of a particular Church hath Affinity with that of lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms Object §1 IT may be objected that Churches are spiritual Corporations and of a more peculiar Consideration in respect of their Government and therefore not to be reckoned with Civil at least not with Families or such mean and low Societies Answ Policy or Government in it self and all the sorts of it is from the Light of Nature and common Reason And this is generally supposed by all that tho the Subject Matter or Persons governed be of different kinds yet the Law and Forms of Government may be the same where so appointed by Christ And I rather insist on such a way of Discourse and Reasoning as most suitable to the Subject I am upon but especially because Subordination of Churches to Churches is argued from the Light of Nature and in this very Case termed by our Brethren a Divine Topick Now if we may argue and guide our selves in Church-Affairs by the Light that shineth forth from the natural Wisdom and Prudence of Man in the Government and managing of Kingdoms there is as much a Jus Divinum and ground of reasoning from the Light that appears in the prudent Constitution and Government of any other civil Society I have mentioned in the Considerations Cities Families and those lesser and contained as I term them Societies or Corporations with particulars Churches Because I humbly conceive the Policy and Government of each tho in other things different to be more proportionable and of greater Similitude in many things then between particular Churches and those greater and containing Bodies Kingdoms Empires or the like Churches thus humbly constituted and governed are most consistent with Civil Magistracy of what Form soever the Common-wealth shall be In Confirmation of this Agreement or Similitude I shall take for the most part the Concessions of the learned of each Perswasion The Instances or Particulars are these §. 2 1. Families tho contained under the National Government where they are sinuated yet are intrusted with a ruling and governing Power compleat and sufficient each in and for it self so are particular Churches 1. They are intrusted with a Government each for it self It is not sufficient saith Mr. Perkins Perk. on Rev. 2.20 for a Church to have the preaching of the Word but Church-Government This Church speaking of Thyatira is blamed because she did not use the Authority God had given her There is given to the Ministers of each particular Congregation according to Episcopal Ordination established by our Law not only a Power to preach c. Take Authority to preach the Word of God but they are made Rectors Governours in those particular Churches and it 's said to them Whose Sins thou dost remit they are remitted and whose Sins thou dost retain they are retained by which Words the Keys of Discipline are given them see Bilson Perpet Govern p. 213. ' By Order of the Church of England saith Bishop Vsher Reduct of Episc p. 2. all Presbyters are charged to administer the Doctrine and Sacraments and the Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same And that they might the better understand what the Lord hath commanded therein the Exhortation of St. Paul to the Elders of the Church of Ephesus is appointed to be read unto them at the time of their Ordination Take heed to your selves and to all the Flock among whom the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so taken in Mat. 2.6 and Rev. 12.5 and 19.15 rule the Congregation of God which he hath purchased with his Blood ' ' Mr. Hooker Ho. Eccl. Pol. lib. 3. Sect. 1. tells us that for Preservation of Christianity there is not any thing more needful than that such as are of the visible Church have mutual Fellowship and Society one with another In which Consideration the Catholick Church is divided into a number of distinct Societies every of which is termed a Church within it self not an Assembly but a Society A Church as we are now to understand it is a Society that is a number of Men belonging to some Christian-Fellowship the Place and Limits whereof are certain having communion in the publick Exercise of such Duties as are mentioned Acts 2.47 As those of the Mystical Church by their inward Graces differ from all others which are not of the Body and those that are of the visible Body of the Church have the Notes of external Profession Even so these several Societies or Churches have Properties belonging to them as they are publick Christian Societies And of such Properties it may not be denied that one of the very chiefest is Ecclesiastical Policy We use the name of Policy rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatsoever besides belongeth to the ordering of the publick Affairs of the Church of God ' In which words he asserts not each particular Church to have Government in it self but this Government as a Property or Propriety by which it 's distinguished from the Mystical as also the Catholick visible Church So that he doth not as some of late make the Catholick visible Church the first Subject of the Keys but each particular Society or Church supposing that great Body of Christians to be only and immediately under the Spiritual Government of Christ Jesus 2. Compleat and sufficient It is not to be understood of such a perfection as may not with much advantage receive help both from the Power of the Magistrate as I have shewed before as also from the Counsel and Advice of other Churches But I mean an essential Compleatness or Sufficiency not being deficient in any material requisite for Government This that learned Author expresseth in those last Words ' We use the Word Policy saith he rather than Government because Church-Policy containeth both Government and also whatever besides belongeth to the ordering of the Affairs of the Church of God Every particular Church saith Mr. Cartwright Against Whitgift lib 3 pag 147. having an Eldership is a Catholick Church of Christ under whom Pastors Doctors and Elders are the ministerial and immediate Governors In which Words he intimateth a Compleatness in each particular Church for Government and Privileges as much as if the Catholick visible Church were Organical and a governing Church ' The Power of Jurisdiction saith one Rutherf Due Right 〈◊〉 Presbyt pag. 307. is as perfect and compleat in one single Congregation as in a Provincial as in a National yea as in the Catholick visible Body ' All Things are yours saith Paul to a particular Church 2 Cor. 3. To this purpose Mr. Parker Parker's Polit. lib 3. cap. 13. Sicut non pars c. As a particular Church is not a maimed or half but a whole and perfect Body so it is possessed with the whole and entire Church-Government and not
cognizance whereof is taken by a Synod at Edenhurgh Civil censures are for Satisfaction of the whole Nation and not the Parish or Borough only where the crime was committed but in a Church-censure the particular Assembly being only and no other Congregation or person morally leavened and charged with the offence are principally and in the first place concerned to have satisfaction of the repentance and submission of the person offending For by this means only their Lump or Church becomes again unleavened 4 Disparity 4. The other End before mentioned and Vse of Appeals is that our Judges and their Sentence be censured and judged by superior Tribunals To which proceeding the Judges in Civil Judicatures are liable but there is not the like Subordination in Churches for these Reasons Vnaequaque res per quascunque res nascitur per easdem dissolvitur 1. All the Power and Authority placed in their Inferior Courts is no other but the influx of the supream Civil Powers to whom we always make our last Appeal and therefore proper to them to suspend Actings nay utterly to destroy in part or in whole what Jurisdiction is derived from them as appears in the Constitution of all Kingdoms But it is not so here a particular Church The Court we are to Appeal from hath not its Being or Jurisdiction from a Classis or Synod * Ecclesia Parochialis est Ecclesia vera essentialiter integraliter absque ulla correspondentia vel Synodo Voet. de Syn. pag. 13. these rather derive their Power from it being Representatives only as our Brethren have formerly written Particular Churches they term Ecclesiae primae and Synods Ecclesiae ortae Again if Synods as they grant exercise over Churches a Power only cumulative not destructive How can they Excommunicate a Church seeing Excommunication renders a Society as Heathens and Publicans which is to unchurch them as Mr. Rutherford rightly affirms * Parker de Polit Eccles lib. 3. cap. 13. * It is an authoritative unchurching of an obstinate Church we plead for Ruth peaceable Plea cap. 15. p. 223 and p. 222. Excommunication is an authoritative unchurching 2. Although whole Churches may be punished for male Administration by the Civil Magistrate yet may not an Ecclesiastical Power meerly such do the like for to destroy or save whole Societies for the Evil of a major part or a few persons is the prerogative of the Lord himself which he communicates also in some cases to Civil Magistrates his Deputies but in no case to Churches it being an Authority high and Princely and not at all sutable to such as have only a Ministry and not a Dominion Bishop Davenant tells us Brotherly Communion c. 9. p. 102. That a Censure is not to be drawn on the whole Body of the Church for as the Laws forbid to Excommunicate a Society or Corporation because it may happen that those that are innocent may be intangled in the censure So Right and Religion forbids to exclude whole Churches from the Communion of the Faithful because this cannot be done without an injury and contempt to many that be innocent What ever formerly of this same unchurching power in Synods hath been asserted yet since upon further debate we are told this same Excommunicating of whole Churches is a thing not known in the Presbyterian Government and not the Churches but particular persons in the Churches are censured Assemb disputes pag. 180. But how can we say single persons only are to be censured and not the whole Church Whenas we know the contending parties of what condition soever are both equally liable to the Censure of the Judge Now when matters are brought by Appeal to a superior Court the Court Appealed from is a Party and in this respect upon no higher terms than the pars appellans though a single person But grant it be so and that the object of a Censure from a Synod be only particular members Then 1. Churches cannot have such a remedy as in Civil States for Appeals of this Nature are not to be made to any but persons invested with such a power as may suspend or make void in part or in whole the power of that Court by whom the wrong hath been done and Appealed from as hath been shewed Excommunicatio ejusque denunciatio post appellationem legitimam latam est nulla Nardus p. 53. col 2. 2. If there be no Power in a Synod of such a proportion superior to a Church as to censure it by Excommunication or Suspension at least Then will the Members of this Church by admitting such Appeals be necessarily under a twofold Jurisdiction not subordinate which tends to the greatest confusion imaginable For if the Synod and the Church in their Light and Apprehensions vary about the condition of an Offender one of them may in Conscience be bound to justify whom the other condemns 3. There is no supply of a supposed Defect or Addition of what was not before for if their superior powers Excommunicate particular Members only and not the whole Church This is nothing more than each particular Church hath power to do And it is as much an Ordinance of Christ where two or three that is a lesser number are gathered together as where a greater a Censure by the Church at Keneria is as much a Censure as if by Corinth If a Quarter Sessions Execute a man it s as much a Judicial deal as if judged by the Assize Kings-Bench or Parliament The reason is obvious it s the Law that judges him not this or that Judicature So it is the Law and appointment of Christ that Excommunicates not this or that Presbytery greater or less and this Law is the same to all We come now to the other part of the Argument drawn from the light of Nature If Appeals be not there will be a defect in Christ's Government Persons are left without remedy for wrongs done by whole Churches I answer with Suarez in the same case Argumentum est saith he De virtute Tom. 4. p. 99. ab specie ad genus negativum defensio est genus latius patet quam appellatio Potest enim ad superiorem recurrere per simplicem quaerelam vel per modum supplicationis c. quod est sufficens remedium diversum appellatione multo magis decens religiosum statum It is an Argument from the Species to the Genus there are other ways of defence We may have recourse to a Superior by simple Complaint or by way of Supplication which is a sufficient remedy and divers from an Appellation and much more becoming the state of Religion thus that Author More particularly we therefore Answer 1. There may be a sufficient defence or remedy though not by Appeals 2. There may be Appeals though not in such a way 1. For the first this Address or Recursus to others Superior or equal is not for the putting forth any Act of
The best Fence against Popery OR A VINDICATION OF THE Power of the KING IN Ecclesiastical Affairs Being an ANSWER to the PAPISTS Objections against the Oath of Supremacy To which is added Queen Elizabeth's Admonition declaring the Sense of the said Oath and King James's Vindication of the Oath of Allegiance By a Learned Divine London Printed for J. Robinson in St. Paul's Church-Yard and S. Crouch in Cornhill THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy c. THE Supremacy of the Kings of England being eclipsed by the Bishop of Rome in both parts of it the State thought fit to enjoin a Provision of equal extension In relation to the Civil Rights of the Crown is the Oath of Allegiance and against the Encroachments upon the Ecclesiastical this of the Supremacy which being first enjoined containeth in a manner both This Oath hath given the Papists such a Blow as they could not but strike again and have poured out a Flood of Arguments and Absurdities against submitting to it which hath been a long time scattered and stick in the Minds of divers of his Majesty's Loyal Subjects who tho otherwise well affected yet by reason of some Doubts and Tenderness are at a stand to this day and scruple the taking of this Oath For whose satisfaction and clearing the Lawfulness of this Supremacy is the ensuing Discourse CHAP. I. §. 1 The Oath it self as now enjoined §. 2 The Occasion of this Oath §. 3 Various Forms of it and Alterations about it §. 4 Interpretations given of it in our Laws and Writers of Note §. 5 The Nature of our Assent and Stipulation The Oath of Supremacy I A.B. do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal And that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Iurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all Foreign Iurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors and to my power shall assist and defend all Iurisdictions Privileges Preeminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness his Heirs and Successors as united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm §2 For many Years there hath been a Contest about Jurisdiction and Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Matters between the Bishop of Rome and the Kings of England who hath got ground herein according as our Princes were found more weak necessitous or devoted to his Holiness Rome was not built in a Day By William the Conqueror Legates from the Pope to hear and determine Ecclesiastical Causes were admitted Henry the First after much Contest yields to the Pope the Patronages and Donations of Bishopricks and all other Ecclesiastical Benefices it being decreed at Rome that no Lay-Person should give any Ecclesiastical Charge King Stephen grants that Appeals be made to the Court of Rome In Henry the Second's Days the Pope gets the Clergy and Spiritual Persons exempted from Secular Powers The Bishop of Rome is now over all Ecclesiastical Persons and Causes even in these Dominions Supreme Head And having upon the matter made Conquest over more than half the Kingdom in the Times of King John and Henry the Third sets on for the whole and obtains of King John an absolute Surrender of England and Ireland unto his Holiness which were granted back again by him to the King to hold of the Church of Rome in Fee-farm and Vassalage Being now absolute and immediate Lord over all be endeavours to convert the Profits of both Kingdoms to his own Use so that Prince and People were hereby reduced to very great Poverty and Servitude Such Ruine being brought upon both Kingdoms by this Device and Engine the Claim and Exercise of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction over Persons and Causes by a Foreign Power the Nation was awakened both King Lords and Commons yea the Spiritual Lords themselves to join with more Vigor against this Foreign Usurpation To this purpose severe Laws were made in the Time of Edw. 1st 2d 3d. Richard the 2d and Hen. the 4th Notwithstanding these Laws and some formerly as the Constitutions of Clarendon by Hen. 2. partly by Sufferance and partly by Negligence the whole Nation being Catholick and held under a devotional Slavery there was no thorow or successful Contest against these Oppressions They remained unto and were complained of in Henry the Eighth's Days as of Appeals to Rome in Causes of Matrimony Divorce Tithes c. to the great Inquietation Vexation and Trouble Costs and Charges of the King's Highness and many of his Subjects 24 Hen. 8. cap. 12. In a further Complaint Anno 25 cap. 21. it is declared how that the Subjects of this Realm have been greatly decay'd and impoverished by intolerable Exactions of great Sums of Money claimed and taken out of this Realm by the Bishop of Rome as well in Pensions Censes Peter-Pence Procurations Provisions Delegacies Rescripts in Causes of Contention and Appeals as also for Dispensations Licenses Faculties c. who assumed a Power to dispense with all humane Laws Vses and Customs of all Realms And many the like Complaints were made to King Henry by his Parliament at several times as it appears in the Statutes of that Age In which Statutes as in that of the 24th of Hen. 8. c. 12. 25. c. 21. 26. c. 1 3. Anno 28. c. 1 7 10 16 and 35 c. 1. you have the whole Fabrick of Romish Usurpation laid level and all Ecclesiastical Power reduced within his Majesty's Dominions and placed in the Arch Bishop and other Ecclesiastical Persons under him by firm and severe Laws This being done the King is petitioned by his Lords and Commons That for further Corroboration of those Acts and utterly to exclude the long usurped Power Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome that an OATH containing the Substance and Effect of those Statutes be limited and tendred to his Subjects This Parcel of Sacred Worship an Oath is indulged to Mankind in Civil Affairs Such is the Falseness Unrighteousness and Uncertainty of Men as that human Societies could hardly subsist without it The Lord to repair our Credit hath formed Mens Hearts generally to a great and apparent Religion and Reverence of this Ordinance The Heathens themselves termed it Sacramentum as if the most eminent or only Thing Sacred and religiously to be observed It is so effectual a Means to establish a Reformation as Men will be kept firm by Oaths saith one Liv. Hist tho there were neither Laws nor Magistrates We are exposed to more Variety and Changes from Vnsteadiness in the Mind than from any thing that is without us Fix the
them And if any Person that hath conceived any other Sence of the Form of the said Oath shall accept the same Oath with this Interpretation Sence or Meaning her Majesty is well pleased to accept every such in that behalf as her good and obedient Subjects and shall acquit them of all manner Penalties contained in the said Act against such as shall peremptorily or obstinately refuse to take the same Oath In the fifth Year of her Reign there is by Act of Parliament a Confirmation of this Sence by way of Proviso in these Words The Proviso in the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 1. Provided also That the Oath expressed in the said Act made in the said first Year shall be taken and expounded in such Form as is set forth in an Admonition annexed to the Queen's Majesty's Injunctions published in the first Year of her Majesties Reign That is to say to confess and acknowledg in her Majesty her Heirs and Successors none other Authority than that was challenged and lately used by the Noble King Henry the Eighth and King Edward the Sixth as in the said Admonition more plainly may appear There may be a Doubt made about this Interpretation as whether it be not inconsistent with the Words of the Oath it seems to be rather a material Change of them than an Interpretation In the Oath it is All Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes in the Interpretation it is All manner of Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be The Oath seems to speak of one thing and the Interpretation of another the one of Causes and the other of Persons Ad leges per se requiritur potestas in persinam secundario â—…res 〈◊〉 Suarez 〈…〉 lib. 1. cap. 8. Answ There is no opposition or Inconsistency between these two Persons and Causes The principal Object of a Law is a Person and a Person with respect to his Actions a Person morally considered for a Person physical that is in his Being only and Nature as Man without moving or acting any thing good or evil is not the Object of a Law nor Actions of any kind or sort whatsoever as Actions and in that general Consideration do come under a Law but as they respect Persons and are some way or other the Actions of reasonable Creatures Tho a Law be made to punish the Exod. 21.29 Ox which goreth a Man that he dieth yet it is with respect to Man to let him know how much God is provoked by shedding Man's Blood as Gen. 9.5 1 Cor. 9.9,10 Doth God care for Oxen Doth God in his Law respect the Beast for it self is it not that Man may be instructed and restained Verse 10. He saith it altogether for our sakes The mentioning of Ecclesiastical Causes therefore doth imply Persons and Persons of the same Denomination to whom such Actions are peculiar that is Ecclesiastical Persons 2. And that this latter is an Interpretation of the former will thus appear The Oath in giving a Supremacy in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes might seem to imply Spiritual Things to be the immediate and proper Object of the Magistrates Power and spiritual Persons only for this because they had to do in spiritual Matters and to infer thence that the Christian Magistrate hath Power in spiritual Administrations as the Word and Sacraments after the same manner as hath the Ministers of Christ who have Power in these Things as the principal and immediate Object of their Function Which this Form af Expression in the Admonition doth clearly take away 1. In asserting that by the Words of the said Oath Kings or Queens of this Realm may not challenge Authority and Power of Ministry of Divine Offices in the Church 2. The mentioning Ecclesiastical Persons and not Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes at all implieth that the Persons of Bishops Presbyters and such like are primarily and immediately the Object of this Supreme Power and the Laws made by it upon another Consideration than as Bishops c. namely as being born within these her Majesty's Realms and Dominions and such Persons of what Estate either Ecclesiastical or Temporal soever they be She hath the Sovereignty and Rule over them Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Things are mentioned in the Oath upon a twofold Account 1. Because the Civil Magistrate's Power and Jurisdiction really extends it self to the Duties of both Tables and hath to do with Matters and Causes as well as Persons that are spiritual as hereafter we shall shew but 2. Principally that a Calling or Employment in Church-Affairs whatsoever hath been formerly judged and practised doth no more exempt a Person and his Actings that is a Subject to the Queen upon any other account from her Secular Power than doth a Temporal Calling or Employment in any worldly Affairs There is something of Explication further in the Articles of Religion concluded in the Year 1562. The 37th Article is this The 37th Article professed in the Church of England The Queen's Majesty hath the chief Power in her Realm of England and other her Dominions unto whom the chief Government of all Estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all Causes doth appertain and is not nor ought to be subject to any Foreign Jurisdiction Where we attribute to the Queen's Majesty the chief Government by which Titles we understand the Minds of some slanderous Folks to be offended we give not to our Prince the ministring either of God's Word or of the Sacraments The which thing the Injunctions also lately set forth by Elizabeth our Queen do most plainly testify But that only Prerogative which we see to have been given always to all Godly Princes in Holy Scriptures by God himself that is that they should rule all Estates and Degrees committed to their Charge by God whether they be Ecclesiastical or Temporal and restrain with the Civil Sword the Stubborn and Evil-doers The Bishop of Rome hath no Jurisdiction in this Realm of England It is mentioned in the Admonition that the Queen 's Ecclesiastical Power is the same that was challenged and used by Henry the Eighth c. Which is supposed by some to be the same that was in the Pope the Person only and not the Power changed so that our Princes are but Secular Popes This Objection was strengthned by the Subtilty of Gardiner Whom Calvin terms Impostor ille in Am. 7.13 abroad and at home by a Sermon preached at Paul's-Cross in the Year 1588 by Dr. Bancroft who calls Queen Elizabeth a petty Pope and tells us her Ecclesiastical Authority is the same which the Pope had formerly This 37th Article removes the Scruple sufficiently 1. In asserting the Authority given to her Majesty to be no other but what we see to have been given to all Godly Princes in holy Scriptures c. And for what Power Henry the Eighth challenged 26 Henry 8. cap. 1. it was no new Jurisdiction wrested from
termed a Nurse The Prophet in this Promise hath an Eye to Gospel-Times and Churches called together amongst the Gentiles In an Age when there would be no Prophets or Apostles or Signs or Wonders or mighty Deeds 2 Cor. 12.12 wrought in the behalf of the Church as was in the Jewish Oeconomy and first Age of Christians It 's promised that Kings and Princes either by a common or saving Change shall become nursing Fathers nourishing and protecting Christ's feeble Orphant the Church 1 Sam. 10.6,9 1 Kings 4.29 And where the Magistrate is such we ought to pray that all may be such we have the Liberty under them notwithstanding the World's Enmity to lead a quiet and peaceable Life and this not only in Honesty but in all Godliness 1 Kings 4 2â— 3. The Judgments of God Sword of the Magistrate and the like external Administrations are helpful to the best of Men who are liable while a Body of Sin to as foul external Acts of Sin as the worst of Men. The spiritual part in us by these means helps it self much in an hour of Temptation especially against the Flesh over-ballancing the Pleasures of Sin from rhat Shame and Grief Sin brings with it so that Self-love or a higher Principle is hereby strengthened to avert us Servile Fear evil only in defect is good and useful to the best of us while in a mixed Condition and not perfect in our Love to God Joh was eminently godly and righteous yet in both much furthered from the Consideration of Wrath and Judgment If I have seen saith he Job 31.19,21 with 23. any perish for want of Cloathing If I have lift up my Hand against the Fatherless c. ver 23. For Destruction from God was a Terror to me The Magistrates Ecclesiastical Power had the like effect to restrain Impiety in him as vers 26 27 28. If I behold the Sun and my Heart hath been secretly enticed or my Mouth haue kissed my Hand this were an Iniquity to be punished by the Judg The Apostle Paul though constrained by Love vers 14. Such was his Affection to Christ yet moved also to Duty from the Consideration of Judgment and Terror 2 Cor. 10.11 If it be thus with the best of the Saints much more will Churches stand in need of such an external Help against Corruptions There being not only a mixture of Flesh and Spirit in those that are Members indeed but a mixture with them of Hypocrites and such as are Members only in shew We find in the Churches planted by the Apostles a use not only of Spiritual Censures 1 Cor. 5. but also outward and bodily Afflictions Sickness Weakness c. 1 Cor. 11. for Church-Miscarriages and it 's said to be for the Salvation of their Souls Chap. 5. ver 5. with Chap. 11. ver 32. So that Severity of the Lord on Ananias and Saphira was for a Church-Fault and it 's said Vers 11. Great Fear came upon all the Church It was an eminent Church before whom Paul shakes the Magistrate's Sword and tells them if they do that which is evil they have cause to be afraid for he beareth not the Sword in vain Rom 13. Afflictions that are from a more immediate Hand of God either in an ordinary or an extraordinary way those also that the Lord chastiseth us with by the Hand of the Magistrate I difference not each being to the same purpose and as an external Discipline For where there are no Magistrates or negligent ones God in a providential way and more immediately judgeth and afflicts Evil-doers even as where Church-Discipline is wanting or neglected God himself excommunicates as it were and gives Men up to Terror and Anguish of Soul for their evil Deeds If we should draw in here Instances from the Jewish Church and how the Lord disciplined them by the Civil Magistrate and afflicting the outward Man there can be nothing more evident than this an undoubted Usefulness of such Dispensations even to the Churches of Christ And although it should not be a good reasoning to argue from what Power the Princes of Israel exercised in respect of its Extent in Particulars 2 Chron. 3 14. many of them being Prophets as well as Princes yet the Benefit and Usefulness of such Power may be the same unto us as unto them both in respect of Terror to Evil-Doers and Praise to them that do well Though an Argument from Circumcision applied to Infants will not weigh with some because they deny Baptism to be a Sacrament of that Nature Yet this cannot be denied by them that if an Infant be capable of Benefit by an Ordinance it understands not Infants may as lawfully in that respect be baptised while Infants as they were then circumcised The Arguments brought from Ecclesiastical Power exercised by Magistrates in the Jewish Government will argue at least that there is a Capacity in Men now to receive Benefit and Good thereby even in spiritual Matters as they did then which is all that is aimed at 4. As it is the Duty of each Person so of Churches to walk wisely towards them that are without that their Order may be looked upon not only with Rejoycing by Neighbour-Churches but such as may appear amiable and comely in the Eyes of all Men. Col 2. There are many things common to all Societies which Nature and civil Customs instruct us in and are especially to be heeded by Churches For as the things Moral and Lovely in the Eyes of Men being neglected by Professors the Gospel will suffer so much more if by Churches The outward Beauty of these Christian Assemblies consists very much in what is requisite and comely in all human Societies as Unity Love Peace brotherly Forbearance c. Let all things saith the Apostle Phil. 2. be done without murmuring or disputing Paul charged the Church of Corinth with this that there were Debates Envyings Wrath Strifes Back-bitings Whisperings Swellings Tumults and the like amongst them 1 Cor. 12.20 There may be Wrongs and Oppressions in Churches as in other Assemblies Innocent Persons impeached and censured as Schismatiks Seditious and Disturbers of the Peace and no Remedy but from the Civil Magistrate Paul appeals from the Church to Caesar a Secular Prince expecting from him though a Heathen more Justice then from his Brethren being Parties and in their own Cause For where Parties are Judges the Sentence is passed before the Cause is heard As a Church may be offended so they may and oft-times do give Offence as well as single Persons 1 Cor. 10 32. It 's part of a Christian Magistrate's Care and as a Magistrate to punish open Offenderrs whether single Persons or Assemblies And the Truth is if such Assemblies that is Churches be not under the Magistrates Jurisdiction they are under none and will be at a loss in respect of all those Advantages before mentioned The Vsefulness of this Power being declared so
with a part only 2d Instanceâ—… This Oeconomick and Domestick Power is intrinsick and essential to a Family and is a Power derived immediatly from the Lord by the Light of Nature and hath not its original from any Power on Earth Families being much more ancient than Common-Wealths So Government or Discipline is intrinsick and inseparable from the very Essence of a Church received immediately from Christ and not the Grant or Constitution of any Secular Prince or State Churches are endued saith Dr. Jackson Jackson of the Church cap. 8. §5 with a Judicature immediately derived from Christ and independent upon any Earthly Power or any Power whatsoever on Earth whether Spiritual or Temporal Bishop Bilson expresseth it thus Bilson of Suprem p. 171. The Things comprised in the Church and by God himself commanded to the Church these Things are specified in pag. 227. to be the Word Sacraments and Vse of the Keys or Ecclesiastical Power and Cure of Souls are subject to no mortal Creature Pope nor Prince And those of another Persuasion are to the same purpose ' The Church saith Mr. Rutherford Peaceable Plea p 300. hath the Keys from Christ equally independent upon any mortal Man in Discipline as in Doctrine A Power and Right to Discipline saith the same Author Due Right of Presbyt cap. 9. §. 9 is a Property essential to a Church and is not removed from it till God remove the Candlestick and the Church cease to be a visible Church ' Potestas ipsa de jure c. Power saith Dr. Ames Cas con lib 4. cap. 24. p. 4. is so much the Right of a Church as it cannot be separated because necessary and immediatly floweth even from the Essence of each true Church There are Authorities enow to be produced from the Writings of the Learned for the confirmation of this particular All grant there is a Government jure divino I speak not of this or that Form and by the appointment of Jesus Christ It is denied by none but Erastus and those that follow him who may as well deny Praying Preaching or Sacraments jure divino It is as expresly ordained that Discipline be exercised in the Name of Christ as to preach pray or baptize in his Name There are certainly Things of God that are not the Things of Caesar And if those Things upon which Christ hath put his Name be not peculiarly his I know not where we shall find the Joint As we say there were Families so particular Churches before any Commonwealths were and Christian Churches and Discipline exercised many Years before any Emperors or Kings were Christian And therefore as Families have many Privileges so peculiar and by the Law of Nature so much theirs as are never touched or infringed by the Supreme Power of any Nation So likewise it is with Churches they have very many Privileges so evidently theirs from the Law of Christ and their spiritual Constitution as Christian Magistrates will do their utmost to preserve and cherish and not in the least infringe It is a part of Magna Charta 3 Hen. 3. cap. 1. Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta confirmavimas pro nobis Heredibus nostris in perpetuum quòd Ecclesia Anglicana libera sit habeat omnia jura sua integra Libertates suas illaesas And it is mentioned in the Oath our Kings take at their Coronation that He shall keep and maintain the lawful Rights and Liberties of the Holy Church 3d Instance A third Particular or Instance of what we have supposed in the former Considerations is this The lesser Corporations Cities Families and the like have not Authority or Jurisdiction one over another It is the same with Churches each having the Fountain and Original of their own Power as before is shewed immediatly proceeding from Christ in themselves and not elsewhere or one from another cannot by any Art or Device of Man be made to rise up above it self as it doth if one Church exerciseth a Power or Jurisdiction over another There is no Invention of Man that by contriving Pipes or any other Artifice can make Water freely and naturally run higher than the Spring-Head Tho that Jurisdiction which hath its rise in a particular Church be pumped up into a Classis or Synod it is but the same it was before Synods saith Parker out of Chamier Polit lib. 3. cap. 13 §9 nullam habeant Authoritatem c. They have no Authority but what is derived from particular Churches So Voetius Disp de Polit. Eccles p 5. There seems to be a great Emphasis in those Particles of Propriety Children obey your Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephes 6.1 so to Servants And speaking of the Relation of Husbands and Wives by which is set forth our Obedience to Christ and his Officers it is more appropriate Ephes 5.24 As the Church is subject to Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriis viris not only theirs but their own Husbands It is said 1 Tim. 3.4 One that ruleth well his own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So of Ministers Know them that labour among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and are over you in the Lord 1 Thess 5.12 and in Heb. 13.17 it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Duces vestri your Captains Officers in Churches being as exactly limited as in an Army There is no Power in a Superior to command where no Obligation upon the Inferior to obey And therefore the Lord seems by these Expressions to limit both Church and Family-Power within their own Walls This is the Judgment of the Learned of each Persuasion Bishop Davenant Nota est Jurisconsultorum regula c. It is a ' known Rule of Lawyers A Sentence given by him that is not his Judg is void in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private Persons that are of other Churches how much less then over the Churches themselves such Sentences were to be slighted and contemned as of a Judg that presumeth to make Laws out of the bounds of his own Jurisdiction ' Nec potest nec debet saith the same Author elsewhere De judice cont cap. 16. p. 90 particularis una Ecclesia judiciaria authoritate aliam sibi non subjectam a Catholica abscindere quaelibet enim Ecclesia filios suos ad consensionem in Doctrina publicê stabilita censuris adigit Sed fratres Ecclesiarum externarum monet pro officio charitatis non punit pro imperio potestatis Dr. Field as a common Resolution of Divines tells us Of the Church lib 5. That if a Bishop ventures to do any Act of Jurisdiction out of his own Diocess that is his particular Church so cap. 30. as to excommunicate or absolve or the like all such Acts are utterly void and of no force The same thing saith Dr. Crakanthorp cont Spal cap. 28. pag. 177. ' Every
due and peaceable accord and each enjoy its priviledge and Liberties without prejudice to the other unless these two great bodies be moulded and formed one with respect unto the other The policy therefore of the Nation and the National Church of the Jewes were both respectively formed by the Lord himself 4. Hence this opinion of States-men that there is no form of Church Government left by Christ or his Apostles but to be moulded by the wisdom and discretion of Christian Magistrates as may best sute and joynt in with the Civil Government And of others the contrary The Commonwealth saith one must be made to agree with the Church and the Government thereof with her Government for as the House is before the Hangings therefore the Hangings which came after must be framed to the House which was before so the Church being before there was any Commonwealth and the Commonwealth coming after must be fashioned and made suitable to the Church We need none of these extreams The middle way is this Let not the Churches claim to be National or Provincial Jure divino but leave such disposements to the civil Magistrate and be numbred with those lesser Societies Families Cities Colledges c. For these do retain in themselves much the same form of Government and Freedom therein throughout the World 5. It is not so much a different Form of Government For in each Republick there are contained lesser Societies of all Forms but their Extention and Potency in numerousness of Persons by which they are made up Nor from this Principallity but the nature of their Vnion and Incorporation begets the Jealousies If particular Churches become Diocesan Provincial or National by Union from the Law or Direction of the Civil Magistrate for the better exercise of that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction the Lord hath intrusted him with and conveniency of such persons as he shall appoint to inspect the Churches in such a case the Greatness of Churches cannot be disturbent to the Civil Government being so directly under its cognizance The Common-wealth saith one Holy Common-wealth R. B. p. 2.220 containeth all the people in a whole Nation or more united in one Soveraign but particular Churches distinct from the universal united in Christ have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must Unite as one Church How then become they to be termed a National Church Ans As several Corporations in one Kingdom or as so many Schools that have a peculiar form of Government but such only as is under and united in the Magistrates Government in its kind If this should be claimed as the Law or Priviledge of each Family that the Governors be it the Father or Husband or Master are thereby invested by Nature with the same Power in respect to all Families in a Nation and by several Correspondencies and Subordinations raise and Vnite themselves at last into a general Assembly or Representative And by Vertue of that Enconomical Authority give Laws to the whole Nation though not as their Subjects yet to the same persons under another notion that is as Wives Children Servants There is no well Governed State could entertain such a spreading interest as this without great doubtfulness lest their Authority and Supremacy should hereby be much Ecclipsed 6. But a particular Church consisting only of a few persons in it self and independent on others is necessitated to depend under God upon the Magistrate for protection Which if they should not obtain but be opposed and persecuted yet have no ability to resist being as a Family single and alone not able to defend it self or molest others Nor if they were able is it lawful for a Church to compel by the Sword more than the Magistrate may by the Keyes or what is peculiar to the sacred Function 2 Chron. 26. Matth. 16.19 with 24,25 Vzza erred in the latter and Peter in the former The primitive rule and practice was this being persecuted in one City to fly into another Matth. 10.23 and pray that their flight may not be in the Winter Matth. 24.20 No nor do we judg that these spiritual weapons the Keyes or Censures may lawfully by a Church or any Ecclesiastical Assembly be threatned or drawn forth against a whole Nation and the chief Governors thereof to urge or compel especially in State concernment as the Pope and some others have done though it be truly in ordine ad spiritualia The 5. Instance The fifth Instance or particular is this A Family of all Corporations or Societies is the lowest species or kind it 's Consociatio simplex prima and hath the least of pomp or state in the Government of it Cottages are built low Palaces with many stories one above another Those great and extensive Bodies Empires and Kingdoms represent in their Government more adequatly the mystical Church in respect to Jesus Christ who is their King and Lawgiver whose Kingdom is with Power and Glory a Power that is truly Imperial and Princely having Officers under him his Kingdom reaching to the utmost ends of the Earth who in his name command reward and punish But Particular Churches as Governed by his Ministers have their porportion rather with the meanest and lowest Societies of men The Scripture seems to point at more than a similitude and likeness betwixt a Family and Church in the managing of affairs I mean in the general and what is it not determined by express Institution Paul speaking to Timothy about Church affairs mentioneth their expertness in Governing a Family as a good preparative or qualification for Church administrations And this is not only Negatively if a man know not how to rule his own house how shall he take care over the Church of God 1 Tim. 3.5 But affirmatively These things I writ that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thy self in the house of God which is the Church of the living God vers 15. The sence is full in those words the Church of the living God yet it is added the house of God purposed as it were to carry the Eye back to what was written ver 5. which sheweth that there is a great affinity betwixt our Houses and the Houshold of God In a Fathers Governing his Children saith one there is a lively resemblance of such Duties of Government which he is to dispence towards the Church There is nothing enjoyned the Minister as a Father of Children which belongeth not to him as he is a spiritual Father of the Children of God On the other hand it may be observed this question being amongst the Apostles who or which of us shall be the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven Matth. 18.1 upon supposition the Church being termed a Kingdom there would be places of State and higher dignity in it as are in the Kingdoms of the World Christ Answers There shall be no such thing no primacy in one Apostle over another no the greatest of you shall
Forbearance in what they were not satisfied and to practise otherwise Declaration of October 1660. 6. There is no matter or thing appertaining to Religion or first Table-Duties or so intimate and properly spiritual which a Synod or Convocation hath Cognisance of and may make Laws and Canons about But the like things have been established by the Civil Powers more than sometimes for Advice without it as will abundantly appear in the many Statutes and Laws of former and later Times as against Swearing Perjury Sabbath-breaking c. That one instance the Liturgy and ordering Bishops Priests and Deacons the many Rubricks in each of those Books are so many Canons and Ecclesiastical Constitutions insomuch as some have termed the Parliaments of England Synods or Representatives of the Church of England observing also that in the King 's Writ by which a Parliament is called there is expresly committed unto them the Considerations of what concerneth the Church as the Kingdom of England There hath been also Injunctions Declarations Advertisements Proclamations and the like Edicts published in Ecclesiastical Matters from time to time by our Princes without calling or advising with a Synod And Obedience hath been required unto those Precepts by the Ordinary in each Diocess as well as to the Canons and Ecclesiastical Laws made by Synods The Dependency therefore of Synods and Convocations upon the Civil Magistrate according to the Constitution and Practice here in England is very great and apparent For I. They can make no Canon or Ecclesiastical Law without the Civil Magistrate but he can and may without them II. None of their Laws though ever so Ancient but may be revoked by a Parliament but the Rubricks or Ecclesiastical Laws established by it may not be medled with by the Convocation His Majesties Licence to the Convocation May 12. 1640. I shall conclude with B. Bilson who seems to state the Nature and Occasion of Synods as they are in this Kingdom very fully and indeed much as they ought to be wheresoever they are called his words are these D. Bils Per. Gov. cap. 16. p. 383. With us no Synods may assemble without the Prince's Warrant as well to meet as to consult of any matter touching the state of this Realm And why They be no Court separate from the Prince nor superior to the Prince but subjected in all things to the Prince and appointed by the Laws of God and man in Truth and Godliness to assist and direct the Prince when and where they shall be called to assemble otherwise they have no power of themselves to make Decrees when there is a Christian Magistrate neither may they challenge the judicial hearing or ending of Ecclesiastical Controversies without or against the Prince's liking It appears evidently hereby that in the Judgment of the Learned Author Synods in their Nature and Use are not for Rule and Government where there is a Christian Magistrate or otherwise than as Assistants only to counsel and advise Him THe Synods in other Reformed Churches claim a coercive Jurisdiction from an intrinsick right received immediatly from Jesus Christ as Ministers of the Gospel There being no express Scriptures to uphold this Assertion and the light of Nature and common reason being supposed sufficient to create a jus divinum The Authors of this perswasion argue thus Discip of Scot. lib. 2. c. 11. also Act. of G. Assemb before the Confes of Faith Jus divinum regiminis cap. 3. In all Kingdoms and Republicks if wrong be done by inferior Courts we may have right by appealing to a Court superior in Authority there ought therefore to be such an order in Churches that is a Classis Synod c. That there may be regular Appeals in like Cases And further they argue if it be not so when whole Churches or their Consistories transgress there is no ordinary Remedy The Provision Christ hath made for Government in his Church will be found defective For though there be a Remedy for particular persons yet for a Church offending there is none if there be not a superior Church or Ecclesiastical Power to appeal unto Jus D. regim cap. 1. Assembly Dispute p. 114. Rutherf peaceable Plea cap. 15. Assertion of the Gover. of Scot. by G. Gillespie part 2. cap. 4 Leaving wholly what they pretend from Scriptures I shall examine this only their Reasoning from common light it being more suitable to our present subject and in the general say Answ 1. 1. In the Mysteries of the Gospel from which by their own concessions Church-communion and Discipline is not to be excluded any more than Preaching or the Sacraments It is very unsafe to make the dim Eye of Reason our Guide Of what advantage such suppositions have been in producing Arminianism Socinianism Platonism c. but especially of the many gross Errors and loathsom Superstitions in Popish Worship we cannot be ignorant Answ 2. 2. An Appeal as understood in this dispute and ordinarily by Civilians is a provocation to a superior Tribunal upon the error or wrong done by an Inferior Such an Appeal is not essential to Government unless we can suppose a progressus in infinitum Nor is there a defect in that Government where it cannot be had Some Societies are 1. So low and little in compass as they need not such Appeals A Family is a compleat Society or Corporation though there be not a Superior in the same kind that is an Economical power to appeal unto so may a Church be though not a Superior in a series properly Spiritual or Ecclesiastical 2. Others so High If there be an Error or Wrong done in or by a general Assembly or National Synod supposed in the exercise of power of greatest perfection we have no remedy no Superior to appeal unto therefore they term their Church or General Assembly an Independent If it be said as it is by some we may appeal from it to an Oecumenical Councel Answ These great Councels have erred and may and what then is the Remedy or further Provision To what Ecclesiastical Tribunal Superior can we appeal from them Argued by the Commissioners of Scotland Anno 41. p. 1 2 9. Also their Declaration against a Cross Petition P. 10. Answ 3 To answer more particularly This Reasoning being grounded upon a Similitude betwixt the Ministerial Government of Christ and the Political Government of Kingdoms we say there is not Par ratio and therefore no just consequence The Disparity will appear in divers Particulars I. Disparity In their Natures as Civil and Religious Assemblies In this the Difference is so great as Councels Schoolmen and Casuists who all grant Appeals in Civil Affairs yet in Ecclesiastical Matters the ordinary use of them is so constantly and generally denied as it is an Axiom saith One That in Religious Causes the Voice of Appealing is not to be heard or mentioned Videtur axioma communiter acceptum inter probos Religiosos