a sevenâ—h yet let us consider of God as acting by counsell and weighing and considering with himselfe what is most meet and equall and what proportion of time is most fit for himselfe and then with leave of better thoughts when I see better reason I suppose no man can prove unlesse hee bee made privy to the unknowne secrets of the wisdome of God that any other proportion had been as meet as this now made by the actuall determination of God there was not therefore the meer and soveraigne will of God which thus determined of this seventh part of time but also the wisedome of God which considering all things saw it most meeâ— and suitable for man to give and God to receive from man and therefore being commanded and thus particularly determined becomes morall Thesis 29. If that commandment be morall which is therefore commanded because it is good then hence it followes in the second place that such lawes onely are not morall lawes which are known to all men by the light of corrupt nature For as hath been already said a law may bee holy just good suitable and meet for all men to observe whether the light of corrupt nature by awakening or sleeping principles as some call them know it or no and such a comelinesse and suitablenesse in such a law is sufficient to make it morall There were many secret morall sinnes in Paul which he never saw nor could have seene by the light of corrupt nature untill the law fell upon him with mighty efficacy and power Romans 7. for God is not bound to crook his morall lawes to what our corrupt mindes are actually able of themselves to see any more than to what our corrupt wils are actually able to doe If the light of nature be imperfect in us since the fall which no wise man doubts of then there may be many things truely morall which the light of nature now sees not because 't is imperfect which in its perfection it did see and this consideration of the great imperfection of the light of nature is alone sufficient for ever to stop their mouthes and silence their hearts who goe about to make an imperfect light and law of nature the perfect rule and onely measure of morall duties and who make so narrow a limitation of that which is morall to that which is thus imperfectly naturall 't is not now lex nata but lex data which is the rule of morall duties The holy Scriptures containe the perfect rule of all morall actions whether mans corrupted and imperfect light of nature see them or no. It is a common but a most perilous and almost groundlesse mistake of many in this controversie who when they would know what is morall and what is not so of such things as are set downe in the Scriptures they then â—lye to the light of corrupt nature making it to bee the supream Judge hereof and there fall to examining of them whether they are seen by the light of nature or no which is no lesse folly than to set up a corrupt and blinde Judge to determine and declare that which is morall to make the perfect rule of morality in Scripture to bow downe its back to the imperfection and weaknesse of nature to pull out the Sunne in heaven from giving light and to walke by the light of a dim candle and a stinking snuffe in the socket almost gone out to make the horne-book of naturall light the perfection of learning of the deepest matters in morall duties to make Aristotles Ethicks as compleat a teacher of true morality as Adams heart in innocency and in a word to make man fallen and in a manner perfectly corrupt and miserable to bee as sufficiently furnished with knowledge of morall duties as man standing when he was perfectly holy and happy Imagine therefore that the light of nature could never have found out one day in seven to bee comely and most meet for man to give unto God yet if such a proportion of time be most meet for man to give to God and it appeares so to be when God reveales it it may and should then be accounted a morall law although the light of nature left in all men could never discerne it The Schoolmen and most of the popish generation not considering these things which notwithstanding are some of their owne principles have digged pits for themselves and made snares for some of their followers in abolishing the fourth Commandment from being in the true sense of it morall because they could not see how such a speciall part of time viz. a seventh part could be naturall or by the light of corrupt nature discernable which things so discernable they sometimes conclude to be onely morall But how farre the light of corrupt nature may discerne this proportion shall be spoken to in its proper place Thesis 30. If lastly those things which are thus commanded because they are good be morall then the whole Decalogue may hence appeare to be the morall law of God because there is no one law in it which is therefore good onely because 't is commanded but is therefore commanded because it is good and suitable to humane nature When I say suitable to humane nature I doe not meane humane nature considered absolutely but relatively either in relation to God or relation unto man for not onely the light of nature but of common sense also beare witnesse that every precept of the second Table wherein man is considered in relation to man is thus farre good for how comely and good is it to honour Parents to be tender of other mens lives and comforts to preserve ones selfe and others from filthy pollutions to doe no wrong but all the good we can to other mens estates c. Nor doe I thinke that any will question any one Commandment of this Table to bee good and suitable to humane nature unlesse it be some Nimrod or Brennus that professed he knew no greater justice than for the stronger like the bigger fishes of the Sea to swallow up the lesser in case they bee hungry or some Turkish Tartar or Caniball or some surfetted Professor transformed into some licentious opinionist and so growne Master of his owne Conscience and that can audaciously out-face the very light of nature and common sense through the righteous judgement of God blinding and hardning his heart And if the Commandments of the second Table be thus farre good in themselves are not those of the first Table much more Is love to man when drawne out into all the six streames of the second Table good in it selfe and shall not love to God drawn out in the foure precepts of the first Table as the Spring from whence all our love to man should flow much more Are the streams morally sweet and is not the spring it self of the same nature Love to God and love to man are the common principles saith Aquinas truely of the law of nature and all
particular precepts saith hee perhaps unawares are conclusions flowing from these principles out of Matth. 22. And are the principles good in themselves and suitable to humane nature and doe not all the conclusions participate of their nature For what are all particular precepts but particular unfoldings of love to God and love to man If all the precepts of the second Table be morall which doe onely concerne man why should any of the first fall short of that glory which doe immediately concerne God Shall man have six and all of them morally good and God have but foure and some one or more of them not so Is it comely and good to have God to be our God in the first Commandment to worship him after his owne minde in the second to give him his worship with all the highest respect and reverence of his Name in the third and is it not as comely good and suitable that this great God and King should have some magnificent day of state to be attended on by his poore servants and creatures both publikely and privately with speciall respect and service as oft as himselfe sees meer and which we cannot but see and confesse to be most equall and just according to the fourth Commandment If mans life must bee divided into labour and rest is it not equall and good if wee have six dayes that God should have a seventh If the bruit beasts could speake they would say that a seventh dayes rest is good for them Exod. 23.12 and shall man who hath more cause and more need of rest even of holy rest say that it is not good for him even to rest in the bosome of God himselfe to which he is called this day Take away a Sabbath who can defend us from Atheisme Barbarisme and all manner of Devilisme and prophanesse And is it evill thus to want it and shall it not be good to have it I confesse if God had commanded a perpetuall Sabbath it had not then been good but sinfull to observe any set Sabbath but if God will have man to labour for himselfe six dayes and this labour be morally good being now commanded why is it not then as good to observe a seventh in rest to God being also commanded of him Thesis 31. It is therefore at least an indigested assertion of those who affirme that the Decalogue sets out the precepts of the law of Nature and yet withall doth superad certaine precepts proper to the Jewish people in which last respect they say all men are not bound to the observance thereof and they produce the fourth Commandment for proof but in respect of the first they are But although in the application of a law something may bee proper to the Jewish people yet with leave of the learned there is never a law in it but it is morall and common to all for to make any law in the Decalogue proper is an assertion springing from a false and blinde principle viz. That that law onely is morall which is naturall not naturall as suitable to humane nature but which is seene and knowne by the common light of corrupt nature without the helpe of any externall usher or teacher If also any lawes in the Decalogue be proper how will any finde out and discerne morall lawes which concerne all from proper laws which appertaine onely to some For if God hath made such a mingling and not severed morall lawes by themselves then man hath no law or revelation by any dictinct and severed lawes left unto him to discerne lawes proper and peculiar from laws morall and common which how pernicious it may bee to mens soules to bee left to such uncertainty as also how injurious to God and crosse to his maine ends in discovering morall lawes let the wise consider for if they say that wee must flye for help herein to the light of corrupt nature then as hath been shewn an imperfect light and a blinde guide and a corrupt judge must be the chief rule of discerning that which is morall from that which is peculiar and proper for doubtlesse such a kinde of light is the light of corrupt nature Thesis 32. Some thinke that those commandments onely are morally good which the Gospel hath declared and confirmed to be so and by this shift they thinke to avoid the absurdity of flying to the blinde guide of corrupt nature to judge of these colours viz. what is morall and what is not Mr. Primrose therefore excludes the fourth Commandment from being morall the other nine being ratified by the light of the Gospell which this he saith is not but if his meaning be that there must be a generall ratification of lawes morall by the verdict of the Gospell then the fourth Commandment cannot be excluded from being morall because it hath a ratification in generall from the Gospell for therein wee read that the morall law is holy just and good Rom. 7. and that Christ came not to destroy the least jot or tittle of the law Matth. 5. much lesse a whole law of the fourth Commandment In the Gospel also God promiseth to write his Law upon our hearts wherein the fourth Commandment is not excepted But if his meaning beâ— this that the Gospell must particularly mention and so make a particular ratification as it were by name of every morall law then his assertion is unsound there being many judiciall lawes of Moses of which some are wholly morall others containing in them something of common and morall equity which we have no expresse mention of in the blessed Gospell and let him turne over al the leaves of the Gospell hee shall not finde that proportion of time which himselfe affirmes to be morall in the fourth Commandment to bee expressely and particularly mentioned in the Gospell and therefore that also must be excluded from being morall upon his owne principles as well as what we contend for in this Commandment so to bee Thesis 33. Some of those who maintaine the law of the Sabbath to be ceremoniall affirme that every Law in the Decalogue is not morall upon this ground to wit because the Law is called Gods Covenant which Covenant they shew from sundry instances not only to comprehend moralls but also ceremonialls for they make it the excellency of the Decalogue to comprehend as a short epitome all Gods Ordinances both morall and ceremoniall which epitome is more largely opened in the writings of Moses where not onely morall but also ceremoniall lawes are expressed and dispersed And hence they thinke that as the other nine are the summary and epitome of all morall Ordinances so the fourth Commandment which was kept with the practise of Ceremonies was the summary and epitome of all the ceremoniall ordinances and hence the fourth Commandment becomes ceremoniall But for answer to this wily notion unjustly father'd upon Austin and Calvin by some it may thus farre be granted that as the word Law is sometimes taken more strictly for
ever as hee would have that law preserved for ever which these safeguard but on the other side these judicialls which did safeguard ceremoniall laws which wee know were not perpetuall but proper to that Nation hence those judicials which compasse these about are not perpetuall nor universall the ceremonialls being pluckt up by their roots to what purpose then should their fences and hedges stand As on the contrary the morals abiding why should not their judicials and fences remaine The learned generally doubt not to affirme that Moses judicials binde all nations so farre forth as they containe any morall equity in them which morall equity doth appeare not onely in respect of the end of the law when it is ordered for common and universall good but chiefely in respect of the law which they safeguard and fence which if it bee morall it 's most just and equall that either the same or like judiciall fence according to some fit proportion should preserve it still because 't is but just and equall that a morall and universall law should bee universally preserved from whence by the way the weaknesse of their reasonings may bee observed who that they may take away the power of the civill Magistrate in matters of the first Table which once he had in the Jewish common-wealth affirm that such civill power then did arise from the judiciall and not from any morall law when as it 's manifest that this his power in preserving Gods worship pure from Idolatrous and prophane mixtures according to the judiciall lawes was no more but a fence and safeguard set about morall Commandments which fences and preservatives are therfore for substance to continue in as much power and authority now as they did in those dayes as long as such lawes continue in their morality which these preserve the duties of the first Table being also as much morall as those of the second to the preserving of which later from hurt and spoil in respect of their morality no wise man questions the extent of his power Thesis 43. If therefore the question be now made whether the law of the fourth Commandment be morall or no we must then remember that the true state of the question is not in this to wit Whether the law of the Sabbath be a principle of the light of nature knowne and evident of it selfe or at least such as every man that hath the use of reason may readily finde out without some externall revelation as Mr. Ironside injuriously states it wrastling herein with his own shadow with many others of his fellowship in this controversie For morality as hath been declared is of larger extent then such naturality But the question is whether it is one of those lawes which is therefore commanded because it is holy just and good in it selfe whether man see it by any previous light of corrupt nature I or no and being thus commanded as such a law whether it be not therefore of perpetuall and universall obligation binding all Nations and persons in all ages in their hearts lives manners to the observance thereof as a part of that holinesse we owe to God and which God requires of all men according to rules of morall equity or on the contrary whether it be not rather a typicall ceremoniall figurative and temporary precept binding onely some persons or that one Nation of the Jews for some time from the obedience of which law Christians in respect of any law of God are now exempted Thesis 44. For clearing up whereof it may not be amisse to take notice of the agreement at least in words herein on all hands even by those who oppose that morality of the Sabbath which we plead for All sides agree in this viz. That the law of this fourth Commandment concerning the Sabbath is morall But as the differences about the meaning of Tu es Petrus are many so here the difficulty lies to know how and in what sense and respect it may bee called morall for Master Ironside expressely consents in this viz. That all the Commandments of the Decalogue are morall but every one in his proportion and degree and so saith he is that of the Sabbath it is morall for substance but not for circumstance Master Primrose also when he is awake expressely confesseth thus much viz. That the Sabbath is morall in its foundation end marrow and principall substance and that a stinted time is morall and grounded on the principles of nature and therefore the Gentiles saith he had their set dayes of religion and this he tels us is ratified by the Gospel which commendeth to the faithfull the Assembling of themselves together for Word and Sacraments and consequently that they have appointed times to attend upon them wherein the word of God be read and preached as under the old Testament every Sabbath day nay he yields yet more viz. That not onely stinted times but that also there should be a convenient proportion and suitable frequency of time for Gods service now under the Gospell as under the Law and therefore affirmes that the Jewish annuall Feasts and new Moons being but once a yeare or once a moneth and so being rare and seldome could not teach us the convenient and most suitable frequency of Gods publick service as the Sabbath did which returned weekly and therefore he saith that the Commandment runs not thus viz. Remember to keep the new Moons but Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day So that by Mr. Primrose concession not onely a time but a stinted time not onely a stinted but also such a convenient proportion and suitable frequency of time as is once in seven dayes is morally holy by vertue of the fourth Commandment Gomarus also concludes that the publick worship of God required in the fourth Commandment cals for observation not onely of certain but also of sufficient dayes for worship and what these sufficient dayes bee is to bee gathered from the fourth Commandment viz. that they bee not more rare and lesse frequent then the weekly Sabbaths of the Israelites because if God as he shewes challenged a weekly Sabbath of a stiffe-necked people laden with the burden of many other Festivals and Ceremonies how then should Christians freed from their yoaks and burdens have them lesse frequent Master Breerwood also to the like purpose professeth That Christians should noâ— bee lesse devout and religious in celebrating the Lords day then the Jews were in celebrating their Sabbath and his reason labouring with some spice of a contradiction is this viz. because the obligation of our thankfulnesse to God is more then theirs although the obligation of his Commandment to us in that behalfe is lesse for I confesse it s beyond my shallownesse to conceive how the thankfulnesse should bee more and the Commandment lesse unlesse he will imagine some such popish work as exceeds the command Wallaeus comes almost quite over the threshold unto us and maintains upon solid arguments
yet oh that in this matter of the Sabbatâ— God would betimes awaken and that these weakâ—nesses might stirre up their strength for I mucâ— feare and foresee that if it be not done there is aâ— houre and a nick of temptation in such a juncture 〈◊〉 times approaching wherein the enemy will come 〈◊〉 like a flood and rise up from all quarters against the Doctrine of the Sabbath and then farewell all the good dayes of the son of man if this be lost which then men shall desire to see and shall not see them I have therefore been the more willing to let my owne shame and weaknesse appeare to the world if so it be found if this might be any meanes of doing the least good for keeping up the price of Gods Sabbaths in the hearts of any I have therefore spent the more time about the Morality of the Sabbath because the clearing up of this gives light to all the rest The generall CONTENTS of the Theses concerning the Morality of the Sabbath 1. GOD is the superiour disposer of mans time Thes. 1 2. Man who is made next to God and to return to his rest at the end of the larger circle of his life is to return to him at the end of the lesser circle of eveâ—y week Thes. 7 3. What a Moral Law is not 10 11 4. How a Divine Law may be said to be Moral 14 5. What a Moral law is strictly taken 16 6. A Moral Law considered in a strict sense is not good meerly because commanded but is therefore commanded because it is good 17 7. What is that goodnesse in a Moral Law for which it is commanded 21 8. By what Rules may that goodnesse be known which are foure 24 25 9 Divers consectaries flowing from the description of a Moral Law 1. That Divine determination of something in a Law doth not alway take away the morality of it 26 2. That those are not Moral laws only which are known to all men by the light of corrupt nature 29 3. That the whole Decalogue in all the parts of it is the Moral Law of God Thes. 30. where Objections are answered to 38 10. Three sorts of Laws which were among the Jewes Moral Ceremonial Judicial 38 11. The true state of the Question whether the Sabbath be a Moral or Ceremonial Law 43 12. The agreement on all hands how far the Law of the Sabbath is Moral 44 13. Something general is agreed on and whether it lies under this general viz. a seventh day 46 14. The chief means of resolving this controversie in opening the meaning of the fourth Commandment 47 15. The things which are Moral in the fourth Commandment are either primarily or secundarily moral 48 16. Those things which are primarily generally moral in the forth Commandment are 3. 1. A time of worship 2. A day 3. A 7th day determined 17. Not the worship it self but only the solemne time of it is required in the fourth Commandment 53 18. How holy duties are for time 56 19. Instituted worship is not directly required in the fourth but in the second Commandment wherein the meaning of the second Commandment is occasionally cleared against Wallaeus 59 20. If the moral worship it self be not required herein much lesse is the whole ceremonial worship 63 21. Neither the publike worship only nor Jewish holy dayes required in this fourth Commandment 64 22. Not a part of a day but a whole day is moral by the fourth Commandment 65 23. Gods wisdome did rather choose a whole day together for special worship then borrow a part of every day 66 24. The sin of Familists and others who allow God no special day but make all dayes equal 68 25. How any day is said to be holy and that though all places are alike holy yet all dayes are not therefore alike holy 69 70 26. Answer to such Scriptures as seem to make all dayes alike holy under the New Testament 72 73. to 79 27. The chief reason why some abolish the day of the Sabbath in the fourth Commandment is because they abandon the whole Decalogue it self as any Rule of life unto his people 79 28. An inward Sabbath may well consist with a Sabbath day 80 29. The great controversie whether the Law be a rule of life to a beleever discussed in sundry Theses 81 30. The Spirit is not the rule of life 86 31. Not the will of Gods Decree but the will of his command is the rule of life 91 32. The fundamental Errour of Antinomians 93 33. The rule of the Law is kept in Christ as matter of our justification not sanctification 94 34. How Christ is our Sanctification as well as our Justification 95 35. Duties of Christian thankfulnesse to God were not performed by Christ for beleevers under that notion of thankfulnesse but by way of merit 97 36. Whether a beleever is to act in vertue of a command 98 37. The sin of those who affirme that Christian obedience is not to be put forth by vertue of a command 100 38. To act by vertue of a Commandment and by vertue of Gods Spirit are subordinate one to another 101 39. Whether the Law is our rule as given by Moses on mount Sinai or only as it is given by Christ on mount Sion 102 40. How Works and Law-duties are sometime commended and sometime condemned 105 106 41. The new creature how it is under the Law 107 42. How the children of God under the Old Testament were under the Law as a Schoolmaster and not those of the New 108 43. How the Gospel requires doing and how not and about conditional promises in the Gospel 110 44. Various motives to obedience from the Law and Gospel from God as a Creator and from Christ as a Redeemer do not vary the Rule 111 45. Unbelief is not the only sin 112 46. Three evils arising from their Doctrine who deny the Directive use of the moral Law 113 47. The sin of such as deny the humbling work of the Law under Gospel ministrations 114 48. Their Errour who will not have a Christian pray for pardon of sin or mourn for sin 115 49. Whether Sanctification be a doubtful evidence and may not be a just evidence and wheâ—â—er the Gospel and all the promises of it belong to a sinner as a sinner and whether sight of corruption be by the Gospel the setled evidence of salvation as some plead for 117 50. Whether the first evidence be without the being or only the seeing of grace 118 51. The true grounds of evidencing Gods love in Christ cleared 119. 52. Not only a day nor only a Sabbath day but a seventh day determined is the last thing generally moral in the fourth Commandment 120.122 53. That which is particularly moral herein is this or that particular seventh day 123 54. The morality of a Sabbath may be as strongly and easily urged from the Commandment of observing that particular seventh day from the
here that looke as man standing in innocency had cause thus to returne â—rom the pleasant labours of his weekly paradise imployments as shall be shewn in due place so man fallen much more from his toilsome and wearisome labours to this his rest again And therefore as because all creatures were made for man man was therefore made in the last place after them so man being made for God and his worship thence it is that the Sabbath wherein man was to draw most neare unto God was appointed after the creation of man as Peter Martyr observes For although man is not made for the Sabbath meerly in respect of the outward rest of it as the Pharisees dreamed yet hee is made for the Sabbath in respect of God in it and the holinesse of it to both which then the soule is to have its weekly revolution back againe as into that Rest which is the end of all our lives labour and in speciall of all our weekly labour and work Thesis 8. As therefore our blessed rest in the fruition of God at the end and period of our lives is no ceremony but a glorious privilege and a morall duty it being our closing with our utmost end to which we are called so it cannot be that such a Law which cals and commands man in this life to returne to the same rest for substance every Sabbath day should bee a ceremoniall but rather a Morall and perpetuall Law unlesse it should appeare that this weekly Sabbath like the other annuall Sabbath hath been ordained and instituted principally for some ceremonious ends rather than to be a part and indeed the beginning of our rest to come there being little difference between this and that to come but onely this that here our rest is but begun there it is perfected here it is interrupted by our weekly labours there it is continued here we are led into our rest by meanes and ordinances but there we shall bee possessed with it without our need of any helpe from them our God who is our rest being then become unto us immediately All in All. Thesis 9. Were it not for mans worke and labour ordained and appointed for him in this life he should enjoy a continuall Sabbath a perpetuall Rest. And therefore wee see that when mans life is ended his sunne set and his worke done upon earth nothing else remaines for him but only to enter into his perpetuall and eternall Rest All our time should be solemne and sacred to the Lord of time if there were no common worke and labour hâ—re which necessarily occasions common time why then should any think that a weekly Sabbath is ceremoniall when were it not for this lifes labour a perpetuall and continuall Sabbath would then be undoubtedly accounted morall It s hard for any to thinke a servants awfull attendance on his Lord and Master at certaine speciall times not to bee morally due from him who but for some more private and personall occassions allowed him to attend unto should at all times continually be serving of him Thesis 10. The word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and no Scripture phrase and therfore not proper fitly and fully to expresse the question in controversie to wit whether the fourth Commandment bee a morall precept The best friends of this word finde it slippery and can hardly tell what it is and what they would have to be understood by it and hence it is become a bone of much Contention a fit mist and swampe for such to fight in who desire so to contend with their Adversaries as that themselves may not bee known either where they are or on what ground they stand Yet it being a word generally taken up and commonly used it may not therefore be amisse to follow the market measure and to retaine the word with just and meet explications thereof Thesis 11. They who describe a morall law to bee such a law as is not typically ceremoniall and therefore not durable doe well and truely expresse what it is not but they doe not positively expresse what it is Thesis 12. Some describe and draw out the proportions of the morall law by the law of nature and so make it to bee that law which every man is taught by the light of nature That which is morally and universally just say some which reason when it is not mis-led and the inward law of nature dictateth by common principles of honesty or ought to dictate unto all men without any outward usher It is that say others which may be proved not only just but necessary by principles drawne from the light of nature which all reasonable men even in nature corrupted have still in their hearts which either they doe acknowledge or may at least bee convinced of without the Scriptures by principles still left in the hearts of all men But this description seems too narrow For 1. Although it be true that the law naturall is part of the law morall yet if the law morall be resolved into the law of nature only and the law of nature bee shrunke up and drawne into so narrow a compasse as what the principles left in corrupt man onely suggest and dictate then it will necessarily follow that many of those holy rules and principles are not the law of nature which were the most perfect impressions of the law of nature in mans first creation and perfection but now by mans apostacy are obliterated and blotted out unlesse any shall thinke worse than the blinde Papists either that mans minde is not now corrupted by the fall in losing any of the first impressions of innocent nature or shall maintaine with them that the Image of God of which those first impressions were a part was not naturall to man in that estate 2. It will then follow that there is no morale discipline as they call it that is nothing morall by discipline informing or positively morall but onely by nature dictating which is crosse not onely to the judgements but solid Arguments of men judicious and most indifferent 3. If that onely is to be accounted morall which is so easily knowne of all men by the light of nature corrupted then the imperfect light of mans corrupt minde must bee the principall judge of that which is morall rather than the perfect rule of morality contained in the Scripture which Assertion would not a little advance corrupt and blinde Nature and dethrone the perfection of the holy Scripture Thesis 13. They who define a morall law to be such a law as is perpetuall and universall binding all persons in all ages and times doe come somewhat nearer to the marke and are not far off from the truth and such a description is most plaine and obvious to such as are not curious and in this sense our adversaries in this cause affirme the Sabbath not to be morall meaning that it is not a Law perpetuall and universall Others on the contrary affirming that it is morall intend
thus much that it is perpetuall and universall a law which bindes all persons all times and in all ages and herein lies the chiefe matter of controversie at this day Now in what respect and how far forth the law of the Sabbath is perpetuall shall be hereafter shewn mean while it may not be amisse to enquire more narrowly into the nature of a morall law For though a Law primarily morall is perpetuall yet perpetuity seems to bee an adjunct rather than of the essence of a morall law and the difficulty will still remaine untouch'd viz. to know when a law is perpetuall and what is internall and intrinsicall to such a law as makes it perpetuall or morall whereinto I would not search lest I should seem to affect curiosity but that our criticall adversaries put us upon it with whom there is nothing lost in case weâ— gaine nothing by wrastling a little with them upon their owne grounds where for a while we shall come up to them Thesis 14. A divine law may be said to be morall two wayes 1. More largely and generally morall 2. More strictly and specially morall Thesis 15. A law generally morall is this that the whole soveraign will of the Lord be done and submitted unto by every creature and in this large sense every law of God whether ceremoniall judiciall or for speciall triall may be said to be morall because the soveraigne will of God is in all these lawes to be adored It is a morall duty that Gods will be done and hence it is that so far forth as the will of God is in them so far forth to yield obedience to them is a morall duty but the question is not about this morality nor what things are thus morall Thesis 16. A law more strictly and specially morall which concernes the manners of all men and of which wee now speake may bee thus described viz. It is such a Law which is therefore commanded because it is good and is not therefore good meerly because it is commanded Thesis 17. This is Austins description of it long since whom most of the Schoolmen follow which learned Cameron with sundry late Wriâ—â—â— confirme and which our adversaries in this controversie plead hard for and unto which the evidence of Scripture and reason seemes to incline for laws meerly judiciall and ceremoniall are good lawes Deut. 6.18 24. but this was meerly because they were commanded and therefore it had been simply evill to burne Incense offer Sacrifice or performe any ceremoniall duty in the worship of God unlesse they had been commanded What is there therefore in morall lawes which is not in those lawes verily this inward goodnesse in them which others have not and because of which goodnesse they are therefore commanded For to love God to honour parents to preserve the life of man to be mercifull and bountifull and just in all our dealings c. are inwardly good and are therefore commanded and are therefore morall laws and hence we see that when the Apostle would set forth the glory and excellency of the morall law for of no other law can he speake Rom. 7.7 12. he gives these titles to it that it is holy just and good which holines justice and goodnesse he opposeth to his owne morall not ceremoniall wickednesse I am carnall saith he but the law is holy just and good And look as it was evill in it selfe for to have a nature contrary to the law so the Law which was contrary to that nature was good in it selfe and was therefore commanded and therefore in this thing morall lawes are in a higher degree good than such as were onely ceremoniall which were therefore good meerely because commanded The Prophet Micah therefore perceiving how forward many were in ceremonial duties sacrifices in opposition hereunto he tels them The Lord hath shewed thee O man what is good speaking of morall duties of shewing mercy and walking humbly with God Micah 6.8 Was not Sacrifice and Offerings good as well as mercy and walking humbly Yes verily but herein lies the difference as our most Orthodox generally make it Sacrifice and Offerings were not per se and in themselves good but onely as commanded for higher ends and to further morall obedience Ier. 7.22 23 and 6.19 20. Isa. 1.14 16 Psal. 50.13 14 15. but such morall obedience as thâ— Prophet mentions viz. to shew mercy and to walk humbly were good in themselves and were therefore commanded of God and here called by the Prophet good The summe of morall obedience is love to God and man Matth. 22. But what love is this surely t is in such things â—â— are in themselves lovely and consequently in themselâ—â—â— good for otherwise ceremoniall obedience should be a part of morall obedience because in performing such obediences is meerely ceremoniall wee shew our love to God also It being a branch of love to have respect unto all Gods Commandments Deut. 6.1 2 3. with 5 6. Onely herein our love toward God appeares in ceremoniall duties because these lawes are commanded our love appeares in the other because the things commanded are also lovely in themselves The Image of God is good in it selfe as God himselfe is good in himselfe now the morall law is an exact rule of nothing else but Gods Image as is evident Eph. 4.24 where the Image of God is made to consist in holinesse and righteousnesse the first Table being the rule of the one the second Table being the rule of the other and hence it followes undenyably that morall lawes respecting onely Gods Image have respect onely to such things as are good in themselves and wherein we resemble and are made like unto God Some things saith Cameron are good in themselves viz. such things wherein Gods Image shines forth as hee is holy just and good Colos. 3.10 Ephes. 4.24 Some things are indifferent neither good nor bad in themselves but meerely as commanded or forbidden which also bear not Gods Image unlesse it be sub ratione entis but not sub ratione boni moralis i. e. they resemble God as he is a being but not as he is holy just and good in himselfe the rule of which resemblance is the morall law which therefore commands things because they are good Thesis 18. God out of his absolute soveraignty could have made lawes binding all persons in all ages and in this respect morall without having any more goodnesse in them then meerely his owne will but it is his will and good pleasure to make all lawes that are morall to be first good in themselves for all men before he will impose them upon all men And hence it is a weaknesse for any to affirme that a morall law is not such a Law which is therefore commanded because it is good because say they t is not the goodnesse of the thing but the soveraigne will of God which makes all things good for it is the soveraigne will of God as
is proved to make every morall law good and therefore to command it rather than to make it good by a meer commanding of it Thesis 19. The will of God is indeed the rule of all goodnesse and consequently of all morall lawes but we know there is voluntas decreti and voluntas mandati the first of which viz. the will of Gods decree as it appeares in the execution of it makes a thing to be good whether it bee creature or law the second of these viz. the will of Gods command enjoynes the practise of such a duty the rule and law to guide which is first made good if it bee a morall law by the wisdome and power of the will of Gods decree so that the will of God appearing in both these viz. Gods decreeing and commanding will is the compleat rule of every morall law So that as no law is morally good meerly because it is commanded so neither is it thus good unlesse also it be commanded Gods will in all morall laws is first to make them good and then to command them when they are thus far made good both which together make up a morall law Thesis 20. T is true that sin is the transgression of Gods law there is nothing therefore sinfull but it is the transgression of some law and hence there is no obedience good but what is conformable unto some law But wee must know that as transgression of any law doth not make a thing morally sinfull for then to breake a ceremoniall law would be a morall sinne so also obedience to every law doth not make a duty morally lawfull and good for then obedience to a ceremoniall law must be a morall obedience morall transgression therefore is a breach of such a law which forbids a thing because it is evill as morall obedience is our conformity to such a law which commands a thing because it is good not that anything is morally evill in it selfe before it be forbidden for then there should bee a morall sinne before and without any law to forbid it which is most absurd but because a thing is evill in it selfe and is therefore forbidden it is therefore morally evill God may and doth make it fundamentally evill before it be forbidden but it is not morally evill untill it be forbidden The like may be said concerning moral obedience according to any morall law No man should therefore thinke that this description given of a morall law should give occasion to any to imagine that some things are morally good or evill before any law passe upon them and that therefore there are some duties and some sinnes which are so without and before any law of God For wee see that things good in themselves must be commanded else they are not morall duties yet withall they are therefore commanded because they are good in themselves It s true that by the verdict of some of the Schoolemen some duties are morally good before any law commands them as to love and magnifie God and that some sinnes as to curse and blaspheme God are morally evill before any law forbids them but to omit other answers if such suppositions may bee rationally made which some deny yet it may bee upon good grounds denyed that any duty can be morally good or any sinne morally evill untill some law passe upon them either to command or forbid the same 'T is indeed sutable and meet in nature for man to love God and unsutable and unmeet to blaspheme and hate God but such sutablenesse or unsutablenesse as they make things fundamentally good or evill so they cannot make any thing morally good or evill unlesse we suppose some Law for it would be in this case with man as 't is in brute creatures who doe many things unnaturall as to eate up and destroy their owne young which yet are not morally sinfull because they are not under any morall law and one of the most ancient and best of the Schoolemen though he thinks that the observance of the Sabbath before Moses time was not secundâ—m rationem praecepti or debitè fieri i. was not actually commanded yet that it was secundum rationem honesti hoc est dignè steri i. It was congruous and a thing meet and worthy to bee observed even from the first creation But will any of our Adversaries hence say that because it was meet and worthy to bee observed that therefore it was a morall law from the beginning of the world while it had no command as is by them supposed to be observed For it must be something meet and congruous and worthy to be observed of man which when it is commanded makes it to be a morall law for then the Law commands a thing that is good and because 't is good iâ— is therefore commanded which goodnesse wee must a little more narrowly now enquire into Thesis 21. If it be demanded therefore What is that goodnesse in a morall law for which it is therefore commanded The Answer is given by Vasques Suarez Smifinga and most of the Schoolemen and sundry of our owne Writers that it is nothing else but That comely sutablenesse and meetnesse in the thing commanded unto humane nature as rationall or unto man as rationall and consequently unto every man When I say as Rationall I understand as Master Ironside doth viz. as right reason neither blinded nor corrupted doth require When I say as sutable to man and consequently to every man I hereby exclude all lawes meerely Judiciall and Evangelicall from being morall the first of which are sutable to some men onely the other are not sutable to men as men but to man as corrupt and fallen and therefore binde not all men but onely those among whom they are sufficiently and actually promulgated as is evident Rom. 10.14 Iohn 15.22 But morall lawes are sutable to all men and have an inward meetnesse and congruity to be observed of all men For look as when the Lord gives Laws to any particular nation whether immediately by himself or mediately by man he ever makes them sutable to the peoples peace and good of that nation so when he makes lawes binding all mankinde in all Nations he makes them sutable to humane nature or all mankinde therein And look as nationall Lawes binde not meerly by the meere will of the Law-giver but from the goodnesse and sutablenesse in the thing unto their common good so here morall lawes which concerne all Nations bind not meerly because of the will of God which of it selfe is sufficient to binde all men if he had pleased to put no more in morall lawes but also because of some goodnesse in the things commanded which is nothing else but such sutablenes as is mentioned unto the common good of man What this sutablenesse to humane nature is we shall shew in due place meane while I doe not understand by sutablenesse to humane nature the inclination of humane nature now corrupted by sinne for
infused and supernaturall vertues and graces to which therefore humane nature is not inclined are as Vasquez truly and strongly maintaines in some sense naturall and good in themselves not because humane nature is inclined to them but because they are very congruous and consentaneous thereunto and perfecting humane nature as such and consequently sutable thereunto A good is said to be utile delectabile in respect of some profit or delight which comes to man by it but bonum honestum in genere moris as Suarez and his fellowes call it consists in a kinde of decency comlinesse and sweet proportion between such an act and such a nature as acts by right reason to which nature it is exceeding comely and suitable whether any profit or delight come thereby yea or no. As now in the divine nature it 's exceeding beautifull and comely for it and therefore good in it selfe to bee bountifull and mercifull and to doe good unto the creature although no profit could come to him thereby It is Gods nature as I may so say so to doe so 't is in humane nature it 's a comely thing to honour parents reverence Gods Name to bee loving and mercifull to all men in heart word and deed to give God a fit and the most meet proportion of time for solemne service of him who allowes us many dayes to serve our owne good this is good nature and being thus seemly and suitable to it this and such like things are therefore good in themselves though perhaps neither profit or pleasure should come unto man hereby And hence it 's well observed by some of the Schoolemen that right reason doth not make a thing morall but only judgeth and discerneth what is morall for right reason doth not make a thing suitable but onely seeth whether it be so or no a thing may bee suitable before right reason see it yet when 't is presented to reason it sees it suitable as the wall is white before the eye see it yet when the eye doth see it it appeares white also It may bee a meet and comely thing to give God a seventh part of our time though no mans reason can of it selfe find out such a meet proportion yet when reason sees it it 's forced to acknowledge a comlinesse of equity and suitablenesse therein as shall hereafter appeare Thesis 22. But here let it bee observed that although all morall lawes are thus suitable to mans nature yet they are not all alike suitable thereunto and consequently not equally good in themselves for some lawes are more immediately suitable and good others mediately And as Wallaeus well observes out of Scotus that there is a double morality the first is de lege naturae strictè sumpta i. e. such laws as are so deeply engraven upon nature as that these principles cannot bee blotted out but by abolishing of nature The second is de lege naturae latè sumpta and these lawes doe much depend upon the will of the Law-giver but yet they are very congruous and suitable to humane nature even from the light of those principles of nature And hence I suppose it will follow that the law for a seventh part of time to be dedicated to God may well bee a morall law although it depends much upon the will of the Law-giver and is not so immediately written upon mans heart nor so equally suitable to humane nature as the law of love and thankfulnesse to God our Creator is For as Cameron well observes that some things which are good in themselves have more of Gods Image stamped upon them some have lesse of it and hence it is that though all morall lawes are good in themselves yet not equally so there is more unsuitablenesse to hate and curse God than to lust after another mans house or servant and yet both are evill in themselves and breaches of morall rules Thesis 23. Hence therefore it followes that because morall precepts are of such things as are good in themselves they are therefore perpetuall and unchangeable and because they are in this respect good in themselves to wit because they are suitable and comely to mans nature as rationall hence also they are universall so that perpetuity and universality seem to be the inseperable adjuncts rather than the essence of a morall law yet when they are called perpetuall and unchangeable wee must understand them in respect of Gods ordinary dispensation for hee who is the great Law-giver may and doth sometime extraordinarily dispense with morall lawes Abraham might have kill'd his Sonne by extraordinary dispensation Adams Sonnes and Daughters did marry one another by speciall Commission which now to doe ordinarily would bee incestuous and consequently against a mâ—â—â—ll Law as is evident Leviticus 18. Onely let it bee here remembred that when I call morall Lawes perpetuall and universall that I speake of such lawes as are primarily morall which doe firstly and originally suit with humane nature for lawes as are at second hand morall and as it were accidentally so may be changeable as hereafter shall appeare Thesis 24. How these things may evince the morality of a seventh part of time will be difficult to conceive unlesse further enquiry be made to wit when and by what rules may it be knowne that any law is sutable and agreeable unto humane nature and consequently good in it selfe For resolution of which doubt there is great silence generally in most Writers Bishop White endeavours it by giving three rules to cleare up this mist but pace tanti viri I much feare that he much darkens and obscures the truth herein and muds the streames For 1. Because the Sabbath is not simply morall but hath something positive in it he therefore makes it temporary as appeares in his conclusion of that discourse when as 't is evident by his own confession that some lawes positively morall are generall and universall For lawes positively morall he saith are either personall onely as was Abrahams comming out of his owne Countrey Gen. 12.1 Some are for one Nation or Republick onely Exod. 22.1 3â—7 Some are common and generall for all mankinde as the law of Polygamy 2. Hee seemes to make lawes simply and intirely morall to bee such as are in their inward nature morally good before and without any exâ—ernall imposition of the Law-giver Now if by externall imposition he meanes the externall manner of Mosaicall administration of the law there is then some truth in what he affirmes for doubtlesse before Moses time the Patriarchs had the law revealed after another manner but if by externall imposition bee meant externall Revelation whether immediately by God himselfe unto mans conscience or mediately by man then it 's most false that any thing can be morally good or evill much lesse entirely and simply so before and without some such law for though it may be good and sutable to man before a law pasâ—e upon it yet nothing can be morally good
or evill without some law for then there should bee some sinne which is not the transgression of a law and some obedience which is not directed by any law both which are impossible and abominable 3. He makes morall lawes by externall imposition and constitution onely to be such as before the externall imposition of them are a diaphorous and good or evill onely by reason of some circumstance When as we know that some such lawes as are most entirely morall yet in respect of their inward nature generally considered they are indifferent also for not to kill and take away mans life is a morall law intirely so yet in the generall nature of it it is indifferent and by circumstance may become either lawfull or unlawfull lawfull in case of warre or publick execution of justice unlawfull out of a private spirit and personall revenge In one word the whole drift of his discourse herein is to shew that the Sabbath is not morall and this he would prove because the Sabbath is not simply and entirely morall which is a most feeble and weake consequence and this hee proves because the Sabbath day hath in respect of its inward nature no more holines and goodnes than any other day all the dayes of the week being equally good by creation But he might well know that the day is not the law of the fourth Commandment but the keeping holy of the Sabbath day which is a thing inwardly good and entirely morall if wee speak of some day Nay saith the Bishop the law of nature teacheth that some sufficient and convenient time bee set apart for Gods worship if therefore some day be morall although all dayes by creation be indifferent and equall according to his owne confession what then should hinder the quota pars or the seventh part of time from being morall will he say because all dayes are equally holy and good by creation then why should hee grant any day at all to bee entirely morall in respect of a sufficient and convenient time to bee set apart for God If hee saith the will and imposition of the Law-giver abolisheth its morality because he bindes to a seventh part of time then we shall shew that this is most false and feeble in the sequell Thesis 25. There are therefore four rules to guide our judgments aright herein whereby we may know when a law is sutable and agreeable to humane nature and consequently good in it selfe which will bee sufficient to cleare up the Law of the Sabbath to be truely morall whether in a higher or lower degree of morality it makes no matter and that it is not a law meerly temporary and ceremoniall 1. Such lawes as necessarily flow from naturall relation both between God and man as well as between man and man these are good in themselves because sutable and congruous to humane nature for there is a decency and sweet comlinesse to attend to those rules to which our relations binde us For from this ground the Prophet Malachy cals for feare and honour of God as morall duties because they are so comely and seemly for us in respect of the relation between us If I be your Lord and Master and Father where is my feare where is my honour Mal. 1.6 Love also between man and wife is pressed as a comely duty by the Apostle from that near relation betweene them being made one flesh Ephes. 5.28 29. there are scarce any who question the morality of the duties of the second Table because they are so evidently comely suitable and agreeable to humane nature considered relatively as man stands in relation to those who are or should bee unto him as his owne flesh and therefore he is to honour superiors and therefore must not kill nor steale nor lye nor covet nor defile the flesh c. but the morality of all the rules of the first Table is not seen so evidently because the relation between God and man which makes them comely and suitable to man is not so well considered for if there be a God and this God be our God according to the first Commandement then it 's very comely and meet for man to honour love feare him delight trust in him c. and if this God must be worshipped of man in respect of the mutuall relation between them then 't is comely and meet to worship him with his owne worhsip according to the second Commandment and to worship him with all holy reverence according to the third Commandment and if he must be thus worshipped and yet at all times in respect of our necessary worldly imploiments cannot be so solemnly honoured and worshipped as is comely and meet for so great a God then 't is very fit and comely for all men to have some set and stated time of worship according to some fit proportion which the Lord of time onely can best make and therefore a seventh part of time which he doth make according to the fourth Commandment 2. Such lawes are drawne from the imitable Attributes and Works of God are congruous and suitable to mans nature For what greater comelinesse can there be or what can be more suitable to that nature which is immediately made for God then to be like unto God and to attend unto those rules which guide thereunto Hence to be mercifull to men in misery to forgive our enemies and those that doe us wrong to be bountifull to those that be in want to be patient when we suffer evill are all morall duties because they are comely and suitable to man and that because herein hee resembles and is made like unto God Hence to labour six dayes and rest a leventh is a morall because a comely and suitable duty that because herein man followes the example of God and becomes most like unto him And hence it is that a seventh yeare of rest cannot be urged upon man to be as much morall as a seventh day of rest because man hath Gods example and patterne in resting a seventh day but not in resting any seventh yeare God never made himselfe an example of any ceremoniall duty it being unsuitable to his glorious excellency so to doe but onely of morall and spirituall holinesse and therefore there is somewhat else in a seventh day that is not in a seventh yeare and it is utterly false to thinke as some doe that there is as much equity for the observation of the one as there is of the other And here by the way may bee seen a grosse mistake of Mr. Primrose who would make Gods example herein not to be morally imitable of us nor man necessarily bound thereunto it being not naturally and in respect of it selfe imitable but onely because it pleased God to command man so to doe as also because this action of God did not flow from such attributes of God as are in their nature imitable as mercy bounty c. but from one of those attributes as is not imitable
and which wee ought not to imitate viz. his omnipotency But suppose it did flow from his omnipotency and that wee ought not to imitate his omnipotency and that wee who are weaknesse it selfe cannot imitate omnipotent actions yet its obvious to common sense that such acts which arise from such attributes as cannot be imitated of us in respect of the particular effects which are produced by them yet in the actings of such attributes there may be something morally good which is imitable of us As for example though wee are not to imitate God in his miraculous works as in the burning of Sodome and such like yet there may bee that justice and wisedome of God shining therein which wee ought to imitate for wee ought to see before we censure and condemne as God did in proceeding against Sodome So 't is in this extraordinary worke of making the Word wherein although we are not to goe about to make another world within that time as God did yet therein the labour and rest of God was seene which is imitable of man which labour and rest as they are morall duties so they are confirmed by a morall example and therefore most seemly and comely for man to imitate from such an example And whereas hee affirmes that this example was not morall because it was not it self imitable being grounded onely upon Gods free will The reason is weake for to labour in ones Calling is without controversie a morall duty as idlenesse is a morall sin yet if one would aske why man is to labour here and not rather to lead a contemplative life in the vision and fruition of God immediately I suppose no reason can be given but the good pleasure of God who in his deepe wisdome saw it most meet for man to spend some proportionable time in labour for himselfe and some in rest for God whereunto he gave man such an eminent example from the beginning of the world Master Primrose cannot deny but that a convenient time for labour and rest in generall is morall But saith he if God had not declared his will by a Commandment particularly to labour six dayes and rest the seventh the Jewes would not have thought themselves bound to this observation from Gods example onely which shewes that there is no morality in it to bind the conscience for ever But it may be as well doubted whether acts of bounty and mercy to which hee thinks wee are bound meerely from Gods example in respect of the particular application of these acts to enemies of God and of our selves as well as to friends be of binding vertue meerly by Gods example unlesse we had a commandment thereunto for in morall precepts as the thing is commanded because it is good so 't is not morally good unlesse it be commanded but suppose that Gods example of labour six dayes and rest the seventh should not have been binding as other examples unlesse there had been a commandment for so doing yet this is no argument that this example is not morall at all but onely that it is not so equally morall and knowne to be so as some other duties bee for man may spend too much time in labour and give God too short or too little time for rest if therefore hee wants the light of a commandment or rule to direct and guide him to the fittest and most meet proportion of time for both is hee not apt hereby to break the rule of morality which consists as hath been shewne in that which is most suitable comely and convenient for man to give to God or man The commandment therefore in this case measuring out and declaring such a proportion and what time is most convenient and comely for man to take to himselfe for labour or to give to God for rest it doth not abolish the morality of the example but doth rather establish and make it It sets out the most comely and meet proportion of time for labour and rest and therefore such a time as is most good in it selfe because most comely and proportionable which being therefore commanded is a morall duty in man and the example hereof morally binding in God 3. Such lawes which mans reason may see either by innate light or by any other externall helpe and light to bee just and good and fit for man to observe such lawes are congruous and suitable to humane nature I say by any external helpe as well as by innate light for neither internall nor externall light doe make a thing just and suitable to man no more than the light of the Sun or the light of a Lanthorne doe make the Kings high-way to the City but they onely declare and manifest the way or that which was so in it selfe before Hence it comes to passe that although mans reason cannot see the equity of some lawes antecedenter by innate light before it bee illuminated by some externall light yet if by this externall light the minde sees the equity justice and holinesse of such a law this may sufficiently argue the morality of such a law which was just and good before any light discovered it and is now discovered onely not made to be so whether by internall or externall light And hence Aquinas well observes that morall lawes which hee makes to be such as are congruous to right reason sometimes are such as not onely command such things which reason doth readily see to bee comely and meet but also such lawes about which mans reason may readily and easily erre and go astray from that which is comely and meet And hence it is that although no reason or wit of man could ever have found out the most just and equall proportion of time or what proportion is most comely and suitable or that a seventh part of time should have been universally observed as holy to God yet if any externall light and teaching from above shall reveale this time and the equity and suitableness of it so that reason shall acknowledge it equall and good that if we have sixe dayes for our selves God should have one for himselfe this is a strong argument that such a command is morall because reason thus illuminated cannot but acknowledge it most meet and equall For though reason may not by any naturall or innate light readily see that such a division of time is most suitable and yet may readily erre and misconceive the most suitable and convenient proportion and division of time it 's then a sufficient proof of the morality of such a command if the congruity and equity of it be discerned consequenter only as we lay and by externall light 4. What ever law was once writ upon mans heart in pure nature is still suitable and congruous and convenient to humane nature and consequently good in it selfe and morall For whatever was so writ upon Adams heart was not writ there as upon a private person but as a common person having the common nature of man
and standing in the roome of all mankinde Hence as nothing was writ then but what was common to all men so such things thus writ were good for all men and suitable to all men it being most injurious to God to think that any thing evill should be imprinted there if therefore it bee proved that the law of the Sabbath was then writ upon mans heart then it undenyably followes that it is meet and suitable to all men still to observe a Sabbath day and indeed to the right understanding of what is suitable to man as man and consequently morall there is nothing more helpfull than to consider of our primitive estate and what was suitable to our nature then for if that which is morall in marriage is to be searched for in the first and ancient records of our first creation by the appointment of our Saviour I then know no reason whatever others object but morality in all other lawes and duties is there to bee sought also for although our originall perfection is now defaced and lost and in that respect is a merum non ens as some call it yet it had once a being and therefore in this controversie we may lawfully enquire after it considering especially that this being which once it had may be suffiently knowne by the contrary being of universall corruption that is in us now as also by the light of the Scriptures in which the searcher and maker of all hearts declares it unto us and indeed there are many morall duties which will never appeare good and suitable to man but rather hard and unreasonable because impossible untill we see and remember from whence we are fallen and what once we had Thesis 26. If therefore a morall law command that which is suitable to humane nature and good in it selfe then it followes from hence which was toucht before that divine determination of something in a law doth not alway take away morality from a law for divine determination is many times no more but a plain and positive declaration of that which is suitable just and good and equall for man to observe now that which points out and declares unto us the morality of a law cannot possibly abolish and destroy such a law For a morall law commanding that which is suitable and good as hath been shewne it is impossible that the Commandment which determineth and directeth to that which is good that by this determination it should overthrow the being of such a good law nay verily particular determination and positivenesse as some call it is so farre from abolishing as that it rather addes to the being as well as to the clearing up and manifestation of such a law For if it be not sufficient to make a morall law that the thing be good in it selfe but that also it must be commanded then the Commandment which many times onely detemines to that which is good and consequently determination doth adde unto the being of a morall law Thesis 27. There is scarce any thing but it is morally indifferent untill it falls under some divine determination but divine determination of twofold 1. Of such things which are not good fit or needfull for man to observe without a command as Sacrifices and Sacraments and such likes now herein in such lawes positive determination may be very well inconsistent with morality and it may bee safely said that such a law is not morall but rather positive and thus the learned sometimes speak 2. Of such things as are equall good in themselves needfull and suitable for man and here particular determination and morality may kisse each other and are not to be opposed one to another and hence it is that if Gods Commandment positively determines us to observe any part of instituted worship suppose Sacraments or Sacrifices yet such lawes are not morall although it bee morall in generall to worship God after his owne will because the things themselves are not good in themselves nor needfull but if God shall determine us to observe a Sabbath day this determination doth not take away the morality of the command because it being good in it selfe to give God the meetest and fittest proportion of time for holy Rest and the commandment declaring that this seventh part or so is such a time hence it comes to passe that this time is good in it selfe and therefore determination by the commandment in this case doth not abolish the morality hereof It is a morall duty to pay tribute to Caesar to give to Caesar that which is Caesars hence because a man may give too much or too little to him that determination which directs us to that particular which is Caesars due and most meet for him to receive and us to give that is best in it selfe and is therefore morall so prayer is a morall duty but because a man may bee tempted to pray too oft or else too seldome hence determination of the fittest and this fittest season makes this or that morall So 't is here in the Sabbath I doe willingly and freely professe thus farre with our Adversaries of the morality of the Sabbath that it is a morall duty to give God some time and day of holy Rest and worship as 't is morall to give Caesar his due and to pray to God but because we may give God too many dayes or too few hence the determination of the most meet and fittest proportion of time and particularly of this time makes this and that to be also morall If no day at all in generall was good and fit for man to give to God and God should notwithstanding command a seventh day then the commandment of such a day with such positive determination could not bee morall any more then the determination of sacrrifices and such like But every day say some of our Adversaries some day say others of them being acknowledged to be equall just and good and most meet to give to God hence it is that determination of a seventh day doth not abolish but clear up that which is morall because it points out unto man that which is most meet and equall Hence therefore it follows that a seventh day is therefore commanded because it is good and not good meerly because commanded Determination also declaring what is most meet declareth hereby that this commandment is also morall and not meerly positive and ceremoniall which not being well considered by some this fourth commandment having some more positivenesse and determination then divers of the rest hath therefore been the chiefe stumbling stone and rock of offence to many against the morality of it by which they have miserably bruised themselves while they have endeavoured to destroy it upon so grosse a mistake Thesis 28. It is true that God out of his absolute soveraignty and good pleasure of his will might have determined us to observe a fourth a ninth a twentieth part of our time in holy rest more or lesse as well as to
the Decalogue onely Rom. 3.20 Iames 3.8 and sometimes more largely for the whole doctrine contained in all the writings of the Old Testament wherein the Gospel also is comprehended Psal. 19.7 Psalme 119.1.51 55. so the word Covenant is sometime taken more strictly for the covenant of works which is contained compendiously in the Decalogue onely writ by the finger of God in two Tables Deut. 4.13 14 Exod. 34.38 and sometime more largely for all the holy writings of Moses Exodus 24.7 8. and 34.10 Levit. 26.14 Ier. 34.13 Now although all the writings of Moses may be called the Covenant as it is largely taken and so the covenant comprehends not onely morall but ceremoniall lawes yet they are never called That Covenant which was writ by the finger of God in two Tables of stone and given to Moses and in this strict sense the word Covenant comprehends no other lawes but morall nor can the places and texts which they alleadge evince the contrary for in that place of Exodus 24.7 it is not said that the Tables of the Covenant but the Booke of the Covenant was read in the audience of all the people which Booke we readily acknowledge to comprehend ceremonials as well as morals but not the Tables of the Covenant of which the question now is so also when the Lord saith Exod. 34.10 that he will make a Covenant his meaning is that he will revive his Covenant by writing as it is there set downe in the same chapter in which writing it is very true that there is mentioned made of many ceremoniall lawes but suppose this covenant written by Moses comprehends sundry ceremoniall lawes will it therefore follow that the Tables of the Covenant written with the finger of God did the like No such matter and therefore there is an expresse difference put in the same chapter verse 27 28. between the covenant written by Moses and the ten Commandments written by the finger of God But secondly Let it be granted that the Decalogue comprehends summarily all the lawes which are particularly dispersed here and there in the writings of Moses yet it doth not follow that there must bee one ceremoniall law written by the finger of God and lifted up in the Decalogue to be the epitome and summarie of all ceremoniall lawes elsewhere explained in the writings of Moses For all lawes whether ceremoniall or judiciall may be referred to the Decalogue as appendices to it or applications of it and so to comprehend all other lawes as their summary But such a summary will no way enforce a necessity of making any one of them the epitome of ceremonialls and the other nine of them of the morals for we know that many judiciall lawes are comprehended under morall lawes being referred as appendices thereunto by Calvin Martyr Chemnitius Ames and sundry others and yet it will not follow from hence that one of the lawes in the Decalogue must be a judiciall law as the summary of all judicials which are branches of the Covenant as well as Master Primrose his ceremonials Thesis 34. It should not seem strange that that law which in the generall nature of it is moral may in the particular application of it be unto a thing ceremoniall and in this respect it cannot be denyed but that the morall law may comprehend all ceremoniall lawes but it will not hence follow as Mr. Primrose inferres that one law in the Decalogue must be ceremoniall as the head and summary of all ceremoniall lawes because we say ceremoniall lawes may bee comprehended under some morall law as speciall applications thereof ex gr It is a morall law to worship God according to his owne will and not after mans inventions as the second Commandment holds it forth Now in the application of this law the Lord points out his owne instituted worship in sundry significant ceremonies sacrifices sacraments c. which particular institutions though ceremoniall are to be referred unto and are comprehended under the second Commandment which is a morall law for if God will be worshipped with his owne worship according to this Commandment then its necessary for the Lord to shew and that under his Commandment what those institutions be wherein he will bee worshipped many of which are ceremoniall which are therefore directly comprehended here Thesis 35. There is therefore no necessity of making one law in the Decalogue to bee ceremoniall that it may be the summary head of all ceremonials viz. because ceremonialls are branches of the covenant which is the Decalogue for upon the like ground there must bee one judiciall law also as the summary of all judicials nay one Evangelicall law also as the head of all Evangelicals sprinkled here and there in Moses his writings of which we read Iohn 5.43 Rev. 10.6 7 8. with Deut. 30.12 13. Gal. 3.8 with Gen. 12.3 for judicials and Evangelicals are branches of the Covenant as well as ceremonials if Mr. Primrose his principle be true but if by his owne confession nine of them are morals and one of them only the head of ceremonialls how shall judiciall and Evangelicall summaries come in which either he must make room for in the Decalogue or acknowledge his foundation to be rotten upon which he hath built up one ceremoniall law among the nine moralls Thesis 36. It is true that among men the same body of Lawes may be framed up of divers articles as Mr. Primrose pleads but that the Decalogue was such a body as had ceremonials mixt with morals it can never be made good by any colour of proof except it be that which we have shewn will as strongly enforce an introduction of some one judiciall and another Evangelicall law into the Decalogue as well as one ceremoniall but such a confusion of Law and Gospell Evangelicals and judicials ceremonialls and morals the blessed God abhorres for it neither suits with Gods wisedome and end in giving the law nor yet with mans weaknesse which God pitties to make such a jumbling and confusion of things together for who can then tell what law is morall and what Evangelicall and what ceremoniall unlesse it be as was shewn by flying for light to the dictates and instinct of nature to shew unto poore deceitfull man what lawes are morall and what not wherein the remedy would have been as bad as the disease Thesis 37. If there must be one law in the Decalogue ceremoniall that so the more Authority may bee procured hereby as Mr. Primrose pleads unto all Gods Ordinances and therefore one of the ceremonials was written in the Decalogue with Gods owne finger and honoured with the like prerogatives as the morall lawes were which were immediately spoken by God himselfe Then if this reasoning be solid why was not one judiciall and another Evangelicall precept alike honoured also For was there not as much need to procure Authority to this as well as to ceremonials and yet wee see their Authority was sufficiently procured without
being shusted into the Decalogue and so might ceremonialls also Thesis 38. There were three sorts of laws which are commonly knowne and which were most eminently appearing among the Jewes 1. Morall 2. Ceremoniall 3. Judiciall Thesis 39. The morall respected their manners as they were men and are therefore called morall The ceremoniall respected them as a Church and as such a kinde of Church The judicial as a Common wealth and as that particular Common-wealth Morall laws were to govern them as an human society Ceremoniall as a sacred society Judiciall as a civill society Thus the Learned speak and being candidly understood are true Thesis 40. The morall law contained in the Decalogue is nothing else but the law of nature revived or a second edition and impression of that primitive and perfect law of nature which in the state of innocency was engraven upon mans heart but now againe written upon Tables of stone by the finger of God For man being made in the Image of God he had therefore the law of holines and righteousnes in which Gods Image consisted written in his heart but having by his fall broken this Table and lost this Image neither knowing or doing the will of God through the law of sinne now engraven on it Hence the Lord hath in much pitty made knowne his law again and given us a faire copy of it in the two Tables of stone which are the copy of that which was writ upon mans heart at first because the first Table containes Love to God in holinesse the second Love to man in righteousnesse which holinesse and righteousnesse are the two parts of Gods Image which was once engraven upon mans soule in his primitive and perfect estate Ephes. 4.24 Nor indeed doe I see how that popish Argument will be otherwise answered pleading for a possibility in man to keep the law perfectly in his lapsed and fallen estate in this life for say they God makes no lawes of impossible things it being unjust for God to require and exact that of a man which hee is not able to doe to which it is commonly and truely answered That man had once power to keep the law in his innocent estate and hence though man be not able to keep it now yet God may require it because hee once gave him power to keep it and that therefore it is no more unjust to exact such obedience which hee cannot performe than for a creditor to require his money of his broken debtor or spend-thrift who is now failed as they say and not able to repay Man therefore having once power to keep the law and now having no power this argues strongly that the law of the Decalogue contains nothing but what was once written as a law of life upon his heart in his innocent estate for I see not how Gods justice can be cleared if he exacts such obedience in the Decalogue which is impossible for man to give unlesse the very same law and power of obedience was written upon his heart at first and therefore it is a wilde notion of theirs who thinke that the Covenant of works which God made with Adam is not the same for matter with the Covenant of works exprest in the morall law for wee see that there is the same Image of holinesse and righteousnesse required in the Tables of stone as the condition of this Covenant which was once written upon mans heart and required in the same manner of him Now this law thus revived and reprinted is the Decalogue because most naturall and suitable to humane nature when it was made most perfect therefore it is universall and perpetuall the substance also of this law being love to God and man holinesse toward God and righteousnesse toward man Matt. 22.37 39. Luke 1. Hence also this law must needs bee morall universall and perpetuall unlesse any should bee so wicked as to imagine it to be no duty of universall or perpetuall equity either to love God or to love man to performe duties of holinesse toward the one or duties of righteousnesse toward the other Hence again the things commanded in this law are therefore commanded because they are good and are therefore morall unlesse any shall think that it is not good in it selfe to love God or man to be holy or righteous and which is still observable there is such a love required herein and such a lovelinesse put upon these lawes as that by vertue of these all our obedience in other things which are not moral becomes lovely for there were many ceremoniall observances in which and by which the people of God exprest their love to God as Mr. Primrose truely concludes from Deut. 6.1 2 3 4 5 6. and Matth. 22.37 38 40. but yet this love did arise by vertue of a morall rule for therefore it was love to worship God in ceremoniall duties because it was lovely to worship God with his own worship of which these were parts which is the moral rule of the second Commandment And hence Master Primrose may see his grosse mistake in making one law of the Decalogue ceremoniall because the summary of the Decalogue being love to God and love to man and our love to God being shewne in ceremoniall as well as in morall duties because our love is seen shewn in our obedience to all the Commandments of God ceremonial as well as moral For though there be love in ceremonial dutys it is not so much in respect of themselves as in respect of some morall rule by vertue of which such duties are attended Thesis 41. The ceremoniall law consisting chiefly of types and shadowes of things to come Heb. 8.5 and therefore being to cease when the body was come Col. 2.17 was not therefore perpetuall as the law morall but temporary and of binding power onely to the nation of the Jewes and their proselytes and not putting any tie upon all Nations as the morall law did Every ceremoniall law was temporary but every temporary law was not ceremoniall as some say as is demonstrable from sundry judicials which in their determinations were proper to that Nation while that Jewish polity continued and are not therefore now to be observed Thesis 42. The Iudiciall lawes some of them being hedges and fences to safeguard both morall and ceremoniall precepts their binding power was therefore mixt and various for those which did safeguard any morall law which is perpetuall whether by just punishments or otherwise doe still morally binde all Nations For as Piscator argues a morall law is as good and as precious now in these times as then and there is as much need of the preservation of these fences to preserve these lawes in these times and at all times as well as then there being as much danger of the treading downe of those lawes by the wilde beasts of the world and brutish men sometimes even in Churches now as then and hence God would have all Nations preserve these fences for
against the second Commandment might not as wel blot out much of that light of nature about the Sabbath also and then how shall the light of nature be any sufficient discovery unto us of that which is morall and of that which is not Thesis 147. There is a Law made mention of Iam. 2.10 whose parts are so inseparably linked together that whosoever breaks any one is guilty of the breach of all and consequently whosoever is called to the obedience of one is called to the obedience of all and consequently all the particular Jaws which it contains are homogeneall parts of the same Totum or whole law If it be demanded What is this Law the answer is writ with the beams of the Sun that 't is the whole morall Law contained in the Decalogue For 1. The Apostle speaks of such a Law which not only the Jews but all the Gentiles are bound to observe and for the breach of any one of which not only the Jews but the Gentiles also were guilty of the breach of all and therefore it cannot be meant of the ceremoniall Law which did neither binde Gentiles or Jews at that time wherein the Apostle writ 2 He speaks of such a Law as is called a royall Law and a Law of liberty vers 8.12 which cannot be meant of the ceremoniall Law in whole or in part which is called a Law of bondage not worthy the royall and kingly spirit of a Christian to stoop to Gal. 4.9 3. 'T is that law by the works of which all men are bound to manifest their faith and by which faâ—â—h is made perfect vers 22. which cannot be the Ceremoniall nor Evangelicall for that is the Law of faith and therefore it 's meant of the Law morall 4. 'T is that Law of which Thou shalt not kill nor commmit adultery are parts vers 11. Now these Laws are part of the Decalogue only and whereof it may be said he that said Thou shalt not commit adultery said also Remember to keep the Sabbath holy and therefore the whole Decalogue and not some parts of it only is the morall Law from whence it is manifest that the Apostle doth not speak as M. Primrose would interpret him of offending against the Word at large and of which the Ceremoniall Laws were a part but of offending against that part of the word to wit the morall Law of which he that offends against any one is guilty of the breach of all hence also his other answer fals to the dust viz. that the fourth command is no part of the Law and therefore the not observing of it is no sinne under the New Testament because it was given only to the Jews and not to us for if it be a part of the Decalogue of which the Apostle only speaks then 't is a meer begging of the question to affirm that it is no part of the Law of Christians but we see the Apostle here speaks of the Law and the Royall Law and the Royall Law of Liberty his meaning therefore must be of some speciall Law which he cals 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Law now if he thus speaks of some speciall Law what can it be but the whole Decalogue and not a part of it only as when he speaks of the Gospel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he means not some part but the whole Gospel also and if every part of the Decalogue is not morall how should any man know from any Law or rule of God what was morall and what not and consequently what is sinful and what not if it be said the light of nature we have proved that this is a blind and corrupt-Judge as it exists in corrupt man if it be said by the light of the Gospel this was then to set up a light unto Christians to discern it by but none to the Jews while they wanted the Gospel as dispensed to us now many morall Laws also are not mentioned in the Gospel it being but accidentall to it to set forth the Commandements of the Law Thesis 148. If Christ came to fulfill and not to destroy the Law Mat. 5.17 then the Commandement of the Sabbath is not abolished by Christs comming if not one jot prick or tittle of the Law shall perish much lesse shall a whole Law perish or be destroyed by the comming of Christ. Thesis 149. 'T is true indeed that by Law and Prophets is sometimes meant their whole doctrine both ceremoniall and morall and propheticall which Christ fulfilled personally but not so in this place of Matthew but by Law is meant the morall Law and by Prophets those propheticall illustrations and interpretations thereof in which the Prophets do abound for 1. The Lord Christ speaks of that law only which whosoever should teach men to break and cast off he should be least in the Kingdom of Heaven Matth. 5.19 but the Apostles did teach men to cast off the Ceremoniall Law and yet were never a whit lesse in the Kingdom of Heaven 2. He speaks of that Law by conformity to which all his true Disciples should exceed the righteousnesse of Scribes and Pharisees but that was not by being externally ceremonious or morall but by internall conformity to the spiritualnesse of Gods Law which the Pharisees then regarded not 3. Christ speaks of the least Commandements and of these least Commandments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 now what should those least Commandements be but those which he afterward interprets of rash anger adulterous eyes unchaste thoughts love to enemies c. which are called least in opposition to the Pharisaicall Doctors conceits in those times who urged the grosse duties commanded and condemned men onely for grosse sins forbidden as if therein consisted our compleat conformity to the Law of God and therefore by the least of those Commandments is meant no other then those which he afterward sets down in his spirituall interpretation of the Law vers 21. never a one of which Commandments are Ceremoniall but morall Laws and although Mr. Primrose thinks that there is no connexion between the seventeen and the other expositors verses of the Law which follow yet whosoever ponders the Analysis impartially shall finde it otherwise even from the 17 Verse to the end the conclusion of which is to be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect who is never made a pattern of perfection to us in ceremoniall but only in morall matters 't is true indeed which some object that there is mention made of Altar and Sacrifice vers 23 which were ceremonials but there is no Law about them but only a morall Law of love is thereby prest with allusion to the ceremoniall practice in those times he speaks also about divorce but this is but accidentally brought to shew the morality of the Law of adultery the Law of retaliation wants not good witnesses to testifie to the morality of it but I rather thinke 't is brought in to set forth a morall Law against private revenge
out the rest of three daies in the grave and why may not Christs rest from labour in his sleep be as well the antitype as Christs rest from the actions of this life in his grave Thesis 188. Why may not our labour in the six daies be made a type of our labouâ—ing in sin as well as the Sabbath a type of our sanctification and rest from sin as some would have it Why may not our Libertines make abstinence from adultery forbidden in the seventh Command a type of our spirituall chastity as the Gnosticks did of old as well as the rest from labour on the Sabbath a type of our rest from sin And by this liberty how easie is it for fâ—othy allegorizing wits which my heart abhors to typifie as it were and allegorize all the commandments out of the world Theâ—â—â— 189. The rest on the Sabbath may be considered either in respect of Gods example in himself or his command to man out of himself Now the rest of the Sabbath as it is exemplary in God cannot be a type of any thing because God never made himself an example of any ceremoniall thing Gods own immediate acts cannot without much injury to God be made types and ceremonies if therefore there be any thing of the rest of the Sabbath typicall it is so in respect of mans rest on it commanded unto him of God but whether and what it doth typifie we shall speak to in its proper place Thesis 190. There wants not sufficient proof that the Gentiles generally practised and approved a seventh daies Sabbath and that it was highly honoured among them as very sacred This truth both Tertullian Eusebius Iosephus and Philo have formerly affirmed Aretus also especially learned Rivet have lately vindicated and made good against all the exceptions of Gomarus and others insomuch as that the last refuge both of Gomarus and Primrose is this viz. That all those Heathens who writ about the Sabbath and in honour of it received not their light from nature but from the writings of the Iewish Common-wealth all those heathenish testimonies about the Sabbath being published and writ long after the delivering of the law upon mount Sinai And therefore they think this no argument to prove that this law was practised ever since the world began or that it was known by the light of nature by which it might be evinced to be morall but by this answer we shall scarce know any thing to be according to the light of nature by the writings of the Heathens for all their writings are since Moses time if they be of any credit but suppose they did not know it by the working power of the light of nature yet if they approved of and honoured this day when it was made known by other means so that rhey knew it by the approving light of nature as the authors alleaged make good it s then sufficient to prove the seventh day morall even by the light of nature And although Seneca and some others scoft at the Jewish Sabbaths as if they lost the seventh part of their time thereby yet we know that mens lusts wil give them leave to scoffe at that which yet their consciences chastise them for beside I think those scoffs were not so much at the seventh day as at their â—â—ict and ceremonious observance thereof as also of their seventh yeeres wherein it s no wonder if that the light of nature should not so clearly see Thesis 191. The light of nature in the Gentiles especially in matters of the first Table was very imperfect dim and corrupt Hence it is that we cannot expect to â—inde any perfect light of nature in matters of the Sabbath some glimmerings and dark practices herein are sufficient to prove that this Law is naturall although the exact proportion of time for rest should not or could not by any reasoning of corrupt nature be perfectly found out their observation of holy daies and festivals did argue some imperfect light of nature left concerning the Sabbath which once nature had more perfectly as old walls and rubbish doe argue old and great buildings in former times but suppose they could not finde out exactly the seventh part of time and so dedicate it to God for his Sabbath yet the want of such light argues only the want of perfection of the light of nature which we should not expect to finde in the present light of nature in matters of the first Table and in this of the Sabbath and therefore t is no argument to prove the Sabbath not to be of the Law of nature because the perfect knowled of the exact time thereof is not left in corrupt nature now Thesis 192. Suppose the Gentiles did neither know nor were ever reproved particularly by any of the Prophets for breaking the Sabbath yet this doth not argue that they were not bound to sanctifie a Sabbath and that it was no sin for them to neglect the Sabbath for it was a priviledge of the Jews to have Gods Oracles revealed to them and especially this of the Sabbath Nehem. 9.14 Rom. 3.2 so it was a curse upon the Gentiles to live without Christ and so also without Sabbaths Ephes. 2.12 The times of which ignorance God is said to wink at Acts 17.30 not by excusing them for the breach of Sabbath or other sins but by not reproving them for it as neither he did for many other morall transgressions which notwithstanding were sins The Patriarchs were not condemned expressely till Moses time by Mr. Primrose account for their Polygamie that we read of and yet it was a sin all that time against the very first institution of marriage and why might not the breach of the Sabbath be a sin much more longer among the Gentiles and yet none of the Prophets reprove them particularly for the same And therefore M. Primrose hath no cause to mark this argument with chalke and with all attention as he cals it viz. That the breach of the Sabbath among the Gentiles was no sin because it was not any where particularly reproved by the Prophets of God for we see by what hath been said upon what weake crutches it stands Thesis 193. The Gentiles shall not be condemned only for what they did actually know and did not practice but also for what they did not actually know yet might and should have known The Gentiles did know that that some daies were to be kept holy to God saith M. Primrose and they should have known the fittest proportion and most suitable frequency of such daies which the same author acknowledgeth to be morall therefore they should have known the seventh daies Sabbath and possibly might have known it if they had not held truth in righteousnesse but made improvement thereof for in this sense habenti dabitur to him that hath shall be given to wit more of the same kind of lâ—ght whether naturall morall or Evangelicall if common light in all these more common light
if speciall light in them they shall then have more speciall and saving light Thesis 194. As it is no argument that that Law is according to the light of nature which the Gentiles generally practised for then Polytheisme and Sacrificing of beasts yea wil-worship should be according to the light of nature because these sins were generally practised so it is no argument that that Law is not according to the light of nature which they generally neglected and therefore suppose the Gentiles never observed a Sabbath yet this is no argument that it is therefore no morall Law I know M. Primrose thinks that the Sacrifices were by an instinct of nature Because it dictates that all sinnes whereof mortall men are guilty are to be expiated by Sacrifice and Offerings to God offended Which assertion hath some truth in it if those words By Sacrifices and Offerings be left out for what light of nature could make men think that an infinite Deity offended could be pacified by such carnall observances as the Sacrifices of brute beasts and their blood which never offended This custome the Gentiles might retain as a Relique of former instruction and institution by their first Fathers after the flood which being matters meerly ceremonious might be retained more firmly then other morall duties of great consequence however we see that the practice of the Gentiles is no fit guide to direct that which is according to the law and light of nature Thesis 195. If more narrow enquiry be made what the Law of nature is these distinctions must be observed 1. The Law of nature is either of pure or corrupt nature The Law of pure nature was the Law of God writ on Adams heart in innocency which was nothing else but that holy bent and inclination of the heart within to act according to the holy Law of God revealed or Covenant made with him without and thus Aquinas places the law of nature in this inclination The Law of corrupt nature is that dimme light left in the minde and morall inclination left in the will in respect of some things contained in the Law of God which the Apostle cals Conscience Rom. 2.15 which naturall conscience is nothing but the remnants and generall principles of the law of pure nature left in all men since the fall which may be increased by more knowledge of the Law of God or more diminished and defaced by the wickednesse of man Titus 1.15 2. The Law of corrupt nature is taken either more largely or strictly As it is taken more largely so it comprehends all that which is agreeable and sutable to naturall reason and that from a naturall innate equity in the thing when it is made known either by divine instruction or humane wisdom although it be not immediatly known by the light of nature and thus many judiciall laws are naturall and morall though positive and of binding nature unto this day As it is taken strictly so it comprehends no more but what nature immediatly knows or may know without externall instruction as parents to be honoured mans life to be preserved 3. The Law of nature strictly taken are either principles of nature or conclusions from such principles The principles of the law of nature are in some respect many yet may be reduced to this one head viz. That good is to be followed evill to be avoided Conclusions are deductions from those principles like severall streames from the same spring which though lesse evident then the principles yet may be readily found out by discourse and sad search 4. Conclusions arising from these principles are more immediate or mediate Immediate are made by Aquinas to be two 1. Love God with all thy heart 2. Love thy neighbour as thy selfe Mediate are such as arise from the former principles by means of those two more immediate conclusions and of this kinde are some as he thinks yea all the laws of the Decalogue if right reason may be judge Now to apply these Thesis 196. If the question be whether the Sabbath be known by the light of pure nature the answer is yea for Adams minde knew of it and his heart was inclined and bent to the keeping of it although it be true that now this light in corrupt nature as in many other morall duties is almost wholly extinct and worn out as hath been formerly shewn And to speak plainly this great and first impression left on mans heart in pure nature is the first rule according to which we are now to judge of what is the law of nature and it serves to dash to peeces and grinde to powder and dust most effectually and strongly the dreams and devices of such as would make the Sabbath not morall because not naturall or not easily known by the present light of corrupt nature when as corrupt nature is no perfect copy but a blotted discovery of some part of the light of nature which was fully imprinted at large in pure nature and therefore it is no wonder if our adversaries so much oppose the Commandment of the Sabbath in the state of innocency such therefore as are otherwise Orthodox in this point and yet make this description of the Law of nature viz. which was written on mans heart in his first first Creation to be both uncertain and impertinent doe unwarily pull down one of the strongest bulwarks and the first that ever God made to defend the morality of the Sabbath there is indeed no expresse Scripture which makes this description of the Law of nature as they object and so it is of many other things which are virtually and for substance contained in the Scripture although there be no formall description set down of the same and the like I say of this description here Thesis 197. If we speak of the Law of nature strictly taken for that which is immediatly and readily known by the common light of nature in all men then it may be safely affirmed that although the Sabbath should not be in this sence naturall yet it will not follow that it is not therefore morall for the moral law once writ on mans heart in pure nature is almost blotted out only some rudera and old rubbish is left of it in a perverse minde and a corrupt heart Eph. 4.18 we see the wisest of the heathens making those things to be morall vertues Iunius instanceth in the Law of private revenge and we know they magnified will-worship which the Scripture condemns as morall vices and sins God would have common-wealths preserved in all places of the world from the inundation and deluge of mans wickednesse and therefore he hath generally printed the notions of the second Table upon mens hearts to set bounds as by sea-banks unto the overflowings thereof and hence it is that they are generally known but he would not have Churches every where and therefore there is but little known concerning matters of the first Table and consequently about this Law of the Sabbath
which notwithstanding may be morall although it be not so immediatly known Thesis 198. If we speak of the law of corrupt nature largely taken for that law which when 't is made known by divine determination and declaration is both sutable and congruous to naturall reason and equity we may then say that the Law of the Sabbath is according to the light of nature even of corrupt nature it self for do but suppose that God is to be worshipped and then these three things appear to be most equall 1. That he is not only to have a time but a speciall time and a fit proportion of time for worship 2. That it 's most meet that he should make this proportion 3. The Lord having given man six daies and taken a Seventh to himself mans reason cannot but confesse that it is most just to dedicate that time to God and for my own part I think that in this respect the law of the Sabbath was as fairly writ on mans heaâ—â— in innocency as many other morall laws which none question the morality of at this day but disputes about this are herein perhaps uselesse Thesis 199. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper may be administred meet circumstances concurring every Lords day nay upon the week daies often as they did in the primitive persecutions and hence our Saviour limits no time for it in the first institution thereof as he did for the Passeover of old but only this As oft as you doe it doe it in remembrance of me Hence it will follow that now under the Gospel there is no set Sabbath as M. Primrose would because our Saviour at the first institution of the Lords Supper limits no particular day for the celebration thereof as once he did for the Passeover for though there is an appointed speciall time as shall hereafter appeare for the publique exercise of all holy duties not being limited to those times but enlarged to other times also hence there is no reason why our Saviour should institute a set Sabbath when he instituted the Lords Supper as the proper time of the celebration thereof as it was in case of the Passeover Thesis 200. It is no argument to prove the Sabbath to be ceremoniall because it is reckoned among ceremonials viz. shew-bread and sacrifices as M. Primrose and Wallaeus urge it out of Mat. 12.1 2 3. for 1. upon the same ground fornication and eating of idolothytes are ceremoniall because they are ranked among ceremonials viz. bloud and things strangled Act. 15.29.2 upon this ground the Sabbath hath no morality at all in it no more then shew-bread and sacrifices which were wholly ceremoniall 3. The Sabbath is in the same place reckoned among things which are morall as pulling a sheep out of a pit upon the Sabbath day an act of humanity why may it not then be as well accounted morall 4. One may as well argue that the not keeping company with Publicanes and sinners was a ceremoniall thing because the Lord Jesus useth the same Proverbiall speech I will have mercy not sacrifice Mat. 9.13 upon which he defends the lawfullnesse of pulling the ears of corn upon the Sabbath day in this Mat. 12.15 the scope therefore of this place is not to shew the nature of the Sabbath day whether it be ceremoniall or morall but the lawfullnesse and morality of his act in eating the ears of corn upon this day and thus the arguments of our Saviour are very strong and convicting to prove the morality of such an act but no way to prove the ceremoniality of the Sabbath for that is the scope of our Saviour that mercy to the hungry is to be preferred before the Sacrifice of bodily resting upon the Sabbath M. Primrose indeed replies hereto and tels us that mercy is to be preferred before sacrifice or ceremoniall duties but not before morall duties and therefore Christ preferring it before the rest on the Sabbath the Sabbath could not be morall but we know that mercy in the second table is sometimes to be preferred before morall duties in the first table a man is bound to neglect solemn praier sometime to attend upon the sick it 's a morall duty to sanctifie some day for a Sabbath saith M. Primrose and yet suppose a fire be kindled in a town upon that day or any sick to be helped must not mercy be prefer'd before hearing the word which himself will acknowledge to be then a morall duty Thesis 201. When Christ is said to be Lord of the Sabbath Mat. 12.8 the meaning is not as if he was such a Lord as had power to break it but rather such a Lord as had power to appoint it and consequently to order the work of it for his own service M. Primrose thinks That he is said to be Lord of it because he had power to dispense with the keeping of it by whom when he would and that Christ did chuse to do such works upon the Sabbath day which were neither works of mercy or necessity nay which were servile which the Law forbade for Christ saith he as mediatour had no power to dispense with things morall but he might with matters ceremoniall and therefore with the Sabbath How far Christ Jesus might and may dispence with morall laws I dispute not now I think Biell comes nearest the truth in this controversie only this is considerable suppose the Sabbath was ceremoniall yet it 's doubtfull whether Christ Jesus who came in the daies of his flesh to fulfill all righteousnesse could abolish or break the law ceremoniall untill his death was past by which this hand-writing of Ordinances was blotted out Colos. 2.14 and this middle wall of partition was broken down Ephes. 2.14 15 16. But let it be yeelded that Christ had power to break ceremoniall laws then before his death yet in this place there is no such matter for the words contain a clear proof for the right observance of the Sabbath against the over-rigid conceptions of the superstitious and proud Pharisees who as they thought it unlawfull for Christ to heal the sick upon the Sabbath so to rub out and eat a few corn ears upon it although hunger and want and perhaps more then ordinary in the Disciples here should force men hereunto which was no servile work as Mr Primrose would but a work of necessity and mercy in this case and our Saviour proves the morality of it from the example of David eating the Shew-bread and those that were with him preferring that act of mercy before sacrifice and abstinence from Shew-bread and hence our Saviour argues That if they attending upon David might eat the Shew-bread much more his hungry Disciples might eat the corn while they attended upon him that day who was Lord of the Sabbath and that they might be the better strengthened hereby to do him service These things being thus where now is there to be found any reall breach of the Sabbath or doing of any
creation as the morality of a day 125 55. It is not in mans liberty to take any one of the seven dayes in a week to be the Christian Sabbath 126 56. A determined time is here required but not what nature but what counsel shall determine and consequently this or that seventh day 130 57. The force of Gods example in resting the seventh and working six dayes how far it extends 132 58. No reason that God must have a seventh yeer because he will have a seventh day 134 59. How a circumstance of time is capable of morality 137 60. The Law of the Sabbath is a Homogeneal part of the Moral Law and is therefore Moral and whether it be Moral in respect of the letter 138 61. Whether the Decalogue is said to be the Moral Law in respect of the greater part only 139 62. The Law of the Sabbath hath equal glory with all the other nine Morals and hath therefore equal morality 140 63. The Sabbath was given as a moral law to man in innocency 151 64. The Sabbath said to be sanctified Gen. 2 not meerly in a way of Destination or Anticipation 162 65. Adam in innocency might need a Sabbath 174 66. No types of Christ given to man in innocency 177 67. The Sabbath was no type in respect of its original institution 178 68. The Heathens by the light of corrupt nature had some kind of knowledge of the Sabbath 189 69. The Law of nature diversly taken and what it is 194 70. No argument to prove the Sabbath ceremonial because Christ appointed no special day for the Lords Supper 198 71. No argument to prove the Sabbath ceremonial because it is reckoned among the ceremonials 199 72. Christ is not said to be the Lord of the Sabbath because it was ceremonial 200 73. Though the Sahbath be made for man yet it is not therefore ceremonial 201 74. A fond distinction of the Sabbath in sensu mystico literali 202 75. Although we are bound to rest every day from sin yet we are not therefore to make every day a Sabbath 203 76. The Sabbath was not proper to the Jewes because they only were able as some say to observe the exact time of it 204 77. An answer to M. Carpenters and Heylins new invented argument against the morality of the Sabbath 206 FINIS PART I. The Morality of the Sabbath Wherin the chief Arguments used by Gomarus Mr. Primrose Mr. Ironside Mr. Broad with sundry others against it are briefly answered the reasons for it more fully cleared Wherein also the great Controversie whether the whole Moral Law contained in the Decalogue be a Rule of life to a Beleever is occasionally and distinctly handled THE MORALITY OF THE SABBATH Thesis 1. TIme is one of the most precious blessings which worthlesse man in this world enjoyes a jewell of inestimable worth a golden stream dissolving and as it were continually running downe by us out of one eternity into another yet seldome taken notice of untill it is quite passed away from us Man saith Solomon knowes not his time Eccles 9.12 It is therefore most just and meet that he who hath the disposing of all other things lesse precious and momentous should also be the supreme Lord and disposer of all our times Thesis 2. He who is the disposer of all our times is the soveraigne Lord of our persons also and is therefore the utmost and last end of both for if our persons and all our times bee of him they are then to be improved for him as he sees most meer Thesis 3. Now although all creatures in the world are of God and for God so that being of him they receive their being from him as their first efficient and being for him are therefore preserved and governed by him as their utmost end yet no other inferiour visible creature is set so near to God and consequently is not in that manner for God as man is Thesis 4. For although all inferiour creatures are made lastly for God yet they are made nextly for man but man havinâ— nothing better than himselfe between him and God therefore made both lastly and nextly for God and hence is that no inferiour Creature which comes out and issuâ—eth from God hath such a reflux and returne againe bacâ— unto God as man hath because in and by this reflux anâ— returne into him mans immortall being is eternally preâ—served like water running into the Sea againe from whence it first came Thesis 5. For whatever is set next and as it were contiguous to eâ—ternall is eternall Omne contiguum aeâ—erno spirituali est aâ—ternum say some and hence it is that the soule is eternall because it is made nextly for God and as it were conâ—tiguous to him The body also shall bee eternall beâ—cause contiguous to the eternall soule But no other inâ—feriour Creatures are thus eternall For although they bâ— made nextly for man yet so as that they are firstly for thâ— body which is of it selfe mortall and not eternall anâ— therefore not being contiguous to that which is spirituallâ— eternall are not so themselves and the reason of this iâ— because all inferiour Creatures as they come out from God so their motion is toward man for whom they aâ—â— nextly made and they go out strait forward from God as it were in a strait line toward man to the last end anâ— terme of which strait line when they are come in the serâ—vice of man they then cannot proceed any further and dâ— therefore perish and cease to be without reflecting or reâ—turning back againe immediately unto God But maâ— being made immediately and nextly for God hath therforâ— his motion so toward God as that he returnes immediatelâ— unto him againe and is not led in a strait line but led 〈◊〉 it were about in a circular motion and hence returning immediately to him he is hereby eternally preserved iâ— him for whom he is immediately made and unto whom hâ— is nextly contiguous as hath been said Thesis 6. Now although in this returne of man to God suppoâ—sing it to be internall regular and spirituall mans blesseâ— being once lost is hereby recovered and preserved in God yet when man is left unto himselfe the motions of his soul out of this circle in straying from God are innumerable and would be endlesse if God who set him next unto him selfe did not some time or other recall returne and â—ead him back again as it were in a heavenly circle into himself Thesis 7. Look therefore as when man hath run his race finished his course and passed through the bigger and larger circle of his life he then returnes unto his eternall rest so it 〈◊〉 contrived and ordered by divine wisdom as that he shall â—n a speciall manner returne unto and into his rest once â—t least within the lesser and smaller circle of every week â—hat so his perfect blessednesse to come might be foretasted every Sabbath day and so be begun
which Master Primrose contends for but rather directly to the second and reductively and indirectly as appendices to the fourth which appendices as they may be put to so they may be taken off againe the morall Commandment remaining entire even as we know Calvin referres many ceremoniall duties as appendices to such Commands concerning the morality of which Master Primrose doubts not and therefore for him to thinke that the Sabbath comprehends all Iewish Festivall dayes upon this ground viz. because the Sabbath is joyned with and put in among the reckoning of such Festivals Leviticus 23. Isaiah 1.13 14. hath no more force in it than by retorting the argument and upon the like ground prove it to be morall because it is joyned with Morall Commandments as honouring of Parents Leviticus 19.3 and prayer Isaiah 1.19 and by his owne confession with the other nine which are all of them morall also Thesis 65. Secondly not onely a solemne time but more particularly a solemne day a whole day of worship is here also required by vertue of this fouâ—th Command and the Lord gives us good reason for it that if he gives us many whole dayes for our owne work then not some part of a day but a day a whole day according to the reason and expresse words of the Commandment should bee marked out and set apart for his work and service if that place Isaiah 56.6 7. will not demonstrate a seventh dayes Sabbath under the new Testament yet â—â—sufficiently and fully clears the point in hand viz. that a Sabbath day is to be observed by the sonnes of the stranger or Gentiles who are called strangers to the Common-wealth of Irsael Ephesians 2.12 and indeed Wallaeus freely confesseth and proveth that a whole day is here required and if a whole day I hope none will think that the time out of publick Assemblies is common and prophane if a whole day be holy and therefore Mr. Primrose tels us that the Gentiles having no other law but the light of nature have appointed set dayes for the exercise of their religion and that as the Jews had their set days which we know were whole dayes so should Christians have theirs for their publick Assemblies under the Gospel which I hope must be therefore whole dayes also it is also considerable that if the three first Commandments requiring Gods worship do consequently require some time for that worship as being a necessary adjunct to all actions whether morall or civill and without which they cannot be performed then the fourth Command must require somewhat more particularly than a time of worship and therefore they that place the morality of the fourth Command in requiring onely a time of worship because say they a time of worship is necessary may upon this ground wholly and perfectly abolish the fourth Command as superfluous and needlesse because such a time of worship is required in all other Commandments necessarily They may also imagine as great a morality in the command of building the Temple the place of worship because a place of worship is necessary as well as a time it is not therefore a time but such a time as is preserved in a day even in a whole day for worship which is here commanded Thesis 66. The wise God could have appointed some part of every day to be kept holy rather than a whole day together but his wisdome saw this proportion of time every day to be more unmeet in respect of mans daily cumbers which doe so easily intangle mans thoughts and affections so as within some smal piece of a day he cannot ordinarily nor so easily recover and unloose himselfe to find the end of a Sabbath service which is most sweet and full rest in the bosome of his God as he may within the compasse of a whole day set a part for that end or suppose he could so doe in a piece and part of a day yet Gods Name should lose by it if he should not have the hoâ—â—ur of some solemne day which wee see doe serve to advâ—â—ce the names of idoll gods and men on earth it 's meet and just that Gods Name should be magnified by us commonly every day by setting a part some time which we may well spare as whet to the sithe out of our callings for God and this doth honour him but a day much more Thesis 67. They therefore who maintaine that a seventh day is not morall because it is but a circumstance of time may as well abolish time to be morall or any day to be morall because a day let it fall out when it will is but a circumstance of time which notwithstanding they account to be morall in this command but we know that much morality lyes in circumstances and why a day sanctified may not bee as much morall as a duty I yet see not Thesis 68. The Familists and Antinomians of late like the Manichees of old do make All dayes equally holy under the Gospel and none to bee observed more than another by vertue of any command of God unlesse it be from some command of man to which the outward man they think should not stick to conforme or unlesse it be pro re nata or upon severall occasions which speciall occasions are onely to give the Alarums for Church meetings and publick Christian Assemblies an audacious assertion crosse to the very light of nature among the blind heathens who have universally allowed the deity whom they ignorantly worshipped the honour of some solemn dayes crosse to the verdict of popish Schoolmen and Prelatists whose stomacks never stood much toward any Sabbath at all crosse to the scope of the Law of the Sabbath which if it hath any generall morality not denyed scarce to any of Moses Judicials surely one would think it should lie in the observation of some day or days though not in a seventh day for which now we do not contend Crosse also to the appointment of the Gospel foretold by Isaiah and Ezekiel Isa. 56.4 6. Ezek. 43.27 made mention of by our Saviour to continue long after the abolishing of all ceremonies by his death Mat. 24.20 who therefore bids them pray that their flight may not be in the winter nor on the Sabbath day which whether it be the Jewish or Christian Sabbath I dispute not only this is evident that he hath an eye to some speciall set day and which was lastly ordained by Christ and observed in the Primitive Churches commonly called the Lords day as shall be shewn in due place and which notion under pretence of more spiritualnes in making every day a Sabbath which is utterly unlawfull and impossible unlesse it be lawfull to neglect our own work all the week long and without which there can be no true Sabbath doth really undermine the true Sabbath in speciall set days and look as to make every man a King Judge in a Christian Common-wealth would be the introduction of confusion and consequently
Christ to be beholding to any of the light upon Moses face It seemes then that the law written is not to be a Christians rule but onely so farre as it is written in the heart a most accursed assertion for how and why did Christ Jesus himselfe resist temptation to sinne was it not by cleaving to the written word Matth. 44.10 and was not this done for our imitation why did David and Christ Iesus delight to doe Gods will was it not this because it was written of them that so they should doe Psa. 40.7 8. Did not the law in their hearts make them thus cleave to the written law without Why did Paul perswade Children to honour their parents was it not because this was the first Commandment with promise Ephes. 6.2 had it not been more Evangelically spoken to perswade them rather to look to the law of Moses written on their hearts within to direct them hereunto rather than to be beholding for any light upon Moses face to direct them herein how comes it to passe that Paul preacheth no other thing but what was in the old Testament of Moses and the Prophets who were onely the Interpreters of Moses Acts 22.20 How is it that Christ himselfe borrowes light from Moses Psalmes and all the Prophets to cleare up his resurrection and suffering Luke 24.27 32 if no light must bee borrowed from the face of Moses if indeed wee were perfect in this life as wee shall bee in heaven there would then bee no need of the writings of the Apostles Prophets or Moses of Law or Gospell but we being but imperfectly enlightned it 's no lesse than extreame ingratitude and unthankfulnesse to preferre our owne imperfect and impure light before that perfect spotlesse and heavenly Law and counsels of God without us which when the most perfect beleever doth see he may cry out with Paul The Law is holy but I am carnall what is this but painted Popery to make the spirit within to be the supreame Iudge and superiour to the Spirit of God in the written word without onely they shrine it up in the Popes private Conclave and Kitchin or somewhat worse but these in a company of poore imperfect deluded and perhaps corrupted men it 's true the Covenant of grace strictly taken in the Gospel needs not to borrow any light from the Covenant of works in the Law but yet for all this the grace of God appearing in the Gospel will have us to walk worthy of God unto all well pleasing according to the Law Tit. 2.12 13. and to mourne bitterly that we are so unlike the will and image of God revealed in the Law Rom. 7.23 24. Thesis 105. The Apostle Paul as he sometimes condemnes works and sometime commends them so he sometimes rejects the Law and sometimes commends the Law sometime hee would have Beleevers dye to the law and sometime hee exhorts them to live in all holy obedience to it the Apostle therefore must speak of the Law under various considerations or else must speake Daggers and flat contradictions and therefore of necessity wee are to consider the Law not alway under one respect but variously for consider the law as a Covenant of workes or as the way unto or matter of our justification and so works are condemned and the Law is rejected and abrogated and so we are to die to the Law but consider the Law as a rule of life to a person justified already and so the Law is to be received and works are to bee commended and we are to live thereunto Thesis 106. When the Gospel nakedly urgeth Beleevers to good workes and obedience to the Law it is then considered onely as a rule of life but when wee meet with such Scriptures as set the Law and Christ the Law and grace the Law and promise the Law and faith c. at opposition one against another then the Law in such places is ever considered as a Covenant of life from which we are wholly freed and unto which we should be wholly dead that weâ— may be married unto Christ Rom. 7.4 hence therefore their arguings are feeble and weak who would prove a Christian to be wholly free from the directive power of the Law because a Christian is said not to be under the law but under grace Rom. 6.14 and because the Law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ Iohn 1.17 and because the inheritance is not by the law but by promise and by faith Gal. 3.12.18 for these and such like Scriptures speake of the law as standing in opposition to Christ and therefore speake of it as of a Covenant of life by which men seek to be justified from which we grant a Beleever is wholly freed and unto which hee is not bound nay hee is bound to renounce it and cast out this bond-woman but all this doth not prove that he is free from it as his rule of life Thesis 107. The Law and mans sinfull heart are quite opposite one to another Rom. 7.9 10 11 13. but when through the grace of Christ the heart is changed so as there is a new nature or new man in a beleever then there is a sweet agreement between this new nature and the Law for saith Paul I delight in the Law of God in my inner man it is therefore a most false assertion to say that the old man of a Beleever is to be kept under the law but the new man or new nature is above all Law for though the new nature bee above it as a legall covenant yet it never comes to be willingly under it as a rule untill now an imperfect new nature is infinitely glad of the guidance of a holy and most perfect law Psalme 119.140 Thesis 108. It is very evident that the children and sonnes of God under the new Testament are not so under the Law as the children and sonnes of God were under the old Testament for the Apostle expressely tels Gal. 3.23 that before the faith came we i. the children of the Old Testament were shut up and kept under the Law and were under it as under a Schoolmaster verse 24. and these of whom the Apostle thus speaks are not onely wicked and carnall Jewes but the deare children of God and heires of eternall life in those times as is evident from Gal. 4 1 2 3. but the Apostle speaking of the sonnes of God in Gospel-times since faith is come and revealed speakes as expresly that we are now no longer under the law as under a Schoolmaster Gal. 3 25. and that now when the fulnesse of time is come God sent his sonne to redeem them that were under the law that we might receive the Adoption of Sonnes Gal. 4.3 4 5. which though it bee true of all men by nature viz. that they are under the law yet an impartiall cleare eye will easâ—ly discerne that the Apostles dispute is not of our being under the Law by nature meerely
heard of it do certainly and assuredly know that these men at least doctrines in this point are not of God The word in these mens mouths being flat contrary to the mercifull and the for ever to be adored work of God in their hearts When the Spirit comes his first work if Christ may be beleeved even when he comes as a Comforter is To convince the world of sinne Iohn 16.9.10 which we know is chiefly by the law Rom. 3.20 and shall the Ministers not of the letter but of the Spirit refuse to begin here Especially in these times of wantonnesse contention confusion famine sword and bloud wherein every thing almost cries aloud for sackcloth and therefore not for tiffany and silken Sermons As if this corrupt and putrifying age stood only in need of sugar to preserve and keep them sweet from smelling As if sublime notions about Christ and free grace Covenant of grace love of the Father the kingdome within and Châ—istian excâ—llencies and priviledges were the only things this age stood in need of and not in any need of searchings with candles terrours shakings â—ence of sin or forewarnings of wrath to come As if this old world did need no Noah to fortell them of flouds of fire and wrath to come Or as if the men of Sodom and Princes of Gomorah should do well to mock at Lot for bidding him to hasten out of the city because God would destroy it As if the spirit of Paul in these times should not know the terrour of the Lord and therefore perswade men 2 Cor. 5.10.11 but only the love and free-grace of the Lord Jesus and therefore to exhort men nay rather therefore to relate to men stories and notions about â—ree-grace generall redemption the mystery of the Fathers love and the Christ in you and in the spirit not the person of Christ or Christ in the flesh the hope of glory What will the Lord Jesus one day say to these sleepy watchmen that never tell the secure world of their enemies at the door I finde divers colours and pretences for this course of daubing 1. Some say this savours of an old Testament spirit which was wâ—nt to wound and then to heal to humble and then to raise to preach law and then Gospell but now we are to he Ministers of the new Testament and let no law be heard of I confesse those that preach the law as the means of our justification and as the matter of our righteousnesse without Christ or together with Christ as the false teachers did 2 Cor. 3 6. may well be called as Paul cals them Ministers of the letter not of the Spirit of the old Testament not of the New but to preach Christ plainly and with open face the end of the law and to preach the law as the means to prepare for and advance Christ in our hearts can never be proved to be the old Testament Ministry or to put a vail upon mens hearts that they cannot see the end of the law as the old Testament vail did 2 Cor. 3.14 but it is to take away the vail of all conceit of mans own strength and righteousnesse by seeing his curse that so he may sâ—â— to the end thereof the Lord Jesus and embrace him for righteousnesse For the Apostle doth not call them Ministers of the letter and of the old Testament because they did preach the law to humble and leade unto Christ but because they preached the law for righteousnesse without Christ whom he calls the spirit vers 17. and therefore cals them the Ministers of the letter and their Ministry of death and condemnation there is something in the law which is of perpetuall use and something which is but for a time the vis coactiva legis as some call it i. the force of the law to condemn and curse to hold a man under the curse and to hold a man under the power of sin which the Apostle cals the strength of the Law 1 Cor. 15.56 is but for a time and is but accidentall to the law and may be separated from it and is separated indeed from it as soon as ever the soul is in Christ Rom. 8.1 he is then free from the obligation of it to perform personall and perfect obedience to it that so he may be just also from the malediction and curse of it if he be not thus just But that which is of perpetuall use in it is not only the directive power of it but this preparing and humbling vertue of it for if all men by nature Jewes and Gentiles are apt to be puft up with their own righteousnesse and to blesse themselves in their own righteousnesse and so to feel no such need of Christ then this humbling work of the law to slay men of all their fond conceits and foolish confidences in their own righteousnesse and to make men feel the horrible nature of sinne by revealing the curse and malediction due to it is of morall and perpetuall use And hence it is that though the Gospell strictly taken as is intimated Thesis 110. hath no terrour properly in it because thus it reveals nothing but reconciliation through Christs righteousnesse applyed by saith yet the Gospel largely taken for that doctrine which reveals the glad tidings of Christ already come so there is terrour in it because in this respect the Gospell makes use of the law and confirms what is morall and perpetuall therein The sin and terrour which the Gospell largely taken makes use of out of the Law are but subservient to the Gospel strictly taken or for that which is principally and most properly Gospel for thereby the righteousnesse and free-grace and love of the Lord Jesus and pretiousnesse and greatnesse of both are the more clearly illustrated The law of it selfe wounds and kils and rather drives from Christ then unto Christ but in the hand of the Gospel or as Christ handles it so it drives the soul unto Christ and as hath been shewn is the means to that end and 't is a most false and nauseous doctrine to affirm that love only drawes the soul to Christ unlesse it be understood with this caution and notion viz. love as revealed to a sinner and condemned for sin which sin and condemnation as the law makes known so the Gospel makes use of to drawn unto Christ If indeed the Gospel did vulnerare ut vulneraret i. wound that it may wound and terrifie only which the law doth then it saith Chamier was all one with law which Bellarmine pleads for but when it wounds that it may heal this is not contrary but agreeable to the office of a good Physitian whose chiefe work is to heal and may well sute with the healing Ministry of the Lord Jesus and hence we see that although Christ was sent to preach the Gospel yet he came to confirm the law in the Ministry of the Gospel and therefore shews the spirituall sins against the law more clearly and
the heavy plagues for the breach of it more fully then the Scribes and Pharises he that is angry with his brother is a murderer and he that cals him fool is in danger of hell fire Mat. 5.22 Peter was no Minister of the old Testament because he first convinced and prickt the Iews to the heart for their murder of Christ Iesus Paul was no such Minister neither when as he would evince our justification by Christs righteousnesse only in that he begins and spends so much time in proving Gentiles and Iews to be under sin and wrath notwithstanding all the excuses of the one and priviledges of the other as appears in his three first chapters to the Romans but herein they were Gospel preachers Nor can it with any colour of reason be thought that the Prophets in the old Testament were herein Ministers of the letter viz. when they did first wound and then heal first humble by the law and then revive by the Gospel Mr. Saltmarsh hath been so blinded with this notion of the old Testament Ministry that to make this use of the law in preaching the Gospel or to hold forth the promises of grace to them that are qualified with the grace of the promise as the old Testament Prophets did is to give as he thinks the wine of the Gospel burning hot as the covetous gentleman did to his guests and another whom I spare to name professeth That the old Testament because it urgeth the law to humble containeth little good news but much bad news but â—ow when Christ saith Go preach the Gospel thereby he would have them he saith Ministers of the new Testament to preach glad tidings nothing but Gospel but no had bidings not a jot of the law untill men positively reject the glad tidings of the Gospel If these men speak true then neither Peter in his preaching nor Paul in his writings nor Christ himself in his Ministry were Ministers of the new Testament but did overheat their wine and preach much bad tidings to the people of God Verily if this stuff be not repented of the Lord hath a time to visit for these inventions 2. Some object Gal. 3.24 25. That the children of the old Testament were under the law as their pedagogue to lead them to Christ but now the Apostle saith we are no longer under this Schoolmaster who are sons of God in the new Testament Be it so that the sons of God under the new Testament are past the terrouring of this Schoolmasters is it not therefore the work of the new Testament Ministry to preach the law unto servants and slaves to sin and Satan in new Testament times No saith the same auâ—hor for this is to preach bad news this is no good news to say Thou art condemned for these things for the Gospel saith thus Thou poor drunkard thou proud woman here is a gracious God that hath loved thee and sent Christ to die for thee and Ministers to make it known to thee and here is everlasting salvation by him only because thou art a sinner thou art now free from damnation fear not that Christ hath loved thee therefore obey him if not thou shalt not be damned that is done away already c. I would know whether a proud woman or a poor drunkard a villain who never yet beleeved are in a state of condemnation I or no I have read indeed that There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Rom. 8.1 but never of any such freedom to them that are out of Christ unlesse it was only in destination and merit and I have read that we are by nature children of wrath while dead in sin Eph. 2 1 2 3. but never of this viz. that we are in favour while we be in our sin much lesse that we are to beleeve this because we are such If therefore such persons be in a state of wrath and death and condemnation is not this like the old false prophets crying peace peace and salvation where there is no peace There is no peace to the wicked saith my God Isa. 48. ult Isa. 57. ult This is truth before they reject the Gospel is it not This the law saith say some true But is not this confirmed by the Ministry of the Gospel also Iob. 3. ult He that beleeves not the wrath of God abides upon him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it was upon him before he did beleeve and when he beleeves not it abides where it did Must the Ministers of the new Testament therefore preach lies and falshoods and tell proud women and poor drunkards and villains before they refuse the Gospel by unbelief that the Lord Iesus loves them and that they need not fear condemnation when the Scripture hath shut up all men under it that the promise by faith might be given to those that beleeve and them only What is this Gospel Ministry but to tell men they are whole and not sick to death but healed before they come to the Physitian the Lord Iesus surely that is Gospel Ministry which advanceth Christ not onely in word but in power in the hearts of poor sinners but doth this Ministry advance the Physitians custome and honour which where it comes must first tell all the crue of wretched drunkards proud persons and villains that they are already well and whole loved and pardoned blessed and saved before ever they come to the Lord Jesus suppose therefore as some may say that servants and slaves to sin may have the Law preacht to them yet the sons and children of God have no use of it in that respect now 't is true I grant not as the servants have under the new Testament nor yet as the sons of God had under the old for the children of God under the old Testament had need of this Schoolmaster to leade them to Christ to come and ad Christum typecum i. to Christ typed out in sacrifices and oblations high Priest and Altar and so it led them to Christ afar off and as it were a great way about but it doth not follow that there is no use of the Law therefore to be a Schoolmaster still to leade unto Christ immediatly and already come those that are servants to sin under the new Testament have need of the law to shew them the condemnation and curse under which they lie by nature and are now actually under but the sons of God for whom Christ is made a curse are not thus under it and therefore have not this use of it but only to shew that curse and condemnation which they do of themselves deserve and therefore the holy Apostle when he was in Christ and did live unto God he shewes us how he did live unto God viz. by dying to the Law and how he did die to the Law and that was by the Law i. as it did shew him his condemnation he did live to God in his justification as it did shew him his sin and wants
the Law but the hardnesse of their stony hearts which the Law writ upon them was not able to overcome and t is true that the stony Tables did signifie stony hearts but its false that the writing on stone did not signifie continuance also according to Scripture phrase For all the children of God have stony hearts by nature now God hath promised to write his Law upon such hearts as are by nature stony and his writing of them there implies the continuance of them there so that both these may stand together and the similitude is fully thus viz. The whole Law of God was writ on Tables of stone to continue there so the whole Law of God is writ on stony hearts by nature to continue thereon Thesis 144. Only morall Laws and all morall Laws are thus summarily and generally honoured by God the ten Commandements being Christian pandects and common heads of all morall duties toward God and men Under which generals all the particular morall duties in the Commentaries of the Prophets and Apostles are virtually comprehended and contained and therefore Mr. Primrose's argument is weake who thinks that this honour put upon the Decalogue doth not argue it to be morall Because then many other particular morall Laws set down in Scripture not in Tables of stone but in parchments of the Prophets and Apostles should not be morall For we doe not say that all morall Laws particularly were thus specially honoured but that all and only morall Laws summarily were thus honoured in which summaries all the particulars are contained and in that respect equally honoured It may affect ones heart with great mourning to see the many inventions of mens hearts to blot out this remembrance of the Sabbath day they first cast it out of Paradise and shut it out of the world untill Moses time when in Moses time it s published as a Law and crowned with the same honour as all other morall Laws yet then they make it to be but a ceremoniall Law continuing onely until the comming of Christ after which time it ceaseth to be any Law at all unlesse the Churches constitution shall please to make it so which is worst of all Thesis 145. Every thing indeed which was published by Gods immediate voyce in promulgating of the Law is not morall and common to all but some things so spoken may be peculiar and proper to the Jews because some things thus spoken were promises or motives only annexed to the Law to perswade to the obedience thereof but they were not Laws for the question is whether all Laws spoken and writ thus immediately were not morall but the argument which some produce against this is From the promise annexed to the fifth Command concerning long life and from the motive of redemption out of the house of bondage in the preface to the Commandments both which they say were spoken immediatly but yet were both of them proper unto the Iews But suppose the promise annexed to the fifth Commandement be proper to the Jews and ceremoniall as Master Primrose pleads which yet many strong reasons from Eph. 6.2 may induce one to deny what is this to the question which is not concerning Promises but Commandements and Laws Suppose also that the motive in the Preface of the Commandments literally understood is proper to the Jews yet this is also evident that such reasons and motives as are proper to some and perhaps ceremoniall may be annexed to morall laws which are common to all nor wil it follow that laws are therefore not common because the motives thereto are proper We that dwel in America may be perswaded to love and feare God which are morall duties in regard of our redemption and deliverances from out of the vast sea storms we once had and the tumults in Europe which now are which motives are proper to our selves Promises and motives annexed to the Commandements come in as means to a higher end viz. obedience to the Laws themselves and hence the Laws themselves may be morall and these not so though immediatly spoken because they be not chiefly nor lastly intended herein I know Wallaeus makes the preface to the Commandments a part of the first Commandment and therefore he would hence infer that some part at least of a Commandment is proper to the Jews but if these words contain a motive pressing to the obedience of the whole how is it possible that they should be a part of the law or of any one law For what force of a law can there be in that which only declares unto us who it is that redeemed them out of Egypts bondage For it cannot be true which the same Author affirms that in these words is set forth only who that God is whom we are to have to be our God in the first Commandement but they are of larger extent shewing us who that God is whom we are to worship according to the first Commandement and that with his own worship according to the second and that reverently according to the third and whose day we are to sanctifie according to the fourth and whose wil we are to doe in all duties of love toward man according to the severall duties of the second Table and therefore this declaration of God is no more a part of the first then of any other Commandment and every other Commandement may challenge it as a part of themselves as well as the first Thesis 146. It is a truth as immovable as the pillars of Heaven That God hath given to all men universally a rule of life to conduct them to their end Now if the whole Decalogue be not it what shall The Gospel is the rule of our faith but not of our spirituall life which flows from faith Gal. 2.20 Ioh. 5.24 The law therefore is the rule of our life now if nine of these be a compleat rule without a tenth exclude that one and then who sees not an open gap made for all the rest to goe out at also For where wil any man stop if once this principle be laid viz. That the whole law is not the rule of life May not Papists blot out the second also as some of Cassanders followers have done all but two and as the Antinomians at this day do all and have they not a good ground laid for it who may hence safely say that the Decalogue is not a rule of life for all Mr. Primrose that he might keep himselfe from a broken head here sends us for salve to the light of nature and the testimony of tbe Gospel both which saith he maintain and confirm the morality of all the other Commandements except this one of the Sabbath But as it shall appeare that the Law of the Sabbath hath confirmation from both if this direction was sufficient and good so it may be in the mean time considered why the Gentiles who were universall Idolaters and therefore blotted out the light of nature as Mr. Primrose confesseth
because it was impassible say some nor subject to wearinesse in its work say others truly to what purpose then should any Sabbath be appointed unto him in that estate But we must know that the Hebrew word for Sabbath signifies holy rest and therefore as Rivet well shews it 's called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Menuchah which signifies common rest from wearinesse hence it follows that the Sabbath being originally sanctified for holy rest not for common rest or rest from naturall wearinesse in labour Adam might therefore stand in need of a Sabbath though his body was not subject to any wearinesse in or after his labour Hence also although he was to live holily every day yet this hinders not but that his soul might then have need of the holy rest of a Sabbath For 1. Adam was to serve God in a particular calling then as is manifest from Gen 2.15 for he was then to keep and dresse the garden and to act with and under God in the government of many inferiour creatures Gen. 1.26 And thus his time being filled in serving God with all holinesse in his calling he might need a Sabbath nor was it lawfull for him to turn daies of work in his calling into daies of rest and so to keep a Sabbath every day no not in that innocent and happy estate for if it was contrary to Adams holy estate to work six daies how could it be agreeable or sutable to the holinesse of God to work six daies If God did labour six daies and rested a seventh without any need of a rest in respect of any wearinesse in his work why might not nay why should not man imitate and be like to his God in labour and rest although he was not subject to any wearinesse in his holy work 2. Though every day was to be spent in holinesse mediatly both in seeing God in the creatures and meeting with God in his labour and calling yet it was not unsutable nay it was very needfull in that estate to have one day in the week for more immediate and speciall converse with God and for God more immediatly and specially to converse with him Nor indeed was it suitable to Gods wisdom to confine mans holinesse either then or now either to holy labour only or to holy rest only for then he should not have been so like unto God who was exemplary holy unto man in both Speciall time for action wherein he closed with God more mediatly throughout the six daies labour might well stand with speciall time for contemplation of God upon the Sabbath wherein he was to enjoy God more immediatly Adam did not need a Sabbath upon the same ground of weaknesse that we do viz. because we cannot be earnest enough as M. Primrose objects in holy services to God upon the week daies but we see it did not sute Gods wisdom nor mans holy estate then to be intent and earnest only in the enjoyment of his rest to which his intention on his calling and labour then could not be any hinderance when the Sabbath came being free from such clogs of sin then as we are now prest down withall and therefore it is an unworthy expression but oft used by the same author and others viz. That it did derogate from the excellency of Adams condition to observe a seventh daies Sabbath and that the determination of a time then did argue Adams inability or want of inclination and affection to serve God ordinarily and that the observance of a Sabbath is a mark of a servile condition as of other holy daies under the law and that if Adam was able to serve God continually that it was then needlesse to limit him to a particular day and that if a day were needfull God would have left the choice thereof to his own freedom considering the wisdom and godlinesse wherewith God had endowed him These and such like expressions are but hay and stubble which the light of the truth delivered may easily consume Thesis 176. 'T is true the Saints and Angels in heaven have no set Sabbath but doth it therefore follow that the state of innocency on earth should have been in all things like and particularly in this to the staâ—e of glory in heaven No such matter For should there have been no marriage no dressing of the garden no day nor night c. in Paradise because there is no marriage nor dressing of gardens nor weeks nor reckonings of day and night in heaven If God hath work for Adam to do not only upon the Sabbath but upon the week daies also why might he not be said to glorifie God without stint or ceasing as the Angels do in heaven unlesse M. Primrose will say that Adams marriage and dressing the garden was a stinting and ceasing from glorifying God which either he must affirm or else his argument fals flat upon all four who thinks that Adam could not have any set day for a Sabbath because then he should not be like the Saints and Angels in heaven who glorifie God continually without stint or ceasing Thesis 177. They that think that the Sabbath was not given to Adam because it was given as a peculiar perogative and priviledge to the Jews and they that think that it was the Jews prerogative and priviledge because of such Scriptures as affirm that God gave unto them his Sabbaths Exod. 16.29 Nehem. 9.14 Ezek. 20.12 and such like they may as well imagine that neither the whole Decalogue or any part of it did belong to Adam because the very same thing is affirmed of it viz. That he gave his laws to Iacob his statutes and judgements to Israel Psal. 147.19 to them also it 's said were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3.2 The Sabbath therefore is not said to be given to them as a peculiar propriety to the Jews no more then other parts of the Decalogue but as a speciall mercy yea as a sweeter mercy in some respect then the giving of any other laws it being the sweetest mercy upon earth to rest in the bosom of God which the law of the Sabbath cals to and to know that it is our heavenly Fathers minde that we should do so upon every Sabbath day in a speciall manner without the knowledge of which law we have lesse light of nature to hold the candle to us to the observance of it then from any other laws to direct us to the obedience of them Thesis 178. It is affirmed but unwarily by some that the tree of life in Paradise was a type of Christ and thence some would infer that it was not unsutable to Adams estate and condition in innocency to be taught by types and that the Sabbath might therefore be ceremoniall supposing that it was observed by Adam in his innocent estate but although the tree of life and sundry other things in Paradise are made Similitudes to set forth Christ Jesus in his Church by the