benefite of iustification It may be heere demaunded whether the works of grace and regeneration as they are called haue not some place in the condition of the couenant of grace for all the good works of nature are hence excluded I answer that the very works of regeneration are not contained in the condition of the couenant of grace First for that the couenant of grace is made with the vniust and vnregenerate now how can their works be iust good Next in the couenant of grace both regeneration it selfe and all the holy fruits thereof are promised for in it all the benefits of Christ be promised the beleeuers Now then the promise of the couenant must necessarily differ from the condition of the couenant But this you will Obiection say It is euident that in many places of the new Testament that life eternall or as they say the reward of eternall life is often promised vnder the condition of good works that is the works of regeneration as 1. Timoth. 4. Godlinesse is profitable vnto all things hauing the promises both of this life and of the life to come Luke 14. It shall be repaid thee in the day of the resurrection of the iust Matth. 5. Your reward is great in heauen Matt. 19. He shall not lose his reward Gal. 6. Let vs not be wearie in weldoing for in due season we shall reape if we faint not Ephe. 6. Knowing this that what good soeuer euerie man doth that he shall receiue of the Lord. Heb. 6. The Lord is not vniust to forget your worke and the loue which ye ministred vnto the saints 2. Thess 1. 6. Notwithstanding it is a righteous thing with God to render affliction in like manner to them which afflict you and vnto you which are afflicted rest with vs. To these I answer In my Answer Three kinds of promises in the Gospell iudgment there are three distinct kinds of promises in the Gospell The first is the promise of the couenant of works wherein eternall life is promised vnder condition of works done by the strength of nature Thesecond is the promise of the couenant of grace which is propounded vnder condition of faith The third kind of promises are those particular and special promises which are to be referred to the couenant of grace found euery where in the Gospell and made vnder condition of the works of grace and regeneration These three kinds of promises differ first in conditiō next in propriety thirdly in subiect fourthly in end and vse First thē they differ in condition for y e promise in the First difference couenant of works is vnder condition of y e works of nature the strength therof In the couenant of grace the promise is vnder condition of faith in Christ In the promises which I cal particular or special promises there is a cōdition of works indeed but of the works of grace and regeneration and not of the works of nature or any naturall facultie Secondly these promises differ in proprietie for the promise in the couenant of workes is Second differēce meerely legall and requires the condition of works done only by the strength of nature commanded in the lawe and to be done according to the strict rule of Gods law and the works of nature or wrought by natural strength are properly called the works of the law Rom. 9. 32. And the promise in the couenant of grace is not legall but meerely Euangelicall for the condition here is not of any worke morall and naturall but of faith in Christ and of Christ himselfe to bee apprehended by faith Lastly those particular promises they are partly Euangelicall partly legall for the condition is of workes which proceed from grace and regeneration and therefore of such works as in regard of their originall may truly be called Euangelicall works but because the law morall is the rule of them in this respect they may also be called legall works Thirdly these promises differ in subiect because Third differēce the promise in the couenant of works is propounded to them which now after the breach of that first couenant of works lie dead in sins offences hauing notwithstanding Ephe. 2. 1. for the time no sense of sin nor death The promise in the couenant of grace is giuen to them which are also dead in sinnes and transgressions but hauing some feeling of sinne of death and of their owne miserie wrought in them by the law and legall couenant and as for those particular promises they are proposed to them which are alreadie iustified renewed by faith in Christ Lastly these promises differ in vse and end for the end of the couenant of works is that wretched sinners which 4. difference are void of sense of their sin and miserie may be awakened to feele and acknowledge their owne sinne and miserie that is as the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. 9. 10. that sinne may reuiue in them and that they may die that is they may feele that they be dead in sinnes and offences Of this vse of the law see Rom. 3. 19. 20. 11. 32. Gal. 3. 22. and 5. 23. This is the vse then of the couenant of works to worke in vs the sense of sinne and miserie and to prepare men to receiue grace Therefore the doctrine of the Gospell begins with the legall doctrine of works and of the lawe morall for the Gospell should preach and promise in vaine righteousnesse and life to the beleeuers if they were not first prepared by feeling their owne corruption and miserable condition to heare and receiue grace by the Gospell For this cause Christ himselfe first Matth. 5. 17. and after freeth and restoreth the law as pure from the leuen of the Pharisees expounding * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the perfection and exact seuerity thereof for this very cause that men by this light of the couenant of works law morall might acknowledge how miserable they be by nature and so might hereby bee prepared to embrace the couenant of Grace So did Christ prepare that rich young man which came vnto him to be schooled as hee made shew to entertaine the couenant of grace Wilt thou saith he enter into life Keepe the commandements Paul begins his doctrine in the Epistle to the Romans from the law and couenant of works and spends neere his three first chapters of his Epistle in this doctrine to this end that he might conclude all vnder sinne and condemnation and so might prepare men to the doctrine of grace which begins Rom. 3. 21. So Gal. 4. 21. he teacheth the Galathians that would be vnder the law as he speaketh their miserable seruitude which be in that condition and how at the last they are cast out of Gods kingdom for this verie cause that the Galathians renouncing all confidence in that righteousnesse which is by the law couenant of works might lay hold on that righteousnesse which is by faith and
end vse of the couenant of works is that men by it may be iustified and saued or otherwise condemned The couenant of works had this vse in Adam before his fall that Adam by it might be iustified and liue After the fall it hath the same vse in the vnregenerate elect and reprobate to wit to iustifie and saue them or to condemne them And for as much as it can not iustifie them because of their corruption Rom. 8. 3. it followeth that it must necessarilie condemne them And the verie vnbeleeuing and vnregenerat doe otherwhiles feele this condemnation in themselues Of this vse read Rom. 3. 19. where he sayth that by the law Euery mouth is stopped and made obnoxious to the condemnation of God And of the experience of this condemnation reade Rom. 7. 10. I saith he when the commandement came was dead that is condemned in my conscience so that I felt in my selfe present condemnation and death And albeit this first vse of the couenant of works be cōmon to al vnregenerat elect and reprobate yet this wants not some difference for in the elect the acknowledgmēt of sin and condemnation which they haue by the couenant of works is vnto them a preparatiue to imbrace the couenant of grace but in the reprobate it is the way to extream desperation Thus far of the first vse The second end of the couenant of works is this It 2. End of the couenant of works serues to driue on and to stir vp al beleeuers to march on forwardes in all faith and godlinesse This vse it hath I say in the regenerat who in the legall couenant or morall law doe desire principallie to behold as in a glasse euermore first the holinesse maiestie and iustice of God 1. The vse of the morall law to the beleeuers Ro. 7. 12. Therefore the law is holy and the commandement is holy iust good Next they see here that which they call the originall holines and iustice of man to wit 2. the same which was in the creation which is defined to consist of iustice holines and wisdome Thirdly they behold here that life eternall which was to follow that 3. first originall iustice Fourthly they see that corruption and vnrighteousnes which is now in nature after mans 4. fal but this they see by consequent as we say one contrary is discerned and knowen by another for while we consider first that infinit iustice of God next our original iustice which are properlie discerned by that glasse of Gods law and couenant of works by the light and brightnes of these I say we may take a view of the grosse darknes filthinesse and deformitie of our corrupt nature For this cause it is said Ro. 3. 20. By the law commeth the knowledg of fin Fiftly they see herein Gods wrath kindled against y t deformitie of nature so contrarie both to Gods iustice to mans original iustice For this cause it is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all the vngodlines and vnrighteousnesse of men and Rom. 4. The law causeth wrath Sixtly and lastly they behold how present death followeth that wrath of God Ro. 1. 32. Which men though they knew the law of God how that they which commit such things are worthie of death yet not onelie doe the same but also fauour them that doe them Chap. 7. 9 10. When the commandement came I dyed The regenerate when they consider these things in the law and couenant of workes they are forthwith terrified with that heauie spectacle 1. of their sinne 2. of the wrath of God against sinne 3. of eternall death which followeth Gods wrath And then doe they more more relinquish and renounce 1. that legall righteousnes required in the couenant of workes 2. that originall iustice and all opinion of free-will 3. that life and safety which followeth that legal righteousnes of works And hauing renounced all confidence in these thinges with like in deuour they follow hard after Christ by conuersion and faith to this end that they may finde in him first that mercie of God in Christ contrarie to that iustice of God secondlie they seeke for that imputatiue iustice as they call it so contrarie to their owne righteousnes to that originall iustice of the law or of works Thirdly they labour for that sanctification and regeneration that so they may bring forth the fruites of the spirit Fourthly they waite for to attaine that life eternall which is giuen vs of Gods free grace in and by that imputed righteousnes of Christ If we were possest in this life of a perfect faith in Christ A perfect faith we haue not and so of perfect holines then I graunt the beleeuers should not need this terrible glasse of the law and of the couenant of works But because vnbeleefe still resteth in this our nature and the reliques of that inherent contagion still abide in vs and for that so long as wee liue here neither our faith nor holinesse can be perfected Therfore to weaken more more our vnbelcefe and inherent sinne in vs and more and more to increase faith and holinesse we haue euer need of this terrible glasse as a continuall seuere Schoolemaister which euer casting many feares before vs may driue vs to the faith of Christ and to sanctimonie of life Now then seeing it is euident that there is a double vse of the couenant of workes the answer to the question aforegoing is easie For this we auouch that as touching the former vse the couenant of works is abolished to them which are vnder grace To this the Apostle pointeth when he saith Ro. 6. 15. Yee are not vnder the law but vnder grace Gal. 4. that he might redeeme them which were vnder the law Rom. 7. Being dead to the law we are now free from the law 2. Cor. 3. 11. For if that which should be abolished was glorious But as for this second vse it is not abolished This distinction is commonlie receiued that the law legall couenant is abolished as it is a condemning tyrant and not to be abolished as it is a Schoolemaister to chasten vs and with terrours to driue vs vnto Christ For this second vse we haue an example in Paul after his regeneration Ro. 7. 14. c. For when he considers in the glasse of Gods law the spiritualitie that so I may speak the holines and goodnes of the law first next his owne carnalitie to vse that worde and rebellion and lastly death it selfe first he breaks forth into these wordes Miserable man that I am who shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Next he flieth to the mercie of God in Christ Iesu saying I giue God thanks in Christ Iesus And 2. Cor. 5. 11. Paul sayth of himselfe he was inforced and mooued forwardes to doe duties in his calling because of the terrors of the Lord set downe and offered vnto him in and by
his law Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord we bring men to the faith The same Apostle Galath 4. 21. when he saw that the Galathians which began to beleeue in Christ notwithstanding not to cleaue vnto him only by faith but to make a mixture of the law with Christ he sets before them this glasse of Gods law or of the couenant of works wherein he layeth open first the miserable bondage of such as are vnder the law next their finall reiection to this end and purpose that they might be mooued by this fearefull speculation to stick to Christ only and to the couenant of grace Hereunto refer those cōminations which we find partly annexed to the couenant of grace in the secōd part of the Euangelicall doctrine partly put to the particular promises instructions exhortations in the 3. part of the doctrine of the Gospell For this is the duty of the moral law of the couenant of works to containe y e beleeuers with threatnings and terrors within the bounds of the grace of Christ and of his Gospell Io. 3. 18. we haue a commination of the law or of the couenant of works added to Note the office of the law to beleeuers the couenant of grace He that beleeueth in him is not condemned this is the conenant of grace He that beleeueth not is condemned already This commination doth properlie appertaine to the law or couenant of works Rom. 8. 13. He conioineth a threatning of the law or couenant of works with a particular promise wherein life is promised vnto sanctimonie If ye liue according to the flesh ye shall die but if ye mortifie the deeds of the bodie by the spirit ye shall liue See Gal. 6. 8. And thus farre of the first question The second question is this whether the morall law which we call the decalogue be abolished to them which The 2. ques whether the lawe be abolished to the regenerat be vnder the couenant of grace I answer by way of distinction The morall law as it commandeth workes done by the strength of nature and as it is the rule of all works of this kinde to wit of such works as be required in the couenant of works that is in respect of the first and proper vse thereof for it concernes properlie the works of nature which make the condition in the couenant of works in this respect I say the morall law it selfe also is abolished to them which are in Christ euen in like manner as the couenant of works is cancelled and of none effect against them For which cause Paul vseth these phrases We be not vnder the law we are dead to the law we are freed from the law to wit either as touching iustification or condēnation And looke how farre the couenāt of works serueth for their vse which be in grace so farre the law of workes is in vse for them And what vse the beleeuers haue of the couenant of works we haue alreadie shewed Againe looke how farre forth the same morall law serues to giue rules for the works of grace and attendeth not on the couenant of works but of grace and of the Gospell so farre it resteth in vse for the seruants of Christ For there is but one rule and law of all good works whatsoeuer whether they proceede from nature or from grace like as there is but one and the same iustice of God euer like it selfe whereof the law of God is a verie expresse image or a liuelie representation Thus then the lawe morall abideth for such as bee vnder the Gospell yet in some respect that is in vse changed for like as all things are become new in Christ Iesus so also the law it selfe after a sort is renued And that the law serueth and is in vse for them which be vnder the couenant of grace it is very cleere by many scriptures This may appeare by those very testimonies which are before produced for the couenant of works and other scriptures many where the works of the law are commended Rom. 13. Loue one another for he that loueth another hath fulfilled the law Gal. 5. 13. 14. By loue serue one another for all the law is fulfilled in one worde which is this Thou shalt loue thy Neighbour as thy selfe See Iames 2. 8. c. And thus farre as we purposed haue we spoken of the couenant of grace CHAP. IIII. Of such as be comprehended in or may truly be saide to be vnder the couenant of God NOW it followeth that we speake briefelie of such as be vnder the couenant of God or if I may so speake confederates with God Euery reasonable creature must of necessitie be liable to one of both couenants either that of works or this of grace For the very Angels are vnder the couenant of works but because the Scripture speaks so sparinglie of them therefore we say this onelie in a worde that they also be vnder the couenant of workes Againe man must bee vnder some one couenant Adam in the state of his innocencie was vnder the couenant of works man after the fal abideth vnder the couenant of works to this day life is promised him vnder condition of works done by strength of nature But if he wil not do well death and the euerlasting curse of God is denounced against him so long as he is without Christ and without the Gospell And being freed from the couenant of works he is not become a libertine or not subiect to Gods people in grace be not law-les libertines any couenant or as it were law-lesse but forth with he is admitted to the couenant of grace and thence forth liueth vnder it Therefore concerning Angels and men it is euident that they are vnder some one couenant It is a doubt indeede concerning Christ whether he were then vnder any couenant when he dwelt among men and did conuerse on earth I answere there be two natures in Christ a diuine and humane Christ as hee is God and the Sonne of God is not vnder the couenant of works or of grace for that he is no creature but the blessed Creator to whom to whose couenant and law euerie creature is and must be subiect But as he is man he is vnder the couenant of works and that in two respects First Christ vnder the couenat of works in what respect in respect of himselfe because he is a creature because he is a seruant and made man and was in the loines of Adam when that couenant of works was first made with him But wee be to speake sparingly of that state of the man Christ which is in respect of Christ himself whether that his humane nature as touching itselfe were vnder the couenant of works whether this nature did purchase for it selfe life eternall by obseruation of the couenant of works Next I say the * Or christ the Mediator hath subiected himselfe in his humanitie to the law for our sake humane nature of Christ is
in all succeeding ages God himself with his owne hand did first write in tables of stone the words of the Decalogue Next after this he gaue it in charge vnto Moses that he should afterwards write and record all things which hee receiued at Gods owne mouth and that the people of God might be assured that the bookes of Moses came not by mans will but were giuen by diuine inspiration the Lord sealed 2. Tim. 3. 16 and testified these writings to be his heauenly oracles by manie great wonders before they were written when they were written and after they were written And Moses wrote the Word of both couenants of both I say Legall and Euangelicall but whereas he gaue but as it were the first lineaments of the Euangelicall couenant he set forth the Legall couenant clearely and in full measure For the legall couenant in the bookes of Moses is cleerely recommended and vrged but the Euangelical more darkly set before vs. For which cause all the doctrine of Moses is said to be legall The Law came by Moses Ioh. 1. After Moses God stirred vp his Prophets whose writings also he confirmed with his great miracles and gaue them great authoritie yet were they not to set forth any thing diuers or contrary to the doctrine of Moses and the Patriarches nor to publish any thing but what was grounded in the bookes of Moses but by diuine reuelation they did ad more cleere interpretations as the morning starre of the new testament did more neerely approch These holy men wrote the summe and chiefe heads of their doctrine euen so much as God himselfe thought meete to be reserued for posterity And these records being written were laid vp with the holie books of Moses which were kept in the side of the Arke Iosh 24. 26. Finally after the incarnation of Christ the Euangelicall doctrine or the Gospell first beganne for certaine yeares to be deliuered by voice and to be preached by Christ himselfe and then after by his Apostles And lastly the same was written by the Apostles The works of Gods law and nature are commanded in the bookes of the new Testament And the verie moral law is expounded by Christ himselfe freed from the leauen and corruption of the Pharisees but the works of the law and nature are not recommended to the end that by them men might be iustified and saued but they be commended either to prepare men to intertaine grace offered or to quicken them to proceed and grow in grace receiued as is before shewed Againe the works of regeneration be commanded not for iustification but as testimonies of that iustification which is by faith and of thankfulnes vnto God for which cause so soone as the Apostle hath taught the doctrine of faith he descends to the works of the lawe teaching men that their life and conuersation must be worthie that high calling whereunto we are called in Christ Iesu See Ephe. 4. 1. 1. Thess 2. 12. But faith in Christ is that which is principally required in all the books of the new Testament And thus farre generally of the written word of the couenant CHAP. VII The number of the controuersies which are concerning the written Word and of the first controuersie whether the Scripture be the word of God THere be two kinds of controuersies concerning the holy Scripture The first kind is of such controuersies as bee more essentiall that is which concerne the very essence if I may so speake or being of the Scripture The second kind is of those controuersies which bee more accidentall and doe not so neerely concerne the essence of the Scripture Of the first kind there are ten controuersies or questions the first is Whether the Scripture Propheticall and Apostolicall bee the word of God The second is How it may appeare that this Scripture is Gods word The third is Of the antiquitie of it The fourth is Of the perspicuity or cleerenes of it The fift is Of the simplicitie or plainnesse of it The sixt is Of the viuacitie quickening power or life of it The seuenth is Of the simple euident necessitie of it The eight is Of the perfection sufficiencie thereof that it is sufficient and perfect in it selfe without all vnwritten verities or traditions whatsoeuer The ninth is Whether the Scripture may bee the iudge to determine all controuersies The tenth is Whether the Scriptures Propheticall and Apostolicall must haue the chiefe place of excellency and be in authoritie aboue the Church As for those eight controuersies which follow the two first they are touching the properties of the holie Scripture and these when we shall haue proued that the Scripture is Gods word will appeare euidently for they are necessary consequents of that Theoreme For grant we this that the Scripture is Gods word then these things must follow necessarily first that it is most ancient secondly most cleere thirdly most simple or pure fourthly most powerfull fiftly most necessarie sixtly most perfect seuenthly the greatest best iudge of all controuersies without exception eightly most excellent But for as much as the aduersaries denie these eight properties therefore as is a foresaid there is of euerie one of them a speciall controuersie We are then to handle these controuersies in order and first of that which by due right naturally is to haue the first place Whether the Scripture be the word of God The Aduersaries graunt generally that the holy Scripture is the word of God but when they are brought from the generall to a speciall they break from vs. To speake more plainely the word of God at this day is twofold in the Church of God 1. immediate 2. mediate I call that the Gods written word immediate word of God which doth proceede immediately out of Gods owne mouth and that I call mediate which the Lord speakes by his preacher or Minister We hold then and auouch that the holie Scripture is that immediate and primarie word of God and to bee vnto vs in steed of that first immediate and liuely voice of God himselfe yea that it serues vs in place not only of that liuely voice of God but also of the secret and insearchable mind of God and of Gods vnspeakeable mysteries Our arguments are these 1. For that this is the verie will of God They haue Moses saith he and the prophets that is the bookes of Moses and the Prophets Luk. 16. 29. 2. If we had nothing to supply the defect of the liuely voice of God then doubtlesse our state were worse then that of the old Church of the Iewes which had the oracles of God but it is against all light of reason so to Rom. 3 1. 2. affirme 3. Our third reason is this The first ground of our faith must be either the liuely voice of God or the verie mind and counsell of God or something to supply the want of Gods liuely voyce and of the secret mind of God which must also be
the mind enlightned in knowing God in Christ of the will sanctified in imbracing and apprehending God in Christ And here the principall agent is that verie Spirit of Christ who after the first grace and creation abideth and dwelleth in vs not idle but euer working some good in vs and by vs. The second agent working with Gods holy Spirit is the very soule of man or rather the new man or the new creature in the soule and all the faculties thereof By this the holy Ghost that so I may speake knoweth God or otherwise to speake the same to know God the holy Ghost vseth the new creature in man and by this the holy Ghost doth embrace and apprehend God in Christ Thus speakes the Apostle Rom. 8. The holy Ghost saith hee maketh intercession for vs with sighes which cannot be expressed Obserue here how he ascribeth this action of sending forth sighes vnto the Spirit as to the principall agent In this second grace which is the action or worke of faith we stand not as meere passiuely but being moued by the holy Ghost we worke our selues as being stirred vp to beleeue we beleeue and in a word we worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Gods Spirit working in vs. The Aduersaries say this second grace in faith is an action of free-will when as we by our own free-will dispose and prepare our selues to a iustifying grace in beleeuing in hoping in repenting In this action they say not the holy Ghost is the principall agent or any motion to vse their owne word of the Spirit but free-will it selfe which as they say goes before whē as that motion of God working together with their free-will must follow after They speake not a word here of Gods Spirit either in the first or second grace who works effectually in both as is aforesaid but in steede of the holy Ghost they talk of I know not what motion standing without and knocking at the doore They say this motion stirres vp free-will they say it worketh with free-will when it worketh and prepareth vs vnto the grace of iustice or iustification This their doctrine is strange it sauoureth not the holie Scripture of God nor the phrase of Scripture Thus farre of Gods grace in faith or of the second part of our calling and of the two speciall branches of it Next in it we are to consider of the points or conditions before noted which are the verie same with those in our calling afore-going To this second part of our effectuall calling referre the doctrine of faith which in verie truth is the same with it Hope loue and repentance follow faith and Free-will is a common place in diuinitie subalterne or to bee referred vnto that of Repentance CHAP. II. Of the word of God or of the couenant in generall and of the couenant of workes in speciall THE common place in religion which is concerning The common places of religion how they follow in order Gods word or couenant is to be referred vnto this of our effectuall calling as to a most generall heade next follow these points of sinne and of the miserie of mankind thirdly that of faith then follow hope loue and repentance Now therefore we are to speake of the word or of the couenant of God hauing first set down this ground that all the worde of God appertaines to some couenant for God speaks nothing to man without the couenant for which cause al the scripture both old and new wherein al Gods word is contained beares the name of Gods couenant or testament The couenant of God generally is a promise vnder Couenant defined some one certaine condition And it is twofold the first is the couenant of works the second is the couenant of grace Paul Galath 4. vers 24. expresselie sets downe two couenants which in the olde Testament were shadowed by two women as by types to wit Hagar the handmaide and Sarah the freewoman for saith he these be those two couenants Let vs then speake something of these two couenants and first of the couenant of works The couenant of workes which may also be called a legall or Couenant of works the first ground of it natural couenant is founded in nature which by creation was pure and holy and in the law of God which in the first creation was ingrauen in mans hart For after that God had created man after his owne image pure and holy and had written his law in his minde he made a couenant with man wherein he promised him eternall life vnder the condition of holy and good workes which should be answerable to the holinesse and goodnesse of their creation and conformable to his law And that nature thus beautified with holinesse and righteousnes and the light of Gods law is the foundation of the couenant of works it is very euident for that it could not well stand with the iustice of God to make a couenant vnder condition of good works perfect obedience to his law except he had first created man pure and holie and had ingrauen his lawe in his hart whence those good works might proceed For this cause when he was to repeat that couenant of workes to the people of Israel he first gaue the law written in tables of stone then he made a couenant with his people saying Doe these things and ye shall liue Therefore the ground of the couenant of works was Note not Christ nor the grace of God in Christ but the nature of man in the first creation holy and perfect endued also with the knowledge of the law For as touching the couenant of workes there was no mediator in the beginning betweene God and man that God should in him as in and by a mediator make his couenant with man And the cause that there was no need of a mediator was this that albeit there were two parties entring into a couenāt yet there was no such breach or variance betwixt them that they had neede of any mediator to make reconciliation betweene them for as for the couenant of works God made this couenant with man as one friend doth Note with another For in the creation we were Gods friends and not his enemies Thus far of the grounde of the conant of works The thing promised in the couenant of works is life eternall first not righteousnes for that man in his creation was euen then iust and perfect by that original iustice as they call it vnlesse you will say that the righteousnes of works was promised in that couenant for which righteousnes sake after that man had wrought it God would pronounce and declare him to be iust For we are to vnderstand that in this couenant there is a double righteousnes the first is that originall iustice which is nothing else but the integritie of nature in that first state of man This iustice out of all doubt is not promised in the couenant of works for it is the ground of it The
second iustice is that which was to follow the good workes of nature in that integritie might be called the iustice of works for after that man had liued godly and iustly according to Gods law in that integritie then he might be said to be iust againe and to be declared of God to be iust by his good workes well pleasing vnto God and so eternall life might be saide to be giuen vnto him as iustified by his works For Paul to the Rom. teacheth that there may be some imputation of righteousnesse by good works if so be that works be perfectlie good Hence come these manner of speeches Abraham was not iustified by his works by workes no flesh shall be iustified Thus far of the promise Rom. 4. 2 of the couenant of workes or of the things promised in the couenant of works Now to come vnto the condition the condition of y e couenant of works is the condition of good works of good works I say not which proceed from Christ or from his The condition of the couenant of works grace but frō nature only in the integrity thereof being informed with the knowledge of the law and perfectlie good as it was in the first creation proceeding I say from that ground of the couenant of workes Therefore works meere naturallie good onlie are required as the condition of the couenant of works So then by this condition doe you exclude hence faith in Christ I doe so And do ye except here from the condition of the couenant of works all the works of grace and regeneration I doe except these also But the couenant of works is often propounded in the Gospell to such as be in grace and in Christ Iesu for how often is the reward of eternall life promised to such as do well wherefore it may seeme that the works of regeneration appertaine also to the couenant of works for that such works be required of them which be vnder grace I answer the antecedent is false for if at any time we heare or reade in the Gospell of grace that good works be required of them which be in Christ and iustified by him to that end that they may obtaine eternall life we may not thinke that God speakes Note vnto them after the forme of the couenant of works for in the Gospel good works are required of them which be in Christ not such as proceede from their owne nature or such as they can yeelde of their owne strength but onely such as proceede from the grace of regeneration For we neuer finde in the new Testament that they which are in Christ be commanded to do the workes aforesaide of the couenant of works which bee naturallie good or that the couenant of works is set before thē that by it the works therof acted by the strēgth of nature they may receiue eternall life For thou shalt neuer finde it saide to them which are in Christ Do this of your own strēgth that so ye may liue which is the very sum of y e couenant of works As for that place Math. 19. 17. where Christ said to a certaine young man which called vpon him saying Maister what good shal I do that I may haue eternall life The Lord answered and saide If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements I graunt that heere hee vnderstandeth the couenant of works and that the Lord propoundeth to the young man the forme of the conenant of works But obserue that the Lord so answereth to one that sought his life and saluation by the law and which did before cleaue vnto the couenant of works and trusted to works as meritorious For so the couenāt of works and the rule of the law of works must be set before euery one which is without Christ seeking righteousnesse by the law and the works of the law to this end if it may be that by the sense of sin the feeling of his owne misery he may be prepared to embrace the couenant of grace in Christ For to returne vnto his words that young man saide to the Lorde What good shall I doe Therefore he sought saluation by workes and not by faith in Christ So then the Lord answered fitly to his question Doe this and thou shalt liue Which manner of speaking is neuer wonted to be propounded in the Gospell to them which haue once imbraced and professed Christ For those good works of nature be neuer required of them according to the forme of the couenant of works neither be the promises made vnto them vnder condition of any such workes I confesse good workes be required of them which be in Christ and iustified by him but all such works belong to grace and regeneration to grace I say only and they be not the works of free will nor of nature Know this thē that to such as be in Christ the couenant of works to thē is abolished of none effect so far forth as by it iustificatiō saluation is obtained I graunt the law abideth which is the rule of those works which properlie specially How far the law is abolished did first appertaine to the couenāt of works but now it hath another speciall vse for it serueth for our direction in the workes of grace and sanctification So then the law hath ceased as it was the rule of the works of nature required in the couenant of works but it is still in vse to them which are in Christ as it is the rule of the works of grace For the same iustice of God is vnchangeable and the law of God is the very image of diuine iustice wherefore the law of God must abide for euer albeit it haue not euer the same vse nor be not alwaies the rule of the same works But of this we shal speak more at large hereafter It is a question heere whether in the first creation good works in the couenant of works were required of man as meritorious for the promised life I answer not so But they were due in the creation as pledges of thankefulnesse in man to his creatour for that excellent worke of his creation and to glorifie God his creator But it may be obiected that Paul to the Rom. disputing against the works of nature for in that epistle he disputing principally against this kind of works he reasoneth against thē as seeming meritorious not as duties testimonies of mans thankfulnes vnto God wherfore it may seeme they were commanded vnto man in his creation as meritorious I answer true it is Paul disputes there of thē as of merites not for that this was his iudgement of them but because the Iewes had that conceite of them which were so farre blinded that they thought the good works of nature were not only good and iust but also might merit iustification and life But of this blindnesse of the Iewes we shal speake more at large herafter Thus farre of the condition of the couenant of
vnder the couenant of works in respect of vs for being vnited to that diuine nature it is become a mediatour for vs to make intercession and peace betweene God offended and man offending For Christ our Mediatour albeit he be God and man in that personal vnion yet was he made subiect to the couenant of works and to the course of the law for vs properly in respect of his humane nature that as the Apostle speaketh he might redeeme vs from the law and the curse of the law See Gal. 4. 4. and 5. After that the fulnesse of time was come God sent his Sonne made of awoman made subiect to the lawe to redeeme them which vvere vnder the lawe And Galath 3. ver 13. But Christ saith he hath redeemed vs from the curse while he was made a curse for vs. Christ therefore our mediator subiected himselfe vnto the couenant of works and vnto the lawe for our sake and did both fulfill the condition of the couenant of works in his holy and good life euen in the highest degree of perfection as being God and man euen that most holy one of God in one person and also he did vndergoe that curse which was denounced against man in that couenant of works if that condition of good and holy works were not kept for in the couenant of works ye haue together with the promise of life to him who doth well a commination of euerlasting death to him who doth not well For this cause Christ our mediator both did wel according to the promise died also according to the curse denoūced Wherefore we see Christ in two respect to wit in doing suffring subiect to the couenant of works to haue most perfectly fulfilled it that for our sake whose mediator he is become It may be demaunded Had it not beene sufficient for our good and to the end he might redeeme vs if he had only liued well and holily and not also so to haue suffered death for vs I answer it had not sufficed for all his most holy righteous works had not satisfied the iustice and wrath of God for our sins nor merited the mercie of God reconciliatiō righteousnes life eternal for vs the reason is for that the iustice of God did require for our breach of Gods couenant that we should be punished with death eternall according to the condition denounced and annexed to the promise of that couenant Therefore no good works of our owne or of any Mediator for vs after the breach of that couenant of works could haue satisfied the iustice of God which of necessity after asort required the punishment and death of the offender or certainly of some mediator in his steed If then all the good holy works of the Mediator could not satisfie that wrath and iustice of God for sin it is cleere they could not meritany new grace or mercy of God for vs. But you will say that the good and holy works of Christ our Mediatour haue wrought some part at least of that satisfaction whereby Gods iustice was appeased for vs and some part of that merit whereby Gods fauour was purchased for vs I answer these works did serue properly for no part of satisfaction or merit for vs for that to speake properly the death of Christ and his passion onely did satisfie Gods iustice and merited his mercie for vs. If anie will yet further demaund May we not diuide the satisfaction and merit of Christ into his doings and suffrings that we may speake on this manner Christ by his death and passion hath satisfied Gods iustice and by his good and holy works he hath merited Gods mercie for vs that so satisfaction may bee ascribed to his death and merit to his workes that the righteousnesse wherewith wee are iustified before God may bee partly the satisfaction which Christ perfourmed by his death for vs partly the merits which he obtained by his works for vs I answer to speake properly the satisfaction and merit which is by the only passion of Christ both He saith we are iustified only by the passiue righteousnesse of Christ was and is our righteousnesse or the satisfactorie and meritorious death of Christ or the satisfaction which was by Christs death or the merit of his death or the obedience of Christ as being obedient to his Father vnto the death the death also of the Crosse to bee short that iustice of Christ which he obtained when in his passion he satisfied his Fathers wrath this is our righteousnesse For we may say that either the death of Christ or his satisfaction or his merit or his obedience or his righteousnesse is imputed vnto vs for righteousnesse For all these are taken for one and the same thing But here it may bee replied If the works of Christ cannot properly procure for vs any satisfaction nor merit nor anie part of satisfaction or merit then it may bee demaunded What hath beene and what is the vse of Christs works or of his actiue obedience or of the obedience of his life I answer that the holinesse of the person The actiue obedience of Christ or the righteousnes and holinesse of his person and life how it is the ground of the satisfactorie and meritorious passion of Christ of Christ and of his natures diuine and humane and of his works is the verie ground or foundation of the satisfaction and merit which wee haue in the passion of Christ that is the excellencie and worthinesse of that person and of his works did cause that his passion was both satisfactorie and meritorious for if this person which suffered had not beene so holy and excellent as also his life so pure and godly it is most certaine that his passion could neither haue satisfied Gods wrath nor merited mercie for vs. For which cause the Apostle Heb. 7. 26. speaking of this ground of this meritorious passion of Christ saith that such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy blamelesse vndefiled separate from sinners and made higher then the heauens And thus farre of Christ and how hee may bee said to be vnder the couenant of works And that he was not vnder the couenant of grace the matter is so cleare that it needs no disputation For the couenant of grace was made in him and established in his bloud and the promise in the couenant of grace is made to them which were vniust and dead in sinne because of the breach of that couenant of works and lastly Christ not vnder the couenant of grace the condition in the couenant of grace is faith in Christ the mediator Wherfore if ye respect either the ground or condition or promise of the free couenant Christ can not be said to bee vnder it And thus farre of both couenants of them which are vnder the couenant of God either of works or of grace CHAP. V. A comparison of our iudgment and of the Aduersaries concerning both these
iustification which is by Christ onely by the grace of God only by faith only for al these haue one respect and purpose Obserue then here by the way what the palpable blindnesse of the Papists is in this cleere light of the Gospell Popish blindnes First they see not how nature is plainlie lost as touching sanctitie Secondly they know not the sole grace and mercie of God neither do they vnderstand what the excellency is of Christs merit Thirdly they perceiue not how that couenant of works is abolished to them which are in Christ as touching iustification Fourthly they conceiue not that the only couenant of grace is made with mankinde after the fall speciallie now after the incarnation of Christ in the Gospell and that vnto iustification and life eternall Fiftly they see not that the works of free will as they call them if there were any such to be duties only and testimonies of thankefulnesse according to the first institution of the couenant of works which be done by the strength of nature but ascribe some speciall meritorious vertue vnto them Wherefore we conclude concerning these men that albeit they be not iust of one minde with those old Iewes against whom the Apostle disputed in the Epistle to the Romans yet they hold much on their side striuing to defend that nature is in part good and holy so contending against the pure and only grace of God and to diuide iustification and The popish iustification mans saluation betweene Christ and Gods free grace the vertues and workes of nature whereas notwithstanding these two nature and grace can neuer stand together in the worke of our saluation For whosoeuer shall conioine or make a mixture of grace and nature in this matter shall quite ouerthrow and extinguish grace which either is alone or not at all as Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of works for otherwise grace were no more grace And in the Epistle to the Galathians he doth purposelie dispute against those Iewes which did couple together in the matter of iustification the guifts and works of nature with Christ with the grace of God and with the Gospell And these Iewes as I iudge the Papists seeme most to resemble I meane those Iewes against whom he wrote in the Epistle to the Galathians For in that other epistle to the Romans he disputeth against such Iewes as did openly deny Christ and reiect him but to the Galathians his disputation is against such Iewes as were not content with Christ only but would haue Christ and the law ioined together Thus far of the comparison betweene Paul and vs on the one side the old Iewes and the Papists on the other Now because it will be demanded what Paul thought of the works of regeneration and what we and what the aduersaries thinke also therefore I will touch this question in few wordes Here then some one will say did Paul then in that disputation to the Rom. and to the Galathians oppugne the works of grace and regeneration I answer Paules chiefe purpose in that disputation is against the works of nature which the Iewes thought to be holy and iust and also meritorious he did not reiect the works of regeneration as they be duties and testimonies of thankfulnesse vnto God but in that respect commends them Rom. 6. 7. 8. Chapters and in other places But as touching the cause of iustification he would not haue these workes as we call them of regeneration coupled with the grace of God or with Christ or with faith as anie cause or as part of anie meritorious cause of saluation To this purpose he saith Rom. 4. that Abraham himselfe being regenerate was not iustified before God by anie works of his regeneration And Rom. 6. hauing commended the works of sanctification in the end vers 23. where he attributeth death to the merit of sinne hee doth not there notwithstanding ascribe life eternall to the merit of the works or fruits of sanctification but when he had said that the wages of sin is death he doth clearely auouch it that eternall life is the free gift of God in Christ Iesu In which place if the Apostle had beene of this iudgement that the works of regeneration be in anie respect meritorious assuredly he would not so passe ouer the commendation of the works of regeneration specially for that this heere is principally intended Wherefore the Apostle to the Romans so reiecting the works of nature which the couenant of works requireth yet hee vnderstandeth also all kinds of workes morall and naturall going before grace and faith as also all ceremoniall works and the very fruits of regeneration which follow grace and faith that faith onely Christ only grace only may herein be all in all Thus far of S. Paules iudgment We at this day are of one and the same mind with the Apostle concerning works of regeneration Our aduersaries granting there be such works ascribe too much vnto them for they will not haue them to be duties and testimonies onely of thankfulnesse vnto God but also that they be meritorious causes of that iustification which they call the second iustification Again we are to remember that the aduersaries iudgment concerning works of regeneration is that they proceed not onely from infused grace and first iustice as they speake but also from nature and free-will which works together with that iustice in respect whereof also they account good works meritorious as was before The popish opinion of good works shewed so ascribing their good works in part to that their first grace and in part to free-will And thus farre of this comparison wherby it appeares whether we or our aduersaries haue the better or the more sound iudgment concerning both couenants of the grounds of both nature grace and Christ as also of the effect of both which we call mans iustification And lastly for that this is the most fundamentall point of true religion we may hereby discerne also whether we or the aduersaries haue the religion and worship of God the more purely soundly established amongst vs. CHAP. VI. Of the written Word or of the written Couenant of God THe word in both couenants was for a long time in the world euen from Adams time till Moses vnwritten deliuered as from hand to hand and continued by a liuelie voice for I passe ouer such matters as Ioseph recordes to be ingrauen in columnes before the floud as also the Apocryphals of Henoch And whē as in continuance of time corruptions grew by these traditions and the puritie of the doctrine of the couenant could not thus be preserued and y t God would no longer follow the former course onely he beganne in Moses time to ordaine and to publish another forme to wit this to preserue and to continue the puritie of the celestiall doctrine in written books approued and sealed by diuine authoritie and testimonie the more to commend his written word vnto men
for it is deriued either by the soule or by the body of the parents or through their default It cannot bee said that the propagation of this sin is by the soule for the soule of the Father or Mother is not deriued by propagation to the children in whole or in part as is very euident wherfore this sin coms not by the soule of the parents But it may not vnfitly be said that there is some deriuation How sin is deriued from parents to their children of this sin by the body of the parents to the body and soule of the child begotten by them This propagation of sinne by the body of him which begetteth into the bodie of him which is begotten is easily discerned for the seede of the parents being in the child is corrupted infected with sin whence it followeth necessarily that the bodie which is begotten of such corrupt vncleane seede must also be corrupt and vncleane in like manner The propagation of sinne by the body of him which begetteth into the soule of him which is begotten is more hardly expressed yet I deliuer what seemes most How sin infefecteth the verie soule probable vnto me on this manner After that by the bodie of him which begetteth sinne is deriued into the bodie of him which is begotten now the body begotten being corrupt infected with sin this bodie I say infecteth and poisoneth the soule created euen then of God before and infused into it that very moment of time wherein it was created Here you demaund whether the soule were pure and cleane the time it was created and so Quest infused into the bodie and then afterwards so defiled by the contagion of the bodie I answer it is not like to bee so for that the soule is created infused and corrupted in Ans the very selfe same moment of time This corruption of the soule is partly by reason of the desertiō of God partly by reason of the contagion of the body whereinto it is infused for God the very same moment of time wherein he createth infuseth the soule in his iust iudgment forsakes it and giues it ouer to the body to bee so defiled with sinne wherefore this I auouch that the soule is created infused forsaken of God and defiled by the bodie the very same moment of time The manner of the propagation of this sinne which is said to be through the default of the parents followeth and this I expresse on this wise Adam by that his first offence did deriue as by a certaine conduit whatsoeuer corruption was in him to his posteritie for this cause the Apostle Rom. 5. 12. saith By one man to wit sinning sin entred into the world Here it may be demaunded whence proceedes this efficacie or power of that first sin to ingender as it were and to deriue sinne into all and euerie one of Adams progenie I answer this efficacie of that sinne is by reason of that word and couenant which God made with Adam in his creation as it were in these words If man wil stand and persist in that his innocencie which he had by creation he shall stand for his owne good and for his progenie but if he do not stand but fall away his fall shall turn The Couenant of God in the creation as to his owne dammage so to the hurt of his posteritie and whatsoeuer euill shall be tide him the same shall ensue to all his off-spring after him And this last way of the propagation of originall sinne pleaseth me best and ought to content all sober wits for that this is grounded on the authority and words of the Apostle And thus far our iudgement concerning originall sinne Now let vs briefly see what the old hereticks and late aduersaries of Gods truth say concerning this sinne First The opinion of the heretikes cōcerning originall sinne heere wee be to meete with the heresie of Pelagius the Monke and Caelestius his Disciple which said there was no originall sinne that Adam by his fall did hurt himselfe only and not his posteritie excepting onely by his example They said his posteritie sinned not by propagation of his sinne but by imitation of their father Adams preuarication When it was obiected against them that young infants died which could not be but that they are infected with originall sinne They answered that Adam himselfe also had died by the law of nature albeit he had not sinned And this was the Pelagians principall argument against The Pelagians argument against originall sinne originall sinne If sinne be by propagation then it must needs be deriued to the posteritie by the soule or by the body but not by the soule for that it is not by traduction and it is not by the bodie because it is void of reason neither can sinne be said to bee first and properly seated in it and not by both vnited because it is not by the parts therefore there is no originall sinne at all The answere is easie of that which hath beene before set downe in this chap touching the forme or manner of the propagation of this sinne First their proposition Answer doth not number all the formes meanes of the propation of this sinne for there is besides those meanes a deriuation of sinne which is through the default of the parents Next the Assumption is false for albeit there be no propagation of sinne by the soule yet it may well bee by the bodie as is afore shewed And thus farre of Pelagius and Caelestius heresie Next the Schoole-men had diuers opinions of originall Schoolemens opinion of original sinne sinne for some said that originall sinne consisted only in the guilt of Adams apostasy others said it was but the want of original iustice But Peter Lombard reiecting these opinions auoucheth it to be also a positiue euill qualitie contrarie to that first originall iustice Albertus Pigghius Ambrosius Catharinus said that it was nothing els but that first transgression of Adam And out of this conclusion they drew forth three other opinions the first was this Originall sinne is one and the selfe same onely Three grosse opinions of papists concerning originall sin in all men 2. This sin in Adam was reall and actually his but it is ours only by imputation the third that infants in verity haue nothing in them that hath any appearance of sinne for they said that guiltinesse want of iustice and the spots of nature and such like things seeme rather to be punishments then faults if ye speake not happily improperly as when ye apply the name of the cause to the effect Bellarmine following all these first blames Lombards conclusion concerning his positiue qualitie and next Bellarm. obiect against Lumbard Answer condemnes Pigghius assertion as hereticall One of his principall arguments against Lombard is this God is either the cause of that positiue quality or not the cause if the cause then is he the cause of
sin if he be not the cause of it then is he not the authour of all things Therefore there is no such positiue qualitie at all We answer to the Assumption in that euill positiue quality two things must be respected First the qualitie it selfe or the being of it next the euilnesse or irregularity or deformity therof God is the the authour and principall efficient of the first but the diuell and the euil instrument is the authour and cause of the second This done at last the Iesuit sets downe his owne iudgemēt auouching that original sin consisteth in two things Bellarm iudgment of originall sinne first in the first transgression of Adam not as hee was a certaine priuate person but as being then the person of all mankind next he saith it is also a want of that gift of originall iustice And thus farre he speakes wel affirming that there are two parts of original sin but herein he erreth for that he omitteth that euil positiue quality before mentioned And thus farre of the iudgement of the Aduersaries concerning originall sinne CHAP. XXVI Of Concupiscence BVt because there is some controuersie touching concupiscence which is the third part of originall sinne therefore we be to speake something of it apart The word Concupiscence doth first and properly signifie that coueting or lusting which is said to be in the baser facultie of the soule to wit in the sensible and the naturall power thereof and tropically it signifieth our naturall corruption and that euill positiue quality which resteth not onely in the concupiscible faculty of the soule but in all the powers therof also euē in reason it self For the word Concupiscence in Scripture is as generall as the old man or the flesh for Paule vseth these words indifferently for one and the same matter the old man the flesh concupiscence and the law of the members to wit for the third part of originall sinne which is that euill positiue quality And that concupiscence is properly and truly a sinne appeares plainly out of the Epistle to the Romans ch 7. 7. I had not knowne lust except the law had said thou shalt not lust And this briefly is our iudgment touching Concupiscence Pelagius reckoneth Concupiscence in the number of the good things or benefits of nature for hee denies originall sinne Our aduersaries the Papists by Concupiscence vnderstand nothing els but that concupiscible faculty of the soule which is in it self good or atleast indifferent but euill accidentally and in some respect to wit for that now the bridle or originall iustice is let loose whereby Concupiscence ought to haue been curbed so then this curbe being lost it inclines say they to sinne This is the iudgment of the Councell of Trent The iudgment of the papists concerning concupiscence concerning Concupiscence that it may not be saide truly and properly that it is a sin but that it is so called because it proceedes from sin and inclines to sinne But that Concupiscence is sinne is more manifest by Paules doctrine then that it needes any proofe at all and that it is a sinne not onely in the vnregenerate but also in the regenerate And thus farre of Concupiscence and of originall sinne CHAP. XXVII Of Actuall sinne ACtuall sinne is the fruit and effect and the punishment also of originall sin The first and principall diuision of actuall sin is into Actuall sinne internall and externall The internall I call the sinnes of soule and of the faculties thereof Internall sinne is partly of omission partly of commission A sinne of omission in the mind is the want of a holy and good motion and the roote of this is the want of originall iustice And like as that defect of original iustice is in all the powers of the soule so this internall Sinne of omission what sinne of omission is of all the powers of the soule Of the sinne of omission the Apostle speaketh 1. Cor. 2. 14. when he saith that the naturall man cannot conceiue the things of the Spirit of God Lo here the want of a holy motion in mans nature the fundamentall cause whereof he addeth in the next words saying neither can he perciue them In which words yee haue the want of that power and faculty whence a holy motion doth spring The internall sinne of commission followeth and this is a peruerse and euill motion of the mind And this proceedes from the third part of originall sinne to wit that A sinne of commission euill positiue qualitie or naturall corruption And like as y t positiue quality is of al the faculties of the mind so that internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule in like manner Of this sinne the Scripture speakes euery where Rom. 7. 5. When we were in the flesh the * or affections motions of sinnes which were by the law had force in our members to bring forth fruite vnto death Where three things are to Three things Rom. 7. 5. be obserued first the flesh which is original sin Secondly Affections or motions whereby vnderstand the internall sinne of commission Thirdly the fruit of those motions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or affections whereby he meanes euery externall actuall sinne Againe ye haue the same three things knit together Ephe. 2. 3. Fulfilling the will of the flesh and of the mind 1. the flesh that is originall sin 2. Next the thought or lust of the flesh which is the internall commission of sinne 3. To fulfill the same and this is externall sinne The same things ye haue Iam. 1. 15. When concupiscence hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne Concupiscence is originall sinne conception is actuall internall sinne the birth thereof is an externall sinne And thus farre of actual internall sinne The externall actuall sinne followeth which is a sinne of the bodie and of the members thereof and this sinne Externall actual sinne also is partly of omission partly of commission The externall sinne of omission is when things to bee done are omitted and this proceedes from the internall sinne of omission And here also like as the internall sinne of omission is of all faculties of the mind so the externall sin of omission is of all the members of the body Of this sin the Apostle speaketh Roman 7. 9. I do not the good which I would do The externall sinne of commission followeth This is when that is done which ought not to be done Externall sin of commission and it proceedes from the internall sinne of commission This is also of all the parts of the body like as the internall sinne of commission is of all the powers of the soule The testimonies of Scriptures before cited proue this Rom. 7. 19. The euill which I would not that do I. The externall sinne of commission is twofold partly of errour and ignorance partly of knowledge It is of ignorance when a man ignorantly committeth any thing This was Paules sinne 1. Tim.
without Christ and therefore doth beget feare and horror within vs. The instrument wherby the spirit doth worke this sorrow in our hearts is the preaching of the law The sum whereof is in that syllogisme concerning the which we haue spoken in the doctrine of faith the proposition of which syllogisme is this Cursed is euery one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of this law to do thē The assumption is by euery mans conscience thus annexed But I haue not continued in them the conclusion therefore is this I am accursed From hence dooth that sorrow or rather that horror of the heart arise or spring not somuch for sin which is in the assumption as for the punishment and feare of the curse which is in the conclusion And this is that which is called the pricke of conscience which by meanes of the conclusion before shewed doth not only prick a wounded mind but also pierce euen through the heart And this legall sorrow if the grace of the Gospell did not put an helping hand betweene it and vs would driue a man into vtter desperation And thus much concerning that first sorrow The very same spirit of God is likewise a principal efficient cause of the latter sorrow but not proceeding as before for now he becommeth the spirit of adoption Wherby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8. that is testifying of our adoption in Christ and therefore doth inlarge both our heart and mouth to call vpon God familiarly as vpon our Father The instrument whereby the holy spirit doth worke this faith in our hearts it is the preaching of the Gospell the summe whereof is contained in that syllogisme concerning which we haue spoken in the doctrine of faith The proposition of this syllogisme is He that beleeueth shal be iustified and shall liue whereupon faith doth assume saying But I do beleeue and concludeth saying Therefore righteousnesse and life pertaineth vnto me In this conclusion there is I confesse matter of ioy of vnspeakable gladnesse but it is as true that there is in it matter of sorrow also which is conceiued after we haue known the mercy of God in Christ to be so great and doth arise in this respect because we haue offended so merciful and so louing a Father It is then a ioy mixt with sorrow with the vnspeakable and glorious ioy of faith hauing ioined with it sighes that cannot be expressed And thus much also of the later sorrow Now let vs see how both these kinds of sorrow belong vnto sound repentance That first sorrow which is of the law and is conceiued by reason of the punishment which followeth sinne I confesse it is no part of this holy change and conuersion vnto God for of it own nature it doth rather estrange vs from God then conuert vs to The terror of the law a preparatiue for the Gospell God and in very deede it dooth altogether alienate the wicked from God as from a terrible iudge Notwithstanding in repentance it hath his vse for it prepareth the elect by giuing them sense of their misery to that grace and mercy which is propounded in the Gospell The latter sorrow which is according to God and is effected by the Gospel is properly a part of repentance and dooth effect that change of the mind and reason before specified And therefore the Apostle saith 2. Cor. 7. that the sorrow which is according to God causeth repentance And thus far of the first part of this benefit which is found to be in sorrow The other followeth which is called properly by the Apostle 2. Cor. vers 7. a Chaunge of the minde For there followeth after that godly sorrow a certaine wonderfull change of the minde of the will and of the heart As touching knowledge and that illumination Second part of repentance of the mind this goes before the sorrow we haue spoken of is an acknowledgment wrought in vs first of sinne and of our misery by the law next of mercy by the Gospell Therefore the chaunge of the mind which followeth this sorrow it pertaines to the faculty or iudgment of reason which also is called the counsell and purpose of the mind Act. 11. 23. He exhorteth them that with one purpose of heart they would cleaue vnto the Lord. And the iudgment or counsell of the mind is chaunged in this sort The mind disalloweth the euill which is committed and alloweth the good hereafter to be practised There are therefore two parts of the change of y e iudgement or counsell the first is the disallowing of the euill committed the second is the The change of the mind hath two branches approuing of the good to be done After the change of the iudgement or counsell of the mind there followeth a change of the wil in this manner The will reiecteth that euill which is committed or it declineth from it and alloweth the good to be done hereafter or inclineth thereunto There are there two parts of this change first a declination from the euil committed secondly an inclination to the good which is or ought to be done After the 2. Change of the will change of the wil followeth the change of the hart which is on this manner The heart hateth and detesteth that euill which it hath heretofore done and it loues and affects the good which hereafter it ought to doe There are therefore two parts of this change the first is the detestation 3. Change of the heart of euill done and committed the second is the loue of that good which ought to be done In general therfore there are two parts of that chang of the mind which is an effect of sorow the first is a change from euill and from sinne committed the second is a change to good hereafter to be practised and followed Commonly these parts are called mortification and viuification but I know not how rightly iustly for mortification and viuification are properly parts of regeneration which doth differ from repentance as shal be seene Regeneration and repentance differ hereafter By that which hath bin already said we vnderstand what be the especial points of repentance from whence it proceeds and wherunto it serueth The point from whence it proceedes is the euill or sinne committed the point to which it tendeth is the good heereafter to bee done Repentance therefore standeth betweene two actions past and future and it doth differ from regeneration for the points thereof are not deeds and actions but qualities to wit the corruption of nature or the old man and sanctitie or the new man but of this we shall entreate afterward when wee come to speake of the difference of repentance and of regeneration Ye see thē after that great sorow how there is a change in the whole mind of man Next ye see by that hath been saide of this benefit of repentance that repentance doth begin from the heart and doth proceede by the reasonable
are infinite And as concerning the liberty or selfe power which they ascribe to the will of man how many euidences of scripture might be produced to refell y e same Ioh. 6. 44. No man can come Propiqua materia to me except the father which sent me draw him Rom. 8. 5. The wisdome of the flesh it is not subiect to the law of God neither indeede can be 1. Cor. 2. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things which are of God for they are foolishnesse to him neither can he discerne them These places of scripture and other such like are to be vnderstood of that neere power of the wil vnto good which therfore the scripture denieth to man in his corruption because there is in him no holinesse left since the fall of Adam For as touching the remote power of the will vnto good which is a consequent of the matter not of the forme we do not deny that it is in the wil of a man vnregenerat And that this also becomes of a remtoe power a neere power so soone as any holynesse is wrought in the will of man by the spirit of Iesus Christ Seeing then we leaue this remote power to the will of the vnregenerate man that is a certaine power of the cause materiall there is no cause why our aduersaries should say that we make men very stocks and blocks because we denie free will vnto them For this power of the materiall cause vnto good which we ascribe vnto the will of man vnregenerat may not truly be ascribed to any dead stock or trunke We must vnderstand in this place that wheras we deny this neere power to the vnregenerate that is a liberty to good we meane hereby that which is good as it is truly good For euen the vnregenerate person may wil that which is good in it selfe as the conseruation of his countrey iustice equity c. But that which in it selfe is good becomes euill in some sort in regard of the man vnregenerat who dooth not will well that which is good in it selfe that is to say neither in that manner nor to that end doth he will it as he ought to will it because himselfe is not good and cleane and to the vncleane all things are vncleare as to the cleane all things are cleane Tit. 2. 15. Againe be aduertised that in this matter of free will I hold that there is one the same reason of good things of what kind soeuer they be naturall or ciuil and humane or spirituall for the vnregenerat man hath not this liberty or neere power to any good thing as it is good and acceptable to God and agreeable to his law albeit by nature his will is most farre estranged from spirituall things which the naturall man perceiueth not which as the postle saith He cannot know yea they are foolishnes vnto him By spirituall good things I meane faith hope repentance iustification eternall life it selfe There is no cause therefore why our aduersaries should ascribe faith hope repentance to the liberty of our will that is to say to the strength of nature as to the principal efficient cause of the same as if we by nature the strength thereof could beleeue could hope and truly conuert our selues vnto God But to the intent this thing may yet be more manifest we must vnderstand that there bee two kinds of good things the one is of humane good things the other is of kinds of good things diuine and spirituall good things Humane good things are either morall and pertaine to euery priuate man or Oeconomicall and pertaine to a mans family or they are Politicall and pertaine to the whole common-wealth or to the whole City Spirituall good things are faith hope repentanceiu stification sanctification life eternall To both these kinds of good things mans will is not like affected for vnto humane things or vnto humane good things it is somewhat more inclined as for example nature doth incline vnto temperancy fortitude liberality iustice albeit it doth neither will nor choose these things which in themselues are good in that manner or to that end it ought Whereby it commeth to passe that those things which in themselues are good yet in respect of him who is vnregenerate become euill and very sinnes before God And concerning things spirituall the nature of man is more estranged from them and when they offer themselues to the will nature it selfe doth wholy abhorre from them This thing may be yet more plain by example experience There are two certaine good things to wit iustice by works and iustice by faith which is called the iustice Righteousnes by works naturall or rightcousnes of God we all haue experience that our will naturally is inclined to that righteousnesse which is by works and which is a certain humane good thing Hence it comes that euen to this day all the world following nature seekes to be iustified by good works But the same will doth wholy abhorre and vtterly dislike that righteousnesse whichis by faith the reason is because it is a certaine spirituall vnknown good thing Hence it comes to passe that so few seeke to be iustified by faith and by the alone mercy of God in Iesus Christ By this and other such like examples it appeares that mans will is more inclined by nature to humane good things and wholy to abhorre spirituall good things Albeit in truth to speake exactly it is inclined to no good at all as it is truly good It is not inclined at all no not to those humane things as they be truly good and acceptable vnto God for it wils them neither in that maner neither to that end it ought So far forth then as it willeth them euen those things that are good in themselues are sins and vnpleasing to God Notwithstanding they differ from those euils and sinnes which euen in themselues in their own nature are sinnes as manslaughter adultery theft and in which I graunt there be more degrees of sin for in these things men sinne both in the substance of the things themselues and in the manner of doing and in the end And the will of man vnregenerate is more inclinable vnto these things by it owne nature then vnto those things which are good in themselues For first it is caried of it owne accord to those which are euill in themselues Secondly it hath but some inclination to things humane which in their owne kind are good Lastly it doth wholy abhorre spirituall good things before regeneration Againe I conclude that humane good things so farre forth as mā vnregenerate doth wil them become in som sort euill and the man vnregenerate doth sin in the very desire of them which thing also is true in things indifferent which are neither good nor euill in themselues For so far forth as man vnregenerate doth will them so far forth they become euill and the vnregenerate man doth sin when he doth