Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n humane_a person_n unity_n 3,413 5 9.5095 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A01033 A treatise tending to cleare the doctrine of iustification. Written by Io. Forbes, pastour of the English Church at Middelburgh, for the instruction of his flocke: and now published by some of them for the good of others Forbes, John, 1568?-1634. 1616 (1616) STC 11136; ESTC S102456 151,671 206

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

1. vers 19. and out of whose fulnes we all receive grace Iohn chap. 1. vers 16. therefore he is said to fill all in all things Eph. chap. 1. vers 23. and to be the first borne amongst many Bretheren Romanes chap. 8. vers 29. and to have the preeminence in all things Coll. chap 1. vers 18. and to be the first fruites 1 Corinth chap. 15. ver 23. The third obiect is our selves who out of Christs fulnes have received grace For even in vs it may be seene what is the riches of the glory of the inheritance of God and what is the exceeding greatnes of his power Eph. chap. 1. vers 18. and 19. Thus our life and salvation is first in God himselfe as in the first fountaine and in him it is ours by the eternall purpose and Decree of his good will and pleasure Secondly it is in Christ as the Mediator betwixt God and vs to whom belongeth the birthright and all the blessings thereof and that not only in consideration of his divine nature in respect whereof he alone is only Sonne and heyre of all things but also in consideration of his humane nature in the which by personall vnion thereof with his divine nature hee is become the Sonne of God and our Brother and is made head both of Men and Angells Thirdly life and salvation is in vs who are in Christ through whom as the appointed meane we receive from God all saving graces for nothing cōmeth to vs from God immediatly but mediatly through Christ in whom only all the promises of God are yea and amen 2 Cor. cha 1. ver 20. And therefore the Decree of God is first accomplished in him as our head and Prince of our salvation who must bring the rest of his Fathers children vnto glory Heb. ch 2. ver 10. as being the first fruites of them that sleepe 1 Cor. cha 15. ver 20. and our forerunner vnto heaven Hebr. chap. 6. vers 20. Of this it is evident that nothing of all Gods Decree is accōplished in vs vntil first it be accōplished in Christ And in whatsoever order God performeth al things in him in that same order doth he also performe thē in vs so that whatsoever blessing is first accomplished by God in Christ the man must needes be the first in order both in Gods Decree and dispensation towards vs. Now albeit in all these three obiects our happines bee to bee considered yet in none of them can we so cleerlie perceive it as in Christ who is the only Image of the invisible God Colloss chap. 1. vers 14. in whom onely God is manifested For all that ever we are to see of God either in this life or in the life to come we are to see it only in Christ for which cause the Ministers of the Gospell are said to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Iesus Christ 2 Cor. ch 4. ver 6. And as God himselfe so also his grace is only to be seene in the Lord Iesus Therfore saith the Apostle 2 Tim. c. 1. v. 9. 10. that the grace of God which was given vs in Christ before the world was is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Iesus Christ And as touching our selves whatsoever grace or glory commeth vnto vs by the sight of the glory of God in the face of Iesus Christ it is in vs but in part which in him is fully And many things yet rest vnaccomplished in vs which are accomplished in him having in vs no other subsisting but that which faith giveth them Wherefore the Apostle speaking of the glory wherewith God hath crowned man which yet we cannot see in our selves sendeth vs to Iesus as to the cleerest light whereby to perceive the accomplishment of that which is written touching man in the 8. Psalm Hebr. ch 2. vers 6. and for this cause saith Augustin that Christ himselfe is the cleerest light of predestination and grace Whose humane nature did by no preceeding merit either of faith or workes purchase that it should be received in vnitie of person by the Sonne of God so that that Man should bee the only Sonne of God for Christ the Man as he is Man is made the Sonne of God of meere grace who according to his divine nature was from everlasting the only begotten Sonne of God Seeing therfore that in Christ the cleerest sight of predesti and grace is to be had if we would know in what order God doth adopt iustifie vs we must first cōsider in what order God maketh Christ adoption righteousnes vnto vs. For if he make him our brother in order before he make him our redēption of righteousnes thē surly our adoptiō in order must go before our iustificatiō Concerning Christ it is cleere in the Scripturs that it is so whether we respect Gods election before all time or his performing therof in time for the one that is the dignity of Christ as man to be the Son of God is performed in the incarnatiō the other wherby he is made our righteousnes is therafter accomplished in his suffring For when the word was made flesh that flesh in subsisting and personalitie was made the Son of God never having frō the first moment of cōception any subsisting a part of it own but only that of the second person of the Trinitie beeing not so much as cōceived by the H. Ghost in the wombe of Marie but in vnitie of person with the eternal Son of God Therfore iustly do the Fathers call this benefit gratiam Vnionis that is the grace of Vnion Thus in the very first action of Dispensation toward the Son of Marie the grace of siliation shineth cleerely before all other grace After which in order followeth the action of God making him our righteousnes when as he made him now being his Sonne in our nature sinne for vs which he could not haue bene made for vs vntill first he was our brother Like as we can have no right to his redemption except we first be his brethren For brotherhood is the foundation of redemption in so farr that according to the Lawe and Ordinance of God Christ can not offer vp him selfe a ransome for any vnto God but such as are his bretheren Neither can any have part or portion in his oblation whose brother he is not For hee that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one wherefore he is not ashamed to call them Brethren Hebr. chap. 2. vers 11. This ground is made manifest by the lawe of God whereby it is ordayned that the first borne of every man and beast that is the male that first openeth the wombe and the first ripe of all fruites shall be offered and consecrate to the Lord that in the consecration thereof all the rest comming of the same Wombe or being of the same Masse or Kinde might likewise bee consecrated to God For as sayeth the Apostle
before our Iustification seeing he loveth vs not then as iust men because we are yet sinners and God doth iustifie the vngodly And no other ground can preceede in dispensation except our calling which is nothing els in effect but our Adoption or at least the first part and beginning of it Which is the first fruite of his love toward vs by the which wee are made of the seed and so heyres of the promise of righteousnes conforme to the reason of the Apostle Peter Acts chap. 2. vers 39. Where he sheweth that the promise belongeth to all that the Lord our God shall call Which calling is nothing els but the applying to vs in time of our eternall election in Christ before all time which election is nothing els but our Adoption This point is cleere if we consider who they are whose filthines God promiseth to wash away Esay chap. 4. and to whom he promiseth to open the fountayne for sinne and vncleanes Zach. chap. 13. that is to the Doughters of Ierusalem and to the house of David and inhabitants of Ierusalem Which in effect is as much as to say Those who are the children of God who are citizens with the Saints and of the houshold of God And this is that which we said before that we must first be of the seed before we enioy any part or portion of the promise and so consequently righteousnes For the love of God to his Sonne as his Sonne being the only foūdation of Gods love vnto vs it must follow that the first ground of Gods love to vs in Christ must be buylded vpon our communion with him in that which is the foundation of all Gods love to vs that is the Sonne-ship For it is for this cause that it is saide in scripture that Christ is the sonne of Gods love and his beloved and that God is said to make vs acceptable or beloved to him selfe in that his beloved Sonne Secondly we shall perceyve the trueth heereof more cleerly if we consider the grounds in Christ wherevpon dependeth our Adoption and iustification in him Touching our Adoption it must of necessitie be grounded neither vpon the Divine nature of Christ nor simply vpon his humane nature neither vpon his Obedience and suffering in that humane nature now assumed but onely vpon his personalitie and subsisting whereby he is the Sonne of God For which cause our nature which hee assumed was taken by him in vnitie of subsisting or person with his Divine nature In that personall vnitie of our nature assumed with the sonne of God laying the foundation of our Adoption to bee the sonnes of GOD. As touching our Iustification it is buylded vpon his obedience in giving him selfe to the death of the crosse for vs as it is cleare throughout all the scriptures These groundes being considered we have next to marke in which of these two is our communion by faith with Christ first in order accomplished that is whether first by faith we are made partakers of his sonne-ship in being made one with him as the sonne of God or whether first we be made partakers of his obedience and death In answering of this question I thinke there shall no man be founde who shall not agree that we must by faith have fellowship and communion with him selfe as he is the Sonne of God before we can have communion and fellowship of his sufferings For how can his death be our death vntill first he and we be one seeing all vnitie and communion of his sufferinges floweth from our communion and vnitie with himselfe Wherevpon it may easilie appeare that if that saying of those learned and holy men bee not rightly vnderstoode it may make many to cast from them selves the verie foundation and grounde wherevpon the assured confidence and knowledge of their Iustification in Christ dependeth For no man can ever have hope to have part in his death that firste doeth not finde that he hath parte in him selfe for first we must bee fleshe of his flesh and bone of his bones and he of ours before any thing that ever he hath done in the flesh be made ours Of which it followeth that we must first be sonnes before we be iustified For as in earthly Mariage Man and Woman are made one flesh by coniunction of their bodies in one and therevpon followeth communion of all other things even so in our spiritual Mariage with Christ we have no communion with him in any thing that is his vntill the time that first hee be ours and we be his so as he and we be but one And this agreeth with the saying of the Apostle Gallath chapter 3. vers 29. where hee sayeth And if yee bee Christs then are yee Abrahams seed and heyers according to the promise Where the Apostle sheweth that our beeing Christs maketh vs the seed that is the childeren of God And that our beeing the seede maketh vs heyres of the promise And so consequently of the righteousnes that is by faith This same is evident by the Apostles speech Ephez chapter 5. Where hee exhorteth men to love their Wives as Christ loved his Church Which love is declared in these effects that hee did give himselfe for her to this end that he might sanctifie her purifying her by the washing of water that he might make her to himselfe glorious not having spot or wrincle c. By which place it is manifest that the death of Christ and fruites thereof are the effects of his love to those that are nowe alreadie his spouse and ioyned with him in that spiritual Vnitie which is by faith And this we must acknowledge except we will consent to that vile opinion which overthroweth the foundation of all religion which is that even in the intention and purpose of God Christ dyed equally and indifferently for every man alike That is that he did give himselfe to death as well for those that perish as for the elect of God Whereas this place of the Apostle sheweth the direct contrarie that he gave himselfe only for his Church Which is cleere by the Apostles argument wherevpon he vrgeth the like love in husbands towards their wives as was in Christ towards his Church For the analogie of love is builded vpon the analogie of Vnion The force whereof is this if Christ so loved his Church because those of his Church are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones so likewise ought men to love their wives because they are one flesh and one body with their husbands For as the Apostle requireth of husbands towards their wives more then that common love which they owe to all women and that because they are one flesh with their wives but not with any other women even so he vrgeth it from a like example in Christ who beside and above that common love which he carrieth to all flesh did in greater measure declare his love to those that were members of his body flesh of his
if it were the whole and Iustification reconciliation c. to be comprehended in it as the parts thereof or to follow vpon it as inseperable accidents and infallible consequences thereof or to bee nothing except the way of Adoption Which opinion seemeth most to agree with the Scriptures The special ground wherby the first of these opinions is maintayned is besides other places of Scripture that saying which is in Iohn chap. 1. vers 12. which is as manie as receiued him to them he gaue prerogative to bee the sonnes of God that is to those that beleeved in his name Vpon which place they who defend the former opinion seeme chieflie to rely as though it did import Iustification necessarilie to goe before Adoption because that Christ giveth prerogative to be the sonnes of God to none except such as first have received him and have beleeved in his name But before I either speake of these opinions or yet of this place of Iohn it shall bee first expedient for the better satisfaction of all mindes to lay some groundes vpon the knowledge whereof the light of this point dependeth much in my iudgement Besides other grounds there be five of greatest consequence and most expedient to be knowne for clearing our iudgement in the knowledge of the order of Adoption and Iustification The first is the order of subsisting in the blessed and eternall Trinitie The second is the distinct consideration of the order of Gods gracious love in the three severall obiects in the which it is to be considered The third is the order of our sense and perception of the blessings of God in our selves The fourth is the difference of extent and largenes of one benefite in respect of another amongst themselves by mutuall reference of one to another The fist and last is the consideration of the covenant of grace which God hath made with man in Christ CHAPTER X. THE first ground is most necessarie to be knowne not only to the end that we may know God in him selfe aright but also that we may know his gracious working towards vs aright Wherein by the speciall consideration of the Trinitie three things are to be marked First That every worke of grace is the worke of all three Secondly That the order of their working is according to the order of their subsisting so that in every worke the Father is first the Sonne second the holy Ghost third in order of working Thirdly That in respect of these two former groundes these workes of grace which according to the maner and order of subsisting are most properly attributed to every person according as their maner of working doth chieflie shine and appeare in every worke are to be ordered according to the order of the persons them selves So that the actions attributed to God the Father are in order first the actions attributed to the sonne in order seconde and the actions attributed to the holy Ghost in order third And this consideration of the order of Gods working is no more to be altered then the nature of God it selfe in whom the vnitie of essence is no more essentiall then the Trinitie of persons These three pointes are cleare in the scriptures of God The first when one and the selfe same worke is sometimes attributed to the Father sometimes to the Sonne and sometimes to the holy Ghost to teach vs that not onely these three persons are but one God in nature but further that what thinges the one doth the other doth also according as Christ sayeth My Father worketh vnto this time and I also worke Iohn chap. 5. ver 17. And againe VVhatsoever things the Father doeth the same things doth the Sonne likewise Ihon chap. 5. vers 19. The second of these pointes is likewise manifest in the scripture when in one and the same worke The Father is made in order of working first the Sonne second and the holy Ghost third according to the saying of Christ The Sonne can doe nothing of him selfe except he see the Father working Iohn chap. 5. ver 19. And againe I doe nothing of my self as I heare I iudge Ioh. cha 5. ver 30. And againe The thinges that I speake I speake them so as the Father said vnto me Iohn chap. 12. ver 53. And againe The Spirit he shall not speake of him selfe but whatsoever he shall heare he shall speake He shall glorifie me for he shall receyve of myne and shew it vnto you Iohn chapt 16. verses 13. and 14. By which speeches it is manifest that as the Father subsisteth in order first and so in order possesseth life before the Sonne and the Sonne before the holy Ghost even so in operation of life and all good grace in vs the Father in order worketh before the Sonne and the Sonne before the Holy Ghost According to which order we are taught in the scriptures to worship God praying and giving thankes to the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost according to the order of our accesse vnto God which is vnto the Father through the Sonne by the Spirit Ephe. chap. 2. vers 18. Drawing neare vnto God in our ascending vp to him according to the order of his drawing neare vnto vs. that is we ascende by God in God vnto God who of him selfe and in him selfe and by him selfe worketh all grace in vs. of him selfe as the Father in him selfe as the Sonne and by him selfe as the holy Ghost For no man hath any grace either of him selfe but of God alone and that as he is the Father either in him selfe but in God alone and that as he is the Sonne either by him selfe but by God alone that as he is the Holy Ghost The third point is likewise manifest in scripture When as the worke of creation and of the first beeing and existing of all thinges be it either naturall or spirituall is attributed vnto the first person of whom are all things and the worke of dispensation and redemption is attributed to the seconde person in whom onely we enioye all grace And the worke of consummation and sanctification is attributed to the holy Ghost For according to the distinction that is inward arysing from the inward properties whereby these persons are distinguished there is also a distinction outward in the workes of outwarde dispensation according to the terme in which is the beginning of acting Neither is this only to be considered in the actions of outward dispensation towardes vs but in the actions that are inward in God himselfe according to which ground Christ acknowledgeth that the Father hath given him to have life in himselfe Iohn chap. 6. vers 26. For albeit all operation of blessings in vs proceede from the nature and essence of God as the common beginning and terme in all three yet notwithstāding thy are restrayned in respect of order to one beginning that is to one of those three persons according as in every worke the manner of every persons working either of in
For there is a great difference betwixt these workes of the Father to witt the bringing of vs to the Sonne or giving of vs vnto him or making vs to receyve him which are all one and the same thing and the Fathers iustifying of vs in the sonne whom now we have receyved The first is the proper worke of God calling vs The other is the worke of God after our calling Which evidētly appeares by the speech of Christ him selfe Math. cha 11. ver 28. where first he invites vs to come vnto him and then promiseth to such as doe come that he will give them rest vnto their soules for God iustifieth none who have not first receyved the sonne For who cā be made the righteousnes of God in Christ who is not first ingrafted in him Now the first worke of faith standeth in our receyving Christ and making him to dwell in our heartes in and through whom now receyved and possest by faith the Lord doth thereafter iustifie and glorifie vs. so to make a Man to be iust before he be a sonne is as much as to make an accident or qualitie to be before or without a subiect or to make a Man wise before he be a Man and this ground the Apostle cleers by his owne speech when he coūted all but dongue that he might gaine Christ and be found in him to this end that he might not haue his owne righteousnes but the righteousnes which is by the faith of Christ Phil chap. 3. thereby playnelie he sheweth vs that we must first gayne Christ and be found in him by faith before we can haue the righteousnes that is by the faith of Christ so that to receyve Christ and to be iustified in Christ are in no sorte to be confounded although they cannot be separated For this is the principall cause why Iustification and all remanent blessings are attributed vnto faith because by faith onely we are made one with Christ and ioyned vnto him who onely is the substance of all our blessings as being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1. Corint ahap 1. vers 30 Vpon which vnion with Christ followeth our cōmunion with him both in death and life For being once in him we can not but be pertakers of all blessings in him And of this worke of the Father it is that the Evangelist speaketh in this place which is the first worke of his gracious dispensatiō when as he maketh vs to beleeve in his onely sonne as is manifest by the Evangelistes owne words interpreting the first phrase that is Those that receyved him by these wordes that is Those that beleeue in his Name The second argument lieth in the third phrase of this description which is Those that are borne of God By which wordes both the two former phrases that is those that receyved him those that beleeved in his Name are interpreted thereby teaching vs that this worke is not the worke of Iustification but of Adoption and of our receiving of Christ himselfe by faith that in vnitie with him we may be the Sonnes of God and not our receiving of his obedience by faith vnto righteousnes For by beeing borne of God we are made the Sonnes of God Which birth especially is performed by the Father when by his Spirit he brings vs vnto the Sōne makes vs to receive him by faith in our hearts so making vs one with him By which Vnitie alone it is that we are made the Sonnes of God For as the Vnitie of Christs humane nature in subsisting and personalitie with his divine nature maketh that Iesus Christ the Man is the Sonne of God so our spirituall Vnitie by faith with Iesus Christ the Sonne of God makes vs also to be the Sonnes of God Thus it is plaine by the third phrase that the former two are not rightly taken when they are expounded of those that are iustified If any man would expound this birth not of our effectuall Adoption it selfe but of the preparation of vs therevnto as some most learned and reverent Divines doe Yet never can it make the former opinion true for our beeing borne of God in the Scripturs can never be showen to be meant of our Iustification And if they take it for our Regeneration or Sanctification to the obedience of God then it will follow that wrongly they make Adoption to be a part of Reconciliation If sanctification which is no part of Reconciliation must goe before For they them selues acknowledge that Reconciliation hath but two parts Iustification and Adoption Besides this distinction of Adoption wil hardlie be warranted by the 9. of the Romanes except men will make the Apostle playnely to contradict himselfe who restrayneth the Adoptiō which he ascribes to the Iewes onely to the seed of Abrahā according to the promise and not according to the flesh Because otherwise the trueth of God in his promise would have failed Which consideration likewise appeareth evidently to destroy that distinction of Adoption albeit first devised by one of the auncient Fathers whereby one Adoption is made Adoption but by figure and resemblance the other in substance and effect But it seemeth that the ground of this opinion in some though not in all is buylded vpon this that they esteeme our Righteousnes to consist in the very act of beleeving which may be more iustly said of our Adoption albeit in a circumspect meaning CHAPTER XVI TOVCHING the benefite it selfe which Christ bestowes vpon those that receyve him although we should grant it to be the same in sense which they expound it to be yet it will never inferre that in this place To receyve Christ and beleeve in his name is to be vnderstood of Iustification but according as some of themselves say of the worke of God in making vs to beleeve Of the which followeth the dignitie and prerogative of being sonnes as the first and immediate fruite of faith in Iesus Christ In which sense we denie not but this place may be commodiously interpreted although it seemeth that the spirite of God doth meane somewhat more For vnderstanding whereof we are first to consider the third point which we have said to be the ground of the mistaking of this place which stands in the not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers worke and the Sonnes in our Adoption although in the same place they bee cleerely distinguished by the Evangelist Which oversight maketh great confusion in knowledge For we are to vnderstand that although the three persons of the Trinitie be neither in subsisting nor working to bee separated yet in both they are still to be distinguished and never to be confounded if ever we thinke to have a cleere and vnconfused sight of these great workes of grace which they performe in vs. Now in this place the worke of the Father and the worke of the Sōne in our Adoption are cleerely and distinctly set down Like as in other parts the worke of the spirit
righteousnes sometime by the making of a man righteous by the obedience of Christ sometime by the making of Christ sinne for vs and vs the righteousnes of God in him and somtime by healing of vs by Christ his stripes and all these are to one effect the iustified man is sometimes shortly described in one worde the iust by faith sometime in relatiō to the action of God more amply he that hath received the aboundance of grace of the gift of that righteousnes which is by one man Iesus Christ somtime he whose sinnes are remitted to whom sinne is not imputed and whose sins are covered c. out of which and the consideration of the points preceeding wee may gather a more full and cleare definition of the action of iustificatiō in this maner Iustification is that seconde gratious action of the free dispensation of GOD in Christ towarde those whom accordinge to his foreknowledge and purpose hee had predestinated to bee Adopted through Christ whom nowe hee hath adopted through him havinge effectuallie called them to the fellowship of Christ by faith by the which action he maketh them who in them selves are sinners to bee righteous in Christ crucified that is whom albeit he knew no sinne hee had made sinne for them and that by the free imputation of Christs obedience and satisfaction vnto them as their owne righteousnes even as they them selves had performed it and by the imputation of faith which he hath given vnto them as their owne to this end that the righteousnes of God which they possesse no wayes but by faith might be their owne righteousnesse and so they might have remission of sinnes in his bloud of Christ whom God had not onely ordayned but also made a propitiation for them in his bloud In this definition we cal iustification first the action of God because it is he only which iustifieth Secondly wee call it the action of his dispensation to distinguish it from the action of Predestination or of Gods Decree in it selfe Thirdly wee call it the second action of his dispensation to distinguish it from the first action which is our calling preceeding it Fourthly wee call it a gratious and free action because it is dispensed for no merit or deserving of those which receyve it neither for any thing given by them to God before whereof it should be the recompence but is given freely of his grace Fiftly Wee call it the worke of God in Christ to distinguish it from the Decree of God which is a worke of God in him self and to shewe iustification to be a worke of externall dispensation which wholy is performed by God in Christ in whom all the blessings of grace are comprehended as our filiation or iustification and glorification in whom and through whom only God maketh vs his sonnes righteous and glorious he being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption And these five pointes are to bee considered in the nature of this action The next thing that is to be considered is the subiect that is iustified And this we make not simply to be a man foreknowne and fore-purposed neither yet a man simply predestinate but moreover a man effectually called and made one with Christ by faith and in that vnitie the sonne of God For a man simply and nakedly foreknowne is the onely obiect of Gods Decree and Predestination For those whom hee foreknew hee predestinate sayeth the spirit of God And a man predestinate is the only obiect of Gods calling according to his purpose For whō hee had predestinate them also hee called sayeth the spirit of God And the man now called effectually to the faith of Iesus as the sonne of God and promised seed in the which all the nations of the world should be blessed is the onely obiect of Gods iustification like as a iustified man is the onely obiect of Gods glorification Thus to goe backward againe the Lord in glorifying a man hath before him especially his righteousnes for none but the iust shall live next in iustifying a man hee hath particularly before his eyes his vnion with Christ by faith without the which not any man shal be iustified of God And in giving this blessing to bee one with Christ by faith and so in that vnitie the sonne of God in which cōsisteth the calling of God Hee onely hath before his eyes the man predestinate to be Adopted through Christ that is the man whom hee hath ordayned to call that is to Adopt and to make his sonne by faith in Christ And in predestinating a man to this blessinge hee had not any thing before his eyes but his owne foreknowledge of the person of that man his purpose or the good pleasure of his will which are all one in substance and different onely in respect The will of God which limiteth all the actions of his power seeing hee doeth all thinges accordinge to the counsell of his owne will being the highest and the first cause of all thinges created and done by GOD in the world of the which no cause possiblie can bee given and therefore it is in some respect the cause of Gods purpose or counsaile which therefore is called the counsaile of his will although his will and his counsaill in effect bee both one For his will is his purpose and his purpose is his will in all thinges and especiallie in the whole worke of his grace towardes the vesselles of mercie vnto the which his purpose is especiallie restrayned oftentimes in the booke of God which purpose is nothing save a setting of such persons before him from all eternitie as hee him selfe willeth or pleaseth which may cleerlie be perceyved by the holy bread set vpon the Table in the Sanctuarie being twalfe in number representinge the twalfe Tribes of Israell that is the whole elect of God which are called the shew bread in the vulgar translation the worde beeing the same which is called the purpose of God as is cleere by Christ his owne wordes Math. chap. 12. ver 4. Luke chap. 6. ver 4. that is the bread of the purpose of God or of the setting before the face of God And therefore the action of the Priest in settinge those bread vpon the table before the Lord is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 9. ver 2. Prothesis ton arton that is the setting before or the presenting of bread to shewe vs that by that worde which is commonly called the purpose of God which was shadowed in that type of the Lawe is to bee vnderstood the eternall action of God in settinge before himselfe as in the sight of his owne eyes the persons of such as hee willed And in the same sense the same word is referred vnto Christ Rom. chapt 3. ver 25. whether it be referred to Gods eternall purpose touching the humane nature of Iesus Christ in setting it particularly before him as that which should be the onely expiation of the sinnes of his