Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n law_n light_n moral_a 3,394 5 9.2992 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A65753 A vvay to the tree of life discovered in sundry directions for the profitable reading of the Scriptvres : wherein is described occasionally the nature of a spirituall man, and, in A digression, the morality and perpetuity of the Fourth Commandment in every circumstance thereof, is discovered and cleared / by Iohn White ... White, John, 1575-1648. 1647 (1647) Wing W1785; ESTC R40696 215,387 374

There are 18 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and study of the Scriptures is evident by our use and custome in ordinary things of this life We chuse and husband our grounds according to the nature of the seed wherewith we intend to sow it and according to the nature and condition of that matter wherewith we fill our Vessels wee make choice of them appointing some for dry things and others for moist and fit them diversly for foul or clean In like manner must we consider the nature of the Word if we mean to order our hearts aright which are the grounds that must receive this holy seed the Vessels that must contain this precious balm We must therefore consider that the word is a pure word Psalme 119.140 that we may cleanse and purifie our hearts for the receiving of it We must know that the Law is spirituall Rom. 7.14 and heavenly James 3.17 that we may labour for spirituall and heavenly mindes to entertain it we must apprehend it as a word of power and authority the voice of God that mighty Creator of Heaven and Earth before our hearts can be subdued to receive and entertain it with that meeknes Jam. 1.21 and trembling of heart Isa 66.2 which is required We must be perswaded that it is a sure word 2 Pet. 1.19 a faithfull word Tit. 1.9 a vision that will not lye Heb. 2.3 as proceeding out of the mouth of him that cannot lye Tit. 1.2 or else we shall never be prepared to embrace it with faithfull and beleeving hearts without which the word cannot profit us at all Heb. 4.2 In the next place 2 By observing the end wherat the Scriptures aim we must take knowledge of the end wherefore the word was given if we mean to use and apply it as we ought seeing we know one cannot use an instrument aright unlesse he know for what use it was made Now the principall ends for which the Scriptures were given were First the manifesting of God unto us 1. Making God known to us 2. Directing our ways that we may honour him as God Secondly the directing of us in the course of our conversation not onely by informing our judgements but by obliging our consciences to guide our selves by the rules proposed therein in the course of our practise Wherefore the Prophet David used Gods Law as a lanthorn to his feet Psal 119.105 thinking on his ways that he might turn his feet to Gods testimonies v. 59. remembring that the things which are revealed 3. Yea converting the soul belong to us to do them Deut. 29.29 So that as the power of the Scriptures is to purifie the soul 1 Pet. 1.22 and convert it Ps 19.7 so the use of it besides is to make the man of God perfect unto every good work 2 Tim. 3.17 that so it may prove the power of God every way both to sanctification and salvation as the Apostle affirms it to be Rō 1.16 Without the knowledg of this principall scope whereat the word aims it will be impossible either to observe what we ought in reading the Scriptures or to apply them aright That we may therefore give fit directions for the profitable reading of the Scriptures it manifestly appears to be necessary to enquire first both into their nature and scope And as for their nature it cannot well be opened unlesse we consider the Author by whom the Scriptures were given from whom withall flows their authority the instruments by which they were conveighed to the Church and the matter or subject which they handle wherewith if we take in the scope at which they aim their necessary use unto us their power to command us and ability to work effectually in us and lastly their infallible and undoubted truth and righteousnesse will evidently appear So that we shall have just occasion to handle in order these four points 1. The Author from whom ariseth the authority of the Scriptures 2. The Penmen by whom they were written 3. The matter or subject which they handle 4. The scope or end at which they aim CAP. II. Of the Authour of the holy Scriptures SECT I. That they neither could nor were fit to be given by any other then by God himself IT must be considered that at present we have nothing to doe with Atheists Pagans Jews or Turks that deny the Scriptures either wholly or in part so far are they from acknowledging them to be Gods word but onely with such persons as admitting and allowing them to be the word of God doe yet want some clearer light and fuller evidence to work into their hearts a more certain perswasion and more feeling impression of that truth whereof they are convinced that all that is within them even their whole heart may not onely bow and stoop but be wholly thrown down and laid flat on the earth before this mighty scepter of the kingdom of Christ Wherefore we shall not need to bring in all the arguments that are used and taken up by others to prove the Scriptures to be Gods word but passing by amongst them such as are more obscure and farther deduced shall content our selves with such plain evidences of this truth as may be best understood of the simple and appear at the first view as being lively characters imprinted on the face and body of this sacred Book by that divine Spirit that composed it Before we lay open these evidences it will be needfull to demonstrate that it is neither possible nor fit that these Scriptures should flow from any other fountain then the most sacred breast of that holy Lord who is the onely fountain of all wisdome and truth and the God of all soveraignty and power A truth which will be easily acknowledged if in the first place we take notice that it is generally confessed that the Scriptures are or at least contain that Law which is left unto the Church of God for the right ordering thereof in all things which also is evident to all that read them And yet that this truth may be more fully cleared it will not be amisse to establish these two Positions First That the Church of God must have a Law Secondly That this Law can be found in no other books but the Scriptures That Gods Church must have a Law That Gods Church must have a Law proved 1 t By the light of Nature directing all societies to govern by Laws and that as it is a Church I conceive no sober man will deny if it were not proved being so clearly manifested by the constant practise of all Nations and societies of men from the beginning of the world as having found the establishing of laws the onely means of preserving themselves from ruine The truth is there was never found any Nation so barbarous that was not governed by some kinde of Law or other If then the light of Nature directed all men generally to the use of laws as the main band of humane society and the best remedy against confusion and ruine that
but his own Spirit 1 Cor. 2.11 It is true concerning a mans mind seeing it is moved according to reason in order to the end which he proposeth to himself therefore one that knows another mans end may with some probability guesse at his thoughts and purposes tending to that end which Solomon implies in affirming that though counsell be hidden deep in the heart of man yet a man of understanding may draw it out Prov. 20.5 And so a man knowing that Gods main end in all his ways is his own honour may conclude that Gods law must be such as may direct men in those ways in which they may most glorifie God But what those particular directions must be it is impossible for men to guesse till God himself reveal them It is true that the very light of nature which God hath planted in every man will discover unto him some of the chief heads of the duties that he requires of him as to love the Lord with all our hearts and to fear and serve him Deut. 10.12 And to serve one another through love Gal. 5.13 But in what particular services we are to expresse our piety to God or love to men what man can prescribe or imagine For that the ways by which both these main duties may be performed are various and divers it is evident now to which of these different ways God would direct one it was impossible to guesse till God himself had made it manifest in his own word To give instance of this truth in some particulars Especially laws positive must needs bee given by God alone it was impossible for any man to conceive what ceremonies or outward acts God would accept and be best pleased withall in the duties of his worship No man could divine that the tree of life should be a Sacrament to Adam in Paradise or Circumcision to the Jews or Baptisme and the Lords Supper to Christians For ought any man could conceive to the contrary the Priesthood might have been setled upon the Tribe of Simeon as well as Levi. The rest of the Sabbath might have been fixed on the second or sixth day as well as on the seventh and on the first if God had so appointed it And for the duties of the second Table it was not of absolute necessity that God should establish such a kinde of subordination and subjection of one man to another as he hath done or give every man a propriety in his goods to possesse them as severall to himself or limit one man to one wife and ordain marriage for the onely way of propagation of mankinde seeing that although all these are fit and convenient yet God if hee had pleased might have given other rules for the governing and establishing peace amongst men and it was as lawfull for him to give the creatures what laws he pleased as to give them what natures he pleased So that seeing the law for the right ordering of the creatures depends meerly upon Gods will which cannot be known unlesse himself reveal it it must needs be granted which was first proposed that none could give the law to Gods Church but God himself Next if it had been possible 2ly Nor is it convenient that any other then God should give this law 1 For preserving Gods authority it was no way fit either for the advancing of Gods honour or for the furthering of mans good that any other should give that law then God himself Not fit for Gods honour in two respects First Gods authority could be no way so well preserved as by giving his own law to his people seeing all men acknowledge that giving of laws is an honour annexed to the highest power although the execution of them be committed to Magistrates of a lower degree It may be probably guessed that even heathen Law-givers by pretending either consulting with their gods in giving their laws or allowance of them by them acknowledged law-making to be a divine prerogative which yet is more fully manifested by this that we acknowledge no law to bee just that is not either founded on or consonant to Gods law either written in mans heart or delivered in his word So that it was fit that God should give the law to his own people to preserve his own authority amongst them Again it is requisite for Gods honour in another respect 2 And that we might have a perfect mirrour of him Which none could give but himself that none but God himself should give his own law to his people because none is able to give so perfect a mirrour of God as himself As for men we know none of them hath seen God at any time John 1.17 and it is so little a portion that they know of him Job 26.14 that it is impossible they should set him out as he deserves Now it is for Gods honour that hee should be expressed as fully as may be which neither is nor can be performed so exactly by any man as it may be by his law which represents unto us the image of his minde and will and gives us a more distinct knowledge of him then his works can doe Nay his word serves as a Commentary to his works as laying before us the rule according to which God orders all his ways so that by the help thereof we understand the righteousnesse and holinesse of all his acts as David did Psa 73.17 which he could not finde out before It is true indeed that the very works themselves praise God and shew him in his tender mercies Psal 145.5.8 in his mighty power Job 36.22 37.23 Godhead Rō 1.20 yea commonly in his righteousness in rewarding and punishing Psa 58.11 But they neither expresse him so distinctly nor consequently affect the heart so deeply as they doe when they are illustrated by the word as Job confesseth chap. 42.6 that he never saw God so clearly nor abhorred himself so much as when God described unto him his works in that conference Job 38. c. Wherefore seeing the image of God is most exactly expressed unto us in the word it is most fit that the word that represents him to us should be given by God himself who knowing himself best can give us the most perfect draught of his own face Besides these respects unto Gods honour in regard of mans good it was not convenient that the Scriptures which contain Gods law to his Church should be given by any other then God himself For first 3ly For mās good 1. To subdue his heart to obedience mans heart would hardly be brought to stoop to any power but Gods alone whose voice onely prevails upon the conscience and subdues the very thoughts and imaginations of the spirit which the voice of no man can doe Besides 2. To make his services accepted nothing can make our services performed to God or man to be duties of obedience but the undertaking of them upon Gods command which we do when we know the
considered As being grounded on a mistake a temporary Beleevers taste of heavenly things we shall finde to arise out of a double mistake First of the Nature of the Benefits offered to us in Christ 1. Of the nature of the benefits offered as Holinesse Peace Joy and which he conceives to be outward holinesse morall honesty carnall content sensuall joy like that of the foole Luke 12.19 Now this conceit of some carnall and temporall good which is to be found in Christ may worke in a man some desire after him and delight in the Word in which he is published and proposed such a conceit that Christ should be a temporall Prince wrought upon the Iewes and wonne them to entertaine our Saviour for a time but when they saw that his Kingdome was not of this World as himselfe speakes Iohn 18.36 they soone forsooke him so Ioh 6.15.24.66 This first Mistake is seconded by another 2. Of the conditions under which they are tendered no lesse them the former wherein they misunderstand both the conditions under which Christ is offered and the services which he requires For a Carnall man hearing of the large offers of Salvation and Peace so freely tendred desires them and hopes to gaine them at an easie rate But upon farther enquiry finding that neither Christ nor any of his benefits are to be had without renouncing the World nay denying himselfe Mat. 16.24 he is offended Mat. 13.21 and turnes away with a sad heart Whereupon he may be moved to doe or fuffer some thing for Christ and discontented like the young man Mat. 9.21.22 Such a man it may be at his first entertaining the Word while his affections are warme and fresh for Christs sake may sustaine some reproach and make some small losses and sacrifice some of his weaker lusts at Gods command hoping to satisfie him thereby as Saul attempted to doe by destroying the rascall multitude and carion cattle of the Amalekites 1 Sam. 15.9.13 So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist Marke 6.20 when he saw that nothing would satisfie him unlesse he would part with his Darling Herodias he forsooke him and became his utter enemy ver 17. And no marvell if onely a taste of Spirituall things But can never be brought to denie the World much lesse himselfe which a man neither throughly understands nor if he did would much desire as being altogether unsutable to his carnall disposition be insufficient to take off his heart from the love of these outward and Carnall things which are every way so agreeable and pleasing to his carnall disposition much more to move him to abhorre him selfe with that holy man Iob 42.6 to accompt himselfe a foole a beast with David Psal 73.22 to condemne all his righteousnesse Esa 64.6 Phil. 3.7.9 to renounce all ability to do any good 2. Cor. 3.5 to abandon his owne lusts 1 Pet. 4.2 and his owne ends that he may live wholly to the will of him that died for him and rose againe 2 Cor. 5.15 fetching all from Christ 1 Cor. 1.30 and referring all to him 1 Cor. 10.31 Which a true Beleever yeelds unto 1. As throughly understanding the emptinesse of the Creature For till corrupt nature be changed it can neither deny it selfe nor be wholly subject to Gods Law Rom. 8.7 These considerations which a temporary beleever cannot brooke a true Beleever easily submits unto As well upon a full discovery of the vanity and emptinesse of all things save Christ Phil. 3.7 8. 2. And finding them unsutable to his renewed Nature as also upon the cleare manifestation of the infinite value of Christ and all the Heavenly Treasures which are laid up in him which moved Moses to make more accompt of him with reproach then of the treasures of Aegypt Heb. 11.26 And besides his nature now being altered all those things that were agreeable 3. And lastly finding that what he abandons for Christ he gaines in him 3. Of the Duties required of him and sutable unto him before he finds now unsutable and unserviceable And lastly for selfe-deniall which nature can never digest one who is now by faith become a member of Christ findes that whatsoever one loseth for him he receives againe in him with infinite advantage Mar. 10.29 30. Again a temporary beleever mistakes the duties required of a Christian as much as he doth the conditions For conceiving them to consist in outward performances with the Pharisees Mat. 5.21.27 he thinkes them an easie taske with the young man Mat. 19.20 But finding upon better enquiry that in hearing the heart must tremble Isa 66.2 in prayer the Soule must be powred out Isa 26.16 that outward performances are nothing unlesse the thoughts be brought under to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.5 and the flesh with the lusts crucified Gal. 5.24 finding these things impossible to flesh and blood he cryes out with the Capernaites An hard saying Iohn 6.60 Whereas a true Belecver stickes neither at the condiditions nor the Duties and renounceth his service ver 66. But a true Beleever as he sticks at no condition so he stickes at no service which Christ requires He findes a heart melting at Gods word 2 King 22.19 A Spirit helping his weaknesse in Prayer Rom. 8.26 enabling him to powre out his complaint Psal 102. in the title He not onely esteemes Gods Commandements equall Psal 119.128 and good ver 39. but himselfe able to runne the way of them when God enlargeth his heart verse 32. able to doe any thing through him that strengthens him Phil. 4.13 in despite of his corruptions that hinder him Rom. 7.23 Desiring that his whole heart may be inclined to Gods Testimonies Psal 119.36 sound in his Statutes verse 80. and his steppes ordered in Gods wayes ver 133. Considering his wayes for that purpose ver 59. and making the Word a light unto his steps ver 105. All this he doth with much cheerefulnesse knowing that he serves for his owne good Deut. 6.24 having his fruit in Holinesse and the end everlasting life Rom. 6.22 Thus he delights in Gods Law Psal 119.11 Rom. 7.23 and abhors his owne corruptions ver 24. Thus then a temporary beleever Wherefore Temporary Beleevers must needs fall off at last but a true Beleever stands fast to the end grounding his resolution to embrace Christ and his Law upon such grosse errours must needes waver and fall off when he finds his mistake Whereas a true belever understanding truly what Christ is whom he chooseth and what are his Lawes and conditions and finding by experience his bargaine no worse then he conceived it stands still to his first choise and as Boaz liking the woman as well as her inheritance willingly tooke them both Ruth 4.9 10. which his Kinsman refused because he could not have the land alone being all that he sought after So the Godly liking Christ and his Lawes aswell as the benefits that he brings with him take them both Whereas
as Psal 19.7 when it is said that the Law of God converts the soule which is the most proper effect of the Gospell it is evident that in that place under the name of the Law the Psalmist must understand the Gospell too As likewise when he tells us that his delight is in the Law of God which sustained his spirit that he perished not in his afflictions Psal 119.92 he must of necessity understand Gods promises aswell as the precepts of the Law seeing they be the promises rather then the precepts that support the soule in times of triall when we know whom we beleeve who is both able and willing and ready to make good what he hath promised as his children find by experience that there failed not ought of any good which the Lord had spoken unto the house of Israel but all came to passe Iosh 21.45 But as for the Promises especially those that concerne the Kingdome of Christ which were revealed to the Patriarchs delivered by the Prophets and lastly enlarged and more fuly and clearly opened by the Evangelists and Apostles we shall consider them apart hereafter But only the Commandements For the present we have now in hand only that which is properely and most commonly understood by the name of the Law which containe those commandements and rules of practise which God hath given to his Church for her direction and left upon record in the Scriptures Now these we know are distinguished by the names of Laws morall Judiciall Ceremoniall Morall ceremoniall and judiciall which by Moses in sundry places are promiscuously called Laws Statutes Judgements and Ordinances Of these severall sorts of Laws that which we call Morall comes to be handled in the first place Of these this which is called the morall Law because it was given by God for regulating of mens manners and conversation is of all the rest of the Laws most ancient Which is the most ancient of all Laws most generall and most perpetuall First most ancient Psal 119.160 as being given to our first Parents in Paradise As given to Adam in Paradise that is to man assoone as he had any being I grant indeed that we have no record of any other Laws given to Adam but those which we find mentioned Gen. 2. which are only some branches of the Second Commandement in the tree of life of the Fourth in the Institution of the Sabbath of the Seventh in the Law of Marriage and of the Eight in appointing them to keep Paradise which are all of them positive Laws and therefore need to be expresly set down or else they could not have been known whereas the rest of the Laws being all Lawes of nature and therefore discernible by naturall right reason for which cause they are said to be written in mans heart might be known although they were not recorded and therefore are omitted by Moses in that briefe history But that the rest of the morall Precepts were given unto Adam although perhaps not by word of mouth Either by word or written in his heart but written in his heart at the same time must needs be granted unlesse we conceive that God made Adam more imperfect then any other of his creatures for that he gave all the rest of the creatures rules of their motions and operations either imprinted in their natures if they want sense or by the direction of sense in those that have it is as cleare as the light Now that God should either give no law or which is almost one an imperfect law to man who most needed was most capable and best able to make use of a law must needs much disparage either his kindnesse to mankind or his wisdome in rendring the most eminent and serviceable of all the creatures upon earth unusefull and unprofitable at the least for most part if he had no perfect law to guide him It must therefore be necessarily granted that the whole morall Law was given to Adam that is to mankind in Paradise And consequently most universall as given to the whole nature of man in him and by necessary consequent must be acknowledged to be of all laws the most ancient and upon the same ground must necessarily be generall or universall seeing it was given in our first parents to the whole nature of man which when that law was given was wholly in them It is true that the change of mans condition by Adams fall hath seemed to cause some small alteration in the law as it is not a duty that now binds us to labour in Paradise or to abstain from the one or to eate of the other of the trees that stood in the midst of it Notwithstanding even by that law all men in generall are bound to labour in such employments as God cals them unto and to abstain from all things that God forbids and to make use of all such ordinances as the Lord appoints for the confirmation and strengthening of their faith So that those laws given to Adam bind all men still in the grounds and scope of them although they oblige not his posterity in those things which had relation to that state wherein he then stood and from which afterwards he so sodainly fell And upon the same ground it must as necessarily follow Upon the same ground those morall lawes must needs be perpetuall that those laws which were given to Adam are perpetuall to continue as long as men have a being on earth For seeing they were given to him as the root of mankind they necessarily bind his posterity in succeeding generations to the end of the world We never find any new law given to the Church in any age It is true that the law given to Adam hath been since renewed perhaps to Noah after the floud Which have been renued as may be probably guessed by that which we read concerning murther Gen. 9.6 And it may be to Abraham after God called him out from Vr of the Chaldeans seing we find him commended for keeping Gods commandements his statutes and his laws Gen. 26.5 But most fully and cleerly it was renewed and restored by Moses upon mount Sinai But not altered And that the law then published for the substance of it was no new law appears by comparing the law given to Adam which is in effect the same with the second fourth seventh and eighth commandements of the decalogue with which in a generall consideration they are all one if they be compared together That this which we call the Morall law was founded for ever as the Psalmist witnesseth Psal 119.152 and was to remain and to be observed as a rule of life unto Gods Church our Saviour himselfe witnesseth in expresse words Mat. 5.18 where he professeth that untill heaven and earth passe that is till the worlds end one jot or one tittle shall not passe from the law Wherefore whatsoever was praescribed in that law we may observe and guide our selves
innocency in which he then stood then the nature of man in generall and are therefore excepted in the Major proposition wherein is asserted no more but that these laws are perpetuall which were given to Adam as a man not as to perfect man This proposition thus understood is founded upon this ground of truth God made his Covenant with Adam in respect to his nature not to his person that God established his Covenant with Adam principally in respect of his nature and not so much in respect of his person so that by consequent it must follow that all who are partakers of that nature are bound by that Covenant Of this faith we have an evident demonstration in the punishment which light upon the whole nature of man for Adams transgression which of necessity supposeth the sinne of mans whole nature in Adams person in whom it was then included seeing otherwise we know the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father Ezek. 18.20 So that the argument holds strongly and convincingly in this manner As appeares because the nature of man becomes guilty of the breach of that Covenant If Adams breach of Covenant made between God and him brought guilt upon all his posterity that is upon the whole nature of man then it must needs follow that the Covenant obliged the whole nature of man it is utterly impossible that one should become a guilty person by breach of a Covenant to which he was never bound But the punishment inflicted upon the whole nature of man makes it evident that the whole nature of man was made guilty by Adams transgression wherefore the whole nature of man was bound in the Covenant which God made with Adam and consequently is obliged by the Law which was given in that Covenant Unto this argument Secondly Christ urgeth the Law of mariage given in Paradise as then in force may be added another proofe taken from our Saviour Christs reasoning with the Scribes and Pharisees Mat. 19.48 about their question concerning divorce which they pretended to be permitted by Moses his Law Deut. 24.1 2. For in disputing with them our Saviour grounds his argument against the divorce pretended to be permitted by the Law of Moses because it crossed that Law given unto Adam So that all the strength of our Saviours argument against their divorce must rest upon this Maxime Implying that the Law given in the beginning is unalterable That which the Law given to Adam in the beginning did not allow that ought not to be allowed which is all one as if he had said that the Law given to Adam from the beginning is unalterable and therefore remaines still in full force so that all men to the worlds end are bound to yeeld obedience thereunto Some perhaps may object Objection 6 that this answer of our Saviour Christ unto the Pharisees is applied by him to that particular case alone which was then proposed but extends not farther and therefore determines no more but that the law of marriage which was given to Adam in the beginning stands still in force but resolves nothing concerning the Obligation of the rest of the Laws which were given to Adam at the same time whether they be of force still or no. Answer To which exception two things may be answered First we say that seeing our Saviour resolves that the divorce supposed to be permitted by the law of Moses is therefore not to be allowed because it was contrary to the law of marriage given by God to Adam in the beginning then by all the rules of Logick and reason it must necessarily follow that whatsoever is contrary to any Law established in the beginning must needs be unlawfull because the reason of disallowing that kind of divorce is not drawn frō any thing that is peculiar to the Law of marriage but from that which is cōmon to all the rest of the Laws which were given at the same time as well as to that particular namely that the Law given by God from the beginning did not permit it Secondly if our Saviours answer to the Pharisees wherein he condemnes the divorce pretended to be permitted by the law of Moses be restrained to Marriage only and extend not to the rest of the Lawes given at the same time it leaves unto the Pharisees a faire ground of exception against such a resolution of the question proposed For they might easily have replied that this law was not in force any more then the rest of the Laws given at the same time to our first Parents now it is absurd to imagine that our Saviour who knew their cavilling humours by experience would leave them that starting hole Wherefore when he condemnes the divorce pretended to be permitted by Moses for that only reason because it was contrary to the Law given to Adam in the beginning he must necessarily inferre that the Laws which were then given are still in force both unto us and unto the end of the world The major proposition of that syllogisme that concludes the morality and perpetuity of the Sabbath namely that all laws given to Adam which had respect to his nature and not to his present condition are morall and perpetuall being thus fully cleared and confirmed there remains only the minor or second proposition to be made good which consists of two branches Now the law of the Sabbath was given from the beginning The first that this law of the Sabbath was given to Adam in Paradise The second that it was given to him in respect of his nature and not of his person that is to him as a man not as an innocent or perfect man Of these two branches the opposers of the morality of the Sabbath meddle not with the latter but oppose only the former affirming that the institution of the Sabbath by God was not from the beginning The reasons of which opposition we shall examine after we have given our reasons for the proving of the contrary namely that the Sabbath was instituted by God from the beginning The dispute concerning the day in which Adam fell whether it was on the sixth day on which he was created or on the next day which seems more probable if all things be duly weighed as also of the time when the Sabbath day was first instituted whether it was before Adams fall while he was yet in Paradise or after his fall when he was driven out of Paradise is not of any great moment to the point which we have in hand although seeing in the series of the history written by Moses we find the giving of this and diverse other laws recorded before Adams fall we have reason to think all things to have been done in the same order in which they are related unlesse we had better arguments then meer surmises to induce us to judge otherwise it is enough to our present purpose to have that acknowledged which no man denies that the law was given
methodically in the interpretation of the Commandement we must first enquire what the scope is at which it aimes The appointing of a day of rest cannot be the scope of the fourth Commandement For all Laws being rules directed to some end proposed cannot so well be interpreted any way as by the end unto which they are directed Now the appointing of a day of rest cannot possibly be the last scope of this Commandement seeing we know rest from labour is enjoyned to give us freedome for holy duties and the exercising of our selves therein But of rest for holy duties which consequently must be the principall thing intended in the fourth Commandement But then it will be questioned to what kind of holy duties this day is consecrated For there are many that imagine that God hath set it apart only for duties of publike worship Publick and private But this opinion seemes not to agree with the letter of the Law which in expresse tearms gives the whole day unto the Lord for his own immediate service in religious worship Now we know publike worship takes not up the whole day It must needs be granted therefore the Lord appointed that day of holy rest for the performance of something more unto God then publike worship and so much is expresly affirmed Isa 58.13 where we are forbidden to find our own pleasure or speak our own words upon that day which as all men must acknowledge must needs extend to the ordering of our carriage in private as well as in publike so that the setting apart of a whole day of rest unto God for his publike and private worship seemes to be the full scope of this fourth Commandement Next to the scope of this Law 3 Parts of the fourth Commandement the 1. Summe 2. Explication 3. Reason we are to consider advisedly the frame and composure of it and therein we are first to take notice of the principall parts of the Law which we shall find to be three First we have laid down unto us the summe of the Law Exod. 20.8 Secondly we have the explication of that sum ver 9. Thirdly we have the reason of all v. 11. Each of these two first parts containe three heads of duties pointed out in the summe and opened and unfolded in the explication and confirmed in the reason of the Law The first duty is Preparation intimated in the word Remember The second the Sequestration from ordinary employments implied in the word Sabbath The third is Sanctification of that rest expressed in the phrase to keepe it holy All these are explained in their order Our Preparation must be by the dispatch of all our Secular affaires in six daies Our rest must be a cessation by all persons from our usuall labours and imployments in secular affaires The Sanctification of our rest must be by employing our selves in holy duties The confirmation of all follows in the reason of the Law of Preparation and rest from Gods own Act of Creating the world in sixe daies and ceasing from his work on the seventh and the Sanctifying of that rest from Gods Commandement and ordaining the seventh day to be a day of rest unto us for ever Now wherein the strength of that Confirmation lies will be the maine point in question of which hereafter To come now to the Explication of the words and phrases in this Commandement The first word in the summe of this Law Remember is diversly interpreted some conceive that it implies the importance of the duty commanded as that word is used many times to intimate some matter of speciall observation as Deut. 9.7 Others there are that think it points at the Antiquity of that Law given many ages before and therefore to be called afresh to minde as the Psalmist saith he will remember the works of the Lord his wonders of old Psal 177.11 and 143.5 and withall some conceive that he taxeth the peoples forgetfulnesse of that Law and neglect of the observation of it in the time of their bondage in Aegypt Some or all of these senses may be implied in this word Remember but beyond all these we may probably conceive that it may import Remember implies Think upon and by dispatching of thy busines provide for the Sabbath Think upon and accordingly before-hand provide for the observation of this holy rest by dispatching of all the works of thy calling that nothing may be undone which providence and diligence might prevent that might hinder thy rest on the seventh day As for those which conceive that in this Law labour upon the sixe daies is commanded as well as rest upon the seventh they are much mistaken The precept for labour is delivered in the eight Commandement as the Apostle interprets that Law Eph. 4.28 In this place is commanded the dispatch of our secular affaires before the Sabbath whether it be done in six daies or fewer it is not materiall as to this Law The next tearme to be explained Sabbath is a day of rest which only and not seventh is expressed in sum and conclusion of the Commandement is the name of the Sabbath or day of rest and easing from labour as that word properly signifies which is repeated againe in the conclusion of the Commandement And it is not to be passed by without observation that whereas the old Sabbath from the beginning till Christ came was the seventh day or last of the weeke and both in the explanation and reason of the Commandement is appointed to be one of the seven yet God mentions not the name of seven either in the Summe or in the Conclusion of the Commandement We have therefore reason to conceive that seeing God in this Law was to prescribe something of the Law of Nature The day of rest being of the law of nature the set day of positive institution which is the appointing of a day of holy Rest to be consecrated unto God for his worship which the very light of nature teacheth and in the explanation and reason of the Law to adde something which is of positive Institution namely the proportion of the time and the set day wherein this rest was to be observed he first settles that which is of the Law of nature and afterwards establisheth that which is Positive God purposely makes choise of such fit expressions especially in his Law in which he is most exact as may best acquaint us with his minde Wherefore seeing this is a fit Method to be observed by him and seeing the composure of this Law agrees with it we have reason to conclude that the Lord himselfe intended it in this place The last phrase in the sum of this Commandement remains which is To keep it holy To keep holy is to employ the day in holy duties of Gods immediate worship Now to keep a day holy is to employ it in holy actions directed to the immediate service and worship of God in the use of such
of holy rest consecrated to the Lord thy God Now things are said to be Gods for the peculiar interest that he hath in them whether by Creation as Psal 100.3 He made us and therefore wee are his people By redemption or purchase so the children of Israel God challengeth to be his own because he had bought them Isa 43.1 By deputation or designation as Christ is called Gods king Psal 2.6 and David a Type of Christ Psal 89.19 20. Or by advancing or honouring so a day may be called Gods because he hath advanced or honoured it above other daies Psal 118.24 Or lastly by consecration and dedication to God so the Priests are the Lords Levit. 20.26 the tythes vessels c. the Lords for his service Now in both these latter respects the day of holy rest is the Lords day as he calls it his Sabbath Exod. 31.13 Both because his works have advanced that above any other day and besides because upon that ground it is consecrated to him and set apart for his service To restrain men from violating of the holy rest of the Sabbath it is sufficient that it is the Lords but to make a deeper impression of it upon mens hearts he thought fit to adde The Lord thy God a dreadfull name to his people Deut. 28.58 This foundation being laid that the Sabbath is the Lords No manner of works that is of thy calling not excluding he hath a sufficient ground to take upon him to dispose of it and therefore in the next ensuing clause strictly enjoyns In it thou shalt do no manner of worke he means none of the works mentioned before properly called our own works 1. Works about Gods service or works of our particular callings As for works about Gods service such as were those about the service of the Tabernacle justified by our Saviour Mat. 12.5 Works of necessity for the creatures preservation which also Christ allows Mat. 12.11 2. Works of necessity from which also God himself ceaseth not Joh. 5.17 Works of mercy 3. Works of mercy though not of absolute necessity such as was the restoring of the mans withered hand Matth. 12.12 13. yea though it be to our selves vers 7. they are not to be accounted among the works forbidden upon this day If there were any stricter rest then this enjoyned the Jews which perhaps will not so easily be proved it is not required by any restraint in this Commandement and therefore not exacted upon us Christians As for the forbidding of the kindling of a fire and dressing of meat Exod. 16.5.13 35.3 they were inhibitions which determined as it is most probable with the Israelites peregrination in the wildernesse and laid upon them by other laws so that hitherto we meet with nothing ceremoniall in this fourth law The last main branch of this law is the reason or confirmation of it No reason annexed to any law but only to this fourth Commandement But before we undertake the opening of the phrases and tearms in which it is penned we cannot but take notice of one thing by the way that we find no reason annexed to any other Commandement of the Decalogue but to this alone We find indeed some Sanctions annexed to the second third and fift Commandements but none save this fourth is confirmed by a reason The cause hereof can be no other but this because whereas the duties commanded in other laws are either laws of nature or at least approvable by naturall reason as soon as they are delivered Because the grounds of other laws are evident in themselves but the ground of this law could not be known unless it had been revealed because the grounds upon which those lawes are founded are evident in themselves the grounds of this fourth Commandement could not have been known unlesse they had been revealed by God himself Indeed that God must be publikely worshipped That a set time must be appointed and that it must be a time of rest from private employments are dictates of naturall reason But why we must observe a weekly Sabbath and not a monthly and why the seventh or first day of the week rather then the third or fourth no man could have found out the reason unlesse God had revealed unto us the Creation of the world in six daies and his resting upon the seventh by the consideration whereof the equity of this law clearly and manifestly appears and upon the manifestation thereof is as easily approved and assented unto even by the light of naturall reason So then the reason alledged in this Commandement shews us not why God ordained a Sabbath which the very light of nature taught even the very heathen as we know but why he commands a weekly Sabbath and why upon such a day of the week rather then upon any other That therefore which we are to search after in the examining of this reason is how the equity of these two particulars is discovered therein that we may acknowledge this Commandement also to be just and good as S. Paul speaks of all the rest Rom. 7.12 yea equall and right concerning all things as the Prophet David speaks Psal 119.128 and thereupon submit unto it not by constraint but by a willing mind 1 Pet. 5.2 Now concerning the former of those two particulars why God allots out such a proportion of time as one day weekly for his Sabbath we have already in a great part discovered the equity thereof in the explication of this law wherein it appears that so much time may be spared without prejudice to our particular callings which if it should be denied God makes farther manifest by this reason annexed which we have before us To make it appear that six daies in the week are sufficient for the dispatch of our secular affairs one ground must be supposed Why we may spare one day of seven for this holy rest which is unquestionable that mens labours about the things of this world are onely for the conservation of the creatures and fitting of them for mans use That ground being laid this reason for the strengthning of our faith laies before us the example of God himself who created the world and all things therein in six daies from whence we may strongly reason that he that without the help of mans labour created the world in six daies can easily by mans labour of six daies support and conserve the world If it be questioned whether he will do it reason will easily conclude that the same goodnesse that moved God to give a being to things that were not will much more move him to conserve and provide for the things that are being all the work of his own hand seeing we know him to be a faithfull Creator as the Apostle calls him 1 Pet. 4.19 Wherefore we find that the godly for the strengthning of their faith and dependence on God upon any incident occasion usually have recourse to the creation of the world
to be taken away For as for those allegations that the rest of the Sabbath was a type of Christs rest in the grave and a part of the Iewish bondage how little force they have we have shewed before Now then if it evidently appear to all that will consider things with any indifferency by all that we have said that neither the resting from our labour one day in seven nor the continuing of that rest for the whole day nor yet the strictnesse of any rest enjoyned by the fourth Commandement are either as ceremonious or upon any other ground to be altered neither that the particular day of rest which now by Christs resurrection is altered from the last to the first day of the week is there commanded otherwise then in a generall rule equally communicable both to the Iewish and Christian Sabbath there appears no necessity of granting any thing to be mutable in this fourth Commandement more then in any of the laws of the Decalogue It hath been intimated before that mens mistake of the right interpretation of the fourth Commandement hath been a great occasion of questioning the perpetuity and immutability of the morall law and of how dangerous consequent it is to admit that there is any thing mutable therein experience teacheth us when we find how ready men are to embrace and hold that dangerous errour of casting aside the whole law and that so far as to deny it to be a rule of direction unto us Christians in the course of our practice whereby they open a wide gap to all licentiousnesse and by that means overthrow the very life and power of godlinesse to the high dishonour of God and to the extream perill of their own souls so that we see how neerly it concerns all such as have any true zeal for the furthering of Gods honour and their own salvation and their brethrens to endeavour by all the means that they can the establishing and maintaining of this truth that the morall law given by God to Adam in the beginning and renewed afterwards by Moses upon mount Sinai is an everlasting rule left by God unto his Church for the right ordering and guiding them in all their ways The premises then being duly weighed and layed together we have a sufficient ground to argue in this manner All the laws written in the Decalogue are morall and immutable in all things But the fourth Commandement concerning the observation of the Sabbath day is one of the laws of the Decalogue Therefore this law of the Sabbath is perpetuall and unchangeable in all things which are concerned therein And so much concerning the morality and perpetuity of the fourth Commandement in the Decalogue by way of digression SECT IV. A continuation of the consideration of the rest of the Laws recorded in the Scripture with such instructions as may be drawn from them HAving now established the perpetuity of that Law which we call Morall in all the Commandements thereof it is time to returne to that from which we digressed namely the delivering of rules for our direction in drawing out observations from the Laws recorded in Scripture for our instruction and there being three kinds of these Laws Morall Judiciall Ceremoniall as we have shewed before of these the Morall law comes first to be considered Now that Law being given to Adam the roote of mankind and that not so much to his person as to the nature of man which was wholly in him when he received this Law from God and consequently binding all those who are partakers of that nature it must needs be acknowledged that whatsoever commands we find therein we must guide our selves by as the rule of our practice Which that we may the better doe it will be needfull to lay before us some rules All duties to God and man are commanded in the Morall Law that may direct us in the right interpretation of these Commandements Before we give these rules it will be necessary to lay before us this evident ground of truth that these ten words as they are called comprise all the heads of duties to be performed both to God and man This is clearly manifested by our Saviours answer to the Lawyer that tempted him Luke 10.26 enquiring what he might doe to inherit eternall life to whom Christ replies that whatsoever duty was needfull to the attaining thereof was to be found in the commandements where he wils him to seek it Now these precepts being delivered in such briefe expressions as they are it must needs follow that every one of the tearms in them must needs be of exceeding large comprehension First therefore Rules for interpreting the Law whereas we find these Laws of the Decalogue penned some in the form of a command and most of them in the forme of a prohibition Rule 1 we must conceive that under every command there is implied a prohibition of whatsoever is contrary to what is commanded All the Commandements forbidding any sinne command the contrary duty and commanding the duty forbid the opposite sin and in every prohibition a command of all duties opposite to that which is forbidden For example in the second Commandement which under the name of Images forbids the inventing or using of any form of worship of mans devising there is withall commanded the worship of God according to his own will in the use of the ordinances prescribed and warranted by his Word as prayer and hearing of the Word receiving the Sacraments c. And in the third Commandement under the prohibition of taking Gods name in vaine is commanded the taking up of it with all holy reverence and feare Secondly Rule 2 under the name of any duty commanded there is required not only the performance of the outward act of that duty The Law besides the outward act requires the obedience of the heart but withall the inward obedience of the heart to the Law which requires it Rom. 6.17 and the letting out of all the affections of the soule in the performance of it as Psal 119.167 the Prophet professeth that his soul had kept Gods Testimonies and that he did love them exceedingly whence it is that both our Saviour Christ and his Apostles after him both comprise all duties commanded in the Law under the name of Love being an affection of the heart and tell us that the holy affection of love is the fulfilling of the Law Rom. 13.10 implying that whatsoever the act be which we perform yet if it proceed not from that holy disposition of the heart And the use of all helps to any duty commanded it is not answerable to the Law Againe together with the duty commanded in any Law there is required the use of all helps and meanes which may further us thereunto on the other side where any sinne is forbidden there the inward roote of that evill And forbids the originall corruption of the heart with all motions flowing from thence even as far
them either took from the Sibylls books or from some other directions pretended to be given by the Gods themselves Neither can we possibly be assured that such rites as we worship God withall In the observation of the Sabbath use of the Sacraments c. are accepted unlesse God himself prescribe them as we see he did the whole form of ceremoniall worship in the Leviticall law and the Sabbath and Sacraments both in Paradise and under the Gospel by our Saviour Christ And for the services which are to be performed to men first we finde little in the Precepts of such as are meer Moralists concerning that fountain of those duties whence they ought to flow which is love without which none of them is accepted 1 Cor. 13.3 Neither doe we finde that measure of love required by them which our Saviour commands to love our neighbour as our self Mat. 5.44 wherein he affirms we go beyond naturall men and consequently implies that we doe more then naturall reason teacheth whence it will follow that the law which requires that duty was not given by man and therefore must needs be acknowledged to be the Precept and Word of God and not of man Nay beyond all this 3. Most of all self-deniall which nature never taught we find that Gods Word requires of us the deniall of our selves and that every way both of our own vvisdome to prescribe as the Lord requires his people to do not vvhat is right in their own eyes Deut. 12.8 but what is right in the eyes of the Lord their God Deut. 13.18 and of our own ability to undertake and perform as our Saviour requires us to bring forth fruit in him vvithout vvhom vve can doe nothing Iohn 15.5 and of our own ends as the Apostle tels us that vve must bring forth fruit unto God Rom. 7.4 that he may be glorified Mat. 5.16 and therefore the Prophet cals Israel an empty Vine because he brought forth fruit to himself Hos 10.1 whence it is that our Saviour makes this self-deniall the first step to Religion Mat. 16.24 A duty that humane reason is so far from prescribing that it cannot so much as allow and submit unto it when it is prescribed and that because it cannot finde out mans emptinesse and weaknesse the ground on which self-deniall is founded or at least sensibly acknowledged Wherfore the Scriptures which require that duty which is so contrary to the principles of nature must needs be the Word of God Thus we see that the subject which the Scriptures handle is above the pitch of humane wisdome whether vve look to the grounds of faith or rules of practise which are layed down therein The true knowledge of God vvhom the world hath not known the great and glorious works of the worlds Creation vvith the time manner and order thereof And of mans Redemption after his fall and corruption thereby together with the state into which he is redeemed to be mystically united to Christ by the Spirit which gives him interest in his merits and righteousnesse makes him Gods childe by adoption and an heir of glory The duties of fear love and affiance in God all grounded on the true knowledge of him And lastly the service of love to man binding him to love his neighbour as himself yea his very enemies and above all things to deny himself So that the Scripture discovering those things which naturall reason could never finde out must needs be acknowledged to be delivered by God himself and to be his Word MARK III. Of the powerfull effects of the Scriptures upon mens hearts which discover them to be the Word of God THe two former Markes of the Scriptures which manifest them to be the Word of God appear as it were in the face and body of that sacred volume this third Mark is taken from the wonderfull and supernaturall effects that they work upon the heart and conscience which are such as cannot possibly be performed by any other then a divine Power These effects may be reduced unto three heads First the wounding and terrifying Secondly the converting and renuing Thirdly the comforting and reviving of the heart Neither of which being possible to bee wrought by the power of man as we shal manifest by and by it must needs be granted that the Scripture which produceth such wonderfull effects is not of man but of God seeing we know no cause can work an effect greater and of an higher nature then it self To begin with the first The first Effect of the Word the pricking of the heart Differing from naturall terrours the terrours and prickings of heart which are caused in men by Gods Word It cannot be denyed but there may be and are sometimes wrought in mens hearts some naturall terrours which may cause in them much unquietnesse but between such naturall passions and these spirituall agonies which are wrought by the word there will appear a wide difference if they be well examined and that more ways then one 1. In the grounds upon which they be raised 2. In the effects produced by them The grounds of naturall terrours 1. A naturall sense of sin 2. A naturall acknowledgment of Gods Justice Holinesse and Power which may be easily made manifest by observing first the grounds whence either of them doe arise And secondly the effects which the one and the other produce in those on whose hearts they make impression with the different consequents that follow thereupon Concerning the grounds upon which terrours are raised in mans heart the causes of such as are naturall appear to be evidently different from those which raise spirituall passions For we cannot be ignorant that every man by nature having imprinted in his heart some rude notions at the least both of good and evill and withall some acknowledgement of Gods Justice Holinesse and Power and having besides a conscience within his own breast sitting as Judge to passe censure upon his own ways and actions before which his thoughts accuse or excuse one another as the Apostle speaks Rom. 2.15 must needs have usually some sense of every known sin either more or lesse Whence it follows that the more the conscience is illightned and by that means awakened to look back upon a mans own sin and the wrath of God lying upon him for sin and his powerfull revenging hand pursuing him the more he must of necessity be distracted in his thoughts with fearfull terrours which may cause his life to hang before him All working in the heart fears of punishment Deut. 28.65 and to be bitter unto him and yet these terrours as arising from naturall principles are meerly naturall being caused by a naturall sense of sin and acknowledgment of Gods wrath and fear of his own danger thereby which any man may have by nature From this apprehension of the guilt of sin The grounds of spirituall terrours and fear of the punishment that follows it the causes that affect a godly
mans heart differ in two respects First the terrour raised in a good mans heart by the Word is for sins of another nature then are those that trouble naturall men Secondly they are affected by them on different considerations of Gods revenging hand For the former a naturall man is usually sensible onely of sins against the law of Nature 1. Discovery of the sins of infidelity pride c. and especially sins against the second Table But the Word of God represents unto a man chiefly more secret and inward evils infidelity pride self-love sensuall affections hypocrisie hardnesse of heart and the like and causeth them to appear unto him the foulest and most abominable of all kinds of sin that can be committed In the second place that which affects a naturall man in sin is either something that accompanies the sinne as shame or danger of wrath and vengeance of which Cain complains Gen. 4.14 or the sin as it is a trespasse against man and a wrong done to him which affects him more then the sense of any dishonour done to God as Judas was sensible of nothing but betraying innocent blood Mat. 27.4 But when Gods Word smites the heart it represents to the guilty person his trespasse against God his Majesty 2. And those as trespasses against God and Holinesse which affected David Psal 51.4 His unkinde and causlesse trespassing against the God that made sustaineth and carrieth him upon Eagles wings Deut. 32.10 11.15 His frowardnesse in trespassing out of perversenesse of spirit against often warnings and against the secret checks of his own conscience His folly that thus perverts righteousnesse to no profit Job 33.27 forsaking the fountain of living waters to hew broken cisterns that hold no water Jer. 2.13 whereby he hath abased God in his heart Deut. 32.15 and set him at a lower rate then the transitory things of this life yea then his own bare lusts By all which he hath defiled his own soul is become like the beasts that perish Psal 49.20 nay worse then they Isa 1.3 so that he loaths and is ashamed of himself Iob 42.6 Ier. 31.19 Now as the considerations in sin 3. And fear of Judgement certain intolerable eternall that affect men naturally and spiritually are divers so are the apprehensions of the danger that comes by sin A naturall mans fears are like that of Belshazar Dan. 5.6 something he trembled at but what it was he understood not or like those terrours threatned Deu. 28.65 66. wherin they shal fear day night they know not why But the Word of God shews one the cause of his fear representing the purity of those eyes of jealousie which he hath provoked makes it evident that God will by no means pardon the guilty Exod. 34.7 that he cannot be beguiled will not be intreated is impossible to be escaped and yet cannot be endured as smiting with the arm of God and not of man whose breath as a river of brimstone kindles that pile of fire and much wood which God prepares for sinners Isa 30.33 whose worm dieth not neither doth their fire goe out Isa 66.24 So that by the Word the sinner sees the rod and who hath appointed it Micah 6.9 and feels it in his apprehension certain present intolerable and eternal which compasseth him so with terrours that he knows not what to doe unlesse he can make his peace with God and procure his pardon Hence it follows The consequents of these severasl kindes of passions In naturall men astonishment fretting hatred of God In spiritual mē shame grief for offending God fear of losse of his favour lastly deliberation what to doe that as naturall and spirituall terrours are raised upon different grounds so the effects and consequents of them must needs be divers which was proposed to be handled in the next place For naturall terrours produce nothing but astonishment and amazednesse so that such men lye down in their confusion fretting with indignation and murmuring in their hearts at their condition with Cain Gen. 4.13 and both fearing God and hating him On the other side the terrours raised by Gods Word in the heart produce withall a loathing of ones self as a filthy creature shame of ones own vilenesse griefe as much for his unkindnesse towards God as for his misery by sin fear of the losse of Gods favour as much as of his revenging hand indignation at ones own folly and wickednesse still acknowledging the Justice and Righteousnesse of God which produceth at last deliberation what to doe with the Prodigall son Luke 15.17 18. So then naturall terrours break these melt the heart naturall terrours are mixed with pride these produce abasement of the spirit Naturall terrours cause repining at God these indignation at a mans self Naturall terrours drive one from these unto God to sue for peace the former force him into the mouth of hell these cast him into the bosome of Christ with uncertain hopes at first and with a trembling heart as the Lepers adventured on the Syrians camp 2 Kings 7.4 yet with hope of some possibility to finde favour and with a resolution to cast himself upon God come what will Such kinde of heart-breakings which are wrought by the Word being impossible to be wrought by any naturall means argue that word that causeth them to be of God who worketh according to his own pleasure in all things what he will Thus the first work of the Scripture The secōd supernaturall effect of the Word conversiō 1 t The means whereof are manifested only in the Word shewing in pricking and wounding the heart manifestly discovers it to be the Word of God as working beyond the power of nature But the conversion of the soul by the same Word will make it yet more evident Now it appears first by the means of his conversion and secondly by the nature and kind of the work it selfe The means by which the Word draws on the heart towards this work of conversion are by proposing unto one cast down by the sight of sin and sense of Gods wrath two grounds without which that work of conversion cannot be brought to effect 1. The inability of all creatures to work our peace First the unprofitablenesse and inability of all creatures to help in that dangerous condition in which he findes himself Secondly the way of reconciliation and peace tendred by God himself to repentant sinners by the mediation of Jesus Christ his own Son The inability of the creatures to doe us good in this case is onely manifested by Gods Word 1. Of our selves to satisfie for sins passed which makes it evident that we cannot help our selves neither by flight from Gods presence which fils all places Ps 139.7 nor by resisting his power which would be like the encounter of the thorns with the sire Isa 27.4 nor by intreating making peace with him who will by no means clear the guilty Exod. 34.7 without satisfaction which we cannot
make in our own persons neither by our wealth which is no ransome for souls Psal 49.7 Either by ourwealth of by our righteousnesse 2. Or by any other creature 8. nor by our righteousnesse seeing if we could fulfill the whole law it is but duty Luke 17.10 and therefore can make no satisfaction for sins past All other creatures we finde in the same condition with our selves debtors to God for all that they have or can doe and therefore unable to satisfie for us and as unable to defend us from Gods power 2ly Pointing out the onely way of making our peace Christ Jesus 1. Holy in himself 2. Accepted of his Father 3. Satisfying his Justice to the full as they are to work our reconciliation So that our salvation by any creature appears to be utterly impossible The heart of a sinner being by this means brought to despair of help unto salvation by any creature the Word points out unto him that fountain which God hath opened for sin and for uncleannesse Christ Jesus himself the only Son of his Father the holy one in whose mouth no guile was found Isa 53.9 In whom God is well pleased who was bruised for our iniquities so far that God did see the travell of his soul and was satisfied Isa 53.12 and who in our flesh fulfilled all righteousnesse and that for us This means of reconciliation 4. Tendered to us by God himself the Scripture tels us God offers to all that will embrace it and that upon his faithfull Word which is truth it self Psa 119.142.151 Yea makes it manifest that this mercy is of inestimable value and beyond belief yet that it becomes God to doe things incredible to cause his mercies to exceed not onely the mercies of men but even mans apprehension as the love of Christ passeth knowledge Eph. 3.19 that all men may be astonished at the consideration of his mercies as well as of his judgments and generally of all his ways Rom. 11.33 Thus Gods Word shews A means 1. Suiting with Gods Justice 2. Magnifying his Mercy 3. Discovering his Wisdome that this way of saving sinners suits well with Gods justice because he pardons not without sufficient satisfaction with his mercy because it sets out the plentifulnesse of his compassion Psal 86.15 103.11 with his wisdome because this is a way past finding out as all his judgements are a great deep Psal 36.6 and consequently makes a sinner confident that a way of peace proposed by God himself ratified by his faithfull promise and of such advantage to further his own glory every way 4. And consequētly advancing his glory is really intended upon which the distressed soul is encouraged to follow that only way by which he sees hope of escaping the vengeance to come which he could never have known unlesse God had revealed it in the Scriptures Rom. 16.25 26. which must therefore be acknowledged to be the Word of God 2ly The nature of cōversion consisting Now if the grounds of mans conversion could be found no where but in the Word of God much lesse could the act it self of conversion be wrought by any other instrument then the same Word For whereas conversion is the turning away of the heart from all creatures himself and all unto God which consists in two main acts self-deniall and totall subjection to God it is evident that neither of these two can be wrought any other way then by the power of the Spirit working by the Word To begin with self-deniall 1. In self-denial impossible to nature consisting in the abandoning of ones own wisdome righteousnesse ability to doe any good desires and endeavours after his own ends in credit profit pleasure or any other way what wise man among the Heathen guided by the light of nature ever taught it much more practised it Or how is it possible that corrupt nature should conquer it self Indeed it is true that naturall wisdome hath prevailed upon men to change them from a vicious disposition to morall honesty perhaps somewhat out of conscience or more out of self-respect to grace themselves by the honour of a vertuous disposition but to deny ones self one cannot be possibly perswaded but by something that is not himself Again 2. In a totall subjection to Gods wil. it is impossible that the whole spirit of man with all the thoughts thereof should bee brought under to a free and chearfull submission to Gods will unlesse the very temper and frame of it be altered For that Gods desires should be our desires his will our will his delights our delights our wisdome in this state of corruption being enmity against him Rom. 8.7 can bee wrought by no other way Which nature opposeth And therefore must be new framed after Gods image to bring it to this subjection but by making our nature answerable to Gods Nature which necessarily requires the destroying of the corruption therof the creating of it after God in wisdom and holinesse Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 Now the changing and new creating of the heart is beyond mans power effected onely by him that made it at the first wherefore even in respect of our new birth we are said to be his workmanship Eph. 2.10 receiving this spirituall as well as our naturall life from him to whom it properly belongs to quicken the dead Rom. 4.17 to raise up whom he will John 5.21 as having life in himself v. 26. wherefore the renuing of the heart being a work above nature and properly the effect of a divine power it necessarily follows that the Scriptures which are found by experience to be the instruments of that high and supernaturall work must have a divine original and consequently be the Word of God The last of the divine and supernaturall effects The third supernaturall effect of the Word reviving wounded spirits To be effected only by Gods Word that wounded them wrought by the word is the sustaining reviving of distressed wounded spirits Now that this can be effected by no other means then the Word is manifest not only by experience which makes it evident that humane wisdome or eloquence can doe nothing to purpose this way but besides by the consideration of the cause whence the affliction of the spirit ariseth For seeing it is the apprehension of Gods wrath provoked by sin that breaks the heart it must needs be granted that it cannot be healed but upon a perswasion that God is pacified as we see in that wounded spirit Job 33.25 and in David 2 Sam. 12.13 which must be wrought by a message comming from God himself as it is God that must cause David to hear the voice of joy and gladnesse ere the bones that he had broken could rejoyce Ps 51.8 It must therefore be the same hand that hath smitten that must heal Hos 6.1 wherefore seeing it is onely Gods Word that wounds the soul as hath been shewed the Word that restores and heals
by vertue of another under whom it commands is humane 2. In the subject matters prescribed 1. Principles of faith The second difference between the Authority of God and man is in respect of the subjects or matters prescribed which are either principles of saith or rules of life for the former because God is true every man a lyer Rō 3.4 therefore in grounds of faith Which only God can deliver 1. Because many of them are unsearchable by man we admit no testimony but Gods alone for two reasons First the imperfection of our knowledge arising partly by the nature of the things to be beleeved whereof many are unsearchable by mans wisdome and therefore must be revealed by the Spirit 1 Cor. 2.11 12. and partly from the weaknesse of the means of our knowledge which is the information by sense that looks onely on the outward appearance 1 Sā 16.9 so that it is impossible that man should know any thing in matters of faith but by revelation from God which also he apprehends weakly and imperfectly So that in matters of faith there is no infallibility in mans knowledge and that which is depends upon the credit not of the man but of the Spirit which reveals it Another reason why mans testimony is no sufficient ground of faith 2. Because men may lye is because men may deceive as well as be deceived wherefore though they often speake truth we are not sure that they doe so always because it is not contrary to their nature to lye Whereas Gods knowledg is infallible 1. Because he hath light in himself 2. And knows by vision not by discourse as it is unto Gods Tit. 1.2 Neither of these imperfections are found in God whose knowledge must needs be every way perfect because he sees by his own not by a borrowed light which must therefore be without any mixture of darknesse 1 John 1.5 And because the means of Gods knowledge is by vision not by discourse yea by such a sight as pierceth through the very nature of all things seeing God himself is in and through all Ephes 4.6 Besides the most of the things which we beleeve 3. And must needs understād what he freely gives are things freely given us of God 1 Cor. 2.12 which therefore he must needs understand fully seeing the spirit in man understands the things of a man although no man else know them 1 Cor. 2.11 Now in the next place there can be no more question of Gods fidelity in revealing then there is of his infallibility in understanding all things seeing truth is Gods nature And can no more deceive then be deceived which therefore he can no more swerve from then from himself So seeing we finde Gods testimony every way infallible and mans uncertain it must needs be granted that it is peculiar to God alone to establish grounds of faith Againe for the regulating of mans practise 2. And rules of life onely to be prescribed by God 1. Whose will is infallibly good 2. And the duties prescribed are his services there is a wide difference between Gods and mans Authority for if we respect the substance of duty that can be prescribed by none but God alone both because onely his will is infallibly good Psal 143.10.119.39 and therefore only fit to be the rule of righteousnesse and besides because the duties commanded being all of them immediately or mediately services unto God it was most fit that God alone should appoint the duties of his own service The truth is in matters of practise mans authority hath to doe only in two things First in applying the rules of morall duties to particulars for the preservation of order and peace thereby Secondly in compelling men to obedience in such duties as are prescribed In brief then divine Authority establisheth principles of faith and prescribes the substance of morall dutie humane authority meddles not in laying down any grounds of faith at all and in morall duties prescribes not the substance but onely the order and manner of outward performance of that which divine authority hath commanded The third difference between divine and humane Authority 3. In the extent of this authority which bindes the consciēce belonging onely to God is in the extent of them both Humane authority being ordained for preservation of order and by it of peace in civill society for the furtherance and supporting of godlinesse and honesty 1 Tim. 2.2 reacheth no farther then to binde men to conform to order in the course of their practise but divine Authority having an higher scope even the renuing of the heart and bringing under the thoughts thereof to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.5 bindes the conscience that is both the judgement of man to allow that which is commanded as holy and just with the Apostle Rom. 7.12 and the will to choose it as good and the affections to embrace it Rom. 7.22 accordingly yea the whole man to follow it with the strength of constant endeavours after the Prophet Davids example Psal 119.106.112 Hence it follows that in obeying mens commandements he that doth what Authority requires so he perform it in a willing submission thereunto in obedience to God which the Apostle cals obeying for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 hath performed his duty neither hath cause to judge himself a transgressour though he approve not the law it self as good and holy nay though upon good ground he think the contrary to that which is commanded more fit and convenient so he think not so out of any self-conceipt rash judgement or distaste of the Authority that commands But in obeying Gods Commandements it is far otherwise For though a man fulfill the law in the outward act yet if he allow it not as holy and just if his endeavour be not to conform his will to Gods will therein if he rejoyce not in performing it as a good man doth Prov. 21.15 his own conscience ought to condemn him as a transgressour and sinner against God at least in some degree So then divine Authority bindes the conscience by a double band both of the power that commands and of the justice of the commandement but humane Authority bindes onely by vertue of the power that commands not by the equity of the commandement further then it agrees with Gods law or conduceth to order and peace for which Authority was established The last difference between divine and humane Authority 4. In the sanctions annexed to the precepts is in respect of the sanctions annexed to their laws which are proportioned to the nature and quality of the obedience required and to the power of him that requires it For Gods commands in his laws are specially inward holinesse righteousnesse love c. and that under the penalty of the curse and wrath of God 1. Reaching to the soul 2. And reaching to eternity to bee poured out on the soul as well as on the body both in this life
to command it when we will CAP. X. Of reverend Attention and heedfull Observation in reading the Scriptures First such Preparation to the reading of the Scriptures as we have before prescribed cannot but dispose the heart to heedfull attention consisting in the uniting of the thoughts together Attention consists in the uniting and fixing the thoughts upon what we read and bending and fixing them upon that which is read To this attention men are often stirred up when they are to heare God speak unto them as Psalme 49.1 Thus the people of Israel when they were to receive the Law in mount Sinai were first prepared unto attention by the sound of a Trumpet This attention we may be moved unto by considering the person that speakes and the nature of that which is spoken The authority and wisdome of him that speaks requires great attention of him that reads or hears Gods Word Required 1. From the authority and wisdome of him that speakes A child must hear his Father Prov. 4.1 A subject must attend reverently to the words of a Ruler Iob 29.21 Yet none of them is our potter as God is Isa 63.4 or made us as he did Ps 100.3 nor consequently can challenge such respect from us as he may Gods people must heare because it is God that speakes Exod. 20.1 Psalme 50.7 and 81.7 Besides the wisdome of God requires our diligent attention as it is required upon that ground Psalme 49.2 3. now it is Christ that speaks in his Word who is the wisdome of his Father 1 Cor. 1.24 in whom are hidden the treasures of wisdome Col. 2.3 Again 2. From the Subject which the Scriptures handle the Matter or Subject which is handled in the Scriptures requires of us great attention not only for the weight and importance of those high mysteries which are therein revealed But besides that for the great interest which we our selves have in those things which we find in that sacred volume as being directed unto us 1. Weighty and mysterious 2. Neerly concerning us and written for our instruction Rom. 154. containing our evidences and the title that we have to eternall life John 5.39 the lawes and directions which we and our children must observe that we may doe them Deut. 29.29 especially seeing all those things concern us in the highest degree yea much more neerly then our estates liberty peace nay then our lives themselves So that we have great reason to attend diligently to every tittle written in this book much more heedfully then Benhadads Messengers did to the words of Ahab 1 Kings 20.33 Besides In attention mark both the matters expressions our heedfull attention to the Matter or Substance of that which we read in the Scriptures we must take speciall notice of the phrase wherein it is expressed Partly because many of the phrases used in that book are not vulgar or of ordinary use Some of them unusual and therefore not so easily understood unless they be carefully observed Thus S. Peter tells us of many things in S. Pauls Epistles hard to be understood 2 Pet. 3.16 Partly because the Scriptures themselves being as they are very copious and full of matter as David tels us the Law is exceeding broad Psalme 119.96 are oftentimes brief and short in the Phrases and expressions whence it must needs follow Most of them brief and of large signification that the words must needs be of large signification so that if they be not well observed much of the matter contained in them may easily be lost Unto this Attention must be joyned judicious Observation Unto attention adde observation of speciall passages which is nothing else but the fixing and staying of the mind upon some speciall passage where we find things represented unto us either more weighty in themselves or else more proper to our selves for our particular use and occasions It is true that all Gods Testimonies are wonderfull in themselves Weighty in themselvs or more proper to us Psalme 119.129 all of them pure verse 140. righteous concerning all things verse 128. yea all of them are profitable to give understanding Psal 119.130 to cleanse ones waies verse 9. to convert the soule Psalme 19.7 to make the man of God perfect to every good work 2 Tim. 3.16 yet there are some things in Scripture more important then others and some more usefull then others for some persons times and occasions Together with Attention Observation A third duty Approbation and affent to what we read there must necessarily be joyned Approbation of every truth revealed in the Scriptures such as we find in holy David Psalme 119.128 not onely because Gods Law is the truth verse 142. and therefore must be approved by us 1. Because it is the truth of God 2. Because till our judgment approve it we canuot beleeve it that came therefore into the world that we might bear witness to the truth as our Saviour speakes of himself Iohn 18.37 without which God hath no honour by us at all seeing it is the receiving of his testimony by us by which we seal to his truth Ioh. 3.33 But besides because we can neither believe that which we approve not in our judgment nor possibly bring our hearts to yeeld unto it true and sincere obedience This assent which we give unto Gods Word This assent is not forced only voluntary but necessary in approving whatsoever it presents unto us is neither forced nor onely voluntary but rather necessary as is the judgment of sense For when the eye judgeth of colours or the taste of meates it is not in the power of either of these senses to judge otherwise of them then they appeare to the sense that apprehends them This approbation of those severall truths which are contained therein is an acknowledgment that they are not only righteous and true Psal 119.137 138. with the Psalmist but withall with the Apostle that they are good Rom. 7.16 as also the Prophet acknowledgeth Psal 139.19 which is the onely meanes to bring our hearts to love and delight in them which indeed is the fullest testimony that we can give to the perfection purity and excellency of them every way Psal 119.96.140 It is true that every godly man at all times gives his assent to every truth of God revealed unto him but the help of that Anointing which abideth in him and teacheth him all things Neither is alike firme at all times because the evidence by which it is discovered is not alike cleare at all times 1 Iohn 2.27 Notwithstanding that assent is not alike firme at all times because the evidence by which he acknowledgeth it is not alike cleare at all times but is sometimes obscure like the twilight at other times full and perspicuous as the sunne is shining in his strength Such a full closing of our hearts with every particular truth which we meet with in reading Gods Word we
made a curse for us hath taken off from us and redeemed us from this curse of the Law Gal. 3.13 and seeing this exact obedience which the strictnesse of the Law required is now made impossible unto us by reason of the weaknesse of our nature corrupted by Adams fall God through Christ hath been pleased to moderate unto us the rigour of the Law in respect of the obedience required therein and is pleased to accept our sincere constant and faithfull endeavours to performe to the uttermost of our power what we are able to doe although we come short of what the Law requires and are accepted where there is a willing mind according to that which we have and not according to that which we have not 2 Cor. 8.12 The Second benefit which we have by Christ in relation to the Law 2. And from exacting our obedience to Justification is that whereas the Law requires of us perfect obedience to every commandement thereof to be performed by us in our owne persons for the attaining of eternall life as our Saviour implies in his answer to the young man Mat. 19.19 Now Christ having in his own Person perfectly fulfilled the whole Law Mat. 3.15 his Righteousnesse apprehended by Faith is imputed to us and accounted ours as if we our selves had performed it is accepted by God for the justifying of us before him Phil. 3.9 Rom. 5.18 19. so that we have thereby a just title to eternall life which otherwise we could have laid no claime unto by any righteousnesse of our own which is so farre from justifying of us before God that the best of it before him is no better then filthy rags Jsa 64.6 rendring us abominable in his eyes which are purer then to behold evill So that in his sight no man living in himselfe can be justified Psal 143.2 Lastly 3. And from that ill effect of the Law to quicken our lusts by Christ we are freed from an ill effect which the Law wrought in us yet only occasionally not properly by it selfe for the Commandement is holy just and good Rom. 7.12 But sinne taking occasion by the Commandement slew us so that the Commandement which was ordained to life we find unto us to be unto death Rom. 7.10 11. because the Law laying a restraint upon our corrupt lusts but bringing with it no power of the Spirit to enable us to subdue and conquer them by making a barre against them caused them to swell the higher and to rage the more violently as waters doe when they are penned by a damme that is made against them which the Apostle calls the reviving of sinne when the Commandement came Rom. 7.9 But Christ bringing with him the Spirit of grace and Sanctification by which those corrupt lusts are in some measure mortified and subdued the Spirit of Christ taking away that enmity and contrariety of the flesh against the Law and working our hearts to a complyanie therewith By giving his Spirit to work us to a compliance with Law causeth it to work in us a quite contrary effect to that which it hath in naturall men an exceeding love unto Gods Testimonies Psal 119.167 an holy delight in them ver 77. Rom. 7.22 for the sweetnesse which we find in them Psal 119.103 so that our hearts incline to performe them alwaies even to the end v. 112. This gracious effect of the Spirit working with the Law in the hearts of the godly is part of that new Covenant which God promiseth to make with his people unlike the Covenant which he made with their fathers which they brake to write his Law in their inward parts Ier. 31.32 33. and 32 40. A DIGRESSION CONCERNING THE MORALITY OF THE Fourth Commandement BY Iohn White Master of Arts and Preacher of Gods word in Dorchester in the County of Dorset LONDON Printed for Richard Royston A Digression concerning the Morality of the Fourth Commandement SECT I. That the Law of the Sabbath in the fourth Commandement is Morall and therefore perpetuall FOr the evidencing of this truth The first Argument it was given to the whole nature of man in Adam our first Argument shall be drawn from the Institution of this day of holy Rest immediately upon mans creation recorded Gen. 2.3 which upon the examining thereof will appeare so strong and cleare in it selfe that it might be sufficient to convince any man that is not forestalled before-hand by too much prejudice And it may be thus framed What Law soever was given to our first Parents in the beginning without relation to their present state bindes all mankind to the worlds end But such was this Law of the Sabbath It is true that there happened upon the fall of our first Parents a change in the Law Two changes of the Law given to Adam occasioned by his fall which was given them by God in the beginning The First change happened to the whole Law in respect of the conditions and in part of the use of it For whereas of man in the state of innocency and perfection full and perfect obedience to the whole Law was required 1. In respect of the whole Law perfect obedience thereunto being then possible to be performed by him in his own Person whereunto he was sufficiently enabled by the perfection of his nature in which he was created but by the fall of Adam that ability was so farre weakned that such obedience was made impossible to him or any of his posterity after him But by his fall made now impossible the righteousnesse of Christ is accepted for us now in stead of our personall obedience the Righteousnesse of Christ who in our nature fulfilled the whole Law is imputed to us for our justification and our obedience is required only as a fruit of that faith by which we are justified This makes so great a change in the Covenants made betweene God and man before and since the Fall that they are usually esteemed to be two diverse Covenants the former before the Fall we call the Covenant of workes and this latter since the Fall we tearme the Covenant of Grace The Second change which happened in the Law 2. In respect of some Laws given Adam in respect of his condition rather then of his nature by occasion of Adams fall was in respect of some duties commanded in the Law the Sacramentall tree of life and the whole use thereof were of necessity taken away because the promise whereof that tree was the Seale was voide by Adams breach of the Covenant to which it was annexed And the charge of keeping and dressing Paradise was by like necessity utterly voide when man for his rebellion was cast out of that Garden Other commandements as those concerning mans labour and womens subjection to their husbands were made straighter then they were before but the substance of these Laws remained still And these changes happened only in such particulars as respected rather the state of mans
the Sabbath was altogether needlesse and superfluous Thirdly they insist strongly upon this that if God had given Adam such a law at that time then had the Patriarchs been bound to the observation of that law Now say they if the Patriarchs had been bound to the observation of that law they had certainly kept it but that neither all or any of them observed any such is manifest by the history of their lives written by Moses wherein there is no mention of any such thing For the first of these three arguments which is Answer to the first that it was impossible for Adam in Paradise to keep a Sabbath they reason thus The Sabbath say they was appointed for the publike worship of God 1. That supposeth publick worship to be the whole duty of the Sabbath as all men must needs acknowledge But Adam and his wife could not make a publike assembly nor consequently worship God publikely nor by the same observe a Sabbath according to the Law To this we answer in the First place Though publike worship be the principall yet it is not the sole duty of the Sabbath Honoring God forbearing to do ones own waies or to find his own pleasure or to speake ones own words are duties of such an holy day of Rest as God delights in Isa 58.13 as well as publike worship And the Fourth Commandement which sets apart an whole day unto the Lord entirely and commands therein a totall cessation from all our employments in our ordinary calling makes it evident The sequestring of our selves from our ordinary secular affaires for religious duties is the full scope of that fourth Commandement which if a single person shut out by sicknesse or any other casuall accident from publike Assemblies perform he keeps an acceptable Sabbath unto God though he cannot joyne with the Congregation in the duties of publike worship Againe why may not two persons where there are no more 2. Two where no more are may be esteemed a publike assembly be esteemed to be a publike Assembly It is cleare that our Saviour esteems the meeting of two or three for prayer a gathering together Mat. 18.20 And then it 's plaine that Adam and Eve meeting together in Paradise and employing the whole day in prayer and other holy and religious exercises may in a true and proper sense be said to worship publikely so that in this argument brought against possibility of keeping a Sabbath by Adam and Eve in Paradise 3. It is no good argument Adam could not then keep the Sabbath therefore he had no Law for it the propositions are both faulty Besides this is no good argument Adam and Eve could not at that present keep a Sabbath therefore they had no Law given them by God to command it The fifth Commandement prescribing the duties of Parents to their Children is questionlesse a Law of nature shall we say that this Law was not at the least written in Adams heart from the beginning because he had then no child We think it wisdome to make laws for warres in time of Peace although there can be no execution of them for the present The Next Argument against the Institution of the Sabbath in Paradise Answer to the second is that then Adam needed no Sabbath neither for his body nor for his mind For his body they say he needed no Sabbath because that he being exercised in no painfull or toylsome labour but exercised only in such work as might be accounted rather a recreation then a labour needed no rest at all or refreshing of his body thereby 1. Ease by rest though it be a consequent is not the scope of the Sabbath To this we answer that the ease of man and beast from labour although it be a consequent of the rest of the Sabbath yet was it never the scope of it seeing the moderation of labour belongs properly to the same commandement which enjoynes labour that is unto the Eight as the Apostle also interprets it Eph. 4.28 The Fourth Commandement forbids labour indeed but not so much for mercy as for Piety nor so much for easing of the toyle of the body as for the preventing of the distraction of the mind by labour seeing we know the body cannot labour but the mind must needs be more or lesse employed withall which therefore at that time cannot so freely be wholly exercised in Spirituall duties as it ought So that Adam might have use of a Sabbath in Paradise although he needed it not for the ease of his body 2. Adam might make use of the Sabbath in respect of his minde Yea but say they Adam much lesse needed a Sabbath in respect of his mind then he did in respect of his bodie because his mind in that state of Innocency being continually filled with heavenly thoughts he could not choose but keep a perpetuall Sabbath To this Objection we have answered in part already that the Sabbath requires of us not only the filling of the mind with heavenly Meditations but besides a totall sequestration of the whole man to the exercise of all holy duties forbidding us to finde our own pleasure or our own waies Isa 58.13 that is take up any employment either of body or minde about any of those affaires which may properly becalled our own such as are all our secular affaires Now although Adam in Paradise had not in that ease and pleasure of his in keeping the Garden his minde so wholly taken up with that businesse as ours are now in our more toylsome works yet it must needs be and was his duty too to attend and to have his minde exercised in the thoughts of those things that he tooke in hand which on the Sabbath ought to be wholly laid aside In one word Adam was and ought on other dayes to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of earthly things but on the Sabbath day he was to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of heavenly things All then that can be made good in this parcular is only this that Adam in some respects lesse needed a Sabbath then we doe whence cannot possibly be inferred that he therefore needed none at all nay upon the same ground it will follow that because he being riper in knowledge stronger in faith and more quickned and fervent in affection lesse needed the Sacraments or other like helps as we doe it was not fit for him to have any Sacrament at all As well as of the Sacraments c. Rather we may conclude that because Adam infinitely excelled us in all these abilities therefore though he lesse needed yet he was more fit to keep a Sabbath then we are having more leisure and being more heavenly minded then we are All this while we speake of the Sabbath as if it were given to man only for his own good whereas the principall scope of it is the honouring of God which was Adam duty as well as ours So that in respect of
the principall end of the Sabbath Adam needed that Law for the observation thereof as well as we In the last place it is urg'd that if the Sabbath had been instituted in Paradise Answer to the third then had the Patriarchs been bound to the observation of it and had certainly observed it Now that the Patriarchs did not observe it it is evident say they because we find no mention upon record of the observation thereof by any of them either before or after the Flood till Exod. 16. immediately before the giving of the Law We answer that if they can make it appeare that none of the Patriarchs did observe the Sabbath we will be willing to grant them that they had no Law that bound them to any such observation But it will be a very hard matter to make that appeare by any convincing argument Yes say they if they had observed it there would have been left some record of it by Moses who wrote their lives as say they he hath left us instances of their observing of the other Nine Commandements but for their observation of the Sabbath day he makes not so much as the least mention at all To this we answer divers things First 1. It followes not we have no recording of the Patriarchs observing the Sabbath therefore they observed it not we except against this form of arguing from Negative authority which according to the sentence of Logicians proves nothing at all and hereof though we might give other instances we will content our selves with one only concerning the point which we have in hand In all the Books of Ioshua Iudges Ruth For 550 years after Moses we have no record of keeping the Sabbath the two books of Samuel and the first booke of Kings containing the history of the Church for 550. yeares and written much more largely then the books of Genesis and the beginning of Exodus we finde not upon record so much as the very name of the Sabbath shall we therefore conclude from thence that the holy men of those times especially Ioshua Samuel and David kept not the Sabbath when we know they had a Law that bound them thereunto and yet we have instances enough out of the same books of their keeping of the other nine Commandements It will not be sufficient to except against the instance produced by us that we know these holy men kept the Sabbath though there be no record of their keeping of it because we are sure that they had a Law that bound them to keep it but the Patriarchs had no such law this I say is no just exceptiō against our instance for it is to beg the point in question All that they can gaine by this Allegation is that it is not so certaine that the Patriarchs kept the Sabbath because it is not so certaine that they had a Law that bound them to observe it Now this is a wild form of arguing It is not certaine though we prove it is or at least not so certaine that the Patriarchs had a Law that bound them to keep the Sabbath therefore it is certaine that they kept it not As for that colour that they make use of for the strengthning of their exception against our instance that Moses records the Patriarchs keeping of the other nine Commandements It were enough that we have said already that we have the like evidences in the books of Ioshua Objection Iudges c. of those holy mens keeping of the other nine Commandements We have records of the Patriarchs keeping the other nine Commandements But to give a fuller answer I conceive they will not say that in the book of Genesis there be instances of the Patriarchs observing of every duty required and prescribed in those Nine Commandements Answer but will name us some duties only which they performed in obedience to every one of them Not of all the duties of all those nine 4. And we have records of the Patriarchs publike worship And we say that we finde instances of the Patriarchs observing of the Fourth Commandement for we read that they worshipped God publikely Gen. 4.26 chap. 12.8 which that phrase of calling upon the name of the Lord implies as I conceive they themselves will not deny And I am sure they acknowledge that publike worship is a duty of the Sabbath But hereunto they will reply that the performing of this publike worship proves not the observation of the Sabbath or seventh day for that worship To which we answer that using of publike worship necessarily supposeth a time a fit time and a time of Rest for that worship for so much themselves acknowledg to be of the Law of Nature And it is probable on the seventh day Adde hereunto what is recorded of the sending out of Noahs dove just at the distance of seven daies Gen. 8.10 12. Surely this could not be done casually that they should accidentally light just upon the distance of seven daies so many times together If then it were done purposely why was that number chosen above all others was there any mysterious holinesse in that number If conjectures might take place we might with great probability conceive that Noah and his children had upon those daies dedicated to his worship been suing for peace and sent out to see whether there might be any tydings of a comfortable answer to their prayers These I confesse are no infallibly-concluding arguments to prove the Patriarchs observation of the Sabbath or seventh day but seeing it is possible nay more very probable that Moses in this relation points at some such thing it is enough to overthrow the opposites conclusion which must be this That it is certaine that Moses makes no mention of the Patriarchs observation of the seventh or Sabbath day Secondly we answer that the place Exod. 16.23 2. It appeares Exod. 16.23 that the Sabbath was known before the Law was given proves evidently that the observation of the Sabbath was a thing sufficiently known to the children of Israel before the Law was delivered unto them upon Mount Sinai For when the Elders of Jsrael wondering that the people had gathered twise so much Manna on the sixth day as they had done each of the five daies going before come to Moses to enquire of him what the reason of that strange event might be ver 22. he answers them presently To morrow is the holy Sabbath of the Lord c. which is all one as if he had said as he doth afterwards in expresse termes ver 29. that the Lord gave them on the sixth day a sufficient portion of bread for two daies that no man might breake the rest of the Sabbath by going out to gather food upon that day In that place you see Moses speaks of the Sabbath as of a thing which the children of Israel well knew beforehand or else he had spoken Parables to them in naming a day and referring the into an Ordinance of which
necessarily attends upon it shall we think that the God of nature the fountain of all wisdome the first and best former of societies would leave the body of a society composed by himself as it were the work of his own hand in more hazard then men do the states which they settle and stablish by their counsell Again 2ly Because the Church of all societies most needs a law as being 1 Both the largest most dispersed of all societies we know that the larger the body of a State is and the more dispersed the more need it hath to be firmly knit together by those strong bands of society Now we see the smallest societies that are amongst men and the most neerly compacted together the inhabitants of one small City the fellows of one Colledge governed by laws and orders whereas the Church is the largest of all societies in the world in extent and most dispersed as being possible to be scattered over the whole face of the earth and consequently above all other states on earth needs to be established by the best laws as being hardest to be governed and most subject to disorder and confusion without them In the next place we see the laws of men reach no farther then the ordering of mens outward conversation 2 To be ordered in the very motions of the heart and meddle not with the inward thoughts and motions of the minde But in the government of the Church the chiefest work must be the ruling of the heart and conscience as the Apostle tels us that Gods word and laws reach to the imaginations of the heart and bring under the very thoughts to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.5 and enter into the very dividing of the soul and spirit and to the discerning of the thoughts of the heart Which are 1 More various then outward actions 2 More speedily moved hardly governed Heb. 4.12 Now how much greater variety and diversity there is in mens thoughts then in their actions how much more easily and speedily they are moved and consequently with how much greater difficulty they are governed and kept in order is evident to all men Consequently we must conceive that the just wise and provident God that directed all men to give laws to order mens actions would himself much more give laws for the ordering and well governing of the thoughts and conscience Lastly 3ly And the Church being Gods more speciall care as being 1 His own inheritāce if God in the course of his Providence have taken order that other states to which he hath onely a generall relation as Lord of all the earth should be governed and ordered by fit laws for the preservation of society and peace we cannot deny but his care must be much greater for the governing and well ordering of his own people in whom he delights his chosen generation his peculiar inheritance which he hath set apart to bring forth fruits to himself Deut. 32.9 Rom. 7.4 in whose good or ill carriage seeing his Name is called upon them his honour is more interessed 2 In which his own honour is most interessed then any parents can be in the behaviour of his own children And consequently we must conclude that if all the States in the world were left without government yet God would give laws nay the most exact and perfect laws for the well ordering of his own Church seeing it redounds so much to his own honour as Moses tels us Deut. 4.7 8. Thus then the first Position proposed is evident enough This law can be found no where but in the Scriptures that the Church of God must have a law The next is more clear then it that this law can bee found in no other books then the Scriptures And to prove it we need no more but to put men to produce us any other volume besides this sacred book wherein that law is written let them name us to whose custody it was committed and where it may be found There is no reason the law given to the Church should bee committed to any other then the Churches keeping 1 Because the Church the keeper of its own records acknowledgeth no other 2 Other bastard-writings compared with it appear to be counterfeit now the Church acknowledgeth no other Book for the word or law of God but this alone neither did ever any dare to pretend that any other book besides this was Gods word or law if any should the very comparing of such bastard-writings with the true word would easily discover them to be no better then counterfeit But to clear this point more fully we shall desire to manifest this one truth more which any sober minded man will easily assent unto namely that it is neither possible nor in any sort convenient that the law for the governing of the Church should be given by any other then by God himself Besides 1 t It was not possible that any other then God himselfe should give this law 1 Because it rules the spirit of man to which no creature can give a law As being unable to take accompt of the breach thereof 2 Because Gods will must be the Churches law First then it is not possible and that upon a double ground The first is that God being a Spirit and therefore to be worshipped and served in spirit and truth John 4.24 the laws that prescribe the duties of that worship and service must of necessity reach to the spirit and inward man Now the giving of such laws is beyond mans power and therefore no law-giver from the beginning of the world ever took upon him that task And indeed it were absurd for a man to give such lawes of the observation or breach whereof he could take no account now we know seeing no man can know the thoughts of another mans heart it is impossible for him to judge whether they be answerable or contrary to the law by which they were appointed to be ordered The second reason why it is impossible for any other then God himself to give a law unto the Church is because it is agreeable to all rules of equity that Gods own will should be the law and rule to all creatures seeing they are all the work of his hand much more to the Church which besides her Creation Being his own both by Creatiō and Redemption he hath purchased to himself by the blood of his Son Act. 20.28 And consequently being his own by the strongest title must be disposed according to his will even by our Saviours rule which allows one to doe with his own what he will Mat. 20.15 If then Gods will must be the creatures law who can give it but himself for who hath known the minde of the Lord Rom. 11.34 Surely if none known the things of man but the spirit which is in man Now none can know Gods minde but himself the minde of God can much lesse be known by any
while the whole nature of mankind was in our first Parents upon that ground therefore supposed and granted by all we thus argue That which Moses relates God to have done Proved by the series of the history Gen. 2. that he did in the manner and order that he relates but Moses relates that God instituted the Sabbath from the beginning as well as marriage and some other Laws therefore it was so and then done The words of Moses his relation of the Institution of that day of rest Gen. 2.3 are these And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it Now that these words Blessed and Sanctified in the most proper and ordinary construction signifie instituted and annexed a blessing to the observation of it I conceive no man will denie Wherefore seeing this is the most usuall and proper signification of these words and seeing no incongruity with other clauses and expressions in the letter of that text no contradiction to any other place of Scripture nor repugnancy to any principle of faith enforce us to seeke out any other more unusuall signification of them we have sufficient warrant to construe and interpret them according to their usuall literall and proper sense in this place Now that Blessing and Sanctifying the Sabbath was from the beginning besides the series of the history And by the tearmes blessed and sanctified which is a stronger more convincing argument to prove that it was so then any that is or can be alleadged to prove the contrary may be evineed and farther made good by these reasons First we find the Lord himself in the fourth Commandment affirming that he had blessed and sanctified the Sabbath day for so all the Interpreters render these words according to the most proper signification of them in the originall tongue as remembring and referring unto an act done before the giving of the Law Repeated in the fourth Commandement and pointing at an act past Now we find in no place of Scripture any mention of the Lords blessing sanctifying the Sabbath day before the publishing of the Decalogue upon Mount Sinai but in this only Gen. 2.3 Neither doe those that deny the Morality of the Sabbath mention or suppose any time precedent to the delivery of the Law by Moses wherein God blessed and sanctified the Sabbath day neither if any such thing had been done by God would the Scripture have omitted the recording of it being a matter of so great importance neither lastly 3. Neither was any time so fit for giving this Law of the Sabbath as in the beginning was there any time so fit for the giving of this Law as when the ground of the Institution of this holy Rest which was Gods manifesting of the perfecting of the worlds creation by his resting on that day was new and fresh in memory This reason taken from the fitnesse of the time for the enacting and publishing of this Law carries with it the greater weight because we know how carefull God is to make every thing beautifull in its time Eccl. 3.11 and consequently we have no reason to imagine that God would omit the fittest time for the giving of this Law and defer it to a time lesse seasonable As appeares in instituting other Feasts especially seing we see that in the Institution of the Feasts of lesse imporportance as Easter and Pentecost of lesse frequent observation and to last but for a time he tooke care to ordaine them when the mercies were yet fresh and new for the preserving of the memory whereof they were appointed The same course the Church tooke afterwards in the ordaining of the Feast of Purim wherein both the occasion and Institution of the Feast went both together Nay even the Heathen themselves by the very light of nature were directed to follow the same rule as all men know But the strongest and clearest argument to prove the Institution of the Sabbath by God from the beginning is the testimony of the Apostle The Apostle affirmes it Heb. 4.3 4. Heb. 4.3.4 in these words Although the works were finished from the foundation of the world for he spake in a certaine place namely Gen. 2.2 of the seventh day on this wise And God rested the seventh day from all his workes To shew the force of the argument which is to be drawne out of this place we must in this whole disputation of the Apostle's begun chap. 3.12 and ending chap. 4.11 consider what he chiefly aimes at and intends to prove which is to disswade men from unbeleefe to which purpose he sets before them the dangerous consequents thereof namely that it excludes men out of heaven To prove this he alleadgeth the testimony of the Prophet David Psal 95.11 who threatens the people of his time to be shut out of Gods rest as their Fathers by hardening their hearts through unbeleefe were shut out of Canaan a Type of heaven if they proved unbeleevers and hardened their hearts thereby as their fathers had done If it should be replied unto the Apostle that David in that place alleadged out of the Psal meant not heaven by the rest which he there mentions the Apostle demonstrates plainly that David in these words which he relates could not possibly by the name of Rest meane any thing else but the rest of heaven The Apostle's argument by which he demonstratively proves that the Prophet in the words which he cites out of him could meane no other rest but the rest of heaven is this in briefe The rest which David mentions in that place must needs be such a rest as the men to whom he speakes had not entred into for then it had beene a vaine thing to threaten to shut them out of that which they had already in possession but had a possibility to enter in it or else it were a like folly to threaten that as a judgement upon them to deprive them of that which they should never have any possibility to obtain But saith the Apostle there was no such rest to be entred into by them in Davids time but only the rest of heaven therefore David in that place cited by the Apostle could meane no other rest but the rest of heaven To make good this argument he gives a sufficient enumeration of all the kindes of rests which were possible to be meant by David in the place alleadged which must all of them have this condition that they might be entred into by men which were three the rest of the Sabbath the rest of Canaan and the rest of heaven into all which men had a possibility to enter Now the rest out of which they are threatned to be excluded must be a rest which they had not already entred into But saith our Apostle into two of these Rests men had entred before Davids time into the rest of the Sabbath from the foundation of the world in which God rested after he had perfected his workes and into the rest of Canaan