be saved seeing God will have all men to be saved that they may promote godlinesse in a politicke way by their sword Hence those that have no more to doe to procure a peaceable life in all godlinesse by their office then heathens and pagans or if they were not in such an office yea those who have far lesse interest in Christian Religion then if they did not beare the sword at all can in no sort be the object of our prayers to God for the procuring of such a life in all godlinesse But the latter is contrary to the word of truth Argument XIII THat which is foretold to be a fruit of repentance and a casting off of the Antichristian yoke must be lawfull and praise-worthy but that the ten Kings who made war with the Lambe and agreed for a time to give their Kingdome to the beast should now turne their swords against Babylon under the notion of a whore for the Idolatrous worship and spirituall fornication of Rome and shall hate the whore as a whore and shall make her desolate and naked and shall eat her flesh and burne her with fire is a fruit of the repentance of the ten Kings Rev. 17 12 13 14 15 16. therefore their turning of the sword against the Pope the whore of Rome for their whoredomes must be lawfull and praise-worthy the proposition is cleare for if to joyne in warre with the whore against the Lambe and his followers was a worke of the devill in giving their power and kingdome to the Beast when God inclines their hearts to the contrary and they joyne their power with the Lambe against the whore and destroy her and make her naked and desolate for her whoredomes it must be a worke of the Spirit of God and a fruit of the repentance of those Kings for when they repent and hate Babylon the Holy Ghost would not set downe their repentance in a worke of cruelty and bloody persecution for consciences sake as Liâ—ertines define punishing Idolaters to be Argument XIV THat which the servants of God doe in an extraordinary impulsion of the Spirit in the case of the sinfull neglect of the lawfull Magistrate or when there is no Christian Magistrate to doe it that must be the ordinary constant duty of the Magistrate especially when that turns away wrath from the Land and is taken as acceptable service to God as if the ordinary Magistrate had done it But the extraordinary punishing of those that violate the worship of God and pervert the wayes of God and the faith of others is such ergo to punish such as violate the worship of God and pervert the faith of others must be the ordinary constant duty of the Magistrate The proposition is evident because extraordinary acts necessary to bee done supply the want of ordinary acts as in morall acts acceptable to God is cleare when the under-Rulers doe not their duty Phineas is praised that he being a Priest not a Judge slew Zimri and Cosbey and Phineas did acceptable service to God in so doing Num. 25. 11 12 13. and Elias in his zeale killed the Priests of Baal when Achab the ordinary Magistrate sinfully neglected his duty and Samuel now being no Judge killed Agag â—â—go it was the duty of Saul as the ordinary Magistrate to doe it Now in the New Testament it is cleare the ordinary officers and porters should violently have casten out the buyers and sellers and tables of money changers out of the Temple our Saviour Christ doth it iâ— an extraordinary way and it was the zeale of the house of God that moved him Ps 69. 9. Job 2. So Armanias and Sapheira lyed to the Holy Ghost defrauded the Church in a matter of goods therefore Peter struck them dead then if there had been a Christian Magistrate he should have inflicted bodily punishment upon Annanias and Saphira so Paul strikes Eliâ—â—â— with blindnesse for attempting to pervert the faith of Sergius Paulus ergo the Magistrate if there had been any to procure a quiet life in all godlinesse to the Church should have punished Elimas and this is evident in acts of justice and sinfull omissions of men in ordinary places nor were these acts extraordinary in the substance of the act as I have observed but onely in regard of the efficient and manner of doing though there be required an extraordinary impulsion in the doer which in others in place should be ordinary for acts extraordinary in the manner and exigence of providence may be in the substance of the act ordinary duties and to neglect them is to sinne against a set command if David and his followers had refused to eat the Shew-bread because the Law made it lawfull to none to eat it but Priests they had sinned against Commandements of mercy injoyned in the Law of nature nor was that an extraordinary rule I will have mercy and not sacrifice when the Law of nature for the good of spirituall societies requires that the godly Magistrate drive away the Wolves and Lions from the flocke we may see a positive command is not necessary CHAP. XIX Exemption of false Prophets from coerâ—ive power is not Christian liberty Argument XV. THat doctrine is not to be held which maketh that a part of Christian liberty which the word of God maketh no part at all thereof For 1. If there be no bodily punishment to be inflicted on false teachers and blasphemers then must Christ by his blood repealâ— all those Lawâ—â— in the Old Testament but the Scripture shewes us all our parts of Christian liberty in these places of Scripture Titâ—â— 14. Rom. 14. 14. 1 Thess 1. 10. Gal. 3. 13. Gal. 1. 4. Gal. 1. 13. Act 26. 18. Rom. 6. 14. Rom. 8. 28 Ps 119. 71. 1 Cor. 15. 54 55 56 57. Rom. 8. 1. Gal. 5. 1. 1. Job 4. 18. Act. 15. 10. 11. Heb. 4. 14. 16. Heb. 10. 19 20 21 22. Col. 2. 15 16. 2 Cor. 3. 13. 17. 1◠〈…〉 Rom. 14. 4. Act. 4. 9. Act. 5. 29. 1 Cor. 7. 23. Math. 23 8 9 10. Maith 15. 9. and elsewhere in all which places nothing 〈◊〉 hinted of the false teachers patent under the seale of the blood of the eternall Covenant that he is freed from the Magistrates sword though he destroy millions of soules 2. Where the common place of subjection due to Kings and governours sent by them 1 Pet. 2. 11. 12 13 14. is hanâ—led c. freedome to sin and consequently freedome to heresies and teaching and spreading of false doctrines that eat as a gangreen and is no lesse a worke of the flesh then adultery murthers witchcrafts Gal. 5. 19. 10 11 12 â—â— judged false liberty for a cloake of maliciousnesse as if Christiâ—ns were so made free by Christ as subjects were loosed from subjection to Kings and servants from being buffeted for ill-doing 1 Pet. 2. 16. if some ill-doers and the worst of men even soule-murtherers be freed from punishment due to
that men dare not blaspheme Christ nor sweare nor murder nor whore nor steale though the authority of God which is higher than any earthly Kings hath already forbidden blasphemy swearing killing Ergo by this reason all Lawes of men against evill doers should be cashiered because they cannot catch soules when as they are not ordained to catch soules but to binde the outward man in fetters that he prey not upon the soul and body and goods of his brethren yea by this reason men should not by Ministeriall Authority preach the Gospell to catch men for the Gospell is inacted already by an higher Authority than any on Earth King or Pastor can preach and will thy cob-web preaching poore Minister catch whom the net of God will not catch all these men sway to the Familist and Enthysiasts hand beware of them So does the bloody Tenet 1 The Magistrate should not send the Heretick to the Church to heale the Heretick why like mother like daughter perhaps he sends an Heretick to be healed by Hereticks Answ Master Williams cannot finde a Church on Earth but a false and hereticall Church to heale a Seeker Familist or Anabaptist But say it were so should not the Magistrate Hezekiah exhort the Priests to teach the People and deale with the People who think Baal to be the true God because the Priests do also thinke Baal perhaps the true God which if Hezekiah do sure he is a miserable Physitian But saith he the poore Heretick disputes with the Church that shall deliver him over to the bloody sword if he will not yeeld as the Lambe in the Lions paw being sure to be torne in pieces in the end Answ This Author makes ever the supposition of himselfe as if he were infallible we may suppose the Heretick is a ravening wolfe and that he obstinately and as a selfe condemned man disputes and that the Magistrate is the Lambe and the Minister of God who loves not to strike with the sword and the question is not whether he should yeeld reason and conscience up for feare of the sword but whether he should abstaine from prophecying lies in the name of the Lord and should say God sent him to contradict Ieremiah and to assure the Kingdome of Iudah they shall neither see sword nor famine Jer. 14. Notwithstanding the godly Prince we suppose such a King then in Iudah should assure him he should be stoned to death if he shall thus pervert the right wayes of the Lord should not the Magistrate be a terrour to all ill doers and to such a wolfe there can no argument be drawne from Magistrates that are Lions and Tygers persecuting the Saints of God for the truth as this author alwaies vainly supposeth CHAP. XXV Whether the Rulers by their Office in order to peace are to stand to the Lawes of Moses for punishing seducing Teachers JVdiciall Lawes may be judiciall and Mosaicall and so not obligatory to us according to the degree and quality of punishment such as is Deut. 13. the destroying the City and devoting all therein to a curse we may not do the like in the like degree of punishment to all that receive and defend Idolators and blasphemers in their City And yet that some punishment by the sword be inflicted upon such a City is of perpetuall obligation because the Magistrate beares the sword to take vengeance on ill doers and so on these that are partakers of his ill deeds who brings another Gospell 2 Ioh v. 10. 2. Though Sauls destroying of the Amalekites in that cause was morall in regard they lay in wait for Israel when they came out of Egypt and so of perpetuall obligation yet the destroying of them 1 Sam. 15. is temporary and obligeth not us 1. because that generation were their Sons not those same persons that oppressed Israel when they came out of Egypt and we may not punish the Sonnes for the sinnes of their fathers with death therefore Gods poâ—itive command to Saul and the reason I remember what Amalek did in Moses his time therefore kill them does not oblige us except we had the like command 2. Because the slaying of man woman infant and suckling oxe and sheep was temporary and cannot have a perpetually obligatory ground in the Law of nature or naturall justice obliging us 3. Where there is an injury done to God against the Law of nature and against our brethren in drawing them from serving the true God and a punishment commanded by God to be inflicted once that punishment or the like in substance and nature must ever be such as obligeth us in the like cases The Learned Professors in Leidon say They can see no reason but they must oblige under the New Testament I confesse when the fault is ceremoniall though the punishment be reall as the cutting off of an infant not circumcised and some punishments inflicted on the Leper it is not reason the Law should oblige us in the New Testament either as touching the punishment or the degree Because these punishments for typicall faults are ordained to teach rather than to be punishments and the Magistrate by no light of nature could make Lawes against unbaptised Infants 4. No man but sees the punishment of theft is of common morall equity and obligeth all Nations but the manner or degree of punishment is more positive as to punish Theft by restoring foure Oxen for the stealing of one Oxe doth not so oblige all Nations but some other bodily punishment as whipping may be used against Theeves Mr. Jo. Weemes vo 3. ca. 38. of the judiciall Law The determination saith he in Moses Law judiciall was divini juris and they had greater force to binde the Sonnes than any Municipall Lawes have to binde Subjects new in regard they were given by God himselfe yet these judiciall Lawes saith he commanded the outward man whereas the morall Law called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ignea lex Deu. 33. This fiery law pierceth the heart Gamachaeus saith Iuditials and Ceremonials are immediately deduced out of the principles of the Law of nature by way of a more remote and obscure conclusion Aquinas saith by way of divine determination But the truth is the proposition might have some ground in the Law of nature but why 39. stripes not 40. not 38. only should be inflicted on such an evill doer and the assumption in many judiciall Lawes seeme to be an act of the meere positive will of God therefore Aquinas saith Ceremonials primo perâ—â—se first and chiefly were ordained to signifie things but Iudicials secundarie did signifie things to come And Swarez saith That judiâ—ials aecessarily and by accident did signifie things It is true Coriâ—thus 〈…〉 and â—erome saith and the Ebionits as Irenaeus saith and the Nazarer as Augustine tels us hold that Ceremoniais and Judicials do yet oblige Shoolemen deny their obligation as Soto Aquinas Medina Valentia Gamacheus because the Priesthood is
changed Yet let not us go on with Egid-Coninck to say that if it was lawfull to make war with any nation for wrongs done to men how much more for injuries done to God for making of war is an act of Magistracy and so suppose some jus some power and authority that we have either by the law of nature to defend our life peace liberties or for avenging of such heineous inâ—uries done to the Nation as cannot in justice be decided but by the sword So that sin as sin or as greatest sinnes are not the just cause of war but sinnes as most distructive to humane society for which by the Principles of the Law of nature they may be convinced of fearfull breaches Now these that are Idolators the nations that worship God in Idolatrous way and being of a strange Religion worship a strange God though they doe the greatest injury to God that can bee yet in regard they being other nations as independent on us as we are on them and doe it not in order to the destruction of our of our paece liberty and lives we have not jus over them nor authority to make Warre with them except God gave us a Command to destroy them nor is this a good consequence we may by war revenge injuries done to men ergâ— far more by war may we revenge injuries done to God for war is an act of revenging justice that supposeth some authority given of God over such a nation as we come out against in war 2 Every just war is some way defensive in regard every act of Magistracy is an act of defending of the peace life and liberty of the society or the members thereof and a propulsion of violence by violence and this is the intrinsecal and of Magistracy to hold off unjust violence by just and harmelesse violence for if the life of a murtherâ—r be not taken away by the sword of a Magistrate he will still take the life of another man qui semel â—alus semper malus presumitur â—e that is once wicked is still presumed to be wicked except his wickednesse be restrained and to offend a nation or person that hath not offended us must be unjust violence and unlawfull war and to make war against a nation that hath worshiped a strange God and injured God and not us supposeth that we must instruct them of a wrong done to God by teaching them and instructing them in the true Religion for suppose they worship the workes of mens hands and worship Sathan as some Indians do and so by their own conscience may be convinced and so are inexcusable in foro Dei before Gods tribunal yet are they not so inexcusable in foro humano before mans tribunall as we can make warre against them till we informe and instruct them positively of the true Religion But they that shed our blood and invade our peace and liberties are by the Law of nature convinced and by demands of reparation made to them quickly silenced and need not to be instructed in the principles of the law of nature which are written in their hearts But it may be said What if that Nation will not be informed of the true Religion and will go on contumatiously to dishonour God and reproach the true God Shall we not upon a meer quarrell for Religion make war against them and avenge the injuries done to God and defend his truth no lesse then with the sword we defend our own lives and liberties I Answer there is not the like reason for God and nature have given to the strongest a jus and authority over oppressors to repel unjust violence with innocent violence but that we should force the true Religion on Idolators we have not the like ground except they did attempt to obtrude their false ways upon us and injure our soules for there is a vast difference between a people never receiving the true Religion and a people who have imbraced and submitted to lawes that have inacted the profession of the true Religion those that never professed the true Religion cannot bee compelled to receive it by the Sword of another Nation except they first subdue them in a just warre and be masters of them and they may educate the posterity of the subdued people and discharge the duty of parents to them and impose lawes on themselves to cast away the Idols of their fathers house and to learn the knowledge of the true God but they cannot make the not receiving of the true Religion the ground of a war for we read not of any such cause of war in the Scripture It is true God did command his people to destroy the Canaanites but Idolatry was not the quarrell Josh 11. 19. There was not a nation that made peâ—â—â— with the Children of Israel save the Hittites the inhabitants of Gibe on all other they tooke in battell 20. For it was of the Lord to harden their heart that they should come against Israel in battell that he might destroy them utterly and that they might have no favor but that he might destroy them as the Lord commanded Moses And those that they subdued in the Wildernesse denied them harmelesse passage through their Land It is true some Popish writers as Masius Cornelius a lapide Abulensis say if the Canaanites would have sought peace and imbraced the worship of the true God the Israelites would not have destroyed them but the Text Calvin and famous Papists as Cajetanus Swarez Gamachaâ—s and Augustine before them say plainly Israel made warre against them and Israel but defended themselves against the Canaanites Libertines say the teaching of the Gospell Mat. 28. and not the sword is a means to spread the Gospell so say we I see no warrant wee have to obtrude the Gospell in the purity thereof upon Papists in France and Ireland but we may lawfully avenge the blood of the people of God on Irish Murtherers who excercise extreame cruelty and Tyranny over persons and the Consciences of the Martyrs and the oppressed people of God amongst the Papists The question seemes harder when these of a false Religion in regard of their neernesse and vicinitie to a Kingdome professing the true Religion when as they may infect them or if they be in one Nationall Covenant and under the oath of God to indeavour the extirpation of all false religions and what is contrary to sound doctrin It is certain the Kingdom of Judah might justly have avenged the Apostacy of the ten Tribes from Davids house and from Jerusalem where the Lord had set his name for the worshipping of the Golden Calves if the Lord by his Prophet had not expresly forbidden them to fight against their brethren 1 Kings 12. And the children of Israel did justly attempt Warre against the two Tribes and the halfe because they erected a new Altar for worship as they conceived which was Apostacy from the Covenant of God and the true
And if their Rulers feed their Priests the false Prophets and Priests that deceive them and mis-lead them they must punish So the King of Babylon roasted in a fire two false Prophets Jer. 29. 21 22. And it is cleare that Jeremiah argues not from any judiciall Law when he saith The Prophets that speake lies in the name of the Lord shall die by the sword c. 14. v. 14 15. It was by the sword of the Chaldeans who had nothing but the Law of nature that they perished for no Judiciall Law of God taught them that he ought to die by the sword of the Magistrate who speaks lies in the name of the Lord whereas the Chaldeans knowing that Jeremiah had prophecied truth and was sent of God they intreated him well as the Lord had fore-told Ier. 15. 8. Nor can it be said that the consequence is null and that that cannot oblige Christian Magistrates which hath no better warrant than the corrupt practises of Heathens for they persecuted the true Prophets and Apostles that spake in the name of the Lord as Herod beheaded Iames Acts 12. and apprehended Peter Nero persecuted Paul and Dâ—mitian confined Iohn to the Isle Pathutos for the Word of God To which I answer That the Argument is not drawn simply from the practice of Heathen Magistrates but from the light of nature that teacheth all Magistrates Heathen and Christian to punish publike impostors false Prophets and liers as most pernitious enemies to the peace of all humane Societies And if the Law of nature and Nations dictate to all Societies That deceivers and such as raise false reports and lies upon earthly Judges should be punished far more is it a principle of the Law of nature that publike lyers and such as speake lies in the name of the Lord and deceive and seduce the soules of father and mother King and Ruler and of all ranks of men in the Society should not be tollerated in the society And what though Emperours and Kings have abused the power that God gave them for the truth to persecute the servants of Christ for the truth it followes not but they had just power as the Ministers of God to punish seducing Prophets as well as other ill-doers by the law of nature and Nations And this I take is holden forth by Iob 31 26 27 28. who being under no Judiciall Law obliging the Jewes but a Gentile and so in this led by the Law of nature and Nations maketh Idolatry and worshipping of the Sunne and Moone to be an iniquity to be punished by the Iudge That this is not an iniquity to be punished by God as if heresie be innocency as Libertines say it must neither be punished by God nor man but by the Judge on earth is cleare For 1. the expression v. 28. varies onely in the number from that which is v. 11. Now there Iob saith of Adultery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ipsum iniquitas Iudicum And ver 98 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 etiam hoc iniquitas Iudie is The English Divines do well observe That adultery is a capitall crime to be punished by the Iudge Gen. 38. 24. Levit. 20. 10. Deut. 22. 22. And they expound ver 28. the same way Pagnin est iniquites Iudicanda Iudice diâ—na vel Iuditiaria Mercerus Exod. 21. 22 He shall give 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the Iudges Isai 16. 3. do Iudgement Shimlerus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judges that cognosâ—â— of causes Deut. 31. 31. Our enemies being Iudges Job 31. 11. Inquitas dignaque Iudicetur puniatur It is true the LXX expound it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Chalde Paraphrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est enim iniquitas maxima But it is taken for a crime that comes before an earthly Judge So Hieronimus And Exod. 21. 22. If a man strike a woman with childe and she live he shall give according to the sentence of the Iudges Hieronimus quantum arbitri Iudicaverint The Chalde Paraphrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dabit per sentâ—ntiam Iudicum LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Syriak Dabit quantum decernent Iudices The Samaritan Dabitque ex sententia Iudicum Vatablus Job 31. v. 11. Iniquitas capitali supplicio persequindâ— v. 28. Nam ea iniquitas capitali supplicio digna Junius Iniquitas à Iudicibus animadvertenda Piscator Iniquitas Iudiciaria Complutentes Iniquitas Judicanda Pineda in Job 31. 28. Iniquitas digna Iudicio Iudicumque sententiâ severissima gravissimo supplicio All agree to this That Idolatry according to Iob from the Law of nature deserveth canitall punishment to be inflicted by the Judge And Piâ—eda saith this agreeth with the Law of God Especially Deut. 4. 25. 23. Sanctius gathereth from Job 31. 11. That Adulterers in Iobs time were by the sentence of the Judge burnt Now the same expression is v. 28. spoken of Idolatry Hence is Socrates condemned to die for his false Religion as is supposed by the people Maximus condemned the Priscilliaâ—s as Hieronimus observes for Heresie Nor is it much to be valued that Ier. Taylor saith That Maximus was a Tyrant and put to death Catholike Hereticks Without choyce it proves punishing of Hereticks as supposed of old to be warranted by law Vrsatus and Stacius procured at Court Law to death against Priscillianists And the Niceue Fathers that Arrius should be banished Nor doth Spalato cite Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius Hiâ—rome Severus Sulpitius Minutius Hilary Damascen Chrysestome Theophilact Bernard for any other purpose whatever Taylor say on the contrary but 1. To prove that forcing of men to Religion is not to the way of God which also I teach for the preaching of the Word not the using of the sword is the meanes of conversion of sinners 2. That killing is not to be practised on all Hereticks 3. That the Law and the Sword are not to go without convincing of the conscience by the Word of God 4. That to deliver up godly men to persecuting Tyranes because of some errors hath more scandall to cause men stumble at truth than to make truth victorious 5. That neither Church nor State can judge heart-opinions nor punish them but only professed and taught opinions that are both unnecessary and unsound 6. That Pastors have not the Sword to compell to Religion 7. That Nations of another Religion are not gained to Christ by the Sword not can we make warre against them because they are Idolators and follow a false Religion nor was Idolatry the ground of the warre that Israel raised against the Caâ—aanitos and other Nations To all which I adde the words of Ier. Taylor The best and ablest Doctors in Christendome have been deceived actually in 〈◊〉 of Religion in that all sorts of Christians dissent from the errorâ— of Papias Irenaeus Lactantius Iustin Martyr Cyprian Firmilian c. Ergo by
can preaching of man or angel doe without God is it not God and God only who can open the heart therefore this is no argument against the use of the sword against false teachers because it hath no strength against soule obstinacie to work repentance for neither hath preaching but the sword hath strength and more strength against the outward man the tongue the pen the profession of seducing preachers to coerce it and to guard the flock from grievous Wolves for these being testâ—â—ined the flock is in no more danger from the conscience of the Heretick then peaceable men are in danger of the bloodie mans thoughts hatred heart-malice if the Magistrate tie his hands from murther and violence by the sword of God which hee beareth Rom. 13. it hath I say more force in its way then the preaching of the word hath in regard Hereticks men of corrupt minds fearâ— men and the sword of the Magistrate more then God and the threatnings of the word as murtherers and adulterers abstain from disturbing the peace of humane societie more for fear of the laws of men then for God I grant the excessive fear is from the corruption of nature for oderunt peccare mali formidine poenae yet this argues that the sword is ordained of God to order the outward man in a peaceable way both in state and Church for lay down this ground which Libertines do that God hath appointed no law nor rule to men of corrupt minds to those that subvert whole Houses but their own erroneous consciences grievous Wolves may doe in the flock to waste destroy and pervert the flock as they please But they are say Libertines no wolves but the lambs of Christ the anointed ones whom Presbyterians so call and the Presbiterians are the wolves who so domineer over the consciences I answer this is a manifest perverting of the State of the question and to leap from the Proposition to the Assumption for we dispute only upon the Supposition that there be Wolves and Seducers in a Christian societie but who they be Presbyterian or others is another question whether or not the Christian Magistrate should for his part leave them to themselves and suffer them to preach print what blasphemies they list and their erroneous conscience dictates to them for truths But neither the Christian Magistrate not being infallible nay nor any Church on earth can judge who is the Heretick who the Saint and therefore should take on him to judge none at all to be Hereticks but should suffer tares and wheat to grow till harvest for fear he pluck up the wheat in lieu of tares and persecute Saints under colour of justice Hence I argue in the contrary demonstratively that liberty of Conscience is unlawfull and not of God Whatever way layeth down a principle most false and contrary to the word of God is not of God but must be unlawfull but the pretended liberty of conscience is such Ergo c. The Proposition needs no probation That must be false that by strong consequence follows from a false principle I prove the Assumption The prime and first principle of libertie of Conscience now under the New Testament is that Hereticks and seducing Teachers are therefore unpunishable by the sword because they are unknowable The formall and that which constituteth an Heretick an Heretick is in the heart to wit heart-contumacie legible and obvious only to him that knows all say the Belgicks Arminians and therefore they can neither be judged nor punished observe by the way the Church of Thyatira must be then unjustly rebuked for suffering Jezabel to seduce and this exempteth all false Teachers from Church-censures yea from rebukes for who dares rebuke men for fâ—â—s knowable to the almightie only who knows the heart 2. We are expressely commanded say Libertines to suffer the tares that is Hereticks to grow till harvest because we cannot know tares from wheat and we run the hazard saith Iohn Goodwin of fighting against God and fighting against Saints and God in them saith Saltmarsh when we punish Hereticks 3. We have not that infallible Spirit and those Prophets who cannot erre and can infallibly tel us who is the Heretick who not 4. There is a great variety and such contrarietie of judging say they what is heresie what not that what is heresie to one is saving truth to another who is as worthy to be beleeved as he Ergo We are all in the mist and in a sea of uncertainties in judging who is the Heretick who the Saint 5. Heresie is innocencie Ergo there is no such fault reproveable or punishable in the world say they But this principle that the Seducer is not knowable in the New Testament is most false and contrary to Scripture 1. He whom the Holy Ghost bids as try and not beleeve till we try he is knowable but every teacher true or false the Holy Ghost bids us try 1 Thes 5. 21. 1 Joh. 4. 1. and for this are the Bercans commended because they tryed Paul and his doctrine by the Scriptures Acts 17. 11. Ergo If Paul had been an Heretick and a false Teacher he might have been found out 2. Such an one as the Lord forewarns us to beware of and avoid such an one is knowable But the Lord bids us beware of false Prophets and Seducers and bids us avoid them and beleeve them not Matth. 7. 15. Remore of false Prophets Marth 24. 23. If any man say to you loe here is Christ or loe there beleeve it not why if he teach me where Christ is if I heare not him I refuse to hear Christ Matth. 10. 40 41. Ergo the false Christ is knowable Tit. 2. 10. An hereticke avoid c. when Solomon saith Make not friendship with an angry man is not the formality of anger in the heart if any should reply to Solomon God onely knows who is the angry man who is the patient and meek man therefore we will make friendship withall men or with no man Should any say there is no such 〈◊〉 knowable should he not contradict the Holy Ghost So must we say there is not such a man knowable to a mortall man as a false Prophet or an heretick and therefore Paul doth but mocke the Philippians who were not infallible when he writeth to them thus Beware of dogs and John when he saith If any man bring not this doctrine receive him not into your house Might not Libertines say God commandeth us to run the hazard of incroaching upon Gods chaire for who but he who knows the heart can tell who is the heretick who not when the Lord rebukes association with Theeves Robbers Slanderers Prov. 1. 11 12. Ps 15. 18 holdeth he not forth that the Theif the Robber and the Slanderer are knowable 3. These whom the Lord rebukes because they judge not Jezabel and deceiving teachers may know Jezabel and deceiving teachers but the Lord rebukes the Church of Thyatira for
Because he rebuketh them for being dull of hearing which is opposite to being teachers of the word of truth to others which must insinuate they were to have faith and not conjecturall and fluctuating opinions of the things they were to teach 2. He reproves them for that they had not their senses exercised to discerne good and ill and that they were unskilfull in the words of righteousnesse 3. He exhorteth them chap. 6. 1. to be carried on to perfection beyond the principles of the doctrine of Christ Now to be carried to know all except some fundamentalls and principles with a reserve and a doubting of the truth is not to have the senses exercised to discern good and ill nor to be skilfull in the word of truth nor to goe on to perfection but to stand still as in a horse-mill and be at the same perfection of knowledge in knowing and beleeving all even fundamentalls say some or all non-fundamentalls say other Libertines with a reserve and a resolution to judge them all falsehood and lyes 9. It argues the word of God of obscurity and darknesse as not being able to instruct us in all truths and renders it as a nose of wax in all non-fundamentals histories narrations c. in which notwithstanding the Scripture is as evident plaine simple obvious to the lowest capacities in most points except some few Prophesies as it is in fundamentalls and layes a blasphemous charge on the Holy Ghost as if hee had written the Scriptures upon an intention that we should have no assured and fixed knowledge no faith but a meere probable opinion a conjecturall dubious apprehension of truths with a reserve to beleeve the contrary as if the Lords purpose had beene that we should all be Scepticks and dye doubting and how then can God in justice punish any man for not beleeving and doing the will of our Master and Lord If it bee unpossible even by the light of the Spirit to know his will in whole as some say and in the most part as others say yea it must not be our sinfull darkenesse in that wee cannot beleeve most of the matters of God but with a reserve but it is the will and command of God we doe so and how shall we know the second faith contradictory to the former to be the minde of God and not the first and the third and not the second and the fourth and not the third and so to the end since we are to beleeve all the foure with a reserve and all to our dying day with a reserve for the word is alike dubious now as in Pauls dayes and since the Apostles charge us to beleeve and be comforted in beleeving the truths which they beleeved not as Apostles but as Christians and as fellow-Citizens with us we must say that the Apostles also beleeved with a reserve which is blasphemous 10 All our practises according to fundamentals or non-fundamentals must bee in faith that is with a perswasion that what we doe is according to the revealed will of God otherwise we sin Rom. 14. 23. and are condemned in all we doe But if this faith with a reserve be the rule of our practise we can do nothing in faith but with a resolve upon doubting so what you doe may as possibly be murther idolatry stealing lying as obedience to God yea you must beleeve that what you do to day is lawfull but yet so as to morrowyou must beleeve upon a new light that it is unlawfull and sin yea and this makes the erroneous conscience the rule of your faith and practise for if the holy ghost command you to beleeve such points with the faith of a reserve he must command you to practise according to the present faith that he commands you to have of those truths But the present you have may be the beleife of a lye and a blasphemous untruth and so the ten Commandements should bee a rule to no man But his erroneous conscience if then he beleeve that it is such acceptable worship as God craved of Abraham that you sacrifice your Sonne to God you beleeve it with a reserve and you are to practise it with a reserve and oblieged to practice what you are oblieged to beleeve but you are oblieged to beleeve with a reserve that it is acceptable service to God to sacrifice your child to him for it is a non-fundamentall not clearly determined in the word as least it is contraverted by many that goe for godly people Now if so God shall obliege men to sin and not to sin to doe his revealed wil and not to doe his revealed will in the same commandement which were blasphemous now that we are to practise according to our faith of reserve I prove by the doctrin of Libertines for they teach a man is to suffer death and any torment rather then that he say there bee three persons in one God and two natures and one person in Christ and that Presbyterian Government is lawfull that the Christian Prince is to punish false teachers if he beleeve in his conscience though hee is to beleeve with a reserve and doubt somely that these are truths contrary to the word of God then is his faith with a reserve which may be the faith of a lye his onely oblieging rule of his practise according to the way of Libertines I confesse hee is rather to suffer death then to professe any doctrine contrary to the dictates even of an erroneous conscience because he should choose afflictions rather then sin But when we are commanded faith with a reserve as they say we are commanded to beleeve a lye which is blasphemous and what we are commanded to beleeve by the Lord in his word that must be an oblieging rule to our practice and so must we be oblieged to sin nor can it be said to offer your child to God in a sacrifice is against the light and a cleare Law of nature and a fundamentall errour for in this dispute Libertines arguments are for a toleration of all whether they erre in fundamentalls or non-fundamentalls nor can they determine what is of their owne naturall are controversall and disputable to humane reason and what not for we either speake what are de facto actually controverted in all the Christian world or what be those that in regard of their disproportion to humane reason of their owne nature may be controverted 2. Or we speake of those which are not controversall amongst Christians who acknowledge the Old and New Testament to be the word of God and what are not clearely determined in the word and touching the former there is nothing we know not controverted in the Christian world except that there is a God and that is also controverted two wayes Atheists so farre winke though nature cannot no not in devills and godlesse men run it selfe starke blinde as they deny there is a God out of malice 2. They cavill at all arguments brought to
prove that there must bee a God though they be strong enough for the wit of the devill to answer Now for these that are of their owne nature controversall though no truths especially truths revealed and spoken by the God of truth are in themselves controversall or such as can bee opposed yet are there two sorts of truths that are in relation to humane reason controvertable 1. The principles of nature that God is that he is infinit omnipotent just mercifull omniscient c. to be loved served obeyed c. that superiours and parents are to be honoured our neighbour not to bee hurt that wee should doe to others as we would they should doe to us are not of themselves controversall but the practicall conclusions drawne from thence are controversall in regard of our darkenesse as polygamy community of goods all these whether the Saints may rob and spoyle wicked men of their possessions and kill them upon the right and authority of Saintship are of themselves controversall in relation to our nature who acknowledge Scripture to bee the word of God but for supernaturall truths that cannot finde lodging in the sphere or under the shadow of naturall reason such as the doctrine of one God in three persons of the incarnation of two natures in Christ of the imputed righteousnesse of Christ of salvation by beleeving in a crucified Saviour the resurrection of the dead and those that are not knowable but by supernaturall revelation though they be the fundamentalls of the Christian faith yet are they more controversall of themselves then the most part of non-fundamentalls as Joh. Goodwin does rightly observe for nature hath more shadow of reason to cavill and plead against these then any other truths if then no coercive power ought to be used against such as teach errours contrary to the word of God and against fundamentalls because such points are controversall there is farre more warrant to free those from all coercive power who deny all principles of the Christian faith and turne so from the faith that they deny the word of God the bookes of the Old and New Testament to be any thing but phansied fables because they teach things most controversall and so upon the grounds of Libertines one Catholicke toleration is due to all and if any shall turn Jew or Mahometan or Indian or Heathenish in his Religion having been a glistering star in the Firmament of Christianity should pervert the right wayes of the Lord with Elimas the Magistrate hath nothing to doe to punish him though he carry Navies and millions of soules to hell yea nor is he to be rebuked nor declaimed against as a childe of the devill and an enemy to all righteousnesse but with all meeknesse and gentlenesse to be instructed for rebuking of him thus is as unjust since it is not in his power what he thinks or apprehends for truth or what not say Libertines as to command the Sun to shine at midnight CHAP. VII What opinions 〈…〉 BUt are there no far off 〈◊〉 at all to be 〈…〉 not learned men give divers and contrary expositions 〈◊〉 one and the same text of Scripture and hath not the Church suffered errours and erronious 〈◊〉 in godly 〈◊〉 men in all ages even in 〈◊〉 〈…〉 have not implored the sword of the 〈…〉 them though all errours printed and preached hurt the soules of others more or lesse Answ Some errors are about things that God 〈◊〉 indifferent for the time 〈◊〉 opinion and 〈…〉 meateâ— and dayes Rom. 14. 1 Cor. 8. 〈◊〉 in these God gives an indulgence and bidâ— us so long as the date of indifferency in doreth bea with the 〈…〉 1 Cor. 8. you shall not finde that Paul 〈…〉 with the unlimited practise of dayes and meates 〈…〉 and in all cases as for the case of scandall 〈…〉 the practise to the scandalizing of the weake and calleth it soul-murther and here it in like the Church may suffer sinfull ignorances for â—s the Magistrate is not to publish all externals sinnes of infâ—rmity against the second table â—or then humaine societies must be dissolved and 〈…〉 subsist except there be a reciprocall yeâ—lding to the infirmities of men as they are weake and 〈◊〉 as we must not make a man an offender for a word though it bee a hasty and sinful word even in a family where the Lord of the house hath the power of the 〈◊〉 and proportionally in other societies we would heare Solomon saying Eccles 7. 21 Also take not heed to all words that are spoken least thou leave thy servant curse thee So it would appeare that some lower errours that are farre off without the compasse of the ordinary discerning of man and lye at a distance from the 〈…〉 on as fundametals and Gospell promises lye heard the heart of Christ may bee dispensed with as a conjecturâ— what became of the meate that Christ eats after his resurrection when he was now in the state of immortality and some probable opinions that neither better the holder noâ— much promove or hinder the edification of others are not much to be 〈◊〉 save that 〈…〉 is sinfull and happily may bee tollerated or whether the heavens and 〈◊〉 after the day of judgement shall be 〈…〉 and turned to nothing and be no 〈◊〉 or if 〈◊〉 shal be renewed and delivered from vanity and indeed with new 〈◊〉 to stand 〈◊〉 as lasting and eternall 〈…〉 and witnesses of the glory of God 〈…〉 Christs and the redeemed in heaven in 〈…〉 live in glory to be eternall lectures and testimonies of the glory of the Lord Redeemer and Sanctifier of his people 〈…〉 most probable and the Scripture may 〈◊〉 to say much some other side 2 For diverse expositions of one and 〈…〉 Heavens and new Earth when 〈…〉 of the expositions so farre as is revealed â—o the godly and learned who in this life doe but know and prophesie in part doe neither doubt the fundation 〈…〉 truth that is non-fundamentall we think the opinion of both may be tollerated even though the one of them be in it selfe an errour and that upon the ground that Church and Magistrates both are to tollerate not to punish these infirmities against both tables that are the necessary results of sin originall common to all men as men 〈◊〉 about with them a body of sin And the like I say another the like opinions about matters of religion and especially matters of fact as the virginity of Mary for all her life 3 Such opinions and practise â—â—as make an evident schisme in a Church and set up two distinct Churches of different formes of Government and pretending to different institutions of Christ of which the one must by the nature of their principles labour the destruction of the other cannot be tollerated c. for each pretending their fellow Churches to bee of man and so of the devill though they should both make one true invisible Church agreeing in all
Prophets and Apostles in that in which they followed the law of nature which is that every Ambassador relate faithfully his Princes will though some have ordinary gifts some extraordinary and rare gifts in relating the same embassage So it is no good consequence some by extraordinary warrant did punish evill doers ergo the ordinary Magistrate hath not therefore power to punish such evill doers Argument IX THE expresse law of God and of nature written in the heart of al proveth that the seducer should die Deut. 13. If a Prophet or a Dreamer arise and say let us goe after other Gods he shall be put to death That is no temporary law oblieging the Jewes only the Text sayth 1 Let us goe saith the Dreamer after other Gods is 〈◊〉 them this â—in is against the first command and that imâ—aculate principle of nature graven in the heart of man That there is one onely true God and he onely to be served 2 It is against the love of God ver 2. The Lord tryeth you whether you love the Lord your God if he be God our love is due to him 3 It is against the fear of God v. 4. Ye shall fear him if he be God he is omnipotent infinitely great and dreadfull therefore by the light of nature to be feared And 5. cleaved to as the onely happinesse of men Adde to these that it is a morall transgression if Magistracy and lawfull revenging of violence and unjustice by the Minister of God and Government against highest soule-oppression be a naturall Remedy not a temporary positive salve as undoubtedly it is then sure he that seduces so should dye 1. He speakes aversion and turning away from God and that is hell and the extremity of miseries 2. He thrusts thee out of the way v. 5. a word of violence Then 3. he is evill and destructive to the society of men which the Magistrate by his office should defend v. 5. So shalt thou put away the evill from the midst of thee 4. He seeks to thrust thee from the Lord thy God that brought thee out of the Land of Aegypt The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to remove from God as from an unclean and cursed thing and it expresseth excommunication and then to thrust men away from the Lord in Covenant with us that can save from the greatest of miseries must be the highest of injuries and if the Lord proved a publicke avenger against the highest wrongs that can be done in a society as he doth then certainly against this 5. It is a wrong that God would have all Israel to feare a wickednesse that strikes at the root of society 11. And all Israel shall heare and feare and doe no more any such wickednesse as this among you And v. 13. such are children of Beliel they make all things and persons cursed they come among and bring on the land the fierce anger of the Lord v. 17. the intâ—â—â—secall worke and end of the Magistrate is to avenge evill doing and so to remove the fierce anger of the Lord from a land that the people may feare and not do any such wickednesse as is cleare Deut. 13. 10. 11. Exod. 32. 29. 30. Deut. 19. 20. Rom. 13. 3 4 5. 1 Pet. 2. 14. Now the false Prophet is such as brings on all these evills and therefore if Magistrates stand under the new Testament and if there be such a sin now as thrusting away people from the Lord who hath in Christ delivered us from a greater bondage then that of Aegypt this must be a perpetuall Law Deut. 17. 2. If there â—e found any among you within any of thy gates which the Lord thy God giveth thee man or woman that hath wrought wickednesse in the sight of the Lord in transgressing his Covenant and hath gone and served other Gods and worshipped them either the Sunne or the Moone or any of the hoast of heaven which I have not commanded 4. And it be told thee and thou hast heard of it and the thing certaine that such abomination is wrought in Israel 5. Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman which hath committed that wicked thing unto thy gates even that man and that woman and shall stone them with stones till they dye 6. At the mouth of two witnesses or three witnesses shall he that is worthy of death bee put to death Hence not simple Idolaters nor all the Nations round about nor all the Papists that are educated in Idolatry by this Law shall be put to death but such as are within the gates of Israel 2. In Covenant with God 3. It is wrought in Israel and so Apostates to Judaisme to strange Gods are to be punished so we teach not that Nations are to be converted by the sword or that the Idolatry of Indians the blasphemy of Jews is a sufficient ground to make warre against them and cut them off with the sword 2. Apostates turning to false Gods were by a written law judged There is no consulting of an Oracle by urim and thâ—â—mim here as Libertines say but just as the murtherer is to be judged under the New Testament if it be told thee the people or the Judge and thou hast â—eard of it v. 6. Vnder two witnesses hee shall be convinced It were a vaine thing to goe and seek witnesses and follow reports and hear-sayes if they had an immediate Oracle to informe the Judge and say Here the Idolatry there the Idolater binde him and lead him away to death as some Patrons of Liberty plead we read not any such conjecture 3 He is not persecuted for opinions Because be cannot câ—me up to that measure of light in judgement that other Saints attain unto but he is put to death for an externall act of Idolatry that is seen heard proved by two witnesses and for externall abomination wrought in Israel v. 5 6. the Lord never puts a Judge to prove opinions that remain within the walls of the heart and are things of the minde by witnesses nor is the end of putting to death to force beat or cudgell him to the sound faith with the sword but to be avenged on hiâ— sin to remove evill to save the Israel of God from infection 4 It is not single Idolatry that is his death but his Idolatry in seducing others by word or example he workâ— such abomination in Israel v. 4. in the Church of God which tendeth to seduce others Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren like unto thee that is Christ Act. 3. 22. so the Holy Ghost in the Apostles expounds it And he adds ver â—0 But the Prophet that shall presume he must mean in the time of the Messiah when the true Prophet shall rise to speak a word in my name which I have not commanded him to speak or that shall speak in the name of other gods even that Prophet shall die It is
am bâ— ye shall dye in your sins and he that beleeveth not is condemned already He chargeth no man guilty of unbeleefe that heareth the Gospel for simple not beleeving But then we are commanded to beleeve no truth that God speaketh to know no truth but onely to know it with an inclination of heart love and will toward the Commander and so the minde and understanding faculty the noblest and most excellent peece in the soule must be left lawlesse and free in its operations from all hazard of guilt or sinne 2. If this Argument be good sinnes of infirmities and of weaknesse must be no sin Idle words cannot come in reckoning in the last day contrary to Matth. 12. 36. for God forgives crimes Ergo he will not call us to an account for our venialls If this conclude any thing the strongest understanding cannot pretend immunity from being deceived Ergo simple ignorance of the things of God is no sin I may argue no man can pretend to be free of sin in the inclination of the heart and originall guiltinesse Job 4. 4. Ps 51. 5. Gen 8. 21. Prov. 20. 9. 1 Joh. 1. 8. 10. Eccles 7. 20. Ergo sin is no sin originall sin sins of infirmities are no sins Object No Christian is to be put to death for his opinion which doth not teach impiety or blasphemy If it plainly and apparently brings in a crime and himselfe doth act it or incourage it then the matter of fact is punishable according to its proportion and malignancy as if be preach Treason and Sedition his opinion cannot excuse because it brings in a crime a man is never the lesse Traytor because he beleeves it lawfull to commit Treason and a man is a murtherer if he kill his brother unjustly although he thinke to doe God good service in it matters of fact are equally judicable whether the principle of them he from within or without and if a man could pretend to innocency in being seditious blasphemous or perjured by perswading himselfe it is lawfull a gate were opened for all iniquity I deny not but certaine and knowne Idolatry or any other sort of practicall impiety with its principiant doctrine ought to be punished because it is no other but matter of fact but no matter of meer opinion no errours that of themselves are not sins are to be persecuted by death or corporall inflictions Answ 1. The Doctor mocketh when he saith No meer opinions are to be persecuted That was never in question a meer opinion is a meer act of the minde within the walls of the soule and can be knowne to no man for neither Magistrate nor Church can judge of invisible and hidden acts of the soule so he sayes nothing 2. The simple apprehension of God to be a fourfooted beast is by the Apostle Rom. 1. esteemed Idolatry and a mentall changing of the glory of the incorruptible God into the glory of a corruptible creature and the profession thereof must then be the profession of manifest Idolatry and so punishable yet it is a profession of a meer opinion but I confesse of a most Idolatrous opinion not of a fact otherwise by this learning of Libertines there can be no sin in simple apprehensions of God though most prodigious and monstrous what is blasphemy is as controverted and as unjudicable as simple errour Servetus his naming the blessed Trinity a Cerberus or three-headed dog blasphemed say we I thinke Doctour Taylor will not say so then by his way blasphemy must be as unjudicable as heresie and to him the formall of it is within in the heart 3. If matters of fact be punishable according to their proportion and malignancy then speaking lyes in the name of the Lord and teaching and professing malignant doctrine contrary to the doctrine of godlinesse that Christ thought it no robbery to be equall and consubstantiall to God that God is one in three persons and to teach any thing contrary to what God hath said in his word as that there were not eight persons in the Arke with Neah must be punishable the contrary whereof the Doctor saith here for every breach of a Commandement is malignancy and punishable when it hurteth humane society especially 4. Can a man be the lesse hereticall and his society the lesse detestable then that he thinks his heresie is sound doctrine for thoughts cannot change the nature of actions 5. To kill a man is indifferent of it self it may be done in justice it may be done in injustice but if a man kill his son and offer him to God neither hating nor envying nor grudging at the safety of his son only upon this meer opinion that he expresseth an act of love to God above that he beareth to his son as Abraham did then by this way he sinneth not this son-slaughter is not murther nor punishable but a simple errour For 1. It may be said by Libertines the act of killing is indifferent of it selfe 2. If he hate not his son and lye not in wait for him it is no murther Deut. 4. 42. Deut. 19. 46. He is not worthy of death for as much as he hated him not in times past Nor can killing be called a vertuall hating or essentially an hatred of our brother for then it were impossible for a Judge to kill a man and not to hate him As every breach of the Law of God is essentially an hatred of God and a vertuall hatred of God for simple killing of our neighbour is not murther by Gods reasoning but killing of him in hatred rage anger or desire of revenge Nor can it be said that hating forbidden in murther by the Law of God includes a loving of him and a saving of his life when it is in our power to save it as it is in the fathers power who sacrificeth his innocent Son to God to save his life Answer I deny not but it is murther for they teach that a man may publish that which by consequence destroyeth the faith of fundamentals and so subvert the faith of others which to do is a sin but because the man followeth the dictment of his erroneous conscience it is no sin to the man that so teacheth yea he may innocently suffer persecution for his conscience thus erroneous yea and dye a martyr for it Ergo if the following of an erroneous conscience shall make a lesse sin to be no sin but innocency it shall make a greater sin to wit killing of his son to his heavenly father no sin and so he may lawfully do it Nor wil it suffice to say to offer a man to God and kill him is against the light of nature and vincibly a sin what then if the man beleeve he is commanded to kill him his erroneous conscience must bind as the offering of whole burnt offerings to God to us is a sin against the light of nature in regard the law of nature can no more warrant it then it can