of his members which must bee heere accomplished vntill all the members in their certaine manner and measure become conformable to Christ by the crosse Whereupon the Apost Colos 1.24 saith thus I fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church that is for the comfort of the Church a for as Leo the first saith The iust hau◠receiued not giuen crownes and from the fortitude of the faithfull are sprung examples of patience not gifts of righteousnesse 3. Metonimically the adiunct for the subiect by passion is vnderstoode the Historie describing Christ passion VVhat is the Lords passion or suffering It is a part of Christs obedience whereby he himselfe beeing innocēt became a sacrifice for the guilty or thus It is a propitiatory sacrifice wherby the son of God being made man offered himselfe to the father that hee might merit for all that beleeue in him eternall iustification sanctification deliuerance from sinne and eternall death and in the end eternall life as Christ himselfe doth expound the matter Ioh. 17.19 I sanctifie my selfe that is I offer my selfe to the Father for them to be an holy and pacifying sacrifice that they also may be sanctified for euer VVhat are the efficient causes of Christs passion There are three efficient causes thereof God Sathan and men and all these in diuerse respects 1. The Counsel and determination of God the most absolute and high will of God that is his ordinance whereby from eternitie he hath so disposed of this businesse that therein he
vnto them as the Apostle declareth verse 10 By the which will wee are sanctifyed by the offering of the bodie of Iesus Christ once made 5 Because whole Christ was geuen vnto vs with his benefits otherwise if his passiue obedience onely had beene imputed vnto vs it would followe that onely halfe Christ was geuen vs namely a suffering Christ and not he that did those thinges that were pleasing to his father a Christ that only taketh away sinnes and death and not a Christ a Isa. 9.6 that bringeth righteousnesse But he is said to be borne and geuen not for himselfe but for vs that he might bestow his whole selfe vpon vs and might doe those thinges that were to be done for vs and might also suffer what was to be suffered for vs. Why then is Christ said to be sett forth of god a reconciliation through faith in his bloud Rom. 3.25 and we said to be iustified by the bloud of Christ Rom. 5.9 and by it to be clensed from all sinne 1. Iohn 1 7. Because in these kinde of speaches by a Synedoche and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the chiefe parte is vsed for the whole in regarde of the most neare affinitie of the passion and the actiue righteousnesse of Christ which also appeareth by that that is sett downe Rom. 4.25 Iustification is ascribed to the resurrection which is a matter actiue bicause Christ by his resurrection did geue testimonie that he had by his death fullie satisfied for all our sinnes for indeed our sinnes had not bene purged by his death if death had the vpper hand in the combat How are wee said to be Iustified freely if wee be Iustified for the merit of Christ Because the decree of God the father for our redemption is free and we pay nothing againe to God of our owne And therefore by that particle Freely our merits are excluded but not Christes and therefore wee are saide to be redeemed by Christ with a great price b 1. Cor 6 20 1. Pet. 1 19 so that we may may well say wee are iustified by merits and by works because we are iustified by Christs merits and by his works What is the subiect of Iustification Christ himselfe is f 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the receiuing subiect or the matter in which is contained that righteousnes for the which we are iustified which dwelleth and abideth in him as in the subiect and doth neuer goe out of that subiect and threfore we are said to be made Righteousnes in him a 2. Cor. 5.20 and Paule saith That he did find righteousnes in him Phil. 3.9 But of iustification that is of that sentence whereby God pronounceth vs iust we our selues are the matter and subiect first indeed not prepared or bringing any merits but sinners and wicked Rom. 4.5 He that iustifieth the wicked Afterwards beleeuing Rom. 3.22 The righteousnes of God is made manifest in and vpon all that beleeue Seeing God forbiddeth to iustifie the vngodly Pro. 17.15 Is he said to doe that vvell which himselfe forbiddeth Yes verie well because he is aboue all Law and not accomptable wherefore it is lawfull for him by iustifying the vngodly to declare his owne iustice seeing his will is the rule of iustice 2 Paule calleth him wicked in respect of nature who in respect of grace accepting him is the elect childe of God 3 In iustification wickednesse is taken away and faith succeedeth euen as the blinde man is enlightened who hauing his bindnesse remooued receiueth his sight Besides Paule calleth him vvicked not in that he doth actually perseuere in wickednesse Dan 9.7 psal 32.6 but because he bringeth no merits of his owne neyther respecteth his owne qualities or actions or vertues but him whom his former life maketh guiltie of wickednesse and yet lamenteth his owne iniquitie and flyeth to the throne of grace and desireth to be pardoned as Daniel doth saying To thee onely btlongeth righteousâ—csse but to vs confusion of face And Dauid for remission of sinnes and therefore also of wickednesse euerie one that is Godly shall make prayer vnto thee Doth the iustification of those that doe alreadie beleue and are regenerate differ nothing from the iustification of those that are not yet regenerate It doth something differ if ye consider the subiects because in those that are vnregenerate God findeth nothing but a horrible sinke of euils and mischiefes but in the regenerate God embraceth and entertaineth his owne gifts withall but yet hee iustifyeth them both after one and the selfe same manner Who are they that are iustified Onely those that were elected before the foundation of the world Rom. 8.30 VVhom he did predestinate them also hee called and vvhom he called them also hee iustified And verse 3.3 VVho shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect Are all iustified after one and the same manner Yes indeed all after one sort and therefore Paule Rom. 4.3.9.10 When he had reasoned from the example of Abraham the father of the faithfull hee addeth Verse 23. Neyther is this vvritten onely for him that it vvas imputed vnto him but euen also for vs to vvhom it shall bee imputed namely to them that beleeue in him vvhich raised the Lord Iesus from the dead VVhat is the forme of Iustification Not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mutation or any motion of alteration whereby righteousnesse is attayned by the shunning of euill and endeuouring to doe good for this is proper to sanctification Neyther is it charitie nor good workes nor our fulfilling of the law to conclude it is not a qualitie infused or inherent no nor faith it selfe but the remission of sinnes purchased by the bloud of Christ and the imputation of the obedience and most perfect righteousnesse of Christ and the acquiring of vs whereby it commeth to passe that the beleeuers are accompted righteous before GOD at his tribunall seate and doe obtayne â—he interest of eternall life Or the forme of iustification is the righteousnesse of Christ imputed so farre foorth as it is imputed of God VVhich the Apostle confirmeth Rom. 4.6 saying Dauid declareth the man to be blessed to whome God imputeth righteousnesse without workes whereby the forme of iustification is sett downe to be not inherent righteousnesse but righteousnesse imputed so farre forth as it is imputed Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whome the Lord imputeth not sinne Gen 15.6 Abraham beleeued God and it was reputed vnto him for righteousnesse Rom. 5.19 By one mans obedience many are made righteous And 2. Cor. 5.21 Him that knew noe sinne God made sinne for vs not in himselfe but by imputing vnto him the guilt of all our sinnes that wee might be made the righteousnesse of God that is to say Iust before God in him And this is our righteousnesse imputed not that wee are the cause thereof in any sort but because it is reckoned and imputed vnto vs
not referred to a qualitie but to the relation which consisteth in a flowing out and respect rather then in the place of abode And besides it is now so imputed vnto vs as hereafter liuing with Christ in heauen wee shall really be clothed with the righteousnes of Christ and shall liue by that life of Christ which is now onely begunne in vs and shall be perfected hereafter How doth the righteousnesse of the law and the righteousnesse of the Gospell differ Not in matter or forme but in the efficient the subiect and the end Not in matter because both of them are obedience performed vnto God Not in forme because the rule of both is the law of God for God acknowledgeth no other righteousnesse but that that agreeth with this law And therfore Rom. 3.30 The law is established by faith both because the righteousnes of Christ is the full performance of the law as also because we are by faith clothed with the spirit of Christ which working in vs we doe begin to will and to doe things appertaining to God and so by him the obedience of the law is begun in vs and Rom. 8.3.4 God sent his sonne in the flesh that the righteousnesse of the law i. that verie thing which the law requireth namely the fulfilling of righteousnesse and the perfect integritie of our abilitie all which we doe freely attaine by Christ apprehended by faith might be fulfilled in vs that is to say indeed in himselfe and as I may so say by application for by faith he and his righteousnesse are made ours and Gal. 4.4 Christ was made vnder the law that is subiect vnto the law both by doing and suffering that hee might redeeme those that were vnder the law i. which were subiect vnto the lawe But they differ in the subiect and efficient because the righteousnesse of the law is performed in and by that man who by the same is accompted righteous of which sort there is none but Christ himselfe The righteousnesse of the Gospell is a perfect fullfilling of the lawe performed not in or by that man who is thereby accompted righteous but by another namely Christ which performance notwithstanding is accompted to come from the man himselfe And therefore Rom 10.5 c. The righteousnesse which is by the Lawe standeth thus The man that doth these things shall liue in them Leuit. 18.5 But the righteousnes that is of faith promiseth free saluation If thou shalt beleeue in thy heart and confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and that the Father hath raised him from the deade thou shalt bee saued They differ also in the end for the end of the righteousnesse of the Gospell is the glory of the mercie and iustice of God but the end of the righteousnesse of the Lawe is rather the glory of men a Rom. 3.26 27 4.12 Ephes 1.6 because man should haue whereof to boast himselfe VVhat thing is there agreeable vnto Iustification or of the like nature with it Regeneration or the giuing of the holy Ghost or Sanctification Viuification Renouation or the infusion of grace by little and little decaying and altering our corrupt nature eyther also inherent righteousnes which being communicated vnto vs by the holy Ghost doth shew it selfe outwardly by workes and whereby wee are iust not before God but before men and are by him acknowledged and accompted for iust and it appeareth by the mortification of sinne or the olde man and renouation of the new i. by the hatred of sinne and loue of righteousnesse and zeale of good works and it is vsually called inchoated or begunne obedience Whereof 1. Iohn 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous and Apoc. 22.11 He that is righteous let him be more righteous Can Regeneration be separated from Iustification No but yet they may be distinguished neyther are the two benefits of Iustification and Sanctification euer to be confounded as of Iustification he saith Psalm 32.2 Blessed is he to vvhom the Lord imputeth not sinne and of renouation he addeth And in vvhose spirit there is no guile For as in orignall sinne which we haue from Adam there are two things namely the guilt and imputation of that sinne and disobedience as it is said Rom. 5.12 In vvhom namely in Adam vve haue all sinned and that which followed that namely the priuation of righteousnesse So if the opposition be true betweene Christ Adam as contrarie causes and then betweene sinne and righteousnesse as contrarie effectes for after the like and selfe same manner righteousnesse is by Christ as sinne was by Adam it must needes be that we must haue both the imputed and the inherent righteousnesse But in the former consisteth the true Iustification of vs before God because that onely is perfect and maketh a quiet conscience a Rom. 5.1 in the other consisteth our Innouation wherein we must of necessity daily profit but yet not rest vpon it before God seeing it is but imperfect b Rom. 7.18 Doe Iustification and sanctification agree in nothing They agree 1. in the efficient cause For God is the authour of both through the merit of Iesus Christ 2. in the instrumentall cause which is faith the instrument of Iustification by receiuing it the instrument of sanctification not by effecting it c 1. Tim. 1.5 3 In the scope and end for they both tend to one end Iustification as the cause sanctification as the waye Ephes 2.10 vve are created in Christ to good vvorkes vvhich God hath prepared that vve should vvalke in them Is there any difference betweene Iustification and the giuing of the holy Ghost Yes euen as Luk. 15.20 the prodigall sonne is reconciled to his father onely of his meere mercie wherewithall his Fatherly heart is inflamed not for all the ornaments which are bestowed vpon the partie reconciled Which is the difference betweene Iustification and Renouation They differ in beeing 1. In forme for Iustification is the remission of sinnes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and imputation of righteousnesse or acceptation of the person to life eternall of Gods mercie for the lambe of Gods sake that taketh away the sinnes of the world But Renouation is by the Holie Ghost dwelling in the hearts of those that are iustified and kindling new motions agreeable vnto the will of God and reducing them from impure qualities vnto pure qualities So that the giuing of the holy Ghost is not a part of iustification but an appendice or part of this so great benefit a sealing vp and testifying of iustification receiued for the Mediators sake according to that Ephe. 1.13.14 In vvhome vvhilest yee beleeue yee are sealed vvith the Holie spirite of promise vvho is the pledge of our inheritance 2. In subiect For the subiect of righteousnesse is not in vs but in Christ but the subiect of sanctification is the minde will affection and all the outward members a Rom. 6.19 Colloss 3 5 3. In the Obiect For iustification respecteth the
renued by the spirit of GOD not as it is of nature and the law of sinne and the inner man is renued daily and the flesh striueth against the spirit so long as wee carie this mortall bodie about vs as the Apostle witnesseth Rom. 7.23 I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde Therefore seeing the naturall faculties of our soule which are the nearest causes of humane actions are not altogether spirituall and regenerate neyther the flesh that is the corruption of nature is not fully wiped away of them neyther is the faith perfect neyther the spirit and the flesh although distinct yet haue their seuerall seates and abode in vs or worke a sunder seuerally but mixtly It followeth that there is no work of any regenerate man though neuer so excellent which is fully pure or in euerie part thereof is pure from all defilement of the flesh and in some other part altogether vicious and is not wholy mixed with something of the flesh although comparatiuely it be to be iudged a good worke wherein the spirit resisting the flesh doth preuaile as they are euill workes wherein the flesh doth ouercome whereupon Paule saith of himselfe being regenerate I doe not the good that I would but the euill vvhich I vvould not that I doe Rom. 7.19 Hovv then are they said to be perfect a Gen. 6.9 Psal 7.9 Luk 1.6 And easie to all that be borne anevv b mat 11.30 Not because of the perfection of degrees that is the extreme rigour of the law requiring perfect fulfilling thereof in the highest degree but first for the perfection of the parties that is the integritie of obedience conformed according to all the commandements of God and not some onely 2 Because of the synceritie of the heart being void of counterfaiting and hypocrisie 3 Because of the presence of Christs spirit wherewith the regenerate are led a Rom. 8.1.2 4 Also by grace wherby they be deliuered from the curse of the law 5 Lastly because of faith vvhereby all that is borne of God ouercommeth the vvorld 1. Iohn 5.4.5 Seeing that vvhich is good onely in part cannot satisfie the lavv of God and therfore that cannot please God vvhich hath the least imperfection in it hovv then doe the good vvorks of the regenerate please God Not by reason of the worthines of the worke in it selfe or for the excellency order or condition of the man for they are altogether vnworthie in themselues to appeare in the sight of God because they are not the fulfilling of the law But 1 by meanes of the person by faith reconciled accepted and pleasing God and iust thorow Câ—rist euen as Gen. 4.4 The Lord had respect to Abell and to his sacrifice but to Cain and his sacrifice he had no regard And Hebr. 11.5 The person of Enoch pleased God and therefore his works also and because the person pleaseth GOD by faith they are imputed vnto righteousnesse that is they are esteemed as iust as it is written of the zeale of Phinebes when hee thrust thorow the fornicators b ps 106.33 2 They please God because they are brought into light into the sight of God with the couering and vaile of the merite and most perfect righteousnes of Christ applied by faith wherewith the blemishes and defects of our good works are couered 3 Because God doth mercifully approue and crowne them not as they are in themselues but as the works of his owne spirit in vs and as the testimonies of our faith 4 So farre forth as he doth consider them not as they are in themselues but as they are presented in the obedience of Christ our Mediatour in whom being most seuerely punished and in his bloud purged he beholdeth all those things which did make discord betweene vs and him 5 Our obedience being but begun doth please God as it were in the children of obedience not of themselues or their owne worthines but thorow Christ according to that 1. Pet. 2.5 Offer vp spirituall sacrifices acceptable to God thorow Christ For which cause also the regenerate are sometimes called perfect a gen 17 1 Saints and vndefiled in the way b psa 119.1 Iust without rebuke vnblameable vnreproueable c Luk. 1.6 1 Not legally but euangelically not simply and absolutely but by way of comparison or comparatiuely namely so as perfect are opposed to rude 2 By imputation because the person is accompted iust holy vnblameable perfect before God thorow Christ 3 Also inchoatiuely because the new life is begun in them 4 In affection not in action I say in affection vnto godlines not in the perfect action of godlines in the sight God vnlesse it be by imputation VVhat are the Adiuncts or the appurtenances of vvorks There be two merit and recompence or reward VVhat is merit In generall it is an accident of workes which respecteth eyther the reward of a good deed or the punishment of an euill deed Hovv manifold is merite Two fold the merit of punishment which is vsually called the guiltinesse or binding ouer to punishment and the merite of reward which retayneth the generall name of merite and it is a dutie or good turne not due profitable for him to whom it is performed and which doth respect a iust recompence or reward a Ro 47 VVhat is recompence It is the fruit which is giuen to him that worketh for his work and respecteth the desert and by another name it is called vvages and it is double eyther rewarde or punishment VVhat is the proper adiunct of wages Due or debt for wages properly is nothing else but that which is giuen of due or debt for that which is giuen is generall but it is restrained as it were by these differences Grace and debt For that which is giuen is giuen eyther of fauour and is a free gift or else it is giuen of debt and is wages properly so called but in generall wages is vsed for that which is giuen whether it be giuen of fauour or of debt And so there is a double reward or wages one is due the other is not due or freely giuen as it appeareth Rom. 4.4 To him that worketh the wages is counted not of fauour but of debt Whereby it is gathered that by the name of wages is signified in the Scriptures euen a free gift For that which is called Math. 5.46 VVages Luke 6.32 is called fauour or free gift So as the schoolemen doe vainely dreame of a mutuall relation betweene merite wages out of Math. 6.1 For that reward alone which is due of debt doth put on the merit of works but that which is not due debt or free doth not And we doe freely confesse the good works of iust men haue a most liberall remuneration or recompense both in this life and also in the life to come but by fauour not of debt What is debt It is that which a man is bound to pay and it
their hands and that he shall be our Iudge whose brethren we are and the members of his bodie who is a most louing Iesus that is a Sauiour Patron Aduocate Redeemer and Intercessor for vs who laid downe his life for vs and who hath solemnly promised euerlasting life to all them that beleeue in him Rom. 8.32 VVho shall condemne It is Christ that maketh intercession Whereupon we haue good cause to wish for that day according to the saying of Christ When these things beginne to come to passe then looke vp for your redemption draweth neere Luke 21.28 So that it is a merueile which Tertullian in his Apolegetic cap. 38. writeth that Christians were wont to pray for the deferring of the end seeing we daily desire the comming of Gods kingdome 3 It terrifieth the wicked because him whom now they refuse for their Sauiour they shall finde to be their iudge who shall adiudge them to eternall torments VVhat is contrarie hereunto 1 The heathens opinions of the worlds eternitie 2 The Decree of Origen and the Chiliasts that at length a thousand yeares after the Resurrection all shall be saued 3 The errour of them who beside the iudgement that ensueth presently at the first seperation of soule and bodie thinke there doth not an other vniuersall iudgement remaine And of others who thinke that the soules of the godly are not rewarded in heauen nor the soules of the vngodly punished in hell before the day of iudgement 4 The wicked opinion of those mockers who denie or contemning that iudgement or scoffingly asking when that shall be which is so long deferred 2. Pet. 3.3 who so soone as they heare that the last iudgement shall bee cauill As the Epicures and Stoicks cauilled Act. 17.32 following Manilius who saith The fathers savv no other neyther shall posteritie beheld any other 4 The curiositie of them who eyther vpon some fained Reuelation as the Circuncellions the Anabaptists the Enthusiasts who were wont to spread their prophecies amongst the common sort and to set downe the verie certaine yeare moneth and day of iudgement or vpon some position and aspect of the Starres or on some imaginarie supputations of numbers and times or on Arithmeticall calculations as this Platonists or are giuen to iucidiall Astrologie or on common prophecies or on humane authority dare define that time as they who repeat I know not what Rabbines dreame as if it were a diuine Oracle pronounced by Eâ—ias Six thousand yeares the world shall last two thousand years before the Lawe two thousand vnder the Lawe two thousand â—fter the Lawe and then shall the end be which saying may by the Historie it selfe be confuted as vaine because there was two thousand fiue hundred and thirtie yeares before the Lawe and fewer by many then two thousand yeares under the Law and it is manifestly contrarie to the saying of Christ Act. 1.7 For the end of the world doth depend neyther on the Law of nature or on course or any other cause but on the pleasure and secrete will of God onely The nine and thirtieth common Place Of Eternall life How many kindes or differences of life doe the Diuines make THree 1 There is a life of nature which the Apostle calleth an Animall life of the naturall soule being the better part of man a 1. Cor. 2.17 15 47 whereby the good and bad doe in this world one among another liue are quickened doe perceiue and vnderstand which may also be called a Bodily Temporall Naturall and Present life Whereunto the first or naturall death which is a dissolution of the bodie and the soule is opposed 2 There is a life of grace which Gods children onely in the spirituall kingdome of Christ doe enioy in this world which by way of excellency is called The life of God not so much for that it is from God as all the other three kinds of life also are as because God liueth in them that are his that this life he sheweth and approoueth b Ephe. 4.18 and it is called for the same respect The life of Christ because Christ liueth in his through a supernaturall faith and spirit and they liue vnto God and conforme their life vnto his will c Gal. 2.20 and it is called a new life a Christian life and a Renewing of the mind will and affections and it is also called a new creature a new man supernaturall and spirituall which is opposed to death in sinne and to the old man a Col. 3.3 3 There is a life of glorie whereby the soule being ioyned againe to her owne bodie shall lead a life which the Apostle calleth spirituall not in respect of the substance but of the qualities 1. Corinth 15.44 whereby the faithfull shall liue for euer and it is laid vp in Christ and in the end of the world shall be disclosed a and which is opposed to the second death and is called eternall whereof only here we are to intreat But how manie waies is aeternall life taken Two waies 1. Metonymically both for the way that is in the meanes and manner of comming to the inheritance of heauen Iohn 3.36 He which beleeueth on the sonne hath aeternall life And Cap. 17.3 This is eternall life that they acknowledge thee to be the onlie true god and whome thou hast sent Christ Iesus where by the way we may note Thee and whome thou hast sent Christ Iesus to be the subiects in this proposition and the only true God the praedicates of either subiect Also for Christ himselfe 1. Iohn 5 20. This is the true God and life eternall Efficiently indeed as he is God but as he is man and died for vs in part materially because sinne which is the cause of death was purged in his flesh in part also efficiently but by a secondarie meanes namely by his intercession good will and vertue of his sacrifice by the communication of his flesh with vs and of forgiuenes of sinnes and of life eternall which is therein partly also instrumentally because the deity quickeneth vs by reason of the substantiall vnioÌ„ through the flesh And after this sense is life aeternall begunne in the faithfull in this life 2 Properly for the estate of the blessed after this life whereof Iohn in the same 3. chapter 16. verse whosoeuer belieueth on the sonne can not perish but hath euerlasting life And. 3.7 to Tit. 9. We are heires according to the hope of eternall life By what arguments doe we proue that there is a life eternall 1 From the nature of God for seeing there is a god and the same is liuing and eternall it followeth necessarily that there is a life eternall whereby god liueth and is eternall 2 From the condition of the soule for seeing that it is immortall it followeth that there doth remaine an other life after this wherein the soule liueth by it selfe though seperated from the body and in which life she acknowledgeth and praiseth god highly 3
otherwise preach the Gospel then he his Apostles did a Gal. 1 9 1 Cor. 11 25 2 Because it is a cursed deede to adde any thing to the testament of Christ or to take away Gal. 3 15. 3 Because more fruit doth redound to the faithfull by both signes then by one and two signes do signifie more fullie do more moue the minde then one otherwise Christ had added another signe to no purpose 4 Because Chrysostom saith It is not with vs as in the old law where some parts of the sacrifices were giuen to the priests some went to the offerers Hom. 8. vpō 1 Cor. 11 but the same body of Christ the same cup is set forth to vs al. 5 Because it is lawfull for councills to determine nothing against the worde of God 6 Because although we be not bound to doe alwaies that which is commaunded as when men cannot for want of oportunitie be partakers either of baptisme or the lords supper yet when we doe it we must not departe from the ordināce of God 7 Because seeing that we are so free from a multitude of Ceremonies that we haue a few easie and plaine it is an intollerable thing if we will not performe them without corruption 8 Because the Pascall Lamb Manna and the sacrifices were not figures of the supper but of Christ And. 1. Cor. 10.3 4. The Israralites are said to eate the same spirituall meat and to drinke the same spirituall drinke 9 Because the keeping of the bread of the Lords supper was superstitious and could be done more easily then of wine 10 Because the aduersaries themselues do grant that in old time bread was giuen into the hands but that the cup was wont with the Deacons hand to be put to the mouth of the communicants which would drinke of it in the Church and at that which they call Corpus Christi feast they sing thus Dedit fragilibus corpo ris ferculum Dedit testibus salutis poculum Dicens accipite quod trado vasculū omnes ex eo bibite That is he gaue to the weake the dish of his body he gaue also to the sorrowful the cup of safety saying take this small vessell which I giue drinke ye alof it 11 Because godly consciences are not to be debarred of the sweete promise which by the voice of the sonne of God is annexed to pertaking of the cup. 12 Because the cause is not taken away for which Christ ordayned the vse of the cup. 13 Because Paul wrighting to the whole church of the Corinthians yea to all that call on the name of Iesus Christ in euerie place 1. Cor. 1.2 not onely to the ministers of the church doth commaund both kindes to be giuen take eat drinke Neither are the wordes let him eat and drink lesse commaunding then let him examine and truly till the comming of the Lord Chap. 11 28. 14 Because they are deceiued which suppose that the lay mēs communion in time past signified the participation of one of the partes onely but the Clergies of both For there also both kindes were giuen but it was called a lay communion because the Clerick ministers put out of their office for some offence did not communicate any more among the Clergy or among the ministers but as mingled among the companie of lay men 15 Because it is a new and lately deuised mingling of the sacrament of the Euchariste 16 Because when their is mention made of breaking of bread by a Synecdoche the whole supper is vnderstood otherwise the Apostles themselues whose office it was to break bread had vsed onely one signe Whether or no for the discommodities which Gerson doth reckē vp as 1. The liqour by some chance may be spilt 2. It cannot be caried about without daunger 3. In winter it soone waxeth sower 4. In his booke of the communion vnder kinde In sommer it purifieth and hath wormes 5. It bringeth a lothing to thē which drinke 6. In some countries it is hardly gotten 7 By this meanes lay mē touch the cup. 8. Some of them haue beards 9. Some are taken with the palsey 10. The dignity of the priest of lay mē is not alike are these causes weightie inough iust for which by good right one parte of the sacramēt could be takē away frō the laicks In no wise because 1 Christ the Apostles and the ancient Church set not so much by these and the like things foreseene of them that therfore they supposed the holy Supper in one part thereof should bee maymed 2 Because it may happen also to the bread that it may fal vpon the ground and being kept long may become mustie yet it is not excluded Truely negligence in handling of mysteries is to bee taken heed of but if by chance but one onely piece of bread or drop of wine fall on the earth for want of circūspectiō it hath not any more the forme of a Sacrament when it cannot be any more vsed 3 Because the keeping of it against the time to come for the vse of sicke folkes and the carrying of it from place to place did spring from mans superstition 4 Because it is a superstition not to permit vnto lay men that they should touch the cup with hand or with mouth whom Paul 1. Cor. 6 11. saith To be washed and sanstified and iustifyed in the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our Lord. 5 Because that collection from particulars is erroneous For neither if some doe abhorre wine and some nations do hardly get wine some also can hardly keepe it being carried vnto them by reason of the extreame cold is a law to bee made which may prescribe to the whole Christian world a necessitie of communicating in one kinde But it is more tolerablie concluded that the abstemious may eyther abstaine from the Supper of the Lord whereof nature hath depriued them or if they bee present that the offering it them is sufficient Or that proportionable drinke which men doe familiarly vse is to be vsed in those places where wine cannot be had at all then to conclude vpon Gersons premisses the denial of the cuppe 6 Because by reason of the bearded which were in the ancient Church the cuppe was not nor is not to be denied vnto women as it is in poperie 7 Because Christians ought not to be so delicate and if the pollution of some communicants be enormious and abhominable or there be seare of some dangerous and infectiue sicknes these may communicate eyther a part by themselues or in the last ranke 8 Because in the palsey and those which are troubled with the shaking of the head that warinesse may bee vsed that there may bee no neede of chaunging of the institution of Christ 9 Neyther is the commaundement of Goe to bee made of none authoritie that the tradition of men may bee kept Math. 15.6 10 Because the dignitie of the minister is not placed in
senses all which truely together cannot bee deceiued vnlesse they bee withholden as in the two Disciples which did thinke the Lord to be some stranger and in Marie Magdalene which supposed that he had beene the gardiner Luk. 24.16 Ioh. 20.15 Whether vnlesse the bodie of Christ be determined to be euery where by this is it separated and pulled asunder from the Diuine nature which is eueriewhere and to which it selfe is personally vnited or hath the body of the Lord obtained that by the vnion that it should be wheresoeuer the word is In no wise because of those things which are equally vnited so as one doth not stretch further then another one cannot be in any place where the other is not but if the one doe stretch further then wheresoeuer the lesse is there also is the greater but not contrariwise as wee may see in a precious stone and in a ring Because therefore the diuinitie of Christ doth exceede the humanitie wheresoeuer the humanity is there is the diuinitie with it not on the contrarie Neither is the personall vnion a making euen of the humane nature with the Diuine or an effusion of the properties of the Diuine nature into the humane that the humane nature may haue the same properties which the diuine hath but it is such an vnion wherby the humane nature doth subsist in the person of the word so as it may be as it were a part therof neither may it subsist by it selfe or without the word But it doth not follow Epist 57. ad Dard. saith Augustine that that which is in God is euery where as God is Moreouer seing that the deitie is euery where whole not by parts not as in a place it cannot be that the humane nature which it assumed can be said to be separated any where from it although it be contained onely in it owne place so as the inuiolable truth thereof doth beare But also the bodie of the sunne and the light thereof haue betweene themselues a naturall and extreme coniunction yet notwithstaÌ„ding to what places soeuer the light doth extend it self the body doth not come to them really So also the eye the sight are verie neerly ioyned together between themselues yet the sight goeth to many things to which the eye doth not extend it selfe Finally rightly said those ancient fathers in the general council of Chalcedon that the difference of natures in Christ is not taken away for the vnion but rather that the propertie is kept of both natures concurring into one person or one hypostasis But whether did that which Christ said Ioh. 3.13 No man ascendeth vp to heauen but the sonne of man which is in heauen make the humane nature of Christ while it was in earth to haue beene also at the same time in heauen No for the Sonne of man in this place signifieth the whole person of Christ which also is the Sonne of God but the humane nature doth signifie onely one part of that person which was assumed in time of the virgin Therefore that which is spoken of this person which is not man onely but also God is amisse said to be spoken of the humane nature also For by this it should be gathered that the humane nature was before Abraham before it was conceiued in the wombe of the virgine But it is certaine that the sonne of God when hee did speake in earth was in heauen in the same manner wherein hee descended from heauen For Christ doth speake of one and the same subiect that is of the sonne of man that he descended from heauen concerning whom he said that he is in heauen But the son of maÌ„ is said to haue desceÌ„ded not because his flesh fell downe from heauen but because the diuine nature is from heauen and tooke vnto it humane flesh Therefore the sonne of man when hee was vpon earth is so said to haue beene in heauen not because the humane nature but because the diuine nature of this sonne which alwaies filleth heauen and earth was in heauen namely by the Trope Synecdoche wherby both the whole is plainely vnderstood Booke 6. cap. and a part is named of the whole saith Cassian It is not vniust to subiect the nature of Christs glorious body which is called spirituall to the lawes of common nature In no wise because the glorie abolished not the trueth of the bodie nor changed it into a spirit but altogether made it subiect to the spirit a Luk. 24.36 Acts. 1.9 10 11. 7.55 56 Aug. Whether doe the Orthodoxall Fathers when they write that the bread which the Lord did reach to the Disciples not changed in forme but in nature by the almightie power of his word was made flesh Cyprian Serm. de caena domini In prologe Psal 33 That Christ bare himselfe in his hands Augustine That the bodie of the Lord doth enter into our mouth That the tongue is made bloudie with the bloud of Christ and that Christ himselfe is seene touched broken and that teeth are fastned to his flesh whither doe they I say b Chrysost Hom. 83. vpon Math. 45. vpoÌ„ Iohn hom 24 vpoÌ„ 1. Cor. speake properly and without trope No seeing that the senses themselues and experience do witnesse the contrarie and these things cannot bee spoken properly without great and Capernaiticall blasphemy Therefore those speaches of the fathers are figuratiue whereby the name and effects of bodie and bloud are giuen to bread and wine and in like manner those things which are done in the signes are attributed to the bodie and bloud of Christ but yet although somewhat hardly and by an hyperbole to commend the worthinesse of the mysterie they doe shewe in these most expresse figuratiue and Metonimicall phrases how certaine and effectuall the mystery is of our communion with Christ or our spirituall eating of Christ namely of such sort that we may bee flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is that being truely made one with him wee may enioy all his goods b Ephe. 5.30 In epist vpon Ioh tractat 1 serm de Crâ—mate Epist 102 ad Euodium Otherwise saith Augustin We cannot with the hand handle Christ fitting in heaueÌ„ but we can touch Christ by faith And Tract vpon Io. 50. The bodie of Christ ascended into heauen some body may aske How shal I hold him being absent How shal I send my hands into heauen that I may hold him sitting there Send thy faith thou hast hold on him And vpon Ps 73. he writeth that he did beare himself in his owne hands after a sort namely because he did beare in his own hands the SacrameÌ„t of his bodie And Cyprian saith that Sacraments haue the names of those things which they doe signifie And the same Augustin Neither let it moue thee saith he that somtime the thing which doth signifie doth take the name of that thing which it signifieth for so the rock is called
humane ordinance 1. Pet. 2.13 this hee doth not because man deuised it for it is an excellent gift of God but because it is either proper to men or appointed for the good of men Out of all this wee may gather that the Pope of Rome is Gods aduersary in that he dares arrogate this to himselfe to translate Kings to set vp and pull downe whome hee will Is it necessarie to keepe this particle in the difinition of a magistrate that hee is ordained of God It is 1. First that by this wee may acknowledge God the author thereof 2. That wee may obey this diuine ordinance 3. That the Magistrate may know that in his faithfull seruice to God he doth that which pleaseth him 4. That both Magistrates and subiectes may receiue comfort from this that God gouerneth all the daungers of this politicke life but as for tyrants and rebels hee will punish them May a Christian man being lawfully called by the Law of God and in a good conscience become a Magistrate Surely he may 1. Because magistracie is the good ordinance and disposition of God a Rom. 13.1 1 Pet 2 13 2. Because the Gospel doth not abrogate policies politicke administration no more then it doth physick or Architecture the sciēce of building onely it proclaimeth spirituall righteousnesse which is by faith in Christ 3 Because the Magistrate is cōmaunded to serue the Lord in feare and to kisse the sonne of God b Ps 2.11 that is by this symbolicall note of subiection to acknowledge and professe Christ his Lord. Now this no man can better doe then a true Christian who aboue others is indewed with the knowledge faith and feare of God 4. God commaunds praiers to be made for the Magistrates Ierem. 29.7 Pray for the kingdome of Babilon for in the peace thereof shall bee your peace Thus Abraham prayed for king Abimeleck c Gen. 20.17 Iacob blessed the king of Egypt d Gen. 47.10 1. Tim. 2.1 I exhort you saith Paul that praiers and supplications and thankesgiuings be made for all men for Kings and such as are set in authoritie yet the magistrates of those times were Infidels it followeth therefore necessarily that magistracie is both a good thing and acceptable to God for we must not pray for the establishing of that which is euill 5 We haue also examples of such as bare rule and yet were Christs most faithfull disciples such were Ioseph of Arimathea Nicodemus Sergius Paulus Erastus and many others and such we read that the Centurions were e Mar. 15.9 Ioh. 3.1 Act 13 7 12 Rom. 16.25 that I may say nothing of those most holy Emperors Constantine Theodosius and others who defended the church both by publick authority and victorious armes Is thinke you power and authority from the Diuell because he is called the prince of the world Iohn 12.31 16.11 And because he saith Math. 4.8.9 That the kingdomes of the earth are in his power and he can giue them to whome he will In no sorte for he is not called a prince by right absolutely simply but in that he is so by treachery malice vsurpation abusion and relation to those who are subiects vnto him as for his speach to Christ he belyes his authority and therein shewes himselfe a lying spirit for he cannot giue kingdomes to whome he will But doth not this make as though god allowes not the authority of Princes because he is displeased with his people for making a king in Israell 1. Sam. 8.6.7 No but he rather disliked 1. The diffidence of the people who relied more vpon man than God 2. Their boldnesse in erecting a new forme of gouernment 3. The contempt of Gods gouernment in that contemning God their King they sought a certaine King after the example of other nations 4. Their tedious wearinesse both of faith and hope whereby they were bound to depend vpon God and expect iudges at his alone pleasure for the Israelites from Moses to Samuell had Iudges who sometime of one and sometimes of another tribe were set ouer them for the most part by the extraordinarie hand of God therefore God in his wrath saith vnto Samuell Hearken vnto the voice of this people for they haue not onely dispised thee but mee that I should not raigne ouer them 1. Sam. 8.7 and in Osea the 13.11 saith the Lord I haue giuen thee a King in my wrath and taken him away in mine indignation But since many bad men yea tyrants are Magistrates and in gouernments much iniustice is committed in iudgements are many deceipts can we say that euen their offices are of God 1. Surely they are because they are the good ordinances of God Rom. 13.1 as for these abuses and corruptions they are in the persons who take vpon them the office of Magistrates neither are these from God but haue another beginning as from the Diuell and from both the malice and weaknesse of men we must therefore distinguish betwixt the office and bad persons which are in office For this is a fallacion of the accident when by reason of the corruption of some gouernours manifold confusions in mans life the politick gouernment it selfe is condemned 2. Neither must wee looke onely what euill is in gouernment but what good is in it the good wee must commend as the consociation of mankinde marriage and in it the procreation and education of children contracts distinctions of Lordships iudgements punishments of the wicked defence of the good nourceries to schooles and Churches and such like but as for the euils in gouernment wee must wisely couer them and by the consideration of our good not so much as name them 3. To conclude corruptions in gouernments are oftentimes punishments and as it were prisons whereby God doth punish the sins of men as it is said Ecclesiasticus 10.8 Because of the vnrighteous dealing and wrongs and riches gotten by deceipt the Kingdome is translated from one people to another and this saying is often true Quicquid delirant reges plectuntur Achini Let Grecian Princes doe amisse The Grecian subiect punisht is Doth not the Gospell vtterly abolish politick order in prohibiting Reuenge No for reuenge is twofold one ordinate or publick which is done by the Magistrate in a certaine order by certaine lawes to a good end without hatred to the person which the Gospell forbiddeth not nay it is a part of the magistrates office whereupon Paul Rom. 13.4 doth expresly call the Magistrate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an auenger of him that doth euill and it is most agreeable to the Lawe of nature and consonant to that Deut. 32.35 Vengeance is mine and I will repay it for God the iust iudge doth punish sins either without mans helpe as in the destruction of Sodome or by ordinarie punishments which hee hath committed to Magistrates 2. The second is inordinate proceeding from an euill affection tending to the hurt or ouerthrowe of him of whome wee seeke
by faith and ouerthrew their enemies But wee must remember this withall that a wise man must first trie all meanes before he goe to warre And the magistrate must beware that he be not therein led by his owne lusts or by any wicked or corrupt affection but as Augustine saith Let him euen pitie the common nature in that man in whom he punisheth his proper and particular offence And lastly the warre must be iust As for that speach Math. 26.52 He that smiteth with the sword shall perish by the sword It is to be vnderstood of him to whom the sword is not deliuered by the Lord that is to say hee that without any superiour authoritie commanding or granting the same vnto him doth vsurpe the sword to smite another man And to Peter being a shepheard of soules and a preacher of the Gospell it was said Put vp thy sword into his sheath as in like manner that 2. Tim. 2.4 is spoken to ministers No man that warreth entangleth himselfe with the affaires of this life Onely they may with their exhortations and prayers be helpefull vnto them that fight iust battels as Iosh 6.8 commaundement is giuen that the Priests should blowe the Trumpets in the time of warre Lastly that speach of the Prophet Micah prophecying of the kingdome of Christ Micah 4.4 They shall breake their swords into mattockes and their speares into sithes nation shall not lift vp a sword against natiō nor learne to fight is meant of the Christiās and thereby is shewed what their behauiour and endeuour shall be and ought to be among the Gentiles namely that they shall seeke loue and peace and concord which all they doe that embrace Chrst Iesus the Prince of peace with a true faith but outwardly to defend themselues against wicked men is not forbidden How many sorts of warre be there Two Spirituall and Carnall Spirituall is that kinde of warre or combat which the spirit hath against the flesh the diuell and the world a Gal. 5.17 In which warre faith in Christ Iesus the word of God a care zeal of iustice such like vertues are weapōs necessary for vs but they are spirituall weapons b Eph. 6.13 2 Cor. 10 4 1 Thess 5.8 The carnall warre is that which is fought with carnal weapons And the battell is the verie fight conflict of disagreeing persons among themselues this later the Graecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fight the former is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 warre What is politicall or carnall warre It is a lawfull defence or a lawfull recouery of those things which are wrongfully taken away or a iust and due punishment which is inflicted by a mans owne magistrate by force and by corporall weapons Which are iust warres 1 Those which without the manifest danger of the whole common wealth and of the common safetie cannot bee pretermitted 2 Those which are commaunded by the chiefe magistrate to whom the care of the commonwealth is committed or else by him that hath the gouernment thereof vnder him and in this case the priuate person must follow that commission that he hath receiued of his superiour magistrate for this action of warre is the principall part of the higher power 3 The warre must be vndertaken vpon a cause iust and necessarie and agreeable to the word of God 4 The warre must first be denounced to the enemie and the matters for which they warre must first be rehearsed that is to say there must be no warlike action vsed nor hostilitie performed vntill first the Heralds that is the publike messengers of armes and of warre haue denounced the same vnto the enemie and offered conditions of peace a Deut. 20 10 Gen. 11.12 5 They must be made with a right intention not in desire to hurt or in crueltie but labouring for peace and to bridle the wicked and relieue the good For as Augustine saith Men doe not seeke peace to the intent to make warre Libro 5. de verbis dōini but they make warre to the intent to seeke peace Which are iust and necessarie causes of warre The remote causes are peace in time to come and the amendement of our enemies against whom wee fight and by whom wee haue beene vniustly iniured and prouoked a Math. 5 9 23 The propinque or immediate causes are the requiring againe of the thing that is vniustly taken from vs and not restored or of the iniurie or contumely but chiefely the repulse punishment and reuenge of the offence that is committed against vs b Gen. 19.15 20.1 2 Sam. 10.6 7 And lastly the necessarie defence of those that are in league with vs or beeing in our armie are in some extreame daunger Is it lawfull to defend true Religion with weapons It is lawfull so to doe against those that are of other countries that haue no authoritie ouer vs yea and against any part of the Commonwealth which goeth about to ouerthrow the true Religion being once receiued by the publike consent of all estates of the land c Ios 22.10 11.12 2 K. 23.15 In this regard it was lawfull for Constantine to defend the Christians against Licinius his fellow in office For so God commaundeth in the law Deut. 13.14 to slay the inhabitants of that Citie within our dominions with the edge of the sword which shall worship other Gods and continue obstinately in their wickednesse and much more iust then and more necessarie is it to resist them that would force vpon vs strange Gods and wicked superstitions and take away the wholesome doctrine of the word of God or infect it with the brainsicke conceits of mens traditions And this the law of nature approueth which teacheth vs that wee owe all we haue to God and by which the Athenians in times past being enlightened did publikly bind their Citizens by an oth that they should fight for their Gods and for their Temples and holy rites both with themselues and with others But the Lord hath not commaunded his seruants to inuade other countries or to make warre for idolatrie but commaundeth his people to ouerthrow the Altars within their owne lands and territories a Deut 7.1 5 Neyther hath Christ commaunded vs for the propagation of religion to make warre vpon forraine countries which are not subiect vnto vs but to teach them and to preach the gospell vnto them and where the gospell is not receiued to flie and giue place Math. 10.23 Are those iust actions that doe accompanie and are incident to warre namely spoyles ambushes besiegings slaughter taking away their furniture and such other Calamities which are vsually done to the enemie in time of warre They are iust actions if the cause of the warre at first were iust Epist 105 ad Bonif. if that were vniust they are also vniust But yet Saint Augustine telleth vs that It is not sufficient that the warre be iust vnlesse it be also iustly performed Which that it may be
these cautions following are to be obserued 1 Burning or pulling downe of villages trees that beare fruit cutting vp and spoyling of cornefields vnlesse the enemies abuse the same to our preiudice are not allowed by the word of God b deut 20.19 2 In iust warres it is lawfull and meete to vse against our enemies spies ambushes pollicies yea and stratagems but so as no promise made vnto the enemie be broken for wee must keepe faith euen with the enemie so long as he doth not breake with vs. Whereupon Augustine hath this speach c Psal 15 4 Lib. quest Quest 83 VVhen warre is once iustly vndertaken it skilleth not whether a man fight openly in the field or closely by way of ambush And this he proueth by the authoritie of God himselfe who commanded Ioshua that he should lye in waite against the Citie of Ai d Ios 8.2 And commaunded also Dauid that he should turne about behind the Philistines come vpon them on the other side e 2 Sam 5 23 For in warre that sentence is verie true Dolus an virtus quis in hoste requiret If once I fight against my foe I looke for fraud let vertue goe And we see that euen by the commaundement of God spies were sent from the hoast of Israell vnto the promised land and that good men euen Caleb and Ioshua f Numb 13 17 3 When the enemie seeketh peace the law of suppliants and of those that yeeld and submit themselues is to be obserued by which meanes the Gibeonites were spared Ioshua 9.3 4 In Cities or Townes that are vanquished by force after once the victorie doth appeare certainly to be thine refrain from shedding the bloud of the Citizens that are taken and so also from crueltie towards women infants and old decrepite men and aboue all beware of rauishing or deflowring of women for the law of God neuer tolerateth adulterers or rauishing of virgins or matrones but most seuerely condemneth it and so long as the enemie liueth so long continueth the diuine bond of mariage Those whom God hath ioyned together let no man put asunder Math. 19.6 5 The victorie must be vsed moderately and difference made betweene the causes that moued the leaders and the error of the people and the armie or people yeelding themselues must not be cruelly put to the sword g 2 Cron 28 18. For saith Augustine writing to Boniface As he that fighteth it out and resisteth is to be requited with violence so the conqueror oweth mercy to him that is taken captiue specially if he be such a one as in whom there is no feare of disturbing the common peace And therefore the Romans are commended because they knew Parcere subiectis debellare superbos To pitie those that subiect were And stubborne proud ones downe to beare And in generall vnlesse there be a speciall and peculiar commandement of God to the contrarie clemency is more to bee commended then too much seueritie For it is no vnaduised speach that in lenitie and mercie is the chiefe part of the victory 6 The ransackings and spoyles taken in warre doe of right belong to the Conquerour and are of right his goods and that as Ambrose saith by the verie lawe of warre For there is a iust translation of things from one to another when he that wageth lawfull warre doth possesse the substance of them that are offenders as Cyrus was iustly made ruler of the king of the Babylonians a Isay 45.1 And this point is confirmed by the examples of Abraham b Gen. 14.21 Dauid c 1 Sam. 30 20 and the Israelitese. 7 There must be a meane vsed in the defending of places besieged that we fight not with mans nature d Ios 22 8 but with men our enemies as Xenophon in his first booke of the matters of Greece reporteth that Anaxilaus being accused before the Spartane Iudges for yeelding into the enemies hands the citie of Byzantium which was committed to his charge when he saw many die for hunger he made answere that he defended it as long as the warre was betwixt them and the enemie but when he saw that the warre was betweene them and nature and that such men perished as in warre vse to be spared he then thought there was an ende of the warre which honest excuse when the Iudges heard they acquited and discharged him for warlike offices haue their bounds confirmed by the law of God and nature 8 As for common souldiers and those in garrison trauelling along the countries eyther of their companions they haue these lawes giuen them by Iohn Baptist Luke 3.14 Doe violence to no man neyther accuse any falsely and be content with your wages And the sentence of the Emperour Aurelian in Vopiscus is worthie of exceeding great cōmendation who gaue vnto the Tribune his vicegerent these commaundements If thou wilt be a Tribune nay if thou wilt liue restraine the hands of the souldiers let no man take another mans pullen let no man touch another mans sheepe let no man take away other mens grapes nor destroy their corne nor exact of them oyle salt or wood let euerie one be content with his diet let him take part of the enemies pray not of the teares of the inhabitants c. Seeing that for the most part Princes make warre of an euill and corrupt affection how shall the subiects that are their souldiers satisfie their consciences They are thus to be perswaded that the warre is made vpon a iust cause and that it is not vndertaken against the word of God which is spoken to this end that subiects should not suffer themselues wittingly and willingly to be compelled to oppugne iust and true causes But because subiectes cannot alwaies vnderstand the true causes and counsels of their Princes in this case in the middest of their doubtfulnesss this rule is to bee followed hold that which is certaine and leaue that which is vncertaine Now this is certaine that wee must obey authoritie when it commaundeth not things manifestly vniust And as in the law of Moses Exod. 21.13 there was a refuge and sanctuary appointed for him that had killed another man not willingly nor of set purpose so are the subiects worthie of excuse when in a doubtfull cause they obey their Prince Are those mercenarie souldiers to be allowed of that being hyred with a price will follow eyther side No in no sort For. 1 The most of them doe not fight for their owne magistrate but for forraine Princes 2 They doe most filthily forsake the calling that they haue from God and leauing their parents their wiues their children their trades or their husbandrie they betake themselues to such a kinde of life as there cannot be at this day a worse or a more wicked life deuised 3 They propound vnto themselues none other end but spoile or to satisfie their lust and they are for the most part of the number of those that shed
subiect to the higher powers be he an Apostle bee hee an Euangelist bee hee a prophet bee he who hee may bee for this subiection doth not ouerturne pietie and. 2. Peter 2.10 Peter condemnes them who despise gouernement and feare not to raile on them who are in authoritie The which it is plain against whom it is spoken Neither was it lawfull for princes and gouernours so to depart from their right as to exempt the Clergie from the authoritie of the magistrate neither must we looke what they did in this matter but what they ought to haue done because they cannot neither euer could annihilate the commandements of God What is the office of a good subiect and citizen towards his commonwealth 1. In generall to profit it in the Lord according to his calling both in peace and warre a 2 Sam. 2◠16 22 Heb. 11 22 2 2. To pray for it and the safety of it b Ps 122 7 Ier. 29 3. To helpe it but in a iust cause by the precept of Christ Mat. 20.27 in a word amongst Christians a good man a good citizen hath in euery thing the like office What is the office of subiects to the Magistrate 1. Obedience that all men if hee bee lawfull obey him bee he faithfull or an Infidell whither hee commaunde iustly or couetously or cruelly c 1 Sā 8 11 Ier 27 8 29 7 Ac 24 16. Tit. 3 1 1 Pet. 2.13 Rom 13.1 because not without the singular prouidence of God euen they who iniustly and cruelly rule are stirred vp to punish the sinnes of the people d EZe 29 19 Dan. 2.21 37. 5.18 Rom. 13.1 There is no power but of God Nay it is necessarie most equall to be subiect neither is it a thing indifferent or arbitrarie but such as binds the verie conscience Rom. 13.5 Because no man with a good conscience can resist him to whose power God hath made him subiect And surely subiects are bound to obey in all things but vsque ad aras not violating religion and so farre forth as Magistrates commaund not things impossible and aboue our abilitie and contrarie to the lawe of Nature or of God or forbid those things which God commandeth according to that rule of Christ Math. 22.21 Giue vnto Caesar the things that are Caesars and vnto God the things that are Gods and Acts. 5.29 It is better to obey God then men according to which rule Sidrach Misach Abednego and Daniell did well not to obey but without deliberation constantly and sincerely withstoode the vngodly edicts of the Kings both of worshipping the grauen Image and not calling vpon God a Da. 3 18 6 11 on the contrarie the Israelites are condemned who obeyed the vngodly Edict of King Ieroboam to worship the golden calfe b 1 kings 12 30 What if some Magistrates commaund things iust or vniust are the godly citizens to esteeme them as such Lawes as they are bound to keepe No surely not simply to both the termes of the Lawe because euery Lawe bindeth either to obedience which is one terme or to punishment which is another terme but they are so farre forth to esteeme them as lawes and are bound vnto them as they themselues or their country or that common wealth in which they liue can yeeld or else can willingly vndergoe the punishments appointed if they liue in that common-wealth and cannot obey these lawes for priuate men cannot violate publick and ancient Lawes though they be euill but they must either obey them or if with a good conscience they cannot they must either submit themselues to punishment or else depart out of such gouernments but the states of a Christian common wealth must either abrogate such Lawes or prouide that they be abrogated Doth Paule exempt the faithfull from obedience to these Lawes in saying 1. Tim. 1.9 The Lawe is not giuen to the righteous No but hee sheweth that the Law was not made against him who ordereth his life according to the rule thereof such a one is onely hee whom the Lord indueth with true Doctrine and the holy Ghost against such a man also the Law cannot pronounce the sentence of condemnation because he is iustified neither doth it handle him as an enemie but ruleth teacheth and delighteth him as one assenting vnto it but this Lawe is against him who hath not these fruites of the spirit which are repeated Gal. 5.13 and it confirmeth that which is Rom. 13. The Magistrate is not to be feared of them that doe well but that doe euill and thou shalt not feare the King What is the second office of subiects towards the Magistrate Honour or feare or reuerence 1. That they admire and reuerence gouernours ex animo in heart in word in gesture and feare them as Gods vicegerents such was the reuerence which Quintus Fabius Maximus yeelded to his sonne beeing Consull but Christians must goe farre higher Further that they thinke charitably and iudge honorably of the whole state a 1 king 1 23.31 that they construe euen faults in the best part and either couer them with a godly equitie or passe ouer them by a prudent dissimulation or correct them by moderate counsels and admonitions that they submit themselues willingly to his sentence b 2. Sam. 19 19 that they pardon all wrongs forbeare the least violence and in a word that they speake not euill of him c Exod 22 2.8 Act. 23 5 1 Pet 2.17 But that they Giue feare to whome feare belongeth and Honour to whom Honour belongeth Rom. 13.7 VVhat is the Third Fidelitie or that naturall requiting affection which the grecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that subiects doe as much as they can by an honest and godly meanes preserue keepe and defend the safetie life right dignitie cause person and familie of their Soueraine Magistrate against all such as shall conspire against him d 2 Sam. 16 9.20.2.11 2 K. 12.2 c For if wee must giue our liues for the brethren much more for our Gouernors who are fathers 1. Iohn 3 16. What is the forth Piety to pray for the Magistrate for his safety and gouernment 1. Tim. 2. 1. Ier. 29.7 Dan. 6.21 So the Christians of the Church Primitiue prayed for their heathen Emperours wishing vnto them long life secure gouernment a safe house Tract in Apol. Cap. 30 valiant soldiers faithfull Senators good people and quiet Kingdomes Onely Iulian the Apostata was that Emperour for whom they durst not pray e 1 Ioh 5.16 Gal. 5 12 VVhat is the fift Not as Polypragmous to make an inroarde vpon the dutie of the Magistrate but rather if wee knowe any thing which may be for the good of the common weale to acquaint him with it and to craue both aduise and assistance from him a 2 Sam. 4.4 2 K 6 26.8 3. Those two verses are therefore worthy to bee remembred of all busie bodies which Iohn Functius as hee went
to be punished did repeat Disce meo exemplo mandato munere fungi Et fuge ceu postem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Learne by my losse to doe alone that longs to thee And as a plague that kils all busie medling flee What is the sixt Loue or gratitude and beneuolence which they must declare by their best seruices b Gen 47 7 to 2 Sā 14.4 2 K 19.2 20 7 What is the seauenth They are bounde to helpe him according to their abilities be it by Taxes or Subsidies or tenthes or other waies and this they must doe without murmuring c 1 Sam 8 1◠Pro. 13.7 Christ did so d Mat 17 and commaunded subiects to doe so e M 22.21 Abraham paid tythes to Melchisedech Gen. 14.20 Ioseph and Marie in the New Testament went to be taxed f L 2.4 5 And how can the common wealth be preserued and gouerned without tributes yea and The labourer is worthy of his hyre Luke 10.7 Nay the Lawe of Nature teacheth it by which all Nations who had any forme of gouernment since the creation of the world haue paid tributes For Taxes Subsidies and regall hereditaments are graunted to Princes either to testifie the loue of subiects or to rewarde the care of the Magistrate and that they may better endure all publick charges And if citizens are bounden to aduenture their liues in the Kings seruice much more must they communicate their goods for the common good Are Clergie men or Church men as they are called exempted from all taxes and Subsidies Surely Christ chalenged no such priuiledge for hee was readie to pay tribute for himselfe and Peter And it is against the Lawe of charitie that they who haue proper Lands and other emoluments by the Church should bee exempted from ciuill charges casting that burthen vpon the shoulders of others as though when all others are in want they onely should be free g 2 Cor. 8.33 As for that Gen. 47.26 where wee reade that the Egyptian Priests paid not the fift part this was because their fields were not sold to the King in that dearth they hauing corne from the Kings Granaries But the Leuiticall Priests were in Israell iustly exempted because they possessed no fields amongst that people but only liued of oblations Notwithstanding Iustinian made a Law that Churchmen should be free from such personall seruices as were performed by industry and labour because if they were bound to them they must needes be withdrawne from their dueties Wee also deny not but that princes may remit to them somewhat of their tributes so it bee not to others hinderance and to maintaine their ryot But wee auouch that Churchmen cannot chalenge such immunitie by gods word neither that they can in conscience deny trybute to princes if it be demaunded Wherefore wee auouch that that decree of Boniface the eight is most iniust wherein hee straightly forbiddeth Churchmen not once to pay tribute to profane Princes without the Popes authoritie Why must subiects performe obedience to the Magistrate 1. For the commaundement and ordinance of God 2. To auoid punishments because they who resist magistracie are subiect to punishment Rom. 13.2 and we must be subiect not onely for wrath that is for feare of temporall punishment but also for conscience that is the feare of God least wee offend god before whom wee must keepe a good conscience or not only to auoide punishment but because it is acceptable to God and note that the conscience becomes guiltie and subiect to eternall punishments not for violating the Princes commaundement which sometimes may bee vniust but for violating the institution of God which commaunds obedience to Magistrates and Lawes politick because not humane but diuine Lawes binde the conscience and make it guiltie of eternall death May Subiects rise vp in armes against Magistrates or become mutinous No for God hath often punished the authors of sedition so Core and his companie murmuring against Moses was in the desert consumed with fire and the earth swallowed vp Dathan and Abiram aliue with their families b Numb 16 12 31 so Absolon was hanged in his owne haire being thus punished as a rebell to his father neither did Ziba Adoniah and Zimry escape d 2 Sam. 12 22 1 K. 2.10.20 25.16.16 Did Naboth well 1. King 21.3 to deny Ahab his vineyard who deserued it and offered mony for it Hee did well 1. Because God gaue an especiall law to this people that hereditarie possessions should not passe from one tribe to another but should bee reteined still in the tribes who to that purpose must marrie amongst themselues a Leui. 25 23 Num 36 7.9 because God would haue that stock to be knowne out of which hee had decreed the Messias to be borne What if the Magistrate offer thee some open and great wrong what must thou doe I must not vse any violence against him for now no priuate person hath with Ehud Iudges 3.21 Extraordinarie commandement from god Tihis 7 questiōs after are added of purpose to this English trāslation to kil Princes as may be obserued in the Lords prouident disanulling of such trayterous attempts And here note that all such persons as in the Scriptures attempted any thing against the life euen of Tyrants they had not onely a personall warrant from God but also effected their purpose and without the losse of their owne liues deliuered the people And surely it were better for priuate men priuately to beare all wrongs done by Princes as it were in a doubtfull case then in auenging themselues to sin against God For here Christ bids mee to turne the other cheeke that is to beare all wrongs done especially by my gouernour for Gods sake knowing this that he who is reiected by men is not for an iniurie receiued abiected by God Secondly it becommeth wise men to try all meanes and suffer all wrongs rather then to rise in Armes against Gouernours Thirdly if it bee an inferior magistrate who wrongs me I am to come by supplycatorie petition to the superior for his aid and euen against him vse rather Lawe then force in a free common weale Fourthly I am by flight to auoid the present wrong of my gouernour This in the Scriptures wee finde Practised by Gods people to Pharaoh Exod 5 1. Isa 29 7 and the same people to Nebuchadnezzar a tyrant were commaunded to performe obedience and to pray for him His successor Darius Daniell obeyed and said O King liue for euer b Dan. 6 21 And when Dauid was moued to kill Saul though he was to succeed him in his kingdome and had receiued many wrongs from him as that he gaue his wife to another banished him out of his kingdome and killed the priests for his sake yet he said God forbid that I should lay hands vpon the lords annointed c 1 Sam 26 11 and when he had but cut off the lap of his garment he was grieued for
esteeme it as a doctrine of men not of God as a priuate conceipt not a publike assertion We haue no such doctrine neither haue the Churches of God As for the truth of this in practise looke we but to the daies of Queene Mary when more suffered for religion in 5. years then haue done for treason in 45. since did any theÌ„ rebel against the life of that Queen did they not suffer the losse of goods liberty country lands and life praied rather that their soueraigns eies might be opened theÌ„ her years diminished And though diuers amongst vs who cannot conforme theÌ„selues are by the sentence of our consistories depriued of their liuings do any of them lay hands vpon the Lords annointed do not the Protestants in France the like at this time And surely if we well consider amongst many arguments to perswade the truth of our religion the falsity of popery this is not the least that our religion without equiuocation is an obedient merciful coÌ„passionate religion though our aduersaries preferre Turks before vs theirs is a cruel merciles bloudy religion burning al such as denie their breaden God murdering such gouernors as do but fauour of our true Catholicke Christian faith As for this auctor because the auctor of the protestaÌ„ts Apology for Catholicks may bring him in an enemy to magistracy I wish in some points he had written more sparingly He saith if a gouernour come vpon a subiect to spoyle him and kill him by the law of nature he may defend himselfe We say with Tertullian it is better to be killed then to kill and to answer them defence and offence are not a like He saith Dauid might haue killed Saule we lay with Dauid God forbid I should lay hands vpon the Lords annointed and Dauid being annointed king had another gates warrant than they can shew He saith in publike and notorious tyrannie subiects may craue aide from forrain Princes we say Blessed are they that suffer And blessed be God our gouernors are such as we need not to seeke aid against them He saith the Heluetians did wel in shaking of the yoake of Austria we say a particular is no generall rule He saith that the Iewes did well to rise against Antiochus we say the fact was extraordinary In a word there is nothing in him nor I hope in any Protestant writer which will warrant conspiracies against Princes which doctrine was deuised by the diuell nourced by the Pope learned in Seminaries practised more of late by Iesuites then euer it was before written as Dracoes lawes by the fauor of God in their own bloud And if we read diligeÌ„tly this coÌ„mon place of magistracie we shall see that the author was no enemy to gouernment who doubtles thinketh that the king is to be honored as a second from God only inferiour to God alone as Tertullian saith You haue added to your author 8. questions answers returne againe vnto him what is the generall end of politicke admistration and magistracie or magistrates Publike peace the preseruation of pietie and Religion or that right lawfull worship of God Vnto which two heads we may referre all lawes ciuill For hence commeth vengeance to the bad defence of the good safegard of goods rewards of vertues discipline of maners execution of malefactors and robbers and in a word the safetie of mans life To conclude by this means the Eutaxie good order of all things yea of religion it selfe is preserued or as Agapetus writeth to Iustinian by this all men being assembled together instructed in Gods word may vnfainedly adore safely keepe without feare practise his vpright righteousnes To which purpose Stigelius hath these two golden verses Vtque alios alij de relligione docerent Contiguas pietas iussit habere Domos That one might teach an other pietie God houses ioyn'd with contiguitie To this end Paule saith pray ye for kings and for all set in authority I say set in authority that vnder them we may liue a quiet and peaceable life in all godlines and honesty What vse make you of this doctrine of mgistracy Surely in regard of the magistrates 1. that they labour to recognize their dignity vse it with good conscience that they maintaine adorne it with the greatest piety to God integrity of life equity towards men care of their charge diligeÌ„ce in their calling that possibly they can Deut. 1.16 2 Cron. 19 6 7. c. 2. That they may comfort theÌ„selues and hope of Gods aide being indeed in a most troublesome but yet a most holy calling in that they are Gods Ambassadors or viceroys vpon earth yea that they may know that God cares for them according to that of the Psalmist I wil sing vnto thee O lord a new song who giueth saluatioÌ„ to kings But in regard of subiects that they with thanks to god acknowledge so great a benefit with good coÌ„science submit theÌ„selues to Gods ordinance giuing Caesars to Caesar tribute to whoÌ„ tribute praying for the life of their gouernors maintaine it by the hazard of their own both life liuelyhood if need require What now is coÌ„trary to this doctrine of magistracie 1 The heresy of the Donatists who tooke away the authority of magistrates in hatred to this order doe reckon vp many persecutions which some magistrates haue made against the Church of God 2. The error of the Anabaptists Libertines who were so called because they seek liberty in outward things for which in the memory of our forfathers they moued the common people to take arms against their gouernors these deny i. that magistracy is to be exercised amongst â—hose christiaÌ„ spirituall people whom the truth to wit Christ hath made free b Ioh 8.32 2. They admit of no suits in law seats or sentences of Iustice or any defence of a mans selfe wheras the internal liberty of coÌ„science which God by his spirit worketh in the harts of his elect takes not away the subiection of the outward man due to gouernors c Gal 5 1 2 Cor 7 21 3. They are of opinion that God would not haue Christians at all to become soldiers in warr because Paule saith speaking of spirituall not corporall warfare 2. Cor. 10.7 The weapons of our warfare are not carnall but spirituall But Paule speakes not heere of politicke magistrates but of the Pastors of the Church armed on all sides with the word of truth the weapons of righteousnesse 2. Cor. 6.7.4 They speake euill of such as are in authoritie d Iude 8. 3 The seditious rebellions of the Pope all his papall Cleargy who vpon certaine forged immuâ—â—ties presume to take the sword of authority out of the magistrates hand and to make all Princes vassals to them yet Peter himselfe whose successors they would be commaunds Bishops in plaine termes that they should not be Lords ouer Gods inheritance e 1. Pet. 5 3 yea bids all men to honour the King f 1. Pet. 2.17 But saith a papist Persona praecipientis non continetur in persona loquentis Peter commaunds this in his owne person therfore is not bounden to it in his owne person Well then Peter saith before Feare God is he by this commâ—undement excluded from Gods feare It seemeth surely his successors are who because they will not honor gouernors shew to the world that they feare not God for he that feareth the king of kings will honor and obey his vicegerents and Ambassadors 3 The flatteries of such as so either extol the power of princes that they derogate from Gods power or denie that princes in causes both Ecclesiasticall ciuill haue supreme authority headship ouer subiects wher as the princes of Israel are ofteÌ„ in the scripturs called heads of the people not as the Pope wold be to giue life to the church for so only is Christ the head but to coÌ„mand direct that people ouer whoÌ„ it pleaseth god to place kings in suprem authority 4 All such maners rites edicts consultations which are not agreeable to that eternall rule of honouring God and louing our neighbour permitting thefts robberies vnbridled and promiscuous lusts or any other monsters of the like nature 5 Seditious coÌ„motions of turbuleÌ„t rebels against their magistrats 6 Anarchy or want of gouernors which is worse then either the excesse or defect of any magistrate a Iudg 17 6 〈◊〉 21.25 〈◊〉 made Chrysostome in his sermon to the people of Antioch to say It were better to haue a Tyrant king then no king and Cornelius Tacitus to say in the first booke of his history It is better to liue vnder a bad prince than vnder none Laus Christo nescia finis 1. Pet. 2.17 Feare God honour the King To feare God is the beginning of this Booke To honour the King is the end of it FINIS
the holie ghost which is called the Spirit of Christ nor the flesh that is whatsoeuer reliques of corruption remaines in vs or the new and the old mā haue indeed either their distinct seates in our soule or seuerall operations but are mingled together one with another in all those faculties neither yet doe these qualities so contrarie one to another so well agree together that with mutuall consent they should produce a mixt work but doe so wrastle together in one and the selfe same work striuing one against another that one penetrating the other then proceedeth a mixt action from them both from theire mutual not consēt but conflict which of the qualitie preuailing is accompted either the fruite of the spirit or of the flesh The instrumentall cause is faith not by her owne vertue efficacie or operation but so farre forth as shee doth as an instrument apprehend that her obiect to which shee is caried namely Christ in respect of whom alone the holy Ghost doth renue vs creating in vs both the will and the deed and therefore whereas faith is termed the mother or the fountaine of good works by a Metonymie that is attributed to the instrumentall cause which doth properly belong to the principal efficient cause as Rom. 1.16 The Gospell that is the preaching of the doctrine of the Gospell is called The power of God to saluation that is spoken both because of the vnseparable coniunction common dependance of faith and good works For without faith it is impossible to please God Hebr. 11.6 And VVhatsoeuer is not done of faith is sinne Rom 14.23 Therefore Hebr. 11.4 and so forward all the worthie acts in th Olde Testament are ascribed to faith By faith Abell c. VVhat is the matter of good workes The things themselues where about such works are conuersant and which the moral law of God doth intreat of and prescribeth VVhatsoeuer things are true honest iust pure to be loued of good report if there be any vertue If there be any praise thinke of such things Phil. 4.8 VVhat is the forme of good workes As the essence and forme of sin and an euill work is Anomie and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 swaruing from the law so conformitie of our actions vnto the commaundement of God is the forme of a good worke And therefore not the traditions or commaundements of the Church but the word of God wherunto to add any thing or to detract is an horrible sinne is the onely square and rule of good workes a psa 119.4 Deut. 4.2 Neyther are any of those things to be esteemed in the number of good works in the sight of God which are grounded on the bare will of man Math. 15.9 In vaine doe they worship mee with the doctrines of men And Ezech. 20.18 VValke ye not in the precepts of your fathers but in my precepts walke ye Whether is it sufficient that some worke should be good and agreeable to the law of God if that it be done according to the law of God in outward shew No but 1. There is also required the inward synceritie of the minde which proceedeth from faith whereby the heart is purified a Act. 15.9 2 That we be certainely perswaded in our mindes out of his word that that which we doe pleaseth God For Rom. 14.23 whatsoeuer is done without faith that is whatsoeuer we take in hand with a doubting conscience whether it please God and therefore whether it be commaunded of God or not it is a sinn 3 It is required that we haue respect vnto god and to his glorie alone as the cheefe end of a good worke For the pharisaicall Hypocrite giueth almes the publican not iustified geueth also but his is abominable in the sight of God because he desires to be seene of men b mat 6.1 But this mans almes is a good worke not onely because it is commaunded but also because it is done with sinceritye of the heart and in faith to the glorie of God And therfore vertues are to be discerned from vices not so much by the skill mouing them as by the ends VVhat then are good workes Such as are done in true faith according to the law of god are referred to his glory alone c Tim 1.5 Deut. 4.2 1. Cor. 10.31 Colos 3.17 VVho are they that doe good workes Onely the Regenerate For whereas the law of God doth especially require that fountaine of syncerity in the heart d Mat. 3.33 and from thence the respect of Gods glory truly the worke of the vnregenerate although it appeare verie glorious yet cannot simply and properly be called by the name of a good worke because that which is good is not well done of them that is in faith to the glory of God And therefore the worke is not liuing but dead as a figge leafe a Gen. 3.7 couering onely the inward vices for an euill tree cannot bring forth good fruite Math. 7.18 and Cap 12.33 whatsoeuer is done by the impure is impure b Iob. 14 4 Tit. 1.15 yet it may be called good but in vse not in worship But a man now already regenerate to wit who hath recouered some parte of the synceritie of his heart by faith according to the measure of integrity and sinceritie of his heart which he hath recouered is fitte in part to performe good workes Are not Cornelius his workes praised before he vvas baptised and belieued in Christ Act. 10.4 He is called a deuout man and one that feard God verse 22 Therefore now before he receiued the Sacrament of Baptisme he was conuerted vnto the acknowledging of the true God neither was he vtterly without faith in the Messias Besides he is said to pray continually and his almes were accepted and his prayers are said to be heard of God But it is impossible for any man or for any mans worke to please God without faith Heb. 11.6 Therfore hee had the beginnings of faith in Christ and therefore was now iustified and regenerate although as yet hee was not instructed in the full cleere knowledge of Christ and yet knew not that he was come For which cause Peter was sent vnto him who should more fully teach him Are the good workes of the regenerate pure and perfectly good and blemished with no fault No 1 Because the Scripture speaketh to the contrarie c Esa 64.5 Ia. 3.2 2 That any worke be pure and in euery respect good it is not sufficient that that which is done be not done without the holy Ghost and without faith but also it is further required that the first beginnings of a good worke in man to wit the vnderstanding will and affections doe most fully obey the spirit of God which is granted to no mortall man Christ alone excepted But there doth euer remaine in vs and in euery facultie of our soule the new and and the old man spirit and flesh the law of the mind as it is